Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/22/1995 Council Packet6:00 P.M. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday May 22, 1995 6:30 P.M. - Call to Order and Roll Call SCPt4t4O - Setting the Agenda: Are There Any Items to be Added or Deleted from the Agenda? CONSENT AGENDA Consideration of Minutes: 1. Council Meeting, May 8, 1995 2. Council Meeting, March 13, 1995 Consideration of First Amendment to the Blue Yonder Balloon Company Contract • vv.'!" REGULAR AGENDA Open Mike A. 20/20 Vision Update, Kim Sullivan B. Ed DeLaforest, OSM Y\,;471,1(/ t Consideration of Disbursements: May 22, 1995 Centennial Fire District AGENDA to 6:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING, Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7, Not -Tec Systems, Inc., Brian Wessel Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 63 Approving the Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 4. 6:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING, Consider Making an Improvement, Well Site No. 4, Clearwater Creek Subdivision, John Powell 5. Planning and Zoning Report, Mary Kay Wyland Minor Subdivision, Blue Heron LTD, Apollo Business Center Site Plan Review, Blue Heron LTD, Apollo Business enter Site Plan Review, Street Site Plan Review, Fourth Avenue Willow Ponds Senior Cottages, Elm Lino Lakes Correction Facility, 7545 Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Rehbein Transit, 6298 Hodgson Road Variance, Bill Green, 6693 East Shadow Lake Drive Consideration of the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 10 - 95 Authorizing Sale of City of Lino Lakes Land in the Apollo Business Park to Mag -Con, Inc., Brian Wessel City f• City Attorney's Report, Bill Hawkins Consideration of Approving a Purchase Agreement for Well Site No. 3, LaMotte Property, Birch Street Engineer's Report, John Powell Consideration of Bids for Hodgson Road Watermain Improvement, Resolution No. 95 - 49 Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 61 Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Municipal Well No. 3 PAGE 2 AGENDA C. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 62 Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for the Black Duck Pumping Station D. Consideration of Change Order No. 1, Country Lakes Estates E. Consideration of Approval of the Metropolitan Council/Lino Lakes Conveyance Agreement 9. Old Business 10. New Business A. Consideration of Classification and Sale of Tax Forfeit Lands, Marilyn Anderson B. Consideration of an Arbor Month Proclamation, Randy Schumacher 11. CLOSED SESSION, Discussion of Local 49 Labor Agreement �i/a3 [ArS-61AC f -y3- - 5119/95, 12:00 Nona 0,AA (0A A - 3i000 PAGE 3 COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 8, 1995 iEMBEP .................... ................... .................... Staff members present: City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; Acting City Engineer, John Powell; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; Planning Coordinator, Mary Kay Wyland; Parks and Recreation Director, Marty Asleson; 20/20 Coordinator, Kim Sullivan; Assistant to the City Administrator, Dan Tesch; Building Inspector, Peter Kluegel; City Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. SETTING THE AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Neal moved to approve the consent agenda as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. ITEM DISPOSITION Council Minutes, April 24, 1995 Approved Council Work Session, March 22, 1995 Approved Council Board of Review, April 17, 1995 Approved REGULAR AGENDA OPEN MIKE 20/20 Vision Update, Kim Sullivan - Ms. Sullivan thanked the City Council, Advisory Group Leaders and staff who attended the mid - PAGE 1 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 term forum on Saturday, April 29, 1995. The purpose of the mid- term forum was to share ideas and provide a view point as to where each group is headed. She noted that the project is on track, and the groups have done a good job of "visioning". Ms. Sullivan noted that "visioning" is not what anyone expected. "Visioning" is not problem solving or process development but is a statement of desired outcome. At this point, "visioning" is from the citizens standpoint. It is also the first step in the planning process. This step will be finished at the end of May or the middle of June when completed recommendations from each group are given to the City Council. The next step in the process is implementation. The official document will be given to the City Council. The information in the document should be reviewed by the City Council and a determination should be made on how the statements can and should fit with what is currently being done by the City Council. This is the point where the staff does an indepth review. Does the City currently have these things in place or are there adjustments to be made? The process will move from a citizen focus to a city focus and will try to combine the two (2) visions. Ms. Sullivan noted that there is some confusion over what are each others roles. She used an example from the Growth Planning Advisory group. They have a vision, "for Lino Lakes to be recognized with closely knit neighborhoods, citizens who work closely with government and be an environmental friendly place to come home to". Ms. Sullivan said this should give City staff a focus. She explained that this is what the citizens are looking for and while it may not be possible or even probable to put into place all of the action plans that are being devised, this is the way the citizens feel the action "visions" should be implemented but not the only way. They understand very clearly that there may be reasons why things they have recommended cannot be implemented the way they have recommended them. However, it is important for the City Council and staff to understand the intent of the vision so in time they can be implemented. Ms. Sullivan read the recommendation from the Growth Planning Advisory Group, "the City should foster a sense of community through careful planning and design. In addition, the City should promote a sense of identity that captures the unique attributes that Lino Lakes has to offer within the community". The action list for this "vision" includes, create and maintain cooperation between the City and various service or civic organizations. Ms. Sullivan explained that when the City