My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2001-197 Council Resolution-Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-197 Council Resolution-Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2015 12:33:15 PM
Creation date
11/30/2015 11:42:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
12/17/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 17, 2001 <br />Mayor Bergeson stated he had other issues he wished clarified and thererfore supported the motion to <br />table consideration of the interim ordinance. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell believed that a headline regarding this issue has already been made and <br />no matter when the ordinance is passed there will be another headline at that time. He shared Mayor <br />Bergeson's concerns regarding how the proposed moratorium would affect commercial and industrial <br />development. He stated that he supports commercial and industrial growth within the City, however, <br />he was concerned about residential development reaching a record pace over the next two to three <br />years. He stated he supported managing the growth, as well as the proposed interim moratorium. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell feared that tabling the proposed interim ordinance would delay the <br />process and he wished for the process to start immediately in order for the new ordinances to be in <br />place as soon as possible. Therefore, he would vote against the motion to table the ordinance. He <br />felt if City staff does not deliver the necessary information during the January 9, 2002 Council work <br />session, then the Council could consider tabling the second reading of the ordinance at that time. <br />Councilmember Carlson believed that a large part of the effect the City Council will have on the <br />development of the community, both commercial and residential, is how the Council handles this <br />matter. She stated the Council had been able to come together as a team during the comprehensive <br />plan update and the challenge will be to come together as a team again in moving through the <br />moratorium and getting the comprehensive plan approved and in place for the benefit of the entire <br />City. <br />Councilmember Dahl believed that the developers of commercial and industrial uses are always aware <br />of what cities are doing and that they will realize the proposed moratorium makes good business and <br />is a good common sense action for the City. <br />Councilmember Dahl did not support the motion to table the interim ordinance. <br />Councilmember Carlson voted nay. Councilmember O'Donnell voted nay. Councilmember Dahl <br />voted nay. Councilmember Reinert voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. <br />Motion failed on a vote of two to three. <br />Mayor Bergeson called for a motion based on staff's recommended action. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell moved to approve the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 23-01, as <br />presented. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Carlson noted the proposed ordinance states that the purpose of the interim ordinance <br />was to protect the planning process; to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and to ensure that <br />the City and its citizens retain the benefits of, and the protection afforded by, the City's <br />comprehensive plan and offical controls until the study process is completed and any modifications to <br />the City's official controls become effective. She felt that these statements explained the strong need <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.