HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/29/2016 Env Bd Packet*City of Lino Lakes
Environmental Board Meeting
June 29, 2016
6:30 p.m.
AGENDA
Pre -Meeting Field Visit: Clearwater Creek Business Park/Meet on Cedar Avenue
and 21st St at 5:30 PM
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes
4. Open Mike
5. Action Items
A Clearwater Creek Business Park, PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat
Review
B. St Clair Estates, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review
6. Discussion Items
A. Recycling Updates, Marty Asleson
7. Adjourn
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MINUTES
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT .
STAFF PRESENT
May 25, 2016
6:34 P.M.
8:00 P.M.
Steve Heiskary, Barbra Bor, Paula Andrzejewski,
Liz Kaufenberg, Nancie Klebba, John Sullivan
Alex Schwartz
Marty Asleson, Aubrey Fonfara, Dianne Hankee
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:
Mr. Heiskary called the Lino Lakes Environmental Board meeting to order at 6:34 p.rn.
on May 25, 2016.
II. APROVAL OF AGENDA
Ms. Andrzejewski made a MOTION to approve the agenda. Motion was supported by
Ms. Klebba. Motion carried 6 - 0.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Ms. Bor a MOTION to approve the April 27, 2016 Meeting Minutes. Motion was
supported by Ms. Andrzejewski. Motion carried 6 - 0.
IV. OPEN MIKE
Mr. Heiskary declared Open Mike at 6:35 p.m.
There was no one present for Open Mike.
Mr. Heiskary closed Open Mike at 6:36 p.m.
V. ACTION ITEM
A. Lino Lakes NE Drainage Area Study Update
DRAFT MINUTES
Evironmental Board
May 25, 2016
Page 2
Ms. Thompson from WSB & Associates presented an update on the NE Area
Drainage. The NE Area Drainage feasibility study models the drainage for 1400
acres of land on the east and west side of I-35E, and north of Main Street. The study
evaluates water quality improvements and a new surface water outlet to Peltier Lake.
Implementation of the plan will require approval from Rice Creek Watershed
District (RCWD).
The draft feasibility study was completed in January 2016 and submitted to City
staff for review. After review by the Environmental Board and City staff, a new
greenway option is now being considered. The new option includes the new culvert
crossing under I-35E, storm sewer and regional storage facilities, and an open -
channel greenway between Peltier Lake and 20th Ave.
The greenway option also provides additional water quality treatment opportunities
for the study are, above and beyond the City's and RCWD's development
requirements.
The new alignment takes advantage of existing culvert crossing under Peltier Lake
Drive and utilizes an existing drainage way. Is in line with City's AUAR and
proposed trail and greenway alignments. Also most flexible option for future
development because of an earthen channel it can be moved when the land becomes
available for future development.
There has been two meetings with the affected landowners to discuss impacts to
property and drainage systems, as well as to hear their opinions on the project
alignments.
After the meeting with Rice Creek Watershed District, it was determined that at the
conceptual level, water quality impacts could be evaluated using a simple land use
analysis. The analysis is based on a 1.1 inch rainfall depth, which corresponds to the
RCWD volume treatment requirements.
Ms. Bor asked if there were going to be improvements to Peltier Drive because of
the road being under water in the spring time.
Ms. Thompson said yes there may be some road improvements that my need to be
done. It may be raised in order to get the culvert in and since it is a City road the
city would be reasonable for maintaining the road.
Ms. Thompson then said the next steps are finalize the feasibility study with the new
alignment and present to the City Council on June 6. Submit Comprehensive
Stormwater Management Plan to RCWD for review. Which really the governing
rules for design and development, then begin final design of system. To continue
grant applications. And then hoping to start construction 2017.
DRAFT MINUTES
Evironmental Board
May 25, 2016
Page 3
Ms. Bor asked will this study come back to the Environmental Board.
Ms. Thompson said we can have to come when the feasibility study is finalized for
review.
Mr. Asleson stated that RCWD also has to review, approve the numbers and
comment on the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for this feasibility
study.
Ms. Bor mentioned that this last report does not state an improvement in the water
quality and being a member of the Environmental Board, the intent of the board is to
be looking for opportunities to improve the environment.
Ms. Thompson said this is true but the study does not take into effect the benefits of
an open channel. That the channel is flat and long enough that there will be some
filtration to the water before it enters Peltier Lake.
Ms. Andrzejewski made a MOTION that the Council accept the feasibility study and
pursue an open channel design alternative. Ms. Kaufenberg seconded. Amendment
to the recommendation is as part of this proposal is to look at any and all
opportunities to improve the phosphorus level coming off of this development.
Motioned carried 6 — 0.
B. Preliminary Plat, PUD Site Plan Review Woods Edge
Woods Edge is a proposed 112 unit attached townhome development on 11.2 acres,
located north of Village Drive and south east of Town Center Parkway.
Back in January 2003 the Environmental Board reviewed "Legacy Holdings", today
called Woods Edge. The project was approved at that time with Environmental
Board recommendations.
Recommendations from 2003 are unchanged except for new rules in surface water,
wellhead protection, landscape requirements, Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Planning requirements, and Tree Preservation.
There are new design standards for development which are now in effect from the
Rice Creek Watershed District. City staff are now in the process of updating the
overall "Legacy at Woods Edge" development Stormwater Management report to
conform to the current standards of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Additional
features will likely be needed to incorporate additional stormwater management
practices and features in to the project design.
Mr. Sullivan asked what the time line for this development is and are these single
level townhomes.
DRAFT MINUTES
Evironmental Board
May 25, 2016
Page 4
Mike Suel from DR Horton Inc., stated that they are hoping to get started this fall
and the townhomes are three level.
Ms. Kaufenberg asked if the city was working with home owners association's in
regards to best management practices on chemical usage, irrigation and recycling as
well as organics recycling.
Mr. Suel said there will be a HOA for the whole site. As far as water conservation
practices there will be soil sensors as part of the water usage for this project.
Ms. Bor thanked Mr. Suel for his openness to the suggestions of the Woods Edge
development.
Mr. Suel said if the Board has any more ideas or suggestions please share them with
Mr. Asleson for it will be easier and more cost effective to input the changes up
front instead of after the development is in.
Mr. Asleson mentioned that part of the recommendation should be that the native
areas around the ponds should be a company that is approved by the City in the
installing and maintaining of this area for five years.
Ms. Bor made a MOTION to recommend approvable of this project with the
changes suggested by the Environmental Board as it goes on to the P&Z Board and
then the project should come back to the Environmental Board. Amendments to the
recommendations is to add nature plantings by the ponds and Ms. Kaufenberg
suggestion to add a plan for recycling and to use best management practices. Ms.
Andrzejewski seconded. Motioned carried 6 -0.
VI DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Minnesota Bird Talk, Liz Kaufenberg
Ms. Kaufenberg has talked to Monica Bryand and it looks like September 28
Environmental Board meeting is when she would like to present her findings and
also invite the public to this meeting. Minnesota Birds and Endangered Species is
what the talk would be about.
Ms. Bor mentioned that it should be advertised in the City's newsletter, web site and
in the newspaper.
Mr. Heiskary suggested that Ms. Bryand can present at the board and then she can
do some additional talks at other locations. We will put it first on the agenda.
B. Recycling Day Discussion, Marty Asleson
DRAFT MINUTES
Evironmental Board
May 25, 2016
Page 5
Mr. Asleson mentioned that at the annual city wide recycling there was not as many
people. We offer tires, carpet and paper shedding which is not offered at our
Saturday monthly event.
Mr. Asleson suggested a shorter hours for the annual recycling day for next year.
C. Recycling Updates, Aubrey Fonfara
Ms. Fonfana was happy to announce that the City of Lino Lakes recived a award
called Reuse Pioneer from Anoka County for starting the program of donating
furniture to Bridgeing and St. Vincent De Paul.
Organic drop off program partitipation is at 89 households which is about 1.4% of
the population of the City of Lino Lakes.
So far 205 bags of organics has been collected. As of those particting in the program
52% heard about it from the recycling flyer, 32% from the city newsletter and 8%
from their neighbors. A lot of the people are within the 2 miles raduis of the
organics drop off sites.
Mr. Heiskary would like to have the information published somewhere. Such as the
Quad, web site and city newsletter. Also add questions and answer about orgainics
recycling.
Ms. Bor would like to see the recycling information presented to the City Council.
Next Recycling Saturday will be June 18, 2016.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Andrzejewski made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 p.m. Motion was
supported by Ms. Kaufenberg. Motion carried 6 - 0.
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Fogarty
DRAFT MINUTES
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 5A
Marty Asleson, Environmental Coordinator
June 29, 2016
Review: Clearwater Creek Business Park -United
Properties Distribution Facility Rezoning and PUD
Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat.
United Properties Distribution
3600 American Boulevard W #750
Bloomington, MN 55401
OWNERS: Rehbein Properties
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
United Properties has submitted a request for rezoning to Planned Unit Development,
Development Stage Plan Approval and Preliminary Plat approval for the 56 acre
Clearwater Creek Business Park. The proposed plat includes one 30-acre lot for a
proposed distribution center and two out lots for future development. The Planning and
Zoning board held a public hearing for the proposal on June 8, 2016.
Based on revisions to the site plan the proposed distribution facility is approximately
402,552 square feet in area. The applicant is proposing to pursue a rezoning to Planned
Unit Development to allow for design flexibility related to the proposed storage of semi-
trailers on the site.
Development of the site will require the extension of 21st Avenue, from Commerce
Avenue to approximately 2,100 feet south. Extension of the street includes the crossing
of Clearwater Creek and filling and mitigation of floodplain areas adjacent to the creek.
21 st Avenue is planned to be extended to Cedar Street, further to the south, in the
Comprehensive Plan. The project proposes to dedicate right of way for the entire length
of the roadway.
1
ANALYSIS
Existing Site Conditions
The survey shows the Judicial Ditch No. 3 (Clearwater Creek) and adjacent floodplain.
There appear to be numerous wetlands on site, a wetland delineation has been submitted.
There are a number of wetlands scattered throughout the site and many of those are
shown as being impacted by improvements. See Attachment.
The site is relatively flat and is primarily cultivated fields. There are small wooded areas
in the southwest corner, adjacent to the ditch and within the wetlands.
Xcel Energy has an easement across the south portion of the site for an electric
transmission line.
There is an existing billboard (off -premise sign) in the northeast portion of the site. Off -
premise signs are prohibited by Section 1010 of the City Code. This appears to be a
legal, nonconforming sign, which is allowed to remain.
A sewage lift station is located in an easement in the northwest portion of the site.
The site is most likely drain -tiled.
Soils
All of the soils on the Lino Lakes Business Park site are flat to flat concave, or with
depressanal areas, higher pH, mostly poorly drained. These soils supported wet grass
species and trees to some extent.
Soils management in Clearwater Business District proposal site is most important
consideration from a water management and plant growth perspective. The soils in the
proposal site are very thick glacial deposits of unconsolidated glacial till. These soils are
clay with everything else including rocks, boulders and gravel areas. The Soils are
classified as B/D soils that signifies the soils are drained, and have little infiltration. (See
Attachment). Area subsoils consist of sandy clay with some sand seams. Water
elevations in some the test borings show up around 2 -3 feet and go down as deep as 20
feet.
From the Geotechnical Report for the Site, Braun Intertech discusses soils in the
infiltration basin on the north side of the proposal. They say that based on their
experience, actual infiltration rates on this site may be less that what is predicted in the
design manual portion of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. They recommend that the
Minnesota Stormwater Manual should be consulted for further design best practices.
Water reuse may be a good alternative BMP if infiltration rates are inadequate.
2
Recommendation: Soils should be monitored for impacts to the Drinking Water
Service area contamination, and existing wetland resources. Impacts can be created by
uncovering a "gravel -vein" or sand seams where polluted water can enter into a DWSMA
water source, and where wetlands can be drained by creating a "drain situation" for close
proximity wetlands. Gravel and or other pervious areas encountered in excavation areas
for ponds and created wetlands and general excavation must be sealed. Special
consideration must be given to site horticultural practices, and compacted soils discussed
later in this report.
Recommendation: That infiltration areas be further tested and that water reuse be
considered as an additional BMP if, as suggested by Braun Intertec, the soils are slower
infiltrators than the Minnesota Stormwater Manual predicts.
Minnesota Stormwater Manual be consulted for further design best practices.
As with all developments environmental concerns for soil compatibility has been a
recommendation that no soils shall be imported on to the site without City staff approval.
Land Cover
The MLCCS has most of the site listed as corn, or cultivated farmland. There are small
wooded areas in the southwest corner, adjacent to the ditch and within the wetlands of the
site. Pre -vegetation and the soil survey indicates that at pre -settlement time the land was
mostly wet grasses and some tree areas.
Significant Resources
The closest know unique resource is 3000 feet away from this site. The soils are not
conducive to rare plants.
Tree Preservation
The applicant must provide a detailed tree preservation plan to the city.
Landscaping
Where screening is required, the code suggest that a combination of landscaping and
berms be used to provide screening. The PUD flexibility is requested to allow outside
storage adjacent to I-35E and we would like to see a more comprehensive screening plan
to screen the outside storage from I-35E, 21st Avenue and the residential area south of
Cedar Avenue. A staggered double row of trees and/or fencing or berming could be used
to increase this screen. All continuous year round planting screens shall require at a
minimum a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. Planting plans shall include
species which are sized to appropriately screen visibility within five years of planting.
Small shrubs shall be a planted at a maximum interval of 3' on center; medium shrubs
3
shall be planted at a maximum interval of 4' on center; and large shrubs shall be planted
at a maximum interval of 6' on center unless; otherwise authorized by the City.
The applicant should provide a cross section or elevation showing the effectiveness of the
screen.
Other recommendations:
1. Plants that are intolerant of higher pH soils should not be used on this site.
2. Evergreens must not be used in any of the native seed mix areas. Evergreens may
be planted in the sod and any irrigated cultured seed areas
3. MNDOT seeding methods as in the MNDOT Seeding Manual must be used for
Native seed areas.
4. Native Seed areas must be planted and maintained by a City approved contractor
that has experience and knowledge in the planting of a native seed area.
5. A 5-year maintenance plan must be written for the site and accepted by the City.
6. All cultured seed and sod areas must be irrigated.
7. Seed types must be identified on the landscape plan.
8. Seed types must be approved by the City.
Wetlands
There are number of wetlands delineated on site and in the area where the 21st Avenue
improvements are planned. It appears that there are wetland impacts from the street
project and the development on Lot 1.
The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is the LGU for the Wetland Conservation
Act. At the May 31st meeting with the city and RCWD, the applicant indicated that they
intended to prepare a full watershed application on June 6th for a July 27th RCWD board
review.
21 st Avenue is proposed to be a temporary cul du sac ending at the south parking lot. The
roadway would be extended down to Cedar Street in the future. As part of the future road
extension RCWD is requiring a wetland sequencing plan for the roadway alignment all
the way to Cedar. The applicant is to work through the process with the RCWD.
