HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-12-2016 Council PacketEXPANDED AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, December 12, 2016
***********
City Council Meeting
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members Rafferty, Kusterman, Manthey, and Maher
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Roll Call - Council Members Rafferty, Kusterman, Manthey, Maher, and Mayor
Reinert were present
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment - none
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
The agenda was approved as presented
SPECIAL CEREMONY
Certificate of Recognition – Jayson Eisch, for Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout
Promotion Recognition – Deputy Public Safety Director Kyle Leibel and
District Fire Chief Jeff Frid
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) December 12, 2016 (Check No. 104993 through 105060) in the
amount of $232,303.59
B) Consider approval of Nov. 28, 2016 Work Session Minutes
C) Consider approval of Nov. 28, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes
D) Consider approval of Nov. 14, 2016 Budget Work Session Minutes
(Postponed 11-28-2016)
E) Consider approval of Nov. 7, 2016 Work Session Minutes
(Postponed 11-28-2016)
F) Consider Resolution No. 16-159 Approving a Comprehensive Sign Plan
Amendment for Spirit Hills Center (6501-6511 Ware Road)
G) Consider Resolution No. 16-160, Approving Transfers for Partial Installment
Payment on Interfund Loan for Recreation Complex Land
Action Taken: Motion by Kusterman, seconded by Rafferty, to approve
the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1G as presented, was adopted
Council Agenda -2- December 12, 2016
EXPANDED AGENDA
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Resolution No. 16-161, Rescinding Resl No. 16-85, Sarah Cotton
Action Taken: Motion by Kusterman, seconded by Maher, to approve
Resolution No. 161 as presented, was adopted
B) Public Hearing – 2016/17 Property Tax Levy and 2017 Budget, Sarah Cotton
i) Consider Resolution No. 16-162, Adopting the Final 2016 Tax Levy,
Collectible in 2017
Action Taken: Motion by Manthey, seconded by Kusterman, to approve
Resolution No. 162 as presented, was adopted
ii) Consider Resolution No. 16-163, Adopting the Final 2017 General Fund
Operating Budget
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to approve
Resolution No. 163 as presented, was adopted
iii) Consider Resolution No. 16-164, Adopting 2017 Water & Sewer Operating Budgets
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to approve
Resolution No. 164 as presented, was adopted
iv) Consider Resolution No. 16-165, Adopting the 2017 Recreation Fund Budget
Action Taken: Motion by Kusterman, seconded by Maher, to approve
Resolution No. 165 as presented, was adopted
C) Consider Resolution No. 16-166, Canceling the 2016/2017 Debt Service Tax Levy
for Taxable G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B, Sarah Cotton
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Rafferty, to approve
Resolution No. 166 as presented, was adopted
D) Consider Resolution No. 16-167, Amending the 2016 General Operating
Budget, Sarah Cotton
Action Taken: Motion by Kusterman, seconded by Manthey, to approve
Resolution No. 167 as presented, was adopted
E) Consider Resolution No. 16-168, Committing Specific Revenue Sources in
Special Revenue Funds, Sarah Cotton
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Maher, to approve
Resolution No. 168 as presented, was adopted
F) Consider Approval of Public Safety Department - Police Division Vehicle
Replacement Policy and 2017 Replacement Schedule, Sarah Cotton
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Kusterman, to refer the
subject matter to the January work session for more discussion, was
adopted
Council Agenda -3- December 12, 2016
EXPANDED AGENDA
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Resolution No. 16-169, Establishing 2017 Compensation Plan for
Non-Union Employees, Jeff Karlson
Action Taken: Motion by Kusterman, seconded by Manthey, to approve
Resolution No. 169 as presented, was adopted
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Hiring Paid On-Call Firefighter
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Manthey, to approve the
hiring of Craig Menne as recommended, was adopted
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Resolution No. 16-171, Approving LED Retrofit Project for Civic
Complex, Rick DeGardner
Action Taken: Motion by Manthey, seconded by Kusterman, to
approve Resolution No. 171 as presented, was adopted
B) Consider Resolution No. 16-172, Approving Public Works Space Needs
Analysis and Existing Facility Audit Proposal, Rick DeGardner
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Maher, to approve
Resolution No. 172 as presented, was adopted
C) Consider Resolution No. 16-176, Awarding Contract for the Installation of
Two Air Conditioning Systems at the Civic Complex, Rick DeGardner
Action Taken: Motion by Manthey, seconded by Kusterman, to approve
Resolution No. 176 as presented, was adopted
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Resolution No. 16-173, Accepting Quotes and Awarding Contract,
2016 Surface Water Management Project and Establishing a Surface Water
Maintenance Fund, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Maher, to approve
Resolution No. 173 as presented, was adopted
B) Consider Resolution No. 16-170, Relating to the I-35W North Corridor
Improvement Project, Michael Grochala
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Kusterman, to approve
Resolution No. 170 as presented, was adopted
C) Consider Resolution 16-174, Authorizing Preparation of a Feasibility Study
for Water Storage, Diane Hankee
Council Agenda -4- December 12, 2016
EXPANDED AGENDA
Action Taken: Motion by Manthey, seconded by Kusterman, to approve
Resolution No. 174 as presented, was adopted (Abstain – Rafferty)
D) Consider Resolution 16-175, Authorizing the Preparation of Plans &
Specifications, and Ordering the Project, 2017 Mill & Overlay, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Kusterman, seconded by Manthey, to approve
Resolution No. 175 as presented, was adopted
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Motion by Kusterman, seconded by Manthey, to adjourn at 8:00 p.m.
Following adjournment of the regular meeting, the City Council will
reconvene for an EDA meeting. (See separate agenda.)
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
December 12, 2016 through December 27, 2016
Wednesday, December 21 6:30 pm, Environmental Board Council Chambers
Friday December 23 City Hall Closed Holiday
Monday, December 26 City Hall Closed Holiday
Updated 12/9/2016
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, December 12, 2016
***********
City Council Meeting
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members Rafferty, Kusterman, Manthey, and Maher
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
SPECIAL CEREMONY
Certificate of Recognition – Jayson Eisch, for Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout
Promotion Recognition – Deputy Public Safety Director Kyle Leibel and
District Fire Chief Jeff Frid
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) December 12, 2016 (Check No. 104993 through 105060) in the
amount of $232,303.59
B) Consider approval of Nov. 28, 2016 Work Session Minutes
C) Consider approval of Nov. 28, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes
D) Consider approval of Nov. 14, 2016 Budget Work Session Minutes
(Postponed 11-28-2016)
E) Consider approval of Nov. 7, 2016 Work Session Minutes
(Postponed 11-28-2016)
F) Consider Resolution No. 16-159 Approving a Comprehensive Sign Plan
Amendment for Spirit Hills Center (6501-6511 Ware Road)
G) Consider Resolution No. 16-160, Approving Transfers for Partial Installment
Payment on Interfund Loan for Recreation Complex Land
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Resolution No 16-161, Rescinding Resolution No. 16-85, Sarah
Cotton
Council Agenda -2- December 12, 2016
B) Public Hearing – 2016/17 Property Tax Levy and 2017 Budget, Sarah Cotton
i) Consider Resolution No. 16-162, Adopting the Final 2016 Tax Levy,
Collectible in 2017
ii) Consider Resolution No. 16-163, Adopting the Final 2017 General Fund
Operating Budget
iii) Consider Resolution No. 16-164, Adopting the 2017 Water and Sewer
Operating Budgets
iv) Consider Resolution No. 16-165, Adopting the 2017 Recreation Fund
Budget
C) Consider Resolution No. 16-166, Canceling the 2016/2017 Debt Service Tax
Levy for Taxable G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B, Sarah
Cotton
D) Consider Resolution No. 16-167, Amending the 2016 General Operating
Budget, Sarah Cotton
E) Consider Resolution No. 16-168, Committing Specific Revenue Sources in
Special Revenue Funds, Sarah Cotton
F) Consider Approval of Public Safety Department - Police Division Vehicle
Replacement Policy and 2017 Replacement Schedule, Sarah Cotton
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Resolution No. 16-169, Establishing 2017 Compensation Plan for
Non-Union Employees, Jeff Karlson
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Hiring Paid On-Call Firefighter
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Resolution No. 16-171, Approving LED Retrofit Project for Civic
Complex, Rick DeGardner
B) Consider Resolution No. 16-172, Approving Public Works Space Needs
Analysis and Existing Facility Audit Proposal, Rick DeGardner
C) Consider Resolution No. 16-176, Awarding Contract for the Installation of
Two Air Conditioning Systems at the Civic Complex, Rick DeGardner
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
A) Consider Resolution No. 16-173, Accepting Quotes and Awarding Contract,
2016 Surface Water Management Project and Establishing a Surface Water
Maintenance Fund, Diane Hankee
B) Consider Resolution No. 16-170, Relating to the I-35W North Corridor
Improvement Project, Michael Grochala
C) Consider Resolution 16-174, Authorizing Preparation of a Feasibility Study
for Water Storage, Diane Hankee
Council Agenda -3- December 12, 2016
D) Consider Resolution 16-175, Authorizing the Preparation of Plans and
Specifications, and Ordering the Project, 2017 Mill and Overlay, Diane
Hankee
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Following adjournment of the regular meeting, the City Council will
reconvene for an EDA meeting. (See separate agenda.)
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
December 12, 2016 through December 27, 2016
Wednesday, December 21 6:30 pm, Environmental Board Council Chambers
Friday December 23 City Hall Closed Holiday
Monday, December 26 City Hall Closed Holiday
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 28, 2016
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : November 28, 2016 4
TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 6:25 p.m. 6
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty (arr. 6:10 pm), 7
Kusterman, Maher, Manthey and Mayor 8
Reinert 9
MEMBERS ABSENT : None 10
11
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director John 12
Swenson; Community Development Director Grochala; Finance Director Sarah Cotton; 13
Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; City Engineer Diane Hankee; City Clerk Julie 14
Bartell. 15
16
Review Regular Agenda of November 28, 2016 – 17
18
Item 1F - Flex Spending Account Amendment – Administrator Karlson explained that 19
this action would change the City’s policy on the flex spending account by increasing the 20
maximum contribution. Council Member Kusterman noted that he would report back on 21
the possibility of a law change that allows some rollover of those funds. 22
23
Item 2A – Fee Schedule – Finance Director Cotton explained that staff is recommending 24
approval of 2nd Reading and adoption of the ordinance that will set city fees for the 25
coming year. She briefly reviewed the proposed changes. 26
27
Item 3A – Code Amendment Regarding Advisory Board – Administrator Karlson 28
explained that this ordinance amendment would increase the quarterly stipend paid to city 29
advisory board members. 30
31
Item 4A – Public Safety Grant for 2017-2018 – Public Safety Director Swenson 32
explained that this action would accept state grant funds for one police officer and related 33
expenses, including an annual conference. 34
35
Item 4B – Accept Donation for Canine Unit - Public Safety Director Swenson reviewed 36
the circumstances and source of this donation (the actual donor wants to remain 37
anonymous). 38
39
Item 4C – Promotion to District Fire Chief – Public Safety Director Swenson reported 40
that he is recommending the promotion of Mr. Frid to fill a vacant district fire chief 41
position. Mayor Reinert asked if there is a compensation schedule at this time and Chief 42
Swenson explained that this individual would be paid as an on-call fire fighter along with 43
a monthly stipend. Council Member Rafferty asked that that type of information be 44
included in future staff reports for council’s benefit. 45
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 28, 2016
DRAFT
2
46
Item 4D – Promotion to Deputy Director – Police Division – Public Safety Director 47
Swenson reviewed his recommendation to promote Kyle Leibel to the open position. 48
The recommendation is based on the results of a thorough promotional process. Mayor 49
Reinert asked about the difference in compensation and Chief Swenson explained that 50
this individual would move to Step 5 based on coming from the Police Sergeant’s union 51
scale and also this will be a salaried position. Council Member Rafferty remarked that it 52
would be nice to see the individual present for introduction and any questions. Chief 53
Swenson noted that Kyle will be coming in for a ceremony after this is approved. Mayor 54
Reinert suggested changing that procedure because sometime there could be a request to 55
approve an individual the council doesn’t know; not the case here, but it could be. This 56
is a high level position so he thinks the council would benefit from that opportunity. The 57
council concurred that, in this case, they are comfortable moving forward. 58
59
Item 4E – Donation of Seized Property – Public Safety Director Swenson explained that 60
staff requests authorization to donate a group of bicycles that are forfeited and are not 61
needed. The City Code allows this type of donation. The bikes would be donated to an 62
organization the department has worked with before. 63
64
Item 6A – Approving Payment for 2016 Mill and Overlay Project – City Engineer Hankee 65
reviewed the request to make final payment on this project. She explained the areas 66
included in the project. Staff is comfortable making the final payment. 67
68
The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. 69
70
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 71
December 12, 2016. 72
73
74
75
76
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 77
78
COUNCIL MINUTES November 28, 2016
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
4
DATE : November 28, 2016 5
TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 6
TIME ENDED : 6:53 p.m. 7
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Kusterman, Maher, 8
Manthey, and Mayor Reinert 9
MEMBERS ABSENT : 10
11
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Director of Finance Sarah Cotton; Director 12
of Public Safety John Swenson; City Engineer Diane Hankee; and City Clerk Julie Bartell 13
14
PUBLIC COMMENT 15
16
No one was present to address the council regarding a matter not on the agenda. 17
18
SETTING THE AGENDA 19
20
The agenda was approved as presented. 21
22
CONSENT AGENDA 23
24
Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1H, except for 25
Items 1D and 1H (minutes that the council would like to review further). Council Member Maher 26
seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 27
28
ITEM ACTION 29
30
Consideration of Expenditures: 31
32
November 28, 2016 (Check No. 104899 – 33
104992, $445,736.07) Approved 34
35
October 24, 2016 Council Work Session 36
Minutes Approved 37
38
October 24, 2016 City Council Meeting 39
Minutes Approved 40
41
November 7, 2016 Work Session Minutes Postponed 42
43
November 14, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes Approved 44
Resolution No. 16-156, Amending the City’s Flexible 45
COUNCIL MINUTES November 28, 2016
DRAFT
2
Spending Accounts Plan Approved 46
47
Approve Exempt Permit for Lawful Gambling Conducted 48
By Knights of Columbus #9905 at St. Joseph Catholic 49
Church Approved 50
51
November 14, 2016 Budget Work Session Minutes Postponed 52
53
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 54
55
2A) 2017 City Fee Schedule: i. Consider 2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 12-16 56
Establishing the 2017 City Fee Schedule; ii) Resolution No. 16-158 Approving Summary 57
Publication of Ordinance No. 12-16 – Finance Director Cotton reviewed the written staff report, 58
including the changes that are being requested. If the ordinance is approved the fees will be effective 59
in January of 2017. 60
Council Member Kusterman moved to waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 12-16 as presented. 61
Council Member Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 62
Council Member Kusterman moved to approve the 2nd Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 12-16 63
as presented. Council Member Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried; Yeas, 5; Nays none. 64
Council Member Kusterman moved to approve Resolution No. 16-158 as presented. Council 65
Member Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 66
67
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 68
69
3A) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 11-16, Amending Title 200, Chapters 211, 212 70
and 217 of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances Relating to Advisory Boards – Administrator 71
Karlson explained that staff is requesting approval of the 2nd Reading and adoption of this ordinance 72
that would amend the city code to provide additional compensation for city advisory board members. 73
Mayor Reinert noted that it’s been a long time since the stipend for these individuals has been 74
increased. 75
76
Council member Kusterman moved to waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 11-16 as presented. 77
Council Member Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 78
79
Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the 2nd Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 12-16 as 80
presented. Council Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried; Yeas, 5; Nays none. 81
82
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 83
4A) Consider Resolution No. 16-144, Accepting Traffic Safety Grant State fiscal years of 84
2017 & 2018 Renewal – Public Safety Director Swenson explained that staff is seeking authorization 85
to execute a grant (as a renewal) with the State of Minnesota to provide funds for salary and benefits 86
for one police officer to provide traffic safety services in the city and for attendance at an annual 87
conference. 88
COUNCIL MINUTES November 28, 2016
DRAFT
3
Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 16-144 as presented. Council Member 89
Kusterman seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 90
4B) Consider Acceptance Monetary Donation to LLPSD Canine Unit – Public Safety Director 91
Swenson reported that staff requests authorization to accept this donation to support the city’s canine 92
unit. The council concurred in thanking the donor for the generous donation. 93
Council Member Maher moved to accept the donation as recommended. Council Member Rafferty 94
seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 95
4C) Consider Promotion to District Fire Chief– Public Safety Director Swenson reviewed his 96
