Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/11/1996 Council PacketAGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, March 11, 1996 6:30 P.M. SCA Call to Order and Roll Call Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of Minutes, February 12, 1996 B. Consideration of Disbursements: 1. February 29, 1996 2. March 11, 1996 3. Centennial Fire District 2. Open Mike 3. 6:30 P.M. Public Hearing, Centennial Middle School Street and Utility Improvement, David Ahrens 4. Continuation of Public Hearing, Improvement of 12th Avenue/Holly Drive, David Ahrens 5. City Engineer's Report, David Ahrens A. Consider Resolution No.. 96 - 29, Adopt Memorandum of Understanding with the Minnesota Department of Transportation for the Trunk Highway 49 Turnback (Lilac Street to Fourth Avenue) B. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 02 Awarding Construction Contract, Marshan Lake Condominiums Street and Utility Improvements PAGE 1 AGENDA C. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 26 Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for the Fourth Avenue Trunk Utility Improvement, John Powell D. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 28 Approving Final Payments for Country Lakes Estates, Plat 1, John Powell 6. Old Business 7. New Business A. Consideration of Minutes, November 13, 1995 (Mayor Landers and Council Member Lyden were not Council Members) B. Consideration of Minutes, February 26, 1996 (Council Members Bergeson and Kuether were absent.) C. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 27 Correcting the 1995 Assessment, Living Waters Church, Marilyn Anderson D. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 30 Correcting the 1995 Assessment, 7064 Sunset Road, Marilyn Anderson 8. Adjourn March 8, 1996, 10:00 A.M. PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12,1996 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES : February 12, 1996 . 6:35 P.M. : 10:10 P.M. : Bergeson, Kuether Lyden, Neal, Landers : None Staff members present: City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; City Engineer, David Ahrens; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; Community Development Coordinator, Mary LaForest; Planning Coordinator, Mary Kay Wyland; Consulting Engineers, John Powell and Steve Heth; Chief of Police, David Pecchia; Accountant Paula Schloer; Assistant to the City Administrator, Dan Tesch and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. SETTING THE AGENDA Mr. Tesch asked that Agenda Item No. 5A be removed from the agenda. He also asked that Agenda Item No. 8A be moved into the space vacated by 5A. The agenda was set as amended. OPEN MIKE John Theis and Michael Lamb, Northern States Power Company (NSP) - Mr. Theis and Mr. Lamb were invited to attend this Council meeting tonight to explain why there have been so many power outages during the past few months. Mr. Theis explained that he is the Community Service Director out of Maple Grove but is also serving out of White Bear Lake for a couple of months. He asked that anyone with specific questions regarding the service provided by NSP call him at the White Bear office, 493-1631. Mr. Theis introduced Mr. Lamb. Mr. Lamb explained he was here to discuss the recent power outages that have occurred in Lino Lakes. Since January, 1995, there have been 12 power outages on the main circuit the serves Lino Lakes. Seven (7) of the outages were attributed to the ice storm that was experience in mid January, 1996 including the outage that affected the Wednesday evening planning session. Mr. Lamb explained that NSP is addressing the problem in a number of ways primarily with tree trimming and infrared surveys which identifies when pieces of equipment are likely to fail. Three (3) outages were attributed to lightening and wind last summer and the other two (2) failures were random equipment failures. Mr. Lamb said he would be happy to PAGE 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 answer any questions that the City Council or citizens may have regarding electric reliability. Police Chief Pecchia noted that the Police Department has received calls from residents asking who they should call in the event that their power is out. Mr. Lamb said that residents should call 282-1000. Council Member Neal asked if anyone ever answers at that number. He said the number rings and rings. Mr. Lamb explained that when there is a major outage, thousands of customers call this number and there is a problem getting to someone at NSP. Normally, calling that number should not be a problem and you should reach someone at NSP or the automatic answering machine. Based on the telephone number you are calling from the system automatically registers an outage at the residence where you are calling from. However, if you are not calling from the house with the outage, you will have to stay on the telephone line and follow the "prompts" given over the telephone. Council Member Kuether asked is there old power lines or old equipment in Lino Lakes? Mr. Lamb explained that the circuit that serves Lino Lakes is extremely long and has a lot of exposure to the environment. When an ice storm occurs, the longer circuit will experience more problems. NSP is addressing this problem by "beefing" up the construction and making sure the lines are clear of trees. Mr. Ahrens explained that the Police Department has had a lot of problems with the power fluctuating. This has caused a lot of computer problems. He asked what is causing this problem. Mr. Lamb said that this situation could be discussed at length. Whenever there is a lot of activity on the system, lights will flicker and the power will flicker. Lino Lakes could be affected by a "system event" in Minneapolis or as far away as Canada because all the systems are tied together. Mr. Lamb said that if the power is fluctuating during non -storm times, he should be notified and it will be investigated and a solution will be found. He explained that if the problem occurs, it is important to note the time and date of the problem. The problem will be fixed or at least an explanation for the problem will be determined. Mayor Landers thanked Mr. Lamb and Mr. Theis for coming this evening. Council Member Kuether asked Mr. Tesch to invite Meredith Cable to come before the City Council and explain why the cable TV has been down so many times. Mr. Tesch explained that many of their problems were caused by construction in the area. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES January 22, 1996 - Council Member Kuether moved to approve these minutes as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF DISBURSEMENTS PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 January 31, 1996 - Council Member Kuether moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. February 12, 1996 Council Member Neal moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District - Council Member Neal moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, BRIAN WESSEL Resolution No. 96 - 23 Calling Public Hearing on the Modification of Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 - Mr. Wessel explained that earlier this evening the Economic Development Authority (EDA) authorized the preparation of modified Plans for Tax Increment Financing District (TIF) No. 1-4 to drop all parcels from the district with the exception of Emtech and Blue Heron, which are improved parcels. The purpose of the modification is to remove parcels that no longer have capacity for providing financial assistance to industrial businesses wishing to locate in the City. Industrial development is not likely on some of the parcels in 1-4 and they will no longer be within a TIF District. Certain parcels, such as the G.M. Development property in the Apollo Business Park, will be incorporated into TIF District 1-7 so that the City has capacity to provide assistance when these parcels develop. Once the City Council sets the public hearing date, the modified plans will be sent to School Districts 12 and 831, and Anoka County for review and comment. Mr. Wessel recommended that Resolution No. 96 - 23 be adopted setting a public hearing for March 25, 1996, 6:30 P.M. Council Member Lyden moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 23 as proposed. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 23 can be found at the end of these minutes. Resolution No. 96 - 24 Calling Public Hearing on the Modification of Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 - Mr. Wessel explained that the EDA has authorized the preparation of a modified plan for TIF District 1-7. This modified plan will add parcels to the district and provide financial assistance to two (2) industrial projects. The parcels that will be added include the G. M. Development site in the Apollo Business Park, and Glenn Rehbein's light industrial site on I -35W and Highway 49 interchange, the Hawkins Chemical site just north of the Apollo Business Park. The momentum is there for these sites to develop over the next couple of years. Once these sites are PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12,1996 incorporated into TIF District 1-7, the City will have the capacity to offer financial assistance. Mr. Wessel recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 96 - 24 calling for a public hearing on March 25, 1996, 6:45 P.M. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 24. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 24 can be found at the end of these minutes. FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 01 - 96 Offering the Sale of Property in the Apollo Business Park to Progressive Engineering Technology, Inc. - Mr. Wessel explained that Progressive Engineering is an engineering and custom precision machining company that is currently located in Blaine. The company is planning to purchase 2.2 acres in the City -owned portion of the Apollo Business Park to build a 16,000 square foot manufacturing facility. According to the City Charter, an ordinance is required when City -owned property is sold. Mr. Wessel recommended that the City Council adopt the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 01 - 96. Council Member Lyden moved to adopt the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 01 - 96 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 -11 to Consider the Sale of Industrial Revenue Bonds for Taymark - Mr. Wessel explained that the City of Lino Lakes has received a proposal from Taylor Corporation asking the City to assist in financing a project through the issuance of revenue bonds in the amount of $6,000,000.00. The project to be financed is for the construction of Taymark, an approximately 150,000 square foot manufacturing facility to be located on 20 acres in the Clearwater Creek Development Center. Taymark is a division of the Taylor Corporation which has a facility in White Bear Lake. It plans to build an adjunct facility that deals in prom and homecoming supplies, party goods and imprinted specialty products. Approximately 100 people will be employed in Phase I of the project. The project will ultimately be in the range of 200,000 square feet. The Minnesota Municipal industrial Development Act requires that the City Council indicate its preliminary intent to undertake the project and to issue the revenue bonds to finance the project. The issuance of the bonds is subject to a public hearing, approval of the project by the Minnesota Trade and Economic Development Authority, approval by PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12,1996 the City's bond counsel and the City Council and the availability of revenue bond allocations. While the allocations have been used up for 1996, the Taylor Corporation is requesting this preliminary resolution stating the City's intent. The company will wait until new allocations are available before actually applying, which will likely be in January, 1997. At that time, the City can hold a public hearing and finalize the issuance of the bonds. Mr. Wessel explained that adoption of the resolution is necessary to show that the City intends to issue revenue bonds for this project. He noted that revenue bonds are different from general obligation bonds in that it does not impede the ability of the City to issue other bonds to Taymark. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 11. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT, CHIEF DAVID PECCHIA Consideration of Hiring Wendy Rohwer, Full -Time Records Clerk - This item was removed from the agenda. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REPORT, MARY KAY WYLAND Site Plan Review, Anoka County Juvenile Detention Center - Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector to show the location of this planned facility within the grounds of the Minnesota Correctional Facility. She noted that Anoka County is planning to construct a 36 bed Juvenile Detention Center, approximately 10,600 square feet in area, on its property at 7555 Fourth Avenue (south/west corner of Lilac and Fourth Avenue). The building will be used to secure and hold violent juvenile offenders. The site currently contains two (2) juvenile detention cottages, a juvenile shelter, and a 60 bed medium security facility for adult county offenders (workhouse). The new County project description is as follows: The new building will be west of the existing shelter. A secure connection to the shelter will allow dual use of the existing gym. The juvenile shelter will get food service from the state prison, just as the county juvenile center does now. Visitors to the building will park south of the building along with the staff. Sanitary sewer and water will connect to nearby utilities. Storm water will be directed to an existing pond which will be enhanced. Perimeter walls will be built of solid reinforced concrete masonry. The exterior of the building will have earth tone colors that will complement the existing adjacent cottages and match the juvenile center, and have a heavy landscape tree buffer to the north (much of it is existing.). Each entrance will be secured by remote controlled doors and sally ports. The required outdoor recreation areas will have PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 tight -meshed chain link material with a sloped top so as to be unclimbable. No "razor ribbon" will be used. The facility will be licensed by the State Department of Corrections and meet their standards for security. The center is part of a state-wide expansion of juvenile detention beds funded by the State of Minnesota. The City's Police Department originally expressed concerns regarding security and use of the facility. However, they have met with the Anoka County Corrections staff and worked out an agreement that will include special security services for the Lino Lakes Police Department and a much needed holding cell on the Anoka County site. Ms. Wyland explained that County Commissioner Langfeld; Architect & Engineer, Mark Fedders; Division Manager, Anoka County Human Services, Jerry Soma and Juvenile Center Superintendent, Dan Ceynowa are present this evening to answer questions from the City Council and the audience. Site Plan Review The property is zoned Public/Semi-Public (PSP) and the zoning ordinance provides that "all public buildings for county and state government" are permitted uses. The site is approximately ten (10) acres in size and is owned by Anoka County. The State of Minnesota owns the balance of this quarter section or approximately 150 acres. The original site plan review request included a side yard variance for five (5) feet which would have allowed the building to be constructed five (5) feet from the west property line. There was much discussion at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting regarding this variance request. The Planning and Zoning Board did recommend approval of the site plan, however, they added a condition that Anoka County pursue a land transfer with the State of Minnesota which would ultimately eliminate the need for a variance. After Anoka County considered this requirement, the building size was modified so that a ten (10) foot setback could be maintained. Setbacks: The revised building plan meets all setback requirements of the zoning ordinance, including the ten (10) foot side setback requirement. Building Height: A maximum height of 45 feet is allowed according to the ordinance. The proposed structure will be within that requirement. Landscaping and Buffering: A landscape plan has been provided which indicates plantings at the entrance to the building. A large grove of evergreen trees will screen the building from Lilac Street. Anoka County has indicated, to the State, that if any trees are removed during construction, they will be replaced with four (4) inch diameter trees. In addition, Anoka County will be installing an eight (8) foot high wood fence to separate the Anoka County Juvenile Detention building from the State Adult Facility to the west, as requested by the State. PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12,1996 Aesthetic Compatibility: The proposed structure will be constructed of face brick and stucco to match the existing shelter with brown tinted glass. The building will be substantially screened from the east by the existing juvenile shelter. Off -Street Parking: Eighteen (18) parking stalls, including two (2) handicapped spaces, shall be provided south of the proposed new building. Additional parking is also provided elsewhere on the site and via contract with the Minnesota State Correctional Facility. Circulation and Access: Access to the site will be provided from Fourth Avenue through the State Correctional Facility entrances. Anoka County has an agreement with the State providing for this access arrangement. Loading and Trash: An adequately screened trash enclosure will be provided south of the proposed building. Lighting: A lighting schedule has been provided which illuminates the area surrounding the proposed building. The Planning and Zoning Board, based on Police Chief Pecchia's recommendation, has recommended that Anoka County install street lights at Fourth Avenue and Apollo Drive, Fourth Avenue and Lilac Street, Lilac Street and Apollo Drive and east of Patti Drive on Lilac Street. The purpose of the street lights is to provide adequate lighting in the vicinity should there be a need in respect to the use of the facilities. Signs: Sign locations have been indicated on the site plan. The applicant has been advised that sign permits will be required for any sign. The signs must comply with the City's sign ordinance. Utilities, Grading and Drainage: Plans relating to utilities, grading and drainage shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. City sewer and water utilities are available to serve the building from Fourth Avenue. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the site plan at their January 10, 1996 meeting with the following conditions: -1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction, the building permits shall include utilities fees as calculated by the City Engineer. 2. Proper sign permits be obtained prior to any sign installation. 3. Final utility, drainage and grading plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. 4. The parking area shall be provided with a hard surface with concrete curb and gutter surrounding all access drives and parking areas. PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 5. Existing screening shall be maintained along Lilac Street. 6. Anoka County shall provide additional street lighting at the following locations: Fourth Avenue at Lilac Street Fourth Avenue at Apollo Drive Lilac Street just east of Patti Drive Lilac Street at Apollo Drive 7. A special security services agreement be negotiated with the Lino Lakes Police Department including the provision for a holding cell and other items as agreed to by Police Chief Pecchia. Council Member Bergeson noted that at an earlier meeting, the City Council was told that a variance would be needed for side yard setbacks because the building could not be redesigned. Now all of a sudden, a variance is not needed. Mr. Fedder's explained that there are many agencies to work with and sometimes the State Building Code and the City Codes are in conflict with the Department of Corrections requirements. This time the building could be drafted to eliminate the need for the variance. Council Member Neal said he was told that lighting is an issue. Commissioner Langfeld said that Anoka County is adamantly opposed to installing street lights. She said that those street lights are not relevant to the proposed building. She also noted that the Anoka County Public Works Department has never installed street lights on a City street. Council Member Kuether asked that a sign describing this building not contain the words Lino Lakes. Commissioner Langfeld said it would say, "East Central Juvenile Center". Council Member Bergeson asked Mr. Hawkins if the City could require that Anoka County erect street lights on property not owned by Anoka County. Mr. Hawkins said that the City could require the lights if the City could show evidence of the need for the lights. Police Chief Pecchia said that he recommended the street lights based on the "worse case scenario". He noted that he did have a very good working relationship with Anoka County and wanted to maintain that relationship. However, his recommendation remains as stated. Council Member Kuether suggested that the motion for approval could require street lighting if the need arises. Ms. Wyland noted that several years ago, a petition for a street light on Patti Drive and Lilac Street was received signed by several residents on Patti Drive. When the other residents heard about the petition, they petitioned against the street light. A street light was never installed. Council Member Neal said that he could not see a need for street lights. Mayor Landers said he could see a need for a street light at Fourth Avenue and Lilac Street. Council PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Member Lyden asked if the street light was needed for traffic or for illuminating the area if there was an escape from the facility. He was told that the recommendation was made for safety reasons including an escape. There was further discussion regarding the cost of erecting street lights. Council Member Lyden asked if there could be some compromise on this matter. Mr. Soma explained that the Correctional Facility has been at this site since 1977. He noted that the new facility is more secure than the current buildings. Ms. Wyland said that she had only one comment regarding street lights and that came from a business located on Fourth Avenue. They requested streets lights at Fourth Avenue and Lilac Street. Council Member Kuether noted that if a street light in this location benefits businesses, they should share the costs. Commissioner Langfeld said that if a need is determined in the future, she will ask Anoka County Public Works Department to install the lights. Council Member Neal moved to approve the site plan with the conditions listed above except for condition No. 6, street lights. There was no second to this motion and the motion died. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the site plan with condition No. 6 to be a contingency as need arises and based on the Chief of Police's recommendation but not to exceed four (4) street lights. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Neal voting no. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING, IMPROVEMENT OF 12TH AVENUE AND HOLLY DRIVE AND RECOGNITION OF CITIZENS PETITION, DAVID AHRENS Mr. Ahrens explained that the public hearing for the proposed improvements to 12th Avenue and Holly Drive was continued from January 22, 1996. The City Attorney has examined the files and will offer further information on this matter. Mr. Ahrens said he has some exhibits about other MSA roads in the City including their condition and their over all ranking within the City. He noted a petition from property owners along 12th Avenue and Holly Drive petitioning against assessments to their properties for road and utility improvements. This petition is provided for Council acceptance at this time. Council Member Bergeson referred to notes written on the petition by the City Clerk and asked if the landowner had to be a registered voter to petition against proposed assessments. Mr. Hawkins explained that there are no assessments proposed for the abutting property owners so the petition should be received as information only. Mayor Landers said that the petition was presented so that the property owners made it very clear that they did not want to be assessed for any road improvements. Council Member Kuether moved to accept the petition. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12,1996 Mr. Ahrens presented a handout to each Council Member which listed each segment of all the MSA streets in the City and compared the MSA streets using the street inventory rating. The worst street is at the beginning of the list and the best street is at the bottom of the list. A segment of West Shadow Lake Drive is rated as the worst street in the City and three (3) segments of Ware Road are also at the top of this list. Mr. Ahrens noted that out of 294 road segments in this City, Holly Drive ranks 107th. He also noted the average daily traffic, as counted in 1993, for comparison to see which streets have more traffic and which streets have less traffic. Council Member Bergeson noted that there had been a proposal to improve West Shadow Lake Drive north of Birch Street. However, the residents did not support the proposal and it was dropped. Council Member Lyden noted that three (3) segments of Holly Drive are listed as eight (8), nine (9) and ten (10) on Mr. Ahrens list. He asked how quickly would these numbers drop and "mirror" Ware Road when Trapper's Crossing is fully developed. Mr. Ahrens explained how to determine what the additional traffic on Holly Drive will be. Council Member Lyden asked how fast would the numbers for Holly Drive drop to a two (2) or three (3). Mr. Ahrens explained that there are many variables to consider and it would be very difficult to predict. He said that Ware Road is deteriorating faster than Holly Drive will because Ware Road has a lot more traffic and there is a lot more organic material under Ware Road. Council Member Bergeson asked how long will it take to complete both phases of Trapper's Crossing. Mr. Ahrens said he did not know, it would depend on how quickly the developer can get approval from the City. Mr. Corson, the developers representative, explained that the developer is looking at four (4) years at the very least and most likely six (6) years. There will be a total of 115 homes. Council Member Bergeson noted that the City Council talked with the consulting planner Al Brixius and asked him to put his comments in writing. Mr. Ahrens read a letter written to Mr. Schumacher by Mr. Brixius so that it would become part of the record. Council Member Bergeson noted that the City Council had asked for a clarification from the City Attorney on what the City agreed to in the developers agreement for Trapper's Crossing. The attorney for the developer was at the Council work session and gave his opinion about what he felt that the developer had agreed to related to that project . Mr. Hawkins explained that the entire issue concerning what the developers obligation is falls back to the Council resolution/motion approving the preliminary plat in August, 1994. He explained that the motion made by Council Member Kuether to approve the preliminary plat is made on the condition that the developer take action necessary to complete a satisfactory plan for the reconstruction of Holly Drive/12th Avenue. There was further discussion and Mr. Hokanson (the developer) asked if the motion was requiring him to pay for the entire reconstruction. Mr. Hawkins explained that the motion was requiring a satisfactory plan for the reconstruction of the street being PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 included in the developers agreement. Mr. Hawkins said he does not believe that the City has an agreement with Mr. Hokanson concerning the entire Holly Drive improvement. The City has a development contract that covers Trapper's Crossing, Phase I. In this agreement, it is stated that the developer will pay the City installed improvements based upon the estimated costs. Attached to the development contract is a list of the estimated cost for Phase I. Included in the list of benefits for Phase I is a $250,000.00 cost for MSA streets. Mr. Hawkins said that it is his belief that the City does not have an agreement for the balance of the project. This contract only covers Phase I. The City does not have a development agreement for Phase II and has not approved the final plat of Phase II. Mr. Hawkins explained that the City has to meet with the developer and his legal counsel and determine what is a satisfactory agreement for the reconstruction of the roadway. It is clear that the developer signed the development agreement and it only covers Phase I. Mr. Hawkins recommended that the City Council direct staff to meet with Mr. Hokanson and his representatives and negotiate a cost sharing arrangement and bring this agreement back to the City Council to see if it is acceptable. He explained that an agreement for the reconstruction of the entire roadway can now be negotiated since the total cost for the reconstruction has now been determined. Council Member Kuether said that the intent of her motion was to tie the developers requirements to the increase in traffic. Obviously the City would not be forced into considering the reconstruction of that road at this time without Trapper's Crossing. Council Member Lyden asked Mr. Ahrens with the building of Trapper's Crossing taking four (4) to six (6) years, when do you see the roadway being upgraded. Mr. Ahrens said the road is need of repair since it is near the end of its life cycle. Generally the best prices for the reconstruction are obtained when projects are combined. He said it was his opinion that the reconstruction of the roadway be completed prior to the full development of Trapper's Crossing. When Trapper's Crossing, Phase I is constructed, the roadway from the first phase to Birch Street will be torn up to accommodate the installation of utilities. He felt that this would be the optimum time to take care of the road needs for that segment. He said that leaves the question of when to reconstruct Holly Drive south from Trapper's Crossing. He felt that portion of the construction could be done at any time because the residents of Trapper's Crossing will have a new road to travel on north to Birch Street. After Phase II is completed, the reconstruction of the balance of Holly Drive could be completed. Council Member Bergeson noted that the developers counsel made some comments during the Council work session. Since that was not a public hearing, they should be offered the opportunity to make those comments tonight so that it becomes part of the public hearing record. Mr. Tom Baylak, attorney for Hokanson Development, said that he did attend the Council work session and discussed with the City Council the interpretation of the development agreement. He said he would accept Mr. Hawkins' recommendation that they sit down and negotiate Hokanson's obligations prior to the close of the public hearing. Mr. Baylak explained that the City's records indicate that the $250,000.00 was to be allocated against the entire first 28 lots and cover the entire PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Trapper's Crossing plat. The developers position is still the same. They are not obligated to pay more than the $250,000.00 toward the reconstruction of 12th Avenue/Holly Drive. Mr. Baylak asked Mr. Heth to give his understanding of the development agreement. Mr. Hawkins said that it would be unfair for Mr. Heth to be asked to say what he feels is fair or unfair. He said Mr. Heth is a member of the staff and the entire staff will sit down and talk about this matter and then go the developer and his counsel with their conclusion. Mr. Baylak said that Mr. Heth is on record supporting the $250,000.00 figure. Mr. Hawkins explained that Mr. Heth is just a consultant and the City has to fall back on the contract that was signed by Mr. Hokanson. Mayor Landers said that the City Council will follow Mr. Hawkins' recommendation. Mayor Landers opened the public hearing at 8:20 P.M. He explained that the City Council will take public input at this time. He asked that only new information be brought forward at this time. Sue Walseth, 1101 Holly Drive - Ms. Walseth said that there are so many unanswered questions and asked the City Council to continue the public hearing to when these questions are resolved. Caroline Dahl, 1101 Holly Court - Ms. Dahl said that if the south half of the development is going to be discussed, she wanted it noted that the August 8, 1994 PDO contains a fencing agreement for adjoining property owners including herself. She asked that this issue also be discussed at the time staff discusses the road issue. This matter was in the original motion and will be discussed. Al DeMotts, 6265 Holly Drive - Mr. DeMotts asked if there will be another public hearing for the development of Phase II. Mr. Hawkins explained that this public hearing covers the entire development of Trapper's Crossing. Mr. DeMotts asked if the road improvement will be considered for both Phases. Does the $250,000.00 cover only the 1st Phase and how will you determine how much money will be required from the developer for Phase II? Mr. Hawkins explained that this matter will be discussed by the staff. Mr. DeMotts asked if the cash escrow has been paid for Phase I or will it be paid before this hearing is closed. Mr. Hawkins explained that the City requires a letter of credit and this letter of credit has to be posted prior to the start of construction. The cash escrow is 35% of the total cost of the improvement for Phase I. Mr. DeMotts questioned the amount of the cash escrow. It was explained that the preliminary estimate was adjusted. Mr. Ahrens asked Mr. DeMotts if he was talking about phasing the construction of the Trapper's Crossing subdivision or phasing of the reconstruction of Holly Drive. Mr. Ahrens noted that the cost sheet that Mr. Hawkins referred to reflects the bid prices received for the public improvements for Trapper's Crossing, Phase I. Mr. DeMotts referred to the development agreement and said the cash escrow figure that he calculated was based on the development agreement figures. Mr. Ahrens explained that the development agreement contains estimated figures. The actual escrow is based on bid prices which are lower than the figures in the development agreement. PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Council Member Bergeson noted that this hearing is for the improvement of 12th Avenue/Holly Drive and not the Trapper's Crossing subdivision. The public hearing on Trapper's Crossing was held some time ago. Mr. Hawkins explained that there probably will not be any additional public hearings on additional phases of Trapper's Crossing because the costs will be paid entirely by the developer. Julie The11, 6482 - 12th Avenue - Ms. Thell said that it is her understanding that 12th Avenue will be improved and sewer and water utilities will be included. She was told that this is correct. Ms. Thell said it was also her understanding that there will be no assessment to abutting property owners. Mr. Ahrens said that this is also correct. Ms. Thell asked when would assessments be levied against abutting property owners. Mr. Ahrens explained that the developer is installing the sewer and water utilities and also reconstructing all of 12th Avenue and a small portion of Holly Drive. If a property owner wants to connect to the sewer and water utilities, the property owner would have to come to the City and petition to connect to those utilities. An assessment cost would be prepared for the property. The timing of the connection would be at the option of the property owner. Mayor Landers noted that there will be no assessment until a property owner decides to connect to utilities. Council Member Neal asked how many phases will there be in Trapper's Crossing. He was told three (3). Council Member Kuether moved to continue the public hearing to the first Council meeting in March to allow time for the staff and City attorney to get together with the Trapper's Crossing people to prepare some guidance for the City Council on the issue. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Council Member Neal said if they cannot prepare a mutual agreement, the development will probably have to be red tagged. This matter has to be settled even if it requires a special Council meeting. Council Member Lyden said he would like to be present at the meetings between staff and the developer. Mr. Hawkins explained that this would be a staff meeting and they are open to the public. Council Member Bergeson said that all Council Members should be given the date of the meeting so that they can attend if they wish. Mr. Hawkins reminded the City Council of the open meeting law. If three (3) or more Council Members attend, the meeting must be advertised as a special Council meeting. This was intended to be a staff meeting and then a meeting between the attorneys to try to resolve the problems. Mr. Hawkins said that he was not trying to discourage anyone from attending the meeting, however, sometimes there is free flow and open dialog when the parties do not attend including Mr. Hokanson and members of the Council. Whatever the results, this information will be brought back to the City Council. Council Member Lyden asked what fences will be discussed. He was told all issues would be discussed. Council Member Lyden noted that everyone is surprised that the PAGE 13 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 cost of reconstructing 12th Avenue/Holly drive is $1,900,000.00. He suggested that the entire development process be reviewed. Maybe more safety checks need to be included in the process so that this will happen again. Council Member Lyden noted that the City does not have $1,900,000.00 to reconstruct this road. He also said that in reality, the road would not have to be reconstructed if Trapper's Crossing was not developed. Mayor Landers asked exactly what will be negotiated between the attorneys. Mr. Hawkins referred to the original resolution and explained that all concerns outlined in that resolution will be negotiated. All outstanding issues will be resolved. Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously at 8:38 P.M. The City Council took a break and reconvened at 8:51 P.M.. CONSIDERATION OF HIRING CUSTODIAL SERVICES, DAN TESCH Mr. Tesch explained that the person hired for custodian service for all City buildings has resigned. The City solicited proposals from several cleaning services. A cost comparison between the cleaning services and hiring another custodian was prepared and included in the Council packets. Public Works Superintendent, Tom DeWolfe prepared specifications for a cleaning service and three (3) responses were received based on Mr. DeWolfe's specifications. The proposal were received from: Bilder Maintenance Ray Johnson L'Allier, Inc. $38,021.00 per year $31,758.00 $21,321.00 The cost to hire another custodian would be $33,466.00 per year. Mr. Tesch explained that reference checks were performed on L'Allier, Inc. The references were very positive. A contract was prepared and approved by the City Attorney. Mr. Jeremy L'Allier, representing L'Allier, Inc. explained that the owners of the company were on vacation and he is representing them this evening. He explained that the company has been in business since 1990. Council Member Neal said that St. Joseph Catholic Church told him that when L'Allier, Inc. scrubs a floor, they are charged extra. Mr. L'Allier said that there is no extra charge for just scrubbing a floor. However, when a floor has to be recoated or rewaxed, that is called special project work and would cost extra. The restrooms would be mopped daily. PAGE 14 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Council Member Neal asked when the custodial work would be done. Mr. L'Allier said it would be on a daily basis and the time is spelled out in the specifications for the job. Council Member Neal asked if all four (4) buildings were included in his proposal. All four(4) were included. The term of the contract is until December 31, 1996. Council Member Neal said he wanted the approval to contain a six (6) month probationary period. Mr. L'Allier explained that the proposal states that either party can cancel as per the Lino Lakes standard agreement, section seven (7). Mr. Tesch read section seven (7): The City reserves the right to terminate the provider at any time within the term of the agreement. In the event of such termination, the City shall provide the provider with written notice of termination upon the receipt of same. The provider shall immediately cease and desist providers provision of service under the agreement and the City shall have no further obligation under this agreement to pay any further compensation to the provider except for the compensation due and owing for the services prior to receipt of 30 days written notice. Council Member Neal asked who pays for the supplies. Mr. L'Allier explained that the chemicals will be provided by L'Allier, Inc. and supplies of consumables such as paper products are provided by the City. Council Member Neal said that if this is such a good deal, the contract should be for five (5) years. Mr. Tesch said that this contract is renewable every year. Council Member Lyden moved to award the bid for custodian service to L'Allier, Inc. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 96 -12 DESIGNATING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING FOR 1996/1997, DAN TESCH Mr. Tesch explained that each year the City of Lino Lakes receives CDBG funding which is dispensed by Anoka County from the federal government. This year, Lino Lakes will receive approximately $37,605.00. A number of service organizations have requested a portion of these dollars. The City Council held a CDBG public hearing on January 22, 1996 and heard funding requests from several organizations. Two (2) funding options have been prepared for City Council consideration. The difference between the two (2) options is that Option 1 does not include the request from the Lino Lakes Senior Coordinator for $600.00 to be paid toward their insurance. Option No. 2 includes the Coordinator's request and decreases the North Anoka Meals on Wheels program by the same $600.00. Council Member Kuether asked why all of the $600.00 needed to fund the insurance for the Senior Center come from Meals on Wheels. Council Member Neal explained that the amount of money requested from Anoka Meals on Wheels is to pay the site Coordinator of the program. She works out of St. Joseph Catholic Church. This site delivers meals to PAGE 15 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Centerville, Lino Lakes, Circle Pines, Lexington and a portion of Blaine. If Lino Lakes funds their full request, then none of the other cities served will have to pay anything toward the service. Council Member Neal wanted the Council to know that Lino Lakes has been funding the coordinator entirely. (Actually Lino Lakes funded $1,500.00 and Blaine funded $1,000.00.) Council Member Kuether thought that Meals on Wheels provides meals to about 100 Lino Lakes residents. (Actually 22 meals are delivered to Lino Lakes.) Council Member Lyden explained that the question at the work session was not that the money was going to be taken from Meals on Wheels but that it was going to be used for insurance and would the City incur some liability. Mr. Tesch said that this was checked with Mr. Hawkins and he said that this was not a problem. Mr. Tesch explained that the CDBG funding is estimated to be $37,605.00. If this amount changes, a resolution amending the City Council action tonight will be brought to the City Council for consideration. Council Member-Kuether noted that there are considerably less dollars allocated to the ADA funding. Mr. Tesch said that this is true. Council Member Kuether moved to approve Option No. 2. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REPORT, MARY KAY WYLAND Consideration of Clearwater Creek Easements - Ms. Wyland explained that Clearwater Creek plat received final plat approval from the City Council on November 13, 1995. A portion of the site has been final graded and some revisions made to a ponding area adjacent to Lot 8 and Lot 9, Block 1 on Clearwater Court. The revisions were made to avoid a large oak tree. Easements are required over all drainage and ponding areas and are typically shown on the final plat and survey documents. Because this ponding area was revised following final plat approval and does not follow the platted easement, new documents are required. Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector to show the detail of the revised easements. Consulting Engineer, John Powell has reviewed the easement documents and has indicated that they are in order. Staff is recommending that the City Council accept the two (2) easement documents as submitted. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the documents. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, DAVID AHRENS PAGE 16 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Consider Agreement for Professional Services, Water Tower Antenna Leasing with Mr. John DuBois, - Mr. Ahrens explained that the newest generation of wireless communication technology (Personal Communication Service or PCS) is coming to the Metro area and will involve an important role with each city. This new communication service requires a greater density of antennas than existing cellular technology and therefore, the communication companies need to acquire new/additional antenna space. Mr. Jim Nelson, TEA Group, Inc., has contacted the City concerning the lease of antenna space on the City's water tower. Obvious antenna locations include municipal water towers due to their acceptance in communities and height advantages. Since antenna lease agreements and the communication industry are unfamiliar with staff, it is important that the City utilize specialized consulting services to rely upon as discussions with the communication companies evolve. The installation of antennas include specialized issues such as equitable compensation for lease of municipal space and potential for interference to other radio and television users. Mr. DuBois is a Professional Communications Engineer with over 30 years of experience in radio communications system engineering. He is currently assisting other municipalities in the management of their water tower assets. Mr. DuBois has assisted numerous cities in the metro area on this type of work including Lakeville, Burnsville, Coon Rapids and Brooklyn Park. The Consulting Engineer Agreement with Mr. DuBois will allow the City to utilize his services on an "as -needed" basis for antenna leasing coordination. The City Attorney has reviewed the Agreement and has found it acceptable. Mr. Ahrens noted that all costs related to approving the installation of all antennas and Mr. DuBois' services would be recouped through the lease of the space. Mr. Ahrens included in the City Council packets an article written by the League of Minnesota Cities concerning PCS communication service and the Consulting Engineer Agreement. He recommended that the City Council approve the Consulting Engineer Agreement between Mr. John DuBois and the City of Lino Lakes. Council Member Kuether expressed concern regarding what the water tower would look like with numerous antennas attached to it. She asked Mr. Ahrens to get a picture of a water tower with antennas attached. After further discussion, Council Member Kuether moved to approve the Consulting Engineer Agreement between Mr. John DuBois and the City of Lino Lakes. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 -17 Receive Feasibility Report and Call Hearing on Improvement, Centennial Middle School Street and Utility Improvement Mr. Ahrens explained that the Centennial School District requested the City to conduct a street and utility service study and a traffic study for a proposed middle school along Elm Street on May 31, 1995. The report has been completed by the City's engineering consultant, OSM, Inc. In accordance with Minnesota State Statutes 429 and the Lino PAGE 17 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Lakes City Charter, the feasibility report is to be received by the City Council and a public hearing scheduled. The public hearing is scheduled for the March 11, 1996 Council meeting. Mr. Ahrens recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 96 - 17 receiving the feasibility report and call a public hearing for the Centennial Middle School street and utility improvements. Council Member Lyden asked how these proposed improvements would be financed. Mr. Ahrens explained that the cost would be assessed to the benefiting property owners. Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 17 as recommended by the City Engineer. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 17 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 -18 Final Acceptance of Work - Pheasant Hills Preserve, 6th Addition - Mr. Ahrens explained that the developer's of Pheasant Hills Preserve, 6th Addition have requested final acceptance of the public improvements. These improvements were completed in October, 1995, with construction observation provided by the City of Lino Lakes representative. There is a one year warranty period from the final acceptance date to cover possible defective work by the contractor. Mr. Ahrens recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 96 - 18 accepting the work for Pheasant Hills Preserve, 6th Addition. Council Member Lyden moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 18. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 18 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 -19 Authorizing City to Enter Into a Joint Powers Agreement with the Metropolitan Council for Installation of Watermain - Mr. Ahrens used the overhead projector to outline the area where Metropolitan Council will be installing a sanitary sewer interceptor pipe along Ware Road and Ash Street. He explained that staff has looked at the City's need for utility construction in this corridor and has identified the need to install watermain from Coyote Trail to 62nd Street on Ware Road and from Hodgson Road to 155 Ash Street on Ash Street. In order to have this work completed under a contract let by the Metropolitan Council, it is necessary that the City enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the Metropolitan Council. Staff is requesting Council to authorize the City to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement so that this work can be completed. Final approval of the Joint Powers Agreement will be provided at a later Council meeting. ALTERNATIVES PAGE 18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12,1996 Mr. Ahrens explained that both segments of the watermain will ultimately be needed in the City's water system. Therefore, alternates include having the watermain constructed at a later date depending on private development needs or by the City as part of water system development. It is difficult to predict when this might happen, but could be within the next three (3) years. The advantage to having this work completed at this time is that construction activity and disruption to the public in the area of construction will only occur once for the installation of the interceptor pipe and the watermain. If the watermain work is delayed, then the construction activity and disruption will happen twice in a possible three (3) year time span. FUNDING Mr. Ahrens explained that assessments are not proposed to be levied for this work. Assessments will be levied only when a property owner elects to connect to the watermain. It is estimated that the construction costs will be approximately $120,000.00 and it is proposed that this work be funded from the City's Water Area and Unit Fund in the interim until connections are made. OTHER ISSUES The City will need to acquire five (5) feet of temporary construction easement along the proposed Ash Street watermain. Council Member Bergeson asked if the construction will tear up yards and driveways that were torn up about two (2) years ago. Mr. Ahrens said yes and that is why he is asking that both the Metropolitan Council interceptor and the Lino Lakes watermain be installed at the same time. Council Member Lyden asked why the construction of the watermain will not go all the way down on Ware Road to County Road J (Ash Street). Mr. Ahrens explained that Metropolitan Council is proposing to directional bore the interceptor pipe (push pipe underground without any open cut or trench construction) from 62nd Street to Ash Street. There will be minimal disturbance to Ware Road. Mr. Ahrens said that it is unfortunate that this type of construction means that there will not be an opportunity to restore Ware Road to a decent condition. Mayor Landers said that the cost of pushing the sewer interceptor underground must be very expensive. He asked if the boring method could be used on Ash Street so that there will be minimal disruption in an area that was disrupted two (2) years ago. Mr. Ahrens said that the Metropolitan Council will be obtaining a bid alternate for the boring method of construction. However, Metropolitan Council is not sure what those costs will be. If direction boring occurs on Ash Street, the Lino Lakes watermain will be installed at a later date. PAGE 19 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Council Member Kuether asked if the residents on Ash Street know about this pending construction. Mr. Ahrens said they know about the Metropolitan Council interceptor construction. Neighborhood meetings have been held but have not been well attended. Council Member Bergeson noted that Lino Lakes has a non-standard notification policy that requires the City to notify more people by registered mail. Mr. Ahrens said that this project probably would not fall under this policy. However, if the Lino Lakes watermain construction becomes a reality, those residents will be notified under that policy. Mayor Landers asked if the residents along Ash Street could be given a guarantee that they will not be disturbed for a long time. Mr. Ahrens said that he could not make any guarantees for other agencies. Mr. Ahrens said that he will be out in that area notifying residents of the construction and obtaining the temporary easements. Council Member Bergeson moved to approve Resolution No. 96 - 19 and notify the affected property owners by registered mail. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously Resolution No. 96 - 19 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 20 Ordering Preparation of Report on Improvement, Otter Lake Road Re -alignment - Mr. Powell explained that to support the development of businesses in the Clearwater Creek Business Development Center, the infrastructure needs of these businesses must be addressed. The area of the Development Center currently being reviewed in detail is the southeast quadrant of the I-35E/Main Street intersection. The City Council has previously authorized preparation of a study reviewing sanitary sewer and watermain service in this area. This study was received by the City Council in December, 1995. Discussions with Anoka County regarding the re- alignment of County Road #84 (Otter Lake Road) have been ongoing. These discussions have now reached the point where more detailed engineering and cost information needs to be prepared in order to review cost-sharing options with Anoka County. This information will also be very useful in evaluating development proposals for this area. Mr. Powell recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 96 - 20 Ordering Preparation of a Report on the Otter Lake Road Re -alignment. Council Member Bergeson asked if a cost estimate has been prepared for this report. Mr. Powell explained that the engineering work is estimated to cost $7,350.00 and about $6,200.00 for the soil borings. Deeper borings will be done in the area of the re- alignment of the roadway because utilities are anticipated to be constructed underneath the roadway. Council Member Bergeson asked how the study will be funded. Mr. Ahrens explained that it will be funded from his budget under Consultant Services. If the improvement is ultimately assessed to the benefiting property owners, these costs will be recouped. Mr. Powell explained that this area has been exempted from the City Charter assessment restrictions and benefiting property owners will be assessed under Chapter PAGE 20 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 429 of the State Statutes. Mr. Wessel explained that only the businesses locating in this area will be assessed. No residents will be assessed. Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 20. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 20 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 21 Receiving Feasibility Report and Calling Hearing on Improvement, Birch Street Trunk Watermain - Mr. Powell explained that the Lino Lakes City Council ordered preparation of this report at the January 22, 1996 Council meeting. The report addresses the need for trunk watermain extensions to the southeast quadrant of I-35E/Main Street to support development of businesses in the area. In accordance with Minnesota State Statute Section 429 and the Lino Lakes City Charter, the feasibility report is to be received by the City Council and a public hearing scheduled. The public hearing will be held at the City Council meeting scheduled for March 25, 1995, 6:45 P.M. Mr. Powell recommended that Resolution No. 96 - 21 be adopted. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 21 as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 21 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 22 Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications, Birch Street Trunk Watermain - Mr. Powell explained that the City Council just received the feasibility report and set a public hearing for March 25, 1996. It is likely that many of the questions or concerns which will be raised by property owners can only be addressed after preparation of the detailed construction plans. In order to more accurately respond to these questions at the public hearing, staff is requesting that the City Council order preparation of the plans and specifications so that the completed documents will be available at the public hearing. The public improvement process allows the City Council to order the plans prior to the public hearing. The City has followed this process in the past. Mr. Powell recommended that Resolution No. 96 - 22 be adopted. Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 22. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 22 can be found at the end of these minutes. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH PAGE 21 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Consideration of Resolution No. 96 -13 Amending the 1995 General Fund Budget - Mr. Tesch explained that the following resolutions are for housekeeping purposes for the year ended December 31, 1995 for audit and budget adjustments. Resolution No. 96 - 13 makes changes to the General Fund for Police Department salaries and automobile replacement. Council Member Kuether asked if the decrease in Resolution No. 96 - 13 means that those dollars will be returned to General Fund. Mr. Tesch explained that this is a matter of coding. Council Member Kuether asked if the decrease is the dollars left over after the year ended. Mr. Tesch said yes. Council Member Kuether said it appears that dollars are "slushing" around in that budget. Council Member Bergeson explained that the items dealing with the Park Board and Planning and Zoning Board identifies the expenditures as stipends rather than salaries. Board members are not employees and do not have the same privileges as employees. These items correct the accounting and get the dollars out of the salary category. Council Member Bergeson said he was not sure about the other items. Council Member Kuether noted that there is an increase of $10,500.00 and a decrease of $10,500.00 and wanted to know why. Council Member Bergeson explained this item. Council Member Kuether said that she still had a question about the top three (3) items listed in the resolution and asked that this matter be tabled to get further information. Council Member Kuether moved to table Resolution No. 96 - 13 to the next Council meeting and have an explanation for the next work session. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 -14 Transferring Funds from Various Funds for Corrections to the Country Lakes Estates Project - Mr. Tesch explained the purpose for this resolution. Council Member Bergeson moved to approve this resolution as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 14 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 15 Authorizing the Transfer of Monies from the Tax Increment Fund 1-1 and Tax Increment Fund 1-2 to the Economic Development Fund - Council Member Kuether moved to approve this resolution as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 15 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 -16 Transferring Funds from the General Fund to the Escrow Fund for Woods of Baldwin Lake - Council Member Kuether moved to approve this resolution as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PAGE 22 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Resolution No. 96 - 16 can be found at the end of these minutes. ATTORNEY'S REPORT, BILL HAWKINS Consideration of Resolution No. 96 -10 Determining the Necessity for and Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain Property by Proceedings in Eminent Domain, Centennial Middle School - Mr. Wessel showed a map of the proposed roadway and explained that the design of the new Centennial School District middle school on Elm Street and Fourth Avenue is well underway with the site work projected for completion in the fall of this year. The City Engineer, with the concurrence of the Centennial School District and adjacent landowners, has determined a road alignment as being most beneficial to the City. Negotiations have been initiated with the two (2) affected landowners to purchase the properties. Both parcels are undeveloped raw land and both parties are interested in selling. Resolution No. 96 - 10 authorizes a procedure for acquiring the property through Eminent Domain, should good faith negotiations not be concluded within the next 90 days, and therefore jeopardize the new middle school schedule. Centennial School Superintendent, John McClellan will be before the Planning and Zoning Board on Wednesday, February 14, 1996 to present the building and site review as well as the rezoning request. Mr. Wessel explained that the City has had a good working relationship with the School District. He used a posterboard drawing to show where the new school will be located and the proposed street configuration to serve the school. Mr. Wessel said that negotiations have been initiated with the two (2) property owners for street right-of-way. The property owners have indicated willingness to sell the land. The property is raw land and nobody will be displaced. Mr. Hawkins said that he will file the eminent domain petition pursuant to state statute and Resolution No. 96 - 10. The City will have the right to possession in 90 days. Since the property owners are willing to sell the land, the only reason that the eminent domain process will go forward is if the City and the landowners cannot come to a reasonable conclusion regarding the selling price of the land. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 10 as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 10 can be found at the end of these minutes. OLD BUSINESS Consideration of Using a Consent Agenda - Mr. Tesch explained that there has been some interest in using a consent agenda for the regular Council meetings. A consent agenda tends to speed up a meeting by placing items that are not controversial or do not need discussion at the beginning of the meeting on the consent agenda. Council Member PAGE 23 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 Kuether explained that the Council had been using a consent agenda but found that many of the items on the consent agenda had to be removed for various reasons. She did feel if the items on the consent agenda are "clean" items, it does speed up the meeting. However, there will always be circumstances where an item will have to be removed for further discussion. Council Member Lyden asked if there should be some baseline criteria such as all Council Members would have to attend the Council work session where the item was fully discussed. Council Member Kuether explained that when a Council Member is reviewing his packet for the upcoming meeting and finds an item on the consent agenda that he/she does not understand, that Council Member should call the appropriate staff member at city hall and get a clarification. This would eliminate the need to remove the item from the consent agenda. Mr. Tesch suggested that the City Council try using a consent agenda for a month and if it appears that it is not working, the consent agenda can be eliminated. Council Member Bergeson noted that the City Council always has the power to amend the agenda so if there is an item on the consent agenda that needs further discussion, that item can be removed and placed elsewhere on the agenda. Council Member Lyden said that a consent agenda may give the Council more time to talk about an issue that needs added discussion. It was the consensus of the City Council that the consent agenda should be reinstated. Council Member Neal moved to continue the Council meeting until all business is completed. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Selecting a Date for Interviewing Board Applicants - Mr. Tesch explained that advertisement for board members was again placed in the February 20th local newspaper. The deadline for responding to the ad is February 29, 1996. He suggested that the City Council interview each applicant on March 6, 1996 which is the regularly scheduled work session. Council Member Bergeson said that the work sessions are typically two (2) or three (3) hours long and based on interviews in the past, they have taken a considerable amount of time. He asked if interviews should be scheduled for another date. Mr. Tesch explained that last year interviews were scheduled for 7:00 P.M. on the evening of the work session. This meant that the City Council had to complete the work session meeting by 7:00 P.M. Council Member Lyden said that it is his understanding that the deadline for submitting applications for the boards has been extended because there were not enough applicants for the vacant positions. He asked what is the magic number. Council Member Kuether said that this has happened in the past because the advertisements were placed during the holiday season. She said that the City Council should make sure that anyone wishing to apply for a position is aware of the deadline. PAGE 24 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 1;, 1996 Mayor Landers requested that the Council work session be structured to accommodate the interviews beginning at 6:30 P.M. or 6:00 P.M. if possible and notify each candidate about interview time. NEW BUSINESS Consideration of Volunteers of America Week Proclamation - Council Member Bergeson moved to waive the reading of the proclamation and enter the proclamation into the minutes. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Volunteers of America Week Proclamation can be found at the end of these minutes. Council Member Kuether moved to adjourn at 10:10 P.M. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Aye. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a regular Council meeting held on March 11, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer John L. Landers Mayor PAGE 25 Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 96-10 EMINENT DOMAIN RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes proposes to construct and improve a street to serve the new school site, and WHEREAS, the improvement consisting of constructing said street is herein determined necessary to provide for the safety of the traveling public, and WHEREAS, permanent and temporary easements and fee simple interests over certain lands are required to provide for said construction, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has authority to acquire right of way for said Highway by eminent domain pursuant to Minn. Stat. No. 117, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has the right to acquire the right of way prior to the filing of an award by the court appointed commissioners, pursuant to Minn. Stat. No. 117.011 and 117.042, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has been unable to successfully negotiate the acquisition of the required easements at this time; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes the acquisition of said land by eminent domain and to take title and possession of that land prior to the filing of an award by the court appointed commissioner, pursuant to Minn. Stat. No. 117, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Attorney is requested to file the necessary Petitioner therefor, and to prosecute such action to a successful conclusion or until it is abandoned, dismissed, or terminated by the City or the Court. Dated: February 12, 1996 ATTEST: 47? v Man G Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer klv iv dut John L. Landers, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Lyden and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. and the following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 11 Extract of Minutes of a Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 12th day of February, 1996, at 6:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers and the following were absent: None. Member Kuether and moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND TAKING OFFICIAL ACTION WITH RESPECT THERETO AND INDICATING PRELIMINARY INTENT TO ASSIST THE FINANCING OF THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Neal , and after full discussion thereof and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. and the following voted against the same: None. whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 312116.1 Council Member Kuether resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION 96-12 OPTION introduced the following A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR FUNDING YEAR 1996-1997. WHEREAS, The City of -Lino Lakes is anticipating receiving Community Development Block Grant Funds in funding year 1996-1997 in the amount of $37,605.00 ($38,605.00 less $1,000.00 for County administration costs), and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the funding of a Senior Outreach Program for our community through the Anoka County Community Action Program, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports Alexandra House and its cause of assisting families with intervention services, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Community Emergency Assistance Program and its mission of helping people become self-sufficient and maintain their dignity, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau and its goal of providing service to the communities youth, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Meals on Wheels Program, designed to provide food to homebound seniors and handicapped individuals, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Rise Program, designed to provide assistance to area residents with physical and/or mental handicaps. WHEREAS, The City Council supports the continuation of the Senior Citizens Center Coordinator Program which has been funded through C.D.B.G. funds since its inception, and WHEREAS, The City has an adopted ADA plan and the plan recommends that each facility have a TDD phone system. Page 2 Resolution 96-12 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $4,328.00 of its 1996- 1997 C.D.B.G. funds be designated for the Anoka County Community Action Program. 2. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $5,000.00 of its 1996- 1997 C.D.B.G. funds be designated for Family Intervention Services provided by the Alexandra House. 3. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $1,000.00 of its 1996- 1997 C.D.B.G funds be designated towards the Community Emergency Assistance Program. 4. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $5,000.00 of its 1996- 1997 C.D.B.G funds be designated towards the Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau. 5. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $2,517.00 of its 1996- 1997 C.D.B.G funds be designated towards the Meals on Wheels Program. 6. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $2,500.00 of its 1996- 1997 C.D.B.G. funds be designated towards the Rise Program, to go towards the purchase of a van. 7. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $16,262.00 of its 1996- 1997 C.D.B.G. funds be used in support of the Senior Citizen Coordinator Program, designed to promote the center's programs. 8. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $998.00 or its 1996-1997 C.D.B.G. funds will be designated towards the ADA program to purchase two TDD phones(Police and Park /Recreation building). 9. That the aforementioned dollar allocations shall be expended to the fullest extent possible given possible public service limitations at Anoka County. Page 3 Resolution 96-12 Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Counci this 12th Day of February, 1996. ohn L.. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted infavorthereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. and the following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Bergeson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-14 RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM VARIOUS FUNDS FOR CORRECTIONS TO THE COUNTRY LAKES ESTATES PROJECT WHEREAS, the engineering consultant (T.K.D.A.) has reviewed the costs associated with this project, and WHEREAS, certain planning (N.A.C.) costs were incorrectly charged to the escrow, and WHEREAS, legal costs were incorrectly charged to the construction fund instead of the escrow account, and WHEREAS, not all of the Administration fees were charged to the Escrow Fund, and WHEREAS, various publication costs were charged to the Construction Fund instead of the Escrow Fund. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Lino Lakes that the following transfers be approved as follows and effective December 31, 1995: General Fund (101) Escrow Fund (801) Escrow Fund (801) 1994 Construction Fund (456) Escrow Fund (801) 1994 Construction Fund (456) Escrow Fund (801) 1994 Construction Fund (456) Increase Decrease ($ 273.50) $ 273.50 ($ 130.00) $ 130.00 ($8,886.77) $8,886.77 ($ 340.25) $ 340.25 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 1996. J6hn Landers - Mayor Mariyn G Anderson - Clerk Treasurer Page 2 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None. Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council member Kuether move its adoption: introduced the following resolution and CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-15 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF MONIES FROM THE TAX INCREMENT FUND 1-1 AND TAX INCREMENT FUND 1-2 TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND WHEREAS, personnel costs have been charged to the Economic Development Fund, and WHEREAS, these costs are T.I.F. related, and WHEREAS, the City's audit firm has recommended this transfer on an annual basis, and WHEREAS, the City's Tax Increment Districts are all pooled. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following transfer be authorized effective December 31, 1995. E.D.A. Fund (430) T.I.F. District 1-1 (407) T.I.F. District 1-2 (408) Increase Decrease $1,662.85 ($831.43) ($831.42) Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 1996. c- 79 - Marilyn Anderson, Clerk Treasurer n Landers, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Lyden and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None. Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: Council Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-16 RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE ESCROW FUND FOR WOODS OF BALDWIN LAKE WHEREAS, the engineering consultant (T.K.D.A.) has reviewed the costs associated with this project, and WHEREAS, certain engineering costs were incorrectly charged to the escrow, and WHEREAS, this amount totals $2,900. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Lino Lakes that the transfer from the General Fund to the Escrow Fund be approved as follows and effective December 31, 1995: General Fund (101) Escrow Fund (801) Increase Decrease $2,900 ($2,900) Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 1996. Manlyn . Anderson - Clerk Treasurer n Landers - Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None. 'Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Bergeson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-17 RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT. WHEREAS, pursuant to request by the Centennial School District on May 31, 1995, a report has been prepared by OSM, Inc., with reference to the improvement of Elm Street between Cinnamon Teal Court and Lake Drive by reconstructing streets, installing curb and gutter, watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer, and this report was received by the council on February 12, 1996, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the Section 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter at an estimated cost of the improvement of $1,695,217.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 11th day of March, 1996, in the council chambers of the city hall at 6:30 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of ebruary, 1996. hn Landers, Mayor 64""e” Marilyn . Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Lyden and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Council Member Lyden introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-18 RESOLUTION FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. WHEREAS, pursuant to a Development Contract between the City of Lino Lakes and Contractor Property Developers Company, Contractor Property Developers Company's contractor, Barbarossa and Sons, Inc., has satisfactorily completed the improvements of Pheasant Hills, 6th Addition in accordance with such contract, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of F bruary, 1996. - 6d01/)-‘ dvt- Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer ohn Landers, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on 1996. (Luke/W/97v Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Council Member Bergeson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-19 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR INSTALLATION OF WATERMAIN ON ASH STREET AND WARE ROAD. WHEREAS, the Metrolpolitan Council is planning the construction of a sanitary sewer interceptor pipeline in the City of Lino Lakes, and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has identified areas along the Metropolitan Council interceptor pipeline alignment that will require watermain, and WHEREAS, it is to the benefit of the public and the City of Lino Lakes to construct watermain under the same contract as the Metropolitan Council interceptor project to minimize disruption from construction work to the public NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City is authorized to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement for the construction of watermain along Ware Road and Ash Street in conjunction with the Metropolitan Council interceptor project. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of F bruary, 1996. ohn Landers, Mayor "g1 Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Council Member Bergeson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-20 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT - OTTER LAKE ROAD REALIGNMENT. WHEREAS, it is proposed to realign County Road 84 (Otter Lake Road) between Cedar Street and Main Street and to assess the benefitted properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.035 and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the proposed improvement be referred to John Powell of TKDA for study, and he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th da % F. ruary, 1 9 Jo n L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn . Ma y Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a corr=ct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted 1996. and approved by the City Council on . / 4 AA.. lJwt.dLOJt�A� L� Marilyn G. A derson, Clerk -Treasurer Council Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-21 RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE BIRCH STREET TRUNK WATERMAIN FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING. WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted January 22, 1996, a report has been prepared by John Powell, TKDA with reference to the improvement of trunk watermain in the Birch Street area, and this report was received by the Council on February 12, 1996 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 for the estimated total cost of the improvement. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 25th day of March 1996, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 6:45 P.M. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of February, 1996. Mn214)6)6MarilyAnderson, Clerk -Treasurer Jo n L. Landers, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on a/o- , 1996. Marilyn G. nderson, Clerk -Treasurer Council Member Neal introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-22 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BIRCH STREET TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 96-05 of the Lino Lakes City Council adopted the 22nd day of January, 1996, a report was prepared for this improvement and, WHEREAS, Resolution No. 96-21 adopted the 12th Day of February, 1996, received the report and fixed a date for a City Council hearing on the following described improvement: BIRCH STREET TRUNK WATERMAIN AND WHEREAS, Certain questions and concerns raised by property owners relating to the construction of these improvements could only be answered and addressed after preparation of plans and specifications, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City finds it necessary to order the preparation of plans and specifications at this time. 2. John Powell, TKDA, is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. - Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day, f F,bruary, 1996. ` dA _ A,4 Jain L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None . Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on �.� � , 1996. I � (1/;,e9.7-\_ Marilyn G. nderson, Clerk -Treasurer Member Lyden introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 9 6 -2 3 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-4 WHEREAS, on April 26, 1990 the city council of the city of Lino Lakes (the "City") adopted a tax increment financing plan (the "TIF Plan") Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 ("TIF District No. 1-4"); and WHEREAS, in 1991 authority over TIF District No. 1-4 was transferred to the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA"); and WHEREAS, the EDA proposes to modify the TIF Plan in order to delete certain parcels from TIF District No. 1-4; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 through 469.179 (the "TIF Act") requires that the City hold a public hearing on the proposed modified TIF Plan, following approval thereof by the EDA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as follows: 1. The city clerk -treasurer is authorized and directed to prepare a notice for publication in the official newspaper setting a public hearing before the city council to consider this matter on March 25, 1996, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers at city hall. The notice shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but not more than ---30 days prior to the public hearing. 2. The city clerk -treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to notify Independent School District Nos. 12 and 831 and Anoka County at least 30 days prior to the public hearing and to invite their comments on the modified 11F Plan. RHB100128 LN140-11 3. The city staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary to bring this matter before the city council at the time of the public hearing. Dated: February 12, 1996 i 7 L. Landers, ayor Randall Schumac er, City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers and the following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RHB100128 LN140-11 Council Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 24 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-7 WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") and the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes (the "City") have adopted a tax increment financing plan (the "TIF Plan") Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 ("TIF District No. 1-7"); and WHEREAS, the EDA proposed to modify the TIF Plan in order to authorize assistance for two (2) industrial facilities and to add land to TIF District No. 1-7; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 through 469.179 (the "TIF Act") requires that the City hold a public hearing on the proposed modified TIF Plan, following approval thereof by the EDA, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Clerk -Treasurer is authorized and directed to prepare a notice for publication in the official newspaper setting a public hearing before the City Council to consider this matter on March 25, 1996, 6:30 P.M. in the council chambers at city hall. The notice shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing. 2. The City Clerk -Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to notify Independent School District No. 12 and Anoka County at least 30 days prior to the public hearing and to invite their comments on the modified TIF Plan. 3. The City staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary to bring this matter before the City Council at the time of the public hearing. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of February, 1996. hn L. Landers, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 24 Page -2- M Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted Page 1 MONTH END February-1996 ENGINEERING/PLANNING POSTMASTER-CIRCLE PINES (POSTAGE FOR MAILING) $ 59.79 POSTMASTER-CIRCLE PINES (POSTAGE FOR MAILING) $ 59.03 TOTAL $ 118.82 POLICE DAVE PECCHIA (REIMBURSE SAM'S CLUB) $ 170.37 TOTAL $ 170.34 COMPUTER PURCHASE PLAN BEST BUY (JEANIE KENOW) $ 2,878.61 TOTAL $ 2,878.61 LAND ACQUISITION JAMES R. AND DIANE T. SCHILLING (UDOR) $ 800.00 JAMES R. AND DIANE T. SCHILLING (FORERTY) $ 30,000.00 TOTAL $30,800.00 TOTAL FEBRUARY MANUAL DISBURSEMENT $33,967.77 Page 1 1 DISBURSEMENTS 1 MARCH 11,1996 Page: 1 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) 1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER/HWY 49 & LAKE) STATE OF MINNESOTA(INSPECTIONS) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/COUNTRY LK EST) * T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/HODGSON R) Total for Department Total for Fund 1996 CONSTRUCTION FUND * OSM, INC.(MUN ENGINEER/M LAKE CONDOS) * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER/TRAPPERS CROSS) Total for Department Total for Fund APOLLO DRIVE CONSTRUCTION FUND * T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/APOLLO DR) Total for Department Total for Fund AREA AND UNIT CHARGE ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(ELECTRIC SERVICE) EVERGREEN -LAND SERVICES COMPAN(CONSULTANT) * NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP, INC.(2 SUBMERSIBLE PUMPS) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/35E TRUNK) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/CEDAR LIFT ST) * T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/BIRCH STR) * T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/WATER TOW) * T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/WELL #4) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/4TH AVE TRUNK) Total for Department Amount 5,586.69 178.96 1,126.41 21.20 6,913.26 6,913.26 8,371.00 4,286.15 12,657.15 12,657.15 89.35 89.35 89.35 500.00 164.00 14,349.81 119.62 196.57 801.09 1,034.87 3,613.34 8,948.34 29,727.64 Total for Fund 29,727.64 Page: 2 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, GroupedbyInvoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS POLICE DEPARTMENT * SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.(CAPITOL OUTLAY/SERVER) 4,540.10 Total for Department 4,540.10 Total for Fund 4,540.10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT BLOCK GRANT * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING/CDBG) 70.60 Total for Department 70.60 Total for Fund 70.60 CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(LEGAL SERVICE/FOGERTY ESCROW) 39.00 * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(LEGAL SERVICE/TAYMARK) 832.00 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING/CENTENNIAL SCHOOL) 263.50 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING/NOREN ESCROW) 10.50 * OSM, INC.(MUN ENGINEER/CENTENNIAL SCH) 12,808.59 PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, INC.(REIMBURSE BUILDING ESCROW) 1,000.00 * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER/TRAPPERS CROSS) 2,806.55 * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/BEHM C FARM) 107.22 * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/CLEARWATER CK) 303.79 * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/COUNTRY LK EST) 71.48 * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/SENIOR COTTAGES) 178.70 * T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/FOX TRACE) 17.87 * T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/CLEARWATE) 446.44 Total for Department 18,885.64 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION D.C.A. INC.(FLEX INSURANCE) ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(ADVERTISING) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(LEGAL SERVICE) * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) Total for Fund 18,885.64 163.80 51.20 21.20 670.32 350.12 Page: 3 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER POSTAGE) 321.3: * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER) 1,064.8: * OFFICEMAX, INC.(SUPPLIES) 9.5' * SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.(SUPPLIES) 192.4 * TAUTGES,REDPATH & CO, LTD(TRAINING SESSIONS) 300.0( Total for Department 3,144.7' BUILDING INSPECTIONS * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 10.6( GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVICE(SEMINAR) 30.0( SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS (ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS) 382.7: Total for Department 423.3: BEST BUY COMPANY, INC.(COMPUTER PURCHASE/CAROL ERSI) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT 2,350.2E -8.4( 537.92 132.6: Total for Department 3,012.44 DAVID GREDZENS GRAPHIC DESIGN(DESIGN CONSULTATION) 525.0( EXPRESS MESSENGER, INC.(DELIVERY SERVICE) 10.8( * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 10.6( WESSEL, BRIAN(MEALS/PARKING/SUPPLIES) 292.92 Total for Department 839.34 ENGINEERING/PLANNING DEPARTMENT CENTER FOR WATERSHED PROTECTIO(SUBSCRIPTION) 48.0( COPY EQUIPMENT, INC.(SUPPLIES) 189.7E * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) _ 21.2( KRECH, MICHAEL(SUPPLIES) 35.5( * MEDICA(INSURANCE) 556.2E MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP(PRINTED MATERIAL) 341.2 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(GENERAL PLANNING) 1,000.7] * OFFICEMAX, INC.(SUPPLIES) 10.64 * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER) 430.21 * T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER) 1,167.42, FINANCE * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) Total for Department 3,800.94 15.9C 415.1E Page: 4 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC.(SUPPLIES) 85.2' * TAUTGES,REDPATH & CO, LTD(TRAINING SESSIONS) 225.0, VASKE, MARY(REIMBURSE DISK FILE STORAGE) 13.7` VASKE, MARY(REIMBURSE ACCESS SOFTWARE) 127.7 Total for Department 882.8: FIRE DEPARTMENT * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 5.3( Total for Department 5.3( FLEET MANAGEMENT ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC.(STEAM CLEANER) 132.3` AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOT(PARTS) 11.3: AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC.(SMALL TOOLS) 106.6( BOYER TRUCKS, INC.(PARTS) 478.7: BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(PARTS) 592.8`_ BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(PARTS) 24.8." CATCO PARTS, INC.(PARTS) 21.2E FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.(PARTS) 328.4- * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 5.3( * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(PARTS) 1.5! GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC.(PARTS) 149.6' GOA COMPANY, INC.(PARTS) 99.2, INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL, INC(PARTS) 809.5E J. C. AUTO SUPPLY, INC.(SMALL TOOLS) 25.5( LINO LAKES TRANSMISSION, INC.(PARTS) 1,272.5; LINO LAKES TRANSMISSION, INC.(PARTS) 895.84 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC.(PARTS) 42.7: RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.(PARTS) 405.0( SAFELITE AUTOGLASS CORPORATION(PARTS) 379.91 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET,(PARTS) 90.8E TOM THUMB, INC.(FUEL) 17.5( WISCONSIN MAGNETO, INC.(PARTS) 51.7: Total for Department 5,943.4( FORESTRY DEPARTMENT DNR TREE SALES(WILDLIFE PACKET) 220.0( FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 330.6E * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 5.3C * LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES(WORKSHOP) 15.0( * UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA(REGISTRATION - 2) 170.00 Total for Department 740.9E GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,162.09 Page: 5 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES, (MONTHLY SERVICE) 155.8, DALCO, INC.(SUPPLIES) 217.2, * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 374.6: INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.(MAINTENANCE SERV - 3 MO'S) 922.5( * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, (MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,713.1: NORTHERN SANITARY SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 160.8: * OFFICEMAX, INC.(SUPPLIES) 214.8E SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC(SUPPLIES) 196.6E Total for Department 5,117.72 MAYOR AND COUNCIL JULEEN DESIGNS, INC.(LAYOUT/PRINT LOGO) LINO LAKES SENIOR CENTER(CITY DINNER) * PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(SUPPLIES) PARKS DEPARTMENT 360.0( 240.0( 12.6 - Total for Department 612.6', AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS(BASE ANTENNA) 217.9 BIFF'S, INC.(RENTAL/SERVICE) 221.04 * FLAHERTY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION(GENERATOR) 769.4' * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 21.2( * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 89.91 * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 29.3( * LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES(WORKSHOP) 15.0( * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) 132.7( * MENARDS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 20.8E * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, (MONTHLY SERVICE) 272.72 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMER(NOTARY COMMISSION) 40.0( MINNESOTA SAFE KIDS(MEMBERSHIP FEE) 125.0( MRPA(REGISTRATION) 45.0( * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER POSTAGE) 214.2: * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER) 709.92 * UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA(REGISTRATION) 85.0( US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 114.0' VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) 15.9: * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 150.2E * WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.(PARTS) 18.1E Total for Department 3,307.65 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD TIMESAVER OFF-SITE SECRETARIAL(SECRETARIAL SERVICE) Total for Department POLICE DEPARTMENT 222.7E 222.7E A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 21.3C Page: 6 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS(LLPD TESTING) DALE CARNEGIE(COURSE) DALE CARNEGIE(COURSE) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) GRAFIX SHOPPE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, (MONTHLY SERVICE) MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS (CONFERENCE) MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ED FOUNDAT(REGISTRATION) MOORE, HALSEY & ESKOLA, LLC(CRIMINAL DEFENSE) * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER POSTAGE) * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER) PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF(MEALS) PETTY CASH (SUPPLIES) * PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(CRIME PREVENTION SUPPLIES) * PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(SUPPLIES) ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION, INC(DELIVERY SERVICE) * SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.(SERVICES) STREICHER'S, INC.(TRAINING SUIT) STREICHER'S, INC.(TRAINING SUIT) U S WEST CELLULAR, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) RECREATION DEPARTMENT 10.6 53.0( 700.00 700.0( 58.9C 6.3E 46.94 64.71 38.34 2,275.00 319.04 170.0( 220.00 100.0( 35.7: 118.3 75.8E 66.00 19.12 7.3C 20.3E 950.0C 846.6E 66.11 337.6E Total for Department 7,327.3E BERNSTEIN, BARRY(MILEAGE) 39.3C * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 5.3C * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 194.73 * LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES(WORKSHOP) 15.00 * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) 45.6S * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER POSTAGE) 214.22 * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER) 709.92 Total for Department 1,224.16 SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT CONSTANT, JACKIE(MILEAGE) 50.4C * LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES(WORKSHOP) 15.00 * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) 45.68 * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER POSTAGE) 71.40 * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, (NEWSLETTER) 236.64 Total for Department 419.12 STREETS * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 217.26 Page: 7 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) DRESSER TRAP ROCK, INC.