Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/08/1995 Council Packet6:00 P.M. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Authorizing Preparation of a Modification of the Plan for Tax Increent Financing District 1-4 AGENDA CITYOF LINO, LAKES Monday May 8, 1995 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Rol Call Setting the Agenda: Are There Any Items to b Deleted from the'Age a? CONSENT AGENDIt A. Consideration of Minutes: 1. Council Meeting, April 24, 1995 2. Council Work Session, March 22, 1995 3. Council Board of Review, April 17, 1995 REQVLAR AGENDA 1. Open Mike A. 20/20 Vision Update, Kim Sullivan' 2. Consideration of Disbursements: A. April 30, 1995 B. May 8, 1995 C. Centennial Fire District Added or AGENDA 3. Consideration of a North Central Cable T V Report, Dan Tesch 4. Planning and Zoning Report, Mary Kay Wyland A. Consideration of Preliminary Plat for Behm's Century Farms B. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 07 - 95 Rezone from Rural (R) to Single Family Residential (R-1), Behm's Century Farms C. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 08 - 95, Planned Development Overlay (PDO) for Lino Air Park Lots 5. City Engineer's Report, John Powell A. Consideration of a Petition Requesting an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Trapper's Crossing B. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 59 Restricting Parking on North Road 6. Park Board Report, Marty Asieson A. Consideration of a Donation for Park Trails in Shenandoah Subdivision 7. Consideration of the Building Department First Quarter Report, Peter Kluegel 8. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 58 Calling a Public Hearing on the Modification of Tax Increment Financing District 1-4, Brian Wessel 9. City Attorney's Report, Bill Hawkins A. Consideration of Approving a Purchase Agreement for Well Site No. 3, LaMotte Property, Birch Street (Mr. Hawkins will present his material at the Council meeting.) 10. Old Business 11. New Business A. Consideration of an Application for Authorization for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License, Lino Lakes Elementary Parent Advisory Group, Marilyn Anderson PAGE 2 AGENDA B. Consideration of an Application for a Block Party for Birch Wood Acres, Marilyn Anderson C. National Correctional Officer Week, Mayor Reinert D. REMINDER, Council Team Building Session, Tuesday, May 16, 1995, 8:30 A.M., Wargo Nature Center 12. Adjourn PAGE 3 COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 24, 1995 Staff members present: City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; Acting City Engineer, John Powell; Consulting City Planner, Al Brixius; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; Planning Coordinator, Mary Kay Wyland; Building Inspector, Peter Kluegel; City Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. The agenda was approved as submitted. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Elliott moved to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. ITEM Consideration of Minutes: Regular Council Meeting, April 10, 1995 REGULAR AGENDA OPEN MIKE DISPOSITION Approved 20/20 Update, Kim Sullivan - Ms. Sullivan explained that she noted that the City Council will be considering and approving the City Goals for 1995. She was very pleased that the 20/20 Vision Project is a part of the 1995 Goals. Ms. Sullivan explained that there will be a midterm meeting of all the advisory groups on Saturday, April 29, 1995 starting at PAGE 1 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 8:30 A.M. The City Council, City boards and commissions and staff are invited to attend this meeting. The advisory groups will be sharing drafts of their goals so that all advisory groups will be aware of what the other groups are doing. The purpose of the midterm meeting is to validate each advisory groups goals, determine that all groups are going in the same direction and do not overlap, and offer assistance to each other. Ms. Sullivan felt that this is an opportunity for the City Council to come and recognize the dedication of the advisory groups that have met during the past eight (8) to ten (10) weeks. This will also help alleviate the concerns of the advisory groups such as will their recommendations be implemented and are their recommendations representative of the community concerns. It was noted that there will be a regional VFW parade that same morning and the City Council was asked to be a part of the parade. Ms. Sullivan suggested that the City Council come to the midterm meeting early and then become part of the parade at the appropriate time. CONSIDERATION OF DISBURSEMENTS April 24, 1995 - Council Member Kuether moved to approved these disbursements as presented. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District - Council member Elliott moved to approved these disbursements as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING AND ZONING REPORT, MARY KAY WYLAND Consideration of the Site Plan Review, Living Waters Lutheran Church, 685 Birch Street - Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector showing the location of the Living Waters Lutheran Church and the proposed addition to the church building. She noted that a conditional use permit was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board (P & Z) and City Council in April, 1993 for construction of the Living Waters Church at 685 Birch Street. This permit review included future phases of development, utility installation, parking, grading and drainage concerns and park and trail dedication. The current request is to add an area of either 1,016 square feet or 1,635 square feet to be used as open space for gathering and/or classrooms. The size of the proposed construction is dependent upon church financing which has yet to be determined. The proposed plan is consistent with the original site plan PAGE 2 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 approved in 1993. Issues regarding drainage, grading, parking, and landscaping have not changed and all requirements of the original permit are still in force. A deposit is still on file at the City for final site improvements as they are not yet complete. Landscaping work is proposed for early this spring. Staff has reviewed this request and recommends approval with all conditions outlined in the original conditional use permit and the additional condition that proper building permits be obtained prior to construction of the addition. The P & Z Board recommended approval of the site plan review at the April 12, 1995 meeting with the conditions outlined previously. Council Member Bergeson moved to approve the amended conditional use permit with the conditions outlined above. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of a Minor Subdivision, City of Lino Lakes, Apollo Business Park, Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. - Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector to show the proposed location for Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. in the Apollo Business Park. She noted that the property is zoned General Industrial. The Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan also indicates that the area is Industrial. The plat for the Apollo Business Park was approved by the City Council in August, 1994. The plat contained lots 1, 2, 3 of Block 1, and Lot 1 of Block 2, and three outlots, A, B, and C. Commercial prospects had been anticipated for the four (4) lots that were actually platted. U -DOR U.S.A has constructed a building on Lot 1, Block 2 but the prospects for Lot 2 and 3 did not materialize. The City now has new prospects for Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1, however, the lot size needs to be adjusted. Therefore, a minor subdivision is being requested which will add the southwesterly two-thirds of Lot 3 to Lot 2 for a total area of three (3) acres. The remainder of Lot 3 will be added to Outlot A for future platting. Staff is recommending approval of the minor subdivision to facilitate the development of Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. The P & Z Board recommended approval at their April 12, 1995 meeting. Mayor Reinert noted that there were representatives from Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. in the audience and asked Mr. Wessel to introduce them. Mr. Wessel introduced Mr. Phil Nolan, President of Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. and the Secretary/Treasurer Wayne Johnson and said PAGE 3 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 he was very pleased to have Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. moving into Lino Lakes. There are several items on the agenda this evening dealing with Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. and Mr. Nolan and Mr. Johnson will answer any questions that the Council may have. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the minor subdivision as proposed. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Site Plan Review, Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. - Ms. Wyland explained that Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. is requesting a site plan review for a 16,256 square foot building to be located in the Apollo Business Park. Office space in the building will occupy approximately 9,216 square feet and 7,040 square feet will be used as shop area. Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. currently employs 35 persons. Phase II of their construction consists of a proposed 7,680 square foot office addition and a 7,040 square foot shop addition. The property is zoned General Industrial and consists of three (3) acres. Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. is an engineering and light assembly company. When phase II of their construction is completed, they will employ approximately 70 people. Site and Plan Review: Setbacks: The proposed building meets the setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for the General Industrial District. Building Height: The Zoning Ordinance requires a maximum height of 45 feet. The proposed building will be 24 feet in height. Green Area: The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 10% green area. The proposed construction, including phase II meets the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. Landscaping/Buffering: A landscaping plan has been provided which indicates a combination of spruce trees, junipers and barberry bushes. Aesthetic Compatibility: The proposed construction is designed to fit with the aesthetics required for construction in the Apollo Business Park. The exterior will be insulated precast concrete wall panels with random rake. An accent color will be provided. Noise: As a condition of approval, the proposed use must be compatible with the surrounding area in regard to noise. Off -Street Parking: The developer is proposing 55 parking stalls for phase I and an additional 87 spaces for phase II. This PAGE 4 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 should be adequate according to the Zoning Ordinance. As a condition of approval, handicapped parking shall be provided as dictated by the ADA Rules and Regulations. Circulation and Access: Access will be provided from both Fourth Avenue and Apollo Drive. The City Engineer has recommended that the Fourth Avenue access be located as far north as possible to avoid conflict with the intersection of Apollo Drive and Fourth Avenue. Loading and Trash: The developer has indicated loading and trash handling areas on the site plan. They will be properly screened as provided in the Zoning Ordinance. Lighting: Off-street parking areas will be required to be illuminated so as to reflect light away from adjoining property. Signs: A sign location has been indicated on the site plan but details of the sign have not been provided. A sign permit will be required prior to installation of any signage. Utilities, Grading and Drainage: Utilities, grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Utilities are available to serve the site. Conclusions: City staff and the Economic Development Authority Advisory Board (EDAAB) recommend approval of the site plan as submitted with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall sign a development agreement and post financial guarantees as specified by City Staff prior to issuance any building permits. 2. The City Engineer shall review and approve utility, drainage and storm sewer plans. 3. Proper sign permits shall be obtained prior to installation of signage. 4. The Site Plan signed and dated April 5, 1995 shall be made a part of this approval and shall incorporate all landscaping, parking, building location, trash handling, loading docks, etc. 5. The parking area shall be provided with a hard surface with concrete curb surrounding all access drives and parking areas. PAGE 5 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 6. Handicapped parking shall be provided according to ADA Rules and Regulations. 7. Access drives off Fourth Avenue shall be located as far north of the intersection of Apollo Drive and Fourth Avenue as possible. 8. Steps are to be taken to minimize or screen all roof top equipment. The P & Z Board reviewed the site plan at their April 12, 1995 meeting and recommended approval. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the Site Plan Review with the eight (8) conditions outlined above. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit, Teleport Minnesota, 6221 Holly Drive - Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector and noted the location of the WCCO property on Holly Drive which currently contains a number of tele -communications devises. Teleport Minnesota, a division of CBS, Inc. is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to install two (2) satellite antenna's within this existing telecommunication compound. One antenna will be 9.2 meters and the other will be 6.1 meters. The property is zoned Rural. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan also indicates that the property is rural. According to the Zoning Ordinance, transmission towers are permitted in a Rural zone with a Conditional Use Permit. The original permit for the site was approved in 1982 with updates in 1984, 1988 and 1990. The site contains a micro -wave tower and components, doppler radar, several satellite antennas and other site improvements including fencing, berming and a 44 foot by 52 foot block building containing transmitters and receivers. There is a driveway to Holly Drive. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval with all conditions contained in the original and subsequent permits and the condition that proper building permits be obtained prior to installation. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the request at their April 12, 1995 meeting with the conditions stated above. Mr. Robert Juroszek, representing the property owners, was present. Mayor Reinert asked him to outline the ultimate plans for the site. Mr. Jurosec explained that all the equipment on the site is utilized. Outdated antennas and other equipment are PAGE 6 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 replaced, however, no other major changes are planned for the site. Mr. Jurosec explained that there is not much land left at the site for additional equipment. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the Amended Conditional Use Permit with the condition that proper building permits be obtained prior to installation. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of a Minor Subdivision, Art LaCasse, 6609 - 24th Avenue - Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector to outline this request. She noted that this item had been before the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council in February, 1994. The original request was to split 40 acres into two (2) parcels, one 33 acres in size to facilitate the sale to a developer and the other 6.21 acres which contains the homestead. After deliberation between the potential developer and the property owner, a revised plan was submitted in January 1995 which reconfigured the lot lines to allow a 7.72 acre parcel containing the homestead and a 32.9 acre parcel which contained an island of upland intended for park dedication. This plan was approved by the City and has been recorded at Anoka County. The developer has platted Clearwater Creek. The property owner has now determined that he would prefer a slightly different configuration to concludee the sale of a portion of the property to his grandchildren. Mr. LaCasse would like to retain a 2.62 acre parcel containing the existing homesite and a 10.23 acre site to be sold to one of his grandchildren. Mr. Emmerich, the developer of Clearwater Creek, has agreed to make a trade and sale to Mr. LaCasse to facilitate this new parcel arrangement. The property is zoned Rural and Single Family Residential (R-1). Municipal utility services will not be available to serve the site, therefore, the 10 acre minimum lot size will apply to the newly created parcel. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval. Mr. Emmerich has agreed to the re -arrangement of lot lines, and Mr. LaCasse is dividing his property as he wishes. The zoning of the site should be corrected, however, this can be facilitated with a future zoning map update. Mr. LaCasse has also advised staff that he would like to move the existing barn onto the homestead property. Aesthetically, it would fit with this property better than the 10 acre parcel which will ultimately contain new construction. The rafters of the barn are in good condition but the foundation needs repair. The PAGE 7 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 repair would be facilitated in the move. Staff does approve of the relocation plan. The existing homestead contains no garage, the barn will allow for interior storage and fit with the nature of the existing structures. Staff is suggesting that a one year limit on the relocation of the barn be added as a condition of approval. The P & Z Board recommended approval of the minor subdivision at their April 12, 1995 meeting. They did not discuss the relocation of the barn. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the minor subdivision request with the condition that the barn be relocated to the existing homestead within one year. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Behm's Century Farm - Mr. Brixius reviewed the rezone request, the Planned Development Overlay (PDO) request, Comprehensive Plan Amendment for MUSA Exchange request and the preliminary plat approval request. Mr. Gary Uhde and Mr. John Johnson representing the applicant were in the audience and will be available for additional comment or information. Mr. Brixius explained that the first phase of Behm's Century Farms is being pursued this year. This is part of a larger concept for the northwestern part of the community. Mr. Brixius outlined the boundaries of the planned subdivision. He noted that the current preliminary plat contains lands that abut the original Lino Air Park, that were not part of the original concept plan. The P & Z Board reviewed these requests at their last meeting and have recommended approval. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - The applicant is proposing a trade of approximately 27 acres. An agreement has been made with a property owner south of Birch Street for approximately 27 acres of buildable land that is currently within the MUSA. This property owner does not have any plans to develop his property at this time and has come to an agreement with Mr. Uhde for the land trade with the condition that this area be included as a growth area when the City amends their MUSA boundaries. Staff feels that a growth area designation in this area would be reasonable. The proposed Behm's Century Farms falls into what the staff has designated as a growth area in the MUSA expansion area. In addition, this proposed subdivision falls into the "infill policy" established by resolution where the developer would bear PAGE 8 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 the cost of all utility extensions, cost of operation and maintenance to the system and would pay all up front costs relative to the extension of the utility systems. Mr. Brixius said that staff is recommending that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the MUSA land trade be approved. Rezone Request from Rural (R) to Single -Family Residential (R- 1) - Mr. Brixius explained that approximately 2/3rds of the site is zoned Rural. The developer is requesting a rezone to R-1. This is consistent with the zoning on the balance of the site. This request is also consistent with the original concept plan that was approved in 1994. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan identifies this area as a single-family residential district. The area would be served by public utilities, at the developers expense, and generally address the performance standards. Preliminary Plat - The preliminary plat consists of 105 lots on approximately 51 acres. The net density would be 2.8 units per acre. The lot and block arrangements conform with requirements. Staff did cite a number of concerns with a number of lots in regard to lot area. The concern involves buildable area above the wetlands. The lots in question are not included in the first phase of development. Lots 8, 17 and 18 in the first phase were cited as a concern in regard to slopes and fill. These lots contain dredged fill material from the County Ditch and the removal or changing of their topography will not create a problem. Staff will not have a problem with this. Lot 18 is an "abut" lot. Other lots in the second addition raise concern regarding buildable land above the wetlands. The developer is working with the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) to determine if these lots will be acceptable and whether mitigation to allow the lots to be filled will be acceptable. If these lots do not receive RCWD approval, some modification in the preliminary plat will be necessary when the second phase is brought to the City for approval. Lot 18 represents a "abut" lot enclosed by two (2) adjoining corner lots. Lot 18 would orient to the north and the adjoining lots would orient to the east and to the west. An "abut" lot arrangement is a less than desirable design feature and staff is recommending that the lot be eliminated. Mr. Brixius noted that Mr. Johnson, the developers engineer did not share his opinion of Lot 18 and would address this matter later in this meeting. The street arrangement in the preliminary plat complies with all PAGE 9 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 requirements. In the first phase, a long street will end until the next phase is constructed. Staff is suggesting that a cul- de-sac be constructed at the end of this long street until the street is continued into the next phase of development. A full cul-de-sac should be constructed to address the turn around needs of public works vehicles, emergency vehicles, etc. Planned Development Overlay for Lino Air Park Lots - Mr. Brixius explained that the Air Park lots are oversized lots ranging in size above 30,000 square feet. The developer is requesting a PDO Overlay to allow for use of the Air Park and oversized hangars. Staff has requested that the developer provide specific language that will be established as deed covenants and also part of the PDO approval that would outline the terms under which the hangars would be designed and how these lots would operate as air park lots. Mr. Brixius has discussed the covenants as outlined and discussed at the P & Z Board meeting with Mr. Johnson. However, the conditions are not yet in written form. If the PDO is approved, staff is requesting that the covenants be written and submitted to staff for more detailed comments regarding their acceptability prior to the second reading of the PDO Ordinance. Staff wishes to tie up all lose ends. Wetland concerns will be addressed by the RCWD. Screening along Lilac Street consisting of berming and landscaping, will be provided. Staff has requested a detailed landscape plan. Thomas Street currently runs through the proposed plat in an east to west direction. It is not likely that the street will be extended due to the wetlands in the area. Street vacation will be necessary and if approved, a public hearing before the City Council must be scheduled. Staff is requesting that the developer work with the Park Board to finalize park dedication. Grading, drainage and utility plans must be submitted for review by the City Engineer. The P & Z Board reviewed Behm's Century Farms and recommended approval of all four (4) applications. Mr. Brixius asked that a formal written plan be submitted for the Air Park lots so that staff can review the plan and provide a detailed evaluation of those criteria before the SECOND READING of the PDO ordinance. Mayor Reinert asked for the time frame for development of the 105 lots. Mr. Uhde explained that the first phase would include 55 lots. He hoped to have a model home completed this fall. The first phase would be about two (2) years of lot inventory. Mr. Uhde said that the first three (3) phases would be constructed over approximately a four (4) year period starting this fall. Mr. Uhde explained that he had averaged every building project he had every completed and found that he averaged about 20 to 25 PAGE 10 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 building lots per year. Mayor Reinert referenced the nine (9) Lino Air Park lots and asked if a homeowners association would be formed for these lots. Mr. Uhde explained that there is an existing homeowners association in place and the Air Park lots will become a part of the existing association with additional rules and by-laws. The new lots will be of a different size and will require stricter