Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05/28/1996 Council Packet
AGENDA 600 P.M. Economic DeveIp1ient Authority CITY OF LINO LAKES Tuesday May 28, 1996 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call OATH OF OFFICE - Bill Hawkins SPANNE Planning and Zoning Board - Allan Robinson, Caroline Dahl, Park and Recreation Board - Paul Montain, George Lindy, Joe Schmidt Circle Pines Gas Utility Commission - Vernon Reinert Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? Consent Agenda A. Consideration of Disbursements: May 28, 1996 (Check Nos. 44512 to 44598, $105,030.39) Centennial Fire District, May 20, 1996 N: ' ?-‘ L10 Open Mike ou jytc. A. Introduction of Eugene Peterson, Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Board Member and Update by Mr. Peterson Regarding Future RCWD Projects (3 4Wv.h.04(..VeA— — S6Lool2-a&D 6:30 P.M., CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING, Improvement of 12th I Avenue/Holly Drive, David Ahrens ---055\,-4, Economic Development Department, Brian Wessel A. FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 06 - 96 Offering the Sale of Property to Emergency Apparatus Maintenance PAGE 1 AGENDA Consideration of the SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 05 - 96 Amending Ordinance No. 18 - 95, Establishing the Position and Duties of an Electrical Inspector, Peter Kluegel Consideration of Establishing an Environmental Board, Maurine Davidson Consideration of Approving Agreement for Recycling Program with Anoka County, Jackie Constant Consideration of the Arbor Day Proclamation, (The celebration of Arbor Day will take place at the Lino Elementary School, Friday, May 31, 1996.), Marty Asleson 9. Planning and Zoning Board Report, Mary Kay Wyland A. Consideration of a Minor Subdivision, Hal Liebel, 7566 Peltier Lake Drive B. Consideration of a Minor Subdivision and Variance, Duff Dorschner, 307 Lilac Street 6 • ifa/fitim-ep 10. City Engineer's Report, David Ahrens A Consideration of SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 04 - 96, Noise Ordinance B. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 54, Awarding Bid for Birch Street Trunk Watermain Improvement 11. Old Business 12. New Business A. Consideration of Minutes, City Council Board of Review, April 15, 1996 (Council Member Lyden was absent) B. Consideration of a Block Party Request for White Owl Drive for Sunday, June 9, 1996, 4:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M., Marilyn Anderson 13. Adjourn PAGE 2 1 DISBURSEMENTS 1 MAY 28, 1996 Page: 1 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount 1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER/HWY 49 & LAKE) 1,644.0( Total for Department 1,644.0( Total for Fund 1,644.0( APOLLO BUSINESS PARK FUND * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/A BUS PARK) 1,075.5( Total for Department 1,075.5( Total for Fund 1,075.5( AREA AND UNIT CHARGE * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE/WELL #4) BRAUN INTERTEC, INC.(EXCAVATION/COMPACTION WELL 3) SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM, INC.(ADVERTISING/BIRCH ST TRUNK) CLOSED BOND FUND 1.21 901.5( 224.1( Total for Department 1,126.81 Total for Fund 1,126.81 ANOKA COUNTY(REAL PROPERTY TAXES) 5,359.02 Total for Department 5,359.02 Total for Fund 5,359.0z COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT BLOCK GRANT FOREST LAKE AREA(COORDINATOR SUPPORT SERVICES) 1,416.0( Total for Department 1,416.0( Total for Fund 1,416.0C Page: 2 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN DEDICATED PARKS ENGINEER/TRAPPERS CROSS) ATTORNEY/PHEASANT H VII) ATTORNEY/TRAPPERS CROSS) ATTORNEY/GEN ESCROW) Total for Department Total for Fund * A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC.(COUNTRY LAKES PARK) Total for Department GENERAL ADMINISTRATION * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) ANOKA COUNTY(RECORDING FEE) D.C.A. INC.(FLEX INSURANCE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) LABOR RELATIONS, INC.(CONSULTANT SERVICE) MULCRONE, MR. TIM B.A.(CANCELLATION FEE) MUN CLERKS/FIN OFFICERS ASSOC(MEMBERSHIP) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) SCHUMACHER, RANDALL B.(MEAL) TESCH, DAN(MEAL) * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) Total BUILDING INSPECTIONS Total for Fund for Department * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) JACKSON, THOMAS(BUILDING OFFICIAL TEST) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC.(ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS (11) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) Total for Department Amount 511.36 139.5C 379.00 355.5C 1,385.36 1,385.36 119.81 119.81 119.81 10.11 62.6C 167.7C 1,012.76 1,334.06 50.0C 25.0C 15.7E 22.94 25.0C 1.36 2,727.26 1.2E 390.01 70.0C 7.00 434.92 148.8C 1,051.95 Page: 3 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount CONSULTANTS * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(CRIMINAL ATTORNEY) 1,473.40 7,412.9C Total for Department 8,886.30 * ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER(MAPS FOR RESALE) 53.25 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 364.80 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 541.54 * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(APRIL SAC) 16,200.00 * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(APRIL SAC) -162.00 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 2.75 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 148.30 Total for Department 17,148.64 ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 9.87 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE/KAISER PROP) 4.91 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 7.00 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/KAISER PROP) 434.50 Total for Department 456.28 ENGINEERING/PLANNING DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 13.49 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 390.01 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 12.25 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 24.07 * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER) 243.03 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) 93.00 FINANCE * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) FIRE DEPARTMENT * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) Total for Department Total for Department Total for Department 775.85 0.22 9.63 9.85 415.15 3.50 418.65 Page: 4 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount FLEET MANAGEMENT CRYSTEEL DIST., INC.(SHOP PARTS) GOA COMPANY, INC.(MICROPLATE GREASE) GOPHER BEARING COMPANY, INC.(SWEEPER PARTS) GRAFFCO, INC.(HOSE FOR FUEL PUMP) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) FORESTRY DEPARTMENT 825.98 189.14 378.85 23.96 3.50 Total for Department 1,421.43 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 335.01 * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.(COPIER MAINTENANCE) 9.79 JEWELL NURSERIES, INC.(TREES) 1,623.30 NORTHWAY SPTS & GARDEN, INC.(TREES) 3,414.99 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 3.50 Total for Department 5,386.59 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) -29.35 * ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER(MAPS) 72.42 * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 839.59 PITNEY BOWES, INC.(POSTAGE METER RENTAL) 238.66 * SAM'S CLUB(SUPPLIES) 50.08 * UPPER MIDWEST SALES COMPANY (BATH TISSUE) 92.59 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 926.06 MAYOR AND COUNCIL LANDERS, JOHN(MILEAGE) WINFIELD SIGNS(3 X 5 LINO LAKES FLAG) PARKS DEPARTMENT Total for Department 2,190.05 8.06 178.00 Total for Department 186.06 BEACON BALLFIELDS DIVISION OF(SUPPLIES) 148.38 * CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE(ROLL STAMPS) 32.00 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF(MONTHLY SERVICE) 149.72 CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES, INC.(SPRAYER) 163.05 * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 23.93 GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC.(BASE ANCHORS) 67.80 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 1,065.03 * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.(COPIER MAINTENANCE) 88.08 ISANTI COUNTY EQUIPMENT, INC.(7' POWER BROOM) 6,177.00 Page: 5 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount J & E SMALL ENGINE & SPORT, IN(SUPPLIES) 8.4 MN. WANNER COMPANY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 27.9 NORTH STAR TURF, INC.(SWIFT/SURE 50#) 176.7 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 186.7 PRINTERS SERVICE, INC.(CHIPPER KNIVES SHARPENED) 26.2 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 14.0 * SAM'S CLUB(SUPPLIES) 19.6 TODORA, GAIL(FILE ENTRY/PARK & REC NWSLTR) 450.0 * UPPER MIDWEST SALES COMPANY (GARBAGE LINERS) 125.0 URICH, TRACEY(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE) 51.0 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 84.4 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 231.5 WALDOCH SPORTS, INC.(ATV RENTAL/COUNTRY LAKES PK) 225.0 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) 93.0 Total for Department 9,635.0 POLICE DEPARTMENT A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 11.3 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 0.9 ANOKA COUNTY(MOBILE DATA TERMINAL FEE) 723.5 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF(RANGE USE) 136.3: * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 10.6: EAST MAIN/NORTHWAY PHYSICIANS(EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL (3) 1,272.0, GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 131.8, * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 1,717.5- * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE/SIRENS) 3.1 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 56.0' ST. CROIX DESIGNS, INC.(PRINTING FOR DARE MATERIAL) 285.3_ ST. PAUL CITY OF(RADAR REPAIR) 216.81 STRATEGIC MORTGAGE SERVICE(CREDIT REPORTS (3) 60.0( THOMPSON AND VRAA(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) 918.0( TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC.(DARE EXPENSE -BALLOONS) 108.8, * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 293.8' Total for Department 5,946.2( RECREATION DEPARTMENT BERNSTEIN, BARRY(MILEAGE) 84.3. * CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE(ROLL STAMPS) 32.0( * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 23.9_ * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 390.0_ * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.(COPIER MAINTENANCE) 97.8< PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) 46.9` * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 3.5( * SAM'S CLUB(SUPPLIES) 19.61 * TODORA, GAIL (SPRING FLYER) 80.0( Total for Department 778.3- Page: 6 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT ACCAP(RECYCLE DAY) 200.0( GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, INC.(RECYCLE DAY/1.95 TONS) 293.0( J. R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL, IN (RECYCLE DAY/118 APPLIANCES) 874.0( LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB(RECYCLE DAY SERVICE) 300.0( MIDWAY ELECTRONICS, INC.(RECYCLE DAY/1.625 TONS) 301.0( * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 3.5( SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC.(RECYCLE OIL FILTERS) 297.0( * TODORA, GAIL(RECYCLING NEWSLETTER) 140.0( Total for Department 2,408.5( STREETS * A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC.(BOULEVARD REPAIR) 30.6E * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 11.4E * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE/STREET LITES) 218.8- * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 517.4_ MN. DEPT OF PUBLIC SERVICE(GEC INSPECTION) 160.0( * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE/STREET LIGHT) 2,342.1; PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING/PUBLIC WORKS PT) 79.9 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 14.0( T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC.(FINE ASPHALT) 123.22. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA(SNOW/ICE CONTROL/VIDEO) 95.0( WILKE, CHARLES(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE) 122.9E Total for Department 3,715.6( Total for Fund 63,142.5E PROGRAM RECREATION BOESPFLUG, SHELLY(PROGRAM REC OVERPAYMENT) 5.0( Total for Department 5.0( RECREATION DEPARTMENT MRPA(UMPIRE HATS/BALL BAGS) PRINT CENTRAL(SCORECARD PADS) PRINT CENTRAL(SCORECARD PADS) WILSON RACQUET SPORTS(PRACTICE TENNIS BALLS) 162.0( 75.3( 75.3" 71.2: Total for Department 383.9E Total for Fund 388.9E Page: 7 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount SEWER DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 0.1" * FUNDWORKS(UTILITY UPDATES) 212.5( * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 150.5( * GRAINGER, INC.(DIE HEAD PARTS) 130.5' * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 91.2( * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(MAY SEWER SERVICE) 21,414.0( * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 259.0; * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 5.6 Total for Department 22,263.6' Total for Fund 22,263.6'_ TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1-7 UDOR * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY/UDOR) 103.5( Total for Department 103.5( Total for Fund 103.5( WATER OPERATING WATER DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 0.1S FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC.(CHEMICALS) 2,743.8; * FUNDWORKS(UTILITY UPDATES) 212.5( * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 150.5( * GRAINGER, INC.