(SANDING MIX) * FLAHERTY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION(GENERATOR) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) J & C TRUCKING, INC.(HAULING SALT) * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) * MENARDS, INC.(SUPPLIES) MICKELSON, LESTER(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE) NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(STREET LIGHTS) T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC.(WINTER ASPHALT) * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) Total PROGRAM RECREATION for Department Total for Fund HISLOP, JODI(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) RAUCHWARTER, SUE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) Total for Department RECREATION DEPARTMENT BLAINE OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION(REIMBURSE OFFICIALS) Total for Department Total for Fund SEWER OPERATING SEWER DEPARTMENT C. W. HOULE, INC.(REMOVE FORCEMAIN/RECONST CUL) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP, INC.(GRIPPER PLUG) * WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.(BLACK DUCK LIFT STATION) Total for Department Total for Fund TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1-7 * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(LEGAL SERVICE) Total for Department Amount 473.26 769.46 26.50 47.16 161.77 41.32 432.50 5.42 89.99 2,078.63 86.27 150.25 4,579.79 41,604.57 10.00 12.50 22.50 272.00 272.00 294.50 1,398.12 7.95 84.29 43.13 68.64 1,602.13 1,602.13 1,040.00 1,040.00 Total for Fund 1,040.00 'Page: 8 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1 Amount * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(LEGAL SERVICE) 247.00 Total for Department 247.00 Total for Fund 247.00 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1-7 * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(LEGAL SERVICE) 885.50 Total for Department 885.50 Total for Fund 885.50 WATER OPERATING WATER DEPARTMENT DNR, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES(WATER SUPPLY PLAN) 475.74 * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 7.95 * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, (MONTHLY SERVICE) 152.94 * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/WATER PLAN) 35.74 * T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/WATER SUP) 3,856.32 Total for Department 4,528.69 Total for Fund 4,528.69 ** Total ** $123,086.13 * - Invoice split to different Departments Page: 1 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount Checking Account 1010 000080 - ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 000110 - A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 000210 - AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOTA, IN 000260 - AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC. 000450 - ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC. 000510 - AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 000670 - BERNSTEIN, BARRY 000678 - BEST BUY COMPANY, INC. 000700 - BIFF'S, INC. 000748 - BLAINE OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION 000770 - BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 000870 - BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES, INC. 000900 - BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 000950 - C. W. HOULE, INC. 001000 - CATCO PARTS, INC. 001048 - CENTER FOR WATERSHED PROTECTION 001050 - CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 001189 - CONSTANT, JACKIE 001208 - COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. 001260 - D.C.A. INC. 001269 - DALE CARNEGIE 001270 - DALCO, INC. 001278 - DNR TREE SALES 001279 - DAVID GREDZENS GRAPHIC DESIGN 132.39 21.30 11.33 106.66 1,889.95 217.91 39.30 2,350.28 221.04 272.00 478.72 155.84 617.66 1,398.12 21.26 48.00 53.00 50.40 189.78 163.80 1,400.00 217.24 220.00 525.00 Page: 2 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 001294 - DNR, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 475.74 001335 - DRESSER TRAP ROCK, INC. 473.26 001390 - ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 51.20 001435 - EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES COMPANY 164.00 001450 - EXPRESS MESSENGER, INC. 10.80 001509 - FLAHERTY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 1,538.93 001530 - FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 328.41 001540 - FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. 330.66 001550 - FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 214.80 001560 - FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 603.96 001608 - GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY/INC 270.97 001610 - GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 149.67 001620 - GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 64.71 001630 - GOA COMPANY, INC. 99.24 001700 - GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVICE 30.00 001710 - GRAFIX SHOPPE, INC. 38.34 001848 - HISLOP, JODI 10.00 001860 - KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 3,713.82 001963 - INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL, INC. 809.56 001980 - INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC. 922.50 002020 - J & C TRUCKING, INC. 161.77 002050 - J. C. AUTO SUPPLY, INC. 25.50 002100 - JULEEN DESIGNS, INC. 360.00 002177 - KRECH, MICHAEL 35.50 002310 - LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 60.00 002340 - LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC. 615.51 Page: 3 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 002420 - LINO LAKES SENIOR CENTER 240.00 002431 - LINO LAKES TRANSMISSION, INC. 2,168.37 002440 - LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC. 42.72 002540 - MEDICA 4,349.47 002550 - MENARDS, INC. 26.27 002590 - MICKELSON, LESTER 89.99 002640 - RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 405.00 002700 - MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 2,457.83 002822 - MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC 170.00 002834 - MINNESOTA SAFE KIDS 125.00 002922 - MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 40.00 002925 - MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT 341.22 002929 - MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ED FOUNDATION 220.00 003013 - MOORE, HALSEY & ESKOLA, LLC 100.00 003050 - MRPA 45.00 003240 - NORTHERN SANITARY SUPPLY, INC. 160.82 003260 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 2,078.63 003280 - NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP, INC. 14,392.94 003320 - NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 1,345.31 003370 - NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. 3,696.48 003390 - OFFICEMAX, INC. 235.09 003430 - OSM, INC. 21,179.59 003478 - PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF 75.86 003492 - PETTY CASH 66.00 003509 - PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1,000.00 003590 - PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO 39.09 Page: 4 Date: 03/08/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 003679 - RAUCHWARTER, SUE 12.50 003802 - ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION, INC. 20.35 003880 - SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. 13,109.60 003890 - SAFELITE AUTOGLASS CORPORATION 379.95 004010 - SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC. 85.20 004030 - SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 5,682.54 004192 - STATE OF MINNESOTA 178.96 004240 - STREICHER'S, INC. 912.81 004251 - SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS 382.73 004280 - SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC. 196.65 004340 - T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 86.27 004350 - T.K.D.A. 22,135.78 004370 - TAUTGES,REDPATH & CO, LTD 525.00 004410 - THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 90.86 004427 - TIMESAVER OFF-SITE SECRETARIAL 222.75 004450 - TOM THUMB, INC. 17.50 004630 - UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 255.00 004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 114.07 004671 - U S WEST CELLULAR, INC. 337.65 004710 - VASKE, MARY 141.57 004728 - VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 15.93 004730 - VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 300.50 004800 - WESSEL, BRIAN 292.94 004840 - WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 86.80 004842 - WISCONSIN MAGNETO, INC. 51.71 Total for Checking Account: 1010 123,086.13 ** Total ** $123,086.13 AGENDA ITEM 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: 3/8196 TOPIC: Public Hearing - Centennial Middle School Street and Utility Improvements BACK$ROUND: Centennial School District officials have requested that the public hearing for the proposed improvements to serve the proposed Centennial Middle School be continued to March 25, 1996. Therefore, staff will not make a presentation on this item at the March 11, 1996, Council meeting. OPTIONS: 1. To continue the public hearing to March 25, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to March 25, 191 AGENDA ITEM 4 STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: 3/8/96 TOPIC: Continuation of Public Hearing12thAvenue and Hotly Drive Improvements BACKGROUND: The public hearing for the proposed improvements to 12th Avenue and Holly Drive was continued from February 12, 1996. Staff met with the Trapper's Crossing developer and the developer's attorney to discuss road improvements, estimated construction costs and the $250,000 street assessment. Additional information is needed to finish these discussions and no action on this topic is recommended. Staff will be meeting with the developer the week of March 11, 1996, to continue discussions. OPTIONS: 1. To close the public hearing 2. To continue the public hearing to March 25, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to March 25, 1996. STAFF DATE: 3/8/96 TOPIC: TOR: ITEM 5A Public Works Director/ Resolution No. 96 - 29 Adopt Memorandu Trunk Highway 49 Tumback The Minnesota 'i partment of Transportation (MnDOT) has identified Trunk Highway 49 as a highway to be under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County,;Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes. Currently, Ramsey County has jurisdiction of Highway 49 from Highway 96 to County Road J in Shoreview. Anoka C • my has adopted a Memorandum of Understanding for the portion of Highwa 49 from County Road J to Fourth Avenue. The portion of Highway 49 pr« • • _ • to be under the jurisdiction of Lino Lakes is from Lilac Street to Fourth Av e (refer to attached map). This segment is approximately 0.2 miles in length. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is a nonbinding statement of intent for the tumback of Highway 49. A formal agreement between the City and State will need to be executed to identify the terms of the tumback. The MOU states that the Cit can utilize Municipal State Aid Tumback Account funds for improvements to the roadway. Tumback routes placed on the Municipal State Aid Symon i$ designated mileage above the normal 20% limit on mileage available to be on the Municipal State Aid System (the total mileage of streets eligible for MSA designation is :limited to 20% of all streets in the City). The ability for the City to have more than the normal 20% limit designated as MSA does provide for some compensation to the City for receiving this roadway. Issues regarding this tumback proposal include the appra segment of Highway 49 as a State roadway. Fourth Avenue, b south of the tumback segment, are City MSA roads. If the Count execute the tumback of the remaining portion of Highway 49, proposed to be a City tumback would be an orphaned Highway. MOUTH 49 Turnback Page 2 OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Reject the Memorandum of Understanding 3. Adopt Resolution No. 96 - 29 Authorizing the Mayor, City Administrator and City Attorney to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 96 - 29 authorizing the Mayor, City Administrator and City Attorney to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-29 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR, CITY ADMINISTRATOR AND CITY ATTORNEY TO SIGN THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has identified certain routes in the State with functional classification that should not be under State jurisdiction; AND WHEREAS, a nonbinding Memorandum of Understanding has been prepared by the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding the possible tumback of Trunk Highway 49, from Lilac Street to Fourth Avenue, to the City and which is attached hereto, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor, City Administrator, and City Attorney are hereby authorized to sign said Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Lino Lakes and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 11th day of March, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 11, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer STATE OF MINNESOTA METRO DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Memorandum of Understanding between: The State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, and The City of 1 inn Laken RE: Change of jurisdictions of roadways located in Anoka County and associated designations This Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, acting by and through its Board of Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Counties in the Metropolitan Area and the State concur that in the interest of bringing decision making for routes of specific functional classification into the appropriate levels of government, it is necessary to change jurisdiction of certain routes; Therefore, it is the intent of the State, the Counties and the City to work toward the following objectives: Article I - Nonbinding Memorandum of Understanding 1. Definitions will be as contained in Minnesota Rules 8820.0100, and as follows: Receiving authority - The political subdivision which receives jurisdiction as a result of jurisdiction transfer. Transferring authority - The political subdivision which has jurisdiction prior to jurisdiction transfer. Route -miles - The distance as measured along the existing roadway, between termini, rounded to the nearest 1/100 of a mile. 2. Both parties acknowledge that this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is a nonbinding statement of intent. Agreements executed by the parties as a result of obtaining enabling legislation as anticipated in this MOU are subject to approval of such State Officers as the Law may provide, the Commissioner of Transportation and the City. Article II - Introduction of Legislation Implementation of jurisdictional transfer as listed in this MOU requires approval of enabling legislation by the State Legislature. The State will prepare and introduce appropriate legislation with notification to the City no less than two (2) weeks prior to the introduction to the Legislature. Article III - Basis for Determining Compensation If enabling legislation is obtained, the State and City intend to execute jurisdictional transfer incorporating the concepts set forth herein. 2 The party receiving subject roadways as anticipated in this MOU (receiving authority) will be compensated for each change of jurisdiction as follows: 1. All project funds allocated in the improvement programs of the party transferring subject roadways as anticipated in this MOU (transferring authority) will transfer to the receiving authority in the year designated in the transferring authority's improvement program. Project funds will include estimated construction funds. Project funds that are transferred must be used on the transferred route; any interest accrued on such funds must be used on roadways under jurisdiction of the receiving authority. Note: At this time, no such projects are anticipated. 2. Municipal State Aid Turnback Account funds may be utilized by the City for improvements to subject roadways transferred to the city resulting from this MOU in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820 in effect on the date of the jurisdictional transfer, and Screening Board Resolution Re: Trunk Highway Turnback - October 1967 (latest revision June 1989). Additionally, if the City receives project funds under Article 111.1, turnback construction funds will be reduced by an equal amount. 3. Municipal State Aid System funds may be utilized by the City for subject roadways transferred to the County under agreements resulting from this MOU in accordance with Minnesota Rules Part 8820 in effect on the date of the jurisdictional transfer, and Screening Board Resolution Re: Trunk Highway Turnback - October 1967 (latest revision, June 1989). 3 Article IV - Identification of Routes and Schedule Additions of routes other than listed will require approval of the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation, and the City. It is the intent of the parties to achieve jurisdictional transfer within one (1) year following passage of enabling legislation. TH 49 Segments: (1) TH 49 from the south Anoka County line to the intersection of CSAH 23 at Lilac St. then turning west on Lilac Street to the intersection of 4th Ave. N., a total distance of 5.51 miles,will be transferred to the County. (2) TH 49 from the above noted junction south to the end point, a distance of 0.28 miles will be transferred to the City. The above State Route will be conveyed under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.16 Subd. 4. The above described trunk highway and County roads are shown on the map attached hereto titled RA' SIihjert to Transfer, State/Cnunty/City, marked Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part hereof. The City will by Resolution agree to the TH 49 turnback to Anoka County as listed in Article IV and its designation as a County State Aid Highway. The State and City intend to agree to the future right of way limits at State/County/City intersecting roadways, prior to the transfer of land 4 The State and City intend to agree to the future right of way limits at State/County/City intersecting roadways, prior to the transfer of land title for each subject roadway. Article V - Infrastructure Management Responsibilities All routes included in this MOU will continue to be included in the transferring authority pavement management system and, when appropriate, receive program funds for pavement management until such time as the roadway changes jurisdiction. All routine maintenance on the subject route covered in this MOU will -be the responsibility of the transferring authority as normal, up until the time of transfer. This includes keeping any routine maintenance agreements with municipalities in force also. It is anticipated that where maintenance agreements exist the receiving party will replace the existing agreements with their own, so that no lapse in coverage will occur. Nothing in this MOU is intended to prohibit the State or City from entering into roadway maintenance agreements, including reimbursement provisions, for any roadway identified in this MOU. 5 Article Vill - Information and Records Transfer The transferring authority will make the following information and records available to the receiving authority upon request, to the extent that they are available, for the route to be transferred. 1. List of active maintenance agreements which will be canceled with other governmental agencies and utility companies. 2. Utility, drainage, access driveway, sign advertising, and limited use permits. 3. As -built construction plans, and microfilm records. 4. Bridge inspection reports and ratings. 5. Photo -logs, aerial photos, right of way maps, and parcel files. 6. Inventory data.. 7. Pavement condition ratings. 8. History of most recent betterment. 9. Signal files including timing sequence and repair history. 10 Accident reports and statistics, subject to Privacy Act requirements. 11 The most current traffics counts. 12 Any alignment ties, horizontal and vertical control monuments, and relative data. 13. All completed and partially completed plans for construction projects associated with the routes being transferred. 14 Road opening authority documentation and/or right of way authority. Article IX - State Aid Route Designation The State, through the Commissioner of Transportation, will designate the highway segments described in Article IV to be transferred to the City as a Municipal State Aid Street and will approve the corresponding increase in mileage, in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820, upon receipt of a resolution requesting such, from the City. This mileage is not transferable to other routes in the City. 6 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this memorandum of understanding by their authorized officers. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF LINO LAKES ATTEST: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: City Council By: Date Metro Division Engineer By: By: By: City Administratrator Date State Aid Engineer City Attorney Date RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: By: Assistant Commissioner - City Engineer APPROVED: Date By: Deputy Commissioner of Transportation Date of Understanding Routes Subject to Transfer State/County/City Exhibit A Lino Lakes Rehabilitation Center STAFF C RIGINATOR: l ev i Ahrer , Rcrt lic s Dire DATE:. 3/8/96 TOPIC: Resolutiuon No. 96 - 02 Award Construction Contras Condominium Street and Utility Improvements and opened on Thursday, January 18, 1996, for the ars# utlities for the Marshan Lake Condominiums. City aired to award a construction contract to the lowest BACKGROUND The City Council ordered the improvement for the Marshan Lake Condominium Street and Utility Improvements at the December 18, 1996, Council Meeting. On Thursday, January 18, 1996 thirteen sealed bids were received and opened with the following results: .40 $24,21 ,238.00 $18,039.00 ,522.90 $29,435.00 3,157.45 $24,430.85 ,387.50 $29,175.00 26.36 - $28,832.18 $593,406.00 $35,608.50 $830,402.00 $18,450. $617,256.75 $38,805.1 $633,334.69 $640,058.66 $648,090.40 $677,465.82 $626,662.00 town & Cris Kober Excavating Engineer's estimate X388.40 $593,277.00 $602,957.90 $617,588.30 $623,562.50 $623,758.54 $629,014.50 ,852.00 .061.75 $31,870.15 $31,957.70 $34,547.50 $29,879.99 $22,235 The bid alternate includes the necessary work to extend the sanitary sewer to properties south of Aqua Lane (refer to attached map). Staff has bid aitemate price to the property andthey have ii sewer extended. Marshan Condos Award Page 2 The low bidder, C.W. Houle, Inc., has worked for the City on past projects, including Clearwater Creek, Wenzel Farms, Wenzel Farms 3rd Addition, and Apollo Drive Phase II. C. W. Houle, Inc., is a reputable contractor capable of performing the required work. FINANCING SUMMARY: The construction costs (including the bid alternate) for this project are estimated to be funded as follows: Special Assessments $526,079.40 City's Area & Unit Fund $ 38,289.00 Total $564,368.40 The City's portion of this project includes the cost for jacking the trunk watermain under Highway 49 and oversizing the watermain to a trunk watermain. PROJECT SCHEDULE: It is anticipated that construction will begin in April, 1996, and, per the Contract, will be substantially complete by July 31, 1996. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 96 - 02, awarding a construction contract for the Marshan Lake Condominium Street and Utility Improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Resolution Number 96 - 02, awarding a construction contract for the Marshan Lake Condominium Street and Utility Improvements to C. W. Houle, Inc., be adopted. FUTURE M.H.– • :;..: —<----6 EX. 8" NOTE: LIFT STATION PUMPS 8, CONTROLS UPGRADED TO PROVIDE SANITARY SEWER FOR FULLY COMPLETED SERVICE AREA. • - . . . . . 6.1,1 .FU FU • j1 4 KAT 11,04 D EX.• L.$. • • EX. 4 • • . • FN 11 REROUTE 4" FORCEMAIN NORTH TO FUTURE MANHOLE I WHEN SERVICE AREA IS—VULLY COMPLETE. 20 -31-" • ,.'2-0611 (EXCEPTION) TVIVU La Arl. *316#113•Snal -.1 rt• J 20-31- ACKY 600g -14 -0001 rig- .31- 22 -14 1• 1 TRUNK EXTENSION SHALL 8" 2-322. BE PAID FOR BY CITY AND PETITIONED PROPERTY OWNERS. 31 *2 -23-0009 I/ 11 • . , 14 1" - 250' NOTE: @ALL SERVICES SHALL BE 6" P.V.C. EXCEPT OTHERWISE NOTED. PETITIONED PROPERTY OWNERS FOR SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION. Drawn By: PH Date: 9-6-95 MR Orr Schelen Associates, Inc. Mayeron & Engineers • Architects • Planners • Surveyors 300 Park Place East • 5775 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis. MN 55416-1228 ai 612-595-5775 Drawing Title SANITARY SEWER MARSHAN LAKE TOWNHOMES LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA Comm. N 5521.10 Sheet nc January 24, 1996 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014-2123 Orr Schelen Mayeron& Associates, Inc. 300 Park Place East 5775 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55416-1228 612-595-5775 1-800-753-5775 FAX 595-5774 RFCFI\/ED JAN 2 5 1996 CITY OF LINO LAKEF Re: Utility Construction and Appurtenant Work Marshan Lake Condominiums OSM Project No. 5521.10 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors Bids were received for the above -referenced project at 10:00 a.m. on January 18, 1995, and were opened and read aloud. A total of thirteen responsive bids were received. C.W. Houle, Inc., submitted the lowest base bid in the amount of $540,153.40. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and the tabulation is enclosed. The engineer's base bid estimate was $626,662.00. C.W. Houle, Inc., has successfully completed projects for OSM and the City of Lino Lakes. City staff has worked with the contractor in other municipalities. Based on their previous performance on similar projects, we anticipate that C.W. Houle, Inc., is capable of successfully completing the Marshan Lake Condominium project. We, therefore, recommend award for the contract to C.W. Houle, Inc., 1300 West County Road I, Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 in the amount of $540,153.40. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON - & ASSOCIATES, INC. David D. Mitchell, P.E. Project Manager Enclosure c: Dave Ahrens, P.E. - City of Lino Lakes ce x \Ssu.1O\cmc\cORRESWia496.CIY Equal Opportunity Employer Extension of Bids STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 5521.10 Bid Date: January 18, 1996 10:00 A.M. ' Denotes corrected figure. Item Spec No Description Quantity Unh ENGINEERS ESTIMATE TOW BIC $048,997.00 Udt Pala hem Total LOW BIDDER C.W. HOULE, INC. Total Bid: $684,388.40 Unit Price Item Total 2ND BIDDER SJ LOUIS CONSTR., INC Toted Bid: $593,277.00 Unit Price Item Total 3RD BIDDER KADLEC EXC. OF MORA Total Bid: •$802,957.90 Unh Noe Item Total 4TH BIDDER BONINE EXCAVATING, INC. Total Bid: $817,588.30 Unit Price Item Total SCHEDULE At STREETS 1 2104.606-00120- REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 300 SO YD $3.00 3900.00 93.00 $900.00 $3.00 $900.00 $200 $800.00 52.50 3750.00 2 2104.513-00011- SAWING BR PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 670 UN FT $3.00 $2,010.00 $200 $1,340.00 $5.00 33,360.00 $4.00 52.890.00 $260 31.675.00 3 2106.501-00010- COMMON EXCAVATION 3900 CU YD $3.00 311.700.00 $135 $5,265.00 $425 $16,575.00 52.00 $7.800.00 $0.01 $39.00 4 2106.62140010- GRANULAR BORROW (LV) 3900 CU YD 57.00 $27,300.00 $0.01 $39.00_ $5.85 822,815.00 35.25 $20.475.00 30.01 $39.00 5 2112.601-00010- SUBGRADE PREPARATION 33 ROAD STA $200.00 36,8000.00 3155.00 $5,115.00 3130.00 $4,290.00 3100.00 33,300.00 3123.00 34,059.00 8 2211.501-00000- AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 6 (RECYCLED) 3120 TON 37.00 321,840.00 38.80 427,458.00 37.00 $21.840.00 $825 $25.740.00 $6.87 321.434.40 7 2331.614.00030- TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE 1100 TON $30.00 $33.000.00 $25.40 $27.940.00 $25.00 327,500.00 $24.00 328,400.00 $24.70 $27.170.00 8 2331.608-00040- TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 380 TON $31.00 312,090.00 $33.00 312,870.00 $30.00 $11,700.00 $28.00 310,920.00 $29.16 111,372.40 9 2531.501-04110- CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 0412 6670 UN FT $6.00 $34.020.00 38.00 434.020.00 3826 335,437.50 $6.25 329,767.50 $6.13 334,757.10 10 2367.50240010- BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 190 GALLON 35.00 3960.00 $1.80 3304.00 $1.99 3313.50 $200 $380.00 31.84 3311.80 11 2573.603-00003- SILT FENCE, PREASSEMBLED 2000 UN FT 5200 $4,000.00 31.25 $2,600.00 $2.00 34.000.00 31.50 $3,000.00 4242 34,840.00 12 2673.50600030- SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL 4' TOPSOIL) 8900 SO YD 32.00 $13,800.00 $1.80 $11,040.00 31.40 $9,880.00 31.96 313,455.00 8221 315,249.00 13 2232.6014)0115- M81 BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5') 2256 SQ YD $2.00 $4,510.00 30.80 31,804.00 30.52 31,172.80 31.75 33,94825 3051 31.150.05 TOTAL SCHEDULE At STREETS 8172,720.00 3130,593.00 3199,563.80 $148,463.75 $122,646.56 SCHEDULE B: STORM SEWER 14 2501516-90421. 4r RC PIPE APRON W/TRASH GUARD 1 EACH $2,600.00 $2,600.00 $1,700.00 $1.700.00 31.600.00 $1.500.00 31,500.00 _ 31,500.00 *1,696.00 31,698.00 16 250151540181. 18' RC PIPE APRON W/TRASH GUARD 4 EACH 8700.00 82,800.00 3680.00 $2,720.00 3640.00 *2,560.00 $500.00 42,000.00 3641.00 $2,564.00 16 2503541-00125- 12' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3000 CL V 140 UN FT $18.00 $2,620.00 318.00 $2,520.00 $26.00 $3,840.00 317.00 $2.380.00 317.30 32,422.00 17 2503.641-00165- 16' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V 638 UN FT 819.00 512,12200 $1950 312.441.00 323.00 314,874.00 318.00 $11,484.00 $18.80 $11.994.40 18 2503.64140186- 19' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CI. V 300 UN FT 328.00 $8,400.00 $2125 $6,375.00 $25.00 $7,500.00 $20.00 38,000.00 320.56 36,185.00 19 250354140215- 21' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V 175 LIN FT $30.00 $5,250.00 $25.00 $4,375.00 $32.00 $5,600.00 $30.00 35,250.00 324.85 $4,313.75 20 250354140243 24' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3008 CL 111 174 UN FT $30.00 $5,220.00 426.00 84,624.00 $33.00 $5,742.00 $30.00 $5,220.00 52520 $4,384.80 21 2503.541-90273- 27' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3008 CL III 29 UN FT $35.00 31,015.00 $33.00 $957.00 $39.00 $1,131.00 $37.00 31,073.00 $32.20 $933.80 22 250354190303- 30' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 C1.111 283 UN FT 245.00 $12,735..00 $37.00 310,471.00 339.00 311,037.00 $40.00 311,320.00 $37.80 310.697.40 23 2503.54140383- 38' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 C1.111 288 UN FT 580.00 515,960.00 $6050 *13.433.00 $52.00 313,832.00 $55..00 314,830.00 351.96 513,818.70 24 2503.54140423- 42' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL III 166 UN FT 376.00 312,375..00 $71.00 311,715.00 $73.00 $1Z045.00 $80.00 313,200.00 368.70 311,33550 25 260650842420- CONSTRUCT MANI OLE DESIGN 48-4020 10 EACH 51.200.00 312,000.00 3925.00 $9,250.00 $1,200.00 312,000.00 31,200.00 *12,000.00 $1,142.00 311,420.00 26 2606.608-03020- CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 60-4020 1 EACH $1,600.00 31,5000.00 81,650.00 31,660.00 31,800.00 31,600.00 32,600.00 42,500.00 31,67140 31,571.00 27 2506.508-03620- CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 72-4020 2 EACH $2,200.00 $4,400.00 32,800.00 416.800.00 $2,800.00 $5,200.00 *2,750.00 $5,500.00 32,252.00 $4.504.00 28 2506.60644219- CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 844019 1 EACH $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $4.060.00 $4,050.00 33,600.00 $3.5000.00 $3.600.00 $3,500.00 33,223.00 33.223.00 29 2509.50242420- CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 8 EACH $1,200.00 $9,800.00 $875.00 37.000.00 81,100.00 $8,800.00 $1,200.00 39,000.00 31.117.00 $8,836.00 30 2502.541-07040- 4' PERF PE PIPE DRAIN 400 UN FT 315.00 36.000.00 3720 32.880.00 $3.00 31,200.00 $5.75 32.300.00 $3.82 31,528.00 31 2511.501-00013 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III WITH TYPE N GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND GRANULAR BEDDING 20 CU YD 340.00 $800.00 358.00 $1,180.00 $39.00 3780.00 345.00 $900.00 $40.00 $800.00 32 0461.802-00040- GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 670 TON 86.00 $3,360.00 30.01 $8.70 $0.01 $6.70 $0.01 36.70 30.01 36.70 IiiCISIL 211oJa.e Page 1 of 9 Extension of Bids STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 5521.10 Bid Date: January 18, 1996 10:00 A.M. • Denotes corrected figure. Item Spec No DeealptIon Ofun6ly Unit ENGINEERS ESTIMATE Total Bld: $246,117.00 UMt Price Item Total LOW BIDDER C.W. HOULE, INC. Total Bid: $564,369.40 Unit Noe Item Total 2ND BIDDER SJ LOUIS CONSTR., INC Total Bid: $593,277.00 Unit Pdc. Item Total 3RD BIDDER KADLEC EXC. OF MORA Total Bid: • $602,067.90 Unit Pdoe Item Total 4TH BIDDER BONINE EXCAVATING, INC. Total Bid: $617,666.30 Unit Noe Item Total TOTAL SCHEDULE S: STORM SEWER $121,947.00 8102,727.70 $112,347.70 $110,363.70 $102,319.06 SCHEDULE C: WATERMAIN 33 2611.602-00001- CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN 2 EACH $1,200.00 $2400.00 81,250.00 $2,500.00 $330.00 $660.00 $500.00 81,000.00 $2,725.00 $5,450.00 34 2011.508-04241- 24' STEEL CASING PIPE (JACKED) 70 UN FT $150.00 *10,500.00 $152.00 $10,640.00 $150.00 $10,500.00 8125.00 $8,750.00 $123.00 $8,610.00 34 2611.50241143- 8'X6' WET TAP 1 EACH $1,600.00 81,500.00 $1,600.00 $1,500.00 81,200.00 $1,200.00 11,025.00 $1,025.00 $1,456.00 81,455.00 36 261150240802. 