4
Wetland Management Corridor
The site is located within the limits of the RCWD Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland
Protection and Management Plan (CWPMP) boundary. The RCWD CWPMP landscape
scale Wetland Management Corridor (WMC) is shown to extend through the site along
the banks of Clearwater Creek, with a slight overlap of the southern edges of delineated
Wetlands 8 and 9 WMC.
According to RCWD Rule F.6.(b)3)(ii) - The District, in its judgment, may retract the
WMC boundary on the basis of site -level information demonstrating that the retraction is
consistent with the associated CWPMP and does not measurably diminish the existing or
potential water resource functions of the WMC. In making such a decision, the District
may consider relevant criteria including wetland delineation, buffer and floodplain
location, WMC connectivity, protection of surface waters and groundwater recharge, and
whether loss would be reduced by inclusion of compensating area supporting WMC
function.
Field observations suggest that the site level WMC should not extend any further than the
eastern property line. Within the subject site, Clearwater Creek/Anoka County Ditch No.
3 is a channelized public ditch (not wetland) with no adjacent floodplain wetland.
Additionally, extension of the WMC into the subject site does not result in the gain of a
corridor encompassing high priority wetland resources — either onsite or nearby.
Wetlands 8 and 9 are partially -drained ditches that contain wetland vegetation and their
immediate surroundings have been manipulated in the past by farming and construction
activities.
Retraction of WMC limits to the east property line will not measurably diminish the
existing water resource functions of the WMC, or result in a disconnect/gap in the
landscape scale WMC. Retraction will also not result in the exclusion of high value
wetlands, or the loss of high value existing wetland buffer areas.
As proposed, the project will require a total of 0.3637 acres of impact to wetlands. The
proposed plan meets the project purpose, need, goals, and requirements as described
previously. The proposed project represents an orderly and logical use of the subject
property and is compatible with applicable land use and policy plans.
Impacted Wetland Replacement Plan:
Onsite wetland replacement was rejected because: 1) there are no wetland restoration
opportunities, and 2) wetland creation within the project area (between stormwater
features and Clearwater Creek) would not be hydrologically sustainable.
Under RCWD Rule F, wetland bank credits may be used for CWPMP replacement if the
chosen bank is located within a CWPMP or CWPMP Contributing Drainage Area. The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requires that the wetland bank chosen be within
5
the same Bank Service Area as the wetland impacts, and that the credits used be Corps
certified.
The Hair Wetland Bank meets the requirements for WCA, CWPMP, and USACE
regulatory requirements and was therefore selected to meet mitigation obligations.
Because the majority of wetland impacts are to Type 3 ditch wetland, Subgroup B was
chosen.
Flood Plain
The applicant is proposing to fill 1.670 acres of floodplain, and mitigate 11.024 acres of
flood plain.through the creation of the two ponds on the north side of the building. See
Attachment.
The Natural Resources based City Open Space Suitability Analysis Modal shows the
proposed area as Moderately Suitable for Development, with a small corridor area along
the creek and flood plain area to the north as Marginally Suitable. See Attachment.
Natural Resources Greenway and Wetland Preservation Corridor Overlay
The Lino Lakes Natural Resources and Wetland Preservation Corridor Overlay shows the
Clearwater Creek area as part of the overlay on the Lino Lakes Business Park site. The
developer must provide at least a 50 foot buffer, 25 foot average buffer along the corridor
depicted on the attached map.
The Developer is proposing to place this buffer area along the creek with a conservation
easement placed over it. The Easement must name both the City and the Rice Creek
Watershed as easement holders.
Waste and Recycling
The plans must be revised to show trash/recycling areas. The ordinance requires all
refuse, recyclable materials, and necessary handling equipment including but not limited
to garbage cans, recycling bins and dumpsters shall be stored within the principal
structure, within an accessory building, or totally screened from eye level view from all
neighboring uses and the public right-of-way. Exterior storage of refuse and recyclable
material shall require the following:
1. Exterior wall or fence treatment shall be similar and/or complement the principal
building.
2. The enclosed trash and/or recycling receptacle area shall be located in the rear or
side yard and shall observe all applicable setback requirements and easements.
3. The trash and/or recycling enclosure must be in an accessible location for pick up
hauling vehicles.
6
4. The trash and/or recycling receptacles must be fully screened from view of
adjacent properties and the public right-of-way by a fence or wall of at least six
(6) feet in height and a minimum opaqueness of eighty (80) percent.
Storm Water
WSB reviewed the Stormwater Drainage Report for United Properties, dated May 16,
2016, and provided by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and have the following comments:
1. Provide drainage area maps for existing and proposed conditions.
2. The HydroCAD total drainage areas between existing and proposed conditions do
not match.
3. The stormwater treatment basins shall be separate for the site and street impervious
areas.
AUAR Review
An AUAR was completed for the project area in 2005 and updated in 2015. Please Find
attached the AUAR Review and Mitigation Plan for the Clearwater Creek Business Park,
completed by WSB.
Drinking Water Protection
After searching the County Well Index, there does not appear to be any private wells on
this site. The site is however in a moderately susceptible area of contamination to
groundwater in our new Drinking Water Service Management area. Precautions should
be taken to contain fueling stations for equipment used to construct this site. This is also
required in the SWPPP.
Lighting
A photometric plan must be submitted to the City to ensure compliance with the
ordinance standards:
1. Any lighting used to illuminate a structure, an off-street parking area, or other area
shall be arranged so as to deflect light away from any adjoining residential property or
from any public right-of-way. All lighting shall be installed in accordance with the
following provisions:
a. The luminaire shall contain a cutoff which directs and cuts off the light at an
angle of ninety (90) degrees or less.
7
b. Light sources shall not be permitted so as to light adjacent property in excess of
the maximum intensity defined in § 1007.043 (6)(d) of this Ordinance.
c. Architectural/historical light fixtures that feature globes that are not shielded, or
lighting of entire facades or architectural features of a building may be approved
by the City Council. In no case shall the light affect adjacent property in excess
of the maximum intensity defined in § 1007.043 (6)(d) of this Ordinance.
d. The maximum height of the fixture and pole above the ground grade permitted for
light sources is thirty (30) feet. A light source mounted on a building shall not
exceed the height of the building. In no case shall the height of a light source
mounted on a pole or on a building exceed the height limits of the zoning district
in which the use is located, unless allowed by conditional use permit.
e. The light source of an outdoor light fixture shall be set back a minimum of ten
(10) feet from a street right-of-way and five (5) feet from an interior side or rear
lot line.
f. No light source shall be located on the roof unless said light enhances the
architectural features of the building and is approved by administrative permit.
g.
The use of outdoor lighting for parking lots serving commercial and industrial
businesses shall be turned off one (1) hour after closing, except for approved
security lighting.
h. All illuminated on premise signs for advertising purposes shall be turned off
between 12:00 AM and sunrise except that said signs may be illuminated while
the business facility on the premise is open for service.
i. Direct or reflected glare from high temperature processes such as combustion or
welding shall not be visible from any adjoining property.
Erosion and Sediment Control
The submitted plan is site specific. The developer is responsible for all aspects of the
MPCA requirements for construction site sediment and erosion control. There must not
be any disturbance of the soils on this site until the SWIPP is fully engaged and
authorized by City environmental and engineering.
RECOMMENDATION
Forward staff and environmental comments on to Planning & Zoning Board and the City
Council.
ATTACHMENTS
8
1. Preliminary Civil Drawings
2. Wetland Impacts
3. DWSMA
4. Grading Plan
5. Greenway and Wetland Preservation Corridor
6. Landscape Plan
7. Landscape Screening Picture
8. Soils
9. Wetland Delineation
10. Floodplain Mitigation
11. Suitability
12. Engineering Review Lino Lakes CCBP
13. Mitigation Plan Update (AUAR)
9
CLEARWATER CREEK BUSINESS CENTER
TITLE SHEET, NOTES & LEGEND
LINO LAKES, MN
'an18 S1H811 NZI3H.L ION
L
N 3A6'16WZ
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
EL
LLJ
z
LLJ
U
0
z
CLEARWATER
0
J
0
511tl11V0 30 3003 r ,
,•,
/
8066031 '0N -000
11131133171 4lll1fl ONV
30VNIVNO '0830V09
2+00 3+00 !.
21 ON dPfl AVM tO 1HVI&l A.I+100 VYONle
I
LEGEND
TEL
OBL
°TCS
GP
0
MBA
ECBX
O PP
LP
0
0
x
•
930--
928--
EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN
EXISTING GUARD POST
EXISTING MAIL BOX
EXISTING CONTROL BOX
EXISTING UTILITY POLE
EXISTING LIGHT POLE
EXISTING
EXISTING
EXISTING
STORM SEWER
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STORM MANHOLE
EXISTING GATE VALVE
EXISTING HYDRANT
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
—•—•—•—•— EXISTING FENCE
53/I63dOUd N/38/43N 1213NM0
3HL AO 17
- -0 DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE
311,11,060 3
N31VM JO 30031
i
SL ON S YAVM
tO 1HONA1N1lOO IWONV
I
c-1IIIIII
OO
A
AV
— 928 -
-930-
X 24.60
o 0 0
4.0%
PROPOSED WATER PIPE
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE
PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE
PROPOSED DRAINTILE AND CLEAN -OUT
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN
PROPOSED FLARED -END SECTION
PROPOSED GATE VALVE
PROPOSED HYDRANT
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
(GUTTERLINE, BITUMINOUS SURFACE, OR GROUND
SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
o PROPOSED SILT FENCE
0
PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE
PROPOSED RIP -RAP
PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION
PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER SIGNAGE
SHIPPING OFFICE
MONUMENT
-_^
511V11V2
PRODUCTION OFFI1
PROPOSED BUILDING
FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION 912.00
PROPOSED BUILDING
402,552 S.F.
14+00 15+00 16-00 17+00
M_CH ROOM
123.
EMPLOYEE
ENTRY 9
- J�llll`.
19-00
SHEET INDEX
CO TITLE SHEET, NOTES & LEGEND
C1.1 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C1.2 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C2.1 UTILITY PLAN
C2.2 UTILITY PLAN
C3.1 PLAN PROFILE - 21 ST AVE S
C3.2 PLAN PROFILE - 21 ST AVE S
DETAILS
DETAILS
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
VICINITY MAP
\A \� \\
\\\ \
\\ \\ \ \\
g,: N FORMER
20+00
0
N
4 ONV3'o13M 153083d02/d N13883U -N3N410
511, 1V0
t/ L MS 3HL AO 7/ MS
6
37741831N30 20 13 -83N440
11 \
Jr
1
O
,
S11V11V3
25+00 26+ee 26+
DRAWN BY:
A.G.
DESIGN BY:
A.G.
CHCKD BY:
C.W.P.
PROJ. NO.
16-1604
ORIGINAL DATE:
MAY 16, 2016
REVISION DESCRIPTION
w
cc
w•
3CCJOw
ZOpCI
}aWZ
a2gZ—
rNIrQ(Se
®�w0
ZQLLI
I Z<
~odor!
P2zw=
cwj00�ccIL
CI CC CC 0
LLIaawD
LLI
aw�
U
J
DATE: 05.12.2016
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
TITLE SHEET & LEGEND
PREPARED FOR:
UNITED
PROPERTIES
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
PLOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
FAX: (651) 361-8701
0 60 120
SCALE: 1" = 120'
CO
P1
z
z
-0
D m D
z�
-I -1 m
C)
D1
—I O
O 77
z
�O
mp=
n C D
• fTl C
z o
C)
z
0
PT1
GO
•
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
DOC. NO. 1992466.009�
I 1 _
/ \ ./
/4.101 :0;1:/ 7A 49:4 a:40 b441 • • • • • • ... {�0..........04'•••�••:•�• .18.` 414.4.4.4"1441
tI
i
_sue ----
--/
()
0
z
0
0
z
m
Z
D
Z
C7
m
0
C)
0
z
U)
O
z
m
z
23
D
z
C7
m
0
I I I
/I 2
17'' /
i/lf I
/ //
//
//
//
//
//
/7
7 /
/
7
z
7
7
/
7
7
9
7
i
AND UTILITY EASEMENT
n--
7
\
--5e8--/
e5-
i
7
•
PROPOSED DRAINAGE
Fri
r
0
Cr
CD CA
Z
cn
3f1N3AV IS lZ 3O 1SV3 1333
0
0
0
0
0
0
cn
0
cn
0
03
z m
vi
z
-13
CO
0 XI
-71
3ONf1S ) 8 038Vd38d
—L
•
cn
0
° NORTH
CO
0
'0NI `ONI76133NIDN3
-0
0
rn
0 XI
33 1-1
CLEARWATER CREEK
BUSINESS PARK
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
WETLAND IMPACTS
SITE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
ADAM GINKEL
DATE: 06.17.2016 LIC. NO. 43963
DATE
REVISION DESCRIPTION
6-7-16
RCWD SUBMITTAL
6-17-16
CITY RESUBMITTAL
9 LOZ `9 L AVW
:31y® 1VNIOIHJO
Lino Lakes Business Park
RNOL KES DWSMA Status Map
9/15/2015
N' tb 1);
6.261
+3o-ir)
Pri
miser
■gip !�.i�
w:r:eO
07TPR :axe
CHWL 911.
100-ye 912.6
FiRm1 SFc 9 I 3
Fie BF901'.
IIIE111211111111
Ann
IltfliP1
City of Lino Lakes
Community Development
600 Twon Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
Phone (651) 982-2400
Lino Lakes Business Park DWSMA Vulnerability
Vuln
Lino lakes Business park Site
<all othervalues>
High
Low
Iv1oderate
Very High
IN
0 1.550
F
3.100 4.65(
Maps are for illustrative purposes only. Recent changes may not be included. Land Use and Zoning Information should be verified with City Staff
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka US Feet
EXIST DITCH
_ — — �e5
/
N i
/ 0Q I I
Z m�c�rrizm
^OxLm
N X
Zp�v)
• N Z 0`z
°MI°
--1 Zg
CO 0 orb \\
'0 0» Z
0-I0 =0
r-Snmm-
�mmxi/ m
0 � -1
20 3: rn m
-< > WJ l 0
>m00
m O -
m� �-n0 1
owTm
DDp�CwQ
�= IWoD�z71 o(njo
m�7DODZ
(/) 0 1-12 >
O Z N 0 m Z
z02-0�0
-0z7-Dou)
nmm
;
N
=m
z O Z m r
71*vmOZ
»wmo
07DTI
yrzv
mDwrlm
x)2
NWzom /
,- 1
730 /
z,o
1 D oz
1
7 0 1
J
I /
/
7 I
1 1
I 1
1 I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I �
■1
•
arc-
0M
SAO
PC
/
.eke'
PT =
/
1 /
/ --912 --
1 7 J13 — — —
91
911.9
/2
/
^
'12.34 OHHE IHW
I i/ I � ' 8'tCP
f S
(
/
/
/
/
/
/
r
7
0 0
oo, ,0 0
2
LJ LJ LJ LJLJ LJ LJ
rl111rlr1ElElrl
1 1 /
1
o�/> E 1
/ i /U4-NN/ A ) /
\ \ /\� / /
�• ��� / / / /� //
/ /
� f ( //� /// //
/ 9' / / / / / /
/ 7/ // / / /
/ /
/ / / / / / /
/ / / / / /
i / / / / / `'� / / /
/ / 9r / / / / // / / ' // / /
/
/ /, /
/ / / / 2 / /
r/ / / / / / //
/ / /
/ / / / N''
/ / / / /// ��
/ /
/ /
/ / /
/
/
/
/
/---
— CBL �pF{W ONt� � • '
L NOL 1 fie— °
NOR TH70IIV TE
2/VD ,q DDl TION
OHW
-929- —
1
N) 5-9;097 sq. ft. /
/ 56.453� acres /
L �` J L J L J
03
r1rir11r1
�r
OWNER. KENNETH & CONSTANCE
LOT l DUELLMAN BLOCK 5
LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ
r1r1r1ET( rlrlrl r1r1L1r1
/
/ /
/ /r
/ /
/
---9-22—
\
/ OHYLNE
920�53-'
NOR II /POIN IE
921'.50
rlrlrl/Elrlrl"
X X�if X—•-•`-X—X X
of/
rl rl I- r1
1
SANITARY 'EWER AND UTILITY
EASEMENT D5C NO. 1453482
�-922 — — - ---I-
---
-_ '�-10HEi OLW_ — s�
_--9-21
2.56%
_LEL_—
I� 921
�FfE�
OWNER: BISON DEVELOPMENT CO„
INC.