(DIE HEAD PARTS) 130.5£ * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 273.6( INFRATECH, INC. SUIT(BLUE MARKING PAINT) 76.6E * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,844.15 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 5.65 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 36.1E WATERPRO SUPPLIES CORPORATION(LID COVERS) 1,531.2E Total for Department Total for Fund Total for Checking Account 1010 * - Invoice split to different Departments 7,005.1' 7,005.1' 105,030.35 ** Total ** $105,030.35 Page: 1 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount Checking Account 1010 000020 - A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 000050 - A T & T 000052 - A T & T 000090 - ACCAP 000350 - ANOKA COUNTY 000370 - ANOKA COUNTY 000403 - ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF 000440 - ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 000450 - ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC. 000620 - BEACON BALLFIELDS DIVISION OF 000670 - BERNSTEIN, BARRY 000732 - BOESPFLUG, SHELLY 000820 - BRAUN INTERTEC, INC. 000929 - WILKE, CHARLES 000930 - WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 001100 - CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 001110 - CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 001230 - CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 001260 - D.C.A. INC. 001267 - CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES, INC. 001409 - EAST MAIN/NORTHWAY PHYSICIANS 001480 - FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC. 001527 - FOREST LAKE AREA 001583 - FUNDWORKS 150.49 18.41 11.30 200.00 5,421.64 723.50 136.32 125.67 1,070.26 148.38 84.32 5.00 901.50 122.98 11,708.60 64.00 149.72 825.98 167.70 163.05 1,272.00 2,743.83 1,416.00 425.00 Page: 2 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 001608 - GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY/INC 001621 - GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC. 001630 - GOA COMPANY, INC. 001650 - GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, INC. 001660 - GOPHER BEARING COMPANY, INC. 001680 - GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 001709 - GRAFFCO, INC. 001720 - GRAINGER, INC. 001825 - HEALTH PARTNERS 001964 - ISANTI COUNTY EQUIPMENT, INC. 001971 - INFRATECH, INC. SUITE 100 001980 - INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC. 002025 - J & E SMALL ENGINE & SPORT, INC. 002040 - JACKSON, THOMAS 002053 - J. R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL, INC. 002070 - JEWELL NURSERIES, INC. 002220 - LABOR RELATIONS, INC. 002285 - LANDERS, JOHN 002410 - LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB 002508 - MUN CLERKS/FIN OFFICERS ASSOC 002570 - METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 002610 - MIDWAY ELECTRONICS, INC. 002779 - MN. DEPT OF PUBLIC SERVICE 002850 - MN. WANNER COMPANY, INC. 003050 - MRPA 003220 - NORTH STAR TURF, INC. 179.70 67.80 189.14 293.00 378.85 301.00 23.96 261.15 7,504.05 6,177.00 76.68 195.75 8.47 70.00 874.00 1,623.30 1,334.00 8.06 300.00 25.00 37,452.00 301.00 160.00 27.91 162.00 176.79 Page: 3 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 003310 - NORTHWAY SPTS & GARDEN, INC. 003520 - PITNEY BOWES, INC. 003600 - PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 003619 - PRINT CENTRAL 003620 - PRINTERS SERVICE, INC. 003625 - PRUDENTIAL 003870 - S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 003880 - SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. 003900 - SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 003910 - SAM'S CLUB 004001 - SCHUMACHER, RANDALL B. 004070 - SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM, INC. 004101 - ST. CROIX DESIGNS, INC. 004125 - ST. PAUL CITY OF 004231 - STRATEGIC MORTGAGE SERVICE 004251 - SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 004340 - T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 004400 - TESCH, DAN 004416 - THOMPSON AND VRAA 004456 - TODORA, GAIL 004479 - TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC. 004640 - UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 004654 - UPPER MIDWEST SALES COMPANY, INC. 004660 - URICH, TRACEY 004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 4,640.15 3,414.99 238.66 126.94 150.73 26.25 315.55 24.07 2,398.41 297.00 89.44 22.94 224.10 285.31 216.86 60.00 434.92 123.24 25.00 918.00 670.00 108.84 95.00 217.68 51.06 1,573.51 Page: 4 Date: 05/23/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 004760 - WALDOCH SPORTS, INC. 004790 - WATERPRO SUPPLIES CORPORATION 004818 - WILSON RACQUET SPORTS 004830 - WINFIELD SIGNS 900001 - MULCRONE, MR. TIM B.A. 225.00 1,531.26 71.22 178.00 50.00 Total for Checking Account: 1010 105,030.39 ** Total ** $105,030.39 STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, Public Works Direct DATE: April 19, 1996 TOPIC: Continuation of Public Hi Improvements gyring - 12th Avenue and Holly Drive BACK The publ Drive was the propos+ OPTIONS: 1. To continue the public hearing to June 10, 1996. for the proposed improvements to 12th Avenue and Holly nued from May 13, 1996. Staff needs additional time to review reernent and amendment prior to presenting it to Council. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the public F AGENDA ITEM 4A STAFF C RIGINATOR: Brian We DATE: TOPIC: First Reading: Ordinance No. 06-96 offering sale of # pe r in the Apollo Business Park to Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Emergency Apparatus Maintenance is a company that repass, customizes and upgrades emergency vehicles for fire departments. It is also a dealer of specialty equipment for emergency vehicles The company is currently leasing space in Blaine and is planning to purchase 1 acre in the city -corned portion of the Apollo Business Park to build a 5,000 square foot manufacturing facility. On ordinance is required when city -owned property is sold. 2. R a Q►T dlo CO S. i sale of Y THE CITY OF LINO L ift APOLLO BUSINESS PARK The real property described Lot 1, B Miinnesota, (the "Property") is owned council of the City has determined tha any public purpose• Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, City of Lino Lakes (the "City"). The city Prope ty is no longed needed by the City for The motion for ad ion of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by co ncilnie nber and upon a vote being taken thereon, the` following voted in fav©r thereof: STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC BACKGROUND: The FIRST READING Council meeting. It wa Electrical Inspector and reviewed by t1 State Std Board of Electric the FIRST OPTIONS AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 Feer iluegel, Bn • May 1 Consideration of the SECOND READING, Ordinance No. tis - 96 Amending Ordinance No. 1$ , Establishing. the Position and Duties of an Eiectriicaal inspector of Ordinance No. 05 - 96 was introduced at the May 13, 1996 s nca l that the original Ordinance creating the position of outlining the duties and responsibilities of the inspector had bei card of Electricity. Mr. William Bickner, Executive , ty tun; fount a ofportions of the ordinance were in nre r fictive than Minnesota State Smites. Ordinance No. 05 - ortguuu once. sr sug Corrections t City Council meeting, 1 Adept Ordinance No. 05 - 96.. 2 Return to staff for further information or corrections.. RECOMMENDATION imposed ordinano since Council Member adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA Ordinance No. 05 - 96 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1003, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SUBDIVISION 3 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. Section 1003, Building Code, Subdivision 2: Electrical inspector and Subdivision 3: Electrical Permits are hereby repealed and replaced with the following:. Subdivision 1. Electrical Inspector. The position of electrical inspector is hereby established. The person chosen to fill this position shall hold a license as a master or journeyman electrician under Minnesota Statutes, Section 326.242, Subdivision 1 or 2. The Minnesota Electrical Act is adopted by this ordinance. The electrical inspector shall be appointed by the City Council and make electrical inspections required by the Minnesota Electrical Act. Subdivision 2. Electrical Permits. A. No electrical installation in any construction, remodeling, replacement or repair, except minor repair work, as defined in Chapter 3800.3500, Subp. 10 of the Minnesota Rules, shall be made without first securing a permit therefor. B. Permits shall be granted to properly licensed electrical contractors who are registered and bonded by the State of Minnesota or to a company or institution employing a class A master electrician currently licensed by the State Board of Electricity and having on file with the State Board of Electricity and the City of Lino Lakes, a confirmation notice announcing the master of record. (The company/institution employment permit allows wiring in accordance with the Minnesota Electrical Act only on property owned and/or leased and operated by the company/institution.) Permits may be granted to a bona fide owner of single family residential property, who intends to conduct such work on his/her ORDINANCE NO. 05 - 96 Page -2- property and who occupies or intends to occupy the property. If the owner exhibits inability to properly install the electrical wiring in accordance with the National Electrical Code, his/her permit must be canceled and an electrical contractor must permit and complete the installation. The unused portion of the owners permit fee will be refunded. C. Any violation of this article, including a failure to file a permit when required, shall be a misdemeanor violation subject to all the penal provisions of this Code and the State Electrical Act. Any person who shall commence work of any kind for which a permit is required under the provisions of this Code without first having received the necessary permit therefor shall, when subsequently receiving such permit, be required to pay double the fees provided in this article. Section 2: Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this day of May, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. AG NEA ITEM 6 STAFF ORIGINATOR Randy Schumacher City "Administrator DATE 23 May 1996 TOPIC Environmental Affairs Committee On February 7, 1996 representatives of the Citizen's Advisory Group of the 20/20 Vision plan met with the Lino Lakes City Council to discuss the prospect of establishing a citizens environmental advisory board. Since February the Advisory Board has gathered information and presented that information to the City Council at their 22 May Worksession. the + onsensus of the City Council at their May 22 worksession e Environmental' Advisory Group from the 20/20 Vision Project was to recommend seven (7) individuals to be appointed to the Environmental Affairs Committee. These individuals can not presently be serving; on any other advisory board or commission. The Committee will establish a one (1) year work plan for 1997 as well as a corresponding budget and bylaws. These items will be accomplished by NoverttherNovember 1996. At that time, the Council will review the work plan, and make final determinations relating tothe scope of committee projects, term ;limits, liaisons and budgets. During this six (6) month organizational period, the Committee shall have access to city staff, and other departmental resources as authorized by the City Administrator. AGENDA 'TEM # 7 STAFF ORIG AT JrR: Jackie i t DATE: May 22, 1961 TOPICS Consideration of an Agreement with Anoka County for Residential Rycling Please find attach the 1 moment far R siders tial i eccycli execut l by Anoka County. This agement proves financ to the city for exile inn 1996 for the coordination and prom n f recycling. The an ent allows f reimbursement of $34,334.46. This 1s tl standard ment that the City has into with Anoka County in the past. Anoka County Contract # 900260-6 AGREEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on the 23rd day of April, 1996, notwithstanding the date of the signatures of the parties, between the COUNTY OF ANOKA, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY", and the CITY OF LINO LAKES, hereinafter referred to as the "MUNICIPALITY". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Anoka County has received $762,937 in funding from the State of Minnesota pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115A.557 (hereinafter "SCORE funds"); and WHEREAS, the County wishes to assist the Municipality in meeting recycling goals established by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners by providing said SCORE funds to cities and townships in the County for solid waste recycling programs. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions: 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for cooperation between the County and the Municipality to implement solid waste recycling programs in the Municipality. 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement is from January 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. 3. PROGRAM. The Municipality shall develop and implement a residential solid waste recycling program adequate to meet the Municipality's annual recycling goal of 1,073 tons as established by the County. "Recycling" means the process of collecting and preparing recyclable materials and reusing the materials in their original form or using them in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of recyclable materials in a manner that precludes further use. "Recyclable materials" means materials that are separated from mixed municipal solid waste for the purpose of recycling, including paper, glass, plastics, metals, fluorescent lamps, and vehicle batteries. Refuse derived fuel or other material that is destroyed by incineration is not a recyclable material. "Problem material" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subdivision 24a. "Yard waste" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115A.931. 