covenants. The parcel under the PDO is the only parcel in Behm's Century Farms that will have a homeowners association. Mayor Reinert noted that some associations have been created in the City that have caused problems for the City Council. He said that the City does not want any more of these associations. Mayor Reinert asked Mr. Brixius if he had seen the by-laws that are being proposed for the Lino Air Park lots. Mr. Brixius said no, he has expressed these concerns to Mr. Johnson and has requested that the by-laws and regulations be formally submitted to staff for their review and written opinion. If the City Council approves the first reading of the rezone and PDO request tonight, staff is asking that the plan of action for these lots be submitted and staff provide a formal opinion before the second reading. Mayor Reinert said that he is concerned about how homeowner associations as designed and their impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Uhde said that he understood and pointed out that this particular association is an established association. He said that he is taking a possible existing platted 19 lots that would be part of the homeowners associating and cutting them down to nine (9) lots. He said he will be reducing the size of the association, and overlying additional rules, regulations and disclosures. It is Mr. Uhde's intent to eliminate any further controversies in the future. Mr. Uhde said this organization already exists and he will only be making the regulations for his lots stricter. Mr. Brixius explained that Mr. Uhde will not be creating larger rural lots and staff is concerned about creating a neighborhood rather than just the use of the Air Park. Staff will be looking at rules regarding maximum hangar size, specific location of the hangars, specific statements that the hangars will not be used for commercial or rental use, maximum building heights, no fuel or limited fuel storage, how guest airplanes are going to be treated, limiting the number of airplanes per lot, a green space requirement for each lot, disclosure of the Air Park requirements that currently exist, the Air Park will continue to exist as an operating facility so that the people who purchase lots in the subdivisions beyond the nine (9) Air Park lots will know that this is an on-going operation and the lot that they are buying will be in close proximity to someone who flies airplanes. Another issue discussed by the P & Z Board is the specific location of the joint taxi areas. These areas must be PAGE 11 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 established by private easements. Mr. Johnson is in the process of writing this criteria. Staff has requested this information in writing prior to the consideration of a second reading for the rezone ordinance so that written comments can be provided for the City Council review. Council Member Kuether asked Mr. Hawkins if a developer can add nine (9) lots to an existing association and then make them more restrictive than the other lots in the association. Mr. Hawkins said yes, the owner can place additional restrictions on some individual lots. Mr. Uhde explained that he went through a lengthy negotiation process with the existing homeowners association. They retained legal council and an agreement document has been completed. Mr. Uhde said that this document addresses the concerns and questions outlined by Mr. Brixius. Mr. Jim Conroy, an Air Park resident is the representative of the Air Park Association who worked with Mr. Uhde to prepare the new documents. Mr. Uhde said that it is his intent to come into the community and create harmony between the existing property owners and the community of Behm's Century Farms. Council Member Bergeson noted recent regulations regarding accessory buildings and asked Ms. Wyland how the new regulations would impact the Air Park. Ms. Wyland said that the Air Park was approved with an association that allows a maximum of 3,200 square feet for their accessory buildings. The City has continued issuing building permits under this agreement. The Air Park hangars are "grandfathered" and the existing ordinance does not apply to Air Park hangars. Council Member Bergeson expressed a concern regarding the type of construction for hangars. Ms. Wyland explained that pole barn construction is not allowed in the Air Park. Construction guidelines will be addressed in the documents for the Air Park Association. FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 07 - 95, Rezone from Rural to Single -Family Residential - Council Member Bergeson moved to approve the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 07 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 08 - 95, Planned Development Overlay (PDO) for Lino Air Park Lots - Council Member Kuether moved to adopt the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 08 - 95 and dispense with the reading and to have the bylaws prepared and reviewed by staff before the Council work session for the next City Council meeting. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PAGE 12 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for MUSA Exchange - Council Member Elliott moved to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Preliminary Plat Approval - Council Member Kuether moved to approve the preliminary plat with conditions outlined in the staff report dated April 7, 1995. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Mr. Johnson addressed the issue of Lot 18. He did not agree with Mr. Brixius and said he did not feel that this is an "abut" lot. He felt that this lot and the lots on either side of it would face north. Mr. Johnson addressed the temporary cul-de-sac concern raised by Mr. Brixius. He explained that if the City were to require that a full cul-de-sac be installed at the end of the street in the first phase, he would re -locate the cul-de-sac slightly to the south and take two (2) lots platted for the second phase and place them in the first phase. Mr. Johnson addressed the PDO concern and noted that protective covenants have been prepared. He will make these documents available to Mr. Brixius for his review. Mr. Johnson addressed the parkland dedication concern. He noted that he had already presented a plan that will be considered by RCWD in May. If RCWD approves the plan, a trail will be constructed through the wetlands from the east cul-de-sac to the west cul-de-sac to allow access by the new neighborhood to the park area. Mr. Johnson also noted that a transportation trail will be located on the north side of Lilac Street. Mr. Uhde said that he would provide more detail regarding the location of the temporary cul-de-sac and eliminate Lot 18 if that is what the City Council desired. He did note that the City would lose approximately $5,000.00 on fees is Lot 18 were omitted. There was further discussion regarding the location of the cul- de-sac, parkland dedication and the transportation trail on the south end of the subdivision. It was decided to delay action on the preliminary plat until the next Council meeting. Mr. Uhde will send to Mr. Brixius covenant documents for the nine (9) Air Park lots for his review and comment, will prepare a revised preliminary plat for the first phase showing the location of the temporary cul-de-sac, elimination of Lot 18 and, and get a solid recommendation from the Park Board regarding parkland dedication. PAGE 13 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 Council Member Bergeson rescinded his second on the motion to approve the preliminary plat and Council Member Kuether rescinded her motion to approve the preliminary plat. Council Member Kuether moved to table consideration of the preliminary plat for Behm's Century Farm until the May 3, 1995 Council work session. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES OF SURPLUS RECREATION FUNDS, MARTY ASLESON Mr. Asleson explained that ballfield #3 at Rice Lake Elementary School is a multi-purpose field that is used in the adult softball program. In the past, the City has spent a great deal of time installing a make -shift snow fence for the outfield home run area and field line areas. The fence has to be continually adjusted and is a danger to the ball players. There is also a concern for the safety of the spectators, player bench areas and people walking on the trail that is directly adjacent to the right field home run area. Mr. Asleson proposed to use $4,878.25 of the fees in the special revenue account to purchase and install a permanent fence. The purchase would comply with the agreed upon improvements to be added to the joint -use, Centennial School District/City of Lino Lakes ballfield. The Park Board reviewed this request and has recommended approval. Council Member Bergeson noted that this matter was discussed at the work session. The City Council asked that a policy be prepared that would address the use of fees paid for recreational uses such as team fees. Council Member Bergeson said that these fees should not be used routinely for construction of new or additional facilities. Mr. Schumacher noted that the request is unique and should not be considered a precedence setting matter. He also noted that a policy is being developed and will be presented to the Park Board at their next meeting. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the request to expend recreational use fees for the installation of a ballfield fence at Rice Lake Elementary School and to note that this is not a policy setting motion. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PAGE 14 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 57 AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION FOR AN OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT, MARTY ASLESON Mr. Asleson presented Resolution No. 95 - 57 and explained that this resolution outlines support by the City Council for application of an Out -Door Recreation Grant and to request funding for the acquisition of the A-3 Athletic Complex property on Holly Drive. The grant cannot exceed 50% of the appraised market value of the land or $125,000.00. Council Member Elliott moved to approve Resolution No. 95 - 57. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. SECOND READING, ORDINANCE NO. 06 - 95, AUTHORIZING THE SALE BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES OF LOT 2 AND A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, APOLLO BUSINESS PARK, BRIAN WESSEL Mr. Wessel explained that Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. is purchasing three (3) acres of land in the City -owned portion of the Apollo Business Park for its engineering and assembly facility. According to Chapter XII, Section 12.05 of the Lino Lakes City Charter, an ordinance is required to authorize the sale of real property owned by the City. The FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 06 - 95 took place at the April 10, 1995 Council meeting. No changes or corrections to the ordinance have been presented. After the SECOND READING, the ordinance will be published and take effect on June 2, 1995. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 06 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. SECOND READING, ORDINANCE NO. 05 - 95 AMENDING THE LINO LAKES BUILDING CODE, SECTION 1003, PETER KLUEGEL Mr. Kluegel explained that the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 05 - 95 was held at the. April 10, 1995 City Council meeting. As was explained at that time, the 1995 Minnesota State Building Code was effective March 20, 1995. The City should update its codes to reflect this change. In addition to adopting the 1995 State Building Code, the City should select certain options in the State Building Code and adopt them at the same time the 1995 State Building Code is adopted. The options include: reroofing standards, exposed residential concrete standards, membrane structures standards and fire protection systems (sprinklers). There have been no comments or corrections proposed since the FIRST READING of the ordinance. Mr. Kluegel recommended that the PAGE 15 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 City Council adopt the SECOND READING of the ordinance. Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 05 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, JOHN POWELL Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 48 Accepting Bids for Country Lakes Estates, Phase II Improvements At the March 27, 1995 Council meeting, the City Council passed Resolution No. 95 36 approving the plans and specifications for this project and ordering advertisement forbids. The bids were opened this morning at 10:00 A.M. and tabulated. The bids were acceptable and Mr. Powell recommended awarding the bid to the low bidder, Bonine Excavating of Elk River, Minnesota. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 48 Awarding the Bid for Country Lakes Estates, Phase II to Bonine Excavating. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 48 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Receiving Bids for the Hodgson Road Watermain Improvement - At the March 27, 1995 City Council meeting, the City Council passed Resolution NO. 95 - 37 approving the plans and specifications for,this project and ordering advertisement for bids. The bids were received this morning at 10:00 A.M. and tabulated. Mr. Powell explained that according to the City Charter, bids cannot be awarded if all bids received are 10% or more than the engineer's estimate. Mr. Powell requested that the City Council adopt a motion receiving the bids. He will review the requirements of the City Charter and make a recommendation to the City Council at the regular Council meeting. Mr. Powell noted that the construction of this watermain is an important leg of the City's watermain system and he is not sure why the bids are so high. Council Member Kuether moved to accept the bids for the Hodgson Watermain Improvement. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 50 Accepting Bids for Woods of Baldwin Lake, Second&Addition Improvement - At the March 27, 1995 Lino Lakes City Council meeting, the City Council passed Resolution No. 95 - 31 approving the plans and specifications for PAGE 16 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 this project and ordering the advertisement for bids. These bids were received this morning at 10:00 A.M. and tabulated. Mr. Powell noted that he had some concerns because the low bid was considerably below the engineer's estimate and the other bids. He explained that the significant difference is in the mobilization portion of the bid. Since the contractor is already on the site and had previously installed services for Woods of Baldwin Lakes, First Addition, his knowledge of the area is better than the other bidders. Mr. Powell recommended accepting the low bid from Glenn Rehbein Excavating. Council member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 50 Accepting Bids for the Woods of Baldwin Lake, Second Addition Improvement and awarding the bid to the low bidder, Glenn Rehbein Excavating. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 50 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 51 Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Report for Clearwater Creek - Mr. Powell explained that the rezoning and preliminary plat for this subdivision have been approved. The next step in the public improvement process is preparation of the feasibility report as requested by property owner, Anthony Emmerich. Mr. Powell recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 95 - 51 Ordering Preparation of the Feasibility Report for Clearwater Creek development. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 51. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 51 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 52 Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Report for Trapper's Crossing - Mr. Powell explained that the rezoning and preliminary plat for this subdivision have been approved. The next step in the public improvement process is preparation of the feasibility report as requested by the property owner, Roger Hokanson. Mr. Powell recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 95 - 52 Ordering Preparation of the Feasibility Report for Trapper's Crossing. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 52. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PAGE 17 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 Resolution No. 95 - 52 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 53 Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Report for the 12th Avenue/Holly Drive MSA Improvements - Mr. Powell explained that the 12th Avenue/Holly Drive route from CSAH 10 (Birch Street) to County Road J (Ash Street) is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street. The upgrade of the 12th Avenue/Holly Drive roadway is necessary to service the additional traffic generated by the Trapper's Crossing subdivision and future traffic needs of the City. As part of the Trapper's Crossing preliminary plat approval, the developer was required to participate in a satisfactory plan for the reconstruction of the roadway. The first step toward improving the roadway is preparation of a feasibility report for the project. At the City Council meeting on February 13, 1995, a cost sharing proposal was approved whereby the City would reimburse the developer for 50% of the feasibility report costs, not to exceed $10,000.00, if the project proceeds as a Municipal State Aid project where this cost would be reimbursed by the State Aid fund. Mr. Powell recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 95 - 53 Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Report for the 12 Avenue/Holly Drive Municipal State Aid Improvement. He noted that the report should be ready for either Council meeting in May. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 53. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Council Member Kuether suggested that a time limit be placed on the project such as if the project does not commence within one year from the date the City Council receives the report, the City will not be responsible for costs of the report. After further discussion, Council Member Elliott agreed to add the above described time limit to her motion. Council Member Kuether amended her second to the motion to include the time limit. Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 53 can be found at the end of these minutes Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 54, Resolution No. 95 - 55 and Resolution No. 95 - 56 Adding and Deleting Segments of the Municipal State Aid Roadway System - Mr. Powell explained that Cities which qualify for participation in the Municipal State Aid (MSA) System are allowed to designate roadways to the system based on a percentage of the amount of improved roadways within the City. In a community like Lino Lakes which is increasing the number of improved roadways through the construction of subdivisions, the amount of mileage available for MSA designation PAGE 18 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 increases also. The MSA designation can be assigned to either an existing or non -existing roadway. Before the State Aid Division of MnDOT will recognize MSA routes, the routes must first be officially designated by the City Council. The following revisions have been reviewed by the State Aid Division of MnDOT and would be acceptable. Resolution No. 95 - 54 Establishing Non -Existing Apollo Drive from State Trunk Highway 49 to Lake Drive as a M.S.A.S. This route would allow for the extension of Apollo Drive north of Lilac Street ultimately connecting to Lake Drive. Resolution No. 95 - 55 Establishing a Non -Existing Route from Anoka Country Road 84 to County State Aid Highway 14 as a M.S.A.S. This proposed route is located on the east side of I - 35E and would begin at Main Street, run south through a future development area, and connect with Otter Lake Road. Although the route is shown roughly midway between I -35E and Elmcrest, its exact location can be',determined at some time in the future. It may ultimately lie over'portions of Otter Lake Road and Cedar Street depending on development activity in the area. Resolution No. 95 - 56 Revoking Non -Existing Industrial Boulevard from Apollo Drive to State Trunk Highway 49 as a M.S.A.S. In the preliminary review of the Apollo Business Park development, the construction of another north -south connection from Apollo Drive to Lilac Street was considered. As development has evolved in this area, it is becoming apparent that a single, larger parcel will be more marketable than the much smaller parcels created by another roadway connection. Mr. Powell recommended that the City Council adopt the above three (3) described resolutions to adjust the Lino Lakes MSA System. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 54. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 55. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 56. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution Nos. 95 - 54, 95 - 55 and 95 - 56 can be found at the PAGE 19 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 end of these minutes. CONSIDERATION OF THE 1995 INTERNAL CITY GOALS, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher explained that the City Council met in January, 1995 to review the goals for the 1995 City Work Plan. April 1, 1995, the City Council met in a special session to finalize this plan. Adjustments have been made based on the results of the special Council session and time lines have been added. This document serves as a working document to guide the staff and City Council through the year and can be used as a measuring stick for productivity. Mr. Schumacher noted that these goals will be updated about June or July. Council Member Elliott asked that this list of goals be added to the Citizens Library. Council Member Bergeson asked that Item No. 19, Adams Outdoor Advertising be further explained. Mr. Schumacher suggested that the item be titled, "Adams Outdoor Advertising Litigation". Council Member Elliott moved to approve the 1995 Internal/City Hall Goals as amended. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. OLD BIISINESS There was no old business. NEW BUSINESS Consideration of 3.2 Beer License for the Circle -Lex VFW Club, Post #6583 for their April 29, 1995 Loyalty Day Celebration - Mrs. Anderson explained that the Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583 is hosting the 1995 Loyalty Day Parade on April 29, 1995. As part of their celebration, a tent will be erected in the parking lot at the VFW Club. Food and beverages will be served from the tent. Beverages include 3.2 beer and other non -intoxicating drinks. The State of -Minnesota is requiring that a separate 3.2 Beer License be issued for this event. Council Member Kuether moved to Council Member Elliott seconded unanimously. Consideration of a Proclamation Prayer, Thursday, May 4, 1995 - proclamation. The service will Hall. approve the 3.2 Beer License. the motion. Motion carried Recognizing the National Day of Mayor Reinert read the be held at the Lexinton City PAGE 20 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 Consideration of a Proposal from the Brimeyer Group, Inc. for Recruitment Services in Filling the Director of Public Works/City Engineer Position - Mr. Schumacher explained that the City has used executive search firms in the past to fill its last two (2) department head level vacancies. It has been a positive and successful process. The Council has requested that a proposal be obtained from the Brimeyer Group for the purpose of filing the vacant position of Public Works Director/City Engineer. An outline of the search process as well as a time schedule has been prepared for the City Council to review. Mr. Schumacher noted that he has spoken to several other metro - area cities who have used the Brimeyer Group and all have had positive results. He noted that the Brimeyer Group does recruit personnel from the entire midwest area and not just the metro - area. Council Member Bergeson referred to item "B" on page 3, and asked Mr. Schumacher to explain the fee. Mr. Schumacher explained that five (5) candidates will be examined for $400.00 and if additional candidates are to be examined, Brimeyer Group will charge an extra $85.00 per candidate. Mayor Reinert referred to page four (4), GUARANTEE and asked Mr. Schumacher to explain the 18 months guarantee. Mr. Schumacher explained that the guarantee covers all situations including if the selected person decides to leave before the 18 month period has lapsed. Mr. Hawkins said it appeared to him that the only way the City would get a guarantee is if the City terminated the employment of the person. Mr. Schumacher will talk to Mr. Brimeyer about this provision and get proper wording in the contract before it is signed. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the contract with Brimeyer Group for $10,000.00. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 8, 1995. Marilyn G. Anderson Vernon F. Reinert, Clerk -Treasurer Mayor PAGE 21 Council Member Bergeson introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 05 - 95 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE. THIS ORDINANCE: PROVIDES FOR THE APPLICATION, ADMINISTRATION, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE BY REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA, AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THIS MUNICIPALITY; PROVIDES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREOF; PROVIDES PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF; REPEALS ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES THAT CONFLICT THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1003.01 Building Code, Subdivision 1, Minnesota State Building Code Adopted deleted and replaced by the following: Section 1. Application, Administration and Enforcement. The application, administration, and enforcement of the code shall be in accordance with Minnesota rule part 1300.2100 and as modified by Chapter 1305. The code shall be enforced within the extraterritorial limits permitted by Minnesota statute 16B.62, Subdivision 1, when so established by this ordinance. The code enforcement agency of this municipality is called the City of Lino Lakes Building Department. Section 2. Permits and Fees. The issuance of permits and the collection of fees shall be as authorized in Minnesota statute 16B.62, Subdivision 1, and as provided for in Chapter 1 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code and Minnesota rules parts 1305.0106 and 1305.0107. Permit fees shall be assessed for work governed by this code in accordance with Table No. 10A of this ordinance. In addition, a surcharge fee shall be collected on all permits issued for work governed by this code in accordance with Minnesota Statute 16B.70. Section 3. Violations and Penalties. A violation of the code is a misdemeanor (Minnesota Statute 16B.69) Section 4. Building Code. The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 16B.59 to 16B.75, is hereby adopted as the building code for the City of Lino Lakes. The code is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as if fully set out herein. ORDINANCE NO. 05 - 95 Page -2- A. The Minnesota State Building Code includes the chapters of Minnesota Rules: 1. 2. 3. 4. 1300 1301 1302 1305 5. 1307 6. 1315 7. 1325 8. 1330 9. 1335 10. 1340 11. 1346 12. 1350 13. 1360 14. 1365 15. 1370 16. 4715 17. 7670 B. Minnesota Building Code Building Official Certification State Building Construction Approvals Adoption of the 1994 Uniform Building Code Appendix Chapters: a. 3, Division I, Detention and Cor Facilities b. 12, Division II, Sound Transmission c. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures Elevators and Related Devices Adoption of the 1993 National Electrical Solar Energy Systems Fallout Shelters Floodproofing Regulations Facilities for the Handicapped Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Mechanical Manufactured Homes Prefabricated Buildings Snow Loads Storm Shelters Minnesota Plumbing Code Minnesota Energy Code following including rectional Control Code Code The following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Building Code are hereby adopted and incorporated as the building code for the City of Lino Lakes: 1. 15 Reroofing 2. 19 Exposed Residential Concrete 3. 31 Division II, Membrane Structures Uniform part of C. The following optional chapters of Minnesota rule are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for the City of Lino Lakes: 1. 1306 Special Fire Protection- Systems with Option 8A Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage publication according the City Charter. and Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer ORDINANCE NO. 05 — 95 Page —3— The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. Councilmember Kuether introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 06 - 95 AN ORDINANCE OFFERING THE SALE BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES OF LOT 2 AND A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, APOLLO BUSINESS PARK The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: The real property legally described as Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, measuring 401 feet (+ or -) along Apollo Drive and 337 feet (+ or -) along 4th Avenue and 419 feet (+ or -) along the north property line and 295 feet (+ or -) along the east property line, Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota (the "Property") is owned by the City of Lino Lakes (the "City"). The city council of the City has determined that the Property is no longer needed by the City for any public purpose. The city council of the City authorizes sale of the Property to NoI-Tec Systems, Inc., for $117,000. The mayor and city clerk -treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to execute such deed and other documents as may be necessary in order to sell the Property. Proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used in accordance with the requirements of the city charter. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the city charter. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn . Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by councilmember Elliott and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. First Reading Approved on April 10, , 1995 Second Reading Approved on April 24, , 1995 Published in the official newspaper on May 2, , 1995 Council Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95- 48 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR COUNTRY LAKES ESTATES - PHASE 2 WHEREAS, Pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Country Lake Estates - Phase 2, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name and Address Amount of Bid Bonine Excavating 12669 Meadowvale Road Elk River, Minnesota 55330 $230,643.63 Glenn Rehbein Excavating 8651 Naples Street NE Blaine, Minnesota 55449 $263,365.68 Volk Sewer and Water 8909 Bass Creek Court Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428 $278,369.31 Northdale Construction 14450 Northdale Boulevard Rogers, Minnesota 55374 $283,818.85 Burschville Construction 11440 -8th Street NE Hanover, Minnesota 55341 $290,381.50 C.W. Houle, Inc. 1300 West County Road I Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 $292,997.45 Brown & Cris, Inc. 19740 Kenrick Avenue Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 $339,527.01 Engineer's Estimate $296,786.10 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Bonine Excavating, Elk River, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Bonine Excavating of Elk River, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for Country Lakes Estates - Phase 2, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: c .. Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Council Member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95- 50 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR WOODS OF BALDWIN LAKE WHEREAS, Pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Woods of Baldwin Lake, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name and Address Amount of Bid Glenn Rehbein Excavating 8651 Naples Street NE Blaine, Minnesota 55449 $108,947.71 Bonine Excavating 12669 Meadowvale Road Elk River, Minnesota 55330 $157,036.72 Northdale Construction 14450 Northdale Boulevard Rogers, Minnesota 55374 $160,908.55 Brown & Cris, Inc. 19740 Kenrick Avenue Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 $180,230.60 Burschville Construction 11440 -8th Street NE Hanover, Minnesota 55341 $182,916.85 C.W. Houle, Inc. 1300 West County Road I Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 $186,705.85 Ro-So Contracting 7137 -20th Avenue Centerville, Minnesota 55038 $206,216.00 Hydrocon, Inc. PO Box 129 North Branch, Minnesota 55056 Engineer's Estimate $215,646.00 $178,291.30 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Glenn Rehbein Companies, Blaine, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Glenn Rehbein Companies of Blaine, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for Woods of Baldwin Lake, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. 2 Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: • Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution Member Kuether taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Ber was duly seconded by Council and upon vote being geson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Council Member Elliott moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution and CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-51 RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT CLEARWATER CREEK. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. A certain petition requesting the improvement of Clearwater Creek, filed with the Council on April 24, 1995, is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby. This declaration is made in conformity to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.035 and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. 2. The petition is hereby referred to John Powell of TKDA, and he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor • Marilyn G. Ahderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. PETITION FOR A FEASIBILITY STUDY We, the undersigned Lino Lakes property owners, do hereby petition the City of Lino Lakes to prepare a feasibility study to determine whether or not it is feasible to install sewer and water service Nk for the property listed below in accordance with the provisions of /0 the Lino Lakes City Charter, Section 8.04 and Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes. (A benefitted property owner can only sign once regardless of the number of benefitted parcels owned and a benefitted parcel can only have one signature.) PROPERTY ADDRESS DESCRIPTION Council Member Kuether moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution and CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-52 RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT - TRAPPER'S CROSSING. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. A certain petition requesting the improvement of Trapper's Crossing, filed with the Council on April 24, 1995, is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby. This declaration is made in conformity to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.035 and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. 2. The petition is hereby referred to Steve Heth of SEH, and he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. 'Lk_ • ( L MarilY n Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 04/07/95 09:59 FAX 812 784 9136 IUl{91tiSU1\ 0)02 00z PETITION FOR A FEASIBILITY STUDY We, the undersigned Lino Lakes property owners, do hereby petition the City of Lino Lakes to prepare a feasibility study to determine, whether_ or not it is feasible to install sewer and water servicegvi\G for the property listed below in accordance with the provisions of 404 the Lino Lakes City Charter, Section 8.04 and Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes. (A benefitted property owner can only sign once regardless of the number of benefitted parcels owned and a benefitted parcel can only have one signature_) PROPERTY ADDRESS DESCRIPTION Council Member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-53 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT - 12TH AVENUE/HOLLY DRIVE WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve 12th Avenue and Holly Drive between Birch street and Ash Street and to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The petition is hereby referred to Steve Heth of SEH, and he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn & Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Kuether moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution and CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-54 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS. WHEREAS: it appears to the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that the street hereinafter described should be designated Municipal State Aid Street under the provisions of Minnesota Law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the road described as follows, to wit: Nonexisting route Apollo Drive from State Trunk Highway No. 49 to Lake Drive, a distance of 0.22 miles, be, and hereby is established, located, and designated a Municipal State Aid Street of said City subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said road or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of the City of Lino Lakes. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-55 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS. WHEREAS: it appears to the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that the street hereinafter described should be designated Municipal State Aid Street under the provisions of Minnesota Law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the road described as follows, to wit: Nonexisting route from Anoka County Road No. 84 to County State Aid Highway No. 14, a distance of 1.67 miles be, and hereby is established, located, and designated a Municipal State Aid Street of said City subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said road or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of the City of Lino Lakes. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. 1 iJ Marilyn G.4Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-56 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS. WHEREAS: it appears to the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that the street hereinafter described as a Municipal State Aid Street under the provisions of Minnesota Law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the road described as follows, to wit: Industrial Boulevard from Apollo Drive to Trunk Highway 49 (Lilac Street) now numbered and known as Municipal State Aid Street 114, Segment 010, be, and hereby is revoked as a Municipal State Aid Street of said City subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for his consideration. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of April, 1995. Marilyn G\. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Work Session March 22, 1995 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE TIME STARTED .................................................. ................................................. TIME ;ENDED._. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT Reinert, Neal,.;Ellott, Bergeson Kuether Staff Members Present: Acting City Engineer Powell, EDAB Director Wessel, EDAB Assistant LaForest, Building Official Kluegel, Fire Chief Bennett, Parks Coordinator Asleson, Assistant to the Administrator Tesh, Planning Coordinator Wyland 1. CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT - Superintendent John McClellan Superintendent McClellan was present to discuss future School District plans and enrollment projections. He indicated that the District communicates regularly with the City to determine what is happening regarding development. He stated that the current market directs what is happening and the District wants to be in a position to respond. By 1997 there will be 1200 high school students, which is the maximum for the existing facility. The Junior High is full this year with 1300 students. They anticipate between 1400-1700 new students by the year 2002. Kindergarten enrollment is anticipated to increase 500+ students per year. For the 96-97 School Year there will be 6-8 kindergarten classes at St. Joe's, 6-8 at St. Genevieve's, 2 at Centerville and 2 at Rice Lake. The District needs additional facilities, the only question is the size. They currently own 40 acres on Birch Street and 61 off Elm. The Facilities Committee has been meeting for over a year to discuss future needs. There will be a public hearing on April llth to discuss the options with a $35 - 45 Million Bond Issue proposed for November. The Bond Issue will most likely include a middle school on Elm Street and some ECFE Facilities for a total of 1800 students. The District is concerned about overbuilding. They currently have 8 portable classrooms that they would like to eliminate in the future. They are also considering moving the District Offices elsewhere. The Mayor asked if the District had considered other options such as year round school. Mr. McClellan stated that they had considered this, however, year round school is hard on buildings, 1 Council Work Session March 22, 1995 principals, and families moving into the District. The Facilities Committee did not feel this was a good option. Mr. McClellan presented a preliminary rendering of the proposed facility on Elm Street. The proposal would involve the addition of some property the District has a purchase agreement on that is currently zoned Industrial. The City expressed some reservations about rezoning industrial property for school use. Additionally, this industrial property is adjacent to the freeway which would provide good visibility for commercial purposes. Brian Wessel added that the EDAB Board should discuss this proposal. They are working very hard to get industrial development into the City and have had numerous inquiries. They are very protective of properties zoned light industrial. The parcel the District is looking at could feasibility generate up to $100,000 in taxes annually - to lose this would be unfortunate. The City currently has only 700 acres of buildable commercial property which is approximately 4.8%. This is a low percentage for communities our size. Mr. McClellan stated that an additional 10 acres in the Elm Street vicinity is crucial for the facility they wish to construct. This facility is proposed to include 3-4 softball fields, 3-4 soccer fields, 1 football field, 8 tennis courts, gym facilities, parking and the school building. Brian added that the 20/20 Program has indorsed the concept of a community center which could possibly include a new City Hall and space for the District Offices. Mr. McClellan indicated that he would be willing to attend the next EDAB meeting to discuss the Districts needs with the Board. Councilmember Bergeson indicated that in his meetings with the School District he had never heard any discussion of the purchase of this industrial property for school use. 2. 1994 BBC - Milo Bennett and Pete Kluegel Pete Kluegel explained that we are currently operating under the 1988 Uniform Building Code. The 1994 Code has been completed and is recommended by the State. Individual communities must adopt the new Code by Ordinance. This update includes a revised fee schedule which, based on previous permits, could add $110,000 in building permit fees. This new Code becomes effective March 20, 1995. Building contractors have been notified of the increased fees. Mile Bennett explained that the new Code includes several items which are optional. Staff would like to delay review of these optional items to a later date. He added that a new fire code will be reviewed in November. 2 Council Work Session March 22, 1995 3. Five Year MSA Report - discuss at future work session 4. ADA Update - Marty Asleson Marty introduced John Landers and Kathy Griffin, members of the ADA Committee. A Plan has been development which must be adopted by the Council and then implemented. Two important issues involve programs & services and facilities. The City has an agreement with the School District to share facilities. They are also working with adjoining communities. The Mayor asked to see a timetable of what needs to be done and what costs are involved. There most likely are some items that would be simple to facilitate at minimal cost. He also indicated that a staff person should be identified to coordinate the program. 5. 20/20 VISION Update - Rim Sullivan Kim introduced Julie Chyle who is the facilitator for the Environmental Group. Kim expressed her quote for the week which was that "people are not afraid of change, they are afraid of loss". She indicated that the groups have started meeting. They just completed a tour of the City which was very informative. She thanked Brian, Mary Kay and John Powell for being the tour guides - good job!! A citizen's library has been started in the hallway. The committees are unsure that their recommendations will be acted on so they are requesting a letter of commitment from the Council - Kim will prepare an agreement for Council review and approval. Currently the committees are divided into the following groups: Environment - 9 Park - 7 Growth - 18 Education - 6 Commercial Development - 12 6. Regular Agenda - March 27, 1995 Staff briefly discussed the regular Agenda. The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted by Mary Kay Wyland 3 CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF REVIEW CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 17, 1995 Staff members present: City Clerk -Treasurer, Marilyn Anderson. Anoka County Assessor's Todd Smith and Mary Boyle were also present. Mayor Reinert explained the purpose of the meeting is to review property values of landowners in Lino Lakes, not actual taxes. He introduced Mr. Smith and Ms. Boyle and explained that they will answer any questions regarding the value that has been placed on property. Mayor Reinert said that if a landowner is not satisfied by the explanation given this evening, they have the right to take the matter to the County Board of Equalization. Beverly Wolters, 7787 Lake Drive - Ms. Wolters was present and explained that she has made arrangements to meet with Mr. Smith tomorrow regarding the commercial property that she owns at 7787 Lake Drive. Cathy Thompson, 6342 Red Hawk Trail was present and explained that her valuation increased more than $20,000.00 in one year. She felt that this was unreasonable since no improvement have been added to the property. Mr. Smith explained that he personally reviewed her area in 1994. He noted that her land value is comparable to recent land sales. Mr. Thurston, County Assessor, made a decision to increase the structure values on all of Anoka County properties by three (3) percent. Ms. Thompson's structures were increased by the same percentage. The purpose of the increase was to reflect actual market value. Council Member Bergeson asked if the law is still in effect that PAGE 1 CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF REVIEW APRIL 17, 1995 prohibits any increase in value of more than 10%? Mr. Smith yes and Mr. and Mrs. Thompson may be eligible for a refund. Ms. Thompson said she felt that if no improvements are made to the property, the value should remain steady. Ms. Thompson has the option of appearing at the County Board of Equalization. Gerald Clausen, 6109 Baldwin Lake Drive noted that his property was valued at $47,700.00 in 1988 and it will be valued at $89,400.00 in 1996. He explained that he has been living in the house since 1952 and nothing has changed. Mr. Clausen said he is retired and living on a fixed income. He has applied for the circuit breaker refund. The refund is $100.00. Mr. Clausen said that this does not seem right to him. He said he did not agree with all the development in the City because it causes a need for additional schools, police and fire protection and street maintenance and increases the property values as it has in his case. Mr. Smith said the bulk of the increase is in land values. There was only a 3% increase in structure values. He also noted that the value for wells and septic systems has increased from $2,000.00 to $4,000.00 to more closely reflect the actual cost of installation. Mr. Clausen noted that about one-third to one-half of his property is in the flood plain. Mr. Smith explained that although the value on the property is high, people are paying the prices to relocate in°Lino Lakes. Mr. Clausen said that progress is killing some of the older residents. He explained that the increased traffic on Baldwin Lake Drive is "killing" the road. Mr. Smith said that he empathized with Mr. Clausen, however the law says that he must value all property at market price. Mr. Clausen has the opportunity to take this matter to the County Board of Equalization. Robert Krause, 6675 Blue Heron Drive explained that their market value increased $21, 400.00. They have met with Mr. Smith and there have been no changes to this point. However, Mrs. Krause did have some information from her realtor and Mr. Smith will take this information into consideration. Mr. Smith again noted that the Rice Lake Estates area was completely reviewed in 1994 and a lot of changes were made. He explained that without completely ignoring the market valuation PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF REVIEW APRIL 17, 1995 system, he has adjusted the market value from $138,600.00 to $133,400.00. He noted that he has some recent sales in that area for comparison. Mr. Smith noted that the style of the home is somewhat different that others in that area. Mr. Smith will contact the Krause's and review the material given to her by her realtor. If the Krause's are still not satisfied, he will send another appraiser to review this property. They will also have the opportunity to bring the matter before the County Board of Equalization. Mayor Reinert expressed satisfaction with the work done by Mr. Smith. He noted that before Mr. Smith became the City Assessor, the council chambers were crowded for this meeting. Mr. Smith explained that a lot of changes have occurred that are not under his control. He gave a brief explanation of how the appraisal system operates. Council Member Neal asked for a clarification of property values in the Apollo Business Park. Mr. Smith said there was some miscommunication regarding who was paying the actual assessments on the property. He understood that the new landowner had paid his own assessments. This would increase the value of the property. However, since this is not the case, those property values have been adjusted. Property owners will be notified by mail of the changes. Ms. Boyle explained that many things go into calculating the value of commercial property. The process is complicated. Council Member Kuether asked if the property owners in the Apollo Business Park are getting a break because they are getting Tax Increment Financing (TIF)? Ms. Boyle explained the process and noted that Fiscal Disparity comes into the process. She noted that most areas of Anoka.