recommendation to promote Jeff Frid to the vacant District Fire Chief Position, effective December 1. 97
Council Member Kusterman moved to approve the appointment as recommended. Council Member 98
Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 99
4D) Consider Promotion to Deputy Director – Police Division– Public Safety Director Swenson 100
explained that he is seeking council approval to promote Kyle Leibel to the position of Deputy 101
Director of the Police Division, a position that is currently vacant. Mayor Reinert commended the 102
work of Sergeant Leibel, a longtime member of the Police Department. 103
Council Member Manthey moved to approve the promotion as recommended. Council Member 104
Kusterman seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 105
4E) Consider Donation of Seized Property to Bikes for Kids– Public Safety Director Swenson 106
reviewed the written staff report outlining the recommendation to donate forfeited bicycles to a good 107
cause and as allowed within the city code. Council Member Manthey noted that the city has done a 108
similar donation in the past; it is a good organization. 109
Council Member Maher moved to approve the donation as recommended. Council Member Rafferty 110
seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 111
112
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 113
114
There was no report from the Public Services Department. 115
116
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT 117
118
6A) Consider Resolution No. 16-157, Approving Payment No. 3 and Final for the 2016 Mill 119
and Overlay Project – City Engineer Hankee reviewed the details of the recommended final 120
payment for the 2016 Mill and Overlay Project. 121
Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 16-157 as presented. Council Member 122
Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 123
124
UNFINISHED BUSINESS 125
126
There was no Unfinished Business. 127
128
129
COUNCIL MINUTES November 28, 2016
DRAFT
4
NEW BUSINESS 130
131
There was no New Business. 132
133
COMMUNITY EVENTS 134
135
SECRET HOLIDAY SHOPPING will be held at 1189 Main Street on Saturday, December 10 from 136
9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. For additional information please contact 651-982-2445. 137
138
TOYS FOR JOY/CHRISTMAS COMMITTEE DROP OFF locations are located at Lino Lakes City 139
Hall. Collection of toys and food for the upcoming holiday will serve folks right here in our 140
community. For more information, please contact Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues at 651-982-2424. 141
142
COMMUNITY CALENDAR 143
144
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead 145
November 28, 2016 through December 12, 2016 146
Wednesday, November 30 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board 147
Thursday, December 1 8:00 am, Community Room EDAC 148
Monday, December 5 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session 149
Monday, December 12 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting 150
151
ADJOURN 152
153
There being no further business, Council Member Rafferty moved to adjourn at 6:53 p.m. Council 154
Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 155
156
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, December 12, 2016. 157
158
159
160
161
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 162
163
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 14, 2016
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : November 14, 2016 4
TIME STARTED : 7:20 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 9:30 p.m. 6
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Kusterman, 7
Maher, Manthey and Mayor Reinert 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9
10
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director Swenson; 11
Community Development Director Grochala; Finance Director Sarah Cotton; City Clerk 12
Julie Bartell. 13
14
Finance Director Cotton presented new budget information developed since the council’s 15
last review (distributed). New information and health care costs have resulted in some 16
new figures within the gap analysis. She noted reductions of $110,000 resulting in a new 17
tax rate of 45.5%, to be reflected in the tax rate statement that is distributed to property 18
owners. 19
20
Council Member Manthey noted that staff promised to keep working at reductions and he 21
sees that has happened and that the tax rate has been reduced. 22
23
Council Member Rafferty asked for a review of positions added within the budget. 24
Mayor Reinert asked for discussion of personnel across the board. 25
26
Administrator Karlson explained the new positions: 27
- A CSO position is included that relates to the Police Department’s ACE program 28
and increased volume. Mayor Reinert recalled that there was to be a threshold at 29
which the position would go away but staff did not specifically recall that point. 30
Mayor Reinert suggested the position shouldn’t be added without that 31
information. Director Swenson noted the amount of revenue to date for the 32
program and the cost of the position ($25,000) with no additional car costs. 33
Council Member Manthey said he doesn’t recall a dollar amount but the council 34
could have that discussion now. Mayor Reinert indicated that without the 35
threshold he fears the position would never go away, even if the ACE program 36
slows. Council Member Kusterman asked if the threshold should be $75,000 37
considering the $25,000 cost of the position. Mayor Reinert suggested a direction 38
that the position shouldn’t be added without the threshold established. Director 39
Swenson said pre-2016, based on his review, the revenue was $40,000. Mayor 40
Reinert said it suggested it should be somewhat higher – perhaps $40,000 plus 41
$12,500. Director Swenson suggested a $65,000 revenue point as the threshold. 42
It was clarified that the position is not considered permanent at any rate. The 43
mayor clarified that at that point ($65,000) the position goes away, no further 44
action required. The council concurred. 45
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 14, 2016
DRAFT
2
- Reinstate from part-time to full-time the Office Specialist position in Finance – 46
Director Cotton recalled her request to transition certain utility functions to this 47
position, including serving as a front line resource and back-up to the utility 48
billing clerk. The individual in this position would also do scanning of certain 49
documents in the quest to reach a paperless status for the utility billing records. 50
The Mayor asked about increased activities that would call for additional 51
personnel. Mayor Reinert noted the full time Human Resources position brought 52
in this year with the promise of that position covering some additional duties. 53
Administrator Karlson said the work is there for the human resources position, 54
including benefits administration, seasonal hiring, working with hiring throughout 55
the city, wellness and safety program as well as working on performance 56
management. Council Member Rafferty recalled that Administrator Karlson 57
requested that this Office Specialist position be downsized and he wonders what 58
has changed. Council Member Manthey remarked that he recalls the position 59
would also help with some tasks that were being covered by the Finance Director 60
and that didn’t seem appropriate at that level. Council Member Rafferty 61
suggested that the utility billing function seems to be impacted by the Utility 62
Billing full-time person also providing IT services when those services are 63
supposed to be coming from Metro INet He asked if there is any need to increase 64
this position that relates to comp time balances and how that impacts the presence 65
of staff. Administrator Karlson said the additional half position is not being 66
added to cover comp time but to cover duties that exist. 67
68
- A .6 FTE position added to the Public Services division to support the current 69
single support position in that department. Addition of the Cartegraph system has 70
added workload to the Public Services Department. The mayor noted that the 71
system came at great expense but he wonders if it is costing the city in staff time 72
and the value when, in some cases, it isn’t providing good information that was 73
anticipated. Council Member Rafferty recognized that the city’s fuel system is 74
archaic and if it needs to be updated the system that draws the most from that 75
system should bear the cost. His visit to the department and review of the 76
Cartegraph system led him to believe that the fuel system is letting us down and 77
that is causing the overwork. Director DeGardner was requested to report to the 78
council on the Cartegraph system, what it does and what is working. 79
80
The mayor called for discussion of the DEA position in the Public Safety Department. 81
Council Member Manthey remarked that drugs are a strong force and he feels some 82
comfort in having this position in place. Mayor Reinert suggested that this person 83
actually works with thirteen people on metro area problems and the work would continue 84
with or without this city’s participation. 85
86
Council Member Manthey noted his experience with public safety and his awareness that 87
it’s a group effort – to work as a public safety community on efforts. He also noted the 88
forfeiture funds involved that come back to the city. 89
90
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 14, 2016
DRAFT
3
Council Member Rafferty asked staff to provide the makeup of the task force and 91
Director Swenson said he would. 92
93
Council Member Kusterman said he could support redeployment of the officer but not 94
eliminating an officer position. He also reviewed crime data and the fact that Lino Lakes 95
is a growing community - redeployment of the position makes sense. He recognizes the 96
correlation between cutting officers and increasing crime in the community, and he noted 97
information he has gathered on like cities and their crime rates. His goal is to keep crime 98
rates down in this city. Mayor Reinert said he’d support that action. The council 99
concurred. Director Swenson said he would contact the DEA about bringing the position 100
back to the City as of the first of the year. Mayor Reinert said if it goes into January, he 101
hears the council saying that is okay. 102
103
Grant Traffic Officer Position – Council Member Maher said she loves having the 104
position because it makes the city safer. Council Member Kusterman remarked that the 105
position is enforcing the law and that is what should be happening; he doesn’t struggle at 106
all with the work. Council Member Manthey said he supports the position especially with 107
the ACE program available for those receiving tickets; he sees good impact in the area 108
where he lives. Council Member Rafferty asked for an explanation of the position – 109
what is different about this position from other police officers in the city. It was 110
explained that duties are tied to the grant funds that pay for the position. Director 111
Swenson explained that this person is a police officer first and foremost but there are 112
rules attached to the grant funds that dictate that the officer cannot spend more than a 113
quarter of any hour on duties not related to traffic. The council concurred to keep the 114
position and the resolution accepting the grant will go back on the council agenda. 115
116
Public Safety Fleet – the Mayor called for a short discussion. He suggested that he’s like 117
replacement plan for vehicles to be clear. Council Member Rafferty noted 118
communications he’s received that are confusing as to the replacement period. He 119
reviewed information he has gathered through research of other government entities that 120
utilize cars. Based on what he’s studied, he recommends a 100,000+ miles club, having 121
seen that working in some other cities. He also noted figures on the city’s maintenance 122
costs versus outsourced maintenance. Another consideration is that the resale of the 123
vehicles is minimal. He is recommending a five year replacement schedule. The mayor 124
asked Director Swenson to respond with information on questions raised. Director 125
Swenson suggested that the public services director and city mechanic would best be able 126
to respond on some of the matters and Administrator Karlson indicated that he will 127
instigate that report. Council Member Kusterman remarked that it’s clear that the 128
maintenance should be done right. 129
130
Mayor Reinert acknowledged that staff will provide additional information on the 131
subjects brought to light but it raises the question as to whether or not the budget going 132
forward needs to include the purchase of five cars next year. The mayor said he is also 133
questioning the need for additional cars to go to the fire department. Council Member 134
Manthey recalled his experience within the fire department and that station chiefs did not 135
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 14, 2016
DRAFT
4
at that time have take-home vehicles provided to them. Director Swenson explained the 136
three vehicles in the Fire Division - two go to the district station chiefs and there is one 137
spare. Director Swenson noted that the rotation of the vehicles to the Fire Division was 138
part of the division going live last year; Mayor Reinert said he doesn’t recall that 139
arrangement and Director Swenson said he’d provide the history on the matter. The 140
council concurred that they would receive more information from staff on a five year 141
replacement plan and that will assist with additional discussion on establishing a policy 142
on car replacement that would then drive the plans for the 2017 budget for purchasing 143
cars. 144
145
A $100,000 capital contribution for equipment replacement – Mayor Reinert said he’s 146
concerned about making an annual contribution that will sit in a fund and could lose 147
value until spent. He recalled that there was an idea to have a commitment of those 148
funds for when they are needed but not actually keeping the money in hand. Finance 149
Director Cotton explained that one thing that is possible is to commit a portion of the 150
fund balance (by resolution) to fire capital equipment replacement. Council Member 151
Kusterman said he had suggested an interfund loan. Ms. Cotton said that another option 152
that is used by some cities is to use year-end surplus for capital equipment replacement. 153
The council will need to adopt any budget change by resolution. 154
155
Upcoming discussions suggested by the Mayor – outsourced services (review current 156
contracts); goal setting/team building; and consulting services (which were determined on 157
a line item basis to be mostly related to Metro INet). The council requested that the 158
Metro INet contract be added to the discussion about outsourced services. Mayor 159
Reinert mentioned that he is still interested in a discussion about baseline management 160
and he pledged to bring forward more information for review. Council Member 161
Kusterman noted that the council seems to do the “deep dive” on the budget already so 162
that seems to cover all the ground. 163
164
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. 165
166
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 167
November 28, 2016. 168
169
170
171
172
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 173
174
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 7, 2016
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : November 7, 2016 4
TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 8:50 p.m. 6
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Kusterman, 7
Maher, Manthey and Mayor Reinert 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9
10
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director Swenson; 11
Community Development Director Grochala; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Finance 12
Director Sarah Cotton; City Planner Katie Larsen. 13
14
1. DEA Task Force Officer - Public Safety Director Swenson reviewed the staff 15
report that recaps information relating to the city’s participation in the DEA Task Force, 16
including size of the task force, represented cities, and impact on the local community. 17
Council Member Kusterman asked if the assigned officer has any regular duties with the 18
Lino Lakes Police Department and Director Swenson explained that the officer’s work 19
does augment the work of the department but his specific duties are exclusively tied to the 20
work of the task force; his wages and benefits are paid by the task force. 21
22
The council discussed the ability of another community to send an officer to the task 23
force; Director Swenson said that’s certainly possible but he noted that the City won’t see 24
the same benefits if another community’s officer is assigned. For instance, in one case 25
the involvement and tools of the task force brought a local matter to a federal prosecution 26
level. 27
28
Council Member Manthey asked about the impact on the department’s narcotics work 29
and Director Swenson explained how the city would have to take on the work. The task 30
force has also produced forfeiture funds that assist the department in law enforcement; the 31
Chief feels the department is solid but the participation in the task force has benefited 32
from that collaboration. Council Member Manthey expressed concern about the loss of 33
the benefits to the city. Council Member Kusterman remarked that he would have 34
expected that drug arrests in the city would go up with task force participation rather than 35
down and Director Swenson explained that the numbers go down because the cases 36
actually become federal matters and don’t show in the state statistics that the city uses. 37
38
It was clarified that, should the city end the provision of an officer to the task force, the 39
city would not lose outstanding forfeited funds that are pending in the court system. 40
41
Mayor Reinert noted that the city has participated with the task force efforts by providing 42
an officer for five years and he believes it’s time for another community to step forward. 43
It is a budget matter that will be considered at the next budget work session. 44
45
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 7, 2016
DRAFT
2
2. Traffic Safety Grant Resolution No. 16-144 – Director Swenson noted that the 46
council called for more discussion on this matter. The City was awarded a grant to fund 47
one officer to work traffic safety duties. He explained the funding coverage provided 48
through the grant that includes overtime. The Minnesota Office of Traffic Safety that 49
administers this grant would like a new resolution reflecting their fiscal years. Mayor 50
Reinert asked what in the area of traffic enforcement has changed with this grant position 51
and that now causes the concern that he is hearing from businesses and individuals. 52
Director Swenson said that he feels that businesses need to serve responsibly in order to 53
not negatively impact the safety of all the citizens. Mayor Reinert remarked that he hears 54
about impacts on people who aren’t drinking and the general negative demeanor of some 55
of the work that this grant is funding. Director Swenson noted that all contacts are 56
recorded and he would urge anyone concerned to contact the department after any 57
incident of concern and it will be checked. Director Swenson added that what the 58
program does do is provide education and helps to respond to the many traffic related 59
complaints that the department receives from city residents. Council Member Manthey 60
remarked that he understands the need for an officer in this position to be assertive but 61
not aggressive; in his community he feels the additional traffic enforcement has been 62
