My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2002-117 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2002
>
2002-117 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 3:56:17 PM
Creation date
12/1/2015 9:44:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
10/14/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 02417 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION & VARIANCE <br />FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 855 ASH STREET <br />(LINDAHL PROPERTY) <br />WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Variance and Minor Subdivision <br />of property, and <br />WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations provide for and <br />establish requirements for Variances and Minor Subdivisions, and <br />WHEREAS, the proposed Variance and Minor Subdivision apply to property zoned <br />Rural, but which is being subdivided to a size under the minimum lot size requirements <br />for property in a Rural zone, as allowed under the homestead clause of the City's Zoning <br />Ordinance (Section 3, subdiv. 3.A.2.b.2), and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council finds that: <br />1.) That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />The property is being subdivided according to the homestead clause of the <br />City Zoning Ordinance (Section 3, subdiv. 3.A.2.b.2), which allows minimum <br />lot size below what is normally required under Ordinance. The proposed <br />property can not take advantage of the homestead (which allows lot size down <br />to one acre in size) while also meeting the normal minimum lot size <br />requirements of Ruraly zoned property (which requires lots to be at least 10 <br />acres in size). <br />2.) That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to <br />his property, not created by the land owner. <br />While the existing lot of record, while meeting the area requirements as <br />prescribed in the ordinance, does not have the necessary frontage required <br />under minimum Rural lot width standards. <br />3.) That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.