My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/14/2015 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2015
>
10/14/2015 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2022 2:29:47 PM
Creation date
10/9/2015 3:55:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
10/14/2015
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. <br />The general purpose and intent of the ordinance is to establish performance standards intended <br />to assure compatibility of uses, prevent blight and to enhance the health, safety and general <br />welfare of the residents of the community. <br />Approving this variance request for an attached accessory structure doesn 't pose a threat to the <br />health, safety or general welfare of the neighborhood. In fact, since no attached accessory <br />structure is present on the applicant's property (6602 Pheasant Run) approving this variance <br />request will enhance the atmosphere in the neighborhood as Lino Lakes requires all dwellings to <br />have, at minimum, a double garage. <br />2. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />The variance request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The applicant's property is <br />intended for a Single Family dwelling as such, current zoning ordinances require dwellings to <br />have, at minimum, a double garage. <br />3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as <br />used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to <br />use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. Economic <br />considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are <br />not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, as the construction of <br />a double garage is considered a reasonable use of the property. The practical difficulty in <br />complying with the 40' setback from Birch Street's right-of-way creates a situation where the <br />applicant cannot construct a double garage unless the variance is approved. <br />4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and was not created <br />by the landowner. The current landowner recently purchased the property and did not construct <br />the house without a garage. <br />5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality by maintaining the 30 foot — <br />40 foot setbacks found along other Birch Street corner properties. Accessory structures such as <br />garages are common features found throughout Lino Lakes residential districts. <br />6. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for <br />property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.