beneficial and well received by residents. 63
64
Mayor Reinert noted that after two years of participation, it merits a review by the 65
council. 66
3. Audit Request for Proposals – Finance Director Cotton noted that an RFP was 67
distributed for city internal auditing services. There were four proposals received and 68
reviewed by staff. There aren’t a lot of differences in services to be provided but costs 69
do vary. She noted some concern about the last product provided by the City’s current 70
provider CliftonLarsonAllen; there were errors that were not properly corrected in their 71
reporting. She is recommending that the City go with a fresh perspective and enter a 72
three year contract with Red Path. Administrator Karlson suggested that he supports a 73
move at this time and he is comfortable with the Finance Director’s recommendation. 74
4. December City Council Meeting Schedule – Administrator Karlson noted that 75
some years the council has chosen to revise the December council meeting schedule due 76
to the holidays. Mayor Reinert said the council will plan on cancelling the second 77
meeting of the month unless it becomes evident that a meeting is necessary. 78
5. Ashley Swenson Trail Accessibility Letter – Public Services Director 79
DeGardner noted that the council requested this discussion. Mayor Reinert explained 80
that he was contacted by a resident who has concerns about the lack of accessibility for 81
disabled persons to the City’s trails and parks. Mr. DeGardner said his staff report 82
attempts to respond to the concerns raised. He noted that it is an unfortunate fact that 83
making trails more accessible is an expensive proposition. The trail segment that was 84
brought to light was reviewed and improvements would run in the area of $150,000. 85
Grant funds could be sought but they are more and more difficult to secure. He also 86
noted that the correspondence under discussion requests accessibility to parks. The 87
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 7, 2016
DRAFT
3
council has reviewed a park improvement plan that could provide more accessibility. 88
Mr. DeGardner said that one improvement that he could move on right away would be to 89
switch the pea gravel at Birch Park to wood chips and add some accessible play items in 90
2017. He noted a request at Lino Park recently that will result in a small change. 91
Overall, accessibility improvements have largely come as a reactive approach with 92
changes attempted when the city hears about needs. Council Member Maher noted the 93
importance of responding to the need to accessibility as a welcoming community. 94
Mayor Reinert suggested that Mr. DeGardner provide a response to Ms. Swenson 95
explaining what the city is practicably able to do and how that will be accomplished. 96
Director DeGardner said the work has been addressed as a priority and it will continue to 97
be included in budgeting priorities. 98
6. I-35W North Corridor Project – Community Development Director Grochala 99
remarked that while no action is required of the council on this matter, it is before the 100
council to finalize that no action response. Mayor Reinert said he’d like to eventually 101
see a resolution solidifying where the city ended up on this question. He would like to 102
say that municipal consent by non-action is just that and what the state gets – so 103
discussion remains open for the future (after the response period has ended). 104
7. Council Updates on Boards/Commissions - There were no updates offered. 105
8. Monthly Progress Report 106
Mayor Reinert called for discussion about plans for a City veterans’ memorial. 107
Administrator Karlson recalled that the last discussion on the topic in June involved 108
consideration of developing a park as a memorial site. Mayor Reinert suggested that 109
determining a location would be a first step, followed by a design, followed by a cost and 110
then finding necessary funding. He verified that the council still favors doing a project 111
and that the location would be the island at city hall. Council Member Manthey 112
remarked that he remains interested in a location by the new fire station and in 113
conjunction with park facilities. The mayor suggested that the council would then have 114
to look for funding for a park, possibility in the range of $8 million. Council Member 115
Kusterman noted that it may be a long range plan for that development. Council 116
Member Rafferty spoke in favor of doing the memorial at the city hall site; he feels that it 117
is appropriate especially because the city complex represents the freedoms and rights of 118
government that our veterans have fought for. Mayor Reinert said that location is his 119
number one choice as well. Budget wise it’s more feasible and more likely to be done in 120
the not so distant future. He also likes the idea of seeking grant funds. Administrator 121
Karlson remarked that he can envision the memorial on the city hall island but his 122
concern is that it wouldn’t work well for ceremonies because of traffic, etc. Council 123
Member Rafferty remarked that the idea is not to have regular gatherings but perhaps 124
more to draw people to the city complex. The mayor asked that the council consider the 125
matter further at the next regular work session. 126
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 7, 2016
DRAFT
4
Administrator Karlson provided an update on the Channel 16 (city cable channel) 127
discussion. He spoke about the city channel to the North Metro Telecommunications 128
Commission and they have agreed that providing additional services to keep services on 129
that channel updated is a priority for them. The mayor requested that they provide 130
viewership details as well; he wants to ensure that the city gets good services for the 131
funds provided for telecommunication services. 132
Council Member Rafferty asked about a city asset tour which he thinks would be 133
particularly beneficial to new members of the council; he’d be interested as well in seeing 134
new projects in the city such as the water tower and pump house. The council agreed to 135
participate in a tour previous to the next council meeting. 136
The council also scheduled the annual performance review for the City Administrator to 137
be held as a closed meeting following the November 28th regular council meeting. 138
Regarding the American Legion parking lot expansion, Community Development 139
Director Grochala updated the council on discussions between the Legion and city staff 140
on how the project could move forward. 141
9. Review Regular Agenda – All items on the agenda were briefly reviewed. 142
Item 1A, Expenditure Report – Council Member Rafferty asked for an explanation of the 143
community garden items and it was explained that refunds are granted for those 144
participants who adequately clean up their garden area. 145
Item 3A, Ordinance No. 11-16- Administrator Karlson explained that the ordinance 146
change would increase the stipend to city advisory board members by $25, as the council 147
requested. 148
Item 4A, Traffic Safety Grant – Mayor Reinert requested that the item be moved to the 149
November 28th council agenda since there are some pending budget discussions that 150
relate. 151
Item 6A, Lino Lakes Elementary School - City Planner Larsen reviewed the project that 152
includes additional classrooms (2), parking lot changes and a new façade on the front of 153
the building. Any change to their conditional use permit requires consideration. Staff 154
has no concerns about the project. 155
Item 6B – Variance for 1558 Meadowview Court – City Planner Larsen explained that the 156
request involves an already constructed porch that is fifteen inches too close to the 157
property line. Staff is recommending approval of a variance based on a careful review 158
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 7, 2016
DRAFT
5
and the impacted neighbor’s approval. The staff report will be added after Planning and 159
Zoning consideration on Wednesday. 160
Item 6C, 2016 Surface Water Management Program – City Engineer Hankee explained 161
why staff is recommending rejection of the bids received. Staff would intend to go out 162
for quotes based on needs, budget and the current conditions for contractors. 163
Item 6D, Grant Agreement with Department of Health for Wellhead Implementation Plan 164
– City Engineer Hankee reviewed the need to gain information on wellhead needs to 165
maintain safe and secure wells. Seeking grant funds is standard for cities with a wellhead 166
protection program. 167
Item 6E, Approving Joint Powers Agreement for Street Lighting of the Sunset Avenue 168
and 109th Ave/Apollo Drive Roundabout – City Engineer Hankee explained the 169
cooperative plans between cities that share this intersection. 170
171
The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m. 172
173
174 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
175 December 12, 2016.
176
177
178
179
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 180
181
1
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1F
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-159, Comprehensive Sign Plan
Amendment for Spirit Hills Center (6505-6511 Ware Road)
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Dan Lee, Sprit Hills Mall, LLC and Brian Hansen, Rice Creek Properties, LLC, owners of
property in the Spirit Hills Center, requested an amendment to their Comprehensive Sign Plan.
The property is located at 6505-6511 Ware Road.
BACKGROUND
Section 1010.007(12) requires multi-occupancy businesses prepare a comprehensive sign plan
for the entire building. These plans and amendments require Council approval.
(12) Multi-occupancy business and industrial buildings. When a single principle
building is devoted to three or more businesses or industrial uses, a comprehensive sign
plan for the entire structure shall be submitted and shall be of sufficient scope and detail to
permit a determination as to whether or not the plan is consistent with the following
regulations. The plan shall be subject to the approval of the City Council. No permit shall
be issued for an individual use except upon a determination that it is consistent with the
approved comprehensive sign plan.
(a) The maximum individual tenant sign sizes for multiple occupancy structures
and individual uses which may display signs shall not exceed the maximum provisions for
single occupancy structures in the same zoning district.
(b) Multiple occupancy structures may display an area identification sign
consistent with the applicable district provisions. Individual freestanding signs identifying
the tenants' business shall not be displayed. Twenty-five percent of the area identification
sign must identify the entire site, the balance of the sign may be used for individual tenant
identification.
(c) Except as provided in this chapter, individual tenants of multiple occupancy
structures shall not display separate wall signs unless the tenants' business has an exclusive
2
exterior entrance. The number of signs shall be limited to one per building façade that the
tenant occupies, and each sign shall be limited to the maximum wall size sign permitted per
building façade, the total of which shall not exceed the square footage allowed.
(d) In any multiple occupancy structure qualifying as a mall type shopping center,
directory signs shall be permitted for each common public entrance. Each directory sign
area shall not exceed a total of 50 square feet and shall be located within 50 feet of the
common public entrance being served. The size of individual business identification signing
within the directory shall be established during the site plan review process. Attention shall
be given to the possible number of tenant or occupancy bays which may be served by the
common public entrance for which the directory sign is intended.
The Spirit Hills Center comprehensive sign plan was written in August 2004 and amended in
April 2007. The current 2007 sign plan does not allow for wall signs on the south elevation of
the building addressed 6505 Ware Road (Rice Creek Animal Hospital). The amendment now
allows for wall signage on the south gable. The amendment is consistent with Chapter 1010:
Signs ordinance in regards to allowed total wall sign area.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 16-159.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 16-159
2. Amended Comprehensive Sign Plan-Spirit Hills Center
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-159
APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN AMENDMENT FOR
SPIRIT HILLS CENTER (6505-6511 WARE ROAD)
WHEREAS, Dan Lee, Spirit Hills Mall, LLC and Brian Hansen, Rice Creek Properties,
LLC, property owners of Spirit Hills Center (6505-6511 Ware Road) requested an
amendment to their Comprehensive Sign Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 1010.007(12) requires multi-occupancy businesses prepare a
comprehensive sign plan for the entire building and these plans and amendments require
Council approval; and
WHEREAS, city staff reviewed the amended comprehensive sign plan and deemed it
compliant with Chapter 1010: Signs.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino
Lakes hereby approves the Comprehensive Sign Plan Amendment for Spirit Hills Center
(6505-6511 Ware Road).
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council
Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
SPIRIT HILLS CENTER
Lino Lakes, MN
SIGN CRITERIA
Section I Intent and Purpose
Section II Sign Approval
Section III Allocated Sign Area
Section IV Sign Criteria
Section V Sign Construction Specifications
Attachment: Wall Elevation with Sign Bands
Original Document-August 2004 prepared by Visual Impact Signs, Inc.
Amended-April 2007 prepared by Visual Impact Signs, Inc.
Amended-December 2016 prepared by Property Owners Dan Lee & Brian Hansen and the City of
Lino Lakes
2
SECTION I INTENT AND PURPOSE
Spirit Hills Center Sign Criteria is intended to provide guidelines for tenant identification that
will present an attractive image and complement the architectural integrity and continuity of
the business center. These criteria are intended to reduce clutter and provide strong, clear
identification of businesses. Spirit Hills Center shall have consistent sign criteria governing the
framework of sign plans used by each tenant to clearly and consistently identify them as a part
of the overall development.
SECTION II SIGN APPROVAL
A. Landlord
Design, content, and details of signs must be approved by the landlord and
the City of Lino Lakes prior to fabrication and erection of signs. Although
previous signing practiced by a tenant will be considered, they will not
necessarily govern the signage to be installed in this business center.
1. Tenant’s sign contractor shall submit drawings and specifications to the
landlord for all purposed sign work. The drawings shall clearly show the
location of each sign on the facade of each elevation, including graphics,
color, construction, and attachment details.
2. All costs incurred in furnishing and installing of a sign shall be the full
responsibility of the tenant. Sign construction must be completed in
compliance with the instructions specified within these criteria.
3. Tenants are required to identify their premise with a sign specified within
this contract.
4. All tenant signs must be approved by the landlord prior to submittal for
city approval.
B. City of Lino Lakes
A licensed sign contractor shall be responsible for obtaining all city approvals
and sign permits. City approval does not imply or supersede the landlord’s
approval.
SECTION III ALLOCATED SIGN AREAS
A. Exterior Sign Band
1. Tenant’s major identification will be installed only onto the designated
sign band.
2. The tenant sign area constitutes that area near their front entrance and
rear wall of leased premises equal to lineal footage of the storefront.
3. All building units are allowed illuminated individual letters and logos on
raceways (like their storefront) on the rear wall of their building with the
exception of the convenience store/gas station.
3
4. The buildings addressed 6501 and 6505 are allowed illuminated
individual letters and logos on raceways (like their storefront) on the
south wall of their building (facing Birch Street) with the exception of the
convenience store/gas station.
5. The building addressed 6505 is allowed 1 logo on a raceway not to
exceed a maximum of 36 inches on the south gable of the building (facing
Birch Street). No other signage is allowed on the south elevation.
6. Tenant’s proper name is not to exceed a maximum of 18 inches in height
and can be no closer to top or bottom of allowed signage area than 10
inches and no closer than 12 inches to either side of lease limit.
7. Each wall sign is not to exceed 10% of the building face area or 100
square feet, whichever is greater.
B. Windows and Doors
Tenants shall provide cut vinyl graphics of tenant identification, first surface
mounted onto glass, per detail specifications contained in this criteria (Note:
only 25% of tenant window area may have vinyl copy).
SECTION IV SIGN CRITERIA
A. Exterior Major Identification
1. Signs placed onto the designed sign area shall be limited to tenant’s
proper name.
2. Tenant’s proper name will be individual channel letters mounted to a
raceway.
3. Corporate logos or signage other than tenant’s proper name may be
permitted as part of the sign, subject to landlord’s approval. A height
limit of up to 2 feet is permitted except for south gable of building 6505
(see Section III.A.5 above).
4. All letters and returns are allowed in any color as approved by the
landlord (see section V.A) unless corporate sign copy dictates otherwise.
5. National corporate logo colors are permissible on logos and letters and
can be internally laminated.
6. Backlight cabinets are prohibited except as supplementary signage to
tenant’s proper name.
7. Service station signage: Signage will be restricted to the area
identification sign and wall sign as outlined in Section III-A of this sign
criteria. No illuminated signage is allowed on the protective canopy
except on the south side facing Birch Street.
As part of a multi-occupancy project, a gas station will be required to
comply with the multi-occupancy section of the ordinance and will not be
allowed to display separate freestanding signage.
4
8. Directional signs are allowed and cannot exceed 4 square feet in size.
Directional signs are non-illuminated and can be placed up to 10 feet
above grade but cannot be erected adjacent to a residential street.
B. Exterior Signs Prohibited
1. Moving, rotating, or flashing signs.
2. Signs, letters, symbols, or identification of any nature painted directly on
exterior surfaces of the premises.
3. Cloth, wood, paper, or cardboard signs, stickers or painted signs around
or on exterior surfaces (light poles, door, and/or windows) of the
premises.
4. Individual freestanding signs identifying the tenants business.
5. Rooftop signs.
6. Signs employing noise making devices and/or components.
7. Window display signs of any kind without the prior written approval of
the landlord.
8. Signs employing un-edged or uncapped plastic letters or letters with no
returns and exposed fastenings.
9. Signs placed at right angles to any front.
10. Banners (unless approved in conjunction with the City of Lino Lakes (Sign
Ordinance Section 1010))
SECTION V SIGNS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION
A. Illuminated Signage
1. Dimensions- All channel letters shall be a maximum height of 18 inches.
All letters will have painted aluminum returns and edged trim on letter
face and mounted to a raceway.
B. Vinyl Signage for Tenant Entrances
1. All glass mounted signage to be on 3M Scotchcal vinyl film or adhesive
vinyl of equality, white in color.