Ci W 21.00
o
1 CB
TOP=905.9
BOX CULVERT
0\5 03 •
11
14
141
\il'—'11'sAl \:111\11 1\I \11
-11,--1'111:11111:1)1'1111,1,11111,IIIIII\11111\111\111111
1.111 111 1111,1,111:11i1.111, 1\1111 1\1
11
III ill
11,111111(1
11111
CB
TOP=906.7
INV=902.0
24'RCP<
ST S
mm0
>XO
Zo0
m-0
II 71 Z
(0 ' c
N Cr) -1
O 0
co O
I 1
m >
m z
z
m0
D Z
N
o
mm
N c
D =
z
cm
m0
m
CO
0,
co
1ZZ
o
100
913.43
C 0
Z
xi
co
0
o
0
-L
1.71
0
NORTH
0
So
0
'3NI `JNI76133NIDN3
-0
0
rn
0 XI
13
CLEARWATER CREEK
BUSINESS PARK
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
ADAM GINKEL
DATE: 06.17.2016 LIC. NO. 43963
DATE
REVISION DESCRIPTION
6-7-16
RCWD SUBMITTAL
6-17-16
CITY RESUBMITTAL
9 LOZ `9 L AVW
:31ya 1VNIOIHJO
Lino Lakes Business Park
Wetland Preservation Corridor
Greenway Corridor
9/15/2015
/m%emu 4# r ie.a.
4n
"w_' yAA'
Lino Lakes Business Park DWSMA Vulnerability
City of Lino Lakes
TYPE
Lino lakes Business park Site
N
Community Development
600 Twon Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
Phone (651) 982-2400
Greenway System
0
Feet
1.550 3.100 4.650
Maps are for illustrative purposes only. Recent changes may not be included. Land Use and Zoning Information should be verified with City Staff
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka US Feet
Filename: CLEARWATER CREEK\CLEARWATER CREEK-L1
NORTH
CA
fV
S
6�
6'
111) )39';
•3
m
I 0
SEED
I —I I I—
III-1I
"V 0/
• • 0S O7\
-o
0
0
0
aNn02io 0382in1SI0Nn
me
z
0
m 03
c o
O
r
-< co
> �7
Z r
0 D
(i)m
Crl co
°
•CJ O
0 01
0
Fri
NO llV8 13S
®40 ® 0 ® $ 4040 $ ®
,---4I1, SEED
SOD
afkiZiP
rj 7
SEE DETAIL 6/A1.1
FOR SCREENING
'S
Mi
mik,0
au JOruP
4,4 l
lip)
k
kart
AN,
040
r4
6110
MCI
rri
giu
1
CD <;)
Oro
n�
2
I I
LJLJ
N
10
b- m Erl
z
0 -0
oD
N z
n
D
✓ z
m
(J)
5r6,° o
\ U1
P1
4 '
L_IJI ImI I I ' 1
rirlrl rrr-1ri17-1ririr1 ririr1
SEED
0
D
\
CO
-1
z
m
D
CO
D
r
r
0 0 � 44
o
Z
0
c
co
m
0
U)
0
1=
310H 3O SKIS NMOG >1V3218
S13>13Od 21IV 31VNIIN113
Q7
m�
O-
0 I
m
= X
rN
00
N
0
r
<0 ��
E—SEED ->
44
4'
O ;o
M
- < 0
m
m1
cam
C
-1 CO
CO D
C N
2:1m
r-1
D
Z
o�
3GV21D ONIISIX3
\
1 vI LJLJ LJLJINI 1NIL/JLJLJ LJLJ
ririEJ
HO1fIN dIHO DOOM
\•
ririri r1r1r1
1 1 1 1
OH] [1]-[1]
SEED
0 0 7l
O > m
Z D 0
0- mm
n 0 0
CJI-
- 23
m n 0
>m1
m m 0
�7 N
N o
cIr w N
- I m < N
1Z 0m
D mm
nr
D
-<1m 00
z� • z0
� N
Om
Z r
m
mn
Z
> 0
Z
00
2:1W
0 m
1NVDIJINOIS ONIISIX3 JO
0 (/)-0C *-1CDZN
m o0z m0 < m
000 m mm
00000m G0<WZ moro-
�-n,co g0<� n ,M
1TIOZ -IO-r0
0 DM0 =0Znj
Z N 0 r =
D13r; CPCD
n pm0 r 00z
no-n nm• _1
00C=1 =ojz
• m 0 Z X D (OJ)
z0z
0ODN 02=I-I
m z 0
-IZ-1 o0M000
D -C 13 CO m
mD- mD0m
Z
P_�0 m=1NZ
NZco Z Z rJ
0i �(O/)23 Z0
• D
>
Z Ij
0 0
0 D
mri
00 2)
r D
z
N
m
m
0
X
c
m
I I
z
0
0
X
w
N
co
•NVld 3H1 NO NMOHS SV SV32iV 033S • l
N
0
:S310N 3dV3S0NV1
100
86
80
_
O
pl
84
84
N)
N
.
(,J
0'
41
(J'
-
N
30
0)
co
0
-1
-<
PLANTING SCHEDULE
N-1
>
o
0
CD
c-
c-CO
CO
CC1
M
0
2)
0
*
-D
CO
i
M
Co
M
N
N
n
0
Co
n
-I
=
D
Co
M
PURPLE LEAF
SANDCHERRY
TECHNY
ARBORVITAE
GARDEN GLOW
DOGWOOD
BLUE CHIP
JUNIPER
JAPANESE BARBERRY
ROSY GLOW
COMPACT
BURNING BUSH
RED TWIGGED
DOGWOOD
RED PINE
WHITE PINE
BLACK HILLS
SPRUCE
RIVER BIRCH
RED SPLENDOR CRAB
SPRING SNOW
CRAB
OHIO BUCKEYE
COFFEE TREE
IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUS1
AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE
COMMON NAME
PRUNUS CISTENA
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS
CORNUS HESSI GARDEN GLOW
JUNIPERUS BLUECHIP
BERBERIS THUNBERGI 'ROSY GLOW'
EUONYMUS ALATUS 'COMPACTA'
CORNUS BAILEY! 'CARDINAL'
PINUS RESINOSA
PINUS STROBUS
PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA
BETULA NIGRA
MALUSxHYBRIDS 'RED SPLENDOR'
MALUS SPRING SNOW
AESCULUS GLABRA
GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS
GLEDITSIA TRICANTHOS
ACER SACCHARUM
BOTANICAL NAME
0'
(II
on
qk
Cn
cn
cn
6'
6'
6'
-
N
LT!.
-
CP
-
U1
N
(Ji
k)
6
N
U.
SIZE
CONT.
CONT.
CONT.
CONT.
CONT.
CONT.
CONT.
CD
Co
CO
CO
BB
BB
CD
CO
CO
CO
BB
BB
CD
CO
BB
MTH
CLUMP
EMARKS
1
0
40 U)
fV CO
O
(AN*N1 CO
O)
= 1J NIH11M S8n2iHs
030IA02id S8n2iHS 1791
Z
rn
D
rn
0301A021d S3381
0
C
23
mm
0
*1
2 Z
z Z
wc�
0 N
m
II
74.
O
0
m
mDD
0 Z7 -1
m IV
moo
m m 0
II m m
II
rn A II
N
wm
m
N
II
m
m
N
= 1332i1s
SONI1NV1d 0N11021
N
co
m
m
N
SONI1NV1d 0Nn02I
- N011VGNn03 31810113
O
O
',
H
0301A02id S8naHs 9Z�
SONI1NV1d N0I1V0Nn03
0301A02id '3'S 00c`61.
O
0301A02id S332i1
D
= 000`Z/332i1
O
0
m
m
N
(SONI1NV-Id N0J 2i0
3d 3dV3SONV1
1N3W3211n
0
0
z
0
cri
0
0
z
c
3dVDSC]NV1
13:
z
rn
1V111w8ns A11D
) VNIIN113dd
11 :A8 Pa)PauD
0
0
Co
Co
CLEARWATER CREEK
BUSINESS PARK
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
•M •Pn18 UDDlaai.ud
EM.
Webster barn
EI:rf: o
loamy tine
Sand
ERN UTYj
m _J
FJ'
Ness
sandy
4 perce
Webster Loam is a nearly level,o
et
poorly drained soil formed in limy w
glatial till.Native vegetation was water
tollerant grasses and a few scattered trees `'
Dundas Loam nearly level, poorly drained
soils in calcareous loamy glatial till. Native vegetation
was deciduous forest and a y&Ssy understory
/NIN/I/H.
,z4,,wa# 14' /' Ii-iI?
„Nc.s.
Bloamford Fine LaomySand are nearly level
somewhat poorly drained soils. The native
vegetation was deciduous forest and some
water tollerant grasses
Legend
A Hydrant
City Road Limits
Site Limits
- - - • Overhead Utility
—► Pipe
Transect
Wetland
Anoka Co Ditches
(Wetland 8
;� (0.25 acres)
",Wetland 4c
(0.06 acres)
Wetla, nd,10
(0.02 acres)
• Wetland
j5
((0.08 acres)
Stormpond
Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2015 FSA Photo)
0 240
11 Feet
KJOLHA C ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY
Source: NlnGeo, ESRJ Imagery Basemap
United Properties (KES 2016-037)
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Note: Boundaries indicated
on this figure are approximate
and do not constitute an
official survey product.
b
t
--9
c�—
v
/
>--( )-c u )-c 1--!
NORTH
""is
'0NI `ONI76133NIDN3
1
90N
Zm
Zy
mmZ
• Z
L) L)
J o __.P
/ 7/
IC1
7
/
/
/
/
/
//
i //
///
A /\\N\ N
N
N
r
CLEARWATER CREEK
BUSINESS PARK
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY FLOODPLAIN
EXHIBIT
i70..6—
7
N
A
A
DATE
m
m
m
z
m
z
0
m
c)
7J
z
m
0
m
— o
O
0
— o
z
O
z
O
m
z
0
6
m
0
m
m
z
D
NOIIVAT1d)
dO dOIS Hinos
m
z
D
CA
f M
>
z m
> D
DC
—I<Z
Om
D
Z -H
1 O >
Zp m
<-
M>
co GI •
E
op 4 -H
p D
N
C N C
p 2J
�m
)\N`d 01 elONd ) dI LA —
1aNf1S ) 9 adJlVd1eld
-0 -0
0 0
zz
0 0
D
II II
N 00
00
00 0)
D D
nn
I I
—9�
—I
0 0 C
C O 0
O O C
II II
-71
0 0
O — O
O�
N 1— •
D - D
>z
o I-
�O
O
••
� \
E4I
a.�'•
•
•
•
REVISION DESCRIPTION
Fri 0
Fri
C 1—
D
O O
z�
II r-
O
O O
• N �
O r-
z
7
7
7
6-7-16
RCWD SUBMITTAL
6-17-16
CITY RESUBMITTAL
9 LOZ `9 L AVIN
:31110 1VNIOIHJO
N
o Dan
9 n
P z
z
Lino Lakes Business Park
Suitability for Development
Overlay
9/15/2015
City of Lino Lakes
,_ aim �� �_ lins IIIMiii iftliliiigurc
c 1
nei1 ,wed Fr IS! nail
bw in* ream
mom in yin el II Iii ilr‘m minium
Mr ri mum is r
%4U:ttEti 4) T
`LCs Pei tiii:::j!
�- my: .. ■n . uu inimsa um
Community Development
600 Twon Center Parkway ��
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 5501't
"If an
mil Mg atigqin
JJpE vall
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Lino
CCES
Phone (651) 982-2400
Suitabilit
'■::I M
ll�Wien
al
UMW-
il�i►
MSS a�
AIL
iffirl
■■■ sti';"amUP a
Ira
Lakes Business Park DWSMA Vulnerability
Lino lakes Business park Site
Model3_Floodplain
<all other values>
Highly Suitable
Marginally Suitable
Moderately Suitable
Not Suitable
N
Feet
4,650
0 1,550 3,100
Maps are for illustrative purposes only. Recent changes may not be included. Land Use and Zoning Information should be verified with City Staff.
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka US Feet
WSB
Building a legacy— your legacy.
Memorandum
To: Katie Larsen, City Planner
Froin: Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer
Date: June 23, 2016
Re: Clearwater Creek Business Park
Plan Review for AUAR Conformance
WSB Project No. 2029-820
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
We have reviewed the plans for Clearwater Creek Business Park in Lino Lakes, MN prepared by
Plowe Engineering, Inc. received on June 17, 2016 for conformance with the AUAR.
For reference please see notes on the Mitigation checklist enclosed, along with the following
comments.
FISH, WILDLIFE ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE RESOURCES
1. AUAR Mitigation Item 11.1. The AUAR highlights this area as part of the Conservation
Design Framework (CDF) with a future greenway corridor and trail from Cedar Street
north through the property. Clearwater creek is located within the parcel and a 100 foot
buffer is required per the mitigation plan. The plans indicate less than 60 feet within the
proposed conservation easement adjacent to the creek. It is unclear if this conservation
easement is representative of the creek buffer, and if so it is inadequate.
2. AUAR Mitigation Item 11.8. The AUAR requires an eagle nest survey. At the time of
the AUAR update (June 2015); the DNR did not have records of any eagle nests within 1
mile of the project area. There are not many trees on the site, but those that are present
are primarily adjacent to Clearwater creek. The presence of an eagle's nest seems
unlikely, but city environmental staff should confirm.