4. REPORTING. The Municipality shall submit the following reports semiannually to the County no later than July 20, 1996 and January 20, 1997: A. An accounting of the amount of waste which has been recycled as a result of the Municipality's activities and the efforts of other community programs, redemption centers and drop-off centers. For recycling programs, the Municipality shall certify the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been collected and the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been marketed. For recycling programs run by other persons or entities, the Municipality shall also provide documentation on forms provided by the County showing the tons of materials that were recycled by the Municipality's residents through these other programs. The Municipality shall keep detailed records documenting the disposition of all recyclable materials collected pursuant to this agreement. The Municipality shall also report the number of cubic yards or tons of yard waste collected for composting or landspreading, together with a description of the methodology used for calculations. Any other material removed from the waste stream by the Municipality, i.e. tires and used oil, shall also be reported separately. B. Information regarding any revenue received from sources other than the County for the Municipality's recycling programs. C. Copies of all promotional materials that have been prepared by the Municipality during the term of this Agreement to promote its recycling programs. The Municipality agrees to furnish the County with additional reports in form and at frequencies requested by the County for financial evaluation, program management purposes, and reporting to the State of Minnesota. 5. BILLING AND PAYMENT PROCEDURE. The Municipality shall submit itemized invoices semiannually to the County for abatement activities no later than July 20, 1996 and January 20, 1997. Costs not billed by January 20, 1997 will not be eligible for funding. The invoices shall be paid in accordance with standard County procedures, subject to the approval of the Anoka County Board of Commissioners. 6. ELIGIBILITY FOR FUNDS. The Municipality is entitled to receive reimbursement for eligible expenses, less revenues or other reimbursement received, for eligible activities up to the project maximum as computed below, which shall not exceed $34,334.46. The project maximum for eligible expenses shall be computed as follows: A. A base amount of $10,000.00 for recycling activities only; and B. $6.02 per household for recycling activities only. C. A supplemental grant of $2,235.04 (hereinafter referred to as a "Supplemental Grant") for problem material management, solid waste recycling and yard waste abatement programs to be disbursed to the Municipality within thirty days of execution of this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the Municipality shall be entitled to use said Supplemental Grant monies only for eligible expenses paid by the Municipality during the period January 1, 1996, through June 30, 1996, for problem material management, solid waste recycling and yard waste abatement programs. On or before July 20, 1996, the Municipality shall submit a report itemizing the expenditures of the Supplemental Grant monies on a report form provided by the County, together with receipts verifying said expenditures. Any Supplemental Grant monies not expended by the Municipality on or before June 30, 1996, shall be returned to the County. 7. RECORDS. The Municipality shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in accordance with requirements of the county and the State of Minnesota. The Municipality shall maintain strict accountability of all funds and maintain records of all receipts and disbursements. Such records and accounts shall be maintained in a form which will permit the tracing of funds and program income to final expenditure. The Municipality shall maintain records sufficient to reflect that all funds received under this Agreement were expended in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 115A.557, subd. 2, for residential solid waste recycling purposes. The Municipality shall also maintain records of the quantities of materials recycled. All records and accounts shall be retained as provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than three years from the last receipt of payment from the County pursuant to this Agreement. 8. AUDIT. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.06, Subd. 4, the Municipality shall allow the County or other persons or agencies authorized by the County, and the State of Minnesota, including the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor, access to the records of the Municipality at reasonable hours, including all books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Municipality relevant to the subject matter of the Agreement, for purposes of audit. In addition, the County shall have access to the project site(s), if any, at reasonable hours. 9. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. In performing the provisions of this Agreement, both parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or standards established by any agency or special governmental unit which are now or hereafter promulgated insofar as they relate to performance of the provisions of this Agreement. In addition, the Municipality shall comply with all applicable requirements of the State of Minnesota for the use of SCORE funds provided to the Municipality by the County under this Agreement. B. No person shall illegally, on the grounds of race, creed, color, religion, sex, marital status, public assistance status, sexual preference, handicap, age or national origin, be excluded from full employment rights in, participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to unlawful discrimination under any program, service or activity hereunder. The Municipality agrees to take affirmative action so that applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, layoff, termination, selection for training, rates of pay, and other forms of compensation. C. The Municipality shall be responsible for the performance of all subcontracts and shall ensure that the subcontractors perform fully the terms of the subcontract. The Agreement between the Municipality and a subcontractor shall obligate the subcontractor to comply fully with the terms of this Agreement. D. The Municipality agrees that the Municipality's employees and subcontractor's employees who fall within any job classification established and published by the Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry shall be paid, at a minimum, the prevailing wages rates as certified by said Department. Each Municipality and subcontractor performing work on a public project shall post on the project the applicable prevailing wage rates and hourly basic rates of pay for the County or area within which the project is being performed, including the effective date of any changes thereof, in at least one conspicuous place for the information of the employees working on the project. The information so posted shall include a breakdown of contributions for health and welfare benefits, vacation benefits, pension benefits and any other economic benefit required to be paid. E. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral and written agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. F. Any amendments, alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing, duly signed by the parties. G. Contracts let and purchases made under this Agreement shall be made by the Municipality in conformance with all laws, rules, and regulations applicable to the Municipality. H. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining portion of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating the relationship of co-partners, joint venturers, or an association between the County and Municipality, nor shall the Municipality, its employees, agents or representatives be considered employees, agents, or representatives of the County for any purpose. 10. PUBLICATION. The Municipality shall acknowledge the financial assistance of the County on all promotional materials, reports and publications relating to the activities funded under this Agreement, by including the following acknowledgement: "Funded by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and State SCORE funds (Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment). 11. INDEMNIFICATION. The County agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the Municipality harmless from all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its public officials, officers, agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities performed by the County under this Agreement. The Municipality agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its public officials, officers, agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities performed by the Municipality under this Agreement. The provisions of this subdivision shall survive the termination or expiration of the term of this Agreement. 12. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual written agreement of the parties or by either party, with or without cause, by giving not less than seven (7) days written notice, delivered by mail or in person to the other party, specifying the date of termination. If this Agreement is terminated, assets acquired in whole or in part with funds provided under this Agreement shall be the property of the Municipality so long as said assets are used by the Municipality for the purpose of a landfill abatement program approved by the County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto set their hands as of the dates first written above: COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES By: By: Dan Erhart, Chairman Anoka County Board of Commissioners Name: Date: Title: Date: ATTEST: John "Jay" McLinden Municipality's Clerk County Administrator Date: Date: Approved as to form and legality: Approved as to form and legality: Assistant County Attorney m:\ma\carolyn\96maai.ag STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC eson 1996 ty Proclamation BACKGROUND Over the past several years the City has taken an active part in annual Arbor Day celebrations. This year the celebration will take place on Friday, May 31 at Lino Elementary School. The City will receive a Tree City award for the eighth consecutive year. A Proclamation is usually' Part of the Arbor Day ceremonies. 1 am asking that the Council approve the attached Proclamation regarding Arbor Day Celebrations. OPTIONS Approve the Proclamation Do not approve the Proclamation RECOMMMNDATION Approve the Proclamation PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, In 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees and WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, and this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world, and trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce oxygen and provide habitat for wildlife, and trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products, and trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community, and trees wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal, WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has been recognized as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue it's tree -planting ways, NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOHN LANDERS, Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes, do hereby proclaim May 31, as FURTHER, DATED ARBOR DAY in the City of Lino Lakes, and I urge all citizens to support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands and to support our City's urban forestry program, and I urge all citizens to plant trees to gladden the hearts and promote the well-being of present and future generations. this of May 1996 SIGNED, MAYOR I'IHT-lb-1'77b 1G%YJb L:Do rur' i 1=.1G 4b4 19th Annual. Lino Lakes Elementary Arbor Earth Day Friday, May 31, 1996 2:00 P.M. Lino Lakes Arboretum 2:00 Welcome to Guests, Students, and Faculty. (joe Kramer) 2:10 Parent Advisory Board Recognition (Georgia .Martin) 2:20 The Arbor Day Tradition at Lino Lakes (Yoe Kramer) 2:30 Tree City Award to The City of Lino Lakes. (Mr. Lapatka and the mayor of Liao Lakes, Mr. John Landers) 2:40 Care of Seedlings - New Arboretum Plantings (Art 'Wiederstrom, Minnesota D.11,9t) 2:50 Dedication and planting of 1994-95 School Tree. (Marty Asteson and Mike Hoffman City of Lino Lakes) Our thank] to special' guests: R,ickWaCters for again donating the school - tree. Marcia Marquardt -Anoka Co. Tree Board. TOTAL P.F2 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT : May 8, 1996 : 6:30 p.m. : 9:10 p.m. : Dahl, Dunn, Gelbmann, Herr, Johnson, Robinson, Schaps : Planning Coordinator Wyland, Planning Consultant Kirmis, Economic Development Director Wessel I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., May 8, 1996. He welcomed new members, Caroline Dahl and Donald Dunn and congratulated Mr. Robinson on being reappointed another term. All members were present. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve the minutes of the April 10, 1996 meeting as submitted and was supported by Herr. Motion carried 7-0. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: There were no changes. IV. OPEN MIKE: Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:31 p.m. Mr. Ronald Rick, 7080 Sunset Avenue, stated that he has been a homeowner at this location for 10 years and would like to apply to build a tool shed on his property for storage purposes. The design is a 12' x 24' metal construction which the City does not allow. However, a wood building would be twice the cost of his proposal. The type of structure, which is classified as a pole barn, is not allowed on lots less than five acres. He needs the additional accessory building because there is no basement in the house and storage in the garage is crowded. Mr. Rick distributed pictures and design plans to Board Members showing the metal he had selected, which would be under warranty for 40 years. The structure would be built by a professional builder and would match the existing home which is vinyl. Colors would also match. 