2. Helvetica medium style upper cases letters shall be used.
3. All graphics shall be surface mounted to the glass of the entrance door.
4. Rear building signage will consist of 12x18 inch aluminum plaques
attached to each tenant’s rear door designating company name in vinyl
copy.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Site Location Map
B. Wall Elevations with Sign Bands
5
This Sign Criteria amendment was authorized by property owners Dan Lee, Spirit Hills Mall LLC
and Brian Hansen, Rice Creek Properties, LLC.
PROPERTY OWNER
By:________________________________ Date:_________________________
Dan Lee, Spirit Hills Mall, LLC
PROPERTY OWNER
By:________________________________ Date:_________________________
Brian Hansen, Rice Creek Properties, LLC
City Council approved the amendment on December 12, 2016 with Resolution No. 16-159.
WW
AA
RR
EE
RR
DD
LAKOTA TRLLAKOTA TRLWARE CIRWARE CIRHHOOKKAAHHDDRR65266526
65416541
403403 65016501
65346534 65336533
65016501
65256525
65176517
401401
65186518
354354
325325
65096509
65246524
0 100 20050Feet
December 2016
Attachment A: Site Location Map
Spirit Hills Center Ü
6511
6505 6501
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1G
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-160, Approving Transfers for Partial
Installment Payment on Interfund Loan for Recreation Complex
Land
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
In 1999, the City purchased land for the purpose of creating a recreation complex. A temporary
interfund loan was approved and was intended to be repaid through a successful park improvement
referendum. The referendum was held in 2001 and did not pass; therefore, it was the intent of the
City Could to approve a plan to repay the interfund loan. The City Council approved Resolution
No. 06-212 providing for the repayment of the interfund loan for the Recreation Complex land. The
attached Resolution No. 16-160 approves the transfers necessary to make the 2016 installment of
the approved repayment program.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 16-160.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-160, Approving Transfers for Partial Installment Payment on Interfund Loan
for Recreation Complex Land
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-160
RESOLUTION APPROVING TRANSFERS FOR PARTIAL INSTALLMENT
PAYMENT ON INTERFUND LOAN FOR RECREATION COMPLEX LAND
WHEREAS, in 1999 the City purchased land for the purpose of creating a recreation complex,
and
WHEREAS, a temporary interfund loan was made from the Area and Unit Fund (406) to the
Dedicated Parks Fund (405) for the purchase of said land, and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 06-212 providing for a plan to repay the
interfund loan from the General Fund and Dedicated Parks Fund.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes, that
the following transfers are approved to pay the 2016 installment on the Recreation Complex
Interfund Loan:
From To Amount
General Fund Dedicated Parks Fund $50,000.00
Dedicated Parks Fund Area and Unit Fund $100,000.00
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-161, Rescinding Resolution No. 16-
85, Establishing an Annual Capital Expenditure Budget for
Purchase of Fire Apparatus and Equipment
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to consider a resolution that will rescind Resolution No. 16-85,
Establishing an Annual Capital Expenditure Budget for Purchase of Fire Apparatus and
Equipment.
BACKGROUND
At the August 8, 2016 City Council Meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-85,
which established that $100,000 be allocated to the Capital Equipment Reserve Fund in 2017
and annually thereafter for replacement of fire apparatus and equipment.
During the November 14, 2016 City Council Special Work Session, the City Council discussed
the annual capital contribution for fire equipment replacement as part of the Draft 2017 Budget
discussion. It was noted that there was concern over making an annual contribution to the
Capital Equipment Fund and the actual intent of the council was not met by adopting
Resolution No. 16-85. Another option discussed included reviewing surplus funds at year-end
and committing a portion of the fund balance on an annual basis to fire capital equipment
replacement.
Based on the November 14th discussion, staff has amended the Draft 2017 Budget and has
prepared Resolution No. 16-161 in order to rescind Resolution No 16-85.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Resolution No. 16-161, Rescinding Resolution No. 16-85, Establishing an Annual
Capital Expenditure Budget for Purchase of Fire Apparatus and Equipment.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-161
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-161
RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 16-85,
ESTABLISHING ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
BUDGET FOR PURCHASE OF FIRE APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, the adoption of Resolution No. 16-85 allocated $100,000 of the 2017 budget, and
annually thereafter, for the replacement of fire equipment and replacement; and
WHEREAS, the intent of the City Council was not met by the adoption of Resolution No 16-85.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by t he City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that
the adoption of Resolution No. 16-85 be rescinded; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that on an
annual basis the surplus funds of the General Fund will be reviewed and evaluated and a
commitment of fund balance will be considered related to fire capital equipment replacement.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2B(i)
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-162, Adopting the Final 2016 Tax
Levy, Collectible in 2017
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
Minnesota State Statutes require the City of Lino Lakes to adopt and certify a final 2016 tax levy,
collectible in 2017 on or before December 28, 2016.
The total levy includes dollars for the general operating budget as well as dollars for special levies
for tax abatement and bonded indebtedness. The levy provides resources for City operations, capital
outlay and equipment replacement, street and storm drainage maintenance and a contingency for
unforeseen emergencies. The levy also includes voter-approved levies of $177,692 to service debt
for the Birch/Ware and Lake/Main intersection signalization projects and $217,127 to service debt
for the Shenandoah Street Reconstruction project. The total proposed tax levy for 2016/17 is
$9,491,855, which is a decrease of $193,707 to the preliminary levy adopted in September. The
proposed levy represents an increase of $433,427 over the 2015/16 tax levy. The tax rate is
estimated to decrease for 2017 from 46.017% to 45.044%.
A public hearing was held on the tax levy for this evening. Tax levy information was presented and
discussed during the public hearing and public testimony was received.
The City Council needs to take final action on the tax levy at this time.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 16-162.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-162, Adopting the Final 2016 Tax Levy, Collectible in 2017
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-162
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL 2016 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2017
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has budgeted to pay expenditures for General Fund
operating costs anticipated in the year 2017, and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has budgeted to pay the annual debt service on outstanding
indebtedness, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted its preliminary 2016 tax levy, collectible in 2017, in
anticipation of the above expenses, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has published in the official newspaper all notices required by
Minnesota State Statutes and the City Charter, and
WHEREAS, the City Council held its public hearing on December 12, 2016.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes,
approves its final 2016 tax levy, collectible in 2017, upon taxable property within the City of
Lino Lakes as follows:
1. Total amount levied in the year 2016 to be spread for taxes due and payable in the year
2017 is $9,491,855.
2. The total amount levied above is for the following purposes:
General Operating Levy $7,360,431
Bonded Indebtedness
G.O. CIP Refunding Bond 2006E 464,100
G.O. Bond 2012A 177,692
G.O. Bond 2015A 273,223
EDA Lease/Revenue Bond 2015 317,717
G.O. Tax Abatement Refunding Bonds 2016C 261,560
Equipment Certificates 2014 178,164
Equipment Certificates 2015A 71,749
Equipment Certificates 2015B 215,030
Equipment Certificates 2016 172,189
Total Bonded Indebtedness: 2,131,424
TOTAL LEVIES $9,491,855
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2B(ii)
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-163, Adopting the Final 2017 General
Fund Operating Budget
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
Minnesota State Statutes require the City of Lino Lakes to adopt and certify a final 2016 tax levy,
collectible in 2017 on or before December 28, 2016.
A public hearing was held tonight to take public comment on the budget. A summary of the
proposed budget and tax levy was presented and discussed during the public hearing.
The final 2017 budget represents a 4.00% increase from the 2016 adopted budget. The budget
includes resources for on-going city operations, capital outlay and equipment replacement, and
the addition of three staff positions (1 PT CSO, 1 PT Office Specialist, and 1 PT to FT Office
Specialist). A contingency for unforeseen circumstances is also included in the budget.
Accumulated General Fund Reserves are being used to balance the budget.
The City Council needs to take final action to approve the budget at this time.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 16-163.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-163, Adopting the Final 2017 General Fund Operating Budget
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-163
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL 2017 GENERAL FUND OPERATING
BUDGET
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the Lino Lakes City Council is required to
adopt a resolution setting out final General Fund revenues and expenditures for the upcoming
fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes,
that the following final General Fund operating budget be adopted for 2017:
2017 FINAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET
REVENUES:
Property Taxes $7,424,931
Intergovernmental Revenue 681,409
Licenses & Permits 612,753
Charges for Services 288,800
Fines & Forfeitures 175,600
Interest on Investments 30,000
Miscellaneous 1,058,065
TOTAL FINAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES $10,271,558
EXPENDITURES:
Administration $1,372,708
Community Development 833,378
Public Safety 4,633,458
Public Services 2,816,214
Other 615,800
TOTAL FINAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $10,271,558
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2B(iii)
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-164, Adopting the 2017 Water and
Sewer Operating Budgets
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The City Council reviewed the proposed 2017 Water and Sewer Operating Budgets at the December
5th City Council Work Session. The budgets include the cost of depreciation of infrastructure as an
expense, and recovery of this cost is incorporated into the utility rate structure.
It has been the practice of the City Council to adopt the Water and Sewer Operating Budgets by
resolution.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 16-164.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-164, Adopting the 2017 Water and Sewer Operating Budgets
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-164
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2017 WATER AND SEWER OPERATING BUDGETS
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed 2017 Water and Sewer Operating
Budgets during their budget work sessions, and
WHEREAS, the City Council each year adopts the Water and Sewer Operating Budget by
resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes,
that the following Water and Sewer Operating Budgets for the year 2017 are hereby adopted:
2017 Water Operating Budget 2017 Sewer Operating Budget
Operating Revenues $1,099,500 $1,667,500
Transfers -0- -0-
Total Revenues & Transfers $1,099,500 $1,667,500
Operating Expenses $1,153,613 $1,932,093
Debt Service -0- -0-
Total Expenses $1,153,613 $1,932,093
Revenues/Transfers over/
Under Expenses $ (54,113) $ (264,593)
Use of Fund Surplus $ 54,113 $ 264,593
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2B(iv)
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-165, Adopting the 2017 Recreation
Fund Budget
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The City Council has reviewed the proposed 2017 Recreation Fund Operating Budget during their
budget work sessions. The budget being presented for approval has not changed since the work
session held December 5th. The Recreation Fund is a special revenue fund and operates from
revenues collected from recreation fees. No part of the tax levy is used to finance Recreation Fund
operations. A transfer to the General Fund is budgeted to offset fixed costs. The budget for 2017
estimates that a small surplus will be realized in this fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 16-165.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-165, Adopting the 2017 Recreation Fund Budget
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-165
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2017 RECREATION FUND BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Recreation Fund is a Special Revenue Fund, funded through fees generated by
recreation programming, and
WHEREAS, Special Revenue Funds are required to adopt a budget for the forthcoming year.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes,
that the following Recreation Fund Operating Budget for the year 2017 is hereby adopted:
2017 RECREATION FUND BUDGET
REVENUES EXPENDITURES
Adult Instructional $ 1,400 $ 1,000
Adult Leagues 6,900 4,210
Youth Instructional 69,525 69,175
Youth Leagues 23,500 12,000
Special Events 8,110 11,500
Senior Programs 17,800 18,300
Program Totals $127,235 $116,185
Operating Surplus 0 1,050
Transfer to General Fund 0 10,000
Recreation Fund Totals $127,235 $127,235
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Resolution No. 16-166, Canceling the 2016/2017 Debt Service
Tax Levy for Taxable G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds,
Series 2016B
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND
In September 2005, the City Council awarded the sale of $5,550,000 Taxable General
Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2005A to finance public improvements in the Legacy at
Woods Edge development. At the time of issuance, an annual tax levy was included in the
bond documents for the payment of future debt service. It was fully anticipated that the annual
debt service would be satisfied by special assessments and that the tax levy would be evaluated
and canceled, if possible, on an annual basis.
At the October 24, 2016, City Council meeting, the City Council awarded the sale of
$1,980,000 Taxable General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B to
refinance the outstanding portion of the 2005A Series Bonds issued to fund the Legacy at
Woods Edge Improvements. At the time of issuance of the refunding bonds, an annual tax levy
was included in the bond documents for the payment of future debt service. It was fully
anticipated that the annual debt service would be satisfied by special assessments, TIF,
interfund loans (if needed), and future land sale proceeds and that the tax levy would be
evaluated and canceled, if possible, on an annual basis.
Following an analysis of the resources available for payment of the ensuing year debt service,
staff has concluded that adequate resources are available, and recommends that the debt service
tax levy for 2016, collectible in 2017 be canceled by the City Council. By adopting Resolution
No. 16-166, the City Council hereby cancels the 2016/2017 debt service levy for this bond
issue.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 16-166
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-166
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-166
RESOLUTION CANCELING THE 2016/2017 DEBT SERVICE TAX LEVY FOR
TAXABLE G.O. IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2016B
WHEREAS, a tax levy is scheduled for 2016 to be collected in 2017 to pay the debt service on
the Taxable G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B; and,
WHEREAS, funds are available from other sources to satisfy such debt service requirements;
and,
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to cancel such debt service levy for 2016,
collectible in 2017.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes,
Minnesota, that the tax levy scheduled for 2016 to be collected in 2017 to pay the debt service on
the Taxable G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B is hereby cancelled.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of September, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-167, Amending the 2016 General
Operating Budget
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The City Council has made a number of fiscal decisions through the year which have an impact on
the general operating budget. Additionally, economic conditions and projected changes in budget
projections have had a significant impact on the City’s budget for 2016. Staff has examined the
potential budget areas that will be impacted by these factors. The impacts include increased
revenues in building activities, police state aid, and other fines and fees, as well as changes in
expenditure areas due to personnel vacancies, changes to professional and contracted services,
variances in supplies, tools, fuel, and utilities, and finally the transfer for the park land loan.
Staff has prepared a listing of proposed budget adjustments for conditions that are known today
for City Council consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 16-167.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-167, Amending the 2016 General Operating Budget
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-167
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 2016 GENERAL OPERATING BUDGET
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a general operating budget for 2016, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has made certain fiscal decisions through the year which have an
impact on the general operating budget, and
WHEREAS, changes in economic conditions and changes in budget forecasts have made it
necessary for the City Council to reconsider portions of the adopted general operating budget,
and
WHEREAS, it is good management and accounting practice to amend the general operating
budget to reflect such changes.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes,
that the general operating budget for 2016 be amended as follows:
REVENUES:
ADJUSTMENT
AMOUNT
101 000 3010 000 General Property Tax (1,042,194)$
101 000 3020 000 Delinquent Taxes (40,000)
101 000 3040 000 Fiscal Disparities 1,042,194
101 000 3050 000 Tax Increment Collections 8,000
101 000 3150 000 Penalties & Interest (5,000)
101 000 3201 000 Liquor License -Bar 6,500
101 000 3204 000 Sunday Liquor License 500
101 000 3225 000 Lodging Tax 10,000
101 000 3250 000 Building Permit Fees 150,000
101 000 3251 000 Plan Inspection Fees 70,337
101 000 3253 000 Plumbing Permit 10,000
101 000 3264 000 Underground Utility Permit 10,000
101 000 3345 000 Municipal State Aid (MSA)(7,500)
101 000 3346 000 Police State Aid 18,500
101 000 3350 000 Circle Pines Gas Franchise (20,000)
101 000 3422 000 Police Other Revenues (20,000)
101 000 3492 000 Engineering/Planning Fees 15,000
101 000 3510 000 Fines & Forfeits 30,000
101 000 3511 000 ACE Fees 20,000
101 000 3900 000 General Fund Reserves (423,000)
(166,663)$
ACCOUNT
EXPENDITURES:
ADJUSTMENT
AMOUNT
101 401 4300 000 Mayor/Council Professional Services (2,000)$
101 401 4330 000 Mayor/Council Travel & Tuition (1,200)
101 401 4452 000 Mayor/Council Subscriptions & Dues 750
101 402 41xx 000 Admin Personal Services (23,323)
101 402 4310 000 Admin Other Consultant (7,000)
101 402 4330 000 Admin Travel & Tuition (1,000)
101 402 4340 000 Admin Printing & Publishing (500)
101 405 4300 999 Charter Admin Professional Services (1,000)
101 415 41xx 000 Econ Devel Personal Services (5,787)
101 415 4300 000 Econ Devel Professional Svcs (2,500)
101 415 4900 000 Econ Devel Marketing 9,500
101 416 4410 000 Planning & Zoning Contracted Services (2,500)
101 420 41xx 000 Police Personal Services (35,341)
101 421 41xx 000 Fire Personal Services (18,926)
101 421 4300 000 Fire Professional Services (5,000)
101 421 4410 000 Fire Contracted Services 38,400
101 422 41xx 000 Building Inspections Personal Services (25,436)
101 422 4410 000 Building Inspections Contracted Services 2,500
101 430 4102 000 Streets Overtime (2,000)
101 430 4211 000 Street Maintenance Supplies (4,000)
101 430 4229 000 Streets Gravel & Misc (3,000)
101 430 4300 000 Streets Professional Services (2,000)
101 430 4410 000 Streets Contracted Services (20,000)
101 431 4212 000 Fleet Vehicle Fuel (25,000)
101 431 4221 000 Fleet Shop Parts (5,000)
101 431 4240 000 Fleet Small Tools (1,000)
101 431 4300 000 Fleet Professional Services (13,500)
101 431 4410 000 Fleet Contracted Services 45,000
101 432 4211 000 Government Buildings Maint Supplies 20,000
101 432 4300 000 Government Buildings Professional Services 9,000
101 432 4381 000 Government Buildings Electricity 20,000
101 432 4383 000 Government Buildings Heat (24,000)
101 432 4384 000 Government Buildings Sanitation 5,000
101 432 4410 000 Government Buildings Contracted Services (10,000)
101 450 4382 000 Parks Utilities (5,000)
101 451 4310 000 Recreation Other Consultant (800)
101 461 4106 000 Environmental Temporaries (10,000)
101 499 4910 000 Operating Transfers 50,000
101 499 4905 000 Other Contingency (110,000)
(166,663)$
ACCOUNT
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2E
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-168, Committing Specific Revenue
Sources in Special Revenue Funds
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement #54
which requires that fund balances be divided into categories from most restricted to uncommitted
funds. The City Council must annually adopt a resolution to ‘commit’ certain funds.
