Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/24/1996 Council PacketAGENDA 5:30 P.M. COUNCIL WORK SESSION WITH THE AUDITOR CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday June 24, 1996 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call SCANNED 4)\oce,v,- R)e)Is Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? Consent Agenda ,/ A. Consideration of Disbursements: June 24, 1996 ($389,137.88.. Check Nos. 44732 - 44857) ,/B. Resolution No. 96 - 65; Aufliorize Final Payment, Hodgson Road Trunk Watermain Improvements ,Powell 1/ C. Resolution No. 96 - 66, Authorize Final Payment, Country Lakes Estates Improvements, Plat 2 Powell Resolution No. 96 - 67, Declaration of Intent to Bond, Various City Projects -t/' D. E. Final Plat: I/I. Pheasant Hills Preserve, 7th Addition I-- 2. Trapper's Crossing, 1st Phase Presentation of 1995 Audit, Fred Espe Open Mike 1-e4k-A ��� \ \ e - Consideration of Hiring Two (2) Police Officers, Chief Pecchia PAGE 1 AGENDA 5. Planning and Zoning Board Report, Mary Kay Wyland A. Consideration of Site Plan Review, Arndt Construction, Phelps Road ✓ B. Consideration of Site Plan Review, Lino Lakes Family Dentistry, Blue Heron Drive C. Consideration of Site Plan Review, EAM, 4th Avenue I/ D. Consideration of Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision, Blue Heron II, Apollo Drive E. Consideration of Minor Subdivision, Alan Donat, 8134 East Rondeau Lake Drive F. Consideration of Minor Subdivision, Molly & Jim Jungbauer, 2207 Deer Pass Trail r."7- G. "G. Consideration of Minor Subdivision, Richard Carlson, 7932 Lake Drive ✓ H. Consideration of Rezone, Preliminary Plat and Planned Development Overlay, Bruce Hanson, Surfside Seaplane Base Consideration of Variaiice, Gaty Sandahl, 478 Lonesome Pine J. Consideration of Zoning' Giiiiitance Text Amendment, Jeff Kelly K. FIRST READING, Ordinance 96-03, Amending Section 506 of the City Code, Animal Ordinance — Co►Of. A, N D,M tR.,.. L. Accept Easements, Lino Air Park, Roger Kolstad M. Consideration of MUSA Designation, Pheasant Hills Preserve, 7th Addition Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 73, Livable Communities Action Plan N. 6. City Engineer's Report, David Ahrens ✓ A. Resolution No. 96 - 64, Awarding Bid for Underground Storage Tanks PAGE 2 r/ B. AGENDA Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 68, Ordering Improvement, Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids, Clearwater Creek Development Center Trunk Utilities (Powell) C. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 69, Order Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications, Otter Lake Road Realignment Powell D. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 70, Order Preparation of Report on Improvements, I35W/TH 49 & Interchange Commercial Development Trunk Utilities E. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 71, Declare Adequacy of Petition and Order Preparation of Report, Trapper's Crossing, Phase 2 F. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 29, Memorandum of Understanding with MnDOT, Trunk Highway 49 Tumback, Fourth Avenue to Lilac Street G. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 75 Determining the Necessity for and Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain Property By Proceedings in Eminent Domain, Clearwater Creek Development Center Street Utilities V 7. Consideration of Waiving or Not Waiving Monetary Limits on Tort Liability Per Minnesota Statute 466.04 8. Old Business v A. Consideration of Draft Letter to the Charter Commission Relating to Street Improvement Issues, Randy Schumacher (Will be available at the Council meeting.) B. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 74, Approving Metropolitan Council MUSA Allocation of 150, Randy Schumacher 9. New Business ft\S A -€11 - Mayor's Comments 10. Adjourn PAGE 3 AGENDA - 5:30 P.M., COUNCIL WORK SESSION WITH THE AUDITOR CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday June 24, 1996 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call (Bergeson absent) Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of Disbursements: June 24, 1996 ($389,137.88 Check Nos. 44732 - 44857) (Approved) B. Resolution No. 96 - 65, Authorize Final Payment, Hodgson Road Trunk Watermain Improvements Powell (Approved) C. Resolution No. 96 - 66, Authorize Final Payment, Country Lakes Estates Improvements, Plat 2 Powell (Approved) D. Resolution No. 96 - 67, Declaration of Intent to Bond, Various City Projects (Approved) E. Final Plat: 1. Pheasant Hills Preserve, 7th Addition (Approved) 2. Trapper's Crossing, 1st Phase (Approved) 2. Presentation of 1995 Audit, Fred Espe (Short, City in good financial condition) 3. Open Mike (M. Anderson read letter from Bill Houle regarding condition of 24th Avenue) PAGE 1 AGENDA 4. Consideration of Hiring Two (2) Police Officers, Chief Pecchia (Approved 1 officer immediately and 1 when discussing 1997 Budget) 5. Planning and Zoning Board Report, Mary Kay Wyland A. Consideration of Site Plan Review, Arndt Construction, Phelps Road (Approved) B. Consideration of Site Plan Review, Lino Lakes Family Dentistry, Blue Heron Drive (Approved) C. Consideration of Site Plan Review, EAM, 4th Avenue (Approved) D. Consideration of Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision, Blue Heron II, Apollo Drive (Approved) E. Consideration of Minor Subdivision, Alan Donat, 8134 East Rondeau Lake Drive (Approved) F. Consideration of Minor Subdivision, Molly & Jim Jungbauer, 2207 Deer Pass Trail (Approved Minor Subdivision and waived park fee) G. Consideration of Minor Subdivision, Richard Carlson, 7932 Lake Drive (Approved minor subdivision, not request to rezone) H. Consideration of Rezone, Preliminary Plat and Planned Development Overlay, Bruce Hanson, Surfside Seaplane Base (Tabled to next Council meeting) Consideration of Variance, Gary Sandahl, 478 Lonesome Pine (Approved variance to allow pool construction 10 feet from side property line and deny request for 5.5 foot variance into required side yard setback with condition that pool equipment be located adjacent to existing dwelling) J. Consideration of Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment, Jeff Kelly _ (Approved) K. FIRST READING, Ordinance 96-03, Amending Section 506 of the City Code, Animal Ordinance (1st reading approved, come back to Council with language to include cats) L. Accept Easements, Lino Air Park, Roger Kolstad (Approved) PAGE 2 AGENDA- M. GENDA M. Consideration of MUSA Designation, Pheasant Hills Preserve, 7th Addition (Removed from Agenda) N. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 73, Livable Communities Action Plan (Approved) 6. City Engineer's Report, David Ahrens A. Resolution No. 96 - 64, Awarding Bid for Underground Storage Tanks (Approved) B. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 68, Ordering Improvement, Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids, Clearwater Creek Development Center Trunk Utilities (Powell) (Approved) C. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 69, Order Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications, Otter Lake Road Realignment Powell (Approved) D. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 70, Order Preparation of Report on Improvements, I35W/TH 49 & Interchange Commercial Development Trunk Utilities (Approved) E. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 71, Declare Adequacy of Petition and Order Preparation of Report, Trapper's Crossing, Phase 2 (Approved) F. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 29, Memorandum of Understanding with MnDOT, Trunk Highway 49 Turnback, Fourth Avenue to Lilac Street (Approved) G. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 75 Determining the Necessity for and Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain Property By Proceedings in Eminent Domain, Clearwater Creek Development Center Street Utilities (Approved) 7. Consideration of Waiving or Not Waiving Monetary Limits on Tort Liability Per Minnesota Statute 466.04 (Approved) 8. Old Business A. Consideration of Draft Letter to the Charter Commission Relating to Street Improvement Issues, Randy Schumacher (Will be available at the Council meeting.) (Tabled) PAGE 3 AGENDA- B. GENDA B. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 74, Approving Metropolitan Council MUSA Allocation of 150, Randy Schumacher (Approved but develop plan for how allocation is to used) 9. New Business Mayor's Comments (Mayor thanked Mr. Ahrens, Mr. Hawkins and Mr. Schumacher for many hours of work on Trapper's Crossing) 10. Adjourn (9:50 P.M.) PAGE 4 1 DISBURSEMENTS JUNE 24, 1996 Page: 1 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount Checking Account 1010 1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND BONINE EXCAVATING(CONTRACTOR/COUNTRY LK EST) 11,227.77 BONINE EXCAVATING(CONTRACTOR/HODGSON ROAD) 10,758.78 MCCRADY, MARLOWE J.(TRIAL TESTIMONY/HWY 49 & LK) 300.00 PETERSON, JOHN R.(TRIAL TESTIMONY) 325.00 * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER/49 & 23) 2,382.07 * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/HODGSON ROAD) 50.06 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/HIGHWAY 49 & 23) 5,244.00 Total for Department 30,287.68 Total for Fund 30,287.68 1995 CONSTRUCTION GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC.(CONTRACTOR/WOODS OF B II) 4,545.63 Total for Department 4,545.63 Total for Fund 4,545.63 1996 CONSTRUCTION FUND OSM, INC.(MUN ENGINEER/CENTENNIAL SCH) 142.50 OSM, INC.(MUN ENGINEER/MARSHAN CONDOS) 9,546.53 * OSM, INC.(MUN ENGINEER/CENTENNIAL SCH) 5,265.00 * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER/TRAPPERS CROSS) 19,133.49 Total for Department 34,087.52 Total for Fund 34,087.52 APOLLO BUSINESS PARK FUND APOLLO BUSINESS * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/APOLLO BUS PK) 35.74 Total for Department 35.74 Total for Fund 35.74 Page: 2 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) AREA AND UNIT CHARGE BAILEY AUTOMATED SYSTEM, INC.(RADIO TELEMETRY/WELL #3) * BRAUN INTERTEC, INC.(MUN ENGINEER/WELL #3) * BRAUN INTERTEC, INC.(MUN ENGINEER/WELL #4) GME CONSULTANTS, INC.(GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORE/TWR #2) MILLS CONCRETE RESTORATION, IN(CONTRACTOR PAYMENT/WELL #4) S.R.WEIDEMA, INC.(CONTRACTOR/4TH AVENUE TRUNK) * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER/WELL #3) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/WELL #4) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/4TH AVE TRUNK) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/CEDAR ST L S) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/WATER TOWER #2) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/BIRCH ST TRUNK) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/4TH AVE TRUNK) Total for Department Total for Fund CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER) STS CONSULTANTS LTD.(ENGINEERING SERVICE) COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT BLOCK GRANT SMITH, PEG(REIMBURSE MILEAGE) CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS Total for Department Total for Fund Total for Department Total for Fund CLASSIC HOME DESIGN(REIMB BLDG ESCROW/1161 RUFGS) D.C. GENERAL BUILDERS(REIMB CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) HULT & ASSOCIATES, INC.(EMERGENCY APPARATUR) * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(MUN ATTORNEY/TAYMARK) * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(MUN ATTORNEY/FOGERTY) * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(MUN ATTORNEY/PROGRESSIVE ENG) * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(MUN ATTORNEY/NO WHOLESALE) KLOSNER-GOERTZ(REIMB BLDG ESCROW/6262 B LK) Amount 19,433.00 421.38 76.58 1,892.00 25,057.20 89,725.60 12,192.00 1,795.14 3,033.90 2,248.97 1,345.94 10,094.31 46.50 167,362.52 167,362.52 3,266.34 1,595.00 4,861.34 4,861.34 241.80 241.80 241.80 500.00 300.00 450.00 390.54 19.76 12.76 298.80 500.00 Page: 3 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount MAC MAY HOMES(REIMB BLDG ESCROW/651 HICKOR) 500.00 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(UNDERGROUND SERVICE/BEHMS) 2,816.00 * OSM, INC.(MUN ENGINEER/CENTENNIAL SCH) 972.50 PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW/389 LINDA) 500.00 PREFERRED BUILDERS, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW/437 FORSHA) 500.00 * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER/TRAPPERS CROSS) 48.30 * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/BEHM'S C FARMS) 16,657.50 * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/CLEAR WATER CK) 8,210.36 TWIN OAKS(REIMB BLD ESCROW/1567 MERGAN) 500.00 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/TRAPPERS CROSS) 213.90 Total for Department 33,390.42 Total for Fund 33,390.42 DEDICATED PARKS BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD.(MASTER PLAN STUDY/RICE LK PK) 1,455.73 Total for Department 1,455.73 Total for Fund 1,455.73 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 14.17 D.C.A. INC.(FLEX INSURANCE) 175.50 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 1,012.70 METROPOLITAN AREA(SURVEY) 15.00 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 15.75 SCHUMACHER, RANDALL B.(MILEAGE/MEALS) 92.87 * SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC.(SIGNS) - 0.98 Total for Department 1,326.97 BUILDING INSPECTIONS * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC.(ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS) CHARTER COMMISSION 3.45 390.01 29.49 7.00 675.61 Total for Department 1,105.56 * DUNN, DONALD(SUPPLIES) 19.17 Total for Department 19.17 ,age: 4 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount CONSULTANTS * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(CRIMINAL ATTORNEY) 7,760.80 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) 2,095.92 Total for Department 9,856.72 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) KLOSNER-GOERTZ(REIMB BLDG ESCROW/6262 B LK) METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(SAC CHARGES/MAY) METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(SAC CHARGES/MAY) NYSCA(COACHES CERTIFICATION) PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW/389 LINDA) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT 541.54 364.80 - 390.00 36,000.00 - 360.00 915.00 - 260.00 2.75 156.70 Total for Department 36,970.79 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 2.74 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE/KAISER PROP) 7.85 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 7.00 WESSEL, BRIAN(MILEAGE/MEALS/SUPPLIES) 301.98 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/KAISER PROPERTY) 313.00 Total for Department 632.57 ENGINEERING/PLANNING DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 21.39 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 390.01 * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 4.51 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 12.25 * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER) 389.19 * SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC.(SIGNS) 1.96 * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER) 2,554.16 FINANCE * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * FUNDWORKS(COMPUTER SUPPORT) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) Total for Department 3,373.47 4.13 100.00 9.63 Total for Department 113.76 'age: 5 )ate: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) FIRE DEPARTMENT * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) FLEET MANAGEMENT Amount 415.15 3.50 Total for Department 418.65 AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOT(PARTS) AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS(REPAIR RADIOS) BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(PARTS) BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(PARTS) CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC.(ACETYLENE) CRYSTEEL DIST., INC.(PARTS FOR SWEEPER) FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.(PARTS) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(PARTS) LINO AUTO MACHINING(TURN DRUMS) LINO AUTO MACHINING(TURN DRUMS) MIDWEST SPECIALTY SALES, INC.(PARTS) MN. WANNER COMPANY, INC.(PARTS/CUSHMAN PAINT SPRAYER) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) TRACY FUELS, INC.(FUEL) FORESTRY DEPARTMENT * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.(MAINTENANCE) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 43.61 218.20 862.39 29.92 43.62 217.24 55.91 24.64 12.00 30.00 254.78 175.03 3.50 4,847.14 Total for Department 6,817.98 335.01 7.99 3.50 Total for Department 346.50 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 28.44 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 6.36 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 78.87 GRAFFCO, INC.(FUEL FILTERS) 11.72 * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.(MAINTENANCE/SERVICE AGREEMT) 999.57 L'ALLIER, INC.(JANITORIAL SERVICE/JUNE) 1,776.75 * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) 72.53 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM, INC.(ADVERTISMENT) 175.50 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 922.49 MAYOR AND COUNCIL LANDERS, JOHN(MEALS) Total for Department 4,072.23 25.95 Total for Department 25.95 Page: 6 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount PARK BOARD DONLIN, AMY(QUARTERLY STIPEND) LANE, SHARON(QUARTERLY STIPEND) LINDY, GEORGE(QUARTERLY STIPEND) MONTAIN, PAUL(QUARTERLY STIPEND) PIPER, BETTY A.(QUARTERLY STIPEND) SCHMIDT, JOE(QUARTERLY STIPEND) TASCHUK, PAM(QUARTERLY STIPEND) PARKS DEPARTMENT 150.00 150.00 225.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 150.00 Total for Department 975.00 BONA, JANET M.(MILEAGE) 17.36 BONA, JANET M.(STAMPS) 44.80 * D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 13.83 FLANAGAN SALES, INC.(SIGNS) 735.00 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 37.53 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 6.21 * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 64.78 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 1,065.03 * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.(MAINTENANCE) 47.93 * ISANTI COUNTY EQUIPMENT, INC.(PARTS) 152.51 * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 15.95 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 204.30 NORTHWAY LANDSCAPING, INC.(TORO PARTS) 121.94 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 14.00 SHIELY COMPANY, INC.(SAND/GRAVEL) 52.45 * SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC.(SIGNS) 0.97 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 318.35 * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 58.06 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) 46.50 WOOD, SANDIE(NOTARY COMMISSION) 25.00 Total for Department 3,042.50 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD DAHL, CAROLINE(QUARTERLY STIPEND) 100.00 * DUNN, DONALD(QUARTERLY STIPEND) 100.00 GELBMANN, RICK(QUARTERLY STIPEND) 150.00 HERR, GUY C.(QUARTERLY STIPEND) 150.00 JOHNSON, WILLIAM C.(QUARTERLY STIPEND) 150.00 ROBINSON, AL(QUARTERLY STIPEND) 150.00 SCHAPS, JAMES(QUARTERLY STIPEND) 225.00 Total for Department 1,025.00 Page: 7 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount POLICE DEPARTMENT A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 12.2E * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 0.4E ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER(MAP) 9.5S CAR WASH 109, INC.(MAY CAR WASHES - 9) 45.5_ CRIME PREVENTION RESOURCES(CRIME PREV) 188.0( CY'S UNIFORMS, INC.(UNIFORMS) 120.4 D C. HEY COMPANY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 136.1L GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 359.1= GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 28.92 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 1,717.5E KAULFUSS, RENEE (MILEAGE) 27.9C LARSON, CYNDY K.(MILEAGE/MEALS) 106.8( LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.(TRANSCRIBER) 841.3E * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 154.2E OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER(ANIMAL CONTROL) 67.74 PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 34.3E PETTY CASH(CONFERENCE) 45.0( * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 56.00 TOMAHAWK TRAPS AND EQUIPMENT(TRAP) 61.9E U S WEST CELLULAR, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 310.4S US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 450.1C WALLIN VIDEO PRODUCTIONS, INC.(DARE EXPENSE) 390.7E Total for Department 5,164.75 RECREATION DEPARTMENT ENGLAND, MARY SUE(PERFORMANCE IN THE PARK/7-7) * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) HI-TOPS(PREFORMANCE IN THE PARK/6-30) IMAGES &MEMORIES, INC.(FILM) * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.(MAINTENANCE) * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) * SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC.(SIGNS) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT 750.0C 11.0E 390.02 750.00 20.4E 103.8E 68.9; 15.9E 3.5C 0.9"; 46.5C Total for Department 2,161.34 CONSTANT, JACKIE(MILEAGE) 27.55 * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) 3.5C UNITED RECYCLING, INC.(RECYCLE DAY/CARPET) 314.5G * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) 93.00 Total for Department 438.55 Page: 8 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) STREETS * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) DEWOLFE, THOMAS(MILEAGE) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) FRIDLEY, CITY OF(MEMBERSHIP) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) * ISANTI COUNTY EQUIPMENT, INC.(PARTS) * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE/STREET LITES) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC.(ASPHALT/FINE MIX) * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) WALGREENS(TWO ROLLS FILM) Total for Department Total for Fund INTERIM CONSTRUCTION FUND * BRAUN INTERTEC, INC.(MUN ENGINEER/OTTER LAKE RD) * T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGINEER/OTTER LAKE RD) Total for Department Total for Fund PROGRAM RECREATION BJORLIN, DEB(PROGRAM REC/T-BALL) DULLINGER, GLORIA(PROGRAM REC/BASEBALL) KOHLS, TERRI(PROGRAM REC/T-BALL) MALINOWSKI, JIM(PROGRAM REC/BASEBALL) SCHMALL, PATTI(PROGRAM REC/T-BALL) SEAGREN, LYNNE(PROGRAM REC/BASEBALL) Total for Department RECREATION DEPARTMENT CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS(PROGRAM REC/TENNIS) MRPA(PROGRAM REC) U S & A TEAM TENNIS(PROGRAM REC/TENNIS) Total for Department Amount 5.64 219.00 51.21 7.43 10.00 517.41 152.50 4.51 2,298.54 14.00 946.55 58.06 7.86 4,292.71 82,180.25 616.09 550.98 1,167.07 1,167.07 23.00 27.00 23.00 27.00 23.00 27.00 150.00 40.00 1,210.00 450.00 1,700.00 Total for Fund 1,850.00 Page: 9 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) SEWER OPERATING SEWER DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, INC.(SMALL TOOLS) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(SEWER SERVICE MICKELSON, LESTER(CLOTHING ALLOWANCE) * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) * SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC.(SIGNS) Total SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FOR JULY) for Department Total for Fund * SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(MUN ENGINEER) Total for Department Total for Fund TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1-7 * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(MUN ATTORNEY/TIF 1-7) Total for Department Total for Fund WATER OPERATING PREFERRED BUILDERS, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW/437 FORSHA) Amount 0.66 30.00 15.89 170.40 193.37 91.20 21,414.00 34.97 4.51 1,108.75 5.68 522.01 23,591.44 23,591.44 389.10 389.10 389.10 585.00 585.00 585.00 -48.00 Total for Department -48.00 Page: Date: 10 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount WATER DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, INC.(SMALL TOOLS) * D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC.(CONTAINERS) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FUNDWORKS(COMPUTER SUPPORT) * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC.(AIR ELIMINATOR/1561 MERGANSR) * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) MN. DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH(RENEWAL FEE) MN. DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH(RENEWAL FEE) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * PRUDENTIAL(INSURANCE) * SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC.(SIGNS) * T.K.D.A. (MUN ENGINEER) Total for Department Total for Fund Total for Checking'Account 1010 ** Total ** * - Invoice split to different Departments 0.67 30.00 89.20 10.00 170.39 325.00 193.38 273.60 123.71 4.51 23.00 23.00 724.67 5.69 522.02 635.80 3,154.64 3,106.64 389,137.88 $389,137.88 Page: 1 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount Checking Account 1010 000050 - A T & T 000052 - A T & T 000210 - AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOTA, IN 000440 - ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 000510 - AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 000571 - BAILEY AUTOMATED SYSTEM, INC. 000675 - BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, INC. 000740 - BONINE EXCAVATING 000810 - BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 000820 - BRAUN INTERTEC, INC. 000900 - BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 000930 - WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 000960 - CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC. 000970 - CAR WASH 109, INC. 001050 - CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 001141 - CLASSIC HOME DESIGN 001189 - CONSTANT, JACKIE 001230 - CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 001255 - CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 001257 - D.C. GENERAL BUILDERS 001260 - D.C.A. INC. 001261 - D C. HEY COMPANY, INC. 001262 - D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY, INC. 001300 - DEWOLFE, THOMAS 81.75 12.26 43.61 9.59 218.20 19,433.00 60.00 21,986.55 1,455.73 1,114.05 892.31 15,860.12 43.62 45.53 40.00 500.00 27.59 217.24 120.45 300.00 175.50 136.14 322.03 51.21 Page: 2 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 001327 - DAHL, CAROLINE 001329 - DONLIN, AMY 001338 - DUNN, DONALD 001480 - FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC. 001520 - FLANAGAN SALES, INC. 001530 - FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 001560 - FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 001570 - FRIDLEY, CITY OF 001583 - FUNDWORKS 001604 - GELBMANN, RICK 001608 - GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY/INC 001618 - GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC. 001620 - GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 001628 - GME CONSULTANTS, INC. 001680 — GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 001709 - GRAFFCO, INC. 001825 - HEALTH PARTNERS 001833 - HERR, GUY C. 001853 - HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 001860 - KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 001883 - HULT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 001964 - ISANTI COUNTY EQUIPMENT, INC. 001969 - IMAGES & MEMORIES, INC. 001980 - INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC. 002102 - JOHNSON, WILLIAM C. 002113 - KAULFUSS, RENEE 100.00 150.00 119.17 10.00 735.00 55.91 438.85 10.00 425.00 150.00 434.99 4,545.63 107.81 1,892.00 386.75 11.72 7,504.05 150.00 123.71 1,306.86 450.00 305.01 20.49 1,159.35 150.00 27.90 Page: 3 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 002152 - KLOSNER-GOERTZ 002211 - L'ALLIER, INC. 002243 - LANE, SHARON 002244 - LARSON, CYNDY K. 002285 - LANDERS, JOHN 002340 - LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC. 002355 - LINDY, GEORGE 002360 - LINO AUTO MACHINING 002374 - LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. 002467 - MAC MAY HOMES 002512 - MCCRADY, MARLOWE J. 002570 - METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 002580 - METROPOLITAN AREA 002590 - MICKELSON, LESTER 002670 - MIDWEST SPECIALTY SALES, INC. 002687 - MILLS CONCRETE RESTORATION, INC. 002694 - MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 002850 - MN. WANNER COMPANY, INC. 002920 - MN. DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH 003011 - MONTAIN, PAUL 003050 - MRPA 003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 003270 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 003300 - NORTHWAY LANDSCAPING, INC. 003360 - NYSCA 003430 - OSM, INC. 110.00 1,776.75 150.00 106.80 25.95 170.99 225.00 42.00 841.35 500.00 300.00 57,054.00 15.00 34.97 254.78 25,057.20 49.95 175.03 46.00 50.00 1,210.00 4,498.37 2,816.00 121.94 915.00 15,926.53 ' Page: 4 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 003443 - OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER 67.74 003492 - PETTY CASH 79.36 003509 - PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 240.00 003521 - PIPER, BETTY A. 100.00 003593 - PREFERRED BUILDERS, INC. 452.00 003625 - PRUDENTIAL 323.95 003805 - ROBINSON, AL 150.00 003874 - S.R.WEIDEMA, INC. 89,725.60 003880 - SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. 37,800.49 003915 - SCHAPS, JAMES 225.00 003935 - SCHMIDT, JOE 150.00 003980 - SHIELY COMPANY, INC. 52.45 004001 - SCHUMACHER, RANDALL B. 92.87 004010 - SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC. 1,048.91 004040 - SMITH, PEG 241.80 004070 - SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM, INC. 175.50 004251 - SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 675.61 004340 - T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 946.55 004350 - T.K.D.A. 47,212.86 004367 - TASCHUK, PAM 150.00 004470 - TRACY FUELS, INC. 4,847.14 004574 - U S & A TEAM TENNIS 450.00 004600 - UNITED RECYCLING, INC. 314.50 004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1,690.94 004671 - U S WEST CELLULAR, INC. 310.49 004730 - VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 116.12 Page: 5 Date: 06/20/96 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 004761 - WALLIN VIDEO PRODUCTIONS, INC. 390.76 004762 - WALGREENS 7.86 004800 - WESSEL, BRIAN 301.98 004836 - WOOD, SANDIE 25.00 00739 - BONA, JANET M. 62.16 900016 - TWIN OAKS 500.00 900017 - STS CONSULTANTS LTD. 1,595.00 900018 - PETERSON, JOHN R. 325.00 900019 - HI -TOPS 750.00 900020 - ENGLAND, MARY SUE 750.00 900021 - TOMAHAWK TRAPS AND EQUIPMENT 61.95 900022 - SCHMALL, PATTI 23.00 900023 - SEAGREN, LYNNE 27.00 900024 - MALINOWSKI, JIM 27.00 900025 - DULLINGER, GLORIA 27.00 900026 - CRIME PREVENTION RESOURCES 188.00 900027 - KOHLS, TERRI 23.00 900028 - BJORLIN, DEB 23.00 Total for Checking Account: 1010 389,137.88 ** Total ** $389,137.88 City of Lino Lakes Police Department New Hires (Revenues & Savings) 05/01/96 COPS Grant 06/15/96 Replace resigned officer in 1995. 08/01/96 Replace resigned officer in 1996. 08/01/96 Replace Youth Resource Officer Position. 05/01/95 COPS Grant Pending Grants Youth Resource Officer - Dollar for Dollar Match Overtime State Grant COPS Grant - State of MN COPS Grant - Federal Total Pending Grants Budget 1996 Adopted Budget 1996 Amended Budget (4 new hires) Difference 1997 Budget (4 new hires in 1996) 1998 Budget (4 new hires in 1996) 6/19/96 1996 1997 1998 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 39,337 13,000 33,000 33,990 25,000 20,000 1996 1997 1998 18,000 18,000 12,000 28,000 60,000 40,000 30,000 106,000 40,000 867,986 850,521 (17,465) 985,158 171916 1,034,786 —711110 3?)a i City of Lino Lakes Police Department 1996 1997 1998 New Hires (Revenues & Savings) 05/01/96 COPS Grant 30,000 25,000 20,000 06/15/96 Replace resigned officer in 1995. 15,000 2,000 08/01/96 Replace resigned officer in 1996. 39,337 12,038 08/01/96 Replace Youth Resource Officer Position. 