2015-104 Council Resolution - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 15-104 RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED 2015 WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Section 904, any weeds or grass growing upon any lot or parcel of land in the City of Lino Lakes to a greater height than eight (8"), or which have gone or about to go to seed are declared to be a nuisance, and WHEREAS, certain property owners in noncompliance with such code requirements were notified and provided the opportunity to comply with such provisions, and WHEREAS, upon failure of the property owner to comply with the provisions of said notice, the City Weed Inspector ordered the abatement of such nuisance, in accordance with the City Code Section 904, and charged the property owner thereof for expenses incurred by the City, and WHEREAS, the total cost incurred by the City is $274.02. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the city is hereby declared to be $274.02. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of one year, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2016 and shall bear interest at the rate of 7% percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The city clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such work against every property where work was completed by the City, as provided by law, and he/she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 28th day of September, 2015. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member Kusterman and was duly seconded by Council Member Roeser and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor there Kusterman, Roeser, Stoesz, Raffert The following voted against same: none ATTEST: litlnne Bartell, City Clerk , Reinert eff Reine or