Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/14/2017 P&Z PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, June 14, 2017 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 10, 2017 4. OPEN MIKE 5. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING: Lake Amelia Vistas Comprehensive Plan Amendments B. PUBLIC HEARING: Houle Addition Preliminary Plat C. PUBLIC HEARING: Golden Acre Variance, Preliminary Plat and Final Plat D. Chavez Preserve Variances and Final Plat E. NorthPointe 6th Addition Final Plat 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. 2040 Comprehensive Plan B. Project Updates 7. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: Please address the meeting chair. State your name and address for the record. Please observe a 4 -minute limit. The topic must relate to city business. Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice -Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. Staff will present their report on the proposal. Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT . STAFF PRESENT May 10, 2017 6:30 P.M. 7:52 P.M. Dale Stoesz, Lou Masonick, Perry Laden, Paul Tralle (Chair), Neil Evenson, Michael Root Jeremy Stimpson Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Diane Hankee, Mara Strand I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on May 10, 2017. II. APROVAL OF AGENDA The Agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Masonick made a MOTION to approve the April 12, 2017 Meeting Minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Stoesz. Motion carried 5 - 0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:31 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:32 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Masonick. Motion carried 5 - 0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. Chavez Preserve DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 10, 2017 Page 2 Chaves Preserve action item was tabled. Mr. Laden asked about the variances that go along with this project. Ms. Larsen stated there are 2 potential variances. One for reducing right-of-way width and one for reducing the front yard setback. B. Lake Amelia Vistas Ms. Larsen presented the staff report. The applicant submitted a land use application for PUD Concept Plan and Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The proposed development is a master planned residential community located along CSAH 54/20th Avenue just east of Amelia Lake. The site contains 2 parcels totaling approximately 40 gross acres. Staff recommended deeming the development premature. Staff addressed questions of the board. Mr. Masonick asked about the depth of the lake. Ms. Larsen stated that it is a natural environment lake but unsure of the actual depth. Ms. Hankee said that she was reading and there are restrictions around this lake. Mr. Masonick reinstated that he was wondering if this lake would be good for recreational use. Ms. Larsen stated that everything along the shoreline is existing wetland. Mr. Laden asked for clarification regarding sanitary sewer hookup in Lino Lakes. Mr. Grochala stated sewer is designed to be served by White Bear Township and water is designed to be served by Lino Lakes. Mr. Laden asked about the ownership of the trail system and how would they be accessed by others. Ms. Larsen stated that this trail currently is not planned to connect to anything existing and would be primarily used by residents in the area. Mr. Laden asked where the closest recreational park is. Mr. Grochala stated that the cities long range park plan does not identify a park for that specific area. There is a park planned to the north of the site. Ms. Larsen stated that Park Board to review on Monday, May 15, 2017. Mr. Stoesz asked how the development got around the electrical line. Ms. Larsen stated that the applicant was cognitive of the layout, easement, and utilities. As proposed, the electrical lines will not be moved. Mr. Stoesz asked how the development would go about utilities if this was planned in a rural city, outside of Lino Lakes. Ms. Larsen stated the development would be on well and septic but not at this density. Ms. Hankee stated that the largest permitted soil system in the state is a third of what's being presented. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 10, 2017 Page 3 Mr. Masonick asked how the number of units were increased. Ms. Larsen stated the request was for 452 units. Four (4) units would be allowed today based on one (1) unit per 10 acres. Mr. Evenson asked how the neighbors would be affected if the utility staging area were to be approved. Ms. Larsen stated that that is something that would need to be evaluated at a later point. Ms. Larsen stated that we have to be conscious about taking up the entire allocated sanitary sewer. Mr. Evenson asked if there would be any harm if the utility staging area were to be approved. Ms. Larsen stated everyone in this area is in the post 2030 and there would be no cost to the immediate property owner. Chair Tralle asked about the no service area to the south. Ms. Larsen stated that there is one home on the property that is on well and septic. Chair Tralle asked if there are any issues with bringing a pipe through the no service area. Ms. Larsen stated that they would have to obtain an easement to get the pipe through the easement. Chair Tralle stated that NorthPointe is about a mile from the proposed location. Chair Tralle asked why we are reviewing this land use application with all the red flags. Ms. Larsen stated that any land owner has the opportunity to submit a land use application and we are doing our due diligence. Chair Tralle declared the Public Hearing open at 7:22 p.m. Rick Harrison, Rick Harrison Site Design Studio, 8832 7th Ave North, Golden Valley, presented his own PowerPoint presentation. Mr. Harrison discussed why this site is good for a high density residential development given its topography and view sheds of the lake. Chair Tralle stated that he likes the concept of what is planned but it boils down to sewer and water. Chair Tralle questioned the affordability of the housing. Mr. Harrison stated that he cannot answer that question at this point. Mr. Root stated that the concept is great but there are several hurdles. Mr. Harrison asked if these issues can be overcome and if it is something that could be supported. Chair Tralle stated that if this does come to fruition, what is the board's opinion? Chair Tralle stated that if you get your ducks in a row, this project would probably be a go. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 10, 2017 Page 4 Tom Budzynski, TJB Homes, 9100 Baltimore Street, Blaine. We know sewer is available towards White Bear Township, can water come from this way? Kent Brander, Civil Methods, 1551 Livingston Avenue, West St. Paul. The 300 units could be supported by utilities. There may be different calculation methods used to come to 302 units. There is water and sanitary sewer available. This is a draft study and because of that, we did not dig deeper. We will look at the different options for the utilities and the variances available. Mr. Grochala stated that the feasibility study stated the 8 inch water main connection to the south; however, the City never planned on going to White Bear Township for this site. The city is not anticipating White Bear Township to provide water outside of their city. Extending the water main from White Bear Township is not a viable option. Chair Tralle asked for clarification on whose responsibility it would be to gain the agreement. Mr. Budzynski asked who is currently maintaining the sanitary sewer. Mr. Grochala stated that it is currently paid by North Oaks and maintained by White Bear Township. Chair Tralle asked about the density of senior living. Ms. Larsen stated that she would have to go back and analyze the density numbers. Chair Tralle asked what we need to tell the applicant and land owner. Ms. Larsen stated they are present to hear the comments from the board. Mr. Grochala stated that they will be at the next meeting. Mr. Budzynski stated that we are here today to present a jewel. You are creating a luxury living space and creating a space for seniors. Mr. Stoesz stated this plan is a dream. This plan adds a lot of value and tax revenue. There are a lot of positives that go along with this project. We are not in a position to decline at this time. The first step would be to figure out the water and sewer. Mr. Laden stated that this could be an asset to the city. Mr. Laden questioned the market rate apartments. Mr. Budzynski stated resident qualifications is not determined at this point. Mr. Laden stated concerns around the transportation. Three cul-de-sacs are not appealing and would like to see cross connections. Mr. Laden stated concerns around density using all the capacity with one project. Mr. Laden stated that he would like to call this premature now but review this project as we are reviewing the 2040 comprehensive plan. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 10, 2017 Page 5 Mr. Root stated that there is a list of things that need to be worked through. If all these issues can we worked through, it is worth considering. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Update All Board Comprehensive Plan meeting scheduled for Monday, May 15, 2017. Landform planning consultant will be present Paving on 21St Avenue happened today Wood Edge buildings are going up and a model is open Eagle Liquors will be getting their building permit shortly Potential meeting scheduled with All Seasons next week American Legion purchased land from the city and will be constructing a parking lot on the south side of the building Plans in for Saddle Club 31-d addition and adjacent Comcast property VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Root made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:52 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 5 - 0. Respectfully submitted, Mara Strand Community Development Assistant DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: June 14, 2017 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING for Lake Amelia Vistas Comprehensive Plan Amendments CASE NUMBER: PC2017-001 APPLICANT: OWNERS: REVIEW DEADLINE: TJB Homes, Inc. Attn: Tom Budzynski 9100 Baltimore Street NE Blaine, MN 55449 John & Patricia Commers and Jerry Bauer 11841 Flanders Circle NE Blaine, MN 55449 Complete Application Date: March 27, 2017 60 -Day Review Deadline: May 26, 2017 60 -Day Extension: July 25, 2017 Environmental Board Meeting: April 26, 2017 Park Board Meeting: May 15, 2017 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: May 10, 2017 Tentative City Council Work Session: July 5, 2017 Tentative City Council Meeting: July 10, 2017 BACKGROUND The applicant submitted a land use application for PUD Concept Plan and Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The proposed development is a master planned residential community located along CSAH 54/20th Avenue just east of Amelia Lake. The site contains 2 parcels totaling approximately 40 gross acres and consists of the following residential density mix: 1 Residential Type # of Buildings # Units per Building Total # of Housing Units Market Rate Apartments 8 24 192 Twin Homes 10 2 20 Senior Assisted -Living Facilities 2 120 240 Total Tonight's public hearing is specifically for the following requested Comprehensive Plan Amendments: 1. Amend Future Land Use Map from Urban Reserve to High Density Residential (HDR) 2. Amend the Utility Staging Map from Stage 3 to Stage 1B (2015-2020) The following staff report is based on the following information: Certificate of Survey, prepared by Acre Land Surveying dated October 11, 2016 Technical Memorandum, prepared by Civil Methods, Inc. dated March 27, 2017 Geotechnical Explorations, prepared by Independent Testing Technologies dated October 12, 2016 Wetland Delineation Report, prepared by Midwest Natural Resources dated October 12, 2016 Feasibility Report Draft, prepared by TKDA dated December 23, 2014 Market Assessment, prepared by Maxfield Research & Consulting dated January 25, 2015 ANALYSIS The Planning & Zoning Staff Report dated May 10, 2017 details the project. At that meeting, staff presented the PUD Concept Plan. Planning & Zoning Board member comments include: • Is there need for a neighborhood park? Premature development Questions regarding existing utility transmission line Affordable housing? High amenity project Transportation concerns regarding CSAH 54, CR J and I -35E intersection Water and sanitary sewer service concerns 2 Existing Site Conditions The 40 acre site is currently vacant, natural open space. Per the MLCCS, land cover includes cattail marsh, deciduous woodlands, oak forest and tall grasslands. It is in the shoreland district of Amelia Lake. Topography contour elevations range from 908.1 OHWL to 930 along CSAH 54 and from 900 on the south end to 950 on the north end. A 66 foot wide utility transmission easement with overhead power lines bisects the parcel north to south. Wetlands exist on site. General Site Plan The mix of residential buildings (8 market rate apartments, 10 twin homes buildings and 2 senior assisted living apartments) are located throughout the site. A clubhouse and pool are also proposed. The senior assisted -living apartments are centrally located and the twin homes are located on the north half. The market rate apai tiuents are dispersed throughout the site. Two (2) public roads provide to ingress/egress to the site from CSAH 54/20th Avenue. These public roads cul de sac and internal 24' wide private roads access the individual buildings. Pedestrian connectivity is provided throughout the development via sidewalks. A linear public park and trail are proposed adjacent to the lake. The development appears to make a conscientious effort to preserve the natural resources by minimizing wetland impacts, providing wetland buffers, protecting significant trees and maintaining the shoreland setback. Zoning The property is currently zoned R -X, Rural Executive. Current Zoning I R -X, Rural Executive Current Land Use Vacant Rural Residential Future Land Use Urban Reserve Utility Staging Area Post 2030 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North R -X, Rural Executive Agricultural Urban Reserve South R -X, Rural Executive Agricultural Permanent Rural East R -X, Rural Executive CSAH 54/20' Avenue Rural Residential Urban Reserve West R -X, Rural Executive Amelia Lake Amelia Lake 3 It should be noted the property to the south is guided Permanent Rural and is not ever intended to be developed. Environmental Review Record Per EQB Environmental Review Rules, the following formula is used for development proposing a mixture of residential attached and unattached units: S= A/B+C/D A = # of unattached units 20 twinhomes (10 buildings x 2 units each) B = applicable unattached unit threshold 250 C = # of attached units 432 240 senior apts + 192 market rate apts D = applicable attached unit threshold 375 If S equals or exceeds 1.0, review is required. 1.232 > 1; THEREFORE EAW REQUIRED The proposed development requires a Mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Wetlands A Wetland Delineation Report was completed in October 2016 by MNR, Midwest Natural Resources. The report indicates 5 wetlands including the fringe of Amelia Lake on the subject site. The concept plan appears to minimally impact the wetlands. Floodplain The 2015 FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rating Map (DFIRM) indicates Zone AE flood plain on the subject site, mostly along the shoreline of Amelia Lake. The Base Flood Elevation is 910.20. The floodplain appears to be within the shore impact zone and will not be impacted. Shoreland District The subject site is located within the Shoreland Management Overlay District of Amelia Lake. This lake has been established as a natural environment lake by the DNR. The regulations of Chapter 1102, specifically Section 1102.13 Shoreland Planned Unit Development (PUD), will apply to this development. Key regulations include: Impervious surface coverage must not exceed 35% Maximum allowed structure height is 36 feet Property owners association is required 4 Deed restrictions preserving 50% open space are required Access to public sanitary sewer and water 200 foot setback from OHWL Structures must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public water When the City amended the Shoreland Management Ordinance in 1995, it replaced the complicated DNR tiering density calculations with lot area per unit requirements. The current shoreland ordinance requires 5,000 s.f. per unit for townhomes and 2,900 s.f. per unit for apartments. Per the applicant's Technical Memo, this yields a potential for 513 units (20 townhome + 493 apailinents). However, the shoreland ordinance states that where the requirements of the underlying zoning district are more restrictive, the more restrictive standards shall apply. If the property were to be re -guided to High Density and rezoned to R-4, High Density Residential, the allowed density (6.0 to 10.0 units per net acre) would yield 361 units. The proposed development shows a 150 foot OHWL setback, preserves 59% open space, creates impervious surface of 27.5% and proposes building heights to 30-35 feet. The setback from the OHWL requires a 200 feet per Shoreland PUD requirements. Comprehensive Plan Resource Management System The Resource Management System Plan identifies the following needs in the area: Designated Bike Route along CSAH 54/20th Avenue Proposed trail along Amelia Lake Greenway system The concept plan indicates a public trail along the lake through the greenway system which is consistent with the Resource Management System Plan. Land Use Plan The 2030 Future Land Use Map guides the site as Urban Reserve. The Full Build Out Future Land Use Map guides the site for low density sewered residential development. Lake Amelia Vistas proposes 12.54 units per net acre. This exceeds the allowed High Density Residential (HDR) density of 6.0 to 10.0 units per net acre. The development is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for Urban Reserve land use density. Housing Plan The proposed development is consistent with the goals of the Housing Plan by providing life -cycle and senior housing. Trail corridors and sidewalks shall provide access to natural amenities and commercial nodes. 5 Economic Development Plan The proposed residential development does not negatively impact the Economic Development Plan. Transportation Plan The proposed development is consistent with the Transportation Plan by incorporating sidewalks and trails and connecting public access to CSAH 54/20' Avenue; however, a traffic study is required to determine level of service criteria and traffic flows to ensure the roads are safe, especially at the intersection of CSAH 54/20th Avenue, CR J/Ash Street and I -35E SB ramp. Sanitary Sewer Plan The subject site is in Utility Staging Area 3 (Post 2030). Development around Amelia Lake is staged in a "clockwise" manner starting on the west side. The subject site is intended to be the last stage of development. The proposed development is not consistent with the Sanitary Sewer Plan in regards to the utility staging areas. Water Supply System Plan Public water main shall be required to service the development. The proposed development is not consistent with the Future Water Supply System Plan which indicates this area to be served by the City of Lino Lakes by a 12" watermain extending from Birch Street south along CSAH 54 to the development. Community Facilities Plan The only community facilities proposed with the development are possible trails. Planning Districts The development is located in Planning District 4. Overall recommendations include: Work with White Bear Township to create Joint Powers Agreements for municipal utility service. Pursue a full interchange at I -35E and County Road J (Ash Street). Work with Anoka County and Ramsey County to ensure appropriate access management on County Road J (Ash Street). 6 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Tonight's agenda item is specifically regarding two (2) requested comprehensive plan amendments. 1. Amend Future Land Use Map from Urban Reserve to High Density Residential (HDR) Per the 2030 Future Land Use Map, the site is guided Urban Reserve. The purpose of the Urban Reserve area is to preserve land for post -2030 urban development. To promote an efficient future development pattern in this area, land use prior to year 2030 in the Urban Reserve area shall be limited to agriculture related uses and single family residential limited to one unit per 10 acres. This would equate to 4 housing units on the 40 acre development site. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment is required to re -guide the land use to allow for higher density. In determining the appropriate land use and density, staff analyzed the site's gross area and buildable land. PROPOSED DENSITY Gross Area (acres) 40.85 Wetlands & Water Bodies (4.79) Net Area (acres) 36.06 # of Units 452 Gross Density (units/acre) 11.06 1 Net Density (units/acre) 12.54 The proposed Lake Amelia Vistas net density is 12.54 units per acre. Per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Medium Density Residential (MDR) allows for 4.0 to 5.9 units per net acre and High Density Residential (HDR) allows for 6.0 to 10 units per net acre. The proposed 12.54 units per net acre exceed both allowed MDR and HDR densities. When considering a land use amendment for Urban Reserve parcels, staff would typically refer to the City's Full Build Out Future Land Use Map. Per the full build map, the site is guided for low density sewered residential development. This would allow for 1.6 to 3.9 units per net acre and could potentially yield 20 to 49 units. The proposed development exceeds these density standards. If the City were to consider re -guiding the land use to High Density Residential to allow for 10 units per net acre, the site could potentially allow a total of 361 housing units. 7 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Gross Area (acres) 40.85 Wetlands & Water Bodies (4.79) Net Area (acres) 36.06 # of Units 361 Gross Density (units/acre) 8.83 Net Density (units/acre) 10.00 Per page 3-16 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, "The City may offer a density bonus if a development project includes elements that meet the City's goals, supporting the public values expressed in the goals and policies. A project might be allowed to exceed the land use category's density for providing affordable or life -cycle housing that would not be provided without the incentive. A project that is designed to avoid valued natural features, or that includes a management plan for restoration of a resource, might also qualify for a density bonus." At the request of the applicant, Maxfield Research and Consulting prepared an Initial Market Assessment Report in January 2015 to evaluate the potential to develop a market rate rental housing and service based senior living community on the 40 acre site. The Primary Market Area (PMA) includes that portion of Lino Lakes sourtheast of I -35W, the City of Hugo and portions of North Oaks, Shoreview, White Bear Lake and Vadnais Heights. The study recommends 316 total housing units based on PMA demographics, growth and the existing competitive market. Lake Amelia Vistas proposes 452 total housing units. When analyzing the 2030 Future Land Use Map and the portion of Lino Lakes within Maxfield's PMA, there are over 350 acres of land currently guided for medium, high or mixed use with utilities available by 2030 that meet the City's existing housing needs. In March 2016, the City reviewed a PUD Concept Plan for a 206 unit mixed residential development from North Oaks Company, LLC for their 46 acre parcel at the intersection CR J/Ash Street and CSAR 21/Centerville Road. This development is in the current lA (2008-2015) utility staging area (the start of the clockwise development around Amelia Lake) and guided appropriately for density. Comprehensive Plan Amendment #1 Comments: 1. The City would need to evaluate if a density bonus is warranted to allow for the proposed 452 housing units. 8 2. The City currently has enough land guided and within the utility staging area for medium to high density development. 2. Amend the Utility Staging Map from Stage 3 to Stage 1B (2015-2020) Public water, sanitary and storm sewer utilities are required to serve the development. The subject site is in Utility Staging Area 3 (Post 2030). The proposed development is not consistent with the Sanitary Sewer Plan in regards to the utility staging areas. Sanitary Sewer An 8" sanitary sewer main and manhole exist on the south side of CR J approximately halfway between Centerville Road and I -35E. The subject site is in Utility Staging Area 3 (Post 2030). Development around Amelia Lake is staged in a "clockwise" manner starting on the west side. The subject site is intended to be the last stage of development. The subject site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 4 (Sub -district 4C) and is ultimately served by White Bear Township. The area south of Amelia Lake is a "No Service Area" and will not benefit from utilities. Per Table 7-6 of the Sanitary Sewer Plan, projected 2030 flows in Sub -district 4C are 0.00. No development is anticipated in this district prior to 2030. Per Table 7-7, Ultimate Development (based on full build low density residential development) flows in 4C are 0.027 MGD. This equals approximately 99 REU (residential equivalent units) with one (1) REU = 274 gpd. The proposed 452 unit development far exceeds the anticipated development is this area. Watermain Watermain service to this development is proposed from White Bear Township by an existing 8" watermain on the south side of CR J. The City of Lino Lakes Future Water Supply System Plan indicates the subject site to be served by the City of Lino Lakes by a 12" watermain extending from Birch Street south along CSAH 54 to the development. White Bear Township Review A draft Feasibility Report for Lake Amelia Utility Extension was prepared by TKDA for White Bear Township in December 2014 specifically for this development. The draft report and technical memo suggests the existing 8" gravity sewer on the south side of County Road J contains adequate capacity for up to 300 residential units. In addition, the proposed watermain to the project site will be a dead-end 8" line, as providing a looped system will not be feasible due to cost and site limitations. Upon receipt of the Lake Amelia Vistas PUD Concept Plan, the City asked White Bear Township to further review and comment on the project. Per the June 6, 2017 letter from White Bear Township, "Please be advised that the Township is not in the position, at this time, to assure that these services can be provided. As you are aware, the Township's future groundwater appropriations are uncertain as a result of the White Bear Lake 9 Lawsuit. Also, the capacity available in the Township's sanitary sewer system may not be sufficient to serve a project of that size." The letter also states White Bear Township is currently updating the sewer chapter of their Comprehensive Plan and issues related to sewer capacity will be addressed through this process. This update is expected to be completed by the end of 2018. Growth Management Policy Per the Growth Management Policy of the Comprehensive Plan (page 3-26), the following criteria will be used to determine if the city should allow a specific development project to occur early in a ten-year staging area, or five-year phase within a staging area, prior to the timing indicated on the staging plan. a. The proposed development must be located within both the current and the next ten-year staging area, or five-year phase, or located adjacent to the current staging area. The proposed development is in the Stage 3 (Post 2030) Planned Service Area. The City is currently in Stage IB (2015-2020) and therefore, does not meet this criteria. b. The proposed development must be master planned. Small, piecemeal developments do not justify redefining the ten-year staging area, or five-year phase. The proposed development is master planned. c. The proposed, master planned project must provide discernable public values. The proposed, master planned project provides discernable public values such as preserving open space, trails and life -cycle housing. d. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate analysis will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions and transportation improvements are required to support new development. Per the June 6, 2017 letter from White Bear Township, the Township cannot assure sanitary sewer and water service for this development at this time. Further analysis is needed to determine if adequate infrastructure such as sanitary, water and transportation is available to support the development. e. There must be a commitment that the development will pay its proportionate share of infrastructure improvement costs associated with development. The developer shall be required to pay its proportionate share of the infrastructure improvements. 10 Comprehensive Plan #2 Comments: 1. The proposed development does not meet the criteria of a comprehensive plan amendment. 2. Per their June 6, 2017 letter, White Bear Township cannot assure that water and sanitary sewer service can be provided to the development. 3. Further analysis is required to determine the impacts of this development on Sanitary District 4 and White Bear Township. 4. The subject site shall be served by City of Lino Lakes municipal water supply. 5. The City needs to seriously analyze the cost efficiency and benefit of extending public utilities to the site. 6. A Joint Powers Agreement between Lino Lakes and White Bear Township would be required for sanitary sewer service. Adjacent Jurisdictional Review As required, on May 11, 2017 the City sent notice of the comprehensive plan amendment to adjacent jurisdictions for review and comment. The 60 day review period ends July 10, 2017. The following is a summary of jurisdiction responses. 11 Jurisdiction L Date Response Received Response White Bear Township June 6, 2017 WBT cannot guarantee water or sanitary service at this time. City of North Oaks May 17, 2017 The CPA does not appear to have any impact on the community and we have no objection to the CPA. Anoka Count Hi hwa Departmentg y May 15, 2017 No additional comments from original April 24, 2017 letter. The original comment letter recommends a full traffic study be completed to determine development impacts. Anoka County Parks Department June 5 2017 Anoka County Parks has no comments. The County does acknowledge and support the trail proposed in the concept plan. Ramsey County Public Works No comments received yet TBD White Bear Lake Area Schools #624 No comments received yet TBD 11 Jurisdiction Date Response Received Response VLAWMO No comments received yet TBD MN DNR No comments received yet TBD MN DOT June 5, 2017 No additional comments at this time. Original comment letter dated April 27, 2017 notes access control along 35E, and noise mitigation. Park Board Comments The Park Board discussed the Lake Amelia Vistas concept plan on May 15, 2017. The Board was in favor of the proposed linear public park and trail adjacent to the lake. The Board also discussed a neighborhood park in the development. Per the City's Park Plan, a future neighborhood park is identified to the north of the development. The Board agreed one should not be included in the Lake Amelia Vistas. The Board also noted the proposed regional park is located to the north and there would be an opportunity to connect Lake Amelia Vistas to the regional park. Premature Subdivision In addition to the concerns regarding the comprehensive plan amendments, the development is a premature subdivision. Section 1001.013 Premature Subdivision states that any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council: (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed development meets several goals of the City's Resource Management Plan and Housing Plan, it does not meet the goals of the Land Use, Sanitary and Water Plan. (b) Consistency with infill policies. The proposed development is not within the current utility staging area. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. 12 A complete traffic study is required to determine the level of service along CSAH 54/20th Avenue especially at the intersection of CSAH 54/20th Avenue, CR J/Ash Street and 1- 35E SB ramp shall be analyzed. (d) Water supply. The proposed development is not consistent with the Future Water Supply System Plan which indicates this area to be served by the City of Lino Lakes by a 12" watermain extending from Birch Street south along CSAH 54 to the development. (e) Waste disposal systems. The proposed development is not consistent with the Sanitary Sewer Plan in regards to the utility staging areas. The concept plan fails to meet the above criteria and should be deemed premature. RECOMMENDATION Staff acknowledges that the proposed development meets several goals of the City's Resource Management Plan and Housing Plan. However, it does not meet the goals of the Land Use, Sanitary Sewer and Water Supply Plans and it does not meet the criteria of comprehensive plan amendments. For the reasons stated above, the comprehensive plan amendments for land use and utility staging areas should be denied and the development subdivision should be deemed premature. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Future Land Use Map 5. Full Build Future Land Use Map 6. Utility Staging Area Map 7. Certificate of Survey, Existing Slopes & Hydrology and Trunk Utility Maps 8. Concept Plan 9. White Bear Township Letter dated June 6, 2017 10. Park Board Comment Letter dated June 7, 2017 13 INARDS LAKE _w 444. Yr >HE RMAIU-L-AKE ask //04111111111114 NEM" °fTT�� n■1 Ills i►� Si AssVist 0.10 121 [0 w El .: • ` i.1 .,it;ikt3ilJ\I • -z ■ O� KARTH RD DOLL-Y'DR 1167 MOL"ITOR-DR Lino-L--akes O • 4 w a:20e In I II I Pa 'a �` n4i►i� ♦11 1•�I,►�c 1111■ • 64TH ST PMP •Martin Lake AMELIA LAKE OHWL 908.1 FIRM BFE 910 FIS BFE 910. ASH ST Murravgirwr r!a i 1 -35E CN N 651:F/ sr 411■ �L� ■ Vistas • rr i� ��� BALD EAGLE LAKE ♦�� OI4/VLi9:11. 0 E 913 OTTER LAKE I ."', jFI8S BEF9 2.5 OHWL 911.5 r-. `� FIRM BFE 913 m� FIS BFE 912.7 ,AXirp.,. hr All• c ■/1P= 0 niA�W'41ti Lake Amelia .