13,000 33,000 33,990 05/01/95 COPS Grant 25,000 20,000 Total Revenues & Savings 122,337 92,038 53,990 Budget 1996 Adopted Budget (Salaries & Benefits) 867,986 1996 Amended Budget (Salaries & Benefits) (4 new hires) 850,521 Difference (17,465) 1997 Budget (Salaries & benefits) (4 new hires in 1996) 1998 Budget (Salaries & Benefits) (4 new hires in 1996) 985,158 1,034,786 Net Budget 728,184 893,120 980,796 6/19/96 Pending Grants 1996 1997 1998 Youth Resource Officer - Dollar for Dollar Match Overtime State Grant 18,000 18,000 COPS Grant - State of MN 12,000 28,000 COPS Grant - Federal 60,000 40,000 Total Pending Grants 30,000 106,000 40,000 6/19/96 Estimated Salary Increase REGULAR 1.00 POLICE 1998 (with 4 new hires) HOLIDAY TOTAL MEDICARE/ SALARIES RATE\HR PAY SALARIES FICA WORK PERA HEALTH LIFE COMP TOTAL CHIEF SERGEANT (STEVE M) SERGEANT (B. HAMMES) TOP PATROL (SAL) TOP PATROL (TIM) TOP PATROL (DAVE) TOP PATROL (BRANDON) TOP PATROL (CLIFF) STEVE WAGNER KENT STREGE K. RAUSCH W. KOCH ***NEW 05/01/96 ***NEW 06/15/96 ***NEW 08/01/96 ***NEW 08/01/96 CSO POLICE RECORDS CLERK POLICE OFFICE MANAGER 62,834 30.21 0 53,425 25.69 3,699 53,425 25.69 3,699 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 39,702 19.09 2,749 38,640 18.58 2,675 35,804 17.21 2,479 35,272 16.96 2,442 36,869 17.73 2,552 36,869 17.73 2,552 27,450 13.20 0 28,038 13.48 0 34,840 16.75 0 TOTAL REGULAR SALARIES 773,472 * Salaries have been adjusted for salary step increases. WORKER'S COMP INFORMATION WORK COMP RATE FOR PATROL WORK COMP RATE FOR SECRETARY 62,834 911 7,163 4,680 100 3,451 79,139 57,124 775 6,512 4,680 100 3,137 72,327 57,124 775 6,512 4,680 100 3,137 72,327 44,343 0 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,013 44,343 0 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 54,569 44,343 0 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,013 44,343 643 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,656 44,343 0 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 54,569 44,343 643 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 55,212 44,343 643 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,656 42,451 616 4,839 2,636 100 2,331 52,973 41,315 599 4,710 4,080 100 2,269 53,073 38,283 555 4,364 4,080 100 2,102 49,484 37,713 547 4,299 4,080 100 2,071 48,811 39,421 572 4,494 4,080 100 2,165 50,832 39,421 572 4,494 4,080 100 2,165 50,832 27,450 2,100 1,230 2,636 100 1,507 35,023 28,038 2,145 1,256 4,080 100 191 35,810 34,840 2,665 1,561 5,060 100 238 44,464 372 42,945 816,416 14,759 86,821 73,080 1,900 41,810 1,034,786 5.23 0.65 EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION 105% 6/19/96 Estimated Salary Increase REGULAR 1.00 POLICE 1997 (with 4 new hires) HOLIDAY TOTAL MEDICARE/ SALARIES RATE\HR PAY SALARIES FICA PERA WORK HEALTH LIFE COMP TOTAL CHIEF SERGEANT (STEVE M) SERGEANT (B. HAMMES) TOP PATROL (SAL) TOP PATROL (TIM) TOP PATROL (DAVE) TOP PATROL (BRANDON) TOP PATROL (CLIFF) STEVE WAGNER KENT STREGE K. RAUSCH W. KOCH ***NEW 05/01/96 ***NEW 06/15/96 ***NEW 08/01/96 ***NEW 08/01/96 CSO POLICE RECORDS CLERK POLICE OFFICE MANAGER 61,004 29.33 0 51,869 24.94 3,591 51,869 24.94 3,591 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 39,702 19.09 2,749 40,410 19.43 2,798 35,449 17.04 2,454 34,384 16.53 2,380 31,548 15.17 2,184 31,017 14.91 2,147 30,309 14.57 2,098 30,309 14.57 2,098 27,450 13.20 0 26,436 12.71 0 34,840 16.75 0 TOTAL REGULAR SALARIES 733,956 * Salaries have been adjusted for salary step increases. WORKER'S COMP INFORMATION WORK COMP RATE FOR PATROL WORK COMP RATE FOR SECRETARY 61,004 885 6,954 4,680 100 3,350 76,973 55,460 752 6,322 4,680 100 3,046 70,360 55,460 752 6,322 4,680 100 3,046 70,360 44,343 0 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,013 44,343 0 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 54,569 44,343 0 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,013 44,343 643 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,656 44,343 0 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 54,569 42,451 616 4,839 2,636 100 2,331 52,973 43,208 627 4,926 4,080 100 2,373 55,313 37,903 550 4,321 2,636 100 2,081 47,591 36,764 533 4,191 4,080 100 2,019 47,688 33,732 489 3,845 4,080 100 1,852 44,099 33,164 481 3,781 4,080 100 1,821 43,427 32,407 470 3,694 4,080 100 1,780 42,531 32,407 470 3,694 4,080 100 1,780 42,531 27,450 2,100 1,230 2,636 100 1,507 35,023 26,436 2,022 1,184 4,080 100 180 34,003 34,840 2,665 1,561 5,060 100 238 44,464 353 40,446 774,402 14,054 82,142 73,080 1,900 39,580 985,158 5.23 0.65 EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION 105% 6/19/96 Estimated Salary Increase REGULAR 1.00 POLICE 1996 (with 4 new hires) HOLIDAY TOTAL MEDICARE/ SALARIES RATE\HR PAY SALARIES FICA WORK PERA HEALTH LIFE COMP TOTAL CHIEF SERGEANT (STEVE M) SERGEANT (B. HAMMES) TOP PATROL (SAL) TOP PATROL (TIM) TOP PATROL (DAVE) TOP PATROL (BRANDON) TOP PATROL (CLIFF) STEVE WAGNER KENT STREGE K. RAUSCH W. KOCH ***NEW 05/01/96 ***NEW 06/15/96 ***NEW 08/01/96 ***NEW 08/01/96 CSO POLICE RECORDS CLERK POLICE OFFICE MANAGER 59,228 28.48 0 47,720 22.94 3,304 47,720 22.94 3,304 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 35,449 17.04 2,454 36,159 17.38 2,503 31,194 15.00 2,160 29,778 14.32 2,062 18,082 8.69 1,043 14,493 6.97 502 11,080 5.33 320 11,080 5.33 320 27,450 13.20 0 24,834 11.94 0 34,840 16.75 0 TOTAL REGULAR SALARIES 636,467 * Salaries have been adjusted for salary step increases. WORKER'S COMP INFORMATION WORK COMP RATE FOR PATROL WORK COMP RATE FOR SECRETARY 59,228 859 6,752 4,680 100 3,253 74,871 51,024 692 5,817 4,680 100 2,802 65,114 51,024 692 5,817 4,680 100 2,802 65,114 44,343 0 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,013 44,343 0 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 54,569 44,343 0 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,013 44,343 643 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,656 44,343 0 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 54,569 37,903 550 4,321 2,636 100 2,081 47,591 38,662 561 4,408 4,080 100 2,123 49,934 33,354 484 3,802 2,636 100 1,832 42,207 31,840 462 3,630 4,080 100 1,748 41,859 19,125 277 2,180 2,720 67 1,050 25,420 14,994 217 1,709 2,040 50 823 19,834 11,400 165 1,300 1,700 42 626 15,232 11,400 165 1,300 1,700 42 626 15,232 27,450 2,100 1,230 2,636 100 1,507 35,023 24,834 1,900 1,113 2,720 67 169 30,803 34,840 2,665 1,561 5,060 100 238 44,464 306 32,326 5.23 0.65 EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION 105% 6/19/96 668,792 12,431 70,213 63,560 1,667 33,857 850,521 Estimated Salary Increase REGULAR 1.00 POLICE 1996 (ADOPTED) HOLIDAY TOTAL MEDICARE/ SALARIES RATE\HR PAY SALARIES FICA WORK PERA HEALTH LIFE COMP TOTAL CHIEF SERGEANT (STEVE M) SERGEANT (B. HAMMES) TOP PATROL (SAL) TOP PATROL (TIM) TOP PATROL (DAVE) TOP PATROL (BRUCE) TOP PATROL (BRANDON) TOP PATROL (CLIFF) STEVE WAGNER KENT STREGE K. RAUSCH T. SCHMATZ W. KOCH CSO POLICE RECORDS CLERK POLICE OFFICE MANAGER 57,503 27.65 0 46,330 22.27 3,207 46,330 22.27 3,207 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 41,472 19.94 2,871 35,449 17.04 2,454 36,159 17.38 2,503 31,194 15.00 2,160 29,778 14.32 2,062 29,778 14.32 2,062 26,650 12.81 0 28,777 13.84 0 33,825 16.26 0 TOTAL REGULAR SALARIES 650,605 * Salaries have been adjusted for salary step increases. WORKER'S COMP INFORMATION WORK COMP RATE FOR PATROL WORK COMP RATE FOR SECRETARY 57,503 834 6,555 4,680 100 3,158 72,830 49,537 672 5,647 4,680 100 2,720 63,357 49,537 672 5,647 4,680 100 2,720 63,357 44,343 0 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,013 44,343 0 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 54,569 44,343 0 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,013 44,343 0 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 54,569 44,343 643 5,055 4,080 100 2,435 56,656 44,343 0 5,055 2,636 100 2,435 54,569 37,903 550 4,321 2,636 100 2,081 47,591 38,662 561 4,408 4,080 100 2,123 49,934 33,354 484 3,802 2,636 100 1,832 42,207 31,840 462 3,630 2,636 100 1,748 40,415 31,840 462 3,630 4,080 100 1,748 41,859 26,650 2,039 1,194 2,636 100 1,463 34,082 28,777 2,201 1,289 4,080 100 196 36,644 33,825 2,588 1,515 5,060 100 231 43,319 313 34,882 685,487 12,165 71,969 62,032 1,700 34,633 867,986 5.23 0.65 EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION 105% 6/19/96 AGENDA ITEM 1B (CONSENT AGENDA) STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. TKDA DATE June 21. 1996 TOPIC Resolution No. 96-65 Approving the Final Payment for the Hodgson Road Trunk Watermain Improve rents BACKGROUND; This project involved the installation of a 12" trunk Watermain along the east side of Trunk Highway 49 (Hodgson Road) from Linda Avenue to the north side of CSAH 10 (Birch Street). The construction activity on this project has been completed by Bonin Excavating, Inc. and this final payment will initiate the contractor's one-year warranty period. The final contract amount of $204,145.12 is significantly under the original contract amount of $230,200.50 due to cost savings realized during the construction phase by reducing the amount of bituminous roadway shoulder removal and completing the work prior to the State's overlaTrunk Highway 49. not be released to the contractor until they have ents. eve Resolution No. 9645 Approving Final Pay Trunk Watermain improvements. RE 1�i 1 � Option No. 1: Approve Resolution No. 96-65 Approving Final Payment for the Hodgson Road Trunk Waterrnain Improvements. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96- �GJ RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE HODGSON ROAD TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, construction of the Hodgson Road Trunk Watermain Improvements have been completed by Bonine Excavating, Inc., AND WHEREAS, the one-year warranty period for this project will begin with the final payment, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, that: Final Payment is hereby approved for the Hodgson Road Trunk Watermain Improvements. t -- Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM 1C (CONSENT AGENDA) STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. TKDA DATE TOPIC June 21. 1996 Resolution No. 96-66 Approving the Final Payment for the Country Lakes Estates improvements - 'tease 2 BAOSSIEQUAR: This project involved the installation of sanitary sewer, watermafn, storm sewer, and roadway improvements for the eastern 28 lots of the Country lakes Estates subdivision. The construction activity on this project has been completed by Bonine Excavating, Inc. and this final payment will initiate the contractor's one-year warranty period. The final contract amount of $224,555.45 is under the original contract amount of $230,643.63. The Final Payment will not be released to the contractor until they have completed their final submittals as per contract regfirpments. Approving Final Pa #base 2. esolution No. 96-66 Approving Final P es Improvements - Phase 2. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96- (OW RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE COUNTRY LAKES ESTATES PHASE 2 IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, construction of the Country Lakes Estates Phase 2 Improvements have been completed by Bonine Excavating, Inc., AND WHEREAS, the one-year warranty period for this project will begin with the final payment, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, that: Final Payment is hereby approved for the Country Lakes Estates Phase 2 Improvements. T -- Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM NO 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, City Engineer/Public Works Director DATE: June 20, 1996 TOPIC: Resolution No. 96 - 67 Declaration of Intent to Bond, Various City Projects INTROP!JCTIDN: The City of Lino Lakes is required by the Internal Revenue Service to declare its intent to reimburse project costs from bond proceeds prior to encumbering project costs City Council action is necessary to adopt the attached resolution. BACKGROUND: The City has recently ordered tw(vi, sjects that may be finer proceeds. These projects inc 1. Pheasant Hills 7th Addition Street and Utility Improveme l 2. Centennial 111 l+dle'Sc ool Strom and Utility Irn rove e 3. Otter Lake Road Re : Prc The City must declare its intent thatitheCity may finance. bond proceeds. This is non-bindingration that must t projects in this manner. ExhtA► of the Resolution each of the above projects. If the attached resolution is not: ti red to find alternate methods of financing these pry 1. Not adopt Resolution No. 96 - 67. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 96 - 67 declaring the City's intent through bond proceeds. ►TION: nds that resolution No. 9fi - 67 be adopted. through bond fo nance projects Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-67 RESOLUTION RELATING TO FINANCING OF CERTAIN PROPOSED PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES; ESTABLISHING COMPLIANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is in the practice of constructing certain improvements and in some instances reimbursing itself for the cost of any portion of the improvements with bond proceeds, and WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued proposed Treasury Regulations Section 1.103-17 (as proposed and/or finally adopted, the "Regulations") dealing with the issuance of bonds where all or a portion of the proceeds are to be used to reimburse the City for any project costs paid by the City prior to the time of the issuance of the bonds, and WHEREAS, the Regulations generally required that the City make a prior declaration of its official intent to reimburse itself for supirprior expenditures out of the proceeds of a subsequently issued taxable or tax exempt borrowing, that such declaration generally be made prior to but not more than two years before the time the expenditure is actually paid, that the borrowing occur and the reimbursement allocation be made from the proceeds of such borrowing within one year of the payment of the expenditure or, if longer, within one year of the date the project is placed in service, and the expendituresrelate to property having a reasonably expected economic life of at least one year. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, that: 1. Official Intent - The City desires to comply with requirements of the Regulations with respect to certain projects hereinafter identified. a. The City proposed to undertake the following projects: 1) Pheasant Hills 7th Addition Street and Utility Improvements; 2) Centennial Middle School Street and Utility Improvements; and 3) Otter Lake Road Re -alignment project, which is further described on Exhibit A attached hereto. b. Other than costs to be paid or reimbursed from sources other than a tax-exempt borrowing or costs permitted to be reimbursed pursuant to the transaction provision of section 1.103-17(1) of the Regulations, none of the costs of the foregoing projects as identified on Exhibit A has heretofore been paid by the City and none of the costs will be paid by the City until after the date to this Resolution. Each of the projects and costs related thereto, constitutes property having a useful life of at least one year. Resolution 96-67 Page 2 c. The City intends to reimburse itself for the payment of the designated project costs out of the proceeds of a tax exempt bond issue, debt or similar borrowing (the "Bonds") to be issued by the City after the date of payment of all or a portion of the costs. Pending the issuance of the Bonds, the City reasonably expects to pay and temporarily finance the costs from the following source of sources of funds identified on Exhibit A. d. The Bonds are proposed to be issued by the City pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and other applicable statutory authority. The reasonably expected sources of funds to be used by the City to pay the debt service on the Bonds are identified on Exhibit A. 2. Budgetary Matters - As of the date hereof, there are no City funds reserved or otherwise allocated pursuant to the City's budget (or expected to be reserved or allocated pursuant to the City's budget) to provide permanent financing for the bonding portion of the project costs, other than pursuant to the issuance of the Bonds. Furthermore, there has been no allocation, budgeting, or restriction of moneys (or the adoption of a requirement or policy to reimburse a fund) as part of the City's budgetary process, the primary purpose of which is to prevent moneys from said sources from being available for the permanent financing of the cots of the projects. This resolutioiriTtherefore, is determined to be consistent with the City's budgetary and financial circumstances as they exist or are foreseeable on the date hereof, all within the meaning and content of the Regulations. 3. Filing - This resolution shall be filed in the publicly available official books, records, or proceedings of the City, which shall be continuously available for inspection by the general public. This resolution shall be available for inspection at City Hall during normal business hours of the City on every business day the period beginning on the earlier of 10 days after the adoption hereof or the date of issuance of the reimbursement bonds and ending on the day after the issuance of such bonds. 4. Reimbursement Allocation - The City's fmancial officer shall be responsible for making the "reimbursement allocations" described in the Regulations, being generally the transfer of the appropriate amount of proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse the source of temporary financing used by the City to make payment of the prior costs of the projects. Each allocation shall be evidenced by an entry on the official books and records of the City maintained for the Bonds, shall specifically identify the actual prior expenditure being reimbursed, and shall be effective to relieve the proceeds of the Bonds from any restriction under the bond resolution or other relevant legal documents for the Bonds, and under any applicable state or federal statute, which would apply to the unspent proceeds of such bond issue. Resolution 96-67 Page 3 Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declarassed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on June 24, 1996.' Marilyn G. Anderson INTENT TO BOND RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 67 EXHIBIT A Estimated Cost to be Reimbursed Project Total from Bond Source of Interim Source of Funds to Pay Bonds Description Cost Proceeds Funding Source Amount Pheasant Hills 7th Addition Street & Utility Project $400,000 $400,000 Assessments $400,000 Centennial Middle School Street and Utility Improvements $1,600,000 $1,600,000 Area & Unit Fund —, Assessments $1,600,000 Otter Lake Road Re- alignment $1,300,000 $1,300,000 Bond Proceeds Assessments $1,300,000 TOTAL $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $3,300,000 AGENDA ITEM 12, STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, City Engineer/Public Works Director DATE: June 21, 1996 TOPIC: Consideration of Final Plat, Pheasant Hills 7'" Addition BACK t ROU : The preliminary plat of Pheasant Hills Preserve was approved in 1991 by the City Council. The Pheasant Hills 7'' Addition plat contains 19 lots and 2 outlots. The property is zoned R•1X and is located immediately north of Timberwolf Trail. A Development Agreement has been signed and financial securities posted prior to award of contract for the street and utility construction. OPTIONS: 1. Return the final plat to staffurther review. 2. Approve t#e final plat. RECQMM ND.ATION Staff recommends that bempproved by Council. CENTERVILLE MMiiiii NORTH ego e. ratfat.9,NPI rs1 Ga,,, -..1,..i . j 5/c;KI,-r3; zn',44-451. e 1 r 0 .PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE 7TH ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 91-133G LOCATION MAP AGENDA ITEM 1 STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, City Engineer/Public Wo DATE: June 21, 1996 TOPIC: Consideration of Final Plat, Trapper's Crossin BACKGR D: The preliminary plat of Trapper's Crossing was approved on August 8, 1994 by the City Council. The Trapper's Crossing Phase 1 plat contains 28 lot single family lots zoned R -1X. A Development Agreement has been signed, financial securities have been posted and the construction of street and utilities are well under way for this plat. OPTIONS: 1. Return the final plat to staffor urther review. 2. Approve the final plat. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the final plat be_approved by Council. / ,ne of the S1/2 of the SE1/4 of Sec. 28 -, S 89°49'09eW 413.26 ,► 1070.90 5 v "It' (o 00 00 ro j / 1?0 9 • 664 J C . /8 » Opo on - 211.09 ; OND 202.17 \ D� ▪ • Rab, �C`\{SJ9. \8 Nr3s^02 R 64.93 H O 8 N O''54•O.E t^/ 83° 9'418.E 13/ /� bC •P OND I -rill! H1 / i oyF 4 p°l � JI 20.00 N 89°29.31"E1.1 20.83 232.31 366.81 `J /211.48 / LOW LAND ,S sem" .'O Jh i n I -A a,40 elf owl, sr • N V 60 .4 'S 80°28,79 °E 7 . 1 /�i [ > • / 4•' / / PON _- D 274.00 I 0 9 N "9.56 S M°i2'20 E p ,Drainage h Utility Easement - - - 0 0 8 o I1 0 8� to to .1.3z N 61s13't0� $, /'A 4'„ 38.00 155.01 467.01 N 89°41.26"E 46 C N 89°41'264E 263.43 - •4j 7 h - 4 • Z 4 /p" n ' r(.3\r23nl ioDa n • N 89°56'51"E J r 153.39 IN N1 N. 16.09 .79. • • • 1 • ly lo ` "ryh11 / II Z 1 1• (.1 I W I 3 1cp No Lo N 89°56'51"J19, 45.LOA 0Fsio0 10 oil �4 Lc)J o • • • • co • • z W. Line of the E1/2 of the SE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Sec. 28 �r,�LN895 aE.. nee ao - 145.00-W� o h'\•l o 0.4 0 - 13 ; Icoq' ..-' - Z d' im �Ia o°° S 89°41'26"W L:6�°52 tZ woo 75.73 • -- E --p 145.00 s r I" o I.�� n L�_S 83°47'53J•E „ 5 _ 226.05 ° -- _ 'p N29437.54 / if '0 t! (( ti POND e 'by • 515 RN\. �< 2 \.. 8 g s s az=aa•z7•E • �{s w n �� it d w; • .o + 1 �^ <�.i 16s'.� 1;p \' S 4 (30 0. o o:o S Imo: 30 18� �N N o co 0 O ° 111 O S 82°33'27?: o- o 4 �.5.55-2„E ja R 0 E'> tr� o • • ♦<Yti> moo/ 1 o \ 17h�. o if / C' •jycF e a e5 FeF w c,a_ POND .- rn •C • • s •- (si ?n • • 1614.8o --- 2r, 514.80-- N o .• 8O* In ;«IQ - u) Ig 2 a� . hl L S 89°57'53"E 9 L'' r 140.00 7 C I1 IP Ig; o1 O 10 NI L 140.00 _1 24.15 S Z w - 18 O M /C N (\ p 8000 �- O• \ f Z ;°t°�aLOW LAND �1 60 0 r .,,89.0, 4 78.00 DRIVE S 89°33'07"E • _7.9�; ' ra +39.44 S 7939 20•E • 89°33'07•E /fULLY -_- _ 467.01 i N 89°41'26"E= z '---1.101ch Line (See Sheet '' 'eets) s MEMORANDUM DATE June 21, 1996 TO Maya & Council Members FROM Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer REGARDING Letter from Mr. Bill Houle (See Attached) The attached letter was delivered to me;after,the agenda was preeSared. Mr. Houle would like to come and read the letter under open Mike. Would you please add this letter to your agenda. Thank you. °ttliiL-el/ ..-/ Ali.c, oe4ii"-- ')).4( _rz.,_,...),,4„,‘,,,, 019c_et., e'_ eta cG` V y i '> L c t;/: -i.. E. Nva -al azri-e -e.., ✓ J 2°-----d-tz_ , cteztvn,-.z-6,--,Az, ,,„_,}c,',:6_,€. ---&-it_oz. ,t..tJ__kc,<_./,, A:4_, .2.61LQ_, dz./ . _z___3-,f_t__ ,i.„4 -a- er, 6,--1, 4,2 _8_,,:-/v_.,,,;(2,,/ 0,3!--e?t =,.._,-,/-:, / cc - e'ltA2-,14}.e.,a- .4-4:erzef 3s` .a., . Q 7, ,L,,I, .,_--,-,dzi 3 a- - 76 , ,Ti_eftc___e_ el ac,1,,t) -- etA4 AL—C-&-71-7 }/ • - ry • - _ ✓1 76-4.<;). . "1-17 • /v✓ / .' W • 44'C/ 4 ,j2,&,c -'tel l�'�� t k ��� , • � ,• GIG 7v)4 -e- E L0.4_L1 480-7-w— *e- c__O-yti, 9_et oco- raop;c7- 1A)2Y ,4,qvvt '� r ) -U0 (✓� i�Z �Q. ce- C2/ •G-� U� '- c� & —t ti--��--Q.Q crY- 4-zte, ig_e_otjzzu_ 0,7 alt C 6-�-,�- ,..___.. ..__ ,,vii_ e�.� � n 7 STAFF ORIGITtR DATE TOPIC GEED A ITEM 4 David J. Pecchia une 21, 1996 ring of Two off cera The Liao Lakes Polic two Police Officers. The Council previously pproved the hire of one officer effective May 1, 1996 utilising Federal COPS grant and one officer effective Juan 15, 199 to replace an officer that reeigaad in 1995. We are One of to hire two addition* a vacancy er u the other the neje dere The revenue i n savings, a 'dor estimated pct on th 19'97, portion of the beset s rar at Return to staff RSCOMIONDATION Option 1 AGENDA ITEM 5 A STAPF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 20, 1996 TOPIC 96-13-S, Arnt Construction, 2190 Phelps Road, Site Plan Review and Variance Arnt Construction is requesting a site plan review and variance to allow the construction of a 17,200 square foot warehouse/shop and 2,528 square foot office on their site at 2190 Phelps Road. The plan is to remove the existing metal building and attach the new warehouse/shop and office to the existing 9,600 square foot warehouse/shop building. Removal of the existing metal building was a condition of approval when the 9,600 square foot warehouse/shop building was construction in 1988. Setback requirements for the LI, Light Industrial Zoning District in the current Zoning Ordinance are as follows: From Streets: Residential Street: Collector/Arter.41 St: 10 feet 50 feet a Principal Building Accessory Building Parking Lot/Driveway From Residential District: 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet 75 feet Setback requirements in the LI, Light Industrial Zoning District in the proposed Zoning Ordinance are as follows: From Streets: Residential Street: 30 feet Collector/Arterial St: 50 feet Parking Lot 15 feet Front Yard: Rear Yard: Principal Building: Accessory Building: Parking Lot/Driveway: Side Yard: Principal Building Accessory Building Parking Lot/Driveway 50 feet 15 feet 10 feet 5 feet 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet Between Principal Buildings: Not less than 1/2 the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. The new office area is proposed to be located 27.7' from Phelps Road which is a residential street and 7.7' from the west property line. The realigned Otter Lake Road will abut the east side 'of this property and become the focal point, or front, of the property. Presently, Phelps Road is the front of the property and a 50' setback is required. We would recommend approval of a 20' variance that would allow the building to be setback 30' from Phelps Road. When, and if, the new zoning ordinance is approved, a 30' setback from a residential street is recommended and would, therefore, be maintained. For P & Z information, the bor-mor building located to the north of this site is set back 40' from Phelps Road. This 30' setback requirement would mean that the property owner must reduce the size of the proposed office, or warehouse/shop area by approximately 3 feet. The property owner is also requesting a variance on the east property line of 2.3'. The existing block building is located 8.1' from the property line at a slight angle. The new building will_be 7.7' from the property line, therefore another variance is necessary. We would suggest that Arnt Construction purchase an additional 2.3' from the p `operty to the west to eliminate the need for this variance. Staff has been advised that Arnt currently has a purchase option on that parcel of property. FINDINGS.OF FACT: A. That the property in questions cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed' by the official controls. The property owner could reduce the size of his building and meet the setback requirements, however, ,the ordinance is proposed to be changed to a 30' setback. B. That the plight of the landowners is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. The pending realignment of Otter Lake Road was not created by the property owner, therefore, a unique circumstance does exist. C. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. There is no economic consideration in this case. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied _by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Under similar circumstances the opportunity to apply for a variance would be given to other lands, structures, or buildings. E. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. Property values should, in fact, be increased with this proposed construction. F. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to provide for light industrial development and eliminate pole barn type construction. This will be facilitated with the proposed construction. SITE PLAN REVIEW: SETBACKS: Staff recommends a setback from Phelps Road of 30' and a setback on the west property line of 10', facilitated by the purchase of an additional 3' of property. BUILDING EXTERIOR: Rock faced concrete block is proposed to match the existing block building. BUILDING HEIGHT: The structure will be approximately 20' in height for the shop area and 14' in height for the office area. GREEN AREA: The Ordinance requires a minimum green area of 10% which will be exceeded on this plan. OFF-STREET PARKING: A total of 36 parking spaces will be provided. Handicapped spaces must be provided according to ADA Regulations. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: Access to the site will Wprovided off Phelps Road. LANDSCAPING: A landscaping plans has been reviewed by the City Forester. He would, howevfr.; suggest some modification to the plan which must be coordinated with him prior to issuance of any building permits. LIGHTING: The City's Community Service Officer must review the lighting and overall security plan for the building with the applicant prior to any construction. LOADING AND TRASH HANDLING:" A trash handling area has not been indicated on the plan and should be addressed by the applicant. This area should be properly screened from adjoining properties. SIGNS: All signage must conform to the City's Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained prior to any installation. UTILITIES, DRAINAGE AND GRADING: Utilities will be available to serve the site from the realigned Otter Lake Road. The applicant intends to construct the office building and defer construction of the shop area until that roadway is complete due to the location of their existing drain field which is adjacent to the shop area which is to be demolished. All plans will be subject to the final review and approval of the City Engineer. RCWD permits may be required for the proposed construction. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Any hazardous materials generated from the site will be subject to MPCA disposal rules and regulations. ROOF TOP HEATING/VENTILATING UNITS: not applicable In summary, staff would recommend approval of the site plan and Variance from Phelps Road with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs be escrowed to insure completion of all site improvements. The City's CSO Officer shall review the building plans prior to issuance of the building permit to insure compliance with CEPTED recommendations. 2. Landscaping of the site shall be coordinated with the City Forester prior to issuance of any building permits. 3., Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained prior to installation. A. RCWD Permits shall be obtained, if required, prior to any site grading. 5. Utility, grading and drainage plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 6. A variance for 20' on the front setback (Phelps Road) shall be approved allowing a setback of 30'. The Variance setback requested on the West property line is denied. 7. Concrete curb, gutter and bituminous paving shall be provided for all access driveways and parking areas. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item and recommended Options 1, approval of site plan with conditions outlined, and Option 2, approve variance on Phelps Road and deny variance on west property line. 1. Approve Site Plan Review with conditions outlined above. 2. Approve 20' variance on Phelps road (requiring reduction in size of office or warehouse) and Deny Variance on West property line. 3. Approve 22.3' indicated on site 4. Return to staff variance on Phelps Road (allowing building as plan) and 2.3' variance on West property line. .................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... Options 1 and 2 for further consideration. OUTLOT aa:ACORN.�� O 9no, k e, .ToP�j CREEK�D�p�� ©©�f Te ♦: ��.. CI 3 EEo, � , CDC ibi00013 ; Op_� ooaCri© calls at►p dE oitta.L.,!ily....„.„-vr,' „,.. . organ Ej lall nag, ul+6pa `d am- . ©o J ©k° P4� ihP un, � ,0 4 r texivaim 4 i ISI Elidad l nriuimm 1 CENTERVILLE z L EMT MIIMMEL1T0 ®[U LO o riFF 0 L[E % 0 TTEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 908 - - IT MyI' aktej I• CO m q 11' CONC; APRON r - m 4 910 } Al A e \ CHAIN LINK FENCE m � o EXIST. CONTOUR PROP. CONTOUR WW'IT00 SC LE: i" =20' 2 ®1003 B @MM 7285 FOXBORO CT. Woodbury Mn. 55125 I Q11TIR TUT DOS FUN YS WPM IE CM IXOrINPUT P 0YIS101 The 1 N A WILY TEEISIEIED IOUL ESKER J 0 TIE W4 pF �TITE 6 NINENT" MIR ISSi7 CO H BIT. ENT. RD. 910 NEM CONC. WALK - 1 5i `OPI ti A I II I I 01 PHELPS ROAD ryt EVE, �o 9 BI T. LOT CHAIN LINK FENCE 1-- CONC. 1 LOADING QOCK \ 00 \\ \ \ i EXISTING METAL BUILDING N W BUILDIN3 ADDITION NS HOP AREA A EL. 9i i. 0 O STORAGE TANK jy 100' 1 k kI I =IN pk 1LIM c 101101 /L 10--�__ / QVERGREENS (II��1I • \y�SKIMEI 'a." // 906--' ....„<„,/// %js/ / 15JRCP� 900• / 107.11• — ' , /�-C �- c:=7,=='-'""• /.--- 904 '---/- ''•-'%'---"---- ...- -,..„.-.---- ":,..- - -- ..;.....-...--..- :.---.•!.'... -.........../......__..,_-...._...%...",- ...-.- .:..' ','.-:.. ..-.......--,.--...- ,-:":" .......--...- .-.. -:-...-.% ......"...-.-.•.-:.•--•:- ":"-:.- ..!-.- ._-..-...-...- ."-_-- -;--"--.-- - "'""5"' -:.;...--- -R7-A- %'RAP �—" %i i 90 / i - viii//:„/, ii- • --. Vij%/�—' ;-- - — EX I ST. CONTOUR PROP. CONTOUR ®al1W tJ WCLOJ®U7 0 7285 FOXBORO CT. Woodbury Mn. 55125 pam� m m44Wmm10 mm mm. MTTOMM 4 0 U M BUILDING ADDITION PLAN n®©1I® SCALE: 1' =30' I ®RIR NIT 11111 IUM MSS RUM R 1R A 7. 1R OI11ELT 91FATIN71 Mo TAT 1 Mt 3 SILT RESISIMID 6 171 1711E 6 OIMt3318 TIE UM TLMI, 11061 RAN UM% MEN O mfT D mm fIFO f E MITE SET BACK MEASUREMENTS AS NOTED EXIST. BLOCK BUILDING NEW BLD. ADM./ EXIST. METAL BUILDING mmwUw SCALE: 1 •30' RIM 4124490 60' AGENDA ITEMS B STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 20, 1996 TOPIC 96-14-S, Lino Lakes Family Dentistry, 6691 Blue Heron Drive, Site Plan Review/Conditional Use Permit, and Variance Lino Lakes Family Dentistry is requesting a site plan review and conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 3,874 square foot office building on Outlot A of Rice Lake Estates. In 1985, when the property was platted, this Outlot was Zoned Neighborhood Business (NB) and set aside for some future commercial development. Professional Offices are permitted in this Zoning District with a Conditional Use Permit. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Variance that would allow the building to be located 28' from an adjacent residential district - the Ordinance requires a setback of 35'. The proposed structure has been designed to fit into the general character of the existing neighborhood. Access will be provided off Blue Heron Drive ant-zoreening provided for the adjacent residence. According to the zoning Ord hence, a - setba< ntial district is requiredin the NB Zonii d structure indicatesti . a setback of 28' f dential district, therefbre, a Variance oy ud approval of the Variance s of Fact: e'property in question cannot be put to a reasonable us nder conditions allowed by the official controls. A building' could be constructed on the site and meet, the setback reqtairmaents, however, the applicant has determined that the s.i,erequested is a minim for their intended use. 3,874 square feet its not a large structure and therere is an odd shape to the existing lot. 35' from any strict. The the adjoining required. B. That the plight of the landowners is due to circumstances unite to his property not created by the land owner. The property in question is an odd shaped lot calling for unique design considerations. Additionally there is a large ponding/wetland area to the rear which further restricts design. C. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the proper exists Under the teras of the ordinance. The hardship in this case appears to he the shape and configuration of the lot, not an economic consideration. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the 'same district. We would afford any applicant the option of applying for a variance under similar circumstances. E. That the proposed action will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. A 7' variance should not impair property values in the neighborhood. The proposed variance is actually adjacent to a large wetland platted as an outlot, not a parcel of property in private ownership. F. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to maintain a larger setback between a business use and a residential use. The proposed variance is adjacent to a large wetland area, not an individual residence, therefore the spirit and intent of the ordinance is maintained. SITE PLAN REVIEW: SETBACKS: The proposed structure will be located toward the rear of the lot 40' from Hodgson Road and 28' from the interior side property line. A variance of 7' is required for this 28' setback as 35' is required by Code. The front and rear setbacks will be within the requirements of the Code. The parking area is setback 5' from the side property line and 15' from Blue Heron Drive and Hodgson Road as required Iy Code. BUILDING EXTERIOR: The building exterior will consist of aluminum siding, clad windows and asphalt shingles. The design of the structure is intended to blend with the residential character of the immediate vicinity. BUILDING HEIGHT: The structure will be approximately 25' in height, 30' is the maximum height allowed in the NB Zoning District. GREEN AREA: The Ordinance requires a minimum green area of 35%, 56% of green area will be provided with this site plan. OFF-STREET PARKING: A total of 36 parking spaces, including two (2) handicapped, will be provided on the site. The majority of these spaces are provided in an angle fashion. The Ordinance requires a minimum of 32 spaces. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: Access to the site will be provided by two (2) entrance drives off Blue Heron Drive. Due to the unusual shape of the lot, the City Engineer has determined that this arrangement is acceptable. LANDSCAPING: A landscaping plans has been reviewed by the City Forester and found to be acceptable. He would, however, request a final review and discussion with the applicant concerning the grasses and wild flower area being provided on the rear of the lot. A tree preservation plan has also been provided, however, the majority of the existing trees on the site are scrub cottonwood trees and will be removed. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication will not be required in this case as there is no subdivision of the site. We would, however, recommend that the applicant be required to grade and rock a pedestrian trail, to City specifications, within the right-of-way of Hodgson Road, the length of the property. This work shall be coordinated with the City Forester and MnDOT. LIGHTING: The City's Community Service Officer should review the lighting and overall security plan for the building with the applicant prior to any construction. LOADING AND TRASH HANDLING: No loading area has been provided due to the nature of the business. Trash handling will be via residential containers located on the west side of the building. This area should be property screened from -the adjoining properties. SIGNS: All signage must conform to the City's Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained prior to any installation. The existing monument marker is planned to be removed. UTILITIES, DRAINAGE AND GRADING: Utilities are available to serve the site off Grey Heron Drive. Plans are subject to the final review and approval of the City Engineer. RCWD permits will also be required for the drainage and grading of the site. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Any hazardous materials generated from the site will be subject to MPCA disposal rules and regulations. r7- ROOF "ROOF TOP HEATING/VENTILATING UNITS: not applicable In summary, staff would recommend approval of the site plan, conditional use permit to allow the professional building, and variance for 7' on the interior side setback with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs be escrowed to insure completion of all site improvements. The City's CSO Officer shall review the building plans prior to issuance of the building permit to insure compliance with CPTED recommendations. 2. A pedestrian trail shall be graded and rocked, to City Specifications, along the Hodgson Road side of the property. This trail work shall be coordinated with the 'City Forester and MnDOT. 3. Landscaping of the site shall be coordinated with the City Forester. 4. Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained prior to installation. 5. A detail of the proposed fencing on the west property line shall be provided prior to City Council Review. 6. RCWD Permits shall be obtained, if required, prior to any site grading. 7. Utility, grading and drainage plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 8. A variance for 7' on the interior side setback line shall be approved allowing a setback of 28'. The Planning & Zoning Board held a Public Hearing at their June 12, 1996 meeting to discuss this item. Residents from the immediate area were present and voiced concern regarding the entrance drives off Blue Heron Drive. The City Engineer explained that permits from MnDot for access off Hodgson Road would be near impossible to obtain. After some discussion and general consensus from the residents in the area that this was an acceptable use of the site, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval with the conditions outlined above. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Site Plan/Conditional Use Permit/and Variance with conditions outlined above. 2. Approve Site Plan/Conditional Use Permit and required building to be setback 30' on the interior lot line. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. COMMENDATION Option 1 IV* ..tiVVIrt[lCiattydricr7 • NYE INFORNADON SITE AREA 4Ezia.5750. FT. /UILABA]AREA XXI W COM WALK 172.2 90. FT. BRUT PAYING 103 30 Q. FT TOTAL HAND SURF NOTS2 so. FT. GREEN SPACE 58.48% EMPLOYEES PARKAVO RECO SPACES SPACES PROVIDED NAApr4P2 B STA34 TOTAL x SPACES STALL SCE 84X 18-0 8 49 O —�M �'��kTf—t�i�FtV4f Y NO. 49 (H0BCSON 9rrw+or�asslw�.oiwRa/�r�_�iw10 "; 1 4 ,X • • • • • • ✓f_ //te rem7r7 • N 4532'29_8.104.885 NT.vr » 64,111 Igr prIr Igr 1r NV lir ,fi � LorIN PILs 04-44 ♦ • ♦ / • • — S 45.32.29E 110.00 — S 45'32'29" E 130.00 a R1 8 SITE PLAN 1% z 0 J 4 0 0. 0. 4 U COMMWr aavn0 1 1 1 II 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1. 1 1 1 1 11 11 ruing 111/11 0 0 0 LINO LAMM OFAi<r e NORTH ELEVATION i,c -l• WEST ELEVATION MT Y ALLM T404 DOLOR el • TRIPLE T ALUM SIDGU6. COLOR •2 ALEC LOWERS PLASHM6. DOLOR 41 ALUM BEAM. COLOR M COLUMN!. SOUTH ELEVATION .3 _.,.-.L.,DSSJ 1- -•• 4: .4: 13 4 ALUM TRG4 COLORII FLOOR PLAN SOFFIT 4 2. FACIA COLOR 11 • ALUM TRIM. COLOR �I • ALUM SIDING. COLOR 45 CLAD ?INDOYO AEPHALT 9HW64 OPTIMAL. HI61l.I6HT SAND CURVED. ALUM OEM. COLOR « J CONC. col.UAri^� DECORATIVE, BEAM EAST ELEVATION REST [LZVATION J z 0 J 4 ce0 n. 4 } 66 0411000 1 1 1 .1 II 1I 1 1 1 1 1 1 :i1111111i II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1I 1' 1 1 1 1 1 psi 0 0 Q LAMS �L�y�� c 4a .r CO6111l1RY 1 1 11,711111111 111 I Sig/ IIISM2111 Kaaba roll pliusli II 11 11 II 11 1 1 1 �1 II 11 1� 1 1 1 1 I 11 o GRADING PLAN 1•- -D J z 0 J 4 0 a. 0. 4 ORMANOY CHICIIMD is 1 11 11 1111. 1� 1 RIK 1 1 PARK 1 •11•.3 • M1r• SAW TIM MAIM uM••MW OMNI 91••O mar ilk BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY OF OUTLOT A, RICE LAKE ESTATES LOCATED IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 30, T31 N, R22W, \ CITY OF LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA LEGEND 4 , ..00• Sart rvKO NNW uM me Mawr •M.Ir UM• 4— •MMY. 430. COMM MOM MOIWCT 10 %ENVY M11 SC111ACX OCOIBaLD1/S. INCLUDING POSSIBLE 11E1W0 SC1-Af1L a4 a4 1113 5111•aar • w!J 0 T i 1 Ape MAWS 311•21 SAM Re 0•100. sawn* MART 000R•1AR Mss OW SIA101•10W y4— - r! wi1wTW nem rM r AMA MORI LT••MAn • - sR1am • . 103.1_ Y.• 1w 0OA114 asSWAIM NOWOM 3•0 +Aro+o w MW. 00 Oram MUM . 1 .car SETBACK REQUIREMENTS 1•Mft w ••••••••• __ MKT MM*" OMR sRT 02240011 w MOM MOS a 1 1 Mon waft RMT Rr M w RT RTOM il•R• R0 M M RT OI WO MI MO MOO UN 11 MD UCWIR art MAIM OF Ye WO. Oft IMO Mall 1000.10X., 7 I r COMWOOR • Kw OTYIRR NUM / CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 5••r 1-.•0.21 Al O •.T / • / TOrr 000 M M�MMOOYI ` \ 127I L r S1tRO/R .R .1L ••••1010.Mw a 301-11•1 / S emu *J.• LOT 1, BLOC( 3, ?• MAI / 42 • / •cb / / \ 400E / v / \1 / =KKR IMO sue. nu won- •ors www' / \ wo MwAr • \ wO swat • Mw.Mn.Y 1. cart MO M. moor 044.44-0.401 wom MC. IIPUrammw um 1w A ..• 011A0 110.210 11L IA1• 1.••••• MOM M 1A•• Of 5r nAir v u•m. YAM Ow . N Men O IM Inv I mos KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. LAND SURVEYING • ENGINEERING MMSINUoc 0RnCE ►ANA 2172 4—. SN. STC 130 ST. N1•. MINNESOTA 11151 012-431-030, TAM 012_431_.401 Il111 96-0G-NSI ware, ALL CEDAR 70 BE PI Olt BETTER. 5l -s al -3 X X6 GEAR SLA'S IX GEAR RAIL 4X4 GEAR PO NOTE: ALL c1EAR TO BE #1 OR BETTER, 75 E AR AIL 4X4 GEAR PO NOTE: ALL c1EAR TO BE #1 OR BETTER, 75 AGENDA ITEM 5C , STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: 6/20/96 TOPIC: EAM, 4th Avenue, Site Plea Review BACKGQUND: CNH Architectshas submitted a site plan review package for Emergency Maintenance Apparatus (EAM). EAM would like to construct a 5,250 -square foot building with 5,600 square feet of fie expansion area on 4th Avenue next to the K$osner-Goertz building in the ApoIlo Business Park. The building will consist of office, warehousing area, and repair bays. The proposed site is approximately one acre in size is zoned General Industrial, and is stint as industrial on the city's Land Uian. customizes and upgrades emergency apparatus for fire Centennial Fire District, and is.abutor for dem and valves. They have y EAM has requested that the driveway be moved farther to t Avenue to better a omc date vehicles driving into the work Dave Ahrens reviewed the site plan and agreed the new driveway was an Improvenient SITE PLAN REVIEW: SETBACKS: The building is proposed to be constructed 60 feet back frc n 4th Avenue. The required setback from a collector or arterial street is 5D feet. BUILDING EXTERIOR: The proposed construction is rock face concrete block, with accent colored biotic striping. It will be compatible with other -buildings in the business park. The east side of the building will be smooth block as future expansion is planned for that area. BUILDING HEIGHT: The building will be 18 feet clear in height. GREEN AREA: A minimum green area of 10% is required by the Zoning Ordinance. This will be met with the proposed site plan and future expansion area. OFF-STREET PARKING: Eight parking stalls will be provided and include one handicapped van space. The proposed construction based on the number of employees actually requires six. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: One 26 -foot wide access drive off of 4th Avenue is indicated on the site plan. Since there will be no access to Apollo Drive, the drive is not subject to review by Anoka County. The final driveway location is subject to review by the city engineer before issuance of a building permit. LANDSCAPING: The landscaping plan submitted shows a variety of decorative trees and shrubs along 4th Avenue and in front of the building, plus several pine trees to be used for screening the parking area from 4th Avenue. The Community Service Officer has recommended the pines be replaced with decorative trees so that the area is not totally screened from view. LIGHTING: A detailed lighting plan was not submitted. We would recommend that a plan be provided and reviewed by our Community Service Officer to ensure compliance with CPTEI5 commendations prior to issuance of the building permit. LOADING AND TRASH HANDLING: The trash handling area was not included on the site plan. It is proposed to be located and screened on the northeast side of the building on the concrete pad. SIGNS: All signage must conform with the city Sign Ordinance. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE: Plans for utilities, drainage and site grading will be subject to review and approval by the city engineer. Utilities will be available to serve this site. The RCWD must also review and approve drainage, ponding, and grading plans. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: No hazardous materials are used on the site. An underground storage tank shown on the site plan contains water for testing equipment. ROOF TOP HEATINGNENTILATING UNITS: No roof top units are involved in this construction project. Staff would recommend approval of this site plan review with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction on the site. The building permit shall include a deposit of 1% of construction costs to ensure completion of all site improvements. 2. The applicant sign a development agreement and post financial guarantees as specified by the city prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. The city engineer shall review and approve the grading, utility and drainage plans. 4. The parking area shall be supplied with adequate handicapped spaces as provided by the ADA Rules and Regulations. 5. Permits be obtained from the RCWD for grading and on-site ponding, if required. 6. Signage comply with the City Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained. 7. Concrete curb, gutter and bituminous paving shall be provided for all access driveways and parking areas. Curb and gutter shall not be required on the concrete pad on the east side of the building in the proposed expansion area. 8. The contractor shall review final construction documents with the Community Service officer to ensure compliance with CPTED recommendations. The P & Z recommended apprrat of the site and building plan with the conditions outlined above. OPTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of the site plan review with conditions outlined above. 2. Retum to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 J 21111111 13 lz 0 9 1 9 .4-"r4 aserdPv,P:ii 71) ruow218-ry zlhsee,fii 10 Nattn1Q9Pil P Ti -can : • IM.41 ra , • • !iiM-It.#41f1 tiit';' 41443 r..17:13 Zkirkl -'4:6;d6 i'(4.14:411i4PR:i741111:reCZ • 11711‘1.44445W14: -PttT e2riTinducaQ rwa4mPrMlor. ii•ii immARAIIIIIII 12:1.Jus;v1 ,Ii#._,0P 1 .. wad; '21 ,fert s:9 NI aft1.11 El'.4 ,N. / cr ratt al ,60,. ar MVO 6,1 m 70- . ‘ ,.,._ _.. .,....1;:itt co glIrMt Mit il .:. . -_,.. „,.. -,.. ,cet; Fr.,L.!cd -t/ .:-..- gull La11111111211. 'L #3 :Immo -_,#,7 E3r4G-#- EO MARSHAN LAK 9 captszaF„, FAT 151 PRAp ti • ,yr ,;,,,//l,/////l,/,,;r,///;!!!/!/1,;,;,,,/l1LL/1111/,;.;d;,SJ ;i,✓l;,%/,/!///;;,;,,,, --77-- -- - EMERGENCY -APPARATUS ___ -i_r-t L' . , . I . .III ! .T-1. T"Ti �T-L1 ,. JII 1 i1 �ANiso MN L .! ' TT -T -i Mani _ffloamminnummas T —r•— 1 11111 I .dnr 27,1 all •— —r Saha-/ATIG WEST Fl FVATIGN RE..eIE0 tent ruwes 03.001, ROCK r,a u.taere stat 00NIC__TIM ROM FACE: 00104[1t IVO( A tekl* can - FACE K.4lTe MOM =I 52-fEMATIG SOUTH F FVATION Ar.ZNr MAW .gat Ma tLWFOe attar Atilt FACE “.. Cre KRA CAMEO Yetrf R7UT PAM "Mt Acte' ranm .CER FA¢ twraCre ICOR eA+asv.r . era +a v w ataew cane. CONN: 9529 5/22/96 EMERGENCY APPARATUS 0 5:1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS U Cr) 5 - -: - t•mismN r• t•IIMMIIIIMINIIMII•I•I•NraallallIIIIINI/a ' t -Y I I mama -7 NI•��I•�M�����=I•t•t•���p L' dam. �� I _ f; I l ... - _ _ .r._,...l_.,_,._ Ell L1_- --- - r- T -rTL•^ _____ U 1) O= __ O O O O O O ..L_ O O 0 -y Tom_ A =I 52-fEMATIG SOUTH F FVATION Ar.ZNr MAW .gat Ma tLWFOe attar Atilt FACE “.. Cre KRA CAMEO Yetrf R7UT PAM "Mt Acte' ranm .CER FA¢ twraCre ICOR eA+asv.r . era +a v w ataew cane. CONN: 9529 5/22/96 EMERGENCY APPARATUS 0 5:1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS U Cr) 5 ,T1 T 74 .;01EMATI6: FLOOR FLAN xZ 1/4- - t-0 COUN:9629 5/22/96 EMERGENCY APPARATU 14 � � z o� FLOOR PUN U v) 9 5 !nil' 1 MEN O ICE �) 11) 10 W. p 11 ,..T. STOCK ROOM lila Mull, :IR1111ll:l.lfl'II.i 1111 1 ill I; 11 ill 41111ii.144.61 f A R Iff f ir- REPAIR HAYS J f-0 C-0 r 1 -I—I Fll Cd YYM I !-0 1 iii Kd YYY I�I !d I Cd I V i ,,,YYY AAA"' ...YYY AAM" 711 f 74 .;01EMATI6: FLOOR FLAN xZ 1/4- - t-0 COUN:9629 5/22/96 EMERGENCY APPARATU 14 � � z o� FLOOR PUN U v) 9 5 STAFF ORIG DATE: 6120196 TOPIC: Blue Heron Il, Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review AGENDA ITEM 5D Kay Wyland BACKGROUND: The Blue Heron II project involves the construction of a 35,000 -square foot building just west of the newly constructed Blue Heron Phase I building. It will contain 11,600 square feet of office space and 23,400, square feet of warehouse space. The property is located in the Apollo Business Center which is zoned Light Industrial. Office and warehousing are permitted uses within this zoning district. , It is the developer's intent to offer space for rent in 3,500 squa A dock area is provided to access the warehousing portion of. phase also requires a minor subdivision and site plan review. re foot increments. building. This SITE AND BUILDING P1 SETBA :The buildir s propo +d to be cons ruc ted Give, whlc r meets the required 'setback from an arterial or ooh BUILDII G: TENIOR: The proposed bt tiding exterior is rock f bre design to matt i the construction used in Pim I BUILDING I IIT The office and warehouse area will be KFC GREEN AREA. A minimum of 109 green area is required by thi ©rdinar. The site plan shows a 16% green area. OFF-STREET PARKING: 95 parking stalls plus four van handicapped stalls indicated on the site plan. This meets the ADA requirements for handicapped vehicles, and exceeds the number of parkirva spaces required by the catty. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: A 40 -foot shared access drive with Blue Heron Phase 1 is indicated on the site plan. This is in compliance with Anoka County requirements on Apollo Drive. The drive is subject to review and approval by Anoka County. ;A shared driveway agreement will be required. DSCAPING: A landscaping plan has been submitted which indicates a number of Chinese lilac, Norway maples, ash, spruce and other ornamental 7d OFF-STREET PARKING: 95 parking stalls plus four van handicapped stalls are indicated on the site plan. This meets the ADA requirements for handicapped vehicles, and exceeds the number of parking spaces required by the city. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: A 40 -foot shared access drive with Blue Heron Phase I is indicated on the site plan. This is in compliance with Anoka County requirements on Apollo Drive. The drive is subject to review and approval by Anoka County. A shared driveway agreement will be required. • LANDSCAPING: A landscaping plan has been submitted which indicates a number of Chinese lilac, Norway maples, ash, spruce and other ornamental shrubbery. All sod and planting areas are to have water irrigation systems. We recommend the landscaping on the southwest corner be revised to ensure compliance with CEPTED recommendations. LIGHTING: A lighting plan was not submitted with the site plan. We recommend that a plan be provided and reviewed by our Community Service Officer to ensure compliance with CEPTED recommendations prior to issuance of the building permit. LOADING AND TRASH HANDLING: All exterior trash is to be stored in 7 -foot high masonry enclosures thatt6Ich the exterior of the building. SIGNS: All signage must conform to the city Sign Ordinance. UTILITIES, DRAINAGE AND GRADING: Plans for utilities, drainage and site grading will be subject to review and approval by the city engineer. Utilities will be available to serve this site. The RCWD must also review and approve drainage, ponding, and grading plans, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Proper storage and disposal of any hazardous materials generated on the site must be ensured by the developer. ROOF TOP HEATINGNENTILATING UNITS: All roof top HVAC units are to be screened with standing seam metal panels. Staff would recommend approval of this site plan review with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction on the site. The building permit shall include a deposit of 1% of construction costs to ensure completion of all site improvements. 2. The applicant sign a development agreement and post financial guarantees as specified by the city prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. The city engineer shall review and approve the grading, utility and drainage plans. 4. The parking area shall be supplied with adequate handicapped spaces as provided by the ADA Rules and Regulations. 10. A shared driveway agreement be included in the development contract. 11. The contractor shall review final construction documents with the Community Service officer to ensure compliance with CEPTED recommendations. The P & Z has reviewed this site plan and minor subdivision and recommended approval with the conditions outlined above. OPTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of the site plan review with conditions outlined above. 2. Recommend approval of the minor subdivision as submitted. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Options 1 and 2 gee / rw'g c • REHABILITATIO 13 43E11 ;523:,1?E k lat 1313:131.11161agt CIP ILA ' ruts MARS J'....idgagg 11$ ED , RN . ,,e,v, j*IIIIEII Mt malerdti3t,p• ila Tann MEN kvsn a7,71).1.65,11i 1E3E0 amEas roil.,63,,titintr E Fsusru• • Per"' 411.111M IIITION go= Ems LT • eiVAUga-921P %MEE IICION P,-.4i0.gT171 Vs= WORM 1)114tril a is W103 . mann KIM i41" liCriP, tztrivm 1 iiii 61111SM FC:AtiLd.'.6;a6 alq ri a ric MAI repyt;p4,-.F.:4,! pnri Ems :KT. riponpuz . a 11631 wk;170,:Z3M • EN !I 4. ... ' Ma 1 s . O 11410116 SETBACK LOCATION MAP PROPOSED BLUE HERON 11 PROJ ECT SITE SITE PLAN SCALE 1' - 40'-0" • JARTH NOTES. 1.) ALL EXTE NCR TRASH TO BE 6TOBED IN TAO' MOH MASONRY E30.06UIES TO MATCH BUILDING 0) ALL RODE TOP HVAC UNITS TO BE SOPEENED WITH .STN10NO6@N4 METAL PANELS 3.) BIT PAV16070 8E AS F0-1.OW6 6' CLASS 8 CRUSHED GRAVEL B CN APPROVED SUB ONCE 7 BITUMINOUS MAT 1 16. 8111MINOU6 WEAR COURSE PLANT SCHEDULE MIRK PLANT NESE A L9 PoC110M CMIEW3 NORWAY MARE ACERPLATANDIOESTOW. C MAOEBON ASH PRNCNI3 PEN�>43•ILVAMCA LAN:E0IATA PIICEA L1NENNSSAiA E E trzpeTgqMLUIYWE6IS��TRS P 1918P636eMPI063ALU5 FLUMOSA) "ME WATBRRR1RIGA¶ONTlY3TEM63TD NAVE OMB BLUE HERON LTD 1500 JACKSON 8T NE 3.O NNEAOQU8, MN 55413 VOICE 7886840 FAX 789 0608 SIZE ROOT OTY 13 2 12 11 386 2117 388 2117 883 e' 888 6' BE 11 338 CONTRACTOR RIVER WOODS DEVELOPMENT CORP 1500 JACKSON ST N.E. SONMEAP0Il$3/N 55413 VOICE 7886880 FAX 788 0608 42 ARCHITECT CHARLES J. RADLOFF ARCHITECT 9979 VALLEY VIEW RD SUITE #256 EDEN PRAI0IE, 1,114 55344 VOICE 9411661 FAX 941 5240 SITE DATA ZONING LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SITE AREA 3.1 ACRES GREEN AREA 21,150 SQ FT 1696 CODE 1994 UBC OCCUPANCY 8/5/3 CONSTRUCTION TYPE V FIRE PROTECTION AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM BUILDING AREA 35,000 SQ FT OFFICE 11,600 SQ FT WAREHOUSE 23,400 SQ FT PARKING 95 CARS 4 VAN AC HC TOTAL 99 CARS PROJECT BLUE HERON OFFICE SHOWROOM WAREHOUSE INTERSTATE 35W APOLLO DRIVE LINO LASES, MN SHEET DATA REVISIONS SHEET TITLE 1 2 SHEET NUMBER j1 SOUTH ELEVATION PHASE II NORTH ELEVATION ni EAST ELEVATION Niif ill I I. • 120111 I Si i 'l I Ir B•..i F ❑ rA1111111Ik I d'' iiN NHF 4 k IINII wises r tl% 1. WEST ELEVATION (B) c) Q Y T Y Y T T 1 ia -v I, wo �` �o- w.v i r+p wa wo ry 1 w rre T i r r' r 5 UNIT9 5 I I 1 I I I UNIT 10 T 1 I I UNIT1 :, UNIT2 e I I I III II UNIT3 e iI I I I i I I I I UNIT4 UNIT {Ir T e5 I J - UNIT 5 i � I UNIT7 I UNITS IT i J_ , I I `l J.._____ I r— --1 ii I* T iT VI1 III J ' J •l i I J `l. I 1 wi�aur.w. . i a.lcewru 1 J A'l 1 _ `i— i i I i i I I I I I I I i FLOOR PLAN NORTH =IR BLUE HERON LTD 15001ACKSON ST N.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 VOICE 7886840 FAX7890608 PROPOSED BLUE HERON 11 PROJECT CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT RIVER WOODS CHARLES J. RADLOFF DEVELOPMENT 1500 JACKSOTTS('f TlT. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 53413 VOICE 788 6840 FAX 7890608 ARCHITECT 9979 VALLEY VIEW RD SUITE 6256 EDEN PRAIRIE. MN 35344 VOICE 9411667 FAX 941 5240 PROJECT BLUE HERON OFFICE SHOWROOM WAREHOUSE INTERSTATE 35W APOLLO DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN SHEET DATA REVISIONS SHEET TITLE 2 of 2 SHEET NUMBER AGENDA ITEM C STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 20, 1996 TOPIC 96-17-P, Alan Donat, 8134 Rondeau Drive East, Minor Subdivision Mr. Alan Dona t of 8124 Rondeau Drive East has requested a minor subdivision to allow a 16.76 acre parcel to be split into two. He has an existing home which will remain on 6.75 acres and will be creating an additional building site of 10.01 acres for future development. Access for both parcels will be off Rondeau Lake Road. The property is Zoned Rural and indicated as such on the City's Land Use Map. As the P & Z is aware, Ordinance No. 93-18 allows a property construction prior to July of 1992 to reduce the homesite to a minimum of one acre provided the balance of the site is 10 acres or more. Staff has reviewed the request and would recommend approval with the condition that a $500 jerk Dedication Fee be required for the 12 acre parcel and that this fee be collected prior to recording of the subdivision with the County. The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed this item 1996 meeting and recended approval with the p reqUiresent. 1. Approve minor subdivision with Park Dedica 2. Return to staff for further consideration. Option 1 40, ?`33? 9031 3 ---262. (XIS7IN0 FENCE• 9 � - 'x -424.00--- /?/ 5 8B / ?36590 SUBS/V/SIO N /_ (/ T PARCEL "B" Gross Area= 434,949 Sq. Ft. 10.01 Acres >L'4�IAT'26,. -N89° 54'/2"W �0y t • h`O ,;NUMBER I P1 RCEL "A" Gross Area = 294,004 Sq. Ft. 6.75 Acres 400.69 - -- - 365.90---cr" !VIED METAL BC 04. M ---N 89°54' /2"W 6/4./0--- --- 427.9/--- ---669.87--- 375.00 S89°54'/2V"E /00 r.20'\N \N \� O �\o 'ROPOSED w\c� DRAINAGE EASEMENT ti h r ✓ O SWAMP N eN89°54'/2"W 375.04--- 33.00 ' � ,„ NOQ °52'40 E a w\ r- `- 50. O ---300.00--- if M S I S f --"N 89°54'/2"W /044.9/--= STREE 0N89°54'/2"W 6.99 ANOKA COUNTY ' CAST IRONMONUMENT1 (WITNESS CORNER) M"i h� o M O 375.04 EAST SOUTH L/NE LOT 3 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 49 REV/SED (SOUTH LINE NW //4 - SW//4 SECT/ON 2) AGENDA ITEM 5 F STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wy1and DATE June 20, 1996 TOPIC 96-18-P, Molly & Jim Jungbauer, 2207 Deerpass Trail, Minor Subdivision Mr. and Mrs. Jungbauer are requesting a minor subdivision to, add 5' to their property from the adjoining property. The purpose of this minor subdivision is to correct the existing encroachment on the east side of their property of a retaining wall and stairway, establish a minimum 51 setback for the existing decking, and eliminate future mortgage and/or resale problems. The property is Zoned Rural Executive and indicated as Rural on the City's Land Use Plan. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 5' on the side for any decking. The minimum lot area in a rural district is 10 acres, however, this area was platted prior to the 10 acre rule and the average lot area on the north side of Deerpass Trail is 11,500 square feet with a lot width of 70'. The Jungbauer property is 70 x 165 and the property to the east (a double lot) is 140 x 165 fgr:23, 000 sq. ft. The Jungbauer residence was constructed in 1986 with an addition in 1988. I believe it was some time after '88 that the decking was added by a previous property owner. When the home was originally constructed the site included two lots although they were not legally joined. The owner aubseequuently lost title to the adjacent property. slitting 5' from the ad j oirti, double lot A0111dth from 140' to 135'. Hoiever, a setback of lad -22 ew property line and the existing °garage will be mai Code requires a setback of 5' On the garage. Staff has reviewed this request and would recommend approval. Adding 5' to the Jungbauer property will eliminate an existing encroachment, maintain or exceed the required setback for the decking, and eliminate future problems with resale or refinancing of the property. The adjoining property owner has agreed to this subdivision and will be transferring title of the 5' to the Jungbauer's if the subdivision is approved. We would require that this 5' be attached to the Jungbauer's existing property. The Planning & Zoning Board have reviewed this item and recommended approval. At the P & Z meeting, Mr. Jungbauer requested that his application fee of $250 be refunded as the setback problem was not of his making, he is merely correcting an existing problem. The P & Z recommended that the application fee be refunded. However, staff would discourage this practice. OPTIONS 1. Approve minor subdivision as requested with the condition that the westerly 5' of Lot 24 be added to the legal description of Lot 23, that the park dedication requirement be waived and that the $250 application fee be retained by the City. 2. Approve minor subdivision as requested with the condition that the westerly 5' of Lot 24 be added to the legal description of Lot 23, that the park dedication requirement be waived and that the $250 application fee be returned to the applicant. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. COMMENI?AT .................................. .................................. Option 1 'Y �y X: C 94, , 4 i nAUS " 70 712 1, I 24 1St; 14 'zs' "\- (3) CV) 70 70 P A,S S IRML 100 /00 70 27 28 `1. (4) ile 70 /00 /00 22 2/ (/9) Og.) Arr /00 6t) 7/ 20 , /00 1/ ‘‘.1 (it) k ,\01 /9 /00 .1 /01 %A? •tt tr.•44' A2 •f, „ f; irc '44 v.. /00 /8(p) /00 - I 1 ...),..., 4 /7 a /6 ,-,, a .4 "%st, \'-*A — - /00 /3 '7 0/ a "--f4 -074 4fty, (10 (29) 4., 4 I, 4. 4 ':i 30 .. IV 7 4. ,4 / 111 \ \ - \ 61 N 41 / 11 . / : '4 : A / ' \ \ \ z / • A A / ; AN / /7.14/ /iir\ /ZZ ‘ • i N.74, 29 (A) L, A 1( ,re• • A VI 6 4, r /7! "4"-Jk7 s 01) (1) 14 # 'V /2 (A) / CEN R SEC. 6 4"5-1 IL /Z/49 3 • 1. --• --. . 9..r CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY *00.51 ,0Mt70ndJ.nJngh•u.r 2207 neer Waite deer Lake, Mlee.eot. 10110 68PVtY 0211.0t 011file .Mt el cccccc 1n the Officaccordinto the lot e of theCounty Sec o01.1."Mote County, N*W"•ot.. Subject to .....ante of record. More •1re fox*. l.rsx. 01.2 61..64 ...Le lies Let U' •' .._ 66' e. 591 2j" W 70.00 24 3/6` 31 10 - . **TM LIM1 7 22 (0/ 0 . 2.d) °r- U .4018- _Z 025 l4 barb." .Ir. fence --_ Y--._ _ _ _ ''-110148 LIME 1e 1/4 - 111 1/4 b Tlox_ Lbo. n 401.4 1 Blurt.11r 111ILtI_ 21 4 s . A.B. 81r0maty Load Surv0501 1340 010. 011011 730 Oa..v/31e 01400.{0 013-/43-040 5 Lot 1 a t .. cm.x.rli+i 40.4 • 20.1 Alr /Q��J�Jt tf Can 01.014 23 1.24, 2- oatU U: mo o� r pl .o 10 10 lee 3201 beer 00.ITroll ,heads 'Z 4. 4600.-220.0 - 3" 7 N89•0820'We • Go .t.n 111 ILII 69.71 -4. 00r1sTl•rs era ea Mete4e2".Mt" 1.0. Or 0000 1614 Let 33 e xcept as .hove 0.r.... ▪ l. parcel vas *errand Masa elo0 to, 10.04 .M0u04.Lotl00 Ler Let* 3340 4• maU 22 to, feed am amumeate for Let. 30-24 Tl. 11,2es 4.1101std 40 the 'OUtb W t!. M.t 2/01. of to, &e 1/4-00 1/44 aro "lave graphically ..ly 0404 Indicateo, a& td 040 *02"to Indicate tmad 1 plot 4..erlptl01 mato, the 00144.01 1.!000.1 ea for - & ectl00 68-3141 Area to, Moto County 0.4.05014 4 X 1 &Gales 1 10011 • 10 Feet .4 0 0 10 /0 00110 M root .10.11'W0 thoam ars assume. • 0.00010 0100 p15. 00000..1 1.504 • O.0Otee /yea PIP. 000u000t 002 o 2.wts..tttlty/00"04 polo ' .•••-t5- O.eates NUMB .tree ._-64.04 a... ..1. I01 • 233 M 4311 6.1.11.& µd0. libber ..te10104 0.11. .0rt00." Deer Pass o Trail (Lakeview r 30' MUM.. surface Avenue) \ 24 0 0 T.1. 0o. • 30 00 „� Lot 22 (4, 4 7:11 ' O OP 0 1 Mreay teat this server. plea U r.Mr% e01 prepared b1 se r ed.r ee /treat wp.0v10/01 .d that 1 am • duly 1141.004 Lad Servos. miler to, Lees a to, 0142. d Nt01...t.. Sigma this t� 4ee d 04..•0 .., 1081 A.A. by OoMrt-3. Str"..q. 20 MIw0.ta &lema.. 7.. 14047 00.1004 8.00/00 *44 0' 0.40.0 173-06832 I.M. 36-31-43 STAPP ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC AGENDA ITEMS Mary Kay Nyland June 6, 1996 96-19-P, Richard Carlson, 7932 Lake Drive, Minor Subdivision Mr. Richard Carlson has purchased the His and Her Barber & Beauty Shop at 7932 Lake Drive and plans to operate a Rental Equipment Business. The property is located within the Central Business Zoning District and indicated as Business on the City's Land Use Map. The CB District has no minimum requirements for lot width, depth or area. The property is approximately .62 acres in size. There are no sewer and water utilities to serve the area. The applicant is requesting a minor subdivision to add an 80 x 135' (Tract B) parcel to the existing 164+ x 135' (Tract A) parcel from an existing 19 acre (Tract C) parcel. Tract B and C are currently zoned rural -executive. Staff originally recommended approval of this minor subdivision to the Planning and Zoning Board with the following conditions: . 1. Tract A and B shall be combined to provide for one legal description and one taxed parcel. 2. No park dedication shall be required as no additional structures are proposed to be cnsetruction. Thee to any additi intention to' accommodate mom at that time). ptly. for a rezoning of Tract B prior a site#ications . (It is the _applicants plan review in the future to site improvements, a rezoning may be appropriate The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their June 12, 1996 meeting and recommended approval of the minor subdivision with the conditions outlined above. As Council is aware, this approval was given prior to discussion with David Licht of NAC concerning the upcoming Comprehensive Plan Review. At the Council Work Session on June 18th, the Council directed staff to defer future rezoning requests until completion of this Comprehensive Plan, particularly in areas that may be subject to change ie: the Lake Drive Corridor. For that reason, staff is recommending that Council consider a denial of the subdivision request until such time as the comprehensive plan review for this area is complete. 1. Deny minor subdivision. 2. Approve minor subdivision as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board with the conditions outlined above. 