My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-07-2015 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2015
>
12-07-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 9:23:49 AM
Creation date
12/8/2015 1:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/07/2015
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WS — Item #4 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item No. 4 <br />Date: December 7, 2015 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director <br />Re: Bald Eagle Lake Properties <br />Background <br />Council members have expressed interest in investigating what it would take to change <br />the boundary of Anoka County to include 7 or possibly 8 lots that currently straddle the <br />Anoka County/Washington County border. These lots are somewhat unique in that they <br />front Bald Eagle Blvd in Lino Lakes (Anoka County) and the rear of the property is <br />located in the City of Hugo (Washington County) abutting Bald Eagle Lake. The <br />Washington County portions of the lot are only accessible by land through Anoka <br />County. <br />Both Anoka County and Washington County tax the portion of the properties contained <br />within their respective jurisdiction. In 2012 residents approached the City with concerns <br />regarding how their properties were valued by the two respective counties. This led to <br />some additional discussion between Lino, Hugo and each county assessing department to <br />coordinate valuations. Based on these discussions property values where reduced. <br />However, there was a suggestion to pursue a county boundary change so each parcel <br />would be entirely within one county. <br />County boundary changes are governed by Minn. Stat. Chapter 370. Based on staffs <br />initial review it appears that a boundary change would require the following steps: <br />1. Receipt of a separate petition for each affected county signed by one-fourth of <br />those voting in the county at the last preceding election. <br />2. If the petitions are sufficient an election in each county would be held to consider <br />the change. <br />Given the limited number of affected parcels is not likely a boundary change under this <br />process would be successful. Staff has requested input from Anoka County to see if there <br />are any other options available including special legislation. <br />A boundary change, either by statutory provision or special legislation, if necessary, will <br />likely require a significant investment of staff time and financial support on the part of <br />the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.