-4111 • Il\ Enj 1 i C 1 T IIN( Site Location Map w N S E 0 1.000 2,000 4.000 Feet Date: 5/3/2017 AMELIA LAKE OHWL 908.1 FIRM BFE 910 FIS BFE 910.2 OTTER LAKE OHWL 911.5 FIRM BFE 913 FIS BFE 912.7 Ll ii MOL•ITOR DR R R AMELIA LAKE OHWL 908.1 FIRM BFE 910 FIS BFE 910.2 • gib R WILKINSON LAKE 4OHWL 8,9_5.2 / OTTER LAKE OHWL 911.5 FIRM BFE 913 FIS BFE 912.7 R -X 0899 /' Res. 02-144 0-03 / CC/ LinoLakesMN.DBO.ZoningDistrict Zoning Description Rural Rural Executive Single Family Residential Single Family Executive Two Family Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Manufactured Home Park Limited Business General Business Neighborhood Business - General Industrial Light Industrial ▪ Rural/Business Reserve Public Semi -Public PUD C OF Zoning Map Lake Ameila Vistas w N s E 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Date: 5/3/2017 tti U' WILKINSON L _LOHWL $9_5.2 26 25 AMELIA LAKE OHWL 908.1 FIRM BFE 910 FIS BFE 910.2 1 • 35 36 • 64TH ST r• • '4 • • • • • Martin Lake NUM 1 OTTER LAKE OHWL 911.5 FIRM BFE 91: FIS BFE 912.. 35 36 Future Land Use 2030 (Stantec Future Land Use 2030 (Stantec) Permanent Rural Urban Reserve Low Density Sewered Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Commercial Mixed Use El Industrial — Civic/Institutional Park and Open Space Private Airfield Right -of -Way Open Water C OF Future Land Use Map Lake Ameila Vistas N s E 0 500 ,,000 2,000 Feet Date: 5/3/2017 27 26 34 35 MOL•ITOR DSR 64TH ST AMELIA LAKE OHWL 908.1 FIRM BFE 910 FIS BFE 910.2 Martin _Lake WILKINSON L _LOHWL 8.9_5.2 I 0 0 FII FL5 6T-3-6\ 0 — J — J 0 J J LL0 TT Future Land Use Full Build (Stantec) Full Build Out Future Land Use (Stantec) Permanent Rural Low Density Sewered Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Commercial Mixed Use Industrial Civic/Institutional Park & Open Space Private Airfield Right -of -Way Open Water Rural Land Use C 1 TOF Full Build FLUM Lake Ameila Vistas w N s E 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Date: 5/3/2017 IL° HOLLY DR II MOL-ITOR DR ®® 64T, H STj ®w i • .` • AMELIA LAKE OHWL 908.1 FIRM BFE 910 FIS BFE 910.2 Martin Lake rs H ST 2015 - 2020 WILKINSON LAKE OHWL 895.2 3 O FII FI5 n Stages Stage 2008 - 2015 2015 - 2020 2020 - 2025 2025 - 2030 No Service Post 2030 CITY 11N Utility Staging Area Map Lake Ameila Vistas N s E 0 500 1000 2,000 Feet Date: 5/3/2017 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: PATRICIA COMMERS VICINITY MAP LINO LAKES, MN No j(V 1 NORtI� GRAPHIC SCALE 100 1 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100ft. BASIS FOR BEARINGS: NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME GPS MEASUREMENTS UTILITIZING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK). 1� I; I gI 5 .=I 1 ' Twi ^^VV_ L N89'27'46"W hs /4 Cr. sec 33-31-42 8.....E-W1/l lila aM`atl from Milner/Caney Surveys (Coot Inn Monument) LLOW32 wlLown OTTON24 COTroN30 COTTON28 COTTON21 CO OAK 6 T'489°22'59"W 443± 83 • 019 5.89°22'59"E ' 0.063 950.4 25 00020 00420 920.0 009710 sZB-1 ' OAK24$ .. s AK20 \ 15. ':1420-60 ' S6 • x.931.0 8921.3 OA 18 OAK18 OAK18X2\ "2-06. OAK2 oAK25 OAK23 OA 8 11.6 OA 22 34 Ng 7 909.1 x914.1 x9120 916.4 SB -t OR 00018X3 =lei to8IJI I\ FENCE LINE 21.1 £T S0. OF UNE GRAVEL EDGE 24.0 SO.. OF UNE ZB6 & 952.3 1'6.7 l^ L 4w, 1 ) 948 / 913.0 00820 SD 99 SO 943.0 -a . 55 5B COTTON20X3 caTroN23 COTTON. COTTON30 COTTON28x2 00023 LO02092' I 00033002 2 _ c AK OAK19 K24,- \ - wA K1956S 7 -- .\� ems 04,K24 14.1 OAK19 AKza ,x.931.0 •OAK22 ''-CNERR019 0 \HE81R823808.- A�OAK. P. COTTONt9 COTTONt9 928.9 0. C.V-BURIE COTTONI9 COTTON2 COTTON33 COTTON20 7.7 _ 6OTTON29 n a°j0o'A �N b • i LL o o�yry40 COTTON26 TTON119 9t 2.4 ASH18x2 ELM22 TioN19 ASH2O .07002 8 t OAK32 OTfON ( ��K{914.8 wt 2 tff1TfON2 1. oTTorvzT arTfes '� \ COTTONI9 COTTONI9• x915.1 /1 `21 V. i1"ei A 2 3.1 i COTTON20 C0 2 S .1 .5 COTTON.- H18-.A8H2O 91p, - Y: .T C0TT0N2 928.4 Q'930.6 COTfON27 04021 928 OAK20 x • OAK23 OA 18 • a x9278PKt OR 19 ' 1/ ��OUNSHMa , oy.y y NORTH 00022x926.9 OAK2. AK25 7 0A 00020 9378x,yy 00822 �q 00024' 0 19a' 4? '9 9126\ COTTON. // COTTON19 27 5 CO ON1OA OA 25 7 9°2744"4t� COTTON3634 C0TT0N30 COfrON35 o2K ,/ ON2y 918. 8199 xx 918.8 25.8 COTTON23 (MON.. COTTON24 - .. 9191 -'\ o COTTON32 m7 LLD \�50 Z COTTON20 COTTON sns ..�� /- - 5 O ,8X4 , / fix" s09x \ COTTON. x 7.8 . • C\1 L 915 3 #915.6\ N. TrN19 '\ \coTo�a . '7 Q lpryra 2OUON26 922.4 COTTON30 COTTON* - -y COTTONT9 F 6 TON25x2 .COTTON COM COTTON2: COTTON -120 Cdfr0N19 6099.01921 COTTON COTToo5 25 COTroN19 COTTON29 COTTON20 COTToN18 COTTON38 913.01.4 C00002* 910.6 0,1'0022 914;4 !w 'COTe- 1 t_ x.913��I�" y1i COTT0N29 oTTON. 2x3 22 TTON24 Coorroari-� � COTTON. COTTON. c0fr0N2z Mii0N33 7 0> co907923 923 COTTON. GOTTON24X2 O 911.6x-- ELM2089970 Meas=58920'13"E Deed -N89'52'21"6 1C0 I 'c mm1 MMM `r �og:I '/ I s CP'I -- 51/4 con sac 3e-31-22 7 I j (Clothed Iran MN -DOT Plana & Miner Cally I 5 28l1. 4rE i flaw note. *loll .home an r 1n -game a a.) com 2611.133 NO Mora FOUND sw w. s«. 3s 58912'41 "E 327.94 (Cast Iron Mon.) Q LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES UTILITY POLE DENOTES EXIS11NG CONTOUR CW -"DENOTES GUY WIRE DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE DENOTES TREES DENOTES GRAVEL DENOTES BITUMINOUS MC = DENOTES MEASUREMENT FROM MILNER CARLEY (6) = DENOTES DEED OR RECORD MEASUREMENT (m) = DENOTES FIELD MEASUREMENT ZONING EXIS11NG ZONING: RX (Rural Executive) PROPOSED ZONING: PUD BENCHMARK BASIS FOR ELEVATION: NAVD 88 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 3005- With an Elevation of 930.19 2. MnDot Benchmark OtterModt Reset- With an Elevation of 941.08 BENCHMARKS ARE NOT SHOWN ON. SURVEY EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION That part of Government Lot 8, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, lying Westerly of the Westerly Right -of -Way line of County Road No. 54, except the North 14.70 feet of said Government Lot lying Easterly of the Southerly extension of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35. AND That part of Government Lot 7, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Westerly of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Section 35, 327.94 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35; thence North at right angles to the South line of said Section 35 for a distance of 1,328.0 feet to the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7; thence North 89 degrees, 52 minutes, 21 seconds East on the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7, 89.7 feet to point of beginning of Zine to be described; thence North 27 degrees 00 minutes 57 seconds East, 523.59 feet; thence North 32 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East, 229.41 feet; thence North 33 degrees 22 minutes 24 seconds East 803.9 feet to the Northerly line of said Govemment Lot 7 and there terminating. NOTES: - This survey was prepared without the benefit of titlework. Easement, appurtenances and encumbrances may exist in addition to those shown hereon. This survey is subject to revision upon receipt of a title insurance commitment or attorneys title opinion. - Field work done June thru October of 2016. - Wetland information provided from Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. No field locates have been completed as part of this survey. - The UPA Electric Transmission Easement described in Doc. No. 413293Soc. should be Re -defined to follow the Electric Transmission Line as now located. - A Gap exists between the Co. Rd. No. 54 ROW line and property line as noted on the survey. JOB #15074BS I hereby certify that this plan, sketch or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. JOSHUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: 10/11/16 Reg. No. 44655 SHEET SO 1 CRE LAND SURVEYING -aaa - III {763-238-6278 js.acrelandsurveyy4gmail.com to 8 8 8 818 o 80 ol os os os , os po Raine, MN 55449 CI\Users\Josh\DneDrIve\Land Desktop 2008\15074bs-Llno Lakes\dwg\15074bs.dwg 10/11/2016 1125108 PM CDT QO to' ler 0 4, 4% 3 1% Jr, (60 1 jO 0 0 • 0 em • • oh 0 9n 0 • 0 \% • • BC -2.0% 0 0 '4 • 0 0 0 5 NATURAL ENV. LAKE SETBACK, 150' °I. • yD 0 WETLAND D (MANAGE 1, 38' BUFFER) EDGE OF LAKE OHW = 908.3 • 1% Slopes Table Number Minimum Slope Maximum Slope Area Color 1 12.00% 18.00% 280858.23 2 18.00% 25.00% 110760.87 3 25.00% 33.00% 48272.99 4 33.00% 100.00% 55175.47 ■ 00 09 e� BNS , WETLAND C �. (MANAGE 2, " 26' BUFFER) — 04. C LAKE AMELIA oho 9m 00 es 5% es� nw nw ohw ;a°. Iwo WETLAND B (MANAGE 2, 26' BUFFER) O P, oh 0�% 1 -4.2% CIVIL METHODS, INC. 1551 Livingston Avenue, Suite 104 West St. Paul, MN 55118 o:763.210.5713 I www.civilmethods.com OWNER: TJB HOMES, INC. BLAINE, MN TITLE: EXISTING SLOPES & HYDROLOGY LAKE AMELIA VISTAS LINO LAKES, MN SHEET NO: C 0 1 Grr 0 O\ I / I I 1 1 / I , 1 1 III I1I 11 �, // I I --://7--://7/ I — ,\ \ I I 1 i ________ — 7\11� / — _____\\ \\II I / / CONNECT TO UTILITIES ON SOUTH SIDE OF CO. RD. J 1700 LF TRENCHLESS 6" HDPE SAN. FORCEMAIN 8" HDPE WATERMAIN (FEASIBILITY STUDY, TKDA 2014) LAKE AMELIA 100 200 11 I F LEGEND: —1- F FM 0 WETLAND PROPOSED 8" WATERMAIN PROPOSED 6" FORCEMAIN PROPOSED LIFT STATION __ J-- \\ i 1 , 1.�� �-- % -- /—%�— --- 7 '/ \ / / /i — /(11/' /'�_ V— � __ AA r„ /r 111 -)--' V A 1 v / -- —'i 7— /11)----- V — 7 ;/ / Ii�/1�-- ______= / (”,-- — =___--_—-— ,-- i -- — 7 7 �_-- I / rr,/ /—� v �/�� _ 7 /�--\I °Ill/_ e //VI* Ill//k1/ I,-- --/'/J/)//1111/111/1/ 1111////11,- ,1 1 /lls u,q 106,// }N////// .xe f 1/ / ' (qi%// — //01/II/* lull ///// //// 1i //dill,//////, 41111[4:0„. lea �1�11// � C��►► re es CIVIL METHODS, INC. 1551 Livingston Avenue, Suite 104 West St. Paul, MN 55118 0:763.210.5713 1 www.civilmethods.com OWNER: TJB HOMES, INC. BLAINE, MN TITLE: TRUNK UTILITY CONNECTION LAKE AMELIA VISTAS LINO LAKES, MN SHEET NO: CO2 • Land Use Space 'Public Open Space / City Park) Space: City Park Space Common. 'Common Open Space} Area Char) Total- Area: 1,779,328 /40,9478 aeree4 ■spa..: 1t...t Right -of -ray 2,31 40,920 ft' (0.9]94 ..r! (leper..: 2.i. .. Pr,p.rty.. 7.29 121°701 f[' 52.9546 auras/ 8•6167 mouornp Bit. 7.a4 131.611 ft, (3.1122 .or) 084;.64: .4.4r4a.nt Prep.rty. 15.19 371.436 1t' (1.3702 01r40 41Sp61.: City Park. 19 6. 345,303 Et' (7.0069 069.0., Cosa... 45.6= 10:.309 ft- (11.3065 sora! 0of 35 a ed n ous s c pace' Apant.ent Property pace: Senior Housing She SpaceInHome Property Neighborhood Information: Total Area (Net) 40,848 Acres Senior Housing Apartments 240 Market Rate Apartments 192 Townhorne rrwinhorne Units 20 Total Unita 452 Space: Street RIgtt-of•way NOteS Apartment units served with underground parking -thus surface parking is for guests, Private drive [arms shown are 24' wide. Senior housing is intended to ba both ass steel. and nor-assi stud services. A Video presentation can ha swan at: www.rhsdplannnng.com tT16.mp4 Pervk7u \` N, Envlronmenlal Density (27 } Vehicular: Private Lanes of o4 all ructure: Apartment Building mature: Teal phone rutture: Senior Housing Vehicular: Public Street realm: 4' Wide Walk 46610169: 10' Emery edestrlan: 6' Wide Trail cture:: Patio Arco Vehicular: Twinhome Driveways desirlon: Minor Walk ructurs: Porch ructure: Clubhouse 4 Pool O e t .° Clobh999. a Pool0.10 OPedoiteieni 61n.r Belk 0.34 015.E at Untie 11x0.60 13 eguleetriow 10' Lerp. Teeil1.06 ■v h i P0911e street 1..50 ■ S erre. 991.66664. 3.10 V h u1.r: Pryvate 1.969•11.79 Total Slte: 1,705.326 (0' (44.5477 66x63) 2,157 et' 10.0493 .90.0 •strd.cturaz p•tnh 0,35 3,491 ft' 10.1300 some.) 6,116 et' 10,1404 eeeer) •9.41..1.,: Winnow. Or1Wn.y0.44 6,545 1t' (0.1507 eases) 11,521 18' 10.2660 weer) OPed ! n: 6° Nide Tre110.34 11,376 ft' (0.1530 envoi) 17,¢74 et' 10.3966 eeeer) Op d t n° 4' Nod. r41t 1.44 24,436 1t' (0.5610 4.010 24,072 et' 10.5905 eared) Clateueturel Senior 11.91991.65 31,116 09- (0.7167 eaten? 54,421 et' (1.2565 .cr..) ■St' ,tut.. 9pettner9 Building 4.54 19,536 re' 11.6259 .rtes) 149..111$7 ft (1.1901 .cram! Pe lou. 12.5, 1,289,901 ft (29.6121 .cr..) 1 ick Harrison Site Design studio L 8832 71h Ave N Golden Valley, MN 55427 783-595-0055 www.rh'$dpla nning.Corn www.neishborhoodinnoyetions.com entor Significant trees likely to be saved 1"=1 00' \ SHEET NO. L01 SHEET NO. L03 1 1 h L4 1 II ))01- 1 .�1 Board of Supervisors ROBERT I. KERMES, Chair ED M. PRUDHON STEVEN A. RUZEK June 6, 2017 WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP Katie Larsen, City Planner City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 18.58 RAMSEY COUNTY MINNESOTA 1281 HAMMOND ROAD WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP, MN 551 !Cl 651-747-2750 FAX 651-426-2258 Email: wbtCr'whitebeartownship.org Re: Lake Amelia Vistas Dear Katie: Thank you for notifying White Bear Township that you are processing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the proposed 452 unit Lake Amelia Vista project. White Bear Township is aware that the project developers are considering requesting municipal sanitary sewer and water service from the Township. Please be advised that the Township is not in the position, at this time, to assure that these services can be provided. As you are aware, the Township's future groundwater appropriations are uncertain as a result of the White Bear Lake Lawsuit. Also, the capacity available in the Township's sanitary sewer system may not be sufficient to serve a project of that size. We are currently updating the sewer chapter of our Comprehensive Plan. Issues related to sewer capacity phasing, alignment, etc. will need to be addressed through this process prior to making any commitments for the Lake Amelia Vistas project. The Town expects to complete our Comprehensive Plan update by the end of 2018. We hope to have a better understanding of the municipal water and sewer capacity that may be available to Lino Lakes at that time. LIAM F. SHORT Clerk -Treasurer WFS/psw cc:admin/add.fiie b:linocomp iecyt.ed paw DATE: June 7, 2017 TO: Katie Larsen, City Planner FROM: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director RE: Lake Amelia Vistas — Park Board comments The Park Board discussed the Lake Amelia Vistas concept plan on May 15, 2017. The Park Board was in favor of the proposed linear public park and trail adjacent to the lake. The concept plan indicates a public trail along the lake which is consistent with the City's Park, Greenway and Trail System Plan. The standard width for City trails is eight feet (concept plan indicates six feet). The pedestrian connectivity provided throughout the development via sidewalks was well received. A future neighborhood park is not identified per the City's plan. The Park Board agreed that a neighborhood park area should not be included in the Lake Amelia Vistas development. Rather, a neighborhood park should be considered when future development to the north occurs. The cash dedication should be designated for the future park area. Another option: If the Lake Amelia Vistas development and the future development to the north can be connected via trails to the recreation complex land (located at Centerville Road and Birch Street), perhaps the recreation complex could serve as providing leisure opportunities for Lake Amelia Vistas, rather than developing and maintaining an additional park area. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 5B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: June 14, 2017 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING for Houle Addition Preliminary Plat CASE NUMBER: PP2017-002 APPLICANT: OWNER: REVIEW DEADLINE: GRH Contracting Attn: Guy Houle 4417 Channel Lane NE East Bethel, MN 55092 Guy R. Houle and Joseph L. Houle 4417 Channel Lane NE East Bethel, MN 55092 Complete Application Date: May 15, 2017 60 -Day Review Deadline: July 14, 2017 120 -Day Review Deadline: September 12, 2017 Environmental Board Meeting: May 31, 2017 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: June 14, 2017 Tentative City Council Work Session: July 5, 2017 Tentative City Council Meeting: July 10, 2017 BACKGROUND The applicant, Guy Houle with GRH Contracting, has submitted a land use application for preliminary plat. The proposed development is a 1 lot and 1 outlot single family residential subdivision located at the north end of Ruffed Grouse Road. The development contains one 30.72 gross acre parcel and is called Houle Addition. The Land Use Applications are: Preliminary Plat 1 o 1 lot and 1 outlot The following staff report is based on the following information: Preliminary Plans prepared by Kaskaskia Engineering Group, LLC dated 5/15/17 House Building Plans prepared by Schwieters Home Design dated 2/29/17 Soil Borings prepared by Professional Engineering Consultants dated 2/7/17 Title Commitment prepared by Title Resources Guaranty Company dated 12/13/15 Warranty Deed dated 3/10/16 ANALYSIS History This parcel has been through several land use proposals. In 2008, Ed Vaughan received preliminary plat (Resolution No. 08-22) and final plat (Resolution No. 08-44) approval for 1 lot and 1 outlot. The final plat was never recorded; therefore, the preliminary plat and final plat are void. In 2004, Mr. Vaughan received PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat approval but a PUD Final Plan/Final Plat was never submitted; therefore the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat is void. Existing Site Conditions The 30 acre site is a vacant rural parcel containing wetlands, short grasses and woodlands. The Hydrology and Soil Summary Sheet indicates peat soils, sandy subsoils and Miami fine sandy loam soil. The soil boring logs indicate presence of lean clay till soils below topsoil extending 10 feet below grade. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 17 feet. Trees on the proposed single family lot have been substantially removed from the site. The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve abuts the property to the north. The plans show a retaining wall and fence belonging to 6697 Ruffed Grouse encroaching 1.5 feet into Lot 1. Zoning The subject site was rezoned from PUD, Planned Unit Development to R -1X, Single Family Executive in 2008 with Ordinance No. 02-08 as part of the then proposed Vaughan's 1st Addition. Current Zoning R -1X, Single Family Executive Current Land Use Vacant Rural Residential Future Land Use per CP Low Density Sewered Residential Utility Staging Area 1A=2008-2015 2 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North PSP Regional Park Parks & Open Space South R -1X Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential East R -1X, PSP Vacant Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential West R-1 Open Space Park & Open Space Zoning Requirements The entire site is 30.72 acres. Lot 1 is being created for the purpose of constructing one (1) single family home. Outlot A is the remaining balance and will remain undeveloped. 3 • Required per R -1X Lot 1 Outlot A Min. Lot Size (upland) 12,825 s.f. 40, 574 s.f. (0.93 acres) 1,136,590 s.f. (26.09 acres) Gross Lot Size NA 201,870 s.f. (4.63 acres) 1,136,590 s.f. (26.09 acres) Min. Lot Width 90 feet (interior lot) 915 feet NA Min. Lot Depth 135 feet 220 feet NA Building Setback (feet)' -From Streets Local = 30 feet 30 feet NA -Rear --Principal 30 feet 135 feet NA -- Accessory 5 feet 135 feet NA -Side --Principal 10 feet 220 feet NA --Accessory 5 feet 380 feet NA Buffer Adjacent to Collector 15 foot NA NA 3 Impervious Surface --Within Shoreland District 30% Reviewed at building permit NA Per Section 1007.091(2)(a), minimum lot size is 12,825 square feet of contiguous buildable land. Contiguous buildable land is land area occurring within the property lines of a parcel or lot excluding wetlands and/or water bodies. This includes a 10 foot buffer/easement extending outward from the delineated wetland boundary. Lot 1 appears to meet the minimum requirements but this shall be verified. The property is located within the Shoreland Overlay District of Wards Lake and setbacks from the ordinary high water level (OHWL) apply. This is further discussed below under Shoreland Management Overlay District. Comments: 1. The lot area (contiguous buildable land) shall be recalculated and correctly shaded to exclude the delineated wetland boundary plus 10 foot buffer/easement. 2. Sheet 4, Preliminary Plat shall show building setbacks (front, side and rear) measured to the lot line. Building Requirements At the time of building permit, the single family dwelling unit will be reviewed for compliance regarding floor area, garage and design and construction standards. Comprehensive Plan Houle Addition is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. Resource Management System Plan The Resource Management System Plan provides the conservation design framework for the Comprehensive Plan and promotes sustainable decisions regarding growth and development. It provides a unified system approach to natural resource management and natural resource based amenities. Goals of the Resource Management System Plan include: Natural Resources and Amenities o Goal #1: Identify, protect and preserve the desirable natural areas and ecological and aquatic resources of the community Land Use Policies 4 o Goal #1: Ensure that well-planned, quality residential, commercial, industrial and institutional development to accommodate the city's projected growth needs occurs in a manner that also conserves and enhances the city's natural resources and amenities. The Resource Management System Plan identifies the following in the area: Existing trail Greenway system connectivity A trail extends from the end of Ruffed Grouse Court north to Ruffed Grouse Road. Houle Addition does not negatively impact this trail. The greenway corridor extends over both Lot 1 and Outlot A and incorporates the wetland and floodplain areas. This corridor may be preserved with a conservation easement if required by RCWD. Land Use Plan Goal 2: Ensure that zoning and subdivision ordinances and official maps are consistent with the intent and specific direction provided within the Comprehensive Plan. Policies: 1. Ensure developers meet the standards specified within the land -use plan and official controls, including zoning and subdivision ordinances and official maps. 2. Ensure compatibility of adjacent land uses. Houle Addition is compliant with the zoning and subdivision ordinances. It is also compatible with adjacent residential land uses. Density and Land Area Calculations The following chart implements Met Council's formula for calculating net density. Gross Area (acres) 30.72 Wetlands & Water Bodies TBD Public Parks & Open Space NA Arterial ROW NA Other (Wetland Buffer Conservation Easement) TBD 5 Net Area (acres) TBD # of Units 1 Gross Density (units/acre) TBD 411! Net Density (units/acre) TBD The subject site is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.9 units per net acre. Although more detailed information is needed verify consistency, it appears Houle Addition meets the land use goals of low density residential development by creating a 1 lot subdivision on a 4.63 gross acre parcel. Comments: 1. Sheet 4, Preliminary Plat shall include the above chart with correct area calculations for each line item. Housing Plan Goal 1: Ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and provides accessibility to key community features and natural resources. Houle Addition meets the goals of the housing plan. The development is compatible with the existing and adjacent residential homes and Anoka County Regional Park. Transportation Plan Goal 1: Plan for and achieve required street improvements and connectivity throughout the City of Lino Lakes. Ruffed Grouse Road is a local street and has capacity to accommodate 1 new single family home. Sanitary Sewer Plan Goals of the sanitary sewer plan are to ensure well-planned, quality residential development that conserves and enhances the city's natural resources and to provide an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The subject site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 1 (Sub -district 1D) and is served by MCES Lift Station L69. An 8" PVC sanitary sewer main extends along Ruffed Grouse Road. The sanitary system has capacity to handle 1 single family home. 6 Water Supply Plan A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents affordable potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The subject site is served by a 6" DIP watermain along Ruffed Grouse Road. The water supply system has capacity to handle 1 single family home. Planning Districts The site is located in Planning District 1 and is guided for low density residential development. There are no specific planning recommendations for this site. The site is located within Reshanau Resource Management Unit (RMU). Subdivision Ordinance The legal description of the subject site is Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve with exceptions. Per Section 1001.098(15), an outlot shall be platted into a lot and block prior to issuance of a building permit; hence, a preliminary and final plat are required. Per Section 1001.076(2), any subdivision that results in the creation of one or more sewered residential lots shall be platted in full compliance with preliminary plat and final plat requirements and therefore, it is not a minor subdivision. Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for low density residential development and zoning code requirements for R -1X, Single Family Executive as discussed above. Blocks and Lots The preliminary plat contains Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A. The Preliminary Plat Sheet 03 indicates a 1,710 s.f. future buildable area on Outlot A along CSAH 34/Birch Street. Comments: 1. Any future subdivision and development of Outlot A shall require full preliminary and final plat review and approval. 2. No principal or accessory buildings shall be constructed on Outlot A. 7 Streets and Alleys Lot 1 (future single family) has frontage along Ruffed Grouse Road that has 60 feet of platted right-of-way. Outlot A has frontage along CSAH 34/Birch Street. No street improvements are required. Comments: 1. CSAH 10 shall be renamed CSAH 34 on all plan sheets. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided along all lot lines. The wetland shall be protected by an easement that includes a 10 foot buffer extending outward from the delineated wetland boundary. The preliminary plat shows 10 foot easement along the front and side lot lines. It also indicates an easement around the wetland but it does not meet the required 10 feet. A conservation easement, if required by RCWD, shall be dedicated over the wetland management corridor. Comments: 1. The entire delineated wetland boundary shall be shown on the preliminary plat. 2. The preliminary plat shall be revised to show the drainage and utility easements including a 10 foot buffer extending outward from the entire delineated wetland boundary. 3. A separate plan sheet shall be submitted showing any required conservation easement. Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control Per the submitted Grading and Utilities Plan Sheet 5, no stormwater management facilities are proposed and drainage appears to occur on site. RCWD and the City Engineer will review and comment on plan. Comments: 1. The plan sheet indicates 470 s.f. of grading within the shore impact zone. a. The applicant shall clarify what this is and where it is located. 2. The Upland Lot Area (42,603 s.f.) does not match the data provided on Sheet 03 and the plans shall be revised accordingly. 8 Utilities Sanitary Sewer An 8" PVC sanitary sewer main along Ruffed Grouse Road will serve Lot 1. There is an 8" sanitary plug at the end of the main. Watermain A 6" DIP watermain along Ruffed Grouse Road will serve Lots 1. There is a 6" watermain plug at the end of the main. Public Land Dedication The Park, Natural Open Space, Greenways and Trail System Plan do not indicate a future neighborhood park within the area. The City is requiring cash in lieu of land dedication for the new lot. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 1 x 2017 Park Dedication Fee $2,575 = Total Due $2,575 Tree Preservation The goal of tree preservation is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity and forest resource and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. Several trees have been removed from the entire site prior to submittal of the land use application. The Grading and Utility Plan, Sheet 05 identifies 2 trees on Lot 1 and that these trees are not being impacted. A tree inventory is not required for Outlot A since no development is proposed. Comments: 1. Staff has concerns the tree west of the house may be damaged during site grading. a. The applicant shall provide tree protection. Landscaping No landscape plan was submitted. One (1) boulevard tree is required. Comments: 9 1. A separate Landscape Plan shall be submitted showing the location and tree species for one (1) boulevard tree. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The one (1) unattached residential unit is under the 250 unattached unit thresholds. Wetlands A Wetland Delineation Report was completed by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC on May 23, 2017 and is currently under review by RCWD. Since no future development is to occur on Outlot A, a delineation is only required on Lot 1. A WCA Notice of Decision has not yet been received. The site is located within in the RCWD Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). A conservation easement covering an average 50 foot wide wetland buffer may be required. Comments: 1. A WCA Notice of Decision shall be submitted to the City. 2. Plans shall be revised to reflect the WCA approved delineated boundary. 3. The entire wetland boundary on Lot 1 shall be delineated and shown on the plans. 4. If required by RCWD, the WMC 50 foot buffer area and the proposed WMC buffer area shall be provided on a separate plan sheet. Floodplain The 2015 DFIRM indicates Zone A floodplain on both Lot 1 and Outlot A. The plan sheets indicate a RCWD floodplain base flood elevation (BFE) of 887.6. The Grading and Utilities Plan Sheet 05 show the north corner of the house abutting the floodplain. Grading and house construction could potentially impact the floodplain. Comments: 1. The applicant shall provide written documentation from RCWD the 887.6 BFE is correct. a. If correct, this should be listed under "Notes" on the plan sheets. 2. The applicant shall verify the floodplain will not be impacted. Shoreland Management Overlay The site is located in a Shoreland Management Overlay district of Wards Lake. This lake is a classified as a Natural Environment Lake and has an 883.7 OHWL elevation. A 10 setback of 150 feet from the OHWL is required for all primary and accessory structures. Section 1102.07(2)(a) does however, allow for the following exception: "Placement of structures on lots. When more than one setback applies to a site, structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building site, structure setbacks may be altered without a variance to conform to the adjoining setbacks from the ordinary high water level, provided the proposed building site is not located in a shore impact zone." The plans show the 883.7 OHWL; however, staff understands this elevation was not field surveyed and may not be accurate. Therefore, the setbacks of houses on the adjoining lots cannot be verified. The February 11, 2008 Council Report states the house at 6697 Ruffed Grouse is 70.6 feet from the OHWL and the house at 6690 Ruffed Grouse is 90.5 feet from the OHWL. The average of the 2 setbacks is 80.55 feet and this would be the allowed setback from the OHWL. Unfortunately, this information may not be accurate and must be field surveyed and recalculated. The Preliminary Plat Plan Sheet 04 incorrectly shows the 75 foot shore impact zone as the allowed setback. The proposed house plan encroaches into the previously approved 80.55 foot average setback. Again, this information needs to be verified and recalculated. The plan sheet also incorrectly labels the 75 foot shore impact zone as the Upland Boundary. The Grading Plan indicates 2.31% impervious surface coverage which meets the allowed 30% impervious surface coverage of the shoreland ordinance. Comments: 1. The 883.7 OHWL shall be field surveyed and shown on the plans. 2. The actual house setbacks to the OHWL of 6697 Ruffed Grouse and 6690 Ruffed Grouse shall be shown on the plans. 3. The average of setback line of theses adjacent houses shall be shown on the plan. 4. The 75 foot shore impact zone shall be clearly marked on the Preliminary Plat Plan Sheet 04 and Grading and Utilities Plan Sheet 05. 5. The Upland Boundary label shall be renamed Contiguous Buildable Area. 6. The Contiguous Buildable Area shall be shown and calculated 10 feet outward from the delineated wetland boundary. 7. The civil plans and house plans shall be revised to meet the accurately calculated average setback. 8. On the Preliminary Plat Plan Sheet 04, it shall be included under Notes that all structures (decks, accessory structures etc.) shall meet the required OHWL setback. 11 Final Plat A land use application for final plat and Development Agreement shall be required. FINDINGS OF FACT Preliminary Plat Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. Houle Addition is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities as detailed in this staff report. The development is also consistent with the local water management plan, capital improvement plans and growth management policies. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. 12 Houle Addition is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A= 2008-2015. No new utility or street extensions are required. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer -financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Houle Addition meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). Ruffed Grouse Road is a local street and has capacity to accommodate 1 new single family home. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City's capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 13 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Houle Addition will have an adequate water supply. The subject site is served by a 6" DIP watermain along Ruffed Grouse Road. The water supply system has capacity to handle 1 single family home. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. Houle Addition will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. The subject site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 1 (Sub -district 1D) and is served by MCES Lift Station L69. An 8" PVC sanitary sewer main extends along Ruffed Grouse Road. The sanitary system has capacity to handle 1 single family home. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat for Houle Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. Comments from City Engineer Letter dated June 7, 2017 shall be addressed. 2. Comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated June 9, 2017 shall be addressed. 3. General Comments: a. Any future subdivision and development of Outlot A shall require full preliminary and final plat review and approval. b. No principal or accessory buildings shall be constructed on Outlot A. c. CSAH 10 shall be renamed CSAH 34 on all plan sheets. 4. Sheet 03-04, Preliminary Plat: 14 a. The lot area (contiguous buildable land) shall be recalculated and correctly shaded to exclude the delineated wetland boundary plus 10 foot buffer/easement. b. Both sheets shall show building setbacks (front, side and rear) measured to the lot line. c. Sheet 04 shall include the density chart with correct area calculations for each line item. d. The entire delineated wetland boundary shall be shown on the preliminary plat, especially on Lot 1, Block 1. e. Both sheets shall be revised to show the drainage and utility easements including a 10 foot buffer extending outward from the entire delineated wetland boundary. f. A separate plan sheet shall be submitted showing any required conservation easements. g. The 883.7 OHWL shall be field surveyed and shown on the plans. h. The actual house setbacks to the OHWL of 6697 Ruffed Grouse and 6690 Ruffed Grouse shall be shown on the plans. i. The average of setback line of theses adjacent houses shall be shown on the plan. j. The 75 foot shore impact zone shall be clearly marked on the Preliminary Plat Plan Sheet 04 and Grading and Utilities Plan Sheet 05. k. The Upland Boundary label shall be renamed Contiguous Buildable Area. 1. The Contiguous Buildable Area shall be shown and calculated 10 feet outward from the delineated wetland boundary. m. The civil plans and house plans shall be revised to meet the accurately calculated average setback. n. On the Preliminary Plat Plan Sheet 04, it shall be included under Notes that all structures (decks, accessory structures etc.) shall meet the required OHWL setback. 5. Sheet 05, Grading and Utilities: a. The plan sheet indicates 470 s.f. of grading within the shore impact zone. i. The applicant shall clarify what this is and where it is located. b. The Upland Lot Area (42,603 s.f.) does not match the data provided on Sheet 03 and the plans shall be revised accordingly. c. Staff has concerns the tree west of the house may be damaged during site grading. i. The applicant shall indicate tree protection measures on the plan. 6. Landscape Plan: a. A separate Landscape Plan shall be submitted showing the location and tree species for one (1) boulevard tree. 7. Wetlands: a. A WCA Notice of Decision shall be submitted to the City. b. All plans shall be revised to reflect the WCA approved delineated boundary. c. The entire wetland boundary on Lot 1 shall be delineated and shown on the plans. 15 d. If required by RCWD, the WMC 50 foot buffer area and the proposed WMC buffer area shall be provided on a separate plan sheet. 8. Floodplain: a. The applicant shall provide written documentation from RCWD the 887.6 BFE is correct. i. If correct, this should be listed under "Notes" on the plan sheets. b. The applicant shall verify the floodplain will not be impacted. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Future Land Use Map 4. Zoning Map 5. City Engineer Letter dated June 7, 2017 6. Environmental Coordinator Letter dated June 9, 2017 7. Preliminary Plat and Civil Plan Set prepared by Kaskaskia Engineering Group, LLC dated May 15, 2017 16 vIARSHAN LAKE OHWL 8831-3 IRM BFE 8187 F.1-BFE 887 GEORGE WATCH. LAKE CENTERVILLE LAKE OHWL 885.0 FIRM BFE 888 FIS BFE 887.9 RICE LAKE OHWL 883.1 FIRM BFE 887 FIS BFE 887 RESHANAU LAKE OHWL 883.5 FIRM BFE 887 FIS BFE 887 SHERMAN :411111►� a I:: I LI: I 1 ■ IS 11 Houle Addition I. mill �i /iiiiim uuu ►o �� "V". ►„//11``,.11111111111111 ►� '� .._ dQ111111 ! �I ►�! �.�� Illi CEDAR LAKE OHWL 892..9 111 % ■ '1 M 1"""' AMELIA LAKE _,OHWL 908.1 FIRM BFE 910 I_� FIS BFE 910.2 CIT` 11N( Site Location Map w N S E 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet 0 C I T E Aerial Map Houle Addition E 0 200 400 800 Feet WARDS LAKE 'ARIR/DGE PL ANTEftN ANTERN I•i'gg 3LACK DUCZ- CT Q w CL z D z w 2 a \GHERRY1RD \ 1 1111 l 0' 111111 O�F C�� • �y 111 W m a 4 g,11111.*1 HUNTERS �Q 1 HERMAN LAKE Legend Future Land Use 2030 (Stantec) Future Land Use 2030 (Stantec) Permanent Rural Urban Reserve Low Density Sewered Residential Medium Density Residential ▪ High Density Residential Commercial Mixed Use - Industrial Civic/Institutional Park and Open Space - Private Airfield Right -of -Way Ir Open Water CITY ,OF RN CA KES Future Land Use Map W NLA s E 0 250 500 1,000 Feet Date: 5/31/2017 PSP WARDS LAKE 3LACK DUCK CT PHEASANT RUN S R-1 R-1 X R-1 PSP R-1 I I l j GNOKEC.HERRY Rp uJ Legend LinoLakesMN.DBO.ZoningDistrict Zoning Description Rural Rural Executive Single Family Residential Single Family Executive Two Family Residential Medium Density Residential min High Density Residential Manufactured Home Park Limited Business General Business Neighborhood Business General Industrial Light Industrial Rural/Business Reserve Public Semi -Public Lu R-1 X WOLF, CLQ- • PS P ,r R-1 X 111, � HUNTERS R-1 X�-.ii SHERMAN LAKE �i PUD C 1 T 0 11\1_±01EEK Zoning Map N s E 0 250 500 1,000 Feet WSB Building a legacy— your legacy. Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Ed Youngquist, WSB Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer Date: June 7, 2017 Re: Houle Addition Plan Review WSB Project No. 010154 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat documents dated May 15, 2017 for the Houle Addition development in Lino Lakes, MN prepared by Kaskaskia Engineering Group, LLC. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. All plans, specifications, and construction activities shall reference the latest version of the City General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction dated November 2016, the 2013 CEAM, and the 2016 MnDOT Standard Specifications. Engineering Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control The Houle Addition development proposes replatting Outlot D of Pheasant Hills Preserve into one residential lot and an Outlot (A). No additional public right of way or streets are proposed. Grading of the house pad is specific to the proposed house. Erosion control measures include a rock construction entrance at the end of Ruffed Grouse Road and silt fence around the perimeter of the disturbed area (house pad grading). Comments: 1. The applicant shall list the total area to be disturbed. 2. The applicant shall denote and label required buffer distances from surface waters/wetlands. 3. The applicant shall use the City's current standard plate for silt fence detail. Environmental Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com S:\Community Development \Projects\Planning Cases\Houle Addition\Staff Reports \20170614PZ\a5 city engineer letter.docx Ms. Katie Larsen June 7, 2017 Page 2 There are existing wetlands and lakes on and adjacent to the proposed plat of Houle Addition. The proposed plat is also within the City's Shoreland district. Comments: 1. How was the OHW of 883.7 established on the plans? The OHW should be located/verified in the field. 2. The building setback from Ordinary High Water is 150 feet or the average of the neighboring structures. The average setback based on neighboring structures was previously established as 80.55 feet. The submitted plan shows the proposed house encroaching on this setback. The applicant shall revise the plan to remove the proposed house from the OHW setback of 80.55 feet. 3. Please edit the comment in the erosion control notes to read "all slopes 3:1 or steeper, to be sodded". Stormwater Management The Houle Addition development proposes the creation of a single family lot at the end of Ruffed Grouse Road. The proposed development is located within 1000 feet of a public water (Wards Lake) and is in excess of one acre. Comments: 1. Per the Rice Creek Watershed District Rule C, a stormwater management plan is required. Water Supply The Houle Addition development is proposed to be served by municipal water. A 6 inch diameter watermain extension was constructed as part of the Pheasant Hills Preserve development. Comments: 1. Provide a utility plan that details the service connection to the existing 6" watermain extension, including curb stop at the right of way line. 2. The applicant shall use the City's current standard plate for water service detail. Sanitary Sewer The Houle Addition development is proposed to be served by municipal sanitary sewer. An 8 inch diameter sanitary sewer extension was constructed as part of the Pheasant Hills Preserve development. Comments: S:\Community Development \Pr jects\Planning Cases\Houle Addition \ Staff Reports \20170614PZ\a5 city engineer letter.docx Ms. Katie Larsen June 7, 2017 Page 3 1. Provide a utility plan that details the service connection to the existing 8" sanitary sewer extension. 2. The applicant shall use the City's current standard plate for sanitary sewer service detail. Transportation The Houle Addition development proposes the creation of a single family lot at the end of an existing street (Ruffed Grouse Road). No additional right of way or public streets are proposed. 1. No additional comments offered. Floodplain There is floodplain on the parcel. The plan sheets indicate a RCWD floodplain base flood elevation (BFE) of 887.6. The 2015 DFIRM indicates Zone A floodplain on both Lot 1 and Outlot A. Comments: 1. The applicant shall verify the low floor and low openings of the proposed house and verify the elevations are in compliance with the 2 -foot separation from the 100 -year high water elevation and the 4 foot separation from the highest known groundwater elevation Clarify if the line labeled RCWD Floodplain is the 100 -yr high water level? This line is similar to the FEMA Zone A (areas subject to the inundation by the 1 - percent -annual -chance flood event). Based on the soil borings, the highest groundwater elevation observed was 882.8. 2. Show the FEMA Zone A. If encroached by development, a LOMR may be required. Wetlands and Mitigation Plan A wetland delineation was provided for the boundary surrounding the proposed house. The site is within the City's wetland preservation corridor. Comments: 1. A wetland delineation and report is needed over the entirety of Lot 1, Block 1. 2. The applicant shall submit the wetland delineation approval from the LGU (RCWD). 3. Please show, on the grading plan, wetland buffers and drainage easements over the buffers and wetlands. Please reference easement section below. Drainage and Utility Easements A 10 foot drainage and utility easement is shown along the front line (right of way) of Lot 1, Block 1 Houle Addition. The plat also shows a drainage and utility easement following the wetland delineation around the sides and rear yard. S:\Community Development \Pr jects\Planning Cases\Houle Addition \ Staff Reports \20170614PZ\a5 city engineer letter.docx Ms. Katie Larsen June 7, 2017 Page 4 Comments: 1. A conservation easement and signage may be required over delineated wetlands. RCWD may require additional easement. 2. Provide a drainage and utility easement to cover 10 feet beyond the approved delineated wetlands contained within the proposed Lot 1. Development Agreement The Houle Addition development will require a development agreement. Grading Agreement A grading agreement is not applicable. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance agreement may be required. Permits Required The following permits may at minimum be required as part of the development construction. 1. NPDES Construction General Permit 2. Rice Creek Watershed Permit a. Stormwater and Erosion Control. 3. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Grading. If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or diane.hankee@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us. S:\Community Development \Pr jects\Planning Cases\Houle Addition \ Staff Reports \20170614PZ\a5 city engineer letter.docx Environmental Memo To: Katie Larsen From: Marty Asleson Date: June 9, 2017 Re: Houle's First Addition, Environmental Board Comments and Recommendations The Lino Lakes Environmental Board made the following comments and recommendations at their May 28, 2017 meeting concerning the Houle's First Addition proposed subdivision: 1. Shoreland Impact Overlay requirements must be met. 2. House is set on the DNR 75 foot setback impact zone. Anything done on the back side of the house would be in violation of this setback requirement. Recommend reconfiguring house to allow for future active area, such as deck. 3. Any required infiltration ponds must have a 3 foot separation between the bottom of the pond and the ordinary high ground water. The Houle property is within a High Vulnerability DWSMA area. 3 feet of separation will protect the ground (future drinking) water from surface water runoff contaminants. 4. No soils shall be imported without City staff approval. 5. Remaining Ash trees on the site should be treated for Emerald Ash Borer or Removed. 6. Native plants would be highly desired in ground restoration disturbed from construction. 7. Tree protection fence would be needed along the property line. 8. Standard Erosion control practices, such as silt fence perimeter control and rock entrance must be implemented before construction. • Page 1 P: \17-1042 — Houles — Lino Project\1 O_CAD\CADD Drawings\Guy — Lino Lakes Project.dwg PRELIMINARY PLANS for PLAT, GRADING, STREETS, UTILITIES for HOULE ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN PREPARED FOR: GRH Contracting 4417 Channel Lane NE East Bethel, MN 55092 Contact: Guy Houle Phone: 612-210-3854 PREPARED BY: • Kaskaskia Engineering Group, LLC PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 161S St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 615.337.5652phone 618.233.5977 fax www.kaskaskiaeng.com LICENSE NO. Minnesota. Professional Design Firm 688435000021 INDEX: Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 2 3-4 5 6 7 COVER CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PRELIMINARY PLAT GRADING NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT AND DETAILS RESOURCE INVENTORY VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE //A Ce1tervklle Pd e3[I11,r 11, D 9 GenLOr SI DOL Mair+ s1 PF 7 BFrch St L L, (NOT TO SCALE) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plans for PLAT, GRADING, STREETS, AND UTILITIES for HOULE ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN Date: 5/15/2017 Sheet: 1 of 7 LAST PLOTTED: 5/15/2017 10:36 AM OPERATOR: SCA P: \17-1042 — Houles — Lino Project\1 O_CAD\CADD Drawings\Guy — Lino Lakes Project.dwg 0 c a) T E 0 LL a) in LIJ in O 0 N 0 N • • Edge Of Wetland As--‘ Delineated By Jacobson Environmental in April, 2017 , Retaining Wall and— Fence Falls 1.5' "T North of Property n 915.53 N 89°4131" E 1315.53 `--The Southwest corner of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 MINITY MAP Not to Scale PDO & R -1X (Planned Development and Single Family Executive) V 1 G• A •SHEET A 07 SHEETS C.S.A.H.1 .1/\ V (�G' (1/alI 4/ \IN 4,�I NO.10 I(\ ` <<5.).' r/ � C') 54 \I J 1 1 Section 27, & 28 Township 31, Range 22 Anoka County, MN 100 0 HORIZONTAL: 1"=100' I= LEGEND 100 200 EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING SIGN EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING GUY WIRE ® CB EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE EXISTING GATE VALVE • FOUND IRON MONUMENT O SET MONUMENT S? EXISTING AUTO SPRINKLER CO EXISTING MANHOLE O EXISTING WATER METER CI EXISTING GAS METER Z EXISTING HAND HOLE ® EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX ® EXISTING GUAR POST EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT s�1 EXISTING SOIL BORING • NOTES WL 502 502 E G D D DD DD SF W SF Zoned : PSP (Public Semi -Public) S 89°42'27" W 1314.92 ,---Ordinary High Water JJJ/ Elevation: 883.7 Floodplain \ /Elev=887.6 --1 / • ,� ✓i s / 7 �-- — \ —CO \ •1 89 E i. E PT 1 0 v inI'1 \ • \ • House /) / / \ �� ,SJ \ °o °a / // / / / // // 1,// // / PROPOSED SETBACK LINE EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING WETLANDS EDGE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING TREELINE EXISTING WATERLINE EXISTING SILT FENCE UPLAND AREA 1) The area of the property is 1,338,460 sq. ft. or 30.72 acres 2) Wetlands were located as shown on the drawing 3) The property lies in flood zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and zone A (areas where no base flood elevations are determined) as designated on Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel Number 27003C 0365 E, Anoka County, Minnesota, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency effective date December 16th, 2015. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, Minnesota EXCEPT that part of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve being in the West One-half of the Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the West One-half of said Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West along the East line of said West One-half, Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27, a distance of 57.73 feet to the Southeast corner of said Outlot D for a point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the East line of said Outlot D, a distance of 910.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 580.47 feet; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D, a distance of 548.90 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East, parallel with the South line of said Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27, a distance of 416.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D a distance of 370.14 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10 (Anoka County Right -of -Way Plat No. 11); thence North 85 degrees 24 minutes 36 seconds East along said right-of-way line a distance of 28.66 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way line along a curve concave to the North (which has a radius of 3879.72 feet, a delta angle of 02 degrees 00 minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 136.02 feet) a chord bearing and distance of North 86 degrees 24 minutes 53 seconds East, 136.01 feet to the point of beginning. And EXCEPT the North 1100 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserver, Anoka County Minnesota And EXCEPT the South 400 feet of the North 1500 feet of the East 600 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, Minnesota / / / /7 / -7 / / / • BENCHMARK Top Nut of Hydrant (NAVD 88) Located at the end of Ruffed Grouse Road as shown on the survey. Elev.= 897.26 feet IN BASIS OF BEARINGS For the purposes of this survey the West line of Outlot D, of PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, according to the plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota is assumed to bear N 00'44'55" W .---The South Line of the North 1100 feet / of Outlot D S 89°19'39" W _-Anoka County Reference Monument on the E. Line of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 \ WETLAND 400.00 The Southeast corner of the NE 1/4 of--' the NE 1/4, Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 'OO ,' \ �9/e F 60 00, C /� Fkeo'lt�JA. /o,, t / / /\ _) \\ 1 r\ I \J C L I rThr\It Lr\ /7 • • / / / >' / / PARK 4 / -\ ona°4-R >N opi2//y Fnea / / N kee4/1`4, 41� fop, ent O N _C N 0 \ • A Kt 719.23' 882- WETLAND / \\ \rn \\ �-- 8l, �! A \• \N\ct \c5)0(5, -- _____ ---' \Q \ \ \ \C -c \g 00 \\ \I �\ \ go \\\- \ \t_ _:i) J/ / _ _ _s9e / ,4* `, LLJ S 00°54'46" ea Cr b,, / O�Se /%0(:), / / 5 / / 1 // 7 - I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Ronal • P. Alwin DATE 5-11-17 LIC. No 17765 • 30 / l WETLAND -) i_i 1- A C. -s%\ �IC I1- 1 1 L_/—\ 1 N 1 N 89°294E 3b9:80 Zoned: R- Sill, cicoyly k ee\/\,3,,,,;31; tial) c5j \ \ \ \ -- \\\\ \ 1 (Li \\ \1 ZN \ V--__\\\ N a) \ `9 \ \ t C /\ \\ \\ L O a u) / \ U , I- sN (C3; 7 U I 00°38'22" W z c E. C o°) • C + 0 Cg o c O O L 0 o rn C o < / / / / �I I J J 4 I III I CTs 1 I L_L_`. • • • • • • DC ED\'E- 1 1 \ V L_ r\ I ITI r\T r\ V I L_\_./ 1 V Edge Of Wetland As Delineated___' By Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. On Nov. 15, 2000 WETLAND O On 0 O r -- O z Zoned : PSP (Public Semi -Public) I —600'— E.j ,- r r 1 n 11 ,s L 1 1 V IV / — The South Line of the North 1500 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, MN S 89°19'39" W 600.01 O O --- WETLAND CN 0) S 89°22'49" W 580.47 Zoned : R-1 (Single Family Residential) T) ii r— A^ A N I m i_i 1 1 1 L_)r-^r-D\ /r - I 1 I L_/—\.D/-\I N 1 1 1 1 L_L_.2 1 I\ L_L_1 \ V L_ 1 cii\ \I ( -'"/ 1 ��6 / \ ,-Ordinary High Water \IElevation: 883.7 \ / \--75-ft Shore Impact Zone \ • \ \ \ I \ � \ p )» \\ //,/ OCft setbiickko�rn�O1 \ • \ •• J 7 / O J fm I I T 1 r\ --r r\ V 1 L_\J I LJ 0 _Parallel with the South line of the Northwest Quarter N 89°22'49" E N `-The South line of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 27, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 \ 302.40 90 C.S.A.I. --L=1:. 58 \ 90 1 "18'�5„N - 898. J 416.00' N 7 0 O O 4E) c S 01°00'55" E M „8S,00.1.0 N /-The Northerly / right-of-way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10. The Southeast corner of said \ Outlot D. \ 1 7 z M N 1-2 PREPARED BY: a-� Q Q E 4• tiou t. CMN. • vi 06 N rid \O �O LICENSE NO. PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS 688435000021 4417 Channel Lane NE cip REV. DATE DESCRIP A •SHEET A 07 SHEETS SHEET TITLE: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PROJECT TITLE: DRAWN IL1_: •SHEET NO. 02 OF 07 SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 1 7-1• LAST PLOTTED: 5/15/2017 10:37 AM OPERATOR: SCA P: \17-1042 — Houles — Lino Project\1 O_CAD\CADD Drawings\Guy — Lino Lakes Project.dwg tJ J_ v c 0 Fn a) T E 0 u_ rn J) a) 0' o 90 15 o a 0 Z o • oci _c N •c .~ U o O N • S4 a) — \s ) • w -o Z o _c • ON • LLJ in O O N O N O U) 100 0 LOT 1 City Setback Line • • Edge Of Wetland As - Zoned : PSP (Public Semi -Public) S 89°42'27" W 1314.92 I Floodplain \ /' -/ / • \ / Elevation: 883.7 ---Ordinary High Water Delineated By Jacobson \--' �st Environmental in Aril, 2017 \1 4 p57 s• ' . It. 201,870 sq. ft. 4.63 acres BLOCK 1 N 89°41'31" E `--The Southwest corner of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 14CINI TY MAP Not to Scale \ 4 • • 915.53 1315.53 PDO & R -1X (Planned Development and Single Family Executive) C-Dl</G (1,�1 V///V/V 1 DE SCRIP 0 G. S ik RPA C.S.A.H., �G' ai X11 NI N0.10 1 ^ �G' 1°c �4'\ 1 i Section 27, & 28 Township 31, Range 22 Anoka County, MN 100 200 HORIZONTAL: 1"=100' ■ LEGEND Municipality Proposed Utilities: r wL Elev=887.6 \ • -� I 1 House /• / / // // // // // // L Owner / Developer Guy and Joseph Houle 1221 Birch St. Lino Lakes, MN 55038 (612)210-3854 Engineer & Surveyor Kaskaskia Engineering Group 2550 University Avenue West Suite 161 S St. Paul, MN 55114 (651)337-5652 City of Lino Lakes Sewer: City Utilities (available) Water: City Utilities (available) CI EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING SIGN EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING GUY WIRE ® CB EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE C) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE K4 EXISTING GATE VALVE • FOUND IRON MONUMENT O SET MONUMENT EXISTING AUTO SPRINKLER �O EXISTING MANHOLE 0 EXISTING WATER METER cM EXISTING GAS METER Z EXISTING HAND HOLE ® EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX ® EXISTING GUAR POST tf EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT SB-1QbEXISTING SOIL BORING • ZONING SUMMARY ■ Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Current use: Proposed use: R -1X Ord. 02-08 R-1 X Not being used Residential WL 502 502 E D G SF W D DD SF ■ EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, Minnesota PROPOSED SETBACK LINE EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING WETLANDS EDGE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING TREELINE EXISTING WATERLINE EXISTING SILT FENCE UPLAND AREA EXCEPT that part of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve being in the West One-half of the Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the West One-half of said Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West along the East line of said West One-half, Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27, a distance of 57.73 feet to the Southeast corner of said Outlot D for a point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the East line of said Outlot D, a distance of 910.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 580.47 feet; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D, a distance of 548.90 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East, parallel with the South line of said Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27, a distance of 416.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D a distance of 370.14 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10 (Anoka County Right -of -Way Plat No. 11); thence North 85 degrees 24 minutes 36 seconds East along said right-of-way line a distance of 28.66 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way line along a curve concave to the North (which has a radius of 3879.72 feet, a delta angle of 02 degrees 00 minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 136.02 feet) a chord bearing and distance of North 86 degrees 24 minutes 53 seconds East, 136.01 feet to the point of beginning. And EXCEPT the North 1100 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserver, Anoka County Minnesota And EXCEPT the South 400 feet of the North 1500 feet of the East 600 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, Minnesota =PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1 and Outlot A, HOULES ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota House' r v 0 r p T n l AI L L 1 I v IV \ • 0 c\J CV \ F-0 cr co LJ2° 0 I— ino Z DMco O•N / \ \ / >\ / N / I L •"� / 00 / V*60, / 0 /' w SSB / \ // /7 / \ / \Z___,_ \ // \ / \ \ / \/ ■LOT SUMMARY Lot 1 201,870 sq. ft. Outlot A 1,136,590 sq. ft. Upland Area 40,574 sq. ft. Total 1,338,460 sq. ft. or 4.63 acres or 26.09 acres or 0.93 acres or 30.72 acres HOULE ADDITION C 11, -The South Line of the North 1100 feet of Outlot D S 89°19'39" W 719.23' / ,-Anoka County Reference Monument on the E. Line of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 28, \r ( \\ Twp. 31, Rge. 22 WETLAND ---/ 400.00 The Southeast corner the NE 1/4, Sec. 28, WETLAND WL of the NE 1/4 of--/ Twp. 31, Rge. 22 /7 L �I /\/'It bL_Vvf\ "fi (J • N _c N 4- ai O 0) N a O N U • .6 a) a) � z \ w S 00°54'46" 1 ti / ■ BENCHMARK 4 Top Nut of Hydrant (NAVD 88) Located at the end of Ruffed Grouse Road as shown on the survey. / Elev.= 897.26 feet ■BASIS OF BEARINGS For the purposes of this survey the West line of Outlot D, of PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, according to the plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota is assumed to bear N 00'44'55" W ■ NOTES 3 / 6 1) The property lies in flood zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and zone A (areas where no base flood elevations are determined) as designated on Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel Number 27003C 0365 E, Anoka County, Minnesota, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency effective date December 16th, 2015. 2) Upland boundary line is 75 feet from the ordinary high water line I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Ronal oilP. Alwin DATE 5-11-17 LIC. NO. 17765 / 7 / • 30 WETLAND -- r- /\ ^ /\ --l\ I T 1 1 L_/—\._:%/—\ I \1 I N 89°222-9�E N 09:80 Zoned Si gle Fa 'ly ential)\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0) 0) u) 10 N 00'38'22" W c 0 I III I DID r—^_ID\ /r— I I I L_L1 I\ L_ I\ V L_ '\I 111 ("\T r\ U V 1 L_\J 1 V Edge Of Wetland As Delineated--_-_-' By Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. On Nov. 15, 2000 OUTLOT A 1,136,590 sq. ft. 26.09 acres \ /� ( �I \ WETLAND --'/\ \ \ ,-Ordinary High Water \IElevation: 883.7 ---75-ft Shore Impact Zone• \ \ • • • • \ • • • \ \ \ -114 osz Zoned : PSP (Public Semi -Public) 600' — r s, /v r [) T I n A I I v Iv / The South Line of the North 1500 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, MN S 89°19'39" W 600.01 H 0 0 ---- WETLAND Ln 0 O O z N d 0) cn 00 cD LC) O O � S 89°2249" W 580.47 Zoned : R-1 (Single Family Residential) h)iiI--A^A NIT 11 I 1 1 N I 1 1 1 L _ L I\ L_`: L_ I\ V L_ T Dr -C rD\ /C z r /'\ 11 r 1 ("\ T r1 vvIL_v1 L) --- Parallel with the South line of the Northwest Quarter N 89°22'49" E fV 0 \ I "••"'`/� // /-1(5OLft Setb?ick fr;511 WL- Figure Buildable Area 0 1,21Q1Q sq. `-The South line of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 27, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 7 \ 302.40 •r °18�i5`N C.S.A.I NO. 1-0 416.00' -0 • �Q.) c U) o. 0 0 a_ Ill S 01)30'55" E F_l� N $524 2,a 6 6 0 V) M „85,00.10 N 0 0 N /-The Northerly / right-of-way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10. The Southeast corner of said I Outlot D. Zoned : PSP (Public Semi—Public) PREPARED BY: 4 a r 0E• 4g en • el an 0/0 ,41 N C] i4 CC; a cA o CC; -?:,r) v CZ; * 54) W LICENSE NO. PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS 688435000021 b!J U c� 0 L.) rz4 4417 Channel Lane NE Ch 120 ct REV. DATE DE SCRIP 0 CHECKED BY: RPA SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 03 OF 06 SHEETS SHEET TITLE: PRELIMINARY PLAT PROJECT TITLE: DRAWN BY: SCA SHEET 03 CHECKED BY: RPA SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 03 OF 06 SHEETS 17-1042 LAST PLOTTED: 5/15/2017 10:37 AM P: \17-1042 — Houles — Lino Project\1 O_CAD\CADD Drawings\Guy — Lino Lakes Project.dwg HOULE ADDITION Orindary High Water Elevation: 883.7 S89°05'20"E 728.90' S72°53'24"E `• ia 34.66'x_• Ng=41 '$: — �04 9� �` \ • \ 7. --SF 9121 SFS — — SiF SF 9 7�� `• RCWD FlooplaiR 4 ^ • \ — — —Eley 887.6 — ,--Drainage and Utility Easement BLOCK 1 Retaining Wall and Fence Fall / 1.5' North of Property i Existing Rock , Entrance • . `. 53.45 • EX. SMH RIM: 894.21 INV: 887.40 30 0 HORIZONTAL: 1"=30' LEGEND NOTES 1) The property lies in flood zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and zone A (areas where no base flood elevations are determined) as designated on Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel Number 27003C 0365 E, Anoka County, Minnesota, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency effective date December 16th, 2015. 30 60 2) Upland boundary line is 75 feet from the ordinary high water line 3) This project falls in the Wards lake shore land overlay district and is categorized as a natural environment lake EX. SMH RIM 893 53 INV: 887.01 EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING SIGN EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING GUY WIRE ® CB EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE D4 • 0 AS 0 WM GM z EXISTING GATE VALVE FOUND IRON MONUMENT SET MONUMENT 502 502 E 0 EXISTING AUTO SPRINKLER EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING WATER METER EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING HAND HOLE EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX EXISTING GUAR POST EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING SOIL BORING PROPOSED SETBACK LINE EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING WETLANDS EDGE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING TREELINE EXISTING WATERLINE EXISTING SILT FENCE UPLAND AREA A " 0 ce, N. 2 e en k LICENSE NO. 68043500002]1 REGISTRATIONS P I" OFJESSION 0 PREPARED BY: b!J U c� 0 L.) rz4 4417 Channel Lane NE 120 ct REV. DATE DESCRIP 0 CHECKED BY: RPA A SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 04 OF SHEET TITLE: PRELIMINARY PLAT PROJECT TITLE: DRAWN BY: SCA SHEET 04 CHECKED BY: RPA SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 04 OF 07 SHEETS 17-1042 LAST PLOTTED: 5/15/2017 10: 37 AM P: \17-1042 — Houles — Lino Project\1 O_CAD\CADD Drawings\Guy — Lino Lakes Project.dwg PROPOSED LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HOULE ADDITION EROSION CONTROL NOTES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. ALL EROSION CONTROL AND SILTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA'S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, STAKED STRAW BALES, ROCK ENTRANCES AND/OR SILT FENCES. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES: ALL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY, AT HIS/HER OPTION, DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR IN HIS/HER METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON THE SITE HAVE BEEN RESTORED. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL TO BE PLACED AROUND STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY AND MUST BE REMOVED IF DESIGN CAPACITY HAS BEEN REDUCED BY FIFTY PERCENT. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR DURATION OF PROJECT. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER, NOT TO BE SODDED AND GREATER THAN EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT, SHALL HAVE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC INSTALLED. WHEN THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH THOSE AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER WITHIN 48 HOURS OF GRADING COMPLETION. THE SEEDING SHALL COMPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION NO. 3876, AT A RATE OF 50 LBS/ACRE. THE SEEDED AREA SHALL BE MULCHED. THE MULCH SHALL APPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3882, TYPE 1. THE MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AND ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION NO. 2575.3, F1. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. THE MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH A DISC, CLODBUSTER OR OTHER APPROVED EQUIPMENT. ALL ADJACENT STREETS SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY AND SWEPT CLEAN OF SEDIMENT TRACKED FROM THE SITE. SILT FENCE CURRENTLY IN PLACE. NEEDS TO BE REFRESHED. LEGEND • 0 AS 0 GM EB z P/113_ EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING SIGN EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE EXISTING GATE VALVE FOUND IRON MONUMENT SET MONUMENT EXISTING AUTO SPRINKLER EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING WATER METER EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING HAND HOLE EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX EXISTING GUAR POST EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING SOIL BORING WL 502 502 E G SF w SF PROPOSED SETBACK LINE EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING WETLANDS EDGE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING TREELINE EXISTING WATERLINE EXISTING SILT FENCE UPLAND AREA Orindary High Water Elevation: 883.7 S89`05'20"E /28.90' \\\ /Ey/°�a / —7572'53'24"E \ / 34.66' 1 co / L co i —Drainage and Utility Easement \ 42. 