3. Suggest applicant withdraw the request until completion of the Comprehensive Plan - specifically the area relating to the Lake Drive corridor. >RECOMMENDATION Option 1 -10 IMMO MIMI \ 2 N 11/111111=11 411•111111•1111 R 19 • - COUNTY---STATE-A10--$141NWAY 1 dorifFileifiggYIV:70. Fr i• • • • 1 t �1K • 4 �'t r R 'i' h. v J A targt 141 s�+rf %MA Ja41•01E .:4,.e4coLita4...A�hw�4.a�+ypsi7..s..tre.. .m rj`' o��s girI=Mani 41111 mosomplossmor Add smut 0,110 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR -0\CK IHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THUS SuRVEY. PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED STME OR UNDER MY O4RECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT IAM A DULY 1OR u ER TME AwS OF THE STATE OF MINMESOTA. GISTEREO LAM Rv MINNESOTA 1 NO. 7-021C) REGISTRATION KURTH SURVEYING INC. 4002 JEFFERSON STREET N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MINNESOTA 55421 6l2 -Tee -,,69 TRACT "A" (Existing Shop) That part of the north 135.00 feet of the west 248.50 feet of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the easterly line of ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 17. ?OU t.l N 3, TRA "B" (To be added to "A") The north 135.00 feet of the east 80.00 feet of the west 328.50 feet of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. DATE 1.- 1 -`1(o SCALE 1"" 5d� OIRON MONUMENT NO fl (9.00 SI V U^I l $5,0l5 OIelGI' 4 10A1 >fl -VM ,Ivry tt Ft) KPINflD FR.a�t A& 1At, Pl}OTC' 'ck IjNC1 St 7-R ANC- ‘Rt NLdal_ �c.. Nw'1'47Ntw'k,' (..,cL) i.' ‘) NEW DESCRIPTION (A B Combined) That part of the north 135.00 feet of the west 328.50 feet of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the easterly line of ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF- WAY PLAT NO. 17. 9 .A.1 L I Mi 5 tc.0.1 T. b \, SL.,'2.,7— L TRACT "C" (Remaining Homestead] That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly and southerly of the north 135.00 feet of the west 328.50 feet and easterly of the easterly line of ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 17. STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC AGENDA ITEM 5 H Mary Kay Wyland/Northw Consultants June 20, 1996 96-20-PDC/Resone/Preliminary Plat Bruce Hanson, Surfside Seaplane Base Northwest Associated Consultants has reviewed this prepared a report that will be outlined at the Counci The Planning & Zoning Board recoMmended approval of the rezoning, preliminary plat and PDO at their June 12th meeting with the conditions outlined in the staff report. Their cc»ents are attached for your information. The Board also discussed this item at their May P & Z meeting in a concept form and indicated at that time that they concurred with the concept. Mr. Benson then proceeded with his application. As the council is aware, ©rbc is being initiat Comprehensive Plan and this ere* is included in on neighborhood roups totot studied. Council directi Work Session of 41une 39, 199.6 to defer any stay "arm unti]. n reason, it may be r riai applicant 1. Deny P1 2. Until couplet 3. Request applicant to withdr Comprehensive Plan. Council discretion '06/20/96 THU 15:49 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 LINO LAKES He intends to fence the property and request rezoning. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning of Parcel B to conform to the zoning of Parcel A. Chair Schaps asked what type of equipment will be rented. Ms. Wyland stated that lawn and garden equipment will be for rent, i.e., roto tillers, lawn mowers, etc. Mr. Carlson stated that there is an existing pole barn on the property which he plans to remove to build a permanent structure at some later date. Mr. Dunn asked if the rental equipment would be contained within a building, or stored outside. Mr. Carlson stated that there will be some outside storage. Screened fencing will prevent visibility of the site. T -- Ms. Wyland noted that a Conditional Use Permit for outside storage is required, and the applicant will have to come back to the Board for its approval. Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision with the following conditions: 1. Tract A and B shall be combinedio provide for one legal description and one taxed parcel. 2. No park dedication shall be required as no additional structures are proposed to be constructed. 3. The applicant shall apply for a rezoning of Tract B prior to any additional land use applications. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0, with Mr. Robinson abstaining. H. 96-20-PDO/Rezone, Bruce Hanson, Surfside Seaplane Base, Rezoning, Planned Development Overlay and Preliminary Plat City Planning Consultant, Bob Kermis stated that Mr. Hanson bas submitted plans for five single family lots with access to the Surfside Seaplane Base. With this application is a proposal to rezone 11 acres to R 1X from General Business to build the homes. The Hansons intend to retain the existing General Business portion shown as Lot 7 along Lake Drive. A number of approvals are necessary to accommodate the proposed development: 13 E 013 06/20/96 THU 15:50 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12,1996 -►-* LINO LAKES 14g014 1. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Land Use Plan which now suggests a business use of this property. 2. A finding that indicates the appropriateness of the proposed land use to justify rezoning the portion that will be designated residential. 3_ A PDO overlay of air strip accessible lots is necessary to accommodate oversized accessory buildings 4. Preliminary plat. Mr. Kermis stated that he believes there is justification for either rezoning the property or denying its continuation. It is the City's policy not to down -zone commercial property unless there is an equitable land exchange or unique conditions that make the change appropriate. In order to approve the proposal, the Board must make findings that support the special conditions that make the proposed land use acceptable. The proposed use could be found to be compatible with the lots to the north toward Aqua Lane which is south of a multi -family development. This development could be a natural barrier to a higher intense commercial use. The Comprehensive Plan provides for the following conditions that would support the proposed residential use: "Future community development shall take into account social, economic, and environmental opportunities and constraints in an effort to provide an optimal arrangement of future land use activities. A variety of residential development types is desirable and shall be encouraged in the community. Particular areas ofthe City shall be designated for each of the desired housing types which range from multi -family residential to rural." Mr. Kermis further stated that the City is in the process of updating its Comprehensive Plan. This site is included in that study, and the Planning Board may wish to make a finding that rezoning is premature until the Comprehensive Plan document is completed. Should the City find this particular use to be appropriate, he would recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the 12 conditions listed in the staff report. Mr. Johnson asked if Lot 6 and Outlot A are contiguous and could be combined. Mr. Kermis responded that they would be combined to the seaplane base to the east. Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 8:50 p.m. Mr. Wessel, Economic Development Director, stated that he believes this project is premature. The Comprehensive Plan review process has been underway since the beginning ofthe year_ Sessions have been held with the City Council, and meetings will be scheduled 14 06/20/96 THU 15:50 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 LINO LAKES I ] 015 for input from residents. It will take a year to complete the review process. The review will focus on the Highway 49 corridor from Hodgson Road to Lila because of the increased activity in that area and its strategic importance. Comprehensive land use valuations will be done to develop direction to reorganize that corridor. Secondly, there is the issue of not losing commercially zoned property in the City. Also, there is the possibility of setting a precedent that precludes the Comprehensive Plan update process. There is a lot of interest in rezoning, and approval of this project could snowball into similar requests. Mr. Bruce Hanson, Owner of Surfside Seaplane Base, stated that he is opposed to any further studies and would like to see the project approved at this time. With regard to the Comprehensive Plan, Surfside Seaplane Base is part of the metro airport system and should be protected against planning for conuaunity development. Land use changes were attempted in 1977 and again in 1984. It is time to move ahead and approve the appropriate land use. As of this date, he has three, and perhaps four buyers for the proposed residential lots. Chair Schaps asked if there has tteenany response to this project from residents to the north. Mr. Hanson stated that he has heard nothing. Ms. Wyland stated that she received one phone call from Mr. McFee, who lives in the townhomes. His only question was the purpose of the taxiways, whether sea planes have wheels, the hours of operation and noise That may be generated from those five lots. After discussing the daily hours of operation and. tl a special equipment used to move the planes to the base, he had no objections. Mr. J.P. Houchins stated that he has no objections. The sea planes are fun, and there are not many around. Residents do not want to see the area rezoned for more townhomes. He does not have an opinion on what type of commercial business might fit the area, but upscale housing would be attractive to local residents. Mr. Johnson noted that although the land would be zoned residential, the property owners would be supporting a Lino Lakes business. The City would not necessarily lose business property because this residential property would be part of a larger commercial complex, which is a significant economic component. Mr. Wessel agreed with Mr. Johnson but stated that the land use must be separate between private residential and commercial use. Mr. Robinson was excused and left at 9:00 p.m. Mr. Dunn asked if anyone else has come forward with a better use for this land. 15 06/20/96 THU 15.51 FAX -'-.-' LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 Mr. Wessel stated that this land is zoned General Business and no other business candidates have made a proposal It is a difficult parcel because it is split by wetland, and the parcel off Aqua Lane is somewhat removed. EDAB is concerned about protecting current land uses until the Comprehensive Plan review is complete and a design for the whole area can be developed. A decision to consolidate should be made by the community as well as public officials. Mr. Johnson asked if this development would attractother kinds of businesses to locate close to the landing site. Mr. Hanson responded that it would be a possibility.. He has an inquiry about space from a company in Anoka that is recognized as the premier plane engine rebuilder. The issue of generating the same tax dollars as General Business zoning is addressed by the fact that the land has been vacant for a number of years generating no tax dollars. His project will be built within the next year and will bring tax dollars to the City. Mr. Wessel stated that he can understand the Zoning. Board's position to deem this project appropriate for the site. He noted an earlier meeting of interested parties, including Mr. Hokanson and Mr Hanson, that was held to consider a study of land use designations for the area. The decision of the group was to not pursue a study. It would have been helpful now in reviewing a specific proposal. • Mr. Herr noted that for the project_ to move forward, approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment is needed. Mr. Kermis stated that the amendment is a minor one. The Metropolitan Council will only respond if there is a problem. Mr. Herr asked if utilities are installed on Aqua Lane. Ms. Wyland answered, yes. City Engineer Ahrens added that the utilities were put in when the Marshan Townhomes were built. This property was then stubbed. If business development is considered in the area, Aqua Lane could support a business hire Mr. Hanson's. It could not support a -business that uses semi -trucks. Mr_ Dunn asked how long Mr. Hanson has been in business. Mr Hanson answered, since the 1960's. 16 10 016 06/20/96 THU 15:51 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 19% LINO LAKES Mr. Dunn noted that Mr. Hanson has been a good neighbor and has an excellent reputation in the business community. He would support this proposal and urged other Board members to support it. Mr_ Johnson stated that office/business would fit on Aqua Lane, but there is not a high demand for that type of development in Lino Lakes, and there are other sites that would be appropriate for office development He would not anticipate office development on this site in the foreseeable future. To retain General Business District zoning would mean that the land will be vacant for a long time. This proposal would be a unique economic asset to the community that would link a residential development to the sea plane base. He stated that he also would support the project. Mr_ Herr agreed that this residential project would uniquely fit this area and would support it. Mr. Gelbmann stated that this development would provide a good buffer along the edge of the residential area to the north and would make a nice transition from residential to commercial areas. The sea plane base has been a long-standing business in the community and he would support the economic viability of keeping existing businesses. He expressed concerns, however, about losing a General Business District and suggested that options be explored to arrange some type of land exchange. Ms. Dahl stated that she agrees witl the other Board members and would have no opposition as long as residents are not opposed: ,It -is an opportunity to put land to use that has stood vacant. Rezoning to R 1X will bring expensive, large homes on big lots. Mr. Johnson asked about the air safety zones south of the base along Lake Drive. The area is zoned light industrial, and there is an area zoned R-1 that fronts Lake Drive south of the Marshan Townhomes. Much of this property is vacant, and he asked if some of it could be reclaimed for General Business, or Limited Business or Neighborhood Business to make up for rezoning Mr. Hanson's property. • Mr_ Wessel agreed that there would be potential in that approach. He stated that he is not surprised that this General Business property bas stood vacant so long. The City is just beginning to make headway in attracting commercial development. If the Boardtapproves this project, it would make sense to find an equitable exchange of land along Lake Drive as part of the planning process. Chair Schaps stated that he likes Mr. Hanson's proposal and the size of the lots. The property is unique and the business is unique. There are not many sea plane bases, particularly in the Twin Cities_ He would be interested to have community input on what happens to this 17 V1017 .06/20/96 THU 15:52 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 -P.4-, LINO LAKES property but noted that only one person came to the public hearing. General Business zoning has been retained on the corner, and he agrees with the idea of an equitable land exchange. In light of the future residential development to the north, this project is a consistent use of the property in all respects, and he would favor it. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing. Ms. Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Chair Schaps stated that the specific findings of the Board to justify down -zoning this property from General Business to R -1X are as follows: 1. The property is unique in itself in its proximity to Rice Lake and an existing Surfside Seaplane Base. 2. This proposal would compliment existing business and surrounding new future residential construction. 3. There is general copproval which would be consistent and necessary for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mr. Johnson added a further finding that there is a good possibility that the City may be able to claim land for General Business use in the area. Chair Schaps added a 13th candition,to approval of the preliminary plat, which is that the City focus on obtaining land for limited business or other business related zoning in exchange for the land rezoned to R -IX in this project:. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to recommend approval of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation of this property to R -1X based on the following findings: 1. The property is unique in itself in its proximity to Rice Lake and an existing Surfside Seaplane Base. 2. This proposal would compliment existing business and surrounding new future residential construction. There is general community approval that which would be consistent and necessary for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. There is a good possibility that the City may be able to claim land for General Business use in the area. Dunn seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 18 4 018 06/20/96 THU 15:52 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 LINO LAKES 4 019 Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to rezone the eastern portion of the site (air strip accessible lots) from General Business to R -IX, Single Family Executive. Mr. Gelbmann seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Herr made a MOTION to recommend approval of the PDO overlay of air strip accessible lots to accommodate oversized accessory buildings. Ms. Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to recommend approval of the preliminary plat with the conditions listed below from the staff report and including the 13th condition stated above. 1. The preliminary plat is revised such that Lot 6 and Outlot A are combined with the adjacent Surfside Seaplane Base property. 2. Hanger building materials and heights are specified and found to comply with applicable City requirements. 3. Seaplane hangers shallceed 2,400 square feet in size. 4. No detached accessory buildings, other than seaplane hangers, are allowed. 5. A copy of restrictive covenants shall be applied to the proposed residential lots and submitted for City review and approval. Such covenants must address architectural requirements for hangers and include a provision that such hangers are to be used solely for airplane (seaplane) and.related equipment storage. 6. It is demonstrated to the City that wetland boundaries have been delineated by a qualified surveyor. 7. Drainage and utility easements .are provided along all lot lines and a drainage easement is provided over the site's wetland. This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. 8. All park dedication requirements as determined by the City Park Board are satisfactorily met. 9. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted. Such plan Shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 10. All conditions of operation, as required by the FAA and/or Minnesota Department of Aeronautics, are satisfied. 11. The City Engineer shall provide comments and recommendations in regard to utility issues. 12. Comments from other City staff 13. The City of Lino Lakes shall focus on obtaining additional business related property in the area for an equitable land exchange for the property rezoned R 1X. Mr. Dunn seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 19 JUN -07-1996 12:02 NAC 612 595 9837 P.01 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. COMMUNITY PLANNING • DESIGN • MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: Bob K irmis DATE: 7 June 1996 RE: Lino Lakes - Surfside Addition Rezoning and Final Plat FILE NO: 194.01 - 96.05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Bruce and Mim Hanson have submitted plans to develop five, air strip accessible single family residential lots upon a portion of a 18.6 acre parcel of land located east of Lake and south of Aqua Lane. Specifically, such lots are intended to be provided access to the adjacent Surfside Seaplane Base via a taxiway easement. The subject property is currently zoned GB, General Business. ."` To accommodate the proposed development, the following approvals are necessary: 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Land Use Pian). 2. Rezoning of the eastern portion of the site (air strip accessible lots) from GB, General Business to R -1X, Single Family Executive. 3. PDO overlay of air strip accessible Tots to accommodate oversized accessory buildings. 4. Preliminary plat. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Detailed Site Location Exhibit C - Land Use Plan Exhibit D - Preliminary Plat Exhibit E - House/Hanger Detail Exhibit F - Air Safety Zones 5775 Wayzata Blvd.- Suite 555 • St. Louis Park. MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837 JUN -07-1'3'36 12:02 Recommendation NAC 612 595 9837 P.02 The City's 1991 Comprehensive Plan suggests commercial use of the subject property. While the down zoning of property is commonly discouraged within the City (unless a land trade is negotiated) a rezoning of the eastern portion of the subject property may be justified in consideration of the site's context and physical characteristics of the site. Also to be noted is that the area in question is to be subject to specific study as part of the Comprehensive Plan Update. In this Tight, rezoning at this time may be considered premature. Matters of land use appropriateness are, however, considered City policy issues to be determined by City officials. If the City finds the proposed R-1X/PDO rezoning to be acceptable, it should be approved only upon fulfillment of the following: • The necessary Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved by the Metropolitan Council. • The City approve the proposed subdivision (parcel must be created to which R -1X zone is to be applied). Should the City approve the requested rezoning, our office recommends approval of the Surfside Addition preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The preliminary. plat is revised such that Lot.6 and Outlot A are combined with the adjacent Surfside"Seaplane base property. 2. Hanger building materials and ileIghts are specified and found to comply with applicable City requirements. 3. Seaplane hangers not exceed 2,400 square feet in size. 4. No detached accessory buildings other than the Seaplane hangers are allowed. 5. A copy of restrictive covenants be applied to the proposed residential lots are submitted for City review and approval. Such covenants must address architectural requirements for hangers and include a provision that such hangers are to be used solely for airplane (seaplane) and related equipment storage. 6. It is demonstrated to the City that wetland boundaries have been delineated by a qualified individual. 2 JUN -07-1996 12:03 NAC 612 595 9837 P.03 7. Drainage and utility easements are provided along all lot lines and a drainage easement is provided over the site's wetland. This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. 8. All park dedication requirements as determined by the City Park Board are satisfactorily met. 9. A grading and drainage plan be submitted. Such plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 10. All conditions of operation as required by the FAA and/or Minnesota Department of Aeronautics are satisfied. 11. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation in regard to utility issues. 12. Comments from other City staff. 13. Oc\-y oR some ot1 Covnme€c`c \ or`d,,.,,� c k ISSUES ANALYSIS � ;�1 a� � ���� �� ' ,N �'\imX (" '-Sib; c� o►,�, Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Amendment: As noted previously, both a Comprehensive Plan amendment (minor) and rezoning will be necessary to accommodate the proposed use: These requests . are interrelated considering that a basis ' for rezoning evaluation is the use's consistency with',the Comprehensive Pian. Specifically, the applicants have proposed to rezone the eastern one-half of the subject property from GB, General Business to R 1X, Single Family Executive. The portion of the subject property which flanks the Lake Drive corridor is to retain its existing GB, General Business zoning designation. That portion of the site proposed for R -1X zoning is to be overlaid by a PDO, Planned Development Overlay zoning designation. Such designation will allow some flexibility from the strict provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, particularly in regard to accessory building requirements. In review of all rezoning requests, the following criteria should be considered. Comprehensive Plan. As shown on Exhibit B, the City's Land Use Plan suggests commercial (business) use of the subject property. While the western 7.6 acres of the subject property (along Lake Drive) is proposed to retain its current GB zoning designation, the proposed residential use (rezoning) of the eastem 11.0 acres will require an amendment to the City's Land Use Plan. 3 JUN -07-1996 12:03 NAC 612 595 9037 P.04 While the City's economic development policy discourages the down zoning of commercial property, it is believed the physical characteristics of the eastern portion of the site make future commercial use questionable (Le., visibility, wetland containment, etc.). In this regard, the proposed air strip accessible residential lots may represent an appropriate use of the eastem portion of property. The proposed residential use is also supported by the following Comprehensive Pian policies: • Future community development shall take into account social, economic, and environmental opportunities and constraints in an effort to provide an optimal arrangement of future land use activities. A variety of residential development types is desirable and shall be encouraged in the community. Particular areas of the City shall be designated for each of the desired housing types which range from multi family residential to rural. While the preceding policies would tend to support the proposed land use, a change to the City's Land Use Plan is consider?d, a matter of City policy to be determined by City officials. Also to be noted in this matter is that the issue of land use appropriateness of the area will be specifically examined as part of the City's pending Comprehensive Plan Update. ` If the City feels rezoning of ,the subject property would, ' at this time, be "premature" the = postponing of action may be considered Such action should, however, be contingent upon a request for extension by the applicant. The requested rezoning request should be subject to recommendation by the EDAB. Compatibility. To determine the compatibility of the proposed use, it is considered beneficial to examine existing and anticipated land uses which surround the subject property. The following is a listing of land uses and zoning designations which lie adjacent to the subject property: Direction Land Use Zoning North Multiple Family R-4 South Residential R-1 East Surfside Seaplane Base R-1 West Commercial GB 4 JUN -07-1996 12:04 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05 In many ways, the proposed land use represents a westward expansion of the Surfside Seaplane Base, as all residential units are to have base access via a taxiway easement. Considering the orientation of dwelling units and the existence (and location) of the site's wetland, it is believed the proposed residential use can compatibly exist upon the subject property. Public Services. Public sanitary sewer and water service is available to the subject property as a result of the Marshan Townhomes development This issue should be subject to comment by the City Engineer. Performance Standards. As part of the City's consideration of the preliminary plat and forthcoming final plat, the proposed use will be required to comply with applicable performance standards. Specific items of issue will be discussed in the preliminary plat review section of this report. Preliminary Plat: In addition to the rezoning/Compre sive Plan amendment request, the applicant has also requested preliminary plat oval of a seven lot subdivision, six lots of which are to be rezoned to an R -1X zoning designation. The remaining lot along Lake Drive is to retain its existing GB, General Business zoning designation. Lot Layout. While the general lot layout is,viewed as acceptable, some concems exist in regard to the designations of Lot 6 and Outlot A Technically, a lot cannot be created within the City which is not provided public street access. While it is acknowledged that Lot 6 is to overlay a wetland, it is recommended that the lot be combined with the adjacent Surfside Seaplane Base property which lies to the east. Likewise, It is also recommended that Outlot A (located in the northeast portion of the subject site) be combined with the existing Seaplane Base property to avoid the creation of a lot remnant. Lot Dimensional Requirements. All proposed lots have been found to comply with R -1X and GB District dimensional requirements, as listed below: 5 JUN -07-1996 12:04 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06 interior lot width requirement applicable. As noted previously, it is recommended that Lot 6 (which is overlaid almost entirely by a wetland) and Outlot A be legally combined with the adjacent Seaplane Base property. Streets. No new streets have been proposed as part of the proposed subdivision. The air strip accessible lots are to receive access from Aqua Lane while the commercially zoned parcel (Lot 7) is to be provided access from the west via Lake Drive. PDO, Planned Development Ov rTay. To accommodate the unique and creative circumstances surrounding the proposed air strip accessible residential Tots (e.g. air hangers), a PDO, Planned Development Overlay of such lots has been proposed. The PDO designation will allow for some flexibility from the strict provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, particularly in regard to accessory building requirements. Appropriately, the applicant has submitted plans detailing henger locations, sizes and relationships to principal structures. • According to the submitted plans, Seaplane hangers are to measure a maximum of 2,400 square feet in size (40 feet by 60 feet). As part of the PDO, the following conditions should be upheld: 1. Hanger building materials and height are specified. 2. Seaplane hangers not exceed 2,400 square feet in size. 3. No other detached accessory buildings other than the referenced hangers are allowed. 4. A copy of applicable restrictive covenants to be applied to the Airpark lots should be submitted for City review and approval. The aforementioned site plan should require architectural controls be placed upon hangers and specify that such hangers are to be used solely for airplane (seaplane) and related equipment storage. 6 R -1X District (Lots 1-5) GB District (Lot 7) Required Proposed Required Proposed Lot Area 12,825 SF 37,500 SF 20,000 SF 7.6 acres Lot Width' 90 feet 125 feet 100 feet 900+ feet Lot Depth 135 feet 300 feet None 280 feet interior lot width requirement applicable. As noted previously, it is recommended that Lot 6 (which is overlaid almost entirely by a wetland) and Outlot A be legally combined with the adjacent Seaplane Base property. Streets. No new streets have been proposed as part of the proposed subdivision. The air strip accessible lots are to receive access from Aqua Lane while the commercially zoned parcel (Lot 7) is to be provided access from the west via Lake Drive. PDO, Planned Development Ov rTay. To accommodate the unique and creative circumstances surrounding the proposed air strip accessible residential Tots (e.g. air hangers), a PDO, Planned Development Overlay of such lots has been proposed. The PDO designation will allow for some flexibility from the strict provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, particularly in regard to accessory building requirements. Appropriately, the applicant has submitted plans detailing henger locations, sizes and relationships to principal structures. • According to the submitted plans, Seaplane hangers are to measure a maximum of 2,400 square feet in size (40 feet by 60 feet). As part of the PDO, the following conditions should be upheld: 1. Hanger building materials and height are specified. 2. Seaplane hangers not exceed 2,400 square feet in size. 3. No other detached accessory buildings other than the referenced hangers are allowed. 4. A copy of applicable restrictive covenants to be applied to the Airpark lots should be submitted for City review and approval. The aforementioned site plan should require architectural controls be placed upon hangers and specify that such hangers are to be used solely for airplane (seaplane) and related equipment storage. 6 JUN -07-1996 12:04 NAC 612 595 9837 P.07 5. PDO performance standards shall be recorded with the properties in question and shall apply regardless of ownership. Setbacks. All R -1X lots (proposed) have been found to have an ability to comply with the following R -1X District setbacks: Wetland. Lot 6 of the proposed subdivision is overlaid almost entirely by a wetland. While no wetland impact/ mitigation has been proposed, specific wetland boundaries must be delineated by a person recogn ed as qualified by the City for such work. To ensure that such wetland is reserved for storage of storm water, It is recommended that a drainage easement over the wetland be provided. This issue should be subject to further comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Easements. As mentioned previously, a drainage easement should be placed over the subject site's wetland. Additionally, drainage and utility easements should be placed along all lot lines. To gain access to hangers, a 50 foot wide private taxiway easement has been proposed. Applicable restrictive covenants should address maintenance responsibilities for such easement. Parks. The proposed subdivision should be subject to review and comment by the City Park Board in regard to preferred dedication requirements. Grading and Drainage. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, a grading and drainage plan must be submitted subject to review and comment by the City Engineer. Air Space Obstruction Zoning. The subject property lies directly adjacent to the Surfside Seaplane Base landing strip. According to the FAA, the following setback requirements are imposed on private landing strips: • 125 foot setback from runway centerline. • 200 foot setback from roadway ends. 7 Required Setback Front Yard 30 feet Side Yard - Principal Building Side Yard - Accessory Building 10 feet 5 feet Rear Yard - Principal Building Rear Yard - Accessory Building 30 feet* 5 feet Wetland. Lot 6 of the proposed subdivision is overlaid almost entirely by a wetland. While no wetland impact/ mitigation has been proposed, specific wetland boundaries must be delineated by a person recogn ed as qualified by the City for such work. To ensure that such wetland is reserved for storage of storm water, It is recommended that a drainage easement over the wetland be provided. This issue should be subject to further comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Easements. As mentioned previously, a drainage easement should be placed over the subject site's wetland. Additionally, drainage and utility easements should be placed along all lot lines. To gain access to hangers, a 50 foot wide private taxiway easement has been proposed. Applicable restrictive covenants should address maintenance responsibilities for such easement. Parks. The proposed subdivision should be subject to review and comment by the City Park Board in regard to preferred dedication requirements. Grading and Drainage. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, a grading and drainage plan must be submitted subject to review and comment by the City Engineer. Air Space Obstruction Zoning. The subject property lies directly adjacent to the Surfside Seaplane Base landing strip. According to the FAA, the following setback requirements are imposed on private landing strips: • 125 foot setback from runway centerline. • 200 foot setback from roadway ends. 7 JUN -07-1996 12:05 NAC 612 595 9837 P.08 • 20 to 1 approach may not be obstructed. in addition to the aforementioned requirements, uses proximate to the landing strip must comply with the safety zone requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (see Exhibit F for reference). Zone A. Areas designated as Zone A shall contain no buildings, temporary structures, exposed transmission lines, or other similar above -ground land use structural hazards, and shall be restrictive to those uses which will not create, attract, or bring together an assembly of persons thereon. Permitted uses may include, but are not limited to, such uses as agriculture (seasonal crops), horticulture, animal husbandry, raising of livestock, wildlife habitat, light outdoor recreation (non -spectator), cemeteries, vehicle parking Tots, and single family dwellings. Zone B. Areas designated as Zone B shall be restricted in use as follows: 1. Each use shall be on a site whose area shall not be less than one (1) acre. 2_ The following uses are specifically prohibited in Zone B: churches, hospitals, schools, theaters, stadiums, hotels and motels, campgrounds, and other places of. frequent public or semi-public assembly. As shown on Exhibit F, the land use•safety zones do not appear to have an impact on the submitted developtherjf plan. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, all applicable conditions of operations are specified by the FAA and/or Minnesota Department of Aeronautics must be satisfied. Utilities. Utilities for the proposed single family dwellings are to be extended from Aqua Lane. The City Engineer should provide comment and recommendation in regard to utility issues. CONCLUSION While our office believes justification exists to approve the requested R -1X rezoning and PDO overlay, changes in land use are considered matters of City policy to be determined by City officials. Should the City approve the requested rezoning, our office recommends approval of the Surfside Addition plat subject to the conditions listed in the Executive Summary of this report. 8 JUN -07-1996 12:05 NAC 612 595 9837 P.10 NORTH 1 MILE CITY OF LINO LAKES MINNESOTA EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATION JUN -07-1996 12:06 NAC 612 595 9837 P.11 EXHIBIT B - DETAILED SITE LOCATIO. JUN -07-1996 12:08 NAC 612 595 9837 P . 12 411•10. ON. NOM i '0 s • 1.4.0 • RE 0 IMM.117M ".4k EXHIBIT C - LAND USE Kt • JUN -07-1996 12:09 NAC 612 595 9837 P.13 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: PROPOSED SURFSIDE ADDITION FOR: BRUCE 4 11I1`1 HANSON ACREAGE/WIDTH/DEPTI-I TABULATION; LAT f SQUARE FEET ACREAGE SETBACK WIDTH DEPTH . NLOT 1 LOT 2 tOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 OUTLOT A 37,501 sq.ft. 37,501 sq.ft. 37,501 sq.ft. 37,501 sq.ft_ 36,127 sq.ft_ 265,083 sq.ft. 329,602 sq_ft. 27,908 sq.ft. 0.86 acres 0.86 Dues 0.86 acres 0.86 acres 0.83 acres 6.09 acres 7.56 acres 0.64 acres 125.0 ft wide 125.0 ft. wide 125.0 ft. wide 125.0 ft. wide 125.0 ft. wide 1350 ft. wide 9004- ft. wide 300 ft. deep 300 ft. deep 300 ft. deep 300 ft. deep 300 ft. deep 100-420 ft. deep 280-400 tt. deep TOTAL AREA 808.724 sq.ft. 18.57 acres ,EXHIBIT D - PRELIMINARY PLAT JUN -07-1996 12:10 NRC XISTING SAN. MM INV 885.34 1 Cor. of Gov't t 3, Sec. 20 EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES WA1ERMAIN HA- ; = is -w EXISTING 8' P.V.C. SANITARY SEVER 0 0.40% PROPOSED SANITARY i t!'SEWER 385" 0 0.40X ^1•• EXISTING 12D.I.P. cke "� ;• 1 t N. Zine of Gov't Lot 3. Sec. 20 612 595 9837 P.14 PROpO V SAN_ MH INV+887.00 EXISTING NIDRANT & EXISTING 12- O.I.P. EXISTING 00' g9° POWER l • 32.5' go _ —. i• i / � — i 00 ce-�_ . , oltxr- mskteeD AREA FROM TO R- 1 . r /, -•� �< . -� i` i i .-' 1 I • JUN -07-1996 12:10 NAC 612 595 9837 P.15 PROPOSED IOUSE/ ANC,ER LAM'OUT 0 0 O co 32.5' 0 0 125.00 0 er PROPOSED HOUSE PAD 60.0' 0 rn 1 PROPOSED HANGER 0 0 CONCRETE APRON — 1 0 15' 15' M 50' GRASS 125.00' 0 T 125.00 0 PROPOSED HOUSE PAD rn 60.0' PROPOSED HANGER L 15' 15' Q co 0 0 0 32.5' CONCRE TE — APRON TAXIWAY EASEMENT 125.00' 0 EXHIBIT E - HOUSE/HANGER DETAIL 612 595 9837 P. 16 MARSHAN LAKE EXHIBIT F - AIR SAFETY ZONES Tf1TOI P 1 a AGENDA ITEM _5 I STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 21 1996 TOPIC 96-21-V, Gary Sandahl, 478 Lonesome Pine, Variance Mr. Gary Sandahl is requesting a Variance from Section 4, Subd. 31 Swimming Pools (1) (D) which states: The pool, filter unit, pump heating unit and any noise making mechanical equipment shall be located at least 35 feet from any adjacent or nearby residence and not closer than 10 feet to any lot line. The Planning and Zoning Board, in their recent review of the Zoning Ordinance has, recommended a modi C. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. The applicant could consider a smaller sized pool or locating the pool in a different area on the property although it may be more costly. The Council could consider the slope of the land a hardship. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Staff is anticipating adoption of the revised zoning ordinance which would eliminate the need for this request. E. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within he neighborhood. Property values should not be diminished one way or the other - however, that is a subjective statement. F. That the proposed action will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the ordinance was to provide a separation between existing neighboring residences and pool equipment. Placement of the pool itself requAres a 10' setback according to the existing ordinance and revised ordinance. For Council information, the applicant has supplied staff with a petition from twelve(12) adjoining property owners, including the owners immediately to the south, indicating no objections to the variance request. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this request and recommended approval of the Variance to allow the pool to be set back 10' from the side property line. There was considerable discussion, at a P & Z Work Session, when the recommendation was made to change the pool ordinance and the proposed request conforms to the recommended change. The P & Z did not have an opportunity to review the side yard variance request for 5.5' into the required 30' setback. Staff would recommend denial of this request as the pool may be moved toward the back yard and meet the setback requirement although this may require removal of the existing fencing and a possible retaining wall. 1. Approve Variance request to allow pool construction. 10 feet from side property line and 5.5' within the required side yard setback of 30' with condition that pool equipment be located adjacent to existing dwelling. 2. Approve Variance request to allow pool construction 10 feet from side property line and deny request for 5.5' variance into required side yard setback with condition that pool equipment be located adjacent to existing dwelling. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. .................................... ...................................... Option 2 LAKE i N RESHANAU iii ROSI, iratTINEi� --,, a's r\�?'..: �_:. & ,,v. ep i `Ni .;�•`� YitL7� .y„�} itsalosg Arez '410*..iim, 4. 4 „1 Y ,,, ,, 1 ,teMa Q����7o,s;�,i. ` LLLILL .�`��r:+r .. a "�`.�•.'ti': J,ri.:u•.�{+�: `eta 1. .,o Mi _# q �•'{�y yQ�r,',;S f.itsoX43 'Fa/' �P Yp-0,7�^ itl1 t£%y04.4y Risgtampisaweate .latratagafflowswasilisp r4' iiletti.6 v` •r(. ,��:.'Ti tz �a+i,Rt�.,,, Ism= ......, ri4V.:* ;ftctle.c..14, %:),.. ealg,s1R - L t„.—:. ..f,...,.,..zi 7fraviggizseninus R. ::,.........„,.,,v.,� .A,F, 14: &e 44 Aitistc 4 j'.: .... . s JA. Jaiga Oaken 1: To whom it may concern: Gary and Nancy Sandahl have my permision to put a in ground swimming pool in at 478 Lonesome Pine Trail, Lino Lakes Minnesota. I fully understand the swimming pool will be located 10 feet from the Sandahls south lot line. %o Z4e Ti( lid m naMly A 1-64/-4-/4 (33Tw1/4,0_ � 63-7-2 � pk_ tie6-6609 �7s Lort esome ',Ile Tr/ L biz lig Z qt, 14469 l_bNecOIidl E T +N E ID 7- 6'431 THANKYOU GARY AND NANCY SANtAHL '/U A Estoblished in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601.73rd Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 $nrvegars tertifirate TARAWOOD HEMS Property located in Section 32, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota 660.4093 0 a x000.0 INVOICE NO 31166 F B NO 532-60 SCALE I" x 20' Denotes Iron Monument Denotes Wood Hub Set For Excavation Only Denotes Existing Elevation Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Surface Drainage Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Laytelt Floor Type of Building - 4 /eye/SP L X79461,7113 "Ze✓el No trees on lot >O 0 N x Lott, Block 6, PINERIEGB ADDITICN The only sasmsnts shown ars from plats of record or information provided by silent We hereby certify that this N abut and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above deeadbed Meld and the location of as buildings and vie. Ible encroachments, It any, baa or on add and Surveyed byusthM-26/11-day of February is 92 mond A. Prasch Minn. Req. No. 6743 '/in Estoblished in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 1601.73rd Avenue North 680-3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 65428 Am -agars antitira TAR/HOOD DOMES Property located in Section 32, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota INVOICE NO 31166 F 8 NO 532-60 SCALE I" = 20' o Denotes Iron Monument o Denotes Wq'od Hub Set For Excavation Only x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation Denotes Proposed Elevation . — Denotes Surface Drainage Proposed Top of Block 901../ 901./0 Proposed Garage Floor IN./ Proposed Lowe St Floor Type of Building 4Ievel pill- j(791I'oa71 3 PZe✓e/ No trees on lot Vetcan% Lott, Block 6, PINERIDGE ADDITION The only easements shown sew from plats of record or kitom,atlon provided by dint We hereby certify that this Metros end corset represent tion of a survey of the bound ise MIAs above described lend and the location cf en bonding* end vis- ible naoednwM s.It en% from even eek lend. Samoyed byuepde h deyof February 1e 92 Signed mond A. Prasch Minn. Reg. No. 674 AGENDA ITEM J STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 20, 1996 TOPIC Jeff Kelley, Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment On May 27th, the City Council approved a site plan reviewand Interim Use Permit for Mr. Jeff Kelley to allow a golf driving range on 20th Avenue in the R -BR Zoning District. As a condition of approval, a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment adding golf course/driving range to the R -BR Zoning District as an Interim Use was required. Attached for Council review is that text amendment. 1. Approve first reading of Ordinance No. 07-96 adding golf course/driving range as an Interim Use to the R -BR Zoning District. 2. Return to staff for further consideration Council Member introduced the following Ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 07-96 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 6, SUBDIVISION 21, "R -BR" RURAL - BUSINESS RESERVE DISTRICT OF THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE APPENDIX B1 The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: SECTION 1. Section 6, Subdivision 21, of the City Zoning Ordinance shall be amended to add the following: Subd. 21 (B) Golf Course/Driving Range as regulated by Section 4, Subdivision 38, Interim Uses. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication.. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 1996. j---' CITY OF LINO LAKES John Landers, Mayor ATTEST: Marily G. Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said Ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM 5 41 K STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 20, 1996 TOPIC ANIMAL ORDINANCE, First Reading The attached document incorporates the changes recommended by the Council to the proposed Animal Ordinance. Some of the highlights include: 1. Maximum number of dogs allowed is two (2) 2. Private kennels permitted in any zoning district upon five (5) acres of land or more with a conditional use permit. 3. Limit of four (4) dogs per private kennel. Kennel to be located 100' from any property line or in the middle of the parcel of property, whichever is greater. 4. No reference to cats or licensing of same. 5. Incorporates provisions for "Wild and/or dangerous animals" 6. Feces disposal and leash requirements for dogs. 7. Provisions to enhance police enforcement of the ordinance. 1. Approve first reading of Animal Ordinance 2. Return to staff for further consideration Option 1 STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC AGENDA ITEM 5 J Mary Kay Wyland June 20, 1996 ANIMAL ORDINANCE, First Reading The attached document incorporates the changes recommended by the Council to the proposed Animal Ordinance. Some of the highlights include: 1. Maximum number of dogs allowed is two (2) 2. Private kennels permitted in any zoning district upon five (5) acres of land or more with a conditional use permit. 3. Limit of four (4) dogs per private kennel. Kennel to be located 100' from any property line or in the middle of the parcel of property, whichever is greater. 4. No reference to ca s or licensing of same. 5. Incorporates provisions for "Wild and/or dangerous animals" 6. Feces disposal and leash requirements for dogs. 7. Provisions to enhance police enforcement of the ordinance. Approve first reading of Animal Ordinance 2. Return ff for further consideration Option 1 Una Lakes ce AIIAA►LS 502.1 Definitions: As used in this Section except as otherwise provided, the followiaag terms shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them: Subd 1 Animal. Every living creature except members of the human race. Subd 2 Animal -Domestic. Animals horn► l kept within the home, but not exclusive of the home, tbelly pigs and household birds. Subd 4 Animal --Wild Means ape, including chimpanzee, gibbon, gorilla orangutan, baboon, any bison, bobcat, cheetah, crocodile, ote, deer, incl kIl members of ,the +deer bmf such as ante , elk, and mo nanous Ana' dog which meets the definition of dangerous do forth in Minnesota Statutes Se+c'ti it 347. any successor statute. Dangerous Dog. *Dangerous "mesas any dtalg tett Vis: (1) without protrocatitui, infli+dted substantial haacm a hum being on public or private property. (2) killed a domestic animal without provocation while off the o at property; been mound be poten dahge aaad after the owner ha notice that a is potentially daasge mous, the dog agareive bites, attacks o endangers the of he ns or dome is as Subd 9 Subd 10 Subd 11 Subd 12 Subd 13 Potentially Dangerous Dog. Any dog which meets the definition of potentially dangerous dog set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 347.50 or any successor statute. Potentially Dangerous Dog. "Potentially Dangerous Dog" means any dog that: (1) when unprovoked, inflicts bites on a human or domestic animal on public or private property; (2) when unprovoked, chases or approaches a person, including a person on a bicycle, upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public or private property, other than the dog owner's property, in an apparent attitude of attack; or (3) has a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals. Kennel, commercial. Any parcel of property on which more than two (2) dogs over six (6) months of age are kept, owned, boarded, groomed, sheltered, prod, bred, or offered for sale or any other merchandising that is not defined as a private kennel under Subd 11. Every commercial kennel shall be enclosed or fenced in such manner as to prevent the running at large or escape of animals confined therein. After issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, Commercial Kennels shall be allowed in the following zoning districts: Rural Business Reserve (RBR), Commercial, Industrial. Kennel, private. Any'parcel of property on which more than two (2) dogs over six (6) months of .age are kept for private 'enjoyment and not for monetary gain. Every kennel shall be enclosed or fenced in such a manner as to prevent the running at large or escape of animals confined therein. Private Kennels shall be allowed in all zoning districts upon parcels of property five (5) acres or more in size following issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. Owner. Any person, firm, corporation, organization, or department, possessing, harboring, keeping, having an interest in, or having temporary or permanent custody or control of an animal. Under Restraint. Controlled by a leash of not more than six (6) feet in length; under restraint by an electrical device, i.e. electric fence provided the animal is wearing a shock collar made for that specific electrical device; or within the limits of its owner's premises in any residential district; under the voice or signal command of a competent person whose command the animal will obey immediately in other zoning districts. Page 2 Subd 14 An unattended dog on the property of ano her, without the consent of such property owner, is "at large" and not under restraint, even though it might be on a leash. Subd 1 Enforcement. A The provisions of this: bion may be enforced by any of the foliown (1) The primary law enforcement agency of the unity. (2) The animal Erol officer as designated by the City. (3) The animal control facility contracted with by the City. For the purpo a of di argiag the duties imposed bar this chapter and to rce its p., any animal control officer or any police officer is empowered to enter upon any premise upon which any domestic or non- domestic animal is kept and to demand the edition of such animal by the owher of . the license and rabies certifice for such animal. Any ponce 4 . � may enter the premises were any animal is kept in a A. mane m rand de nd:;to mine such animal a nd to. 'cm of such , In such officer's ovinic�n, the Ater, duties are e licensing and vacamation requirements of .this chapter, a Qept as terwise , shall not apply to any dog be aging to a n of of the elty and kept within the city for not longer thirty 3) days, prided. alit sum dogs shall at all tunes while in the city be kept thin a buidig, ecure or vehicle, or be under restraint by the owner. cowed .to a riparian clinic, la pital or licensed m rc isl kerne .or des engaged in lay► enforcement work for the city cd not be licensed; Subd 4 Section 502.1 relating to dangerous dogs and potentially dangerous dogs shall not apply to dogs under the control of a law enforcement officer. Subd 5 Section 502.1 and 502.2 shall not apply to raptures possessed by licensed falconers holding valid State and Federal Falconry Permits so long as the conditions of the permit are being satisfied. 502.4 License and Vaccination Requirements: Subd 1 License and Registration. All dogs within the City of Lino Lakes shall be licensed except the following: A Dogs less than six (6) months of age; B Dogs which are brought into the City for appearances in an animal show or trial; C Dogs being used by law enforcement officers. Subd 2 Vaccination Required. It shall be unlawful for any dog owner to keep or maintain any dog older than six (6) months of age, unless it has been vaccinated within the prior twenty-four months with an anti -rabies vaccine by a licensed veterinarian. No license shall be issued except upon compliance with this Section. Subd 3 Licensing/Vaccination Procedures. A Application. Except as herein provided, within thirty (30) days of acquiring possession of a dog which has not been licensed by the City, or within thirty (30) days of moving to the City with a dog which has not previously been licensed by the City, the owner of the dog shall make application for a dog license. The application shall be on forms provided by the City. The applicant shall also provide proof of vaccination and spay or neuter to the City prior to the issuance of a license or renewal of a license. B License Fee. The license fee for each dog must be submitted with the license application. The fee will be as set forth as follows: (1) Dog male or female, not neutered or spayed $10.00 (2) Dog male or female, neutered or spayed $ 5.00 C Duration of License. All licenses are valid for the same length of time as the rabies vaccination and must be renewed within 30 days after the vaccination or a $5.00 penalty will be applied. Page 4 D Receipt and Tags. Upon completion of the application form, receipt of the license fee(s), and receipt of proof of vaccination and spay or neuter, if applicable, the City shall cause a license fee receipt to be issued to the applicant, along with a metallic tag. The applicant shall cause the tag to be affixed permanently by metal fastening device to the collar of the licensed dog in such a manner that the tag is easily observed. If a tag is lost, a duplicate may be issued by the City upon presentation of a receipt showing payment of the initial license fee and upon payment of an additional fee for each duplicate tag in the amount of $1.00. E Change of Address. An applicant who has obtained a dog license shall notify the City of applicant's address change within corporate limits of the City within thirty (30) days of any address change. F Counterfeit Tags. No person shall counterfeit, attempt to counterfeit, or attach any counterfeit tag to any dog in the City. G Transfer of Tags. No person shall transfer a dog tag from one dog to another. T—" H Change of Ownership. If there is a change in ownership of the dog during the year, the new owner may have a current license changed to their name upon payment of an ownership transfer fee, or may secure a new license. The ownership transfer, fee shall be $1.00 502.5 Dog Kennels: Subd 1 Requirements. A Health, Safety and Welfare. No dog kennel license, commercial or private shall be issued or renewed if the council finds that maintenance of the kennel at the subject location would be injurious to the public health, safety or welfare. B Land Requirements. Five acres of land or more is required for private dog kennels in any zoning district. Private kennels shall be limited to four (4) dogs upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. C Notification. Notification of public hearing for a conditional use permit to operate a dog kennel must be sent to all property owners within 1,000 feet of a proposed dog kennel. Page 5 Subd 2 Conditions. A Sanitation. Every dog kennel shall be operated in a clean, healthful, sanitary, safe condition and humane manner so as not to create a public nuisance, and failure to do so shall constitute grounds for a revocation of the license of such kennel. B Inspection. All dog kennels are subject to annual review and inspection and shall be open to complete inspection by any properly designated officer or employee of the city, at any reasonable time. C Running at Large. No dog kept in a kennel shall be allowed to run at large at any time, either on the streets, or other public grounds or on private property of others within the city. D Noise. No person maintaining a dog kennel shall permit the dogs kept there to bark, bay, cry, yelp, howl or causes noise, disturbance or annoyance to persons residing in the vicinity thereof, sufficient to constitute a public nuisance. Subd 3 Nuisance. A Any dog kennel kept in violation of any provision of this code shall be deemed a public nuisance and may be abated as such. This shall be in addition to all other remedies providedfor violation of this chapter. Subd 4 Grandfather Clause. A All dog kennels which are validly located within the city prior to the adoption of this ordinance may continue to exist as to size and present location, provided the dog kennel does not violate any provisions of the code in force on the date this ordinance is passed and adopted. Page 6 Subd 5 Dog Kennels --License; required, fee, term; penalty. A It shall be unlawful for any person to own or operate any kennel, commercial or private, unless a licensed conditional use permit as per the city zoning ordinance is secured therefore. All kennels are subject to annual review and inspection. The annual license fee for a Commercial Kennel shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00). The annual license fee for a Private Kennel shall be twenty dollars ($20.00). In addition, all dogs kept in Private Kennels shall be licensed under the requirements of Section 502.4 of this ordinance. All kennel licenses expire on April thirtieth next following issuance of the license, except that such license may be renewed prior to June first without penalty. B Any person in violation of any of the provisions in this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Each day on which such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. C Application The Kennel application shall contain the following: (1) WhethWthe license is for commercial or private purposes. (2) The location of the premises of the kennel along with the home and work telephone numbers of the licensee and one other person who could be contacted in .the absence of the licensee. (3) The maximum number of adult dogs to be kept on the premises. The term "Adult", as used herein, shall include any dog over six months of age. (4) A site plan showing the location, size, and type of all structures for housing, fencing, and runs for dogs. Separate housing and runs for dogs shall be a minimum of 50 feet from any neighboring habitable dwelling and 100 feet from any property line, or located in the middle of the parcel, which ever is greater. If the dogs are to be kept primarily within a building, the applicant shall so state. (5) Whether the applicant anticipates breeding the animals and, if so, how often and the expected size of the litters. (6) The method to be used to keep premises in a sanitary state. (7) The method to be used to keep the animals quiet. Page 7 (8) An agreement by the applicant that the premises may be inspected by the City at all reasonable times. D Issuance and Conditions. The City Clerk shall refer the application to the Council. The Council or Planning and Zoning Board shall conduct a public hearing. The issuance of a license shall be within the discretion of the Council. In making such determination, the Council shall take into consideration the following: adequacy of housing and runs for the animals; the methods to be used for sanitation and to maintain quiet; the quantity and height of the fencing; and , with particularity, any violations during the previous license period, if applicable. The Council may impose such conditions as it shall deem necessary and appropriate to carry out the intent of this Chapter. E Revocation. If a licensee fails to comply with the statements made in the application or with any reasonable conditions imposed by the Council, or violates any other provision of this Chapter, the licensee shall be notified by mail and given ten (10) days to remedy any defects or defaults. If such condition beort remedied in said ten (10) days, the Council may revoke the license. F Three or more violations of any provision of this code, in one calendar year constitutes reason for revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. G Unlawful Acts. It shall be unlawful for any licensee to do or permit any of the following: (1) Allow any of the dogs to run at large on any street or public property or any private property not owned by the licensee or under the licensees's control. (2) Allow the premises to be kept in an unsanitary or unhealthful condition. (3) Burn offal or waste. (4) Allow the dogs to bark, yelp, or fight so as to disturb the neighborhood either night or day. (5) Allow any of the dogs to bite anyone lawfully on or off the premises. (6) Maintain any dogs in such manner as to create a nuisance by way of noise, odor, or otherwise. Page 8 (7) Sell or cause to be sold any dog(s) without first providing the purchaser with written certification as to the origin of the animal. (8) Private kennels shall be limited to one litter in a 12 month period. (9) All dogs shall always be treated in a humane manner as set forth in Minnesota Statute Chapter 343 and 346. H Tags. In the case of Private Kennels, licensees shall affix an identification tag to all dogs owned by or under the control of the licensee. Such identification tags shall meet the requirements set forth in this ordinance. Rabies Vaccination A licensee shall cause every dog in a kennel to be vaccinated by a licensed veterinary surgeon with anti -rabies vaccine. Puppies shall be so vaccinated at or before the age of sixteen weeks and again at the age of one year. Adult dogs shall be so vaccinated at least once in every 24 month period or as often as needed under the type of vaccine used to ensure immunity. 502.6 Regulations: Subd 1 All dogs shall be kept under restraint by their owners at all times. Subd 2 The owner of any dog in heat shall cause such dog to be confined in such a manner so as not to come in contact with any other dog during such time as the dog is in heat, except for intentional breeding purposes. Subd 3 The owner of any dog shall prevent the dog from committing in the City any act which constitutes a nuisance. Acts which constitute a nuisance include, but are not limited to, the following: To bark, bay, howl or make any other loud noise; (1) Habitually or frequently between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; (2) Consistently for a period of five minutes or longer between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; or (3) Consistently for a period of ten minutes or longer between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. B To be present on school grounds. Page 9 C To chase vehicles or to molest or unreasonably annoy any person while away from the property of its owner. D A dog shall not be deemed a barking dog if, at the time the dog is barking or making any other noise, a person is trespassing or threatening to trespass upon the private property upon which the dog is situated or when the dog is teased or provoked. Subd 2 Feces Disposal: A The owner of any dog shall be responsible for the sanitary disposal of all feces material deposited by such dog in the following manner: (1) During the period of November 1st through April 30th, all feces material shall be removed from the owner's premises and/or stored in a sanitary manner within seventy-two (72) hours. (2) During the period of May 1st through October 31st, all feces material shall be removed from the owner's property and/or stored in a sanitarjmanner within forty-eight (48) hours. (3) Objectionable feces odor and/or flies detectable at the adjoining property line shall be deemed a violation of this Section. B The owner of any dog shall,not permit such dog to be on park property, City trails, public property or the.property of another without having in the owner's immediate possession a device for the immediate removal of feces material deposited by•the dog as well as a container for the transport of such material to an appropriate disposal receptacle. C The provisions of this Section shall not apply to the ownership or use of seeing -eye dogs by blind persons; ownership or use of companion dogs by quadriplegic, paraplegics or other individuals with severe disabilities who are 'Unable to clean up after the companion dog; dogs when used in police activities; or tracking dogs. Subd 5 Humane Treatment of Animals: A The owner of any animal within the City shall provide such animal with sufficient wholesome food and water on a daily basis, proper and sufficient shelter from the weather, and veterinary care when needed to prevent suffering of any sick or injured animal. B No person shall beat, torment, tease, or otherwise abuse an animal, or permit an animal fight. Page 10 C Guard Dog Warning Signs. A person maintaining a dog for security purposes within the City shall post a sign at all entrances to the property. Said sign shall be a minimum of 6" x 12", with letters of contrasting color, a minimum of 2" in height, and a brush stroke of 1/2" minimum, with the following words affixed to such sign, "DANGER - GUARD DOG". 