My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-02-2015 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2015
>
11-02-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 3:23:44 PM
Creation date
11/2/2015 8:37:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/02/2015
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 2, 2011 <br />APPROVED <br />90 be too wet for use since it is sand based and doesn't get muddy; the city attorney reports <br />91 that city insurance would generally cover the land and additional coverage by the Legion <br />92 is recommended; a hold harmless agreement is recommended; police department is <br />93 working with the state patrol on the Governor's visit; Fire Department lot is partially <br />94 available. The council concurred with the request for parking for a one-time use the <br />95 coming weekend. <br />96 <br />97 The Mayor then noted that the American Legion has some long-standing parking issues <br />98 and they are requesting on-going use of some of the city owned land for that purpose. <br />99 City ordinance has specific requirements for parking areas (including curb and gutters) so <br />100 a temporary use would be a difficult call. Henry White, American Legion Commander, <br />101 noted that the Legion understands that temporary means they could lose the parking at the <br />102 city's call. The Mayor suggested that the Legion consider buying a portion such as a half <br />103 acre. Mr. Grochala noted that splitting the land could inhibit its future sale. Mr. White <br />104 stressed that the American Legion facility clearly doesn't have adequate parking but it's a <br />105 good community organization that serves the area and doesn't make a lot of money. The <br />106 council discussed the option of joining the current Legion parking with adjacent Fire <br />107 Department lot to gain parking space. Staff will continue to work with the Legion on <br />108 options and report back to the council. <br />109 <br />110 5. Update on 49/J Development Proposal — Economic Development Coordinator <br />111 Divine reviewed her written update on the grocery store proposal. As recommended <br />112 previously by the council, a public meeting was held on the proposal. Approximately 75 <br />113 people attended the meeting and some voiced their concerns about such things as noise, <br />114 size of store, traffic, proximity to residential area and 24 hour operations. Staff has since <br />115 met with the developer and has heard from them that they would not be interested in <br />116 building a smaller store (she shared market information for the area that the developer <br />117 had provided). She noted the master planning that has been done for the area and the <br />118 need for infrastructure improvements for new development. She also reviewed the <br />119 concept of tax increment financing for those improvements, as has been discussed <br />120 previously. <br />121 <br />122 The mayor noted that without agreement on all sides of the matter, there really isn't a <br />123 project in his eyes. He disclosed that he has spoken with the developer and has heard <br />124 their needs and why they can't change them. He also understands what the neighbors are <br />125 saying. Ms. Divine remarked that if the 50,000 square foot store isn't acceptable to the <br />126 council, more discussion may not be needed; also the tax increment element won't be <br />127 available indefinitely. The development could be proposed without city assistance (tax <br />128 increment) however no faunal application has been received. The mayor remarked that <br />129 he sees it is appropriate for the council to give the developer an answer on the project; his <br />130 preference would be to give them an answer other than just "no". In that light, his <br />131 question would be "if not this, what?" understanding that something will eventually be <br />132 developed at the site. <br />133 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.