HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/27/1995 Council PacketAGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday
February 27, 1995
6:30 P.M.
- Call to Order and Roll Call
- Setting the Agenda: Are There Any Items to be Added or
Deleted from the Agenda?
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Consideration of Minutes:
Regular Council Meeting, February 13, 1995
REGULAR AGENDA
Open Mike 1011" oo l w i
.�
2. Consideration of Disbursents:
37
February 13, 1995
/A31( February 27, 1995
Centennial Fire District
Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 25 Supporting Passage
of the Minnesota Emerging Communications Services Act of
1995, Dan Tesch
Planning Report, Mary Kay Wyland "yfr
SECOND READING, Ordinance 01-95, Clearwater Creek
Rezone
Consideration of Preliminary Plat, Clearwater Creek.
Consideration of Conditional Use Permit, Kids at Heart
Child Care, 7330 Lake Drive
D. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 24 Setting Public
Hearing to Vacate a Certain Drainage Easement on Lots 5
AGENDA
& 6, Block 2, Rohavic Oaks, Second Addition
E. FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 02 - 95 Amending the
Zoning Code, B1, Subd. 29. Fences and Walls Provision
F. Consideration of MUSA Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Amendment
5. City Engineer's Report, John Powell
6. 6:50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING,_ Improvement of Woods of Baldwin
Lake, Second Addition, John Powell
A. Consideration of Resolution No.95 - 26 Ordering Plans
and Specifications for Woods of Baldwin Lake, Second
Addition, John Powell
7. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 22 Accepting Donation
from the Ladies Auxiliary VFW, Post /6583, Chief Pecchia
8. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 23 Designating
Community Development Block Grant Funding for 1995/1996,
Randy Schumacher
9. Consideration of Designating Legal Depositories, Randy
Schumacher
10. Consideration of Awarding Bids for Dump Truck Equipment,
Randy Schumacher
11. Consideration of Appointment of Council Liaisons, Randy
Schumacher
12. Old Business
A. Verbal Update, Senior Housing, Randy Schumacher
13. New Business
A. Set Public Hearing to Redesignate a Portion of the
1994/1995 Community Development Block Grant for Monday,
March 27, 1995, 6:40 P.M., Randy Schumacher
14. Adjourn
2/24/95, 12:00 Noon
PAGE 2
4 A - SECOND READING, Ordinance 01-95,
Clearwater Creek Rezone from Rural to R-1
Residential'
Clearwater Creek� ��
�
-(16
The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 01-95
at theirl February 13, 1995 meeting.
Action on the Preliminary Plat for Clearwater Creek was delayed to
give the staff additional opportunity to respond to citizen
concerns relating to the plat.
A neighborhood meeting was held `03n Wednesday, February 15, from,
6:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. to answer neighborhood concerns. A list of
those present is attached for Council review.
Please refer. to `.Green Sheet from February 13. 1995 meetjnq for
detailed, staff report and information relating to the rezoning and
preliminary.plat An updated report from NAC and TKDA relating to
the revised preliminary plat is attached for Council information.
1. Approve Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1-95 Rezoning Clearwater
Creek from. Rural to R-1 Residential
2. Approve preliminary plat for :Clearwater
outlined in MAC report dated February 24, 1.99
3. Return to staff for further consideration
Option 1`a 2
Council Member introduced the following
ordinance and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ANOKA COUNTY
ORDINANCE NO. 1 - 95
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B1 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY
REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM RURAL (R) TO SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL (-1), CLEARWATER CREEK
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota
does ordain:
I.
Ordinance No. B1 of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County,
Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 13, 1992 is hereby
amended by rezoning from Rural (R) to Single Family Residential (R-
1) pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate:
INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION
II.
Save as above amended, said Ordinance No. B1 shall stand as
initially passed and as previously amended.
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its
passage and publication according to the City of Lino Lakes this
27th day of February, 1995.
ATTEST: Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly
seconded by Council Member and upon vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
February 15, 1995
CLEARWATER CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
NAME /21- 2 //
/0c.Ifin fila /ply
( yiL/`772/744/,c: G �jC =rte i
1�-cf.
cAm
C) 7
it
ADDRESS 7 d % /UJ /45
c?/44(2 A - tJ L1( > s /tee
66o`� 0-4-€)1L4ko Ad- //1u. „5-5-L-=
G5 7 i 2V
Z 7_S /frG/ `i O"C -j
/il'L� (127176'1 r / J<i
l Lc l� ` C;�z d� f� /_
1,
`2 3 -4 2
(
/f / )) d
7 ( N1<< pkms,
e..).-tt e ko
( veti P-et
ct\a
t )( k L.
I Off\ - L
•-•L k
Z,P 1 tJ .-
z\'°
FEB -24-19W 11: t=gyp h C 512 595 9837 P. 02/03
tP "a Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
C URBANP L A N N I N G • D F $! r N• M A R K F T MFQIFAACM
MEMORANDUM
TO. Mary Kay vJy laud
FROM: Bob Kirmis
DA l'E: 24 February 1995
RE: Lino Lakes - Clearwater Cry Rezoning/Preliminary Plat
FILE NO: 194.01 - 94.07
At your request, we have conducted a review of the revised Clearwater Creek preliminary plat
dated 8 February 1995. The revised preliminary plat proposes 153 single family lots over a
112.9 acre site, located east of Interstate 35E and south of Cedar Street. Such ptnposal contrasts
the previous preliminary plat submission dated 26 September 1994, which proposed 157 lots
upon a 121 acre site.
The proposed subdivision will open a new area of Lino Lakes up for development, The
successful development of the residential plat will offer the City the opportunity to provide
municipal utilities to the I-35/County Road 14 interchange area opening areas of commercial and
industrial zoning up for economic development. This prospect is keeping with the Lino Lakes
1990 Comprehensive Plan amedment, the position set forth in the Lino Lakes/Centerville
annexation dispute, and the economic development objectives of the City.
hi preparing for this new development opportunity, the City has completed the following studies:
�a
TKDA : ArmWide Utility Feasibility Study
SEIL Otter Lake Improvement and Alignment
OSM: lin couperaiion with the City of Hugo, the City has completed an area
Storm Water Management Study
5775 Wayzata Blvd.- Suite 555 -St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (612) 595 -9636 -Fax. 595-9$37
FEB -24-199 11:A8 NAC
612 595 9837 P.03/03
-t$aviatig r repleted th aoorern nt n ed c,4.idie.. our ,r.f .+n +-+.coairn. nds approval ....vi e,Y
«ux q.�.'cxa the wa LviaLVUWVI.a�a ucitaaalNw� Lu1 vial+,.v lyy�/A �ylu Vi L4Ji! Q�/I.11LlY Ql of the 1GbLp+.rlj
Clearwater Creek preliminary plat dated 8 February 1995 subject
et(.CP the following conditions:
1, The City approve the requested rezoning of the subject property from R, Rural to an R-
1, Single Fancily Residential zoning designation.
2. A landscape plan is submitted which illustrates the screening of lots that abut either Otter
Lake Road or Cedar Street.
3. The following precautions are taken in the event that adjacent southerly development does
not occur in the immediate Mum.
a. Those lots west of Street A which receive access from Street. 11 be excluded fivui
the subject plat at this time and be developed as a future phase in conjunction
with future southerly development.
b.
Provision is made to provide a possible Street. E loop within the boundaries of the
subject site.
4. A temporary cul-de-sac is provided at the southern terminus of Street A.
5. The City Engineer provide cominentlrecornmendation in regard to street width
requirements.
6.A,nl ac sspnermit is obtained from Anoka County Highway to accommodate propose;
County Ro(tad. access.
64
7. The submitted grading and drainage plan is subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
8. The submitted utility plan is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
9. Park land dedication, as recommended by the Park Board and depicted upon the revised
plat, is formally dedicated to the City.
10. All wetland related recommendations offered by the Army Corps of Engineers. Rice
Creek Watershed District, and City Engineer are satisfactorily met.
11. The submitted phasing plan is subject to City approval.
13
0
TOTAL P.073
TKDA
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
To:
1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140
PHO4E:612292-4400 FAX:612/292-0083
Mary Kay Wyland Reference: Preliminary Plat/Rezoning
Copies To: Clearwater Creek Subdivision
John Powell
From: Acting City Engineer
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Date: February 10, 1995 Commission No. 10414-953
Since the Planning and Zoning Commission acted on this matter at their November 9, 1994 meeting,
additional review of the engineering matters related to this subdivision has been completed. An update
on these matters is as follows:
Drainage
A hydrologic study funded jointly by the cities of Hugo and Lino Lakes for the Clearwater Creek
watershed has been completed by Hugo's consulting engineer. The preliminary findings of this study
were discussed in detail at a joint Council meeting held between the two cities on February 1, 1995. A
great many details regarding the implementation and financing of any improvements to be made in the
watershed have to be worked out by the two communities. However, the preliminary findings as
discussed indicated no unusual drainage concerns regarding the subdivision. The developer will have to
comply with all Rice Creek Watershed District requirements and the City's Surface Water Management
Plan.
Wetlands
A copy of a letter from the Rice Creek Watershed District to the developer's engineer has been received
confirming their agreement with the wetland descriptions and determinations.
Traffic
A study of the sketch plan of the proposed subdivision was prepared by SEH in August of 1994. This
study indicated that the five phase development proposal of which this preliminary plat is a part, would
not create significant traffic volumes. An expanded study was then prepared in January of 1995 which
looked in more detail at the areas surrounding the proposed development including the City of Hugo.
The following items should be noted:
Memorandum
February 10, 1995
Page Two
1. The developer has shifted the proposed Otter Lake Road connection to a point with more
acceptable site lines. Anoka County has been contacted by the developer's engineer and does not
object to this connection point.
2. A future phase of this subdivision shows an east -west roadway generally aligned with the 134th
Street connection to Elmcrest Avenue considered in Hugo's Draft Transportation Study. In order
to discourage the traffic from the east from continuing through this residential neighborhood, some
discontinuity in the roadway should be considered. Hugo representatives are aware of this
concern_
Sanitary Sewer
The 1990 Comprehensive Sewer Plan for Lino Lakes approved by the Metropolitan Council allows the
City to connect directly to the MCWS forcemain located in Cedar Street at the north end of the proposed
subdivision. A lift station would be constructed as part of this subdivision consistent with the
Preliminary Utility Planning review of this service area.
Water System
The Preliminary Utility Planning review which I presented to the City Council at a work session last fall
indicated that initially a well with a hydropneumatic tank would be constructed to serve this area; but,
after the first two phases of the subdivision were constructed, a storage tank must be considered to
provide any additional service. A Preliminary Report on the well for this area was completed in January
of 1995. Its fmdings and cost estimate for the well and pumphouse are consistent with the Preliminary
Utility Review done in October of 1994.
Financing
The estimated trunk sanitary sewer and watermain assessments generated by the proposed preliminary
plat are adequate to offset the cost of the trunk improvements required for serving the subdivision.
Summary
The additional information received regarding engineering matters since the Planning and Zoning
Commission action on this matter supports the previous engineering recommendation to approve the
rezoning and preliminary plat.
JMP:j
AGENDA ITEM 4 E
STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland
DATE February 23, 1995 1S
TOPIC Ordinance No. -95 REVISIONS TO FENCE ORDINANCE
PUBLIC HEARING
At the request of our Building Inspector, City Staff has reviewed
the existing fence ordinance and proposed the changes highlighted
on the attached ordinance. These changes were initiated by citizen
request and involve the following:
A) Change ordinance to allow a 6' fence to be installed from
the front of the home to the rear property line. Existing
ordinance provides for a 6' fence from the back of the house
to the rear property line.
B). Change the requirement providing for 30% of open area to
10%. This change would allow purchase of standard type
privacy fences offered for sale at Knox, Menards, Etc.
C). Clarify the section relating to the side of the fence
considered to be the face.
We have reviewed the fence ordinance in several adjoining
communities including Circle Pines, Blaine, Hugo, Forest Lake,
White Bear Township, New Brighton, and Arden Hills. These
ordinance were reflective of the changes we are proposing.
The Planning & Zoning Board held a Public Hearing on February 8,
1995 and recommended approval of the attached Ordinance.
tri �w�er�s
Approve First Reading of Ordinance No.
2. Return Ordinance to staff for further consideration
-RECOMM
ATi
option 1
Council Member introduced the following ordinance and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
ORDINANCE NO. 1-95
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4, SUBD. 29 FENCES AND
WALLS OF THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE APPENDIX B1
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota
does ordain:
SECTION NO. 1. Section 4, Subd. 29 Fences and Walls, is hereby
deleted and replaced by the following:
Subd. 29. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall require a
building permit and shall be permitted in all yards subject to the
following:
(1) Prior to issuance of a building permit for any boundary
line fence, abutting property owners shall be notified.
2) Solid Walls (such as masonry construction) in excess of
forty-two (42) inches in height shall be prohibited.
(3) Fences in residential districts may be located in any yard
to a height of four (4) feet, except that a fence up to six
(6) feet in height may be erected from the nearc3t rcar corncr
the trentfacade of the principal building to the side and/or
rear lot line. Wire fences shall not be permitted in
p
residential areas, X3.3 '� ` fit ticiY1 ct chain link fences,
(4) Should the rear lot line of a lot be common with the side
lot line of an abutting lot, that portion of the rear lot line
equal to the required front yard of the abutting lot shall not
be fenced to a height of more than four (4) feet.
(5) Fences located eight (8) feet or more from the rear lot
line may be up to eight (8) feet in height, except that fences
for tennis courts maybe up to twelve (12) feet in height with
(ten ) foot �s9etback a at 3 figs line behind
t o r :i atructure,
(6) Fences in Business and Industrial districts may be erected
on the lot line to a height of six (6) feet; to a height of
eight (8) feet with a security arm for barbed wire.
(7) That side of the fence considered to be the face (facing
as applied to fence posts) shall face abutting property. ht
ljd frit* thit t4tytitt
(8) No fence shall be permitted on public rights-of-way.
(9) Fences which are ninety percent (90%) open (barb wire,
chain link, woven wire, and other similar type fences) which
are for the sole purpose of containing non-domestic animals
are not subject to the provisions of this ordinance and do not
require a building permit. Chain link fences shall have round
street parts and braces.
(10) Fences shall be at least thirty perccnt (30%) titittlAtitittlit
116%) open to provide space for the passage of air. No used
material shall be used in construction of fences.
SECTION NO. 2. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage
and publication according to the City Charter.
Passed this day of , 1995.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
Motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
STAFF ORIGINATOR
DATE
TOPIC
BACKGROU
........................
Mary Kay Wylanl
February 23, 1995
Vacation of Drainage Easement,
2nd Addition
The vacation of a drainage easement through Lots 5 and 6, Block 2,
Rohavic Oaks 2nd Addition is necessary to clear the title for these
two properties. This easement was recorded as the Southwesterly 15
feet of Lot 17, Block 2 Rohavic Oaks which was subsequently
replatted as a portion of the Rohavic Oaks 2nd Addition and never
vacated when that plat was approved.
The City Attorney has recommended that this item be continued to
the March 27, 1995 City Council Meeting. Notification in the Legal
Newspaper referenced a St. Paul Water Utility easement when, in
fact, this easement relates to a City of Lino Lakes easement for
drainage purposes.
At this time it would be appropriate for the City Council to adopt
the attached Resolution setting a Public Hearing for Monday, March
27, 1995 to consider the Vacation of this drainage easement.
,OPTIONS
Adopt Resolution No. 95-24 setting a Public Hearing for March
27, 1995 to vacate a drainage easement in Rohavic Oaks 2nd
Addition.
RECOMMENDATION..:
Option 1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 24
RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR VACATION OF A DRAINAGE
EASEMENT ON LOT 5 AND LOT 6, BLOCK 2, ROHAVIC OAKS, SECOND ADDITION
WHEREAS, a 15 foot wide drainage easement was recorded over the
southwesterly border of Lot 17, Block 2, Rohavic Oaks at
the time the plat was recorded, and
WHEREAS, this portion of Rohavic Oaks has been replatted into Lot
5 and Lot 6, Rohavic Oaks, Second Addition and proper
drainage easements were recorded over Lot 5 and Lot
6, Block 2, Rohavic Oaks, Second Addition at the time the
plat was record,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA:
that a public hearing be set for Monday, March 27, 1995 at
6:30 P.M. to consider the vacation of the drainage easement as
shown on the attached map.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February,
1995.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
'7
FAS ./A
< --••`2°),
\ ‘"'•
,h•
O
:E•
‘1,
NORTH
a/P fc-e.
1%;
16
e90.
00
,y,61
-
ROHAVIC OAKS
CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA
/5'22
---- -
12
/....•,.R.„;
0400
49:eirl/1"
0'0
oh -3 cb
••,'" — / 9./0. 44.
0
14
/Y619 '0/
4'30.00
490.00
13
/90.00
,...1,4f ,,.. • ...
.... -9.?(Ir.
_ ,...,..r... I 5 . ,
0441
\
N'l ,
%
k,•+
0`1‘)
•.*
/90.00
8
40.-14 /m., at .6,o/ ./, Sue
:;':.,'6;/'.,,,,--,,,,
ti
,< ,,,‘ _
0 \ t 1,
o N i',',
41 5 e
\,, I i
- -ftee°,1-6
0 4, ,,
• 0 / .6' r
, , 0
/99. 0.c
I 5
N09°66:97 "IV
„,../
8
ir8e'se'Bp-ff
4'0,5:00
„ 9
4 'R991.9
.9,17a2
,
\
90
AGENDA ITEM 4 F
STAPP ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland
DATE February 23, 1995
TOPIC MUSA Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment
Attached, for Council consideration, is a detailed MUSA Amendment
Report prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants. This report
outlines the technical aspects of the amendment and the methods
used to obtain the data contained within the report.
Additional information includes a map outlining, in shaded cross-
hatch form, those areas staff would recommend including in the
designated growth area. The growth areas are in the vicinity of
existing utilities. A neighborhood Meeting was held for property
owners within the designated growth. Approximately 30 property
owners attended this meeting. Some expressed interest in being
included in the growth areas and others indicated a desire to be
excluded. To facilitate those property owners nix_ wanting their
property included in the growth area, the map was revised and
properties deleted from the growth area as requested. A copy of
the revised map is enclosed for your review.e('
Ya c�,
Q
Three tables have been prepared outlining the following:
Table 1 - Breakdown of acreage within the City according to
various categories and an explanation of those
categories.
Table 2 - Breakdown of acreage within the City.
Table 3 - Inventory of Upland Acres within Growth Area.
The Planning and Zoning Boardheld a Public Hearing on February 8,
1995 to review the MUSA Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
recommended approval of the Amendment on a 4 to 2 vote (Schones and
Landers voting nay).
1. Authorize City Staff to pursue MUSA Comprehensive Plan Amendment
with Metropolitan Council Staff.
2. Retultn to staff for further consideration.
COMI1EI
Option 1
1,6
'1/41'\`"AO
450 a(
' 12/93 Areas
Crura ..Craica „Zea a' 9.ruc rta uy Sfrzeaddeel
CITY OF LINO LAKES
—i
0
MUSA Acres
Metropolitan Urban Service Area
4050
Commercial Zoned MUSA
Industrial Zoned MUSA
Public Zoned MUSA
Residential Zoned
NB, LB, SC, C8, or GB Zoning within MUSA
GI or U Zoning within MUSA
PSP Zoning within MUSH
R-1, R -1X, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-6, and R-7 Zoning within MUSA
475
Total
Residential Developed MUSA
NWI Acres within MUSA
MUSA
acres containing platted subdivisions.
Available Acres within
MUSA
Area of National Wetland Inventory within MUSA boundaries.
Upland area of lots within the MUSA, larger than 5 acres,
zoned residential. Upland area being defined by the NW1 or the 1977
county delineation (on the base map) whichever is more restrictive.
895
Non-MUSA Acres
Total city acres minus MUSA acres.
17315
State ROW Acres
Lake Acres
County Park
Non-MUSA NWI Acres
All the acres within the ROW of 35E and 35W.
All the acres within
All the acres in the
the 13 "Named" lakes in the city.
county park not including the lakes.
560
3110
Non-MUSA Available Acres
All the NWI outside the MUSA boundaries. This includes the 3110 acres of lakes.
Upland area of lots not within the MUSA, larger than 5 acres,
zoned residential. Upland area being defined by the NWI or the 1977
county delineation (on the base map) whichever is more restrictive.
3770
Total NWI Acres
All the National Wetland Inventory acres in the city;'
8670
Total Available Acres
Upland area of lots within the CITY, larger than 5 acres,
zoned residential. Upland area being defined by the NWI or the 1977
county delineation (on the base map) whichever is more reshct!ve
4665
Total Acres
All the acres within the cities boundaries
21365
2/I,cclraee �aed
-r4\le 1
2/23/995
12/93 Areas
i/2!clrad zaea
Cryo C'aEca 2a4d 9.usentoay- S,F✓eadalcect
CITY OF LINO LAKES
0
MUSA Acres
Commercial Zoned MUSA
Industrial Zoned MUSA
Public Zoned MUSA
Residential Zoned MUSA
Total Residential Developed MUSA
NWI Acres within MUSA
Available Acres within MUSA
Non-MUSA Acres
State ROW Acres
Lake Acres
County Park
Non-MUSA NWI Acres
Non-MUSA Available Acres
Total NWI Acres
Total Available Acres
Total Acres
4050
475
420
265
890
1225
820
895
17315
560
3110
2440
7850
3770
8670
4665
21365
--7-R\z\e, a
2/23/995
Inventory of Upland Acres within the Growth Area ( 2/24/95 MAP )
Upland Acres
Growth Area Acres
Percentage Upland
Section 7 157.55 241.79
Section 8 20.93 20.93
Section 17 32.89 35.85
Section 19 2.16 2.16
Section 24 41.12 84.22
Section 27 43.4 129.6
Section 28 0 31.2
Section 29 24.04 33.67
Section 31 71.46 107.2
Section 32 56.07 88.27
65%
100%
92%
100%
49%
33%
0%
71%
67%
64%
TOTAL
450
775
`-7'G\1e. 3
58%
2/24/95
AGENDA ITEM 6-A
STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. Acting City Engineer
DATE February 24. 1995
TOPIC Resolution No. 95-26
BACKGROUND:
Woods of Baldwin Lake - 2nd Addition
Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications
A Feasibility Report has been prepared for this project and the Public Hearing is
scheduled for February 27, 1995. Preparation of Plans and Specifications can begin
upon receipt by the City of adequate financial security from the developer.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 95-26 ordering the preparation of Plans and Specifications
for Woods of Baldwin Lake - 2nd Addition.
2. Return the matter to City, staff for review.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 1
Council Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 95-26
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WOODS
OF BALDWIN LAKE - 2ND ADDITION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 95-03 of the Lino Lakes City Council a
report has been prepared with reference to these improvements
detailing estimated construction costs and assessments, and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 95-04 of the City Council adopted the 23rd day of
January, 1995, fixed a date for a public hearing on the proposed
improvements.