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 Mr. Schaps asked if the garage would be attached or detached. Mr. Rick answered that it would be detached. Planning Coordinator Wyland stated that the accessory building ordinance stipulates that pole barn structures are only allowed on parcels of five acres or larger. Because this lot is not five acres, the type of structure Mr. Rick has requested is not permitted. Secondly, any accessory structure would have to be of a wood frame and roof, as metal is prohibited. The metal siding is not a problem, but the metal roof and pole barn type of structure is not permitted. Ms. Wyland further stated that the project does not meet criteria for a variance because Mr. Rick's hardship is not related to the land parcel. Although the accessory structure ordinance is currently under review, no recommendation is being made to allow pole barns on smaller parcels than five acres. Mr. Schaps asked when the house was built. Mr. Rick stated that the house was built in the late 1940's with a later addition. The present garage was built in the early 1980's, and has a wood frame. Mr. Dunn asked the size of Mr. Rick's lot. Mr. Rick stated that it is approximately 8/10 of an acre. It is located on the corner of Fairmont and Sunset. Mr. Dunn asked if there are neighbors nearby that would be affected. Mr. Rick stated that his driveway fronts on Sunset. There are no neighbors close to the location of the buildings. The proposed structure would be in the middle of his property. Mr. Johnson asked if all metal buildings are defined as pole barns. Ms. Wyland stated that it is not the siding of the building that determines classification as a pole barn but the type of construction. The only zoning districts that allow pole barns are rural properties over 5 acres, commercial, industrial and semi-public by Conditional Use Permit only. Mr. Johnson asked if the size of the proposed building is in compliance with the code. Ms. Wyland responded that size is not the issue. The problem is the type of construction. Chair Schaps explained that to the extent that proposals do not comply with City ordinances, the Board has taken the position for the last several years not to grant variances unless there is a good reason. Financial consideration is not always a sufficient 2 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 reason. In this situation, he believes that with creative effort and continued work with staff Mr. Rick can resolve the issues and bring the proposal into compliance with City ordinances. As it stands, he would not be able to vote for it. Rick Gelbmann made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:45 p.m. and was supported by William Johnson. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. ACTION ITEMS: A. Hal Leibel, 7566 Peltier Lake Drive, Minor Subdivision Ms. Wyland reported that Mr. Hal Leibel is seeking to split a 2.36 acre parcel from a 125.4 acre parcel located at 7566 Peltier Lake Drive. Ordinance 93-18 allows a habitable single family homes constructed prior to July 13, 1992 may reduce their lot size to a minimum of one (1) parcel if the balance of the property results in a parcel of ten (10) acres. There is an existing home on the property. Staff has recommended approval with a waiver of the park dedication request. Chair Schaps noted that it is the Board's practice to waive a park dedication, if there is an existing home on the split off portion of a landsplit. Mr. Johnson asked if a park dedication would be required if a house were built on the remainder of the property. Ms. Wyland stated that a park dedication can only be collected when the property is further subdivided. Mr. Dunn asked if, under the ordinance approved in 1993, the smaller piece of property would have to be a 10 -acre parcel in order to be further subdivided. Ms. Wyland explained that if the balance of the property is 10 acres or less, it cannot be further subdivided unless sewer and water services are available. If the smaller property were further subdivided after sewer and water services are available, it would not have to be as large as 10 acres. Mr. Leibel stated that he has no intention of subdividing the property further until sewer and water are available. The main reason for subdividing the property is because he owns one-half of the undivided portion. The home is his, and he would like to isolate it from the balance of the acreage. The ordinance requires a minimum of one acre, and this proposal is 2.3 acres. William Johnson made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision to split 2.36 acres from the remaining 124 acres and waive the park dedication requirement. Mr. Herr seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. Motion carried. B. Duff Dorschner, 307 Lilac, Minor Subdivision/Variance 3 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 Ms. Wyland stated that this application is for a minor subdivision and variance. Mr. Dorschner's current driveway encroaches approximately 10 feet onto his neighbor's property. When the house and garage were built in 1982, the City did not require a survey and allowed the garage and driveway to be situated as they are today. The garage is 26 feet from the property line. The encroachment was discovered when a survey was done by Mr. Uhde for development on the adjacent property. Ms. Wyland stated that two options are presented: 1) to allow the sale of 10 feet to Mr. Dorschner to maintain his existing driveway, and therefore, allow Mr. Uhde's property a lot depth variance of 10 feet; 2) suggest Mr. Dorschner secure an easement from Mr. Uhde for use of the westerly 10 feet until the garage can be reoriented to Lilac Street. Staff is recommending the easement option. Mr. Dorschner stated that he did not know of any problem until a month ago, when Mr. Uhde had a survey done for development. He has lived in his house approximately four years. There are two driveways on the property. The driveway in question has been there since the house was built and is the only straight access to the back yard. He put up a cedar wood fence along the driveway last year, replacing an existing roadway. Chair Schaps asked if Mr. Dorschner ever had a survey done when he put up the fence. Mr. Dorschner stated that he had a survey done last week, and it agrees with Mr. Uhde's survey. When he put the fence up last year, a survey was not required. The Building Inspector indicated that as long as he was replacing an existing fence, a permit was not required. His lot is 166 feet wide, and he -had no reason to believe there was a problem. Had he known of this problem at the time he bought the property, he would have had stipulations put in the purchase agreement. Chair Schaps asked if the property was inspected at the time of Mr. Dorschner's purchase. Mr. Dorschner stated that the property was inspected, but there was no survey. He and the mortgage company received a property sketch indicating the orientation of the house on the property. Chair Schaps asked if Mr. Dorschner researched the file to see if a survey had ever been done. Mr. Dorschner stated that to the best of his knowledge a survey has never been done. There is nothing on file with the county. Mr. Robinson asked if there is an old fence north of Mr. Dorschner's property along the tree line. 4 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 Mr. Dorschner stated that the fence is no longer there. In talking with other neighbors who have had surveys done, he was told that many of them found their property lines were off by two or three feet. Mr. Robinson noted that in the past farmers put fences where they thought the property lines were, and those estimated property lines were accepted for many years. He asked if the pins on the corners can be located. Mr. Dorschner stated that he could not find them on the west side. There appeared to be a stake in the northeast corner which is the only one he found. Mr. Herr asked if Mr. Dorschner measured his property when he found the pin. Mr. Dorschner stated that he never had a reason to look for the corner stakes because of the size of his property. Ms. Wyland noted that the present surveys did not locate any existing stakes. Chair Schaps asked how Mr. Dorschner knew where to place the fence. Mr. Dorschner stated that he estimated and thought he was well within his lot line. There is asphalt in front of the garage, but the rest of the driveway is gravel. He jogged the fence to keep kids from playing in the gravel. Mr. Robinson asked Mr. Dorschner where, the entrance to the garage would be if it had to be reconstructed. Mr. Dorschner stated that if the garage were rebuilt, access would be on the south side. While that would be a solution, he stated that he cannot afford to have the work done. Also, several trees would have to be removed and new blacktop put down. He would not be able to get his boat to the back yard using the other driveway which is curved. Mr. Robinson asked if Mr. Dorschner carries title insurance. Mr. Dorschner answered that he does, but it has not helped because there is no survey. He was not told at his closing that a survey was needed by the title insurance company. Chair Schaps asked if Mr. Dorschner has sought an opinion on the matter from an attorney. Mr. Dorschner answered that he has not seen an attorney. This is the first home he has purchased and was unfamiliar with the process. Chair Schaps asked if the corner house of Mr. Uhde's development would need further variances if the sale of 10 feet to Mr. Dorschner is approved. 5 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 Mr. Uhde stated the sale of 10 feet will not have a negative effect on the development. He believes that the property line was miscalculated in a metes and bounds survey. Mr. Dunn asked if Mr. Uhde and Mr. Dorschner have reached agreement on a purchase price for the 10 feet. Mr. Uhde responded that a purchase agreement has been reached contingent upon the action of the Planning & Zoning Board and City Council. Mr. Herr stated that he is inclined to bring the matter to a permanent closure and allow the sale of 10 feet to Mr. Dorschner. The rationale for the variance for Mr. Uhde's property is fitting. He asked for staffs rationale in recommending the easement option. Ms. Wyland stated that historically variances are not usually favored. Mr. Herr stated that he believes the City bears some responsibility for the problem because a survey was not required at the time the property was platted. Also, an easement always leaves uncertainties for the future. Mr. Gelbmann agreed with Mr. Herr and stated he would like to see a permanent resolution. The size of the lot where a variance is being created is larger than the minimum standard which minimizes the impact of the variance. Mr. Dunn agreed that Mr. Dorschner has made a reasonable request. It is the duty of the City to rectify this error that has been handed down. He would support granting the minor subdivision contingent upon Mr. Uhde not challenging the City with this action. He recommended that members support Option No. 1 to take care of a difficult situation and one that would be otherwise very costly to rectify. Mr. Robinson stated that his only problem with approving the subdivision request is setting a precedent. Chair Schaps noted that the Board must make specific findings of fact to approve the subdivision and variance as follows: A. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls. As it exists, the garage will be difficult to enter without the additional 10 feet provided with this subdivision. However, an easement would allow the same access. B. That the plight of the land owners is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. Although the access problem was not created by the current property owner, Mr. Dorschner, the original building/owner created the problem by orienting the garage entrance to the west with only 26 feet to 6 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 access. No survey was conducted, although it is the obligation of every land purchaser to verify what is being purchased. C. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. This hardship could be considered economic as the problem would be eliminated with the reorientation of the garage to face Lilac. However, a reasonable use for the existing garage does not exist unless the subdivision is approved or an easement obtained. It would be an unreasonable amount of money to reconfigure the property for the garage and yard. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. No special privilege would be afforded this applicant that would not be offered to another under similar circumstances. E. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. Property values should not be "unreasonably" diminished with the variance or easement arrangement. F. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the ordinance is to provide for single family residential use of the property. That shall be maintained in either case. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the subdivision with the variance to allow Lot 1, Block 1, Behm's Century Farms, a lot depth of 125 feet in order to add 10 feet to the adjacent Dorschner property as a result of the findings of fact listed above. Dunn seconded the motion. Mr. Robinson amended the motion to include the 1,000 square foot parcel in the legal description of Mr. Dorschner's property. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Dunn accepted the amendment. All voted aye. Motion carried. C. Jeff Kelley, 20th Avenue, Site Plan Review/Text Amendment to Allow Golf Driving Range Mr. Jeff Kelly has made application for a Site Plan Review which also requires an Interim Use Permit for the construction of a golf driving range and future mini golf facility on 20th Avenue in the Rural Business Reserve Zoning District. The property in question is 20 acres in size and located on the east side of 20th Avenue in the 7300 block. A parking area, club house (garage approximately 24x36), portable sanitation, fencing, tee boxes, and netting are proposed for the site. A future mini golf area is also outlined on the plan. Interim uses were added to the Zoning Ordinance to allow new uses as the need arose within a zoning district or until the code was amended to include the interim 7 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 use. Mr. Kelley is seeking approval for a proposed golf driving range this season as an interim use on the property indicated on 20th Avenue. Mr. Dunn stated that he would like to see detailed construction plans before approving this plan. Ms. Wyland stated that once the concept is approved, the final site plan does not come back to the Planning & Zoning Board. The proposed building does meet all code requirements. Mr. Robinson added that the City has expert staff to review all details so that final plans are in compliance with the City Code. The Board reviews the overall plan in terms of zoning. Chair Schaps stated that there are performance standards in the ordinances that must be applied and rigorously enforced. Anything approved by the Board must meet those standards, or the project cannot proceed. Mr. Kelley stated a survey and site plan have been done, which is as far as he can go without further approval. Chair Schaps asked if lighting is included in the plan. Mr. Kelley stated that there will be five light poles, all of which direct light toward the driving range which is to the east. There is nothing but agriculture from the range to the freeway one-half mile away. Chair Schaps asked how long Mr. Kelley has owned the property. Mr. Kelley stated that purchase of the property is contingent on approval of this plan. He is purchasing the property in two phases of 10 acres each. Chair Schaps asked if Mr. Kelley discussed the plans with adjoining neighbors and whether they are in favor of the project. Mr. Kelley stated that there is a subdivision to the west. His property is 20 acres of a 60 acre parcel. The owner is aware of his plans. Otherwise he has not talked to anyone else. Mr. Robinson asked if Mr. Kelley's property would include the pole barn to the north. Mr. Kelley stated that the second 10 acres that he intends to purchase in two years includes the pole barn. Mr. Johnson questioned what would happen if this is not a permitted use in the future. 8 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 Ms. Wyland stated that she believes when the new ordinance is adopted, golf courses will be a permitted use in Rural Business Reserve (RBR) zoning districts. If golf courses are not allowed in RBR districts, then a time frame would be set for the interim use. Mr. Kelley stated that it was explained to him that rezoning would come into effect when a certain percentage of area is developed to a certain degree. He is assuming that a temporary use permit would supersede any decision not to allow golf in RBR zoning districts. Mr. Gelbmann cautioned that terms and future possibilities should be clearly stated to protect all parties. He agreed that the changes in the zoning ordinances are likely to include golf courses as a permitted use in the RBR districts. Mr. Herr stated that he would like to see this project operate under an interim use permit with full detailed plans on file for each phase, so that the City has complete documentation. Mr. Schaps asked if Mr. Kelley plans to do anything with the land before the text amendment to the zoning ordinance in June. If golf becomes a permitted use, then an interim use permit at this time would not be necessary. Mr. Kelley stated that he would like to start immediately and had hoped to be on the agenda for the City Council meeting Monday, May 13, 1996. He would not want to wait until mid-June to begin because he would lose the peak season. Ms. Wyland suggested approving the site plan contingent upon the text amendment to the zoning code. This would allow him to seed and grade the property now. Mr. Robinson asked if there is a screen between the natural grass and the proposed tee boxes. Mr. Kelley answered, yes. Mr. Herr asked the type of lighting fixtures that will be used. He expressed concern about the glare to freeway drivers. Mr. Kelley stated that he is considering quartz lights at approximately 1000 to 1500 watts. The area is fully wooded between the golf range and the freeway. There is little visibility from the freeway. Mr. Robinson noted that the golf range is across the road from residential property in Centerville. He asked if Centerville residents should be notified of the public hearing. Ms. Wyland stated that staff will contact the City of Centerville to notify their property owners. 9 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 Mr. Kelley asked what conditions will play a big role in determining whether or not golf is a permitted use. Chair Schaps responded that at the public hearing staff will draft provisional language adding a golf range or mini golf facility as a permitted use to the RBR zoning district. The amendment will be published throughout the City. Residents will have an opportunity to come forward and state any objections. Typically, there is little response. Mr. Dunn asked what protection there is for the City if the golf range is later abandoned. Ms. Wyland stated that a condition of the permit could include a provision that all equipment items relating to the golf range be removed by the property owner within a year of closing, or the City will do so and assess the property. Mr. Kelley asked what would happen if he resold the property. Mr. Gelbmann responded that if the property is sold and the golf range use continues, removal of the equipment would not be necessary. Mr. Johnson added that a time lapse would be allowed for resale of the property. If the business is ceased for a period of greater than a year, the equipment would have to be removed. Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to approve the site plan review with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction. A deposit equal to 1 percent of construction costs shall be posted to insure completion of site improvements. 2. The driveway and parking area be provided with a dustless surface approved by the City Engineer. 3. Lighting standards be of the type to provide minimum disruption to the adjoining property owners as determined by the City. 4. The sanitation facilities be located inside the club house/garage area. If this is not possible, screening be provided to adequately screen the facilities from the street right-of-way and adjoining properties. This screening shall be subject to the review of the City Forester and/or Community Service Officer. 5. A landscaping plan shall be provided and reviewed by the City Forester. 10 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 6. Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained prior to installation. 7. Netting serving the golf range shall be durable and secured to poles subject to approval of the City Engineer. A detail of the fencing/netting shall be provided for City review. 8. A public hearing shall be set to add golf course/driving range as an interim use to the R -BR Zoning District. 9. Other conditions as imposed by the City. 10. Handicapped parking shall be provided and an alternate site for future parking needs. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion and amended it to include condition No. 11., that major facilities on the property shall be removed if the business is discontinued for one year, or the cost of removal shall be assessed to the property. Mr. Gelbmann accepted the amendment. The motion carried 6-0-1. Mr. Robinson abstained. Chair Schaps called a five-minute recess to the meeting at 8:25 p.m. He left the meeting at this time. Acting Chair Johnson reconvened the meeting at 8:32 p.m. Economic Development Director, Brian Wessel, arrived. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Bruce Hanson, Rezone GB Property to R1, PDO to Allow Residential Homes with Sea Plane Hangars, Aqua Lane Ms. Wyland stated that a portion of Aqua Lane has previously been considered by the Board for rezoning to General Business. The matter was tabled. Mr. Bruce Hanson, who owns the sea plane base, would like to purchase the property and rezone a portion of it to R1, single family residential to allow homes to be constructed with hangars for sea planes that would have a common access to the landing strip on the sea plane base. Ms. Wyland further stated that the City has a Resolution discouraging commercial properties from being rezoned to lesser uses. However, after considering many factors of Mr. Hanson's proposal and the location of this particular site, it may be a more appropriate land use for the area than General Business. A full staff review will be presented at the June 1996 meeting. Mr. Johnson noted a substantial amount of wetland on Lot No. 6, which is landlocked. 11 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 Mr. Hanson stated that Lot No. 6 would remain part of the sea plane base. Mr. Johnson asked what is planned for the upland area. Mr. Hanson answered that possibly a narrow expansion of the landing strip and possibly a hangar. Mr. Johnson asked what will be in Outlot A. Mr. Hanson stated that Outlot A is wetland. Mr. Robinson asked if Lot No. 5 is buildable. Mr. Hanson stated that he has talked to the City Engineer, and has been assured that he can build on that lot. Ms. Wyland stated that the property is now zoned General Business and is vacant and for sale. Rezoning would be necessary for the five lots, Outlot A and perhaps Lot No. 6. Lot No. 7 would remain General Business. Mr. Robinson asked if the proposed hangars will be large enough for the planes. Mr. Hanson stated that the size of the hangars is the maximum allowed, 60 feet x 40 feet. Mr. Wessel asked if a wetland delineation has been completed. Mr. Hanson stated that a delineation wasdone the previous day. He does not have the report back, but the map he has presented is fairly accurate. Mr. Wessel noted that the Council passed a resolution that no commercial or industrial property would be down -zoned without an exchange of the equivalent amount of land, or only under special conditions. He agreed that Mr. Hanson's proposal may be a more appropriate use for Aqua Lane because the site is split by wetland. He further noted that this will be an area of focus when the Comprehensive Plan is updated. The City has engaged a planner to begin the Comprehensive Plan update, which is mandated by the state to be completed by December 31, 1997. His concern about down -zoning the area from commercial business is that the City does not have a lot of land zoned for General Business. Mr. Johnson asked if Mr. Hanson intends to have a road connection between the north end and south end of the property. Mr. Hanson stated that it is impossible to connect them because of the wetland. Mr. Johnson noted that it may be possible to enlarge Lot No. 6 to increase the General Business area to seven acres. 12 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 Mr. Hanson agreed that may be a possibility, but there is a line of trees he would like to protect. Mr. Dunn asked if any residential areas are affected by this proposal. Mr. Wessel responded that although residents are present in the area, the whole area is zoned General Business and intended to be all business development. The residents understand that they are in a non -conforming status. Mr. Dunn asked the size of the homes planned. Mr. Hanson stated that he does not plan to build homes. He plans to sell the lots to sea plane pilots who would like to live adjacent to his facility. He has had numerous requests for housing that would allow a hangar. Ms. Wyland stated that the concept is for a future application that would require rezoning and a minor subdivision preliminary plat Planned Unit Development that would allow five single family lots rezoned to RI, and allow sea plane hangars with some type of arrangement for the homeowners to use the sea plane base. It would be similar to Lino Air Park. Mr. Dunn asked if the increase in air traffic would be a problem and if there would be any traffic pattern conflict with Anoka County Airport. Mr. Hanson responded that the State of Minnesota air space is designated by the Federal Aviation Association (FAA). State officials have indicated no problem with this proposal. Mr. Gelbmann expressed concern about safety zones and the size of the runway. Ms. Wyland showed a sketch of the air safety zones provided in the City's ordinances. Mr. Hanson stated that the runway being used is 150 feet wide. Buildings within the area have to meet certain criteria in height and setback distances. Mr. Robinson stated that while the City would sustain a net loss of General Business land with this proposal, he questioned who would buy the land for General Business development. The land is undesirable for General Business development because it is on a 7 -ton road with no direct access from the freeway and no visibility. The City may be better off to rezone it to R1 or R1X to allow the property to be utilized. Mr. Wessel agreed that the property is a dilemma as zoned General Business. During preliminary investigations of Mr. Hanson's proposal, it was discovered that Mr. Hanson's sea plane base is generally respected and is a unique resource in the community. It is the only sea plane base in the area and considered to be a quality operation. Mr. Hanson is 13 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 supposed to close on purchase of the property in May, but he could pursue an extension on the purchase agreement deadline. Mr. Johnson noted that five residential lots with sea plane hangars might attract some type of economic development to be near the sea plane base. Mr. Robinson noted that if the property is rezoned, there will be neighbors who will want to give their input. Notices must be sent to neighbors within 600 feet of the proposed rezoned property. At best, the process would take two months. He believes residents may be positively disposed to this classification proposal, as they were quite opposed to a convenience center. Mr. Wessel left at 9:00 p.m. Mr. Dunn asked the number of takeoffs and landings at the sea plane base. Mr. Hanson stated that there are approximately 100 landings per year on the landing strip. There are approximately 3,000 water landings per year. Approximately 40 aircraft are based on his site. The approach to land is made over Marshan Lake, and he has received no complaints. Mr. Dunn agreed that Mr. Hanson's proposal may serve a better purpose for this property than trying to sell it for General Business development, and he would support it with more detailed plans. Mr. Herr stated that he would support this concept and likes the idea of R1X lots to maximize the tax base. Mr. Gelbmann agreed and stated he would be open to supporting this concept with further information and expressed his remaining concern about air safety zones. Ms. Dahl asked if noise would become a greater problem. Mr. Hanson stated that he would hope for more sea planes to use the facility, but that is an unknown. He does not believe the noise factor will change. Mr. Robinson stated that if all the problems can be worked out, Mr. Hanson's proposal is a good usage of this property. He does not believe General Business developers will locate on Aqua Lane. If General Business zoning is dropped, he would like to see the General Business portion follow the wetland boundary, so that a full 7.5 acres remains zoned as General Business. It was the consensus of the Board to approve Mr. Hanson's proposal in concept, contingent upon resolution of the problems discussed above and formal application. 