3. AUAR Mitigation Item 11.10. The AUAR requires a rare plant survey to be completed
in wetlands and other designated areas. There are wetlands present within the
development area. Has the developer completed a rare plant survey yet?
4. AUAR Mitigation Item 11.12. The AUAR requires that the CDF include consideration
of, among other things, protection of ecologically significant natural resources from
adjacent land uses by implementing buffering. Clearwater creek bisects the development
parcel, and per the AUAR requires a 100 foot buffer. The plans indicate less than 60 feet
within the proposed conservation easement adjacent to the creek. It is unclear if this
conservation easement is representative of the creek buffer, and if so it is inadequate.
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com
S:\Community Development\Projects\Planning Cases \ Clearwater Creek Business Park (United Properties Distribution»Staff Reports\20160629 EB SR Clearwater Creek Business Park\12. 20160623 Engineering Review Lino Lakes-
CCBP.doex
Ms. Katie Larsen
June 23, 2016
Page 2
WATER RESOURCES: WETLANDS
1. AUAR Mitigation Section 12.1. Wetlands exist within the development area and
confirmation of boundary approval by the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Local
Government Unit (LGU) should be obtained.
2. AUAR Mitigation Sections 12.2 — 12.6. The project proposes 0.36 acres of wetland fill.
An application has been prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services. The application
will need to be reviewed and approved by the WCA LGU and US Army Corps of
Engineers (ACOE). The application should include sequencing measures and a
replacement plan and will also need to conform to the wetland alteration requirements set
forth by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD).
3. AUAR Mitigation Section 12.7. Clearwater creek is not proposed to be impacted.
WATER USE
1. AUAR Mitigation Section 13.5. The AUAR requires that abandoned private wells be
sealed in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) regulation. There are
no known wells on the property, but if any undocumented wells are encountered they
should be sealed in compliance with MDH regulations.
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
The plans submitted June 17, 2016 do not include erosion or sediment control plans. The grading
plans and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were reviewed for compliance with
the AUAR.
1. AUAR Mitigation Section 16.1. Project proposers are required to obtain a NPDES/SDS
General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity from the MPCA prior to initiating
earthwork. This permit should be obtained and filed with the city prior to construction.
2. AUAR Mitigation Section 16.2. Project proposers are required to meet the erosion and
sediment control regulations in all applicable regulations, ordinances, and rules of the city
and MPCA and RCWD. A SWPPP has been prepared for the project. A sediment and
erosion control plan should also be prepared and reviewed by the applicable regulatory
agencies for compliance with rules.
3. AUAR Mitigation Section 16.3. Project proposers are required to minimize runoff,
improve the quality of runoff, and provide erosion control through BMPs and other low
impact development techniques. The SWPPP provided with the plans outlines various
BMPs, but specific use of BMPs should be shown on an erosion and sediment control
plan.
4. AUAR Mitigation Section 16.4. Project proposers are required to provide construction
oversight to ensure designed sediment and erosion control measures are being
implemented. The SWPPP indicates that an individual has not yet been identified to
provide this oversight. The individual(s) providing this oversight should be identified and
contact information provided in the SWPPP.
5. AUAR Mitigation Section 16.5. This section requires the implementation of the CDF.
The AUAR highlights this area as part of the Conservation Design Framework (CDF)
with a future greenway corridor and trail from Cedar Street north through the property.
Clearwater creek is located within the parcel and a 100 foot buffer is required per the
S:\Community Development\ Projects\ Planning Cases \Clearwater Creek Business Park (United Properties Distribution) \Staff Reports \ 20160629 EB SR Clearwate
Ms. Katie Larsen
June 23, 2016
Page 3
mitigation plan. Clearwater creek also bisects the development parcel. The plans indicate
less than 60 feet within the proposed conservation easement adjacent to the creek. It is
unclear if this conservation easement area is representative of the creek buffer, and if so it
is inadequate.
WATER QUALITY: SURFACE WATER RUNOFF
1. AUAR Mitigation Section 17.3. The AUAR requires stormwater management systems to
be developed in accordance with the current version of the Rice Creek Watershed District
Rules. This area has been identified as a Runoff Sensitive Area for rate and volume of
stormwater runoff and applicant should seek to maintain proposed runoff volumes within
20% of existing conditions runoff volumes. In addition, infiltration is not feasible due to
high seasonal groundwater, NURP ponding will be provided to treat runoff.
WATER QUALITY: WASTEWATER
1. AUAR Mitigation Section 18.5. Each proposed development is required to provide a
detailed projection of wastewater generation and flows. This has been reviewed by the
city engineer and is in compliance with the mitigation measures.
SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
1. AUAR Mitigation Section 19.2. While contaminated materials are not expected within
the development area, if any are discovered during construction the applicant should
follow state laws and report the information to the MPCA for further investigation and, if
necessary, remediation.
TRANSPORTATION
The applicant needs to submit an updated Traffic Impact Study, and evaluate the impacts from
the site assuming no connections to 20th Ave. or Cedar St. that were assumed in the AUAR.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
1. AUAR Mitigation Section 25.1. Is the development area within an area with high
potential for archeological sites? If so, has an archeological survey been completed?
COMPATIBILITY WITH PLANS
1. AUAR Mitigation Section 27.1. The plan for a business park fits within the three
development scenarios outlined by the AUAR and the current zoning for the area
(General Business).
PERMITS
The following permits and approvals may be required prior to construction:
1. ACOE Section 404 Permit
2. MPCA Section 401 Permit
S:\Community Development\ Projects\ Planning Cases \Clearwater Creek Business Park (United Properties Distribution) \Staff Reports \ 20160629 EB SR Clearwate
Ms. Katie Larsen
June 23, 2016
Page 4
3. State Historic Preservation Office Cultural Resources Review
4. MDH Watermain Extension Permit
5. MDH Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
6. Rice Creek Watershed Wetland Boundary Confirmation
7. Sanitary Sewer Service Connection Approval
8. City of Lino Lakes Approval
a. Site Plan
b. Grading, Excavation, and Foundation Permits
c. Building Permits
d. Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit
e. Municipal Water Connection Permit
f. Use Permit — Floodplain District
g. City Roadway Access/Crossing Permit
9. FEMA Letter of Map Revision
10. NPDES Construction General Permit
11. Rice Creek Watershed Permit
a. Rule C: Stormwater Management
b. Rule D: Erosion and Sediment Control
c. Rule E: Floodplain Alteration
d. Rule F: Wetland Alteration
If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane
Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or diane.hankee@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us.
S:\Community Development\ Projects\ Planning Cases \Clearwater Creek Business Park (United Properties Distribution) \Staff Reports \ 20160629 EB SR Clearwate
MITIGATION PLAN
The AUAR Mitigation Plan is outlined below. If mitigation items have been revised or updated, they are noted as such below.
ITEM 8. PERMITS AND APPROVALS REQUIRED
As projects are proposed, the project proposer will be required to obtain permits and approvals. Projects proposed since the original AUAR
have obtained proper approvals. Additional permits that may not be listed here may also be required.
Unit of Government
Type of Application Status
Federal
Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To be Applied for
Letter of No Wetland Jurisdiction To be Applied for
Federal Highway Administration
Interchange Access Request To be Applied for
State
Completed 2005
Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Assessment (AUAR) Updated 2010
Updated 2015
Minnesota Board of Soil and Water Resources Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Approval To be Applied for
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Section 401 Water Quality Certificate To be Applied for
NPDES/SDS General Permit To be Applied for
Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be Applied for
State Historic Preservation Office
Cultural Resources Review To be Applied for
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources
Storm Sewer Discharge Permit To be Applied for
Water Appropriations Permit To be Applied for
Public Waters Work Permit To be Applied for
1 Mitigation Plan Update - 2015 June 3, 2015
Unit of Government Type of Application Status
General Permit 97-0005 for Temporary
Water Appropriations (need if more than
10,000 gpd of water is appropriated
To be applied for,
if necessary
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Use of or Work within MnDOT right of way
Drainage Permit
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
Minnesota Department of Health
Watermain Extension Approval
Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Approval
Well Location and Construction Approval
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
Regional
Rice Creek Watershed District
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Approval
Stormwater Management Plan Approval
Wetland Delineation Boundary Confirmation
Drainage Authority Review and Approval —
Mn. Stat. Section 103E.227 (impoundments
& diversion) and/or Mn. Stat. Section
103E.805 (abandonment proceedings)
Certificate of Wetland Exemption
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be applied for
upon completion
of wetland
delineation
To be applied for
To be Applied for
Metropolitan Council
Sanitary Sewer Service Connection Approval To be Applied for
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review To be Applied for
County
Anoka County
County Roadway Access Permits
Roadway Plan Approval on County Roads
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
2
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
Unit of Government Type of Application Status
Local
City of Lino Lakes
Site Plan Approval
AUAR and Mitigation Plan Approval
Planned Unit Development Approval
Preliminary Plat Approval
Final Plat (multiple) Approval
Grading, Excavation and Foundation Permits
(multiple)
Building Permits (multiple)
Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit (multiple)
Municipal Water Connection Permit
(multiple)
Use Permit — Floodplain District
City Roadway Access/Crossing Permits
Comprehensive Plan Amendment(s)
To be Applied for
Adopted
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
To be Applied for
3
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
ITEM 11. FISH, WILDLIFE, ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE RESOURCES
Item
No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
11.1
Implement the Conservation Design Framework (CDF, see
Figure 10-3), which includes conservation of "Core" and
"Outlier" habitat areas, buffering these natural resources,
and establishing greenway corridors throughout the AUAR
area to provide connectivity for ecological and wildlife
corridors, regional stormwater collection and conveyance,
and passive recreational opportunities
This mitigation measure is ongoing
Has the CDF been implemented
for this area? The AUAR
highlights this area as part of the
Conservation Design Framework
with a future greenway corridor
and trail from Cedar Street north
through the property.
Has a 100' buffer been provided
adjacent to Clearwater Creek?
Plans indicate <60' within the
proposed conservation easement
(unsure if this is representative of
a buffer area or not).
11.2
Add the "Core" and "Outlier" habitat areas to the City's
Parks, Natural Open Space/Greenways, and Trail System
Plan map.
This has been added to Fig 2-9 in
the Comprehensive Plan.
N/A
11.3
Require public land dedication of priority natural open
space areas through the subdivision process.
This mitigation measure is ongoing
N/A
11.4
Require that cash in lieu of public land dedication for
subdivisions within the AUAR area be spent within the
AUAR area to purchase, restore, and/or maintain priority
natural open space areas.
This mitigation measure is ongoing
N/A
11.5
Consider provisions for conserving "Other" habitat areas
(see Figure 10-2) during the development review process.
This mitigation measure is ongoing
N/A
4
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
1 1.6
Establish mechanisms for ecological restoration,
management, stewardship, and education.
This mitigation measure is ongoing
and implemented through the
Comprehensive Wetland Protection
and Management Plan
N/A
11.7
Provide for turtle and other wildlife passage by continuing
to require surmountable curbing in new residential
developments and encouraging ecologically sensitive site
design.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
Residential developments that have
occurred within the study area have
all incorporated surmountable
curbs.
N/A
11.8
Consult with the DNR and/or US Fish and Wildlife
Service to determine appropriate mitigation strategies for
activities near the Bald Eagle's nests within the AUAR
area before development occurs within the vicinity of the
nests, including reviewing recommended disturbance limit
guidelines developed by the DNR.
This mitigation measure is ongoing
Documented eagles were not
within a mile of this location at
the time of the AUAR update.
Few trees are present within the
site, but those that are present are
primarily adjacent to Clearwater
creek. The presence of eagle
nests seems unlikely. City staff
should confirm.
11.9
Continue to enforce the Peltier Lake No -Wake Zone
ordinance and establish buffers to protect the Peltier Lake
Heron Rookery.
This mitigation measure is ongoing
N/A
11.9A
Added
The City will limit development within 300 meters of the
edge of a heron colony and not allow disturbance in or near
colonies from March to August
Measure was included in original
AUAR within the text.
N/A
11.10
Require rare plant surveys, by qualified personnel, prior to
development in wetland areas and of areas of banded soils
between muck soils and adjacent Isanti, Soderville, or
Zimmerman soil map units. These surveys shall be
conducted by qualified professionals at an appropriate time
of year to identify the rare plants.
This mitigation measure is ongoing
Have these surveys been
performed for wetland areas yet?
5
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
1 1.1 1
Encourage ecologically sensitive design and construction
practices for the proposed northerly bypass that would
connect I-35W and I-35E.
This mitigation measure is ongoing
N/A
11.12
Added
Implement the Conservation Design Framework (CDF) of
the AUAR (Figure 10-3 and 10-2). The CDF includes
consideration of:
• Conservation of the most ecologically significant
natural resources within the AUAR area (in
particular, the "Core" and "Outlier" habitats as
shown in Figure 10-2 of the original AUAR).
• Protection of ecologically significant natural
resources from adjacent land uses by implementing
buffering.
• Connection of ecologically significant natural
resources via multi -functional greenway corridors.
Measure was included in original
AUAR within the text.
Has the CDF been implemented
for this area?
Has a 100' buffer been provided
adjacent to Clearwater Creek?
Plans indicate <60' within the
proposed conservation easement
(unsure if this is representative of
a buffer area or not).
6 Mitigation Plan Update - 2015 June 3, 2015
ITEM 12. WATER RESOURCES: WETLANDS
Item
No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
12.1
Delineate wetlands in accordance with the Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and classify
wetlands according to Wetlands of the United States
(Circular 39) and Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the
United States.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
Are wetland boundaries approved
yet? RCWD is LGU.
12.2
Follow sequencing process of wetland avoidance,
minimization, rectification, and mitigation as outlined in the
Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) if wetlands area altered.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
Per note on Page C1.3 of plans,
refer to wetland permit
application has been prepared by
Kj olhaug Environmental
Services.
12.3
Apply for applicable wetland permits to obtain authorization
for wetland alterations under WCA and Section 404 prior to
project construction if development activities will impact a
jurisdictional wetland.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
Per note on Page C1.3 of plans,
refer to wetland permit
application has been prepared by
Kjolhaug Environmental
Services. Have they applied yet?
12.4
Mitigate areas of wetland impacts according to the
requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
Per note on Page C1.3 of plans,
refer to wetland permit
application has been prepared by
Kj olhaug Environmental
Services.
12.5
Submit wetland permit applications and replacement plans,
as appropriate, to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil
Resources, Rice Creek Watershed District, and the City of
Lino Lakes.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
Per note on Page C1.3 of plans,
refer to wetland permit
application has been prepared by
Kjolhaug Environmental
Services.
7
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
12.6
Follow the requirements for wetland alterations delineated
by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD).
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
Per note on Page C 1.3 of plans,
refer to wetland permit
application has been prepared by
Kj olhaug Environmental
Services.
12.7
Minimize or avoid totally any filling of public waters
This mitigation measure is
There are no DNR public waters
through careful design.
ongoing
on the property. Clearwater Creek
is not proposed to be impacted.