AND WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the
hearing was given, and the hearing was held on the 27th day of
February, 1995, at which all persons desiring to be heard were
given an opportunity to be heard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. John Powell, TKDA, is hereby designated as the engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of
such improvement.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February, 1995.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
AGENDA ITEM 6
STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. Acting City Engineer
DATE February 23. 1995
TOPIC Public Hearing for Woods of Baldwin Lake -
BACKGROUND:
2nd Addition Utility and Street Improvements
The preliminary plat for the Woods of Baldwin Lake - 2nd Addition was approved with
conditions by the City Council on October 24, 1994. In response to a petition received
by the City from the property owners within the project area, a report has been prepared
evaluating the feasibility of installing public improvements to serve the area. These
public improvements would include sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewers, and
streets. The information contained within the report will be presented at the City
Council meeting and public input will be received.
OPTIONS:
Public input will be received at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
No action required.
AGENDA ITEM N0. 7
STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Chief of Police
DATE, January 24, 1995
TOPIC
Consideration of Resolution No. 95 22
Accepting Donation From the Ladies Auxiliary,
Circle -Lex VFW Post #5583 for the Support of
the D.A.R.E. Program Within Lino Lakes and Rice
Lake Elementary Schools
commencing in 1995, the Lino Lakes Police Department began teaching
the D.A.R.E. Program in the local elementary schools. The goal of
the Lino Lakes Police Department is to ensure that the D.A.R.E.
Program will become totally funded through donations from the
community. The Ladies Auxiliary, Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583 is
aware of this goal and has donated S1,000.00 toward the cost of
administering the Program in the local elementary schools. The
purpose of Resolution No. 95 - 22 is to publicly thank the Ladies
Auxiliary, Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583 for their generous donation.
1. Adopt Resolution No. 95 - 22 accepting the donation.
2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 22
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE LADIES AUXILIARY VFW, POST
#6583 FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE DARE PROGRAM WITHIN LINO LAKES AND RICE
LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
The Lino Lakes Police Department began teaching the D.A.R.E program
in local elementary schools in January, 1995; and
The curriculum, developed by educators, is an elementary school drug
prevention curriculum taught by specially selected and trained uniformed
police officers; and
WHEREAS, the Ladies Auxiliary VFW, Post 6583 was made aware of the desire for
the Lino Lakes Police Department to teach this program in the elementary
schools and has donated $1000.00 to the City to defer the cost of this
program.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
hereby accepts the donation of $1000.00 to help fund the D.A.R.E. program and
wishes to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Ladies Auxiliary VFW
Post #6583 for its donation.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February, 1995.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof.
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
Request by a Government to Spend Gambling Funds
Goverriirient Information.
Name of Government Requesting Funds
Lino Lakes Police Department
Phone Numoer
( 612) 780-0605
Adoress
7731 Lake Drive
City
Lino Lakes
State
MN.
Zp Code
55014
Check type of government making request:
X
City
I 1
County f 1 Township 1 School District No. of
l 1 State of Minnesota, Department of , Division of
1 1
United States, Department of
, Division of
Other Governmental Entity - specify
Organization In forrnatiart
Organization
Ac•D/gS !u.r// A.4
frz/ 6-4-Y3
Phone Number
(67" ) . r- /
Aaadre/ss. City State
7
�G`,tAx-G De J f nJ6 , \M h S fG L
License Numbef
0G/i-c0/
Zp coca
Lawful Purpose Request
The above-named government requests lawful g—amobng profits for the following purpose:
(explain expenditure - anach additional sheets if necessary.
Support of the D.A.R.E. Program within Lino Lakes and Rice Lake
Elementary Schools.
Amount requested
$ /I c•07)
Educational Materials used during the 17 week program. $4,300.00
Wages for D.A.R.E. Instructor.
$8,000.00
• By completing and signing this form, the govemmenrs agent confirms that the requested funds will be spent for a lawful
purpose. This request expires one year from the date below and may be renewed at the request of the local governing body.
S.gnaau• pov.mm.i agent
Pnnt nam.
I Tit7.
Chief of Police
0at.
01-19-95
Use of Form:
1. If an organization wishes to cJnnnbute gambling funds to a governing body, the governing body must complete this form.
2. Aporovaf of the gambflno Control @card la not rsoulred _
3. The form should be kept on file by the licensed organization.
4. o• o lou . .0 •••ul: ;••.g o .n 1 whl tuna •r• seen
l0C6
Vi
AGENDA ITEM 8
STAFF ORIGINATOR Randy Schumacher
DATE February 24, 1995
TOPIC Adopting Resolution 95-23, Designating Community
Development Block Grant Funding for years 1995-1996.
Please find attached Resolution 95-23 detailing the allocation of 1995-1996
Community Development Block Grant funds. These are federal funds administered
through Anoka couty for which the City is able to distribute to local organizations for
services. These organizations must generally provide assistance to the elderly, diabled
or low to moderate income residents.
Approve Resolution 95-23 as presented (Administrator's recommendation):
Program Name
ACCAP
Alexandra House
1994-1995 1995-1996 1995-1996 1995-1996
Present Requested AdministratoSt Council
Funding Funding Recoitimendapons Recommendation
500 3,637 3400
500 5,000 t 00
Pro
Forest lake Y
Meals on Wheels
u
500 1,000
500 2,000
5,
10
2,000
Lino Lakes Senior Coor
0
2,783
Land Use Housing Need/t i3ev Impact Study (continuation)
Land Use Housing Need/Econ 0ev Impact Study Phase 1
No. Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped
Rise, Inc.
13,000 15.621
14,601
0 15,000
10,000
8,500
0
0
0 1,500
0
500 1,000
0
Total
47,541
37,601
2. Reallocate funding distribution and/or add alternative projec
.....................
RECO!
�JEM
VA TION
Reco
emend option
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION 95-23
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR FUNDING YEAR 1995-1996.
WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes is anticipating receiving Community Development
Block Grant Funds in funding year 1995-1996 in the amount of
$37,601.00 ($38,601.00 less $1,000.00 for County administration
costs), and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the funding of a Senior Outreach Program for
our community through the Anoka County Community Action Program,
and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports Alexandra House and its cause of assisting
families with intervention services, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Community Emergency Assistance
Program and its mission of helping people become self-sufficient
and maintain their dignity, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau and its
its goal of providing service to the communities youth, and
WHEREAS, City Council supports the Meals on Wheels Program, designed to provide
food to homebound seniors and handicapped individuals, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the continuation of the Senior Citizens Center
Coordinator Program which has been funded through C.D.B.G. funds
since its inception, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the continuation of the Land Use/Housing
Need/Economic Development Impact Study (in coordination with the
Comprehensive Plan update), and
Page 2
Resolution 95-23
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $3,500.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G. Funds be designated for the Anoka County Community Action
Program.
2. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $5,000.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G. Funds be designated for Family Intervention Services provided
by the Alexandra House.
3. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $1,000.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G Funds be designated towards the Community Emergency
Assistance Program.
4. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $2,000.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G Funds be designated towards the Forest Lake Youth Service
Bureau.
5. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $1,500.00 of it 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G Funds be designated towards the Meals on Wheels Program.
6. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $14,601.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G. Funds be used in support of the Senior Citizen Coordinator
Program, designed to promote the center's activities, programs and general
operation.
7. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $10,000.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G Funds be designated to the continuation of the City's Land
Use/Housing Need/Economic Development Impact Study (in coordination with
the Comprehensive Plan update).
8. That the aforementioned dollar allocations shall be expended to the fullest
extent possible given possible public service limitations at Anoka County.
Page 3
Resolution 95-23
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th Day of February, 1995.
Vernon Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
AGENDA ITEM No . 9
STAFF ORIGINATOR Randy Schumacher, City Administrator
DATE February 22, 1995
TOPIC Consideration of Designating City Depositories
Attached, please find a list of depositories prepared by the Finance Department.
These depositories are agencies with which we invest City funds. We are required
to appoint and/or reappoint depositories annually.
3'W`:`'.
1 Approve the fist of depositories.
2. Disapprove the list of depositories,
DEPOSITORIES 1995
NORWEST
GAYLE GIBSON 667-7255
FIRST BANK NA
KAREN JARVEY 973-3912
FIRSTAR BANK
DEANNA KNUTSON 780-4240
MERRILL LYNCH
SCOTT KAULS 349-7905
DAIN BOSWORTH
STEVE SANTOS 228-6941
JURAN AND MOODY
RAND WINDSPEAR 224-1500
PRUDENTIAL BACHE
STEVE PADDOCK 340-4561
STAFF ° ORIGINATOR
DATE
TOPIC
AWARD BID FOR
MW SNOW PLOW'
PURCHASED CAB
DUIP BOX, HYDRAIILICS,
EQUIPMENT FOR PREVIOUSLY
AND CHASSIS
Purchase of a replacement dump/snow plow truck was budgeted for
1995. This purchase takes place in two steps. First the cab and
chassis is bid, this has been done and the Council awarded the bid
for this step.
Second, is the bidding of the dump box, hydraulic and snow
equipment to be installed on the cab and chassis.
I received quotes from three equipment dealers. Two quotes were
received from each of these dealers. One quote was for dump
box/hydraulics and the other quote was for the snow glow equipment.
��'�`�-fig'
%+'k....> ' 1 } q'�S y y. .�
y
}. ki a \�Y '.yat?bs'v
DI
MACQUEEN
16, Q S. i 0
12, 562.00
CRYSTEEL
12,636.00
12,980.00
J -CRAFT
12,541.00
12,521.00
Option #1, Award the bid to the company with the lowest b
dump box hydraulics and also lowest bid for plow equipment.
Option /2, Do not accept any bid.
Option #1, Award the bid to _ the company with the lowest b .d for
dump box/hydraulics to J -Craft, Inc. at $12,541.00, and award the
lowest bid for plow equipment to J' Craft, Inc. at $12,521.00.
AGENDA ITEM NO 11
STAFF ORIGIIATOR Randy Schumacher, C. A.
DATE February 24, 1995
TOPIC Consideration of Appointment
Liaisons
Council
The City Council discussed the appointment of liaisons to various
departments and committees at their February 22, 1995 work session.
The following committees were discussed and it was decided that
liaison appointments should be made for them:
Committee
Solid Waste Committee
Police Department
Star City Program
Government Efficiencies Program
Suggeste4 Appointment
Linda Elliott
Andy Neal
Sally Kuether
Andy Neal*
* Mayor Reinert asked that Mr. Schumacher and Mr. Tesch form
committee to assist Council Member Neal in this area.
1.
2.
3.
Appoint the committee liaisons as suggested.
Revisit the matter and appoint other liaisons.
Do not appoint liaisons
Option No.
a
AGENDA ITEM 4 C
STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Nyland
DATE February 23, 1995
TOPIC 95-3-C, Kids at Heart Child Care, 7330 Lake
Drive, Conditional Use Permit
•Kids at Heart Child Care• Center is located at• 7330 Lake Drive in
the Gethsemane Methodist Church building. They have been at this
site since January of 1992 and hold a license from the State of
Minnesota for 35 children. Recently a request was submitted to the
State to increase the number of children to 42. The breakdown
would be as follows:
20 Pre School Children - 2 1/2 - 5 years of age
15 School Age Children 5 - 12 years of age
7 Toddlers 16 months 2 1/2 years of age
The property in question is Zoned R-3, Medium Density Residential
and the Zoning Ordinance provides for day care nurseries (15
persons or more) with a Conditional Use Permit. The City was asked
to review this center as a result of the request to increase the
number of children to 42. In the review process it was determined
that a Conditional Use Permit was not obtained in January 1992 when
the facility was originally licensed by the State. I believe this
was an oversight in 1992 as there were some staffing changes within
the City between late 1991 and early 1992 when the original State
review occurred. The applicant has, therefore, been required to
obtain the necessary Conditional Use Permit at this time.
Space has been provided within the church building for a
play/fellowship area, nursery, kitchen and restrooms.A fenced in
playground on the site is used for ourdoor recreation. There are
currently four (4) full time employees and two (2) part time. The
facility is open from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Parking in the church
parking lot is more than adequate to serve this use and the church.
The State Licensing Division, the Fire Marshall, the Building
Inspector and myself have inspected the site and find it to be in
compliance with all applicable requirements. The Conditional Use
Permit will be subject to various State Inspections and City review
on an annual basis.
The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing on February 8,
1995. Condition No. 4 was added as the result of neighborhood
concerning regarding drainage on the church property.
In summary the Planning & Zoning Board and Staff would recommend
approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the following
conditions:
1. A License from the Minnesota Department of Human Services
be maintained at all time.
2. Access to the premises be provided upon notification of
annual and periodic inspections from appropriate City Staff.
3. An increase in the number of children to be served in the
facility will require modification of the license from the
State. Staff would require notification of any increase and
inspection by the building inspector and fire marshall to
determine adequacy of structure but waive the requirement of
an Amended Condition Use Permit.
4. Staff is to review drainage and grading issues on the
church property in the Spring.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Conditional Use Permit with conditions listed above.
2. Deny permit as requested.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
GEORGI
rfrAbtta
w•A Bi �+f/
zaut:
cls
RESHANAU
'22
•-•
/ -- „-
/,.., 7',-
/„-,,,
c:-
,,
/ V
/
4o7
1G
H I
-1?
// i „-)
,
,
, _ -------! ...-',(.._,L.j • G.2 a-_,-_-2 7/,..-,, ',,
,
,
/ ,' /
I
/
,/
4
/ — h '
---- 1.^
• •-e,„
„ -
0
`,..,
------\,'„,-1 '-(----;J '
i -H
1
----,
:-) --:":,
-----— •-. 1' I.
.5./..., :
----r
•
(7
„
---
, "Woc
- _
0./
1\ )-(,--h c' :5:2? '"•" '' • '-' / 47 ,(-'' , 7' 7-
'‘-; r-''.,- ;:-"" -- C... z//C,'S
:
...<2-7: G--_,..-;.5._,,-,- .:;,'...?,.-%,..,-C---K--. (''-
,
17•'7,1,
//,`•
7...2".:.--.,... .......____
-
(/)
DISBURSEMENT LIST
FEBRUARY 13, 1995
Page: 1
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
AREA AND UNIT CHARGE
OTHER
RO-SO CONTRACTING, INC.(WARE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS) 2,375.00
Total for Department 2,375.00
Total for Fund 2,375.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT BLOCK GRANT
OTHER
* JULEE QUARVE-PETERSON, INC.(ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION) 4,001.00
Total for Department 4,001.00
Total for Fund 4,001.00
CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS
Default Department
HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC.(REDUCTION OF ESCROW/WENZEL F) 16,850.00
HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC.(REDUCTION OF ESCROW/OAKS 0 L) 8,346.55
* MIKE MCPHILLIPS, INC.(CLEAN SEWER LINES/FOX ROAD) 3,172.50
Total for Department 28,369.05
Total for Fund 28,369.05
DEDICATED PARKS
OTHER
ALLEN COMPANY(APPRAISAL/ATHLETIC COMPLEX)
BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD.(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)
* MENARDS(SUPPLIES)
OSM(DED PARK/COUNTRY LAKES)
GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
750.00
150.00
265.86
866.02
Total for Department 2,031.88
* ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(PRINTING)
* EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY(SUPPLIES)
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE)
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE)
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE)
Total for Fund 2,031.88
17.40
138.68
81.20
68.63
1,085.25
Page: 2
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
* LIGHTNING PRINTING(SERVICE) 84.24
* MEDICA(INSURANCE) 437.00
MN. GOVT FIN OFFICERS ASSOC(MEMBERSHIP (2)) 30.00
* PRESS PUBLICATIONS(PRINTING SERVICE) 44.63
* S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 267.58
Total for Department 2,254.61
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP COMPANY(SUPPLIES) 102.00
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE) 20.80
GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVICE(SEMINAR (2)) 60.00
JACKSON, THOMAS(MILEAGE) 7.35
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE) 35.92
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 746.15
* MEDICA(INSURANCE) 216.25
NORTH HENNEPIN COMMUNITY COLLE(REG/T JACKSON - WNTR QTR) 126.25
* PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(FILM PROCESSING) 22.62
Total for Department 1,337.34
CHARTER COMMISSION
* ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(PRINTING) 11.60
* PRESS PUBLICATIONS(PRINTING SERVICE) 6.38
CONSULTANTS
LABOR RELATIONS(SERVICES RENDERED)
Total for Department 17.98
Total for Department 4,246.00
4,246.00
Default Department
BRUDER, DAVID(REFUND WITHHOLDING '94)
CHEAP SKATE(FROM DONATION/SKATING)
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI(WITHHOLDING)
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(PREPAID INSURANCE)
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE)
* MEDICA(FLEX INSURANCE)
MN. TEAMSTERS(WITHHOLDING)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT
A T & T(DECEMBER SERVICE)
ANOKA COUNTY(GOLF CART RENTAL)
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE)
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE)
193.08
500.00
270.00
-590.66
-27,480.17
626.10
299.20
Total for Department -26,182.45
7.05
205.00
13.20
35.92
Page: 3
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
LAFOREST, MARY(MILEAGE/SEMINAR) 53.30
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 255.79
* S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 18.07
WESSEL, BRIAN(MILEAGE/MEAL/SEMINAR) 231.00
WESSEL, BRIAN(MILEAGE/MEALS) 249.10
Total for Department 1,068.43
FINANCE
POLICH FROGNER & ASSO.(PROFESSIONAL SERVICE)
TAUTGES,REDPATH & CO, LTD(PROFESSIONAL SERVICE)
FIRE DEPARTMENT
427.50
321.00
Total for Department 748.50
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE) 13.20
Total for Department 13.20
FORESTRY DEPARTMENT
A. M. LEONARD, INC.(TOOLS) 75.44
* EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY(SUPPLIES) 1.91
HOFFMAN, MICHAEL(BOOKS) 34.24
* INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY MAINTENANCE) 4.02
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 127.89
Total for Department 243.50
Fleet Management
BAUER BUILT(PARTS) 21.85
BOYER TRUCKS(PARTS) 106.97
BRAD RAGAN, INC.(PARTS) 223.99
BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS) 386.18
CATCO PARTS(PARTS) 106.47
EGAN OIL COMPANY(FUEL) 2,920.50
* FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE(SUPPLIES) 0.69
GILLUND ENTERPRISES(PARTS) 28.48
GOA COMPANY(PARTS) 149.37
LINO AUTO MACHINING(PARTS) 45.00
MINAR FORD(PARTS) 383.13
MTI DISTIBUTING(PARTS) 160.56
NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP(PARTS) 191.79
RENT ALL MINNESOTA, INC.(RENTED DRILL PRESS) 44.23
SAFETY KLEEN CORP(PROFESSIONAL SERVICE) 201.82
Total for Department 4,971.03
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
Page: 4
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
ANDERSON BURNER SERVICE(FURNACE REPAIR) 141.25
* ANOKA ELECTRIC(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,114.36
BEST LOCK SYSTEMS OF MN(KEYS) 28.91
COAST TO COAST(SUPPLIES) 15.70
DALCO(SUPPLIES) 288.79
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE) 7.60
* FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE(SUPPLIES) 237.01
* GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD(MONTHLY SERVICE) 27.32
INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY MAINTENANCE) 343.05
* JULEE QUARVE-PETERSON, INC.(ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION) 150.77
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE) 17.95
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 27,207.88
* MEDICA(INSURANCE) 216.25
* MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,302.56
NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT(INSPECTION) 62.65
PLUNKETT'S, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 109.38
SUNSHINE LIGHTING CO(SUPPLIES) 229.40
VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) 28.37
Total for Department 31,529.20
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE) 89.79
LANE, EUGENE(SUPPLIES) 7.11
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 5,214.74
* MRPA(WORKSHOP) 35.00
PLETSCHERS GREENHOUSE(FLOWERS/PEG SMITH) 32.79
Total for Department 5,379.43
PARKS DEPARTMENT
1995 STATE BICYCLE CONFERENCE(CONFERENCE)
* AIRSIGNAL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE)
BIFF'S, INC.(RENTAL UNITS)
CARLSON EQUIPMENT CO(TOOLS)
CARLSON EQUIPMENT CO(TOOLS TAX)
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF(HEAT)
E. L. REINHARDT COMPANY, INC.(SUPPLIES)
EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC(SUPPLIES)
* EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY(SUPPLIES)
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE)
* FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE(SUPPLIES)
* INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY MAINTENANCE)
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE)
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE)
* MEDICA(INSURANCE)
* MENARDS(SUPPLIES)
* MENARDS(SUPPLIES)
* MENARDS(SUPPLIES)
* MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* MRPA(WORKSHOP)
70.00
1.15
276.30
107.40
6.98
222.39
56.99
52.38
5.34
43.60
43.62
28.18
107.76
2,332.82
216.25
119.04
320.69
15.99
58.21
35.00
Page: 5
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 155.91
TODORA, GAIL(DATA ENTRY) 135.00
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 171.02
WALDOCH SPORTS(PARTS) 378.20
WALDOCH SPORTS(PARTS TAX) 12.30
Total for Department 4,972.52
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
* AIRSIGNAL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1.15
ALBINSON, INC.(SUPPLIES) 31.50
AMES, MARJORIE(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 96.40
ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER(MAPS) 8.52
BUELOU, CATHERINE(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 42.50
DETERS, DENISE(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 95.80
* ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(PRINTING - 20/20 VISION) 21.75
* EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY(SUPPLIES) 46.11
EVERGREEN PRESS(20/20 VISION) 1,213.47
FEIDER, CHRISTOPHER, NATURALIS(20/20 VISION/NATURALIST) 20.00
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE) 34.00
* FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE(SUPPLIES) 25.32
GRUBER, MARY(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 45.00
HARKINS, ARTHUR M., PH.D.(20/20 VISION MEDIATION/CNSLT) 250.00
HARRINGTON, STEVE(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 58.80
JOHNSON, MARIANN(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 59.40
JONES, LYNETTE(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 96.20
KARTES, CHERYL(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 57.60
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE) 71.84
KINGSLEY, CHARLES(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 45.00
KOPP, FRANK(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 96.80
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 699.30
* LIGHTNING PRINTING(SERVICE) 150.06
MARSHALL & JUNTUNEN(COMM SUPPORT 20/20 VISION) 300.00
MARTINEZ, JUAN A.(20/20 VISION MEDIATION) 80.00
MEDIATION SERVICES(MEDIATION SERVICE 20/20 VISI) 250.00
* MEDICA(INSURANCE) 541.25
OFFICEMAX(SUPPLIES 20/20 VISION) 33.21
* PRESS PUBLICATIONS(PRINTING SERV 20/20 VISION) 179.85
* PRESS PUBLICATIONS(PRINTING SERVICE) 10.63
SELIX, LINDA(20/20 VISION) 49.80
SULLIVAN, JOHN(20/20 VISION) 154.30
SULLIVAN, KIM(20/20 VISION) 93.61
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AIRSIGNAL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE)
ANOKA COUNTY(MOBILE DATA TERMINAL)
BLUE TOW SERVICE(TOW/STORAGE (2))
CPAC, C/O MARK ORTNER(REGISTRATION)
CY'S UNIFORMS, INC.(UNIFORMS)
Total for Department 4,959.17
15.97
218.80
500.00
14.00
123.41
Page: 6
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
DORADUS CORPORATION(MAINTAIN 7 SIRENS) 714.00
* EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY(SUPPLIES) 25.27
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE) 117.60
* GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD(MONTHLY SERVICE) 45.05
HEALTHSPAN TRANSPORTATION(CLASS/S WAGNER) 60.00
I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC.(UNIFORM SUPPLIES) 97.22
JOHN E. REID AND ASSOCIATES(SEMINAR/S MORTENSON) 347.00
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE) 269.39
KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC.(PARTS) 45.84
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 11,698.34
LIGHTNING PRINTING(SERVICE TAX) 5.40
LIGHTNING PRINTING(SERVICE) 83.15
* LIGHTNING PRINTING(SERVICE) 188.40
MCPA(CONFERENCE) 25.00
* MEDICA(INSURANCE) 1,623.75
MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC(SUPPLIES) 265.16
MSA MEMBERSHIP(MEMBERSHIP FEE) 20.00
* PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(FILM PROCESSING) 6.66
PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPAN(BATTERY PACK/CHARGER) 88.63
SKILLPATH, INC.(SEMINAR (2)) 198.00
STREICHER'S(UNIFORM SUPPLIES) 23.42
U S WEST CELLULAR(MONTHLY SERVICE) 160.06
Total for Department 16,979.52
PUBLIC WORKS
* AIRSIGNAL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1.15
* ANOKA ELECTRIC(MONTHLY SERVICE/ST LIGHTS) 202.92
DEWOLFE, THOMAS(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE '93) 85.03
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE) 51.20
* FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE(SUPPLIES) 15.40
* FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE(SUPPLIES) 32.55
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE) 143.67
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 3,130.54
* LEROY J. HOULE CONTRACTING(REMOVE TREES/GRIND STUMPS) 3,063.60
* MEDICA(INSURANCE) 432.50
* MIKE MCPHILLIPS, INC.(CLEAN SEWER LINES/LOIS LANE) 1,147.50
NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,975.24
* PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(FILM PROCESSING) 6.34
TOM THUMB(SUPPLIES) 31.06
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA(REGISTRATION (2)) 50.00
Total for Department 10,368.70
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
* AIRSIGNAL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1.15
BERNSTEIN, BARRY(MILEAGE) 64.50
* EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY(SUPPLIES) 31.76
FOGARTY, MARY(SUPPLIES) 15.33
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE) 13.20
* INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY MAINTENANCE) 48.30
Page: 7
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE) 17.96
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 127.89
* LIGHTNING PRINTING(SERVICE) 135.84
MN. DEPT OF JOBS & TRAINING(UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS) 217.45
NATIONAL REC/PARK ASSN(SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL) 18.00
PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(FILM PROCESSING) 10.92
WILCO PUBLISHING COMPANY(ART LIBRARY) 49.00
Total for Department 751.30
SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT
* EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY(SUPPLIES) 8.92
* LIGHTNING PRINTING(SERVICE) 23.43
MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.,(PUMP) 1,057.04
MN. POLLUTION CTROL AGENCY(SEMINAR) 100.00
MN. POLLUTION CTROL AGENCY(CONFERENCE) 115.00
RECYCLING ASSN OF MN(MEMBERSHIP DUES) 110.00
RECYCLING ASSN OF MN(CONFERENCE) 35.00
Total for Department 1,449.39
Total for Fund 65,107.37
INTERIM CONSTRUCTION FUND
INTERIM CONSTRUCTION
ADRIENNE C. MUSIL(EMINENT DOMAIN)
RICHARD J. GEVAY, BANK(EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION)
ROGER A. WEAVER AND GAIL B. WE(EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION)
PROGRAM RECREATION
Default Department
BERKHOLZ, GAIL(REFUND/KARATE)
BLOOM, JEAN(REFUND/KARATE)
FINLAYSON, RAY(REFUND/KARATE)
SPEISER, LOIS(REC REFUND)
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1,306.00
500.00
500.00
Total for Department 2,306.00
Total for Fund 2,306.00
20.00
20.00
9.00
15.00
Total for Department 64.00
DAVE'S SPORT SHOP, INC.(SUPPLIES/BASEBALL)
GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS(SUPPLIES/SKATE)
GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS(SUPPLIES/BASEBALL)
PIONEER COMPANY, INC.(CONCESSION SUPPLIES)
23.94
15.79
27.32
314.33
Total for Department 381.38
Total for Fund 445.38
Page: 8
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
SEWER OPERATING
Default Department
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(PREPAID INSURANCE) -5.56
Total for Department -5.56
SEWER DEPARTMENT
* AIRSIGNAL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE)
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE)
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE)
* MIKE MCPHILLIPS, INC.(CLEAN SEWER LINES/LIFT ST)
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1
Default Department
ANOKA COUNTY(OVERSETTLEMENT)
OTHER
ANOKA COUNTY(TAX INCREMENT '94)
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1-2
OTHER
1.15
3.80
8.98
413.79
637.50
Total for Department 1,065.22
Total for Fund
Total for Department
Total for Department
1,059.66
400.70
400.70
1,796.01
1,796.01
Total for Fund 2,196.71
ANOKA COUNTY(TAX INCREMENT '94) 1,664.37
Total for Department 1,664.37
Total for Fund 1,664.37
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1-4
Page: 9
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
OTHER
ANOKA COUNTY(TAX INCREMENT '94) 1,034.40
Total for Department 1,034.40
Total for Fund 1,034.40
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1-5
OTHER
ANOKA COUNTY(TAX INCREMENT '94) 962.35
Total for Department 962.35
Total for Fund 962.35
WATER OPERATING
Default Department
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(PREPAID INSURANCE) -5.57
Total for Department -5.57
Water Department
* AIRSIGNAL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1.16
DNR, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES(PERMIT FEES) 379.40
* FORTIS BENEFITS(INSURANCE) 3.80
* FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE(SUPPLIES) 1.80
* KELLY AGENCY, INC.(INSURANCE) 8.98
* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE) 413.79
* LEROY J. HOULE CONTRACTING(REMOVE TREES/GRIND STUMPS) 2,558.40
* MENARDS(SUPPLIES) 80.85
* MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 126.29
MN. DEPT OF HEALTH(EXAM/WATERWORKS SCHOOL) 105.00
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 187.28
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 35.78
Total for Department 3,902.53
Total for Fund 3,896.96
** Total ** $115,450.13
* - Invoice split to different Departments
Page: 1
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
000009 - 1995 STATE BICYCLE CONFERENCE
000031 - A. M. LEONARD, INC.