4' GATE VALVE AND BOX 11 EACH 8350.00 $3,850.00 8420.00 $4,620.00 5370.00 $4,070.00 1375.00 $4,125.00 $294.00 $3,234.00 36 2611.50240803. 6' GATE VALVE AND BOX 12 EACH $450.00 $5,400.00 $440.00 $5,280.00 8420.00 *5,040.00 $425.00 $5,100.00 $346.00 $4,152.00 37 2611.50200804. 8 GATE VALVE AND BOX 8 EACH $560.00 $4,400.00 1585.00 84,680.00 9670.00 $4,680.00 8576.00 84,600.00 $479.00 83,832.00 38 2611.50240808. 12' GATE VALVE AND BOX 6 EACH $900.00 $5,400.00 8930.00 $5,590.00 $960.00 $6.760.00 8950.00 $5,700.00 $1.023.00 16,138.00 39 2611.50341047. 4' WATER MAIN DUCT IRON CL 52 400 UN FT $15.00 $8,000.00 $14.70 $5,880.00 *16.00 $6,400.00 $11.90 $4,780.00 $10.00 $4,000.00 40 2811.50240410. 1' CORPORATION STOP 39 EACH $50.00 81,960.00 $31.00 81,209.00 $47.00 $1,633.00 $30.00 81,170.00 *15.00 $585.00 41 2611.503-01067. 8' WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 62 130 UN FT $16.00 82,340.00 $16.00 82,080.00 $17.00 82,210.00 $12.75 $1,657.60 $10.70 81,391.00 42 2611.502-03100 1' CURB STOP 8 BOX 39 EACH $100.00 $3,900.00 $70.00 $2,730.00 $89.00 $3,471.00 876.00 $2,925.00 $60.00 112,340.00 43 2611.503-01067. 8' WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 52 1956 UN FT $20.00 $39,100.00 $1720 $33,626.00 $14.00 $27.370.00 $1525 $29,813.75 113.30 526,001.50 44 2811.603-00710 1' TYPE K COPPER PIPE 1500 LIN FT 810.00 816,000.00 $9.10 $13,650.00 $9.00 *13,500.00 $6.75 $8,625.00 $8.96 513,425.00 46 2011.60301127. 12' WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 52 2370 UN FT $25.00 $59,250.00 $23.80 $55,932.00 $22.00 $52,140.00 $42.25 $52,73260 $21.76 851,54750 46 2611.520-00020- DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 10000 POUND 51.25 812,500.00 $1.30 $13,000.00 *1.25 $12600.00 81.00 810,000.00 81.60 816,000.00 47 2611.502-00020 HYDRANT 12 EACH *1,000.00 *12,000.00 *1,330.00 *15,960.00 51,000.00 *19,200.00 $1,050.00 $12,600.00 81,546.00 518,55200 48 0461.80240040 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 670 TON $5.00 $3.360.00 $0.01.,$6.70 $0.01 $6.70 $0.01 $6.70 $0.01 $6.70 TOTAL SCHEDULE C: WATERMAIN $199,140.00 $170,673.70 8170,420.70 8164,590.45 8166,719.70 SCHEDULE D: SANITARY SEWER 49 2621.608-07410 STANDARD 4' SANITARY SEWER MH (0-105 15 EACH $1,200.00 *18,000.00 ,26 $10.00 • $18.900.00 $1,300.00 1119,500.00 $1,000.00 115,000.00 81,294.00 *19,410.00 50 2621.50607410 EXTRA 4r DIA. M.H. DEPTH OVER 10 46 UN FT $100.00 $4,500.00 $70.00 $3,150.00 $100.00 $4,770.00 $75.00 $3,375.00 $69.00 $3.105.00 61 0451.802.00041 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 400 TON $5.00 $2,000.00 $0.01 $4.00 $0.01 $4.00 816.00 $6,400.00 $0.01 $4.00 52 2621.50240206 CONST. 8' TYPE 'A' OUTSIDE DROP (0-45 2 EACH $1.000.00 82,000.00 $1,200.00 $2.400.00 $450.00 $900.00 $800.00 $1.600.00 81,300.00 $2.600.00 53 2621.50607420 EXTRA DROP SECTION DEPTH OVER 4' 2 LIN FT $100.00 $200.00 $120.00 $240.00 833.00 $66.00 $200.00 $400.00 $75.00 $150.00 54 2621.50240003 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SAN) 1 EACH $500.00 $600.00 $4,100.00 84,100.00 $500.00 $500.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $21.400.00 521,400.00 66 2621511-13085- 8 PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 36 3045 LN FT $19.00 $57,866.00 81820 556.419.00 $23.50 571,667.60 $27.00 $82,215.00 $37.11 $112,999.96 56 2621502.13086 6'X8 PVC WYE 13 EACH $100.00 81,300.00 $82.00 $1,066.00 $59.00 $767.00 $35.00 $456.00 832.00 8416.00 67 2621511.13000 6' PVC PIPE SEWER 9081 26 SERVICE PIPE 660 LIN FT 816.00 18,250.00 $1250 $6,875.00 $11.00 $6,050.00 $27.00 $14,850.00 $6.46 $3.553.00 68 2621.502-00010 UFT STATION UPGRADE 1 EACH $5,000.00 $5,000.00 82,350.00 $2350.00 $2,900.00 12,900.00 $5.000.00 55,000.00 $1,842.00 91,84200 60 202150600206- 8' FORCE MAIN DUCTILE IRON PIPE 1120 UN FT $26.00 528,000.00 816.75 $18,760.00 *13.00 814,660.00 $15.50 $17.380.00 521.61 $24,20320 60 2611502-00803 6' GATE VALVE AND BOX 2 EACH 8450.00 11900.00 $860.00 51,720.00 $420.00 1840.00 $425.00 5850.00 $546.00 $1,092.00 81 262150240100 PLUG & ABANDON PIPE SEWER 2 EACH 12,000.00 $4,000.00 $860.00 $1.700.00 $250.00 $500.00 5300.00 $600.00 $100.00 5200.00 82 210450140086- REMOVE FORCE MAIN 150 UN FT 95.00 8750.00 $8.50 $1,275.00 $0.01 $1.60 58.00 $900.00 12.00 $300.00 HJCMUBIDV662110XL9 Page 2 of 9 Extension of Bids STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 5521.10 Bid Date: January 18, 1996 10:00 A.M. • Denotes corrected figure. Mem Spec No Deeorlption Csantlty Unit ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Total Bid: 9646,357.00 Ur9t Prla Item Total LOW BIDDER C.W. HOULE, INC. Told Bid: 3564,366.40 Unit Price lam Total 2ND BIDDER SJ LOUIS CONSTR., INC Total Bid: 1603,277.00 UMt Pfloe Mem Total 3RD BIDDER KADLEC EXC. OF MORA Total Bid: • 1102,967.90 U r t Price Mem Total 4TH BIDDER BONNE EXCAVATING, INC. Total Bid: 1617,560.30 Unit Price Item Total TOTAL SCHEDULE D: SANITARY SEWER 1133,256.00 3117,959.00 1122,910.00 1150,105.00 3101,275.15 SCHEDULE E: MOBILQAT)ON & CLEANUP 83 2021.501-00001• MOBILIZATION 1 LUMP SUM 36.000.00 35,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 $6,000.00 15.000.00 15.000.00 96,000.00 _ 15.000.00 04 2021.501-00004- CLEANUP 1 LUMP SUM 16,000.00 35,000.00 15,000.00 15.000.00 36,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 15.000.00 15.000.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE Es MOBILIZATION & CLEANUP 110,000.00 910,000.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 910,000.00 SCHEDULE F: ALTERNATE SID 86 2621.608-07410. STANDARD 4' SANITARY SEWER MH (0.10') 4 EACH 11,200.00 94,800.00 11,280.00 16,040.00 11,900.00 , 15.200.00 11,000.00 14,000.00 11,294.00 95,170.00 86 2621.50047410- EXTRA 46' DIA. M.H. DEPTH OVER 10' 20 UN FT 1100.00 32,000.00 170.00 81,400.00 1106.00 *120.00 175.00 11,500.00 169.00 51,380.00 67 2821.511-13065. 8' PVC PIPE SEWER SOR 96 086 UN FT 119.00 112,836.00 32320 316,426.00 112.00 17,980.00 329.00 119,285.00 124.09 916,019.85 35 2521.511.13040. 4' PVC PIPE SEWER SOR 28 SERVICE PIPE 40 LIN FT 310.00 3400.00 914.50 9580.00 311.00 1440.00 327.00 51,080.00 16.00 3240.00 35 2021.511-130080. 8' PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 26 SERVICE PIPE 40 UN FT 316.00 3800.00 315.50 3620.00 11200 1480.00 127.00 91,080.00 97.00 1280.00 70 2621.502-13084. 8%4' PVC WYE 2 EACH 350.00 1100.00 366.00 113200 350.00 $100.00 135.00 370.00 120.00 140.00 71 2021.502.13086 6'x6' PVC WYE 2 EACH 3100.00 1200.00 182.00 1164.00_ 359.00 1118.00 135..00 370.00 132.00 364.00 72 2575.80140010. SEEDING 1 ACRE 91.000.00 11,000.00 3850.00 3850.00 11,000.00 91.800.00 1760.00 1750.00 31230.00 11,230.00 73 0451.002.00040. GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 100 TON 15.00 1000.00 10.01 31.00 30.01 11.00 116.00 11,600.00 10.01 11.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE F: ALTERNATE SID 14$231.00 124,215.00 110,03500 120,436.00 124,430.85. TOTAL SCHEDULES A THROUGH E (SASE SID) 3626,635.00 3840,153.40 1675,235.00 3573,522.00 1353,157.45 TOTAL SID , 1545,357.00 1654,355.40 1199,277.00 1502,057.90 1617.655.30 H:ICIVILVIE06621 %ICUS Page 3 of 9 Extension of Bids STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 5521.10 Bid Date: January 18, 1996 10:00 A.M. * Denotes corrected figure. Item Spec No Deealpdon Quantity Unit 5TH BIDDER FOREST LAKE CONTR., INC. Total Bid: $423,182.80 Unit Pilo* Item Total 6TH BIDDER NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION Told Bid: 1423,780.84 Unit Price hem Total 7TH BIDDER REHBEIN EXC., INC. Total Bid: 1629,014.80 Unit Pdoa Item Total 8TH BIDDER S.M. HENTQES & SONS, INC. Taal Bit 1848,152.00 Unit Price Item Total 9TH BIDDER RYAN CONTR., INC Total Bid: '1154,061.75 Unit Nee ham Taal SCHEDULE A: STREETS 1 2104.50540120- REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 300 SQ YD $200 5800.00 $4.00 51,200.00 51.00 $300.00 52.00 5800.00 $2.00 5800.00 2 2104.513-00011- SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 870 UN FT $2.25 $1,507.50 $4.25 52,847.50 3125 5837.50 $200 81,340.00 52.50 51,875.00 3 2106.50140010- COMMON EXCAVATION 3900 CU YD 5325 812,675.00 31.25 54.875.00 $0.01 $39.00 55.00 519,500.00 53.50 513,150.00 4 2105.52140010- GRANULAR BORROW (LV) 3900 CU YD $4.00 $15.8000.00 81.25 $4,875.00 50.01 $39.00 55.00 519,500.00 $8.50 525,350.00 5 2112.50140010- SUBGRADE PREPARA11ON33 ROAD STA 8150.00 $4,950.00 5125.00 $4.125.00 5130.00 $4290.00 5100.00 $3.300.00 5125.00 $4.125.00 8 2211.50140000- AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 6 (RECYCLED) 3120 TON 86.00 818,720.00 $8.05 $25.116.00 57.10 822.152.00 57.00 521,840.00 58.00 524.980.00 7 2331.51440030- TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE 1100 TON 524.00 $26,400.00 $24.50 528.960.00 523.55 528,105.00 524.50 528,950.00 $23.00 $25.300.00 8 2331.508-00040- TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 390 TON 528.00 810,920.00 527.60 510,725.00 $3020 511,778.00 528.50 811,115.00 828.00 510,140.00 9 2531.501-04110- CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN D412 5670 UN FT 55.50 $31,186.00 58.46 538,82820 $8.00 534,020.00 $5.60 531.752.00 55.00 528,350.00 10 2157.50240010- BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 190 GALLON 31.60 5285.00 _ 51.65 5313.50 51.70 5323.00 51.80 5304.00 51.50 $285.00 11 2573.503-00003- SILT FENCE, PREASSEMBLED 2000 UN FT $200 84,000.00 $225 $4,500.00 51.50 $3.000.00 8200 $4.000.00 5125 52.600.00 12 2573..606-00030- SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. 4' TOPSOIL) 6900 SQ YD $1.75 512,075.00 51.84 512,696.00 $1.75 512,075.00 51.50 510,350.00 51.90 513,110.00 13 ', 2232.501-00115- MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.51 2256 SO YD 5120 52,706.00 81.80 54,069.00 $0.55 31,24025 50.50 51,127.50 51.15 53,720.75 TOTAL SCHEDULE A: STREETS 5141,823.50 5138,91020 5118,190.75 5161,878..500 $113,715.75 SCHEDULE B: STORM SEWER .14 2601.51640421- 42' RC PIPE APRON W/TRASH GUARD 1 EACH 51,700.00 51,700.00 $1,15724 51,85724 51,870.00 $1,870.00 51,500.00 51,600.00 51.350.00 51,350.00 15 2501.515-00181- 18' RC PIPE APRON W/IRASH GUARD 4 EACH 5700.00 32,800.00 5592.52 $2.370.08 5845.00 52,580.00 5750.00 $3,000.00 3725.00 52,900.00 16 2503.54140125. 12' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CI. V 140 LIN FT 821.00 0940.00 522.37 $3,131.80 820.80 $2,884.00 317.00 52.380.00 525.00 $3.600.00 17 2503.54140166 ir RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V 638 UN FT $2200 514,038.00 523.84 *15,082.32 $20.90 $13,33420 519.00 $12,122.00 $28.00 518,588.00 18 2603.54140186- ir RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 9006 CL V 300 UN FT 523.00 58.900.00 $25.53 57,159.00 823.35 57.005.00 521.00 $6,300.00 $29.00 58,700.00 19 2503.54140216 21' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V 175 UN FT 528.00 $4,660.00 32920 $5,110.00 327.70 54.847.110 $25.00 34,375.00 536.00 $6.125.00 20 2503.541-90243- 24' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3008 CL III 174 UN FT 527.00 54,898.00 529.62 85,153.88 $28.30 84,92420 526.00 $4.624.00 $35.00 $8.090.00 21 2503.51140273. 27' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3008 CL In 29 LIN FT $35.00 $1,015.00 836.01 51.04429 $37.70 31,093.30 $33.00 5967.00 $45.00 51,305.00 22 2503.54190303. 30' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3008 CL 111 283 LIN FT 839.00 511,037.00 $15.84 511218.12 $41.80 511,77280 $37.00 r 510,471.00 546.00 813,018.00 23 2603.54140383. 36' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL 111 286 UN FT 153.00 $14,098.00 852.90 814,071.40 $55.10 514.658.80 552.00 513,832.00 882.00 516,492.00 24 2509.54190423- 42' RC PIPE SEWER 0ES1{3N 9006 CL III 166 LIN FT 373.00 812,046.00 57022 811,586.30 872.90 512,028.50 570.00 511,550.00 584.00 513,860.00 25 2506.50802420- CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 48.4020 10 EACH 51,200.00 512,000.00 51,08027 510,802.70 51,185.00 511,850.00 51,250.00 812,500.00 51,080.00' 510,800.00 28 2506.508-09020- CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 60-4020 1 EACH 31,800.00 31,600.00 31,661.84 $1,881.84 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0000.00 52,000.00 31,080.00 51,880.00 27 2506.508-03620- CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 72-4020 2 EACH 0700.00 $5,400.00 060329 $5,006.58 52.960.00 55,900.00 83,500.00 87,000.00 32.200.00 54,400.00 28 2506.508-04219- CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 84.4019 1 EACH 84,000.00 84,000.00 53,793.92 83.793.92 84,186.00 34.166.00 55.000.00 $5.000.00 53,070.00 33.070.00 29 2506.50242420- CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 8 EACH 51,200.00 $9,600.00 51,080.49 58.643.92 51.146.00 89,160.00 51.250.00 510,000.00 5796.00 88,380.00 30 2502.541-07040. 4' PERF PE PIPE DRAIN 400 UN FT 54.75 31,900.00 58.50 0800.00 87.00 32,800.00 512.00 54.800.00 510.00 84,000.00 31 2511.601430013 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS 18 WITH TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND GRANULAR BEDDING 20 CU YD $56.00 $1,100.00 $67.93_ 31,358.80 555.00 51,100.00 550.00 31,000.00 540.00 5800.00 32 0461.802-00040- GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 670 TON 56.00 54,020.00 80.01 56.70 80.01 86.70 $10.00 $8,700.00 510.00 $8.700.00 Iecnnolk00,562110.3tuk Page 4 of 9 Extension of Bids STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 5521.10 Bid Date: January 18, 1996 10:00 A.M. Denotes corrected figure. Item Spec No 0•116110011 Quantity Unit 5TH BIDDER FOREST LAKE CONTR., INC. Total Bid $627,662.60 Unit Prlos Item Total 6TH BIDDER NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION Total Bid: 1623,766.64 Unit Pdos Item Total 7TH BIDDER 1REHBEIN EXC., INC. Total Bid: 1828,014.80 Unit Price Item Total 8TH BIDDER S.M. HENTGES & SONS, INC. Total Bid: 1646,862.00 Unit Price Ban Taal 9TH BIDDER RYAN CONTR., INC Total Bid: 1664,061.76 Unit Price hem Total TOTAL SCHEDULE B: STORM SEWER 8116,839.00 8111,966.89 8113,71/.00 2120,011.00 $127,738.00 SCHEDULE Cs WATERMAN 33 2611.502-00001- CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN 2 EACH $450.00 8900.00 8360.14 270028 21,500.00 $3,000.00 2350.00 2700.00 21,360.00 82.700.00 34 2611.503-04241. 24 STEEL CASING PIPE (JACKED) 70 LIN FT 2175.00 $12,250.00 8120.96 28,46720 $120.00 $8.400.00 2116.00 $8,120.00 $200.00 214,000.00 34 2011.50201143 87:6' WET TAP 1 EACH $1,300.00 81,300.00 81,700.79 81,700.79 21,860.00 81,660.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $1,000.00 81,000.00 35 2011302-00602- 4 GATE VALVE AND BOX 1 11 EACH 2375.00 84,125.00 $377.83 $4,153.93 8390.00 84290.00 $400.00 $4,400.00 $315.00 83,485.00 36 2611.5020060.3 W GATE VALVE AND BOX I 12 EACH 2425.00 26,100.00 2152.50 $5,430.00 2410.00 84,920.00 2450.00 $5,400.00 8370.00 $4.440.00 37 2811.02200604- W GATE VALVE AND BOX 8 EACH 2550.00 24,400.00 $580.53 84,64424 2575.00 24,600.00 8600.00 $4,800.00 2600.00 24.000.00 36 2611.502-00606. 12' GATE VALVE AND 90) f 6 EACH 2925.00 $5,560.00 $976.16 25,856.96 21.075.00 26.450.00 21,000.00 26.000.00 8800.00 25.160.00 39 261130301047- 4' WATER MAIN DUCT IRON CL 52 400 LIN FT 817.00 86,800.00 81627 28.508.00 $1420 $5,680.00 812.50 $5.000.00 217.00 $6,800.00 40 2611.502-00410- I' CORPORATION STOP 39 EACH $45.00 81,755.00 $25.44 $992.16 $25.00 $975.00 $50.00 81,950.00 243.00 21,677.00 41 2611.503-01067- W WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON Cl. 52 130 UN FT $18.00 22,340.00 $17.15 $2,229.50 518.00 22,080.00 813.00 $1,690.00 219.50 22,535.00 42 2611.502-00100. 1' CURB STOP & BOX 39 EACH 8100.00 $4,095.00 $99.16 $3,88724 $70.00 82,730.00 2100.00 $3,900.00 $83.00 $3,237.00 43 2611.50301087- W WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CI. 52 1966 UN FT $21.00 $41,066.00 816.94 533,117.70 215.00 529,325.00 218.50 $32,25730 $21.00 241,065.00 44 2611.50300710. 1' TYPE K COPPER PIPE 1500 UN FT 212.50 218,750.00 $723 210,845.00 $8.50 812,750.00 211.00 $16,500.00 57.70 511,550.00 45 2611.503-01127. 12' WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 52 2370 UN FT 529.00 568,730.00 $23.94 256,737.80 $23.45 256,576.50 $23.00 $54,510.00 $27.60 $85.412.00 46 2011.52000020- DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 10000 POUND 81.00 $10,000.00 21.56 $15,800.00 $1.45 $14,500.00 21.40 514,000.00 $0.80 58.000.00 47 2811302430020 HYDRANT 12 EACH 21,500.00 218,000.00 81,159.31 213,911.72 $1,490.00 $17,880.00 81,300.00 215,600.00 $1,190.00 $14,260.00 48 0451.60400040- GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 670 TON 26.00 $4,020.00 20.01 86.70 $0.01 $6.70 $10.00 26,700.00 810.00 56.700.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE C: WATERMAN $209,170.00 8174,789.22 $174,623.20 $182,777.60 2196,011.00 SCHEDULE D: SANITARY SEWER 49 2621.50807410 STANDARD 4' SANITARY SEWER MH (0101 15 EACH 21,400.00 521,000.00 81,20282 818,039.30 81,465.00 821,975.00 21,300.00 519,500.00 $1,375.00 220,625.00 50 2621.50607410 EXTRA 48' DIA M.H. DEPTH OVER 10' 45 UN FT $80.00 13,600.00 $88.49 $3.847.06 260.00 22,700.00 $80.00 $3,600.00 275.00 83.375.00 61 11451.602-00040 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 400 TON 86.00 $2,400.00 $0.01 $4.00 $0.01 $4.00 510.00 $4,000.00 $10.00 84,000.00 52 2621302-00208- CONST. 8" TYPE'A' OUTSIDE DROP (0-4) 2 EACH $1,100.00 22,200.00 $825.10 21,65020 $960.00 $1,900.00 $1,500.00 83.000.00 81,210.00 $2.420.00 53 2821.506-07420- EXTRA DROP SECTION DEPTH OVER 4' 2 LIN FT 8110.00 $220.00 $83.58 8167.16 $30.00 860.00 5300.00 8800.00 $100.00 2200.00 54 2821302-00003 1 EACH $800.00 2600.00 21,000.00 81,000.00 $1,475.00 $1,475.00 $350.00 8350.00 $812.00' 8812.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SAN) 56 2621311.13086 r PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 3045 LN FT $19.00 $57,856.00 832.36 $98.506.75 $38.45 8117.08025 815.00 $45,675.00 822.00 288.990.00 66 2621.502-13086 8700' PVC WYE 13 EACH 960.00 2780.00 $45.43 8690.59 240.00 2520.00 $50.00 2850.00 $50.00 5650.00 57 2621.511.13080 W PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 26 SERVICE PIPE 650 LIN FT $15.00 28250.00 87.94 $4,367.00 27.80 84,290.00 $12.00 $6.600.00 88.00 $4.400.00 68 2621302-00010 UFT STATION UPGRADE 1 EACH $2,000.00 22,000.00 $2,873.64 $2,873.64 21960.00 81,960.00 $64.000.00 864,000.00 $9.500.00 $9.500.00 50 2821.503-00206 8' FORCE MAIN DUCTILE IRON PIPE 1120 UN FT $15.00 $16,800.00 216.62 818,502.40 213.60 $15,232.00 513.00 814,560.00 813.00 514,580.00 60 2611.50200803. 6' GATE VALVE AND BOX 2 EACH 8426.00 2890.00 $449.83 $899.68 $465.00 2930.00 $450.00 2900.00 $370.00 2740.00 81 2821302-00100- PLUG a ABANDON PIPE SEWER 2 EACH 2250.00 $500.00 2250.00 2500.00 8120.00 $240.00 8500.00 21,000.00 $300.00 5600.00 62 2104.50100086 REMOVE FORCE MAIN 160 UN FT 88.00 2200.00 256.61 88,341.60 $65.00 $8.250.00 210.00 $1,500.00 85.80 8870.00 IN41MLWID81662110. &6 Page 5 of 9 Extension of Bids STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA M PROJECT NO. 5521.10 Bid Date: January 18, 1996 10:00 A.M. • Denotes corrected figure. Sem Spec No Deecdp0o0 Ouantlly Unit 5TH BIDDER FOREST LAKE CONTR., INC. Todd Bid: *822,56250 UNt Noe item Todd 6TH BIDDER NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION Total Bid: '1823,758.54 Unit Price Item Total 7TH BIDDER REHBEIN EXC., INC. Total Bid: '1629,014.50 Unit Pifoa Item Total 8TH BIDDER S.M. HENTGES & SONS, INC. Total Bid: 1646,55200 Unit Noe Item Total 9TH BIDDER RYAN CONTR., INC Total Bk: 1854,051.75 Unit Price Item Total TOTAL SCHEDULED: SANITARY SEWER $117,955.00 $159,286.25 $175,600.25 $185,935.00 8129,742.00 SCHEDULE E: MOBILIZATION & CLEANUP 03 2021.501-00001• MOBIUZATION 1 LUMP SUM $5,000.00 $5,000.00 85,000.00 *5.000.00 *5,000.00 $5.000.00 55,000.00 $5.000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 84 2021.501-00004- CLEANUP 1 LUMP SUM 55,000.00 15,000.00 $8,000.00 55.000.00 $8.000.00 $5,000.00 85,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 *5,000.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE E: MOBILIZATION & CLEANUP $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 810,000.00 SCHEDULE F: ALTERNATE BID 59 2621.508-07410• STANDARD 4' SANITARY SEWER MH (0.10') 4 EACH $1,400.00 $5,000.00 $1,202.82 $4,810.48 $1,465.00 $5,850.00 81,300.00 $5,200.00 $1,375.00 $5,500.00 66 2621.50607410- EXTRA 48' DIA. M.H. DEPTH OVER W 20 UN FT $90.00 $1,800.00 $85.49 $1,709.80 $50.00 $1,200.00 $80.00 $1.600.00 $75.00 $1,500.00 67 2021.611.13085. r PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 36 '886 UN FT $27.00 $17,956.00 $30.34 $20,178.10 $39.50 $26,267.50 51200 $7,980.00 541.00 $27.265.00 08 2021.511.13040. 4' PVC PIPE SEWER SCR 28 SERVICE PIPE 40 LIN FT 812.00 1480.00 $11.94 $477.600 $18.00 $720.00 $20.00 $800.00 $8.50 $340.00 89 2621.51143050. 6' FVC PIPE SEWER OCR 26 SERVICE PIPE 40 UN FT $13.00 $520.00 $11.94_ $477.60 $19.00 $780.00 $20.00 $800.00 $9.00 $380.00 70 2621.502-13084. 6'X4' PVC WYE 2 EACH $50.00 $100.00 $44.90 $89.80 $50.00 5100.00 $50.00 5100.00 $45.00 $90.00 71 2621.50243088- 81(6' PVC WYE 2 EACH 860.00 5120.00 544.90 589.80 $50.00 $100.00 $80.00 *120.00 $50.00 *100.00 72 26/5.501-00010. SEEDING 1 ACRE $2,000.00 $2,000.00 *1,000.00 *1,000.00 $800.00 $600.00 $850.00 5850.00 $650.00 5850.00 73 0451.002-00040• GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 100 TON_ $6.00 $800.00 *0.01 81.00 *0.01 11.00 $10.00 $1,000.00 *10.00 $1,000.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE F: ALTERNATE BID 829,178.00 $26,532.18 $59,109.50 516,480.00 838,806.00 TOTAL SCHEDULES A THROUGH E (BASE BID) $594,387.50 $594,928.36 $593,408.00 8630,402.00 8617,256.76 I TOTAL 010 , $823,59250 *923,759.54 *629,014.50 *649,852.00 8654,061.75 IM L3BI0$662110.M9 Page 6 of 9 Extension of Bids STREET AND UTIUTY CONSTRUCTION MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 5521.10 Bid Date: January 18, 1996 10:00 A.M. • Denotes corrected figure. Item Spec No DNcelpdon Quantity Unit 10TH BIDDER ARGON CONSTRUCTION CO.,IN Total BId: 1686,004.84 Unit Ptice Item Tota\ 11TH BIDDER RICHARD KNUTSON INC. Taal Bid: 1672,01636 Unit Price Item Total 12TH BIDDER BROWN & CRIS, INC. Total Bid: 8002,63730 Unit Pelee Kern Total 13TH BIDDER KOBER EXCAVATING, INC. Total Bid: =707,346.01 Unit Price Item Total SCHEDULE A: STREETS 1 2104.506-00120 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 300 SO YD $200 5600.00 12.50 5750.00 51.66 $485.00 57.05 $2,115.00 2 2104.61340011- SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FUU. DEPTH) 670 UN FT 85.00 $3,350.00 13.00 52010.00 $3.05 $2,043.50 $2.97 51,989.90 3 2105.501.00010- COMMON EXCAVATION 3900 CU YD 58.00 $23,400.00 53.90 $15,210.00 $2.50 $9,750.00 51.53 $5,967.00 4 2105.521.00010- GRANULAR BORROW (LV) 3900 CU YD 58.20 131,960.00 57.10 827,690.00 $13.95 $64,405.00 57.60 529,260.00 5 2112501-00010- SUBGRADE PREPARATION 33 ROAD STA 3175.00 $5,775.00 $123.60 $4,078.80 $122.40 $4,039.20 $123.20 84,016.60 0 2211.50140000 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (RECYCLED) 3120 TON 57.67 $23,930.40 56.90 $21.528.00 57.E $24,492.00 $10.12 $31,574.40 7 2331.614-00030. TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE 1100 TON $73.00 $25,300.00 $24.82 $27.302.00 82458 $27,038.00 $3124 $34,384.00 8 2331508-00040. TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 390 TON $26.00 $10,140.00 $29.30 $11,427.00 $29.02 511,317.80 $38.74 114,328.60 9 2531501-04110 CONCRETE CURB i GUTTER DESIGN 0412 , 5670 UN FT 56.88 $33.22820 55.53 831,356.10 $5.51 $31,241.70 $6.81 $32442.70 10 235750240010. BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 190 GALLON $1.50 8285.00 51.65 $313.50 31.63 $309.70 51.32 5250.80 11 2573.603-00003- SILT FENCE, PREASSEMBLED 2000 LIN FT 51.25 52,500.00 $1.38 52,780.00 51.90 53,800.00 51.27 $2,540.00 12 2573.506-00030. 3000240 TYPE LAWN (INCL 4' TOPSOIL) 6900 SO YD $2.25 515,525.00 $1.48 310,21200 $1.90 113,110.00 $2.37 $16,353.00 13 223250140115- MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5') 2255 SO YD $1.85 $3,720.75 *0.52 $1,17260 $1.05 $2,367.75 51.43 $3,224.85 TOTAL SCHEDULE A: STREETS $179,73235 $166,809.00 $184,379.05 8176,966.65 SCHEDULE B: STORM SEWER 14 2501515-90421- 47 RC PIPE APRON IN/TRASH GUARD 1 EACH $2.000.00 $2,050.00 $1,91851 51,91651 51,323.00 $1,323.00 51,543.92 $1,543.92 15 2501.515-00181. 18' RC PIPE APRON W/TRASH GUARD 4 EACH 8865.00 $2,680.00 $887.00 $2,748.00 $503.00 52,012.00 5838.45 $2,553.80 16 2503.64140125- 17 RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V 140 UN FT $20.52 82,872.80 52159 $3,064.60 $21.90 83,068.00 $21.15 $2,961.00 17 2503.54140155- 15' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V 638 UN FT 520.48 513,068824 $2228 814,214.84 $22.75 514.51450 $19.59 512,498.42 18 250354140185- 18' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V 300 UN FT $23.72 $7,116.00 $25.12 17,636.00 524.50 57,350.00 525.40 57,620.00 19 2603.64140215. 21' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V 175 LIN FT $25.83 $4,52025 $27.48 $4,805.50 $27.85 $4,873.75 $35.51 5621425 20 260354140243- 24' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL 111 174 LIN FT 12628 54,57272 $27.92 $4,858.08 828.70 $4,993.80 53824 58,305.78 21 2503541-90273- 27' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL III 29 LIN FT 138.83 $1.12027 $35.39 81,02831 534.80 81,00920 14123 $1,195.67 22 2503.541-90303- 30' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3008 CL 111 283 LIN FT 536..18 510,238.94 $37.46 $10,801.18 $39.00 $11,007.00 549.17 $13,915.11 23 2503.54140383. 36' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 Cl. III 266 LIN FT $50.52 513,438.32 550.88 313,534.06 551.50 513,699.00 18524 517,353.84 24 2503.54140423. 47 RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CUR 165 LIN FT $87.72 511,173.80 $87.87 $11,198.55 86850 511,30250 575.33 312,429.45 25 2506.80842420. CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 48-4020 10 EACH 51,240.00 312,400.00 $1,385.55 513,855.60 51,043.00 510,430.00 51,398.93 513,989.30 26 2508.508-03020. CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 60-4020 1 EACH $1.900.00 $1,900.00 $2,107.50 02,101.50 $1,680.00 $1,680.00 11,882.01 $1,882.01 212606.6060620 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 72-4020 2 EACH 33,095.00 $8,190.00 $3,456.03 86,910.06 $3,086.00 $6,132.00 $3,136.88 $8,273.76 28 2506.508-04219- CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 84-4019 1 EACH 84,320.00 $4,320.00 $4,839.50 $4,839.50 $3.789.00 $3,789.00 $4.366.11 54.366.11 29 2600.50242420. CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 8 EACH $1,205.00 $9,640.00 $1,185.01 $9.480.08 $1,020.00 $8,160.00 $1,396.93 $11,191.44 30 2602.541.07040. 4' PERF PE PIPE DRAIN 400 UN FT $13.00 $5,200.00 $10.00 $4,000.00 $9.30 $3.720.00 58.34 83,336.00 31 2611.601-00013 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III WITH TYPE IV GEOTEXM.E FABRIC AND GRANULAR BEDDING 20 CU YD $49.00 5980.00 $40.00 $800.00 $43.80 $872.00 $40.42 $808.40 32 0451.602-00040- GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 670 TON $0.01 56.70 512.50 $8,375.00 50.10 587.00 57.46 $4,996.20 lecnniNa0e56211ox18 Page 7 of 9 Extension of Bids STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 5521.10 Bid Date: January 18, 1996 10:00 A.M. Denotes corrected figure. Item Spec No Deecdpdon Quantity Unit 10TH BIDDER ARGON CONSTRUCTION CO.,IN Total Bid: '3866,004.84 Unit Pits hem Total 11TH BIDDER RICHARD KNUTSON INC. Total Bk: 1874,018.36 Unit Price Item Total 12TH BIDDER BROWN & CRIS, INC. Total Bid: 8852,63720 Unit Price Item Total 13TH BIDDER KOBER EXCAVATING, INC. Total Bid: 8707,346.81 Unit Price Item Total TOTAL SCHEDULE S: STORM SEWER 8113,476.04 8126,871.09 8110,010.75 3131,438.44 SCHEDULE C: WATERMAIN 33 2611.502430001- CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN 2 EACH $340.00 $680.00 8600.00 31200.00 $586.00 31,172.00 $2900.16 8580.32 34 2611.503.04241. 24' STEEL CASING PIPE (JACKED) 70 UN FT 8187.00 813,090.00 8110.85 88,179.50 5128.00 88,960.00 1123.20 88.624.00 34 2811.602431143. 81(8' WET TAP 1 EACH 51280.00 51280.00 $1,019.00 81,019.00 $1,577.00 51,577.00 51,202.213 8120228 35 2611.502-00802- 4' GATE VALVE AND BOX 11 EACH 5324.00 $3,584.00 $319.00 $3,509.00 $451.00 34,981.00 8387.18 54258.76 38 2611.502430803. 8' GATE VALVE AND BOX 12 EACH 3375.00 $4,500.00 5385.76 54,829.00 8503.00 $8.038.00 3445.65 $5,348.80 37 2811.502-00804- 8' GATE VALVE AND BOX 8 EACH 8837.00 55,098.00 8525.00 84,200.00 8838.00 35,104.00 $628.00 55,024.00 38 2811.502-00808. 12' GATE VALVE AND BOX 8 EACH 8981.00 $5,768.00 878024 $4,881.44 81,008.00 88.038.00 31,089.53 88,537.18 39 2611.503.01047. 4' WATER MAN DUCT IRON CL 52 400 1174 FT $18.17 17,288.00 $15.04 $6,018.00 814.70 85,880.00 31528 86,112.00 40 2611.502-00410- 1' CORPORATION STOP 39 EACH 133.00 51,287.00 838.57 $1,504.23 825.00 8975.00 $9721 83,791.19 41 2611.50301007- 8' WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 52 130 UN FT 818.77 52,180.10 - 518.85 52,189.70 $1550 82,015.00 317.37 82,258.10 42 2811502-03100. 1' CURB STOP & BOX 39 EACH $78.00 $3,042.00 $99.85 53,885.35 887.00 $2,619.00 $116.75 $4,55325 43 2811503-01087- 8' WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 52 1955 LIN FT 514.25 527,858.75 318.80 $32,453.00 118.20 835,581.00 817.94 $35,072.70 44 2511.503-00710- 1' TYPE K COPPER PIPE 1500 UN FT 510.44 515,880.00 17.88 $11,820.00 $7.96 811,925.00 57.43 $11,145.00 45 2811503-01127. 12' WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 52 2370 UN FT $20.73 549,130.10 $22.82 554,083.40 $25.45 880,31850 $27.08 884,179.80 46 2611.52000020- DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 10000 POUND $1.48 514,800.00 81.85 818,500.00 51.35 $13,500.00 81.86 518,800.00 47 2811502-00020- HYDRANT 12 EACH 51,235.00 514,820.00 51,488.00 517,818.00 51,190.00 814,280.00 81,583.68 519,002.72 48 0461.802-00040- GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 870 TON 60.01 56.70 112.50 $8,375.00 80.10 587.00 88.05 55,393.50 TOTAL SCHEDULE C: WATERMAN 5170,008.85 5181,54122 5150,98820 8185,851.16 SCHEDULE Dt SANITARY SEWER 49 2821508-07410- STANDARD 4' SANITARY SEWER MH (0-10') 15 EACH 81,8800.00 $24,900.00 51,589.50 $23,842.50 31,390.00 120,700.00 $1,589.71 $23.845.85 50 2621508-07410- EXTRA 48' DIA. M.H. DEPTH OVER 10' 45 UN FT 878.00 $3,610.00 $85.00 53,8225.00 $67.00 53,015.00 5133.57 88.010.85 51 0451.802-00040- GRAN(LAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 400 TON 89.80 $3,920.00 812.50 55,000.00 30.10 840.00 510.48 54,184.00 62 2821502-00208- CONST. 8' TYPE W OUTSIDE DROP (0-4') 2 EACH 51,050.00 82.120.00 5840.00 $1,280.00 8544.00 51,088.00 31,589.83 83.139.88 63 2821506-07420- EXTRA DROP SECTION DEPTH OVER 4' 2 UN FT 859.00 8118.00 8150.00 $300.00 5132.00 8264.00 8134.48 8288.98 54 2521.502-00003- CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SAN) 1 EACH 5406.00 8405.00 $800.00 $600.00 $544.00 $544.00 $832.83 8632.83 56 2621511.13065. 8' PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 3045 LIN FT 531.91 897,186.95 833.03 8100,578.35 $2820 579,779.00 825.88 $78,134.70 66 2821.602.13088- 8'X8' PVC WYE 13 EACH $45.90 8598.70 545.00 6085.00 838.00 5494.00 859.80 5774.80 67 2821511-13080- 6' PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 28 SERVICE PIPE 660 LIN FT 51058 55,808.00 59.50 $5,225.00 818.00 $9,900.00 510.30 $5,886.00 68 2621502-00010- LIFT STATION UPGRADE 1 EACH $2,960.00 12,980.00 55285.00 $5,285.00 55,025.00 $5.025.00 12,19424 $2,19424 59 2621503.00206 8' FORCE MAIN DUCTILE IRON PIPE 1120 LIN FT 814.45 518,184.00 316.10 818,032.00 835.55 $39,818.00 825.70 828,784.00 60 2811502-00803. 6' GATE VALVE AND BOX 2 EACH $375.00 5750.00 $355.55 $711.10 5417.00 $834.00 $82.15 $924.30 81 2821.502-00100- PLUG & ABANDON PIPE SEWER 2 EACH $120.00 8240.00 8150.00 $300.00 1125.00 5250.00 3134.73 $289.48 82 2104501-00086 REMOVE FORCE MAIN 150 UN FT 89.00 81,440.00 88.50 8975.00 88.35 $952.50 517.03 $2.55450 IHCML BI0S662110.XLS Page 8 of 9 Extension of Bids STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA OSM PROJECT NO. 5521.10 Bid Date: January 18, 1996 10:00 A.M. ' Denotes corrected figure. Item Spec No Description Quantity Unit 10TH BIDDER ARGON CONSTRUCTION CO.,IN Total Bld: '5895,004.64 Unk Prioe Item Total 11TH BIDDER RICHARD KNUTSON INC. Total Bid: 1572,016.96 Unit Prloe Item Total 12TH BIDDER BROWN & CRIS, INC. Total Bk: 5882,637.50 Unit Price Item Total 13TH BIDDER KOBER EXCAVATING, INC. Total Bid: $707,345.61 Unit Price Item Tote!' TOTAL SCHEDULE D: SANITARY SEWER 8160,117.65 8189,635.89 8162,701.40 8157,352.65 SCHEDULE E: MOBIUZATION & CLEANUP 63 2021.501-00001- MOBILIZATION 1 LUMP SUM 85,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6.000.00 $5.000.00 $6.000.00 84 2021.501-00004- CLEANUP 1 LUMP SUM 85,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5.000.00 $6.000.00 $5,000.