` County benefit from Fiscal Disparity and certainly Lino Lakes benefits. Mr. Smith explained the "This Old House" legislation. The purpose is to restore properties over 35 years old. The increased value of the property is deferred or spread out over several years. There was discussion regarding how this information can be given to the public. Mayor Reinert asked that this matter be brought before the City Council at a work session so that the newspapers can publish the information. Mr. Smith told the City Council that he has just finished rephotographing the entire City. Ms. Boyle noted that Mr. Gary Uhde has called and sent a letter PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF REVIEW APRIL 17, 1995 regarding the valuations on parcels 18-31-22-41-0005 and 18-31- 22-42-0002. He has requested that the valuation of the properties be reviewed. The property is adjacent to the Apollo Business Park. Ms. Boyle noted that Mr. Mike Muske has called regarding parcels 09-31-22-22-0021 and 09-31-22-22-0022. The parcels contain the ERA Muske Real Estate Office at 7989 Lake Drive. Ms. Boyle will review the property values and if Mr. Muske is still not satisfied, he will be advised to go the County Board of Review. Attached to these minutes is a list of individuals who have had their market values resolved prior to this meeting. Council Member Kuether moved to adjourn at 7:24 P.M. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Aye These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 8, 1995. Marilyn G. Anderson, Vernon F. Reinert, Clerk -Treasurer Mayor PAGE 4 APRIL 26, 1995 TO: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA Office of the County Assessor Government Center 2100 3rd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2281 612-323-5475 Fax: 612-323-5421 1. The following information is provided for your files and delineates the outcome of the BOARD of REVIEW proceedings of April 17, 1995. 2. The below individuals had their market values resolved before the local board of reviews met. PIN 08-31-22-24-0004 10-31-22-24-0001 11-31-22-11-0002 17-31-22-34-0011 17-31-22-34-0019 19-31-22-32-0003 19-31-22-42-0003 27-31-22-13-0015 27-31-22-32-0066 27-31-22-34-0005 28-31-22-24-0095 28-31-22-24-0097 29-31-22-33-0014 29-31-22-43-0007 29-31-22-43-0008 29-31-22-44-0040 29-31-22-44-0050 30-31-22-24-0022 31-31-22-31-0030 31-31-22-31-0050 31-31-22-31-0054 31-31-22-32-0022 31-31-22-33-0015 31-31-22-34-0004 31-31-22-34-0005 31-31-22-34-0006 31-31-22-34-0008 31-31-22-42-0035 31-31-22-43-0002 31-31-22-43-0009 31-31-22-43-0010 31-31-22-43-0011 31-31-22-43-0012 31-31-22-43-0021 31-31-22-43-0031 31-31-22-43-0032 31-31-22-43-0035 31-31-22-43-0037 32-31-22-11-0008 32-31-22-11-0019 32-31-22-12-0079 32-31-22-14-0010 32-31-22-43-0002 35-31-22-41-0007 NAME Tim Anderson James Landsberger Orrin Clover Richard Backlund Kenneth Sternke Paul & Joyce Laduke Kathleen Teorey Mark Benson Daniel Pothen Lynn Delaitsch Gerald Foss Randy Hoesley Clara Neis Louis Gregorich Martin Fabian Francis Foley Rick Kamrath Robert & Kelli Krause Thomas Becchetti John Lapadat Kelly Sharkey John Ukura Oliver Roen Lee Ora Mielke Othel Johnson Janet Darrow Thomas Oostdik Howard Lundgren John Quarfoth Gerald Schmidt Gerald Schmidt Jerome Betterman Richard Judge Todd Maesse Martin Shockency Jeffrey Bloomquist Ryan Reisdorfer James Kuhn John McClellan Gary Prazich James Holm Michael Ball Dean Shull John Mclean VALUE $ 92,200. 134,400. 101,600. 154,800. 160,000. 101,000. 34,900. 205,700. 183,000. 138,500. 167,600. 161,200. 72,200. 163,800. 139,500. 198,300. 139,500. 138,600. 194,100. 190.300. 139,800. 177,700. 118,300. 93,400. 73,000. 73,200. 91,200. 161,800. 94,800. 83,400. 16,400. 98,300. 82,500. 165,400. 133,000. 70,500. 155,200. 183,200. 187,100. 169,300. 174,800. 118,500. 145,800. 50,600. ACTION TAKEN Reduced to $ 88,700. Reduced to 124,900. Reduced to 95,400. Reduced to 146,700. Reduced to 149,600. Reduced to 90,300. Reduced to 17,000. Reduced to 198,800. Reduced to NO CHANGE Reduced to 125,900. Reduced to 148,200. Reduced to 153,800. Reduced to 67,800. Reduced to 144,800. Reduced to 120,800. Reduced to 184,100. Reduced to 126,200. Reduced to 119,400. Reduced to 180,700. Reduced to 173,400. Reduced to 137,000. Reduced to 173,000. Reduced to 113,800. Reduced to 88,900. Reduced to 68,500. Reduced to 68,700. Reduced to 86,700. Reduced to NO CHANGE Reduced to 90,300. Reduced to 83,000. Reduced to 16,000. Reduced to 93,900. Reduced to 78,100. Reduced to 156,500. Reduced to 125,300. Reduced to 66,000. Reduced to 145,300. Reduced to 173,800. Reduced to 182,300. Reduced to 153,000. Reduced to 159,900. Reduced to NO CHANGE Reduced to 139,600. Reduced to NO CHANGE Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer 31-31-22-33-0008 32-31-22-22-0052 30-31-22-24-0022 COUNTY OF ANOKA Office of the County Assessor Government Center 2100 3rd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2281 612-323-5475 Fax: 612-323-5421 (APPEARED AT BOARD OF REVIEW) Gerald Clausen Kathy Thompson Robert & Kelli Krause 89,300. 196,300. 138,600. (REVIEWED AFTER BOARD OF REVIEW) 06-31-22-12-0002 Dean & June Allen NO CHANGE NO CHANGE Reduced to 119,400. 140,300. Reduced to 126,200. Listed below are the reductions in value for the Lino Industrial Park and Apollo Business Center properties which were discussed at the meeting. 17-31-22-21-0001 17-31-22-21-0006 17-31-22-21-0008 17-31-22-21-0009 17-31-22-22-0002 17-31-22-22-0003 17-31-22-22-0004 17-31-22-22-0005 17-31-22-22-0006 17-31-22-22-0007 17-31-22-22-0008 17-31-22-22-0009 17-31-22-22-0010 17-31-22-22-0011 17-31-22-22-0012 17-31-22-22-0022 17-31-22-22-0023 17-31-22-22-0031 17-31-22-22-0032 17-31-22-22-0033 17-31-22-22-0034 17-31-22-23-0013 17-31-22-23-0014 17-31-22-23-0015 17-31-22-23-0016 18-31-22-41-0004 18-31-22-41-0005 18-31-22-42-0002 322,800. 37,000. 82,900. 57,500. 36,100. 138,900. 149,000. 118,600. 87,600. 39,500. 797,700. 47,500. 72,900. 133,800. 214,800. 118,900. 36,000. 25,900. 40,200. 239,700. 117,900. 19,900. 36,600. 125,500. 56,800. 389,400. 350,700. 740,500. Reduced to 173,800. Reduced to 27,100. Reduced to 80,700. Reduced to 35,400. Reduced to 22,500. Reduced to 125,400. Reduced to 135,500. Reduced to 105,100. Reduced to 73,700. Reduced to 24,600. Reduced to 778,200. Reduced to 28,100. Reduced to 41,100. Reduced to 98,000. Reduced to 179,300. Reduced to 105,400. Reduced to 22,500. Reduced to 18,000. Reduced to 27,200. Reduced to 215,900. Reduced to 83,600. Reduced to 14,000. Reduced to 24,900. Reduced to 89,000. Reduced to 40,300. Reduced to 340,500. Reduced to 245,500. Reduced to 518,400. Mike Muske Pin 09-31-22-22-0021 & 0022, Met on Wed., April 26th, 1995. Mr. Muske will be providing additional information at which time I will complete my review. No change at this time. Beverly Wolters, PIN 08-31-22-41-0028, I will be inspecting property Thur., April 27th, 1995. Amount of adjustment unknown at this time. As of 4-25-95 these are all of the changes made. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to call me at 323-5483. Sincerely, Todd Smith Lino Lakes Appraiser Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer $3,876.14 APRIL 30, 1995 DISBURSEMENT LIST PLANNING/ENGINEERING ANOKA COUNTY (GIS BOOK) $20.00 TOTAL $20.00 POLICE MN DEPT OF SAFETY (VEHICLE REG (2) $41.50 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS WITHHOLDING (DCA) TOTAL TOTALS $41.50 $1,661.47 $1,661.47 $1,722.97 SUMMARY SHEET BY DEPARTMENT LEAGUE OF MN CITIES (REGISTRATION) ADMINISTRATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR/COUNCIL TOTAL DULUTH CONVENTION BUREAU (HOUSING) ADMINISTRATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR/COUNCIL TOTAL SAM'S CLUB (SUPPLIES) ADMINISTRATION FORESTRY PARK POLICE RECREATION SOLID WASTE TOTAL TOTAL GRAND DISBURSEMENT TOTAL $235.00 $269.60 $536.00 $157.50 $157.50 $473.50 $233.63 $10.40 $10.40 $48.84 $10.40 $10.40 $1,040.60 $788.50 $324.07 $2,153.17 DISBURSEMENT LIST MAY 8, 1995 Page: 1 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount 1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND A & B SANITATION(PUMPING SERVICE/COUNTRY LK E) 325.00 Total for Department 325.00 Total for Fund 325.00 APOLLO DRIVE CONSTRUCTION FUND * ALLEN COMPANY(SERVICE/SUGGS PROPERTY) 1,450.00 Total for Department 1,450.00 Total for Fund 1,450.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION HARRIS COMMUNICATIONS(TDD EQUIPMENT) LADEN'S BUSINESS MACHINES, INC(PAYMASTER CHECK SIGNER) CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS 553.90 958.50 Total for Department 1,512.40 Total for Fund 1,512.40 * ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(PRINTING SERVICE/GEN ESCROW) 17.40 HOLMES AND GRAVEN(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) 637.00 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(CONSULTING SERV/SCHULTE) 74.65 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(CONSULTING SERV/MARSHAN T H) 43.50 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(CONSULTING SERV/CLEARWATER) 110.75 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(CONSULTING SERV/BEHMS C FARM) 511.75 Total for Department 1,395.05 Total for Fund 1,395.05 DEDICATED PARKS * ALLEN COMPANY(ATHLETIC COMPLEX/GRANT) 250.00 Total for Department 250.00 Total for Fund 250.00 Page: 2 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ANOKA COUNTY(CONSULTANT FEE) 194.00 BRIMEYER GROUP, INC.(EXECUTIVE SEARCH) 3,333.00 * ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(PRINTING SERVICE) 17.40 * EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 87.59 * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 47.20 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) 528.79 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE(SUPPLIES) 49.00 LUND, JOYCE(MEALS/PARKING) 14.75 MN CLERKS/FIN OFF ASSOC MCFO(DUES) 30.00 SCHLOER, PAULA(SEMINAR) 75.00 TESCH, DAN(MILEAGE/MEAL/PARKING) 17.48 VIGER, JEAN(MEAL) 5.37 Total for Department 4,399.58 BUILDING INSPECTIONS * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 20.80 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) 363.56 * MEDICA(INSURANCE) 216.25 * ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC.(CAR WASHES) 15.12 Total for Department 615.73 CHARTER COMMISSION * ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(PRINTING SERVICE) 11.60 Total for Department 11.60 CONSULTANTS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(CONSULTANT FEE) Total for Department ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER(MAPS FOR RESALE) * MEDICA(INSURANCE - FLEX HEALTH) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(SHORELAND ORDINANCE) ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT 500.00 500.00 71.36 561.10 862.77 Total for Department 1,495.23 ANDERSEN, CRAIG G., INC.(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) 1,280.00 Page: 3 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION(MAPS) BARTON-ASCHMAN, INC.(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) WESSEL, BRIAN(MILEAGE/MEALS/PARKING/MISC) FINANCE * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) FIRE DEPARTMENT * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) FLEET MANAGEMENT 30.00 3,553.02 26.40 124.63 432.50 297.78 Total for Department 5,744.33 Total for Department Total for Department 34.00 437.00 471.00 13.20 13.20 * AMERICAN FASTENERS(PARTS) 101.20 BASTIEN PRODUCTS, INC.(PARTS) 11.15 BRAD RAGAN, INC.(PARTS) 488.79 CONTRACTORS REFINISH SERVICE,(REPAINT TRAILER) 455.00 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC.(PARTS) 60.53 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.(PARTS) 28.59 * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 7.60 GOA COMPANY, INC.(PARTS) 391.45 H & L MESABI, INC.(PARTS) 110.55 * MEDICA(INSURANCE) 216.25 MN DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT(CHEMICAL FEE/ON SITE) 25.00 MN. DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY(VEHICLE REGISTRATION) 47.00 * STREICHER'S, INC.(SUPPLIES) 207.68 * THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET,(PARTS) 360.19 THOMAS CHEVROLET(PARTS) 6.28 TRACY FUELS, INC.(FUEL) 1,769.39 TRACY FUELS, INC.(PARTS) 673.36 Total for Department 4,960.01 FORESTRY DEPARTMENT * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) JEWELL NURSERIES, INC.(VIRGINIA CREEPERS) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) NORTH STAR TURF, INC.(SUPPLIES) 7.60 130.10 62.32 156.72 Total for Department 356.74 Page: 4 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice (Entry Description) Claims Roster Vendor Company GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS BAROTT DRILLING SERVICES, INC.(REPAIR OF CURB STOP) DALCO, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MAINTENANCE CHARGES) INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MAINTENANCE CHARGES) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) PLUNKETT'S, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO.(SERVICE/ADJUST DOORS) Total for Department MAYOR AND COUNCIL LANE, EUGENE(SWITCH REIMBURSEMENT) LEAGUE OF MN CITIES(REGISTRATION (2) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) LINDBLAD, MARK(TUITION) PRESENTA-PLAQUE(PLAQUES) Total for Department PARKS DEPARTMENT * AMERICAN FASTENERS(PARTS) CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES, INC.(SUPPLIES) * EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) GOPHER BEARING COMPANY, INC.(PARTS) * INFRATECH, INC. (SUPPLIES) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) * MN. DEPT OF JOBS & TRAINING(UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE) NORTHWAY LANDSCAPING(TREES) STATE TREAS. SURPLUS PROP.(SUPPLIES) TURF SUPPLIES, INC.(SUPPLIES) * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) WALDOCH FARM & PRODUCE(SUPPLIES) Total for Department PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD TIMESAVER OFF-SITE SECRETARIAL(SECRETARIAL SERVICE) Total for Department PLANNING DEPARTMENT Amount 260.00 24.92 7.60 550.36 548.73 13,275.19 216.25 467.21 27.16 211.01 15,588.43 85.46 470.00 2,540.88 75.00 183.58 3,354.92 8.03 73.91 37.27 36.00 63.51 49.98 1,126.00 49.96 185.09 5,952.05 29.33 1,385.14 39.56 9.91 75.00 9,120.74 167.25 167.25 Page: 5 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount ALBINSON, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(MONTHLY CONSULTING SERVICE) OFFICEMAX(SUPPLIES) POLICE DEPARTMENT 105.93 34.00 340.73 541.25 2,565.54 31.89 Total for Department 3,619.34 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 30.36 ANOKA COUNTY(MOBILE TERMINALS) 218.80 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC.(UNIFORMS) 152.09 D C. HEY COMPANY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 153.24 DARE AMERICA MERCHANDISE(POSTER SET/DARE) 58.44 DON ABBOTT(USE OF FORCE TRAINER) 240.00 EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 90.13 * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 117.60 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC.(SUPPLIES) 45.05 HEROLD ADVERTISING PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) 159.64 I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 102.72 LABOR RELATIONS, INC.(PROFESSIONAL SERVICE) 270.00 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) 5,699.99 LORENZ BUS SERVICE, INC.(CRIME PREVENTION/SAFETY) 254.00 * MEDICA(INSURANCE) 1,688.75 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC(SUPPLIES) 122.55 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT(SERVICE RENDERED) 750.00 MN CRIME PREVENTION PRACTIONER(RECERTIFY COURSE (2) 80.00 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/OISM(MONTHLY SERVICE) 150.00 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/OISM(MONTHLY SERVICE) 240.00 PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 84.85 PETTY CASH(PARKING) 2.50 * PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(FILM DEVELOPING/DARE) 73.64 * ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC.(CAR WASHES) 38.60 * ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC.(CAR WASHES) 7.72 ST. CROIX DESIGNS(SHIRTS/DARE) 360.00 * STREICHER'S, INC.(SUPPLIES) 247.78 * THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET,(PARTS/DARE) 12.00 TOM THUMB, INC.(SUPPLIES) 12.12 U S WEST CELLULAR(MONTHLY SERVICE) 120.12 * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 97.28 Total for Department 11,679.97 RECREATION DEPARTMENT BROADWAY AWARDS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 89.59 * EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 52.71 * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 13.20 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) 62.32 * MEDICA(INSURANCE) 216.25 * MN. DEPT OF JOBS & TRAINING(UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE) 175.33 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC.(BANNER) 167.21 Total for Department 776.61 Page: 6 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT * EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) * PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(FILM) QUALITY PROMOTIONALS(SHIRTS) TODORA, GAIL(RECYCLING BROCHURE) TROPHIES BY LINDA, INC.(TROPHY) Total for Department STREETS * EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * INFRATECH, INC. ;SUPPLIES) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) * MEDICA(INSURANCE) NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(STREET LIGHTS) * PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(FILM) * ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC.(CAR WASHES) T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC.(WINTER ASPHALT) * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) Total for Department PROGRAM RECREATION RECREATION DEPARTMENT BEACON BALLFIELDS DIVISION OF(SUPPLIES) BEACON BALLFIELDS DIVISION OF(SUPPLIES) DAVE'S SPORT SHOP, INC.(SUPPLIES) DURBAND, JUDY(KARATE REFUND) HUGHES, PETER(KARATE REFUND) MRPA(REGISTRATION) Total SEWER OPERATING SEWER DEPARTMENT Total for Fund for Department Total for Fund * AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(GENERATOR INTERFACE) * EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) Amount 10.65 20.56 544.20 120.00 10.65 706.06 1.67 36.00 49.97 1,553.13 216.25 1,993.90 19.33 7.72 93.29 27.48 9.91 4,008.65 67,589.39 116.87 116.86 705.91 11.00 5.00 752.00 1,707.64 1,707.64 250.78 7.03 Page: 7 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) * INFRATECH, INC. (SUPPLIES) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1-7 OTHER 7.60 72.35 201.59 Total for Department 539.35 Total for Fund 539.35 * ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(PRINTING SERVICE/TIF) 11.60 Total for Department 11.60 Total for Fund 11.60 WATER OPERATING WATER DEPARTMENT * AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(GENERATOR INTERFACE) 250.77 * AMERICAN FASTENERS(SUPPLIES) 42.34 * EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 7.03 FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC.(CHEMICALS) 2,668.19 * FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 7.60 * INFRATECH, INC. (SUPPLIES) 72.35 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION) 201.62 * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) 110.81 MN DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT(CHEMICAL FEE/WELL # 1 & 2) 200.00 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 404.51 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 35.83 Total for Department 4,001.05 Total for Fund 4,001.05 ** Total ** $78,781.48 * - Invoice split to different Departments Page: 1 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 000010 - A & B SANITATION 325.00 000100 - AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 501.55 000110 - A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 30.36 000140 - ALLEN COMPANY 1,700.00 000168 - ALBINSON, INC. 105.93 000210 - AMERICAN FASTENERS 151.57 000335 - ANDERSEN, CRAIG G., INC. 1,280.00 000350 - ANOKA COUNTY 194.00 000370 - ANOKA COUNTY 218.80 000430 - ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 30.00 000440 - ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 71.36 000580 - BAROTT DRILLING SERVICES, INC. 260.00 000583 - BARTON-ASCHMAN, INC. 3,553.02 000590 - BASTIEN PRODUCTS, INC. 11.15 000620 - BEACON BALLFIELDS DIVISION OF 233.73 000780 - BRAD RAGAN, INC. 488.79 000853 - BRIMEYER GROUP, INC. 3,333.00 000860 - BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 89.59 001200 - CONTRACTORS REFINISH SERVICE, INC. 455.00 001230 - CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 60.53 001255 - CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 152.09 001261 - D C. HEY COMPANY, INC. 153.24 001267 - CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES, INC. 73.91 001270 - DALCO, INC. 24.92 001283 - DAVE'S SPORT SHOP, INC. 705.91 001293 - DARE AMERICA MERCHANDISE 58.44 Page: 2 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 001327 - DON ABBOTT 001338 - DURBAND, JUDY 001390 - ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 001420 - EMERALD OFFICE SUPPLY( INC. 001480 - FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC. 001530 - FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 001550 - FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 001620 - GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 001630 - GOA COMPANY, INC. 001660 GOPHER BEARING COMPANY, INC. 001768 - H & L MESABI, INC. 001816 - HARRIS COMMUNICATIONS 001832 - HEROLD ADVERTISING PRODUCTS 001860 - HOLMES AND GRAVEN 001871 - HUGHES, PETER 001971 - INFRATECH, INC. SUITE 100 001977 - I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC. 001980 - INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS 002070 - JEWELL NURSERIES, INC. 002220 - LABOR RELATIONS, INC. 002226 - LADEN'S BUSINESS MACHINES, INC. 002310 - LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 002320 - LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST 002351 - LINDBLAD, MARK 002373 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE 002375 - LORENZ BUS SERVICE, INC. 240.00 11.00 58.00 294.08 2,668.19 28.59 416.40 45.05 391.45 63.51 110.55 553.90 159.64 637.00 5.00 244.65 102.72 1,099.09 130.10 270.00 958.50 470.00 26,580.75 75.00 49.00 254.00 Page: 3 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 002422 - LANE, EUGENE 85.46 002450 - LUND, JOYCE 14.75 002540 - MEDICA 4,741.85 002608 - MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC. 122.55 002699 - MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 750.00 002700 - MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 627.98 002731 - MN CLERKS/FIN OFF ASSOC MCFOA 30.00 002741 - MN CRIME PREVENTION PRACTIONERS,INC 80.00 002770 - MN. DEPT OF JOBS & TRAINING 360.42 002780 - MN. DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 47.00 002781 - MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/OISM 390.00 002911 - MN DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 225.00 003050 - MRPA 752.00 003220 - NORTH STAR TURF, INC. 156.72 003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 404.51 003260 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 1,993.90 003300 - NORTHWAY LANDSCAPING 5,952.05 003320 - NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 4,168.96 003390 - OFFICEMAX 31.89 003492 - PETTY CASH 87.35 003540 - PLUNKETT'S, INC. 27.16 003586 - PRESENTA-PLAQUE 183.58 003590 - PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO 113.53 003640 - QUALITY PROMOTIONALS 544.20 003850 - ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC. 69.16 003930 - SCHLOER, PAULA 75.00 Page: 4 Date: 05/05/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 004010 - SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC. 004101 - ST. CROIX DESIGNS 004220 - STATE TREAS. SURPLUS PROP. 004240 - STREICHER'S, INC. 004340 - T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 004400 - TESCH, DAN 004410 - THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 004420 - THOMAS CHEVROLET 004427 - TIMESAVER OFF-SITE SECRETARIAL 004450 - TOM THUMB, INC. 004456 - TODORA, GAIL 004470 - TRACY FUELS, INC. 004486 - TROPHIES BY LINDA, INC. 004530 - TURF SUPPLIES, INC. 004540 - TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. 004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 004671 - U S WEST CELLULAR 004720 - VIGER, JEAN 004730 - VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 004750 - WALDOCH FARM & PRODUCE 004800 - WESSEL, BRIAN 167.21 360.00 29.33 455.46 93.29 17.48 372.19 6.28 167.25 12.12 120.00 2,442.75 10.65 1,385.14 211.01 75.39 120.12 5.37 144.58 75.00 297.78 ** Total ** $78,781.48 TOPIC May 4 1995 Consideration of a Petition Requesting an Eonmental Assessment Worksheet (EAV For Tr, BtPP The Envirornnental uality Board (ECM) received a petition requesting that an EAW be prepared for the Tram`s Crossing project. This petition was forwarded to iiia City of Lino Lakes on Mir 29, 1995 tor the City to decide on the need tor air EAW. The petition was refend to SEH, the consultant assigned to this project, kr make a recommendation regarding the petition. SEH has determined that preparation of an EAW for this project is not mandatory. As the project is also not specifically exempted, the City must decide in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Part 4410.1100, Start 6 whether or not an EAW is to be prepared. Based on the SEH review of the petition it appears the petition tails to demonstrate the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects. Therefore, preparation of an EAW is not required. Regardless of the City Cat is action on this matter. the c ricern . nrcrted by the nearby residents at 'the May 3 City Council Work Session will be forwarded tot Wiper for consideration dlurin final design of the Improvements. The deveiq r i did be directed to monitor the drain id at 6275 Holly Drive West to d+ ivislon impr ernents are rert+denng it unusable. y the EAW and dated All for the Trapper's Crossing project. Ri CQ.MPAENDAllON: Option No_ 1 - Move to deny the EAW petition for the Trapper's Crossing project for the following reasons. 