14 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 8, 1996 VII. ADJOURNMENT Al Robinson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m. and was supported by Don Dunn. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 15 AGENDA ITEM #9A STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE May 20, 1996 TOPIC Hal Leibel, 7566 Peltier Lake Subdivision ve, Minor This minor subdivision involves a request by Mr. Hal Leibel to split, a 2.36 acre parcel, containing the original homestead, from a 125.4 acre parcel located on the east side of Peltier Lake Drive, south of the Rehbein's Peltier View Subdivision. The property is zoned Rural and indicated as such on the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's Zoning Ordinance provides for a 10 acre minimum lot size in a rural zoning district. However, in October of 1993 the City Counicl adopted Ordinance No. 93-18 which provides, in part "Habitable single family homes constructed prior to July 13, 1992 may reduce their lot size to a minimum of one (1) acre if the balance of the property results in a parcel of ten (10) acres... The minor subdivision proposed meets the criteria established by this Ordinance No. 93-18. The existing homestead is approximately 80 years old and the balance of the property will exceed 10 acres. Additionally, no wetlands are located on this site according to the NWI Map. Currently the property is wooded and can provide alternate site(s) for an on-site septic system should that be necessary. City sewer and water will not be available to serve this property for some quite time. The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed this request at their May meeting and recommended approval of this minor subdivision with the condition that the Park Dedication Fee be waived. Subdivision of this property will create no additional housing units and any future development of the site will require full Park Board review and dedication. 1. Approve minor subdivision to split 2.36 acres from remaining 124 acres and waive park dedication requirement. 2. Approve minor subdivision to split 2.36 acres from remaining 124 acres with the condition that a park dedication fee in the amount of $550 be collected prior to recording of the subdivision with Anoka County. Option 1 PELTIER LAKE (N*,..H_ ARM) PELTIER LAKE alb D . Aco�iv �7�,'114#111 t 000 CP- � GREEK 0;_la�� © m p mionafiii3aon1 Iry assn eo opv� alit dEiS NVIPalf,P; el MSIStiggir 7, o:. ma Is aEv o ad0000haCo ®a, 41;::::%12,1111 EIVIMIChtlf— ROWAN" EI n�so�� ■ 'i v© < . 111311121 11111111111 ettillierfiegitiEficzV egad lj m nF Coe; No 47' h 1 'NCH': 4OFEtr SET NORTH 4/NE of Gov'r. LOT /, S,Ec. /¢ n54 22 NoR rm Y4 "CORNER -148, 88 - /V89" 35'06"W - 282,00 - 5 89'35'06"Z / / I!) \O kif1 / 34.05 - 243,85 - -.283 V v Y v� a :h s , 12. 6 • 2o.e ?-SfSys— / - -s•F (i - .3.20. 7/- -I- (1: '‘ _, - 354; 7(o - 1 N88"58'52"1•V 5007-H LINE OF /VORrm 7e o Gorr, Lor / AS mo/yziMENTE D 1t2 of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, follows: AGENDA ITEM t9B STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE May 20, 1996 TOPIC Duff Dorschner, 307 Lilac, Minor Subdivision/Variance This case involves a request for a minor subdivision and variance to allow the easterly 10' of Lot 1, Block 1, Behm's Century Farms 1st Addition to be split from that lot and added to Mr. Duff Dorschner's property at 307 Lilac, immediately to the east. The purpose for the subdivision is to allow Mr. Dorschner more maneuvering room to enter his existing garage at 307 Lilac, the garage faces due west. Should the subdivision be approved, a variance would be necessary in order to allow Lot 1, Block 1 to be 125' in lot depth. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum depth of 135'. No variance would be needed for lot area as the reduced parcel size would be 13,625 square feet, 10,800 square feet is required by the Zoning Ordinance. Both properties are Zone R-1 Single Family Residential and indicated as single family in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Dorchner's property is currently 165 feet wide and 600 feet deep. When the dwelling was originally constructed, in 1982, the City did not require a lot survey and apparently this home was constructed too close to the westerly property line considering the garage orientation. Two driveways have been serving the site for several years with the westerly driveway encroaching on the Behm's property. Access to the existing attached garage is from the westerly driveway. Additionally, Mr. Dorchner has reconstructed a fence which was also over the property line. To eliminate this access problem, Mr. Gary Uhde, the developer of Behm's Century Farms, has agreed to sell Mr. Dorchner 10' of Lot 1, Block 1 subject to City Approval. This would allow the fence to remain and Mr. Dorchner to maintain access to his garage. As an alternative, Mr. Uhde has offered to provide a temporary easement over Lot 1, Block 1 to allow time to reorient the garage entrance to the front of the home. This would require an addition to the existing garage and possibly the living area over the garage. Mr. Dorchner is not in a position, at this time, to facilitate this construction and would prefer the subdivision route. In considering the variance, the City must make a finding of fact: A. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. As it exists, the garage will be difficult to enter without the additional 10' provided with this subdivision. However, an easement would allow the same access. B. That the plight of the landowners is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. Although the access problem was not created by the current property owner, Mr. Dorschner, the original building/owner created the problem by orienting the garage entrance to the west with only 28 feet to access. C. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. This hardship could be considered economic as the problem would be eliminated with the reorientation of the garage to face Lilac. However, a reasonable use for the existing garage does not exist unless the subdivision is approved or an easement obtained. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. No special privilege would be afforded this applicant that would not be offered to another under similar circumstances. E. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. Property values should not be "unreasonably" diminished with the variance or easement arrangement. F. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the ordinance is to provide for single family residential use of the property which will be maintained in either case. The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed this item at their May meeting and recommended Option No. 1. There was a great deal of discussion concerning the criteria for granting a variance and the Board concurred that justification for the variance exists. The Board also determined that there was some responsibility on the City's part as a building permit had been issued to construct the home as it is located without the requirement of a survey document. OPTIONS ............................ ............................. ............................ 1. Approve Minor Subdivision with variance to allow Lot 1, Block 1, Behm's Century Farms a lot depth of 125'. 2. Deny minor subdivision and variance and suggest Mr. Dorchner secure an easement from Mr. Uhde to allow use of the westerly 10' of Lot 1, Block 1, Behm's Century Farms until his garage can be reoriented to Lilac Street. RECOMMENDATION Concur with Planning and Zoning Board Option 1 IIMMINKTIVILM1 , Proll••"°"--1Rm ©iia r© t rEmdmirm 1111: Nis ®Qr R 0 sal NEI Eki I . • m_,-- uNovawn ,II ool col N of©I v OQ�1 c oI v�OLlO ©© .. .!1 111111111111 Nine a V I l 1 S 00° 08 ' 26"W 1 /—%I\IVI 1322.79 >7OPa)O O O 0 s ly 8� 7 �I U 'yip- 8x 16 I ,5,1 a 8x I 5 nl ;5'161: 0 I sx 14 �I ,:luvit, F-° 8� 8 13 �I 12 »I nukt...v.Q02 �, 4b$.(s. `**NO �; :...o. .- 0 0 t.40•M 3.340:1° 0s_ I'-" 7 yl 01'24"EI 66 ...»_... a..« a Z F, � 'W10.00�j I' .00� .al I eoirca-roivim. Nov 09 Ii68II 5gII 4SIIF3gI 12 811 1 7 L. �1 1LO L J. _1061.00.04 2eJ 1 0 0 0 0 �s" 4341 ...74"°1P '0� °'0'l °'�� o� ' 21 'g8 • 8• 8 8 8 � I;" 9 ni L 1 o nl 1„ 1 1 yl l:7 12:1 I1,l 3 � �I I" 14 �.� �9b3c 8�4; ��141$ 8'14► � = 122_00 -I 4 135 •05.00 19 177.74 r24•srw 00. r 145.17 tai 145. 350.00 N 00°08.26"E 0 51-E U T � T � W 0 v co z N N 06°09.13'E N 00°19.18"E — 265.00 — «.01 COUNTY OF AN AGENDA ITEM 9 C STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE May 23, 1996 TOPIC Northern Wholesale Minor Subdivision The Council will recall approving a minor subdivision and site plan review for Northern Wholesale at their April 29th meeting. Since that time, the Rice Creek Watershed District has determined that the best location for ponding and wetland area is on the west side of the building. This has resulted in a shift of the proposed structure approximately 200 feet to the east and the purchase of an additional 200' of property from Paul Miller. The building size will remain the same as will the parking and loading area. Landscaping will be increased along Otter Lake Road and a pond & park like area will be developed in front of the building. Staff is requesting Council approval of this revised site plan and minor subdivision. There is some urgency in this request and Northern Wholesale must begin construction soon in order to insure occupancy before winter. Our City Attorney has advised staff to return this to the City Council for their review and approval. 1. Approve Revised Site Plan with all conditions outlined in the original approval (copy attached for Council information). 2. Approve Revised Minor Subdivision as requested. 3. Return to staff for further consideration Options 1 and 2 XC ep S Zb y/clb 2-e poa 6 screened and or blended with the design and coloring of the building. JII� MINOR SUBDIVISION Staff has rev ewed the minor subdivision request which involves splitting a`Q acre parcel from the balance of the site. The total parcel is approximately 30 acres. The proposed subdivision exceeds the requirements of the LI Zoning District as the minimum lot size is one acre. The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed both the site plan and minor subdivision request at their April 10, 1996 meeting and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction on the site. The building permit shall include a deposit of 19s. of construction costs to insure completion of all site improvements. 2. The applicant sign a development agreement and post financial guarantees as specified by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. The City Engineer shall review and approve the grading, utility and drainage plans. 4. The Developer receive access permits from Anoka County. 5. Roof top heating and ventilating units shall be screened and/or blended with the design and coloring of the building. 6. The parking area shall be supplied with adequate handicapped spaces as provided by.the ADA Rules and Regulations. 7. Permits be obtained from the RCWD for grading and on-site ponding, if required. 8. Signage shall comply with the City Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained. 9. The Developer shall participate in the reconstruction of Cedar Street at a cost to be determined by the City Engineer. 10. Delivery vehicles and truck traffic shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. when and if this traffic is allowed on Cedar Street. 11. Concrete curb, gutter and bituminous paving shall be provided for all access driveways and parking areas. Curb and gutter shall not be required on the northern access drive in the proposed expansion area. 12. The site plan shall be modified to reflect a 50' setback from Cedar Street. p(tt I ,1 1 i } .:1, [ 7.1 + A •.s ff /4-- rink!, riri' ItlE171, Miptb RidE01111 P. - ePo JR V logiL71 Ii'i:IliJ oor :m0©DODQo Ia�Md L.� ©o �i1111 48 t© Il1j gyp pp �. 1113 ©Q� ► c fl Q 1. It AL©2®oEQD,.'. Retails fra 24 Y OF CENTERVILLE M . 13 1.01 NUMBER 48 ®Fob; • 1� ge rmin-mbY off„W�� o An-umayarm© d. . 10-1996 06:06PM FROM Sunde Engineering, Inc. TO /t( ubbb Engineering, Inc. TO 8660390 P.02 • gab 4' 5 06:05PM FROM Sunde Engineering, Inc. TO a r,r i 41 OR eg ,.•.v �yi CED •r -(•r - - z CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR. ACTON CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PAUL MILLER 2209 PHELPS ROAD LINO LAKES, MN. 55014 NORM tRY a 94E SW 1/4 OF THE SW t/4 a THE SE 1/4 OF WO 24. T. 32 R. 22 /--- 2486°57'36"W EXCEPTION 659.37 60.00 33 4n 0 0 0 o- 9.37 • i • • 2 "° 1! CEDAR (PROPOSED RIGHT—OF—WAY) STREET 599.,3 o N66°33'12"W n 5W COR- a OE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 24, T. 32 R. 22 ( acts U PUT SCALE: 1 Inch 50 ft. • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET To TA L AREA 39Z,518 5g• P2t .12.33 CENTERtN4E OF TRAVEU.EO SURFACE 4 y o urd a THE SW 1/4 a THE SW 1/4 a 111E SE 1/4 a SEC. 24. T. 31. R. 22 The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quorter of the Southeost Quarter of Section 24, Township 31 N., Range 22 W., Anoka County, Minnesota, except the north 65 feet thereof. Subject to Cedar Street and County Rood No. 84. CARLEY-TORGERSEN, INC. LAND SURVEYORS (612) 484-3301 SUITE 703 70 west COUNTY ROAD •r LITTLE CANADA. . M9. 