receives this document, an analysis should be made to determine whether or not there is a process to do what this advisory group PAGE 2 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 is requesting or does the City have to implement some other measure. Council and staff should ask what is it that the citizens want from this? Ms. Sullivan gave an example of how the City is already implementing this step. She referred to the Economic Development Assistant who is taking a very active role in moving the Chamber of Commerce forward so that it will become a real support for the City and the businesses in the City and the surrounding communities. Ms. Sullivan explained that from now on the City Council will be getting more information from the advisory groups. The focus will be shifting from the citizens and their "visioning" to how will their recommendations be implemented. The Council and staff will take time to determine if the recommendations are already implemented or what does the City need to do differently, if anything. "Visioning" is not a report card. Because there are recommendations in the visioning statements and the City has some of the processes currently in place, it does not mean that the City is not doing what the citizens want them to do. It means that the citizens are asking the City to recognize that there are two (2) very similar trains of thought. Ms. Sullivan noted that the citizens looked at what was in place for economic development. They are very supportive of what plans are in place and what direction the City is headed. Although they may make recommendations or additions or support the development process, she asked that the Council understand that the citizens do not feel that the City is doing a bad job. It means that it is important enough to the citizens to make it a highlight of their recommendations. Ms. Sullivan provided copies of the agendas for the advisory groups so that if the City Council and staff found a particular issue that they would like to come and listen to they could adjust their schedules. At this point the focus and responsibilities will be shifting from the citizens groups to City staff. Ms. Sullivan will be working more closely with staff and Council to help them to analyze the vision statements according to what is currently being done and to look at ways to implement the recommendation or highlight them. It is fully expected that there will be comments from the City Council such as how supportive the 20/20 Visioning groups are of the City Council and highlight some things that could be changed. Ms. Sullivan felt that the citizen recommendations are well considered and very common sensed. She said the citizens have put a lot of work into the "visioning" statements and they should be a valuable instrument in letting the City Council know what the citizen direction is and how closely the City fits this direction. The purpose is to see that the City Council, staff PAGE 3 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 and citizens are all on the same track and have the same picture of where the City is headed. Once this is determined, then the City Council and staff have to move to the balance of the planning process. City Council and staff will look at department plans and how departments prioritized the issues addressed in the 20/20 Visioning. Ms. Sullivan invited staff and City Council to attend the meetings as visitors. She felt that attendance at these meetings will give a better understanding of what the citizens are expecting and allow opportunity for feedback. Ms. Sullivan said that when something is said that is not understood, the City Council and/or staff can come to her or Dan Tesch to be sure that the communication is there. The advisory groups are in the middle of a focus shift and are on track and moving forward. The "visions" will be finalized in the next two (2) weeks and work will done on the final presentation to the City Council. Ms. Sullivan encouraged the City Council and staff to let her or Mr. Tesch know if they have any questions or concerns. Mayor Reinert thanked Ms. Sullivan for her report. CONSIDERATION OF DISBURSEMENTS: April 30, 1995 - Council Member Elliott moved to approve the disbursements as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. May 8, 1995 - Council Member Kuether moved to approve the disbursements as presented. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District - Council Member Elliott moved to approve the disbursements as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A NORTH CENTRAL CABLE TV REPORT, DAN TESCH Mr. Tesch presented the annual report for the North Central Suburban Cable Communications Commission (NCSCCC). He explained that the report contained information regarding projects that were completed in 1994 and statistics regarding the number of subscribers in Lino Lakes as well as the number of potential subscribers and franchise fees paid to the City. Mr. Tesch noted some projects and issues that were considered during 1994. These include: PAGE 4 COUNCIL MEETING - Rate Regulation - - Telecommunication MAY 8, 1995 The second round of FCC rate regulations were implemented which had the direct affect of reducing subscribers rates. Legislation - A bill was introduced into the Legislature which would have regulated use of municipal rights-of-way by new communication providers. This legislation did not pass in 1994 but will be re- introduced. - Transfer of Community Programming - The NCSCCC has begun negotiations with Meredith Cable to establish a non-profit corporation which would oversee community programming. Mr. Tesch further explained the proposed telecommunation legislation. Telephone communications are now able to provide cable service to homes through the telephone lines presently in place. They are not affected by community programming and do not pay municipal franchise fees. The telephone is basic and is needed, however, a cable company is a for profit business providing entertainment and goes through municipal rights-of-way. Therefore, if telephone companies are going to provide services other than basic telephone, there is the need to re-evaluate to determine if telephone companies should be classified in the same manner as cable TV. Mr. Tesch explained that the NCSCCC is investigating whether they should be taking responsibility for community programming from the cable TV company. The cable