BACKGROUND
The City Council has approved a policy implementing Governmental Accounting Standards
Board (GASB) Statement #54. This statement’s definition of special revenue funds states that
special revenue funds are used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources
that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other than debt service or
capital projects. The term “proceeds of specific revenue sources” establishes that one or more
specific restricted or committed revenues should be the foundation for a special revenue fund and
comprise a substantial portion of the fund’s revenues. Resolution No. 16-168 commits the
specific revenue sources of the Recreation Special Revenue Fund specifically for operating City-
sponsored recreation programming and the Cable TV Fund specifically for expenditures
associated with Cable TV programming. This commitment may only be changed by resolution
of the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 16-168.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-168, Committing Specific Revenue Sources in Special Revenue Funds
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-168
RESOLUTION COMMITTING SPECIFIC REVENUE SOURCES IN SPECIAL
REVENUE FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s Statement #54 definition of
special revenue funds states that special revenue funds are used to account for and report the
proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for
specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects, and
WHEREAS, the term “proceeds of specific revenue sources” established that one or more
specific restricted or committed revenues should be the foundation for a special revenue fund and
comprise a substantial portion of the fund’s revenues, and
WHEREAS, investment earnings and transfers from other funds do not meet the definition of a
specific revenue source, and
WHEREAS, council action is required to formalize the commitment of the specific revenue
sources to specified purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes, as
follows:
1. The specific revenue sources of each special revenue fund and the specific purposes for
which they are committed are as follows:
Fund Specific Revenue Sources Committed For
Recreation Program Recreation Fees Committed for expenditures
associated with City
Sponsored Recreation
Programs
Cable TV Franchise Fees Committed for expenditures
associated with City
Sponsored Cable TV
Programming
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2F
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Approval of Public Safety Department – Police Division
Vehicle Replacement Policy and 2017 Replacement Schedule
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
During the November 14th Budget Work Session, there was much discussion surrounding the
replacement of police vehicles. Staff was directed to prepare a five-year replacement schedule;
however, there was concern that the schedule prepared would trigger automatic replacement of
a police vehicle after five years. Therefore, staff prepared a revised vehicle replacement plan
and a Police Vehicle Replacement Policy that would serve as a guideline for staff to follow, in
an effort to reinforce the Council’s disposition to extend the life of vehicles as much as possible.
Both the Police Division Vehicle Replacement Policy and 2017 Replacement Schedule were
further reviewed by the City Council at the December 5th Work Session.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Public Safety Department – Police Division Vehicle
Replacement Policy and 2017 Replacement Schedule.
ATTACHMENTS
Public Safety Department – Police Division Vehicle Replacement Policy
2017 Police Vehicle Replacement Schedule
1
City of Lino Lakes
Public Safety Department – Police Division
Vehicle Replacement Policy
1. Purpose
The purpose of this Vehicle Replacement Policy is to propose a vehicle replacement plan for the
Police Division to follow, and to establish the specific vehicle needs and requirements of the
City. This document may be modified or updated annually due to the changing needs of citizens
or changes in the automotive industry.
2. Objectives
The primary objectives of the City of Lino Lakes is to control the overall cost of operating and
maintaining the fleet of vehicles, to maintain the vehicles in a manner that extend their useful
life, to control the growth in size of the fleet, to standardize the composition of the fleet, and to
accurately budget for maintenance replacement costs. All new purchases for vehicles are part of
the budget cycle and are coordinated through the City Administrator for recommendation.
3. Acquisition
The goal of the City’s acquisition practices is to obtain the lowest possible price and the highest
possible quality for vehicles. Before preparation of the Police Capital Equipment Plan, the
Public Safety Director will review the vehicle replacement schedule and appropriate
maintenance and repair records with the Public Services Director and Mechanic and plan the
acquisition of replacement vehicles. Any request for new vehicles that will increase the size of
the fleet must be approved by the City Council.
4. Maintenance
The goal of the Public Safety Department is to keep vehicles in sound operating condition.
Accurate and complete vehicle maintenance records are a key tool for making management
decisions. Preventative maintenance routines and intervals are based on local driving conditions
and manufacturer’s recommendations of each type of vehicle. Preventative maintenance is the
key to avoiding the repair or replacement of costly major vehicle components such as engines,
transmissions, and drive trains. Appropriate records for each vehicle are maintenance logs, fuel
usage logs, and cumulative costs of parts and labor.
5. Replacement
It is the policy of the City of Lino Lakes to replace police vehicles after 60 months or 100,000
miles of use. However, vehicle maintenance costs are variable and distinct to each vehicle. The
goal is to analyze the costs associated with a vehicle and to identify the point when each vehicle
is reasonably depreciated but not yet incurring significant maintenance costs. Based on the
vehicle records, it may be determined that a vehicle can be replaced later or may need to be
2
replaced earlier than the schedule calls for. Any request for replacing vehicles must be cost-
justified to the City Administrator and City Council.
6. Guidelines and Procedures
The Police Division has inventoried existing vehicles and has prepared a replacement schedule
for police vehicles. The schedule will be updated annually and will be used as the basis for
planning for the replacement of vehicles through the annual budget. Each vehicle recommended
for replacement will include the following information:
a. Age in years, also known as life
b. Miles of use
c. Useful life (based on commonly used standards for police vehicles)
d. Cost of maintenance
e. Overall condition (mechanical, operating, safety, and appearance)
f. Downtime
g. Availability of replacement parts
h. Funding
The guidelines for vehicles considered for replacement are based on 60 months of age or 100,000
miles of use, but additional consideration is given to functionality and overall condition of the
vehicle. As vehicles reach this threshold for age or miles, a vehicle maintenance evaluation will
be performed by the Public Services Director and Mechanic. If the evaluation indicates the
vehicle would be economical to retain for an additional year, the vehicle will be retained.
Depending on the availability of funds, vehicles will be replaced when they are at the end of their
economic life, no longer safe to operate, not reliable enough to perform their intended function,
or there is a demonstrated cost savings to the City of Lino Lakes.
Final Draft Completed 12/08/16
City of Lino LakesPublic Safety Department - Police2017 Vehicle Replacement PlanUnitYearAssigned20172018201920202021202220232024300 2004 CSO/Reserv27,000$ 380 2008 Invest 21,000$ 25,500$ 379 2009 Invest 21,000$ 25,500$ 390 2009 Invest 21,500$ 385 2011 Invest 21,500$ 382 2013 CSO/Reserv48,000$ 383 2013 Patrol 47,000$ 39,500$ 386 2013 Patrol - K9 39,000$ 42,000$ 388 2013 Patrol 37,000$ 39,500$ 392 2014 Patrol37,500$ 40,000$ 393 2014 Patrol37,500$ 40,000$ 394 2014 Patrol37,500$ 40,000$ 395 2014 Patrol37,500$ 40,000$ 396 2015 Patrol38,000$ 397 2015 Admin39,000$ 398 2015 Admin39,000$ 399 2015 Patrol38,000$ 301 2016 Admin39,500$ 302 2016 Patrol38,500$ 303 2016 Patrol38,500$ 304 2016 Patrol38,500$ 42,000$ 166,000$ 177,000$ 124,000$ 115,500$ 78,000$ 160,500$ 211,000$ Note: This plan reflects the cost of purchasing new investigations vehicles.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Karlson
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Non-Union Compensation Plan
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is being asked to consider a resolution establishing the 2017 compensation
plan for non-union employees.
BACKGROUND
The non-union compensation plan includes the following positions: city administrator,
department directors, deputy public safety directors, public safety captain, HR manager, and city
clerk. The 2017 plan embodies a salary adjustment of 2.5 percent.
The 2017 budget includes a 2.5 percent wage increase for all City personnel.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Resolution No. 16-169, establishing the 2017 compensation plan for non-union
employees, effective January 1, 2017.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 16-169
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-169
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2017
COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-UNION EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, Section 207.04 of the Code of Ordinances requires the City Administrator to
establish and maintain a compensation plan for all positions in the City, which is to be reviewed
and approved by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, this plan is in compliance with Minnesota Statute 471, which is referred to as the
Pay Equity Law; and
WHEREAS, the compensation plan for non-union employees includes a two and a half percent
(2.5%) wage increase, effective January 1, 2017.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that
the following salary schedule by adopted.
City of Lino Lakes 2017 Compensation Plan
Effective January 1, 2017
Position
Minimum
Monthly
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Maximum
Monthly
City Administrator $9,419 $9,889 $10,360 $10,831 $11,302 $11,773
Public Safety Director $8,289 $8,704 $9,118 $9,533 $9,947 $10,362
Finance Director $7,785 $8,174 $8,564 $8,953 $9,342 $9,731
Public Serv. Director $7,697 $8,081 $8,466 $8,851 $9,236 $9,621
Comm. Dev. Director $7,502 $7,877 $8,252 $8,628 $9,003 $9,378
Dep. Public Safety Dir. $7,261 $7,624 $7,987 $8,350 $8,713 $9,076
Public Safety Captain $6,786 $7,126 $7,465 $7,804 $8,144 $8,483
HR Manager $6,220 $6,531 $6,842 $7,153 $7,464 $7,775
City Clerk $5,109 $5,364 $5,619 $5,875 $6,130 $6,386
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of December 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member __________ and upon vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
____________________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 4A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Swenson, Public Safety Director
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Hire Paid On-Call Firefighter
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Lino Lakes Public Safety Department is requesting council approval to hire a paid on-call
firefighter.
BACKGROUND
As directed by Council Resolution 14-50 staff is integrating fire operations into the Public
Safety Department. Staff has been engaged in a fire recruiting and hiring process for paid on-
call firefighter candidates as part of the integration process.
The hiring process has been extensive including an interview process, background investigation,
medical examinations, and drug screen. This process has identified candidates that will
continue the Public Safety Department’s proud tradition of delivering high quality services
to the Lino Lakes Community.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council approve the hiring of Craig Menne for the position of paid on-
call firefighter effective December 13, 2017.
ATTACHMENTS
None
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC : Resolution No. 16-173, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a
Construction Contract, 2016 Surface Water Maintenance Project
and Establishing a Surface Water Maintenance Fund
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting authorization to accept quotes and award the construction contract for the
2016 Surface Water Maintenance Project, in addition to establishing a Surface Water
Maintenance Fund.
BACKGROUND
Quotes were received for the above-referenced project on December 6, 2016. The quotes were
checked for mathematical accuracy and tabulated.
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
Olson’s Sewer Service, Inc. $39,715.60
CW Houle, Inc. $69,245.00
Taylor West LLC $73,322.60
Veit & Company, Inc. $109,701.00
The low bid was submitted by Olson’s Sewer Service, Inc., Forest Lake, Minnesota, in the
amount of $39,715.60. The completion date for this project is June 16, 2017.
The 2016 General Fund Streets Budget includes $125,000 for Surface Water Maintenance
projects. To date, the City has incurred $24,275 of expenditures primarily related to finishing up
the 2014/2015 Surface Water Maintenance projects. Due to the nature and timing of Surface
Water Maintenance projects, the Finance Department is recommending the establishment of a
Surface Water Maintenance Fund to account for the 2016 carryover of funds, as well as the
surface water maintenance allotment budgeted for annually in the General Fund Streets Budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 16-173 accepting quotes and awarding a
construction contract for the 2016 Surface Water Maintenance Project, in the amount of
$39,715.60 to Olson’s Excavating Service, and the establishment of a Surface Water
Maintenance Fund.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 16-173
2. Project location map
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-173
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTES, AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT, 2016 SURFACE WATER MAINTENANCE PROJECT AND
ESTABLISHING A SURFACE WATER MAINTENANCE FUND
WHEREAS, pursuant to a request for quotes for the construction of the 2016 Surface Water
Maintenance Project, quotes were received, and tabulated:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
Olson’s Sewer Service, Inc. $39,715.60
CW Houle, Inc. $69,245.00
Taylor West LLC $73,322.60
Veit & Company, Inc. $109,701.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Olson’s Sewer Service, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, due to the nature and timing of Surface Water Maintenance projects, the Finance
Department is recommending the establishment of a Surface Water Maintenance Fund;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the
Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Olson’s Sewer
Service, Inc., in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the 2016 Surface Water
Maintenance Project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on
file in the office of the City Clerk; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that a Surface
Water Maintenance Fund be established to account for the 2016 carryover of funds, as well as, the
Surface Water Maintenance allotment budgeted for annually in the General Fund Streets Budget.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
!5
!5
!5
!5
!5
!5
!5
!5
Centerville Lake
Peltier Lake
Reshanau Lake
Rice Lake
Marshan Lake
George Watch Lake
Baldwin Lake
Amelia Lake
Otter Lake
Cedar Lake
Wards Lake
Sherman Lake
CENTERVILLE
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GwWX
GÀWX
Site 3-340 Pine St
Site 4-7718 Mustang Ln
Site 8-1366 Wolf Cir
Site 6-6556 White Oak Rd
Site 1-1183 Durango Pt
Site 5-1144 Hudson Trl
Site 7-2001 Otter Lake Dr
Site 2-7032 2nd Ave ELMCREST AVE NCENTURY TRLMILL RDOTTER LAKE RDDIANE CT
HIGHLAND DRA S P E N L NWOODDUCK TRLF
O
X CIRIVY RIDGE LNBEAVER POND WAYCOUNTY ROAD J BRIAN DRFAWN LNDEERWOOD LNCLEARWATER CREEK DRCEDAR ST W
LINDA LNPARTRIDGE PL
BLACK DUCK DRLAKE DR NEM O UND TRLAQUA CIR21ST AVE SLAMOTTE DRRED FOX RDSTAGECOACH TRLINTERSTATE 35EDEER CTAQUA LN
HERITAGE STAPOLLO DR2ND AVEGRAY HERON DRPETERSON TRL12TH AVE SOLD MI
LL RDTELE LNLEA CTM E A D O W L N
PARK CT
74TH ST IN TER S TA TE 35W
U LM ER D R
R O N D E A U LA K E R D W
GLADSTONE DR
N O R T H R D
62ND ST
D U PR E R D
ELM ST
SERVICE RDJAMES ST
ROHAVIC LN
KARTH RDMARILYN DR7 3 R D S TLOIS LNHODGSON RDBLOOM CT4TH AVECENTERVILLE RDEVERGREEN TRL
M
U
S
T
A
N
G
L
N
D
I
A
N
E
S
T
JEANNE DRG LEN TRL SARROWHEAD DR
FOXTAIL DRMAIN ST
EAGLE TRL
S H E R M A N L A K E R D
MARVY ST
GLENVIEW DR
HOKAH DRPELTIER LAKE DRJON AVEWOOD DUCK TRLPINE OAKS DR20TH AVE NPALOMINO LN
LANGER LN
64TH ST
65TH STCOUNTRY LNPATTI DRC A R L S T
MOLITOR DR
FOXTAIL CTS
A
N
D
HIL
L D
R ELBE STK E L LY S T
SUNRISE DRHOLLY DR N72ND ST
20TH AVE SPLUM LN
82ND ST E
MAPLE ST
BLUEBILL LNCENTER ST
MARSHAN LN KNOLL DRLAKE DR81ST ST W
WARE RDOLIVE ST
AENON PLNANCY DRW H I T E P I N E R D
LILAC ST
77TH ST W
81ST ST E
ASH ST SHAD AVELINDEN LNLAKEVIEW DRSUNSET AVETHOMAS ST
W O O D L A N D D R
WOODRIDGE LN
G STCAROLE DRP
E
LTIE
R CIRRONDEAU LAKE RD ELEONARD AVEH AW T H O R N R D
OAK LN
CEDAR ST E
REHBEIN ST
77TH ST E
OLD BIRCH STPARKWAY RD E
SHADOW LAKE DR WBIRCH ST
F ST
80TH ST E Document Path: K:\02988-300\GIS\Maps\2016StormwaterMaintenanceProject.mxdÜ
0 3,500Feet
Site Location Map2016 Stormwater Maintenance ProjectLino Lakes, MN
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-170, Relating to the I-35W North
Corridor Improvements
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council has requested consideration of a resolution documenting its position relating to
the I-35W North Corridor improvement project.