1. Preparation of an EAW for this project is not mandatory_ 2. Based on the review of the petition by SEH dated April 20, 1995 the petition tails to demonstrate the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects. -2- EQB March 29, 1995 Ms. Mary Kay Wyland, Planning Coordinator City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Petition for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Trappers Crossing Subdivision Project Dear Ms. Wyland: The Environmental Quality Board (EQB) has received a petition requesting that an EAW be prepared on the project described in the petition, and has determined that the City of Lino Lakes is the appropriate governmental unit to decide the need for an EAW. The requirements for environmental review, including the preparation of an EAW, can be found in the Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200 to 4410.7800. Please contact me if you do not have access to these rules. The procedures to be followed in making the EAW decision are set forth in part 4410.1100. Key points in the procedures include: 1. No final government approvals may be given to the project named in the petitions, nor may construction on the project be started until the need for an EAW has been determined. Project construction includes any activities which directly affect the environment, including preparation of land. If the decision is to prepare an EAW, approval must be withheld until either a Negative Declaration is issued or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is completed (see part 4410.3100.) 2. A first step in making the decision regarding the need for an EAW would be to compare the project to the mandatory EAW, EIS and Exemption categories listed in parts 4410.4300, 4410.4400, and 4410.4600, respectively. If the project should fall under any of these categories, environmental review is automatically required or prohibited. If this should be the case, proceed accordingly. 3. If preparation of an EAW is neither mandatory nor exempted, the city has the option to prepare an EAW. The standard to be used to decide if an EAW should be done is given in part 4410.1100, subp. 6. Note that this requires that a record of decision including specific findings of fact be maintained. 4. You are allowed 30 working days (Saturdays, Sundays and holidays do not count) for your decision if it will be made by a council, board, or other body which meets only periodically, or 15 working days if it will be made by a single individual. You may request an extra 15 days from EQB if the decision will be made by an individual. C3 ENVIRRNMENIAI 00AIIFY RRARO 6511 P,EOAR S1REE1. S1. PARI. MN 55155 Al? 296-2603 FAX 017 796-3696 SFAFF PRfYI0F0 BY m PIANNIM6 1 Irrr- 0 0 March 29, 1995 Page Two 5. You must notify, in writing, the proposer, the petitioners' representative and the EQB of your decision within five working days. I would appreciate your sending a copy of your record of decision on the petition along with notification of your decision for our records. This is not required, however. 6. If for any reason you are unable to act on the petitions at this time (e.g., no application has yet been filed or the application has been withdrawn), the petitions will remain in effect for a period of one year, and must be acted upon prior to any final decision concerning the project identified in the petition. Notice of the petitions and its assignment to your unit of government will be published in the EQB Monitor on April 10, 1995. If you have any questions or need any assistance, please do not hesitate to call. The phone number is (612) 296-8253 or you may call on our toll-free line by dialing 1-800- 657-3794. Sincerely, Gregg Downing Environmental Review Coordinator cc: Susan Walseth AtInERVAMMWAIPSerl April 20, 1995 Ms. Mary Kay Wyland Planning Coordinator 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Mary Kay: 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE 200 SEH CENTER. ST PAUL. MN 55770 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 ARCHITECTURE • Eh,=G'."HERB JG • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRAIVSPORT4T'ON RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Trapper's Crossing Subdivision EAW Petition SEI -I No. A-LINOL3336.00 This letter is provided in response to the citizen petition for the completion of an EAW for the proposed residential development known as Trapper's Crossing. The petition and the response of the Environmental Quality Monitor (EQB) were reviewed to determine the potential actions of the City of Lino Lakes. According to the Minnesota rules, parts 4410.4300, 4410.440 and 4410.4600, the project does not meet the criteria of any of the categories for the completion of a mandatory EAW or an EIS, nor does it qualify for any exemption from environmental reporting. Therefore, the City has the option to prepare an EAW for the proposed project, but is not required to do so. The requirements established by the City's zoning and shoreland ordinances, Comprehensive Plan and Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) should be adequate to address the concerns of the residents. The LWMP requires peak storm water discharge rates and storage volumes from any watershed be consistent with the values shown in the Plan and analyzed for a 100 -year, 24-hour storm. The Plan also requires treatment of storm water runoff prior to discharge to wetland areas. At your request, I have reviewed the project to address the comments raised in the citizens petition. The proposed development was reviewed to determine the adequacy of the proposed ponding and storm water treatment facilities. The following paragraphs summarize the results of the review and modeling performed with respect to the citizen petition. Page 1, Paragraph 4 Any disruption of the land has the potential to fill and thereby reduce the capacity of the wetland areas for holding water and run-off. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC . 'NIVEAPOLIS. MN 37. CLOUD. MN C ,`EIA/A FAL t S. VY! EOUAi- OPPORT1j417Y E11�. EWER MADISON V1/I LAKE COUNTY IN Ms. Mary Kay Wyland April 20, 1995 Page 2 The design of the proposed development avoids direct impacts to wetlands in all but one basin. Overall, only 7,200 square feet (0.17 acre) of one wetland basin will be filled by the proposed project, approximately one percent of the wetland habitat on the site. This impact will be mitigated by the construction of 15,000 square feet (0.34 acre) of wetland habitat, resulting in a net increase in wetland habitat on the site. All of the wetlands on the site will retain their natural function of water retention. In addition to the water retention function of the wetlands, the construction of seven storm water treatment ponds will also serve to retain and treat storm water runoff from the site. Page 1, Paragraph 5 Presently there are 4 culverts (from Ponds #1, #2, #4, and #6), which re-route excess water from a portion of the western half of this project into the wetland area adjacent to Country Ditch #25. With the potential for the water table to rise as a direct result of this unnatural, additional drainage into this wetland arca, the adjacent landowners: of the 40 -acre parcel adjoining the far northern boundary of the project, of the 5 -acre parcel (1101 Holly Drive West), of 6275 Holly Drive West, and of 6265 Holley Drive West --- have serious concerns that the presently dray and functional areas of their properties, which directly abut this wetland, will become water- logged and unusable. The proposed development does not significantly alter the existing drainage pattern on the site. The culverts from Ponds 1, 2, 4, and 6 will route runoff from the western portion of the site to the wetland adjacent to County Ditch #25 (Basin A). However, this arrangement is not unnatural, as much of the area currently drains to this wetland in the undeveloped condition. The Lino Lakes LWMP requires developments to detain runoff on the site and discharge at rates no higher than those determined in the local water management study to prevent flooding of adjacent properties. Review of the development shows that discharge rates from the ponds on the site will not exceed the rates in the undeveloped condition. Page 1, Paragraph 6 There is a culvert from the pond located in Block 5, Lots 24-26 draining into the wetland identified as Basin G. Additionally two holding ponds: one in Block 5, Lots 29, 30„36, 37 --- and Pond #5 in Block 3, Lots 6 & 7, directly adjoin the wetlands, identified as Basins G and E without the use of a culvert to handle their overflow problems. The excess water from these basins drains off-site and has the same impact as above to the adjacent property owners east (1210 Holly Drive) of the project --- and south: a 10 -acre parcel, a 20 -acre parcel, and a 11.5 -acre parcel (1101 Holy Court East). The pond in Block 5, Lots 29, 30, 36 and 37 is hydraulically connected to a second basin in Block 5, Lots 24-26. The culvert in the downstream basin will control runoff from the entire pond. Pond 5 will discharge into the adjacent wetland basin in Block 3. Discharge from this basin will be controlled by the culvert under Road "B" to avoid flooding in the wetland south of Road "B" and adjacent properties. The design of the ponds and outlet structures will not allow discharge from the site at rates higher than in the undeveloped condition. Ms. Mary Kay Wyland April 20, 1995 Page 3 Page 1, Paragraph 7 After evaluating the numerous storm -water catch basins and the proposed ponding of this project, they are substandard, in keeping water run-off contained on-site. Most of the holding ponds have their inlet openings barely 3 feet fronz the lowest level of each pond — which does not allow much water capacity in these ponds before they ALL drain into the adjacent OFF-SITE WETLANDS OF OTHER LANDOWNERS. Because of this arrangement, this project does not have the drainage capabilities to handle the potential "100 -hear flood "", much less normal water problenis. The volume of water below a pond's outlet is not intended to retain all of the runoff from a development during a 100 -year storm event The volume of water below a pond's outlet is intended to perform storm water treatment by allowing suspended solids and adsorbed pollutants to settle out. Rate control is provided by the volume above the outlet. Water will flow into the pond during a storm event. The outlet from the pond is designed to allow water to flow out of the pond, but not necessarily at the same rate runoff is coming in. The additional volume above the pond's outlet is used for storage and the water is discharged at a slower rate to avoid flooding downstream. The ponds have been designed to contain sufficient storage to contain excess runoff within the ponds during a 100-vear storm event. The outlet structures have been designed to allow this stored water to drain from the pond at a rate no higher than runoff from the site in an undeveloped condition. Page 2, Paragraph 1 On the north site of Holly Drive West, the 3.18 -acre wetland identified as Basin A is saturated at a depth of 18 inches. Basin A adjoins County Ditch #25, which appears on the DNR Protected Waters Inventory List, and has the potential to be contaminated from the residential areas' pollution, consisting of lawn chemicals, insecticides, motor oils dripped onto driveways/roads, salts/chemicals for snow/ice removal, and other everyday toxins used. Pond #1 is a small holding pond, with an incoming culvert from the northern portion of Road J. Should the outgoing culvert into Basin A, be unable to adequately maintain the appropriate water level in Pond #1 --- it only has 5 feet, before it potentially overflows into the adjoining 40 -acre parcel to the north. Consistent with the LWMP, the P8 Urban Catchment Model was used to determine the treatment efficiency of the ponds on the proposed development site. Although small, the proposed pond will remove over 60 percent of the total phosphorus and over 87 percent of the total suspended solids in the runoff directed to the pond in accordance with the Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan and the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP). The P8 model shows that under normal conditions, the maximum elevation of water in Pond 1 will be approximately 888.4. The P8 model was also run using the 100 -year, 24-hour storm (6 inches of rain in 24 hours). The model was run five times in sequence and resulted in a maximum elevation in Pond 1 of 889.6. It is unlikely that five 100 -year storms would occur in sequence, but if it did occur, Pond 1 would still not be expected to overflow. Should the pond overflow because of a plugged outlet, the pond will overflow to the west into Wetland Basin A, not into the adjacent property to the north. Ms. Mary Kay Wyland April 20, 1995 Page 4 Page 2, Paragraph 2 On the north side of Holly Drive West, the 0.37 acre wetland identified as Basin B is saturated at a depth of 12 inches. Pond #3, a small holding pond which directly abuts Basin B, has a gradient of 906 feet at its lowest point, with a culvert draining into it, from the southern portion of Road j. The property owner's 8 -acre parcel adjacent to this southeast quadrant of the project, has a gradient of 909-910 feet near this pond, allowing 3-4 feet capacity, before overflozving --- should the outgoing culvert from Basin B, be unable to adequately handle any excess water problems. According to the P8 model, under normal conditions, the maximum water elevation in Pond 3 will be 909.1. The water will have to be at least this high to discharge into the adjacent wetland. Under the conditions of five 100 -year storms in sequence, the maximum elevation of the pond is predicted to be 909.4, still below the maximum elevation of the pond. Page 2, Paragraph 3 From Basin B, this outgoing culvert is run beneath Holly Drive West and drains into the wetland identified as Basin C on the south side of the street. Basin C is a Large wetland, about .3,57 acres in size. Its gradient is 908 feet near the roadway and decreases to 906 feet at its southern end where there is an outgoing culvert beneath Road A --- which drains into Pond #5, a small holding pond with a gradient of 904 feet directly adjoined to the wetland identified as Basin E. Basin E is about 1.53 acres in size with a gradient of 907 feet. There is some mitigation, which divides Basin E in half, to allow for the construction of Road B --- but a culvert beneath this road provides excess water movement south. The adjacent property owner's 10 -acre parcel on the southern boundary of the project is 906 feet, allowing for no flooding capacity on-site. The other adjacent property owner's 11.5 -acre parcel (1101 Holly Court East) on this same boundary has a gradient of 909 feet, which allows only 3 feet of water before it potentially floods onto lois land also. The proposed culvert under Holly Drive will drain water from Basin B on the north side of the road to Basin C on the south. The elevation of Basin C is 908 feet near the roadway and increases to 914 on the southern end. Water from Basin C will north into Pond 4 and eventually into Basin A as it currently does. (The culvert referenced in the above paragraph will carry runoff from Road A into Pond 5.) Page 2, Paragraph 4 To summarize: The culvert from Basin 13, on the north side of Holly Drive West, interconnects the wetlands, composed of Basins C and E -- and the holding ponds, throughout the western half of this project --- to eventually drain excess water onto the adjacent southern properties, along with any potential residential contaminants. The culvert from Basin B to Basin C will not facilitate the drainage of water from the northern portion of the site to adjacent southern properties. Basins B and C naturally drain to Basin A and will continue to do so under developed conditions. Ms. Mary Kay Wyland April 20, 1995 Page 5 Page 2, Paragraph 5 On the south side of Holly Drive West, in the northeast corner of the project, is a 0.64 -acre wetland, known as Basin D, which is saturated at a depth of 16-18 inches. The house pads affecting this wetland in Block 5, Lots 39-42 have backyard gradient levels ranging from 909-916 feet. Although this particular wetland does not have a culvert into it, the water runoff from these homesites will flow downhill into Basin D. Basin D's gradient on its western side is 906 feet and decreases to 904 feet on its eastern side --- where it 17ows into the adjacent landowner's 30 -acre parcel (1210 Holly Drive) whose gradient levels gradually decrease to 900 feet --- thereby causing potential off-site ponding and flooding. Basin D is a small portion of a large wetland complex which also includes Basins F and G. "[he proposed development slightly reduces the drainage area to this portion of the wetland and will therefore reduce the volume of water entering the wetland at this point. Any runoff to Basin D will be spread over the entire area of the large basin and will not increase existing water levels. Page 2, Paragraph 6 Ori this same side of the project is the 3.03 -acre wetland identified as Basin G, which is saturated at a depth of 8-10 inches with scattered areas of standing water. This basin is adjacent to Cedar Lake which is listed on the DNR's Protected Water Inventory as Protected Water #12P. On the north end of Basin G is a holding pond located in Block 5, Lots 29, 30, 36, 37 --- which directly adjoins Basin G. Road G has a culvert draining excess water into this holding pond. There is another culvert draining excess water from Roads E & F, into a holding pond located in Block 5, Lots 24-26 on the south end of Basin G. There is an outgoing culvert from this pond, draining directly into Basin G. Since both Basin G and the adjoining 30 -acre parcel (1210 Holly Drive) have the same gradient level of 896 feet, there is potential off-site ponding and flooding onto this property, along with residential contaminants into Cedar Lake. Pond 7, adjacent to Basin G will remove over 92 percent of the total suspended solids and over 66 percent of the total phosphorus in the runoff directed to it. These removals are consistent with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes and the NURP to protect the quality of receiving waters. The outlet structure on Pond 7 will maintain discharge rates to the adjacent wetland at a rate no greater than those under the undeveloped condition. Page 3, Paragraph 1 On the far southern boundary of this project, is a 2.54 -acre wetland, identified as Basin F which is saturated at a depth of 8-10 inches. Although there are no culverts into Basin F homesites on Block 5, Lots 2,9,12-17, 19,20 have backyard gradient levels ranging from 905-912 feet -- and water runoff will flow downhill from them into Basin F. Both Basin F and the adjacent property owner's 20 -acre parcel have a gradient level of 900 - feet -- thereby causing potential off-site ponding and flooding. Basin F is a small portion of a large wetland complex that also includes Basins D and G. The proposed development slightly reduces the drainage area to this portion of the wetland and will reduce the volume of water entering the wetland at this point. Any runoff to Basin F will be spread over the entire area of the large basin and will not increase existing water levels. Ms. Mary Kay Wyland April 20, 1995 Page 6 Page 3, Paragraph 2 To summarize: The water run-off from the eastern half of the project located on the south side of Holly Drive West impacts adjacent landowners by potentially allowing sus face water to run off-site and to act like a natural floodgate --- resulting in ponding areas on their properties which were previously nonexistent. The adjacent landowners will lose the present and also future use of their properties. Discharge rates from the development will be maintained at rates at or below the discharge rates from the site under undeveloped conditions. The site has been utilized for the cultivation of row crops. Development of the site for residential use will increase the areas of impervious surface within the parcel. However, the maintenance of residential lawns and use of storm water treatment ponds will serve to reduce the rate of runoff from the site. Page 3, Paragraph 3 The nearby roadway, Holly Court East, located south of the project presently has a small culvert beneath the pavement to allow for water drainage. At the present time it is of insufficient size to handle all the water movement beneath the road and pools and overflows on the north side. One portion of the street in particular is consistently under water any time it rains. With the additional water run-off from this project the road has the potential to be completely flooded or even washed mit. The use of storm water ponds for flood storage and rate control will limit the rate of discharge from the proposed development to those rates experienced under undeveloped conditions. Runoff from the site will not contribute to existing flooding problems in the area. Page 3, Paragraph 4 Pond #6 in the far southwest corner of this project collects excess water from Road B & C and then drains through a culvert beneath Holly Drive West into the wetland area adjoining County Ditch #25. The property owner at 6275 Holly Drive West has his septic drainfield approximately 200 feet from that culvert location and is concerned that the excess rim -off from this project will ruin his existing drainfield. 1 f his drainfield is infiltrated by this proposed water increase, and as a result it fails - it has the potential to contaminate County Ditch #25 which is on the DNR Protected Waters Inventory List. Water from Pond 6 will discharge under Holly Drive West into Basin A at rates at or lower than discharge rates under undeveloped conditions. It is unlikely that surface water will infiltrate the drainfield which is approximately four feet higher than the elevation of the culvert. Page 3, Paragraph 5 Presently, County Ditch #25 is a marginal ditch that overflows every spring for weeks or from any heavy rainfalls. With the zoater table rising from surface water run-off of this project, this ditch has the potential to be constantly flooded by even the slightest rain. One suggestion is that this ditch will possibly require some major cleaning and modifications to accommodate the additional water. Discharge rates from the proposed development will be maintained lower than those under undeveloped conditions minimizing the flood potential in County Ditch #25 and downstream. Ms. Mary Kay Wyland April 20, 1995 Page 7 Page 3, Paragraph 6 According to the most recent "Soil Sensitivity Map"" provided by Anoka County, the soil sensitivity rating for this project is in the range of "Very High -- Hours to Months." (The opposite range of this survey is "Low -- Decades to a Century" to compare how critical is this issue is, to the soils here.) The definition for "Soil Sensitivity" is the estimated travel time for water -borne contaminants at the land surface, to reach the uppermost aquifer. So contamination from residential pollutants is a major concern. The Soil Sensitivity analysis is an attempt to locate those areas of geologic sensitivity for surface contamination to reach ground -water resources. The map portrays an estimate of the time of vertical travel for water soluble contaminants, primarily nitrates, to reach ground water aquifers. Where municipal sewer services are provided, contamination from on-site septic systems, the primary source of nitrate contamination, is eliminated. The primary contaminants from residential development are in the form of total suspended solids along with other pollutants adsorbed to the solid particles. These pollutants are not readily transferred through soil to ground water resources. Page 3, Paragraph 7 The residential pollutants from water run-off of this project has the potential to filter down to the ground water table and contaminate the well water of nearby homeowners. Mand of the wells are ns shallow as 60-70 feet. The primary contaminants from residential development are in the form of total suspended solids along with other pollutants adsorbed to the solid particles. These pollutants are not readily transferred through soil to ground water resources. Page 3, Paragraph 8 On the north side of Holly Drive West, Pond #2 is n small holding pond draining excess water from Road H with a low gradient of 885 feet. Should the outgoing culvert draining into Basin A, be unable to ]handle all excess water problems, there is only a 5 -foot capacity before water could potentially overflow into the adjoining 5 -acre parcel with a gradient of 890 feet. This property owner at 1101 Holly Drive West, whose hobby farm will be surrounded by this project on three sides, is concerned that her horse pasture will not be having the project's residential contaminants be absorbed into her pasture grass --- thereby causing problems for her grazing animals, who utilize every square inch of the pasture for their needs. The outlet from Pond 2 is designed to maintain pre -development discharge rates, but even in the event of five 100 -year storm events, the maximum elevation in Pond 2 is estimated to be 889.75, more than two feet below the maximum elevation of the pond. In the unlikely event the pond did overflow, runoff would not flood the adjacent property to the south as it is located at a higher elevation. The property at 1101 Holly Drive West actually contributes runoff to Pond #2 from the northeastern corner of the parcel. Page 4, Paragraph 1 On the above 5 -acre parcel (1101 Holly Drive West), the developer has taken the liberty to install over 100 feet of a proposed drainage culvert, from Pond #4 inside her property line without any permission whatsoever!! This corner of her property is not assigned to any road easements, as it is detached from Holly Drive by a Ms. Mary Kay Wyland April 20, 1995 Page 8 southerly curve in the road. This culvert is located 60-140 feet from the street's center. With this culvert draining excess water near the southern corner of her pasture, and Pond #2 's culvert draining excess water near the northern corner of her pasture -- the property owner is doubly concerned about presently dry and functional land becoming unusable as the water table moves up as a result of the increased unnatural drainage. The position of the proposed culvert is directed by the elevation of the land. The culvert must maintain a constant gradient from Pond 4 to the edge of Basin A. The proposed culvert location is within the existing ditch draining to Basin A and represents the low point in the topography. A drainage easement should be requested for the installation of this culvert. The installation of the culvert will not contribute runoff to the property. Page 4, Paragraph 2 There are concerns that many of the proposed house pads are located too close to the wetlands and holding ponds' boundaries. In the worst cases, there is only a difference of 2-3_ feet 111 elevation between the rear of the house pad and the edge of the wetland/pond areas. It would seem logical that some of these honiesites would be plagued with waterlogged backyards or Leaking basements as these wetlands and ponds increase their water capacities from drainage due to excess rainfall or spring snow melt. Some potential problem sites are: Block 1, Lot 11 Block 2, Lots 6,7,10,11,13 Block 3, Lots 6,7,8,9,11,12,13 Block 5, Lots 1,2,3,4,5,13,14,15,20,21,22,24,25,2.9,30,36,37. There is no required setback or elevation requirement for the construction of homes near ponds and/or wetlands. The Local Water Management Plan recommends a slab or basement elevation at least two feet above the 100 -year elevation of adjacent ponds and wetlands. Page 4, Paragraph 3 In closing: The developer will be combining all the drainage from the southeast quadrant on the north side of the project and the entire western half on the south side of the project to County Ditch #25 which involves excess water flowing (and ponding) across adjacent property owners' land without permission. Three-fourths of the eastern boundary (on the south side of the project) is composed of wetlands and will be impacting tin' property owner who owns the 30 acres along that entire boundary with potential ponding and flooding problems. In not keeping the water on-site, it isgeneratinga liability issue for all adjacent property owners --- whose land will be negatively affected by creating water drainage problems that are presently nonexistent and unnecessary except to benefit the project. These property owners "OWN" their own land, and it is their right to have control of what happens to it --- and not allow the developer to depreciate their property values by instigating these water problems. The developer has the responsibility to keep his water on-site and off adjacent properties. Access to County Ditch #2 can be accomplished by re-routing water on-site where the developer's own property directly abuts this ditch along the western boundary on the north side of the project. The drainage patterns on the two portions of the proposed development will not be significantly changed from the natural drainage on the site. Storm water runoff will be retained and treated on the site and discharged at rates not exceeding discharge rates under undeveloped conditions in accordance with the Local Water Management Plan of Lino Lakes. Ms. Mary Kay Wyland April 20, 1995 Page 9 Thank you for the opportunity to provide assistance to the City of Lino Lakes. If you have any questions with regard to these comments, please contact me at 490-2146. Sincerely, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Rocky J. eehn, RE. Engineer tlo /�- Kelly A. Bettendorf Scientist Environmental Assessment Worksheet: 72_4 Sitt. Trappers Crossing. 