55117 I hereby certify that this survey, Won of recon no= prepared by me or under my direct supervision ono that 1 a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the bwS2 Of thy State of dinoQsota. Ddvkl E. Torganen, .L Minn. Rog. Na. 17551 Dale % — .2/ Revision Date Book No. 668-61 Job No. 96-013 File No. 94172 STAFF ORIG: Engineer DATE May 20, 1996 TOPIC Ordinance No. 04-96 Noise Ordinance AGENDA ITEM #10A Dave Ahrens, Public Works The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 04-96, Noise Ordinance, at their May 13, 1996 meeting. We are now requesting the Council approve the Second Reading of that ordinance. . Approve, Second Reading of Ordinance No. 04-96 . Return to staff for further review Option 1 Councilmember introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY'OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. - 96 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 900 NUISANCES OF THE CITY CODE, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: That Section 901.03 Public Nuisances Affecting Peace & Safety subsection (4) shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof: 901.03 (4) (a) Noise emanating from any use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota Regulations MPC 7030, as amended. (b) No person shall engage in or permit construction activities involving the use of any kind of electric, pneumatic, diesel or gas -powered machine or other power equipment except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on any weekday or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on any weekend or holiday. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with the City Charter. Passed this day of , 1996 The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM 1OB STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. TKDA DATE BAC This project! watermain on and Otter City Council Bids. El May 23._ 1996 Resolution No. 96-_-54 Accepting Bids and Awarding the Birch Street Trunk Waterrnaln Irnproyem extension of a 16" trunk watermain from the existing trunk t near Sherman Lake Road to the intersection of Cedar Co. Rd. No.84) on the east side of I -35E. I the plans and specifications and ordered submitted bids for the project, the bid 1:00 P.M. on May 22, 1996 at Lino Lakes City Hall. As shown by t tabulation, all of the bids which were received were below Richard Knutson, Inc. having the lowest bid. The Engineer's Es - expectation that contract prices tend to rise as contractor's sc hed construction season which is already well underway. rrhe number of the unit prices quoted indicate that the contractor's schedules are mo typical for this time of year. r's Estimate with reflected an get filed for the bids received and s open than is The low bidder, Richard Knutson, Inc. recently successfully completed the Country 1 improvement project for the City of lino Lakes. They have su fatly completed utility improvernt projects locally in scope than the Bimh Street Trunk Watermain Improvements. recommend the contract be awarded to Rchard Knutson, Inc. We expect no delay due to easement acquisition as none are proposed to be acqu for this project. The permit from the 114innesota Department of Health for this watermain extension has been approved. GPTI 1. Approve Resolution No. 96-54 Accepting the Bids and Awarding for the Birch Street Trunk Watermain Improvements. Receive the Bids but delay the contract award pending further staff. RE‘C MEI4DATIQt( Option No. 1: Approve Resolution No. 96-54 Accepting the Bids and Awarding the Contract for the Birch Street Trunk Watermain improvements. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-54 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR BIRCH STREET TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, Pursuant to an Advertisement for Bids for Birch Street Trunk Watermain Improvements, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name and Address Amount of Bid Richard Knutson, Inc. $566,324.57 12585 Rhode Island Avenue South Savage, Minnesota 55378 S. R. Weidema, Inc. $587,744.80 17600 113th Avenue North Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 Bonine Excavating, Inc. $598,737.45 12669 Meadowvale Road Elk River, Minnesota 55330 Northdale Construction $625,470.13 14450 Northdale Boulevard Rogers, Minnesota 55374 Brown & Cris, Inc. $639,769.30 19740 Kenrick Avenue Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 S. J. Louis Construction, Inc. $640,090.94 P.O. Box 1373 St. Cloud, Minnesota 56302 Kober Excavating, Inc. $658,527.77 26406 9th Street West Zimmerman, Minnesota 55398 Lametti and Sons, Inc. $679,784.00 16028 North Forest Boulevard Hugo, Minnesota 55038 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Richard Knutson, Inc., Savage, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Richard Knutson, Inc., of Savage, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for Birch Street Trunk Watermain, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of May, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS May 23, 1996 Honorable Mayor and City Council Lino Lakes, Minnesota Re: Birch Street Trunk Watermain Improvements Lino Lakes, Minnesota Commission No. 11061 Dear Mayor and Council Members: 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE:612/292-4400 FAX:612/292-0083 Bids for the referenced project were received on May 22, 1996, with the following results: Contractor Richard Knutson, Inc. S. R. Weidema, Inc. Bonine Excavating, Inc. Northdale Construction Brown & Cris, Inc. S. J. Louis Construction, Inc. Kober Excavating, Inc. Lametti and Sons, Inc. Engineer's Estimate A complete Tabulation of Bids is attached for your information. It is recommended that a contract be awarded to the low bidder, Richard Knutson, Inc., in the amount of their low bid of $566,324.57. Amount of Bid $566,324.57 $587,744.80 $598,737.45 $625,470.13 $639,769.30 $640,090.94 $658,527.77 $679,784.00 $744,187.00 Sincerely, M. Po ell, P.E. JMP/mha Enclosure An Equal Opportunity Employer/Contractor BIRCH STREET TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 11061 BID OPENING: MAY 22, 1996 1:00 PM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. S. R. WEIDEMA, INC. UNIT UNIT UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION PRICE EXTENSION PRICE EXTENSION 1 MOBILIZATION 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 3 CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN 4 6" DIP CL 50 WM 8'-0" COVER 5 16" DIP CL 50 WM 7'-6" COVER 6 16" MJ DIP CL 50 WM THRU CASING 7 26" DIA. STEEL CASING PIPE 8 6" MJ RES. SEAT GATE VALVE/BOX 9 16" MJ RES. SEAT GATE VAL/BOX 10 6" MJ HUB HYDRANT 8'-6" BURY 11 MJ DIP FITTINGS 12 2" RIGID POLYSTYRENE INSUL. 13 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 14 REMOVE/REPLACE BITUMINOUS SURF 15 TOPSOIL BORROW 16 SODDING 17 ROADSIDE SEEDING 18 TREES/CLEARING 19 TREES/GRUBBING 20 SALVAGE/REINSTALL WOOD FENCE 21 SALVAGE/REINSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 22 SALVAGE/REINSTALL DRIVEWAY CUL * ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION 1.00 1.00 1.00 50.00 10680.00 479.00 423.00 10.00 14.00 10.00 9815.00 160.00 382.00 59.00 3830.00 1754.00 5.10 8.00 8.00 65.00 100.00 1.00 LS LS EA LF LF LF LF EA EA EA LB SF TN SY CY SY AC TR TR LF LF EA $40,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,500.00 $20.00 $35.00 $40.00 $350.00 $550.00 $4,000.00 $1,300.00 $2.00 $2.00 $15.00 $40.00 $8.00 $3.00 $1,100.00 + $150.00 $100.00 $25.00 $17.00 $300.00 $40,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $373,800.00 $19,160.00 $148,050.00 $5,500.00 $56,000.00 $13,000.00 $19,630.00 $320.00 $5,730.00 $2,360.00 $30,640.00 $5,262.00 $5,610.00 $1,200.00 $800.00 $1,625.00 $1,700.00 $300.00 $744,187.00 $9,288.20 $16,476.00 $200.00 $18.03 $32.92 $26.66 $126.48 $388.20 $2,614.53 $1,231.50 $2.25 $2.00 $16.32 $64.18 $6.53 $1.73 $887.40 $153.00 $51.00 $15.00 $10.00 $200.00 $9,288.20 $16,476.00 $200.00 $901.50 $351,585.60 $12,770.14 $53,501.04 $3,882.00* $36,603.42* $12,315.00* $22,083.75 $320.00 $6,234.24 $3,786.62 $25,009.90 $3,034.42 $4,525.74 $1,224.00 $408.00 $975.00 $1,000.00 $200.00 $10,500.00 $7,424.00 $675.00 $29.10 $34.90 $41.05 $130.00 $380.00 $2,365.00 $1,756.00 $2.44 $2.68 $7.10 $21.05 $7.30 $1.62 $645.75 $78.50 $78.75 $10.50 $12.60 $210.00 $10,500.00 $7,424.00 $675.00 $1,455.00 $372,732.00 $19,662.95 $54,990.00 $3,800.00 $33,110.00 $17,560.00 $23,948.60 $428.80 $2,712.20 $1,241.95 $27,959.00 $2,841.48 $3,293.33 $628.00 $630.00 $682.50 $1,260.00 $210.00 $566,324.57* $587,744.80* BIRCH STREET TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 11061 BID OPENING: MAY 22, 1996 1:00 PM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS BONINE EXCAVATING, INC. NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION BROWN & CRIS, INC. UNIT UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION PRICE UNIT EXTENSION PRICE EXTENSION 1 MOBILIZATION 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 3 CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN 4 6" DIP CL 50 WM 8'-0" COVER 5 16" DIP CL 50 WM 7'-6" COVER 6 16" MJ DIP CL 50 WM THRU CASING 7 26" DIA. STEEL CASING PIPE 8 6" MJ RES. SEAT GATE VALVE/BOX 9 16" MJ RES. SEAT GATE VAL/BOX 10 6" MJ HUB HYDRANT 8'-6" BURY 11 MJ DIP FITTINGS 12 2" RIGID POLYSTYRENE INSUL. 13 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 14 REMOVE/REPLACE BITUMINOUS SURF 15 TOPSOIL BORROW 16 SODDING 17 ROADSIDE SEEDING 18 TREES/CLEARING 19 TREES/GRUBBING 20 SALVAGE/REINSTALL WOOD FENCE 21 SALVAGE/REINSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 22 SALVAGE/REINSTALL DRIVEWAY CUL * ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION 1.00 LS 1.00 LS 1.00 EA 50.00 LF 10680.00 LF 479.00 LF 423.00 LF 10.00 EA 14.00 EA 10.00 EA 9815.00 LB 160.00 SF 382.00 TN 59.00 SY 3830.00 CY 1754.00 SY 5.10 AC 8.00 TR 8.00 TR 65.00 LF 100.00 LF 1.00 EA $7,500.00 $5,575.00 $10,500.00 $11.00 $37.45 $32.00 $157.40 $333.00 $2,700.00 $1,515.00 $2.35 $2.00 $9.30 $30.00 $0.01 $1.55 $634.00 $50.00 $50.00 $4.00 $4.00 $300.00 $7,500.00 $5,575.00 $10,500.00 $550.00 $399,966.00 $15,328.00 $66,580.20 $3,330.00 $37,800.00 $15,150.00 $23,065.25 $320.00 $3,552.60 $1,770.00 $38.30 $2,718.70 $3,233.40 $400.00 $400.00 $260.00 $400.00 $300.00 $598,737.45 $2,500.00 $23,807.84 $1,500.00 $18.60 $37.92 $30.29 $130.20 $425.35 $2,395.98 $1,285.98 $2.79 $5.56 $10.05 $42.50 $6.72 $1.79 $913.50 $75.00 $75.00 $10.00 $10.00 $500.00 $2,500.00 $23,807.84 $1,500.00 $930.00 $404,985.60 $14,508.91 $55,074.60 $4,253.50 $33,543.72 $12,859.80 $27,383.85 $889.60 $3,839.10 $2,507.50* $25,737.60 $3,139.66 $4,658.85 $600.00 $600.00 $650.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $625,470.13* $8,500.00 $15,300.00 $1,040.00 $20.80 $37.00 $38.60 $162.55 $406.00 $2,506.00 $1,232.00 $3.25 $9.90 $12.25 $38.75 $7.10 $1.55 $628.00 $306.00 $306.00 $8.25 $9.20 $102.00 $8,500.00 $15,300.00 $1,040.00 $1,040.00 $395,160.00 $18,489.40 $68,758.65 $4,060.00 $35,084.00 $12,320.00 $31,898.75 $1,584.00 $4,679.50 $2,286.25 $27,193.00 $2,718.70 $3,202.80 $2,448.00 $2,448.00 $536.25 $920.00 $102.00 $639,769.30 BIRCH STREET TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 11061 BID OPENING: MAY 22, 1996 1:00 PM ITEM NO. S.J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION, INC. UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS KOBER EXCAVATING, INC. LAMETTI AND SONS, INC. UNIT UNIT PRICE EXTENSION PRICE EXTENSION 1 MOBILIZATION 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 3 CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN 4 6" DIP CL 50 WM 8'-0" COVER 5 16" DIP CL 50 WM 7'-6" COVER 6 16" MJ DIP CL 50 WM THRU CASING 7 26" DIA. STEEL CASING PIPE 8 6" MJ RES. SEAT GATE VALVE/BOX 9 16" MJ RES. SEAT GATE VAL/BOX 10 6" MJ HUB HYDRANT 8'-6" BURY 11 MJ DIP FITTINGS 12 2" RIGID POLYSTYRENE INSUL. 13 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 14 REMOVE/REPLACE BITUMINOUS SURF 15 TOPSOIL BORROW 16 SODDING 17 ROADSIDE SEEDING 18 TREES/CLEARING 19 TREES/GRUBBING 20 SALVAGE/REINSTALL WOOD FENCE 21 SALVAGE/REINSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 22 SALVAGE/REINSTALL DRIVEWAY CUL * ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION 1.00 1.00 1.00 50.00 10680.00 479.00 423.00 10.00 14.00 10.00 9815.00 160.00 382.00 59.00 3830.00 1754.00 5.10 8.00 8.00 65.00 100.00 1.00 LS LS EA LF LF LF LF EA EA EA LB SF TN SY CY SY AC TR TR LF LF EA $27,200.00 $9,700.00 $830.00 $12.00 $37.00 $40.00 $130.00 $450.00 $3,700.00 $1,500.00 $1.18 $1.29 $9.00 $47.00 $9.00 $1.56 $420.00 $83.00 $83.00 $6.24 $16.00 $470.00 $27,200.00 $9,700.00 $830.00 $600.00 $395,160.00 $19,160.00 $54,990.00 $4,500.00 $51,800.00 $15,000.00 $11,581.70 $206.40 $3,438.00 $2,773.00 $34,470.00 $2,736.24 $2,142.00 $664.00 $664.00 $405.60 $1,600.00 $470.00 $640,090.94 $9,600.00 $5,200.00 $670.00 $24.00 $39.00 $35.00 $135.00 $670.00 $2,900.00 $1,700.00 $3.55 $4.02 $9.00 $78.00 $8.00 $2.08 $830.00 $170.00 $170.00 $16.00 $8.00 $560.00 $9,600.00 $5,200.00 $670.00 $1,200.00 $416,520.00 $16,765.00 $57,105.00 $6,700.00 $40,600.00 $17,000.00 $34,843.25 $643.20 $3,438.00 $4,602.00 $30,640.00 $3,648.32 $4,233.00 $1,360.00 $1,360.00 $1,040.00 $800.00 $560.00 $658,527.77 $21,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,500.00 $22.00 $45.00 $50.00 $125.00 $400.00 $1,500.00 $1,750.00 $1.70 $10.00 $22.00 $18.00 $2.00 $1.50 $615.00 $200.00 $150.00 $12.00 $15.00 $1,000.00 $21,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,100.00 $480,600.00 $23,950.00 $52,875.00 $4,000.00 $21,000.00 $17,500.00 $16,685.50 $1,600.00 $8,404.00 $1,062.00 $7,660.00 $2,631.00 $3,136.50 $1,600.00 $1,200.00 $780.