BACKGROUND
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) is currently completing preliminary
design of the 35W North Corridor Project. The proposed project will add a lane in each direction
from Highway 36 to Lexington Avenue in Blaine. The lanes will be managed under the MnPass
program. Eight (8) additions spot improvements along the corridor are also being recommended
as part of the project. The project includes the construction of a noise wall from Sunset Avenue
to a point approximately 1,300 feet to the east in Lino Lakes. Construction is anticipated to start
in 2019. Residents along the corridor in Lino Lakes overwhelmingly supported the noise wall.
Of the 108 total eligible points Mn/DOT received 94 (87%) in favor of the wall. No votes in
opposition of the wall where received.
The deadline for consideration of Municipal Consent for the I-35W North Corridor Project was
November 20, 2016. No action was taken by the City Council and in accordance with State
Statutes the layout is deemed approved.
The City Council discussed consideration of a resolution documenting the City’s position
regarding this project at the November 7, 2016 and December 5, 2016 work sessions. While the
City Council supported the proposed lane and noise wall improvements concern was expressed
regarding the expansion of the MnPass system. Attached is a draft resolution documenting the
City Council’s opposition to MnPass and stipulating that any change in scope or expansion of the
project within Lino Lakes or future project with Lino Lakes requires City consent if required by
state law.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution 16-170.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 16-170
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-170
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FINAL LAYOUT FOR STATE PROJECT 6284-172 I35W NORTH
CORRIDOR WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF LINO LAKES
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing on the final layout for State Project 6284-172 for improvements to
the Interstate 35W North Corridor was held by the City Council of Lino Lakes on August 22,
2016; and
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has prepared a final layout for State Project
Layout 1A, 6284-172 on Interstate 35W North, from Sunset Avenue to approximately 1,600 feet
northeast within the City of Lino Lakes for corridor improvements; and seeks the approval
thereof, as described in Minnesota Statutes 161.162 to 161.167; and
WHEREAS, said final layout is on file in the Metro District, Minnesota Department of
Transportation office, Roseville, Minnesota, being marked as S.P. 6284-172, Layout 1A, from
R.P. 680+00 to 696+00; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes supported the construction of sound
barriers and additional lanes to I-35W between Highway 36 and County Road 17, as those
improvements are clearly needed, but opposes designating the additional lanes as MnPass lanes,
and instead supports the construction of general purpose lanes open to all given that all taxpayers
are financially supporting their construction.; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined it in the best interest of the City to take no action on
the plans within the 90-day statutory review period thereby deeming the plans approved for
purposes of Mn/DOT proceeding with the specific project.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that
the lack of a specific denial of the project does not allow for or otherwise permit the change in
scope or expansion of State Project 6284-172 on Interstate 35W North within the City of Lino
Lakes, or future projects within the City, without the expressed consent of the Lino Lakes City
Council as described in Minnesota Statutes 161.162 to 161.167.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 16-174, Authorizing Preparation
of a Feasibility Study for Water Storage
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting council authorization to prepare a Feasibility Study for a Water Storage
Facility.
BACKGROUND
The City’s water system is designed to meet The American Water Works Association standards
for system pressure and supply. The water system consists of water storage, water supply and a
network of pipes. The City is responsible to continually review the system and complete
improvements as outlined in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
The City has two existing water storage tanks 1 million gallons each. The Comprehensive Plan
outlines the need for additional water storage. Thus the water system was further evaluated using
hydrant flow tests and water system modeling. The evaluation confirmed the need for additional
water storage within the next two years. WSB & Associates was asked to prepare a proposal for
a Water Storage Feasibility Study.
The Water Storage Feasibility Study will evaluate multiple sites throughout the City for
elevation, ownership, and site access. The feasibility report will make a recommendation for the
location and type of storage that will provide desired results in the most cost-effective manner.
The study will outline the following recommendations:
• Size and type of storage;
• Potential sites;
• Impact to City water distribution system; and
• Cost.
The feasibility study cost is $17,100 and would be funded through the City’s trunk water fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending adoption of Resolution No. 16-174 Authorizing Preparation of a
Feasibility Study for Water Storage.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 16-174
2. Proposal for Water Storage Feasibility Study
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-174
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY
FOR WATER STORAGE
WHEREAS, the City’s water system is in need of additional water storage to maintain American
Water Works Association standards for system pressure and supply, and
WHEREAS, the Water Storage Feasibility Study will evaluate multiple sites throughout the
City for elevation, ownership, and site access. The feasibility report will make a
recommendation for the location and type of storage that will provide system improvements in
the most cost-effective manner; and
WHEREAS, WSB and Associates, the City Engineer, has submitted a proposal to prepare the
Feasibility Study.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes:
1. The Water Storage Feasibility Study is hereby ordered to determine if the
proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible and as to
whether it should best be made as proposed, and at the estimated cost of the
improvement.
2. WSB and Associates are directed to prepare the Feasibility Study for Water
Storage in an amount not exceed $17,100.00.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
477 Temperance Street | St. Paul, MN 55101 | (651) 286-8450
Building a legacy – your legacy.
Equal Opportunity Employer | wsbeng.com
K:\Personal\Erin Heydinger\Lino Lakes\LTR - PROPOSAL - m grochala - WaterTowerSiting - 110816.docx
November 11, 2016
Mr. Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Proposal to Provide Services to Complete W ater Storage Feasibility Study
for the City of Lino Lakes, MN
Dear Mr. Grochala:
We are pleased to provide you with this proposal for services to assist the City of Lino Lakes (City) in
performing a water storage siting and feasibility study. Outlined below is our scope of work and estimated
fees to perform the siting study that includes:
Evaluation of the existing and future water storage needs;
Identification and analysis of potential storage locations;
Analysis and recommendation of ground storage versus elevated storage;
Water distribution system modeling for each of the potential sites; and
Cost estimates for each alternative evaluated.
The American Water Works Association recommends that a City’s storage capacity be equal to its
average daily demands plus some additional storage for fire fighting at a minimum. To date, the City’s
average day demand has not exceeded its storage capacity; however, as the City develops, the City will
need to construct additional storage to adequately serve its residents. In this study, WSB will evaluate
several locations for water storage and will make a site recommendation based on the findings of the
study. This study will provide the City with the information necessary to begin the design and construction
of a storage tank and will allow the City to anticipate how the proposed storage will change the existing
water distributions system.
WSB’s project scope and proposed work plan as presented is based on our understanding of the project,
discussions with City staff, and experience on similar projects. The following are the major tasks that will
be performed in preparing the City’s water distribution system model.
Task 1: Project Management and Coordination
Project management is a key task included in each project undertaken by WSB. This task consists of
management and administration, project coordination, and overall communication with the City. Proper
completion of this task will help keep all affected parties routinely updated and informed reg arding project
issues, as well as keep the project on schedule and within budget. The proposed work plan will include up
to three meetings with the City as deemed necessary. Project milestone meetings may include:
Preliminary site findings meeting;
Draft review meeting; and
City Council meeting
Mr. Michael Grochala
September 20, 2016
Page 2
K:\Personal\Erin Heydinger\Lino Lakes\LTR - PROPOSAL - m grochala - WaterTowerSiting - 110816.docx
Task 2: Storage Size and Type
Using water use data and population projections, WSB will determine the size of storage tank the City will
require to adequately serve the future population. In addition to tank size, two types of storage will be
considered: ground storage and elevated storage. Ground storage can be at grade or sub-grade. Water
from ground storage reservoirs is supplied to the system via high service pumps. Elevated storage tanks
are raised and do not require a pump station; the elevation of the tank provides water pressure to the
distribution system. WSB will evaluate both types of storage for the City and will provide a
recommendation.
Task 3: Determination of Potential Sites
Once the type of tank is determined, we will evaluate potential sites for the tank. The sites highlighted in
TKDA’s Water Treatment Plant Feasibility Study, dated September 17, 2007, will be analyzed in this
study. Up to three additional sites will also be studied. Any additional sites studied will be determined
using GIS and will be based on location within the water distribution system, gr ound elevations, likely soil
type, and ownership.
Task 4: Water Distribution System Modeling
In 2015, WSB created an existing and ultimate water system model in WaterCAD that will be used for this
study. The existing system model will be updated with any watermain changes that have been made
since its creation. The model’s ultimate water demands were based on the City’s 2030 Comprehensive
Plan. Since that time, the Metropolitan Council has released new population and water demand
projections; the City’s ultimate water model demands will be updated accordingly.
Once the model has been updated, scenarios will be created to evaluate the impact of adding storage at
each of the sites identified in Task 3. If necessary, alternatives to each scenario will be included to
determine how to successfully integrate storage at each site.
Task 5: Cost Estimates
Approximate cost estimates will be provided for each site considered. The cost estimates will be based on
the findings from tasks 2 through 6. The estimated costs included in the final report will include a
construction contingency and indirect costs. Specific design requirements unique to each site will be
considered.
Task 6: Prepare Feasibility Report
WSB will deliver a detailed feasibility report outlining the methods and results of the study. The report will
include a final recommendation based on cost and design requirements. The findings from the storage
evaluation, site determination, geotechnical evaluation, water distribution system modeling, and cost
estimates will be included in the report. The report will allow the City to move forward in property
acquisition (if necessary), design, and construction of the storage facility.
Cost and Schedule
The estimated cost to perform Tasks 1 through 6 described above is $14,900 billed on an hourly, not-to-
exceed basis. The following presents the cost breakdown for each task presented in this proposal. These
fees do not include geotechnical services. A proposal to obtain soil borings and provide a geotechnical
report will be submitted to the City after the potential water storage facility sites have been determined
during the study phase.
Task Number Description Cost
1 Project Management and
Coordination
$1,900
2 Storage Size and Type $2,400
3 Determination of Potential Sites $3,400
4 Water Distribution System
Modeling
$3,700
5 Cost Estimates $1,800
6 Prepare Feasibility Report $3,900
Total Direct Labor Costs: $17,100
Mr. Michael Grochala
September 20, 2016
Page 3
K:\Personal\Erin Heydinger\Lino Lakes\LTR - PROPOSAL - m grochala - WaterTowerSiting - 110816.docx
If additional work is required beyond the summarized scope above, WSB will receive authorization from
the City prior to initiating the work. Upon authorization, WSB will deliver the associated Feasibility Report
by February 24, 2017. If you wish to authorize this work, please sign below and return a copy to WSB.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Greg F. Johnson, PE Erin Heydinger
Principal/Sr. Project Manager Project Engineer
cc: Diane Hankee, PE, WSB & Associates, Inc.
kkp
ACCEPTED BY:
City of Lino Lakes, MN
Name
Title
Date
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-175, Authorizing Preparation of
Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Project, 2017 Mill and
Overlay Project
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting council authorization to prepare plans and specifications, and order the
project, for the 2017 Mill and Overlay Project.
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City’s Pavement Management Plan, streets are identified annually for
maintenance. The City performs pavement ratings and uses Cartegraph software to analyze the
conditions of the City’s streets. This data along with traffic volumes, maintenance records and
drainage review are used to prioritize the roadway maintenance needs.
Staff is proposing to include a bid alternate to provide options if we receive favorable bids. The
2017 Mill and Overlay maintenance project includes the following:
Mill and Overlay
2nd Avenue (Lake Dr to Elm St)
Glenview Avenue (Glenview Ln to 2nd Ave)
Parkview Avenue (Glenview Ln to 2nd Ave)
Alternate Glenview Lane and Gladstone Circle
Seal Coat
Kelly Street
Stagecoach Trl (north section)
Vaughn Ct
Oakwood Ln
Red Fox Rd
Fox Rd (east section)
The schedule for this project is as follows:
City Council Order Project, Authorizes Plans and Spec’s Dec. 12, 2016
City Council Approves Plans and Specifications Feb. 13, 2017
City Council Authorizes Ad for Bids Feb. 13, 2017
2
City Open Bids March 16, 2017
City Council Awards Contract March 27, 2017
Construction Begins Mid May, 2017
Final Completion August 25, 2017
WSB and Associates, the City Engineer, have submitted a proposal to complete the plans and
specifications, and provide bid documents, for the not to exceed cost of $24,140 based actual time
spent on the project.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 16-175 authorizing preparation of plans and
specifications and ordering the project.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 16-175
2. WSB Proposal
3. Project Location Map
3
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 16-175
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING THE PROJECT FOR THE 2017 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT
WHEREAS, it is proposed to perform mill and overlay and seal coat improvements on
recommended street segments, and
WHEREAS, the City Council is ordering the project finding that it would be in the best interest of
the city to proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, WSB and Associates, the City Engineer, has submitted a proposal to prepare plans
and specifications.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes:
1. The 2017 Mill and Overlay Project is hereby ordered.
2. WSB and Associates are designated as the engineer for this improvement and
directed to prepare plans and specifications for the 2017 Mill & Overlay Project.