000052 - A T & T
000094 - ADRIENNE C. MUSIL
000110 - AIRSIGNAL, INC.
000140 - ALLEN COMPANY
000168 - ALBINSON, INC.
000311 - AMES, MARJORIE
000330 - ANDERSON BURNER SERVICE
000350 - ANOKA COUNTY
000370 - ANOKA COUNTY
000410 - ANOKA COUNTY
000420 - ANOKA COUNTY
000440 - ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
000450 - ANOKA ELECTRIC
000610 - BAUER BUILT
000662 - BERKHOLZ, GAIL
000670 - BERNSTEIN, BARRY
000680 - BEST LOCK SYSTEMS OF MN
000700 - BIFF'S, INC.
000724 - BLUE TOW SERVICE
000746 - BLOOM, JEAN
000770 - BOYER TRUCKS
000780 - BRAD RAGAN, INC.
000810 - BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
000878 - BRUDER, DAVID
70.00
75.44
7.05
1,306.00
22.88
750.00
31.50
96.40
141.25
400.70
218.80
205.00
5,457.13
8.52
1,317.28
21.85
20.00
64.50
28.91
276.30
500.00
20.00
106.97
223.99
150.00
193.08
Page: 2
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
000888 - BUELOU, CATHERINE
000900 - BUMPER TO BUMPER
000924 - WILCO PUBLISHING COMPANY
000963 - CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP COMPANY
000980 - CARLSON EQUIPMENT CO
001000 - CATCO PARTS
001110 - CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
001119 - CHEAP SKATE
001194 — COAST TO COAST
001214 - CPAC, C/O MATZK ORTNER
001255 - CY'S UNIFORMS, INC.
001270 - DALCO
001283 - DAVE'S SPORT SHOP, INC.
001294 - DNR, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE
001296 - DETERS, DENISE
001300 - DEWOLFE, THOMAS
001330 - DORADUS CORPORATION
001360 - E. L. REINHARDT COMPANY, INC.
001380 - EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC.
001390 - ECM PUBLISHERS, INC
001407 - EGAN OIL COMPANY
001420 - EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY
001437 - EVERGREEN PRESS
001481 - FEIDER, CHRISTOPHER, NATURALIST
001487 - FINLAYSON, RAY
001528 - FOGARTY, MARY
42.50
386.18
49.00
102.00
114.38
106.47
222.39
500.00
15.70
14.00
123.41
288.79
23.94
379.40
95.80
85.03
714.00
56.99
52.38
50.75
2,920.50
257.99
1,213.47
20.00
9.00
15.33
Page: 3
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
001550 - FORTIS BENEFITS
001560 - FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
001610 - GILLUND ENTERPRISES
001620 - GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
001621 - GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS
001630 - GOA COMPANY
001700 - GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVICE
001751 - GRUBER, MARY
001811 - HARKINS, ARTHUR M., PH.D.
001812 - HARRINGTON, STEVE
001827 - HEALTHSPAN TRANSPORTATION
001850 - HOFFMAN, MICHAEL
001853 - HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC.
001977 - I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC.
001980 - INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS
002001 - INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING
002040 - JACKSON, THOMAS
002093 - JOHN E. REID AND ASSOCIATES
002098 - JOHNSON, MARIANN
002099 - JONES, LYNETTE
002101 - JULEE QUARVE-PETERSON, INC.
002106 - KARTES, CHERYL
002120 - KELLY AGENCY, INC.
002148 - KINGSLEY, CHARLES
002166 - KOPP, FRANK
002200 - KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC.
403.20
356.39
28.48
72.37
43.11
149.37
60.00
45.00
250.00
58.80
60.00
34.24
25,196.55
97.22
423.55
270.00
7.35
347.00
59.40
96.20
4,151.77
57.60
275.00
45.00
96.80
45.84
Page: 4
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
002220 - LABOR RELATIONS
002230 - LAFOREST, MARY
002320 - LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST
002324 - LEROY J. HOULE CONTRACTING
002340 LIGHTNING PRINTING
002360 - LINO AUTO MACHINING
002422 - LANE, EUGENE
002476 - MARSHALL & JUNTUNEN
002481 - MARTINEZ, JUAN A.
002509 - MCPA
002530 - MEDIATION SERVICES
002540 - MEDICA
002550 - MENARDS
002608 - MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC.
002611 - MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO., INC.
002688 - MIKE MCPHILLIPS, INC.
002690 - MINAR FORD
002700 - MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
002760 - MN. DEPT OF HEALTH
002770 - MN. DEPT OF JOBS & TRAINING
002790 - MN. GOVT FIN OFFICERS ASSOC
002820 - MN. POLLUTION CTROL AGENCY
002980 - MN. TEAMSTERS
003050 - MRPA
003051 - MSA MEMBERSHIP
003070 - MTI DISTIBUTING
4,246.00
53.30
25,974.00
5,622.00
670.52
45.00
7.11
300.00
80.00
25.00
250.00
4,309.35
802.43
265.16
1,057.04
4,957.50
383.13
1,487.06
105.00
217.45
30.00
215.00
299.20
70.00
20.00
160.56
Page: 5
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
003090 - NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT
003120 - NATIONAL REC/PARK ASSN
003233 - NORTH HENNEPIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE
003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER
003260 - NORTHERN STATES POWER
003280 - NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP
003390 - OFFICEMAX
003430 - OSM
003510 - PIONEER COMPANY, INC.
003530 - PLETSCHERS GREENHOUSE
003540 - PLUNKETT'S, INC.
003550 - POLICH FROGNER & ASSO.
003590 - PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO
003600 - PRESS PUBLICATIONS
003631 - PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
003710 - RECYCLING ASSN OF MN
003770 - RENT ALL MINNESOTA, INC.
003781 - RICHARD J. GEVAY, BANK
003800 - RO-SO CONTRACTING, INC.
003806 - ROGER A. WEAVER AND GAIL B. WEAVER;
003870 - S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.
003900 - SAFETY KLEEN CORP
003967 - SELIX, LINDA
004003 - SKILLPATH, INC.
004092 - SPEISER, LOIS
004240 - STREICHER'S
62.65
18.00
126.25
343.19
1,975.24
191.79
33.21
866.02
314.33
32.79
109.38
427.50
46.54
241.49
88.63
145.00
44.23
500.00
2,375.00
500.00
285.65
201.82
49.80
198.00
15.00
23.42
Page: 6
Date: 02/10/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
004280 - SUNSHINE LIGHTING CO
004345 - SULLIVAN, JOHN
004346 - SULLIVAN, KIM
004370 - TAUTGES,REDPATH & CO,LTD
004450 - TOM THUMB
004456 - TODORA, GAIL
004640 - UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
004671 - U S WEST CELLULAR
004730- VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS
004760 - WALDOCH SPORTS
004800 - WESSEL, BRIAN
229.40
154.30
93.61
321.00
31.06
135.00
50.00
206.80
160.06
28.37
390.50
480.10
** Total ** $115,450.13
DISBURSEMENT LIST
FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Page: 1
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
1989 CONSTRUCTION FUND
1989 CONSTRUCTION
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGIN/RESHANAU 5TH) 343.78
Total for Department 343.78
Total for Fund 343.78
1991 CONSTRUCTION FUND
1991 CONSTRUCTION
* S.E.H.(MUN ENGINEER/BRANDYWOOD) 64.78
Total for Department 64.78
Total for Fund 64.78
1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND
1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND
A & B SANITATION(PUMPING MANHOLE/C LAKES EST) 210.00
* ALLDRIGE, SUSAN A.(COMMISSIONER FEE) 416.24
* ALLDRIGE, SUSAN A.(COMMISSIONER FEE) 416.24
* MCCRADY, MARLOWE J.(COMMISSIONERS FEE) 473.71
* MCCRADY, MARLOWE J.(COMMISSIONERS FEE) 473.70
* PETERSON, HARVEY(COMMISSIONER FEE) 423.14
* PETERSON, HARVEY(COMMISSIONER FEE) 423.15
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGIN/COUNTRY LAKES EST) 3,783.78
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGIN/HODGSON ROAD) 224.70
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGIN/HWY 49 & LAKE DR) 133.28
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/HODGSON ROAD) 953.50
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/CNTRY LKS EST) 1,282.50
Total for Department 9,213.94
Total for Fund 9,213.94
APOLLO DRIVE CONSTRUCTION FUND
APOLLO DRIVE
* ALLDRIGE, SUSAN A.(COMMISSIONER FEE) 416.24
ALLEN COMPANY(APPRAISER FEE) 300.00
* MCCRADY, MARLOWE J.(COMMISSIONERS FEE) 473.71
* PETERSON, HARVEY(COMMISSIONER FEE) 423.15
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGIN/APOLLO DRIVE) 343.22
TIMOTHY A. PETERS AND(EMINENT DOMAIN/APOLLO BUS PK) 6,250.00
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/APOLLO DRIVE) 175.50
Total for Department 8,381.82
Total for Fund 8,381.82
Page: 2
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
AREA AND UNIT CHARGE
OTHER
* S.E.H.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/AREA UNIT)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENGIN/AREA & UNIT)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
POLICE DEPARTMENT
14,230.71
232.22
Total for Department 14,462.93
Total for Fund 14,462.93
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION(COPIER) 6,407.00
Total for Department 6,407.00
Total for Fund 6,407.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT BLOCK GRANT
OTHER
A T & T(THREE MONTHS SERVICE) 17.85
CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS
Default Department
* S.E.H.(MUN ENGINEER/CLEARWATER CRK)
* S.E.H.(MUN ENGINEER/QUAIL RIDGE)
* S.E.H.(MUN ENGINEER/BLACK DUCK)
* S.E.H.(MUN ENGINEER/PHEASANT HILLS)
* S.E.H.(MUN ENGINEER/TRAPPERS CROSS)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/TRAPPERS CROSSING)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/CLEARWATER CREEK)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/WOOD OF BALDWIN 2)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/FOX TRACE)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/SHORES OF MARSHAN)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/OAKS OF LINO)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/PHEASANT HILLS)
* T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER)
Total for Department 17.85
Total for Fund 17.85
1,549.22
631.51
314.43
8,495.02
133.62
523.00
445.63
751.60
2,192.73
144.88
1,293.61
133.28
155.74
Page: 3
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/WENZEL FARMS)
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/OAKS OF LINO)
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/TRAPPERS CROSS)
DEDICATED PARKS
OTHER
Amount
676.42
36.00
45.00
Total for Department 17,521.69
BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD.(PLANNING STUDY)
BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD.(MASTER PLAN STUDY)
GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
Total for Fund 17,521.69
92.85
130.35
Total for Department 223.20
Total for Fund 223.20
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 4.59
CITIZENS LEAGUE(DIRECTORY) 20.00
D.C.A. INC.(FLEX HEALTH) 155.80
GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVICE(CONFERENCE REGISTRATION) 130.00
METROPOLITAN AREA(LUNCH (3) 39.00
OFFICEMAX(SUPPLIES) 241.02
PELOUZE SCALE COMPANY(SUPPLIES) 7.45
* PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 45.33
* PETTY CASH(POSTAGE) 2.12
ST. PAUL BOOK AND STATIONERY(SUPPLIES) 36.21
TIMESAVER OFF-SITE SECRETARIAL(MONTHLY SERVICE) 192.00
* WYLAND, CATHY(NEWSLETTER) 225.00
Total for Department 1,098.52
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
INTNL CONF OF BUILING OFFICIAL(REFERENCE GUIDE)
* PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES)
CONSULTANTS
15.65
8.00
Total for Department 23.65
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(CRIMINAL ATTORNEY)
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY)
14.50
5,902.40
1,564.80
Total for Department 7,481.70
Page: 4
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
Default Department
LINO LAKES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIAT(WITHHOLDING) 268.00
* METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(JANUARY SAC CHARGE) 5,950.00
* METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(JANUARY SAC CHARGE) -59.50
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(MONTHLY SERVICE) 2,002.55
* S.E.H.(MUN ENGINEER/SHORELAND ORD) 1,242.54
* T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER/SHORELINE) 49.98
Total for Department 9,453.57
ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 5.21
ALBINSON, INC.(SUPPLIES) 59.41
ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION(MAPS) 35.00
ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION(MAPS) 10.00
DEAN GALLERY, INC.(PROFESSIONAL SERVICE) 341.59
EXPRESS MESSENGER(MESSENGER SERVICE) 68.19
* PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 49.00
* PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 13.56
* PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 9.70
* WYLAND, CATHY(NEWSLETTER) 56.24
Total for Department 647.90
ELECTIONS AND VOTER REGISTRATION
SECRETARY OF STATE, ELECTIONS(MAP) 17.50
Total for Department 17.50
FORESTRY DEPARTMENT
* INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MAINTENANCE)
* UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA(REGISTRATION (2))
Fleet Management
5.68
187.50
Total for Department 193.18
* AMERICAN FASTENERS(PARTS) 117.98
AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC.(REPAIR PRESSURE WASHER) 79.75
* CCP INDUSTRIES, INC.(SUPPLIES) 381.62
CENTRAL SUPPLY AND MFG. CO.(CONVEX MIRROR) 37.28
EGAN OIL COMPANY(FUEL) 1,011.96
FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.(PARTS) 14.41
* OLSEN CHAIN/CABLE CO., INC.(PARTS) 46.67
* PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 40.00
* ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH(SERVICE) 7.72
Total for Department 1,737.39
Page: 5
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 82.69
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS(SUPPLIES) 128.00
* CCP INDUSTRIES, INC.(SUPPLIES) 35.16
DALCO(SUPPLIES) 278.59
KNOX LUMBER COMPANY(SUPPLIES) 19.88
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 483.13
* POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM(POSTAGE) 2,816.94
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,214.84
Total for Department 5,059.23
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
COUNTRY INN - WHITE BEAR LAKE(BREAKFAST/SPINNAKERS) 88.06
MN. MAYORS ASSOCIATION(MEMBERSHIP DUES) 20.00
Total for Department 108.06
PARKS DEPARTMENT
A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 14.62
BEACON BALLFIELDS DIVISION OF(SUPPLIES) 320.57
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 25.37
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF(MONTHLY SERVICE) 480.93
* INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MAINTENANCE) 39.73
J & E SMALL ENGINE & SPORT(SUPPLIES) 1.17
* N.R.P.A.(SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL) 35.00
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 521.29
PRINTERS SERVICE, INC.(SHARPEN CHIPPER KNIVES) 26.25
* UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA(REGISTRATION (2)) 187.50
URICH, TRACY(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE) 21.00
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 121.72
* WYLAND, CATHY(NEWSLETTER) 168.76
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
GELBMANN, RICK(QUARTERLY STIPEND)
LANDERS, JOHN(QUARTERLY STIPEND)
MESICH, THOMAS(QUARTERLY STIPEND)
NORDINE, KATHLEEN(QUARTERLY STIPEND)
ROBINSON, AL(QUARTERLY STIPEND)
SCHAPS, JAMES(QUARTERLY STIPEND)
SCHONES, EDWARD L.(QUARTERLY STIPEND)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Total for Department 1,963.91
100.00
100.00
50.00
100.00
100.00
150.00
100.00
Total for Department 700.00
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 38.19
Page: 6
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
A TO Z RENTAL CENTER(SUPPLIES - 20/20 VISION) 365.10
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 13.69
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(MONTHLY SERVICE) 2,611.43
* S. E.H.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER) 948.24
* T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER) 4,930.30
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1.53
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY - 20/20 V) 63.00
Total for Department 8,971.48
POLICE DEPARTMENT
A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 6.24
ANOKA COUNTY(MOBILE DATA TERMINALS) 450.00
ANOKA COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE(MEMBERSHIP DUES) 20.00
BANYON DATA SYSTEMS, INC.(COMPUTER SOFTWARE INSTALL) 225.00
INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MAINTENANCE) 120.07
KAULFUSS, RENEE(SUPPLIES) 11.80
MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/OISM(MONTHLY SERVICE) 390.00
OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 659.07
PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 69.65
PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 7.35
PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 23.00
* PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 1.50
* POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM(POSTAGE) 183.06
* ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH(SERVICE) 54.04
TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC.(SUPPLIES FOR DARE) 200.15
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 283.65
Total for Department 2,704.58
PUBLIC WORKS
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 2.04
* AMERICAN FASTENERS(PARTS) 24.71
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 25.37
DEWOLFE, THOMAS(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE '95) 250.00
MSSA(MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION) 25.00
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 3.14
RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.(STREET LIGHT REPAIR) 110.90
TOTAL WEATHER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 165.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA(REGISTRATION) 50.00
ZEP MANUFACTURING CO.(CLEANING COMPOUND) 157.17
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MAINTENANCE)
MRPA(REGISTRATION APPLICATION)
* N.R.P.A.(CERTIFICATION APPLICATION)
* TODORA, GAIL(SPRING BROCHURE)
Total for Department 813.33
56.76
68.11
25.00
30.00
310.00
Page: 7
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
* WYLAND, CATHY(NEWSLETTER) 168.76
Total for Department 658.63
SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT
COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES, INC.(RECYCLE OIL FILTERS)
SMITH OFFICE EQUIPMENT(SERVICE AGREEMENT)
* TODORA, GAIL(RECYCLING NEWSLETTER)
* WYLAND, CATHY(NEWSLETTER)
INTERIM CONSTRUCTION FUND
INTERIM CONSTRUCTION
100.00
130.80
70.00
56.24
Total for Department 357.04
Total for Fund 41,989.67
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY/HWY 49&LK) 36.00
PROGRAM RECREATION
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PIONEER COMPANY, INC.(SUPPLIES)
PIONEER COMPANY, INC.(SUPPLIES)
SEWER OPERATING
SEWER DEPARTMENT
Total for Department 36.00
Total for Fund 36.00
45.36
325.42
Total for Department 370.78
Total for Fund 370.78
* INFRATECH, INC. SUIT(RECALIBRATE GAS DETECTOR) 170.20
* METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(MONTHLY SEWER SERVICE) 21,267.00
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 604.48
* OLSEN CHAIN/CABLE CO., INC.(PARTS) 91.38
Total for Department 22,133.06
Total for Fund 22,133.06
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
OTHER
Page: 8
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
* S.E.H.(MUN ENGINEER/SURFACE WATER) 576.79
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/SURFACE WATER) 422.00
Total for Department 998.79
Total for Fund 998.79
WATER OPERATING
Water Department
C. W. HOULE(WATERMAIN WORK) 2,228.98
FEED RITE CONTROLS(CHLORINE CYLINDERS) 10.00
* INFRATECH, INC. SUIT(RECALIBRATE GAS DETECTOR) 170.20
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 442.04
NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 540.45
* PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 5.07
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 35.86
Total for Department
Total for Fund
** Total **
* - Invoice split to different Departments
3,432.60
3,432.60
$125,597.89
Page: 1
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
000010 - A & B SANITATION
000032 - A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
000040 - A T & T
000050 - A T & T
000052 - A T & T
000137 - ALLDRIGE, SUSAN A.