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015 June 3, 2015
ITEM 13. WATER USE
Item
No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
13.1
Monitor water usage and do not permit new development to
proceed if it exceeds the capacity of the water supply and
distribution system.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A
13.2
Construct the water supply and distribution system in
accordance with Minnesota Department of Health standards
and with the goals, policies, and recommendations set forth
in the city's Comprehensive Water System Plan.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A
13.3
As necessary, amend the city's Comprehensive Water
System Plan and Capital Improvement Plan to be consistent
with any future amendments or updates to the
Comprehensive Plan that would necessitate expansions or
alterations to the water system.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing. No updates have been
needed to date for the study area.
N/A
13.4
Prepare a Wellhead Protection Plan amendment for new
wells and follow the adopted wellhead protection plans for
Lino Lakes and Centerville.
The City has completed their well
head protection plan in March of
2016 and is implementing the
plan. The City of Centerville is in
the process of preparing their
WHP.
N/A
13.5
Require abandoned private wells to be sealed in compliance
with the Minnesota Department of Health regulations
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
There are no known wells on the
property. If any undocumented
wells are encountered they should
be sealed in compliance with the
MDH regulations.
13.6
Require that the installation of any private individual wells
be constructed and installed in accordance with the
Minnesota Department of Health regulations (Minnesota
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A
9
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
Well Code).
13.7
Continue to implement the City's adopted water
conservation policies which are intended to attenuate peak
water demands throughout the City.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A
13.8
Mitigation will be regulated through the city's development
Measure was included in original
The City is active with NE metro
Added
approval and permitting process. Proposed master
development plans, planned unit development and
subdivision applications, plats, and/or site plans must
address relevant water conservation mitigation measures
prior to final approval by the city. Implementation of
mitigation measures will be assured through developer
agreements with the city, which will require a financial
security for land and infrastructure improvements and/or
revoke the right to acquire building permits and/or
certificates of occupancy until all relevant mitigation
measures have been addressed.
AUAR within the text.
water conservation and uses
mitigation measures as feasible
with development.
ITEM 15. WATER SURFACE USE
Item
No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
15.1
Consider restricting individual lake access and dock
construction along public and private shorelands by
encouraging the use of clustered access and dock facilities.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A
ITEM 16. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
Item
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
No.
10
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
16.1
Require project proposers to acquire NPDES/SDS General
Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity from the
MPCA prior to initiating earthwork.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
SWPPP has been prepared;
require copy of NPDES permit
prior to initiating construction.
16.2
Require project proposers to meet the erosion and sediment
control regulations in all applicable regulations, ordinances
and rules of the city and MPCA, and Rice Creek Watershed
District.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
SWPPP has been prepared;
require copy of NPDES permit
prior to initiating construction.
16.3
Require project proposers to minimize runoff, improve the
quality of runoff, and provide erosion control through BMPs
and other low impact development techniques.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
SWPPP outlines BMPs. BMPs
should be shown on an erosion
and sediment control plan as well.
16.4
Provide construction oversight to ensure designed sediment
and erosion control measures are being implemented.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
SWPPP does not identify this yet.
16.5
Implement the Conservation Design Framework (CDF,
Figure 10-3).
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
The AUAR highlights this area as
part of the Conservation Design
Framework with a future
greenway corridor and trail from
Cedar Street north through the
property.
Verify if 100 foot buffer is being
provided adjacent to Clearwater
creek.
ITEM 17. WATER QUALITY: SURFACE WATER RUNOFF
Item No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
17.1
DELETED
Work to
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
this mitigation measure.
N/A
with project proposers establish a regional
the Conservation
stormwater management system within
Design Framework Figure 10 3) that
(CDF, see consists of
ics,-anir` •,cresnds-o ie
vegetatey Pet a etl ite
11
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
volume, and enhance water quality.
17.2
DELETED
Work to disperse
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
this mitigation measure.
N/A
with project proposers collection,
conveyance, and management of stormwater runoff as
throughout the AUAR through the
much as possible site
bio infiltration
use of swales, rain gardens, and areas.
17.3
Require stormwater management systems to be developed
in accordance with the current version of the Rice Creek
Watershed District Rules. These rules assist in achieving
the goals of the Resource Management Plan — 3 that was
added into the AUAR Update 2005.
Updated to be inclusive of the
current version of the rules.
The RCWD rules are intended to
meet the goals of the Resource
Management Plan-3 that was
included in the 2010 AUAR
Update.
The area has been identified as a
Runoff Sensitive Area for rate
and volume of stormwater runoff
and applicant should seek to
maintain proposed runoff
volumes within 20% of existing
conditions runoff volumes.
Infiltration not feasible due to
high seasonal groundwater,
NURP ponding will be provided
to treat runoff
17.4
DELETED
Require to design
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
this mitigation measure.
N/A
project proposers stormwater
to
management areas (SMAs) support native vegetation
below development
and maintain runoff rates at or pre
conditions.
17.5 -
DELETED
Require to design
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
this mitigation measure.
N/A
project proposers stormwater
that
management systems can achieve proposed conditions
that less than 80%
runoff volumes are no and no greater
than 150%
of existing conditions runoff volumes.
17.6
DELETED
Encourage to techniques that
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
N/A
project proposers use
increases in total
produce no net phosphorus content of
12
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
to
this mitigation measure.
proposed conditions runoff relative existing conditions
runoff.
17.7
DELETED
Require to detailed topographic
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
this mitigation measure.
N/A
project proposers provide
information interval 1 foot drain tile
with a contour of and
mapping.
17.8
DELETED
Require to disperse from
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
this mitigation measure.
N/A
project proposers outflow
facilities to
t;tormwater management prevent erosion and
failure s,ructurec Make to sim„late sheet
of outlet attempts
flow these locations to flows.
at as opposed concentrated
17.9
DELETED
Require to development
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
this mitigation measure.
N/A
project proposers use conservation
design low impact development techniques,
and/or and
techniques.
ecological stormwatcr management
17.10
DELETED
Require to limit the
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
this mitigation measure.
N/A
project proposers amount and
impervious direct
connectedness of surfaces and runoff
into laic
vegetated
and other infiltration.
17.11
DELETED
Require to
This measure has been removed
as the RCWD rules supersede
this mitigation measure.
N/A
project proposers use stormwater management
techniques that infiltration
encourage of stormwater runoff
to
and groundwater recharge, whenever possible,
the infiltration the
maximize potential of site.
13
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
ITEM 18. WATER QUALITY: WASTEWATER
Item
No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
18.1
Monitor wastewater flows and not permit new development
to proceed if it exceeds the capacity of the wastewater
system.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A
18.2
Construct the major infrastructure improvements needed to
expand the capacity of the wastewater system (i.e. lift
stations, forcemains, and upgrades to the existing systems)
in accordance with the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
and Capital Improvement Plan.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A
18.3
Adequately phase capacity improvements.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A
18.4
Amend the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan and Capital
Improvement Plan to be consistent with any amendments to
the Comprehensive Plan that would necessitate expansions
or alterations to the sanitary sewer system and regional
capacity needs.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing. No updates have been
needed to date for the study area.
N/A
18.5
Added
Each proposed development will be required to provide a
detailed projection of wastewater generation and flows.
These calculations will be checked by the City's
Engineering Consultant.
Measure was included in original
AUAR within the text.
This has been reviewed and is in
compliance.
18.6
Added
The City will create a year-end report to evaluate
wastewater increases by major sewer lines and overall
system usage in relation to capacity. Results of this
assessment will become the targets for growth for the
following year.
Measure was included in original
AUAR within the text.
N/A
14
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
ITEM 19. SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
Item
No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
19.1
Require the removal of all tanks and associated
underground piping in accordance with applicable state and
federal laws.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
No Tanks identified by MPCA
WIMN per AUAR map.
19.2
Require that any party that may discover residual petroleum
contamination shall follow state law and report the
information to the MPCA for further investigation and
potential remediation.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
If any are discovered during
construction they should be
reported to MPCA.
ITEM 21. TRANSPORTATION
Item
No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
21.1
Create a monitoring program that closely evaluates traffic
impacts from proposed developments within the AUAR
area.
Traffic Impact Studies are
required for proposed
developments showing the impact
on the transportation system and
consistency with the AUAR.
Developer needs to submit an
updated Traffic Impact Study, and
evaluate the impacts from the site
assuming no connections to 20th
Ave or Cedar St. that were
assumed in the AUAR.
21.2
Implement traffic mitigation measures as development
occurs within the AUAR area. Specific mitigation
measures for the three development scenarios are discussed
in Item 21 and depicted on Figures 21-8, 21-9, and 21-10.
These mitigation measures improve overall traffic
operations for the respective development scenarios. The
improvements are intended to represent the minimum level
of infrastructure investment that would be needed to meet
CSAH 14 improvement was
completed in 2009 and noted in
the 2010 AUAR Update
CSAH 54 (formerly CSAH 21)
20th Avenue North intersection
improvements were completed
and noted in the 2010 AUAR
15
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
acceptable level of service standards. Additional roadway
and non -motorized improvements, beyond the minimum
level, may be identified to accommodate specific
development needs that are identified within the AUAR
area." Primary improvements, regardless of land use
scenario, include:
21.2.1 Develop frontage road system in compliance
with local, county and state access management
guidelines to serve local and regional traffic.
21.2.2 Work with appropriate road authorities to
reconstruct and provide additional capacity for
CSAH 21.
21.2.3 Work with appropriate road authorities to
construct Northerly Bypass with new
interchanges at I-35W and I-35E (80th Street
East) to improve traffic operations and
access to and within the AUAR area. As
recommended by FHWA and Mn/DOT, a
phasing plan should be established to
construct each piece of the Northerly
Connector as it becomes necessary to
maintain the serviceability of the
transportation system.1
Phase Improvement
Update.
I-35E Interchange reconstruction
was completed in 2011. This
mitigation measure is complete.
1. CSAH 14, I-35W to I-35E (funded
and programmed for construction)
2. CSAH 14, I-35E Interchange
3. CR 140 (80th Street )/I-35E
1 CSAH 14 Alternative Analysis Report — July, 2004, SRF Consulting Group,
16
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
Interchange
4. CSAH 14 across Peltier Lake
(Northerly Bypass/Connector)
5. CSAH 14/I-35W Interchange
As part of these improvements, the following
steps should be taken as the opportunity is
presented:
• Inclusion of the northerly bypass and
proposed interchanges in future
transportation and comprehensive plans
• Preservation of right of way through
official mapping or other process
• Right of way dedication through the
platting process
21.3
Require a traffic impact analysis for all development
projects within the AUAR area. The traffic impact analysis
will assist the City and other road authorities in determining
the appropriate mitigation measures that are required to
mitigate impacts of a specific development proposal.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A21.4
Work with appropriate road authorities to mitigate the
impact of the additional traffic on the on the regional
system, specifically Interstates 35W and 35E, by
reconstructing each to provide a six -lane cross-section
consistent with the recommendations outlined in the I-35
IRC. It should be noted that it was determined that an
expansion will be necessary even without the development
scenarios used in this analysis. As the interstates serve a
much larger area, the projected growth of the entire Twin
Cities region should warrant expansion by the year 2030.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
17
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
21.5
Prioritize alternative travel modes within the AUAR study
area and require project proposers to address alternative
travel modes (e.g., buses, bicyclists, and pedestrians) by
identifying appropriate accommodations.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing.
21.6
Consider the need for additional infrastructure
improvements (see item #21.2) in future updates or
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Submit the plan
update to the appropriate agencies (i.e., FHWA, MnDOT,
Met Council, etc.).
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
21.7
Require project proposers to follow all appropriate
guidelines and policies related to traffic nose and noise
walls.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
21.8
Require that site plans for each of the developments include
measures such as appropriate setback distances, earthen
berms, noise walls, and appropriate site design to reduce the
impact of traffic noise to residential areas.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
21.9
Continue to require the implementation of the conditions of
approval for the Eagle Brook Church relating to mitigating
traffic impacts.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing.
21.10
Achieve effective traffic operations within the city by
requiring that site plans make use of access management
practices to promote safe, effective traffic flow.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
21.11
Require project proposers to follow the Anoka County
Highway Department Development Review Process Manual
(updated June 2013.)
This mitigation measure is
ongoing and has been updated to
reflect the newest manual.
21.12
Continue to coordinate capital improvement programming
with applicable transportation authorities.
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
ITEM 25. CULTURAL RESOURCES
18
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
Item
No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
25.1
Consult the map that shows areas with a high potential for
archaeological sites when development applications are
submitted for review. Given the sensitive nature of this
information, this map cannot be included in the AUAR
document, nor can it be made available to the public. If a
development application falls within an area that is
considered to have a high potential for archaeological sites,
the city will require that the following steps and procedures
involved in the identification and analysis of any
archaeological sites is followed prior to development:
■ Conduct a Phase I archaeological survey within
the area of potential effect (APE). The objective
of the archaeological fieldwork is to determine if
there are archaeological sites in the areas
identified as having high potential for such, and
define the extent of those sites that may be
impacted by development plans.
■ Conduct a Phase II archaeological survey. If
archaeological resources are uncovered within
the APE that may be eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) a
Phase II survey should be conducted. The
objective of the investigation is to determine
whether archaeological resources are eligible for
listing on the NRHP.
■ Plan for avoidance or conduct Phase III data
recovery. If a significant archaeological site is
This mitigation measure is
ongoing.
Historic/Architectural Sites are
present in Section 24, Township
31N, Range 22 W, but appear to
be located outside of the project
area.
Is this project within high
potential area?
19
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
identified that will be impacted by development,
avoidance is recommended. If this is not
possible, then a data recovery of the site should
occur.
■
If human remains are recovered at any time
during archaeological investigation or
development, all activities must stop and
consultation initiated with the Office of the State
Archaeologist and Minnesota Indian Affairs
Council.
ITEM 25. UNIQUE FARMLANDS
Item
No.
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
25.2
Consider preservation of agricultural heritage sites by
implementing thoughtful interpretive planning As
This mitigation measure is
ongoing.
N/A
development plans for the two Century Farms come to
fruition, the City can encourage landscaping and other
amenities that reflect the agricultural heritage of this city. In
addition, the City can continue to reflect the agricultural
heritage of the community in public buildings and gathering
places (for example, City Hall reflects elements of the
community's agricultural heritage).
ITEM 27. COMPATIBILITY WITH PLANS
Item
Mitigation Description
Update
Plan Review
No.
20
Mitigation Plan Update - 2015
June 3, 2015
27.1
Use the information contained in the AUAR during future
The City has completed the 2030
Proposed Business Park fits
considerations of updates or amendments to the adopted
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Any future
consideration of amendments or updates to the
Comprehensive Plan amendment
within all 3 scenarios outlined by
the AUAR and the current zoning
for the area.
Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances would follow the
city's set procedures and guidelines for such amendments.
27.2
Require that tools such as clustering, buffering, and/or
screening be incorporated into future development plans to
mitigate potential land use conflicts
This mitigation measure is
ongoing
N/A
21 Mitigation Plan Update - 2015 June 3, 2015
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 5B
Marty Asleson, Environmental Coordinator
June 29, 2016
Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review/St Clair
Estates
St. Clair Land Company
Attn: Jamie Jensen
1517 Dawn Circle
Arden Hills, MN 55112
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The applicant has submitted a land use application for Preliminary Plat and Variance.