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE E: MOBILIZATION & CLEANUP 810,000.00 810,000.00 810,000.00 $10,000.00 I SCHEDULE F: ALTERNATE BID 86 2621.508-07410- STANDARD 4' SANITARY SEWER MH (0-10') 4 EACH 81360.00 $6,640.00 51335.00 85,740.00 51,421.00 $5,684.00 81,589.71 56.368.84 66 2821.506-07410- EXTRA 48' DIA M.H. DEPTH OVER 10' 20 UN FT 878.00 $1,660.00 885.00 $1,700.00 $69.00 81,380.00 8142.42 $2,848.40 67 2621.511.13065- 8' PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 36 666 UN FT $30.31 $20,156.15 $31.18 820,734.70 $35.90 $23,873.50 824.63 816,378.966 89 2021.511.13040- 4' PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 28 SERVICE PIPE 40 UN FT 814.24 $569.80 88.70 $346.00 $22.05 $88200 822.50 8900.00 89 2021.511.13060. 6 PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 20 SERVICE PIPE 40 UN FT 815.04 8801.60 89.50 $300.00 823.20 8928.00 $23.37 8934.80 70 2821.502.13084- 8'%4' PVC WYE 2 EACH $38.00 872.00 836.50 873.00 $30.00 560.00 56725 8134.50 71 2821.50243080. 876' PVC WYE 2 EACH $45.40 890.80 550.00 8100.00 540.00 880.00 878.75 8157.50 72 2576.501-00010- SEEDING 1 ACRE 81,000.00 81,000.00 81,632.00 81,632.00 81,650.00 81,850.00 81,320.00 81,320.00 73 0451.60240040- GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING 100 TON 89.80 8980.00 812.50 $1,250.00 80.10 810.00 88.47 8847.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE F: ALTERNATE BID $31,670.15 $31,967.70 534,547.50 829,579.99 TOTAL SCHEDULES A THROUGH E (BASE BID) 8633,334.89 8540365,66 $646,090.40 $677,464.52 TOTAL BID $665,004.54 8672,016.35 5082337.90 8707,346.51 M1CMLtBID8'662110.XL8 Page 9 of 9 Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-02 RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - MARSHAN LAKE CONDOMINIUM STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of Marshan Lake Condominium Street and Utility Improvements, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name C. W. Houle, Inc. S.J. Louis Construction Kadlec Excavating Bonine Excavating Forest Lake Contracting Northdale Construction Rehbein Excavating S. M. Hentges Ryan Contracting Arcon Excavating Richard Knutson Brown & Cris Kober Excavating Bid Amount $540,153.40 $575,238.00 $573,522.90 $593,157.45 $594,387.50 $594,926.36 $593,406.00 $630,402.00 $617,256.75 $633,334.69 $640,058.66 $648,090.40 $677,465.82 Bid Alternate Total Bid $24,215.00 $564,368.40 $18,039.00 $593,277.00 $29,435.00 $602,957.90 $24,430.85 $617,588.30 $29,175.00 $623,562.50 $28,832.18 $623,758.54 $35,608.50 $629,014.50 $18,450.00 $648,852.00 $36,805.00 $654,061.75 $31,670.15 $665,004.84 $31,957.70 $672,016.36 $34,547.50 $682,637.90 $29,879.99 $707,345.81 AND WHEREAS, it appears that C. W. Houle, Inc., 1300 West County Road I, Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with C. W. Houle, Inc., of Shoreview, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the Marshan Lake Condominium Street and Utility Improvements according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 1 l th day of March, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 11, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer STAFF ORI G ATOR . John Powell DATE, 7.1 Resofuticn Iii. A+cpttng B the TOPIC Fourtt Av T.n Irnprpv nts flACKGRQUND: At , 1 r Lino ciI meeting, the City Council passed Resole ►. a rovi the piece and specs ations fouthis project and ordering the r for Bids. The i were opened aid read aid on Wednesday, Te ary 21, 1996 and S. R. Weklema Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder. Option No. 1 - App ve Resolution No. 96.26 accepting the b for the Fourth Avenue Trunk t ltj( improvements and awarding the c ct tc S. i Weiderna In amount of x,454.7 : Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-26 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR THE FOURTH AVENUE TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, Pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Fourth Avenue Trunk Utility Improvements, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name and Address Amount of Bid S. R. Weidema, Inc. $342,454.73 17600 113th Avenue North Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 F. M. Frattalone $379,512.50 3066 Spruce Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55117 Kadlec Excavation of Mora, Inc. $391,370.05 Route 5, Box 81 Mora, Minnesota 55051-9301 Richard Knutson, Inc. $393,322.19 12585 Rhode Island Avenue South Savage, Minnesota 55378 Bonine Excavating, Inc. $402,249.45 12669 Meadowvale Road Elk River, Minnesota 55330 S. J. Louis Construction, Inc. $422,266.30 7284 County Road 138 P. O. Box 1373 St. Cloud, Minnesota 56302 Acron Construction Company, Inc. P. O. Box 57 Mora, Minnesota 55051 C. W. Houle, Inc. 1300 West County Road I Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 $458,242.89 $472,648.55 Name and Address Northdale Construction Company, Inc. 14450 Northdale Blvd. Rogers, Minnesota 55374 Brown and Cris, Inc. East Frontage Road of 1-35 19740 Kenrick Avenue Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 Engineer's Estimate AND WHEREAS, it appears that S. R. Weidema, lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Amount of Bid $476,435.09 $478,010.76 $471,214.00 Inc., Maple Grove, Minnesota, is the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with S. R. Weidema of Maple Grove, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the Fourth Avenue Trunk Utility Improvements, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of March, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-28 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE COUNTRY LAKES ESTATES - PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, construction of the Country Lakes Estates - Phase I Improvements have been completed by Richard Knutson, Inc. AND WHEREAS, the one-year warranty period for this project will begin with the final payment, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Final Payment is hereby approved for the Country Lakes Estates - Phase I Improvements. Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of March, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES : November 13, 1995 . 6:30 P.M. . 8:04 P.M. : Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert : None Staff Members present: City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; City Engineer, David Ahrens; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; Planning Coordinator, Mary Kay Wyland; Chief of Police, David Pecchia; Assistant to the City Administrator, Dan Tesch; City Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. SETTING THE AGENDA Mr. Schumacher asked that an item titled, "Rice Creek Watershed District", be added to New Business. Mayor Reinert asked that an item titled, "Clarification of Tax Dollars Usage for Non- public Official Use", be added under Old Business OPEN MIKE There was no one to speak under open mike. CONSIDERATION OF DISBURSEMENTS October 31, 1995 - Council Member Elliott moved to approve this disbursement as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. November 13, 1995 - Council Member Kuether moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Council Member Kuether asked if the disbursement to Jerry's Schwinn Cyclery for $1,700.00 is for the same bicycles for which the City will be accepting a donation later in the meeting. Mr. Schumacher said yes. Council Member Kuether asked about a disbursement to Neal Enterprises for supplies and breakfast with Santa Claus. Mr. Schumacher explained that these are supplies for the December 9th breakfast with Santa Claus. Page 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL UPDATE, DONNA CARLSON AND SCOTT WORDELMAN Ms. Carlson thanked the City Council for submitting her name for appointment to the Fairview District Memorial Hospital Board. She explained that this is a very challenging and exciting time both nationally and regionally with the development of the Fairview Lakes Health Care Region. She noted that her term on the board began July 1, 1995. Ms. Carlson presented some booklets and an annual report from Fairview Hospitals. Ms. Carlson explained that Fairview Hospitals are a value based organization. These values are compassion, dignity, integrity and service. Ms. Carlson said that she hoped to be a part of bringing these values to the region and to our community and be a source of communication between this community, the Board and Fairview Hospitals. Mr. Wordelman, Senior Vice President with the Fairview Hospital system explained that he is responsible for the development of the northeast regional facility which is now named Fairview Lakes Regional Health Care. He reminded the City Council that he had appeared before the them in January, 1995 to update the City Council on what was happening at that time. He explained that District Memorial Hospital in Forest Lake and the Chisago Health Services in Chisago Lakes have joined Fairview Hospital and have planned an overall goal of consolidating operations along with Fairview and developing a concept of a regionally focused health care system. The region consists of Lino Lakes/Circle Pines on the south boundary to Rush City on the north boundary. Mr. Wordelman said the purpose of his visit this evening is to let the City Council know that a site has been selected for the new regional medical center. The site is located between I35 and T.H. Highway 61 about 2.5 miles north of downtown Forest Lake and about 1.5 miles south of the main intersection in Wyoming. The site contains 110 acres and has access to every area in the region. The site will also contain various other community based services. Mr. Wordelman noted that sites are still being reviewed for ambulatory care and clinic development. There has been some discussion with members of the Lino Lakes staff about a possible location in Lino Lakes. Mr. Wordelman noted the Vision 20/20 program and explained that Fairview Hospital had discussed providing resources to assist in conducting a community health assessment. Correspondence has been provided on this matter and Fairview Hospitals will assist that ongoing project. Mr. Wordelman said that he is excited about the new regional hospital project and also excited to have Ms. Carlson as part of the Board. She will be an integral part of the continuing development of health care focused on a regional basis. Page 2 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13,1995 Council Member Neal asked why the Wyoming area was selected for the new hospital facility. Mr. Wordelman explained the process and noted that this site was selected because of its size and because it has very good access to the entire region. Cost was also a very important factor. Many studies were completed before the site was selected. Ms. Carlson said that there seems to be a tendency for people in this area to travel to the south for health care. She felt it is important to have a clinic in Lino Lakes to connect the people with their doctors and with quality health care. A complete regional health care system is being developed, not just a hospital. Mr. Wordelman explained that there is currently hospital legislation that restricts any organizations ability to build a new hospital or to relocate an existing hospital. This legislation contains mileage limitations and in this case, Fairview was restricted from building a new facility farther than ten (10) miles from Chisago or five (5) miles from Forest Lake. This limited site selection. Mr. Wordelman also explained that the delivery of health care is continuing to be shifted away from inpatient to outpatient care. As technology continues to developed, much of the care that was traditionally delivered in a hospital setting will be delivered to a home or clinic setting. Mr. Wordelman said he felt the location of health ambulatory sites and clinics are going to be more important to delivering health care to the people than an actual inpatient facility. Mr. Wordelman noted that the District Memorial Hospital in Forest Lake will continue to deliver some type of health care service. At this time, use of the facility has not been determined. He also noted that the use of the Chisago Lakes Hospital has not been determined. Mayor Reinert thanked Ms. Carlson and Mr. Wordelman for updating the City Council on this matter. POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT, CHIEF PECCHIA Consideration of Resolution No. 95 -146 Accepting Donation from. the Centennial Fire District for Two (2) Bicycles for Park and Trail Needs - The Centennial Fire District has donated $750.00 to offset the cost of purchasing two (2) high quality Mountain Bikes. The bikes will be marked "POLICE" and will be utilized to patrol City parks and trails. The addition of bicycles to the Police Department fleet will enhance the Community Oriented Policing Philosophy by enabling staff to have more intimate contact with the residents of Lino Lakes. The purpose of Resolution No. 95 - 146 is to accept and publicly thank the Centennial Fire District for their generous donation. Page 3 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13,1995 Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 146 accepting the donation from the Centennial Fire District. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 146 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of the Renewal of the Animal Control Contract to Otter Lake Animal Care Center - Otter Lake Animal Care Center has been the contract holder for animal control services for the past year. The relationship with the Police Department this past year has been very professional and they helped the Police Department to meet the needs of the citizens, the City and the Otter Lake Animal Care Center by utilizing the provisions of the contract. Chief Pecchia requested that the contract be continued/renewed through December 31, 1996. He noted one change in the contract which is mandatory to comply with the current state statutes. The remainder of the contract remains the same as the 1995 contract. In addition, there is no increase in fees to the City or the residents. The contract has been reviewed and approved by the City attorney. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the request to enter into a renewal contract with the Otter Lake Animal Care Center. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING, THE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) DISTRICT NO. 1-7, BRIAN WESSEL Mayor Reinert opened the public hearing at 7:02 P.M. Mr. Wessel explained that the Economic Development Authority has adopted the modification of the plan for TIF District No. 1-7 to provide financial assistance to Fogerty Development/Custom Remodelers. Copies of the Plan have seen sent to Anoka County and the Centennial School District for their review. The hearing this evening is to receive public comment regarding the modification of the Plan for TIF District No. 1-7. There were no comments or questions from the City Council or from the audience. Council Member Elliott moved to close the public hearing at 7:03 P.M. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 -152 Approving Modification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 - Mr. Wessel explained that resolution No. 95 - 152 finds that the modification of TIF District No. 1-7 allows the City to provide tax increment financing assistance to Fogerty Development/Custom Remodelers and fords that assistance to Fogerty Development/Custom Remodelers is in the best interest of the City. Page 4 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Mr. Wessel explained that the financial assistance to Fogerty Development/Custom Remodelers is approximately $200,000.00 which includes land, assessments and fees. The total project is approximately $1,500,000.00 which means that the assistance will be below 15% of the entire project and within the three (3) to five (5) year project limit which is below the City policy for TIF assistance. Mr. Wessel noted that the project is on schedule and recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 95 - 152 for Fogerty Development/Custom Remodelers. Council Member Kuether moved to approve Resolution No. 95 - 152. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 21- 95 Authorizing the Sale of City of Lino Lakes Land in the Apollo Business Park to UDOR, U.S.A. - Mr. Wessel explained that UDOR wishes to purchase an additional 10 feet of property to enlarge its driveway. The UDOR request was accommodated when subdividing the Fogerty Development/Custom Remodelers property. According to the City Charter, an ordinance is required when City - owned property is sold. The request from UDOR is for the purchase of 0.7 acres. The cost to UDOR will be $2,955.00 which is full price for this strip of land. Mr. Wessel used the easel and made a diagram of the UDOR and Fogerty Development/Custom Remodelers driveway and explained why the additional land is needed for the shared driveway. Council Member Elliott moved to approved the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 21 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Mr. Wessel explained that there is legal documentation regarding this particular driveway. Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 -153 Calling a Public Hearing for December 18, 1995, 6:30 P.M. on the Modification of the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan for TIF District No. 1-1 and 1-2 - Mr. Wessel explained that the Economic Development Authority has authorized preparation of a modified program for Development District No. 1 and Tax Increment Financing Plans for TIF Districts 1-1 (Rice Lake Estates) and 1-2 (Sunrise Meadows). Resolution No. 95 - 153 sets the public hearing before the City Council for 6:30 P.M., Monday, December 18, 1995 to receive public input regarding the modified program.. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 153. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 153 can be found at the end of these minutes. Page 5 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13,1995 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 -156 AMENDING THE CITY'S FLEXIBLE HEALTH CARE DEPENDENT DAY CARE PLAN, DAN TESCH Mr. Tesch explained that the City adopted a Flexible Health Care and Dependent Day Care Plan November 13, 1990 with January 1, 1991 as the effective date. The Plan allows employees to pre-tax health insurance and day care costs. Since 1991, Family Medical Leave and Military Leave acts have been voted upon. The City's Plan does not include these new laws. As it costs $390.00 to update the plan, there is another section to add to include those employees who opt out of health care coverage that the City provides. The City can add the option to pay the employee who opts out of the health coverage, cash payment of a City contribution to I.C.M.A. The cash option contribution would be equal to the higher insurance single premium less Social Security, Medicare and P.E.R.A. The deferred compensation contribution would be equal to the higher insurance single premium. An employee on family coverage could save the City $2,000.00 per year by opting out of the City's insurance plan. Proof of insurance is needed to be eligible for this option. There is no additional cost to the City and the City may see a slight saving on this benefit. It is also possible to see a rate reduction. Mr. Tesch explained that the Finance Director conducted a survey of City employees and it appears that at least five (5) employees are interested in this plan. The City could see a $10,000.00 saving if the plan is implemented. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 156 Amending the Flexible Health Care and Dependent Day Care Plan to include Family Medical Leave and Military Leave and also amend the Plan to include a section allowing for cash or deferred compensation City contributions. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 156 can be found at the end of these minutes. FIRST READING, ORDINANCE NO. 22 - 95 AMENDING CHAPTER 207, PERSONNEL POLICY, DAN TESCH Mr. Tesch explained that Chapter 207, Personal Policy, of the Lino Lakes City Code has not been updated in a number of years. The City has adopted state and federal mandates such as Family Medical Leave and Parental Leave, but these new policies have not been codified. In addition, several advances in benefits have been afforded to union employees, but not to non-union employees. The state Pay Equity statute mandates that benefits need to be similar among employee groups. Page 6 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Mr. Tesch presented a copy of the proposed ordinance along with a summary of changes made to the policy. There are no new benefits included in the document that are not already in place for certain other employee groups. Staff is proposing a new portion of the policy which is the pro -rata extension of paid leave benefits to regular part-time employees who work a minimum of 40 hours a pay period. Extension of benefits to these workers would have cost the City $1,100.00 in 1995. Mr. Tesch noted that the updated policy is modeled after a number of other metropolitan municipalities. He explained that this matter will be discussed again at the next Council work session prior to the second reading of Ordinance No. 22 - 95. Council Member Bergeson asked about the threshold for full time benefits and asked Mr. Tesch to check with the League of Minnesota Cities to determine if the Lino Lakes approach to this matter is how most communities handle these benefits. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 22 - 95. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A CITY LOGO, DAN TESCH Mr. Tesch explained that one of the recommendations from the recent 20/20 Vision program was that the City try and make its symbols and logos uniform. It was further recommended that the City adopt or re -adopt the Blue Heron as part of the official logo. The Blue Heron design being considered is one developed by the City's Economic Development Department. The logo would be used on letterhead, water towers and other logical places. Council Member Kuether asked what would be the cost of changing the logo. Mr. Ahrens said he did not know the cost, however, where the City logo is required on such fixtures as the water tower, the logo would be bid separately. Mayor Reinert said he felt that the new logo would give a uniform identity to the City. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt the Blue Heron as part of the City logo for application to letterhead, signs, water towers, etc. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Ms. Sullivan, from the audience, congratulated Mr. Tesch for following through on this recommendation from the 20/20 Vision group. Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. Page 7 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR AN OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BRIAN THORSON (J & K LIQUOR), 6013 HODGSON ROAD, MARILYN ANDERSON Mrs. Anderson explained that J & K Liquors is in the process of being sold to Mr. Brian Thorson, a resident of Ham Lake. Mr. Thorson has submitted all the required application information including a dram shop certificate of insurance and a Police Department background investigation has been successfully completed. Mr. Thorson is proposing to assume ownership of J & K Liquors on December 1, 1995. Mrs. Anderson recommended that the City Council approve the transfer of the off -sale liquor license to Mr. Thorson effective December 1, 1995. Council Member Neal asked if a resident manager is required. Mrs. Anderson explained that Mr. Thorson will be moving into the residence above the liquor store. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the transfer of the off -sale liquor license to Brian Thorson. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REPORT, MARY KAY WYLAND Final Plat, Clearwater Creek - Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector to show the location of Clearwater Creek. She explained that the preliminary plat was approved by the City Council in February, 1995 for 157 Single Family (R-1) lots. The property is located south of Cedar Street and east of Otter Lake Road. The City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates the property is planned for single family residential use. The Developer is requesting final plat approval for the first phase of the development. Phase one consists of 83 lots and two (2) outlots which will contain a well and well house and a lift station. The preliminary plat had indicated a total of 87 lots for this phase, however, a cul-de-sac was eliminated and some lot lines re -arranged to provide the 83 platted lots. At this time the second phase includes 71 lots from: the original preliminary plat for a total in both phases of 154 lots plus the two (2) outlots. A development agreement was signed on June 6, 1995 and grading work is nearing completion on Phase I. Utility construction. is underway and financial guarantees are in place. The City Attorney has reviewed the title work for the plat and has indicated that it is acceptable. When the preliminary plat was approved, the City Council added two (2) conditions to those outlined by staff. The first condition required disclosure by the developer and/or builders of the adjoining hobby farms in the area. The developer has included an item in his "Builder's Rules" to inform potential buyers, through the purchase agreement, of area hobby farms. A copy of this document is on file at City hall and all builders are required Page 8 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13,1995 to sign the document. The second condition stated that the developer or the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) must take responsibility for cleaning the culvert under Elmcrest Avenue. RCWD has assumed that responsibility and the culvert has been cleaned. All other conditions of the preliminary have been met to the satisfaction of City staff and required landscaping is in place on Otter Lake Road. Ms. Wyland recommended approval of the final plat for Clearwater Creek, Phase 1. Mayor Reinert noted that this subdivision has been controversial. However, he explained that this subdivision requires the extension of sewer and water utilities into this area. Utility services are needed for commercial development. Mayor Reinert also noted that earlier in this meeting, the Council was informed about the potential for a health clinic in the area which would require municipal utilities. He felt that potential commercial and industrial growth to the north of this subdivision hinged on the approval of this subdivision. Council Member Kuether noted that she had heard that the models under construction in the Clearwater Creek subdivision start at about $275,000.00. Council Member Bergeson noted that this is probably the first fmal plat presented to the City Council that does not have any contingencies placed on it. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the final plat form Clearwater Creek, Phase 1. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Minor Subdivision, UDOR U.S.A., 500 Apollo Drive - Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector to show where UDOR U.S.A. constructed a building in the Apollo Business last fall. Their original parcel of property consisted of one (1) acre. UDOR U.S.A. has determined the need for an additional 10 feet along the westerly property line to allow increased maneuvering and driveway area for delivery vehicles serving their property. The City has agreed to sell UDOR U.S.A the additional 10 feet and a survey has been prepared describing this parcel. The timing of this subdivision is good as it coincides with the sale of three (3) acres immediately west of this parcel and a minor subdivision for Fogerty/Custom Remodelers. UDOR U.S.A. will share a driveway access with Fogerty/Custom Remodelers. The property in question is zoned General Industrial and contains a 6,000 square foot office/warehouse building. The City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates the property as Industrial. Minimum lot area in an industrial district is one (1) acre. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this request and concurred with the staff recommendation of approval with the condition that a five (5) foot drainage and utility easement be provided along the entire length of the westerly property line. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the minor subdivision with the additional five (5) foot drainage and utility easement. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Page 9 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Minor Subdivision, Fogerty/Custom Remodelers, 475 Apollo Drive - Ms. Wyland used the overhead project to show the location of a proposed office/warehouse building. Fogerty Investment and Custom Remodelers is requesting a minor subdivision to create a three (3) acre parcel in the Apollo Business Park to allow the construction of the office/warehouse building. Plans for the building were approved by the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council in October contingent upon approval of this minor subdivision. The property is zoned General Industrial and indicated as commercial on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The minimum lot size in this zoning district is one (1) acre. City staff has reviewed this request and is recommending approval with the condition that a five (5) foot drainage and utility easement be provided on the side property lines. A 30 foot easement currently exists on the rear property line. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this minor subdivision at their November 8, 1995 meeting with the conditions listed above. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the minor subdivision with a five (5) foot utility and drainage easement on the side property lines. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Acceptance of Trail Easements, Living Water Lutheran Church - Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector to show the location of a trail system completed by Living Waters Lutheran Church on the lake side of 865 Birch Street. The City has paved the trail. This trail segment was a condition of approval for the original subdivision and conditional use permit granted to Living Water Church. A survey document has been prepared describing the easement. The trail will now be given to the City. As is the normal practice, any easements granted to the City must first be accepted by the City Council. Staff is recommending that the City Council accept the easement document for the trail at 865 Birch Street, Living Waters Lutheran Church, and direct the City Clerk to register the easement at Anoka County. Council Member Elliott moved to accept the easement document. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, DAVID AHRENS Resolution No. 95 -149 Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Report on Improvement, Sunset Road Utility Improvement - Mr. Ahrens explained that the property owners at 7164 and 7172 Sunset Road have submitted a petition to the City requesting sanitary sewer and water service. Copies of the petition and a location map was included in the City Council packets. Page 10 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13,1995 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter, Council is required to declare the adequacy of the petition and order preparation of a report studying the proposed improvements. Mr. Ahrens recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 95 - 149. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 149. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 149 can be found at the end of these minutes. Resolution No. 95 -150 Receiving Report on Improvement and Approve Plans and Specifications, Sunset Road Utility Improvements - Mr. Ahrens explained that pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter, Council must receive the feasibility report studying the proposed utility improvements to Sunset Road. As a result of the utility construction done in conjunction with the senior housing (Willow Ponds) project, the sewer and water mains are readily accessible to serve the petitioning properties at 7164 and 7172 Sunset Road. The size, type and depths of the existing utilities are adequate to serve the two (2) properties. A third property that, at the moment, is not interested in connecting to the utilities can also be served by the proposed improvements. Utility connections will be placed at the property line for this property. Mr. Ahrens said that he has studied the proposed improvements and has determined that the improvements are feasible and should be constructed as shown on a map included with the City Council packets. The estimate for the proposed improvements is $38,380.00. Funding is proposed to be through the collection of assessments levied against the benefiting property owners. The property owners have signed a waiver of public hearing and appeal of assessment. A copy of the waiver was also enclosed in the City Council packets. Therefore, no public hearing is required and the City Council can approve theplans and specifications at the same time as receiving the feasibility report. In addition, the property owners have waived 50 of the 60 day waiting period to order the project. Mr. Ahrens recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 95 - 150 Receiving Report and Approving Plans and Specifications for the Sunset Road Utility Extension Project. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 150. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 150 can be found at the end of these minutes. Page 11 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Resolution No. 95 -155 Authorizing a Change Order to Construct Improvements, Sunset Road Utility Improvements - Mr. Ahrens explained that staff requested Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. to provide a quote for a change order to the existing contract for the Highway 49 (Hodgson Road)/County Road 23 (Lake Drive) Intersection project to include the construction of the proposed Sunset Road utility extension. This was done to speed up the bidding process since the property owners have expressed some urgency in getting the project done this fall. The other alternative to the change order is to advertise for bids, which would delay the project until next spring. The quote submitted by Forest Lake Contracting is $38,910.55. The Engineer's estimate is $38,380.00 or approximately one (1) percent lower than Forest Lake's quote. The process provided by Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. are very reasonable and it is staff's opinion that there would be minimal or no cost savings bidding the project in the spring. Funding for the project is proposed to be through the collection of assessments from the property owners. Council Member Kuether asked if the City Council could approve this improvement without actually advertising for bids. Mr. Hawkins said that the project can be constructed as outlined by Mr. Ahrens. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 155 Authorizing the City Engineer to Construct the Sunset Road Utility Extension Project as a Change Order to the Highway 49 (Hodgson Road)/Lake Drive (County Road 23) Intersection Project. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 155 can be found at the end of these minutes. REVIEW OF THE THIRD QUARTER BUILDING REPORT, PETER KLUEGEL Mr. Kluegel explained that at the end of the first nine (9) months of the year, a total of 469 building permits were issued which is roughly equivalent to what was issued in 1994. The total construction value for these first nine (9) months equals $33,045,172.00 which is approximately $11,000,000.00 more than at this time last year.. To date, 144 new homes have been or are under construction. This is a decrease of 38 new home permits from the same time period as last year. In the commercial area, the following permits were issued: Mag Con _ $625,000.00 Oasis Market $459,000.00 Teleport $ 60,000.00 These three (3) projects are nearing completion and should be getting their occupancy permits. Page 12 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13,1995 A $6,519,000.00 permit for the Minnesota Correctional Facility Chemical Dependency building was also issued in the third quarter. Mr. Kluegel explained that the residential permit area is improving in the fourth quarter. Council Member Kuether asked why the Dairy Queen has not been constructed. Mr. Kluegel explained that the Anoka County Health Department has just recently issued their review of the proposed construction so that things should be proceeding. Mayor Reinert said that this report clearly indicates that there is a defmite direction in tax diversity which is what this City Council has worked on. ATTORNEY'S REPORT, BILL HAWKINS SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 18 - 95 Establishing the Position and Duties of Electrical Inspector - Mr. Hawkins explained that within the last month the City Council has determined that it would be advantages for the City to assume the responsibilities of electrical inspections within the City which have previously been performed by the State of Minnesota. In order to implement that decision, it is necessary for the City to amend the City Code to create the position of electrical inspector. Ordinance No. 18 - 95 will amend the City Code and create this position of electrical inspector. This ordinance also establishes the duties and responsibilities of this position. Mr. Hawkins also noted that a contract has been completed between the City and the business that will be providing the electrical inspection. The contract cannot be implemented until 30 days after the ordinance has been adopted and published. Mr. Ken Peterson will provide the electrical inspections for the City under the contract just mentioned by Mr. Hawkins. Mr. Peterson noted that the contract is effective through March 31, 1997. He noted that he will be contracting with other cities as well. Mr. Hawkins noted that the contract does not provide for automatic renewal. At the end of the contract, the City and Mr. Peterson will have to negotiate another contract. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 18 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 18 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. SECOND READING, ORDINANCE NO. 17 - 95 AMENDING THE COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION ORDINANCE, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher explained that Ordinance No. 05 - 94 was passed on April 11, 1994 requiring licenses for Commercial Solid Waste Collection haulers. Page 13 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 The initial ordinance was proposed to limit the number of Commercial Solid Waste licenses to six (6). This ordinance should have read seven (7) licenses. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 17 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 17 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. SECOND READING, ORDINANCE NO. 19 - 95 AMENDING CHAPTER 211, PARKS, RECREATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD, SECTION 211.05, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher explained that the existing ordinance dealing -with Park Board Members compensation is unclear as it relates to payment of board members who do not attend all regularly scheduled meetings. Ordinance No. 19 - 95 amends the current ordinance, clarifying the fact that if a member misses a regularly scheduled meeting, he/she will not be paid the full quarterly salary. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Ordinance No. 19 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 19 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. SECOND READING, ORDINANCE NO. 20 - 95 AMENDING CHAPTER 212 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD, SECTION 212.06, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher explained that the existing ordinance dealing with the Planning and Zoning Board Members compensation is unclear as it relates to payment of board members who do not attend all regularly scheduled meetings. Ordinance No. 20 - 95 amends the current ordinance, clarifying the fact that if a member misses a regularly scheduled meeting, he/she will not be paid the full quarterly salary. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Ordinance No. 20 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 20 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. OLD BUSINESS Newly, Elected Officials - Mayor Reinert said that sometimes newly elected Council Officials get anxious and may want to get into the "drivers seat" and travel around a little ahead of time. He said he did not have a problem with this if they are willing to pay their own way. Mayor Reinert said that he does not remember a time when the City has paid for newly elected officials travel in advance of the newly elected official being properly Page 14 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 sworn in as officials of this City. He said if this happened there could be some conflict at a meeting that was duly called by the National League of Cities, the Minnesota League of Cities or some other meeting where the newly elected official would be attending at the same time as the duly authorized official would be attending. For instance, if both the newly elected official and the duly sworn official were attending the same workshop, conflict could arise if conflicting opinions were to be presented. This could be embarrassing to the City. Mayor Reinert said that he understands that there has been a transfer of funds for an airplane ticket to the National Association of Cities from a Council Member to the newly elected Mayor. Mayor Reinert said he was opposed to this action. He said if the newly elected Mayor wants to go to this conference, he should pay for the ticket himself. Mayor Reinert also stated that the newly elected Mayor would be attending in no official capacity until he is duly sworn in. Mayor Reinert explained that Council Member Bergeson transferred his ticket to Mr. Landers, the newly elected Mayor. He said he felt that the Council as a whole is the only body or person that can authorize any official transfer of any dollars. Mayor Reinert thought there may be nothing illegal about this action, however, the Council holds the "purse strings" and the Council is the one (body) who should make this decision. He said that he did not think that it is appropriate for the taxpayers to pay travel expenses for someone in advance of their being sworn into office. Council Member Bergeson explained that Mr. Landers (the newly elected Mayor) did not initiate this action. He said that he learned last Thursday that he may not be able to attend the League meeting. Council Member Bergeson called the travel agency and found that the airline ticket was not refundable but it could be transferred to someone else. He thought that it would be appropriate for a newly elected official to use the ticket rather than let the ticket be wasted. Mayor Reinert said that if the ticket could be transferred to someone who has official status, he would not be concerned. Council Member Bergeson noted that persons with no official status have attended the Minnesota League of Cities. He was sure that these persons paid their own expenses. Council Member Bergeson said, in retrospect, the action he took probably was not wise, however, he had only Friday afternoon to take action or lose the ticket. Mayor Reinert said that he still feels that the potential for embarrassment to the City was a valid concern. He felt that there were people in official capacity that could have used the ticket. Mayor Reinert said that he did not mean anything personal against Council Member Bergeson. Council Member Bergeson said that the travel agency should be contacted in the morning and see if there are any options left in terms of transferring the ticket to a City employee. He will also check his schedule to see if it can be changed. Mr. Schumacher asked if Council Member Bergeson could attend a portion of the conference. Council Member Bergeson said he would also check this suggestion. Page 15 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 NEW BUSINESS Consideration of Renewal of Gambling License for Circle -Lex VFW, Post #6583, Ladies Auxiliary - The Ladies Auxiliary is requesting renewal of their gambling license which expires March 31, 1996. This gambling operation is based at the Circle -Lex VFW Post # 6583. There have been no complaints or comments on this gambling operation. The Ladies Auxiliary has complied with the provisions of the Lino Lakes Gambling Code. They are required to donate 10% of their net proceeds to benefit citizens of the City. The Ladies Auxiliary has donated money for the purchase of ballistic vests for the Police Department was well as money for a new American and POW flag, orange safety vests and IBM computer equipment/software. Other donations include dollars for the operation of the Youth Safety Camp in both of the two (2) years that the Youth Safety Camp has been held. This organization also donates money to private individuals in need in this City and the surrounding communities. Council Member Elliott moved to renew the gambling license for the Circle -Lex VFW, Post #6583, Ladies Auxiliary. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 -148, Authorizing Access to the Safe Deposit Box at Firstar Bank of Minnesota, N.A., Lino Lakes Branch - The City of Lino Lakes has rented a safety deposit box at the Lino Lakes branch of Firstar for as long as the bank has been in existence. Many important documents are kept in the safety deposit box and it has become apparent that the current safety deposit box is no longer large enough. In addition, the Finance Department would like to keep some of the computer backup disks in the safety deposit box. Application has been made for the rental of a larger safety deposit box. Firstar is requiring that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing access to the Safety Deposit Box by the Clerk -Treasurer, Marilyn Anderson, Accounts Payable Clerk, Joyce Lund and Finance Director Mary Vaske. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No 95 - 148 Authorizing Access to the safety deposit box at Firstar Bank of Minnesota, N.A., Lino Lakes Branch. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 148 can be found at the end of these minutes. REMINDER, League Conference, Friday, November 17, 1995. Page 16 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13,1995 Consideration of Resolution No. 95 -157 In Support of the Re -Appointment of Eugene Peterson to the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers - Mr. Schumacher explained that Mr. Peterson's term as manager on the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Board will end December 31, 1995. Mr. Peterson has been responsive to the needs of Lino Lakes while simultaneously observing environmental sensitivity and recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 95 - 157, In Support of the Re- Appointment of Eugene Peterson to the RCWD Board of Managers. Mr. Schumacher noted that the City of Blaine is also preparing a resolution in support of Mr. Peterson. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 157. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 157 can be found at the end of these minutes. Council Member Neal moved to adjourn at 8:04 P.M. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Aye. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the March 11, 1996 regular Council meeting. Marilyn G. Anderson, Vernon F. Reinert, Clerk -Treasurer Mayor Page 17 Council Member Elliott and moved its adoption: introduced the following ordinance CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 17-95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE CODE 507 The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes ordains: Section 507.04, Subdivision IA is here by amended as follows: Subdivision 1A. Commercial Solid Waste Collection License No person shall collect garbage, refuse or recyclables from commercial establishments, multi -family dwellings or manufactured home parks in the City without first securing a commercial solid waste collection license from the City. The City Council, in the interest of maintaining healthful and sanitary conditions in the City, hereby reserves the right to limit the number of licenses initially issued to seven (7), through attrition the number of licenses issued shall decrease to four (4). (Add by Ord. 95-94, passed 4/11/94) Save as above amended, Section 507 of the Lino Lakes City Code shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passed this 13th day of November, 1995 by the Lino Lakes City Council. Signed this 13th day of November, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Attest: Marilyn Anderson, Clerk - Treasurer This motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor therof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert The following voted against same: None. Whereupon the said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA Ordinance No. 18 - 95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING LINO LAKES CODE BY ESTABLISHING THE POSITION AND DUTIES OF AN ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, ordains: Section 1. Section 1003, Building Code is amended by adding the following subdivisions: Subdivision 2: Electrical Inspector. The position of electrical inspector is hereby established. The person chosen to fill this position shall hold a license as a master or journeyman electrician under Minnesota Statutes, Section 326.242, Subdivision 1 or 2. The electrical inspector shall be appointed by the city council. Subdivision 3: Electrical Permits. a. No electrical installation in any construction, remodeling, replacement or repair, except minor repair work, as defined in Chapter 3800.3500, Subp. 10 of the Minnesota Rules, shall be made without first securing a permit therefor. b. Permits shall be granted only to properly licensed electrical contractors who are registered and bonded by the State of Minnesota, except that such permit may be granted to a bona fide owner of single family residential property, who intends to conduct such work on his property and who occupies or intends to occupy the property and further, who demonstrates to the satisfaction of the electrical inspector that he has sufficient knowledge to perform the required work. c. Any violation of this article, including a failure to file a permit when required, shall be a misdemeanor violation subject to all the penal provisions of this Code and the State Electrical Act. Any person who shall commence work of any kind for which a permit is required under the provisions of this Code without first having received the necessary permit therefor shall, when subsequently receiving such permit, be required to pay double the fees provided in this article. d. The Minnesota State Board of Electricity Rules Chapter 3800, revised April, 1995, and any future revisions, modifications or amendments thereto, are hereby adopted by reference, except for those sections which have been revised by city council resolution. With regard to such rules adopted by reference, wherever the phrase "request for inspection" is used therein, substitute the words "electrical permit" and wherever the words "the board" referring to the state board of electricity are used therein, substitute the words "the city." Section 2: Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) after its passage and publication by the Lino Lakes City Council. Passed this 13th day of November , 1995 by the Lino Lakes City Council. Attest: Marilyn Anderson, Clerk Vernon Reinert, Mayor Council Member Elliott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA Ordinance No. 19 - 95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE BY CLARIFYING COMPENSATION FOR PARK BOARD MEMBERS The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does hereby ordain: 1. Appointment and Compensation of Members, Section 211.05 of the Lino Lakes City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 211.05. Appointment and Compensation of Members. The Board shall consist of seven (7) members and they shall be appointed by a majority of the City Council and shall receive a quarterly salary of $150.00 ($50.00 per meeting) with the chair of the Board to received $225.00 per quarter ($75.00 per meeting) consistent with the Mayor/Council relationship. Members will not be paid for meetings that they miss. However, if a Member misses a regularly scheduled meeting but attends a special Park Board meeting, compensation will be paid for the special meeting. 11. Save as above amended, said City Code shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect January 1, 1996 after its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passes by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of November , 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 19 - 95 Page -2- Marilyn O. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Kuether introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA Ordinance No. 20 - 95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE BY CLARIFYING COMPENSATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMBERS The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does hereby ordain: Compensation for Member. Section 212.06 of the Lino Lakes City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 212.06. Compensation for Members. The Planning and Zoning Board shall receive a quarterly salary of $150.00 ($50.00 per meeting) with the chair of the Board to received $225.00 per quarter ($75.00 per meeting) consistent with the Mayor/Council relationship. Members will not be paid for meetings that they miss. However, if a Member misses a regularly scheduled meeting but attends a special Planning and Zoning Board meeting, compensation will be paid for the special meeting. [I. Save as above amended, said City Code shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect January I, 1996 after its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passes by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of November , 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 20 - 95 Page -2- Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. Councilmember Elliott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 21-95 AN ORDINANCE OFFERING THE SALE BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES THE NORTHEASTERLY 10 FEET OF OUTLOT B, APOLLO BUSINESS PARK The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I. The real property legally described as the northeasterly 10 feet of Outlot B, in Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota (the "Property") is owned by the City of Lino Lakes (the "City"). The city council of the City has determined that the Property is no longer needed by the City for any public purpose. II. The city council of the City authorizes sale of the Property to UDOR U.S.A. for $2,955. The mayor and city clerk -treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to execute such deed and other documents as may be necessary in order to sell the Property. Proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used in accordance with the requirements of the city charter. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the city charter. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Maril G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. Council Member Elliott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 22 - 95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 207, PERSONNEL POLICY OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE Chapter 207, Personnel Policy, of the Lino Lakes City Ordinance was amended November 27, 1995. Following is a summary of the provisions of that ordinance as adopted. A complete copy of the ordinance is available for public review at the City Hall, 1 189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, between the hours of 7:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. The ordinancefshall take effect and be in full force 30 days following it publication. CHAPTER 207 PERSONNEL POLICY 207.01 Purpose 207.02 Scope of Ordinance 207.03 Applicability to Unionize Personnel 207.04 Statement of Non -Discrimination 207.05 Definitions 207.06 Probationary Period 207.07 Position Classification 207.08 Compensation Plan 207.09 Work Schedule 207.10 Performance Evaluations 207.11 Promotions 207.12 Relationship to Other City Personnel 207.13 Political Activity 207.14 Legal Holidays 207.1.5 Vacation Leave 207.16 Sick Leave 207.17 - Worker's Compensation 207.18 Sick Child/School Child 207.19 Funeral Leave 207.20 Military Duty 207.21 Time off to Vote 207.22 Jury Duty ORDINANCE NO. 22 - 95 Page -2- 207.23 Family Medical Leave Act 207.24 Parental Leave 207.25 Personal Leave of Absence 207.26 Leave Without Pay 207.27 Health Care Benefit Package 207.28 Deferred Compensation 207.29 Short -Term Disability 207.30 Lay Off/Transfer 207.31 Demotion 207.32 Dismissal 207.33 Absence Without Leave 207.34 Grievance Procedures 207.35 Resignation 207.36 Severance This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 27th day of November, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor • L71,- ( ,)1,1 Marilyn a. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION #95— 146 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT FOR THE $750.00 DONATED TO PURCHASE TWO SCHWINN MOUNTAIN BIKES FOR PATROLLING OUR PARKS AND TRAILS. WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Police Department in conjunction with the Lino Lakes Parks Department would like to enhance our park and trail patrols; and WHEREAS, the Bicycle Patrol Program would enhance the Lino Lakes Police Department's Community Oriented Policing Philosophy; and WHEREAS, the Centennial Fire District Donated $750.00 to the General Fund to offset the costs of purchasing two high quality Mountain bikes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, that the City of Lino Lakes accepts the donation of $750.00 for the Bicycle Patrol Program and wishes to express its gratitude to the Centennial Fire District for its donation. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this 13th day of November, 1995- - ATTEST: i City Clerk` Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Kuether adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 148 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO THE SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX AT FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA, N.A. (LINO LAKES BRANCH) WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has owned and used a safety deposit box at the above named facility for several years, and WHEREAS, this safety deposit box is now to small to contain all of the important documents of the City, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be authorized and directed to rent a larger safety deposit box at the Firstar Bank of Minnesota, N.A., AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that the City Clerk -Treasurer, the Accounts Payable Clerk and the Finance Director be authorized access to the safety deposit box. Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 13th day of November, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. An erson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for he adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Elliott adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 149 RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDER REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT - SUNSET ROAD UTILITY EXTENSION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. A certain petition requesting the improvement of Sunset Road between Elm Street and the south line of 7164 Sunset Road by constructing sanitary sewer and water mains and services, filed with the Council on November 13, 1995, is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby. This declaration is make in conformity to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.035 and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. 2. The petition is hereby referred to the City Engineer, and he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of November, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor % t / Marilyn G.'Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. Council Member Kuether adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 -150 RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - SUNSET ROAD. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted November 13, 1995, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the improvement of Sunset Road between Elm Street and the south line of 7164 Sunset Road by constructing sanitary sewer and water mains and services, and this report was received by the council on November 13, 1995. WHEREAS, the property owners at 7164 Sunset Road and 7172 Sunset Road have waived there right to a public hearing and appeal of assessment. WHEREAS, the property owners at 7164 Sunset Road and 7172 Sunset Road waive fifty (50) of the sixty (60) day waiting period as provided in section 8.06 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes Charter, at an estimated cost of $38,380. 2. Plans and specifications prepared by the City Engineer, engineer for such improvement pursuant to council resolution, a copy of which plans and specifications is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and shall be filed with the city clerk. 3.. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 13th day of November, 1995. RESOLUTION NO. 95-150 PAGE 2 Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of November, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-152 RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-7 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes (the "City") established the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") in 1990 and conferred upon it responsibility for economic development within Lino Lakes. 1.02. The City approved a tax increment financing plan (the "Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 on May 22, 1995. 1.03. In response to a recent development proposal from Fogerty Development/Custom Remodelers, the Authority and the City have authorized the preparation of a modified Plan, which is contained in a document entitled "Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7" dated November 13, 1995 and on file with the clerk -treasurer. 1.04. Copies of the modified Plan have been forwarded to Independent School District No. 12 and Anoka County along with a notice of a public hearing to be held by the City on November 13, 1995. 1.05. The Authority has adopted the modified Plan and referred it to the City for public hearing and consideration as provided by Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 through 469.179 (the "TIF Act."). 1.06. The City has fully reviewed the contents of the modified Plan and has on this date conducted a public hearing thereon at which the views of all interested persons were heard. Section 2. Findings; Modification of Plan. 2.01. It is found and determined that it is necessary and desirable to the sound and orderly development and redevelopment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 and the City as a whole, and for the protection and preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare, that the authority of the TIF Act be exercised by the Authority and the City to provide public financial assistance. 2.02. It is further found and determined, and it is the reasoned opinion of the City, that the development proposed in the modified Plan could not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonable foreseeable future and that therefore the use of tax increment financing is necessary. 2.03. The modified Plan conforms to the general plan for development of the City as a whole. 2.04. The proposed public assistance to be financed largely through tax increment financing are necessary to permit the City to realize the full potential of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 in terms of development intensity, employment opportunities and tax base. 2.05. The modified Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the area by private enterprise. Section 3. Approval of Modification: Filing 3.01. The modified Plan is hereby approved. The modified Plan incorporates by reference the original Plan and all subsequent modifications except as this modified Plan explicitly or by reasonably necessary implication conflicts with the original Plan or previous modifications. 3.02. The geographic boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 are not affected by this modification and are as described in the original Plan. 3.03. The Authority is requested to file a copy of the modified Plan with the Minnesota commissioner of revenue as required by the TIF Act. 3.04. The clerk -treasurer is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the Authority. 