000140 - ALLEN COMPANY
000168 - ALBINSON, INC.
000210 - AMERICAN FASTENERS
000260 - AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC.
000370 - ANOKA COUNTY
000424 - ANOKA COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC
000430 - ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION
000510 - AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
000573 - BANYON DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
000620 - BEACON BALLFIELDS DIVISION OF
000810 - BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
000930 - WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES
000950 - C. W. HOULE
001030 - CELLULAR ONE
001065 - CENTRAL SUPPLY AND MFG. CO.
001110 - CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
001127 - CITIZENS LEAGUE
001165 - CCP INDUSTRIES, INC.
001171 - COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES, INC.
001211 - COUNTRY INN - WHITE BEAR LAKE
210.00
365.10
32.47
82.69
56.27
1,248.72
300.00
59.41
142.69
79.75
450.00
20.00
45.00
128.00
225.00
320.57
223.20
10,480.70
2,228.98
121.19
37.28
480.93
20.00
416.78
100.00
88.06
Page: 2
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
001260 - D.C.A. INC.
001270 - DALCO
001288 - DEAN GALLERY, INC.
001300 - DEWOLFE, THOMAS
001407 - EGAN OIL COMPANY
001450 - EXPRESS MESSENGER
001480 - FEED RITE CONTROLS
001530 - FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.
001604 - GELBMANN, RICK
001700 - GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVICE
001956 - INTNL CONF OF BUILING OFFICIALS
001971 - INFRATECH, INC. SUITE 100
001980 - INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS
002025 - J & E SMALL ENGINE & SPORT
002113 - KAULFUSS, RENEE
002155 - KNOX LUMBER COMPANY
002285 - LANDERS, JOHN
002401 - LINO LAKES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
002512 - MCCRADY, MARLOWE J.
002555 - MESICH, THOMAS
002570 - METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES
002580 - METROPOLITAN AREA
002781 - MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/OISM
002930 - MN. MAYORS ASSOCIATION
003050 - MRPA
003060 - MSSA
155.80
278.59
341.59
250.00
1,011.96
68.19
10.00
14.41
100.00
130.00
15.65
340.40
233.59
1.17
11.80
19.88
100.00
268.00
1,421.12
50.00
27,157.50
39.00
390.00
20.00
25.00
25.00
Page: 3
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
003080 - N.R.P.A. 65.00
003195 - NORDINE, KATHLEEN 100.00
003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER 2,594.53
003320 - NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT 4,628.48
003390 - OFFICEMAX 241.02
003410 - OLSEN CHAIN/CABLE CO., INC. 138.05
003443 - OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER 659.07
003486 - PELOUZE SCALE COMPANY 7.45
003489 - PETERSON, HARVEY 1,269.44
003490 - PETTY CASH 174.28
003492 - PETTY CASH 100.00
003510 - PIONEER COMPANY, INC. 370.78
003560 - POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM 3,000.00
003620 - PRINTERS SERVICE, INC. 26.25
003789 - RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 110.90
003805 ROBINSON, AL 100.00
003850 - ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH 61.76
003880 - S.E.H. 28,186.86
003915 - SCHAPS, JAMES 150.00
003939 - SECRETARY OF STATE, ELECTIONS 17.50
003978 - SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 6,407.00
003985 - SCHONES, EDWARD L. 100.00
004030 - SMITH OFFICE EQUIPMENT 130.80
004126 - ST. PAUL BOOK AND STATIONERY 36.21
004350 - T.K.D.A. 16,358.15
004427 - TIMESAVER OFF-SITE SECRETARIAL 192.00
Page: 4
Date: 02/24/95
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
004428 - TIMOTHY A. PETERS AND
004456 - TODORA, GAIL
004460 - TOTAL WEATHER
004479 - TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC.
004630 - UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
004640 - UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
004660 - URICH, TRACY
004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
004850 - WYLAND, CATHY
004900 - ZEP MANUFACTURING CO.
6,250.00
380.00
165.00
200.15
375.00
50.00
21.00
1,657.60
675.00
157.17
** Total ** $125,597.89
AGENDA ITEM 3
STAFF ORIGINATOR Daniel Tesch, Assistant to the City Administrator
DATE 24 February 1995
TOPIC Emerging Communication Services Act of 1995
Please find attached a copy of Draft Six of the Minnesota Emerging
Communication Services Act of 1995, as well as Resolution 95-25 which outlines
our support of this bill's passage in the Legislature. All members of the
North Suburban Cable Communications Commission are being asked to approve this
resolution, and forward it on to our state representatives.
There are four points to this bill:
1. The protection of public rights-of-way from emerging communication
service providers,
2. Recognizes that a wide range of voice, data, and video providers are
now and will be on the scene shortly,
3. States that current state statute does not adequately address these
needs,
4. Concludes that local authorities must have the authority to require
control of rights-of-way via our permitting authority.
1. Approve Resolution 95-25 and instruct staff to forward this resolution
to our state representatives.
Deny Resolution 95-25.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 25
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PASSAGE OF THE "MINNESOTA EMERGING
COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES ACT OF 1995"
WHEREAS, the North Central Suburban Cable Communications
Commission ("Commission") is a Joint Powers Commission
organized pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.59, as
amended, and includes the following eight (8)
municipalities: Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines, Coon
Rapids, Ham Lake, Lexington, Lino Lakes and Spring Lake
Park (hereinafter "Cities"), and,
WHEREAS, the Commission's Joint Powers Agreement, assigns to the
Commission the responsibility to monitor the operation
and activities of cable communications; to provide
coordination of administration and enforcement of the
cable franchise; to promote the development of locally
produced cable television programming; and to conduct
such other activities to insure equitable and reasonable
rates and service levels for the citizens of the Member
Cities and,
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the cable franchise to ensure the
development and continued operation of a cable
communications systems so that the Cities may achieve
better utilization and improvement of public services and
contribute significantly to the communication needs of
its residents and,
WHEREAS, in pursuit of these goals the Cities have granted to
private interests the use of Public Property and Public
Rights -of -Way.
NOW, THEREFORE, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Lino Lakes, the City has reviewed the proposed Minnesota
Emerging Communications Services Act of 1995, and hereby endorses
the proposed legislation and encourages its adoption by the
Minnesota State Legislature for the following reasons:
FINDINGS
1. Public Property and Public Rights -of -Way are valuable public
assets and Local Authorities are entitled to ensure that the
public is benefitted, compensated, protected and able to
access and share in the use of any Emerging Communications
Services that makes use of those Public Rights -of -Way by a private
for- profit provider.
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 25
Page -2-
2. There is a wide range of Persons seeking to use Public
Property and the Public Rights -of -Way to deliver video, voice
and data services and all such Persons should be treated
similarly by State and Local Authorities.
3. Existing state statutes do not adequately address these
Emerging Communications Services.
4. Local Authorities are well equipped to analyze and implement
the needs and interests of the local citizen/consumer, and
protect taxpayer's investment in Public Property and Public
Rights -of -Way.
CONCLUSIONS
The City concludes that Local Authorities must have the authority
to require Emerging Communications Services utilizing Public
Property and Public Rights -of -Way.
1. Obtain permits and comply with minimum state standards
and existing local standards for use of Public Property
and Public Rights -of -Way.
2. Prohibit redlining and uphold nondiscrimination
standards.
3. Support community access to Emerging Communications
Services.
4. Oversee the design of local communications infrastructure
to ensure the meeting of community needs which includes
ensuring that a portion of the public capacity being
delivered on a city, county and school district specific
basis as determined by Local Authorities.
5. Allow Local Authorities to receive compensation for use
of Public Property and Public Rights -of -Way.
The City further concludes that existing local authority must be
implemented with local permitting authority which:
1. Enforces compliance with financial, technical, legal and
connectivity standards.
2. Authorizes local collection of fees to compensate Local
Authorities for both the use of and decrease in the value
of Public Property and Rights -of -Way as a result of the
construction of and occupancy by Emerging Communications
Services.
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 25
Page -3-
3. Assures delivery of Emerging Communications Services to
Local Authorities and School Districts.
This resolution was adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council on the
27th day of February, 1995.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
DRAFT 6
1 A bill for an act
2 relating to Persons who provide Emerging Communications Services;
3 encouraging the development and proliferation of Emerging Communications
4 Services in the State of Minnesota; empowering Local Authorities to control
5 the use of Public Property and Public Rights -of -Way by communications
6 providers; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 237A.
7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
8 Section 1. [237A.01] [SHORT TITLE.]
9 Sections 1 - 8 may be cited as the "Minnesota Emerging Communications Services
10 Act of 1995."
11 Section 2. [237A.02] [OVERVIEW.]
12 Minnesota communications law and policy have developed in response to advances in
13 the communications industry. Major policy goals include fostering development of the
14 industry, universality of service, and regulation of actual or near monopolies. In pursuit of
15 these goals, use of Public Property and Public Rights -of -Way has been granted to private
16 interests for the purpose of furthering the development of such business.
17 Section 3. [237A.03] [LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS; POLICY.]
18 Subdivision 1. Findings. The Legislature of the State of Minnesota finds and
19 declares the following:
381648 - February 9, 1995 - Page 1
Prepared jointly by the law firms of Fredrikson & Byron and Bernick and Lifson
1 kcjl In the Minnesota Cable Communications Act. Minnesota Statutes
2 Chapter 238, the Legislature has established a plan for the occupancy
3 and use of Public Property and Public Rights -of -Way and declared that
4 it is in the public interest to protect and to preserve the interests of
5 communities with regard to Plain Old Cable Service ("POCS") and yet
6 at the same time established uniform policies that will bring about
7 development and the availability of POCS subject to reasonable state
8 and municipal oversight.
9 0.1 The Legislature recognizes that the services offered by the
10 communications industry and the number of Persons providing those
11 services are rapidly growing and changing. A need exists to develop a
12 comprehensive state communications policy.__
13 in It has long been the intent of the Legislature to assure that Emerging.
14 Communications Services are fully accessible to every state resident.
15 business and public institution.
381648 - February 9, 1995 - Page 3
Prepared jointly by the law firms of Fredrikson & Byron and Bernick and Lifson
1 (k) Local Authorities are responsible for the development and maintenance
2 of Public Property and Public Rights -of -Way. Public Property and
3 Public Rights -of -Way are valuable assets for which it is appropriate for
4 Local Authorities to receive reasonable compensation for the use
5 thereof by Persons for profit.
6 ul In light of Local Authorities' compelling and legitimate interests in
7 ensuring broad and diverse access to communications services in
8 exchange for the occupancy and use of Public Property and Public
9 Rights -of -Way by private communications providers. it is appropriate to
10 require communications providers to reserve capacity for public use.
11 The Public Utilities Commission, as a state agency, is well equipped to
12 develop uniform, statewide policy in the convergence of.
13 communications services. Local Authorities are well equipped to
14 implement and enforce such statewide policies.
15 Subdivision 2. The Legislature of the State of Minnesota makes the following policy
16 statements:
17 Local Authorities must have the authority to require Emerging
18 Communication Services utilizing Public Property and Public Rights -of -
19 Way to:
381648 - February 9, 1995 - Page 5
Prepared jointly by the law firms of Fredrikson & Byron and Bernick and Lifson
1 f� ensures enforcement of and compliance with state and federal
2 technical and connectivity standards:
3 L21 enforces financial. technical. and legal qualifications of
4 Emerging Communications Services providers:
5 al authorizes local collection of fees adequate to reimburse Local
6 Authorities for the use and diminution of value and useful life of
7 public rights-of-way and public property in addition to
8 reimbursement for expenses associated with permitting;
9 141 protects local interest in the management of public rights-of-way
10 and public property:
11 in assures discrete delivery of certain communications services to
12 relevant constituencies within Local Authorities. local school
13 districts, and adjoining Local Authorities: _.
14 Section 4. [237A.04] [DEFINITIONS.]
15 Subdivision 1. [APPLICATION.] The definitions in this section apply to this statute
16 237A.
17 Subdivision 2. [EMERGING COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE OR SERVICES.]
18 "Emerging Communications Service or Services" means any communications service
19 other than POTS or POCS delivered to a Subscriber through the utilization of Public
20 Property or Public Rights -of -Way.
381648 - February 9, 1995 - Page 7
Prepared jointly by the law firms of Fredrikson & Byron and Bernick and Lifson
1 Subdivision 10. [SUBSCRIBER.] "Subscriber" means a consumer or user of a
2 communications service delivered through the utilization of Public Property or Public
3 Rights -of -Way.
4 Section 5. [AUTHORITY FOR USE OF PUBLIC PROPERTY AND PUBLIC RIGHTS -
5 OF -WAY TO PROVIDE EMERGING COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES.]
6 Subdivision 1. A Person cannot offer Emerging Communications Services unless a
7 Permit is obtained from the Local Authority.
8 ) Application. This Act applies to every Person using (over. under. on,
9 or across) public property or public rights-of-way for the purpose of
10 constructing. operating, maintaining. offering or delivering any
11 Emerging Communications Services.
12 th) A Local Authority acting pursuant to its own authority or in
13 conjunction with other political subdivisions shall require a Permit of
14 any Person subject to this Act.
15 Subdivision 2.
16 The PUC shall promulgate uniform statewide standards and regulations
17 to ensure that the intent and policy of this Act will be accomplished.
18 bi) Within 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act. the PUC shall
19 prescribe. and periodically thereafter revise regulations to carry out its
20 obligations under paragraph (a) above.
381648 - February 9, 1995 - Page 9
Prepared jointly by the law firms of Fredrikson & Byron and Bernick and Lifson
1 Interconnection requirements to attain interconnection between
2 Persons providing Emerging Communications Services, where
3 possible,_ within the jurisdictions of Local Authorities.
4 Regulations to ensure that all providers of similar Emerging
5 Communications Services shall be subject to the same
6 requirements pursuant to this Act.
7 Requirements that all existing commitments to municipal,
8 educational. and other public/community services shall be
9 maintained.
10 .7 Requirements that providers of Emerging Communications
11 Services shall provide services to identified discrete communities
12 within Local Authorities. school district. and county boundaries.
13 in Requirements which ensure open access to all communications
14 architecture through the development of a "seamless web" of
15 Emerging Communications Services delivery systems.
16 Uniform construction and safety standards ensuring that Local
17 Authorities retain control over the use of and equipment and
18 facilities located on or in Public Property and Public Rights -of -
19 Way•
381648 - February 9, 1995 - Page 11
Prepared jointly by the law firms of Fredrikson & Byron and Bernick and Lifson
1 Requirements for filing written documentation (e.g. location
2 maps) with the PUC and Local Authorities by every Person,
3 including Local Authorities. providing Emerging
4 Communications Services which identifies all wires. conduits or
5 other equipment necessary for the purpose of constructing,
6 operating. maintaining. offering or delivering the Emerging
7 Communications Services which are placed under. above or on
8 Public Property or Public Rights -of -Way.
9 Subdivision 3. Nothing in this Chapter shall diminish. limit. or otherwise restrict the
10 existing authority of cities relative to any corporation or other business association
11 organized to construct. acquire. maintain; or operate telephone lines, as such authority
12 exists as of the effective date of this Act.
13 Section 6. [237A.06] [COMPENSATION FOR USE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.]
14 Subdivision 1. The Local Authority may charge and collect reasonable Permit fees
15 sufficient to recoup the costs of regulation. Such fee may include not only the actual
16 costs of permitting. but all expenses associated with the monitoring of Permit
17 compliance, costs associated with enforcement of PUC regulations and any diminution
18 of value of Public Property or Public Rights -of -Way as a result of the installation
19 upon or continued occupancy of Public Property or Public Rights -of -Way.
381648 - February 9, 1995 - Page 13
Prepared jointly by the law firms of Fredrikson & Byron and Bernick and Lifson
1
3
4
5 for the .eriod from throu • h June 0 19
6 On July 1. 19,, such persons shall pay a charge calculated by
7 multi plyinthe applicable base annual charges) by the percentage
8 change during the previous calendar year in the National Consumer
9 Price Index. published by the United States Department of Labor} and
10 then multiplying the sum thereof -by the total length of conduit and/or
11 aerial wire within the Local Authority. Thereafter, such persons shall
12 pay an annual charge which shall be calculated by multiplying the
13 previous year's charge by the percentage change during the previous
14 calendar year in the National Consumer Price Index and then
15 multiplying the sum thereof by the total length of conduit and/or aerial
16 wire within the Local Authority. In the event such Index ceases to be
17 published. the PUC. may select another measure of general price
18 changes. The Local Authority shall notify such persons of the base
19 annual charges for the subsequent year by June 1 of each year, setting
20 forth the calculation of the charge.
Under subsection (b), persons providing emerging communications
services shall pay. as initial compensation, an amount calculated by
multiplying the applicable base license chargefs) by the total length of
conduit and/or aerial plant system within the Local Authority. pro -rated
381648 - February 9, 1995 - Page 15
Prepared jointly by the law firms of Fredrikson & Byron and Bernick and Lifson
1 Subdivision 5. Regulations promulgated pursuant to this Section 7 shall provide that
2 if the Local Authority determines that any portion of reserved public space will go
3 unused, the reserved amount may be reduced by such unused portion.
4 Subdivision 6. The technical quality of reserved public space shall be equivalent to
5 the highest technical quality of the remaining capacity of the affected communications
6 network in all respects.
7 Subdivision 7. Eligible Entities. The following entities are eligible for access to
8 public space reserved under this section which shall be allocated and used in the
9 discretion of the Local Authority.
10 Lai state and tribal governments. and Local Authorities and their agencies:
11 @) accredited educational institutions open to enrollment by the public;
12 public and nonprofit libraries: and
13 ) nonprofit organizations described under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
14 Revenue Code of 1986 that are formed for the purpose of providing
15 nondiscriminatory public access to noncommercial educational,
16 informational, cultural, civic. or charitable services.
17 Subdivision 8. Terms and conditions of access. Such eligible entities shall have
18 access to such public space at no charge (for installation or service) if using such
19 public space only for the provision of educational, informational, cultural. civic or
20 charitable services directly to the public without charge for such services.
381648 - February 9, 1995 - Page 17
Prepared jointly by the law firms of Fredrikson & Byron and Bernick and Lifson
COMMISSION'S SENATOR & REPRESENTATIVE
MAILING LIST
STATE SENATORS:
Senator Don Betzold
State Capitol
Room G-24
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-2556
Senator Jane Krentz
State Capitol
Room 235
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-7061
Senator Gene Merriam
State Capitol
Room 122
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-4154
STATE REPRESENTATIVES:
Rep. Mike Delmont
State Office Building
Room 575
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-4226
Rep. Joel Jacobs
State Office Building
Room 485
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-4231
Rep. Phil Krinkie
State Office Building
Room 303
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-2907
Rep. Doug Swenson
State Office Building
Room 255
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-4124
Senator Paula E. Hanson
State Capitol
Room 328
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-3219
Senator Linda Runbeck
State Office Building
Room 107
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-1253
Rep. Tom Hackbarth
State Office Building
Room 313
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-2439
Rep. Alice M. Johnson
State Office Building
Room 539
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-5510
Rep. Teresa Lynch
State Office Building
Room 295
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-5369
Rep. Charlie Weaver
State Office Building
Room 261
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-1729
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES
DATE
TIME STARTED
..............................................
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT:
ALSO PRES
ENT
February
6:33 P.M.
9:58 PM.
Gelbmann, Landers, Mesch, Nordne,_
Robinson, Schaps, Schones
Planning Coordinator Wyland, Bu ldang
Inspector Pete'Kiuegel, Planning Consultant
Brixius, and Acting City Engineer Powell.
I.
II.
IV.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve
the minutes of the January 11, 1995 meeting as submitted
and was supported by John Landers. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman Schaps noted a change to the
agenda regarding item V. D., this item would be continued
until the March 8, 1995 meeting. Chairman Schaps
indicated the Department of Natural Resources had not had
an opportunity to give an opinion and this is the reason
for the continuation.
Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve the agenda as
amended and was supported by Ed Schones. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
OPEN MIKE: Chairman Schaps declared the Open Mike portion
of the meeting opened at 6:36 p.m. Chairman Schaps at
this time asked if anyone in the audience wished to
address the Planning and Zoning Board regarding issues
not already on the agenda.
Kim Sullivan addressed the Board with an update of the
20/20 Vision Community meetings held on January 25 and
26. Ms. Sullivan noted measurable interest in the City
for the project, approximately 250 residents were
involved in the two day meetings or wrote her.