The proposed development is a 35 lot single family residential subdivision located north
of CSAH 34/Birch Street and east of Hokah Drive. The development contains one 30.47
gross acre parcel and is called as St Clair Estates.
ANALYSIS
Existing Site Conditions
The 30 acre site is bordered by the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve on
the north, Rice Lake Elementary School on the east, single family homes and CSAH
44/Birch Street on the south and a residential subdivision to the west. The site consists of
grasslands, woodlands and wetlands and is in the Anoka sandplain. Elevations range
from 880 feet (wetland area) to 900 feet. A stormwater management pond for CSAH 34
owned by Anoka County and maintained by the City is located on PID #29-31-22-32-
0004 (473 Birch Street) and drains east into an open ditch. Soil borings indicated sandy
and silty materials. Soils are classified as a hydrologic group and not hydric that signifies
the soils are suitable for infiltration.
Shenandoah 3rd Addition along Hokah Drive was platted in 1979 with 48 single family
lots. Hokah Drive existed as a long cul-de-sac until 2012 when Sioux Lane was extended
to the west. Hokah Drive was reconstructed in 2015.
Spirit Hills along Sioux Lane was platted in 2001 with 51 single family lots and the retail
center.
1
The City and County undertook an extensive reconstruction project of the intersection at
Ware Road and Birch Street and installed traffic signals to address traffic issues. The
intersection of Hodgson Road and Birch Street is also signalized.
The Resource Management System Plan identifies the following needs in the area:
• Proposed designated bike route
• Existing Trails
• Greenway system connectivity
A separate, at -grade, bituminous trail exists along the north and south side of CSAH
34/Birch Street and is a designated bike route and regional trail. The existing trail
provides pedestrian connectivity to the Rice Lake Elementary School, Rice Creek Chain
of Lakes Regional Park and Sprit Hill Center, a multi -tenant retail center. A new trail
will be constructed off the end of the cul-de-sac south to Birch Street to provide addition
connectively.
The greenway corridor extends north -south incorporating the wetland and floodplain
areas. This corridor will be preserved with a conservation easement.
The Resource Management System Plan identifies the following needs in the area:
• Proposed designated bike route
• Existing Trails
• Greenway system connectivity
A separate, at -grade, bituminous trail exists along the north and south side of CSAH
34/Birch Street and is a designated bike route and regional trail. The existing trail
provides pedestrian connectivity to the Rice Lake Elementary School, Rice Creek Chain
of Lakes Regional Park and Sprit Hill Center, a multi -tenant retail center. A new trail
will be constructed off the end of the cul-de-sac south to Birch Street to provide addition
connectively.
The greenway corridor extends north -south incorporating the wetland and floodplain
areas. This corridor will be preserved with a conservation easement.
Soils
Soils in the proposed St Clair Estates location are Zimmerman Sand on the west side of
the project where the road and housing pads are located. Most of the proposed ponds and
infiltration areas are located within this Zimmerman soil profile. The Zimmerman soils
on this site have a deep profile and has plenty of separation from the water table making
it ideal for infiltration and safe in the DWSMA area. On the East side of the project there
are some Lake Beach and Muck soils that enter in to the buffer area, and a bit where the
2
proposed middle pond is located. The pond should be designed for the separation needed
from the water table, and/or lined.
Land Cover
The MLCCS Land Cover for St Clair classifies the majority of the St Clair site as it has
Cultivated herbaceous vegetation, and some seasonally flooded altered/non-native
dominated emergent vegetation on the east side. There is a grouping of trees in the center
of the project, and trees on the boarder of the west and south boundaries.
Significant Resources
With each additional subdivision review in the City, additional natural resources and rare
features data are being documented, refined, and collected as part of local, state, and
federal environmental review requirements and environmental regulatory programs.
Environmental review of proposed subdivisions has resulted in the discovery and
documentation of additional high quality natural community remnants and additional rare
feature records (rare plant communities, state -listed plant and animal populations) that
were not able to be accessed or documented during previous county -wide or city-wide
surveys and inventories. Many of these new discoveries are a direct result of the City's
Conservation Development policies and processes. Significant natural resources data that
result from environmental reviews of proposed subdivisions and developments are
incorporated into local and state databases and plans, and are used to help guide land
development to help avoid, preserve, and enhance rare, sensitive, or otherwise important
natural features within the City and to incorporate natural areas into contiguous city-wide
greenway corridor systems.
St Clair Estates has the soil and floodplain features of an area on the south and east side
of the large wetland know as wetland 1. Rare plants were found in the beach
sand/floodplain overlap areas south and east of the school. Similar profiles exist on the
east edge of this development. Since this area is a buffer area, and will be under
conservation easement, plants will be protected on the closest edge to wetland 1.
Disturbance to the buffer area for stormwater modifications should have the organic soils
(top soil) stockpiled and replaced as close as possible to the original site removal. Seed
bank for native plants will be viable in this soil and can be re -applied to the buffer. Areas
immediately east of any storm water modifications, must be protected from any
disturbance by fence.
Blanding's Turtle activity area is shown in the Lino Lakes Blanding's Turtle Modal on
the St Clair Estates site. Recommend installing surmountable curb in the project to
eliminate a road barrier to the Blanding's Turtle. Blanding's Turtle will travel a fairly
large distance to lays eggs and always lay eggs in sandy areas. The green way proposed
in the wetland preservation corridor should be a good nesting area for the Turtles, but if
they decide to go further west, they could do that with street barriers eliminated.
Surface Water/Storm Water
3
Per the Site Design Narrative and Storm Water Calculation report, the existing site is
mostly undeveloped open field with minimal tree coverage. Soil borings generally
indicate sandy materials (fine-grained sand — SP; fine-grained sand with silt — SP-SM)
with some silty materials (silty fine sand — SM). The majority of the site drains east and
north to Rice Lake.
Three NURP ponds and one infiltration basin are proposed to manage stormwater.
The proposed infiltration basin located in the "boulevard loop" shall be eliminated or
shall be HOA maintained.
Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide are provided along all lot
lines. Drainage and utility easements shall also be dedicated 10 feet above the high water
level over stormwater drainage ponds. Drainage and utility easements are also shown as
being dedicated over stormwater management out -lots.
Conservation Easement
Conservation easements shall be dedicated over the wetland management corridor. The
conservation easement must name the city and the watershed district as easement holders.
Signs that are acceptable to the RCWD and the City of Lino Lakes must be placed on the
lot boundaries to the Conservation Easement area stating no encroachment allowed.
Tree Preservation
The goal of tree preservation is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity and
forest resource and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical.
The Tree Inventory identifies the basic use area (BUA), Environmentally Sensitive Areas
(ESA) and trees proposed for removal. According to the plan, there are 104 total trees
being removed within the BUA, 0 trees being removed outside the BUA and 15 new trees
required for replacement. These 15 replacements trees will be satisfied through open
space area landscaping requirements.
All bordering trees on properties next to the project must be fenced off with orange fence
to ensure there is no impacts to private trees on bordering properties.
Landscaping
Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per lot frontage for single family
and two family lots. Thirty-eight (38) boulevard trees are proposed which is compliant
with the ordinance.
Open areas are being landscaped with 33 trees and 99 shrubs as required by Section
1007.043(16). Landscape screening and buffers are not required.
4
Pond area seed mix in their landscape plan is indicated as MNDOT mix 33-641. There is
no such seed mix that I could find. The developer must submit a native seed mix that is
acceptable to the City.
All trees planted in pond areas with a native seed mix must be tolerant of fire. Fire is a
tool used to maintain healthy native plant communities. This basically limits the species
to Oak.
The developer should submit a substitution for Fall Fiesta Sugar Maple. Fall Fiesta is a
good urban tree but does not do well in sandplain soils. A red maple would be a better
choice.
The City will select the species for boulevard trees.
Wetlands
A wetland boundary delineation report was prepared by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC
on April 18, 2016. An application for wetland boundary was submitted to RCWD and is
pending approval.
According to the report, 2 wetland types were found on the subject site. Two sample
points were also taken west of the wetlands and were found to lack wetland hydrology.
Per the preliminary plat, the wetland area is 13.6 acres. The development maintains a
greenway corridor and does not propose any wetland impacts, therefore; no wetland
mitigation is required.
The wetland Preservation Corridor will require a 50 foot average buffer, 25 foot
minimum buffer. The wetland preservation corridor is depicted on attachment. The
Corridor is subject to change based on ground based actual delineation. It is believed that
at this time there will be some changes to the corridor. The 1-2 wetland area has been
determined to not be wetland so this will push the wetland corridor in this area to the east.
The site is located within in the RCWD Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland Protection
and Management Plan boundary and Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). A
conservation easement covering approximately 2.6 acres of wetland buffer is proposed.
Comments:
1. RCWD WCA Notice of Decision shall be provided to the City.
Flood Plain
Flood plain areas encroaching on to the site may support rare plant communities.
Surface Water
5
The site is located within the Rice Lake resource management units (RMU). The
majority of the site drains east and north to Rice Lake. A small portion drains west to
Shenandoah Acres, which in turn drains to Hokah Drive and then to Rice Lake.
Water diverted to a proposed infiltration basins on the site have the required 3 foot
separation from the water table.
According to our City Engineering review the following comments were made:
1. Rate control is being met.
2. All water quality requirements are being met.
3. The stormwater management design and calculations need to be updated and re-
submitted with the proposed changes for review. We do not anticipate any
significant changes to the proposed layouts with relation to the storm sewer
system.
4. The side yard storm sewer on narrow lots needs to be coordinated with the
building plans. No overhanging windows or window wells can be installed. A
clear 20 feet needs to be provided. The applicant shall provide a summary of side
yard storm sewer with pipe depths and a summary of how future access for
maintenance will be accommodated.
Wetlands
A wetland boundary delineation report was prepared by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC
on April 18, 2016. An application for wetland boundary was submitted to RCWD and is
pending approval.
According to the report, 2 wetland types were found on the subject site. Two sample
points were also taken west of the wetlands and were found to lack wetland hydrology.
Per the preliminary plat, the wetland area is 13.6 acres. The development maintains a
greenway corridor and does not propose any wetland impacts, therefore; no wetland
mitigation is required.
The site is located within in the RCWD Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland Protection
and Management Plan boundary and Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). A
conservation easement covering approximately 2.6 acres of wetland buffer is proposed.
Comments:
1. RCWD WCA Notice of Decision shall be provided to the City.
The developer's engineering report states there are 420,000 SF of wetlands on the
proposed site. There will be no wetland impacts, including there will be no increase in
6
wetland bounce (increase in water elevation after a storm event). From our Engineer's
report:
1. Provided the LGU approves the wetland delineation, there are no proposed
wetland impacts. Therefore, no wetland mitigation approval is needed.
1. Wetland buffers are shown on the plan set. The RCWD will have regulatory
authority over review and approval of the wetland buffer.
2. A conservation easement is recommended for parcels adjacent to the lake to
protect the buffer area.
Storm Water
A Storm Water Management Plan submitted as part of the Civil Drawings has been
submitted. Detail information on SWPPP construction site management must be
submitted before ground is broken for the proposed project.
Drinking Water Protection
St Clair Estates has two DWSMA classifications associated with the land. For the most
part as seen in the DWSMA attachment, the area has a Moderate Vulnerability.
Vulnerability determines what types of potential contamination sources must be managed
within the DWSMA or as determined by the Department of Health. In the Moderate
vulnerability areas of the DWSMA wells and tanks must be managed. The small area on
the south end of the development proposal is shown as high vulnerability and in that case
all land uses and potential contaminant sources, including wells and tanks must be
managed.
There does not appear to be any wells on the site.
Tree Preservation
The goal of tree preservation is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity and
forest resource and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical.
The Tree Inventory identifies the basic use area (BUA), Environmentally Sensitive Areas
(ESA) and trees proposed for removal. According to the plan, there are 104 total trees
being removed within the BUA, 0 trees being removed outside the BUA and 15 new trees
required for replacement. These 15 replacements trees will be satisfied through open
space area landscaping requirements.
Tree areas that border adjacent properties must be fenced off if the trees are privately
owned. Fencing out to the driplines, or as much as feasible must be maintained to protect
adjacent private trees from sustaining root damage.
7
According to our tree replacement standards, 15 trees will need to be replaced.
Lighting
Low intensity, downward focused lighting with cut off lenses to eliminate glare must be
used. Recommend that LED smart type lighting be used.
Landscape Plan
Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per lot frontage for single family
and two family lots. Thirty-eight (38) boulevard trees are proposed which is compliant
with the ordinance.
Open areas are being landscaped with 33 trees and 99 shrubs as required by Section
1007.043(16). Landscape screening and buffers are not required.
Shoreland Management Overlay District
The site is located in a Shoreland Management Overlay district. Rice Lake is a Natural
Environment Lake with an 883.1 OWHL elevation. A setback of 150 feet from the
OHWL is required for all primary and accessory structures. Impervious surface coverage
of 30% applies to all lots within the overlay district.
The plan submitted meets the setback requirement for the overlay District. That is 150
feet from the Ordinary High Water of (OHW) of Rice Lake, there can be no building.
The OHW level of Rice Lake is 883.1. The site is designed to meet this requirement.
The 150 foot no -build line comes right up to the back of a few proposed house pads. The
developer must create an awareness of this no -build line, with written correspondence,
copy the city and ensure all future sales of the property has the awareness document
follow the sale.
Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control
Before any ground breaking occurs, a complete Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,
(SWPPP) must be accepted by the city. At the time of ground breaking, all of the
concerns of the Minnesota Pollution Control permit issuance must be met. A certified
inspector must be in contact with the City. All weekly and post rainfall inspection
reports, and follow up corrections made must be emailed to the City in a timely manner
Failure to do so could result in a "Stop Work Order".
RECOMMENDATION
Forward staff and environmental comments on to Planning & Zoning Board and the City
Council.
8
ATTACHMENTS
1. Site Location
2. Area Map
3. Grading Drainage and ESC Plan
4. Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Notes
5. Wetland Mitagation Corridor Buffer
6. Landscape Plan
7. Overall Preliminary Plat
8. St Clair Blanding's Turtle
9. St Clair Estates DWSMA
10. Soils
11. Site Map
12. Wetlands
9
mMik
mMI
DI.
mEI
MME
■=
MIME
E-
...N.
IIIID
I IIIIIITII
11
r
.
■ u00
LL
•woo
•
pIIIII
wiOill
o•
GOLDEN 4I
LAKE II.
/14
11*
1= MEM
MIN
1111111I
.1111 e
4
11
: Iu.
inn
•
iipi
Nip
IF
■
III
Awe
Mai mu MI.