companies are required to provide this service but do not want the responsibility. NCSCCC feels that they may be able to do a better job of community programming and have decided to establish a nonprofit corporation in case that NCSCCC decides to follow through on this program. Council Member Kuether asked how many subscribers does Meredith Cable serve at this time. Mr. Tesch said about 25,000. Council Member Kuether noted that cable companies who have less than 15,000 customers are no longer bound by some legislation passed earlier. Mr. Tesch noted other savings contained in the earlier legislation; 1) cable company no longer can charge for cable T V remote control devices, 2) cannot charge for additional outlets in the home, and 3) reduced some costs for maintenance and repair service. Mayor Reinert thanked Mr. Tesch for his report. PAGE 5 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PLANNING AND ZONING REPORT, MARY RAY WYLAND Consideration of Preliminary Plat for Behm's Century Farms - Ms. Wyland used the overhead project and explained that the City Council reviewed this request at the April 24, 1995 City Council meeting. The request involves a 105 single family lot subdivision, a rezone from Rural to Single -Family (R-1) for a portion of the Lino Air Park lots that are intended to be included in this subdivision, and a Planned Development Overly (PDO) for the Lino Air Park lots. At the Council meeting there were several questions raised concerning the subdivision and PDO for the Lino Air Park lots. Since the meeting, staff has reviewed the Council concerns with the developer and the following paragraphs outline the resolution to the concerns. Concerning the temporary cul-de-sac at the end of the 1st addition, the developer has decided to increase the 1st addition by two (2) lots which will allow a temporary cul-de-sac to be constructed at an intersection. This arrangement meets the requirements outlined in the staff report of April 7, 1995 and concurs with the Planning and Zoning Board recommendation. The developer has discussed two (2) options pertaining to the "abut" lot detailed in the April 7, 1995 planning report. Option No. 1 would involve the placement of restrictive covenants on the two (2) corner lots which would insure their orientation to the north, rather than the east or west, thus eliminating the "abut" lot problem of back yards abutting side yards. Option No. 2 would eliminate the "abut" lot completely, however, this option is less desirable from the developers standpoint. The third concern expressed by the City Council involved the development of protective covenants on the Lino Air Park lots. Staff has completed a detailed review of the proposed covenants with the developer. A copy of the covenants were included with the City Council packets for their review. It is recommended that the covenants be made a part of the subdivision approval. Prior to the final plat, staff will insure that the covenants are recorded with the Lino Air Park lots and made a permanent part of the development agreement. Ms. Wyland recommended that the City Council approve the preliminary plat as shown on the overhead projector with conditions outlined in the April 7, 1995 planning report which include the revised restrictive covenants, a revised plat indicating a north orientation with deed restrictions on the lots east and west of the "abut" lot, and the construction of a temporary cul-de-sac at the north/west terminus of the first addition. PAGE 6 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 Council Kuether referred to the restrictive covenants and read Item No. 8, "the hangars are for the exclusive use of the property owner for storage of airplanes". She did not feel this covenant was necessary and was too restrictive for people who would be second or third home buyers and do not have airplanes. Council Member Kuether noted that another restrictive covenant requires that the hangars not be used for commercial purposes. Council Member Kuether referred to the restrictive covenants and read No. 11, "property owners may be allowed two (2) years from occupancy to construct a hangar". Ms. Wyland explained that this covenant was added so that airplanes would not be stored outside for more than two (2) years. Council Member Kuether suggested that this covenant be tied to the purchase of the airplane rather than the construction of the hangar. She noted again that some buyers may not have airplanes. Ms. Wyland suggested that the covenant read, "property owners may be allowed two (2) years from the purchase of an airplane to construct a hangar". Council Member Kuether agreed. Council Member Neal asked if a street will be constructed from Sunset Road to Lake Drive. Mr. Powell explained that the line that Council Member Neal is referring to is an easement for a drainage ditch. Ms. Wyland explained that Thomas Street will never be extended to the west because of a large drainage ditch. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the preliminary plat with conditions outlined in the April 7, 1995 planning report which include the revised restrictive covenants, a revised plat indicating a north orientation with deed restrictions on lots east and west of the "abut" lot, and the construction of a temporary cul-de-sac at the north/west terminus of the first addition, with the revision of restrictive covenant No. 8 to read, "property owners may be allowed two (2) years from purchase of airplane to construct a hangar" and revision of restrictive covenant No. 11 beginning with "property owners" to read, "property owners may be allowed two (2) years from the purchase of an airplane to construct a hangar". Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 07 - 95 Rezone from Rural (R) to Single Family Residential (R-1), Behm's Century Farms - Ms. Wyland explained that the City Council approved the FIRST READING of this ordinance at their April 24, 1995 meeting. The rezone pertains to Lots 10 through 16, Block 2 of the existing Lino Air Park North plat and is necessary to facilitate the development of Behm's Century Farms, first and second additions. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the SECOND READING of PAGE 7 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 Ordinance No. 07 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 07 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 08 - 95, Planned Development Overlay (PDO) for Lino Air Park Lots - Ms. Wyland explained that the City Council approved the FIRST READING of this ordinance at their April 24, 1995 meeting. The ordinance places a PDO onto a portion of the Lino Air Park North plat that is being incorporated into the Behm's Century Farms development. The PDO will contain all provisions approved in review of the preliminary plat. Council Member Bergeson asked if this action makes these lots essentially the same as the existing Air Park lots. Ms. Wyland explained that the lots in Behm's Century Farms will be smaller and the PDO will place more restrictive conditions on them. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 08 - 95 and dispense with the reading, rezoning the Behm's Century Farms Air Park lots to R-1 with a PDO. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 08 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, JOHN POWELL Consideration of a Petition Requesting an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Trapper's Crossing - Mr. Powell explained that the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) received a petition requesting that an EAW be prepared for the Trapper's Crossing subdivision. The petition was forwarded to the City of Lino Lakes on March 29, 1995 for the City to decide on the need for an EAW. The petition was referred to SEH, the consultant assigned to this project, to make a recommendation regarding the petition. SEH has determined that preparation of an EAW for this project is not mandatory. As the project is also not specifically exempted, the City must decide in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Part 4410.1100, Subpart 6, whether or not an EAW is to be prepared. Based on the SEH review of the petition it appears that the petition fails to demonstrate the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects. Therefore, preparation of an EAW is not required. Regardless of the City Council's action on this matter, the concerns noted by the nearby residents at the May 3, 1995 City Council work session will be forwarded to the developer for consideration during final design of the improvements. The PAGE 8 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 developer should also be directed to monitor the drainfield at 6275 Holly Drive to determine if the subdivision improvements are rendering it unusable. Mr. Powell noted that Mr. Rocky Keehn and Ms. Bettendorf who prepared the review letter from SEH are in the audience and are available to answer questions. Council Member Neal asked who would pay for the EAW if the City Council would require preparation of one. Mr. Powell explained that if an EAW would be prepared, the developer would pay the cost. Council Member Elliott moved to deny the EAW petition for the reasons presented in the SEH letter to Ms. Wyland dated April 20, 1995. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive - Mr. Lyden said he is concerned because this process started March 29, 1995 when the EQB sent a letter to the City. The reason the citizens had concerns initially is because Trapper's Crossing has been in process for over a year and yet the residents have not seen any detail work on the water run-off effects. Mr. Lyden noted that this plat still has not been approved by Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). He said that the residents concerns led them to petition for the EAW. Mr. Lyden referred to the March 29th letter, item No. 4, which states that the City has 30 working days to determine if the petition is to be approved or denied. He expressed concern regarding the process. SEH sent a letter to the City on April 20, 1995 and it was not considered by the City Council until the May 3, 1995 work session. In the meantime, citizens obtained a copy of the SEH letter and appeared at the May 3, 1995 meeting to ask questions about its contents. At that meeting the citizens were told that the City Council was just now reviewing the letter and would be addressing it this evening. Mr. Lyden explained that the deadline for action on the EAW petition was this evening and asked when was there any opportunity for citizens to review the report with the City Council so that an amicable decision could be made? Could the SEH response have been reviewed earlier to provide more dialogue and a better understanding could have been reached? Mayor Reinert noted that at the work session, Council Members were asked to contact Mr. Powell if they had any concerns or questions about the SEH letter and recommendation. Mr. Powell explained that at the work session, he commented that the citizens received a copy of the SEH letter before the City Council did. He felt that this was inappropriate because PAGE 9 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 telephone calls would be generated and City Council would be caught uninformed. Mr. Powell explained that when staff is assigned a particular task, they prefer discussing the task with the City Council at a meeting rather than just handing them a document. The first opportunity that staff had to review the SEH letter with the City Council and answer questions was at the May 3, 1995 Council work session. Mr. Lyden said that some of the citizens feel that it is inappropriate that a time constraint be put on this situation because it does not leave an opportunity for the citizens to have any input or have a good dialogue. Mr. Lyden referred to Mr. Powell's "green sheet" and read the sentence that recommended that the developer be directed to monitor the septic system at 6275 Holly Drive, his home. He felt that this was a strong statement. Mr. Lyden asked Mr. Hawkins who is responsible for seeing that the developer follows through on this direction? What happens if there is an impact on the drainfield. Mr. Powell's sentence does not carry much weight. What does monitor mean? Mayor Reinert explained that Mr. Lyden brought this matter to the City Council's attention at the work session and this is addressed as a curtesy to Mr. Lyden. Mr. Lyden asked who is going to monitor the septic system and at what cost to whom? Mr. Powell read the entire sentence in his "green sheet" and explained that it is the developers responsibility to specifically monitor the drainfield periodically and especially to get a good look at what is there before any development begins. Periodic inspection should continue particularly after significant