21' 9L� SiF SFS RCWD Floolai =Elev 887.6 / Existing Rock , Entrance 0) ds g d / 7— / 1 L 1 / UTILITY NOTES / / / / / / / / / CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA AND ALL STANDARD DETAILS FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE TO BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (P.V.C.) SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SANITARY SEWER WYES SHALL BE 8 INCH BY 4 INCH SCHEDULE 40. SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 4—INCH SDR -26 P.V.C. ALL WATERMAIN PIPE TO BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (D.I.P.) CLASS 52 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 1—INCH, TYPE "K" COPPER. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS—BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. AS—BUILT INFORMATION SHALL INCLUDE ELEVATIONS OF ALL SANITARY SERVICE ENDS. z / / / / / 4,- / 0 b pa�o�T co ary F-890 ces Ex. 8" Sanitar 1V' EX.• SMH RIM: 894.21 INV: 887.40 tea, 6 v0� -A / / / / N / / // r EX. SMH RIM: 893.53 INV: 887.01 / / Total Lot Area: 201,870 sq. ft. Total Impervious Area: 4,669 sq. ft. Impervious Surface Coverage: 2.31 % Upland Lot Area: 42,603 sq. ft. Upland Impervious Area: 0 sq. ft. Upland Impervious Coverage: 0.00% / / / Shore Impact Zone Area: 50,823 sq. ft. Grading Area Within Zone: 470 sq. ft. (0.9%) .ice / / \ co / \ ` / / / cP NOTES 1) For additional proposed home information see house plans as submitted /.' '//c)c- N cx 6), N OV,o • • • • • ► ► ► ► 1315 • \ • / >/ • / 30 0 \ / \ \ \ 53.45 n 30 60 HORIZONTAL: 1"=30' \?NF - N / / / / / / • BUILDING ELEVATIONS First Floor Garage Floor Lowest Floor Bottom of Footing Sewer Service at House 899.93 898.43 889.6 888.77 888.1 PREPARED BY: A a 42, k N 41)e en el CCO rn b — VD VD ct a CA v Ct • 513 LICENSE NO. PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS 6884350000211 b!J U c� 0 L.) rz4 4417 Channel Lane NE 120 ct REV. DATE DESCRIP 0 CHECKED BY: RPA A SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 05 OF SHEET TITLE: GRADING AND UTILITIES PROJECT TITLE: DRAWN BY: SCA SHEET 0 5 CHECKED BY: RPA SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 05 OF 07 SHEETS 17-1042 LAST PLOTTED: 5/15/2017 10:37 AM P: \17-1042 — Houles — Lino Project\10_CAD\CADD Drawings\Guy — Lino Lakes Project.dwg 1' MAX. PROPOSED OR EXISTING ROADWAY 6' STEEL FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE DATE COVER AS SPECIFIED SIZE, LENGTH, AND TYPE OF MATERIAL FOR SERVICE LINE AS SPECIFIED 8' MIN COVER CURB BOX 8' LONG AT FULL EXTENSION 6" TAIL WITH CRIMPED END HORIZONTAL LOOP CORPORATION STOP WATER SERVICE DETAIL Nk-SUPPORT CURB BOX WITH CONC. BLOCK STANDARD DRAWING NO. DRG CITY i GEOTEXTILE WITH NET BACKING �` BACKFILL 8 M AXI MUM DESCRIP 0 - 5' METAL OR 2"x2" WOOD FENCE POST OF FLOW NI E�11 pIR 2" x 2" HARDWOOD MARKER W/SPIKE. SPIKE. 1 -6' METAL FENCE POST MARKER 06 OF 07 SHEETS PAINTED GREEN 4/-4-'4°I� _ - 3' u- II III oI- Q III- AIRTIGHT i -I =I - SWYECE SLOPE 1% MINS N SI� - j PLUG OR CAP I' AP _I - -1C71 —Ihip -111-111- I -I 11-1 11=1 11-' ' 45° BEND II GRANULAR BEDDING I MATERIAL (COMPACTED) WITHOUT RISER PL 2" x 2" HARDWOOD MARKER W/SPIKE. - 6' METAL FENCE POST MARKER PAINTED GREEN ' - ;,111,-1f I Q -- IIIII DEPTHS GREATER THAN 14' WHERE RISER APPROVED iv SLOPE 1% MIN. - -I AIRTIGHT PLUG OR BY ENGINEER. —I- CAP NI) CAP Z -1 -I • 1- II =1I1= I1-' 45' BEND I- GRANULAR MATERALBEDDING I- (COMPACTED) If SERVICE A., ;_I1=;� ..1= SERVICE WYE TO BE .���11- EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE �� MAX. 45' NOTE: SERVICE PIPE TO BE PVC, 1111r GEOTEXTILE TOOVERLA THROUGH TRENCN TRENCH. 6' MO J/ NOTE -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT 3886, TYPE B. -FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. SILT FENCE DATE (HEAVY DUTY) =1 - SCH. 40 (ASTM D-2665). WITH RISER SOLVENT WELD ALL JOINTS. -111-111-1 I I-- SANITARY SEWER SERVICE DATE CIT r' OF STANDARD DRAWING NO. DRG Gm, �,_ CIT r'' >OF STANDARD DRAWING NO. DRG Cm, IN 0 4 KEIN 0 n KE 100 0 100 200 HORIZONTAL: 1"=100' • Notes 1) The purpose of this drawing is to show neighboring land uses. 4417 Channel Lane NE 120 ct REV. DATE DESCRIP 0 CHECKED BY: RPA 0 SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 06 OF PROJECT TITLE: DRAWN BY: SCA SHEET 06 CHECKED BY: RPA SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 06 OF 07 SHEETS 17-1042 LAST PLOTTED: 5/15/2017 10:37 AM OPERATOR: SCA P: \17-1042 — Houles — Lino Project\10_CAD\CADD Drawings\Guy — Lino Lakes Project.dwg 200 0 HORIZONTAL: 1"=200' • NOTES 1) All trees to remain across site with the exception of where the proposed house is to be constructed on Lot 1, Block1, proposed Houle Addition. 2) No mitigation necessary. 3) Soils shown are from US Department of Agriculture Bureau of Soils. 4) Hydrology features are shown from Anoka County Water Resources. 200 400 HYDROLOGY AND SOIL SUMMARY 9j PEAT SOILS APTAyNS PL �I I 11, --- f • 1 1 Sandy subsoil phase Miami fine sandy loam J. 1 BIRCH ST 1 34 HOIEIHERFY FD9�_ LEGEND Type 1 - Type 2 - Type 3- • Type4- • Type5- Type6- Type 7 - Type 8 - Seasonally Flooded Wet Meadows Shallow Marshes Deep Marshes Open Water Wetlands Shrub Swamps Wooded Swamps Bogs U c� O L.) rz4 4417 Channel Lane NE 120 W REV. DATE DESCRIP A CHECKED BY: RPA A SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 07 OF PROJECT TITLE: DRAWN BY: SCA SHEET 07 CHECKED BY: RPA SHEET NO. PROJECT NUMBER 07 OF 07 SHEETS 17-1042 LAST PLOTTED: 5/15/2017 10:37 AM PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 5C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: June 14, 2017 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING for Golden Acre 1. Variance 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Final Plat CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REVIEW DEADLINE: VR2017-002 PP2017-003 FP2017-007 Tim Anderson 547 Lois Lane Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Complete Application Date: May 17, 2017 60 -Day Review Deadline: July 14, 2017 120 -Day Review Deadline: September 12, 2017 Environmental Board Meeting: May 31, 2017 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: June 14, 2017 Tentative City Council Work Session: July 5, 2017 Tentative City Council Meeting: July 10, 2017 BACKGROUND The applicant, Tim Anderson, submitted a land use application for variances, preliminary plat and final plat. The proposed development is a 4 lot single family residential subdivision located at 547 Lois Lane which is legally described as Lot 4, Block 1, Mar Don Acres. The development contains one (1) gross acre parcel and is called Golden Acre. This staff report is based on the following information: Civil plan set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. dated May 18, 2017 Drainage report prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. dated May 15, 2017 1 Certificate of Survey, Resource Inventory and Preliminary Plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated May 17, 2017 Final plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated May 15, 2017 Title Commitment prepared by First American Title Insurance Company dated April 20, 2017 Lot area summary prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated May 17, 2017 ANALYSIS History Mar Don Acres was originally platted in 1978. As part of that plat, eight (8) lots were created north of Lois Lane with each lot being 294.00 feet in depth and approximately 165 feet in width for lot sizes of 48,510 sq. ft. Houses were purposely located on the lots in a manner so that the lot could further subdivided when public water and sewer become available. Two other residential subdivisions similar to the proposed Golden Acre have since been approved from these 8 lots, Hailey Manor and Isabell Estates. Hailey Manor Hailey Manor subdivided Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, Mar Don Acres into 12 single family residential lots (3 original lots subdivided into 4 lots each for a total of 12 lots). The parcel was rezoned and variances were allowed for 132 foot lot depths vs 135 foot required due to required 30 foot right of way dedication along Arlo Lane. The following actions were approved in 2006/2007 by City Council regarding Hailey Manor: Resolution No. 03-120 for Variance and Preliminary Plat Ordinance No. 16-03 for Rezoning from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Resolution No. 03-208 for Final Plat Isabell Estates Isabell Estates subdivided Lot 3, Block 1, Mar Don Acres into 4 single family residential lots. This development is immediately to the west of the proposed Golden Acre plat. The following actions were approved by the City Council in 2014 regarding Isabell Estates: Resolution No. setback Resolution No. Resolution No. 14-66 approving variances for lot depth, lot width and side 14-67 approving the Preliminary Plat 14-114 approving the Final Plat 2 Golden Acre A preliminary plat, final plat and variances were once approved in 2006 for Golden Acre. The final plat; however, was never recorded by the developer and has since expired. The plat subdivided Lot 4, Block 1, Mar Don Acres into 4 single family residential lots. The parcel was rezoned and variances were also approved allowing for 132 foot deep lots, lot width reduction and side yard setback reduction due to required right of way dedication and location of existing house on the lot. The following actions were approved by City Council regarding Golden Acre: Resolution No. 06-181 for Variances and Preliminary Plat Ordinance No. 11-06 for Rezoning from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Resolution No. 07-103 for Final Plat This land use application is basically a resubmittal of the 2006 application. Existing Site Conditions The 1 acre site is a residential parcel containing a single family house and attached garage. Other than trees and shrubs, there are no significant natural resources on site. The Certificate of Survey indicates a split rail fence along the west side of the property. Zoning The parcel was rezoned from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential in 2006 with Ordinance No. 11-06. Current Zoning R-1, Single Family Residential Current Land Use Rural Residential Future Land Use per CP Low Density Sewered Residential (1.6 to 3.9 units per acre) Utility Staging Area j,, 1A = 2008-2015 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoningit Existing Land Use Future Land Use 4 North R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential East R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential South R, Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential West R, Rural Residential Low Density 3 Sewered Residential Zoning Requirements Zoning requirements and standards of the R-1 Single Family Residential District apply to this subdivision. Per Section 1007.090(2)(a), minimum lot size is ten thousand eight hundred (10,800) square feet of contiguous buildable land. Contiguous buildable land is land area occurring within the property lines of a parcel or lot excluding wetlands and/or water bodies. On lots with infiltration basins, the lot area is measured from a 10 foot buffer above the bottom of the basin. Due to the varying lot widths, lot depths and infiltration basin, a variance is needed for minimum lot size requirements. 'Variances are required. b Lot 1 is being created with the existing house. Since the house already exists, it will be considered legal non -conforming. Impervious surface calculations will be required with the individual building permits for the new single family homes on Lots 2, 3 and 4. 4 Required per R-1 Proposed Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Min. Lot Size (s.f.) 10,800 10,237a 9,067' 9,653a 9,653a Gross Area (s.f.) NA 11,550 10,230 10,890 10,890 Min. Lot Width (ft.) 80 87.50 77.50a 82.50 82.50 Min. Lot Depth (ft.) 135 132' 132a 132' 132a Building Setback (ft.) -From Collector Road 40 38.6b 40 40 40 -Rear --Principal 30 30 30 30 30 --Accessory 5 5 5 5 5 -Side --Principal 10 6.3' 10 10 10 --Accessory 5 17 5 5 5 Impervious Surface° i 40% TBD 40% 40% 40% Per Section 1007.090(2)(a), minimum lot size is ten thousand eight hundred (10,800) square feet of contiguous buildable land. Contiguous buildable land is land area occurring within the property lines of a parcel or lot excluding wetlands and/or water bodies. On lots with infiltration basins, the lot area is measured from a 10 foot buffer above the bottom of the basin. Due to the varying lot widths, lot depths and infiltration basin, a variance is needed for minimum lot size requirements. 'Variances are required. b Lot 1 is being created with the existing house. Since the house already exists, it will be considered legal non -conforming. Impervious surface calculations will be required with the individual building permits for the new single family homes on Lots 2, 3 and 4. 4 Comments: 1. The impervious surface coverage of Lot 1 shall be provided on the preliminary plat. 2. The preliminary plat shall be revised to show the Side Yard Setback is 10 feet for principal building and 5 feet for accessory building. Building Requirements At the time of building permit, each individual single family dwelling unit will be reviewed for compliance regarding floor area, garage and design and construction standards. Comprehensive Plan Golden Acre is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. Resource Management System Plan The Resource Management System Plan provides the conservation design framework for the Comprehensive Plan and promotes sustainable decisions regarding growth and development. It provides a unified system approach to natural resource management and natural resource based amenities. Goals of the Resource Management System Plan include: Parks, Trails, Open Space and Recreation o Goal #3: Develop, maintain, and connect the current and proposed trails in the City of Lino Lakes and Rice Creek Regional Park in a manner that preserves and sustains the natural environment. The Resource Management System Plan identifies a proposed trail corridor along Arlo Lane. The final plat will dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way along Arlo Lane that will preserve this trail corridor. The Golden Acre development does not negatively impact these plans. Land Use Plan Goal 2: Ensure that zoning and subdivision ordinances and official maps are consistent with the intent and specific direction provided within the Comprehensive Plan. Policies: 1. Ensure developers meet the standards specified within the land -use plan and official controls, including zoning and subdivision ordinances and official maps. 5 2. Ensure compatibility of adjacent land uses. Golden Acre requires several variances; however, these variances are consistent and compatible with previous plats in the adjacent neighborhoods. Density and Land Area Calculations The following chart implements Met Council's formula for calculating net density. Gross Area (acres) 1.111" Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.00 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 Other (Wetland Buffer Conservation Easement) 0.00 Net Area (acres) # of Units 4 Gross Density (units/acre) 3.60 Net Density (units/acre) 3.60 Golden Acre meets the land use goals of low density residential development by creating a 4 lot subdivision with one lot containing the existing home and the three other lots intended for single family home construction connected to municipal utilities. The parcel is guided Low Density Sewered Residential per the City's Comprehensive Plan which allows for 1.6 to 3.9 dwelling units per acre. The proposal of 3.60 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's guided land use and density. Housing Plan Goal 1: Ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and provides accessibility to key community features and natural resources. Golden Acre meets the goals of the housing plan. The development is compatible with the existing and adjacent residential neighborhoods. Transportation Plan Goal 1: Plan for and achieve required street improvements and connectivity throughout the City of Lino Lakes. 6 Golden Acre is consistent with the Transportation Plan. Lois Lane and Arlo Lane are minor collector roads and are capable of handling one (1) and two (2) additional single family homes, respectively. Sanitary Sewer Plan Goals of the sanitary sewer plan are to ensure well-planned, quality residential development that conserves and enhances the city's natural resources and to provide an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The subject site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 2 (Sub -district 2B) and is served by MCES Interceptor 83-61, a 24 inch gravity sewer located in North Road. The subject site is also in the current lA (2008-2015) Utility Staging Area. Eight (8) inch PVC sanitary sewer main exists along both Lois Lane and Arlo Lane that will service the lots. The sanitary system has capacity to handle 3 new single family homes. Water Supply Plan A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents affordable potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The subject site is served by 8" DIP watermain along both Lois Land and Arlo Lane. The water supply system has capacity to handle 3 new single family homes. Planning Districts The site is located in Planning District 2 and is guided for low density residential development. There are no specific planning recommendations for this area. The site is located in the Marshan Lake resource management unit (RMU). Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat has been reviewed for compliance with the comprehensive plan, zoning and subdivision ordinance. The subdivision is not considered premature, is consistent with the comprehensive plan for residential development and meets the performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance with the approved variances. Blocks and Lots The proposed preliminary plat creates 1 block with 4 lots. Lot 1, Block 1 will contain the existing home which will remain on site. Lots 2, 3 and 4 will be developed with single family homes. 7 The lots will be 132 feet in depth. The minimum lot depth in an R-1 Single Family Residential District is 135 feet. When Mar Don Acres was platted, the lots were 294 feet deep. The required 30 foot right-of-way dedication on the north for Arlo Lane reduces the lot depth to 264 feet. Subdividing this in half creates 132 foot deep lots. Streets and Alleys Lois Lane and Arlo Lane are minor collector roads and are capable of handling one (1) and two (2) additional single family homes, respectively. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements are being dedicated along the front and side interior perimeters of the four lots. Easements are also being dedicated around the stormwater drainage areas in the rear yards. It is important to note that due to the size of the easement in the rear yards, the allowed buildable area for decks and accessory structures may be reduced. Typical rear yard easements are 10 feet but 15 and 30 foot easements are being proposed to accommodate the storm water management facility. This is comparable to those easements in Hailey Manor and Isabell Estates. Comments: 1. Drainage and utility easements shall extend a minimum of 10 feet beyond the basin's 100 -year storm high water level elevation. a. The applicant shall verify these standards are being met and revise all plans accordingly. Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control An infiltration basin is proposed in the rear yards of the four lots. A drainage and utility easement is provided over the stormwater management facility. The City Engineer letter details comments and required revisions. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls shall be employed during construction of the single family homes. Utilities The existing house at 547 Lois Lane is on public watermain and sanitary sewer. The three (3) new lots will also be connected to public water and sanitary which is capable of handling three (3) single family homes. Water and sanitary sewer laterals are already stubbed into the 3 proposed parcels. The utility plan indicates a well located on Lot 1. 8 Comments: 1. The applicant shall confirm if the well on Lot 1 has been properly capped or if it is used for private irrigation purposes. Public Land Dedication The City will require payment in lieu of land dedication. Since this is an existing lot with one (1) home, park dedication fees will be required for the three (3) newly created lots. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 3 x 2017 Park Dedication Fee $2,575 = Total Due $7,725 Tree Preservation The goal of tree preservation is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity and forest resource and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. The submitted plans identify tree locations, tree protection fencing and two (2) trees proposed for removal. The plans do not provide a count of the total numbers of trees on site and proposed for removal. The plans also do not indicate the basic use area. Comments: 1. A separate Tree Preservation and Mitigation Plan sheet shall be submitted in accordance with Section 1007.043(17)(j). Landscaping One new boulevard tree is required per new lot. Three (3) new boulevard trees are provided which is compliant with the ordinance. No new boulevard tree is required on Lot 1. Per the Landscape Plan, Sheet L1, the open area is 4,000 s.f. This requires 2 large trees and 6 shrubs to be planted. The Landscape Plan shows 2 trees and 7 shrubs being planted which is compliant with the ordinance. Comments: 1. The Environmental Coordinator shall coordinate with the developer or builder on the planting of the boulevard trees. 9 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The 4 unattached residential units are under the 250 unattached unit thresholds. Wetlands There are no wetlands on the subject site. Floodplain There is no floodplain on the subject site. Shoreland Management Overlay The subject site is not within a shoreland management overlay district. Final Plat Typically, the final plat is submitted separately after the preliminary plat has been approved. Since this development received variances, preliminary and final plat approvals in 2008, staff agreed to run the preliminary plat and final plat concurrently. The final plat substantially conforms to the preliminary plat. Details are noted below in the Findings of Fact. FINDINGS OF FACT Variances The zoning ordinance has established an R-1, Single Family Residential District. Lot and yard requirements related to lot size, depth and setback have been detailed as previously noted in the staff report. The following variances are required for the Golden Acre preliminary plat: Lots 1 thru 4: o Variance to reduce the required lot size (contiguous buildable land) from 10,800 s.f. to lot sizes ranging from 9,067 s.f. to 10,237 s.f. o A 3 foot variance to reduce the required lot depth from 135 feet to 132 feet. Lot 1: o A 3.7 foot variance to reduce the required principal building side yard setback from 10 feet to 6.3 feet. 10 These variances were approved in 2006 with Resolution No. 06-181 but were not recorded and are being re-evaluated with this land use application. Criteria and Findings of Fact. No variance shall be granted unless it meets all the criteria in paragraphs a. through g. below. The City shall make findings regarding compliance with these criteria. a. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The general purpose and intent of the R-1, Single Family Residential District is to provide a residential atmosphere for those persons desiring a single family neighborhood with a suburban density. The district is intended for development of single family detached homes on lots served with public sanitary sewer and water. The four (4) lot residential subdivision proposed for Golden Acre meets the general purpose and intent of providing single family housing. All four (4) lots will be served by public water and sanitary sewer. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare of the neighborhood. b. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The parcel is guided low density residential per the City's Comprehensive Plan which allows for 1.6 to 3.9 dwelling units per acre. The proposal of 3.60 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's guided land use and density for residential development. c. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The subdivision of an existing parcel and creation of four (4) residential lots are reasonable uses of the property. The practical difficulty in complying with the lot depth, lot width and setback standards of the zoning ordinance would only allow for the creation of two (2) lots. This would not be consistent with the intent of the Mar Don Acres plat or the previously approved Hailey Manor and Isabell Estates subdivisions. d. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner is created by the requirement to dedicate 30 feet of right-of- way on Arlo Lane which reduces the lot depths to 132 feet and the requirement to provide 11 an infiltration basin for stormwater management. The need for the side yard setback variance due to the location of the existing house on 547 Lois Lane was not created by the landowner. e. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposal to create four (4) single family residential lots for the purpose of constructing three (3) new single family homes is compatible with the surrounding existing single family homes. Similar variances were approved for the two neighboring subdivisions, Hailey Manor, and Isabell Estates. f. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. Single family homes are permitted uses in the R-1, Single Family Residential District. g. In accordance with MN Stat. 462.357, Subp. 6, variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in MN Stat. 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with the zoning ordinance. Not applicable. Preliminary Plat Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. Golden Acre is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities as detailed in this staff report. The development is also consistent with the local water management plan, capital improvement plans and growth management policies. 12 (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Golden Acre is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A— 2008-2015. No new utility or street extensions are required. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer -financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 13 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Golden Acre meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). Lois Lane and Arlo Lane are minor collector roads and have structural capacity to handle one (1) and two (2) additional single family homes, respectively. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City's capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Golden Acre will have an adequate water supply. The subject site is served by an 8" DIP watermain along Lois Land and Arlo Lane. The water supply system has capacity to handle 3 new single family homes. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. 14 Golden Acre will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. The subject site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 2 (Sub -district 2B) and is served by MCES Interceptor 83-61, a 24 inch gravity sewer located in North Road. The subject site is also in the current lA (2008-2015) Utility Staging Area. An 8" PVC sanitary sewer main exists along both Lois Lane and Arlo Lane. The sanitary system has capacity to handle 3 new single family homes. Final Plat Per Section 1007.057(1), the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: (a) The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan; The final plat substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat. (b) For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and The 4 lot subdivision will be completed in one (1) phase. (c) Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. The conditions of this staff report shall be satisfied prior to release of the final plat mylars. A Development Agreement has been drafted by the City Engineer. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of variances, preliminary plat and final plat for Golden Acre subject to the following conditions: 1. Comments from WSB Plan Review Letter dated June 7, 2017 shall be addressed. 2. Comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated June 8, 2017 shall be addressed. 3. A Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) permit is required. 4. Resource Inventory and Existing Conditions Survey: a. Soil boring data shall be provided and added to the sheet. 5. Preliminary Plat Sheet: a. The impervious surface coverage of Lot 1 shall be provided on the preliminary plat. 15 b. The preliminary plat shall be revised to show the Side Yard Setback is 10 feet for principal building and 5 feet for accessory building. 6. Sheet C2, Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan: a. Drainage and utility easements shall extend a minimum of 10 feet beyond the basin's 100 -year storm high water level elevation. b. The applicant shall verify these standards are being met and revise all plans accordingly. c. Soil boring data and groundwater depth shall be added to the sheet. 7. Sheet C3, Utility Plan: a. The applicant shall confirm if the well on Lot 1 has been properly capped or if it is used for private irrigation purposes. 8. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan: a. A separate Tree Preservation and Mitigation Plan sheet shall be submitted in accordance to Section 1007.043(17)(j). b. The Environmental Coordinator shall coordinate with the developer or builder on the planting of the boulevard trees. 9. Final Plat a. Drainage and utility easements shall extend a minimum of 10 feet beyond the basin's 100 -year storm high water level elevation. b. The applicant shall verify these standards are being met and revise all plans accordingly. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Future Land Use Map 5. Neighboring Subdivisions Map 6. City Engineer Letter dated June 7, 2017 7. Environmental Coordinator Letter dated June 8, 2017 8. Certificate of Survey, Resource Inventory and Preliminary Plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated May 17, 2017 9. Civil plan set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. dated May 18, 2017 10. Final plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated May 15, 2017 16 ■ Golden Acre 547 Lois Lane iM +JN ,NAMED ill"VII&Ile•A4TIM �► ill �:r �����1����►/ #411.a► .11OB_' Itillll I.I■I Illi IPigialaw S' . ♦l -■■1 ■' 4 mg p i 41 Tii;4; ■0 iitir :::: mill m..94 Italin ___. - - Ili w .11 ■• II ■■ • p El .1 ri �_ NI■r 11111'u" Emi oll A MEV AMIE CITY OF RN CA KES Site Location Map E 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Date: 6/8/2017 CITY' OF I N l<E Aerial Map Golden Acre w N s E 0 50 100 200 Feet Date: 6/8/2017 ( '3 R-1 474 OODD\jGK�1V 7918 R CMZ R-1 7901 R 523 496 R 7869 R 7859 MEADOW VIEW TRL 540 546 R-1 553 571 565 MYRTLE LN 577 7927 112 552 0031 JOSEPH Q. 558 564 570 576 582 7906 533 539 545 551 557 563 569 575 581 ARLOLN 528 534 529 535 R-1 547 559 R in 564 570 576 R-1 582 565 S LN 571 577 583 7870 R R-1 548 554 564 R 7869 ? > Z 0 0 7859 7870 7926 7920 7914 7908 7902 R-1 601 1 LinoLakesMN.DBO.ZoningDistrict Zoning Description Rural Rural Executive Single Family Residential Single Family Executive Two Family Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Manufactured Home Park Limited Business General Business Neighborhood Business General Industrial Light Industrial Rural/Business Reserve Public Semi -Public PUD OF IN KE Zoning Map w N s E 0 100 200 400 Feet Date: 6/8/2017 CITY.,' .; OF IN KE 474 553 571 565 MYRTLE LN 577 7927 112 552 U' 558 564 570 576 582 588 7906 533 539 545 551 557 563 569 575 581 ARLO1LN 528 534 529 535 547 559 496 7860 7859 564 570 576 582 565 LOIS LN 571 577 583 548 554 564 7869 7859 COUNTRY LN 7870 7926 7920 6.33 641 / 6G 4b9 7914 7908 601 Ce( 7911 0 Zi Qt 790701 7903 Future Land Use 2030 (Stantec) Future Land Use 2030 (Stantec) Permanent Rural Urban Reserve Low Density Sewered Residential NB Medium Density Residential - High Density Residential Commercial Mixed Use Industrial - Civic/Institutional Park and Open Space Private Airfield Right -of -Way Open Water Future Land Use Map W N s E 0 100 200 400 Feet Date: 6/8/2017 WSB Building a legacy— your legacy. Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Ed Youngquist, WSB Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer Date: June 7, 2017 Re: Golden Acre Plan Review WSB Project No. 010155 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the Final Plat documents dated May 18, 2017 for the Golden Acre development in Lino Lakes, MN prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. All plans, specifications, and construction activities shall reference the latest version of the City General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction dated November 2016, the 2013 CEAM, and the 2016 MnDOT Standard Specifications. Engineering Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control The Golden Acre development proposes subdividing an existing lot (Lot 4, Block 1, Mar Don Acres) into four (4) single-family lots. Erosion control measures include a rock construction entrance off of Arlo Lane and silt fence around the perimeter of the disturbed area. Comments: 1. The applicant shall add a note to the grading plan stating that the site grading including infiltration area and building pads shall be graded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. List the total area to be disturbed with pre and post -construction impervious area calculations. 3. Add silt fence between Lot 1 and Lot 2. 4. Replace details provided with city standard plates for all erosion control BMP's. 5. Please provide typical lot detail information for existing lot (Lot 1), including Low Floor Elevation and Low Entry Elevation, and Entry Type. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com S:\Community Development \Projects\Planning Cases\Golden Acre (547 Lois lane -Tim Anderson)\Staff Reports \20170614 PZ\a6 engineer letter.docx Ms. Katie Larsen June 7, 2017 Page 2 6. Provide a note for a minimum 2% cross slope for yard drainage. 7. Show locations for stockpiles and BMP measures for stockpile management. Stormwater Management The proposed stormwater management for the Golden Acre development consists of the construction of an infiltration basin along the rear lot lines of Lots 1 through 4. The basin has a proposed high water level of 908.8 and an emergency overflow elevation of 908.6 located on the east end of the basin. Comments: 1. Please confirm NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall data. Site Drainage Narrative states 7.36 inches for 100 -year storm event. HydroCAD Existing and Proposed Models use 7.15 inches for 100 -year storm event. 2. Please provide explanation of impervious areas provided. HydroCAD Models show a decrease in impervious area, whereas the Drainage Narrative states an increase in impervious area of .502 acres. Total Impervious in Existing Conditions HydroCAD Model = 33408 SF Total Impervious in Proposed Conditions HydroCAD Model =12803 SF Estimated New Impervious Area in Drainage Narrative= .502 acres = 21867 SF Volume Control Calculation — Total Impervious Area = 13440 SF 3. Please justify infiltration rate of 0.8 in/hr and provide geotechnical data. According to Table 5 under City Ordinance Chapter 1011, infiltration rate of 0.8 in/hr may be used for Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) A, Unified Soil Classification SP. HydroCAD models provided indicate soil HSG C for pervious areas. Provide documentation for HSG A soils within infiltration basin. If HSG C soils are present within the infiltration basin, Table 3 under City Ordinance Chapter 1011 states that infiltration is prohibited and a different BMP must be used for stormwater management on site. 4. Please include seasonal high groundwater level information. Bottom of infiltration basin must be at least 3 feet above seasonal high water table per Table 3 within City Ordinance Chapter 1011. Low floor elevation must be 4 ft higher than seasonal high groundwater level per Table 6 within City Ordinance Chapter 1011. 5. Please indicate maintenance access points for infiltration basin on the plans. Water Supply The Golden Acre development is proposed to be served by municipal water. There are existing water system services for each proposed lot. Comments: S:\Community Development \Pr jects\Planning Cases\Golden Acre (547 Lois lane -Tim Anderson»Staff Reports\20I70614 PZ\a6 engineer letter.docx Ms. Katie Larsen June 7, 2017 Page 3 1. The proposed lots can be adequately served by municipal water. No additional comments offered. Sanitary Sewer The Golden Acre development is proposed to be served by municipal sanitary sewer. There are existing sanitary sewer services for each proposed lot. Comments: 1. The proposed lots can be adequately served by municipal sanitary sewer. No additional comments offered. Transportation The Golden Acre development consists of the addition of three (3) single family lots along existing public right of way. No additional roadway improvements are proposed. 1. No additional comments offered. Floodplain Floodplain is not present on the Golden Acre development site. Wetlands and Mitigation Plan Based on information provided, no wetlands are present on the Golden Acre development site. No permitting or mitigation will be required. Drainage and Utility Easements The proposed Golden Acres plat provides for ten (10) foot drainage and utility easements along the existing right of way of Lois Lane and the proposed right of way of Arlo Lane. Five (5) foot drainage and utility easements are shown along side lot lines. The infiltration basin is located within a drainage and utility easement. 1. The infiltration basin shall be located within a drainage and utility easements that extends 10 feet beyond the ordinary high water level. Development Agreement The Golden Acre development will require a development agreement. Grading Agreement A grading agreement is not applicable at this time. S:\Community Development \Pr jects\Planning Cases\Golden Acre (547 Lois lane -Tim Anderson»Staff Reports\20I70614 PZ\a6 engineer letter.docx Ms. Katie Larsen June 7, 2017 Page 4 Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A Declaration for Stormwater Maintenance is required and shall include the City of Lino Lakes as a party to the agreement. Permits Required The following permits may at minimum be required as part of the development construction. Comments: 1. NPDES Construction General Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Grading 3. Rice Creek Watershed Permit If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or diane.hankee@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us. S:\Community Development \Pr jects\Planning Cases\Golden Acre (547 Lois lane -Tim Anderson»Staff Reports\20I70614 PZ\a6 engineer letter.docx Environmental Memo To: Katie Larsen From: Marty Asleson Date: June 8, 2017 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations for Golden Acre The following staff and Environmental Board comments and recommendations were made concerning Tim Anderson's proposed subdivision, Golden Acre. 1. There are no significant pre-existing land covers on site, nor are there any pre-existing soil -water relationships that would indicate rare plant features. There are no National heritage Consideration and no existing wetlands. 2. The project is less than an acre, therefore; a SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) and a MPCA permit are not required for this project. In terms of erosion control requirements: The city requires perimeter control around each house pad at the time of construction, and rock entrance for each house construction pad site. Changes should be made to the plan to reflect these requirements. The City will also require a rock entrance and storm drain protection in close (200 feet) proximity of the project. Two adjacent lots must both have the perimeter control independent of each other unless the adjacent lots start and finish at the same time. Rock entrances are required for each lot. As with Isabelle Estates, a required infiltration basin to control volume and runoff pollutants from the site is designed into the back -sides of the houses. In line with Isabelle Estates, the developer has submitted drawings for an infiltration basin on the back -sides of the 4 house. The infiltration area must be protected from compaction before construction begins. At least 2 soil borings should be done in the bottom of the infiltration pond to show that there is at least 3 feet of separation from the • Page 1 ordinary high groundwater. The borings should also show that there are no barrier soil- layers to infiltration. 3. Tree protection is adequate, and may not work in the case of two pine trees on the south of the proposed infiltration pond. The developer is willing to be responsible to remove those trees if they should die. There is a half-dead cottonwood on site outside the basic use area, the Environmental Board would like this tree removed. 4. Landscaping: Enough escrow shall be provided to plant 1 boulevard tree on the frontage of each house. The City will determine the species and location of these trees. Ground story cover should be a native, short grass mix with native forbs. Trees planted in the infiltration pond must be tolerant of fire, so that if fire is used as a maintenance tool, the trees will survive. All of the oaks fall into this category. The Environmental Board encourages the developer to use more appropriate native seed mix in the back yard area around the infiltration swale. Appropriate would mean a low profile mix with forbes, or blue gramma if it is anticipated low foot traffic in the back yards, or a combination of cultural sod with areas of native seed mix where there would be some use in the back. • Page 2 CERTIFICATE OF SU for-- TIM ANDERSON �ofN 547 Lois Lane Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 (651) 216-2685 • 0 S 0 111 X 952.36 o::::. ❑ - GAS PIN No. 17-119-22-14-0008 Owner: City of X Address: Unassigned LEGEND DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES VEY IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 19241 CURB STOP CABLE PEDESTAL SEWER STUB OUT DRAINAGE ARROW ELECTRICAL BOX EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION GAS METER HYDRANT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL WATER VALVE WELL WOOD FENCE EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) LEGAL DESORIPTION Lot 4, Block 1 MAR DON ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesota Anoka County PID: 31-22-24-0004 BE NCHMAHK Top nut of hydrant located on the north side of Arlo Lane, northwest from the northwest corner of Lot 4. An assumed elevation of 912.91. E. G. RUQ & SONS, INC. EST 1971 Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 www.egrud.com TREE DETAIL __-----"DENOTES ELEVATION DENOTES TREE QUANTITY ....... DENOTES TREE SIZE IN INCHES ----DENOTES TREE TYPE TREE TYPES: ' CEDAR 7/R PINE SPRUCE COTTONWOOD ASH OAK • MAPLE ASH VICINITY MAP SEC. 8, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 THIS SURVEY GENWQUE I til 1i1II '1E•MR'' _N N`� n7%7iTLE LN (- �0 a - 2 ILO LN 1) 1.1 U 1S I4 • Na. LN HIGHLANI. t JI _1 I it 1 11 it II l i VI32KYLN C., 2J 1 r 10 VIEY� +tA r S BARBARA LN ((HIST AF'.J_LC� f',R ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY OF LINO LAKES (NO SCALE) I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. BLAKE L. RIVARD Date: 5/17/17 License No. 19421 NORTH BENCHMARK 912.91 TNHXYZ O M 7- • • 0 O 001',..„..,.._ 01 r7 i --_NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 8-31-22 908.35 MHSA RIM 903.79 0) 0.05 MHSA RIM 902.79 ^INV ALIO LANE S89°27'24 "E 165.00 O ro . . 1"N0' 1P' • 1.7765 910.25 • _O a) A6 6 PID: 08-31-22-24-0046 Owner: DONELLE ALFORD STEPHEN ALFORD Address: 534 ARLO LN• <YV •.;-- 908.35 .;-- 0. O0 o%A ••• g10 5 ° h0 F0 0°O:G t-- o. s �e 00,O\ �0 5Q •.....5.. ��, Drains�ge..an 1..... ......�...Ut.. tility Easemen................• L CS CO SERVICE ELEVATION PER CITY AS -BUILT = 904.6 O{' Drainage and• Utility Easement • 5 0° 00 oi 9 90 • A• O 0 xo • • PID: 08-31-22-24-0048 Owner: RYAN LANGE Address:535 LOIS LN > Hous �e o° o • • 90 G�0 .• 0 00 • •. `\I//00QJ• G F'1� % 0©• P4- a. A > 909......•.. tee 94 0A Q00cP,�0 x000. LOT 4 SERVICE ELEVATION /7 ,......PER CITY / 9 13'` ........g09'.......ris-BUILT =••s04.2 / 60,.7Z 15 0°O. �00 < N 00 �4'0 0 ��40 48510 SF OVERALL at 0 1 Drainage and _ Utility Easement\ f \ °0060 0G oti 00 0 v 4< 00F^° 0 \� ,- �, .................. O� ' ..000 .o 1,�- .Dra•inldge and Utility Easement 3P 0090JG��O f 0° GF'4, ck) e \ N \ \\ 51 ^� °�Qe °oe� \ I 0 94< $5 t I I� e a•. �� 4, _,q,_ - � , �, , o° 0- Ooh. O - 0 - o0, G - o� �ooa`;-�•: �e0 \. �P GJI 00 0°0 0 G% 0° 0�0- y I °h.• I o°h x% Chir:nney 11 P9 C\/ 00 gp9.. 6 0�N gOO,Z, o?' xo .............. 910 •.... / // //' //// House 911.06 T08+ - 72V// bT•G / FND IP ' X68.5. O (0 > O > N89°27'24 "W ...1.1 G0 e'"• co C � 000X > P4 8.7..-50 �G o I I GAS LOIS LAN > > > X5.00 000\ GA Fe k0 F0 ti............ 00 0 9-- �1 000 1909 00/ : e /• • /SET IP 1.9241 .0S..909.02 • I. 'A..........• 0° �k 04 O 00 PID: 08-31-22-24-0005 Owner: DANIEL V WALDOCH 'Address: 559 LOIS LN > >- - 909.44 MHSA RIM > > 902.33 O INV NOTES 30 0 15 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 60 120 Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 04/17/17. Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. 1 INCH = 30 FEET 1 < . "t° -9,n 112. NH • 909.27 DRAWN BY: JSE JOB NO: 17233 DATE: 04/25/17 CHECK BY: BLR SCANNED ■ 1 5/15/17 Removed play deck and planter BLR 2 5/17/17 Revise Title JEN 3 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 17233PP HMARK RESOURCE INVENTORY AND EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY --of-- GOLDEN ACRE --for-- TIM ANDERSON --of-- 547 Lois Lane Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 (651) 216-2685 x • 0 .S •C0 ❑ ❑ GAS L= 77 PIN No. 17-119-22-14-0008 Owner: City of X Address: Unassigned LEGEND DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 19241 DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES SEWER STUB OUT DENOTES DRAINAGE ARROW DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES WATER VALVE DENOTES WELL DENOTES WOOD FENCE DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 4, Block 1 MAR DON ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesota Anoka County HD: 31-22-24-0004 NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. on 04/17/17. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. IE. G. RUQ & SONS, INC. "T "n Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 www.egrud.com TREE DETAIL DENOTES ELEVATION DENOTES TREE QUANTITY DENOTES TREE SIZE IN INCHES -'--DENOTES TREE TYPE TREE TYPES: CEDAR PINE SPRUCE COTTONWOOD ASH OAK MAPLE ASH VICINITY MAP SEC. 8, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 11E•F1'' _1 TRIS SURVEY SHER'V••C0:1 LN z 39E5 .NO0) 1 N r V I I I •soc Sti �A <<_aNa. LN 1'7'1' 7%1'TLE LN 1- . IGHLA1d1 OIs l4 • 'ILC LN U 2J I -II 1 '}� II11II III IIl1 V I.;.KY LN tloR1E V1EYV7 4{A r S BARBARA LN CP LIA 1 23 1-1 1'".F Y Ia •I, ((I1,ST AP'u_LO nR CUAK LN ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY OF LINO LAKES (NO SCALE) I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. BLAKE L. RIVARD Date: 5/17/17 License No. 19421 NORTH BENC Top nut of hydrant located on the north side of Arlo Lane, northwest from the northwest corner of Lot 4. An assumed elevation of 912.91. ZONING AND SETBACKS Current Zoning is R-1. Single Family Residential Minimum lot size: Minimum lot width: Building Setbacks: Collector street: Rear yard: Side Yard: BENCHMARK jp,91TNHXY2.91Z 2,17 °0j' 0913 O N) 7- • • t% O No °494 ---.NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 8-31-22 :• 0) •i 0.05 MHSA RIM 902.79 ^INV ALIO LANE S89°27'24 "E 165.00 O N) 1'N0'1P'•1.7765 910.25 ° PID: 08-31-22-24-0046 Owner: DONELLE ALFORD STEPHEN ALFORD Address: 534 ARLO LN•. 908.35 MHSA RIM 903.79 INV 0. Orc)0 o 0 42 5 °k , G 0°q�Jp t-- 0.6 5e :5 000�JOc0 \-5c:ESQ 5Q 0'5 Drains . ge•..ant1•.... x •• •.... . Utility Easement..... .............: CS co SERVICE ELEVATION PER CITY AS -BUILT = 904.6 SERVICE ELEVATION /7 ,....PER CITY / 1x0 «N ........g09,.......ris-BUILT =••s04.2 / 00.11Z 15 Drainage and' Utility Easement • • 1: o° . 0° PID: 08-31-22-24-0048 Owner: RYAN LANGE Address:535 LOIS LN Hous 4 0° 0 6p A 909......•.. tee 9< 10 ° � e,0°°,\<;b x0°o. LOT 4 48510 SF OVERALL AN 1 ° �4't 0°t. ��0 0 0 p oo�a1.......•' 0°>�pl- 90;0- oo' I :dry pOh•'• �O. Chir:nney e° 10°�' 1 =--x --__ ,Drainitigeoand - Utility Easement Oq q,GF�O t . O 4<6/ 5I °�Qe 0°''t& \ ‹,- 0° 1x 0°1 xo� O O 0o<e- Oo� 0� PQLF' -c0 FND IP ' X68.5. • • ^k P9 I Drainage and _ Utility Easement\ 'f'\ h� 4ti <'°.k'N 000. °00.90 Op 9ti 0°t. 0 Nt .14 szt CV g09 .. N 00P0d 04< oo� x .............. 910•••., 911.06 TOB -L- Cant. cc 0 0^° N89°27'24 "W . x.11 00 / // // //// House ••9 pip ,0k� C 000X > o o°o e�,T� - P� 82.50 �O GAS X5.00 \ GA Fe > O (0 > O > 10,800 SF (Variance obtained previously per City Resolution No. 06-181) 80 feet (Variance obtained previously per City Resolution No. 06-181) - 40 feet (Both Arlo Lane and Lois Lane) - 30 feet - 10 feet(Variance obtained previously per City Resolution No. 06-181) LOIS LAN > > > I I I 09° > k< F0 ti............ 00 0 x 60 4 4-- �1 909 00 I : e5 / • /SET IP 1.9241 GS..iy 909.02/ °Ph 0°0 k �� q� 0pC0 43, p✓0°00,,0 PID: 08-31-22-24-0005 Owner: DANIEL V WALDOCH 'Address: 559 LOIS LN > > O 0°90 RO <9Deck ip 909.44 MRSA RIM > > 902.33 O INV o,c GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 120 1 INCH = 30 FEET • 909.27 q -'.p 912.33 lJ TNHXYZ - DRAWN BY: JSE JOB NO: 17233 DATE: 04/25/17 CHECK BY: BLR SCANNED ■ 1 5/15/17 Removed play deck and planter BLR 2 5/17/17 Revise Title JEN 3 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 17233PP PRELIMINARY PLAT -dofN GOLDEN ACRE Nfor-, TIM ANDERSON 547 Lois Lane Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 651-216-2685 CIVIL ENGINEER CHUCK PLOWE, P.E. Howe Engineering, Inc. 6776 Lake Drive Suite 110 Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 4, Block 1 MAR DON ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesota BENCH MARK Top nut of hydrant located on the north side of Arlo Lane, northwest from the northwest corner of Lot 4. An assumed elevation of 912.91. ZONING AND SETBACKS Current Zoning is R-1. Single Minimum lot size: Minimum lot width: Building Setbacks: Collector street: Rear yard: Side Yard: Family Residential 10,800 SF (Variance obtained 80 feet (Variance obtained previously per City Resolution No. 06-181) previously per City Resolution No. 06-181) - 40 feet (Both Arlo Lane and Lois Lane) - 30 feet - 10 feet(Variance obtained previously per City Resolution No. 06-181) DEVELOPMENT DATA Total boundary area = Number of proposed lots = Proposed Right of Way = Average lot size = Density = Net Density = 48,510 square feet (1.11 acres) 4 4,950 square feet (0.11 acres) 10,890 square feet 3.60 lots per acre 4.00 lots per acre CITY of LINO LAKES 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential Future Land Use: Low Density Residential NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 04/17/17. Bearings shown are on Anoka County Coordinates, NAD83 1996 Adjustment. Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. Parcel ID is 08-31-22-24-0004 This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. IE. G. RUQ & SONS, INC. "T,9n Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 www.egrud.com TREE DETAIL = DENOTES ELEVATION ------ DENOTES TREE QUANTITY O 1 r ° :2 -( ---- ------DENOTES TREE SIZE IN INCHES -------DENOTES TREE TYPE TREE TYPES: CEDAR PINE SPRUCE COTTONWOOD ASH OAK MAPLE ASH LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 19421 DENOTES BOLLARD DENOTES CATCH BASIN DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES SEWER TIE-IN DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES DRAINAGE ARROW DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES WATER VALVE DENOTES WELL DENOTES WOOD FENCE DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE co • • S ❑E X 952.36 ❑T 0 0 0 0 0 E GAS PIN No. 17-119-22-14-0008 Owner: City of X Address: Unassigned NET= DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) DENOTES LOT AREA MINUS A 10 FOOT BUFFER AROUND THE BOTTOM OF THE POND I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. BLAKE L. RIVARD Date: 05/22/17 License No. 19421 NORTH VICINITY MAP SEC. 8, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY OF LINO LAKES (NO SCALE) BENCHMARK n 912.91 4-4.TN H XYZ 0 10.05 0 MHSA RIM Ir- 902.79 INV -.NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER E OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 8-31-22 r7 00 e 0 °. �� `' '' .4,-•- 910•• ..._ T-rND'1P'17765 0 910.25 o F) 908.35 MHSA RIM 903.79 INV 00 <o 0 PID: 08-31-22-24-0046 Owner: DONELLE ALFORD STEPHEN ALFORD Address: 534 ARLO LN• Hou 1 A r• 11 „ /\ Ff 1 I 1 S8 O27'24 "E 16 00 ARL •, LANE ROAD DEDICATION oma;\ 0 CS Drain.oge and..• `.............��...�' Utility Easem nf'.....�............•` co82.50 o 82.50 0 ro 1T 0 (9 • O 1 i NO 1 C 0 O 0 r7 0 0c° IV �0 SERVICE ELEVATION 5 °O°jtJ° PER CITY 5e 00 �, AS -BUILT 0 04 I S89°27'24"E 1 I I 1 / = 904.6 1 / I Proposed I Drainage and -1 Utility Easement...'..... • \ °° 1 BLDSB- 0, ,-,Q)- •--BLDSB-\� 1 ;__- Drainage and \\\I o x � OQ' OG o`° o°o z .x. 00�. PID: 08-31-22-24-0048 Owner: RYAN LANGE Address:535 LOIS LN > (5 0(, 0G 0 0 °°° ° 4040 0 - I 5 5 Utility Easement '1 • 3 GROSS=10,890 S.F. NET= 9,653 S.F. O0 4 '•BLDSB w U 00 �0 z • 90' w O O r7 5 0 x '- 0.8 Q rr H / 0_ 0'582.50 7'7.50 �o / / / 1 S89°27'24"E X040 SERVICE ELEVATION / ) - --.-z°ER-CITY - ,„e 909 ....... -BUILT = 904.2 O°0 0 ........ G° 0 00' ° FND IP 17765 909.42 5 Drainage and�_� Utility Easement c' EILDSB- -B SB BLDSB °°�. ° M O 0) 5 0 4 GO I GROSS=10,890 S.F. NET= 9,653 S.F. 4)\-\ ° EILDSB BLDSB 4 (Q� Proposed Drainage and Utility Easement 82.50` 7 /1 /1 /I / I / / 1 j 1 �, , / 09'ko ; 00 \ ,, 00\�<c, , °b. BLDSB - ............ x.`' DLO ;;..---eiv:909A6 ;1,1 GROSS=11:,55.0...S..F.0 Deck ...... NET• -10,237 S.F. /o c''',°<.GO <0 °-, °, ci �� ■ G°`: h 87.50 S89°27'24"E (9 z� wQw LJ_ w x Z z BLZSO 1- 0 O Z J 0 w o_ 40q - 0 00. ///T TGarage`' Floor =909 4° 909'•'•.'•. o 0 C n > •x 'L LU 0 ' 00 00 tA ob.4 E3 I, 1 G OSS=10,230''•. S.F. 1.:5 NET= 9.;067'_ 11 At' r I a BLDSB- - - .K Chimney 40 0 BLDSB- - .D.rointige and �� 1 Utility Easement • Q , 1 a0 �o :' ° 0 o°oe \....... 1b5i 5 0 s�,„, foo°'�o °,- N\ v,00� ;�' I ck �4 tee/ 11 III N89:27'2 o °o. °j,r, 0 a4 6. 5 FND IP - 908.5 �,.. • 06'..•'\n �0 �G +°0 0- 77.50L°.co I 1 1 L. sI > Cant. F; DIG C °+N° x . L Or, ti °e.�w . ae x ,a r 17.0 o° GAS > A 1 I\ > 0 co > 1 909. 00 l• • /SET IP 1.9241 909.02: > xo .5 (9' 0 PID: 08-31-22-24-0005 Owner: DANIEL V WALDOCH 'Address: 559 LOIS LN > GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 120 1 INCH = 30 FEET > ->- 909.44 MHSA RIM > e INV .33 909.27 J912.33 lJ TNHXYZ DRAWN BY: JSE JOB NO: 17233 DATE: 04/25/17 CHECK BY: BLR SCANNED ■ 1 5/15/17 JSE 2 5/17/17 ADD NET BUILDABLE AREA JEN 3 5/22/17 REV NET BUILDABLE AREA JEN NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 17233 0 0 0 \plowe\cad \17prol\17-1688 GOLDEN ACRE (TIM ANDERSON)\17-1688 CAD\17-1688_BASE 1_C3D.dwq GOL EN AC E TITLE SHEET, EXISTING CONDITIONS, NOTES & LEGEND LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA r910.50 TNHXYZ 7- Y`,•. � Vlv•Y BENCHMARK A bTNHXYZ 1014 A 910.03 TRAVLRGSPK O o90 9•�G NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 8-31-22 908.35 MHSA RIM 903.79 O INV 1'NY3.1P• • 1.7765 910.25 • rn PID: PID: 08-31-22-24- 0046 Owner: DONELLE ALFORD STEPHEN ALFORD Address: 534 ARLO LN rs N 10.05 MHSA RIM 902.79 ilipINV O.• O 0• • I'!) •9p.•. ^6 ARLO LANE S89°27'24 "E 16 .00 9 - ROAD DEDICATION„,Ebt a 0 • •••••• •• E Drainage•••and..... • •••�cs I Utility Easem-nf.••"••••••. co82.50 ed'. _ 1.011 2.5 _ �°' 82.50 S89°27'24"E 4 T �9'S ER VI C7ELFTFO N1 0.6 ei' PER CITY\AS 1 BUILT = 904.6 Proposed Drainage and Utility Easement \\ \\ ti \\ 5 LOT 3 10,890 SF \�x Drainage and Utility Easement O O CV M N PID: 08-31-22-24-0048 Owner: RYAN LANGE Address:535 LOIS LN Hous 09 a� // > o'oqS 'J 0.8 cPr.,b CC 1- LJ 0 z w L._ FNDIP177 5PT7 S89°27'24"E , O SERVICE ELEVATION /� .AGR CF�K 1/: -� 5 1 I 09-•. AS -BUILT = 904.2 1 5 j l A° 1 0 • 1 - O O 1 C C0\ ...:' 0 cpv k O 1n 5 Draina�ge and'_ 1 UtilityXasement\ \ \I LOT 4 9p0 ' °�� 1 0 10,890 SF xl h0 \y1 I L,J ,,1k A.., 6' Z)1 4,09Q�4'9 \ x�0 L_ Z z J_ O O Proposed/`\ ji z0 w Drainage and `�.,_ Utility Easement ��Mj I \\ (3' 1 /1 8007 11 82.50 5 ery IP 17765 ,p.\0 aC' a°0 0C XI ///4o Garage`' Floor X09.4 P177,6tPS 77.50 • T-- 5Ii / FNDHND1INAP6' 1 87.50 S89°27'24'E / eA / 9p0 i•"" 1 / 1 //1 1 7--•---__-.../ 1 m`1' N9 \ 1 F \ 9p' 909 LOT 2 0. 10,230 SVP' cke 4:0-'1 x 0P•t• __...__.........909 p9h6 p• .....I' �•. 09 9 cy` 9p•'I. I -°--- °G� LOT 19p90^ P . 'ss xjo �1 � 990 11.,550.•SF xl''') a I• I... ab' ^,�� .0 9OQ5 9\o g,,st 1 94 77.50 -co Chimney:.'- Drainage and • Utility Easement I I `/ k 5 I 00cib e oo�p ,�ge�0O � ,\, \\ 1 5 1 1o�.b 90QQ eoo�° 0 \ \ ° 1 0 `g / '\ I .,1188 ¢x909.95 77.50 'co s ��_ 4__ 100' �° , v .7..5Q > 0 M > 911.06 11111111 TOB+ - 0 P !.2 Existing House 04,0,‘<.• Ne' - O'G 9 •9;r:.2 hti • nt - CO 08.® pry FND7,6PPT12 9o. •' •_ s0 6' aP M9 > PID: 08-31-22-24-0005 Owner: DANIEL V WALDOCH Address: 559 LOIS LN Garage oho, 0<�0 N 45, N89°27'2 .108 ..- d'AS •O 5.0 17 G, O7� LOIS LAN > > > > > ••"1 /SET IP 1.9241 909.02 .h .�G > > > > 909.44 MHSA RIM 902.33 INV Know what's below. CaII before you dig. 1U1. L 908.92 TRAVLRGSPK 909.27 v 912.33 TNHXYZ 912.15 �•-•d TNHXYZ 908.94 MHSA RIM 902.79 INV LEGEND [NOT ALL SYMBOLS APPLY] OHW TEL CBL > FM 8 930 928, X 920.99 GE 90T7.4 XBI x EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRICAL PEDESTAL CABLE PEDESTAL UTILITY POLE LIGHT POLE STORM SEWER WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING FLARED -END SECTION EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING WELL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION (MATCH INTO ELEVATION) EXISTING BITUMINOUS EXISTING TREES EXISTING TREES (TO BE REMOVED) EXISTING FENCE ELEC GAS TEL 0 A -928- -930- )8( 920.60 S 4.0% �p p pp p C n p p p p PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED WATER PIPE SANITARY SEWER PIPE STORM SEWER PIPE DRAINTILE AND CLEAN-OUT ELECTRIC SERVICE * GAS SERVICE * TELEPHONE SERVICE * PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED FLARED -END SECTION PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (GUTTERLINE, BITUMINOUS SURFACE, OR GROUND SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED RIP -RAP PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION PROPOSED ENKAMAT VICINITY MAP CirE!r!n1%4,cdI I..14 y yo�d9'. L„i01 S LN MAIN ST 11091.15 Li50. of lPoralil? -9einrll Lo tQf 8 S 10.0116 l.n Tr-ri v„t View PI AR,ILO LN Luis L.ri IHLcilolarrd'1'1 P9arbura Lin E. 1..1.114 Lal+u's ,FY IEllarns!rrt!rp St?1,0+01 Li rluor li4a i!a ovJk.. Lin -1: EI!ll'iE� c / C 1( L!MIg111PI 11pd1C.c'IF ,,1. ns SHEET INDEX N.T.S. C1 TITLE SHEET, NOTES & LEGEND C2 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C3 UTILITY PLAN C4 DETAILS L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: R.W. C.W.P. CHCKD BY: C.W.P. PROJ. NO. 17-1688 ORIGINAL DATE: MAY 15, 2017 REVISION DESCRIPTION CITY COMMENTS Lu 0 N 001 1 L() GOLDEN ACRE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TITLE SHEET, NOTES & LEGEND PREPARED FOR: TIM ANDERSON SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWS ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 NORTH 0 15 30 1 INCH = 30 FEET C1 0 0 \plowe\cad \17prol\17-1688 GOLDEN ACRE (TIM ANDERSON)\17-1688 CAD\17-1688_BASE 1_C3D.dwq T EXIST HYDRANT 612.91 TNHXYZ 0 4, 1 3 ��- EXIST SAN MH 1014 910.03 TRAVLRGSPK 9110.05 MHSA RIM 902.79 INV 02.79 1 � � APL O LANE S897'24"E 165.1 0 0 EXIST 8" PVC WATER MAIN EXIST 8" D.I.P. CL52 SANITARY SEWER qb PID: 08-31-22-24-0046 Owner: DONELLE ALFORD STEPHEN ALFORD Address: 534 ARLO LN PID: 08-31-22-24-0048 Owner: RYAN LANGE Address: 535 LOIS LN r EXIST SAN MH RE 908.35 INV 903.79 908.35 MHSA RIM 903.79 INV © 1/ • 1 E E • cs co 82.50 S89°27'24"E 0 0) O ••di • h°' q00. 0 6 -1 'r 00 00 00• JG 0 --- b0 0 aoQO� X 1b\f' S RVICE E EVATION P R CITY A -BUILT = 904.6 • kh 82.50 89°27'24' NC E ELEVATION PER CITY 90472" LOT 3 10,890 SF L.F.E. 908.80 911.30 9 9 911.30 LOT 4 10,890 SF L.F.E. 908.8 S.E.L. S.E.L.O. 911.30 s )8( 08 77.50 16.50 �0 -0908.80 EXISTING GARAGE ' ii G 64 • 909 01 (e 6 r0 Ire 18(1O o ` 'ryes` J 14 ,� JGO� 97°900 Hg(9i08 011 80 FILTRATION BASIN HWL 908.8 911.06 TOB+ - EXISTING HOUSE a9 hry REMOVE TREE (TYP) -44 908.60 EOF ti • • 9°0• 0 TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) 0 A0 4•••° 41 sr 1- y 00h• 0b` 00 t0 . 00 000 0°0 ye0 9n8.90 77.51 10� V ° 00A .sG L N8927'2"W 165. d 0 G h e n GAS A GAS " h, ty cb04. 0 :GAS 909.02 , 00 PID: 08-31-22-24-0005 Owner: DANIEL V WALDOCH Address: 559 LOIS LN - 0 > N Know what's below. CaII before you dig. >\ > > > > EXIST SANITARY SEWER & WATER SERVICE (TYP) 1 1 1 908.97 LOIS LANE > 0 EXIST 8>" D.I.P. CL52 SANITARY SEWER > > > > EXIST 8" PVC SDR 35 WATER MAIN EXIST SAN MH - RE 909.44 INV 902.33 1013 908.92 TRAVLRGSPK FXIT NYDRANT - GENERAL NOTES THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. CALL "811" FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND WATER MAIN AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INTERRUPTION OF ANY SEWER OR WATER SERVICES TO EXISTING HOMES OR BUSINESSES. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES NO MINING OF SANDY SOILS ALLOWED IN BASIN. FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. BASIN TO REMAIN UNLINED. PROTECT BASIN FROM RUN-OFF DURING LOT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EXCAVATE BASIN TO FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS WITH SOD OR OTHER APPROVED STABILIZATION. USE LOW -IMPACT, EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT (WIDE TRACK OR MARSH TRACK EQUIPMENT, OR LIGHT -EQUIPMENT WITH TURF -TYPE TIRES.) LOW FLOOR ELEVATION GARAGE ELEVATION AT DOOR 911.20 S.E.L.O. L.F.E. 908.8 911.2 TYPICAL LOT DETAIL FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION AT REAR OF HOUSE SPLIT ENTRY LOOK OUT EXISTING CURB NOT TO SCALE GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WIMCO INLET PROTECTION (OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL) FOR ALL STORM SEWER INLETS THAT WILL RECEIVE RUN-OFF FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES . CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TOPSOIL STOCKPILES AT LOCATION DESIGNATED BY OWNER. PLACE STOCKPILES AS FAR FROM DRAINAGE WAYS AS POSSIBLE. PROVIDE SILT FENCE AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF STOCKPILE LOCATIONS. IF STOCKPILE IS TO BE IN-PLACE LONGER THAN 7 DAYS, PROVIDE SEED AND MULCH. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SOD, SEED, MULCH AND FERTILIZER WHICH SHALL CONFORM WITH THE FOLLOWING MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS AS MODIFIED BELOW. ITEM MNDOT SPECIFICATION/NOTES 911.30 3878 SEED ** 3876 -911 MNDOT MIX 25-131 (220 LBS/ACRE) MNDOT MIX 25-131 (120 LBS/ACRE) TEMPORARY FALL COVER SPRING/SUMMER SOIL -BUILDING COVER 1-2 YEARS COVER 2-5 YEARS COVER S.E.L.O.. MULCH 3882 (TYPE 1 - DISC ANCHORED) 909__. LOT 2 3881 WOOD FIBER BLANKET 3885 (CATEGORY 2) 10,230 SFE, 90, L.F.E. 908.8°� 1 00 00. 0 914'03 011 80 FILTRATION BASIN HWL 908.8 911.06 TOB+ - EXISTING HOUSE a9 hry REMOVE TREE (TYP) -44 908.60 EOF ti • • 9°0• 0 TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) 0 A0 4•••° 41 sr 1- y 00h• 0b` 00 t0 . 00 000 0°0 ye0 9n8.90 77.51 10� V ° 00A .sG L N8927'2"W 165. d 0 G h e n GAS A GAS " h, ty cb04. 0 :GAS 909.02 , 00 PID: 08-31-22-24-0005 Owner: DANIEL V WALDOCH Address: 559 LOIS LN - 0 > N Know what's below. CaII before you dig. >\ > > > > EXIST SANITARY SEWER & WATER SERVICE (TYP) 1 1 1 908.97 LOIS LANE > 0 EXIST 8>" D.I.P. CL52 SANITARY SEWER > > > > EXIST 8" PVC SDR 35 WATER MAIN EXIST SAN MH - RE 909.44 INV 902.33 1013 908.92 TRAVLRGSPK FXIT NYDRANT - GENERAL NOTES THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. CALL "811" FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND WATER MAIN AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INTERRUPTION OF ANY SEWER OR WATER SERVICES TO EXISTING HOMES OR BUSINESSES. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES NO MINING OF SANDY SOILS ALLOWED IN BASIN. FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. BASIN TO REMAIN UNLINED. PROTECT BASIN FROM RUN-OFF DURING LOT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EXCAVATE BASIN TO FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS WITH SOD OR OTHER APPROVED STABILIZATION. USE LOW -IMPACT, EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT (WIDE TRACK OR MARSH TRACK EQUIPMENT, OR LIGHT -EQUIPMENT WITH TURF -TYPE TIRES.) LOW FLOOR ELEVATION GARAGE ELEVATION AT DOOR 911.20 S.E.L.O. L.F.E. 908.8 911.2 TYPICAL LOT DETAIL FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION AT REAR OF HOUSE SPLIT ENTRY LOOK OUT EXISTING CURB NOT TO SCALE GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WIMCO INLET PROTECTION (OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL) FOR ALL STORM SEWER INLETS THAT WILL RECEIVE RUN-OFF FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES . CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TOPSOIL STOCKPILES AT LOCATION DESIGNATED BY OWNER. PLACE STOCKPILES AS FAR FROM DRAINAGE WAYS AS POSSIBLE. PROVIDE SILT FENCE AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF STOCKPILE LOCATIONS. IF STOCKPILE IS TO BE IN-PLACE LONGER THAN 7 DAYS, PROVIDE SEED AND MULCH. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SOD, SEED, MULCH AND FERTILIZER WHICH SHALL CONFORM WITH THE FOLLOWING MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS AS MODIFIED BELOW. ITEM MNDOT SPECIFICATION/NOTES SOD 3878 SEED ** 3876 * FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT COMMERCIAL TURF RESIDENTIAL TURF MNDOT MIX 25-131 (220 LBS/ACRE) MNDOT MIX 25-131 (120 LBS/ACRE) TEMPORARY FALL COVER SPRING/SUMMER SOIL -BUILDING COVER 1-2 YEARS COVER 2-5 YEARS COVER MNDOT MIX 21-112 (100 LBS/ACRE) MNDOT MIX 21-111 (100 LBS/ACRE) MNDOT MIX 21-113 (110 LBS/ACRE) MNDOT MIX 22-111 (30.5 LBS/ACRE) MNDOT MIX 22-112 (40 LBS/ACRE) MULCH 3882 (TYPE 1 - DISC ANCHORED) FERTILIZER 3881 WOOD FIBER BLANKET 3885 (CATEGORY 2) * MOW A MINIMUM OF: RESIDENTIAL TURF - ONCE PER 2 WEEKS COMMERCIAL TURF - ONCE PER 4 WEEKS ** SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED OR COVERED BY FIBROUS BLANKETS TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR IMPLEMENTED IN THE FIELD SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY AND NPDES PHASE II PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, AND THE MPCA'S "PROTECTING WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AREAS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR MINNESOTA." THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DESIGNATED CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT AREA WITH APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE. WASHOUT AREA IS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 50' FROM STORM DRAINS, DITCHES, PONDS, OR OTHER STORMWATER FEATURES. ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTE GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK -PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER (E.G. COMPACTED CLAY LINER, IMPERMEABLE GEO-MEMBRANE). AFTER WASTE CONCRETE IS SET, BREAK-UP AND DISPOSE OF PROPERLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SILT FENCE, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, THROUGH COMPLETION OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. SILT FENCE TO BE REMOVED ONLY AFTER COMPLETION OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES AND MAKE SURE THE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES IN-PLACE IN THOSE AREAS PREVENT MIGRATION OF SEDIMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WOOD FIBER BLANKET FOR ALL AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW AND FOR ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER. IF ANY SLOPES APPEAR TO BE FAILING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE, BIOROLLS AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AS NEEDED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FINAL GRADE SWALE AREAS UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SOD ALL DISTURBED DRAINAGE AREAS, INCLUDING SWALES, OVERFLOWS, AROUND STORM SEWER FLARED -END SECTIONS, AND OFF-STREET CATCH BASINS. UPON GRADING COMPLETION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NATIVE TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCH ANCHORED WITH A STRAIGHT SET DISC WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. EXCESS SOIL SHOULD BE TREATED LIKE OTHER EXPOSED SOIL AND STABILIZED WITHIN 72 HOURS. ANY SOIL STOCKPILES ARE TO HAVE SILT FENCE PLACED ON DOWNSTREAM SIDES AND SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS. ADJACENT STREETS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, DIRT, AND OTHER UNDESIRABLE MATERIALS. WHEN MATERIALS OR DEBRIS HAVE WASHED/FLOWED ONTO ADJACENT STREETS, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SWEEP/SCRAPE STREETS AS NECESSARY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN GOLDEN ACRE DRAWN BY: R.W. DESIGN BY: C.W.P. CHCKD BY: C.W.P. PROJ. NO. 17-1688 ORIGINAL DATE: MAY 15, 2017 REVISION DESCRIPTION CITY COMMENTS Lu 0 GOLDEN ACRE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA z 0 0 w �s< W C0 0_ Q 2"_o - i z °0 0 C9 0 z 0 0 PREPARED FOR: TIM ANDERSON SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWS ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 NORTH 0 10 20 11111 1 INCH = 20 FEET C2 0 ID 7-1688 GOLDEN ACME DM ANDERSON\17_1687 CAD \177-1688 BASE1 SC5D.dwg S; \Nlow6\rod\17pro� Know what's below. CaII before you dig. EXIST HYDRANT 912.91 TNHXYZ EXIST SAN MH RE 910.0 9%.051 MRSA RIM 902.79 r INV 02.79 A 'LO LANE > > EXIST 8" D.I.P. CL52 SANITARY SEWER EXIST 8" I PVC WATER MAIN • PID: 08-31-22-24-0046 Owner: DONELLE ALFORD STEPHEN ALFORD Address: 534 ARLO LN PID: 08-31-22-24-0048 Owner: RYAN LANGE Address: 535 LOIS LN r— EXIST SAN MH RE 908.35 INV 903.79 908.35 MHSA RIM 903.79 INV / // EXISTING GARAGE 909 910"' cs E E n co 82.50 1 S89°27'24E SERVICE ELEVATION PER CITY AS—BUILT = 904.6 LOT3 10,890 SF 011 910 N 0 0 9 SO°33'15"W D9 r LOT 4 10,890 SF 7 82.50 77.50 009 L 7 7.5 0 co :s 1 ®® r L GAS 82.50 87.50 007 S-8 0 °2 7' 24" E 0 c� GAS LOT 1 11,550 SF // EXISTING HOUSE v v v GA 909.. 910 ...... ..87:•50:' GAS GAS 0 0 O O 0 0 N V) 0 0 909.02 90g.. 03 O On NO PROPOSED UTILITIES. ALL UTILITIES ARE EXISTING. PID: 08-31-22-24-0005 Owner: DANIEL V WALDOCH Address: 559 LOIS LN LOIS LANE EXIST SANITARY SEWER & WATER SERVICE (TYP) I I I I I v > > EXIST 8" D.I.P. CL52 SANITARY SEWER EXIST 8" PVC SDR 35 WATER MAIN > EXIST SAN MH \ RE 909.44 INV 902.33 \\ \\\\\v \� MHSA RIM 902.33 > > 0 INV 909.27 EXIST HYDRANT ----- TNHXYZ UTILITY PLAN GOLDEN ACRE DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: R.W. C.W.P. CHCKD BY: C.W.P. PROJ. NO. 17-1688 ORIGINAL DATE: MAY 16, 2017 REVISION DESCRIPTION CITY COMMENTS GOLDEN ACRE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA UTILITY PLAN PREPARED FOR: TIM ANDERSON SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWS ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 NORTH 0 10 20 1 INCH = 20 FEET C3 7-1688 GOLDEN ACME DM ANDERSON\17_1688 CAD \177-1688 BASE 1 SC5D.dwg S; \Nlowe\r_pd\17proj 1. NO MINING OF SANDY SOILS ALLOWED IN BASIN. 2. FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. 3. BASIN TO REMAIN UNLINED. 4. PROTECT BASIN FROM RUN-OFF DURING LOT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EXCAVATE BASIN TO FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS. 5. USE LOW -IMPACT, EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT (WIDE TRACK OR MARSH TRACK EQUIPMENT, OR LIGHT -EQUIPMENT WITH TURF -TYPE TIRES.) 10' SOD (TYP) PLACE MIN 3" WOOD CHIPS 907.0 10,0 -44 *40i#4v ei4'44►#.i4*i NOTE: ALLEVIATE ANY COMPACTED SOILS (BY USING A PRIMARY TILLING OPERATION SUCH AS A CHISEL PLOW, RIPPER OR SUBSOILER) INFILTRATION BASIN VERIFY EXISTING SOILS TO BE GRANULAR IN-SITU SOILS Know what's below. CaII before you dig. NOT TO SCALE (.) LTJ z DIRECTION OFA 2" X 2" WOOD OR STEEL POST 7'-7" 0.C. WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT, STD. FIELD FENCE. MIN. .30" HIGH, MAX. MESH SPACING OF 6" AND MIN. 14-1/2" GAUGE WIRE IS OPTIONAL. GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC - OVERLAP 6" AND FASTEN AT 2' INTERVALS. LAY FABRIC IN TRENCH. FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOIL. EXTEND WIRE MESH INTO TRENCH SUPPORT POST ANCHORAGE IN-SITU SOIL 6" MIN. NOTES: 1) WIRE MESH IS NOT REQUIRED. 2) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS FOLLOWING TURF ESTABLISHMENT. SILT FENCE NOT TO SCALE �O Svc ROp,O 6" MINIMUM 1-1/2" - 3" CLEAN WASHED ROCK ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE DETAILS GOLDEN ACRE DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: R.W. C.W.P. CHCKD BY: C.W.P. PROJ. NO. 17-1688 ORIGINAL DATE: MAY 15, 2017 REVISION DESCRIPTION CITY COMMENTS GOLDEN ACRE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 0 PREPARED FOR: TIM ANDERSON SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWS ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 C4 0 N r 7-1688 GOLDEN ACRE DMANIERSON\17 1688 CAE \17-1688 BASE 1C Ddwg S; \Nlowe\rod\17proj LANDSCAPING NOTES STAKE AND/OR MARK ALL PLAN PLANTING LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. OWNER TO APPROVE ALL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND BURLAPPED AS INDICATED IN THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. ALL TREES MUST BE PLANTED, MULCHED, AND STAKED AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS. MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK MULCH ON DRAWINGS. USE 4" FOR TREES, SHRUB BEDS, AND 3" FOR PERENNIAL/GROUND COVER BEDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED. PLANTING SOIL SHALL HAVE A pH RANGE OF 5.00 TO 8.00. SOIL SHALL BE DECOMPACTED AND FREE OF STICKS, STONES, AND OTHER DEBRIS. SOIL SHALL CONTAIN NO LESS THAN 5% ORGANIC COMPOST AND 25% SAND. FOR PLANTING OF SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS, A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE AFFECTED AREAS BEFORE INSTALLATION. FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF TURF, A MINIMUM OF DEPTH OF 4" OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE AFFECTED AREAS BEFORE INSTALLATION OF SOD OR SEED. SOIL SAMPLES SHOULD BE SUBMITTED WITH AMENDMENT PROCEDURES INDICATED PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS: FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COMPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL. MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HARDPACK SUBSOIL, STONES, CHEMICALS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, ETC. SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND 10-0-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD, IN PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY ROTOTILLING IT INTO THE TOP 12" OF SOIL. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE -SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. WHERE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED, SAID SYSTEMS SHALL HAVE WATER SENSOR DEVICES TO AVOID OVERWATERING AND TIMING DEVICES TO ENSURE IRRIGATION IS CONDUCTED DURING THE HOURS PERMITTED BY THE CITY WATER RESTRICTION REQUIREMENTS. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TURF SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 4" TOP SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. ALL WORK TO BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING AT TIME OF ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER. CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS IN A TIMELY MANNER. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. WHEN STAKING OR GUYING OF TREES IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL OCCUR SO AS NOT TO CREATE ANY HAZARDS OR UNSIGHTLY OBSTACLES. ALL WIRES SHALL BE ENCASED IN HOSE TO PREVENT TREE DAMAGE. PRUNE EVERGREEN TREES ADJACENT TO PARKING STALLS AS NEEDED TO AVOID LIMBS BRUSHING AGAINST CARS. 1 r N I I APLO LANE S89°Z7'24 "E 165. 0,0 I I 0 0 PID: 08-31-22-24-0046 Owner: DONELLE ALFORD STEPHEN ALFORD Address: 534 ARLO LN • PID: 08-31-22-24-0048 Owner: RYAN LANGE Address: 535 LOIS LN OPEN AREA COVER PER SECTION 1007.43(17)E OF THE CITY CODE, OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED FOR DISTURBED SITE AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE VEHICULAR LANDSCAPE AREA AND ABOVE THE POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL (1 LARGE TREE + 3 LARGE SHRUBS PER 2,000 S.F.) TOTAL OPEN AREA DISTURBED = 4,000 S.F. (A) MIN. LARGE TREES REQUIRED = (4,000 S.F. / 2,000 S.F.) X 1 = 2 10 LARGE TREES (A) MIN. LARGE SHRUBS REQUIRED = (4,000 S.F. / 2,000 S.F.) X 3 = 6 Know what's below. CaII before you dig. • m /// EXISTING GARAGE //// 909 CV wF4 w M 0 0 0 LOT 3 10,890 SF 911 0t�0000 000000 oo0l°0° O O -Ob.0 O 0 O.A0 0 0 N V) SO°33'1 5"W cs O9 ... LOT 4 10,890 SF 0 0 HL 06, • ' it14 N`Ve V/.5 82.50 77.50 909 REMOVE TREE (TYP)* co 0 rn *REPLACED W/ TREES IN OPEN AREA C\2 10 4 Cip 0 909 LOT 2 10,230 SF HB 0� 77.50 CS 0 > N / //////////V�///' EXISTING HOUSE /////////'7/1 I - L -I 1,09 N89°27'24 "W 165.00 GAS GAS 3 > _> SYMBOL KEY QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE AT INSTALL DECIDUOUS TREES :.k ISH HB RB HL 2 1 2 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS HACKBERRY 2-1/2" B&B* ss DSS BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH 2-1/2" B&B* #5 POT BROOT GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS "SH ADEM ASTER" HONEY LOCUST 2-1/2" B&B* SYMBOL KEY QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE AT INSTALL DECIDUOUS SHRUBS sH ISH 4 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS INCREDIBALL SMOOTH HYDRANGEA #5 POT BROOT EVERGREEN SHRUBS ss DSS 3 PICEA OMORIKA 'NANA' DWARF SERBIAN SPRUCE #5 POT BROOT PID: 08-31-22-24-0005 Owner: DANIEL V WALDOCH Address: 559 LOIS LN 10' WIDE SODDED AREA SEED ALL DISTURBED AREADS W/ SEED MN -DOT #21-112 N— TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) OPEN AREA 4000 S.F. I/ 907' TO DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT GASB GAS LOIS LANE > > > 0 > TOTAL SHRUBS 7 + + !- 1_159.27 - 1 959.27 -' 912.33 TNHXYZ Ii io/7 oII1111ik IIS / 110° 111104i .../,JO1h1011llnl ]f,Ul 141111II111i1111�1 1pliuu x0111111 PLAN 8" 2 -PLY NYLON STRAPS DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE WHITE FLAGGING (TYP.) TREE WRAP 4 INCHES MULCH 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER 8' STEEL TEE POST- 3 REQUIRED AT 120° BACKFILL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL REMOVE BURLAP & ROPE FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 4 INCHES MULCH ( SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES FOR TYPE OF MULCH ) IF SHRUB IS B & B, THEN REMOVE BURLAP & ROPE FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL BACKFILL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL SHRUB & CONTAINER PLANTING DETAIL LANDSCAPE PLAN GOLDEN ACRE DRAWN BY: R.W. DESIGN BY: C.W.P. CHCKD BY: C.W.P. PROJ. NO. 17-1688 ORIGINAL DATE: MAY 15, 2017 REVISION DESCRIPTION CITY COMMENTS w 1- 0 r 00 GOLDEN ACRE LINO LAKES, MINNESTOA LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED FOR: TIM ANDERSON SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWS ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 NORTH 7,0;es; 011,) 0 10 20 1 INCH = 20 FEET L1 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Timothy J. Anderson, a single person, fee owner of the following described property. Lot 4, Block 1, MAR DON ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as GOLDEN ACRE and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and the drainage and utility easements as shown by this plat. In witness whereof said Timothy J. Anderson, has hereunto set his hand this day of , 20___. Timothy J. Anderson STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___ by Timothy J. Anderson, a single person. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I Blake L. Rivard do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20____ . Blake L. Rivard, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19421 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___ by Blake L. Rivard. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires City Council, City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota This plat of GOLDEN ACRE was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20___, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota , as Mayor , as City Clerk County Surveyor I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of 20___ . Larry D. Hoium Anoka County Surveyor GOLDEN ACRE 0 / I I L 1 J I I L L J r, LJ L_ r, - L L _ L _ A r♦ , i� /_%t F! I I I 1 r. F /I e I\I 1 \ / I V L A n 1 r� F- L_ 1 \ L_ S89°27'24 "E 165.00 O 0 0 0 M AILO LANE --DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT i M ,' PER THE PLAT OF MAR DON ACRES --' r • 82.50 • 5 82.50 n n n r I \ / I \ F( 0 3 4 O o in o o O M O i�N NO M• � 0'- CZ N 5 5 DRAINAGE `r 82.50 AND V • W kJ 5r cI Cc T) O \I I U) I- LIJ r . I w 2 o uz in 0 0 < M M o - Q o ▪ I -L- 0 0 z F - Q J W a- 0 O W z = I- Q CC CC 0 W 0_ S89°27'27"E 77.50 Ln 20 1 5 I J 1 \ 0 77.50 • N89°27'24"W ,/ 165.00 (-THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, MAR DON ACRES 0 0 N N 1 \I I\I L / • / I • 82.50 S89°27'22"E 87.50 • UTILITY O 0 M EASEMENT / • 1 75 I W Z� W() W �z <0 W 0 >c I- Q 0▪ u 0 0 zF- Q Q W 0- < Q CC- CC oW 0_ 87.50 /n\ 0 0 N N) ik _15 o 43( I NORTH 30 0 15 30 60 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 8, T31N, R22W 120 ( SCALE IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 feet DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 15 51 1 I 0 L 0 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES, AND REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. O DENOTES SET 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY RLS NO. 19421. • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. County Auditor/Treasurer ' ' ;, i �- 0 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, MAR DON ACRES IS ASSUMED TO Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20_ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant HAVE A BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of 20_ . 24 SECONDS WEST. Property Tax Administrator By , Deputy County Recorder/Registrar of Titles County of Anoka, State of Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of GOLDEN ACRE was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of , 20 , at o'clock _M. and was duly recorded in Book Page , as Document Number County Recorder/Registrar of Titles By _ Deputy A A n r\ r\ /< n I n \ r\ r- r --- I \/ -- I\/ I /\ F( I I I I I\ I /_\ I F! I-- 1 1 / \ 1 \ L / / I V / \ \ / I \ L — / 1- - I / \ I 1- - CkAE.G. RUD & SONS, INC. _r" Professional Land Surveyors PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 5D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: June 14, 2017 REQUEST: Chavez Preserve 1. Variances 2. Final Plat CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: OWNER: REVIEW DEADLINE: VR2017-001 FP2017-005 Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. Attn: Marcel Eibensteiner 1000 County Road E West Shoreview, MN 55126 Same Complete Application Date: April 18, 2017 60 -Day Review Deadline: June 17, 2017 120 -Day Review Deadline: August 16, 2017 Environmental Board Meeting: N/A Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: June 14, 2017 City Council Work Session: July 5, 2017 City Council Meeting: July 10, 2017 BACKGROUND The applicant, Marcel Eibensteiner with Royal Oaks Realty, Inc., submitted a land use application for two (2) variances and final plat for Chavez Preserve. The proposed development is a 6 lot single family residential subdivision. It contains 1 existing parcel (177 White Pine Road) that is approximately 2.18 gross acres. The variances are for reduced right-of-way and reduced front setbacks. 1 This staff report is based on review of the following information: Civil Plans, prepared by Plowe Engineering date May 26, 2017 Lot Tabulation dated May 26, 2017 Stormwater Drainage Report, prepared by Plowe Engineering dated May 24, 2017 Preliminary Plat, prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons dated April 18, 2017 Engineer's Cost Estimate dated April 18, 2017 Title Commitment, prepared by First American Title Insurance Company dated April 6, 2017 Previous Council Actions: September 12, 2016: Resolution No. 16-90 approving Preliminary Plat September 12, 2016: Resolution No. 16-104 approving Accessory Structure Agreement ANALYSIS Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The final plat is compliant with the comprehensive plan, zoning and subdivision ordinance with the approved variances (these will be furthered discussed). Some of the lot widths and areas have been revised from the preliminary plat but they all meet the R- 1, Single Family Residential District requirements. The final plat substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat. Blocks and Lots The final plat for Chavez Preserve creates six (6) lots and zero (0) outlots. Streets No new streets are proposed with this subdivision. White Pine Road is a classified as a minor collector road. It is an east -west collector between CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CSAH 32 (Ash Street). The section of White Pine Road along the proposed plat of Chavez Preserve has 73 feet right-of-way and 32 feet back to back paved roadway. Collector roads require 80 foot right-of-way to allow for potential future roadway improvements that might involve wider paved surfaces or utility installation. Per Resolution No. 16-90 approving the preliminary plat: 2 1. An additional 7 feet of right of way shall be dedicated on the plat to provide a full 40 feet of right of way from centerline. This will be consistent with the Rohavic Oaks Second Addition development on the south side of White Pine Road that was platted in 1990. The applicant is requesting a variance from the 80 foot right-of-way requirement to allow the right-of-way to remain at 73 feet. The variance is detailed below under Findings of Fact. Easements Drainage and utility easements have been provided along the front and side lot lines. Front lot easements vary from 10 to 15 feet. Rear lot line easements vary in width from 55 to 70 feet to accommodate the stormwater facilities. Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The original Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan proposed two (2) wet basins (retention ponds) in the rear yard and a basin in the front yard between Lot 5 and Lot 6. Infiltration ponds are not suitable in this area due to high water table. Per Resolution No. 16-90 approving the preliminary plat: 1. Staff has concerns regarding the function and maintenance of the basin located in the front yard between Lot 5 and Lot 6 and requests the applicant re -analyze the plan. The revised Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan proposes one (1) infiltration basin and one (1) NURP pond in the rear yards. Swales with drain tile are proposed in the right-of-way along White Pine Road. The City Engineer has reviewed and provided comments regarding the proposed stormwater management facilities. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer An existing 12" PVC sanitary sewer main located along White Pine Road directly serves the development. Five (5) sanitary sewer services are stubbed to the property. Revised Sheet C3.1 shows a new sanitary sewer service stubbed to Lot 5 as required. Watermain An existing 6" DIP watermain located along White Pine Road directly serves the development. Five (5) water services are stubbed to the property. Revised Sheet C3.1 shows a new watermain service stubbed to Lot 5 as required. 3 Public Land Dedication and Fees The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication. Since one (1) house already exists, fees will only be collected for 5 new lots. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 5 x 2017 Park Dedication Fee $2,575 = Total Due $12,875 Tree Preservation The goal of tree preservation is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity and forest resource and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. According to the original Sheet C 1 -Grading Plan, there were 31 total trees on the site and 29 trees were to be removed. The 29 trees being removed are within basic use area (BUA) and do not require replacement. Per the revised Sheet C1 -Grading Plan, 30 trees were removed. Tree #4022 on Lot 1 was a 12' Oak tree and was to remain but was accidently removed. This tree was not located in the Basic Use Area or in an Environmentally Sensitive Area. Tree mitigation requires 1 new tree for every tree removed; therefore, 1 new tree is required. Comment: 1. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan shall be revised to include one (1) new tree on Lot 1. This is in addition to the required boulevard tree. 2. Sheet PP 1, Preliminary Plat a. The tree inventory chart shall be revised to note that tree #4022 was accidently removed and 1 new tree is required for mitigation. b. The tree inventory chart shall be revised to show that tree #4047 was not removed. 3. The Development Agreement shall include a $300 Tree Preservation Mitigation fine. Landscaping Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per lot frontage for single family and two family lots. Six (6) boulevard trees are proposed which is compliant with the ordinance. The open area is calculated at 19,820 s.f.. The landscape ordinance requires 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2,000 s.f. This equates to 10 large trees and 30 large shrubs. The 4 revised landscape plan provides 10 large trees but only 29 shrubs. The landscape plan is not compliant. Comments: 1. The Environmental Coordinator will review the revised Landscape Plan and make comments. 2. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan a. Plan shall be revised to include one (1) new tree on Lot 1 required for tree mitigation. This is in addition to the required boulevard tree. b. Plan shall be revised to include one (1) more open space shrub. c. The boulevard trees shall be located 10 feet back of curb and out of the front yard swales. Zoning The parcel is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The revised preliminary plat and final plat meet the requirements lot size and lot width. aThe applicant has requested a variance from 40 foot setback to 30 foot. The variance is detailed in the Findings of Fact. 5 Required per R-1 Propose Min. Lot Sizel (upland) 10,800 s.f. 15,854 s.f. Min. Lot Width (feet) 80 Vary 83-106 Min. Lot Depth (feet) 135 174 Building Setback (feet) -From Collector Roads 40 30a -Rear --Principal 30 30 -Side --Principal 10 10 --Accessory 5 5 aThe applicant has requested a variance from 40 foot setback to 30 foot. The variance is detailed in the Findings of Fact. 5 The following chart compares the original and revised lot widths and lot sizes. a Lot size is contiguous buildable land Per Section 1007.090(2)(a), minimum lot size is ten thousand eight hundred (10,800) square feet of contiguous buildable land. Contiguous buildable land is land area occurring within the property lines of a parcel or lot excluding wetlands and/or water bodies. On lots with infiltration basins, the lot area is measured from a 10 foot buffer above the bottom of the basin. On lots with NURP ponds, the lot area is measured from a 10 foot buffer above the normal water level (NWL). Building Requirements At the time of building permit, each individual single family dwelling unit will be reviewed for compliance regarding floor area, garage and design and construction standards. The existing single family home structure was removed by the developer in fall 2016. Two (2) accessory structures exist on the property. On September 12, 2016 as part of the preliminary plat approval, the Council passed Resolution No. 16-104 approving an Accessory Structure Agreement to allow for the accessory structures to remain in place for 1 year after final plat or 18 months after preliminary plat. The revised plan set now shows the structures being removed. Comment: 1. A Building Permit for demolition shall be required prior to removal of either of the accessory structures. 6 Original Preliminary Plat Revised Preliminary Plat Width Gross Area Lot Size' Width Gross Area Lot a Size II Lot 1 80 13,945 10,803 90.90 15,845 10,800 Lot 2 90 15,681 10,913 85.50 14,896 14,896 Lot 3 85 14,802 13,439 83.44 14,530 14,530 Lot 4 96 16,709 15,434 87.10 15,160 10,801 Lot 5 90 15,656 11,364 94.06 16,363 10,801 Lot 6 106.31 18,331 10,991 106.31 18,331 11,496 TOTAL 95,124 95,125 a Lot size is contiguous buildable land Per Section 1007.090(2)(a), minimum lot size is ten thousand eight hundred (10,800) square feet of contiguous buildable land. Contiguous buildable land is land area occurring within the property lines of a parcel or lot excluding wetlands and/or water bodies. On lots with infiltration basins, the lot area is measured from a 10 foot buffer above the bottom of the basin. On lots with NURP ponds, the lot area is measured from a 10 foot buffer above the normal water level (NWL). Building Requirements At the time of building permit, each individual single family dwelling unit will be reviewed for compliance regarding floor area, garage and design and construction standards. The existing single family home structure was removed by the developer in fall 2016. Two (2) accessory structures exist on the property. On September 12, 2016 as part of the preliminary plat approval, the Council passed Resolution No. 16-104 approving an Accessory Structure Agreement to allow for the accessory structures to remain in place for 1 year after final plat or 18 months after preliminary plat. The revised plan set now shows the structures being removed. Comment: 1. A Building Permit for demolition shall be required prior to removal of either of the accessory structures. 6 Comprehensive Plan Chavez Preserve is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. This was reviewed during the preliminary plat approval process. Density and Land Area Calculations The following chart implements Met Council's formula for calculating net density. ross Area (acres ' .18 Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.00 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 Other (Undevelopable) 0.00 Net Area (acres) 2.18 # of Units 6 Gross Density (units/acre) 2.75 Net Density (units/acre) 2.75 There have been no density changes since the preliminary plat approval. Chavez Preserve meets the land use goals by developing a single family residential subdivision that is consistent with low density residential development as guided by the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Low density residential development allows for 1.6 to 3.9 units per net acre. The net density for the development is 2.75 units per net acre and this is consistent with density requirements. Floodplain There is no floodplain on site. Shoreland Management Overlay The site is located in a Shoreland Management Overlay district of Baldwin Lake. Baldwin Lake is a Recreational Lake with an OWHL elevation of 883.1. A setback of 75 feet from the OHWL is required for all primary and accessory structures; however, this setback does not impact any structures within the proposed development. Impervious surface coverage of 30% applies to all lots within the overlay district. Per Resolution No. 16-90 approving the preliminary plat: 1. The shoreland management overlay district shall be shown on the preliminary plat. 7 The revised preliminary plat shows the shoreland management overlay district. Development Agreement A Development Agreement shall be drafted by the City, executed by the City and the developer and recorded by the developer. Title Commitment The City Attorney reviewed and approved the title commitment and final plat. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance agreement shall be required. FINDINGS OF FACT -VARIANCES The applicant is requesting two (2) variances. 1. Seven (7) foot variance to reduce required collector road right-of-way width from 80 feet to 73 feet Per Section 302.03(1)(a), street right-of-way widths shall not be less than 80 feet for collector streets. The section of White Pine Road along the proposed plat of Chavez Preserve currently has 73 feet of right-of-way and 7 more feet would be required to be dedicated on the final plat. The stormwater in this development is being managed through an infiltration basin and pond in the rear yards resulting in drainage and utility easements varying in width from 55 feet to 70 feet. Standards rear yards easements are 10 feet. All of the parcels meet lot area and width requirements but the wider easements reduce the buildable rear yard area. By not requiring the additional 7 feet and allowing the right-of-way to remain at 73 feet, the rear yards gain an additional 7 feet. Staff has reviewed the future roadway needs of White Pine and Baldwin Lake Road. Both White Pine Road, west of the subject site, and Baldwin Lake Road have 60 feet of right-of-way. Existing traffic volumes are less than 500 ADT and projected 2030 traffic forecasts are less than 1,999. These traffic volumes would not warrant the need for a wider roadway in the future. Additionally, the paved roadway of White Pine Road is off -set approximately 8 feet to the south within the existing right-of-way. There is currently 30 feet from the north curb line to the south property line of Chavez Preserve that allows ample room if future sidewalk or trail construction were ever needed in this corridor. Staff has no concerns regarding the variance. 2. Ten (10) foot variance to reduce required street setback from 40 feet to 30 feet 8 Per Section 1007.090(2)(d)lb, building setbacks from streets for a collector or arterial street is 40 feet. White Pine Road is a classified as a minor collector road and 40 foot building setbacks are required along collector roads. On a local street, the building setback is 30 feet. The reason for the 40 foot setback is that a collector road is intended to carry more traffic and may require wider paved roadway surface. The increased setback provides more separation from the house and the more intense, higher traffic volume roadway. As discussed earlier, although White Pine Road is classified as a collector road, it functions as a local street in regards to traffic volume and will continue to function as a local street. As noted above, the paved roadway of White Pine Road is off -set approximately 8 feet to the south within the existing right-of-way. This provides at least 8 feet vs. 10 feet of additional separation from the house and paved road surface. Staff also analyzed the front setbacks of the neighboring properties. The houses to the west of the development and the houses on the south side of White Pine Road are setback 30 feet. The property to the east (6201 Laurene Avenue) is the only nearby setback at 40 feet and this is the side of the house on a corner lot. Staff has no concerns regarding the reduced setback to 30 feet. Per Section 1007.018(a), no variance shall be granted unless it meets all the criteria in paragraphs 1. through 7. below. The City shall make findings regarding compliance with these criteria. 1. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The general purpose and intent of the Street Construction Standards ordinance is to establish standards to encourage well planned and efficient streets by establishing standards for design and construction. The reduced right-of-way is harmonious with ordinance intent by continuing to provide well planned and efficient streets. The general purpose and intent of the R-1, Single Family Residential District is to provide a residential atmosphere for those persons desiring a single family neighborhood with a suburban density. The reduced street setback from 40 feet to 30 feet provides for the construction of single family homes in a residential atmosphere. 2. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Both variance requests are consistent with the comprehensive plan. The subject site is guided for low density residential development and the proposed 6 lot residential development is consistent in regards to land use and density. 9 3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. There are practical difficulties in dedicating a full 40 feet of right-of-way and requiring a 40 foot street setback. The stormwater in this development is being managed through an infiltration basin and pond in the rear yards resulting in drainage and utility easements varying in width from 25 feet to 70 feet. Standards rear yards easements are 10 feet. All of the lots meet area and width requirements but the wider easements reduce the buildable rear yards. By not requiring the additional 7 feet of right-of-way and allowing the 10 foot street setback variance, the rear yards gain an additional 17 feet. 4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and was not created by the landowner. The developer is proposing to subdivide an existing lot of record platted in 1949. 5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The adjacent properties are residential houses. The White Pine Road right-of-way west of the subject site to Baldwin Lake Road is only 60 feet and this area is fully developed. The front setbacks in the area (with the exception of 6201 Laurene Avenue) are 30 feet. 6. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. Single family detached homes are allowed as Permitted Uses in the R-1, Single Family Residential District. 7. In accordance with MN Stat. 462.357, Subp. 6, variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in MN Stat. 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with the zoning ordinance. Not applicable. FINDINGS OF FACT -FINAL PLAT The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board 10 recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: 1. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. Some of the lot widths and areas have been revised from the preliminary plat but they all meet the R-1, Single Family Residential District requirements. The final plat substantially conforms with the preliminary plat. 2. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and This is a 6 lot single family residential subdivision and will be platted in one (1) phase. 3. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. The conditions of the preliminary plat have been fulfilled. Securities will be required with a Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variances and final plat for Chavez Preserve subject to the following conditions: 1. All comments from City Engineer letter dated June 9, 2017 shall be addressed. 