Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-023 Council ResolutionCITY OF LINO LAKES �,. RESOLUTION NO. 16-23 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING BUILDINGS AS STRUCTURALLY SUBSTANDARD WITHIN LINO LAKES REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes ("City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10(d), the City or the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") is authorized to deem parcels as occupied by structurally substandard buildings despite prior demolition or removal of the buildings, subject to certain terms and conditions as described in this resolution. 1.02. The City or Authority intends to cause demolition of the buildings located on the property described in Exhibit A hereto (the "Designated Property"), and may in the future include the Designated Property in a redevelopment or renewal and renovation tax increment financing district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174, Subd. 10 or Subd. 10a. Section 2. Buildings Designated Substandard; Other Proceedings. 2.01. The City finds that the buildings on the Designated Property as described in Exhibit `.- A are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance, based upon the analysis of such buildings by LHB Architects dated March 27, 2015 and on file in City Hall. 2.02. After the date of approval of this resolution, the buildings on the Designated Property may be demolished or removed by the City, or such demolition or removal may be financed by the City, or may be undertaken by a developer under a development agreement with the City. 2.03. The City intends to include the Designated Property in a redevelopment or renewal and renovation tax increment financing district, and to file the request for certification of such district with the Anoka County auditor within three years after the date of demolition of the buildings on the Designated Property. 2.04. Upon filing the request for certification of the new tax increment financing district, the City will notify the Anoka County auditor that the original tax capacity of the Designated Property must be adjusted to reflect the greater of (a) the current net tax capacity of the parcel, or (b) the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the buildings were demolished or removed, but applying class rates for the current year, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10(d). 2.05. City staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. 460588v1 LN140-114 Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 11th day of April, 2016. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member Kusterman and was duly seconded by Council Member Manthey and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kusterman, Manthey, Maher, Rafferty, Reinert The following voted against same: none ATTEST: u >a e Bartell, Ci Cle 460588v1 LNI40-114 EXHIBIT A Description of Designated Property 6007 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, Minnesota PID Nos. 31-31-22-43-0007, 31-31-22-43-0006, and 31-31-22-43-0017 460588v1 LN140-114 CITY COUNCIL `._ AGENDA ITEM 6D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala MEETING DATE: April 11, 2016 TOPIC: i. Consider Resolution No. 16-23, Designating Building as Structurally Substandard, 49 Club VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council approval to designate buildings (49 Club) as structurally substandard. BACKGROUND The 49 Club, located at the corner of Hodgson Road and County Road J, has been vacant since approximately 2003. The site has become a blighted location with illegal dumping and vandalism taking place on a regular basis. The city has received numerous complaints regarding the property. The site has been the topic, along with the neighboring 17 acre Jensen property, of several development proposals. However, none have advanced past the concept phase due to a number of complicating factors including the need for public improvements, multiple property owners, and council concern over the intensity of prior commercial development proposals. In March of 2015 LHB Corporation was retained to determine the eligibility of the property for TIF purposes and to document the condition of the building. As noted in the report the buildings are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. Staff has been working with the owner of the property regarding potential demolition of the buildings either as a City project or by the owner. The owner is proposing to remove both the principal structure and accessory garage with their own contractor. Staff is very interested in this project as a means to clean up the site, eliminate the blight and assist redevelopment efforts. The use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) has previously been discussed to help offset utility, road or land assemblage costs to facility redevelopment of the corner. However, removal of the building has the potential to eliminate one of the financial tools available to assist with redevelopment. In order to establish a TIF District after demolition, the request for certification of the TIF District must be filed with the County within three years of the parcel being occupied by a substandard building. An actual project would need to occur within 4 years of district certification or the site would be dropped from the district and no longer �... eligible for TIF. To retain our ability to use TIF staff has listed out the steps that the EDA/City would need to follow in order to demolish a building prior to a redevelopment TIF District being established: 1) The EDA Board finds by resolution (adopted before demolition) that the parcel was occupied by a structurally substandard building and that after demolition and clearance the EDA intends to include the parcel within a TIF district; 2) The City Council adopts resolution and makes blight findings regarding the building (based on report); 3) EDA and owner of property enter into a preliminary development agreement (before demolition) regarding demolition of the buildings and redevelopment of the property. The EDA is considering the substandard building findings and the preliminary development agreement at their April 11, 2016 meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 16-23. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 16-23 2. LHB Recommendation March 27, 2015