502.7 Impounding and Confinement: Subd 1 Abandoned Animals. Upon written notice of the Chief of Police or designated agent, that private property is attracting or providing shelter to animals that are not owned or cared for by any known person, the owner of such property shall be responsible for removing such animals in a humane manner within thirty (30) days of such written notice. Subd 2 Impounding and Confinement. A Any dog found running at large may be seized by an animal control officer or police officer, and impounded at a designated animal shelter, and there confined in a Inunane manner for a minimum period of the greater of seven (7) days or five (5) business days (the Impoundment Period), unless claimed by the owner. B Animal control officers are npt authorized to enter private dwellings for the purpose of seizing animals C Before seizing an animal from the private property of its owner, the animal control officer or police officer shall make a reasonable attempt, taking into consideration the time of day and nature of the violation, to notify the owner that the animal is being seized because it was observed by the animal control officer or police officer to be in violation of the provisions of this chapter. D When an animal is seized from the: private property of its owner and the animal control officer or police officer has been unable to notify the owner of the reason for seizing the animal, a written notice shall be affixed to the dwelling unit, in a conspicuous manner, indicating the day and time the animal was seized; the reason for seizing the animal; and the address and the phone number of the shelter where the animal can be found. E Immediately upon impounding animals, reasonable efforts shall be made to notify the owner and inform the owner of the animal's confinement and the procedures for release of the animal to owner. Page 11 F Disposition of unclaimed animals: An animal which is not redeemed by the owner within the Impoundment Period may be disposed of in any manner provided by law. Any animal that is not claimed by the owner or sold within the prescribed time may be euthanized and disposed of in a humane manner by the appropriate animal shelter facility. Upon notice from the appropriate animal shelter facility that an animal is sick and/or injured, the Chief of Police or designated officer is authorized to permit euthanization at any time within the Impoundment Period in an effort to end the suffering of such animal. G Owner title of any animal may be transferred to the animal shelter facility upon expiration of the Impoundment Period and if the animal has not been claimed by the owner in the manner required by this Section. Impoundment Fees. Any animal impounded under this Section may be reclaimed by its owner within the Impoundment Period. Before the owner shall be permitted to retake possession of the animal, the owner shall make payment to the animal shelter of all required fees and costs of such impoundment,f= 502.8 Rabies Control. Subd 1 Bites. An owner or custodian of a dog which does not have an appropriate antirabies vaccination and which bites or otherwise exposes a person to rabies virus may be penalized under Minnesota State Statute 346.53. Subd 2 It shall be the duty .of every physician to report to the Police Department the names and addresses of any person treated for bites inflicted by an animal, together with any other information deemed helpful in the control of rabies. Subd 3 It shall be the duty of the owner of any animal to immediately, but in all cases no later than twenty-four (24) hours, report to the Police Department all bites inflicted by the owner's animal to any person. The owner of any such animal shall also be required to provide to the police written proof of vaccination and pertinent insurance information when warranted or requested by the police. Subd 4 It shall be the duty of any veterinarian to report to the City a diagnosis of any animal observed by the veterinarian to be suspected of having rabies. Page 12 Subd 5 Subd 6 The police are hereby authorized to take into possession any animal suspected of having rabies following a bite inflicted to any person, and to have the animal destroyed in a humane manner for the purpose of determining whether the animal is in fact, a rabies carrier. The City and/or its agents shall not be held liable for the destruction of such animal when the animal has inflicted injury upon any person and the City and/or its agents act in good faith to protect the public. Whenever an animal has bitten a person and is not destroyed pursuant to Section 502.8 subd 5 , or whenever a suspected or known rabid animal is picked up by an animal control officer or police officer, such animal may be confined for a minimum period of ten (10) days as follows: A Upon proof of current rabies vaccination, the animal control officer or police officer may authorize the confinement of the animal at the owner's place of residence, provided that the animal shall not be permitted to come in contact with other animals or persons, and provided further that the animal be muzzled and on a leash not exceeding six (6) feet when removed from the place of confinement. B If no proof of current vaccination is provided, or if the animal control officer or police officer do not consent to confinement at the owner's place of residence, the animal shall beconfined at the animal control facility for the entire ten (10) day period at the owner's expense. C An animal under confinement may not be removed from such confinement prior to the expiration of the 10 -day period without written permission of the Chief of Police or designee. The owner of any animal confined at the owner's residence shall, at all reasonable times, permit the inspection of such animal during the confinement period upon oral request of an animal control officer or a police officer. The owner shall further be responsible for immediately reporting any change in the animal's health or behavior to the appropriate animal control officer or police officer during the confinement period. E A quarantined animal shall be confined to an enclosure in such a manner so as to prevent the animal from escaping. All openings to the enclosure shall be locked with a secure locking device. The animal shall not be removed from the enclosure unless muzzled and on a leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length, and under the control of a competent person. Page 13 F Any animal control officer or police officer may enter upon the private property of another for the purposes of removing such quarantined animal to an animal shelter when it has been determined that such quarantined animal is not being maintained by the owner in a manner consistent with the provisions of this Section. 502.9 Dangerous and Potentially Dangerous Dogs. Subd 1 The Minnesota State Statute 347.50 is hereby adopted in cases of Dangerous and Potentially Dangerous Dogs. Subd 2 No person shall bring into the City any animal which has previously been declared by another jurisdiction to be dangerous or potentially dangerous. The City shall seize and destroy, at the owner's expense, any animal brought into the City in violation of this provision. 502.10 Wild Animals. Subd 1 No person sheep, maintain, harbor or sell any wild animal within the corporate lino of the City, except as provided in this subsection: A The owner or proposed owner of any wild animal shall, prior to bringing the wild animal into the City, mace application to the City for a wild animal permit on an application form provided by the City. Such application shall be submitted to the City Clerk, together with the following required fees and/or documentation: (1) That the applicant possesses all necessary state and federal wild animal permits, and that all such permits shall be maintained by the owner in valid form during the time that such wild animal is possessed by the owner. Expired state and/or federal permits shall cause the City's wild animal permit to be considered null and void. (2) A written statement shall be submitted with the application by a licensed veterinarian that such wild animal has been vaccinated in an appropriate manner, consistent with accepted veterinary practices, where applicable. Page 14 Subd 2 Subd 3 (3) A copy of a valid insurance policy providing liability coverage for any harm caused by the wild animal with limits of not less than $100,000 per person and $300,000 per occurrence and naming the City as an additional insured. The certificate shall provide that it may not be canceled except upon ten days written notice to the City. The certificate and all renewals thereof shall be delivered to the City. The City Administrator may waive the insurance requirement upon a determination that the wild animal does not pose a substantial risk. (4) A written statement by the owner that such wild animal will be maintained in a locked enclosure and removed only by a competent person for purposes of sanitation. The removal of such wild animal shall be conducted while the animal is muzzled and on a chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length, under sedation, or under the complete physical control of the attendant. (5) A written statement by the owner that such enclosure shall be posted with plainly visible warning signs on all sides of the enclosure with letters Ocontrasting color. The sign shall measure a minimum of 6" x 12", anti have letter of 1/2" stroke and a minimum of 2" height, with the following inscription: "DANGER - WILD ANIMAL". (6) A fee as set at $35.00.t The City may deny or attach conditions to the permit based upon the type of animal, the character of the owner's residence and neighborhood, and any other appropriate factors. If the permit is granted, the owner may bring the animal into the City, subject to any requirements of this Section and any permit conditions. The permit need not be reviewed, but shall be subject to review at any time by the City. The Chief of Police or designated agent is hereby authorized to immediately impound any wild animal not in compliance with this Section. The impoundment shall be in accordance with Section 502.7. 502.11 Summary Destruction. Subd 1 Whenever an animal control officer or police officer determines that any animal presents an immediate threat to the safety of any member of the public, after making a reasonable attempt to impound such animal, the officer is hereby authorized to destroy such animal in the interest of public safety. Page 15 502.12 Penalty for Violations of this Chapter. Subd 1 Any violation of this Section is a misdemeanor. Each day on which a violation continues shall constitute a separate violation. 6/20/96 1" Page 16 AGENDA: ITEM MiltS L STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 24, 1996 TOPIC Lino Air Park - easements Mr. Roger Kolstad is planning to extend Carl Street to serve five lots, previously platted, in the Lino Air Park North. As a part of that project he has been required to dedicate some additional roadway and utility easements. The City Engineer has reviewed the submitted easements and found them to be in conformance with the approved plan. staff would, therefore, recommend that the City Council accept the easement documents as presented. OPTIONS 1. Approve easements as submitted 2. Return to staff for further consideration • Options 1 1 ::��'•.�?q ig r• lest tA;n s2WM EVERT. THEY MUST BE RENTED R11FJ1 T Of THE REACH APPROKMATAT ONE- NAATIE 1IEIOIT a 11€I64 646. ANY SEDIMENT REMM6NQ M PACE AFTER TIE ALT FENCE CR FILTER FABRIC R NO LONGER REWIRED ANLL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM YRTN THE EXISTING GRADE. PREPARED, AND SEEDED W1T1 THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIK, AS DIRECTED IN THE ENONEER. 1.3.4 REMOVAL Of SILT FENCE - SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WNFN THEY HAVE SERA", THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPWARD SL0PN0 AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STADIUM. IF THE UPWARD SLOPING AREA HAS AREA IS TO BE EXPOSED LONGER 11441 SO (6) MOTORS, THAT AREA AUAll BE COVERED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION WHEN FIRST EXPOSED. -- CARL - -------- - --- -- ROA D.. AROADWAY WHILE OPCENf MEAS. IRNIO ADEQUATE i110511011 CON7ROl N 3. SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL ANLL BE STOCKPILED TO ALO, FOR THE REPIICEMENT OF 4. OF TOPSOIL FOR DISTURBED MEAS TO BE REVEOETATED. 4. TIE CONTRACTOR SHILL SCHEDULE 9TE MOM, UMY N5TAUATION AND ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SO THAT TIE DENERA. UTE CM BE MULCHED AND RE -SEEDED SOON AFTER DISTURBANCE. AREAS THAT ,ILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO CONSTRUCTOR TRAFFIC SNAIL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED OR SODDED WITHIN TWO (2) WEEKS OF BONG DISTURBED. 5. THE GRASSES UTILIZED N THE SEED AND S00 AREAS SHALL BE. OF THE SHADE 10LERA T TYPE B. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF CATCH BASNS, HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE STALL BEPLACED AS SHOWN TO LIMIT SILTATION LEADING TO THE SEDIMENT PONDS. TESE MEASURES SHP4i REMAN N PUCE UNTIL PLACEMENT Of BITUMINOUS COURSE. COUNTY DITCH NO. 22 ST(EE1` • u uuLnLUUVL•UUUL^cUL. FOR APPROVAL ONLY - TOP BREAK OF DITCH 18: 901.0 901.0 -l- r T Li 1 TAXIWAY EASEMENT 12 0 �\3 STAFF ORI DATE TOPIC AGENDA ITEM 5 N INATOR Mary Kay Nyland June 20, 1996 Resolution No. 96-73, Livable Communities Action Plan The City Communiti City subm program. with an A The atta which wil Comprehen Resolutid ouncil opted to participate in the Metropolitan Livable e program in November of 1995. In December of 1995 the tted a set of one-year housing goals as a part of that We are now required to provide the Metropolitan Council tion Plan outlining how the City will attain those goals. ed Resolution No. 96-73 adopts a Housing Action Plan be expanded upon within the framework of the overall ive Plan. Staff would recommend adoption of this to comply with the Livable Communities Act. Resolution No. 96-73 as presented . Return to staff for further consideration Council M and moved RESOLUTION Wher approved Metropole Act, and Wher Action P1 City plan life-cycl efforts w Wher efforts o service 1 NOW, City of L' until suc Plan is c 1. T 1995 whic in regard laws, goa 2. T County programs HOME 1st Anok tuber introduced the following resolution its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96 - ADOPTING HOUSING ACTION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES as, the City of Lino Lakes, on December 18, 1995, a set of one-year goals and submitted them to the an Council in compliance with the Livable Communities as, the City of Lino Lakes is required to submit an n identifying the programs, initiatives and actions the to undertake to achieve their negotiated affordable and housing goals and the time frame within which these 11 be undertaken, and as, the City of Lino Lakes recognizes that any housing behalf of thet-eity will be reflective of market and mitations within the community, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the o Lakes that the following action plan is hereby adopted time as the Housing Element of the City's Comprehensive mplete: e City of Lino Lakes established an HRA in the Fall of will be available to service the needs of the community o affordable housing. This HRA will be establishing by - s and an action plan within the next 12 months. e City of Lino Lakes currently participates with Anoka in the CDBG Program and will continue to do so. Other vailable through Anoka County include the following: program for affordable housing ime Homebuyers Mortgage program County Community Action Program providing: * rehabilitation * new construction of affordable housing * home improvement loans * special needs housing * other(s) 3. T e City of Lino Lakes currently participates in the Section 8 rental voucher and certificate program and will continue to do so. Additionally the City of Lino Lakes performs housing inspectio for the Section 8 program. 4. T e City of Lino Lakes has recently completed a 47 unit senior housing project providing affordable housing to area senior citizens. 5. The City of Lino Lakes has initiated an update of the City's Comprehensive Plan which will include a detailed housing element as required by the Metropolitan Council. The City anticipates completion of the plan within 12-18 months. 6. The housing element of the Comprehensive Plan will address: A. Type and rate of residential growth. B. Type, density, and location of multiple family housing alternatives. C. Provision of affordable housing including review of zoning constraints. D. Housing conditions and maintenance of existing housing stock. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of June, 1996. T-77' John Landers, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded b, Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, t e following voted in favor thereof: The follo ing voted against same: Whereupon aid resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby c rtify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passe•, adopted and approved by the City Council on June 24, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM> 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, City Engineer/Public Works Director DATE: June 20, 1996 TOPIC: Resolution No. 96 - 64 - Accept Bids and Award Construction Contract, City Hall Underground Storage Tank INTRODUCTION: The approved 1996 budget included funds for the installation of a new underground storage tank and fuel dispensing system. On May 7, 1996, Council approved plans and specifications for the construction of a new storage tank and fueling system. City Council action is requested to accept the bids and award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. BACKGROUND; ice' On Thursday, June 20, 1996 five sealed bids were received and opened with the following results: Company Minnesota Petroleum Zahl Equipment Co. $44,690.00 estside Equipment $48,298.00 J & D Efiterprise, Inc. $99,/5/73.00 Engi mate $65,000 Bid alternate 1 a includes an amount to be added to the base bid to install a fuel management system. The fuel management system will allow staff by date and time of use, user and vehicle identification, product, volume and mileage on vehicle. This information will be automatically sent to the City's fleet management software as part of the daily maintenance and record keeping efforts for each vehicle. Bid alternate 1 b is the amount deducted from the base bid to install a type 2 tank rather than a type 1 tank. A type 1 tank is a dual wall tank as compared to a single wall type 2 tank. Staff recommends that the base bid and bid alternate 1a be accepted. The type 1 tank is better as it provides leak detection and containment. The City's consulting engineer, SEH, Inc., has experience working with the low bidder and has indicated that they are a responsible contractor capable of performing the required work. FINANCING SUMMARY: The 1996 budget included $62,000 for this project. The base bid ($40,850) and bid alternate 1a ($6,375) results in a total construction cost of $47,225.00. Consulting engineer services are approximately $7,000 for a total project cost of approximately $54,225. PROJECT SCHEDULE: It is anticipated that work will begin within 4 weeks and will be completed by August 30, 1996 completed from start of construction. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further revie ivy 2. Adopt Resolution No. 96-64 accepting the bids and awarding a construction contract for the installation of an underground storage tank to Minnesota Petroleum Service Incorporated in the amount of $47,225.00. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Staff recommends that Resolution No. 96 - 64 be adopted. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-64 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - CITY HALL UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the City Hall Underground Storage Tank, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name Bid Amount Alt. 1 a Alt. 1 b Minnesota Petroleum Service 40,850.00 $6,375.00 $4,300.00 Griggs Contracting $44,500.00 $5,600.00 $2,400.00 Zahl Equipment Co. $44,690.00 $6,309.00 $3,329.00 Westside Equipment $46,298.00 $6,115.00 $5,168.00 J & D Enterprise, Inc. $99,573.00 $10,159.00 $2,957.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Minnesota Petroleum Service, Incorporated, 7650 State Highway 65 NE, Fridley, MN 55432, is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Minnesota Petroleum Service, Incorporated, 7650 State Highway 65 NE, Fridley, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the City Hall Underground Storage Tank according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council, including the base bid and bid alternate 1 a, and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of June, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION is I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on June 24, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell, TKDA DATE June 21. 1996 TOPIC Resolution No. 96-68 Ordering the Improvement, Approving the_ Plans and Specifications, and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids for the Clearwater Creek Trunk Utility Improvements BACKGROUND: This improvement involves the installation of trunk sanitary sewer and watermain improvements to serve the properties east of 1-35E between Cedar Street and Main Street. The alignment of the utilities will coincide with the proposed route of the relocated Otter Lake Road project. The trunk utilities will be installed this summer under a separate contract from the roadway and storm sewer construction in this area which will take place in the Spring 044997. The public hearing for this project was held on January 22, 1996. A copy of the advertisement for bids has been forwarded to the legal newspapers contingent upon the City Council's approval of this resolution. Please note that as the City initiated this project as a trunk system improvement, a minimum 4/5 affirmative majority vote is reriuired to order the improvement. 0 1. Approve Resolution No. 96-68 Ordering the Improvement, Approving the Plans and SRecifications, and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids for the Clearwater Creek Trunk Utility Improvements. 2. Return the matter to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1: Approve Resolution No. 96-68 Ordering the Improvement, Approving the Plans and Specifications, and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids for the Clearwater Creek Trunk Utility Improvements. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96- RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE CLEARWATER CREEK TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, a resolution of the Lino Lakes City Council adopted the 18th day of December, 1995 fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed improvement and, WHEREAS, Ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 22nd day of January, 1996, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on the 22nd day of January, 1996, TKDA has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted the 18th day of December, 1995. 2. Such plans and specifications are herebyapproved. 3. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened and bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:00 A.M. on Monday, July 22,1996 at which time they will be publicly„gpened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will be tabulated and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 P.M. on Monday, July 22,1996 in the Council Chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given the opporiiinity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the City Council this. 24th day of June, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer John L. Landers, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. TKDA DATE June 21. 1996 TOPIC Resolution No. 96-69 Ordering the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Otter Lake Road Realignment Improvements BACKGROUND: This project involves the reconstruction of Otter Lake Road (County Road 84) along a new alignment between Cedar Street and Main Street (CSAH 14). It will provide roadway access to the center of the properties between I -35E and Elmcrest Avenue in this area. The City will receive funding for a portion of the construction costs via execution of a Joint Powers Agreement with Anoka County. An estimated cost split was included in the Feasibility Report which was reviewed with the City Council at the public hearing held on June 10, 1996. Tans and specifications will be prepared in time to allow the project to be bid this Winter when the bidding climate is most advantageous, construction will begin in the Spring of 1997. The design of this project will be coordinated with the design of the sanitary sewer and watermain trunk utilities to be installed along the same corridor this Summer. Please note that as this is a City initiated project, minimum 4/5 is r quired to oder # improvement a, Approve Resolution No. 96-69 Ordering the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Otter Lake Road Realignment Improvements. 2. Return the matter to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: _ Option No. 1: Approve Resolution No. 96-69 Ordering the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Otter Lake Road Realignment Improvements. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES n RESOLUTION NO. 96- IQq RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE OTTER LAKE ROAD REALIGNMENT IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, a resolution of the Lino Lakes City Council adopted the 13th day of May, 1996 fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed improvement and, WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 10th day of June, 1996, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted the 13th day of May, 1996. T`- 2. John Powell, TKDA, is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM 6D STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, City Engineer/Public Works Director DATE: June 19, 1996 TOPIC: Resolution Number 96 - 70, Order Preparation of Report on Improvements, 35W/TH 49 Interchange Commercial Development Trunk Utilities. BACKGROUND: The City is currently studying the concept of developing a Town Center located on the southeast quadrant of the 35W and Trunk Highway 49 interchange. In addition to the Town Center concept, private development interest in this area is very active. One of the main questions regarding any development request is the availability of utilities. Since this area is currently without utility service, a report studying the feasibility of installing utilities to this area is recommended to be completed so the City can adequately plan for future development. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, Council is required to ;order the preparation of a report studying the proposed improvements. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staii`for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 96 - 70 Order Preparation of Report on RECOM.MENt TION: Staff recommends that Council adopt Resolution No. 96 70 ordering a report on improvements for the 35WffH 49 Interchange Commercial Development trunk utilities. MARSHAN LAKE Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-70 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS - 35W/TH 49 INTERCHANGE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TRUNK UTILITIES. WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the 35W/TH 49 Interchange Commercial Development by constructing sanitary sewer systems and water supply systems and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer, or his assigns, for study and that he is instructed to replrtto the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of June, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on June 24, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson AGENDA ITEM 6E STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, City Engineer/Public Works Director DATE: June 19, 1996 TOPIC: Resolution Number 96 - 71, Declare Adequacy of Petition and Order Preparation of Report, Trappers Crossing 2 & 3 BACKGROUND The property owner of the land that comprises Trappers Crossing Phase 2 & 3 has submitted a petition to the City to construct street, curb and gutter, storm sewer and water supply and sanitary sewer systems. Attached for Council's reference is a location map of the subject properties and copies of the petition. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes Charter, Council is required to declare the adequacy 'of the petition and order preparation of a report studying the proposed improvements. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for father review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 96 - 71 Declaring A Irrurovam+ REGI ncil adopt Resolution No. 96 - 71 declaring the petition a report on improvements for Trappers Crossing Phase 2 & 12/15/95 14:59 FAX 612 784 9136 [JOHANSON 1JG1--l�„1�7� tAy- Cr rNJli 4.-4 1 tir a-irvt.t "" IMPROVEMENT PETITION IA 002; 003 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED LINO LAKES PROPERTY OWNERS, DO HEREBY PE I I I ION TPX, CITY OF LINO LAKES TO CONSTRUCT STREETS, dURB & GUTTER, STORM SEWER SYSTEMS, WAL b.E SUPPLY SYSTEMS, AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS FOR THE PROPERTY USTETi BELOW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISION'S OF THE LINO LADS CITY CHARTER AND CHAPTER 429 OF MINNESOTA STATUTES. WE ALSO REQUEST THAT THE CITY OF LINO LAKES WAIVE FIFTY(50) OF THE SIXTY(60) DAY r r?rAITT.NCx'PERIODD AS P?? OVIDM !N SECTION 8.06 OF THE LINO LAKES Ci T a CHARTER. OWNER ADDRESS / / K VPERTY DESCRIPTION (°f7 J? r `,meq e. Posr-le Fax Note 1 n"` 4 o0�r' To F'arn g k Ca iDaP+- Ca L: 0-10 More • Prom • V �f b, a 6,,,,. 7 - rf Pia' 1 Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 71 RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDER REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT - TRAPPER'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. A certain petition requesting the improvement of Trapper's Crossing Phase 2 and 3 by constructing street, curb and gutter, storm sewer and water supply and sanitary sewer systems, filed with the Council on June 24, 1996, is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby. This declaration is make in conformity to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.035 and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. l -r" 2. The petition is hereby referred to the City Engineer, or his assigns, and he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of June, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on June 24, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson AGENDA ITEM 6F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Dave Ahrens, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: June 20, 1996 _ TOPIC: Resolution No. 96 - 29 Adopt Memorandum of Understanding for Trunk Highway 49 Tumback INTRODUCTION: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has identified Trunk Highway 49 as a highway to be under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County, Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes. Currently, both Ramsey County and Anoka County have adopted a Memorandum of Understanding for their portion of Highway 49. The portion of Highway 49 proposed to be under the jurisdiction of Lino Lakes is from Lilac Street to Fourth Avenue (refer to attached map) and is 0.28 miles in length. Fourth Avenue north and south of the subject segment are uii"der the jurisdiction of the City. The MOU states that the City can utilize Municipal State Aid Tumback Account funds for improvements to the roadway. Tumback routes placed on the Municipal StateAid System is designated mileage above the normal 20% limit on rrge ava on the Municipal State Aid System (the mileage of str designation IS limibsd to 20% of all streets irithe City). The aid more than the normal 20% limit deli .. ' as MSA d City Atton't requested to authorize the Mayor, City Admi n the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). BACKGROUND: On the March 8, 1996 Council Meeting, Council reviewed this topic with staff and Mr. Bob Brown, Metro District State Aid Engineer. Council had a number of questions at the March 8, 1996 Meeting that are discussed below. TH 49 Information & Records. The MOU states that the City can have access to all MnDOT information regarding the tumback segment. Staff has received and reviewed this information which includes: 1) Right -of -Way map; 2) all driveway and utility permits; and, 3) the construction plans for the 1995 mill and overlay project. The mill and overlay project completed in 1995 included the placement of 3" of bituminous asphalt on the driving lanes and shoulders of the existing pavement. The MnDOT Materials Engineer estimates that the improvements done to Trunk Highway 49 will provide a 10 - 15 year service life to the roadway. TH 49 Turnback Page 2 Funding. Although reconstruction funding is available, the funds would have to be used within a ten year timeframe from the date of execution of the MOU. Considering that the expected lifespan of the roadway is greater than ten years, staff would not expect to utilize these funds. The City will receive approximately $22,000 towards maintenance costs of the roadway. Apollo Drive Extension. Although the extension of Apollo Drive is not directly related to the turnback of Fourth Avenue, Council had some questions regarding the alignment of Apollo Drive as it extends north of Lilac Street through property owned by the VFW. Staff and the VFW representative have discussed the Apollo Drive extension on a number of occasions recently. Apparently, the VFW is working diligently on site plans to construct a new hall on the parcel of land located on the north side of Lilac Street. The attached map illustrates how the Apollo Drive extension alignment will affect the parcel. This alignment creates two developable parcels on either side of the Apollo Drive extension. VFW representatives feel that this provides an opportunity to place the new hall on the south side of the Apollo Drive extension and then sell or lease the remaining parcel located on the north side of the Apollo Drive extension. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Reject the Memorandum of Understanding 3. Adopt Resolution No. 96 - 29 authorizing the Mayor, City Administrator and City Attorney to sign the Memorandum ;of Understanding. RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that the turnback of Fourth Avenue from the State to the City is appropriate as it better fits in with the existing street designations and MSAS funds are available above the City's normal 20% limit to aid in future reconstruction and maintenance of the roadway. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 96 - 29 authorizing the Mayor, City Administrator and City Attorney to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-29 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR, CITY ADMINISTRATOR AND CITY ATTORNEY TO SIGN THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. WHEREAS, the State has approached the City of Lino Lakes concerning the change in the jurisdiction of Trunk Highway 49 from Lilac Street to Fourth Avenue, and WHEREAS, the State has prepared the attached Memorandum of Understanding; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor, City Administrator an .ity Attorney are hereby authorized to sign said Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Lino Lakes and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 241 day of June, 1996. John L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on June 24, 1996. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Routes Subject to Transfer State/County/City Exhibit A Lino Lakes I Rehabilitation Center STATE OF MINNESOTA METRO DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Memorandum of Understanding between: The State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, and The City of Linn Lakes RE: Change of jurisdictions of roadways located in Anoka County and associated designations This Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, acting by and through its Board of Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Counties in the Metropolitan Area and the State concur that in the interest of bringing decision making for routes of specific functional classification into the appropriate levels of government, it is necessary to change jurisdiction of certain routes; Therefore, it is the intent of the State, the Counties and the City to work toward the following objectives: 1 Article 1 - Nonbinding Memorandum of Understanding 1. Definitions will be as contained in Minnesota Rules 8820.0100, and as follows: Receiving authority - The political subdivision which receives jurisdiction as a result of jurisdiction transfer. Transferring authority - The political subdivision which has jurisdiction prior to jurisdiction transfer. Route -miles - The distance as measured along the existing roadway, between termini, rounded to the nearest 1/100 of a mile. 2. Both parties acknowledge that this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is a nonbinding statement of intent. Agreements executed by the parties as a result of obtaining enabling legislation as anticipated in this MOU are subject to approval of such State Officers as the Law may provide, the Commissioner of Transportation and the City. Article II - Introduction of Legislation , Implementation of jurisdictional transfer as listed in this MOU requires approval of enabling legislation by the State Legislature. The State will prepare and introduce appropriate legislation with notification to the City no Tess than two (2) weeks prior to the introduction to the Legislature. Article 01 - Basis for Determining Compensation If enabling legislation is obtained, the State and City intend to execute jurisdictional transfer incorporating the concepts set forth herein. 2 The party receiving subject roadways as anticipated in this MOU (receiving authority) will be compensated for each change of jurisdiction as follows: 1. All project funds allocated in the improvement programs of the party transferring subject roadways as anticipated in this MOLL (transferring authority) will transfer to the receiving authority in the year designated in the transferring authority's improvement program. Project funds will include estimated construction funds. Project funds that are transferred must be used on the transferred route; any interest accrued on such funds must be used on roadways under jurisdiction of the receiving authority. Note: At this time, no such preirdcts are anticipated. 2. Municipal State Aid Turnback Account funds may be utilized by the City for improvements to subject roadways transferred to the city resulting from this MOU in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820 in effect on the date of the jurisdictional transfer, and Screening Board Resolution Re: Trunk Highway Turnback - October 1967 (latest revision June 1989). Additionally, if the City receives project funds under Article 111.1, turnback construction funds will be reduced by an equal amount. 3. Municipal State Aid System funds may be utilized by the City for subject roadways transferred to the County under agreements resulting from this MOU in accordance with Minnesota Rules Part 8820 in effect on the date of the jurisdictional transfer, and Screening Board Resolution Re: Trunk Highway Turnback - October 1967 (latest revision, June 1989). 3 Article IV - Identification of Routes and Schedule Additions of routes other than listed will require approval of the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation, and the City. It is the intent of the parties to achieve jurisdictional transfer within one (1) year following passage of enabling legislation. TH 49 Segments: 1. TH 49 from the south Anoka County line to the intersection of CSAH 23 at Lilac St. a distance of 4.52 miles, including a portion of CSAH 23 (Old Highway 8) from Point Cross Drive to TH 49 that sttYtrmains Trunk Highway will be transferred to the County. Also, TH 49 from the intersection of CSAH 23 and Lilac St. to the intersection of 4th Ave. N., a distance of 0.53 miles will be transferred to the County. 2. TH 49 from the intersection of Lilac St. and 4th Ave. N. south to the end point, a distance of 0.28 miles will be transferred to the City. The above State Route will be conveyed under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.16 Subd. 4. The above described trunk highway and County roads are shown on the map attached hereto titled Rni,tes Suhject fn Transfer, State/County/City, marked Exhibit A, and by this reference 4 made a part hereof. The City will by Resolution agree to the TH 49 turnback to Anoka County as listed in Article IV and its designation as a County State Aid Highway. The State and City intend to agree to the future right oLway limits at State/County/City intersecting roadways, prior to the transfer of land title for each subject roadway. Article V - Infrastructure Management Responsibilities All routes included in this MOU will continue to be included in the transferring authority pavement management system and, when appropriate, receive program "funds for pavement management until such time as the roadway changes jurisdiction. All routine maintenance on the subject route covered in this MOU will be the responsibility of the transferring authority as normal, up until the time of transfer. This includes keeping any routine maintenance agreements with municipalities in force also. It is anticipated that where maintenance agreements exist the receiving party will replace the existing agreements with their own, so that no lapse in coverage will occur. Nothing in this MOU is intended to prohibit the State or City from entering into roadway maintenance agreements, including reimbursement provisions, for any roadway identified in this MOU. 5 Article VI - Information and Records Transfer The transferring authority will make the following information and records available to the receiving authority upon request, to the extent that they are available, for the route to be transferred. 1. List of active maintenance agreements which will be canceled with other governmental agencies and utility companies. 2. Utility, drainage, access driveway, sign advertising, and limited use permits. 3. As -built construction plans, and microfilm records. 4. Bridge inspection reports and ratings. 5. Photo -logs, aerial photos, right of way maps, and parcel files. 6. Inventory data. 7. Pavement condition ratings. 8. History of most recent betterment. 9. Signal files including timing sequence and repair history. 10 Accident reports and statistics, subject to Privacy Act requirements. 11 The most current traffics counts. 12 Any alignment ties, horizontal and vertical control monuments, and relative data. 13. All completed and partially completed plans for construction projects associated with the routes being transferred. 14 Road opening authority documentation and/or right of way authority. Article VII - State Aid Route Designation The State, through the Commissioner of Transportation, will designate the highway segments described in Article IV to be transferred to the City as a Municipal State Aid Street and will approve the corresponding increase in mileage, in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820, upon receipt of a resolution requesting such, from the City. This mileage is not transferable to other routes in the City. 6 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this memorandum of understanding by their authorized officers. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF LINO LAKES ATTEST: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By. City Council By: Date Metro Division Engineer By: By: By. City Administratrator Date State Aid Engineer City Attorney Date RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: By: Assistant Commissioner City Engineer APPROVED: Date By: Deputy Commissioner of Transportation Date of Understanding 7 Routes Subject to Transfer State/County/City Exhibit A Lino Lakes L Rehabilitation Center AGENDA ITEM 6G STAFF ORIGINATOR:Dave Ahrens, City Engineer/Public Works Director DATE: 6/21196; TOPIC: Resolution No. 96.75, determining the necessity for a; authoring the acquisition of certain property by proceedings in Clearwater Creek Development Center Street BACKGROUND: The City is currently planning the nstructionconstruction of streets and utilities in the Clearwater Creek Development Center ( attached map). The acquisition of right-of-way is necessary for the proposed improvements. Past discussions with property owners regarding the projects have been received favorably and staff does not expect conflicts in at uiring the sight -of -way. However, with the adoption of the attar resolu oii, the City is certain to have;the right-of-way acquired in a timely manner so as not to delay the projects. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 96-75 EMINENT DOMAIN RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes proposes to construct and improve streets and utilities to serve the Clearwater Creek Development Center, and WHEREAS, the improvement consisting of construction said street and utilities is herein determined necessary to provide for the safety of the public, and WHEREAS, permanent and temporary easements and fee simple interests over certain lands are required to provide for said construction, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has authority to acquire right-of-way for said Highway by Eminent Domain pursuant to Minn. Stat. N. 1t7, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has the right to acquire the right of way prior to the filing of an award by the court appointed commissioners, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 117.011 and 117.042, and, WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has been unable tosuccessfully negotiate the acquisition of the required easements at this time; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes the acquisition of said land by Eminent Domain and to take title and possession of that land prior to the filing of an award by the court appointed commissioner, pursuant to Minn. Stat. No. 117, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Attorney is requested to file the necessary Petitioner therefor, and to prosecute such action to a successful conclusion or until it is abandoned, dismissed, or terminated by the City or the Court. Dated: June 24, 1996 John L. Landers, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Agenda Item #7 Staff Originator: Randy Schumacher Date: June 19, 1996 Topic: Consideration of waiving or not waiving monetary limits on tort liability per Minnesota Statute 466.04. Each year, the City has the option of waiving its monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. This limit of liability insurance is currently $600,000.00 per each occurrence or incident. The City of Lino Lakes does carry an additional $1,000,000.00 in excess liability coverage($1,000,000.00 per occuree and annual limit) in the event that the limits were ever declared to be unconstitutional. The City of Lino Lakes has never waived its monetary limits on tort liability. INN The City of Lino Lakes does not choose to waive its monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. b. The City of Lino Lakes chooses to waive its monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. 1111111M1 Recommend option a. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST LMCIT EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE Cities obtaining excess coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide whether or not to waive the statutory liability limits to the extent of the excess coverage purchased. This decision must be made by the city council. CITIES PURCHASING EXCESS COVERAGE MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM TO LMCIT BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE COVERAGE. For further information, refer to the accompanying memo. City officials may also want to discuss these issues with the city attorney. The City of limits of S Check one: accepts excess liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. -OR- The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Date of city council meeting: Signature: Position: Return this completed form to: Berkley Risk Services, Inc. 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 LMCTTAPP.31 (1/96) PAGE 2 OF 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8B STAFF ORIGINATOR Randy Schumacher, CA DATE TOPIC e 21, 1996 Consideration of Resolution No. Approving Metropolitan Co Allocation of 150 Acres BACKGR FUND: In early 1995, the City of ,740 gross acres of additional upgrades to the existing Staff has negotiated a reserve of 150 net acres /. } a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 4ettopolitan Council staff requested numerous Plan prior to any MUSA Amendments. City would allow an interim upcigna#4 MUSA k immediately in sewer districts 1,4,5 or 6 (See OPTIONS Approve Resolution No. 96 - 74 proposal per Metropolitan Counc ItMetropolitan Council - Working for the Region, Planning for the Future May 29, 1996 Randall Schumacher, Administrator City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014-2198 RE: City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Amendment MUSA Expansion - 150. Net Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 16150-1 Dear Mr. Schumacher: At its meeting on May 23, 1996, the Metropolitan Council considered the city of Lino Lakes comprehensive plan amendment. This 'consideration was based on a report of the Community Development Committee, Referral Report No. 96-12. A copy of this report is attached. The Metropolitan Council adopted the staff report with the following recommendations: 1) Inform the city of Lino Lakes that its. amendment to create an undesignated MUSA reserve of 150 net acres (204 gross acres) can be put into effect immediately, but only in sewer districts 1, 4S and/or 6: 2) Inform the city of Lino Lakes that its plan to use the MUSA reserve in sewer district 3 is not acceptable because it may have a substantial impact on the interceptor sewer serving this district which appears to have insufficient capacity at the present time to serve the undeveloped lands within the city's existing MUSA; and the plan amendment must be modified to eliminate the use of MUSA reserve in this district. 3) Advise the city of Lino Lakes that the additional MUSA allocation does not permit the city to exceed the current limitation of 1,520 total sewer connections in sewer districts 1, 4S and 6 remains in place until the new regional interceptor project is completed. 4) Advise the city of Lino Lakes that it must provide the Council with an annual accounting of its use of the MUSA which includes the following information in text and map: name of subdivision, date of approval, general location, sewer district, gross acres, net acres, type of use, and number of residential equivalent units. 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TTY 291-0904 Metro Info Ilne 229-3780 An Equal Opportunity Employer Randall Schumacher Page 2 May 29, 1996 5) Direct MCES staff to complete within the next 60 days a System Improvement Study of alternatives available for upgrading or replacing the Centerville Interceptor (MWCC 76- 51) to serve both approved and anticipated needs of the cities served by the interceptor. CJ:Iv Attachment cc: Alan R. Brixus, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc Donald Bluhm, MCES James Uttley, Office of Local As stance 11 /- mommumegiommunaloilloomm ammummimiummits 23) II\ ..-.ir.•ii.o. r .. d ..•1 4 -I , 1 11 • 1 • t • t •• t t 1 1 i • if 71 I 6 I • I • I I 1 •I u q -1 1 , I \ I . I I k- r : I _mar tr. • 111 AREA ' • ' ) ,. , , .. ,‘,.1 IL . _ 2_____ - A '-=--'-- - ..,1•-14cm. t —1,--- I ",,,, 1 :fi I - II 1i -. , . I 1 1 1. .-: 8 i IIIIIIMMMIOMMOMIIIIM I ' I 1 1 _ I I \ , .# •*# -e1 2 1 ---'..•••• u_..L.1..../E11._..l____,- r .0. ‘0!..-T.T.NEOURIARESTARNTIIIRI RETRAF-11141,010" • fe• I ie. I Oa 04.0 _.x • ea .-2-11-•. or • CPICLE PINES 1 1 N \ I lic!!1_1_ _mum :17 1 um so • 1 I 11 Mr MI Mi al 1.1 Mk ftez-s. 7 ....1 lit.. * 4 6-4 LW. I N" MN OEM 10107 00 • k 6 • \ - / • / / / • - .... --"/ 1 • / • ....... 1 1/ .08. I 1 / ., '1" t 4 ll — IlluMMINWEIMIUM#WWINTWII 461frinsir / woottmito 1 .t1 tit . - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 11 J 1 1 1 II 1 i mitummt SE 11 •••• •••• \ ijl NOR T H OARS 44 1990 UPDATE LINO LAKES, MN. COMM.110.7777-000 SEWER DISTRIC1 MAP PG. 7 ,06/20/96 THU 15:44 FAX CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES + �y LINO LAKES u001 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT ALSO PRESENT : June 12,1996 : 6:30 p.m. : 9:50 p.m. : Dahl, Dunn, Gelbmann, Herr, Johnson, Robinson, Schaps : Planning Coordinator Wyland, Planning Consultant Kermis, City Engineer Ahrens, Economic Development Director Wessel L CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p_m_, June 12, 1996. Mr. Gelbmann and Mr. Herr arrived late. lT IL APPROVAL OF MINUTES Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve the minutes as submitted for the May 8, 1996 meeting and was supported by Johnson. Motif% carried 5-0. HI APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chairman Schaps stated that a notice of public hearing was published for the Dwayne Cardinal property but is not on the agenda for this meeting. The notice will be republished when the matter is to be considered. 1V. OPEN MIKE .. . Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting to be open at 6:35 p.m. There were no comments. Mr_ Al Robinson made a MOTION to close the Open Mike and was supported by Johnson_ Motion carried 5-0. V. ACTION ITEMS: A. 96-13-S. Arndt Construction.. Phelps Road. Site Plan Review & Variance Planning Coordinator Wyland stated that Arndt Construction would like to build a 17,200 square foot warehouse/shop and 2,528 square foot office at 2190 Phelps Road_ A variance to the setback requirement on Phelps Road and on the side property line is requested_ The plan is to remove the existing metal building and attach the new building to the existing 06/20/96 THU 15:44 FAX LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12. 1996 warehouse/shop building The office area will be constructed first and warehouse space after the sewer and water become available in the fall. Ms. Wyland farther stated that at this time there are plans to realign Otter Lake Road which would reorient the front of this proposed building to the east. In a Light Industrial District, the required setback is 50 feet. The applicant. is requesting a variance of. 23 feet to allow a 27 -foot setback Staff is recommending 30 feet, which will be the adopted standard in the .proposed new ordinance for residential streets. A 30 -foot setback would mean a reduction of 3 feet to the office building.. Additionally, Arndt construction is asking for a variance of 2+ feet on the west side to allow the building to be flush with the existing building. Arndt Construction has the option to purchase the adjacent property, and it is staffs recommendation that they exercise that option to meet the 10 foot setback requirement. Staff recommends approval of the plan subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Mr. Dunn asked if the realignment of Otter Lake Road will change the landscape plan. —' Ms. Wyland answered, no. t Mr. Johnson if the shaded areas on the map indicate outdoor storage. Ms. Wyland stated that the shaded areas are outdoor storage, and the applicant has all necessary permits Mr. Wessel noted that there has been considerable discussion about how the whole area will work with regard to ponding and trails. Arndt Construction also owns the property to the south ofthis site. The City has enjoyedla cooperative relationship with the company, and staff is comfortable that positive long range plans will be made for the area. Mr. Arndt stated that the company would like to get approval of the variance for the setback offPhelps Road to allow as much office space as possible. If the variance is allowed on the west side, it will be possible to extend the existing building in a straight line. He confirmed that the company has the option to purchase adjacent property if necessary. Mr. Arndt questioned condition No. 7 in the staff report. He does not want to pave the storage yard because of the heavy equipment that is put there that will just tear up any bituminous or concrete. There is a drainage Swale where trees will be planted on both sides for screening, and no buildings are planned in that area. Ms. Wyland explained that the paving requirement relates to the parking area only. Mr. Dunn asked the applicant's plans for concrete storage east of the property that will face Otter Lake Road when it is realigned. 41002 ,06/20/96 THU 15:45 FAX LINO LAKES Le1003 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12. 1996 Mr. Arndt stated that there are plans to screen the bituminous, sand and topsoil stored on the site with crushed aggregate. Pines have been planted to screen the entire storage area. Mr. Dunn asked if there are any environmental concerns with the storage of these materials. Ms. Wyland stated that the company has all necessary permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Chair Schaps asked if the company is willing to comply with staffs recommendation for a front setback of 30 feet and the purchase of additional property to eliminate the variance on the west side. Mr. Arndt stated that he would prefer to be able to extend the building in a straight line without having to acquire property for two reasons: 1) there is a drainage swale ditch that cannot be built on; 2) while the company has the right to exercise its option to purchase the adjacent Paul Miller property, would prefer not to do so at this time because of the cost of the improvements being put in. Regarding the 30 foot setback, again, they would prefer not reducing their building size but it would be possible. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the sitF plan review with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs be in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. The • City's CSO Officer shall review the building plans prior to issuance of the building permit to insure compliance with CEPT D recommendations. 2_ Landscaping of the site shall be coordinated with the City Forester prior to issuance of any building permits. 3. Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained prior to installation. 4. RCWD Permits shall be obtained, if required, prior to any site grading. S. Utility, grading and drainage plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 6. A variance for 20' on the front setback (Phelps Road) shall be approved allowing a setback of 30'. The variance setback requested on the west property line is denied. 7. Concrete curb, gutter and bituminous paving shall be provided for all access driveways and parking area. Mr. Herr seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. 3 06/20/96 THU 15:45 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 ►-�-► LINO LAKES 10004 Mr. Dwayne Cardinal, who was seated in the audience, stated that he had changed his mind and requested that his issue be discussed. It was the consensus of the Board to add Mr. Cardinal to the agenda as item No. K. B. 96-14-S. Lino Lakes Family Dentistry. Blue Heron Road. Site Pian Review Ms. Wyland stated that the applicant is seeking a site plan review and Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 3,800 square foot office building on Oudot A of Rice Lake Estates. The outlot was zoned Neighborhood Business in 1985, and permits professional office development with a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant is requesting a variance setback of 28 feet from the adjacent residential district. City ordinance currently requires 35 feet Staff is recommending approval of the variance based on the following findings- 1) the applicant has determined that the building requested is at the minimum size for its intended use; 2) the lot is an odd shape with unique circumstances not created by the property owner, and 3) the hardship justifying a variance includes the shape and configuration of the lot. wa Mr. Dunn asked if consideration was given to reversing the location of the parking area and building so the parking area would be further away from the residential area Ms. Wyland stated that the City Engineer did not.recanmend access off Hodgson Road. The access has to be off Blue Heron Drive. ,Because the lot is narrow, it was difficult for the applicant to design the building and parking to fit the lot. Mr. Dunn asked if the local residents have responded to this development. Ms. Wyland stated that the City has received no written responses, but several neighbors are present to speak. Mr. Scott Mower; Progressive Architecture, stated that he is the Architect of record for this project. The site is in a residential area on the busy corridor of Highway 49. Rice Lake is across the road. The shape of the lot is difficult, and there are some bad soil conditions. In positioning the proposed building, all of these factors were considered. Setback requirements would not allow a reversal of placement of the building and parking lot. The parking lot will be buffered with vegetation, berms, and a fence that will be placed behind heavy pine trees so as not to block the neighbors' view. The roof line of the building will be low and broken up as much as possible to blend in with the neighborhood. The building exterior will also blend in to keep a residential feel without a lot of gl9ss or commercial materials. Ms. Dahl asked the placement of the fence, what material will be used to build it and the height. 4 .06/20/96 THU 15.46 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 -�-+-' LINO LAKES 1j 005 Mr. Mower indicated the placement of the fence on the map and the pine trees that will block it. It will be a privacy fence of redwood or cedar. Ms. Wyland stated that the fence height is limited to six feet and will extend from the rear of the garage to past the rear property line. Mr. Mower stated that to comply with City regulations, 30 parking spaces are required. Angle parking is difcuk to use, and 90 -degree parking forces the building to the back of the lot. Mr. Gelbmann asked if the parking lot could be moved to the east to maintain the trees and screening at the back of the property. Mr. Mower stated that the layout of the site already extends to the easterly setback. Mr. Gelbmann asked the numb of dentist rooms on both floors. Mr. Mower stated that the practice area is the upper floor with nine rooms, but it would be difficult to fit. nine practitioners in at one time. The lower floor will be used for storage. Mr. Herr expressed concern about lights shining into residential areas and asked what type of lighting will be used. It is important that the light be cut off with precision lighting. Mr. Mower stated that there will be a few overhead lights. Low Bollard lights are being considered. Ms. Wyland added that City ordinance requires lighting that is restricted. Mr. Mower asked for clarification of condition No. 2 which refers to requiring a pedestrian trail and the reference to wildflowers in condition No, 3. • Ms. Wyland stated that the trail should be 8 feet wide, graded and finished with crushed rock in " the existing right-of-way. The City Engineer and City Forester have plans and specifications to review with Mr. Mower. The trail requirement is reasonable, as no park dedication is being required. Condition No. 3 refers to planting the wildflowers correctly per the City Forester. Mr. Joe Barron, Rice Lake Estates, stated that his only problem with the development is the driveway access off Blue Heron Drive. He and his neighbors would prefer to have the development accessed from Highway 49 to eliminate excess traffic and protect neighborhood children. 5 06/20/96 THU 15.46 FAX -i-,-► LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 Chair Schaps responded that it would be very difficult, to get Mn/DOT approval to put the access on f ighway 49. Mn/DOT is never prone to interrupt major highways with driveways, and the probability of such an access being approved is remote. He asked Mr. Barron his preference for the placement of the fence. Mr. Barron answered that he would like the fence to start further back, closer to his garage. As long as the pine trees survive, any added landscaping wi 1. be a plus. Mr. Robert Kraus, 6675 Blue Heron Drive, asked the destination of the trail Ms. Wyland explained that at this time the trail will not connect to other trails, but as properties are developed new segments will be added to the north and attached to this trail. It is the City's practice to require trail segments as properties develop, such as the trail in front of the bus barn on Highway 49. Mr. Barron noted that the trail int of the bus barn is on the east side, and this one will be on the west. He asked if this one could be put on the east side. Ms. Wyland stated that the trail will cross to the west at some point, perhaps Birch Street. Mr. Johnson added that having the trail cross to the west will make it more accessible to residents. Ms. Lisa Giebink, 6676 Sandhill Drive, stated that she and her neighbors are generally pleased to have a dental office in the neighborhood and prefer it to other business options. The main concern is the access off Blue Heron Drive. She would be interested in pursuing the issue with Mn/DOT for access off Highway 49. Mr. Mower stilted that on another project where the only access point had to be from a state highway, it took a year to obtain approval from Mn/DOT. Here, where there is obviously an alternative access, it would be a miracle to obtain approval for driveways on Highway 49. City Engineer Ahrens stated that both the county and state look at the main function of their roads as being to move traffic through cities. As long as there is an alternative local access road, a driveway permit offHighway 49 would be refused. Ms. Giebink stated that the plan indicates that one monument to the gateway entrance will be removed, and the residents just spent money to paint them. She would not mind if one is taken out, but would want to be sure that the comers match. 4fl 006 06/20/96 THU 15:47 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 LINO LAKES Q007 007 Mr_ Mower offered to help rebuild the one taken out if the construction materials are provided. Mr_ Dunn asked if the City will face these same decisions with the other outlot in this area. Ms. Wyland stated that the proposed site is the only outlot zoned for Neighborhood Business in this plat. Mr. Robinson asked how the bad soil conditions will be corrected and whether the building might have to be reconfigured. Mr. Mower stated that a layer ofmuck was found at a depth that he believes could be dug out and replaced. Mr. Robinson asked if correctable pilings could be used. Mr. Mower stated that would b expensive option. The borings appear to indicate that the problem can be corrected with compaction.. Mr. Dunn stated that it concerns him to see business intermix with residential areas, even though the area is so zoned. He wouldlike to see the City prevent business development from locating adjacent to residential areas. He recommended that in the future residential developments be reviewed with the thought of requiring the first one or two border lots to be used as green space buffers. He believes the City will look better if this philosophy were adopted. Mr. Herr stated that he believes this development is a good application of a neighborhood business that integrates 'well with the residential area. He believes a trend of future development will be a mix of residential and business in the same areas. Chair Schaps stated that the project has been well presented and commended the property owners and architect for communicating with residents and addressing their concerns. Ms. Dahl also commended the developers for the open communication among all parties, which she very much appreciates. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and variance with the conditions outlined in the staff report: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs be in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements_ The 7 06/20/96 THU 15.47 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12,1996 i-►� LINO LAKES Q008 City's CSO Officer shall review the building plans prior to issuance of the building permit to insure compliance with CEPTED recommendations. 2. A pedestrian trail shall be graded and rocked, in the right-of-way, according to City specifications, along the Hodgson Road side of.the property. This trail work shall coordinated with the City Forester and Mn/DOT. 3. Landscaping of the site shall be coordinated with the City Forester, in particular, the grasses and wild flower area shown on the plan. 4. Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained prior to installation_ 5. A detail of the proposed fencing on the west property line shallbe provided prior to City Council Review. 6. RCWD permits shall be obtained, if required, prior to any site grading. 7. A variance for T on the interior side setback line shall be approved allowing a setback of 28 feet. Mr. Gelbmann seconded the mon. The motion carried 7-0. C. 96-15-S, EAM. 4th Avenue, Site Plan Review Ms. Mary LaForest stated that Emergency Apparatus Maintenance (EAM) is seeking to build a 5,250 square foot building with a potential for 5,600 square foot fixture expansion on a one - acre triangular parcel in Apollo Business Park on 4th Avenue adjacent to the Klosner-Goetz building EAM started in 1987, and now serves 300 fire departments in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan Ms. Wyland noted a couple of minor changes requested by the applicant: 1) to move the entrance further south to provide easier access for the emergency vehicles; 2) that the rear exterior wan be :of plain block wall rather than the rock face on the other sides of the building. Staff sees no problem.with either of these requests. A revised site plan will be prepared for the Council. Approval is recommended with the conditions listed in the staffreport. • Mr. Dave Schreier, EAM Owner, stated that the reason for moving the driveway entrances is to accommodate 35 -foot long fire trucks. Landscaping will be moved and placed wherever required by the City. Ms. Wyland noted that there is a minimum amount oftraffic on 4th Avenue, and access would be possible at any point on that alignment. • City Engineer Ahrens stated that he sees no problems with moving the driveway. Mr. Dunn asked if vehicles will be stored on-site. 8 06/20/96 THU 15:48 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 -� LINO LAKES tg 009 Mr. Schreier stated that the company repairs the vehicles and sends them back. They do not sit outside. The only thing stored outside is a small trailer to haul products when traveling outside of the state to do repairs. Mr. Dunn asked if fire extinguishers are repaired or other apparatus using chemicals. Mr. Schreier answered, no. Mr. Herr made a MOTION to recommend approval of the site plan review, subject to: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction on the site. The building permit shall include a deposit of 1% of construction costs to ensure completion of all site improvements. 2. The applicant sign a development agreement and post financial guarantees as specified by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. The City Engineer shalltreview and approve the grading, utility and drainage plans. 4. The parking area shall be supplied with adequate handicapped spaces as provided by the ADA Rules and Regulations. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the RCWD for grading and on-site ponding, if required. - 4 6. Signage comply with the City Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained. • 7. •Concrete curb, gutter and bituminous paving shall be provided for all access driveways and parking areas. , Curb and gutter shall not be required on the concrete pad on the east side of the budding in the proposed expansion area. 8. The contractor shall review final construction documents with the Community Service officer to ensure compliance with CEPTED and the landscaping requirements as recommended by the City Forester. • Mr. Gelbmann seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. D. 96-16-S, Blue Heron 1I, Anono Drive, Site Plan Review Mr. Wessel stated that the Blue Heron II site plan has been submitted for a 35,000 square foot building west of the newly constructed Blue Heron I building in Apollo Business Park The City has been working with the developer to build the Blue Heron development in order to make tenant space available and encourage companies to move in. Blue Heron II will be the same concept as Blue Heron I and leased in 3,500 square foot increments or larger. Ms. Wyland stated that Apollo Business Park is zoned Light Industrial. Staff is recommending approval subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. 9 06/20/96 THU 15.48 FAX -+-►-' LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 Chair Schaps asked the reason that the front of Blue Heron I is oriented to the road, but Blue Heron 11 is not. Mr. Wessel responded that there is concern about screening the service area from the freeway, Apollo Drive, and the Iarge adjoining commercial parcel to the west. Mr. Dan Richmond added that one of the reasons that the Blue Heron II is oriented in a different direction is to maintain consistency with rounded corners and for the adjacent property to look at the nicest side of the second building. Half of the building is leased to a medical company making medical furniture for hospitals and doctors. There will be one cabinet shop.. As with the. first building, the lease includes an option to buy for owner - occupancy businesses. • Mr. Johnson asked the types of businesses that are in the first building. Mr. Richmond stated that GL4-Corporation is out of Chicago and is a large company that makes resins and plastics. There is a box storage company. Techni-Pack assembles detonators. They contract with the federal government. Another company is Excalibur Rollers, which is a light assembly company that puts rollers on the bottom of tables and other furniture. Mr. Wessel stated that in the Development Agreement, there is a provision for the City to pre -qualify all tenants for tax increment financing (TIF) assistance to control who leases the space. • Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to recommend approval of the site plan review, subject to the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction on the site. The building permit shall include a deposit of 1% of construction costs to ensure completion of all site improvements. 2. The applicant sign a development agreement and post financial guarantees as specified by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. The City Engineer shall review and approve the grading, utility and drainage plans. 4. The parking area shall be supplied with adequate handicapped spaces as provided by the ADA Rules and Regulations. • 5. Permits be obtained from the RCWD for grading and on-site ponding, if required. 6. Signage comply with the City Sign Ordinance and proper permits access driveways and parking areas. 7. Concrete curb, gutter and bituminous paving shall be provided for all access driveways and parking areas. 10 14,010 06/20/96 THU 15:49 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12. 1996 LINO LAKES 011 8. The developer receive access permits from Anoka County. 9. The developer pay the required park dedication fees. 10. A shared driveway agreement be included in the development contract. 11. The contractor shall review final construction documents with the Community Service Officer toensure compliance with CEPTED. 12. A certificate of survey shall be provided prior to City Council action on the minor subdivision. Mr. Gelbmann- seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to recommend approval of the minor subdivision as submitted. Mr. Robinson seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. E. 96-17-P, Alan Donat1 8134 East Rondeau Drive, Minor Subdivision Ms. Wyland referred Board Members to the revised report concerning Mr. Alan Donat's property at 8134 Rondeau Drive East. The application meets City requirements, and staff recommends approval. The revised request is for the homestead to consist of 6.76 acres leaving 10 acres for future development. Both the existing home and the new one would have access off Rondeau Drive. Mr. Dunn asked if the zoning will remain the same. Ms. Wyland answered, yes, it is zoned Rural. Mr. Robinson iced if flag parcels are acceptable. Ms. Wyland responded that the parcel has 330 feet of frontage and is not a flag lot. Mr. Johnson asked if the access to 81st Street is blocked by a swamp. Ms. Wyland stated that there is a DNR wetland along 81st. Mr. Robinson made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision with the requirement of a Park Dedication Fee of $500 for the 10 -acre parcel and that this fee be collected prior to recording of the subdivision with the County. Mr. Dunn seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. 11 06/20/96 THU 15:49 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12.1996 -y-• LINO LAKES [?1.012 F. 96-19-P. Mollv & Jim Jungbauer, 2207 Deeroass Trail, Minor Subdivision Ms. Wyland stated that the applicants are requesting a minor subdivision to add five feet to their property from the adjoining property. The purpose is to correct the existing encroachment on the east side where there is a retaining wall and decking. This correction will eliminate future mortgage problems. When the home was originally constructed, the owners owned both parcels, and the house was constructed close to the current side property line. The adjacent property owner has agreed to sell five feet to the Jungbauers. The property is zoned rural. Staff is recommending approval with the condition that the five feet be added to the legal description of Lot 23, and also recommends a waiver of park dedication requirements Mr. Jungbauer stated that he is willing to spend the $3,500 to buy the five feet of property in order to correct the situation. However, it has cost him a $250 fee to present this application to the City, which he believes to be unfair. He requested a waiver of that fee. He added that the deck stairway rlio4onger exists, and the deck will be in full compliance with City requirements upon approval of the subdivision. Chair Schaps stated that it is unprecedented to refund the fee. Mr. Jungbauer stated that when he bought the property, he noted the property line, placement ofthe house and deck He obtained a letter of acceptance from the City so he would not be required to take the deck down. He is now trying to bring his property into compliance. To bring the City's business before the atyis costing him $250, and he requested that the Board recommend to the City Council a refund of his fee. Mr. Robinson made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision as requested with the condition that the westerly 5 feet of Lot 24 be added.to the legal description of Lot 23 and waive the park dedication requirement and that the $250 fee be reimbursed to the applicant in light of the special and unique circumstances. Mr. Herr seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0 Chair Schaps called a break at 8.20 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:30 p.m. G. Richard Carlson 7932 Lake Drive, Minor Subdivision Ms. Wyland stated that Mr. Richard Carlson purchased the His and Hers Barber & Beauty Shop. He plans to open an equipment rental .business. The parcel is located in the central business district and is approximately .62 acre in size. The applicant is requesting a minor subdivision to add Parcel B (80 x 135') to his Parcel A from a larger 79 -acre tract, Parcel C. 12 '06/20/96 THU 15:49 FAX iy ► LINO LAKES a 013 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ]UNE 12, 1996 He intends to fence the property and request rezoning. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning of Parcel B to conform to the zoning of Parcel A. Chair Schaps asked what type of equipment will be rented. Ms. Wyland stated that lawn and garden equipment will be for rent, i.e., roto tillers, lawn mowers, etc_ Mr. Carlson stated that there is an existing pole barn on the property which he plans to remove to build a permanent structure at some later date. Mr. Dunn asked if the rental equipment would be contained within a building, or stored outside. Mr. Carlson stated that there will be some outside storage. Screened fencing will prevent visibility of the site. Ms. Wyland noted that a Conditional Use Permit for outside storage is required, and the applicant will have to come back to the Board for its approval. +Vp # Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision with the following conditions: 1. Tract A and B shall be combined to provide for one legal description and one taxed par 2. No park dedication shall be required as no additional structures are proposed to be constructed. 3_ The applicant shall apply for a rezoning of Tract B prior to any additional land use applications_ Mr. Johnson seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0, with Mr. Robinson abstaining. H. 96-20-PDO/Rezone, Bruce Hanson, Surfside Seaplane Base, Rezoning, Planned Development Overlay and Preliminary Plat City Planning Consultant, Bob Kermis stated that Mr. Hanson has submitted plans for five single family lots with access to the Surfside Seaplane Base_ With this application is a proposal to rezone 11 acres to R 1X from General Business to build the homes. The Hansons intend to retain the existing General Business portion shown as Lot 7 along Lake Drive. A number of approvals are necessary to accommodate the proposed development: 13 06/20/96 THU 15:50 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD NNE 12, 1996 -i-*- LINO LAKES [1014 1. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Land Use Plan which now • suggests a business use of this property. • 2. A finding that indicates the appropriateness of the proposed land use to justify rezoning the portion that will be designated residential. 3 A PDO overlay of air strip accessible lots is necessary to accommodate oversized accessory buildings 4. Preliminary plat. Mr. Kermis stated that he believes there is justification for either rezoning the property or denying its continuation. It is the City's policy not to down -zone commercial property unless there is an equitable land exchange or unique conditions that make the change appropriate. In order to approve the proposal, the Board must make findings that support the special conditions that make the proposed land use acceptable. The proposed use could be found to be compatible with the lots to the north toward•Aqua.Lane which is south of a multi -family development. This development could be a natural barrier to a higher intense commercial use. The Comprehensive Plan prooidos for the following conditions that would support the proposed residential use: "Future comtnunityy development shall take into account social, economic, and environmental opportunities and constraint'sin an effort to provide an optimal arrangement offuture land use activities. A variety of residential development types is desirable and shall be encouraged in the community. Particular areas of the City shall be designated for each of the desired housing types which range from multi -family residential to rural." Mr. Kermis further stated that the City is in the process of updating its Comprehensive Plan This site is included in that study, and the Planning Board may wish to make a finding that rezoning is premature until the Comprehensive Plan document is completed. Should the City find this particular use to be appropriate, he would recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the 12 conditions listed in the staffreport. Mr. Johnson asked if Lot 6 and Oudot A are contiguous and could be combined Mr. Kermis responded that they would be combined to the seaplane base to the east. Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 8:50 p.m. Mr. Wessel, Economic Development Director, stated that he believes this project is premature. The Comprehensive Plan review process has been underway since the beginning of the year. Sessions have been held with the City Council, and meetings will be scheduled 14 -06/20/96 THU 15:50 FAX LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 for input from residents. It will take a year to complete the review process. The review will focus on the Highway 49 corridor from Hodgson Road to Lila because of the increased activity in that area and its strategic importance. Comprehensive land use valuations will be done to develop direction to reorganize that corridor. Secondly, there is the issue of not losing commercially zoned property in the City. Also, there is the possibility of setting a precedent that precludes the Comprehensive Plan update process. There is a lot of interest in rezoning, and approval of this project could snowball into similar requests. Mr. Bruce Hanson, Owner of Surfside Seaplane Base, stated that he is opposed to any further studies and would like to see the project approved at this time. With regard to the Comprehensive Plan, Surfside Seaplane Base is part of the metro airport system and should be protected against planning for conummity development. Land use changes were attempted in 1977 and again in 1984. It is time to move ahead and approve the appropriate land use. As of this date, he has three, and perhaps four buyers for the proposed residential lots. Chair Schaps asked ifthere has lleenany response to this project from residents to the north_ Mr. Hanson stated that he has heard nothing. Ms. Wyland stated that she received one phone call from Mr. McFee, who lives in the townhomes. His only question was the purpose of the taxiways, whether sea planes have wheels, the hours of operation .and noise that may be generated from those five lots. After discussing the daily hours of operation and the special equipment used to move the planes to the base, he had no objections. Mr. I.P.. Houchins stated that he has no objections. The sea planes are fun, and there are not many around. Residents do not want to see the area rezoned for more townhomes. He does not have an opinion on what type of commercial business might fit the area, but upscale housing would be attractive to local residents. Mr. Jnhnson noted that although the land would be zoned residential, the property owners would be supporting a T.ino Lakes business. The City would not necessarily lose business property because this residential property would be part of a larger commercial complex, which is a significant economic component. Mr. Wessel agreed with Mr. Johnson but stated that the land use must be separate between private residential and commercial use. Mr. Robinson was excused and left at 9:00 p.m. Mr_ Dunn asked if anyone else has come forward with a better use for this land. 15 f] 015 06/20/96 THU 15:51 FAX ��-► LINO LAKES 10D16 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12,1996 Mr. Wessel stated that this land is zoned General Business and no other business candidates have made a proposal It is a difficult parcel because it is split by wetland, and the parcel off Aqua Lane is somewhat removed. EDAB is concerned about protecting current land uses until the Comprehensive Plan review is complete and a design for the whole area can be developed. A decision to consolidate should be made by the community as well as public ofci is Mr. Johnson asked if this development would attractother kinds of businesses to locate close to the landing site. Mr. Hanson responded that it would be a possibility.. He has an inquiry about space from a company in Anoka that is recognized as the premier plane engine rebuilder. The issue of generating the same tax dollars as General Business zoning is addressed by the fact that the land has been vacant for a number of years generating no tax dollars. Iris project will be built within the next year and will bring tax dollars to the City. Mr. Wessel stated that he can understand the Zoning. Board's position to deem this project appropriate for the site. He noted an earlier meeting of interested parties, including Mr. Hokanson and Mr Hanson, that was held to consider a study of land use designations for the area. The decision of the group was to not pursue, a study. It would have been helpful now in reviewing a specific proposal. • • • Mr. Herr noted that for the project to move forward, approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment is needed. Mr. Kermis stated that the amendment is a minor one. The Metropolitan Council will only respond if there is a problem. Mr. Heir asked if utilities are installed on Aqua Lane. Ms. Wyland answered, yes. City Engineer Ahrens added that the utilities were put in when the Marshan Townhomes were built. This property was then stubbed. If business development is considered in the area, Aqua Lane could support a business hie Mr. Hanson's. It could not support a business that uses semi -trucks. Mr. Dunn asked how long Mr. Hanson has been in business. Mr_ Hanson answered, since the 1960's. 16 06/20/96 THU 15:51 FAX -+-.-. LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12. 1996 Mr. Dunn noted that Mr. Hanson has been a good neighbor and has an excellent reputation in the business community. He would support this proposal and urged other Board members to support it. Mr_ Johnson stated that off ce/business would fit on Aqua Lane, but there is not a high demand for that type of development in Lino Lakes, and there are other sites that would be appropriate for office development He would not anticipate office development on this site in the foreseeable future. To retain General Business District zoning would mean that the land will be vacant for a long time. This proposal would be a unique economic asset to the community that would link a residential development to the sea plane base. He stated that he also would support the project. Mr_ Herr agreed that this residential project would uniquely fit this area and would support it. Mr. Gelbmann stated that this opment would provide a good buffer along the edge of the residential area to the north and would make a nice transition from residential to commercial areas. The sea plane base has been a long-standing business in the community and he would support the economic viability of keeping existing businesses. He expressed concerns, however, about losing a General Business District and suggested that options be explored to arrange some type of land exchange. Ms. Dahl stated that she agrees with the other Board members and would have no opposition as long as residents are not opposed It is an opportunity to put land to use that has stood vacant Rezoning to R 1X will bring expensive, large homes on big Tots. Mr. Johnson asked about the air safety zones south of the base along Lake Drive. The area is zoned light industrial, and there is an area zoned R-1 that fronts Lake Drive south of the Marshan Townhomes. Much of this property is vacant, and he asked if some of it could be reclaimed for General Business, or Limited Business or Neighborhood Business to make up for rezoning Mr. Hanson's property. Mr_ Wessel agreed that there would be potential in that approach. He stated that he is not surprised that this General Business property has stood vacant so long. The City is just beginning to make headway in attracting commercial development. If the Board approves this project, it would make sense to find an equitable exchange of land along Lake Drive as part of the planning process. Chair Schaps stated that he likes Mr. Hanson's proposal and the size of the lots. The property is unique and the business is unique. There are not many sea plane bases, particularly in the Twin Cities_ He would be interested to have community input on what happens to this 17' 16 017 06/20/96 THU 15:52 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 -+-'-► LINO LANES property but noted that only one person came to the public hearing. General Business zoning has been retained on the corner, and he agrees with the idea of an equitable land exchange. In light of the future residential development to the north, this project is a consistent use of the property in all respects, and he would favor it. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing. Ms. Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Chair Schaps stated that the specific findings of. the Board to justify down -zoning this property from General Business to R 1X are as follows: 1. The property is unique in itself in its proximity to Rice Lake and an existing Surfside Seaplane Base. 2. This proposal would compliment existing business and surrounding new future residential construction_ 3. There is general commufity.approval which would be consistent and necessary for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mr. Johnson added a fiuther finding that there is a good possibility that the City may be able to claim land for General Business use in the area, Chair Schaps added a 13th Condition to approval of the prehiminaryplat, which is that the City focus on obtaining land for limited business or other business related zoning in exchange for the land rezoned to R 1X in this project. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to recommend approval of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation of this property to R 1X based on the following findings: • L The property is unique in itself in its proximity to Rice Lake and an existing Surfside Seaplane Base. 2. This proposal would compliment existing business and surrounding new future residential construction. 3_ There is general community approval that which would be consistent and necessary for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. 4. . There is a good possibility that the City may be able to claim land for General Business use in the area. Mr. Dunn seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 18 ►1.1018 06/20/96 THU 15:52 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 LINO LAKES l& 019 Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to rezone the eastern portion of the site (air strip accessible lots) from General Business to R 1X, Single Family Executive. Mr_ Gelbmann seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Herr made a MOTION to recommend approval of the PDO overlay of air strip accessible lots to accommodate oversized accessory buildings. Ms. Dahl seconded the motion Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to recommend approval of the preliminary plat with the conditions listed below from the staff report and including the 13th. condition stated above. 1. The preliminary plat is revised such that Lot 6 and Outlot A are combined with the adjacent Surfside Seaplane Base property. 2. Hanger building materials and heights are specified and found to comply with applicable City requirements 3. Seaplane hangers shallifot exceed 2,400 square feet in size. 4. No detached accessory buildings. other than seaplane hangers, are allowed. 5. A copy of restrictive covenants shall be applied to the proposed residential lots and submitted for City review and approval.. Such covenants must address architectural requirements for hangers and include a;provision that such hangers are to be used solely for airplane (seaplane) and related equipment storage. 6. It is demonstrated to the City that wetland boundaries have been delineated by a qualified surveyor. 7. Drainage and utility easements are provided along all lot lines and a drainage easement is provided over the site's wetland. This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. 8. All park dedication requirements as determined by the City Park Board are satisfactorily met. 9. A grading and drainage plan shall be .submitted. Such plan Shill be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 10. All conditions of operation, as required by the FAA and/or Minnesota Department of Aeronautics, are satisfied. 11. The City Engineer shall provide comments and recommendations in regard to utility issues. 12. Comments from other City staff 13. The City of Lino Lakes shall focus on obtaining additional business related property in the area for an equitable land exchange for the property rezoned R 1X. Mr. Dunn seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 19 06/20/98 THU 15:53 FAX PLANNING & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 1. 96-21-V Ga Sandah 478 Lonesome Pin Variance d that swimming pools which LINO LAKES [x],020 uesting a variance from Section 4 regarding "The pool, filter unit, pump heating unit and nay noise making mechanical equipment shall be located at least 35 feet from any adjacent or nearby residence and not closer than 10 feet to any lot line." The ordinance is being updated, and in the updated version, which is anticipated to be adopted this fail, the 35 -foot setback. requirement is eliminated because it is difficult to enforce. Jf an addition were to be put on Mr. Sandahl's neighbor's house, the City would not check to be sure that the pool is 35 feet away. The new ordinance would permit the Sandahls' request to Locate the pool 10 feet from the adjoining property without a variance. Staff is unable to find unique circumstances or a hardship of the property configuration. The Sandahls could meet current 1oidinance requirements or make the pool smaller. If this variance is approved, staff recommends that all other setback requirements be met. Letters from 12 neighboring property owners, including the neighbor immediately adjacent, have been received There are no objections. Chair Schaps asked if the applicant is aware ofthe ordinance change. Mr. Crary Sandahl stated that the pool was approved four months ago, and they were scheduled to put it in two weeks ago. When he learned ofthe ordinance change, he decided it would be well worth going through this procedure to move the pool and be able to have a full view of it from the house. Mr. Johnson noted that the Sandahls offer child care in their home. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to recommend approval of the variance request to allow pool construction 10 feet from the side property line with the condition that the pool equipment be located adjacent to the existing dwelling. Ms. Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Herr was excused and left the meeting at 9:37 p.m. Dwayne Cardinal Issue Ms. Wyland stated that Mr. Cardinal owns RBR property on I -35E and 80th Street. He would like to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for an advertising sign on property near 80th Street that is on the freeway. The sign ordinance does not specify advertising in RBR 20 •06/20/96 THU 15:53 FAX PLANNING 8c ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 LINO LAKES I0021 districts because the designation of RBR was created after the sign ordinance was adopted. The sign ordinance will be brought to the Board for review in July but must undergo two readings and be published and adopted by the Council before it is effective. Mn/DOT has jurisdiction on signs on the freeway, and a permit must be obtained from Mn/DOT. Mn/DOT will not issue permits in other than business districts if locally approved. Chair Schaps noted that if a Conditional Use Permit were issued, it would not apply to the property Mr_ Cardinal owns. He does not want to take action that would be detrimental to Mn/DOT approval. Mr_ Cardinal stated that Mn/DOT has intiicat sign, Mn/DOT would also approve it. 0 that if the City would approve the Chair Schaps suggested postponing action on Mr. Cardinal's request until August, after the new ordinance has been reviewed and acted upon. Ms. Wyland stated that the appficcation fee would be refunded to Mr. Cardinal. Chair Schaps stated that he would prefer not to open or continue the public hearing on this matter. Mr. Cardinal agreed to withdraw his application for a Conditional Use Permit and be refunded the permit fee. 96-22 Jeff Kellev, Zoning,Ordinance TextAmendment to Add Golf Course!Driving Range as Interim Use in RBR District Ms. Wyland stated that the P &Z previously approved an interim use request to allow golf and driving ranges in RBR zoned districts, contingent upon adopting the proposed zoning text amendments which would add golf courses and driving ranges as interim uses to RBR districts. Chair Schaps declared the public hearing to be open at 9:45 p.m. Ms. Wyland noted that she has received no calls on this issue. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing. Mr. Dunn seconded the motion Motion carried 5-0_ Chair Schaps closed the public hearing at 9:47 p.m. 21 06/20/96 THU 15:54 FAX ->-+-► LINO LAKES PI ANN]NG & ZONING BOARD JUNE 12, 1996 Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to adopt the ordinance amending the City's Zoning Ordinance, Appendix B1, Section 6, Subd. 21, R BR by adding Golf Course/Driving Range as an Interim Use. Mr. Dunn seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. VL DISCUSSION ITEMS Ms. Wyland requested that the Board schedule one more work session to wrap up review of the proposed zoning ordinance and consider minor changes recommended by staff particularly the size of accessory building structures. Mr. Wessel added that he would like the Board to spend some time in being updated on the Comprehensive Plan process. He agreed to invite Mr. David Licht to the work session to give a brief presentation Board members agreed to check schedules and contact Ms. Wyland to set up the time. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 p.m. Mr. Dunn seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 22 1¢1.022