Laserfiche WebLink
Council Member Reinert <br />resolution and moved its adoption: <br />introduced the following <br />THE CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 87-91 <br />RESOLUTION OPPOSING "POLICE BILL OF RIGHTS" LEGISLATION (HR 2946) <br />WHEREAS, the U.S. Congress is considering adoption of legislation <br />that would pre-empt state and local laws and require cities to <br />impose federal standards on the conduct of internal investigations <br />of police misconduct by the city while providing police officers <br />subject to such discipline the right to sue cities for monetary and <br />other damages, including full reinstatement; <br />WHEREAS, these provisions restrict the authority and ability of <br />the Police Chief to investigate allegations of police misconduct or <br />use of excessive force; <br />WHEREAS, definitions provided in the legislation are so unclear <br />that interpretations could prevent any measures without the need <br />for formal hearings; <br />WHEREAS, restrictions raise the issue of whether police officers <br />would no longer be subject to normal supervision; <br />WHEREAS, provisions raise the conduct of such disciplinary <br />investigations to the level of criminal proceedings; <br />WHEREAS, "Police Officers Bill of Rights" impose the will of the <br />federal government on matters that are clearly state and local <br />labor relations issues; <br />WHEREAS, some states, including Minnesota, have adopted similar <br />requirements, while others have rejected such legislation; <br />WHEREAS, the legislation directly interferes with local processes <br />governing provision of police services; <br />WHEREAS, provisions appear to disallow local appointment of <br />civilian review boards and require that the entire investigative <br />file be open to the police officer under investigation while not <br />providing personnel file information on such officers to those <br />investigations; <br />WHEREAS, congress has failed to hold any hearings or to <br />investigate the views of police officials and others who would be <br />adversely affected by such restrictions; and <br />