11111111■
111111111/
L 1in 111111
Ci cllea nes
BALDWIN LAKE
OH:WL 883.1
100-yr 886.1
FIRM BFE 887
FIS BFE 887
rr
RICE LAKE
OHWL 883.1
100-yr 886.0
FIRM BFE 887
FIS BFE 887
■
lc:
.1.1
Lino.La
17*.QIV*4WPar
•1!
CENTERVILLE LAKE OHWL 885.0 100-
RESHANAU LAKE
OHWL 883.5
100-yr 886.0
FIRM BFE 887
FIS BFE 887
,1
St Clair Estates
fig1111iirli ,1 1j1P�■..1 �d
L
AIIP-
111111111
lift*
•���4 111r4:4-411611:1!
bf4;01111:
we i►jI1111111. is : � •' I �11■
MI 112.11.t.41.4
� �■���� iIIbV�
: nnn''. ■ au... ntIIIL �
1i■11111.-=:
■■■1111111■� ;
M,11111'111■■ ��..
ins p
.arm �.�_ • III.
tali
ink
•
•
Ij
CEDAR LAKE
OHWL 892.9
C I T
IINOL
O F
KES
Site Location Map
N
s
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
IIII
I SHENANDOAH 3RD1 ADDITION
�_.__-I---_ i-- I I BLOCKI4 N
I I I I I + I w I I
1 1 I I I I
)SHENANDOAH 3RD1 ADDITIONI 1 1 I 1
f m I a ht I s '1 II
c u
I
- I 1 ,p
ST. CLAIR ESTATES
PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS
BLOCK 4
I ---
I
1 INCH = 150 FEET
(1 1 " X 17")
\"›
60\
/A
A
A
A
60
w
I
oI
1
� 1
rn
-
21
D
2
v
A
A
/
A
A
/
L
4/
/
/
/
/
89 J
•
0
\
•
•
•
//'
•
\
\
\
•
0
\
-
--
-
\
1 \
�
Lc) co-
�
Hd N i �/ USE 2:1 SLOPES WITH EROSION
- \ CONTROL BLANKT AAS' SHOWN TOE
PROTTT/SAVE TREES
I
-'- S00°02'15"W--- A
__\ ------- __----900-- A, _ _______
-----__
448.97
/
/
a`r
a)
0)
0
0
//----
I I /
I I
I I
I I
I \
1
• 1
T. I \/
�I /
I
\lam
I
S00°02'15"W
314.73
^0
0
0,
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ 1 I
/ I
// /}M
7
•
\
I
I
/
/
I I
wet
\
•
0
1 /•
1 / �-_ �> �v
` / / X
\ \
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
/
et
- - J
/
/
/
0
•
v
o0 zm mi
O� <m ZJ0
� r co n -1-1
Xj II < �rn
co prr7 Dm
0p Dp m<
CD D
II • m O
co Z
O z co
OJ
01
N m
0
0
n
O
W
O
(/1
m
FI
OS)))) -
CO
POND HWL
POND NWL
BOTTOM
cam
cx
rv)
Z z
cr0
c-U
1 -O
o m
mD0
o c
c m Z7
-H >
rm-
z
-�D
CO 0 m
mD
�1 Z
0
I
I
•
•
•
/
7
•
•
PROPOSED POND
NWL 888.6
HWL 890.3
TOP BERM 890.8
0-FT WIDE SODDED '\
OVERFLOW
El,/ 890.3
0
1
O
•
\
•
•
\
•
\
•
r
rn
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
\
•
\
01
1
/
I
•
\
10:1 SAFETY
BENCH
TYPICAL POND DETAIL
•
/
/
/
•
•
\
•
•
•
,
94.50
EOF
"886-
•
•
•
•
1
W
0
<\
/v
v
•
•
•
N
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I SH EN AN DpAH
I - I
I71--2==
BLDSL-
1894.3�
GAR
DROP 1 CRS
/ CA-94.3)
LOW FL=892.3
LOW OPEN=895.
L0*+
DROP 2 CRS
\\GAR Q898,__D
�---= 7- �
v
110 101
J
7)
1 m
m X
GAR qi-97.7�
DROP 1 CRS N
_---- 0�
LOW FL=891.0
Crii--90.5D
PROVIDE INLET SEDIMENT CONTROL
--FOR-NEW STORM SEWER INLETS
WITHIN 24 HOURS OF STRUCTURE
INSTALLATION (TYP - SEE D 4IL
/GEN-19)
I /
1 /
7
\
•
•
•
I•
\
/
/ •\
/ 7 /
0)
\
7
WATER TABLE
MEASUREMENTS
2-29-16
BORING
ELEV
SB 1
884.3
SB 2
883.1
SB 3
885.9
SB 4
886.3
SB 5
884.3
SB 6
882.5
SB 7
884.7
SB 8
884.4
SB 9
882.9
SB 10
882.3
SB 11
882.6
SB 12
--
SB 13
885.0
SB 14
NO BORING
SB 15
--
SB 16
883.8
/
•
\
1
I
I
•
/•
/
0
I I
I
3RD
0
96,0° SIOUX
I
898.5 GAR
w .11
limemwswammi,
wwwwweitarmi
witlimmiffiew
iliiiLLDI
•
I
•
\
•
\
\
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
HOKAH DRIVE
ADDITIOK
co I
•
•
DRAINAGE 84 UTILITY
EASEMENT
LOW FLOOR ELEVATION
LOW OPENING ELEVATION
RECOMMENDED HOUSE TYPE
WO = WALK -OUT
LO = LOOK -OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
(* INDICATES DROPPED GARAGE)
FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION
(GARAGE FLOOR 0.3-FT ABOVE
FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION)
co
•
GAR
LOW PL=892.1
LOW OPEN=895.3
DROP 1 CRS
Ca98. GAR
•
STREET
TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT
•
•
•
•
•
SURFACE DRAINAGE OD
co
ELEMTION 10-FT PAST_BACK OF PAD
•
•
FINISHED GRADE
- 0.5-FT BELOW LOW FLOOR FOR WALK -OUTS
- 0.7-FT BELOW LOW OPENING FOR
FULL BASEMENTS 8c LOOK -OUTS
PROPERTY', LINE
SUGGESTED
GARAGE LOCATION
APPROX.
DRIVEWAY GRADE
ico
•
•
•
•
o
•
•
•
1.5%
LOW FL=890.1
DROP,1 CRS
•
•
•
•
\ ENTRANCE (DETAL EN-
\ PROPOSED RAIN GL4RD
VI I
cn
=890.1
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION COIROL NOTES
1) PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATI'ONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (LOCATIONS TO BE DE iftii,AINED - COORDINATE
WITH OWNER) AND PERIMETER SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON AN. ADDITIONAL
SILT FENCE MAY EfE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS R *VIRE. /-
2) CONTACT MARTY ASLESON, CITY ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR, FOR
INSPECTION OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY GRADING.
3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE GRADING ON AN AREA -BY -AREA
BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNSTABILIZED AREAS. AS EACH AREA IS COMPLETED, ALL
EXPOSED SOILS MUST HAVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PROTECTION OR
PERMANENT COVER WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS.
4) SEE SHEET C4.1 AND C4.2, STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
(SWPPP) FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND SITE SEQUENCING.
5) EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEM TO BE FIELD LOCATED. WELL TO BE
ABANDONED PER ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. SEPTIC SYSTEM TO BE
REMOVED PER ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS.
6) CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT JORGE BERNAL (763-862-4224) AT ANOKA
COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT FOR PERMIT PRIOR TO ANY WORK IN COUNTY
RIGHT-OF-WAY,
4
LC
•
DRAWN BY:
A.G.
DESIGN BY:
A.G.
CHCKD BY:
PROJ. NO.
16-1596
ORIGINAL DATE:
MAY 10, 2016
REVISION DESCRIPTION
0 IL
CO cc 0
• M• CCW
EL 0
D cc
ri
ce
oct
Liu
a.
ADAM GINKEL
co
co
DATE: 05.10.2016
cc
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
DRAINAGE & ESC PLAN
cc
0
PREPARED FOR:
JAMIE JANSEN
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
P LOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
FAX: (651) 361-8701
0
0 25 50
1 INCH = 50 FEET
Cl . 1
Cn
v 11
I
i
SHENAND\OAH 3Rq ADDITION
rn �<
3AI=10 Hd>iTH
1
I
I
----894 -- --- --- 9v
--
896-- - - _ NQ.
)W FL-889.6
FB
im
Ftk
0-397.0
Jo /
8.2R
1 CRS
0.*
802
898.2
�' DROP CRS
(ON W. 0 [(o CA)
.1=PMINW4Wg7. NA
MligNiiiMiiiiMI
rsZ�1
I
I
I
BLOCK\ 4
C897.-5)
LOW FL=890.1
GAR98.2
DROP, 1 CRS
7K) W.O.*
J
89L8nw FL=891 5
892 (891.0)
VP BERM 890.0
/
/
/
/
/
N
ROCK CONST UCTION
I ENTRANCE (DETAL EN-17)
I
\ PROPOSED RAIN GU6DIAN
I
RIP -RAP Ai
(SEE DETAIL STR-7
PROPOSED POND 1
NWL 886.0
HWL 889.2
10-FT WIDE\ SOD.BED
OVERFLOW •
ELEV §.'2
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
-884 -
u
1
7
I=
�m l
- ---896---
898-
(97�GAR
-r-
-
0
(8-98.44 GAR
LOW FL=891
/
/
/
/
cn
O
/,
\
896-
7
I/
/
PROTECT SAVE,
1.5% 897.5
(898.0
LOW FL=89a:6.
EASEMENT-/
7
7
C1
TREES 1
n im
mx
1 mX
1
I --
7
7
t
J- 1
/ /
\
1
1
OC.K \5
I
i
I
02
GAR C898.0
1
I
I
I
BL
,'H 3 R D
1MN0 W
AA
`05 y
--- 71Od 9135
•0\� 1,
ooco �)
.4
EASEMENT--
,aM
f
�fv
ADDITION
I ,
I
1
I I
I
I 1
/
/ /
/ /
/•
/
I I
I � I
I ,
-- 892 --
-894
J
7
PROPOS INFILTRATION
HWL 893.3
(S DETAIL)
RD
o
0
NWL 886:0
HWL 889.1
WATER TABLE
MEASUREMENTS
2-29-16
BORING
ELEV
SB
1
884.3
SB
2
883.1
SB
3
885.9
SB
4
886.3
SB
5
884.3
SB
6
882.5
SB
7
884.7
SB
8
884.4
SB
9
882.9
SB
10
882.3
SB
11
882.6
SB 13
885.0
SB 14
NO BORING
SB 16
883.8
co
cci
co
4_1
OVIE LOW
Ely 889.1
)1
OP BERM 889.5
DRAINAGE 84 UTILITY
EASEMENT
LOW FLOOR ELEVATION
LOW OPENING ELEVATION
RECOMMENDED HOUSE TYPE
WO = WALK -OUT
LO = LOOK -OUT
FB - FULL BASEMENT
(* INDICATES DROPPED GARAGE)
FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION
(GARAGE FLOOR 0.3-FT ABOVE
FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION)
LOW FL=892.1
LOW OPEN=895.3
LO*
DROP 1 CRS
co
•
STREET
TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT
1. USE LOW -IMPACT, EARTH MOVING EQUIOMENT (WIDE TRACK OR MARSH
2. NO MINI G OF SANDY SOILS ALLOWED; IN BASIN.
'rt 3. /F/INAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS.
/5. P TECT BASIN FROM /1RUN-OFF DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
EXC VATE BASIN TO FIRAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING
DR INAGE AREAS. ,'
co
co
PROVIDE 37,FIBROUS SHREDDED
WOOD CHIPS AROUND NEW
_2)0; PLANTINGS
IE
\41;:',-714/
IT1=1 I if
HI 111=111=111
1,11,
7,11,1
ihiL=1
ill=
111=1,111„,
41
=Tilifi
III= III
r=1117 "
PLANTING
BOTTOM OF BASIN
SURFACE DRAINAGE
ELEVATION 10-FT PAST BACK OF PAD
FINISHED GRADE
- 0.5-FT BELOW LOW FLOOR FOR WALK-C
- 0.7-FT BELOW LOW OPENING FOR
FULL BASEMENTS & LOOK -OUTS
PROPERTY LINE
SUGGESTED
GARAGE LOCATION
APPROX.
DRIVEWAY GRADE
SUGGESTIONS
SIDE SLOPES
NATIVE PLANTINGS
GIANT BUR -REED
WOOL GRASS SEDGE
CORD GRASS
BLUE FLAG IRIS
SWAMP MILKWEED
TAMARACK
JOE-PYE WEED
NEW ENGLAND ASTER
PRAIRIE BLAZINGSTAR
BONESET
BLACK WILLOW
NATIVE PLANTINGS
BIG BLUESTEM
BLUE JOINT GRASS
SWITCH GRASS
BLUE VERVAIN
PRAIRIE BLAZINGSTAR
TAMARACK
NEW ENGLAND ASTER
RED -OSIER DOGWOOD
SANDBAR WILLOW
BLACK CHOKECHERRY
BLACK WILLOW
PLANT MATERIAL TOLERANT OF INUNDATION AND
DROUGHT (NATIVE PLANS RECOMMENDED - SEE
TABLE) OR USE MnDOT SEED MIX 33-261
(APPLICATION RATE=35 LBS/ACRE)
0 INFILTRATION BASIN
N.T.S.
POND HWL
10:1 SAFETY
BENCH
POND NWL
BOTTOM
TYPICAL POND DETAIL
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SUITABLE FOR
SEEDING (E.G. STRAW -COCONUT BLANKET)
NOTE: MIX IN SALVAGED ON -SITE TOPSOIL INTO TOP
6'' (MAX.) OF INFILTRATION BASIN
IN -SITU SOILS NOTES:
1) NO MINING OF SANDY SOILS IN BASIN AREA
2) NO BURYING OF SILTY MATERIALS IN BASIN AREA
3) DO NO OVER -EXCAVATE BASIN AREA
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1 ) PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED - COORDINATE
WITH OWNER) AND PERIMETER SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADDITIONAL
SILT FENCE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE.
2) CONTACT MARTY ASLESON, CITY ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR, FOR
INSPECTION OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY GRADING.
3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE GRADING ON AN AREA -BY -AREA
BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNSTABILIZED AREAS. AS EACH AREA IS COMPLETED, ALL
EXPOSED SOILS MUST HAVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PROTECTION OR
PERMANENT COVER WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS.
4) SEE SHEET C4.1 AND C4.2, STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
(SWPPP) FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND SITE SEQUENCING.
5) EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEM TO BE FIELD LOCATED. WELL TO BE
ABANDONED PER ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. SEPTIC SYSTEM TO BE
REMOVED PER ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS.
DRAWN BY:
A.G.
DESIGN BY:
A.G.
CHCKD BY:
PROJ. NO.