2. The city clerk -treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to notify Independent School District No. 12 and Anoka County at least 30 days prior to the public hearing and to invite their comments on the modified Plan. 3. The city staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary to bring this matter before the city council at the time of the public hearing. Dated: November 13, 1995 Vernon Reinert, Mayor Randall Schumacher, City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. and the following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Kuether adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-153 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFIED PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 1 AND THE PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 1-1 AND 1-2 WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") intends to modify the Development District Program for Development District No. 1 and the Tax Increment Financing Plans (the "Plans") for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 and 1-2 ("TIF Districts No. 1-1 and 1-2"); and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes. sections 469.174 through 469.179 (the "TIF Act") and sections 469.124 through 469.134 (the "City Development District Act") requires that the city council of the city of Lino Lakes (the "City") hold a public hearing on the modified program for Development District No. 1 and the Plans for TIF District No. 1-1 and 1-2, following approval thereof by the EDA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as follows: 1. The city clerk -treasurer is authorized and directed to prepare a notice for publication in the official newspaper setting a public hearing before the city council to consider this matter on December 18, 1995 at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers at city hall. The notice shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but not more than 30 days prior to the public hearing. DATED: November 13 , 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Ander-son Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. and the following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Kuether adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 155 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO CONSTRUCT THE SUNSET ROAD UTILITY EXTENSION PROJECT AS A CHANGE ORDER TO THE HIGHWAY 49 AND COUNTY ROAD 13 INTERSECTION PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the council on November 13, 1995, the city engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of Sunset Road between Elm Street and the south line of 7164 Sunset Road by constructing sanitary sewer and water mains and services and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The city engineer shall proceed under the direction of the council, as given from time to time, to construct the Sunset Road Utility Extension Project as a change order to the Highway 49 and County Road 13 Intersection Project. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of November, 99-5: Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Council Member Kuether and moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-156 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF LINO LAKES FLEXIBLE HEALTH CARE AND DEPENDENT DAY CARE PLAN. WHEREAS, the plan was adopted per Resolution No. 78-90 with the effective date of January 1, 1991, and WHEREAS, the plan needs to be updated to include law changes such as Family Medical Leave and Military Leave, and WHEREAS, a section is added to include cash compensation or City contribution to a deferred compensation plan in lieu of single health insurance coverage, and WHEREAS, the deferred compensation contribution is equal to the higher single rate of the current health insurance available, and WHEREAS, the cash contribution is equal to the higher single rate of the current health insurance available less Social Security, Medicare and P.E.R.A. contributions, and WHEREAS, the effective date of this amendment is January 1, 1996. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Lino Lakes that the City Flexible Health Care and Day Care Plan be amended to reflect these changes effective January 1, 1996. Adopted by the city Council of Lino Lakes this 13th day of November, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert - Mayor -----E. s(2.4.4,-,-).„__, Marilyn . Anderson - Clerk Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Elliott adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION 95-157 RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE REAPPOINTMENT OF EUGENE PETERSON TO RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS WHEREAS, Eugene Peterson has served as a Rice Creek Watershed District Board Manager representing Anoka County since January 1993; and WHEREAS, Peterson has been responsive to the needs of City of Lino Lakes while simultaneously observing environmental sensitivity, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes supports the reappointment of Eugene Peterson as a Rice Creek Watershed District Board Manager. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th Day of November, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marlyn G. Anderson, City Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council MemberBergesonand upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. COUNCIL MEETING DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES : February 26, 1996 . 6:30 P.M. . 7:13 P.M. : Lyden, Neal, Landers : Bergeson, Kuether FEBRUARY 26,1996 Staff members present: City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; City Engineer, David Ahrens; Planning Coordinator, Mary Kay Wyland; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; Consulting Engineer, Jim Norton, SEH; City Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. SETTING THE AGENDA Mr. Schumacher asked that item C. Recognizing the Liaisons for 1996 be added under Old Business. He also asked that item A, Recognition of Peg Smith be added under New Business. Mr. Schumacher asked that item B, Limiting Construction Hours Update be added under the Engineer's Report. Mr. Schumacher suggested that the Consent Agenda be waived for this evening and separate action be taken on each item. OPEN MIKE Mayor Landers asked if there was anyone in the audience to speak under open mike. There was no one to speak under open mike. State of the City Address - Mayor Landers presented his State of the City Address. A copy of his address is attached to these minutes. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES November 13, 1995 Regular Council Meeting - These minutes will be considered at the March 12, 1996 Council meeting. February 8, 1996 Regular Council Meeting - Council Member Neal moved to approve these minutes as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PAGE 1 COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 1996 CONSIDERATION OF DISBURSEMENTS February 26, 1996 - Council Member Neal moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District - Council Member Neal moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT EXCLUDED BINGO, LINO LAKES ELEMENTARY PAB The Lino Lakes Elementary School located on Main Street has an active parent group. This group conducts two (2) major gambling events each year to raise money for such things as playground equipment. Since the Minnesota Gambling Statutes allow a non- profit group to be excluded from obtaining a license if they conduct fewer that five (5) gambling events per year, the City Council is also asked to approve the exemption. Council Member Neal moved to allow the exemption. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BIDS FOR FOURTH AVENUE TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENT The Fourth Avenue trunk utility improvement project involves the construction of trunk sanitary sewer and watermain along Fourth Avenue and Lilac Street to serve the Behm's Century Farm subdivision. Plans and specifications for this project were ordered by the City Council on August 14, 1995. On January 8, 1996, the plans and specifications were approved and the advertisement for bids was ordered. Ten bids were received and opened on Wednesday, February 21, 1996. Staff requested the Council to adopt a motion accepting the bids. The award of the contract will occur at a future Council meeting. Council Member Lyden said that the term "apparent low bid" was noted on the bid sheet. He asked if there was a problem with the bids. Mr. Ahrens said that the term "apparent low bid" terminology is used until there is an actual award. Staff does not want to give the impression that a specific bid is the low bid and will be awarded the contract. There is no problem with the bids. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, BRIAN WESSEL SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 01- 96 Offering the Sale of Property in the Apollo Business Park to Progressive Engineering Technology, Inc. - Mr. Wessel explained that this is the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 01 - 96. PAGE 2 COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 26,1996 Progressive Engineering Technology, Inc. is an engineering and custom precision machining company that is currently located in Blaine. The company is planning to purchase 2.2 acres of land in the City -owned portion of the Apollo Business Park to build a 16,000 square foot manufacturing facility. According to the City Charter, an ordinance is required when City -owned property is sold. The FIRST READING of this ordinance was held at the February 12, 1996 City Council meeting. Since that time, no further questions or comments have been received. Mr. Wessel identified the site of this proposed facility and recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 01 - 96. Council Member Neal moved to adopt the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 01 - 96 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 01 - 96 can be found at the end of these minutes. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REPORT, MARY KAY WYLAND Final Plat, Willow Ponds - Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector to show the location of the Willow Ponds west of St. Joseph Catholic Church on Elm Street. She explained that the Willow Ponds preliminary plat was approved by the City Council in June, 1995. The plat consists of 10 single family residential home sites and a large lot containing 47 senior cottages. Agreements were signed in August, 1995 by the City and the developer covering site improvements and City subsidies. Financial guarantees have been posted and the title work reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. City staff is recommending approval of the final plat for Willow Ponds. Council Member Neal asked who will be supplying natural gas to this subdivision. Mayor Landers explained that the area south of Elm Street and the senior housing are supplied by Circle Pines utilities. Since the senior cottages developer is connecting to Circle Pines utilities, it is likely that the 10 single-family home sites will also be served by Circle Pines utilities. Ms. Wyland will check to see who is supplying utilities. Mayor Landers noted that there had been discussion regarding building a senior cottage building on one of the 10 lots and rent it to the public. He asked the status of this proposal. Ms. Wyland explained that she had not been involved in those discussions. The lots have always been considered single family use only. Mr. Schumacher explained that he has—discussed this matter with the developer because there are some senior citizens who do not qualify for the subsidized units but would like to be in the senior community. He said one possible result of the discussion is that a double senior unit similar to what is being constructed now could be placed on a lot and rented at market rates. Ms. Wyland explained that zoning for the 10 lots is Single Family (R-1). Any development other than singe -family housing would require an application for rezoning. She explained this may PAGE 3 COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 1996 not be out of character with what is currently under construction, however, it would have to be rezoned to R-2 or R-3. The size of the lot would also be increased. Ms. Wyland explained that the property is already zoned R-1 and the final plat approval request from the developer is needed so that he can record the configuration of the lots so that these lots can be sold. If the developer decides to build some twin homes later, a minor subdivision would be required as well as a rezone. Council Member Neal moved to approve the final plat of Willow Ponds. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, DAVID AHRENS Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 25 Accepting Bids for Well No. 3 Pumphouse - Mr. Ahrens explained that on Tuesday, February 20, 1996, bids were opened for construction of Well No. 3 Pumphouse. This pumphouse will be located on the south side of Birch Street, west of 12th Avenue. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. The City Council ordered the improvement, approved the plans and specifications, and ordered the advertisement for bids for the construction of Well No. 3 Pumphouse at the January 18, 1996 Council meeting. On Tuesday, February 20, 1996, eight sealed bids were received and opened. The low bid was from M.C. Magney Construction for $339,200.00 and the second low bid was from Sheehy Construction, for $391,300.00. M.C. Magney Construction has submitted a letter requesting that their bid be withdrawn due to an error in transferring the bid amount to the bid form. Per instruction to bidders, in the specifications, any bidder may withdraw their bid within 24 hours after the bid opening by filing a signed written notice with the City. This written notice shall demonstrate, to reasonable satisfaction of the City, that there was a material and substantial error in the preparation of the bid. In addition, the bid security will be returned if the City finds that there was a reasonable error. M.C. Magney Construction submitted information to staff to document that the bid was indeed in error. This information included copies of quotes received by suppliers and calculations of labor charges. It is the opinion of the staff that there was a material and substantial error and that the request to have the bid withdrawn be accepted. If the withdrawal of the bid from M.C. Magney is approved, the low bidder is Sheehy Construction. Per the letter by Mr. Jim Norton, SEH, Sheehy Construction is a reputable contractor and is capable of performing the required work. Project financing will be provided by the City's Enterprise Fund (Area and Unit Fund) and no assessments will be levied to fund this project. PAGE 4 COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 1996 It is anticipated that construction will begin by the end of March, 1996, and, per the contract, will be substantially complete (well is operational) by July 1, 1996. Mr. Ahrens recommended that the City Council approve the withdrawal of the bid from M.C. Magney Construction and award the bid to Sheehy Construction. Council Member Neal moved to accept the letter from M.C. Magney Construction withdrawing their bid. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Neal moved to adopt resolution No. 96 - 25 Accepting the Bids and Awarding the Construction Contract for Well No. 3 Pumphouse Project to Sheehy Construction. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 25 can be found at the end of these minutes. Mr. Ahrens noted that this pumphouse is larger than the pumphouse recently constructed in Clearwater Creek. This pumphouse will accommodate a filtration system if needed in the future. Limiting the Construction Hours Update - Mr. Ahrens noted that at the work session, February 21, 1996, there was discussion regarding limiting hours that construction work could take place in the City. He said initially he thought this matter could be handled through the zoning ordinance update process. Ms. Wyland has informed him that the appropriate place for this to be addressed is within the City Code. Mr. Ahrens said that he will have a draft ordinance prepared for the next Council meeting, March 11, 1996. The second reading of the ordinance could take place on March 25, 1996 and become effective 30 days after the date of publication. He suggested that the City Council discuss this matter at the March 6, 1996 Council work session and define exactly what the issues are and how the City should deal with them. Ms. Wyland did mention to Mr. Ahrens that the City does have a policy which defines the construction working hours and that there is to be no construction activity on Sunday. The policy cannot not be enforced by the Police Department but is usually included as part of the development contract. Mr. Hawkins explained that if the construction is generating loud noises, this can be determined to be a nuisance and the Nuisance Ordinance can be enforced by the Police Department. Adopting a policy does give the City the right of enforcement by criminal procedures. Mayor Landers said that he has discussed this matter with the Police Department and was told that an officer will respond to a call regarding construction noise. However, the only thing that they can do is advise the contractor that there has been a complaint and if the activity continues, the officer is powerless to do anything about it. PAGE 5 COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 1996 Mayor Landers explained that there are three (3) different projects under construction at this time and they are working seven (7) days a week. Council Member Lyden asked if the City should make a qualified difference between a professional home contractor and a resident building his deck? He felt that the ordinance should be fair and consistent. Mr. Hawkins said that the City cannot pick and choose who can or cannot work at specified hours. There is also an issue regarding what the City can regulate in terms of a persons right to conduct business on certain days. There will have to be documentation as to why the ordinance is regulating this activity. Mr. Hawkins said that there are a lot of issues that need to be considered. Mr. Ahrens, Ms. Wyland and Mr. Hawkins will meet to prepare a draft ordinance and bring it to the work session for Council consideration. OLD BUSINESS Consideration of Resolution No. 96 -13 Amending the 1995 General Fund Budget - Mr. Schumacher noted that Council Member Kuether had some questions about this resolution. He did talk to her on the telephone and she does understand what the resolution is doing. Council Member Lyden said that Council Member Kuether had questions about this resolution and he would feel more comfortable taking action on the resolution when she was here to discuss her concerns. Mr. Schumacher said that he was sure that she now understands the reason for the resolution. Mr. Schumacher explained that when the 1995 Budget was prepared, the City was not sure that they would receive a COPS grant. The grant was received and therefore the general fund is going to be changed to reflect this income. The second issue is the receipt of an insurance settlement for a squad car that was involved in an accident. The third budget change reflects the expense for a new squad car to replace the car totaled in the accident. The other salary issue involves hiring of a part-time clerk to replace the full- time clerk who was on a medical leave. The last items involve a name change from salaries to stipends. Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 13. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 13 can be found at the end of these minutes. Re -consider Motion to Accept Petition of Property Owners Against Assessment for 12th Avenue/Holly Drive Improvement - Mr. Schumacher explained that at the last Council meeting, a motion to accept a petition was seconded by a Council Member who also signed the petition. There was a question as to whether or not this action could be considered conflict of interest. Mr. Schumacher said that he did discuss the matter with Mr. Hawkins and determined that considering there was no financial obligation issues involved, the petition should be considered as informational only and there is no conflict of interest. Mr. Hawkins said that the petition has no legal significance and is merely the PAGE 6 COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 26,1996 expression of intent and does not bind the City Council in any manner. He did not feel that there was a conflict of interest under State Statutes or the City Code of Ethics. No action is required on this matter. NEW BUSINESS Recognition of Peg Smith and the Lino Lakes Seniors for their Preparation of the Meal for the Joint Lino Lakes, Hugo, Centerville and Rice Creek Watershed District Meeting - Mayor Landers explained that Peg Smith and the seniors prepared a wonderful meal for the joint council meeting held on February 8, 1996. He and the Council Members said thank you. Recognition of Council Liaisons - Mr. Schumacher explained that there has been discussion during the past couple of months regarding whether there should be or should not be Council liaisons. There have not been liaisons for a couple of years and after a lot of discussion it was the consensus that this practice should be reinstated as follows: LIAISON DEPARTMENT Mayor Landers Council Member Neal Council Member Kuether Council Member Bergeson Council Member Lyden Mayor Landers Council Member Bergeson Administration Police Department Engineering/Public Works Department Community Development Parks and Recreation Solid Waste Department Friends of the Parks Council Member Neal moved to adopt the list of liaison for appointment of one year. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Neal moved to adjourn at 7:13 P.M. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Aye. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a regular Council meeting held on March 6, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer John L. Landers, Mayor PAGE 7 STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS 26 FEBRUARY 1996 JOHN LANDERS, MAYOR GOOD EVENING... THE CITY CHARTER MANDATES THAT A STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS BE GIVEN EACH YEAR BY THE MAYOR. AS I HAVE BEEN YOUR MAYOR FOR ONLY 8 WEEKS, I WILL MAKE MY SPEECH VERY BRIEF, I AM SURE MOST OF YOU WOULD APPRECIATE THAT. FIRST OF ALL, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK MY SUPPORTERS FOR WORKING SO HARD FOR MY ELECTION. I PROMISE TO WORK JUST AS HARD FOR YOU OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS OF MY TERM. I LOOK FORWARD TO THE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES THAT AWAIT ME AS MAYOR. I REALIZE THAT DIFFERENCES OF OPINION PROBABLY EXIST ON THIS COUNCIL ON CERTAIN ISSUES. I CAN'T THINK OF A COUNCIL IN WHICH THIS WAS NOT THE CASE. BUT I KNOW SOLUTIONS ARE OUT THERE. TO THAT END, WE HAVE ALREADY SCHEDULED A TEAM BUILDING AND COMMUNICATION SESSION FOR MARCH IN AN EFFORT TO BETTER UNDERSTAND ONE ANOTHER'S STYLE AND VIEW POINTS. 1996 BEGINS WITH MANY EXCITING PROJECTS IN THE WORKS. LINO LAKES WILL SOON BE HOME TO A STATE OF THE ART MIDDLE SCHOOL. CONSTRUCTION OF SENIOR HOUSING IS NEARING COMPLETION . THESE TWO ADDITIONS ARE GREAT STEPS TOWARDS MAKING LINO LAKES A COMMUNITY IN WHICH A PERSON CAN ENJOY THEIR YOUTH AND TWILIGHT YEARS. WE HAVE MANY NEW BUSINESSES THAT I WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME TO OUR COMMUNITY. ALSO, LOOK FOR A SURVEY LATER THIS YEAR IN WHICH WE WILL SOLICIT YOUR OPINION ON A VARIETY OF ISSUES. THESE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE MANY PROJECTS WE HAVE PLANNED FOR 1996. I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING FOR YOU AS YOUR MAYOR. LINO LAKES IS A GREAT PLACE TO LIVE. TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE IT EVEN BETTER. Councilmember Neal introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 01-96 AN ORDINANCE OFFERING THE SALE BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 2.2 ACRES OF OUTLOT B, APOLLO BUSINESS PARK The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I. The real property described as approximately 327 feet fronting on the south side of Apollo Drive and approximately 297 feet in depth, in Outlot B, in Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Miinnesota, (the "Property") is owned by the City of Lino Lakes (the "City"). The city council of the City has determined that the Property is no longer needed by the City for any public purpose. 11. The city council of the City authorizes sale of the Property to Progressive Engineering Technology, Inc. for $85,800. The mayor and city clerk -treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to execute such deed and other documents as may be necessary in order to sell the Property. Proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used in accordance with the requirements of the city charter. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the city charter. ATTEST: /24 Marilyn G. derson, lerk-Treasurer John L. Landers, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by councilmember Lyden and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None, Council Members Bergeson and Kuether were absent. Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. First Reading Approved on February 12, , 1996 Second Reading Approved on February 26 , 1996 Published in the official newspaper on March 6 , 1996 Council member Neal introduced the following resolution and move its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-13 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1995 GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, the City received a Federal grant for hiring a new patrol officer, and WHEREAS, the budget was adopted prior to the grant award, and WHEREAS, a squad car was totaled and needed to be replaced, and WHEREAS, the City received money from insurance towards the purchase of a new squad, and WHEREAS, the Police Department needed temporary staff to fill a vacancy, and WHEREAS, a new line item was added in 1995 to account for the Planning and Zoning Board and the Park Board Stipend. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following budget amendment be authorized and effective December 31, 1995: Cops Fast Grant (3315) Police Other Revenue (3422) Capital Outlay (Police) Salaries (Police) Other Salaries (Police) Salaries (Park Board) Stipend Park Board) Salaries (Planning & Zoning Board) Stipend (Planning & Zoning Board) Increase $19,900 $ 7,000 $26,900 $10,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 26th day of February, 1996. G.4�nd Maril n erson, Clerk Treasurer Decrease ($10,500) ($ 4,500) ($ 4,500) ohn Landers - Mayor Page 2 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Lyden and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None, Council Members Bergeson and Kuether were absent. Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: Council Member Neal introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-25 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - WELL NO. 3 PUMPHOUSE. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of Well No. 3 Pumhouse, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name Bid Amount M.C. Magney Construction $339,200 Sheehy Construction $391,300 Municipal Builders $406,000 Richmar $408,600 Meisinger Construction $419,900 Mills Contracting $431,200 Gorham Oien $449,800 G.H.T. Construction, Inc. $458,600 AND WHEREAS,_M. C. Magney Construction, Inc., has submitted written documentation to demonstrate that there was a substantial and material mistake in the preparation of the bid in accordance with the bidding documents, AND WHEREAS, it appears that Sheehy Construction, 360 West Larpenteur Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55113, is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City of Lino Lakes approves the withdrawal of the bid of M. C. Magney Construction, Inc. Resolution No. 96-25 Page 2 2. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Sheehy Construction Company, Inc., of St. Paul, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of Well No. 3 Pumphouse according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of February, 1996. J lin L. Landers Mayor Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Lyden and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None, Council Members Bergeson and Kuether were absent Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on February 26, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer TOPIC Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 27 Abating 1996 Installment of Special Assessm on PIN. 28-31-22-32-0019 BACKGROUND An error has been discovered in the 1995 assessment for Living Waters Lutheran Church, 875 Birch Street. Living Waters Lutheran Church paid their assessment in full on November 9, 1995. The record of the pa..-yent did not reach my office and consequently I did not report the payment to Anoka County. As a result, the assessment does appear on the Living Waters Lutheran Church 1996 property tax statements. Passage of Resolution No. 96 - 27 will allow me to report the payment and requ st that a corrected tax statement be preparedird mail to Living Waters Lu eran Church. lotion No. 96 - 27 Abating 1996 Installment of Special on PIN. 28-31-22-32-0019, Living Waters Lutheran r to staff for further consideration. CATION Anoka County Division of Property Records & Taxation Abatement Form 7 (Rev 2/95) APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (M.S. 375.192) County Auditor's Number County of Anoka Applicant's Name For Taxes Assessed in 19 95 and Payable in 19 96 Please print or type. Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer Applicant's Social Security Number Applicant's Telephone Number ( 464 ) 5562 Date of Application March 6, 1996 Applicant's Mailing Address CITY OF LINO LAKES 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Mn. 55014 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Property I.D. or Parcel Number 28-31-22-32-0019 Street Address (if different than above) 875 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Mn. 55014 City or Township Lino Lakes School District Number #12, Centennial LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY See Attached APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF FACTS The City is requesting that the assessment for Funds 82363 and 82364 for the above described property, PIN. 28-31-22-32-0019 be abated entirely. The payment was received in full on November 9, 1995 and the assessment clerk was not notified of the payment. APPLICANT'S REQUEST Include fund number & amount due for payable tax year being abated, not total principal amount. The City is requesting that the assessment for Funds 82363 and 82364 for the above described property be abated entirely. The payment was received in full on November 9, 1995 and the assessment clerk was not notified of the payment. icantSignature i h/ q6 Date NOTE: Minnesota Statutes 1988, Section 609.41, "Whoever, in making any statement, oral or written, which is required or authorized by law to be made as a basis of imposing, reducing or abating any tax or assessment, intentionally makes any statement as to any material matter which the maker of the statement knows is false my be sentenced, unless otherwise provided by law, to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both." NO. 7D STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE a Anderson, Cle 1996 TOPIC Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 30 Correcting the 1995 Assessment, 7064 Sunset Road An error has been discovered in the 1995 assessment for 7064 Sunset Road. The owner of that property paid their assessment in full on August 18, 1995. The record of the payment did not reach my office and consequently did not report the payment to Anoka County. As a result, the assessment does appear on the property tax statement for this address. Passage of Resolution No. 96-0 low me to report the payment and request that a corrected pared and mailed to the property owner. Adopt the Resolution No. 96 - 30 Abating 1996 Installment of Special Assessments on PIN. 19-31-22-23-0003, 7064 Sunset Road. matter to staff for further consideration. ..noka County Division of Property Records & Taxation Abatement Form 7 (Rev 2/95) APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (M.S. 375.192) County Auditor's Number County of Anoka Applicant's Name For Taxes Assessed in 19 95 and Payable in 19 96 Please print or type. Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer Applicant's Social Security Number Applicant's Telephone Number ( 612) 464-5562 Date of Application March 6, 1996 Applicant's Mailing Address CITY OF LINO LAKES 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Mn. 55014 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Property I.D. or Parcel Number 19-31-22-23-0003 Street Address (if different than above) 7064 Sunset Road Lino Lakes, Mn. 55014 City or Township Lino Lakes School District Number #12, Centennial LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lot 3, Block 3, Lexington Park Lakeview APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF FACTS The assessment for the above described parcel was paid August 18, 1995. Due to miscommunicatic in the office, Anoka County was not notified of the payment. Therefor, there is an assessment showing on the 1996 property tax statements. APPLICANT'S REQUEST Include fund number & amount due for payable tax year being abated, not total principal amount. The City is requesting that the assessment for Funds 1330 and 1344 for the above described property be abated entirely. The payment was received in full on August 18, 1995 and the assessment clerk was not notified of the payment. Applica s Signature 3/64 Date NOTE: Minnesota Statutes 1988, Section 609.41, "Whoever, in making any statement, oral or written, which is required or authorized by law to be made as a basis of imposing, reducing or abating any tax or assessment, intentionally makes any statement as 10 any material matter which the maker of the statement knows is false my be sentenced, unless otherwise provided by law, to imprisonment for nol more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both."