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $679,784.00 CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF REVIEW APRIL 15, 1996 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES : April 15, 1996 : 6:30 P.M. : 7:08 P.M. : Bergeson, Kuether, Landers, Neal : Lyden Staff Members present: City Assessors, Todd Smith and Mary Boyle and Clerk - Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the 1996 assessment valuation placed on property for the 1997 taxes. Curtis Mau, 6668 Blue Heron Drive - Mr. Mau explained that he purchased his property in 1987. He noted the value of his property for 1995 was $99,600.00. His current valuation is $122,000.00. Mr. Mau said that he has not made any improvement on his property and asked why the jump in his property valuation. Mr. Smith explained that the properties in Mr Mau's subdivision (Rice Lake Estates) had not been evaluated since 1989. As a result, the value on the individual homes were increased from $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 each. Mr. Smith also explained that the records for the entire subdivision were incomplete. Mr. Mau applied for a permit to install an air conditioner which required that Mr. Smith view the property to update his assessment records. When Mr. Smith visited Mr. Mau's home, he found that the basement had been completed and other improvements made totaling $19,000.00. Mr. Mau explained that everything was completed except the air conditioner when he purchased the home. Mr. Smith said that he did not doubt what Mr. Mau was saying, however, the property had not been appraised for about six (6) years. Mr. Smith also noted that the Assessor tries to value property at market value. That is one reason that there was such a large increase in Mr. Mau's property value. Mr. Smith told the City Council that he has now visited every property in Lino Lakes. Page 1 CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF REVIEW APRIL 15, 1996 Council Member Kuether asked Mr. Mau how much did his property taxes increase. Mr. Mau said approximately $500.00. Council Member Kuether told Mr. Smith that it seems as though Mr. Mau is being penalized. Mr. Smith explained that every property must be properly evaluated. He noted that there is another homeowner from the same neighborhood who experienced the same increase. Mr. Mau told the City Council that his home is in a flood plain. Council Member Kuether explained that this situation was brought to the attention of the City and staff is working to have the flood plain status removed. Mr. Mau told the City Council that he contacted Realtor Carol Peck. Ms. Peck told Mr. Mau that his property value was too high. Mr. Smith said that he will look at Mr. Mau's property again and keep the City Council updated on this matter. He explained that if there are justifiable changes, he will take care of it immediately. Mr. Smith noted that Anoka County no longer mails homestead cards to homeowners. However, Anoka County does mail statements to property owners prior to the Truth in Taxation hearings which are generally held in late November or early December each year. These statements contain the value of the property. Mr. Mau said that he did not receive a Truth in Taxation statement in 1995. Mr. Smith will call Mr. Mau and make an appointment to review Mr. Mau's property. If Mr. Mau is still not satisfied after Mr. Smith's review, Mr. Mau can take his concern to the Anoka County Board of Equalization. Mr. Smith told the City Council that he had received 65 telephone call regarding property values this year. Only three (3) calls resulted in property values being changed. The City Council briefly discussed the proposal by the Minnesota Legislature to freeze property taxes. There is an attempt to make the Legislature address the property tax process and enact a meaningful reform. Council Member Bergeson asked if there is a written summary of commercial tax calculation. Ms. Boyle said yes and would send a written form for calculation of commercial property values to the City. The City Council signed forms presented by Mr. Smith regarding the Board of Review held this evening. Council Member Neal moved to adjourn at 7:08 P.M. Council Member Kuether second the motion. Motion carried unanimously. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a Council meeting held on May 28, 1996. Page 2 CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF REVIEW APRIL 15, 1996 Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer John L. Landers, Mayor Page 3 April 23, 1996 TO: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA Office of the County Assessor Government Center 2100 3rd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2281 612-323-5475 Fax: 612-323-5421 1. The following information is provided for your files and delineates the outcome of the BOARD of REVIEW Proceedings of April 15, 1996. 2. The below individuals had their market values resolved before the local board of reviews met. PIN NAME VALUE ACTION TAKEN 01-31-22-24-0002 Phillip Anderson $ 60,600. NO CHANGE 04-31-22-22-0069 Erik Olson 94,400. NO CHANGE 04-31-22-32-0015 Jeff Winter 90,900. NO CHANGE 05-31-22-12-0003 Nikki Held 78,400. NO CHANGE 08-31-22-13-0003 Jack Menkveld 188,200. NO CHANGE 08-31-22-13-0005 Gail Judd 107,200. NO CHANGE 11-31-22-34-0001 Sylvia Marier 171,900. NO CHANGE 12-31-22-23-0003 Ida Houle 64,900. NO CHANGE 17-31-22-33-0010 Tanya Triemert 102,000. NO CHANGE 18-31-22-21-0009 Ruben Johnson 124,700. NO CHANGE 18-31-22-22-0013 Basil Lilyquist 118,400. NO CHANGE 19-31-22-11-0030 Kathy Shamis 112,900. NO CHANGE 19-31-22-11-0064 Charles Pfingsten 98,300. Reduced to $ 94,000. 19-31-22-14-0013 Donald Lyk 147,900. NO CHANGE 19-31-22-21-0100 Joyce Nelson 102,600. NO CHANGE 19-31-22-22-0020 John Lander 85,800. NO CHANGE 19-31-22-32-0004 Marlys Aune 72,900. NO CHANGE 19-31-22-41-0004 David Storberg 160,200. NO CHANGE 24-31-22-11-0005 Elizabeth Selland 118,000. NO CHANGE 27-31-22-13-0015 Mark Benson 204,600. NO CHANGE 27-31-22-13-0043 George Golden 198,500. NO CHANGE 27-31-22-14-0006 Karen Fruen 220,400. NO CHANGE 27-31-22-14-0012 Loren Brun 260,500. NO CHANGE 27-31-22-14-0018 Joe Orehek 256,300. NO CHANGE 27-31-22-14-0035 Tom Reid 277,500. NO CHANGE 27-31-22-32-0076 David Kircher 195,500. NO CHANGE 27-31-22-34-0008 Charles McKenna 99,000. NO CHANGE 28-31-22-21-0007 Robert Zinggeler 138,900. NO CHANGE 28-31-22-24-0008 Pam Greene 161,700. NO CHANGE 28-31-22-42-0029 Luann Molloy 99,800. NO CHANGE 29-31-22-13-0001 John McClellan 46,000. Reduced to $ 43,300. 29-31-22-33-0024 Warren Ahlers 81,800. NO CHANGE 29-31-22-33-0026 Larry Bloom 89,000. Reduced to $ 85,000. 29-31-22-33-0065 Craig Piette 95,600. NO CHANGE 29-31-22-34-0018 Lori Schwartz 109,100. NO CHANGE 29-31-22-34-0045 Sheila Bourassa 105,100. NO CHANGE 29-31-22-44-0015 Kent Applegate 127,100. NO CHANGE 29-31-22-44-0034 Mark Welle 192,800. NO CHANGE 30-31-22-13-0014 Fred Miller 154,200. NO CHANGE 30-31-22-24-0030 Roger Nelson 157,900. NO CHANGE 30-31-22-24-0067 Glen Whittington 115,000. NO CHANGE 30-31-22-24-0075 Todd Grant 148,200. NO CHANGE 30-31-22-43-0002 Judith Woehrle 102,300. NO CHANGE (cont.) Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer COUNTY OF ANOKA PIN NAME 31-31-22-11-0017 31-31-22-11-0019 31-31-22-14-0054 31-31-22-31-0023 31-31-22-31-0054 31-31-22-32-0020 31-31-22-42-0005 31-31-22-42-0042 31-31-22-43-0002 31-31-22-43-0037 32-31-22-14-0005 32-31-22-14-0017 32-31-22-21-0047 32-31-22-22-0033 32-31-22-22-0052 32-31-22-23-0010 36-31-22-34-0018 36-31-22-34-0021 36-31-22-44-0016 Office of the County Assessor Government Center 2100 3rd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2281 612-323-5475 Fax: 612-323-5421 Brad Demotts Kelly Marcellus Mark Berman Jim Keller Kelly Sharkey Lori Marion Sherrie Hatton Dan Hankel Dean Shull Jim Kuhn Michael Jeffers Dan Langanki Kevin Anderson Mary Obermiller Kathy Thompson Dave Merideth Richard Villella Gary Tangwall Miles Beck VALUE ACTION TAKEN $101,200. 150,900. 187,500. 173,900. 139,900. 201,200. 128,000. 143,300. 142,600. 178,200. 123,300. 136,000. 182,300. 131,500. 201,500. 199,100. 223,300. 370,100. 241,700. (APPEARED AT BOARD OF REVIEW) 30-31-22-24-0068 Curtis Maw 19-31-22-23-0017 21-31-22-32-0034 28-31-22-42-0065 NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE Reduced to $352,700. NO CHANGE 126,700. Reduced to $124,100. (REVIEWED AFTER BOARD OF REVIEW) Nancy Jones Floyd Bradley Daniel Ferguson 84,900. 95,200. 118,600. Reduced to $ 77,700. Reduced to $ 91,900. Reduced to $116,600. As of 4-23-96 these are all of the changes made. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to call me at 323-5483. Sincerely, Todd Smith Appraiser Anoka County Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer CITY OF LINO LAKES 1996 ASSESSMENT/PAYABLE 1997 Total Number of Taxable Parcels: Total Number of Parcels including Exempt and Forfeit: Total Taxable Market Value: 1996 Assessment: New Construction: 1996 Assessment: Parcels with New Construction: Total Taxable Market Value: 1995 Assessment: Net Growth '95 to '96 Including New Construction: Net Growth '95 to '96 Excluding New Construction: Total Market Value Including Exempt and Forfeit, 1996: Total Market Value Including Exempt and Forfeit, 1995: CITY OF LINO LAKES 1996 Assessment - Sales Ratios Type # Sales Residential Single Family Patio Townhomes Municipality County of Anoka Anoka Blaine Columbia Heights Coon Rapids Fridley Circle Pines Ham Lake Lexington Lino Lakes Spring Lake Park Bethel Centerville East Bethel Hilltop Saint Francis Burns Columbus Andover Linwood Oak Grove Ramsey bor i of o/ 96cp 249 12 Median Ratio 94.6% 93.1% 1996 Assessment - Comparable Sales Ratios (Residential Single Family) # Sales 3,548 175 431 222 741 230 57 168 15 249 48 11 37 100 0 56 21 41 500 55 76 293 Median Ratio 94.3% 94.5% 94.3% 94.3% 94.1% 94.4% 94.1% 94.3% 94.2% 94.6% 94.5% 94.3% 94.3% 94.2% N/A 94.5% 94.4% 94.2% 94.5% 94.5% 94.6% 94.4% 5,231 5,734 $542,342,100 $25,501,527- 809 = 14.1% of Total $492,355,100 +10.15% +4.97% $596,173,400 $542,945,300 Coefficient 4.9 3.9 Coefficient 5.4 6.7 4.6 7.2 5.0 6.9 4.5 5.7 6.2 4.9 4.2 5.5 3.9 5.6 N/A 4.9 8.3 5.3 5.2 7.0 5.7 5.0 STAFF ORIGINATOR Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer DATE TOPIC BACKGRO May 23,1996 Consideration of a Block Party Request -for White Owl Drive for Sunday Attached you will find an application for a block party for the Birch Wood Acres subdivision and a map showing the location of the party. The application includes a petition signed by all of the homeowners on White Owl Drive. This application has been reviewed by the Police Department and the Public Wo Department. Comments from each department are attached. I would recommend that the City Council approve this block party. Block parties provide a means of introducing residents of neighborhoods to each other. The block parties often include preliminary steps in setting up neighborhood watch groups. Often the Police Officer assigned to that precinct stops in to its himself/herself. Of course, block parties are an excellent social event. Earlier this year, I discussed some block party concerns with the City Council at a work session. I was directed to meet with reptesendnives from the Police Department and the Public Works Department and to draft a black party recommendation for the City Council to consider. I will be meeting with Officer Sal Costa, Tom DeWolfe and CSO Jeannie Kenow to discuss block party concerns. Officer Costa has been on medical leave from the Police Department and has only recently returned to full duty. I have contacted him and we will be meeting. probably next week and will draft recommendations regarding block party regulations, where block parties should be held, and whether or not to charge a fee to cover City costs for each party. OPTIONS 1, Adopt a motion approving the block party. 2 Return to staff for further informati RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 RECFIVED APR 1 6 1996 DATE BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION CITY OF LINO LAKES The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as a request to hold a block party on the public right-of-way. NAME OF APPLICANT ADDRESS HOME TELEPHONE NO. : WORK TELEPHONE NO. : LOCATION OF BLOCK Bsy-offuArno2. PURPOSE OF PARTY Otsgi 6'3,94 W1 j)riw Li'I o IC1S 53-b 4 3-5o23 PARTY (Street name & location, intersection to intersection) fatsL Sha freet- W r �ll�il. �n ecti9k3 :To Ref +o0-1,ukr VI4 Ofru0a a ui:nl�nc) rle;10 (Not tode coed 10:00 P.M. ) •_ ( ?0,1, DATE AND HOURS OF PARTY: S1 aP e I IT IS HEREBY AGREED: The applicants agree to abide by all rules set forth below, together with all ordinances and regulations which may be imposed governing such activities. 1. Petition. All residents living on the street or block in which the activity is planned, must sign on the last page of this application indicating they consent or do not object to the block party. 2. Barricades. Applicants shall be responsible for placement, maintenance and removal of barricades to be provided by the City in proper locations, such barricades to be left by the City on one corner of the block. Barricades shall be placed at either end of the street in which the block party is to take place. PAGE -1- NAME PETITION (Residents Consenting) ADDRESS TELE. NO. &1 Li k ce -/ Ota` atai &3i wkik, D/L Dmr€ 1-1-g�- E o 3 (..351v,)1. bi,' i 775e 1 (: u -\, 6.3a%5 co l�i�i (J: L' 47 y 6 jRS (3 w c:x.,)- O 4g-4 1 `hof ( r/7 LZ V STV, k3341,>-11,-?(7/,)/� z(e3 N 11 ()WOW. aP Ai -195-3 Name of Organization (If applicable) Bil-ctimince nuts D (op- ttt- Checked by: Police Department Public Works Department ML, 96, /19Kgrit., eoNeexico cmk_ iic 71-fico Z‘046<_0 eotume,66( bLock. qf FAL £i cottrt-e... 4z)4, pac, 1,2e_ iita-ve dext, /2,34 rPaLc.,¢_ sitoufick miak, stert&_, /624-I flL4,0 gi,*&caleecctd 74/O.& ai Xioae. z e Y-L e-7 ritcq ac(4.0 Zat dew 6ifjtv,--- '74-7 -"led coteJxced zzeer4 /tAd iztA. "3,d, 0-2t 4.exi4,1-- 674A-wit) 10t iha:1"," )fe4c1(.0; 44-e- st)e- /e,e ef dot/ "44; t`-rtly 94E, A-,fieWeek AHOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAL PLAT NO. 11 l L may nall1111