HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-012 Council ResolutionCITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 17-12
APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ERICKSON ESTATES
WHEREAS, the City has received a land use application for Preliminary Plat for Erickson
Estates hereafter referred to as "Development"; and
WHEREAS, City staff completed a review of the Development based on the following:
• Preliminary Plat and Civil Plan Set prepared by Loucks, Inc. dated December 8, 2016
• Subsurface Geotechnical Assessment prepared by MTM Environmental, Inc. dated
August 26, 2016
• Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company,
Inc. dated September 30, 2016
• Comprehensive Amendment Form Submitted by Loucks with 2030 Future Land Use
Map and 2030 Future Build Out Map; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on January 11,
2017 and the Board recommended approval of the Development.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
hereby makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision:
(1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the
following criteria shall be denied by the City Council.
(2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed
premature should any of the following conditions not be met.
(a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following:
1. Land use plan;
2. Transportation plan;
3. Utility (sewer and water) plans;
4. Local water management plan;
5. Capital improvement plan; and
6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria.
Erickson Estates is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards
to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities as detailed in the
January 11, 2017 Planning & Zoning Staff Report. The development is also consistent with the
local water management plan, capital improvement plans and growth management policies.
(b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill
1
policies:
1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA)
or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan;
2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following:
a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision;
b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer;
c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city
trunk funds; and
d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital
improvement plan.
3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs
as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and
4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation
and maintenance.
Erickson Estates is consistent with infill policies. With the approved Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, the development will be within the current Utility Staging Area IA=2008-2015. No
new utility or street extensions are required. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility
system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No
future utility costs are proposed.
(c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the
following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual:
1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic
generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade;
�-- 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed
subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C;
3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed
subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D;
4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the
subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as
part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better;
5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural
capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will
pay to correct any structural deficiencies;
6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements
that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. However, the city may, at its
discretion, consider developer -financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies;
7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake Drive
or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in
conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan
must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must
determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total
traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options,
including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties
that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and
8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination.
Erickson Estates meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). White Pine Road and
2
Baldwin Lake Road are classified as minor collector roads. The existing roads and intersections
providing access to the development have structural capacity to accommodate the projected
traffic from one new single family home. No street improvements are proposed that are
�-- inconsistent with the City's capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of
local determination.
(d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply
when:
1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision;
2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the
opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision;
3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire
protection; and
4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a
potable water supply.
Erickson Estates will have an adequate water supply. A 6" DIP watermain along White Pine
Road and Baldwin Lake Road serves both Lots 1 and 2. A water service is already stubbed in for
Lot 2. The City's water system has capacity to accommodate one new single family home.
(e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste
disposal systems when:
1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the
MUSA allocation criteria;
2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its
maximum density;
3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and
capital improvement plan;
4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary
sewer disposal system; and
5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an
effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing.
Erickson Estates will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. With the approved
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the development will be within the current Utility Staging
Area 1A=2008-2015. The sanitary sewer system has capacity to accommodate one new single
family home; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the Preliminary Plat for Erickson Estates subject to the following conditions:
1. Comments from WSB Plan Review Letter dated January 5, 2017 shall be addressed.
2. Comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated January 5, 2017 shall be
addressed.
3. Separate plan sheets with information as required by the Preliminary Plat Checklist shall
be submitted for each of the following:
a. Certificate of Survey
b. Resource Inventory
c. Preliminary Plat
3
d. Preliminary Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan
e. Preliminary Utility Plan
f. Tree Preservation & Mitigation Plan
4. Sheet 1, Preliminary Plat:
a. Right-of-way shall be platted along the south boundary over the 60 foot Highway
Easement and the gap between the easement and property boundary.
b. Right-of-way shall be platted along the west property line over the 30 foot
Highway Easement.
c. Lot 1 and Lot 2 lot lines shall be extended straight north -south to the Highway
Easement/platted right-of-way.
d. Lot areas shall be revised to not include the area of the Highway Easement/platted
right-of-way.
e. The preliminary plat shall show lot widths and building setbacks measured to the
Highway Easement/platted right-of-way lot line.
f. It should be noted on the preliminary plat that the angle of the proposed house on
Lot 2 limits any future driveway access to the rear yard.
g. The drainage and utility easements shall be shown on the interior of the lot lines.
h. The required WMC 50 foot buffer area and the proposed WMC buffer area shall
be provided.
5. Sheet 2, Grading, Drainage & Utility Plan:
a. The plan sheet shall be titled Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan.
b. Drainage arrows shall be provided.
c. The total square footage of disturbance and proposed impervious surface area
shall be provided.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13day of Feb , 2017.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
Kusterman and was duly seconded by Council Member Manthey and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Kusterman, Manthey, Maher, Rafferty, Reinert
The following voted against same:
none
ATTEST:
u ia'ne Bartell, City
4
Jeff Reinert, Ma • r