Ms. Sullivan briefly reviewed information that was
discussed at these meetings and the results. Ms.
Sullivan noted the main concerns of residents were:
1. Citizens desire a balance of growth in the city, with
environmentally friendly and in appearance, reflect the
community's strong environmental flavor.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
2. Citizens desire to maintain wetlands and wildlife
habitats.
3. Citizens want this growth to follow a documented plan
about which they are consistently informed.
4. Citizens want concentrated development: town square,
commercial/light industrial parks, residential areas and
open space.
5. Citizens want a community center.
6. Citizens want more community activities, organized
recreation and education.
7. Citizens want more information about city business
issues.
Ms. Sullivan indicated advisory groups will be formed,
made up of 12-15 members each. Any individual wishing to
be on an advisory group should apply, Ms. Sullivan has
created a two page form that will be filled out and the
applicant is asked to indicate why they are interested in
the group and provide their qualifications.
Ms. Sullivan noted these advisory groups will meet for
approximately eight to ten weeks and then regroup and
form recommendations to the city council and boards.
Mr. Mesich inquired how the groups will contain a group
with a variety of ideas and concerns. Ms. Sullivan
indicated this is the reason for the applications, this
will provide an avenue for reviewing the individuals and
establishing a variety for the groups.
Chairman Schaps thanked Ms. Sullivan for her information.
Al Robinson made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion
of the meeting and was supported by John Landers. All
voted aye. Motion carried. Open Mike portion was closed
at 6:45 p.m.
V. PLANNING ITEMS:
A. 95-3-P, Hardwood Creek, 7979 24th Avenue, Minor
Subdivision.
Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated Mr. and Mrs.
Erickson, owners of the property at 7979 24th Avenue,
known as Hardwood Creek Farm, have reconsidered their
requested minor subdivision submitted at the January
Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The revised request
is to split a 10 acre parcel, containing the dwelling,
from the 50+ acre site. Ms. Wyland indicated this 10
2
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
acre parcel will meet the lot area and street frontage
requirements for the rural zoning district.
Ms. Wyland indicated staff has reviewed the request and
would recommend approval of the minor subdivision as
submitted with the following conditions:
1. A park dedication fee in the amount of $500 be
collected prior to recording of the minor
subdivision with Anoka County.
John Landers made a MOTION to approve the Minor
Subdivision as submitted with conditions listed by staff
and was supported by Tom Mesich. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
Chairman Schaps noted this item will be reviewed by the
Lino Lakes City Council at their February 13, 1995
meeting.
B. PUBLIC HEARING, 95-3-C, Kids at Heart Child Care,
7330 Lake Drive, Conditional Use Permit.
Chairman Schaps OPENED the public hearing at 6:50 p.m.
Planning Coordinator Wyland, indicated the Kids at Heart
Child Care Center is located at 7330 Lake Drive in the
Gethsemane Methodist Church building. They have been at
this site since January of 1993 and hold a license from
the State of Minnesota for 35 children. Ms. Wyland noted
that recently a request was submitted to the State to
increase the number of children to 42.
Ms. Wyland noted the State Licensing Division, Fire
Marshall, the Building Inspector and herself have
inspected the site and found it to be in compliance with
all applicable requirements. She indicated the
Conditional Use Permit will be subject to various State
Inspections and City review on an annual basis.
Ms. Wyland indicated staff recommends approval of the
Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions:
1. A License from the Minnesota Department of Human
Services be maintained at all times.
2. Access to the premises be provided upon
notification of annual and periodic inspections
from appropriate City Staff.
3. An increase in the number of children to be
served in the facility will require modification of
the license from the State. Staff would require
3
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
notification of any increase and inspection by the
building inspector and fire marshall to determine
adequacy of structure but waive the requirement of
an Amended Conditional Use Permit.
Mr. Landers indicated concern if the facility was
notified of an upcoming inspection, problem areas would
be missed regarding care of the children. Mr. Robinson
indicated notification would help staff identify people
in the building, that normally would not be present.
Mr. Mesich indicated the City is not qualified to denote
any problem areas in the care giving, that would be up to
the Licensing Division, therefore notification would be
a mute issue.
Chairman Schaps invited anyone who had comments regarding
this public hearing to step forward.
Mr. John Dorsuch, 7252 Stage Couch Road, indicated since
the area is being reviewed, he would like to see a cul-
de-sac instead of a dead end street, for traffic
purposes.
Mr. Dan Cook, 7290 Stage Couch Road, indicated drainage
problems due to a ball field constructed on the church
property. City Engineer Powell indicated the issue would
be reviewed in the spring.
Mr. Cook indicated he was not opposed to the day care,
but just wanted the drainage issue addressed.
Al Robinson made a MOTION to close the public hearing and
was supported by Rick Gelbmann. All voted aye. Motion
carried. Public hearing was CLOSED at 7:08 p.m.
Ed Schones indicated he would like to add a fourth
condition directing staff to review the drainage and
grading issues and address them this spring.
Ed Schones made a MOTION to approve the Conditional Use
Permit for Kids at Heart Child Care, 7330 Lake Drive with
the stated four conditions and was supported by Al
Robinson. All voted aye. Motion carried. Tom Mesich
abstained from voting.
C. 95-5-P, Wayne Scanlan, 6848 Otter Lake Road, Minor
Subdivision
Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated Mr. Wayne Scanlan,
owner of the Otter Lake veterinarian Clinic at 6848 Otter
Lake Road, is requesting a Minor Subdivision to split a
4.01 parcel of property from his 5.45 acre lot. Ms.
4
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
Wyland noted both the existing lot and the newly created
lot will meet the lot size requirement.
Ms. Wyland indicated the City's Economic Development
Advisory board would recommend approval of this proposed
lot split. The property is intended to be sold for the
development of a pet supply and dog training facility.
Ms. Wyland added a site plan review will, most likely, be
submitted for Planning and Zoning Board review in the
near future.
Ms. Wyland indicated staff has reviewed this request and
would recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision with
the following condition:
1. A Park Dedication fee in an amount as determined
by Ordinance No. 5-91' be submitted prior to
issuance of any building permits for the site.
This fee is determined based on both the use of a
building and the size of said building, therefore,
a determination of the actual Park Dedication Fee
can not be made at this time.
Mr. Landers inquired if the dogs would be housed on site.
Ms. Wyland indicated they would not be housed, it would
be a training facility only.
Mr. Scanlan indicated the facility would be used for
obedience and show training.
Chairman Schaps inquired as to what time frame the
developer is estimating completion. Mr. Scanlan
indicated a fall goal has been set for completion.
Mr. Schones indicated concern that an on-site septic
system would be allowed on a small acre parcel. Ms.
Wyland indicated their is not a 10 acre requirement for
industrial zones.
John Landers made a MOTION to approve the Minor
Subdivision for 6848 Otter Lake Road, with stated
condition and was supported by Al Robinson. 6 voted aye
1 nay, Mr. Schones voting nay. Motion carried.
D. Shoreland Management Ordinance. CONTINUED TO MARCH
MEETING.
E. PUBLIC HEARING MUSA Amendment.
Planning Consultant Brixius indicated a "Neighborhood
Meeting" was held on Thursday, February 2, 1995. He
indicated the meeting was well attended. As a result of
the meeting, approximately six properties were removed
5
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
from the designated growth area and a few
added.
Mr. Brixius presented a report regarding
amendment and its contents. Mr. Brixius
designated growth areas and estimated growth
properties
the MUSA
noted the
rate.
Mr. Brixius explained the designated growth areas are
areas that are anticipated to have the greatest pressure
to develop, due to surrounding existing developments.
Mr. Brixius reiterated, although an area is designated,
it in no way states that this area will be developed,
that will be up to the individual property owner.
Mr. Brixius indicated the benefit of the Land Bank
procedure is so that property owners are not required to
pay inflated taxes due to property value based on
designated MUSA land. He indicated this would give the
owner an opportunity to decide whether their property
should be developed or not, if undeveloped it would not
be included in MUSA designation.
Mr. Robinson inquired if there is 40 acres to be
developed but only 20 acres is buildable and the rest is
wetland, is the entire amount contributed as MUSA land.
Mr. Brixius indicated only the buildable land would be
attributed to MUSA land.
Mr. Schones indicated that the fact that Lino Lakes
contains so much wetland, should be a viable cause for
the Met Council to review the flexibility requests. Mr.
Brixius indicated actually the Charter will be more
viable as an indication of unique features in Lino Lakes.
Chairman Schaps CONTINUED the public hearing at this time
and opened the floor for public comment.
Mr. Christopher Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive, inquired if the
City decides that 300 homes a year is too much for
development, what is the recourse. Mr. Brixius indicated
the City will continue to have control on the amount of
development and what kind of development.
Mr. Lyden indicated he did not feel the Land Bank would
provide efficiency and believed it to be premature. Mr.
Gelbmann indicated the efficiency referred to regarding
the amendment, is in regards to providing urban services,
such as utilities, emergency services, not how the City
develops and how many house can be developed in one year.
Ms. Amy Donlin read a letter from her father, Mr. Art
Hawkins regarding the MUSA amendment. He had indicated
he felt further review should be made and numbers
verified before the City move forward. Mr. Hawkins did
6
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
state the proposed ordinance presented a wealth of
information for long-range planning, but hoped the word
was not final yet.
Ms. Donlin then indicated resident concerns for well
rounded development and not just roof top development.
Mr. Maurice Chenal inquired if the MUSA would require low
cost housing to be included in development. He also
inquired as to the determination of affordable housing.
Mr. Brixius indicated affordable housing is based on the
regions average income, and currently Lino Lakes has one-
third of stock of homes that are under $90,000.
Mr. Gerald Clausen, 6129 Baldwin Lake Road, indicated he
was against the requirement for residents to hook up to
city sewer. He believes his property would not benefit
from city sewer and would only impose unnecessary
additional taxes.
Mr. Powell indicated clarification, residents will not be
forced to hook to city sewer as dictated by the City
Charter. Mr. Powell indicated because the MUSA is
designated does not mean the sewer will be developed.
Mr. Powell also indicated when assessments are made, the
burden of proof falls on the City to show that utilities
will appreciated the value of the property. If this
cannot be proven in an amount at least equal to the
proposed assessment, the assessment is not allowed.
Mr. Powell noted for information that other areas such as
North Oaks has had contamination to on-site septic
systems and sometimes on-site septic system can provide
for a catastrophic circumstances.
Mr. Paul Montain indicated support for the MUSA amendment
and noted he believed this to be a tool to help the City
better plan development in the future. He noted
residents are not forced to develop, but those who wish
to develop their land can then have an opportunity to
apply for MUSA designation.
Ms. Sue Moliter, 7806 Sunset Avenue, indicated support
for the MUSA amendment and noted she was impressed with
the City staff and all their efforts. Ms. Moliter
indicated she had attended the 20/20 Community meeting
and the concern was for proper planning. She believed
the MUSA amendment is the preliminary stage and will
compliment the goals of the residents, therefore there
would be no reason to wait to proceed with the amendment.
Ms. Moliter indicated the rights of all residents need to
be insured, including the residents who wish to develop
portions of their properties.
7
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
Ms. Tracy Douglas, 540 Lilac Street, indicated support
for the MUSA amendment.
Mr. Duff Dorshner, 307 Lilac Street, inquired if he
wished to divide his property how would his taxes be
affected. Mr. Brixius indicated his taxes would not be
affected until the time of actual development, excluding
any increase in property value.
Mr. John Johnson indicated support for the MUSA
amendment, he is representing Mr. Gary Uhde who will be
developing 40 acres in the Behm's Century Farms project.
Mr. John Thompson indicated his property is located along
Baldwin Lake Road and is in support of the MUSA
amendment. He believes the Land Bank system to be a
practical way to development Lino Lakes.
Mr. Roger Weisner, 499 -62nd Street, indicated support for
the MUSA amendment and is looking forward to development.
Ms. Alice Junes inquired how her land that has been
designated as growth area could be developed, since over
50 percent is wetland. Mr. Brixius indicated that her
land would not be developed unless she requested platting
and then she would apply for MUSA designation, if it is
not in the desire of the owner to develop they do not
have to develop.
Mr. Tom Donlin indicated general support for Land
Banking, but noted a couple of problems. First he
indicated transportation will have to be addressed, and
secondly schools.
Mr. Chris Lavear, indicated he believed the City should
slow down and wait for the recommendations of the 20/20
Community Project.
Mr. Mesich inquired as to amount of land zoned R-1 and R -
lx. Mr. Brixius noted except for a small portion the
land is not zoned. Mr. Mesich indicated then the City
still has control over the development that would be
constructed. Mr. Brixius indicated this would be
correct.
Chairman Schaps indicated there is also the possibility
that the Met Council might not even accept this MUSA
amendment.
Ms. Sharon Lane indicated her support for the 20/20
Community Project and felt the City should wait until
June when recommendations from the community have been
made.
8
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
Ms. Wyland indicated she had received a letter from a
resident from, 505 62nd Street, wished not to be included
in the designated growth area.
Ms. Caroline Dahl indicated she would like the City to
wait until the recommendations of the Community Project
are presented.
Chairman Schaps indicated this MUSA amendment provides a
vehicle by which to develop, but does not establish
developments. He indicated this would also provide for
flexibility against citizens being unfairly taxed if the
land is never going to be developed.
Mr. Schones indicated his desire to wait on a decision.
Ms. Nordine commented that moving forward would not
affect the recommendations of the 20/20 Community
Project.
Mr. Robinson publicly thanked Ms. Nordine for her
contributions to the Planning and Zoning Board, this
would perhaps be Ms. Nordine's last meeting.
(Ms. Nordine excused herself at 9:05 p.m.)
Ms. Wyland noted that she had received a letter from Ray
Miller, property owner along 62nd Street, who would like
to be included in the designated growth area.
Mr. Tim Kytonen indicated support for the MUSA amendment
and noted interest in developing land south of Fox Trace.
Mr. Tom McDonough indicated support for the MUSA
amendment as a property owner near Ash Street and Baldwin
Lake Road.
Ms. Joyce Sharpen indicated support for the MUSA
amendment, she noted the City should proceed and not
wait.
Al Robinson made a MOTION to CLOSE the public hearing and
was supported by Tom Mesich. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
Discussion was held at length regarding the MUSA
amendment.
Ed Schones made a MOTION to table the MUSA amendment
until a later date and was supported by John Landers:
Ayes: Schones, Landers
Nays: Gelbmann, Mesich, Schapes Robinson
Motion was failed.
9
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
February 8, 1995
Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve the MUSA amendment
and was supported by Rick Gelbmann.
Ayes: Robinson, Gelbmann, Schaps, Mesich
Nays: Landers, Schones
Motion carried.
Chairman Schaps called a brief recess at 9:25 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 9:38 p.m.
F. Ordinance N. 1-95 Revisions to Fence Ordinance PUBLIC
HEARING.
Chairman Schaps OPENED the public hearing at 9:39 p.m.
Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated at the request of
our Building Inspector, City Staff has reviewed the
existing fence ordinance and proposed changes.
Ms. Wyland indicated staff has reviewed the fence
ordinance in several adjoining communities including
Circle Pines, Blaine, Hugo, Forest Lake, White Bear
Township, New Brighton, and Arden Hills.
Al Robinson made a MOTION to CLOSE the public hearing and
was supported by Rick Gelbmann. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
Discussion was held regarding fence requirements for
businesses.
By consensus the addition to condition number six was
removed and left as originally written.
Rick Gelbmann made a MOTION to approve the Ordinance
Amending the Fence Ordinance and was supported by Al
Robinson. All voted aye. Motion carried.
VI. DISCUSSION: Mr. Landers requested information regarding
low income housing at a future meeting.
VII. ADJOURNMENT: Al Robinson made a MOTION to adjourn the
meeting. All voted aye. Motion carried. The meeting
was adjourned at 9:58 p.m.
10
COUNCIL MEETING
kVA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Staff members present: City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; Acting City
Engineer, John Powell; Planning Coordinator, Mary Kay Wyland;
Planning Consultant, Al Brixius; Assistant to the City
Administrator, Dan Tesch; Community Development Director, Brian
Wessel; Chief of Police, David Pecchia; Accountant, Paula
Schloer; City Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer
Marilyn Anderson.
The agenda was approved as presented.
OPEN MIKE
Tom Donlin, 6100 Centerville Road - Mr. Donlin said he is
speaking as a citizen of Lino Lakes and is concerned about the
proposed development of Clearwater Creek. He said he was not
opposed to Mr. Emmerich's right to develop his land and is not
opposed to development in general as long as it is done in an
organized and consistent manner. Mr. Donlin said he is not
opposed to development as long as the concerns of the existing
residents and citizens are addressed and answered in full.
Mr. Donlin said that at this time he is opposed to the Clearwater
Creek development because it is not a logical extension of
existing services and the legitimate concerns of the residents
and the Planning and Zoning Board have not been answered. He
asked the City Council to address each of the following concerns
and answer them in full before any action is taken on the
development. Mr. Donlin said he would read his concerns, and
asked each Council Member to think about the timing of the
development and ask themselves if, at this time, does adding 456
new homes make sense.
PAGE 1
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Mr. Donlin's first concern was White Bear School District No.
624. He noted that his daughter will be attending this school
district. Mr. Donlin felt that this should also be a great
concern to Mr. Emmerich (the developer) because one of the most
important issues when buying a new home is where will the
children be going to school. He noted that in recent months,
this school district has been forced to lay off teachers,
increase class sizes and eliminate many programs. Although the
school district policy is not to oppose or support development
issues, Mr. Donlin asked if adding 456 new homes to this school
district makes sense at this time?
Mr. Donlin's second concern is the sewer and water extensions in
the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Hugo. He said it is
his understanding that the Clearwater Creek development will be
served by a gravity sewer with a lift station connecting it to
the existing 10 inch forcemain pipe which will carry the sewage
to the Hugo/Forest Lake interceptor. Mr. Donlin's concern is the
existing 10 inch pipe which was constructed in 1976/1977 as an
interim system designed to be replaced around 1990 with a
permanent gravity system. Mr. Donlin noted a letter dated April
28, 1976 from Richard Dougherty of the Metropolitan Waste
Commission to the City Clerk -Treasurer of Hugo, Carole Williams.
Mr. Dougherty assures the City of Hugo, "based the current trends
this system will have a design life beyond the year 2020". Mr.
Donlin said he could not help but think of some other fine
products of the late 1970's such as the Ford Pinto and the AMC
Pacer. Mr. Donlin said, "with proper maintenance they were
designed to last until 2020 and beyond". However, he doubted
that in the year 2020 anyone will jump into the family Pacer and
expect it to go anywhere. Mr. Donlin said his point is that the
forcemain has broken three (3) times and needs to be thoroughly
inspected before any new capacity is added. He asked, does
adding 456 new homes to this system make sense.
Mr. Donlin's third concern is Otter Lake Road. He explained it
does not have any shoulders, is only 28 feet wide and is rated
poor by one Anoka County Engineer. He said this development
would add 2,950 trips per day to a road which is considered below
county road standards by the same engineer. Mr. Donlin noted
that SEH prepared a traffic study for the City of Lino Lakes.
This study states, "the traffic volumes added to Otter Lake Road
will not create significant traffic problems". Mr. Donlin said
this statement is also reflected in Mr. Brixius' planning report,
Executive Summary to Ms. Wyland dated October 7, 1994. Mr.
Donlin said that part of the sentence from this report is missing
in Mr. Brixius statement. The missing part of the sentence
states, "This is one of the most intense single family
developments possible between the County Road J interchange and
PAGE 2
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Clearwater Creek, however the traffic volumes added to Otter Lake
Road will not create significant traffic problems". Mr. Donlin
continued quoting from the same report, "SEH generally considers
that more than 2000 vehicles per day traveling past a residential
unit is very undesirable". Mr. Donlin asked if the City is going
to tell 15 to 20 existing homeowners between County Road J and
Clearwater Creek that 2950 cars per day will pass their homes?
Mr. Donlin explained that the SEH study does not consider the new
theater under construction on the south side of County Road J and
the number of "kids" using County Road J to get to the theater or
the traffic generated by the new commercial and industrial park
north of Clearwater Creek. Mr. Donlin asked if it made sense to
approve this development without Otter Lake Road improvements,
and if the improvements occurred, who will pay the costs. He
asked again, at this time, does adding 2950 trips per day to
Otter Lake Road make sense?
Mr. Donlin thanked the City Council for allowing him to speak and
said he hoped that the City Council would answer some of the
questions and problems in a way that makes sense.
Karen Cunningham, 2310 Cedar Street - Mrs. Cunningham noted that
she has inquired about this same issue before but is again asking
about the water drainage from the development. She noted that
she has talked about the matter many times and voiced her many
concerns. Mrs. Cunningham referred to a newspaper article about
this development and quoted from it as follows: "I have listened
to the same questions for a year and no matter how well we have
answered them, it is not good enough". Mrs. Cunningham said she
did not feel the questions have been answered well enough. She
explained that every answer makes her feel more than ever before
that she will have a water drainage problem and her pasture will
be flooded. She noted that she was very concerned and questioned
the joint water study prepared for the City's of Hugo and Lino
Lakes. Mrs. Cunningham was told at the City Hall that the water
study had been completed but heard from citizens that the study
was not complete. She talked to someone at the Hugo City Hall
and they drafted a letter to her. She gave the City Council a
copy of the letter. The letter is written by the Hugo
Administrator and states that they are still awaiting the final
study and it is not complete. Mrs. Cunningham has been keeping
notes on the development process and noted that they were told
earlier that the study was to be completed before the development
would be voted on. She felt that this is misleading. Mrs.
Cunningham explained that she and her neighbors want to think
that what they are being told is correct and felt it was vital
that the drainage study be completed before this development is
approved.
PAGE 3
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Acting Mayor Neal asked who told Mrs. Cunningham that the study
was completed. Mrs. Cunningham explained that there were letters
in the packet that she was given at city hall stating that the
water study was completed. Also she noted that it has been
stated over and over that the study has been completed. Mrs.
Cunningham said that the drainage problem is not the only thing
that has not been resolved. She explained that the ditch
crossing her land from the proposed development is in need of
repair. Mrs. Cunningham felt that if more homes are going to be
built in this area there is a potential that more water will be
going through her land and flood if the ditch is not repaired.
She felt that the responsibility for maintenance or repair of the
ditch is not just the responsibility of the Rice Creek Watershed
District (RCWD) but the responsibility of everybody who lives
around it. Mrs. Cunningham explained that although she has said
this before, she would say it again. The area is very nice as a
rural area and although she is not against development she felt
that too many homes were being proposed for a rural area that now
contains farm lands and hobby farms. Mrs. Cunningham said that
all the problems should be addressed before additional homes are
built. She also noted that if the area was left rural, these
issues could be handled.
Mrs. Cunningham gave the City Council a copy of the letter she
received from the City of Hugo.
