Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION November 2, 2015 <br />APPROVED <br />90 discussed before and the figure $30,000 ($2.00 per square foot) was mentioned. The <br />91 Legion representatives said their parking need is in the area of 40 to 50 additional spaces. <br />92 <br />93 Mayor Reinert asked Mr. Grochala for his best case scenario for getting parking. Mr. <br />94 Grochala said to set up a lease of property for parking with a city option to get the <br />95 property back if needed such as for development. There would be the question of <br />96 funding. Council Member Roeser remarked that it may not be the best option for the <br />97 Legion to have parking that could be taken back at any time by the city. <br />98 <br />99 The mayor discussed the square footage that would be available minus the setbacks to <br />100 give the Legion an idea of the possibilities and cost. He sees that the Legion would have <br />101 the opportunity to grow its business with more parking. He is interested in solving this <br />102 for the Legion. Staff anticipates that the Legion will approach the city with their <br />103 proposal. <br />104 <br />105 4a. Garage Variance at 6262 Otter Lake Road (no report attached) - City Planner <br />106 Larsen introduced the property owner and noted his contact with staff about construction <br />107 of a garage on this currently garage -less property. There is a variance on record to build <br />108 a certain size garage. There is a pad in place also but it was put in without a permit and it <br />109 does not meet with setback requirements. Historically there is an approval in place for a <br />110 certain size attached garage. At this time the property owner is interested in a different <br />111 variance to allow for a garage that would not conform to the approval already issued. <br />112 The council saw an overhead photo of the property in order to understand the owner's <br />113 request. The property owner explained that he has a garage ready-made and paid for to <br />114 install if he can get permission. There was discussion and arrangements for the garage at <br />115 the closing when he purchased the property, but he eventually found out that the garage <br />116 isn't permitted. The council discussed the location and condition of the existing pad <br />117 where the owner would like to place the garage. The owner added that the cost of the <br />118 garage that was prepaid at closing is non-refundable no matter what the situation. The <br />119 mayor suggested that there are details that can't be changed now and the question to the <br />120 council is what to do to move forward. <br />121 <br />122 Staff is not recommending that the city vary from the setback. The mayor spoke on <br />123 behalf of the council in saying they really want to help work this out but there is no <br />124 apparent compromise. Legally the situation calls for the owner to put in a 20 by 20 <br />125 attached garage. The mayor recommended that the owner check out the possibility of <br />126 working a deal for a different garage that would meet city requirements to understand the <br />127 costs involved. <br />128 <br />129 4. Floodplain Ordinance Amendment — City Planner Larsen introduced Katy <br />130 Thompson of WSB and Associates who has worked on this project to update the city's <br />131 floodplain ordinance that was last updated in 1982. The updates are required by FEMA <br />132 to be in place by December 16, 2015. Ms. Thompson indicated the inclusion of new <br />133 flood plain maps that are updated and more consistent with FEMA standards and across <br />134 the nation. The ordinance itself gets into three different flood districts: floodway, flood <br />3 <br />