2. A Development Agreement shall be drafted by the City, executed by the City and the developer and recorded by the developer. a. The Development Agreement shall include a $300 Tree Preservation Mitigation fine. 3. A Building Permit for demolition shall be required prior to removal of either of the accessory structures. 4. Sheet PP1, Preliminary Plat a. The tree inventory chart shall be revised to note that tree #4022 was accidently removed and 1 new tree is required for mitigation. b. The tree inventory chart shall be revised to show that tree #4047 was not removed. 5. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan a. The Plan shall be revised to include one (1) new tree on Lot 1 required for tree mitigation. b. The Plan shall be revised to include one (1) more open space shrub. c. The boulevard trees shall be located 10 feet back of curb and out of the front yard swales. 11 ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. City Engineer Letter dated June 9, 2017 4. Revised Preliminary Plat 5. Exhibit of Plan Revisions dated May 26, 2017 6. Final Plat 12 ICU BIRCH STL 1- I LU BALDWIN LAKE OHWL 883.1 100 -yr 886.1 FIRM BFE 887 FIS BFE 887 Chavez Preserve CHERRY-LN APPLE LN PLUM -LN [w a w Z Lu J LINDA AVE WHITE PINE RD l$iiiiiiiiuuuu. I I MIN ■■8O•■ LINDA CT '� iil ■ 1 \N c� Z c 1 NAN 94 I. RROWHEAD DR /1„1 1 1 1 1 n_ WTHORN RpJ 0, ■� ■ at LINDEN J COY°t ar U� Z w J LN 111114 J J 0 s 62ND ST CITY OF IN ; KE Site Location Map N s E 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Aerial Map -100' Scale Chavez Property WSB Building a legacy— your legacy. Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer Katy Thompson PE, WSB & Associates Date: June 9, 2017 Re: Chavez Preserve Plan Review WSB Project No. 2988-280 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the plans submitted on May 24, 2017 for Chavez Preserve, Lino Lakes, MN prepared by Plowe Engineering Inc. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. The plans and specification shall reference the City's 2016 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction, the 2013 CEAM, and the 2016 MnDOT Standard Specifications. GRADING, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 1. Show location for temporary/permanent erosion control measures on the plan sheets as well as estimated quantities. Seven day stabilization requirement (temp/perm). Add inlet protection to the existing CP on the east bound side of White Pine Road south of lots 5 and 6 2. Add perimeter control along north side of site where drains away. Completed 3. Show location for construction entrance. Completed 4. Show location for stockpiles and the appropriate BMP measures for stockpile management. Stockpile location is shown on lot 2 i. Temporarily stabiles soil in the stockpile and install bio log around the toe of the stockpile 5. Provide SWPPP contact/manager (contractor) as part of a SWPPP amendment. PP was provided with the 04/21/2017 submittal 6. Provide appropriate certification requirements for SWPPP developer. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02988-280\Admin\Docs\Plan Review - Preliminary Plat Ms. Katie Larsen June 9, 2017 Page 2 Adam Ginkel's certification requirement were provided prior to his certificate expiration date of May 31, 2017 7. The Existing Spot Elevation reads "datum???" on the legends of Sheets Cl and C3 please state the vertical or assumed datum. Completed, Vertical datum used is NAVD 29 8. Sheet C 1 — all proposed basins require normal water level elevations be shown. Add NWL elevation to Basin Add Bottom and 500 -Year HWL elevations to Basin 2 9. Sheet Cl "Basin 1 Overflow" should read "Basin 1 EOF" to be consistent with the plans and modeling results. C o[npleleu STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. The City will not approve stormwater management facilities located in the front yard; please relocate to the rear yards. Additional rate control could be obtained by constructing a third basin in the rear yards or by expanding the capacity of Basin 1 and/or 2. 2. Please install culverts between basins Sl, S2, S3, and S4. In the event of poor infiltration in one or more basin the water between the basins will equalize. In the event of no infiltration, a secondary outlet can be installed to the catch basin located in basin S4 at 900.0 feet to control all four basin's water levels. 3. Emergency overflows for Basins 1 and 2 discharge directly off site. The proposed project project site or the frontage road. Basin 2 EOF's to Basin 1 and Basin 1 EOF's to Baldwin Lake. No discharge is observed in the 500 -year model event. 4. Verify building freeboard requirements are being met: Low floor must be a minimum of 2 feet above the 100 -year high water elevation and 4 feet above the highest known groundwater elevation. i. All lots do not meet 2 foot freeboard requirement with basins Sl, S2, S3, and S4. Low entry/opening must be a minimum of 1 foot higher than the EOF. i. All lots do not beet 1 foot freeboard requirement with basins S 1, S2, S3, and S4. 5. Lots 1 and 2 have inconsistent floor elevations compared to Sheet Cl please verify. Completed, Low floor and low opening for both lots I and 2 are 900.6 on both sheet Cl and C3.2 K:\02988-280Admin \Docel,Plan Review- Preliminary Plat Ms. Katie Larsen June 9, 2017 Page 3 6. A vegetated 10 ft bench with a 10H:1 V slope should be incorporated into all ponds at the transition area between the NWL and HWL. ompleted 7. Please indicate maintenance access points for all ponds on the plans. Provide maintenance access points for Basin 1 8. Please provide the 100 -year 10 -day model runoff results. 100 -year results area provided, 10 -day results are not 9. Verify drainage area boundaries White Pine Road has curb and gutter and should not be entering onto the project site. �011lp1eieu 10. The MPCA recommends a dead storage depth of at least 4 feet for NURP ponds; Basin 1 has a depth of 0.4 ft and Basin 2 has a depth of 2 ft, these ponds may not provide adequate pollutant removals and should be verified with a water quality model or designed to NURP standards. Completed 11. Wet basins do not provide infiltration credit per RCWD rules and given the high groundwater basin benches would ever be achieved. Please include a discussion in the narrative how these rates will be achieved and maintained. Infiltranun c.un. ,«r needed per RCWD Rule C Subsection 2(g) discuss the comment made in the Stormwater Drainage Report "no adverse impacts anticipated" for proposed Subcatchment 11. Comment updated to read "Minor increase in rates for all storm events" i. Both existing and proposed areas are small and produce less than 1.0 cfs discharge in the 100 -year event. The increase in cfs in the 100 -year event is 0.16 cfs. This increase is acceptable to the City. 1. Existing area: 5,903 sf with 0.0% impervious, 100 -yr discharge = 0.56 cfs 2. Proposed area: 5,600 sf with 23.11% impervious, 100 -yr discharge = 0.72 cfs FLOODPLAIN 1. There are no areas of floodplain on the subject property. WETLANDS Rice Creek Watershed District is the LGU to review and approve the wetland delineation. Thus we have not reviewed for the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). K:\02988-280Admin \Docel,Plan Review- Preliminary Plat Ms. Katie Larsen June 9, 2017 Page 4 1. Provided the LGU approves the wetland delineation, there are no proposed wetland impacts. Therefore, no wetland mitigation approval is needed. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. The submittal was reviewed for environmental compliance and no additional comments are offered. TRANSPORTATION 1. The right of way along White Pine Road should be extended to /10 ft as this is classified as a collector street. a. Completed WATER SYSTEM 1. Update `Water Main Notes' note 2 to the following verbiage: Maintain 24 inch minimum vertical clearance between sewer and water main crossings. Maintain 10 foot horizontal clearance between water main and sewer. 2. Revise note for scenario where curb stops fall in driveways to read `Where curb stops fall in driveway, provide Ford Al type casting. 3. Add note to the utility plan to provide insulation over services for Lot 4 and 5 where the swale is located on top of the services. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 1. Add `Sanitary Sewer Notes' note 2 that contractor shall provide X, Y and Z GPS coordinates of wye and service end. 2. Add note to the utility plan to provide insulation over services for Lot 4 and 5 where the swale is located on top of the services. STORM SEWER SYSTEM 1. All storm sewer shall be reinforced concrete pipe. Completed 2. Proposed storm sewer does not meet minimum grade requirements for flushing (3 fps). a. Assuming 11111 Alpe no -w using manning s equation me minimum slope a 1,L incn RCP (n value of 0.012) is 0.38% to achieve 3 fps. i. Increase the slopes on pipes between 1. The outlet control structure (OCS) and CBMH #1 2. CBMH #1 and "Connect to Existing" 3. Proposed storm sewer does not meet minimum cover requirements (2 ft). a. Upstream side of pipe from The OCS and CBMH #1 only has 0.83 ft of cover K:\02988-280Admin \Docel,Plan Review- Preliminary Plat Ms. Katie Larsen June 9, 2017 Page 5 i. INV = 897.60, TC = 899.6, 1 ft pipe, 0.17 ft wall thickness 1. 899.6 — 897.60 — 1.0 — 0.17 = 0.83 ft pipe cover '1. Add `Storm Sewer Notes' note 3 to include the following verbiage: All joints to be wrapped with geotextile fabric (STR 11). a. Completed DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 1. Required with final plat. PERMITS 1. NPDES Construction General Permit 2. Rice Creek Watershed Permit a. Wetland delineation per the WCA b. Wetland buffers, if applicable c. Stormwater and erosion control 3. MDH for Water System 4. MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension 5. DNR Water Appropriation if temporary dewatering is needed. If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or diane.hankee@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us. K:\02988-280\Admin\Does\Plan Review - Preliminary Plat PIN No. 31-31-22-42-0043: Owner: Joyce Hennes Address: 200 White Pine Rd. , PRELIMINARY PLAT, RESOURCE INVENTORY, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY and TREE INVENTORY a REMOVAL -for- ROYAL OAKS REALTY -of- CHAVEZ PRESERVE NORTH VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 31, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 Race Creek BSitt Awe NE Bucher Ave 51 Baldwin Lake Rd Baldwin. Lake SITE ® i 0 Ys Ravens C: I� Ash St Ash St ft 0 a 0 8utho•Ave AT&T ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NO SCALE) Tree Species Codes CT=Cottonwood AR=Aborvitae OAK=Oak PI=Pine Tag# species 4003 AR 4005 AR 4007 AR 4008 AR 4010 AR 4012 AR 4014 AR 4016 AR 4022 OAK 4023 AR 4031 AR 4032 AR 4033 AR 4034 AR 4035 AR 4036 AR 4037 PINE 4038 PINE 4039 MA 4040 CT 4041 PO 4042 OAK 4043 OAK 4044 OAK 4045 OAK 4046 OAK 4047 OAK 4048 PO 4049 BC 4050 OAK 4051 CT MA=Maple PO=Poplar BC=Black Cherry dbh 9 8 6 10 7 10 9 5 12 4 5 4 6 4 3 10 5 3 18 2 12 8 20 20 14 18 10 16 10 30 24 # trunks 4 1 5 1 1 1 1 4 4 6 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 Trees to be removed X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X PROPERTY OWNERS Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. BUILDING SETBACKS R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Setbacks: Front = 30 feet Rear = 30 feet Side = 10 feet house, 5 feet garage GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 120 1 INCH = 30 FEET 895.60 895.65 FNDPINCH • x895.85 4 ............... 90.90 899 I R-1 1+.9. O p I o c Nt 92 E. N - 1 .3 m N N M n N d ••� zc c 77 z 3� aoa 63 (.0 x$97.95 - T 1 ...i- � 144E�34 111 4037 • \ - . ;, IJ.'EXISTING D.R'AINAGE ANDS- / '�///I UTILITY.•EASEMENT , / / �i•••'PROPOSED BASIN 1-II'F LT. 100 YR H WL898.6 loo x899.W: :0H/ ... - I� -7"- 901.18 .L..,10.0. 28 85.50 901.54 LOT STANDARDS Minimum Minimum Minimum lot width = 80 feet (interior), 100 feet (corner) lot depth = 135 feet, 145 feet double frontage lot area = 10,800 square feet buildable land as defined by §1007.001 (2). Minimum Minimum Minimum 896......... lowest opening to be 1.0 foot above EOF. Basement Floor to be 4.0 feet above water table. Basement Floor to be 2.0 feet above HWL. 898 ............................................ x898,39 0••• ........ x900.88 O 0 0 BOTTOM =897,,4' 41) o•5.97.- jt�NTOUR ISA,.• LAC A 5 903.42 SS FNDIP1/2 • C 4046 o0 *4039 0 CO 9 24 902.71 LOT 14040 x 15,845 S.F. 4022 LAC -uILDABLE AREA: 1 •:404210800 sq. ft. O 4043 4044 x903.45 • 0902.92 900.98 •.........[]901,95... 90.90 902. 86 icT 5 1 02 / 5 -=� --PROPOSED DRAINAGE' ••.q AND UTILITY EASEMENTo'•• / x902.70 O1 WCD 1- z zz r ¢ w CN �p W I c 1_I_1 C/1 o> o J 0 LOT 2 14,896 S.F. BUILDABLE AREA: 2 14896 sq. ftrop: 902.3 GND,; 901':48 WTIR=894.4 • O x901.29 4049 4050 ILDSB BLDSB .i 902 n-- 902.32 5 tr iI) 0 O o x O BLDSB--� �J 5 0x 85.50 5 O BLDSB-- O� x901.00 5 Z, 2O moo PIN No. 31-31-22-13-0003 Owner: Virginia K. Mullins Address: 6227 Laurene Ave. •..... m • 4473 900.91 901.15 EXISTING GARAGE (REMOVE) //. /// R-1 rn co 900.34 545.56 .10 CHAVEZ PRESERVE TABLE A LOT AREA SUMMARY 26 -May -17 Block No. Lot No 1 1 2 Total Boundary 3 4 5 6 900.60 901.59 900.84 .900.28 LOT 3 14,530 S.F. 900.06 BUILDABLE AREA: .3 14530 sq. ft. ID 0 • 901.04 II 1 7 900.Ex 160 IQ toz O • cc ;,°. 00 5 LXI5TIN GARAGE (REMOVE) .11101 900.68 I/ ,I x00.38 5 90014' A5 900.58 I u7. N 897.6 N,WL�- • • 1 ` 900.58 >'.. - 4 - -� - • Ii 900.00 LAC i LAC 899.96 ...... ••" LOT 4 15,160 S.F. 900.54 x BUILDABLE AREA: 4 10801 sq. ft. .T01 88,,t 40tz i4016 "800.02 5 O 0 z TOP: 902.26 GND:901.19 ,\ WTR=895.7 5 --BLDSB BLDSB 902.05x .902.11 901.32 901.19 83.44 cs u) 1901.22 902 ........ Gross DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY LOTS = 6 APPROXIMATE PARCEL AREA = 95,124 S.F./2.18 Acres AVERAGE SINGLE FAMILY LOT SIZE = 15,854 S.F. PROPOSED DENSITY = 2.75 LOTS / ACRE Unbuilldabl'e Net Lot Area Sq. Ft. Lot Area Sq. Ft. Lot Area Sq. Ft. 15,845 5,045 10,800 (Above 897.4 contour+ 10' buffer) 14,896 0 14,896 (Above 897.4 contour+ 10' buffer) 14,530 15,160 16,363 18,331 95,125 0 4,359 5,562 6,835 14,530 10,801 10,801 11A96 (Above 897.4 contour+ 10' buffer) (Above NWL + 10' buffer) (Above NWL + 10' buffer) (Above NWL + 10' buffer) Average Lot Size= I 15,854 899.82 94.06 .898.61 0 LAC ----- / LAC .899.00 LAC x898.86 LA .899.21 - 51 OI 1 • x899.73 1900.33` \ 90O 1 BUILDABLE'•QREA: 5 r. 10801 sq. ''Ft. 5 LOT 5 16,363 S.F. A 900.86 • • • • • (V rn rd 10 BLDSB L BLDSB BLDSB �LDSB 901.45 x900. 0 •'..' o PROPOSED DRAINAGE - 1 AND UTILITY EASEMENT �� 10 901.21 87.10 u7 .901.36- 10 x901.30 900.44 94.06 ▪ x900.23 \ , 899.10x `"10'4.56 OHW LAC • S X 952.36 O N PIN No. 17-119-22-14-0008 Owner: City of X Address: Unassigned x901.27 901.10 �• F p�pp ;901.32 PROPOSED BASIN2-PONd''900 /// NWL=897.6 •. 1 HWL=899.3 / r' --- PROPOSED DRAINAGE --r-= r AND UTILITY EASEMENT �__,,\\ i ,•• \ I 897.6 NWL---,\\ x898.46 LA'LAC tLA\ LAC 'w m 10 O O 1n r- 10 x899.25 co b- 0600 LOT 6 18,331 S.F. .898.27 898 BUILDABLE AREA: 6 11496 sq. ft. ---30 FOOT FRONT SETBACK LINE / x899. / BLDSB84TOP: 90--� -0.15-BLDSB---'---BLDSB GND:899.09,„ 0;\ ARD. 0, 10 YY IR=OUV.L" --- -EXISTING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT // O x899.67 i9 : x900.11 0 1 106.31'cs /r / LEGEND DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED CATCH BASIN CURB STOP EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION GUY WIRE HYDRANT POWER POLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WATER VALVE PIEZOMETER BY CARL ANDERSON OVERHEAD WIRES LOT AREA CALCULATION LINE EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL EXISTING CONTOURS BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) x901.23 x901.30 900.78 NDIP41578 901.65 901.75 s , 100 � 900.65-7 FNDIP f Io SHED ...x901.90900.75 1 o e5°._7 14.6 x900.98 5 I gp�99'<901.'4$" / / 902.69 ors Qi cc cct co ()I; x9.01.84 90?.31 • 901.16 x 900.38 vole ,_NOT LOCATED v u (}) OHW OHW ............... .-.OHW OHW 900.88 *'4023 OHW 901.78 OHW 90 .55 OHW S89°40' 46"W :903.81 900.91 TN UHW • l>4901..26, ,• 901.11 m 901.34 OHW A 9001.93 OHW 547.31 OHW 900.98 1000 FOOT SETBACK FROM OHW (SHORELAND DISTRICT) OHN- OHW OHW 900.11 OHW OHW v 900----- 900.50 OHW OHN OHW 900.94 'CL) 100.0=4., 903.50 900.64 0 903.60 L. mt 0 mom• 0 w D 0 c co m 0 Q N J i U) M c (f) rn� .W OS O • • .900.69 • • • • ..x903.87 • • • /2 .42 k x905.0 : x900.7 902.24 .• • :903;1'4'••900.81 900.94 901.37 901.39 PIN No. 31-31-22-13-0038 Owner: Corrine R. Holtzman Address: 6201 Laurene Ave. 900.54 x960.62- O x900.88 x900.87 o 901.78 .901.09 0 0 N 1- .901.0410 900.49 .900.34 900.75 x 900.80 OHW OHW 0i00•88 100.00 900.82 OHW 901.16 901.03 901.36 .901.07 901.40 .901 23 .901.23 .901.50 901.51 FNDIP 901.64 901.00 0) LLI cclo),6 Ctul, A 900.94 LINDA AVE' A 0) A A - OHW OHW 901.55 901.47 900.93 901.71 90.1.32 900.67 PINE 899.92 CBFL 897.22 INV 899.81 BFL A A A - 900.93 -797)3 808 E. G. RUB lir SONS INC • "T"n Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 www.egrud.com PIN No. 31-31-22-31-0054 Owner: Kelley & Lynn Sharkey Address: 174 White Pine Rd. 00 Rir 0 CO 00, 901.31 PIN No. 31-31-22-31-0053 Owner:Robert & CA Anderson Address: 182 White Pine Rd... DRAWN BY: BPN JOB NO: 16136PP DATE: 4/10/17 CHECK BY: DWO SCANNED 1 5/26/17 CITY COMMENTS (5-25-17) BPN 2 .3 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY H 903.27 FND9808 • Owner: Mark & Latirie. Faust Address: 196 White Pine. Rd. EXISTING GARAGE FND9808 NI A LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, ARTHUR E. THOM ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the East 100 feet thereof. 900.66 PIN No. 31-31-22-42-0042/ 'Owner: Daniel & Linda Henkel Address: 212 White Pine..0d. 900.48 901.85 FND1 /4" .. : EXISTING GARAGE1 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the I of the State of Minnesota. M,z4, DANIEL W. OBERMILLER Date: 5/26/17 License No. 25341 PIN 14. 31-31-22-42-0041 Address: 222 White Pine Rd. 900.73 PIN No. 31-31-22-42-0040 Owner: Todd Romocky Address: 234 White Pine Rd. NOTES 901.30 901.5 :9)01.34 900.89 090 .30 Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 5/20/16. Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. See Grading, Utility, Landscape plans by Plowe Engineering these plans. w. z 901.22 R-1 vl rrc OHW which accompany 01 c 171 0! c BENCHMARK 003 co to FNDCIM ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK BOOK: GREEN PAGE: 2 TOP NUT HYDRANT © SW QUADRANT OF COUNTY ROAD J AND MACKUBIN STREET PP1 CHAVEZ PRESERVE GRADING, DRAINGE & ESC PLAN' LINO LAKES, MN TOP BERM=89.3 x894.51 BASIN 1 EOF ELEV=898.9 10 -FT WIDE SODDED TOP BERM=899.3 899.32 895.65 895.60 FNDPIN 896 .. BASIN 1 - INFILTRATION 'BASINS98 BOTTOM=897.4 100 -YEAR HWL=898.6 500 -YEAR HWL=898.9 <899.57 ro x898 39 900••••..... .. BASIN 2 EOF 899.65 10 -FT WIDE SODDED TOP BERM=900.0 0 0 <898.61 BASIN 2 - POND NWL=897.6 100 -YEAR HWL=899.0 0 00 900.32 8$98 897.95 900.28 901.54 <900 8 899.82 899.10x <901.27 ,901.23 901.10 6800941578 901.65 _899 --899-- 900' 900 (STING DRAINAGE AID UTILITY EASEMENT 898 tiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII /177 77 ISTING< I 5' 897 499.. •..- LOT 90 <902.70 901." 5 x 900.8 901.59 901.04 900.68 899 89 x900.00 ---896.6- 7.6- LOT 3 90 :9 899 900.14 4039 899.18 x 899.6 900 <902.44 902.71 89 I �a x900.2 900 20< ;.899.96 *x00.02 8. 21 LOT 5 x898.86 898 899.5-LOT 99 5 LOT 6 99 r C899,P <900.60 901. 900 =01.7 902 Q00.4) 90 r 9 LOW :sL4444300.6 46 •►T •PEN=900.6 403 *) 'a 4044 OP DRO' FT. AR 906.0 a02 LOW FL�900.6 9 1.6 00 900.21 LOW FL=899.1 LOW OPEN=902.3 902.2 00.38 900.54 x <900.78 s 903.42 << FNDIP1 /2 900.98 022 903:. /yy (W.0 TOP\302.53 TOCKPILE LOC. GND:1901.}4,8 ER. W/010WNER) -2.0 FT. 404. 4050 / G A R LOW FL=899.7 LO -W OPEN -9-02.9 05.201 H.P. ,I 904.90 (L. O. *) DROP 1 FT. Ao Ao G A F (L.O. *) DROP 2.5 FT. GAR 904.6 (900.- <899 .73 33 L4W FL=901.4 • / •DEIJ (S. E. W.O:•).. Q00.g) 890 9b w ro O 6 00 <898 27 LOW FL=9001.4 TOP: 902.26 GND: 901.19 WTR=895.7 .L.100.86 03.10 / GAR 903.9 05.20 H.P. 1 SLOPE DRIVEWAY I AS SHOWN (TYP) r (S.E.W.O.) POND MAINTENANCE ACCESS GAR 903.10 903.9 (0 0 <901.00 04.701X DWAY 4.10 H.P. 4016 ... 90904.'( 0 it 0 03.40 901._'0 902.92 902.32904 902.5 90901,5¢ -901.5��� 21 D WAY 6.2% 902 <901.36 0 901 <901.45 90 60 DWAY 5.7% 903.40j <899 84 TOP:900.15 GND: 899.09 WTR=896.2 O 1 ---- EXISTING ▪ UTI TY AND-- 4016 ND- 90200.23 <899.67 906.1 x901.90 9902.69 9099 x901.46'.••• 0D 0)9 >,9'01.84 902.31 .• 901.16 <900.38 0 .<901.52 903.50 900.78 x900.98 0 0 903.60 <900.69 >.<903 87 902.42 <905 003;94 900.94 901.37 901.39 x900.75 902.24x., 900.81 901.78 L - - o- 900.54 - X 6 900.2 <900.88 .900.88 900.49 FNDIP41578 <901.09 0 0 L <901.04 900.82 <900 87 901.16 901.36 <901.07 901.40 <901.23 <901.23 <901.50 901.51 FNDIP 902° ° ' ° 9 02. AMMAN 1 OHW 900.88 <900.34 901.64 .900.80 )8E901.00 H.P. 900.94 �Ij O ) OHW OHW p W OHW 901.55 00.75 901.47 90100© LINDA AVE NW 900.94 //. 0< 0 0 N 0 0) 0 OHW N 0) 0 0 0 A 900.89 0 00 A A - A A A 0 000 A 0 s 0 00 901.22 OHW OHW OHW ly -!- 899.33 900.93 901.30 T/C 902.20 EOF WHITE PINE RD 0.67% (GUT) 901.70 901.71 • 900 9' 902 SWALE W/ DRAINTILE (SEE DETAIL C3.2) LEGEND CO DIRECT FRONT ROOF RUN-OFF TO SIDE YARD SWALES (TYP FOR LOT 2-6) OHW 4 x 920.99 GE wet EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING ELECTRICAL PEDESTAL EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING FLARED -END SECTION EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION NGVD 29 EXISTING FENCE DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE NO WETLANDS PRESENT A 928 930 PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED DRAIN TILE & CLEAN-OUT PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED FLARED -END SECTION PROPOSED CONTOUR -0-0- PROPOSED SILT FENCE (DETAIL GEN -16) PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED RIP -RAP (DETAIL STR-7) 4.0% PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION (DETAIL GEN -19) 90 .60 0.46% /c (GUT) 901.80 EOF 9CL; 37 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 0.50% 901.20 EOF 900 67 899x92. CBFL •897.22 0.52% (GUT) 89 81 CB 7 901 3 900 66 903.27 902..70 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (GUTTERLINE, BITUMINOUS SURFACE, OR GROUND SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) EXISTING GARAGE GENERAL NOTES PROVIDE 10 -FT BOULEVARD IEA BEHIND CURB SLOPED TO WHI E PINE ROAD (MIN. 2%) WHIT PINE RD 1) THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2) CALL "811" FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3) INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INTERRUPTION OF ANY SEWER OR WATER SERVICES TO EXISTING HOMES OR BUSINESSES. 5) STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6) NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7) ALL MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S 2016 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PLATES. 8) SEE SHEETS C4.1 AND C4.2 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. roi EXISTING GARAGE CURB & BITUMINOUS NOTES 900.48 901. 901.20 EOF 4 1) REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF EXISTING STREET MATERIALS AS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION IS CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. 2) SAW -CUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE CURB TO PROVIDE BUTT -JOINT. 3) RESTORE DISTURBED STREET TO EXISTING OR BETTER SECTION. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1) PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED - COORDINATE WITH OWNER) AND PERIMETER SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE. 2) CONTACT MARTY ASLESON, CITY ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR, FOR INSPECTION OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY GRADING. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE GRADING ON AN AREA -BY -AREA BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNSTABILIZED AREAS. ALL EXPOSED SOILS MUST HAVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF GRADING OR INACTIVITY. 4) SEE SHEET C2.1 AND C2.2, STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND SITE SEQUENCING. 5) EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEM TO BE FIELD LOCATED. WELL TO BE ABANDONED PER ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. SEPTIC SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED PER ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. 900 73 EXISTING C&G PROVIDE INLET EDIMENT CONTROL rOR STORM SEWER INLETS THAT WILL REiCEIVE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT LOW FLOOR ELEVATION LOW OPENING ELEVATION RECOMMENDED HOUSE TYPE WO = WALK -OUT LO = LOOK -OUT SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK -OUT (* INDICATES DROPPED GARAGE) FRONT OF GARAGE ELEVATION 901.30 901.5 903.52 901 04-1° FND1P9808 90 34 90 .30 LOW FL= 892.1 LOW OPEN=895.3 LO* DROP 1 FT GAR STREET TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT SURFACE DRAINAGE ............... OHW- Know what's below. Call before you dig. FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION AT 10 -FT PAST BACK OF PAD FINISHED GRADE - 0.5 -FT BELOW LOW FLOOR FOR WALK -OUTS - 0.7 -FT BELOW LOW OPENING FOR FULL BASEMENTS & LOOK -OUTS PROPERTY LINE SUGGESTED GARAGE LOCATION APPROX. DRIVEWAY GRADE DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: A.G. A.G. CHCKD BY: PROJ. NO. 16-1623 ORIGINAL DATE: JULY 11, 2016 REVISION DESCRIPTION 0 o 0 1 CITY COMMENTS 0 a nD II 2 II W LwFZw CL 0 cc CO DATE: 05.26.207 CHAVEZ PRESERVE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA cc w o cc z cc PREPARED FOR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 NORTH (,\A 30 15 1 INCH = 30 FEET C1 CHAVEZ PRESERVE UTILITY PLAN -SANITARY SEWER & WATER LINO LAKES, MN THIS CURB STOP NOT FIELD LOCATED - VER. LOC. 900.98 901.54 T L Ij 11I LOT1 61=#12 OH W OHW OHW OHW LOW FL=900.6 LOW OPEN=900.6 T / LOT 2 JHW OHW OHW OHW 0HW LOT 3 NOTE: WHERE CURB STOP FALLS IN DRIVEWAY, PROVIDE FORD Al TYPE CASTING (TYP) LOW FL=900.6 LOW OPEN=900.6 EXISTING 1" WATER W/HCl RB STOP - TYP. LOW FL=899.1 LOW OPEN=902.3 EXISTING 4" SAN -(NOT FIELD LOC. - TYP. 'T LOT 4 LOW FL=899.7 LOW OPEN=902.9 OH W > 1- X w •oNOT NLOCATED vz OH\ X LL, OH W OHW OHW OH N X w X w F�gy��Y�3 k5hc5v5 x�� - - - \ 1 1- 901.11 Q_ OHW OHW > IAC 901.26 LEGEND Iv WHITE PINE RD 0.67% (GUT) EXIST MH 0.46% RIM 901.7 (GUT) INV 881.2 (NOT FIELD VER) X W OHW X W OH W EXISTING 6" DIP WATER EXISTING 12" PVC SANITARY OH W -----900---- x 920.99 GE x wet EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING ELECTRICAL PEDESTAL EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING FLARED -END SECTION EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION NGVD 29 EXISTING FENCE DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE NO WETLANDS PRESENT >� 0 928 930 4.0% • SOO 0 PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED DRAIN TILE & CLEAN-OUT PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED FLARED -END SECTION PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE (DETAIL GEN -16) PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED RIP -RAP (DETAIL STR-7) PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION (DETAIL GEN -19) 901.7 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (GUTTERLINE, BITUMINOUS SURFACE, OR GROUND SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) EXISTING 0.50% HYDRANT & VALVE (GUT) EXISTING GARAGE GENERAL NOTES OHW r LOT 5 \11 ))III ----� '1/ LOT 6 LOW FL=901.4 LOW OPEN=901.4 A 00.86 ADD 1" CORPORATION TO EXISTING STUB (AS CLOSE TO MAIN AS PRACTICAL) & EXTEND 1" COPPER (TYPE K) - ADD CURB STOP (LOT 5) T v v LOW FL=901.4 LOW OPEN=901.4 ADD CLE OUT AT END OF EXISTING " SANITARY - CUT -IN 8'x4" WYE AND EXTEND " PVC SCH 40 © 2.0% MINv (LOT 5) OH W 1) THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2) CALL "811" FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3) INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INTERRUPTION OF ANY SEWER OR WATER SERVICES TO EXISTING HOMES OR BUSINESSES. 5) STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6) NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7) ALL MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S 2016 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PLATES. 8) SEE SHEETS C4.1 AND C4.2 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. EXISTING 35'- 6" DIP WATERMAIN z >v u OHW OH W 900.50 OH W UH OH W OH W OCD 790 0.78 > > z < W W W 0 900.94 W Q, OH W U H- OHW X OH W L - OHW 901.00 ))OHW 900.11 LAURENE AVE OH W 33 EXIST MH RIM 900.3 INV 880.8 (NOT FIELD VER) EXISTING GARAGE WATER MAIN NOTES ✓ J 900.48 901.5 903.52 TNH 1) EXISTING WATER MAIN LOCATION AND SIZE SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 2) MAINTAIN 24 -INCH MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN SEWER AND WATER MAIN CROSSINGS. MAINTAIN 10 -FOOT HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND SEWER. 3) MAINTAIN MINIMUM 7.5 -FT COVER TO TOP OF ALL WATER MAIN PIPE. SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1) EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 2) CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE X -Y -Z GPS COORDINATES FOR WYES AND SERVICE ENDS. STORM SEWER NOTES 1) FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 2) STORM SEWER PIPES TO BE JOINED TO THE CATCH BASIN MANHOLES W/ APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS TO MAKE THEM GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. CEMENT MORTAR JOINTS ARE PERMITTED ONLY FOR REPAIRS AND CONNECTIONS OF EXISTING LINES CONSTRUCTED WITH SUCH JOINTS. 3) ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS TO BE WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (SEE DETAIL STR-11). EXISTING 45'- 8" PVC © 0.40% 0901.30 LINDA AVE NW EXISTING HYDRANT & VALVE OHW 901.22 OHW Know what's below. CaII before you dig. OHW- DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: A.G. A.G. CHCKD BY: C.W.P. PROJ. NO. 16-1623 ORIGINAL DATE: JULY 11,2016 REVISION DESCRIPTION 1- z w 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 CITY COMMENTS w Q 0 r T T 0 N I w0 < wQ oCOJ - >• - I < a2D~O co cc w Z 1-0<W0 • 0<WO >w2Z0 .= 2a W m z w (� Q }a <w m W W;O Iawu a0 Dcc DATE: 05.26.2017 CHAVEZ PRESERVE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY IIS SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 NORTH (P -NA 0 15 30 1 INCH = 30 FEET C3.1 CHAVEZ PRESERVE UTILITY PLAN -STORM SEWER LINO LAKES, MN 900.98 901.54 r T L Ij II ---- LOT1 / / / / / / / LOW FL=900.6 LOW OPEN=900.6 OHW T L_ - 907 OHW OHW OH OHW-01-VV POND OUTLET STRUCTURE RIM 899.1 -LOW RIM 899.6 -HIGH INV 895.00-N INV 897.60-S BOTTOM 894.50 (SEE DETAIL ON C4.2) LOT 2 LOW FL=900.6 LOW OPEN=900.6 TOP: 902.53 GND:901.48 (* WTR=894.4 OHW OHW OHW OHW UH LOT 3 LOW FL=899.1 LOW OPEN=902.3 -, \ �b� -.\ I I _------ \1\ I 1 -- v 9-&8�---�J 1 11 1 1 _ ../// @ 1.05 LOT 4 LOW FL=899.7 LOW OPEN=902.9 CLEAN-OUT (TYP) TOP: 902.26 GND: 901.19 WTR=895.7 SWALE W/ DRAINTILE ,_NOT LOCATED v 0 LEGEND Ib W OHW OHW OH W WHITE PINE RD OH OH W OHW r LOT 5 LOT 6 A e oo.86 L - W- LOW FL=901.4 LOW OPEN=901.4 OHW OHW LOW FL=901.4 LOW OPEN=901.4 125-12" RCP 0.17% TOP: 900.15 GND: 899.09 WTR=896.2 900.11 -.1 OHW OHW 1;4 901.11 X900 901.71 OHW 0 '4 >g 0 -----900---- -----898----- x 920.99 GEx wet EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING ELECTRICAL PEDESTAL EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING FLARED -END SECTION EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION NGVD 29 EXISTING FENCE DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE NO WETLANDS PRESENT >� 0 928 930 4.0% 0 PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED DRAIN TILE Sc CLEAN-OUT PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED FLARED -END SECTION PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE (DETAIL GEN -16) PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED RIP -RAP (DETAIL STR-7) PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION (DETAIL GEN -19) SWALE 1 FINISHED GROUND=901.5 D.T. INV=900.5 901.7 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (GUTTERLINE, BITUMINOUS SURFACE, OR GROUND SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) SWALE 2 FINISHED GROUND=901.1 D.T. INV=899.6 EXISTING GARAGE GENERAL NOTES OH W 1) THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2) CALL "811" FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3) INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INTERRUPTION OF ANY SEWER OR WATER SERVICES TO EXISTING HOMES OR BUSINESSES. 5) STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6) NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7) ALL MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S 2016 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PLATES. 8) SEE SHEETS C4.1 AND C4.2 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 900.48 SWALE 3 FINISHED GROUND=900. D.T. INV=899.5 EXISTING GARAGE WATER MAIN NOTES CBMH #1 (0=27") RIM 900.8 INV 898.5-6" D.T. INV 897.39-N,S NEENAH R-4341 OHW 0 OH W OHW OCD 901.00 790 0.78 rn 900.94 W �Q, 20-12" RCP © 0.35% CONNECT TO EXISTING (INV 897.32) SWALE 4 FINISHED GROUND=900.0 D.T. INV=898.5 1) EXISTING WATER MAIN LOCATION AND SIZE SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 2) MAINTAIN 24 -INCH MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN SEWER AND WATER MAIN CROSSINGS. MAINTAIN 10 -FOOT HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND SEWER. 3) MAINTAIN MINIMUM 7.5 -FT COVER TO TOP OF ALL WATER MAIN PIPE. SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1) EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 2) CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE X -Y -Z GPS COORDINATES FOR WYES AND SERVICE ENDS. STORM SEWER NOTES 1) FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 2) STORM SEWER PIPES TO BE JOINED TO THE CATCH BASIN MANHOLES W/ APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS TO MAKE THEM GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. CEMENT MORTAR JOINTS ARE PERMITTED ONLY FOR REPAIRS AND CONNECTIONS OF EXISTING LINES CONSTRUCTED WITH SUCH JOINTS. 3) ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS TO BE WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (SEE DETAIL STR-11). OHW OHW OH W L OHW // OHW LAURENE AVE OH W 901.5T� 903.52 TNH FINISHED GROUND ,,AAAA,;,/;;,?!,A. (0 co DRAINTILE INV. `O 2' MIN. 901.30 TOPSOIL/ON-SITE GRANULAR MIX (MIN. 70% SAND) #57 STONE (AROUND AND ABOVE PIPE) 6" PERFORATED DRAINTILE (NO SOCK) NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (MnDOT TYPE 1) OVER AGGREGATE NOTE: USE SOLID PVC PIPE (NO WRAP AND FABRIC) WHEN DRAINTILE IS OUTSIDE OF TOPSOIL/ON-SITE GRANULAR MIX = TOPSOIL/ON-SITE GRANULAR MIX SWALE W/ DRAINTILE N.T.S. LINDA AVE NW OHW 901.22 OHW Know what's below. CaII before you dig. OHW- DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: A.G. A.G. CHCKD BY: C.W.P. PROJ. NO. 16-1623 ORIGINAL DATE: JULY 11,2016 REVISION DESCRIPTION 1- z w 2 2 0 O O 0 O 1 CITY COMMENTS w 0 w0 < wQ OCOJ - >• - I < a2D~O =WQoW I-0CE W < C >w2Zw E>_ zQ W mzwt7) (� <-1 }�zZ2 W W;O Iawu a0 Dcc DATE: 05.26.207 CHAVEZ PRESERVE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY IIS SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 NORTH (,\A 0 15 30 iiiii 1 INCH = 30 FEET C3.2 CHAVEZ PRESERVE LANDSCAPE PLAN LINO LAKES, MN > 900.98 (*) INFILTRATION BASIN RESTORATION SEE INFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL FOR RESTORATION OF INFILTRATION BASIN - PROVIDE MNDOT SEED MIX #35-641 FOR SHADED AREA POND RESTORATION PROVIDE MNDOT SEED MIX #33-261 FROM NORMAL WATER LEVEL (NLW) TO HIGH WATER LEVEL (HWL) & MNDOT SEED MIX #35-641 FOR REMAINDER OF SHADED AREA // EXISTING GARAGE 901.54 899.82 /f/ 7 i%///. �M%%%i%iii/%% iredigr,e' tor eAve, ffOr Ake AWfAl 14I40 -898- 8-94-- 896T6- 8-95- `_ --8-9 T\ — — — — -9-5— OHW -5— OHW OHW NOT LOCATED L- OHW wrr OHW OHW LEGEND WHITE PINE RD 0.67% (GUT) OHW OH W OHW 1><1901 26 901 O) OH W OHW OHW- — 90(} V 90-1 OH OHW OHW J OHW -L 900.50 OHW OHW u OHW OH W 900.94 (±) OHW OHW OHW 900.78 0-0 OHW // OHW A A LAURENE AVE J_ 900.89 OHW • 0 DENOTES APPROX. LOCATION OF PROPOSED BOULEVARD TREE DENOTES APPROX. LOCATION OF PROPOSED OPEN SPACE TREE DENOTES APPROX. LOCATION OF PROPOSED LARGE SHRUB DENOTES OPEN AREA LANDSCAPE NOTES 1) TREES ARE TO BE 2" AT 4' BH WITH 1 YEAR GUARANTY 2) TREES ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY'S TREE ORDINANCE BOULEVARD TREES BOULEVARD TREES REQUIRED: 1 TREE PER LOT 2 TREES PER CORNER LOT SPACE REQUIREMENTS: LARGE TREES - 1 PER/2000 SF LARGE SHRUBS - 3 PER/2000 SF COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SYMBOL GAUTUMN QUANTITY SEE NOTES SIZE 2" CAL. ROOT TYPE B&B SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' (male only) FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum "Balista" NORTHWOOD MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Northwood' HACKBERRY Caltis accidentalis BUR OAK Quercus macrocarpa NORTHERN RED OAK Quercus rubra AMERICAN LINDEN Tilia Americana RIVER BIRCH Betula Nigra RED SUNSET MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Franksred' 6 PROPOSED BOULEVARD TREES SHOWN NOTES: 1) EXAMPLE SPECIES SHOWN — VERIFY SPECIES REQUIREMENTS WITH CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS 2) VERIFY TREE LOCATIONS WITHIN BOULEVARD WITH CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS 3) NO MORE THAN 30% OF BOULEVARD TREES CAN BE OF ONE SPECIES 900.48 901.5 903.52 TNH OPEN AREA LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS: LARGE TREES - 1 PER/2000 SF LARGE SHRUBS - 3 PER/2000 SF SYMBOL SWAMP WHITE OAK SQUARE FOOTAGE LARGE TREES REQUIRED LARGE SHRUBS REQUIRED AREA SEE NOTE #4 REGARDING TREES IN NATIVE SEED AREAS 19,820 9.9 29.7 SIZE 36" HT. TOTAL 10 30 OPEN AREA - TREES COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SYMBOL SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor BUR OAK • QUANTITY SEE NOTES SIZE 2" CAL. ROOT TYPE B&B Quercus macrocarpa SEE NOTE #4 REGARDING TREES IN NATIVE SEED AREAS 10 PROPOSED OPEN AREA TREES OPEN AREA - SHRUBS SYMBOL QUANTITY 0 SEE NOTES ROOT TYPE POT SIZE #5 NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM Viburnum lentago SIZE #5 CARDINAL DOGWOOD Carnus sericea 'Cardinal' SIZE 36" HT. BLACK CHOKECHERRY Aronia melanocarpa elata 30 PROPOSED OPEN AREA SHRUBS SHOWN NOTES: 1) EXAMPLE SPECIES SHOWN — VERIFY SPECIES REQUIREMENTS WITH CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS 2) VERIFY TREE AND SHRUB LOCATIONS WITHIN OPEN AREAS WITH CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS 3) NO MORE THAN 30% OF OPEN AREA TREES OR SHRUBS CAN BE OF ONE SPECIES 4) TREES PLANTED IN NATIVE SEED AREAS MUST BE FIRE TOLERANT 5) NATIVE SEED AREAS MUST BE APPLIED BY A CONTRACTOR KNOWLEDGEABLE IN THE CULTURAL PRACTICES OF NATIVE PLANTS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. 90 30 OHW 901.22 OHW Know what's below. CaII before you dig. OHW DRAWN BY: A.G. DESIGN BY: A.G. CHCKD BY: C.W.P. PROJ. NO. 16-1623 ORIGINAL DATE: JULY 11,2016 REVISION DESCRIPTION 1— Z w 2 0 O 1 CITY COMMENTS w 0 N r T CHAVEZ PRESERVE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED FOR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOW E ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 NORTH (,\A 0 15 30 1 INCH = 30 FEET L1 1 L i L L i i L I 1 J / ▪ 0 O O M�J 5 zw U (/) < OJO LAil w = 0 l� w z o :i �•Ic w� Q \ 5 90.90 DRAINAGE AND / UTILITY EASEMENT / o O / O 0 CO I CO 0 1 CO 1 L 0 0 90.90 T 5 O z 5 5 N N 5 85.50 In N N89°44'13"E 55.00 5 L 0 O z L _J 1f� 85.50 5 G� N ro r I 1 A H /_\ I I � KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Royal Oaks Realty, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, owner of the following described property: That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, ARTHUR E. THOM ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the East 100 feet thereof. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as CHAVEZ PRESERVE and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Royal Oaks Realty, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 . Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. Marcel Eibensteiner, President STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by Marcel Eibensteiner, President of Royal Oaks Realty, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires N89°44' 13"E 545.56 83.44 5 co 5 5 3 BLOCK�o 83.44 589°40'46"W A 645.47 MEAS. (645.57 PLAT) 5 0 5 87.10 10 10 DRAINAGE AND----=__-- UTILITY EASEMENT 4 1 5 rn 5 1n 87.10 547.31 1n CHAVEZ PRESERVE 647.31 MEAS. (647.14 PLAT) I Daniel W. Obermiller do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 Daniel W. Obermiller, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 25341 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by Daniel W. Obermiller. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires , 1111 r ----NORTH LINE OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, // ARTHUR E. THOM ACRES 5 O 5 0 N \ r 94.06 0 5 L J in I0 94.06 10 10 uJ O• ) N o) "Lc) r6 0 (.n 10 -r r I 1- - I L- r I I L L - rs h- r-. I 1 L/ r- F- L- 1-� 10 104.56 0 1 L 0 6 106.31 -----SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ARTHUR E. THOM ACRES /\ 4 r I I L '4 r' A r� / \ 1 1 -� L/ CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA r- 1-- 1 L- Is 1 This plat of CHAVEZ PRESERVE was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA By Mayor By Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 . Larry D. Hoium Anoka County Surveyor 0 1 J 10 • 10 100.00 SO °40'21 "E 10 w Y (Y wLL_Q oma 0 0 W N121 I- LLJ<Li 0 z w 12 I - (n= �w0Q 100.0 ro r- 100.0- 100.00 COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER O O d O 1 I LJJ I , 1 L 1 J L1- Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of , 20 Property Tax Administrator By , Deputy COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of CHAVEZ PRESERVE was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of , 20 . at o'clock .M. and was duly recorded in Book Page as Document Number County Recorder/Registrar of Titles By , Deputy City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Sec. 31, T31, R22 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 120 ( SCALE IN FEET 1 inch = 30 feet LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET, MARKED RLS NO. 25341 DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT (647.14 PLAT) DENOTES DIMENSION FROM PLAT OF ARTHUR E. THOM ACRES For the purposes of this plat, the South line of Lot 1, Block 1, ARTHUR E. THOM ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesota is assumed to have a bearing of South 89 degrees 40 minutes 46 seconds West. E.G. RUQ & SONS, INC. "''"n Professional Land Surveyors PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 5E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner Joe Widing, Community Development Intern P & Z MEETING DATE: June 14, 2017 REQUEST: NorthPointe 6th Addition Final Plat CASE NUMBER: FP2017-006 APPLICANT: Eternity Homes LLC Attn: John Anderson 425 3rd St. Farmington, MN 55024 OWNER: REVIEW DEADLINE: Tony Emmerich Construction, Inc. Attn: Larry Olson 4920 173th Avenue NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 Complete Application Date: May 12, 2017 60 -Day Review Deadline: July 7, 2017 120 -Day Review Deadline: September 9, 2017 Environmental Board Meeting: NA Park Board Meeting: NA Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: June 14, 2017 Tentative City Council Work Session: June 26, 2017 Tentative City Council Meeting: June 26, 2017 & July 10, 2017 BACKGROUND NorthPointe is a PUD residential subdivision located northeast of the intersection of Birch Street and 20th Avenue South/CSAH 54. The preliminary plat is 94.09 gross acres and consists of a residential density mix of single family lots and an 88 unit senior multi- family residence. The following is a breakdown of unit development: 216 Single Family Units (215 new lots + 1 existing home) 11 Future Single Family Units (future development of existing home) 1 88 unit multi -family 315 TOTAL UNITS The applicant, Eternity Homes LLC, has submitted a land use application for final plat of NorthPointe 6th Addition. Eternity Homes LLC is purchasing from Tony Emmerich Construction, Inc. Outlot D, NorthPointe 5th Addition and is constructing 15 single family homes on the 50 foot wide lots. This plan review is based on the NorthPointe 6th Addition Street and Utility Plan Set and final plat dated May 12, 2017 and prepared by Carlson McCain. Previous Council Actions: March 10, 2014: NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, Resolution No. 14-21 June 23, 2014: NorthPointe PUD Final Plan -Final Plat, Resolution No. 14-47 September 22, 2014: NorthPointe 2nd Addition Final Plat, Resolution No. 14-105 August 24, 2015: NorthPointe 3rd Addition Final Plat, Resolution No. 15-86 July 11, 2016: NorthPointe 4th Addition Final Plat, Resolution No. 16-64 April 24, 2017: NorthPointe 5th Addition Final Plat, Resolution No. 17-34 ANALYSIS Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The final plat has been reviewed for compliance with the comprehensive plan, zoning and subdivision ordinance. The proposed development is not considered premature and meets the performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance. The final plat is consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Final Plan. Per the phasing plan dated July 28, 2016, Phase VI has 19 lots. The proposed plat is for 15. The phasing plan for NorthPointe shall be revised accordingly. Phases NorthPointe has been developed in the following phases: Phase # Lots 1 21 2 40 2 TOTAL SF Lots in NP = 215 3 41 4 31 5 39 6 15 7 TBD 8 TBD TOTAL AIL 187 TOTAL SF Lots in NP = 215 - # Lots Platted to Date = 187 # Lots Remaining = 28 'The # Lots Remaining does not include the potential 88 unit multi -family senior complex proposed in the southeast corner of the development. Blocks and Lots The final plat for NorthPointe 6th Addition creates 15 lots and 0 outlots. Streets The following right-of-way and street width was approved with Resolution No. 14-21, PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat: Street Name Right -of -Way Width Street Width (Back to Back) Redwood Avenue 50 feet 28 feet No sidewalk is required along Redwood Avenue. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements are provided on all lot lines. 3 There will be a temporary cul-de-sac easement lying over, under and across the East 90 feet of the West 180 feet of the South 75 feet of Lot 1, Block 5, NorthPointe at the end of Redwood Avenue. The applicant is requesting all of the drainage and utility easements, as created and dedicated over, under and across Outlot D, in the plat of NorthPointe 5th Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota be vacated. This easement will be re -dedicated on the plat of NorthPointe 6th Addition. The City Council approved similar easement vacations throughout the development of NorthPointe. The City Council will hold the public hearings for the vacation. Public Land Dedication and Fees The City will require a combination of land dedication and cash in lieu of land for the entire NorthPointe development. Outlot D, NorthPointe 4th Addition was dedicated to the City for parkland in 2016. NorthPointe 6th Addition Total #of Lots = 15 x 2017 Park Dedication fee $2,575 = Total Due for NP 6th $38,625 The Park Board has been working with WSB to create a master plan for the park and anticipates starting construction in summer 2017. The City will construct the trails in conjunction with the park development. Zoning NorthPointe 6th Addition is zoned PUD -Planned Unit Development as approved by the City Council with Ordinance No. 02-14. Comprehensive Plan The final plat is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of the Resource Management System, Land Use Plan, Housing Plan, and Transportation Plan. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) The project site is within the 2005 I -35E Corridor AUAR and is subject to the AUAR mitigation plan. The NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat is consistent with development Scenario 1 for residential medium density and complies with the mitigation plan in regards to wetlands, water use, erosion and sedimentation, surface water runoff, wastewater and transportation. The final plat for NorthPointe 6th Addition is also consistent with these plans. 4 Floodplain The applicant received a FEMA Letter of Map Revision effective December 21, 2016. There are no floodplain impacts. Development Agreement A Development Agreement shall be drafted by the City, executed by the City and the developer and recorded by the developer. Title Commitment The City Attorney has been provided the title commitment and final plat for review and comment. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A Maintenance Agreement for Stormwater Management Facilities was approved by the City Council on August 11, 2014 with Resolution No. 14-87 for the entire NorthPointe development. Environmental The Environmental Coordinator reviewed the plans and has no issues. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the NorthPointe 6th Addition final plat subject to the following conditions: 1. All comments from City Engineer letter dated June 9, 2017 shall be addressed. 2. Any comments from the City Attorney regarding the title commitment and final plat shall be addressed. 3. A Development Agreement shall be drafted by the City, executed by the City and the developer and recorded by the developer. 4. The Phasing Plan shall be revised and submitted to reflect changes from the original plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location Map 2. City Engineer letter dated June 9, 2017 3. Final Plat, NorthPointe 6th Addition 5 POSve 1 11 111111111111 Aram—aai"rc � �IuI !' IiII .nlp,� p,_ IIIIII� 1 nniI k t j 111111■ Iliinere„. AliiMaEll EIBEIVW ' gom mall -'7,P ii• Cenkn4He Lake l._! __b "�„lrr Lak� rormatilllE ■1ji1■11111111 Ilar j" • 2 WAIM1111111F,,,e CITY,,; U IINOLNKES T Site Location Map N s 0 1,250 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 Feet WSB Building a legacy— your legacy. Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Ed Youngquist, WSB Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer Date: June 9, 2017 Re: North Pointe 6th Addition Plan Review WSB Project No. 10153-000 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the Final Plat documents dated May 10, 2017 for the North Pointe 6th Addition development in Lino Lakes, MN prepared by Carlson McCain. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. All plans, specifications, and construction activities shall reference the latest version of the City General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction dated November 2016, the 2013 CEAM, and the 2016 MnDOT Standard Specifications. Engineering Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control The North Pointe 6th Addition development proposes an additional 15 new single-family lots by extending the street and utilities down Redwood Avenue. Erosion control measures include rock construction entrances at the ends of the existing streets and silt fence around the perimeter of the disturbed area. Comments: 1. Verify that all erosion control BMP's are in place and are properly maintained; including perimeter control (silt fence) and inlet protection at all adjacent storm sewer structures prior to beginning construction. 2. Provide construction entrances at all access points. 3. Show location for temporary/permanent erosion control measures and the estimated quantities for all BMPs. 4. Note the seven day stabilization requirement (temp/perm). 5. Show locations for stockpiles and BMP measures for stockpile management. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com S:\Community Development\Pr jects\Planning CasesWorthPointe\6th Addition -Final Plat and D&U Vacate\Staff Reports \20170614 PZ\a2 city engineer Ietter.docx Ms. Katie Larsen June 9, 2017 Page 2 6. Denote the inspection process/schedule for SWPPP activities as well as the person(s) to ensure the inspections and maintenance activities are being performed. 7. Previously submitted Northpointe grading plan has been approved. Stormwater Management The proposed stormwater management for the North Pointe 6th Addition development consists of; extensions of the existing storm sewer system from the 4th Addition along the rear yards of Lots 1-7 to capture Block 2 rear yard drainage; and extension of the existing storm sewer from the 2nd Addition to capture front yard and street drainage; and existing storm sewer from the 2nd Addition will capture Block 1 rear yard drainage. The runoff is treated in Pond 500 located within Outlot C. Comments: 1. Minimum diameter storm pipe size is 15". Revise pipe size between CB 119 and CBMH 118, and between CB 111 and CBMH 110. Water Supply The North Pointe 6th Addition development is proposed to be served by municipal water. An 8 inch diameter watermain will be extended from the intersection of Dogwood Street and Redwood Avenue along with 1 inch diameter copper service lines to proposed lots. Sanitary Sewer The North Pointe 6th Addition development is proposed to be served by municipal sanitary sewer. An 8 inch diameter PVC sanitary sewer will be extended from the intersection of Dogwood Street and Redwood Avenue along with 4 inch diameter service lines to proposed lots. Comments: 1. Revise SAN -8 detail reference "See details on Sheet 14 ..." Transportation The North Pointe 6th Addition development proposes the construction of a 28 foot wide road (Redwood Avenue) from Dogwood Street north, to a temporary cul de sac. The total length of the road is approximately 400 liner feet. Comments: 1. The temporary cul de sac shall be enlarged to meet the minimum 46 feet City size requirement to allow for access of emergency vehicles, garbage trucks, etc. S:\Community Development \Pr jects\Planning Cases \NorthPointe\6th Addition -Final Plat and D&U Vacate\Staff Reports \20170614 PZ \a2 city engineer Ietter.dc Ms. Katie Larsen June 9, 2017 Page 3 2. The temporary cul de sac shall be moved to the north to allow for return radius' at the street connections. Cul de sac must be contained within the dedicated right of way or temporary easement. 3. No Parking signs along the west side of Redwood Avenue will be installed by the City post construction. 4. A temporary sign stating "This road will extend in the future" shall be place at the north end of the temporary cul de sac. Floodplain Floodplain is not present on the North Pointe 6th Addition development site. Wetlands and Mitigation Plan Based on information provided, wetlands are not present on the North Pointe 6th Addition development site. Drainage and Utility Easements The North Pointe 6th Addition development appears to have all utilities within the current or proposed drainage and utility easements. Development Agreement The North Pointe 6th Addition development will require a Development Agreement. Grading Agreement A grading agreement is not applicable at this time. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement for the overall site was recorded with the 1st Addition of the NorthPointe Permits Required The following permits may at minimum be required as part of the development construction. Comments: The following permits may at minimum be required as part of the development construction. 1. NPDES Construction General Permit 2. Rice Creek Watershed Permit a. Stormwater and Erosion Control. 3. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Grading S:\Community Development \Pr jects\Planning Cases \NorthPointe\6th Addition -Final Plat and D&U Vacate\Staff Reports \20170614 PZ \a2 city engineer Ietter.dc Ms. Katie Larsen June 9, 2017 Page 4 4. MDH for Water System Extension 5. MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or diane.hankee@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us. S:\Community Development \Pr jects\Planning Cases \NorthPointe\6th Addition -Final Plat and D&U Vacate\Staff Reports \20170614 PZ\a2 city engineer Ietter.dc N cc 0 0 0 z � 61 6 110.00 I 1 0 0 L—-- --- --J o f S89° 46'03"W 0 1 110.00 • o di in \ o '--Drainage & Utility Easement--, O 2 Tr_j0 \I I 1_- Ln )Irl l i) 1 1\ N ISI , r 1 1 I \I `J L11J 110.00 • 6 1 i S89 °46' 03"W I I 3 i6 L--- — 110.00 -- --J • 1 o 64 o1o6 S89°46'03"W F— — — — — — — — — 7 o I I 110.00 •1 01 S89°46'03"W I I 5 to I I 110.00 • S89°46'03"W co co N 6 ----- 111.68 I / F) I-1 � \ I r71 ��� � L_ N89°46'03"E 304.18 25.00 25 44 pr) 1- rs- N REDWOOD 25 NO0°18'29"W 25.00 25 25 0 0Ico 0 Iv Nilo 25 - • Gi (n Carlson McCain ENVIRONMENTAL o ENGINEERING o SURVEYING c ,lam \ -\\\,-.\\ \ CI \) \ ,----C, h\iN \ORTHPOI\TE 6TH ADDITIO\ North line of Outlot D, NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION 0 0 6 co r L 144.18 1 119.18 25 0 0 6 0 0 0 N89°46'03"E 2 119.18 0 0 0 10 0 10 /11 IT1 /1T L/U I L_ U I N89°46'03"E LJ 3 144.18 ID a 0 0 0 0 6 1n 0 0 o 10 2 N89°46'03"E 4 144.18 • • ° N cv,„5 2 25 2501 0'f5 p11268 Q5 5 „ R 22°32 32 W C 6 0 0 0 10 L N89°46'03"E • r I X41.49 5 144.18 N89°46'03"E 0 0 co 0 w 0 0 0 0) 6 A nr,lTII v_J —\iJ — L— • • i N_7 8_110' 23—E /1 � I 0) d -NI 7 ONI O I II /\=02°46'20"` 35.96 - — 0905842„ 118• T1 \1.._ I i -r I r I� C, 1 „----)r\„ II y I I n �I I -r1 I -\IJ 25 25 51 0 ooh 0) cn 0 • DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: (NOT TO SCALE) 1 -1-T- 1 I I 5 I I m being 5 feet in width, and adjoining side lot lines, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise shown on this plat. Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch rebar set or to be 0 set within one year of recording of this plat and marked with license number 40361 • Denotes Found Iron Monument, marked with license number 40361 unless otherwise noted For the purposes of this plat, the North line of Outlot D, NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION is assumed to have a bearing of North 89 degrees 46 minutes 03 seconds East. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 (SCALE IN FEET) 1 INCH = 30 FEET CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 25, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Eternity Homes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Outlot D, NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as NORTHPOINTE 6TH ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Eternity Homes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of . 20 ETERNITY HOMES, LLC Patrick Flynn, President STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on by Patrick Flynn as President of Eternity Homes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, My commission expires I Thomas R. Balluff do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 Thomas R. Balluff, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 40361 STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on by Thomas R. Balluff. Notary Public, My commission expires CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA This plat of NORTHPOINTE 6TH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA By: , Mayor By: , Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of 20 B y: Larry D. Hoium Anoka County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of 20 Property Tax Administrator By , Deputy COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES County of Anoka, State of Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of NORTHPOINTE 6TH ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of , 20 , at o'clock .M. and was duly recorded in Book Page , as Document Number County Recorder/Registrar of Titles By , Deputy PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director P & Z MEETING DATE: June 14, 2017 REQUEST: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Discussion CASE NUMBER: NA APPLICANTS: City REVIEW SCHEDULE: NA BACKGROUND Minn. Stat. 473.145 requires the Metropolitan Council (Met Council) to adopt a comprehensive development guide for the metropolitan area. Minn. Stat. 473.175 requires the Met Council to review local government comprehensive plans to determine compatibility with this regional development guide. These plans are developed and updated every 10 years. Our 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update process kicked off at a joint Council/board meeting on May 15, 2017. Representatives from Landform, the City's planning consultant, will be present at the meeting to review the work session results and discuss big picture issues for the update. A public open house is scheduled for Thursday, June 22, 2017. RECOMMENDATION Discussion item only. ATTACHMENTS 1. Landform Cover Memo 2. May 15, 2017 Council/board Work Session Summary Notes 1 2040 CAMP PLAN Date: June 7, 2017 for June 14, 2017 Meeting To: Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board From: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform Professional Services Subject: Comprehensive Plan Update Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update On June 14, the Planning & Zoning Board will have its first work session on the Comprehensive Plan Update. The purpose of this meeting is to identify and discuss big -picture issues for the update. Board members participated in the May 15 Kick -Off session with the City Council and other city board members. The notes from that meeting are attached. The Community Survey is also underway. We may have some preliminary results from the survey to share at the June 14 meeting. As you review the feedback received so far, the Board should ask the following questions: • Did we miss any important strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats? • What are the most important issues for the Comprehensive Plan Update? • What would make the Plan more useful to the Board when reviewing projects and making recommendations? We are continuing to gather public input for the Plan Update. The next major event will be the June 22, 2017 (6-8 p.m.) Public Open House. The survey will remain open until after the Open House. Next meeting—On July 12, the Planning Commission will be discussing specific issues for the Land Use Chapter of the Plan. We will provide some materials to guide discussion. In the meantime, Board members should prepare by thinking about any policies in the current plan that need review, and/or land uses classifications or locations that need discussion. Your "homework" might include reviewing the Planning Districts section (Chapter 10) of the Plan. Attachments: • Summary of Meeting Results, Council/Board Work Session, May 15, 2017 Planning and Zoning Board June 14, 2017 Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Summary of Meeting Results Council/Board Work Session Comprehensive Plan Kickoff, May 15, 2017, 6:00 p.m. Attendees City Council: Ron Rafferty, Michael Manthey, Bill Kusterman, Melissa Maher, Jeff Reinert Board Members: John Sullivan, Michael Root, Richard Jensen, Neil Evenson, Pat Kohler, Jim Schueller, Andrew Levi, Don Johnson, Jeremy Stimpson, Dale Stoesz, Perry Laden, Liz Kauffenberg, Nate Vostech, John Nordlund, Paul Tralle, Paula Andrezejewski, Abby Haworth, Mike Ruhland, Steve Herskary, Pat Huelman, Clark Gooder Staff: Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Mara Strand, Marty Asleson, Jeff Karlson, Diane Hankee, Kendra Lindahl (Landform), Anne Hurlburt (Landform) S.W.O.T. Discussion 1. What are Lino Lakes' greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to live? Please list at least 5 things you think make Lino Lakes great. (Strengths can refer to the community, the people, public facilities, natural resources, character, governance, etc.) • Rural feel • Paths • Public safety • Location re: the freeway system (35E/35W) • Schools • Open spaces, trails, parks, environmental character • Rural/ small town character • "Minnesota Nice" • Public safety • Schools • Low crime • Environmental features • Trails/ parks / open space • Great neighborhoods & residents • Fiscal responsibility • Charter City allows citizen participation City Council and Board Kick -Off Meeting May 15, 2017 Page 1 • Values natural resources (parks/ trails etc.) • Partnership with County & Watershed District • Schools • Freeway access • Room to grow • Proximity to cities • Transit/ park & ride • YMCA • Schools • Lakes & natural amenities • Safe place to live • Location • Governance • Strong park & rec program • Natural resources/ lakes • Schools • Rural feel/ open spaces • Taxes Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 2. What are Lino Lakes' weaknesses? Where does Lino Lakes fall short from your perspective? What is missing that could better reflect the community vision? • Charter makes maintenance of infrastructure difficult • City is divided by lakes, difficult to travel, separate areas • Community engagement; not enough opportunity to come together • Lack of public facilities • Lack of retail/ commercial areas • Prison • Infrastructure (road maintenance, lack of sewer in some areas) • Continuity and condition of trails • Freeway system divides city • Lack of employment opportunities • Charter Commission • Lack of identity • Lakes are impaired • Paths are incomplete • Road conditions—crumbling • Charter • Signage at entrance points to the City; • Lack of identity/ community City Council and Board Kick -Off Meeting May 15, 2017 Page 2 Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update • Impediments to fixing infrastructure • No general funding for parks & trails • Fractured neighborhood identity (east/west) • Tax base needs diversification • Charter leadership ("robust language" could use a change) • Transportation—maintenance • Sewer—infrastructure not in place yet • County Road J—border roads with more than one jurisdiction 3. What are the greatest opportunities in the community? What things do we do well already, but could do better? What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at? Where are the greatest opportunities for the community? • Parks & trails • Neighborhood revitalization • Commercial (including industry and employment) • Infrastructure improvements • Space for development, room to grow • YMCA • Mattamy Homes area in northeast sector • Senior living and other entities related to that • Park land at Birch & Centerville • Room to grow allows more options for homeownership and rental • Park land potential (Birch & Centerville) • Some people want no development, others want maximum; "development if done right" is an opportunity • Improve trail system • Work with County & Watershed • Improve signage • Better gateways into area • CR J/ Hodgson Road area; development opportunity • Sustainable development; be proactive • Inform citizens on best practices to take care of resources; grass clippings/yard waste to lawn watering • Build in more affordable housing • Walkability vs. need to drive everywhere City Council and Board Kick -Off Meeting May 15, 2017 Page 3 Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 4. What are the threats that stand in the way of achieving the opportunities or maintaining our strengths? What threatens the community or city from achieving their goals? • Metropolitan Council imposing their goals • Bad City Council decisions • Poor planning • Overspending • Areas lack city sewer and water (septic systems & wells don't last forever; need to prepare) • Money & resources (lack of) • Competition with other cities for commercial development • Developers have their own interests • Having a town inside of our town (Centerville); they do their own thing • Pockets of older development without good infrastructure (parks, water, sewer) • Charter • Taxes • Traffic • Drinking water and lakes • Anoka County Regional Airport • Neighboring organizations (i.e. Shoreview example) and possible negative impacts • Resources—how to achieve things we need • Big box development while big boxes pick up and move • Lack of social media (no City Twitter) • Lack of big picture visioning • Aging community; what will next generation want? • Do we have our own identity? Does every city need to offer the same things/ cookie cutter? Visioning Discussion—comments on current "Spotlight on 2030" vision statement: • First paragraph—"carefully preserved" and "well maintained", we don't have this yet • Second paragraph—may be "well planned", but we may not yet have a good "mix" • Does not provide vision for high quality public safety and public services; talks about the cost, not quality • First paragraph is succinct, aspirational; easily digestible vision • First paragraph lacks economic aspects of vision • Four paragraphs are probably too much City Council and Board Kick -Off Meeting May 15, 2017 Page 4 UN()[;\KES Miscellaneous Comments Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update • Visit the website and complete the community survey • Check out the "meeting in a box" to use with community groups • Goal is to simplify and make a more usable plan document • Need to work with our partners (schools, watershed, county, etc.) • City may have some "negative identity" we may need to overcome City Council and Board Kick -Off Meeting May 15, 2017 Page 5 C1TY,i t 0 LNOLAKES