Dennis Cunningham, 2310 Cedar Street - Mr. Cunningham said he had
concerns to those already expressed. He quoted from the minutes
of February 13, 1995, page eight (8), Drainage., "A hydrological
study funded jointly by the City of Hugo and the City of Lino
Lakes for this areas has been completed by the Hugo City
Engineer, OSM". Mr. Cunningham noted that the minutes reflects
that the study is complete and yet the information just presented
by Mr. Donlin seems to indicate that the study is not complete.
Mr. Cunningham referred to a report dated October 7, 1994 from
Northwest Associated Consultants (NAC) which mentions that an
area storm water management plan is being prepared in cooperation
with the City of Hugo. Mr. Cunningham quoted, "The results of
this study directly affects this proposed plat" and further
recommends that the City of Lino Lakes continue the hearing to
allow the study to be completed in order to properly evaluate
storm drainage aspects. The conclusion of the NAC report says
studies pertinent to this subdivision are outstanding and did not
believe that sufficient information is available to properly
evaluate the proposal. NAC recommended that without this
information the consideration of the rezoning and the preliminary
plat is premature. Another letter from TKDA dated February 10,
1995 mentioned a preliminary study which has been reviewed by
PAGE 4
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Hugo and Lino Lakes, however a great many details regarding
implementation and financing of any improvement must be worked
out. Mr. Cunningham also referred to the recent letter from the
City of Hugo which states that the study is not complete.
Mr. Cunningham noted that many times it has been stated that only
two (2) phases of the proposed plat are being proposed at this
time, however, all phases are necessary to bring about the
commercial and industrial growth. Yet the City is still looking
at only this one small portion. He felt that is why some people
are calling this an island of development. If the other phases
do not occur, there will be just this one section and it will not
fit into the area.
Mr. Cunningham referred to page 11 of the February 13, 1995
minutes in which the White Bear Lake School Superintendent's
letter was mentioned. He took exception to this portion of the
minutes. The minutes quoted the letter as follows: " it is not
the policy of the White Bear School District to look at stoppage
of growth as a way of controlling School District problems". Mr.
Cunningham felt that the minutes appear to say that the School
District is not opposed to or does not want to limit development
to control growth. He said that the letter that was written by
the Superintendent does not say what was quoted.
Mr. Cunningham said he was still concerned about the five (5)
criteria for rezoning. The Planning and Zoning Board did not
approve the rezone or the preliminary plat. He said that when
the rezone and the preliminary plat were presented to the City
Council it was passed. Mr. Cunningham listed the five (5)
criteria as follows:
Consistency to Comprehensive Plan - Mr. Cunningham found no fault
with this finding since the MUSA and everything else is there.
Compatible With Present and Future Land Use - The Planning and
Zoning Board did not feel that this criteria was met. There are
no other R-1 areas near the development, it is bordered on the
west by a freeway, rural with hobby farms to the south, rural
with wetlands to the east and rural and industrial to the north.
This subdivision would be a small island with a lot of houses in
a rural area. Council Member Bergeson asked that a warning be
issued to prospective new home buyers that there are horses in
this area. Mr. Cunningham felt that if there is a need for this
warning, then it is not compatible with existing uses. Since the
proposed plat is bordered on the south and east by hobby farms,
problems could occur.
Conforms with Performance Standards Within the Zoning Ordinance -
PAGE 5
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Mr. Cunningham said the Planning and Zoning Board stated concerns
about the wetlands. He listed the three criteria for wetlands,
vegetation, soil and the water table. Mr. Cunningham noted that
Mr. Emmerich's delineation expert was out and looked at the land,
studied the vegetation, looked at the soil maps. Some borings
were made. Mr. Cunningham asked if these boring sufficiently
determined where the water table is for the entire project. He
asked if the third criteria had been met.
Proposed Use can be Accommodated by Existing Public Services -
Mr. Cunningham said that the Planning and Zoning Board did not
feel that the school facilities issue was adequately addressed
and noted that two (2) bond issues have been defeated since the
Planning and Zoning Board's consideration of the matter. He also
noted that both staff and Mayor Reinert, at the last Council
meeting and the following neighborhood meeting, said that this is
not a City issue but a school district issue. Mr. Cunningham
said that as a responsible governmental unit, the City Council
must consider the ramification of its actions. He said if the
City Council is not part of the solution then it is part of the
problem. If more problems are being created, the City Council is
not a responsible unit.
Traffic Generated by Proposed Use is Within the Capacity of the
Street Serving the Property - Mr. Cunningham noted that the
Planning and Zoning Board took issue with the condition and
capacity of the roadway and expressed concern regarding bicycle
and pedestrian traffic. He said that SEH appears to address
capacity to some extent however, only that it is designed wide
enough to handle traffic with turn lanes and yellow lines for no
passing zones. The SEH report says nothing about the underlying
road structure and that is where the problems are. The road is
breaking up and is in need of constant repair. It was stated at
the last Council meeting that perhaps the County will have to
overlay the roadway more often and this situation is a County
problem. Mr. Cunningham suggested that if the City adds more
traffic to this roadway, the City should look at it as their
problem, not just a County problem.
Mr. Cunningham said that since a rezone of the proposed plat will
have a direct affect on schools and roads serving the plat, the
City must responsibly assess the impact of their actions upon
these areas of concern. He said that unless the City Council can
say, with no reservation, that the proposed plat does not present
a burden upon schools and roads serving the area, the Council
must vote no to the proposed plat or become a part of the
solution to any negative impact the Council decision imposes on
any other government unit. Mr. Cunningham said that he feels the
best use for the 121 acres is still as a rural area.
PAGE 6
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
John Elder, 13920 Elmcrest Avenue, Hugo - Mr. Elder said that his
concern is in regard to the breaks in the forcemain interceptor
that runs between the City of Centerville and the City of Hugo.
He noted that there have actually been four (4) breaks in this
line since it was constructed. Mr. Elder explained that Mr.
Powell does have written information from the former Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission describing these breaks. Mr. Elder
described the breaks in the line and also noted that he had
received a letter from the Metropolitan Waste Control containing
information regarding when the forcemain was constructed and
information regarding the leaks. The letter states that the
leaks were repaired upon notification to the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission, however some of the leaks were undiscovered
for several days. The letter also says that the 18 year history
of the forcemain indicates the condition of the forcemain. Mr.
Elder talked to current Metropolitan Council Waste Water
personnel and they told him that the pipe has never had a
televised inspection to determine the condition of the pipe.
Although there are plans to perform a televised inspection, this
may not occur for another year or two. Mr. Elder said that
because of the frequency of the breaks in the pipe line and
because of the location of the pipe line he was concerned
regarding whether this is really the time to connect another 450
homes. He asked if the pipe line should be thoroughly inspected
now before the City makes the actual connection. Mr. Elders
asked Mr. Powell what would happen if the flow of sewage has to
be cut off to do a repair? Mr. Powell will respond to this
question when the matter comes up later this evening.
Mr. Elder referred to the joint Clearwater Creek drainage study
and said that he has heard that there is now adequate information
to go forward with the proposed plat. He noted that the Hugo
City Council is meeting this evening and will discuss the
Clearwater Creek development and the impact it will have for the
City of Hugo. He explained that a letter was faxed to the Lino
Lakes city hall about this situation. Mr. Elder said his biggest
concern is that two (2) towns are trying to work together,
however Lino Lakes does not want to wait until both towns get the
final information regarding the drainage study and allow equal
input into the development. He noted that this development will
impact both cities because of the drainage and may affect whether
or not the City of Hugo can connect to the force main pipe line.
Mr. Elder said that the City of Lino Lakes is jumping into
something before all of the preliminary work is completed. He
said he sees a carrot being dangled and the City rushing to
approve the development so that the commercial and industrial
areas can be developed on County Road 14 (Main Street) and the
City can offer the commercial developer a break.
PAGE 7
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Sherrie Eisele, 6509 - 24th Avenue - Mrs. Eisele said that her
property would be in either phase four (4) or five (5) of the
proposed development. She said that the sense of timing is what
bothers her about the development. Mrs. Eisele said that the
City keeps saying that the development will be "narrowed" into
153 homes or it will slowly phase in. She felt that this is not
a slow process. Mrs. Eisele said that either the City will have
153 isolated homes or a huge community. She said timing is a big
piece because at this time the school district is looking at a
very serious school situation. Mrs. Eisele said she has two (2)
children in the White Bear School District which is facing major
problems. She said that the City of Lino Lakes according to the
20/20 Vision wants to be a community that offers "K through 12
quality education". Mrs. Eisele asked how can the City offer
quality education when the White Bear Lake School District is
considering closing a school, and increasing the number of kids
in a school. She asked how are these children going to learn
when they are sitting body to body. Mrs. Eisele asked if this is
a serious part of the Lino Lakes vision, how does the City expect
to offer a community of 450 new homes a school system. How can
the development be marketed under these conditions and how can
the City responsibly offer this community to new families.
Mrs. Eisele referred to the 20/20 Vision program dealing with
citizens concerns such as the citizens desire for a community
that shows growth and balance and citizens value the physical
environment and desire to maintain wildlife and wetland habitats
as part of the overall balance of the development. Mrs. Eisele
said that this is a rural area with horses and hobby farms. She
said, "I do not understand why the Lino Lakes Council wants house
after house after house". She said that there are many ways to
develop property and she would prefer the area to stay the way it
is. Mrs. Eisele noted that this is not realistic. However, she
felt that the City must be realistic and say do we have to have
450 homes or is there another way to develop this property. She
asked if the City could look at three (3) to five (5) acre
developments and bring in big homes. Mrs. Eisele asked if this
would be a better balance of land?
John Landers, 7181 Sunrise Drive - Mr. Landers said that supports
entirely everything that has been said to this point. He asked
that when a vote is taken on both the rezone request and the
preliminary plat request that each Council Member individually
give their yes or nay along with their reasons for voting as they
did.
Mike Stricker, 84 White Pine Road - Mr. Stricker said he wished
to talk about the Woods of Baldwin Lake, Second Addition. Acting
Mayor Neal asked that Mr. Stricker reserve his comments until
PAGE 8
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
this matter is reached on the agenda this evening.
Acting Mayor Neal noted that the City Council does not take
action on matters brought under open mike. The City Council will
take under advisement the comments regarding the proposed
Clearwater Creek rezone request and preliminary plat request and
return to the matter later in this agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 13, 1995 - Council
Member Kuether moved to approve these minutes as presented.
Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
REGULAR AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF DISBURSEMENTS:
February 13, 1995 - Council Member Kuether moved to approve these
disbursements as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the
motion. Motion carried unanimously.
February 27, 1995 - Council Member Elliott moved to approve these
disbursements as presented. Council Member Kuether seconded the
motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Centennial Fire District - Council Member Elliott moved to
approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member
Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 25 SUPPORTING PASSAGE OF THE
MINNESOTA EMERGING COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES ACT OF 1995, DAN TESCH
Mr. Tesch explained that he had enclosed in the Council packets
copies of Draft Six of the Minnesota Emerging Communication
Services Act of 1995 and Resolution No. 95 - 25 which outlines
City support for a bill now in the Legislature. The North
Suburban Cable Communications Commission is asking all members of
the Commission to support passage of the bill by adopting the
resolution which includes protection of public rights-of-way from
emerging communication service providers, recognizes that a wide
range of voice, data, and video providers are now and will be on
the scene, states that current state statute does not adequately
address these needs, and concludes that local authorities must
have the authority to require control of rights-of-way via their
permitting authority. Mr. Tesch recommended that the City
Council approve Resolution No. 95 - 25.
PAGE 9
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Council Member Kuether moved to approve Resolution No. 95 - 25.
Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Tesch explained that the resolution will be forwarded to the
State Legislature.
PLANNING REPORT, MARY KAY WYLAND
SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 01 - 95, Clearwater Creek Rezone
Request - Mr. Brixius explained that at the February 13, 1995
Council meeting, the Council voted to approve the FIRST READING
of Ordinance No. 01 - 95 which is the rezoning of the Clearwater
Creek subdivision from Rural (R) to Single Family Residential (R-
1). The City Council also continued the consideration of the
preliminary plat to allow staff to meet with residents and answer
questions. The neighborhood meeting was held on Wednesday,
February 15, 1995 from 6:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. and a variety of
issues were discussed. Mr. Brixius noted that most of the same
issues were raised again under open mike this evening. He said
that he would give a response to the issues as they were
discussed at the neighborhood meeting.
Mr. Brixus explained that the Clearwater Creek subdivision is
located in the eastern portion of the City which is relatively
undeveloped. In 1990, when the Comprehensive Plan was amended
and the MUSA was established, this area was designated for single
family urban densities in conjunction with commercial and
industrial development around the interchange area (I35E and Main
Street (CSAH 14). The comprehensive plan arrangement envisioned
that it was necessary to provide for some residential support for
the economic growth around the interchange. Mr. Brixius wanted
to make clear that what is before the City Council this evening
is a preliminary plat and a rezone for 153 homes not the 460 that
was quoted earlier by the residents. He explained that
eventually the 460 homes may have opportunity to come before the
City Council but that is contingent upon the developer's pursuit
of the property and his ability to put together a package that
would accommodate the entire 460 homes. The 153 lots are
sufficient to support the utility improvement that are being
suggested independent of the balance of the development. Mr.
Brixius explained and as was noted at the neighborhood meeting,
the 153 lots would be phased in over a three (3) to five (5) year
period. Mr. Emmerich has indicated that due to the increase in
interest rates, further phasing of the development was likely.
Mr. Brixius addressed the timing of the plat. He explained that
the 1990 MUSA envisioned that development in this area would
occur between 1990 and the year 2000. This is a 1995 development
PAGE 10
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
application. Mr. Brixius explained that since that amendment
occurred, the City was challenged for detachment/annexation of
properties around the interchange with claims by those property
owners that utility services could not be provided by the City.
The City won the judgement on this matter by indicating that
utilities could be provided. Mr. Brixius said his October report
and a number of other items indicated that the timing is
appropriate if those features are to be observed. He said that
the area is in the MUSA, defense of the annexation position made
claim that the City can provide the utility services and
according to the City Engineer only a large development that
could provide for the financing of the improvements would make
utilities to that interchange immediately available.
Mr. Brixius noted that the Economic Development Authority
Advisory Board (EDAAB) has reviewed the development and has
supported it on the basis that providing utilities to the
interchange provides for economic development opportunities in a
more immediate fashion. Finally the developer did worked with a
number of property owners to try and assemble a larger piece of
property to make this a more contiguous development. Since then
a number of things have changed and the developer is focusing on
the 153 lots proposed in the preliminary plat.
Mr. Brixius referred to the impact this proposed development will
have on the White Bear School District and noted that concerns of
this district are the same as for any school district in Lino
Lakes. Mr. Brixius also explained that it is not totally within
the realm of the authority of the City Council to do much about
school district concerns. He noted that claims have been made on
the bases of 460 homes. The timing of the 153 homes was not
considered and using the reduced number of homes over a larger
period of time will allow them to be phased into the school
district. In addition, based on the developers projection of
$150,000.00 to $300,000.00 homes, the homes will generate taxes
in excess of what they will generate in demand for services. Mr.
Brixius said there will be some immediate tax benefit through an
expanded tax base. He said as noted by a resident of this area,
continued growth changes the profile within a school district.
Additional families provide additional population base to make
corrections within a government jurisdiction much like Lino
Lakes.
Mr. Brixius said that expansion of economic development to the
eastern interchange provides some opportunity for industrial and
commercial growth. This type of growth provides tax diversity
that has been subjected by the 20/20 Vision Program and also
would be supportive of the school district.
PAGE 11
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Mr. Brixius said that Mr. Powell will address the gravity sewer
utility and a representative of SEH will address the traffic
study. He explained that Anoka County has issued a permit for
access onto Otter Lake Drive. They have also given indication to
the staff that this road can accommodate the development as
outlined. The condition of the road is a maintenance that was
observed and recognized by staff at the neighborhood meeting and
will continue to be an issue that has to be responded to.
Mr. Brixius said that the City Council is making a determination
as to when this development is timely. In 1990 when the City
Council approved a Comprehensive Plan and designated this area
for urban development and included the area in the MUSA, it was
anticipated that the area would develop within this decade.
Additionally, the proactive posture of the City regarding
economic development and the desire to see something happen along
the eastern interchange, provides a City wide prospective as to
differing land uses and how they complement one another.
Mr. Brixius noted that Mr. Emmerich's plat conforms with R-1
standards and in most cases exceeds the required lot area. All
lot areas have been tabulated and meet standards above wetland
areas. RCWD has reviewed the drainage plan and a number of the
required feasibility studies have been completed including
utilities, traffic and storm water drainage. Mr. Brixius felt
that a number of issues that were not necessarily available to
the Planning and Zoning Board have been addressed and in fact,
have been expanded upon. He said he felt that all issues have
been satisfied and meet the criteria.
Mr. Brixius explained that the City Council has a choice of
approving or denying the request for a rezone and a request for
preliminary plat approval this evening. He said based on the
Comprehensive Plan and past planning decisions, he would
recommend approval.
Mr. Powell said he would address the concerns expressed by the
citizens this evening. He referred to Mr. Donlin's comments
regarding the sewer and water extension and said that he would
refer the City Council to his February 10, 1995 report which
summarized and updated these issues. Mr. Powell explained that
currently the City of Lino Lakes does not have a Joint Powers
Agreement with the City of Hugo for sewer and water services
although Mr. Donlin alluded to such an agreement. The current 10
inch force main on Cedar Street is for the connection of Lino
Lakes and the usage of the City of Centerville. It is not
proposed or envisioned that the City of Hugo would make any
direct connection to this forcemain. Their service is provided
by a gravity extension from the Forest Lake Interceptor which has
PAGE 12
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
adequate capacity. Mr. Powell said he met with the Metropolitan
Waste Water Services personel on Friday and verified this
information as well as the plan for the City of Lino Lakes to
connect to the forcemain with a 153 lots. Beyond the 153 lots,
whenever the Metropolitan Council Waste Water Services reviews
the City's sewer extension application, they will keep in mind
the future and how future services will be provided for this
area. Mr. Powell said that the 153 lots proposed for Clear Water
Creek subdivision can certainly be connected to the forcemain
which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan prepared in 1990.
Mr. Powell continued, the SEH study regarding Otter Lake Road
prepared in August, 1994 provides a preliminary study of the
proposed plat. There is also an extensive study, completed
January 17, 1995 which includes the commercial and industrial
area around the interchange. The findings from this study were
consistent with the August, 1994 review of the initial concept
plan.
Mr. Powell noted that Mrs. Cunningham indicated that she had a
letter from the Hugo City Administrator stating the work outlined
in the Joint Powers Agreement regarding drainage has not been
completed. He said there may be confusion because the Agreement
that was undertaken does not only analyze the drainage, it also
requires management policies to be outlined, as well as funding
sources and other similar requirements. As mentioned in Mr.
Powell's February memorandum, the hydrological study has been
completed and this has been confirmed by the Hugo City Engineer
in a letter dated February 20, 1995. Mr. Powell quoted from the
OSM letter, "the hydrologic and hydrological analysis and
calculations necessary to develop this plat were completed prior
to the meeting between the City of Hugo and the City of Lino
Lakes on February 1, 1995". Mr. Powell said that the
understanding from the very beginning was that the hydraulic
study would be completed and then the two (2) cities would meet
to discuss the findings. It was also the understanding that
policies and the funding mechanism would be prepared after the
joint meeting. Mr. Powell continued quoting from the letter,
"they do not believe that any further analysis is warranted in
order to finalize storm water policies in this area". Mr. Powell
explained that the portion of the Joint Powers Agreement with the
City of Hugo regarding the hydraulic analysis is completed. He
said that discussion at the joint meeting included how the joint
study findings would be implemented, and how the improvements
will be funded such as by the RCWD or by the cities
independently.
Mr. Powell noted that some of the speakers tonight said that all
phases of the proposed development would have to be completed in
PAGE 13
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
order to get the commercial and industrial development that the
City wants around the interchange. He explained that the initial
two (2) phases will generate enough area and connection charges
to cover the cost of the initial well and the lift station. Mr.
Powell said that utilities to serve the commercial and industrial
development around the interchange will not come for a while. He
said the proposed plat is the very first step in getting utility
service to the commercial and industrial area. It was never
indicated that 450 lots were required to provide utilities to the
commercial and industrial area.
Mr. Elder asked about cutting off the sewage to do repairs on the
forcemain pipe. Mr. Powell explained that the 10 inch forcemain
on Cedar is pumped through a lift station in Centerville. If
there was to be an interruption to the forcemain, the pumping
would be stopped at the lift station or pumped into a temporary
holding tank or truck. Mr. Powell explained the three different
times that the forcemain had to be repaired.
Mr. Powell said that the three (3) factors for determining
wetlands was mentioned by a speaker this evening. These factors
are soils, vegetation and water table. He again said that the
RCWD has reviewed the delineations that have been prepared and
concurs with the field study. Mr. Powell said that many of the
other issues that were raised have been followed up since the
initial memorandum of February 10, 1995 and have confirmed what
was said at that time and the follow up is consistent with the
review of last fall.
Council Member Bergeson said that when the City Council heard the
review of the drainage plan at the joint meeting with Hugo, the
Hugo engineer presented the idea that one of the keys to drainage
for this area is the culvert under Cedar Street. Council Member
Bergeson said it appeared that it was his feeling if the culvert
was cleaned and maintained, this would go a long way toward
accommodating any potential water problems in the area because of
heavy rains or whatever. He asked if Mr. Powell concurred with
this assessment of the culvert under Cedar Street and who is
responsible for getting the culvert cleaned. Mr. Powell
explained that the culvert is outside of the Lino Lakes boundary
but it does affect the entire watershed district and is a concern
for Lino Lakes. He agreed with the statement of one of the
speakers and said that the culvert needs to be maintained near
the inlet and outlet. There is irregular topography and debris
that needs attention. Mr. Powell said that the culvert is
probably frozen at this time and under water. He felt through
working with the City of Hugo, the RCWD and the contractor for
the proposed development, the culvert can be cleaned and verify
that it is clean. Mr. Powell said that the City should work with
PAGE 14
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
the RCWD to coordinate continual maintenance. He noted that it
is difficult to inspect at this time because it is frozen and
obstructed.
Acting Mayor Neal asked about the culvert under I35E. It was
noted that there is a concern regarding that culvert, however,
the immediate concern is the culvert under Cedar Street. Mr.
Powell said he concurred with statements made by other
consultants regarding the culvert and explained that the City
should allow the RCWD to clean out the culvert if they have plans
to do so. As part of the Clearwater Creek subdivision proposal,
the City will make sure that the culvert is cleaned and will be
maintained. The City will work with the RCWD to determine if
they want the City to do any inlet or outlet treatment to help
keep the culvert clean such as riprap, etc.