grading of the ponds and outlets takes place. Mr. Powell said that the developer will ultimately have to deal with any adverse affects if any occurs. He suggested that the City Council motion should include language indicating that the developer will be doing the monitoring and repair/replacement at his cost, if adverse affects occur. Council Member Kuether asked if there should be a signed document stating that Mr. Lyden is giving authority for the developer to enter his property to monitor and repair/replace if necessary? Mr. Lyden said that Mr. Hokanson has access to his property to monitor the drainfield throughout the life of the improvements. Mr. Lyden asked if the developer has full responsibility for monitoring and repair if there is a failure? Mayor Reinert said yes but strongly urged that the system be inspected prior to development, during development and after the development is completed. Mr. Lyden noted that one reason for requesting the EAW was to PAGE 10 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 address the control of the volume of water leaving the development. The citizens feel that since there is no control, a lake could be created in this area. Mr. Powell explained that the general requirement is that the rate of run-off is controlled but the volume is not. With the size of existing wetlands, water bodies and downstream waterways, SEH's review has indicated that there is no concern regarding the volume. Mr. Powell felt that SEH has responded completely to the concerns raised in the petition and were very thorough in reviewing the hydrology in relation to specific questions. Mayor Reinert noted that the SEH letter outlines the basis on which ponds are placed in any development throughout the City. Council Member Bergeson asked Mr. Powell to comment on when the preliminary plat will go to RCWD. Mr. Powell said that it should go to the next meeting this month. At this time a permit has not been issued. Council Member Bergeson noted that there is a motion on the floor dealing with only the petition for the EAW. He suggested that after the Council takes action on this motion, another motion should be introduced instructing staff to forward the concerns of the residents to the developer. Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. Council Member Bergeson moved to direct City staff to forward to the developer the concerns raised at the work session and this evening and also directing the developer to monitor the drainfield at 6275 Holly Drive to determine if there is any affect on the drainfield at the developers cost. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Powell noted that staff will be notifying the EQB and will take the necessary steps to publish the decision of the City Council. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 59 Restricting Parking on North Road - Mr. Powell explained that in order to allow the intersection of North Road and Lake Drive to function properly, parking cannot be allowed on North Road. The banning of parking on North Road must be formally approved by the City Council, with a copy of the resolution forwarded to MnDOT, to facilitate final approval of the plans by the State. The construction documents include installation of the no parking signs as part of the Lake Drive (CSAH 23)/Hodgson Road (Highway 49) project. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 59 as presented. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion PAGE 11 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 59 can be found at the end of these minutes. PARK BOARD REPORT, MARTY ASLESON Consideration of a Donation for Park Trails in Shenandoah Subdivision - Mr. Asleson explained that Mr. and Mrs. Lund wish to donate the westerly 32 feet x 133 feet of their property at 480 Arrowhead Drive to the City for park trail location purposes. There is an existing ditch which physically separates this 32 foot wide strip of land from the balance of their 114 foot lot (total frontage of 146 feet) making maintenance difficult. Mr. and Mrs. Lund are willing to donate this property to the City in exchange for the following items: 1. A new certificate of survey of each new parcel indicating the new property line. The approximate cost of the survey is $400.00. 2. An appraisal of theproperty to facilitate a partial mortgage release. The approximate cost of the appraisal is $400.00. 3. A partial mortgage release from the lender. cost of the mortgage release is $250.00. 4. Miscellaneous Anoka County recording fees. cost of the recording fees is $25.00. The approximate The approximate Other associated costs with this project include: 1. Trail preparation, concrete pipe extension (approximately 30 feet), 100 cubic yards of fill for the ditch crossing. The approximate cost of these items is $3,000.00. 2. Trail grading and placement of base rock. The approximate cost would be $800.00. The total project cost is approximately $5,000.00. The Park Board considered the donation at the May 1, 1995 meeting and made a motion recommending approval and use of Park Dedicated Funds to accept and expedite the project. Council Member Kuether question the need for a mortgage release which would cost approximately $250.00. Mr. Hawkins explained that this is not unusual because lenders do not want to PAGE 12 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 jeopardize their security (property). Council Member Elliott moved to approve the Park Boards motion as presented. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENTS FIRST OU RTER REPORT, PETER KLUEGEL Mr. Kluegel presented his Building Activity report for the first three (3) months of 1995. There were 63 building permits issued during the first quarter of 1995 with a valuation of $4,586,944.00. This represents a decrease of 45 permits and $3,774,850.00 of valuation from the first quarter of 1994. A total of 33 single family home permits were issued and this represents a decrease of 43 permits issued in 1994. A commercial remodeling permit was issued to Miller's on. Main restaurant, formally Lee's of Lino Lakes. Mr. Kluegel noted that residential home activity has increased early in the second quarter. Commercial and institutional building projects are proposed in the Apollo Business Park, at the Minnesota Correctional facility and at the Anoka County Corrections facility in 1995. Mayor Reinert noted that new home construction is down significantly from last year. Council Member Kuether moved to accept the Building Activity report. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 58 CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) DISTRICT 1- 4, BRIAN WESSEL Mr. Wessel used the overhead projector to show the proposed location for Blue Heron Ltd. in the Apollo Business Center. He explained that the Economic Development Authority (EDA) has authorized preparation of a modification of TIF District No. 1-4 in the Apollo Business Center. The modification will provide public assistance for Blue Heron LTD., a 20,196 square foot facility for leasable manufacturing and warehouse space in the G.M. Development portion of the Business Center. Once the City Council sets the public hearing, Anoka County and the Centennial School District will receive copies of the proposed modification for review. The public hearing is scheduled for 6:30, June 12, 1995. PAGE 13 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 Mr. Wessel noted that construction is scheduled for the first week in July, 1995. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 58 call a hearing for the modification of TIF Financing District No. 1-4. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 58 can be found at the end of these minutes. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT, BILL HAWKINS Consideration of Approving a Purchase Agreement for Well Site No. 3, LaMotte Property, Birch Street - Mr. Hawkins explained that he met with Mr. and Mrs. LaMotte just prior to the meeting this evening. The LaMotte's have proposed a slight change in location of the well site. The proposed change should be discussed with the consulting engineer on this project. Mr. Hawkins recommended that the matter be tabled until the May 22, 1995 Council meeting. Council Member Elliott moved to table action on this matter until the next City Council meeting. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. NEW BUSINESS Consideration of an Application for Authorization for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License, Lino Lakes Elementary Parent Advisory Group - Mrs. Anderson explained that each year the Lino Lakes Elementary Parent Advisory Group conducts one raffle to raise money for their school related projects. This is the only gambling occasion that they conduct. State Law allows non-profit organizations to apply for an exemption from obtaining a gambling license if they hold fewer than five (5) gambling occasions per year. A copy of the Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License was included in the City Council packets for their review. Council Member Bergeson moved to approve the Application for Authorization for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of an Application for a Block Party for Birch Wood PAGE 14 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 Acres - Mrs. Anderson explained that she has received an application for a block party for the east portion of River Birch Place cul-de-sac for June 11, 1995. Attached to the application was a petition signed by all of the homeowners on this portion of the street. The application was reviewed by the Public Works Supervisory and the Chief of Police. They have indicated that there are no problems with the request. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the application for a block party of the east portion of the River Birch Place cul-de- sac. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. National Correctional Officer Week - Mayor Reinert read a letter received from Anoka County Sheriff Lawrence Podany inviting the City Council and staff to an open house on Monday, May 15, 1995 from 1:00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. REMINDER, Council Team Building Session, Tuesday, May 16, 1995, 8:30 A.M., Wargo Nature Center. Council Member Bergeson moved to adjourn at 7:37 P.M. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Aye. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a regular Council meeting held on May 22, 1995. Marilyn G. Anderson, Vernon F. Reinert, Clerk -Treasurer Mayor PAGE 15 Council Member Elliott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 7-95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B1 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM RURAL (R) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: 1. Ordinance No. B1 of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 13, 1992 is hereby amended by rezoning from Rural (R) to Single Family Residential (R-1), pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: All of lots 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 2, Lino Air Park North lying in Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota including that part of Thomas Street adjacent to said lots. 11. Save as above amended, said ordinance No. B1 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 8th day of May, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Ordinance No. 7-95 page 2 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: Neal Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Kuether its adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 8-95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B1 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO R-1 WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) (BEHM'S AIR PARK LOTS). The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: /. Ordinance No. B1 of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 13, 1992 is hereby amended by rezoning to R-1 with a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) (Behm's Air Park Lots), pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: That part of lots 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 2, Lino Air Park North lying in Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of lot 10, thence westerly along the north line of lot 10 a distance of 33.07 feet to the point of Beginning. Thence along an assumed bearing of South 31 degrees 41 minutes 54.5 seconds West, a distance of 351.89 feet; thence South 87 degrees 35 minutes 09.2 seconds West, a distance of 646.67 feet; thence South 78 degrees 03 minutes 47.4 seconds West, a distance of 181.09 feet; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 41.8 seconds West, a distance of 170.00 feet to a point of the west line of lot 16, Block 2, a distance of 312.00 feet southerly of the northwest corner of lot 16, Block 2, Lino Air Park North therein terminating; said described parcel containing 7.403 acres more or less. /1. Save as above amended, said ordinance No. B1 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 8th day f -May, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn . Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Ordinance No. 8-95 page 2 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-58 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-4 WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") intends to modify the plan (the "Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 ("TIF District Na. 1- 4"); and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 through 469.179 (the "TIF Act") requires that the city council of the city of Lino Lakes (the "City") hold a public hearing on the modified Plan for TIF District No. 1-4, following approval thereof by the EDA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as follows: 1. The city clerk -treasurer is authorized and directed to prepare a notice for publication in the official newspaper setting a public hearing before the city council to consider this matter on June 12, 1995, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers at city hall. The notice shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but not more than 30 days prior to the public hearing. 2. The city clerk -treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to notify Independent School District No. 12 and Anoka County at least 30 days prior to the public hearing and to invite their comments on the modified Plan. 3. The city staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary to bring this matter before the city council at the time of the public hearing. Dated: May 8, 1995 ernon Reinert, Mayor RHB88073 LN140-35 ATTEST: Randall Schumacher, City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. and the following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RHB88073 LN140-3E LOCATION MAP 74T- S7atCT SITE LL..O 57. - 5 T. 1M r .40. E 9 /, / / / ZONIN G SITE AREA GREEN AREA Apollo Business Pare SITE DATA LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 2,38 ACRES 26,000.SQFt Council Member Kuether moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution and CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 — 59 RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING ON NORTH ROAD BETWEEN LAKEVIEW AVENUE AND LAKE DRIVE (COUNTY ROAD #23) WHEREAS: the City of Lino Lakes planned the improvement of North Road, and; WHEREAS: the City will be expending State Funds on the improvement of this roadway, and; WHEREAS: this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, and approval of the proposed construction must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: The City of Lino Lakes shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of North Road between Lakeview Avenue and Lake Drive (County Road #23) at all times. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this th day of May, 1995. =1 i Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn/G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 13, 1995 Staff members present: City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; Acting City Engineer, John Powell; Planning Consultant, Mary Kay Wyland; Fire District Chief, Milo Bennett; Police Chief, David Pecchia; 20/20 Vision Facilitator, Kim Sullivan; Finance Director, Mary Vaske; City Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. Mayor Reinert noted that agenda item No. Al, Minutes of February 1, 1995 Work Session are not ready for Council action. This item will be delayed until the March 27, 1995 Council meeting. STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS, MAYOR REINERT Mayor Reinert presented his State of the City Address. A copy of his text is attached to these minutes. OPEN MIKE 20/20 Vision Update, Kim Sullivan - Ms. Sullivan gave a brief update on this project. She pointed out an "update board" that will show what is next on the agenda for the 20/20 Vision. Ms. Sullivan explained that the Park and Recreation Group met on Saturday and toured three (3) community centers, Maplewood, Shoreview and New Brighton. The consensus of the group was that the Shoreview community center would provide a good balanced setting for the entire family. The Park and Recreation group also liked the "campus" style of construction. The city hall was attached to the community center. This group will be meeting every Wednesday at the city hall. Next Saturday the Economic Development and Environmental groups will start their 20/20 Vision process. They will meet and board a PAGE 1 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 bus and tour Lino Lakes. These two (2) groups will look at the way the City is zoned, where different developments are under construction and look at the environmental situation in the City and the impact of the Rice Creek Regional Park. This tour will point out the boundaries of the City and how it is divided by the Regional Park and the City of Centerville. Next week the School advisory group will meet. Mr. Tesch has contacted the school districts. It appears that there will be meetings with each school district as well as panel discussions with them. Ms. Sullivan noted that the citizens have many concerns regarding the growth of the City and the inability of the school systems to keep up with the pace. They want an open dialogue with the school districts to be sure that the quality of education is maintained in Lino Lakes. Ms. Sullivan explained that there will be no advisory groups for such issues as communications and responsive government. She said that she felt that the staff is dedicated, and has been very supportive and helpful with the 20/20 Vision project. Ms. Sullivan felt that the staff was excited about the project. Ms. Sullivan explained that she has discussed with staff the concern regarding communications. Staff has assisted her in developing a citizens library. The library will contain items that citizens usually request. Citizens will be able to check out any item in the library. This should help citizens understand how and why city government does the things they do. All items in the library will be available in the next couple of weeks. Ms. Sullivan explained that the citizens wanted more communication from the City about what is