My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
1991-087 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
1991
>
1991-087 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2016 1:44:07 PM
Creation date
1/25/2016 11:31:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
08/26/1991
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Member Reinert <br />resolution and moved its adoption: <br />introduced the following <br />THE CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 87-91 <br />RESOLUTION OPPOSING "POLICE BILL OF RIGHTS" LEGISLATION (HR 2946) <br />WHEREAS, the U.S. Congress is considering adoption of legislation <br />that would pre-empt state and local laws and require cities to <br />impose federal standards on the conduct of internal investigations <br />of police misconduct by the city while providing police officers <br />subject to such discipline the right to sue cities for monetary and <br />other damages, including full reinstatement; <br />WHEREAS, these provisions restrict the authority and ability of <br />the Police Chief to investigate allegations of police misconduct or <br />use of excessive force; <br />WHEREAS, definitions provided in the legislation are so unclear <br />that interpretations could prevent any measures without the need <br />for formal hearings; <br />WHEREAS, restrictions raise the issue of whether police officers <br />would no longer be subject to normal supervision; <br />WHEREAS, provisions raise the conduct of such disciplinary <br />investigations to the level of criminal proceedings; <br />WHEREAS, "Police Officers Bill of Rights" impose the will of the <br />federal government on matters that are clearly state and local <br />labor relations issues; <br />WHEREAS, some states, including Minnesota, have adopted similar <br />requirements, while others have rejected such legislation; <br />WHEREAS, the legislation directly interferes with local processes <br />governing provision of police services; <br />WHEREAS, provisions appear to disallow local appointment of <br />civilian review boards and require that the entire investigative <br />file be open to the police officer under investigation while not <br />providing personnel file information on such officers to those <br />investigations; <br />WHEREAS, congress has failed to hold any hearings or to <br />investigate the views of police officials and others who would be <br />adversely affected by such restrictions; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.