3. Staff is hereby authorized to execute the hourly based contract in an amount not
exceed $24,140.00.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Engineering Planning Environmental Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
Minneapolis St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
December 08, 2016
City of Lino Lakes
Mr. Michael Grochala
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Request for Proposal to Complete 2017 Street Maintenance Project
Dear Mr. Grochala:
The City of Lino Lakes has an annual street maintenance plan which consists of mill and overlay
and seal coating. The City is requesting assistance with design and bidding of its 2017 Street
Maintenance Project. The streets designated for rehabilitation are local streets as determined by
their OCI ratings established in the City’s Pavement Management Study. A summary of the
project sites is described as follows:
Mill and Overlay
• 2nd Avenue (4550 LF)
• Glenview Avenue (450 LF)
• Parkview Drive (460 LF)
• Alternate Glenview Lane and Gladstone Circle
Sealcoat Areas
• Pine Glen
• Marshan Meadows/Grandview
• Woodridge Estates/Oakwood View
• Fox Borough
• Vaughn Addition
Based on the City’s existing street maintenance plan and discussions with staff, WSB would
perform the following tasks:
I. Prepare Final Project Plans/Maps
Final construction plans and/or maps will be prepared indicating the project
locations and any specific work to be done outside of the scheduled maintenance
Mr. Michael Grochala
December 8, 2016
Page 2
activities. Base topographic information will include field survey, city parcel map
information and Lidar contours.
WSB will contact RCWD and Anoka County to determine if any permits are
required for the proposed work.
II. Final Quantities
An Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost will be completed on the final
construction plans and maps.
III. Prepare Permits, Specifications and Bidding Documents
WSB will assist the City in obtaining approvals from governmental authorities
having jurisdiction over the project if it is determined that they are needed. WSB
will assist the City in preparing permit application(s) and/or approval requests and
will assist the City with submitting the applications/approval requests to the
appropriate regulatory agencies. Permit applications and/or agency review
submittals are anticipated for: (1) RCWD, and (2) Anoka County.
WSB will develop the final project plans/maps and specifications based on the
agency review comments. This task will include an internal QA/QC review of the
final plans, quantities, and specifications.
Upon completion of permitting, and agency review and approval, a final set of
construction documents will be prepared for bidding.
WSB will print, assemble, and submit the final contract documents to the City and
request authorization to advertise the project for bidding. WSB will receive and
respond to bidder inquiries concerning the plans, specifications, and intent of the
project. Logs of all inquiries will be kept and maintained to document inquiries.
WSB will attend the project bid opening with the City.
WSB will review the low bidder’s bid proposal, contractor’s and subcontractor’s
personnel proposed for the project and relative experience, quality and availability
of equipment, performance on similar projects, references, nature and extent of
other similar contracts, whether or not the contractor or subcontractors have ever
been denied contract award, and any other information that would affect the
ability of the contractor to perform the work.
IV. Construction Services
WSB & Associates, Inc. will provide a separate proposal to the City for survey
and construction services once the final plans are completed and limits are known.
The engineering fee to complete the 2017 Street Maintenance Project is $24, 140 (not to
exceed).
Mr. Michael Grochala
December 8, 2016
Page 3
This letter represents our complete understanding of the 2017 Street Maintenance Project and the
proposed scope of services. If you are in agreement with the scope of services and proposed fee,
please sign in the appropriate space below and return one copy to us.
If you have any questions about this proposal, please feel free to call me at 763-287-7167.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Edward C. Youngquist
Project Manager
ACCEPTANCE:
The City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the WSB proposal of $24,140 for all services outlined in
this letter.
City of Lino Lakes
Name
Title
Date
LINO LAKES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MEETING
Monday, December 12, 2016
Immediately Following Regular City Council Meeting.
City Council Chambers
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Consideration of Minutes of July 25, 2016
3. Action Items
A) Consider Resolution No. 16-06, Approving Collateral Assignment and
Subordination of Development Agreement and TIF Note, United
Properties – TIF District 1-12, Michael Grochala
4. Adjourn
EDA MINUTES July 25, 2016
DRAFT
1
DATE : July 25, 2016
TIME STARTED : 8:32 p.m.
TIME ENDED : 8:50 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT : EDA Members Kusterman, Reinert, Rafferty,
Maher, Manthey
MEMBERS ABSENT : None
OTHERS PRESENT: : Community Development Director Michael
Grochala; City Clerk Julie Bartell
The meeting was called to order at 8:32 p.m. by EDA President Kusterman.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF APRIL 11, 2016
Economic Development Authority (EDA) Member Rafferty moved to approve the June 13, 2016
minutes as presented. EDA Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice
vote.
RESOLUTION NO. 16-04, APPROVING MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
PLAN AND APPROVING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
Community Development Director Grochala reviewed the written staff report and requested
actions.
President Kusterman indicated that the council already had a full report and robust discussion on
this subject as part of the regular council meeting.
EDA Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 16-04 as presented. Council Rafferty
seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote.
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 16-05,
APPROVING CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND AWARDING SALE
OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE
Michael Grochala, Community Development Director, reviewed the written staff report. He
noted that this will be a public hearing.
Julie Eddington, Kennedy & Graven, counsel to the EDA, explained what is included in the
proposed development contract, including the term required for construction. With respect to the
tenant, the contract requires that there be an executed lease including a job requirement. Because
of the statutory requirement related to a Green Acres property, the tenant will additionally be
required to meet certain wage stages. The developer agrees to pay for everything related to the
construction and in exchange the EDA promises a pay-as-you -go note and that will be attached
to a tax increment note. The job and wage requirements will be monitored. The developer is
still in the process of purchasing the property although they are in the final stages. If the
developer does run into purchase issues, they can terminate the contract. The action approves
the contract and provides authorization to issue the note.
EDA MINUTES July 25, 2016
DRAFT
2
President Kusterman opened the public hearing. There being no one present wishing to speak,
the public hearing was closed.
EDA Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 16-05 as presented. EDA Member
Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: December 12, 2016
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 16-06, Approving Collateral Assignment
and Subordination of Development Agreement and TIF Note,
United Properties – TIF District 1-12
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The Economic Development Authority (EDA) approved the Contract for Private Development
with United Properties and Distribution Alternatives in July of 2016. The action also included
authorization for the issuance of a Tax Increment Revenue Note. Construction of the 402,000
square foot facility and associated public improvements has commenced in accordance with the
agreement.
United Properties Development LLC (the “Developer”) is in the process of has requested that the
EDA execute a Collateral Assignment and Subordination of Development Agreement and Tax
Increment Note. Pursuant to Section 7.3 of the Contract for Private Development, dated July 25,
2016, between the EDA, the Developer, and Distribution Alternatives, Inc., the EDA agreed to
subordinate its rights under the Contract for Private Development as long as the subordination
was subject to reasonable terms and conditions.
The Collateral Assignment does the following:
Assigns the TIF Note to the UMB Bank N.A. (the lender for the construction of the
building)
Requires EDA to give notice to bank of any default
Allows the Bank to step into the shoes of the Developer to cure a default
Allows the Bank to assume the role of Developer in the case of a default
If the Bank forecloses, the Contract for Private Development is terminated
Julie Eddington, EDA development counsel, has reviewed the agreement and, subject to her
comments, has found the agreement satisfactory for approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 16-06.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 16-06
2. Assignment and Subordination Agreement
491614v1 JAE LN140-116
LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 16-06
RESOLUTION APPROVING COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE.
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the “City”) and the Lino Lakes Economic
Development Authority (the “Authority”) have established, and the Authority administers, Development
District No. 1 (the “Development District”) located within the City and have caused to be created a
Development Plan therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 through 469.1082, as
amended; and
WHEREAS, within the Development District the City and the Authority have created Tax
Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 1-12 (the “TIF District”), pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the Authority, United Properties Development LLC, a Minnesota limited liability
company (the “Developer”), and Distribution Alternatives, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “Tenant”),
have entered into a Contract for Private Development, dated July 25, 2016 (the “Contract”), pursuant to
which the Developer agreed to develop an approximately 400,000 square foot warehouse and distribution
facility with related office space and other improvements to be constructed on property located within the
TIF District for use by the Tenant in its distribution business (the “Minimum Improvements”), and in turn
the Authority agreed to reimburse the Developer for certain public improvements and site preparation costs
through the issuance of a Tax Increment Revenue Note, Series 2016 (the “TIF Note”); and
WHEREAS, UMB Bank N.A., a national banking association (the “Bank”), has agreed to provide
the Developer with a loan (the “Project Loan”) to finance the construction of the Minimum Improvements;
and
WHEREAS, prior to providing the Project Loan, the Bank requires that the Authority agree to
subordinate its interest and rights under the Contract to the Bank and that the Developer agree to assign its
interest in the TIF Note to the Bank; and
WHEREAS, Section 7.3 of the Contract authorizes the Authority to subordinate its interest and
rights under the Contract to the Bank so long as the Authority and the Bank mutually agree to the conditions
of subordination in writing; and
WHEREAS, there has been presented before the Board of Commissioners of the Authority a
Collateral Assignment and Subordination of Development Agreement and Tax Increment Revenue Note
(the “Subordination and Assignment”), proposed to be executed by the Developer, the Bank, and the
Authority, which provides for the subordination of the Authority’s interest and rights under the Contract and
the assignment of the Developer’s interest in the TIF Note to the Bank; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Lino Lakes
Economic Development Authority that:
1. The proposed Subordination and Assignment is hereby approved in all respects and
satisfies the conditions set forth in Section 7.3 of the Contract .
491614v1 JAE LN140-116 2
2. The President and the Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute and deliver
the Subordination and Assignment in substantially the form on file with the Authority, with such
additions, deletions, and other changes as are approved by the President and the Executive Director. The
President and the Executive Director are further directed to take all steps and do all things necessary to
effectuate the provisions of the Subordination and Assignment.
Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority this
12th day of December, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Board Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Board Member ________________ and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
William Kusterman, President
ATTEST:
Jeff Karlson, Executive Director
CORE/0808310.0004/125458168.8
PREPARED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED RETURN TO:
Stinson Leonard Street LLP
150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Attention: Lara S. Page
(Space above reserved for recorder’s use.)
COLLATERALASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE
This COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE (this “Assignment”) is made and
entered into as of December __, 2016, by and among UNITED PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”), UMB BANK N.A., a national banking
association (“Bank”), and the LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a
body corporate and politic duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota
(“Authority”). Capitalized terms used herein without specific definition shall have the meanings
given to them in the Development Agreement (as hereinafter defined).
A. Developer is developing a warehouse facility located in Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the
“Project”), on the real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”).
B. Pursuant to that certain Project Addendum dated as of even date herewith, by and
among Developer, United Properties Investments LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company
(“Borrower”) and Bank (as amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the
“Project Addendum”) and the Loan Agreement referred to therein, Bank has agreed to make a
loan to Borrower in the maximum principal amount of [Twenty Million and No/100 Dollars
($20,000,000.00)] (the “Project Loan”) in order to finance the construction of the Project.
C. The Project Loan will be secured by, among other things, a Mortgage, Security
Agreement, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Fixture Filing, made by Developer in favor of
Bank and encumbering the Property (as amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to
time, the “Mortgage”).
CORE/0808310.0004/125458168.8 2
D. To assist Developer in financing the Project, Developer, Distribution Alternatives,
Inc. and Authority have entered into a Contract for Private Development dated as of July 25, 2016
(the “Development Agreement”). Pursuant to the Development Agreement, Authority has agreed
to issue to Borrower its Tax Increment Revenue Note, Series 2016, in the maximum principal
amount of $1,200,000.00 (the “TIF Note”) upon satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the
Development Agreement.
E. Pursuant to the Project Addendum and the Loan Agreement, and as a condition to
making the Project Loan, Bank has required that Developer and the Authority execute and deliver
this Assignment to Bank.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and in order to induce Bank to
make the Project Loan, Developer and the Authority agree as follows:
1. Assignment. Developer hereby transfers and assigns to Bank and grants to Bank a
security interest in all of its right, title and interest in, to and under the Development Agreement,
the TIF Note, the tax increments payable thereunder, any and all other payments made or to be
made thereunder and all proceeds thereof. This Assignment is made to induce Bank to enter into
the Project Addendum and make the Project Loan and for the purpose of securing the performance
and observance by Developer and Borrower of all of the terms and conditions of the Project
Addendum, the Loan Agreement and the Note (as defined in the Project Addendum), and all other
obligations of Developer and Borrower to Bank in connection with the Project. This Assignment
shall constitute a perfected, absolute and present assignment, provided that Bank shall not have
any right under this Assignment to enforce the provisions of the Development Agreement or
exercise any other remedies under this Assignment unless and until Bank delivers an Assumption
Notice pursuant to Section 8 of this Assignment.
2. Endorsement and Delivery of TIF Note. Upon issuance of the TIF Note, Developer
shall endorse the TIF Note to Bank. Developer authorizes and directs Authority to deliver the TIF
Note, registered in Bank's name, directly to Bank at the address set forth in Section 15 hereof.
Upon receipt, Bank shall attach to the TIF Note an endorsement from Developer in favor of Bank
in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto, which Developer shall execute contemporaneously with
this Assignment. Bank shall then hold the TIF Note subject to the terms of this Assignment.
3. Representations and Warranties of Developer. Developer represents and warrants
to Bank and agrees as follows:
(a) Developer will not, without the prior written consent of Bank, modify,
amend, supplement, terminate, surrender or change in any manner whatsoever the
Development Agreement or the TIF Note and will not release or discharge the obligations
of any party thereto or modify or extend the time of performance thereunder or the scope
of the work thereunder.
(b) The Development Agreement and the TIF Note are or will be, as applicable,
free and clear of all liens, security interests, assignments and encumbrances other than the
assignment and security interest created by this Assignment.
CORE/0808310.0004/125458168.8 3
(c) Developer has the full right, power and authority to assign the Development
Agreement and, upon its issuance, the TIF Note, free and clear of any and all liens, security
interests and assignments.
(d) Developer will keep the Development Agreement and the TIF Note free
from any lien, encumbrance, assignment or security interest whatsoever, other than this
Assignment and security interest.
(e) Developer will from time to time and at the request of Bank execute such
documents and pay the cost of filing and recording the same and do such other acts and
things as Bank may request to establish and maintain a perfected security interest in the
Development Agreement and the TIF Note which is valid and superior to all liens, claims
or security interests whatsoever.
(f) There have been no defaults on the part of Developer under the
Development Agreement, and, to Developer’s knowledge, neither the Authority nor Tenant
is in default under the Development Agreement.
4. Covenants of Developer. Developer covenants and agrees that:
(a) It shall perform each and every one of its duties and obligations under the
Development Agreement and observe and comply with each and every term, covenant,
condition, agreement, requirement, restriction and provision of the Development
Agreement.
(b) It shall give prompt notice to Bank of any claim of or notice of default under
the Development Agreement known or given to it together with a copy of any such notice
or claim if in writing.
(c) At the sole cost and expense of Developer, Developer will enforce the full
and complete performance of each and every duty and obligation to be performed by
Authority and/or Tenant under the Development Agreement and the TIF Note.
(d) It will appear in and defend any action arising out of or in any manner
connected with the Development Agreement and the duties and obligations of Developer,
Tenant or the Authority thereunder.
5. Authority’s Representations, Warranties and Covenants. Authority represents and
warrants to and covenants with Bank as follows:
(a) The execution, delivery and performance of this Assignment have been duly
authorized by all necessary action.
(b) Until all amounts advanced and to be advanced under the Loan Documents
have been repaid, no amendment to the Development Agreement shall be binding on Bank
unless Bank consents to the amendment in writing.
CORE/0808310.0004/125458168.8 4
(c) The Development Agreement is in full force and effect and has not been
amended, and neither the Authority nor, to the Authority’s knowledge, none of Developer
or Tenant, is in default under the Development Agreement.
(d) If a default shall occur under the Development Agreement, the Authority
shall provide Bank with written notice of such default contemporaneously with any notice
given to Developer or Tenant. Prior to exercising its rights under the Development
Agreement in connection with any default (including but not limited to Section 9.2 set forth
therein), the Authority shall provide Bank with the same opportunity to cure such default
as is given to Developer or Tenant under the Development Agreement, and the Authority
shall accept such cure as if tendered directly by Developer or Tenant ; provided, however,
that (i) Bank shall have not less than thirty (30) days to cure a monetary default and not
less than sixty (60) days to cure a nonmonetary default , (ii) Bank will not be required to
cure any default which is personal to Developer or Tenant and is not susceptible of being
cured by Bank, and (iii) if Bank's ability to cure requires it to obtain possession of the
Property, then it shall have such time to cure as is reasonably necessary to gain possession
through foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or other methods. For the avoidance of
doubt, the Authority shall not take any action to terminate the Development Agreement or
the TIF Note due to any default by Developer or Tenant as long as Bank is exercising its
cure rights as provided in this Section with reasonable diligence.