15 i-eside;-111,--ilI Le 2.4 ]!.i Tistteet. 1116 DIOLirTv nieset-ifit„.tzot-tecitt ;Afitt-, ,titt t-tptt_t d Ovt,-1-tutti). Hictjtt,itt ites (_)( _ttetttivettet-; L2-tt,e '.3.-2- VfSUv, 1116 1,;,:-_-;"SicJef i; -- - Ii it, ;6 (_,:),J; ,t t_tutret tfid tt.At'titit, ttptJite nste. - ctirect fe'l;L!T rt -is ittf ft tt HuiI Dv t tfte, t-.7.;Ltltt ±t -,s ttyitt. Jrn tt-ttt _titt_tt_t ; tfp, -ztt, tit, Itt ;its.) tAt,Tfltit L.lif jij TIV.V.(72!iii.J!;1_iS, !6!_!! H elf!,0\.A1 Tftt,:--Tt etttc-ess t/titter rt-(-)t-tn Jff-rt-t;t.e, ttitt-ttij i f f Itt ttititirictttf T,roppe.rs Crossi,r7g - tif[e .trt.t;ft-. ;:t -ft-tett- intet •itt-t.tt, tit ftt--;e7 (:- )f L!(-ift,!t TI ;!.=_J 'OPE ILA Ptectit_tset:;1tittit:tt-:ctetT.,:tttttr, ttiri!c-.; t1-t-tittte;:T iJiji Title il,;)0Telifidi HOO-ytJt_ii I;UciL; It'SS f fulfTii_31 L;1(._-,Lit,'I ti)e, ittrcit;t:terty cyt.Arnerct, witose homes are toccttetit "tiownt-tilr fN1 the Trappers Crossing site, tire sertsilive C. VVtI V! It.: ijUh V', tit eti, l_ttif ickfut__-,Litct i ocJs. ;tr..;etts, t-totiselottittitattzt: ;-tt-tt-t oft-ie.t it-npet-tett-t-rt-itft--; e;s, tt,;:titt tittefttt stf-ittt-iteit piebierilS. Lit ;_ItOpti!;t'i. We would like the deve-ioperto SiNCERELY demonstrate his ability to keep the excess water on-site Hi PAGE 2 ,L,,:. ,:::::.,.-. iikEz; i -,::::',-,-1,1-i st:.--il,E.; :-..D'i- i-iii:-:iii,i,i- Diiii„,:e litiiiii---„,if. Tr''E, A, ,.:3-,---_,.i.T'.-7:, ''.--='!-'-:IFH_I Vit:' -'3-1. t'''.1;1•11 '1-'3 Er-11-3iii As F.,: sr.-_It'uPdte,:ii 'd1-. ,:-._-: B'i..iSF,-; .,n,. .•:']---]7..,' :L)ii-.T1--'. :. n '-',Er'F.,--_:'.1 the, 1-)41R.1-'roe;(171-c_i iii,Vdtei7, i-iCiii, The ipoieriiiLn wc_.--..s,- r_.,.:,,, i,, --3,..,u -,,.-t,:_.: li j--1 ei.onsisting of avvr- .che-,Tnicols„ inseciciclE33„ F.:,-ot.-:ir oi!:3 :-.-27-_-:,ned ,,-,y-',to (.-in',/e:-.Pli-ocicis, Si-i(JvV/irri:e reM()\101, Cii-i(71 011-ief Pififiy Tiaii,,-ins: u.sed. i-,•::::ii--iei 1 is id si-r-viil hokling pond, \Apth (ill inC;Oilli;:r; :--_:'.._.',1'.1€3Ft fl -C,', -n Iihie northerri is-..-iortion c.,f Pc:Jr:id j. S;h(T.'Llkli I'--;;:.-_-:; is:ii_it.r:,,,--:.iing ii.si TirifUS:=3 teis7.--,t, Lt rore,ri11i-I:-• idirriinis:i 40-iiii1-,re Ti74.-t7 the riorth sicie i. --_,.it HK' DINE,' VVe,st, tTr-ie .:37-,_.-i,i:ie ',..,,e;,,ii._.ii ii.i i_iit,-,,i.•'i':‘-_,,.._.i i,J-_, BCISiri :,":-: ,..-_:tk,„-al:-.-.1Ts „-;ii--., Pt. hi..--ic, 71 !:-,Irc-v_lie; il ,-T-if `•','"Cji'.., if.,-, li.--)vvest •,-Dis-_:iii-iT . •vVi; i G LijkielT• ia.5._ dr.fl i i .,', , :::i 1,:: •.-_,- .-_;,-.7,uijief-i--; r--)ispi-Tioi-, ,•::,f f,;(.),..-jd ..i. The '.Te - ..-1,-_-_,•erif ..:...!th.:.---.. .7:::-:1:77nt 7:,.= .in:. -it --..,e Ln ii- iH.-..'ii i, i i ef i/ niniih . i,-.-_-.1.-i-itifiiE--:i.11. i: -_,is i."_2:iii--:i.7_-iii-ii ,.1„ i -.7...i -i f hie sis:ii._11-f-i ---_,.ii.E-fe i-,-Ef thi..i-- '=_it,.-e-ef. E-_,...-_:siii:-i ,,i, ',7.; ,.7: tr.:1:3,-. ---."--.;--7[-'',1,•_-_':-;,,l':: ,:it -7-:L: ,:',.57 i.--i.i.-_.!.---.-.-s 7-i fric.--_-,.'Te is '.1i-', ;7.,;_ltclOi-;;;;;g; ';.:;;_ji\...HT-f;t t;;;eflf-E:1-h; C;.7;_;:j- ';;; •-;;;;;"; il_:'; ;;_'j;;_r;`..-.: ';r;:;;."3 H;.::r;'_.; >'4;"";;, '.i 7;;;7!1.-_;11! h(pijr;;;;:g ;',_;(.)! ;;;;;T ;;-:(Vit;;-; --..M'V CCHC-JITi•if,1 :--.-.- ,-; -r,.--i-.-, iii- er-il-iiei..-', i. --r, Fii.--Isvi--; i-. R,.-17iiri L ii-Ji,iirec_i ii -i size.. •,,,v.it'ri-i ir-i, ,„-_-if-,n,lent. ,:i)f ';'07 t,F_--;,,--- T.. Lefi',-_-,' is si,-*,-i-ie 7,-iitHcii.-_-:ii--:•ri„ ,ii-•-•T--2.7.T ,•--i./i..ie.s Bi. -_1_,:i1 --i E ii. --i i-iiiiVi.. T.,:i-21- I--;.--3 (_.7:(jr:STit;,:=11:::,',-; :-.)t, '-...(:),:::-.Rii ::±: [..',.. ,EL -.7.:._:-..,:::-:;:-T i*_.',-..-:-:::.:-'- 7:6 '•1,--Hi,11;71::::,/,7it'_-',3 .-•:,:..r..-.5:=:-, './v-fil.,HHT,,::.,•:,i',:-;'*,:i',:-.? Pie cd,-7ii-,e,rit 1:-)Fr.-:.i.r.ierty cyveici 0 -CP -7:1e. 1-_-)Crfe 7::J.--; r -"!E3 -;:-.7._!fheT1-i itii'.-'.iiir-iiiii-;/ of this F,Foject F.; H':-_:,1, f'.31,--_-)v.,,lncj t.(. -_-.,r [--1,.--) Tioi.s‘ii:.:Iii ic ,._..._111-:.,:-.7,._.;i'•) ,..:,] -.-.; F.'. ! i .-_; CT; ;';.;:-: :i;,;j;;;i';_:-;`:_r;;T ';,_;;;V:_)T._;-ef t;;;;;;' `,/\;irer)3 I ! .5 -,_.];.;if'; .. ET:isti ,r.i i.--',6 SE:__, -T:;;Tr;;;;;; :;-: '---; T;:t; -; ;-...i..slilov,.ii..s s:ii.-ii'ii:;:!, fir.s-et i'.:if Te 3i_irrirr-ih3-011: The ieuvierf from F -cin E„: --i f he r:,::::[Th sL_:,.--; C,': riio.iiiuy.. L).11 111113. '-i'il-eisf, ii ifeii,._iieir il '-,-'._. 3 iriiii-,. ci,--)r-riposec of Fici_.iiris (.2, C15(11 E ---- ,.--,,-:d Trie HC,!::,:fl,.-j rC,[-I'.7-7, tfliCi._igriQUI trie v‘iiest,eri i r i,._.ii,,1-1-i,,---- 1In evefitividiy isii,:rl :'.E;,..C,.-Vvilif ,7.,D1.7::, ':', :.: ...t.",:lw:,,-DeriTes, cOng ;',1,1!13. ;;;11!-,..,;,, -_-if D...•ii.- the soiiin :iiidi-ie i. --)f hleiily t_)i-r.,:,-.7 \i'',!.---.';'-_;':„ i i,ii'.-• ry:-Tre--.7-iif ,., ioii iei•- (r:jf. 11-;:(7-; ii.'n".1);1(.7;‘';-_;:e: IS ,i'll .64-1::-.T,.':'_i'-..,--,F-.1!:-!.7.---,-":. 1-1(12.,V0- (1"1.: '6,1Sin D, Wr!.!f".7.1-; •"--; sc.-iii iii,-ifed ,.-ii • i,ei...:iii i ii..,ii i:-_,- -,:--• ii i,.....11t:i. iri l,!,--,,,.--':- c,. Lots: ,','--4;2:r,..-T.,..,:--: ,--,,'.7.--..!.,-.-..,..-.11-1 c=y;ir];;;-t;r:-;i7.;" ;';:--;,,,,Fj!7--;;, riiirginc, frici-r-i ,;i.y..,i,-yi ,-,, dicii yv,-,;311iE1 i,_ii,:,esif : 1; ,T_. v:-,:!,.ITel ;iii i(:)f I friii:iiii v(-) i11iirie;sit-113,,i'vi;: ;;:.-., (-_1,:iyvvr-d-ili. ir---,+J.-2, E!. --_,:s0 r..). F,--_-.F,i--,. Y'--,5 gi-,..:.]!:-.:',1e- -:-,r-• '..'._-.: ..-:,;;-.-_:-_,f-,'F.-- -,::-.-.!:.--: ',-, l'::,!,-') fer:::',. -.:', --7_,IE;:.::7..".17; -C :-.--':::.4 !::-_:::-..:', -.:1•7-.! --t-.'-, /,iier-2,, ii fi,-..,,,, ir-iii ,:-_-; ,-..:.--,,•.-i-t icn,J-,;', 3,-..',--,,J._.Lt- i_.,._)r,-._-±-:::, I, i 2 1 il,', rif,-.:iii'i,i, Di-ri..,:eii, •-,,,,.,:rii-.7.i...sie 11 .1111 ci.ii.--icii.iii-iih•/ d,7,ieirecsii-72: tio, 1:•2':i :eei---17ee3.--....,:.3;if11g i--,,:„i-ti„--iy, ,,r.ff,_,-,ite r-„,::ii--,--jinc: .---;,r,;;;-:, ,- t,-,,,...; -,,;;;;;.--„:;f-;,E, ,;;. .;„.. ; ; ; ;:-, L,;; i;,.:i -;;;.±::;; ;.H ;‘, ;-'. i: ;i;..;;._. '._.r;' ';._] '-_i€:,;i_.:ir, (_.) ,1-::- i 0 ;,._!: ,,t,::,„ v.-iiii i :-.,,..._..,._1', t,.-i,..H.__.: :.__]t.:::_iii, ,•_•-: :::!,,...] i"-=:, :113. Lilk.e,', •vvripi-:,h 1.3 iisfeci (i)ni ftie D1' -if F'ii:-)1-e11,fe0 '01,:iter IT:Veri101.-V, CIS Fir.-_:ifee1130 Water #12P. fi:.!ni Ine nortri erid of Bcisif--1 c:_7 iS IS -1 h(Di'lli-g rif.-)i-id, loc.5.-1-feci in BiC),:t: E.,, I f.--)i-S 2:"..',0,•3,').--,7 --- •vvhict c_iirecIry- -.X.L:es-, i,3c111i iioiii r,f..ocia) t.-_ J..-.. r, ii _ii _i i .._iii iiij ii -i ii,_•,, .11. 3303 ii i ibic,R..irJ„ ::). Licii"s SOUth e:nd Ot P.,,:i.`::-In C. 1,---r..E'lm_.' is dr -ii (--:iiitidi.--)n i::3-.!11ri fn." -)Fr 033 pon,..-1. lin!.'-!i7j ,,ly-f:HY Fltn :P:..7::.2:71 .; - -'--.: rAGE 'eel-, tele potential c)ff-sile .T.!:''JH ie7!cient;:,DI nts. into Cector thiS `ifient:tHti P.(71Sir: sctur,:tt(3cio der,th of 6- 0 ;riches. i-Trh:-.,[igh cre no culverts Basin F,norriesites on LOTS 3,?J2-1 7, 1(1,20 have 'Docfryord grcident levels t(inging from '.)05-(112 feet --- and water ti_lharf tr(7)1T1 tf-lem Int() bfis-F Elot T, .1v,m.ent 0\y -lens lev(=_-•;! of '7200 tent-- It ;erelDy ca_ismit off-s;te pondinci To summinze: The wictler 11n -off fr,:)m the e: -__]stern hn. n r):-oect ((-,cated no The sc:uth rinve West, impicis 0/(1c:era Iiindowners. iDy f-intenTvilk.itVJvVIflO SLJIVJC:e ofateu to tun off-site, 1!1:e ricifurcil tioociccite—tesultnc cre ch their nrore,tes, whIch were [7:4-'%.13::)S.1 ucue-Aiste,n1. The i-Jciricent nets mil iose the 17,f esera also future use of their tr;e iT (11, f T "flfl(i't It -le street0 r11rt1 1r3 , (7ons7tent1), unr-it-er 17:17:S. 3, 11-1.e ,-,cfyttiwest i r--;(:.,,ty vv-tST, -v\ietiCifir:{71 '1 ino n-TorJerty owner ct 75 n.Dtrvre Firs 3OrT0 010103001. cirDtDrc)--iiif-ncey :1 111 1113 r.iFC;rit!eH,t ,...--1!-,71.f01-11 !(--]f!!tr,,Tit(-;-7..ft 103 TT50 !,!te1:10310 1000' 1030 if0 3 Fie fproteutkil iS ton V\iiters uSt. 4. il're,sent!y, nunty D1ch#115 (3 10331 0itr.71-]0, 1 1133 every 33i,rir:c1h: o010 3 f.OTitl 3301 103V‘1(_11.1 0110(1 3511113311 301 133ruu-oft Ti 11011:10 (1- r),E3 floociecl, hy othe 3;(.7- est tn(iit ciirk7r- 1eclupe, sor-ne Fr-Rittot n10lnln.1r,if-1(1 no ockilittonci pr-Q,ieC.1 :S in the (The the estif-nclteci ICF 7ne s ;3 6. 11 '(13'3 u 1 ei-7." . 7.fiitri the rlf.Drth slcie of Holly TXtve Wesf „ i7'on(-1 #2 Is (7,3010130 excess -oicifer T.() ucin(tle1 e:x.cess -vvare! DroDierns, tnete DeIore vOOlell L.,f,L)!,J Page 4 101 8.the ,..-JPove .5 -acre par 0 H Drive VVesti, the developer has taken the iirperty lc) 0,„fer 100 feet 01 0 profOSed drCliriCge clAvert, from Fond #4, inside her property line 'vvithoLit Deirnission \id qts ver ThisC Orrie; her isitt...)peny. 6 not CIESicirie!.i tC) n errnnrs, cs Is tietaehed from Holly Di -re Lr snL,--er;; curve .!h The -t-r-J, Le street s Ler iter.Vth Inc CU 'xitt OHI o ecsvvdtei ueur the southern cOrher flf Fier 0001: c. ci la Fond #20culvert (JrainIncil ,:-3xcess watei neor the nortr-lern corner r. -)f her pasture --- the prone v-ri donury rerncd rjoor T,rsei anc 0T100 11itif jter F -r KJ,,, uE,0 Ti 11)020 9. !": p'__Ji,11111g0S0 Theie ()r _L ii.,etv\feen ho ni I tl )Oise 10 000e Ct ThewIfeti-tr.;;7-1/r,o;.-;:-T LIE xs. f..); 1 - - 11100 Hein itnt i DR.-- 7 Z. 1c:11T, •11:1 00 .0 :11k: 1 1-,)C;j1; - c7.) int?, ',0 LH0m3. ill (.1,:--.--1)er,-,on(u fit lvttriY !ssue 1-0 ;i7t1,:idaee- l-:t I If r.i.)1_)er15 (.7)0/1-iels rre crealing V1. -l: DieSer-lny FIrjr titcrietrt the . lIteste ih.e!T v\i11 0elL,1_re.:•6 i T 1-1ese 100, c!(:)ng 0E--; Rt.:spec:livery'Li :,:tHstopher Lye -len, r';275 DelvIcAis, 02601 Dkve ty,r. Ir 03 f 5,5038 r -Th azy,h-fLe pl_EASE SIGN YOUR NAME and ADDRESS LEGIBLY—ADDRESS MUST lis-ICLUDE C TY:STATF:- NAAA.E !:'" • ' ADDRESS DATE / - - ; 7 6 d_t_L,,,cL • f z,--& --,1( ) 77 kir71,--G4-7) 3 ( 5 -771G`, 317--{75- Li4,c, L f_f } Z75r)(2. (Ai( e ") 0, /IL) 3 -(v — C.k -4/ 7// (L•'/-3 (2_,j,/ • ez) / 5-47-2t // 6-Z z K) ,a MiV 55,,,-327 7-5 2))/1/Crg' L Of/ gitt '53 (/ // ) vtuc, 6-1'1 <-L4C_.c. I ki Sam./ „V/,;;- (cct Bk Duc miv•e__, „IA' A Lc es M A(T,‘ A ( 3 -20-- r Ci:`� c�.i 1 J = , ✓� Ali n4- 1cCL�; it /4 17/%L I<< [.rte�� (/ 7(/, « t<<4:.j,f /A- 'l 1 iNC I/)k j �/ U /0/,L K 5-5-c 3�' 3�' L� J P H- 1/4, lam/ r J //vs 410 (25-0 -7' D 7,1 j e ao_ 7 i= SL_.j0„) L. L 04 L L. fry - C 7,2g_9_- _ c` a.&-C�_-Gi/s C - T t'C r n Q. `rte„,__J �_ I ' ii-Ltc., (4.kit �zt � 1 C=i`6(C 1 -'Li ,/ %j�- / C77ti 3 1/ L;v 7 (q �: li,>��.�.�r {r'� �� L�� L� �,� Les 3/ z/ with the Wg for A determination of the RGU. Subp_ oticeto proposer,. The petitioners shall notify the proposer in writing at the time they file a petition with the EQB. Subp_ 5. Deteroinatioa of UGU_ The EGG'S chair or designee shall determine whether the petition complies with the requirements of subparts 1 and 2. If the petition complies, the chair or designee shall designate an RGU pursuant to part 4410.0500 and forward the petition to the RGU within five days of receipt of the petition. Subp. 6. EAlt decision. The RGU shall order the oreparation of an FAN if the cyvid<rnce presrtt.ecltr peAltionerc, proposers, and other persons or otherwise known to the RGU demonstrateli tht, hecAuse of t hnMiure cr proposc_!d project, the project nny have the potential for !-.icnificant environmental effect?. Thr: 9(77 petition if the evidence presented fails to demonstrate the :TilTo1‹?(71_ mz•N hTrvqI eell!!' for !lienIt7lc,Int t_.rtvironnent,.al effects. The RGU shall maintain. either As 4, separate document cr contained within the records of the RGU, a record, including specific findings of tact, of its decision on the need for an Subp. 7. Time1iit. The RCU has 15 days from the date oi the receipt of the petition to decide on the need for an F.A. If the decision must be made by a board, council, or ether boOy which mectf. Gray Oh a periodic b..s1 the ti zc- peric.6 br extended by the RGU for an additional 15 days. Vor all other Rai's, the EQB*s chair shall extend the 15 -day period by not more than 15 additional days upon request of the RGU. Subp. B. Notice of decision. Within five days of its decision the RGU shall notify, in vritino, the proposer, the EQB staff, and the petitioner's representative of its decision. The EQ11 stiff shili publish notice of the RGU's decision concerning the petition In the DOIB Monitor. Subp. 9. Ourstion of effect of petition. If an RGU cannot act on a petition because no permit application has been flied, the application has been withdrawn, or the application has been denied, the petition remains fn effect for no more than one year from the date on which it watt filed with the EQB. While the petition remains in effect, part 4410.3)00, subparts 1 8nd 2, applies to any proposed project for which the nature and. location is substantially similar to the proiact identified in the petition_ 54: MS s 1160.041 1160_045 UIST: 13 SR 1437 17 AGENDA ITEM 5B STAFF ORIGINATOR Jahn Powell Acting Ci3X Engr DATE May 4, 1995 Resolution No. 95-59 TOPIC t3nr ng Parking on North Road BACKGROUND: in order to allow the intersection of North Road and Lake Drive to function properly, parking cannot be allowed on North Road. The banning of parking on North Road must be formally approved by the City Council, with a copy of the resolution forwarded to MnDOT, to facilitate final approval of the plans by the State. The construction documents include installation of the no parking signs as part of the 49/23 project_ OPTIONS: f Approve Resolution No. 95-59. 2. Return the matter to staff for further consideration_ BWASIfiligetleat Option No. 1 - Approve Resolution No. 95-59 Banning panting on North Road. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 59 RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING ON NORTH ROAD BETWEEN LAKEVIEW AVENUE AND LAKE DRIVE (COUNTY ROAD #23) WHEREAS: the City of Lino Lakes planned the improvement of North Road, and; WHEREAS: WHEREAS: the City will be expending State Funds on the improvement of this roadway, and; this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, and approval of the proposed construction must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: The City of Lino Lakes shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of North Road between Lakeview Avenue and Lake Drive (County Road #23) at all times. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 8th day of May, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR Daniel Tesch, Assistant to the City Administrator DATE 5 May 1995 TOPIC 1994 North Central Suburban Cable Communications Commission (NCSCCC) Please find attached a copy of the 1994 NCSCCC's Annual Report. 1994 was a very active year for the Commission. Some of the issued examined were: *Rate Regulation - The second round of FCC rate regulations were implemented which had the direct affect of reducing subscribers rates. *Telecommunication Legislation - A bill was introduced into the Legislature which would have regulated use of municipal rights of way by new communication providers. It did not pass in 1994 but will be re- introduced. *Transfer of Community Programming - We have begun negotiations with Meredith Cable to establish a non-profit corporation which would oversee community programming. *Homes passed in Lino Lakes - 3,818 * Subscribers - 1,898 *Lino Lakes Franchise Fees in 1994 - $18,255.26 For your Information • sk \\LI AGENDA ITEM 4 A /1 STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE May 5, 1995 TOPIC Preliminary Plat - Behm's Century Farms The City Council reviewed this request at their April 24, 1995 meeting. The request involves a 105 lot subdivision, a rezone from Rural to R-1 for a portion of the Lino Air Park Plat that is intended to be included in this subdivision, and a PDO Overlay for the Air Park Lots. At the Council meeting there were several questions raised concerning the subdivision and PDO for the Air Park Lots. Since that meeting Staff has reviewed Council concerns with the Developer and would comment as follows: Concerning the temporary cul-de-sac at the end of the 1st addition,' the Developer has decided to increase the 1st addition by two lots which will allow a temporary cul-de-sac to be constructed at an intersection. This arrangement meets the requirements outlined in the staff report of April 7, 1995 and concurs with the Planning & Zoning Board's recommendation. The Developer has discussed two options pertaining to the "butt" lot detailed in the April 7, 1995 Planning Report. Option 1 would involve the placement of restrictive covenants on the two corner lots which would ensu a their orientation to the north, rather than the east and I thus eliminating the "butt" lot problem - back yards butting up against side yards. Option 2 would eliminate the "butt" lot completely, however, this option is less desirable from the Developers standpoint. The third concern expressed by Council involved the development of protective covenants on the Air Park Lots. Staff has completed a detailed review of the proposed covenants with the developer. The attached memo details those covenants and is recommended to be made a part of the subdivision approval. Prior to Final Plat, Staff will insure that the covenants are recorded with the Air Park Lots and made a permanent part of the development agreement. OPTIONS;; 1. Approve preliminary plat with conditions outlined in the April 7, 1995 Planning Report which include the revised restrictive covenants, a revised plat indicating a north orientation with deed restrictions on lots east and west of the "butt" lot, and the construction of a temporary cul-de-sac at the north/west terminus of the 1st addition. 2. Approve preliminary plat with conditions outlined in the April 7, 1995 Planning Report which include the revised restrictive covenants, a revised plat indicating the elimination of the "butt" lot, and the construction of a temporary cul-de-sac at the north/west terminus of the 1st addition. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 BEHM'S CENTURY FARMS PROPOSED PDO PROTECTIVE COVENANTS PROTECTIVE COVENANTS IN CURRENT AIR PARK ASSOCIATION 1. Maximum 2 story buildings 2. Allows 1 attached accessory building 3. Allows 1 detached accessory building 4. Does not allow subdivision of lots 5. 1 story building must have 1300 sq. ft. 6. 1-1/2 and 2 story buildings must have 1000 sq. ft. on main floor 7. Limits building height to 10' for every 70' from runway centerline 8. No elevation fuel tanks are allowed 9. No temporary structures allowed 10. No engine testing allowed before 8:OOam and after 9:OOpm PROPOSED ADDITIONAL PROTECTIVE COVENANTS 1. Minimum home front setback of 30' and maximum front setback of 40' from street right-of-way line. 2. The following lots will share cross easement access to runway - 12 & 13, block 2 and 17, 18, 19, 20, block 3. Other lots will access directly to runway area - Shared access shall be grass covered. 3. All airplane hangars shall be located on the north 125 feet of each lot except Lot 20, Block 3, 2nd Addition, where wetlands may require hangar to be located on the north 15,5 feet with a minimum of 25 feet between house and hangar. 4. Airplane hangars must be architecturally compatible with homes in color and style, hangars may be metal sided. 5. All airplane hangars must have a 40' clear span door and a minimum building width of 46 feet. 6. Maximum hangar size is 2600 sq. ft. 7. Maximum hangar height would match existing hangar height, but not to exceed 22 feet. 8. No commercial use, building. 9. No fuel storage allowed other than that typical in other residential areas. 10. Aircraft not owned by resident shall not be parked on lots for more than two weeks. 11. Only 3 planes per lot will be stored at one time. No permanent outdoor storage of airplanes or related equipment shall be allowed. Property owners may be allowed up to 2 years (24 months) from to construct a hangar. Outside storage may be allowed in the interim. 12. Each lot shall have a minimum of 70 percent green space. 13. Two architectural review committees will review plans. One for G.M. Development and one for the Airpark Association. 14. The front and side yards of all homes will be sodded. including space rental, will be allowed in accessory 7900 77 MUME S Nom :.•�. .. spaugmastaimate Wirgral oulgigrogaigier 1101111111111511°"114/1 EMU. 131 pat .inigincom .4 .1 twk, 13104). apt 1112;M.M .,-- �i� !NEU g ®Ida a Iwo gm l'il cuss ., , IF et 411.2-'' ® . iliriiiiliii nu -i oma' iIL} itI� gig pIII � MARSHAN LAKE 11 lry■;M .,:co, Ell I' ® o ;- L1(4 -0 B Ma it7;td O 1 0• • m,u� i� �i 'y..� ▪ y ��e..' �� '�4I14'n�=9 \tis :. o •i a rJ.I {� z ' J i1Ryr :v1. arrtim. :rosTirtr(� z.`, : �.r� n EXHIBIT B - DETAILED SITE LOCATION I -RUNWAY SAFETY AREA '� I `RUNWAY 11 310 A'l''fii PARK 'NORTH op,E Ittvised ist Addition Line 4 10 12 13 14 7 6 5 \S 4 3 2 H 7 L 1: rukr BE)IJ REHM•$CENTUTU RY FARM -rµw RIMMENiiiiErc Woo wrnatans. ,�r..-.. ," u, 500° *Jo sop l000 1100 1200 €x ie T C - PROPOSED MUSA LAND EXCHANGE I3 !2 3 RUNWAY SAFETY AREA RUNWAY �- LINO AIR PARK NORTH Revised Temporary Cul-de Sac 0. 00 Revised 1st Addition Line 161 10* I7ik / 0 > _ 8 � ~54 9 6 a 10 S O Z P� 8 I 4 �C� I 12 3 L_ 13 2116 1 i I 14 2 7 ------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- wrnm BENM'S CENTURY FARM L«°T2Irt"'' r". MM APR -07-1995 11:27 IsfiC 612 595 9837 P.11 AGENDA ITEM 4 C c(IIPPLQ „_/ STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE May 5, 1995 TOPIC SECOND READING Ordinance No. 8-95 Rezone Behm's Air Park Lots to R-1 with a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) The City Council approved the first reading of this Ordinance at their April 24, 1995 meeting. The Ordinance places a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) onto a portion of the Lino Air Park North Plat that is being incorporated into the Behm's Century Farms Development. The PDO will contain all provisions approved in review of the preliminary plat,. 