16-1596
ORIGINAL DATE:
MAY 10, 2016
REVISION DESCRIPTION
O IL
- H
CO cc 0 Z
CC
0
D cc
ILI
ADAM GINKEL
co
co
DATE: 05.10.2016
ESTATES
cc
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
DRAINAGE & ESC PLAN
0
PREPARED FOR:
JAMIE JANSEN
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
P LOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
FAX: (651) 361-8701
0
0 25 50
1 INCH = 50 FEET
6) CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT JORGE BERNAL (763-862-4224) AT ANOKA
COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT FOR PERMIT PRIOR TO ANY WORK IN COUNTY
RIGHT-OF-WAY,
Cl .2
7.1
---------900-- -
S00'0215"W----------
448.97
S00.02'15"W
314.73
�- oHW
li=
wet_
r.
0'699 = 2l001J MO1 Wf ININIW
00
o
II
200
II
co
co
O
•
LP
no
BLOCK 41
I W I
0
N
I I
I SHENANDPAH
I _
I - I
I 1
3RD I ADDITION)
I
I I
l I
w
rn
EXISTING WMC ARE7a
114,174 S.F.
CTI
P1
SIHENANDO41
1 1
893RD ' ADDITION
J
-------900--
soo oz'15 W
448.97
\mi
S00'02'15"W �_--
314.73
OHW OHW
1aM
�'h
10
1
„et
1
1
ri
„/- We
r
6
5y
3 lo-an0 JO TN
213AO 1N31/U5\n SOdO?!d-t
D
T
rn
of
w
11=
1 I I I
1 I I I
1 I I I
I I I
1 j
IN
PROPOSED DRAINAGE
L
✓
10
J10
0
10
10
7
1-3
0
SIOUX
LANE
7
J
E A S E M E N T
Co
L
r
"1
mml
0.
AND UTILITY
BLOCK
•O
L
CO
BLOCK 1
'I
J L
-------T
10
(71
--PROPOSED
10L — —
41.
------j101oL-----
PROPOSED WMC AREA
114,236 S.F.
1
1
1
1
DRAINAGE
AND UTILITY EASEMENT -�
41. 8LK
N
li=
W
2
J10
SIOUX
LANE
T
10 10 Zv
0
cv
j0
m
A
L.
m0
z
Mz
mD
zm
ym
1 oL
r/
i
J /
/
9'
n
N
J L
7
/
/
/
/
/
/
s"-- PROPOSED DRAINAGE
57.8
zc
mx
EMIR
----'''--,-PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT -
AND UTILITY
Cti
tec
•
0
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
wet
wet
DENOTES WETLAND BOUNDARY
DENOTES WMC BUFFER
NOTES:
1) FOR AREAS TO BE GRADED/DISTURBED WITHIN
WMC BUFFER AREA, SALVAGE MIN. 6'' TOPSOIL
AND STOCKPILE AS SHOWN — PROVIDE SILT FENCE
AROUND STOCKPILE AREA
2) GRADE WMC AREA TO 6" BELOW FINAL GRADE
3) ONCE SITE GRADING IS COMPLETE, REPLACE 6.”
SALVAGED TOPSOIL WITHIN WMC BUFFER TO MATCH
FINAL GRADES AS SHOWN ON APPROVED GRADING
PLAN
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1) PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED — COORDINATE
WITH OWNER) AND PERIMETER SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADDITIONAL
SILT FENCE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE.
2) CONTACT MARTY ASLESON, CITY ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR, FOR
INSPECTION OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY GRADING.
3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE GRADING ON AN AREA —BY —AREA
BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNSTABILIZED AREAS. AS EACH AREA IS COMPLETED, ALL
EXPOSED SOILS MUST HAVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PROTECTION OR
PERMANENT COVER WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS.
4) SEE SHEET C4.1 AND C4.2, STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
(SWPPP) FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND SITE SEQUENCING.
5) EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEM TO BE FIELD LOCATED. WELL TO BE
ABANDONED PER ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. SEPTIC SYSTEM TO BE
REMOVED PER ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS.
DRAWN BY:
A.G.
DESIGN BY:
A.G.
CHCKD BY:
PROJ. NO.
16-1596
ORIGINAL DATE:
MAY 10, 2016
REVISION DESCRIPTION
ESTATES
cc
0
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
CC
PREPARED FOR:
JAMIE JANSEN
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
P LOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
FAX: (651) 361-8701
1 INCH = 80 FEET
C 1 . 3
COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT FOR PERMIT PRIOR TO ANY WORK IN COUNTY
RIGHT—OF—WAY,
•
L
I
rn
1
rn
1
POND
SEED FROM NWL TO HWL
W/ MNDOT SEED MIX 33-641
0
1
O
BOULEVARD TREES
BOULEVARD TREES REQUIRED:
1 TREE PER LOT
2 TREES PER CORNER LOT
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
SYMBOL
G
QUANTITY
SEE
NOTES
SIZE
1.5-2" CAL.
ROOT TYPE
B&B
SWAMP WHITE OAK
Quercus bicolor
AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO
Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' (male only)
FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE
Acer saccharum "Balista"
NORTHWOOD MAPLE
Acer rubrum 'Northwood'
HACKBERRY
Caltis accidentalis
BUR OAK
Quercus macrocarpa
NORTHERN RED OAK
Quercus rubra
AMERICAN LINDEN
Tilia Americana
RIVER BIRCH
B etula Nigra
RED SUNSET MAPLE
Acer rubrum 'Franksred'
38 PROPOSED BOULEVARD TREES SHOWN
NOTES:
1) EXAMPLE SPECIES SHOWN — VERIFY SPECIES
REQUIREMENTS WITH CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL
COORDINATOR PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS
2) VERIFY TREE LOCATIONS WITHIN BOULEVARD
WITH CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR
PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS
3) NO MORE THAN 30% OF BOULEVARD TREES
CAN BE OF ONE SPECIES
i
SIOUX
LANE
OPEN AREA
LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS
OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS:
LARGE TREES - 1 PER/2000 SF
LARGE SHRUBS - 3 PER/2000 SF
SQUARE
FOOTAGE
LARGE TREES
REQUIRED
LARGE SHRUBS
REQUIRED
OUTLOT A
19,932
10
30
OUTLOT B
36,063
18
54
OUTLOT C
8,900
5
14
TOTAL
33
98
n
�i►i�r �f��t+�1
L
»
Cf
L\_ _ —
\-,'' * *‘' * OAN * \1141}0,:ti"f
11
}am laK, i=X
OPEN AREA - TREES
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
SYMBOL
SWAMP WHITE OAK
Quercus bicolor
AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO
QUANTITY
SEE
NOTES
SIZE
1.5-2"
ROOT
B&B
CAL.
TYPE
Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' (male only)
FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE
Acer saccharum "Balista"
NORTHWOOD MAPLE
Acer rubrum 'Northwood'
HACKBERRY
Caltis accidentalis
BUR OAK
Quercus macrocarpa
NORTHERN RED OAK
Quercus rubra
AMERICAN LINDEN
Tilia Americana
RIVER BIRCH
Betula Nigra
RED SUNSET MAPLE
Acer rubrum 'Franksred'
33 PROPOSED OPEN AREA TREES
OPEN AREA - SHRUBS
SYMBOL QUANTITY
0 SEE
NOTES
ROOT TYPE
POT
SIZE #5
NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM
Viburnum lentago
SIZE #5
CARDINAL DOGWOOD
Carnus sericea 'Cardinal'
SIZE 36" HT.
BLACK CHOKECHERRY
Aronia melanocarpa elata
99 PROPOSED OPEN AREA SHRUBS SHOWN
NOTES:
1) EXAMPLE SPECIES SHOWN — VERIFY SPECIES
REQUIREMENTS WITH CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL
COORDINATOR PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS
2) VERIFY TREE AND SHRUB LOCATIONS WITHIN OPEN
AREAS WITH CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR PRIOR
TO ANY INSTALLATIONS
3) NO MORE THAN 30% OF OPEN AREA TREES OR
SHRUBS CAN BE OF ONE SPECIES
III
r-
vz
CD
}am
th
/
/
I\
\
\
\
\
\
1
SIOUX
LANE
a
POND
SEED FROM NWL TO HWL
W/ MNDOT SEED MIX 33-641
am
}
\
}am
N
Lcg
»
03
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
LEGEND
0
DENOTES APPROX. LOCATION OF
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TREE
DENOTES APPROX. LOCATION OF
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TREE
DENOTES APPROX. LOCATION OF
PROPOSED LARGE SHRUB
DENOTES OPEN AREA LANDSCAPE
NOTES
1) TREES ARE TO BE 1-1/2"-2" AT 4' BH WITH 1 YEAR
GUARANTY
2) TREES ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY'S TREE
ORDINANCE
3) 15 REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED
(PER EXISTING TREE REMOVALS)
4) TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES SHOWN = 66
III
POND
SEED FROM NWL 0 HWL/
W/ MNDOT SEEDgMIX 3341
�e� m
v+e}aM
as
}am
r_�
0
DRAWN BY:
A.G.
DESIGN BY:
A.G.
CHCKD BY:
C.W.P.
PROJ. NO.
16-1596
ORIGINAL DATE:
MAY 10, 2016
REVISION DESCRIPTION
u-J
0
DC
Z
J
W
0
cc
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
z
0
W
0
U
0
z
PREPARED FOR:
JAMIE JANSEN
jll
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
PLOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
FAX: (651) 361-8701
0 25 50
1 INCH = 50 FEET
Li
Q
E
1
c
0 N
E (7) w
tn —Le)
Vc 2z
-0 A'
c tf
3=
.T_
V®1._s)
viV iQ
a
0
1-
1
0
01,
0
0
lad
lad
mTic
kid
CL
o
c
E E
c
co
cc
kid
hid
GRAPHIC
0
(
wet
wet
27.6
u: . n\
..„„1 \\t 0
.::, . F clic \
ui
EH
55
FF
gi
Anoka County, Minnesota.
cn
0
0
gis
REQUESTED FOR
0
oo CD
D Es
LJ
LJ
0
LJ
CC
LJ
•
cc
xnois
PROPERTY IS IN THE MUSA DISTRICT.
•
cn
0
on 2-10-16
0
0
1 co
0
et
oo
Ln
LJ
No
0
LJ
oo
LJ-
0
CC
LJ
0
CO
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
TOTAL BOUNDARY AREA
TOTAL UPLAND AREA
LJ
0
LJ
0
0
CC CI
SINGLE FAMILY LOT
PROPOSED OUTLOTS
;;\ Cl W
lad
SZOD-ZO-ZZ-lf-SZ NM
o
0
LJ
qi
LC 0
0
co
0
gg
gg
Environmental, PIIc. Dated Feb.
PI NY39
Nld
-
TOTAL OUTLOT AREA
LJ
0
CC
0
co
EASEMENT
CC LL
0 Li
26
•
vk
If
ME
NO NINON ISS9
NC
FRONTAGE
LJ
CC
LJ
CC 0
Ln
CO
oo oft
LI
MVO S.
CC
Lu
CO
80.
LO
1,1
0
tri
co
Ida
kid
cc
•
ui
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
co
0
0
cn
c CC
co
o
0
o
co
(1)
-o
Pg
LJ
CO
Li
0
>-
0
CC
Li
LJ
021
LJ
>-
LJ
CC
co
co
II
o
CITA
LL
LJ Li
In 0
LJ
LJ
00
0
NO MPH OM s999PV
7
JOB NO: 15822PP DATE: 3/04/16
SCANNED ❑
Rev. Lot lines
City Submittal
DESCRIPTION
DRAWN BY: JEN
CHECK BY: dwo
co
co
DATE
E
cn
o
-o
0
0
0
0
15`1'
W. OBERMILLER
CN
License No.
5-09-2016
< 0
00
5:25:52 PM CDT
—i .17.* LI:
a) ,„,„,
la .40
0..0= 12 =7,
Blandings Turtle Activity
and Breeding Areas
Blandings Breeding and Activity Areas
blandings_breedingpatches
Blandings Activity Patches
wets and_preservati on_corrido r
i1
17-17--
I r 8 E 1
1 �tititi
rml-1 I \ I I f
1 G 7
City of Lino Lakes
St Clair Estates
Drinking Wate; Service Management Arera
DWWSMA
Lino Lakes
600 Town Center
Parkway
Coordinate System:
Anoka County Coordinates
NAD83, Feet
Source:
Anoka County, WSB, MnDOT, SEH
St Clair Estates DWSMA
Dwsma_VuI
<all other values>
Vuln
High
Low
Moderate
Very H igh
Pet C.Ineterarty.asmerrannegStOorCSalStblr CtSYr S-OCy.ms
o.u.41aema
St Clair Estates Lake Beach and Muck Soils Areas
Lake Beach and Muck Soils at St Clair Estates Site
lino soils selection
<all othervalues>
MU SY M
Vs*,
Lb
Se
Parcels
., •
7
894.72�
,FNOFP
E)(1S11NG
EST. " Professional Land Surveyors
,d.Com 6 776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701
S:\rud\CAD\15pro j\15822\15822PP,dwg 5/9/2016 10:37:19 AM CDT
Pi.
NA'JD88 DAIU*,:
OHWL = 883.T w
•-f00 YR HWL 687,.
MINIMHAd' , ALOER:ik•
Site Address is Unassigned Birch Street, Lino Lakes, MN.
Pin. No. 29-31-22-32-0044.
Fee owner is James H Speiser & Lois M Speiser.
Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 2-10-16
Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum.
Wetland shown was delineated by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC, April 13th & 14th,
Area A delineated May 9th, 2016.
Property falls within 2 FEMA Flood Zones: Zone AE, an area of 100yr flooding, ba
flood elevation of 887.0 and Zone C, an area of minimal flooding.
Tree Inventory by Jacobson Environmental, Pilo. Dated Feb. 3, 2016. Tele: 612-802
Boundary area of the surveyed premises: 30.47 Acres.
Survey is based upon Title Commitment File No. 533574 prepared by Land Title, Inc
issuing agents of First American Title Insurance Company, dated February 15, 2016.
WETLAND EXHIBIT
-of- ST. CLAIR ESTATES
--for-- St. Clair Land Company
C/O Jamie Jensen
1517 Dawn Circle
Arden Hills, MN 55112
DENOTES IRON MONUMENT
FOUND AS LABELED
DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET,
MARKED RLS# 25341
DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY
CAST IRON MONUMENT
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
CATCH BASIN
STORM SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
HYDRANT
POWER POLE
SIGN
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
CABLE PEDESTAL
FIBER OPTIC BOX
ELECTRICAL BOX
GUY WIRE
STORM SEWER APRON
WET LAND
FENCE
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING LIDAR CONTOURS
TREE LINE
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WATER MAIN
OVERHEAD WIRE
CONCRETE SURFACE
BITUMINOUS SURFACE
GRAVEL SURFACE
Lot 1, Block 1, Speiser Acres, Anoka County, Minnesota.
DRAWN BY: JEN
JOB NO: 15822PP DATE: 3/04/16
CHECK BY:: dwo
SCANNED ❑
1
3/14/16
Rev. Lot lines
JEN
2
5/03/16
Revise Wetland per TEP review
DWO
3
5/09/16
Added Area A
JEN
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
BY
15822 PP