Acting Mayor Neal asked if Mrs. Cunningham's question had been
answered. Mr. Powell said as he had mentioned at the previous
Council meeting, the question of will the proposed development
have any direct affect on the nearby properties was directed to
the Hugo consulting engineer. The answer was yes because any
development has some affect. The Hugo consulting engineer said
the effect would be "negligible" maybe a "bounce" of not more
than an inch or two (2) if that. Mr. Powell said that some
confusion was created earlier because the preliminary findings
had indicated that by letting the wetlands "bounce" two (2) to
three (3) feet some storage could take place. Mr. Powell
explained that this would be true in other areas but would be
taken on an individual wetlands basis. He said some wetlands
could "bounce" two (2) to three (3) feet but the wetlands near
the Cunninghams would not be one such area. Council Member
Kuether asked if there would be a guarantee for the Cunninghams.
Mr. Powell said that the developer would be held to the RCWD and
City requirements and those requirements control the rate of
runoff to pre-existing conditions. He explained that the down
stream concerns noted in the drainage study such as obstructions
which are backing the water up may be taken care of too. The
developer will be held to all of the requirements of the RCWD.
The RCWD and the City of Hugo are aware of the concern about the
"bounce" in the wetland area.
Mr. Schumacher explained for clarification reasons, that what is
being consider is a preliminary plat. He asked if the plat
proceeds final plat approval, what additional information would
the developer provide to address the Cunningham issue as it
relates to the RCWD. Mr. Powell explained that there would be a
detailed drainage study based on the final grading plan for the
subdivision. All the detailed analysis would be done which would
evaluate the ponding, the rate of runoff, and the exact routing
PAGE 15
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
of the flow from the subdivision. All this additional
information would be put in context with fitting in with the
overall drainage study which was prepared by the City of Hugo.
Mr. Schumacher explained that more detailed information would be
available to the property owners.
Council Member Bergeson asked Mr. Powell to state the regulation
regarding predevelopment runoff and post development runoff. Mr.
Powell explained that the rate of runoff is controlled to
predevelopment conditions. This means that if a landowner had a
stream of water flowing through his property before development,
that same stream of water would still be flowing through his
property after the development is completed. The only difference
is that the stream may flow longer than it did before the
development occurred. Mr. Powell explained that predevelopment
is evaluated based upon existing topography and where the water
is currently draining and postdevelopment with the added roof
tops, driveways and roadways would have to be routed through
storm sewers and ponds in order to hold back until other drainage
has time to clear the drainage way or ditch. The volume of
runoff may increase but the rate of runoff will not increase.
Mr. Powell explained that he spoke to Anoka County Highway
Department last week. Their 1995 construction plan includes
plans to overlay Otter Lake Road. Bids for this improvement will
be taken this spring. County funding requirements could cause a
delay in this play. Currently an overlay of Otter Lake Road from
County Road J to County Road 14 (Main Street) is included their
1995 construction plans.
Acting Mayor Neal asked what would happen if the Cunninghams
placed a dike around their property or dug a ditch around their
property. Mr. Powell said that the RCWD would be involved
because such action would impact other neighboring property. He
noted that the City has to rely on the RCWD to control the
overall drainage plan for the area.
Mr. Schumacher summarized by noting that the Planning and Zoning
Board has held a public hearing on the request for a rezone and
preliminary plat approval. At the last Council meeting
additional input was taken from the public because some of their
questions were still unanswered and a special work session was
held with staff and residents last Wednesday evening. Mr.
Schumacher said that on the agenda tonight are two (2) items for
Council action, Ordinance No. 01 - 95, rezoning Clearwater and a
preliminary plat approval request. He asked that the Council
take action on the SECOND READING of Ordinance 01 - 95 first and
then take action on the preliminary plat approval.
PAGE 16
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Council Member Elliott moved to adopt the SECOND READING of
Ordinance No. 01 - 95 rezoning the Clearwater Creek area from
Rural (R) to Single Family Residential (R-1). Council Member
Bergeson seconded the motion.
Council Member Bergeson noted that a couple of residents who
spoke under open mike requested that the City Council comment on
why they were voting either yea or nay. He said the Council
received a report on the neighborhood meeting with the names of
those attending and was surprised to see that there were more
people attending that did not live in the neighborhood than did
live there. Council Member Bergeson said he thought the purpose
of the neighborhood meeting was for the people who live in the
neighborhood and people who own property there to talk with the
developer and engineers and exchange information. He said if
that had been a meeting regarding his neighborhood he would have
been a little upset that all the other people showed up. Council
Member Bergeson said he wanted to make the point that the request
before the City Council is not a 456 homes, it is a rezone
request and preliminary plat request for 153 homes. Obviously
the developer would like to expand beyond this but there is no
guarantee that this will happen. Council Member Bergeson felt
that it is curious that people who are not engineers seem to know
more than the engineers. He said the City Council must rely on
the experts who have worked on this project regarding the
adequacy of the sewer forcemain. Council Member Bergeson
explained that the City Council has reports from engineers that
this forcemain is adequate to handle 153 connections and possibly
450 connections. He said again the City Council has to rely on
the engineers regarding the adequacy of Otter Lake Road and not
opinions of persons who are not engineers. The engineers say
that this road is adequate to handle the additional traffic.
Council Member Bergeson referred to the wetland delineation and
noted that the RCWD has reviewed the developer's delineation and
approved it. He noted that in terms of regulatory agencies, they
are one of the toughest agencies that the City deals with. If
they feel that the wetland delineation is adequate, the City
Council should rely on their expertise.
Council Member Bergeson felt that drainage is a legitimate
concern and if the rezone request is approved, further
requirements could be added to the motion for approval of the
preliminary plat such as cleaning the ditch. He said
compatibility with adjoining land uses was also a concern. He
felt that disclosure about neighboring uses is not a warning to
prospective buyers, the concept is full disclosure by the
builders and developer. A similar requirement was approved by
the City Council in the area of the Lino Air Park. The builder
and developer agreed to disclose this information. That does not
PAGE 17
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
mean that the uses are incompatible but that homeowners are made
aware of the uses of adjoining properties and that the people who
own the adjoining properties also have certain rights.
Council Member Bergeson explained that staff has already pointed
out the findings of fact such as the request is consistent with
the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, consistent with present and
future land uses, and performance standards of the preliminary
plat comply with all current City standards. He noted that it is
unusual for a preliminary plat to conform to all City standards
because of all the wetland regulations. Some preliminary plats
do have some undersized lots and some variances are needed. It
is important to note that no variances have been requested for
the preliminary plat Clearwater Creek. Council Member Bergeson
commented on other findings of fact such as the preliminary plat
can be accommodated by existing City services. The school
district situation was discussed and Council Member Bergeson
noted that not all new homes are a drain on a school district.
The taxes collected on a $70,000.00 or $80,000.00 new home may
cause a drain on a school district because on the average the
taxes collected on these homes will not cover the cost of the
students who come from that home. However, a home valued higher
than $150,000.00 is a plus for a school district. On the average
these homes generate more taxes than are spent to supply services
to that home. The comment was made that this matter was denied
by the Planning and Zoning Board. This is true, however it was
defeated on a four (4) to three (3) vote and that is as close to
a tie vote as you can get. Mr. Mesich outlined his reasons why
the matter should be denied and was very careful to stick to the
requirements. However after reading the minutes from that
Planning and Zoning Board meeting, it appeared that some other
members did not follow the same logic and that they may have
voted in terms of their view of what the pace of development
should be in Lino Lakes and that is beyond the scope of the
Planning and Zoning Board. Their responsibility is to make sure
that the development is technically correct. Council Member
Bergeson said that from what he has seen, he believes that the
proposed development is technically correct.
Council Member Elliott noted that Mr. Emmerich owns the land and
legally he has the right to develop it. It does open the
corridor that is needed for commercial growth and if the City
Council is going to be responsible for the entire City, the
Council has to look for commercial growth to take the burden off
of the taxpayers. Council Member Elliott noted that she lives on
Otter Lake Road and will have all of the cars "zooming" up and
down her side yard. She said she would love to see the area
remain rural. However, she does not own the land and to be
legally responsibe she has to approve everything about the
PAGE 18
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
proposed development. The City Council has all the information
and there is no reason to deny it. Council Member Elliott
explained that she has talked to one Planning and Zoning Member
who did vote against the development and believes this members
concerns have been taken care of and if this matter were to be
returned to the Planning and Zoning Board, she felt that it would
not be denied.
Council Member Kuether agreed 100% with Council Member Bergeson
and Council Member Elliott. She said the Council has to be
concerned about commercial development and the City Charter makes
commercial development very hard to do. The City cannot on a
"whim" throw sewer and water in the ground. It takes a lot of
planning to bring a large business to Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes
needs this planning. Council Member Kuether said that the City
Council does listen to all the concerns of the residents next to
any development, however, the City Council must still act
responsibly and hoped that the residents would understand.
Acting Mayor Neal said a little more than a year ago, a company
approached the City and asked to place a mobile home park in the
area where this development is planned. He went and talked to
some of the residents in the area and they said that they did not
want a mobile home park in their area or commercial development
in their back yard but did want houses. Council Member Neal also
said that the developer does have a right to develop as long as
that it is done legally. He said he still is concerned about the
wetlands and the Cunningham's pasture. There has been no
guarantees however, the matter will be addressed in the final
plat.
Council Member Bergeson explained that another concern discussed
at the previous Council meeting was in regard to is this "leap
frogging" or is this out of sequence in terms of development. He
explained that we usually think of development coming from the
south to the north and filling in etc. He said this would depend
on how one looks at the matter. Council Member Bergeson said it
is true that the area to the south is not completely developed
but if you look from the direction of CSAH 14 (Main Street)
south, there is commercial development up until about 200 feet of
Cedar Street. Council Member Bergeson said he did not think this
development would be "leap frogging" but would be a logical
extension of development going out in rings from the I35E
intersection.
Acting Mayor Neal called for the question. On a roll call vote,
all Members voted aye and motion carried unanimously.
Ordinance No. 01 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes.
PAGE 19
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Consideration of Preliminary Plat, Clearwater Creek - Mr. Brixius
asked that the motion to approve the preliminary plat include the
11 conditions that are listed in the February 24, 1995 Northwest
Associated Consultants (NAC) report. He also suggested that if
the Council so desires, item No. 12 could be added requiring the
developer and the builder to disclose adjoining land uses.
Council Member Bergeson moved to approve the preliminary plat of
Clearwater Creek subject to the 11 conditions outlined in the NAC
report dated February 24, 1995 plus a 12th condition that the
developer either independently or through the RCWD be responsible
for cleaning the culvert under Elmcrest Avenue and a 13th
condition that the developer or builder disclose the adjoining
land use (horse hobby farms) to each purchaser of every lot.
Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. On a roll call vote,
motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of Conditional Use Permit, Kids at Heart Child
Care, 7330 Lake Drive - Ms. Wyland explained that the Kids at
Heart Child Care Center is located at 7330 Lake Drive in the
Gethsemane Methodist Church building. They have been at this
site since January, 1992 and hold a license from the State of
Minnesota for 35 children. Recently a request was submitted to
the State to increase the number of children to 42. The
breakdown is as follows:
20 Pre -School Children
15 School Age Children
7 Toddlers
2 1/2 to 5 years of age
5 to 12 years of age
16 months to 2 1/2 years old
The Methodist Church's property is zoned Medium Density
Residential (R-3) and the Zoning Ordinance provides for day care
nurseries (15 children or more) with a Conditional Use Permit.
The City staff was asked to review the child care center as a
result of the request to increase the number of children to 42.
In the review process it was determined that the facility was
originally licensed by the State, however a Conditional Use
Permit was never required by the City. The applicant has now
been required to obtain the necessary Conditional Use Permit.
Space has been provided within the church building for a
play/fellowship area, nursery, kitchen and rest rooms. A fenced
playground on the site is used for outdoor recreation. There are
currently four (4) full-time employees and two (2) part-time
employees. The facility is open from 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.
Parking in the church parking lot is more than adequate to serve
this use.
The State Licensing Division, the Fire Marshall, the Building
PAGE 20
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Inspector any Ms. Wyland have inspected the site and find it to
be in compliance with all applicable requirements. The
Conditional Use Permit will be subject to various State
Inspections and City review on an annual basis.
The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing on February
8, 1995. Condition No. 4 was added as the result of neighborhood
concern regarding drainage on the church property.
The Planning and Zoning Board and staff recommend approval of the
Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions:
1. A license from the Minnesota Department of Human
Services be maintained at all times.
2. Access to the premises be provided upon notification of
annual and periodic inspections, from appropriate City
staff.
3. An increase in the number of children to be served in
the facility will require modification of the license
from the State. Staff would require notification of
any increase and inspection by the Building Inspector
and Fire Marshall to determine adequacy of structure
but waive the requirement of an Amended Conditional Use
Permit.
4. Staff is to review drainage and grading issues on the
church property in the spring.
Acting Mayor Neal asked if the drainage concerns are the result
of a baseball diamond that was constructed during summer of 1994.
Ms. Wyland said yes. Acting Mayor Neal asked Ms. Wyland to
explained the inspections of the premises. Ms. Wyland explained
and noted that all of the inspections are performed annually.
Council Member Kuether moved to approve the Conditional Use
Permit subject to the four (4) provisions listed above. Council
Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING, IMPROVEMENT OF WOODS OF BALDWIN LAKE, SECOND
ADDITION, JOHN POWELL
Mr. Powell used the overhead projector and displayed a map of the
area to be platted into the Woods of Baldwin Lake, Second
Addition. He explained that the preliminary plat was approved
with conditions by the City Council on October 24, 1994. In
response to a petition received by the City from the property
owners within the project area, a report has been prepared
evaluating the feasibility of installing public improvement to
PAGE 21
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
serve the area. These public improvements would include sanitary
sewer, watermain, storm sewers, and streets. The information
contained within the report will be presented at this time and
the City Council should take public input.
Mr. Powell explained that utilities would be extended west from
an existing manhole along White Pine Road to Baldwin Lake Road
and south on Baldwin Lake Road to the south end of Woods of
Baldwin Lake Road, Second Addition. In addition utilities would
be extended west from an existing manhole on Woodridge Lane to
Baldwin Lake Road. The watermain would be extended to complete a
"looping" of the water service in this area. A water storage
pond will be located at the northeast corner of Baldwin Lake Road
and Woodridge Lane. Other utilities include construction of
streets, curbs and gutters. A property owner, Mr. Thompson, west
of Baldwin Lake Drive, expressed a concern during the preliminary
plat process regarding where water runoff from the subdivision
would be eventually go and a culvert across Baldwin Lake Drive.
Mr. Powell pointed to a dark line on the map north of Woodridge
Lane and explained that this represents a storm sewer collecting
drainage from the roadway and depositing it across the street to
the east in a ponding area. He noted that a detailed grading
plan has not been presented by the developer, and said he
envisioned this to be an overflow over the roadway to the west
and no direct culvert would be installed. Mr. Powell explained
that staff is pursuing from RCWD flexibility on whether a street
section not including curb and gutter would be acceptable from a
drainage standpoint. He said that curb and gutter allows water
on a roadway to be collected and routed to a pond before it is
discharged to the ultimate downstream conveyance area. This plan
would allow the roadway to be constructed to the standard City
section which includes five (5) inches of Class #5, two (2)
inches of bituminous base and one and one-half (1 1/2) inches of
bituminous wearcourse. If curb and gutter is not constructed,
the amount of grading adjacent to the roadway would be lessened
and also the impact on the adjacent properties.
In response to a property owners concern on the north side of
White Pine Road, there is a proposed six (6) foot jog to the
south, in the roadway (not the easement) beginning at the
existing curb and continue to the west to Baldwin Lake Road. The
right-of-way remains unchanged. This alignment is acceptable to
the City Utility Foreman. It still allows room for installation
of private utilities on the boulevard.
The preliminary cost estimates have been prepared and were
outlined by Mr. Powell. The cost estimates includes providing
utility stubs for property owners outside of the proposed
subdivision. This action would eliminate the need to disturb the
PAGE 22
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
roadway if an adjoining property owner decided to develop his
land. The total project costs are estimated to be $229,764.00.
The proposed assessment is estimated to be $301,113.67 and will
be distributed equally on each lot.
The proposed time table was also outlined by Mr. Powell. The
plan is to begin construction by May 1, 1995 and complete
construction in midsummer.
Council Member Bergeson asked why a decision has not been made as
to whether or not Baldwin Lake Drive can be reconstructed without
curbs and gutters. Mr. Powell explained that although staff
believes that reconstruction of the street can be done without
curbs and gutters, a request has not been submitted to the RCWD
for final approval. This request will be included with the final
plans and specifications that are forwarded to all reviewing and
permitting agencies.
Acting Mayor Neal opened the public hearing at 8:08 P.M.
Mike Strecker, 84 White Pine Road - Mr. Strecker gave the City
Council a packet containing pictures and information regarding
his property. He used the overhead projector and addressed the
six (6) foot shift in the roadway in front of his property. Mr.
Strecker noted the location of several mature trees on the right-
of-way in front of his house and explained that if the road
continues to Baldwin Lake Drive as planned these trees will be
removed. He requested that the City consider a plan to shift the
road back to the center of the right-of-way as it approaches his
property line. Mr. Strecker said that the trees could be saved
if this plan were approved. He felt that the trees add value to
the neighborhood and should be preserved. Mr. Strecker said that
the neighborhood is developing because it is natural and wooded.
Mr. Strecker said he felt that the first shift to the south is
necessary however if the roadway is not shifted back to the
center of the right-of-way, not only the big trees at the corner
of his lot would be lost, but other trees will be damaged by the
construction and will probably die. He noted the pictures he had
given to the City Council showing the location of the trees he
wanted to save. Mr. Strecker gave a detailed report on how the
shift back to the center of the right-of-way could occur and what
the results would be.
Acting Mayor Neal asked Mr. Strecker what his neighbor across the
street felt about this proposal. Mr. Strecker said his neighbor
is in the audience and could answer this question however, he
would have a larger front lawn because the roadway would run at
an angle until it reaches the west end at Baldwin Lake Road. Mr.
PAGE 23
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Strecker noted that there are no trees on the neighbors side of
the easement that would be disturbed by the construction.
Mr. Powell presented an overhead showing an engineer's rendering
of the proposed area of construction. He noted White Pine Road
going west out of the Woods of Baldwin Lake, the road shifts six
(6) feet to the south and continues on this alignment to the
intersection of Baldwin Lake Road. He said he disagreed with Mr.
Strecker noting that his proposal is a major two (2) direction
change in the roadway. Mr. Powell said he is more concerned
about the utility construction for the area. He explained that
if the utility lines are constructed as they normally are, they
would be centered underneath the roadway. Where the roadway is
shifted south, the reconstruction of the slope would bring the
area of construction to the base of the trees located on the
corner. Mr. Powell explained that with the amount of utility
excavation that will take place at the base of the trees,
particularly the two (2) trees on the corner, they would not
survive and would have to be removed in the future. He further
explained that he has looked at keeping the roadway shifted to
the south as planned but keeping the utilities in the center of
the right-of-way. However, the utility trenches will require a
certain slope and construction will still be within four (4) or
five (5) feet of the trees. This is still not enough distance to
preserve the trees. He said that the placement of utilities
require the use of the entire right-of-way. This makes it more
imperative that the roadway be constructed with only one shift to
the south.
Mr. Strecker said he disagreed with Mr. Powell's comments about
the change in direction of the road. He felt the "curvy" road
would help in slowing down traffic and would add aesthetic appeal
to the area. He felt that the road to the south was much more
"curvy" than what he has proposed for White Pine Road. Mr.
Strecker explained that the roadway has in part kept the tree
roots from growing underneath the roadway because roots are
always seeking water. He felt the trees would not be greatly
affected by the excavation because the roots are growing away
from the road. Mr. Strecker said preserving trees is important
on any project. He said trees in North Oaks and Minnetonka are
left within the roadway. He also noted that "curvy" roads are
constructed in these two (2) areas.
Mr. Strecker agreed that the trees were not on his property, they
are on the right-of-way. He felt that the City should consider
saving the trees to preserve the nature of the area.
Acting Mayor Neal asked if the City has a tree board. Mr. Powell
noted that all projects of this nature are reviewed by the City
PAGE 24
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Forester Marty Asleson. Mr. Strecker explained that he had
talked to Mr. Asleson today. He said Mr. Asleson expressed
concern that he has not been approached about this earlier. Mr.
Powell explained that generally at this stage in a project, Mr.
Asleson would not be involved on a detailed review. He did visit
the site with Mr. Asleson this afternoon and looked at the two
(2) oak trees that have to be removed. Mr. Asleson expressed
concern regarding excavating over 40% of the tree roots within
the drip -line. Mr. Strecker said he knows that this is true,
however, he felt that the 40% being excavated is blacktop and the
tree roots would not be there but in his yard. Mr. Powell
explained that the excavation will extend to almost the base of
the trees and felt the impact on the trees will be significant.
He also noted that the two (2) trees will impact the sight line
at the intersection. The current City standards require that
trees not be planted within 30 feet of an intersection to keep
sight -lines open. Mr. Powell also noted that there are a number
of "curvy" streets in this City however, this particular curve
ends at the intersection of another street creating a 90 degree
angle. He explained that typically a street would not be shifted
one way and then shifted back again within 400 feet.
Acting Mayor Neal asked for a report from Mr. Asleson on this
matter.
Mr. Strecker said that even if the two (2) oak trees on the
corner are not saved there are several trees growing on the
property line that have not yet matured that will be affected by
the utility construction. He felt that all the trees would
eventually die and asked that these trees also be protected. Mr.
Powell said that typically in a project such as this, staff would
meet with the City Forester and identify all trees endangered by
the proposed utility construction. If there are any trees on the
right-of-way encroaching as much as the two (2) oaks on the
corner, they will probably be removed at the same time. This
situation will be evaluated with the City Forester.
Brian Zewers, 6307 Baldwin Lake Road - Mr. Zewers lives on the
north side of White Pine Road where the new road will jog to the
south. He pointed out a house that is very close to the proposed
alignment of White Pine Road. He felt that the new road will be
very close and cause a problem if White Pine Road is extended
west beyond Baldwin Lake Road.
Jim Massa, 6301 Baldwin Lake Road - Mr. Massa asked if a
connection for utility services will be constructed for his lot.
Mr. Powell said yes, each lot will have a utility connection,
however the properties will not be assessed until they petition
for connection to the services. Mr. Massa said that he preferred
PAGE 25
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
that the jog in the road proposed by Mr. Powell be accepted.
Mr. Strecker asked if he could determine the location of the
utility connection for his lot. Mr. Powell said yes within
reason.
John Thompson, 6125 Baldwin Lake Road - Mr. Thompson noted that
he owns all the property that is directly west of the proposed
Woods of Baldwin Lake, Second Addition. He said it appears that
the storm sewer proposed for Baldwin Lake Road is stubbed to the
west and to the east into the pond. Mr. Thompson asked what will
happen to the storm water directed to the west. Mr. Powell
explained and referred to the plat and noted that this plat shows
two (2) catch basins in the roadway to catch the roadway
drainage. This drainage would be directed to the east and into
the pond. Mr. Thompson said that there still is talk about a
concrete curb on the west side of the street and asked if a catch
basin would be needed to catch the runoff from the curbing. Mr.
