My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/10/2015 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
06/10/2015 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2022 4:16:34 PM
Creation date
8/4/2015 9:02:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
06/10/2015
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 10, 2015 <br />Page 3 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />8. Final Plat <br />a. A Consent to Plat is required from the mortgage holder. This shall be drafted <br />by the developer, approved by the City and recorded. <br />b. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated between Lots 1 & 2 and <br />Lots 2 & 3. <br /> <br />Mr. Root asked if there had been any more discussion of mailboxes, as a few community <br />members had concerns about this. Ms. Larsen replied staff did discuss this further but <br />concluded it is not something the City will regulate. <br /> <br />Roger Hokanson, project developer, approached the podium and confirmed he <br />understands the requirements and is ready to start the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Turnberry Crossing Second <br />Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat. Motion was supported by Mr. Masonick. Motion <br />carried 6 - 0. (Tralle abstained.) <br /> <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />A. Watermark Discussion <br /> <br />Michael Grochala, Community Development Director, presented information and <br />analysis of three primary areas of concern raised by the board at the May 13, 2015 <br />Planning & Zoning Board meeting: commercial component, lot sizes, and public values. <br />Staff requested board direction regarding these areas. <br /> <br />Key points of discussion among the board included: <br /> <br /> Commercial component <br /> Market analysis <br /> Comprehensive Plan language and application <br /> Lot sizes <br /> Open space <br /> Impact on City <br /> Market demand <br /> Public values <br /> Drainage <br /> <br />After discussion of these topics, Chair Tralle polled the board members on each area. <br /> <br />1. The board was comfortable with eliminating the commercial component, provided <br />additional master planning is undertaken showing connectivity to the surrounding <br />commercial areas. <br />2. The board was supportive of the proposed lot sizes. <br />3. The board was supportive of the public values obtained through the development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.