1. Approve Second Reading of Ordinance No. 8-95, Rezone o Behm's Air Park Lots to R-1 with a Planned Development Overlay ( DO) 2. Return to staff for further consideration Option 1 Council Member its adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 8-95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B1 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO R-1 WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) (BEHM'S AIR PARK LOTS). The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: /. Ordinance No. B1 of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 13, 1992 is hereby amended by rezoning to R-1 with a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) (Behm's Air Park Lots), pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: That part of lots 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 2, Lino Air Park North Tying in Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of lot 10, thence westerly along the north line of lot 10 a distance of 33.07 feet to the point of Beginning. Thence along an assumed bearing of South 31 degrees 41 minutes 54.5 seconds West, a distance of 351.89 feet; thence South 87 degrees 35 minutes 09.2 seconds West, a distance of 646.67 feet; thence South 78 degrees 03 minutes 47.4 seconds West, a distance of 181.09 feet; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 41.8 seconds West, a distance of 170.00 feet to a point of the west line of lot 16, Block 2, a distance of 312.00 feet southerly of the northwest corner of lot 16, Block 2, Lino Air Park North therein terminating; said described parcel containing 7.403 acres more or less. Save as above amended, said ordinance No. B1 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 8th day of May, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM 4 B STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE May 5, 1995 TOPIC SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 7-95 Rezone from Rural (R) to Single Family Residential (R-1) (Behm's Air Park Lots) The City Council approved the first reading of this Ordinance at their April 24, 1995 meeting. The rezone pertains to Lots 10 through 16, Block 2 of the existing Lino Air Park North Plat and is necessary to facilitate the development of Behm's Century Farms 1st and 2nd Addition. 1. Approve Second Reading of Ordinance No. 7-95 to Rezone Property from Rural to R-1 Single Family Residential. 2. Return to staff for further consideration Option 1 Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 7-95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B1 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM RURAL (R) TO SINGLE FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL (R-1) The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: /. Ordinance No. B1 of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 13, 1992 is hereby amended by rezoning from Rural (R) to Single Family Residential (R-1), pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: All of lots 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 2, Lino Air Park North lying in Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota including that part of Thomas Street adjacent to said lots. //. Save as above amended, said ordinance No. B1 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 8th day of May, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Alan Brixius, Planning Consu 95-5-Z Rezoning of Airpark Property for Behm's Century Farms from Rural to R-1 (Ordinance No. 07-95) Planning Consultant Brixius will review the entire Behm's Century Farms submittal which includes a Rezoning, request from Rural to R- 1, a Planned Development Overlay for the airpark lots, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for MUSA Exchange, and ;Preliminary Plat allowing 105 single family lots. The Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the Rezoning request from Rural to R-1 Single Family Residential. 1. Approve First Reading of Ordi Lots from Rural to R-1 Return to staff for further considera APR -07-1995 11:23 NAC 612 595 9837 P.02 A� Northwest Associated Consultants, inc. URBAN P L ARMING- D E S I G N- MARKET R E S E A R C K PLANNING REPORT TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: Bob Kirniis/Alan Brixius DATE: 7 April 1995 RE: Lino Lakes - Behm.s Century Farm FILE NO: 194.01 - 94.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Mr. Gary Uhde has submitted a plan to develop a 105 lot subdivision entitled Bebnzs Century Farm. The proposed subdivision overlays a 51 acre tract of land, located north of County E.oad 153 (Lilac Street) between County Road 531 (Sunset Road) and Fourth Avenue. The southern portion of the subject site is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, while the northern portion (in which an Airpark component is proposed) is zoned R, Rural. To accommodate the proposed development, the following approvals have been requested at this time: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (MUSA Boundary and Sewer Plan). 2. Rezoning of northern portion of the site (Airpark lots) from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential (see Exhibit D). 3. PDO overlay of those lots provided Airport( access (see Exhibit D). 4. Preliminary plat. 5775 Wayzata Blvd • Suite 555 • St, Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595 -9636 -Fax. 595-9837 APR -07-1995 11:23 NRc 612 595 9837 P.M Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Detailed Site Location Exhibit C - Proposed MUSA Land Exchange Exhibit D - Phasing Plan. Exhibit E - Preliminary Plat Exhibit F - Lot Area Summary Recommendation The City's 1991 Comprehensive Plan suggests single fainly residential use of the subject property. In this regard, the proposed development is consistentwith the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Airpark component is considered a unique and cre.t've concept which can most effectively be accommodated via a PDO, Planned Development Overlay zoning designation. If the City finds the proposed. R 1 /PDO rezoning to be acceptable, it should be approved only upon the fulfillment of the following: The City approve the proposed MIUSA land trade and amendment to the Sewer Plan, Q The necessary Comprehensive Plan amendment is subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council. Should the City approve the requested rezoning, our office recommends approval of the Behms Century Farm preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The City formally vacate that portion of Thomas Street which underlies the subject property. 2. The applicant demonstrate the buildability of the following lots via the submission of site specific building/grading plans, wetland mitigation, or if necessary, a lot reconfiguration: First Addition: Second Addition: Lot 8, Block 2 Lots 17 and 18, Block 5 Lots 3, 4, 5, 9, 14, 20, 21, Block 3 3. The applicant consider the omission of Lot 18, Block 5 of the First Addition which exists as a "mitt" lot. 4. A full size, temporary cul-de-sac be constructed at the terminus of the Airpark lot access street (constructed as part of first phase), 2 APP --07-1995 11:24 WIC 612 5959837 P.04 5. All streets within the plat are named in accordance with the City's street naming plan. 6. Specific plans are submitted for Airpark accessible lots which identify hanger and taxiway Locations, hanger size limits, relationships to principal structures, building materials, etc. 7. A copy of restrictive covenants to be applied to Airpark accessible lots is submitted for City review and approval. Such covenants should address architectural requirements for hangers and include a provision that such hangers are to be used solely as an accessory to the Airpark use. S. A wetland mitigation plan is submitted subject to approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer. 9. A landscape plan and cross section detail be submitted for a buffer strip along Lilac Street. Such plan should specify the type, Location and size of all proposed plantings. 10. Ali park dedication requirements as determined by the City Park Board are satisfactorily met. 11. A grading and drainage plan be submitted. Such plan shall be subject to review and. approval by the City Engineer. 12. A utility plan is submitted subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. B. Drainage and utility easements are provided along all lot lines and placed over designated wetland areas. This item should be subject to comment by the City Engineer. 14. Comments of other City staff. ISSUES ANALYSIS Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Amendment: As noted previously, both a Comprehensive Plan amendment (minor) and rezoning will be necessary to accommodate the proposed use and density. These requests are interrelated considering that a basis for rezoning evaluation is the use's consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. In review of all rezoning requests, the following criteria should be considered. Specifically, the applicant has proposed to rezone the northern one-quarter of the subject property from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential. Within the area proposed for R-1 zoning, Ahpark accessible lots are proposed to be overlaid by a PDO, Planned Development Overlay zoning designation. 3 APR -07-1995 11:24 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05 Comprehensive Plan. The City's Land Use Phan suggests single family residential use of the subject property. While the proposed use is considered consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed net density (2.8 units per acre) cannot be accommodated without the subject property being incorporated within the MUSA. To accommodate the proposed first phase of development (45 lots), the applicant is proposing a MUSA land trade. Specifically, the applicant wishes to apply 27 acres of MUSA currently superimposed upon a tract of land located south of Birch Street and east of Shadow Lake Drive (see Exhibit C). In regard to the proposed MUSA trade, the following should be noted: 1. The llehrns Century Farm site is included within a proposed comprehensive, City-wide expansion of the MUSA. Such amendment will require Metropolitan Council approval. 2. The proposed MUSA land trade is consistent with the City's growth objectives (proposed MUSA expansion). 3. The MUSA land trade will most effectively accommodate the applicant's immediate development objectives. Such trade will, however, require approval by the Metropolitan Council. Any approval of proposed subdivision will be contingent upon Cityand Metropolitan Council approval of the amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan. It should be recognized, however, that approval of the preliminary plat in no case guarantees approval of the site's fixture phases being included in the City's MUSA. Rather, future phases will be considered for inclusion in the MUSA only at the time of final plat. In 1992, the City Council passed a resolution which established policy for the location of new development. The policy basically states that a new development shall be allowed to proceed only if the developer can demonstrate: a_ That the cost of utility and street extensions can be covered by immediate assessment. b. c. That the cost of operation and maintenance of the system will not exceed normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study. That an up front payment or series of payments by the developer would offset any additional costs of installation and/or future operation and maintenance. The proposed development complies with the provisions of the aforementioned resolution. 4 APR -07-1995 11:24 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06 Land Use Compatibility. To determine the compatibility of the proposed use and density, an examination of surrounding land uses is warranted. The following is a listing of surrounding land uses and zoning designations. Direction Land Use Zoning North Low Density Residential (Airpark) R South Undeveloped (southerly portion of flehms plat) R-1 East Low Density Residential R West Low Density Residential R Considering the lands directly south of the area to be rezoned cunently hold an R-1 zoning designation and that the property in question is to be interconnected to such future neighborhood, the proposed use (lot size) is considered compatible with surrounding uses. Public Services. To accommodate the proposed development, public sewer se vice will be necessary. The applicant has proposed to extend sanitary sewer service to the area under consideration at his sole expense, As such, area property owners would not be required to pay for such an extension unless they request connection to the facility. The extension and sizing of proposed utilities will provide utility capacity for the surrounding properties withoutexpense to the City. Performance Standards. As part of the City's consideration of the preliminary plat and forthcoming final plat, the proposed use will be required to comply with applicable performance standards. Specific items of issue will be discussed in the preliminary plat review section of this report. Preliminary Plat: In addition to the rezoning/Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, the applicant has also requested preliminary plat approval of a 105 lot single family residential subdivision. Such subdivision would overlay both the area being considered for rezoning and the recently established R-1 zoning designation to the south, Mocks. All blocks have been found to comply with the maximum 1,500 foot length requirement stipulated within the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Lot Requirements. Generally, all proposed lots have been found to exceed the following minimum R-1 District lot requirements: 5 APR -07-1995 11:25 IJF1C 612 595 9837 P.07 Requirement Lot Area 10,800 square feet Lot Width: Interior 80 feet Corner 105 feet Lot. Depth 135 feet While all lots exceed the aforementioned gross lot area requirements, some question exists in regard to the buildability of a number of lots. Specif cally, the following lots exhibit questionable buildable areas due to their containment of steep slopes and/or wetlands: First Addition: Second Addition: Lot 8, Block : 2 Lots 17 and 1.8 , Block 5 Lots 3, 4, 5, 9, 14, 20, 21, Black 3 While the Ordinance does not specifically exclude steep slopes in the calculation of minimum lot area, wetland areas must be excluded. Lot 8, Block 2 and Lots 17 and 18, Block 5 of the First Addition hold steep slopes which make their buildability questr6nable. The applicant has indicated that the illustrated slopes are reflective of dredge spoils from the county ditch. In this respect, a grading and drainage plan should be pr v.ided to show the proposed finished grades for these lots. While Lots 20 and 21 of Block 3, Second Addition hold ample buildable areas, their containment of wetlands would prohibit aircraft access from the adjacent taxiway. To allow such lots to function as intended, some wetland mitigation will be necessary. Standard City practice is to require not less than 10,800 square feet of land above the OHWM in R-1 Zoning Districts. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, a wetland mitigation plan must be submitted subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District and City Engineer. If such mitigation plan does not receive the necessary approvals, a reconfiguration of the site's lots will be necessary. Lot. Configuration. The proposed lot configuration is considered well conceived and responds well to area design constraints. Some concern does exist, however, in regard to Lot 18, Block 5, First Addition which exists as a "butt" lot. Aside from being isolated from the balance of the subdivision (in terms of orientation), the minimal 10,800 square feet of lot area is significantly less than the Lots which surround it To improve the subdivision's design, an omission of the said outlot should be considered. 6 APR -07-1995 11:25 NAC 612 595 9837 P.08 Streets. Overall, the Proposed street layout is responsive to physical limitations which exist in the area and are reflective of available buildable laud. While appropriate right-of-way widths (60 feet) have been provided, some concern exists in x ad to the length of the temporary cul- de-sac proposed as part of the development's first phase. At nearly 1,000 feet in length, the cul- de -sae is double the maximum 500 foot length required by Ordinance, While it is acknowledged that such cul-de-sac is to be temporary in nature, no assurances exist as to the timing of the plat's second phase. To address this issue, it is recommended that a full size temporary cul-de-sac be constructed at the street's terminus. The cul-de-sac may be constructed in the outlot proposed as Phase II, and not to disturb the Phase I design. As a condition of ultimate final platt approval, all streets within the plat should be named in accordance with the City's street naming plan. Airpark Lots. At shown on the preliminary plat, nine of the subdivision's lots are to be provided access to the Lino Airpaik. Such lots range in size from 30,904 to 39,961 square feet. To accommodate the unique and creative circumstances stu rounding such lots (e.g., air hangers, etc.), a PDO, Planned Development Overlay of such lots has been proposed (see Exhibit D). The PDO designation will allow for some flexibility from the strict provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance provisions, particularly in regard to accessory building requirements. As part of the PDO, the following conditions should be upheld: 1. Specific site plans for Airpark accessible lots be submitted identifying: a. Hanger locations, sizes, building materials. b. Taxiways. c. Hanger relationships to principal structures. 2. A copy of applicable restrictive covenants to be applied to the Airpark lots should be submitted for City review and approval. The aforementioned site plan should require architectural controls placed upon hangers and specify that such hangers are to be used solely for Aupark use (no home business operations). 3. PDO performannee standards shall be recorded with the properties in question and shall apply regardless of ownership. Wetlands. As shown on the attached preliminary plat, a number of wetlands exist upon the subject property. To accommodate the proposed development, some wetland .mitigation will be necessary. As a condition of prelirniaary plat approval, a wetland mitigation plan must be submitted and subject to approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer. 7 APR -07-1995 11:26 NAC 612 595 983'7 P.05 Landscaping. As a condition of final plat approval, a landscape/buffer strip will be required along Lilac Street. To accommodate such buffer, additional lot depth/width should be provided for lots which abut the said street. Details of the buffer will need to be specified upon a specific landscape plan submission and buffer cross section drawing. This includes the size, type and location of any proposed plantings. Thomas Street. To accommodate the proposed development, the vacation of a portion of Thomas Street will be necessary. In consideration of this issue, it has been concluded that due to various physical limitations, an extension of Thomas Street through the proposed subdivision is not practical.. Parks. The proposed subdivision should be subject to review and comment by the City Park Board in regard to preferred dedication requirements. Grading and Drainage. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, a grading and drainage plan must be submitted subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. Utilities. Development of the proposed subdivision will require the extension of utilities. As a condition of preliminary plat approval. a utility plan must be submitted for review. The said plan will be subject to review and comment by the City Engineer. **, Easements. Per City subdivision regulations, drainage and utility easements should be provided along all lot lines. Additionally, specific drainage easements should be placed over designated wetland areas. This item should be subject to comment by the City Engineer. CONCLUSION While our office believes justification exists to approve the requested R-1 rezoning and PDO overlay, changes in land use are considered matters of City policy to be determined by City officials. Should the City approve the requested rezoning, our office recommends approval of the Behms Century Farm preliminary plat subject to the conditions listed in the Executive Summary of this report. Randy Schumacher John Powell APR --07-1995 11:26 t' c 612 595 9837 P.10 /A\ NORTH 1 MILE CITY OF LINO LAKES MEW M1NNESOTA EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATION APF1--07-1995 11:27 N 1C { 612 595 9837 P.11 EXHIBIT 13 - DETAILED SITE LOCATION APR -07-1995 11:28 tsyc 612 595 9837 P.12 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSED MUSA LAND EXCHANGE ................ .............. .... 15 14 RUNWAY SAFETY AREA mT� RUNWAY LINO AIR PARK NORTH - -- I3 12 II 10 WETLAND $87'30.39.11'; AETLA9D 1210.59 - 31276.,'P. 12" 36904 ., B s q•ORA I NAGE UTILITY EASEMENT 11077 ., 2r4 EASEMENT 7:`21002 ., 1. 0956. 1. 2092 27 ', Y `. 3 264 1090.5 •1 2 5 1 1951/ ., 11' 115 4123 .4 r1 15106 1/625 .7 rr 6926. 14 7 155' 10600 " 1. \04,;135' � 5 0600 // 64 / :f 10600'.4 1. r 1 g700'141. '10600.., 1� 15' 1 �1 oz 11936 .,11. b -------- serzb•13• r 1324.94 --------- „ M PALL IM I NARY PLAT SEMI'S CENTURY FARM 7 APR-07-1995 1130 . ' I•�c , 9 ,. UMVdY SAFETY AfICA 612 595 9837 P.14 NIMNAY LINO AIR PARK NORTH . 1 �r 20'13`t i j Ur HAT( EAFElENT n 1 —r,. _ma*....af :: APR -07-1995 11:30 FSC 612 595 9837 P.15 BEAMS CENTURY FARMS SUMMARY OF LOT AREAS DATE: 06 -Apr -95 IST ADDITION BLOCK LOT NO LOT AREA BELOW WO YR WETLAND FLOOD LEVEL WETLAND FILL NET LOT AREA EXHIBIT F - LOT AREA SUMMARY 1 13936 IIIMIIIIINIIIIIIII 13936 10800 2 10800 1 3 4 10800 10800 11111111111 10800 10800 5 10800 10800 1 6 10800 10800 7 14175 14175 1 14175 14175 2 2 10903 10903 2 3 14764 14764 2 4 17097 988 16109 2 111111111 5 6 14724 13541 1080 --_ 13644 540 13001 MI 7 13914 900 13014 2 8 13200 1200 12000 Mil 9 14913 1665 13248 2 111111111 10 30858 31881 3930 26928 31881 12 30904 30904 31297 31297 15180 15180 2 10800 10800 3 10800 10800 3 ME 4 5 10800 10800 10800 10800 6 10800 10800 7 14175 14175 3 8 13982 13982 3 9 10800 -- 10800 3 10 10800 10800 EXHIBIT F - LOT AREA SUMMARY APR -07-1995 11:31 hriC 612 595 9837 P.16 3 11 10800 10800 3 12 10800 10800 3 13 10800 10800 __ 3 14 16040 16040 4 1 15285 15285 -- 5 1 14173 14173 5 2 15672 4840 10832 5 3 19517 8640 10877 5 4 17495 6640 10855 5 5 15473 4640 10833 5 6 13738 2937 10801 5 7 13609 1080 12529 5 8 21602 9600 12002 5 9 13492 1664 11828 5 10 10963 10963 5 11 14175 14175 ---4 5 12 12254 1 12254 5 13 10956 134 10822 5 14 17632 6552 11080 5 15 24448 j 12675 11773 5 16 19203 7161 12042 5 17 13648 13648 5 18 10800 623 10177 53 SUBTOTAL 795794 0 0 77489 718305 APR -07-1995 11:31 NAC 2ND ADDITION BLOCK LOT NO LOT AREA 612 595 9837 P.17 BELOW 100 YR WETLAND FLOOD LEVEL WETLAND FILL NET LOT AREA 1 114359 14359 10926 10926 1 i--- 3 10926 10926 1 4 11207 11207 1 5 11115 11115 6 12567 1710 10857 1 7 18539 7440 11099 1 8 19578 8720 10858 9 19319 7245 12074 1 10 13699 2880 10819 1 11 11766 960 10806 1 12 10800 10800 1 13 10800 10800 1 14 11877 1060 10817 1 15 13937 2620 11317 1 16 12973 970 12003 1 17 10800 ., 10800 1 18 14195 14195 2 1 14839 14839 2 2 11316 11316 2 3 11316 11316 2 4 15108 15108 3 1 23519 4818 18701 3 2 26681 13872 512 7670 13321 3 3 29759 22596 3645 18396 10808 3 4 40795 35701 5750 29951 10844 3 5 47967 37755 650 . 