My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2002-116 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2002
>
2002-116 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 3:56:36 PM
Creation date
12/1/2015 9:43:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
09/23/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 02-116 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR <br />FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8065 WOOD DUCK TRAIL <br />(SULLIVAN PROPERTY) <br />WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Variance to allow the construction <br />of an detached 24' X 36' garage closer to the front lot line than the principle building, <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance, Section 3, subdiv. 4.D.1.c, states that no <br />detached accessory structure shall be closer to the front lot line than the principal building <br />or its attached garage, and <br />WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings of fact: <br />1.) That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />Comment: the property as a whole may be put to reasonable use, but official controls <br />preclude the construction of a garage (which is a requirement under the Zoning <br />Ordinance) in the only workable location that is near the house. <br />2.) That the plight of the landowner is due to physical circumstances unique to his <br />property, not created by the landowner. <br />Comment: The physical location of the septic tank, drain field, well and pond <br />preclude siting a garage in a location which would satisfy the requirements of the <br />Zoning Ordinance. Such a configuration of elements presents a situation unique to <br />this property, although this situation was — at least in part — created by the (previous) <br />landowner. <br />3.) That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone, and when a reasonable <br />use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />Comment: The demonstrated hardship is the lack of a garage site that would satisfy <br />the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Such a hardship is not economically <br />motivated but, rather, site driven. While such a hardship still allows for the <br />reasonable use of the property, such a hardship does not allow the property to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.