Powell said no if the curbs on both the west side and/or east
side of the road are deleted. The existing drainage pattern
would be maintained. Mr. Thompson noted that the total cost to
install services and streets for the proposed subdivision is
approximately $300,000.00. Mr. Powell said that this would be
the total assessment. Mr. Thompson asked if the $300,000.00
would be divided by the number of lots in the final plat to get a
per lot cost. Mr. Powell explained that each lot would bear the
cost of construction plus area and unit fees as well as a area
drainage fee. Mr. Thompson asked if he wanted to develop some
lots on his side of the street, would the assessment be
approximately the same rate as on the lots in this proposed
subdivision. Mr. Powell explained that any lot developed outside
of the subdivision would pay the standard rates. Mr. Powell
quoted the current standard rates. Mr. Thompson said then it
appears that any lot assessment that he might incur would not be
based on the developers assessment. Mr. Powell said that this is
correct and explained an amendment to the City's assessment
policy that says if utilities are extended past your property to
serve a new subdivision and your property can not be subdivided,
you may connect to the utilities and be assessed the current
standard rates for the normal front footage in that particular
zone.
Council Member Kuether moved to close the public hearing at 8:32
P.M. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 26 Ordering Plans and
Specifications for Woods of Baldwin Lake, Second Addition - Mr.
Powell explained that a feasibility report has been prepared for
PAGE 26
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
this project and the public hearing has just been completed. He
explained that preparation of plans and specifications can begin
upon receipt by the City Council of adequate financial security
from the developer. The developer is willing to present the
financial security immediately to keep this proposed improvement
project moving forward. Mr. Powell also explained that the City
cannot order the project for 60 days, however the developer will
be submitting a waiver of 50 of the 60 days. If the waiver is
received, the City Council can order the project at the March 13,
1995 Council meeting.
Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 26
Ordering Plans and Specifications for Woods of Baldwin Lake,
Second Addition and dispense with the reading. Council Member
Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 95 - 26 can be found at the end of these minutes.
Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 24 Setting Public Hearing to
Vacate a Certain Drainage Easement on Lots 5 and 6, Block 2,
Rohavic Oaks, Second Addition - Ms. Wyland explained that the
vacation of a drainage easement through Lots 5 and 6, Block 2,
Rohavic Oaks, Second Addition is necessary to clear the title for
these two (2) properties. This easement was recorded as the
southwesterly 15 feet of Lot 17, Block 2, Rohavic Oaks which was
subsequently replatted as a portion of the Rohavic Oaks, Second
Addition and never vacated when the new plat was approved.
The City Attorney has recommended that this item be continued to
the March 27, 1995 City Council meeting. Notification in the
legal newspaper referenced a St. Paul Water Utility easement
when, in fact, this easement relates to a City of Lino Lakes
easement for drainage purposes.
At this time it would be appropriate for the City Council to
adopt the attached Resolution No. 95 - 24 setting a public
hearing for Monday, March 27, 1995, 6:30 P.M. to consider the
vacation of this drainage easement.
Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 24
Setting Public Hearing to Vacate a Certain Drainage Easement on
Lost 5 and 6, Block 2, Rohavic Oaks, Second Addition. Council
Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 95 - 24 can be found at the end of these minutes.
FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 02 95 Amending the Zoning Code,
B1, Subd. 29. Fences and Walls Provision - Ms. Wyland explained
that the Building Inspector and other City Staff have reviewed
PAGE 27
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
the existing fence ordinance and have proposed the following
changes:
A. Change the ordinance to allow a six (6) foot fence to
be installed from the front of the home to the rear
property line. The existing ordinance provides for a
six (6) foot fence from the back of the house to the
rear property line.
B. Change the requirement providing for 30% of open area
to 10%. This change would allow purchase of standard
types of privacy fences offered for sale at Knox,
Mennards, etc.
C. Clarify the section relating to the side of the fence
considered to be the face.
Ms. Wyland said that staff has reviewed the fence ordinance in
several adjoining communities including White Bear Township, New
Brighton, Arden Hills, Circle Pines, Blaine, Hugo and Forest
Lake. These ordinances were reflective of the changes staff is
proposing.
The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on February
8, 1995 and recommended approval of the proposed ordinance.
Acting Mayor Neal asked what this type of fence would be used
for. Ms. Wyland said it would be used for privacy and for dog
kennels. She noted that staff has received numerous requests to
change the City fence ordinance.
Council Member Bergeson asked about corner lots. Ms. Wyland
explained that fences would be required to maintain a specified
height distance to maintain the sight line. Mr. Brixius
explained that at all times, fences in the front yard are limited
to a four (4) foot height and a greater open area is also
required. Anytime a rear yard abuts someone's front yard then
the four (4) foot restriction would apply to preserve the
visibility.
Council Member Kuether moved to adopt the FIRST READING of
Ordinance No. 02 - 95. Council Member Bergeson seconded the
motion. Motion carried unanimously. The SECOND READING of this
ordinance will be on the next Council agenda.
Consideration of MUSA Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment - Ms.
Wyland used the poster board to display a map of the proposed
MUSA changes. She noted that the City Council has received a
detailed MUSA Amendment Report prepared by Northwest Associated
PAGE 28
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Consultants. The report outlines the technical aspects of the
amendment and the methods used to obtain the data contained in
the report.
Ms. Wyland said that additional information includes a map
outlining, in shaded cross -hatch form, those areas staff is
recommending be included in the designated growth area. The
growth areas are in the vicinity of existing utilities. A
neighborhood meeting was held for property owners within the
designated growth area. Approximately 30 property owners
attended the meeting. Some property owners expressed interest in
being included in the growth areas and others indicated a desire
to be excluded. To facilitate those property owners not wanting
their property included in the growth areas, the map was revised
and properties deleted from the growth area as requested. A copy
of the revised map was enclosed in the Council packets for their
review.
Ms. Wyland noted that the growth
which would equal an upland area
the total 775 acres shown in the
are actually about 450 buildable
areas.
area is a total of 775 acres
of approximately 450 acres. Of
growth areas on the map, there
acres after removal of wetland
Ms. Wyland noted that three (3) tables have been prepared
outlining the following:
Table 1 - Breakdown of acreage within the City according to
various categories and an explanation of those
categories.
Table 2 - Breakdown of acreage within the City.
Table 3 - Inventory of upland acres with the growth area.
The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on February
8, 1995 to review the MUSA Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
recommended approval of the Amendment on a four (4) to two (2)
vote. Mr. Schones and Mr. Landers vote no.
Ms. Wyland said that staff is
authorize staff to pursue the
with the Metropolitan Council
asking the City Council to
MUSA Comprehensive Plan Amendment
staff.
Council Member Bergeson noted that at the last Council work
session, staff presented a related item for Behm's Century Farms.
Ms. Wyland explained that a letter has been received from Mr.
Uhde, the developer of Century Farms which encourages the City
Council to act on this MUSA amendment and advising staff that he
PAGE 29
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
will be asking for a land exchange in conjunction with the
preliminary plat that is scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning
and Zoning Board in April, 1995. Ms. Wyland said that the
Metropolitan Council has up to 90 days to review a MUSA
amendment. With a MUSA amendment such as what Mr. Uhde is
requesting, it is possible that Metropolitan Council review could
take a much shorter period of time. Ms. Wyland explained that
Mr. Uhde, in the interest of developing his land this year, would
like to pursue the land exchange mentioned in his letter.
Council Member Bergeson noted that at the Council work session
some on the staff was going to check with the Metropolitan
Council to see if there would be any adverse affect if both
amendments were pursued at the same time. Ms. Wyland said she
talked to two (2) persons at Metropolitan Council who will be
responsible for reviewing the City's MUSA Comprehensive Plan
Amendment. Both persons indicated that two (2) MUSA amendments
filed separately but at the same time, would not have any bearing
on the review of the larger amendment.
Council Member Elliott moved to authorize staff to pursue the
MUSA Comprehensive Plan Amendment with Metropolitan Council
staff. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion
carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 22 ACCEPTING DONATION FROM
THE LADIES AUXILIARY VFW, POST #6583, CHIEF DAVID PECCHIA
Chief Pecchia explained that commencing in 1995, the Lino Lakes
Police Department began teaching the D.A.R.E. Program in the
local elementary schools. The goal of the Lino Lakes Police
Department is to ensure that the D.A.R.E. Program will become
totally funded through donations from the community. The Ladies
Auxiliary, Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583 is aware of this goal and
has donated $1,000.00 toward the cost of administering the
Program in the elementary schools. The purpose of Resolution No.
95 - 22 is to publicly thank the ladies Auxiliary for their
generous donation.
Council Member Kuether moved adopt Resolution No. 95 - 22
accepting the donation and expressed her thanks. Council Member
Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 95 - 22 can be found at the end of these minutes.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 23 DESIGNATING COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING (CDBG) FOR 1995/1996, RANDY
SCHUMACHER
PAGE 30
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Mr. Schumacher explained that CDBG funds are federal funds
administered through Anoka county for which the City is able to
distribute to local organizations for services. These
organization must generally provide assistance to the elderly,
disabled or low to moderate income residents. The City Council
discussed this matter at the last regular Council meeting and a
public hearing was held earlier. The City has received a variety
of applications from eligible organizations including ACCAP,
Alexandra House, Community Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP),
Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau (YSB), Meals on Wheels, as well
as the Lino Lakes Senior Program and the Lino Lakes Land Use
Housing Need/Economic Development Impact Study.
The City Council at the last regular meeting asked staff to do
some additional research regarding the impact on the community by
each organization. Ms. Schloer had completed this additional
research and included the information in the Council packets.
Mr. Schumacher presented his recommendations which are based on
the research by Ms. Schloer and Council recommendations from the
previous Council meeting. He explained that there is $8,500.00
from an older CDBG program that has not been spent. ,He explained
that the dollars not used in the older program must be used by
June, 1995 or turned back to the County. Mr. Schumacher proposed
that the Land Use Housing Need/Economic Development Impact Study
be funded by $5,000.00 from the older program and $10,000.00 from
the 1995/1996 CDBG program. Mr. Schumacher read his
recommendation: ACCAP $3,500.00, Alexandra House $5,000.00,
Community Emergency Assistance Program, Inc. $1,000.00, Forest
Lake Youth Service Bureau $2,000.00, Meals on Wheels $1,500.00,
Lino Lakes Senior Coordinator $14,601.00, Land Use Housing
Need/Economic Development Impact Study $10,000.00.
Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 23
Designating Community Development Block Grant Funding for Years
1995/1996. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion
carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF DESIGNATING LEGAL DEPOSITORIES, RANDY SCHUMACHER
A list of depositories presently used by the Finance Department
was included in the Council packets. These depositories are
agencies with which the City invests its funds and maintains a
checking and savings account. The City is required to appoint
and/or reappoint depositories annually.
Council Member Kuether moved to approve the list of depositories
as presented by the Finance Department. Council Member Elliott
seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
PAGE 31
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS FOR DUMP TRUCK, RANDY SCHUMACHER
Mr. Schumacher explained that the purchase of a replacement
dump/snow plow truck was budgeted in the 1995 budget. The
purchase is accomplished in two (2) steps. First the cab and
chassis is bid. The City Council has already awarded bids for
this step. The second step is the bidding for the dump box,
hydraulic and snow plow equipment which will be installed on the
cab and chassis.
Mr. DeWolfe has received three (3) bids for the dump box and
hydraulics and three (3) separate bids for the snow plow
equipment. J -Craft, Inc. is the low bidder for all the
equipment. Mr. DeWolfe recommended that the City Council award
both bids to J -Craft, Inc. The low bids are $12,541.00 for the
dump box and hydraulics and $12,521.00 for the snow plow
equipment.
Council Member Kuether moved to approve the two (2) low bids as
recommended by Mr. DeWolfe. Council Member Elliott seconded the
motion. Motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF COUNCIL LIAISONS, RANDY
SCHUMACHER
Mr. Schumacher
appointment of
their February
were discussed
should be made
explained that the City Council discussed the
liaisons to various departments and committees at
22, 1995 work session. The following committees
and it was decided that liaison appointments
as follows:
Solid Waste Committee
Police Department
Star City Program
Government Efficiencies Program -
Council Member Elliott
Council Member Neal
Council Member Kuether
Council Member Neal
At the work session Mayor Reinert suggested that Mr. Schumacher
and Mr. Tesch form a committee to assist Council Member Neal with
the Government Efficiencies Program.
Council Member Elliott moved to set the committees as discussed
and noted above. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business.
NEW BUSINESS
PAGE 32
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995
Verbal Update, Senior Housing, Randy Schumacher - Mr. Schumacher
explained that the developer of the senior housing planned for
the west side of St. Joseph Catholic Church has now received the
federal tax credits and plans to start construction in 1995.
There has been some delay in this matter due to changing some of
the structural design. Also the federal tax credits are for 48
units, not the 96 units originally proposed. The balance of the
property will be developed into 10 single family homes.
The First Bank is still involved in the project. However, since
the City Council last saw the proposal, interest rates have
risen. The developer is looking for other financing in an effort
to keep the rents affordable. He will have further information
to Mr. Schumacher by March 7, 1995.
Council Member Bergeson noted that the original City subsidy was
based on 96 units. He asked if the number of units are reduced,
will the City subsidy also be reduced. Mr. Schumacher said yes.
He explained that he did review the latest proposal to be sure
that this is the case. Mr. Schumacher also noted that there will
be no City subsidy for the single family homes.
No action was needed on this matter.
NEW BUSINESS
Set Public Hearing to Redesignate
Community Development Block Grant
6:40 P.M. Council Member Elliott
as noted. Council Member Kuether
carried unanimously.
a Portion of the 1994/1995
for Monday, March 27, 1995,
moved to set the public hearing
seconded the motion. Motion
Council Member Elliott moved to adjourn at
Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Aye.
9:04 P.M. Council
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a
regular meeting of the City Council on March 13, 1995.
Marilyn G. Anderson,
Clerk -Treasurer
Vernon F. Reinert,
Mayor
PAGE 33
Council Member Elliott introduced the following ordinance and moved
its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
ORDINANCE NO. 1 - 95
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. B1 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY
REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM RURAL (R) TO SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL (R-1), CLEARWATER CREEK
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota
does ordain:
I.
Ordinance No. B1 of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County,
Minnesota, passed by the City Council. on July 13, 1992 is hereby
amended by rezoning from Rural (R) to Single Family Residential (R-
1) pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate:
The NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, the SE 1/4
of the NE 1/4, Section 25, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County
except:
The south 290.00 feet of the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4
and the north 416.5 feet of the south 706.5 feet of the east
350 feet of said E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, subject to
Elmcrest Avenue on the East. All in Section 25, Township 31,
Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota.
II.
Save as above amended, said Ordinance No. B1 shall stand as
initially passed and as previously amended.
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its
passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 27th day
of February, 1995.
7//(//
Wesley A. Meal, Acting Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly
seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken
ORDINANCE NO. 1 - 95
Page -2-
thereon, the following voted in favor: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether,
Acting Mayor Neal.
The following voted against same: None, Mayor Reinert was absent.
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
Council Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 22
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE LADIES AUXILIARY VFW, POST
#6583 FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE DARE PROGRAM WITHIN LINO LAKES AND RICE
LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
WHEREAS, The Lino Lakes Police Department began teaching the D.A.R.E program
in local elementary schools in January, 1995; and
WHEREAS, The curriculum, developed by educators, is an elementary school drug
prevention curriculum taught by specially selected and trained uniformed
police officers; and
WHEREAS, the Ladies Auxiliary VFW, Post 6583 was made aware of the desire for
the Lino Lakes Police Department to teach this program in the elementary
schools and has donated $1000.00 to the City to defer the cost of this
program.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
hereby accepts the donation of $1000.00 to help fund the D.A.R.E. program and
wishes to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Ladies Auxiliary VFW
Post #6583 for its donation.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February, 1995.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
/ ? :�,:•_... _/ - ( 2-4'7 _ L, t'-)
Marilyn GAnderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof. Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Nen] .
The following voted against same: None, Mayor Reinert was absent.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Council Member Elliott introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION 95-23
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR FUNDING YEAR 1995-1996.
WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes is anticipating receiving Community Development
Block Grant Funds in funding year 1995-1996 in the amount of
$37,601.00 ($38,601.00 Tess $1,000.00 for County administration
costs), and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the funding of a Senior Outreach Program for
our community through the Anoka County Community Action Program,
and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports Alexandra House and its cause of assisting
families with intervention services, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Community Emergency Assistance
Program and its mission of helping people become self-sufficient
and maintain their dignity, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau and its
its goal of providing service to the communities youth, and
WHEREAS, City Council supports the Meals on Wheels Program, designed to provide
food to homebound seniors and handicapped individuals, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the continuation of the Senior Citizens Center
Coordinator Program which has been funded through C.D.B.G. funds
since its inception, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the continuation of the Land Use/Housing
Need/Economic Development Impact Study (in coordination with the
Comprehensive Plan update), and
Page 2
Resolution 95-23
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $3,500.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G. Funds be designated for the Anoka County Community Action
Program.
2. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $5,000.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G. Funds be designated for Family Intervention Services provided
by the Alexandra House.
3. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $1,000.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G Funds be designated towards the Community Emergency
Assistance Program.
4. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $2,000.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G Funds be designated towards the Forest Lake Youth Service
Bureau.
5. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $1,500.00 of it 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G Funds be designated towards the Meals on Wheels Program.
6. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $14,601.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G. Funds be used in support of the Senior Citizen Coordinator
Program, designed to promote the center's activities, programs and general
operation.
7. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $10,000.00 of its 1995-
1996 C.D.B.G Funds be designated to the continuation of the City's Land
Use/Housing Need/Economic Development Impact Study (in coordination with
the Comprehensive Plan update).
8. That the aforementioned dollar allocations shall be expended to the fullest
extent possible given possible public service limitations at Anoka County.
Page 3
Resolution 95-23
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th Day of February, 1995.
Vernon Reinert, Mayor
, /
Marilyn Cir. Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal.
and the following voted against same: None, Mayor Reinert was absent.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Council Member Kuether
and moved its adoption:
introduced the following resolution
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 95 — 24
RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR VACATION OF A DRAINAGE
EASEMENT ON LOT 5 AND LOT 6, BLOCK 2, ROHAVIC OAKS, SECOND ADDITION
WHEREAS, a 15 foot wide drainage easement was recorded over the
southwesterly border of Lot 17, Block 2, Rohavic Oaks at
the time the plat was recorded, and
WHEREAS, this portion of Rohavic Oaks has been replatted into Lot
5 and Lot 6, Rohavic Oaks, Second Addition and proper
drainage easements were recorded over Lot 5 and Lot
6, Block 2, Rohavic Oaks, Second Addition at the time the
plat was record,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA:
that a public hearing be set for Monday, March 27, 1995 at
6:30 P.M. to consider the vacation of the drainage easement as
shown on the attached map.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February,
1995.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn C'. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott,
Kuether. Neal.
The following voted against same: None, Mayor Reinert was absent.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Council Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 25
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PASSAGE OF THE "MINNESOTA EMERGING
COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES ACT OF 1995"
WHEREAS, the North Central Suburban Cable Communications
Commission ("Commission") is a Joint Powers Commission
organized pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.59, as
amended, and includes the following eight (8)
municipalities: Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines, Coon
Rapids, Ham Lake, Lexington, Lino Lakes and Spring Lake
Park (hereinafter "Cities"), and,
WHEREAS, the Commission's Joint Powers Agreement, assigns to the
Commission the responsibility to monitor the operation
and activities of cable communications; to provide
coordination of administration and enforcement of the
cable franchise; to promote the development of locally
produced cable television programming; and to conduct
such other activities to insure equitable and reasonable
rates and service levels for the citizens of the Member
Cities and,
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the cable franchise to ensure the
development and continued operation of a cable
communications systems so that the Cities may achieve
better utilization and improvement of public services and
contribute significantly to the communication needs of
its residents and,
WHEREAS, in pursuit of these goals the Cities have granted to
private interests the use of Public Property and Public
Rights -of -Way.
NOW, THEREFORE, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Lino Lakes, the City has reviewed the proposed Minnesota
Emerging Communications Services Act of 1995, and hereby endorses
the proposed legislation and encourages its adoption by the
Minnesota State Legislature for the following reasons:
FINDINGS
1. Public Property and Public Rights -of -Way are valuable public
assets and Local Authorities are entitled to ensure that the
public is benefitted, compensated, protected and able to
access and share in the use of any Emerging Communications
Services that makes use of those Public Rights -of -Way by a
private for-profit provider.
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 25
Page -2-
2. There is a wide range of Persons seeking to use Public
Property and the Public Rights -of -Way to deliver video, voice
and data services and all such Persons should be treated
similarly by State and Local Authorities.
3. Existing state statutes do not adequately address these
Emerging Communications Services.
4. Local Authorities are well equipped to analyze and implement
the needs and interests of the local citizen/consumer, and
protect taxpayer's investment in Public Property and Public
Rights -of -Way.
CONCLUSIONS
The City concludes that Local Authorities must have the authority
to require Emerging Communications Services utilizing Public
Property and Public Rights -of -Way.
1. Obtain permits and comply with minimum state standards
and existing local standards for use of Public Property
and Public Rights -of -Way.
2. Prohibit redlining and uphold nondiscrimination
standards.
3. Support community access to Emerging Communications
Services.
4. Oversee the design of local communications infrastructure
to ensure the meeting of community needs which includes
ensuring that a portion of the public capacity being
delivered on a city, county and school district specific
basis as determined by Local Authorities.
5. Allow Local Authorities to receive compensation for use
of Public Property and Public Rights -of -Way.
The City further concludes that existing local authority must be
implemented with local permitting authority which:
1. Enforces compliance with financial, technical, legal and
connectivity standards.
2. Authorizes local collection of fees to compensate Local
Authorities for both the use of and decrease in the value
of Public Property and Rights -of -Way as a result of the
construction of and occupancy by Emerging Communications
Services.
RESOLUTION NO. 95 — 25
Page —3-
3. Assures delivery of Emerging Communications Services to
Local Authorities and School Districts.
This resolution was adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council on the
27th day of February, 1995.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Mar`ilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott,
Kuether, Neal.
The following voted against same: None, Mayor Reinert was absent.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Council Member Kuether
moved its adoption:
introduced the following resolution and
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 95-26
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WOODS
OF BALDWIN LAKE - 2ND ADDITION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 95-03 of the Lino Lakes City Council a
report has been prepared with reference to these improvements
detailing estimated construction costs and assessments, and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 95-04 of the City Council adopted the 23rd day of
January, 1995, fixed a date for a public hearing on the proposed
improvements.
AND WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the
hearing was given, and the hearing was held on the 27th day of
February, 1995, at which all persons desiring to be heard were
given an opportunity to be heard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1.
John Powell, TKDA, is hereby designated as the engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of
such improvement.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of Februa 1995
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
71 1
(tit( A—, ) ��_ L_ .� _� ,_--'
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member Elliott and upon vote tieing taker' ti iereon. ti e following
voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal.
The following voted against same: None, Mayor Reinert was absent.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.