Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION August 24, 2015 <br />APPROVED <br />Council Member Rafferty asked about the Metro iNet budget. He is seeing an increase <br />but not understanding what it represents. Administrator Karlson reviewed the budget on <br />Page D-27 and passed out additional information received from Metro iNet. The city <br />contract is going up as indicated, however some of the items were also included in <br />department budgets (Laserfiche for example) resulting in a reduction of about $18,000 in <br />the Finance Department. He provided a memo to the council explaining that. Back to <br />the line items, they include core service charges increasing due to staff being added and <br />that is needed mainly because of the amount of equipment required for public safety <br />services. He stressed that the sharing of services and costs through the Metro iNet is a <br />real bargain for the city. The mayor suggested that the city should still investigate other <br />possibilities. Chief Swenson urged caution in looking at other options; other than <br />something like LOGIS, it would be difficult to provide the level of services needed, <br />including 24 hour services. <br />Council Member Roeser, looking back at the General Fund Gap Analysis, noted that the <br />levy for the street construction project is new and really stands alone. Because it is the <br />first year of that program, would a contribution to lessen the impact make sense? The <br />mayor noted that the people of Lino Lakes agreed, by ballot, to let the budget cover the <br />expense of the street reconstruction project and the traffic light improvements. <br />The council discussed the bond payments for the construction of the civic complex. The <br />last payment will be due on 2017. There was a general review of bond payment <br />schedules. Council Member Rafferty suggested that project names be attached to the <br />levy list. <br />Public Safety Director Swenson provided information on fire division related expenses <br />for 2016 including a contingency. Noting Page D-93, a fire contingency in the amount of <br />$125,500 has been added. Mayor Reinert explained that the budgeting is first time <br />around so either you plan high or plan realistically and add a contingency. Council <br />Member Stoesz suggested that the contingency be earmarked for public safety rather than <br />just fire. Administrator Karlson explained where the funds were taken from for that <br />contingency. <br />The council further discussed the Public Safety Department budget request. The mayor <br />reviewed increases to the budget over the period 2013 to requested 2016. Chief <br />Swenson clarified that the current information reflects a reduction from the request, to 27 <br />sworn officers (an almost $250,000 reduction reflected in the gap). The mayor asked <br />for a breakdown of the increase in the budget proposed from 2015 to 2016. <br />Mayor Reinert clarified that the $323,000 was only expenditures and he believes there <br />were revenue changes identified also ($10,000 Engineering & Planning; Licenses $4,000; <br />Intergovernmental $19,000; Excess tax increment, $11,000; phones, $17,000). <br />Administrator Karlson explained the reductions included on the gap analysis that includes <br />some of those things. The mayor asked if there is more revenue to be gained from the <br />ACE program; Chief Swenson will check. The mayor would like the $323,000 included <br />2 <br />