37105 10862 3 6 33707 22850 22850 10857 - 3 7 26655 15810 15810 10845 3 8 19598 7595 7595 12003 3 9 12867 3307 1250 2057 10810 3 10 19375 7065 3215 12310 3 11 10800 10800 .._ 3 12 14175 14175 3 13 14782 736 14046 APR -07-1995 11:31 I•PC 612 595 9837 P.18 3 14 24106 15319 2050 13269 10837 3 15 29317 12813 18161 16504 3 16 49199 30819 35599 18380 3 17 39916 15952 23964 3 18 31415 31415 3 19 32029 465 465 32029 3 20 31241 10094 795 21942 3 21 31259 4908 26351 3 22 31278 31278 3 PARK TRAIL 3420 2250 850 2020 8 CJBTOT 45 915822 264725 15967 245283 633459 APR -07-1995 11:31 Nnc 3RD ADDITION BLOCK LOT NO LOT AREA 612 595 9037 P.19 BELOW 100 YR WETLAND FLOOD LEVEL WETLAND FILL NET LOT AREA SUBTOTAL 8 118961 1830577 105 1743407 0 0 9206 109755 Wk. TOTAL P.19 11249 11249 1 2 11600 11600 1 3 19752 19752 1 4 18028 18028 5 18675 3985 14690 6 15437 4241 11196 1 7 11707 830 10877 18 12513 150 12363 SUBTOTAL 8 118961 1830577 105 1743407 0 0 9206 109755 Wk. TOTAL P.19 TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM Mary Kay Wyland, To: Planning Coordinator Reference: Randy Schumacher, City Administrator Copies To: Alan Brixius, NAC From: John Powell 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE:612292-4400 FAX:612/292-0083 Concept Plan Belun's Century Fann Lino Lakes, Minnesota Date: April 7, 1995 Commission No. 10414-950 As per your request, we have reviewed the Behm's Century Farm c,,oncept plan dated February 21, 1995 which has been prepared by J. C. Johnson Consultants, Inc. The proposed subdivision is located north of Anoka County Road 153 (Lilac Street) and roughly midway between Anoka County Road 53 (Sunset Road) and Fourth Avenue. Jon Avenue abuts its west side. The area in question was recently rezoned to R-1, Single Family Residential, except the very northern portion which is currently located in the Lino Air Park. A rezone with a PDO is also being requested for that portion of the plan covering the Air Park. The Concept Plan was reviewed with regard to City Engineering Standards and the general impact the project would have on existing infrastructure. Our comments are as follows: Sanitary Sewer The project is located at the north edge of the west portion of Sewer District No. 2 which is served primarily by the West Central Trunk Sewer. The nearest connection paint to this system is located on the east side of Fourth Avenue, about 700 feet south of Lilac Street. The existing 15" diameter sanitary sewer on Fourth Avenue would need to be extended about 2,000 feet north on Fourth Avenue and west on Lilac Street. With the existing pipe elevation, it is possible to extend this sewer to serve the proposed project area. Adequate sewer depth could also be maintained to provide a connection point for Thomas Street properties located east of the project area. Extension of sewer to the project would also make sewer more available to large lots located north and west of the proposed subdivision. Properties in this general area have experienced septic system failures clue to periodic high ground water levels. Consideration of sewer service to this area would also include review by the City of the future service area, location of any lift stations which would be required, and trunk sewer routing. Memorandum Page 2 April 7, 1995 Watermain The nearest watermain service is located adjacent to the sewer on Fourth Avenue. A 12" trunk waternain has been extended to this location from the elevated tank located about 1,200 feet further south. This 12" main could be further extended to serve the proposed project area. The concept plan includes looping the main through the project area which is desirable from a water quality standpoint. About 90% of the proposed lots would be served from this looped system. The City would require that the waternain be extended to the west limit of the plat on Lilac Street to make it accessible for any future extension. Storm Sewers/Drainage The significant existing drainage features found on the project site consist of County Ditch 10 which runs west to east through the site, County Ditch 22 which flows south along the northeast border to its confluence with 10 near the west end of existing Thomas Street, and a wetland area concentrated in the northwest area of the site. Except for possible utility crossings beneath it, County Ditch 22 is left in its existing condition. Four lots are shown abutting 22 before its confluence with 10 and three lots after. That portion of County Ditch 10 which passes through the proposed site would be greatly affected by the project. Whereas this channel currently flows open, the concept proposes two culverts be installed, each about 340 feet in length. The areas upstream of the culverts would be used for ponding. Any alterations to this ditch must first be reviewed and approved by the governmental agencies with jurisdiciton over it including, but not limited to, the Rice Creek Watershed District. The location of two ponding areas centrally between the north/south roadways eliminates the need for lengthy overland drainage swales which become maintenance intensive. Great care must he taken prior to proposing any alteration to the existing ditch system to ensure that properties located upstream are not adversely affected. This would require close coordination with the Rice Creek Watershed District and City staff. Streets The internal streets shown in the concept plan provide for 60 -foot rights-of-way as required by the City. The orientaiton of the roadways around the existing farmhouse area allows the development in that area to be isolated and delayed until future phases if desired by Mr. Behm. The roadway locations also indicate that existing wetlands and drainageways were certain design factors. The proposed concept assumes that an extension of Thomas Street to the west, across County Ditch 22, will not take place. The vacation of the Thomas Street right-of-way in this area would be required. As the County Ditch exists as a significant barrier to a roadway extension from the east this is a reasonable assumption. The Concept Plan indicates a phase break for the roadway construction near the northern limit of the project area. Although temporary, this cul-de-sac length would be far in excess of City design standards. Memorandum Page 3 April 7, 1995 The external roadway system consists of three roadway connections to Lilac Street. Prior meetings held with Anoka County personnel indicated they would likely not object to these roadway connections as long as turn and bypass lanes would be provided as they require. Easements Easements would be required over all drainageways, ponding areas, and public utility alignments. Trunk Utility Costs As discussed previously in this review, both sanitary sewer and waternain trunks would have to be extended to serve the proposed site. The City Charter does not allow City tax revenue to be used for trunk improvement projects. The proposed development must be able to support the cost of the improvement through assessments to properties within the development. A preliminary review of the assessments which would be generated by the lots shown on the Concept Plan indicates that this is possible. Summary The plan as proposed generally conforms to City Engineering Standards and should not have a significant adverse impact to existing City infrastructure. Any proposed improvements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. JMP/mha AGENDA ITEM NO. 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson DATE: May 5, 1995 TOPIC Lund Property Donation for Trail Purpose BACKGROUND Joyce and John Lund wish to donate the westerly 32 feet x 133 feet of their property at 480 Arrowhead Drive to the City of Lino Lakes for park trail location purposes. There is an existing ditch which physically separates this 32' wide strip of land from the balance of their 114' lot (the total frontage is 146') making maintenance difficult. Mr. and Mrs. Lund are willing to donate this property to the City in exchange for the following items: 1. A new certificate of survey indicating the new property line. Approximate cost: $400. 2. An appraisal of the property to facilitate a partial mortgage release. Approximate cost: $400. 3. A mortgage release for their lender. Approximate cost: $250. 4. Miscellaneous recording fees with Anoka County. Approximate cost: $25 Other associated` costs with this project: Trail Preparation, concrete pipe extension (approx. 30'), 100 cubic yards of fill for ditch crossing; Approximately $3000. Trail grading and rocking: approximately $800. Total project cost: approximately $5000. The Park Board Considered this donation at their May 1st meeting and made the attached motion recommending the approval and use of dedicated park funds to accept and expedite this project. OPTIONS 1. Approve the Park Boards motion as it and the Lunds proposal stands. 2. Refer back to staff and the Park Board for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MONDAY, MAY 1, 1995 NEW BUSINESS JOYCE LUND TRAIL: Marty read the memo that John and Joyce Lund sent to Mary Kay Wyland. They referenced the donated land on the 32 feet on the westerly side of the creek at 480 Arrowhead Drive, as a possible trail site connecting the southerly trail and Shenandoah Park on the north side of Arrowhead Drive. Marty then read the green sheet that was prepared for the board. He said this would be an excellent trail location because it would be located directly across the street from Shenandoah Park. The only existing trail access off of the Park Grove Development to Arrowhead Drive is about a quarter mile to the east via the old Fox Trail stub. When the trail was initially installed, running along the south side of the houses on the south side of Arrowhead Drive, people were using the Lund Property for access to the park and we had to install a fence to discourage encroachment. It was Marty's opinion that this would be a good trail connection to acquire. He continued by saying they have met with the Rice Creek Watershed on the site and it was discussed that the culvert extension would be needed for this extension would be allowed, that it would not exceed the 400 square feet allowable fill, and that a letter and simple sketch would be needed for approval. He then asked the board to see Michael Krech's memo on the costs for this work. He stated that there would also be costs for grading and rocking the trail in. He felt the cost should not exceed $500. He then showed the property, ditch, building setback and culvert location on an overhead. Marty then introduced John and Joyce Lund. Joyce told the Park Board the history of the development and explained why Parcel A and B are divided the way they are. Marty recommended to acquire the Lund property by donation. Use Dedicated Park Dollars to accotiplish legal and mechanical work. Ken asked if the approximate cost of this work would be between $4000 and $4500. Marty responded yes. Ken asked if it would be a problem to get the money from the Dedicated Park Fund. Marty didn't think it would be a problem. Ken also asked if it was high or low land. Marty said it was generally high land except where the culvert was. Ken then asked if there would be a problem extending the culvert. Marty said Kate Drury looked at it and she didn't feel it exceeded the 400 foot requirement CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MONDAY, MAY 1, 1995 before the permit requirement came into effect. Amy thank the Lund's for the generous donation to the city and said it was going to be a real benefit to the residents. Pam asked if the neighbors had been told that they were going to do this. Joyce said no. MOTION: Amy moved to entertain the Lund's generous offer and accept it as it stands. There was discussion on whether to include the use of dedicated park funds in the motion. Amy moved to entertain the Lund's generous offer and also okay the additional costs, from dedicated park funds, associated with the trail link. Sharon seconded the motion. The motion was amended and approved unanimously. Joyce wanted to know if the Board would keep them informed as to what was going to be done. Ken said this would have to go to the City Council for final approval because the Park Board is only an advisory board. UPDATES AND OLD BUSINESS SPECIAL REVENUE ACCOUNTS: Marty said at a past Park Board meeting he and Barry discussed special revenue accounts and the board said they wanted a $1000 buffer in the account. Marty explained that a fence was really needed at Rice Lake #3 field and he went before the City Council to get approval on the expenditure. The council approved the expenditure, of the special revenue dollars, but they made it very clear that this was a unique situation, a first time thing, and that they needed to work on a policy for special revenue accounts. Marty wanted the Park Board to know what happened at the Council meeting. He said this was going to have to be looked at when budget time came and if they could show a need the money may be moved to a capitol account. Ken said he couldn't see the money coming from the recreation programs going into capitol improvements now. He said the recreation program is still growing and the money needs to be put back into the programs. Marty said he agrees but he could understand why other departments feel the same way. Pam wanted to know if it was harder to get money if special revenue dollars goes into the general fund account. She felt if the Recreation Department was making the money it should stay in the department. Marty said the City Council looks at it as several departments generating income from taxpayers. vt ca.. •,4.) NJ Ls ..„ , -----c, -Z-' 1.--, ‘., , ,-- S flc- 1-` 4 RCL ... . . , . I - -- - f , - ,..) I I - 1 . ; I i , ,,-- -- - --- • /- 0 // RP66- 1 1--- -i O I __I . ----....1 R0,-01 ___•., 1 i' - i'' , _ iv —4-7 _, LT' a44 criL. Ty A..__sLiy\Ltsr L o 141-0 ARQ01,0-1/AD DvIvE, LA Ar0 BLIS _Sk\Ef").tyNNI-1 ANIcyz." Coustfq_ = -0° J Gf_i__I C)s-rif..13 8A8 AGENDA IT] Peter Kluegel, Building Official DATE May 5, 1995 Consideration of the Building De Quarter Report GRO Attached you will find a Summary of the Building Activity through the first three (3) month of 1995 as compared to the First Quarter of 1994. Adopt a motion accepting the report. 2. Return the report to staff for further CITY OF fiNO LAKs MEMORANDUM DATE: April 13, 1995 To: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Peter Kluegel, Building Official SUBJECT: First Quarter Building Report In the first three months of 1995, 63 building permits with a valuation of $4,586,944.00 were issued. This represents a decrease of 45 permits and $3,774,850.00 valuation from the first quarter of 1994. A total of 33 single family permits were issued, a decrease of 43 permits from last year. A commercial remodeling permit was issued for Millers restaurant formally, Lees of Lino, in early 1995. Residential home activity has increased. Commercial and institutional building projects are proposed at the Apollo Business Park, Minnesota Correctional Facility and Anoka County Corrections in 1995. CITY OF LINO LAKES BUILDING PERMITS - 199W 1ST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER TOTAL SINGLE 76 76 FAMILY $8,224,000.00 8,224,000.00 MULTI FAMILY COMMER- CIAL INDUSTRIAL OTHER 28 28 $137,794.00 137,794.00 TOTAL PERMITS ISSUED 104 TOTAL VALUE $8,361,794.00 * Beim •E T issiuwit CITY OF LINO LAKES BUILDING PERMITS - 1995 1ST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER TOTAL SINGLE 33 33 FAMILY $4,359,841.00 4,359,841.00 MULTI FAMILY COMMER- y 1 1 CIAL 50,000.00 50,000.00 INDUSTRIAL OTHER 29 29 $177,103.00 177,103.00 TOTAL PERMITS ISSUED 63 TOTAL VALUE $4,586,944.00 * Remodeling Lees of Lino resturant AGENDA ITEM 8 STAFF ORIGINATOR Brian Wessel DATE May 8, 1995 TOPIC Resolution recommending the city council hold a public hearing and adopt the modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District No. 1-4, Apollo Business Park OL The Economic Development Authority has authorized preparation of a modification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 in the Apollo Business Center (See attached map). This modification will provide public assistance for Blue Heron Ltd., a 20,196 square foot facility for leasable manufacturing and warehouse space in t G. M. Development portion of the business park. Once the city council sets the public hearing, Anoka County and Centennial School District will receive copies of the proposed modification for review. The public hearing is scheduled for June 12, 1995. 'TIONS: 1. Adopt the resolution recommending the city council hold a public hearing on the modification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 2. Return to staff for further consideration Option 1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-58 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-4 WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") intends to modify the plan (the "Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 ("TIF District No. 1- 4"); and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 through 469.179 (the "TIF Act") requires that the city council of the city of Lino Lakes (the "City") hold a public hearing on the modified Plan for TIF District No. 1-4, following approval thereof by the EDA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as follows: 1. The city clerk -treasurer is authorized and directed to prepare a notice for publication in the official newspaper setting a public hearing before the city council to consider this matter on June 12, 1995, at p.m. in the council chambers at city hall. The notice shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but not more than 30 days prior to the public hearing. 2. The city clerk -treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to notify Independent School District No. and Anoka County at least 30 days prior to the public hearing and to invite their comments on the modified Plan. 3. The city staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary to bring this matter before the city council at the time of the public hearing. Dated: May 8, 1995 Vernon Reinert, Mayor RHB88073 LN140-35 A 1"I"EST: Randall Schumacher, City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RHB88073 LN140-3` LOCATION 74TH ST";ECT UAP SITE J z z LIQ ST. - S.T. H (Y NO. 49 fib;-- ---' Apollo Business Pare SITE DATA ZONING LIG SITE AREA GREEN AREA -)cni T INDUSTRIAL 2.38 ACRES 26,000 S, AGENDA ITEM NO. 11A STAPP ORIGINATOR Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer DATE May 4, 1995 TOPIC Consideration of an Application for Authorization for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License, Lino Lakes Elementary Parent Advisory Group Each year the Lino Lakes Elementary Parent Advisory Group conducts one raffle to raise money for their school related projects. This is the only gambling occasion that they conduct. State Law allows non-profit organizations to apply for an exemption from obtaining a gambling license if they hold fewer than five (5) gambling occasions per year. The attached application is a formal application for exemption from obtaining a gambling license for this non-profit group. 1. Adopt a motion approving the Application for Authorization for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License. 2. Return to staff for further information. Option No. 1 LG220 (Rev. 4/'93) Minnesota Lawful Gambling Application for Authorization for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License Fill in the unshaded portions of this application for exemption and send it in at least 45 days before your gambling activity for processing. Name and Address of Organization tVH nViaHu Ubt ONLT FEE 'NIT CHK DATE / I Organization Name Street Current/previous license number Current/previous exempt number 1-1 t, ii_ ±l 4 , City L State Zip code ,11 il; County Chief Executive Officer Daytime Phone Number Type of Non. -profit Organization Treasurer Daytime Phone Number (,,) -J > (, Check the box below which indicates your type of organization ❑ Fraternal ❑ Veterans ❑ Religious Q Other non-profit Gambling Site Check the box that indicates your proof of nonprofit status and attach a copy of the proof to the application. ❑ IRS designation I Certification of good standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's office ❑ Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization (charter) Name of site where activity will take place LI.\t• l -Ci f 1( i(:(i 2)C. li( i I Street i Ctty Township r1V • l)\S';I!\ -\i1 ._ \f,C L( Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing) t `ii`f`i State MN Zip code (/' County /- 1 /1 (-/< ('.. Types of Games Game(s) roes Receipts'. Financial Report Expenses,lncluding Cost of Prizes Net profit Market: Value of Prizes (Including Donations and cash) Bingo Raffles Paddlewheels ❑ Tipboards ❑ Pull -tabs ❑ I declare all information submitted to the Gambling Control Board is true, accurate, and complete. >utor from whom gambling equipment was purchased "s Oishiutors license number 7.. i declare all financial information submitted to the Gambling Control «; Board Is true, accurate, and complete. Chief,Executive Officer's Signature Date Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment Chief Executive Officer's Signature I have received a copy of this application. This application will be reviewed by the Gambling Control Board and will become effective 30 days from the date of receipt by the city or county, unless the local urdt of government passes a resolution to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received by the Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the date tilled in below. Cities o1 the first dass have 60 days in which to disallow the activity. City or County Township City of county name ^� SIgnature gpers 4 receiving Jajpplic(aC"(7 Jf 1.4 Tale This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. Township name Signature of person receiving application Date received Title fee and copy with $25 permit of proof of nonprofit status to: Gambling Control Board 1711 W. County Rd. B, Ste. 300 S. Roseville, MN 55113 Date Received Township is ❑ organized ❑ unorganized' ❑ unincorporated` Attach letter White - Original Yellow - Board returns to Organization to complete shaded areas I, Joan Anderson Growe, Secretary of State of Minnesota, do certify that: Articles of Incorporation, duly signed and acknowledged under oath, have been filed on this date in the Office of the Secretary of State, for the incorporation of the following corporation, under and in accordance with the provisions of the chapter of Minnesota Statutes listed below. This corporation is now legally organized under the laws of Minnesota. Corporate Name: Lino Lakes Elementary Parent Advisory Board This certificate has been is; u`d c;; 05/26/1994. AGENDA ITEM NO 11B STAFF ORIGINATOR Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer DATE May 5, 1995 TOPIC Consideration of an Application for a Block Party for Birch Wood Acres Subdivision Attached you will find an application for a block party for the Birch Wood Subdivision and a map showing the location of th party in the River Birch Place cul-de-sac east of West Shadow Lake�Drive. Attached to the application is a petition signed by all of the homeowners on the east portion of River Birch Place. This application has been reviewed by the PublicWorks Superintendent and he has found no problems with the party.; Police Chief Pecchia will provide his comments regarding this request at the Council meeting Monday evening. Providing that a positive response will be provided by Police Chief Pecchia, I would recommend approval of the block party as requested. 1. Adopt a motion approving the block party provided that Police Chief Pecchia recommends approval. 2. Return the matter to staff for further information. Option ,No. 1 DATE BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION CITY OF LINO LAKES RECFIVEC) APR 2 5 1995 ^ITY OF LINO LAKES The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as a request to hold a block party on the public right-of-way. (�,, NAME OF APPLICANT : �fe Ca ss ADDRESS : Kidn'-ili' kikr (A: L. D ''' 1-4)(1(-- Lacs HOME TELEPHONE NO. : +15'3 _ 502. WORK TELEPHONE NO. : LOCATION OF BLOCK PARTY (Street name & location, intersection to 13-iMitt, 4Th 1tcreS intersection) iAitr f 11-t1- £a -de- s, -t c :SiN (LA,' LCU -1)r-, PURPOSE OF PARTY . 0 ( >4 j �1C1WV: {j?'� C'�i � ✓ Y ' aC CA LLL g(A)1(3 -9jL44- t41 5 .ftY Peg DATE AND HOURS OF PARTY:t td� eed 1O.4, i tLf-7 p` ol, P.M.) IT IS HEREBY AGREED: The applicants agree to abide by all rules set forth below, together with all ordinances and regulations which may be imposed governing such activities. G Petition. All residents living on the street or block in which the activity is planned, must sign on the last page of this application indicating they consent or do not object to the block party. 2. Barricades. Applicants shall be responsible for placement, maintenance and removal of barricades to be provided by the City in proper locations, such barricades to be left by the City on one corner of the block. Barricades shall be placed at either end of the street in which the block party is to take place. PAGE -1- ``S 1. etc. BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION (Continued) 3. Traffic. The total roadway portion of the right-of-way shall not be blocked; at least a 10 foot aisle shall be kept open at all time to permit passage of vehicles of residents of the block and emergency or other authorized or necessary vehicles to enter or exit. 4. Surface of Street. No materials of any type (such as powder, sawdust, etc.) shall be placed on the public right-of-way which will create a hazard. 5. Supervision. Applicants shall maintain adult supervision at all times during the activity. 6. Clean-up. Applicants shall provide trash receptacles to prevent as much littering as possible. Applicants shall be responsible for the pick-up or disposal of trash and garbage following the event. Such clean-up shall be completed within 24 hours after termination of the activity, but in no event later than midnight the following day of the block party. 7. Speakers. No loud speaker system shall produce sounds audible outside the areas designated for the block party. PAGE -2- NAME PETITION (Residents Consenting) ADDRESS (061 j),it?e' 6 r C.P(0,,ce_ 44/2 2/4;71 Are 67-9 nuc (uct 3 V)Lrue—h NtUic A/i2/e TELE. NO. S� 77 t/5/6-66,/ c-ec, 76-36 J t- :AF /rte -181-0313 L q "4`5ct j at c 6-11SCI CI I2(c'f r /3I1 � 9ttkAAAJ?1,62v.Y41.7 67 3 i it P/ I 1163-09 a 1/61 0 33g I Name of Organization (If applicable) Checked by: Police Department Public Works Department BIRCH WOOD ACRES • KINGFISHER COURT rya } b 1i 009 v4 1 r31 1,3x& 63/G'. 4/9 L 4177 SITE OF PARTY PIIASE 1 PIIASE 2 April 24, 1995 The Honorable Vernon Reinert and Members of the City Council City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Office of ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF LARRY PODANY 325 Jackson Street - Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2210 612-323-5000 Fax 612-422-7503 Dear Mayor Reinert and; Councilmembers: /36€ID A #//e. The week of May 7-13 is National Correctional Officer Week, and May 13-20 is Law Enforcement Memorial Week. To celebrate both of these special events, we are planning an Open House on Monday, May 15th from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. That afternoon is set aside for law enforcement and community leaders to join us. You and your staff are cordially invited to come and tour the Sheriff's Office facilities. There will be outdoor displays of vehicles and equipment, including the mobile operations trailer, all terrain vehicles, speedboat and Zodiac rescue boat, underwater recovery equipment, demonstrations of S.W.A.T. tactical equipment and a dive display. We are planning tours in the Jail Division, including booking, visiting and a 2 -cell unit. Tours will also be conducted through the Administration and Support & Services Divisions, and CID Division which will, include the computerized polygraph equipment and Crime Lab equipment. We think this will be an exciting event, and a great opportunity for you to learn firsthand what services the Anoka County Sheriff's Office provides to the community. It is your support that makes it possible for the Anoka County Sheriff's Office to be recognized as a leader and visionary in providing professional law enforcement services to all Anoka County citizens. Please come and join us in honoring all law enforcement and detention personnel. Sin rely, Lawrence W. Podany Sheriff LWP:jI Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer