Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> �-- RESOLUTION NO. 15-119 <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING A 12 FOOT VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR THE <br /> CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED GARAGE AT 6602 PHEASANT RUN <br /> WHEREAS,a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a variance at 6602 <br /> Pheasant Run, said property legally described to-wit: <br /> Lot 32, Block 5, Lakes Addition No. 2; and <br /> WHEREAS,review and approvals of variances are governed by state statutes and City <br /> ordinances, and <br /> WHEREAS,the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. <br /> The general purpose and intent of the ordinance is to establish performance standards intended <br /> to assure compatibility of uses, prevent blight and to enhance the health, safety and general <br /> welfare of the residents of the community. <br /> Approving this variance request for an attached accessory structure doesn't pose a threat to the <br /> health, safety or general welfare of the neighborhood. In fact, since no attached accessory <br /> structure is present on the applicant's property (6602 Pheasant Run) approving this variance <br /> request will enhance the atmosphere in the neighborhood as Lino Lakes requires all dwellings to <br /> have, at minimum, a double garage. <br /> 2. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br /> The variance request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The applicant's property is <br /> intended for a Single Family dwelling as such, current zoning ordinances require dwellings to <br /> have, at minimum, a double garage. <br /> 3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. "Practical difficulties,"as <br /> used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to <br /> use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. Economic <br /> considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are <br /> not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br /> The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, as the construction of <br /> a double garage is considered a reasonable use of the property. The practical difficulty in <br /> complying with the 40' setback from Birch Street's right-of-way creates a situation where the <br /> applicant cannot construct a double garage unless the variance is approved. <br />