6. Bank’s Rights to Act on Behalf of Developer. Developer hereby authorizes Bank
during an Event of Default to act on its behalf either in the name of Developer or Bank in
connection with the exercise of any of the rights of Developer under the Development Agreement.
Developer hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints Bank as its attorney-in-fact to demand,
receive and enforce Developer’s rights with respect to the Development Agreement and the TIF
Note. Developer agrees to reimburse Bank on demand for any expenses incurred by Bank, or its
agents or attorneys, pursuant to the aforesaid authorization. Developer hereby irrevocably
instructs, directs, authorizes and empowers all parties to the Development Agreement to recognize
the claims of Bank, or its successors or assigns hereunder, and to act upon any instructions or
directions of Bank without investigating the reason for any action taken by Bank.
7. Consent to Loan Documents. Authority consents to the execution and recording of
the Mortgage and to the assignment of the Development Agreement and the TIF Note by
Developer to Bank under the terms of this Assignment.
8. Bank’s Option to Assume Development Agreement. Upon the occurrence and
continuance of an Event of Default, Bank may, at its option, notify Authority and Developer in
writing that it has elected to assume the obligations of Developer under the Development
Agreement (such notice is hereinafter referred to as the “Assumption Notice”). Following receipt
of the Assumption Notice, Authority shall treat Bank as if it were the Developer under the
Development Agreement, and shall continue to perform its obligations under the Development
Agreement for the benefit of Bank, as long as Bank continues to perform the obligations of
Developer under the Development Agreement. Bank shall not have any obligation with respect to
the Development Agreement unless and until delivery of an Assumption Notice by Bank to
Authority.
CORE/0808310.0004/125458168.8 5
9. Subordination of Development Agreement. Regardless of the priority of any rights or
interests otherwise available or belonging to Authority and notwithstanding anything to the contrary
set forth in the Development Agreement, each and every right and interest of Authority in and to the
Property of any kind whatsoever, including without limitation any rights or interests acquired in the
Property pursuant to the Development Agreement, are hereby subjected and subordinated and shall
remain in all respects and for all purposes, subject, subordinate and junior to the provisions of the
Mortgage and other Loan Documents (as defined in the Project Addendum) and to the rights of Bank
thereunder and the liens created thereby. The subordination effected hereby shall extend to any and
all advances heretofore or hereafter made pursuant to the terms of the Loan Documents and to any
amendment, modification, extension, replacement or renewal of any of the Loan Documents,
including any amendment which increases the principal amount secured by the Mortgage. If (a) Bank
does not elect to give Authority the Assumption Notice, and (b) Bank forecloses the Mortgage or
Developer delivers to Bank a deed in lieu of foreclosure, then upon the completion of such foreclosure
and the expiration of the applicable redemption period, or upon recording of a deed in lieu of
foreclosure, all right, title and interest of Authority in or to the Property, whether pursuant to the
Development Agreement or otherwise, shall terminate automatically and shall be null and void
without the need for the execution or recording of any other documents. If Bank has provided
Authority with the Assumption Notice, then the rights of Authority under the Development
Agreement shall survive foreclosure of the Mortgage or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure.
Except as specifically agreed to herein, nothing in this Assignment, including a foreclosure by Bank
or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure, shall extinguish the Development Agreement as an
agreement between Authority and Developer or limit the rights and remedies of Authority as against
Developer.
10. Event of Default. As used herein, the term “Event of Default” shall mean the
occurrence of any Event of Default under the Development Agreement, the TIF Note, the Loan
Agreement or any other Loan Documents, or any related documents.
11. Remedies. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, Bank may without demand
or performance or other demand, advertisement, or notice of any kind, except such notice as may
be required under the Uniform Commercial Code, and all of which are, to the extent permitted by
law, hereby expressly waived, collect the amounts payable to Developer pursuant to the
Development Agreement or the TIF Note and shall hold such amounts free and clear of the interest
of Developer therein and shall be entitled to own, hold, dispose of and otherwise deal with the
amounts payable pursuant to the Development Agreement and the TIF Note in its own right and
name as its own property, or in the name of Developer or otherwise, exercise any right of
Developer to demand, collect, receive and receipt for, compromise, compound, settle and
prosecute and discontinue any suits or proceedings in respect of any or all of the amounts payable
pursuant to the Development Agreement or the TIF Note; take any action that Bank may deem
necessary or desirable in order to collect the amounts payable pursuant to the Development
Agreement and the TIF Note, including, without limitation, the power to perform or direct the
performance by any other party to any contracts which are a part of the Development Agreement;
exercise any of the remedies available to a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code
and/or to proceed to protect and enforce this Assignment by suits or proceedings or otherwise; and
to enforce any other legal or equitable remedy available to Bank. The foregoing remedies are
cumulative of and in addition to and are not restrictive of or in lieu of, the rights or remedies
CORE/0808310.0004/125458168.8 6
provided for or allowed in the Mortgage, the Loan Documents or any other instrument given for
the security of the Project Loan, or as provided for or allowed by law or in equity.
12. Indemnity. Unless and until Bank delivers an Assumption Notice, Bank shall have
no obligation to perform or satisfy any duty or obligation of Developer under the Development
Agreement. Developer shall and does hereby indemnify, defend and hold Bank harmless from
and against and in respect of any and all actions, causes of action, suits, claims, demands,
judgments, proceedings and investigations (or any appeal thereof or relative thereto or other review
thereof) of any kind or nature whatsoever, arising out of, by reason of, as a result of or in
connection with the Development Agreement or the TIF Note, and any and all liabilities, damages,
losses, costs, expenses (including fees of counsel and expenses and disbursements of counsel),
amounts of judgment, assessments, fines or penalties, and amounts paid in compromise or
settlement, suffered, incurred or sustained by Bank as a result of, or reason of or in connection
with any of the matters above.
13. Uniform Commercial Code. To the extent that this Assignment may be governed
by the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code now or hereafter in effect, this Assignment
shall be deemed to be a security agreement within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial Code,
shall be governed by the provisions thereof and shall constitute a grant to Bank of a security interest
in the Development Agreement, the TIF Note (upon its issuance) and the proceeds thereof.
14. Choice of Law. Notwithstanding the place of execution of this instrument, the
parties to this Assignment have contracted for Minnesota law to govern this Assignment and it is
agreed that this Assignment is made pursuant to, and shall be construed and governed by, the laws
of the State of Minnesota without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.
15. Notices. Any notices and other communications permitted or required by the
provisions of this Assignment (except for telephonic notices expressly permitted) shall be in
writing and shall be deemed to have been properly given or served by depositing the same with
the United States Postal Service, or any official successor thereto, designated as Certified Mail,
Return Receipt Requested, bearing adequate postage, or deposited with a reputable private courier
or overnight delivery service, and addressed to the address set forth herein. Each such notice shall
be effective upon being deposited as aforesaid. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability
to deliver because of changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to be receipt
of the notice sent.
To Bank: UMB Bank N.A.
1000 Grand Blvd.
Kansas City, Missouri 64106
Attention: Randy Timbers
Telephone No.: 816-860-7256
CORE/0808310.0004/125458168.8 7
With a copy to: Stinson Leonard Street LLP
1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900
Kansas City, Missouri 64106
Attn: Donald J. Kirkpatrick
Telephone No.: 816-691-2409
To Developer: United Properties Development LLC
3600 American Blvd. West, Suite 750
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431
Attention: Richard E. Student
Telephone No.: 952-893-7598
With a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney
50 South 6th Street, Suite 1500
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-1498
Attention: David Meyer
Telephone No.: 612.492-6585
If to Authority: Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority
City Hall
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
Attention: Executive Director
Telephone No.: ____________
With a copy to: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
470 U.S. Bank Plaza
200 South 6th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Attention:________________
Telephone No.:____________
By giving to the other party hereto at least 10 days’ notice thereof, either party hereto shall have
the right from time to time to change its address and shall have the right to specify as its address
any other address within the United States of America.
16. Successors and Assigns; Recording. This Assignment shall bind Developer and
Authority and their respective successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of Bank and
its successors and assigns. At the option of Bank, this Assignment may be recorded in the land
records of Anoka County, Minnesota.
[The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally.]
S-1
COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE
Signature Page
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer has executed this Collateral Assignment and
Subordination of Development Agreement and Tax Increment Revenue Note as of the date and
year first written above.
DEVELOPER:
UNITED PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT LLC
a Minnesota limited liability company
By: ______________________________
Name:
Title:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of
____________, 2016, by __________, the _____________ of United Properties Development
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said limited liability company.
Notary Public
S-2
COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE
Signature Page
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bank has executed this Collateral Assignment and
Subordination of Development Agreement and Tax Increment Revenue Note as of the date and
year first written above.
BANK:
UMB BANK N.A., a national banking association
By:___________________________________
Name: Randy Timbers
Title: Vice President
STATE OF _____________ )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ____________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _______________,
2016, by Randy Timbers, the Vice President of UMB Bank N.A., a national banking association, on
behalf of such national banking association.
___________________________________
(Notarial Seal) Notary Public
S-3
COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE
Signature Page
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Authority has executed this Collateral Assignment and
Subordination of Development Agreement and Tax Increment Revenue Note as of the date and
year first written above.
AUTHORITY:
LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
By
Name:
Title:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ________________,
2016, by ____________________________, the _______________________ of the Lino Lakes
Economic Development Authority, a body corporate and politic duly organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
___________________________________
Notary Public
S-4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CONSENT
TO COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE
The undersigned hereby acknowledges and consents to the foregoing Collateral
Assignment and Subordination of Development Agreement and Tax Increment Revenue Note and
the terms set forth therein, effective as of the date and year first written above.
TENANT:
DISTRIBUTION ALTERNATIVES, INC,., a
Minnesota corporation
Name:________________
Title:__________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF _______________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of
____________, 2016, by __________, the _____________ of Distribution Alternatives, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
CORE/0808310.0004/125458168.8
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
CORE/0808310.0004/125458168.8
EXHIBIT B
Form of Endorsement of TIF Note
ALLONGE TO:
TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE, SERIES 2016, IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF
$1,200,000.00, ISSUED TO UNITED PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT LLC PURSUANT TO THAT
CERTAIN CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT DATED AS OF JULY 25, 2016, BY AND
AMONG THE LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DISTRIBUTION
ALTERNATIVES, INC. AND THE UNDERSIGNED.
UNITED PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT LLC
a Minnesota limited liability company
By: ______________________________
Name:
Title:
Dated: December ___, 2016.
2017 Road Improvement Project
Mill and Overlay - Sealcoat
City of Lino Lakes
Anoka County
Engineering Graduate
Associate /Project Project Specialist Engineer 2-Person Office Total
RLS Manager Engineer V IV Survey Crew Technician Hours Cost
Task Description
1
A.Topographic Survey (estimate by others)8 8 1,376.00$
Subtotal 8 8 1,376.00$
2
A.Final Plans
1.Existing Conditions Plan/Topo Base Map 1 2 16 19 2,099.00$
2.Removals/Demolition Plan 1 4 5 565.00$
3.Traffic Control/Detour Plan 1 2 2 5 601.00$
4.Street Mill/Overlay Plans 1 6 24 31 3,455.00$
5.Storm Sewer Repair 1 2 8 11 1,243.00$
6.Sealcoat Plans 2 1 2 12 2 19 2,145.00$
7.Watershed Permit 2 4 6 702.00$
8.Drainage Review 2 2 2 2 8 962.00$
9.Utility Details Plan (Sanitary/Storm)1 6 7 779.00$
10 Construction Specifications 2 3 4 12 8 29 2,861.00$
11 Misc. Sheets (Title/Details/etc)2 1 6 9 1,065.00$
C.Meetings -$
1.Project Meeting 1 1 1 3 405.00$
2.Design Meeting 1 1 1 3 405.00$
D.Bidding Administration -$
1.Website creation and maitenance 2 3 2 2 9 1,161.00$
2.Advertise bids 1 2 2 2 7 709.00$
3.Create/Distribute Bid Package 2 2 2 6 572.00$
4.Respond to RFIs from prospective bidders 2 2 2 2 8 926.00$
5.Issue addenda, if req'd 1 2 2 5 521.00$
6.Bid Opening/Tabulate results 1 1 2 4 402.00$
7.Letter of Award recommendation to City 2 2 4 384.00$
8 Prepare Notice of Award and Contract 1 2 2 2 7 801.00$
Subtotal 14 26 35 88 22 20 205 22,763.00$
Total Hours 14 26 35 88 22 8 20 213 24,139.00$
Hourly Costs 143.00 137.00 125.00 107.00 94.00 172.00 67.00
Total Direct Labor Costs $2,002.00 $3,562.00 $4,375.00 $9,416.00 $2,068.00 $1,376.00 $1,340.00
TOTAL BASE PROJECT COST 24,139.00$
Budgeted Hours
Preliminary Survey
Design
Centerville Lake
Peltier Lake
Reshanau Lake
Rice Lake
Marshan Lake
George Watch Lake
Baldwin Lake
Amelia Lake
Otter Lake
Cedar Lake
Wards Lake
Sherman Lake
CENTERVILLE
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GwWX
GÀWX
Fox Borough
Vaughn Addition
Woodridge Estates &Oakwood View
2nd Avenue
Marshan Meadows &Grandview
Pine Glen
Glenview Avenue
Parkview Drive
Parkway Rd
Elm St
77th St W
Otter Lake RdKilldeer DrStagecoach TrHighland DrLake DrPony Ct
Gordon AveCl
e
a
r
wa
t
e
r
Cr
e
e
k
DrF
awn LaApollo DrSherman Lake RdLamotte DrLaurene AveOak CtF lo ra C tWhitetail Tr12th Ave SGray Heron DrKelly St
Park Ct
62nd St
F o x R d
Linda LaEgret La
79th StHenery LaBlack Duck Dr
Karth RdChippewa T rMarilyn DrBloom CtTrappers CroLacasse Dr
Lantern LaSunrise AveCedar St E
Baldwin Lake RdLois LaMarvy St
H aw tho r n R d
82nd St E
Foxtail DrC e n tu ry T rHo
k
a
h
DrSioux LaJon AveWood Duck TrP
alo
m
in
o L
a
Langer LaJeanne DrPattie DrTow n Center Pkw yG St
Molitor Dr
S G len TrR eili ng R d21st Ave NDeerwood LaBluebill La64th St
Pheasant Hills Dr
Orange St
Lilac St Aenon PlPheasant Run SBald Eagle Blvd W8 1 s t S t W
Otter Lake DrLinden LaLakeview DrT hom a s S t
Centerville RdVicki La
Birch St
W
oodridge La
Maple LaCarole DrPartridge PlCountry LaISTH 35EHodgson RdW Shadow Lake DrIvy Ridge LaLeonard AveElmcrest Ave N81st St E
22nd Ave SHolly CtISTH 35W Woodland DrJoyer LaAndall St
C a r l S t
140th St NDiane St
Rehbeins St77th St E
Oak La
Old Birch StR o b i n s o n D r
Evergreen Tr
H StJ a m e s S t Freeway Dr20th Ave S20th Ave NPeltier Lake Dr4th AveRondeau Rd WF St
Main St
Ash St Rondeau Lake Rd E80th St E
A q u a L a
Holly DrDocument Path: K:\02988-360\GIS\Maps\2017RoadImprovementMap.mxdÜ
0 3,500Feet
Site Location Map2017 Road Improvement ProjectLino Lakes, MN
Mill & Overlay Street Improvements
Seal Coat Street Improvements
Lino Lakes Boundary