happening. She is looking at several ideas to keep the citizens informed. The ideas must be cost effective. There is a limit as what tax dollars can support. Community Safety is an issue that did not get an advisory group. Ms. Sullivan explained that Police Chief Pecchia and CSO Jeannie Kennow have been 100 percent in keeping her involved with what is happening with community based policing and letting her know how the program is progressing. The Police Department has surveyed citizens and have incorporated communication ideas into the community policing program. Ms. Sullivan said she felt that the Police Department and all City staff have been very supportive and aware of what they are doing and giving a second look at citizen requests and involvement. Ms. Sullivan told the City Council that no matter what the results are in June, the 20/20 Vision project has been a success. Because PAGE 2 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 the citizens have been willing to come together and tell the City Council what they want from the City and because the City staff has been responsive, changes will continue to occur as new situations occur. The process is moving forward successfully. Ms. Sullivan invited the citizens to come on the bus tour Saturday. She explained that there is plenty of room on the bus and they did not have to be on an advisory group. Mayor Reinert asked Ms. Sullivan how many meetings have been scheduled. She explained that each advisory committee will meet on a weekly basis. There will be a minimum of 24 meeting per month. Another facilitator will be helping because more than one meeting is schedule per evening. Mayor Reinert explained that the Council Members are not avoiding the advisory committee meetings. This is a citizens program and the City Council has chosen not to be actively involved so that they cannot influence the groups. Ms. Sullivan explained that as the advisory committees get started, the leaders of each committee will come before the City Council to explain their progress.' You will hear from the citizens as well as Ms. Sullivan. This will let the citizens know that part of her job is to keep the City Council and staff informed and get rolling on what the citizens have asked for. Mayor Reinert thanked Ms. Sullivan for her report. CONSIDERATION OF DISBURSEMENTS: February 28, 1995 - Council Member Elliott moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. March 13, 1995 - Council Member Elliott moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District, March 2, 1995 - Council Member Bergeson moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District, March 10, 1995 - Council Member Elliott moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT, CHIEF MILO BENNETT Chief Bennett explained that he is here tonight to recap the year 1994. He noted that an annual report has been published and given to the City Council in their packets. Chief Bennett explained that PAGE 3 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 1994 completed 10 years as a fire district. The Centennial Fire District services the cities of Lino Lakes, Centerville, and Circle Pines under a Joint Powers Agreement. Chief Bennett presented his 1994 Annual Report. A copy of this report is on file at city hall. Mayor Reinert asked if Chief Bennett is getting a good response from businesses regarding the fire prevention program. Chief Bennett said the situation gets better all of the time. Some businesses have been inspected each year for the past two (2) or three (3) years. The repeat visits are much faster. Each business will be visited annually. Mayor Reinert noted that individual firefighters have been assigned to various fire stations. He asked in the event of a major disaster in one community, are the firefighters from the other communities familiar with each community? Chief Bennett explained that although each firefighter is assigned to a particular fire station, that does not mean that is the only area they protect and explained the structure. He noted that the firefighters train together as one unit. Chief Bennett explained that there are mutual aid arrangements with surrounding communities and his staff trains with these firefighters on an ongoing basis. Mayor Reinert asked about the relationship with the City of Lexington. Chief Bennett said much better, they have done a lot and have good support from their City Council. Mayor Reinert thank Chief Bennett for his report. 1996 Centennial Fire District Budget - Chief Bennett explained that the 1996 Budget represents a 1.68% increase over 1995. He said it is a very workable budget. Some adjustments were made on some line items. The fire district is concentrating on fire prevention and made some adjustments to address this need. Chief Bennett noted that he came to work for the fire district August 20, 1990. Mr. Schumacher noted that the Joint Powers Agreement requires that the budget be prepared one year in advance. This is a 1996 Operating Budget and it represents less than a 2% increase. He also noted that the Steering Committee has reviewed and approved the Budget. Mayor Reinert asked how many dollars are generated for operation of the Fire District other than the tax levy. Chief Bennett explained about $25,000.00 to $26,000.00 per year. He said that community PAGE 4 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 groups are very helpful and provide funding for such items as the Safety Program and smoke detectors that are given to residents. Council Member Neal also noted that the Centennial Fire Relief Association has funded a number of equipment purchases through their charitable gambling funds. Chief Bennett named the pieces of equipment that have been funded in this manner. Council Member Bergeson asked since Chief Bennett is the only full- time employee, how are benefits paid. Mr. Schumacher explained that Chief Bennett receives the same level of benefits as all Lino Lakes employees. The Centennial Fire District reimburses the City for these benefits. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the Centennial Fire District 1996 Operating Budget. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CITY ENGINEERS REPORT, JOHN POWELL Consideration of Appointing Representative to Citizen Committee for Major Update of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD)Surface Water Management Plan - Mr. Powell explained that the RCWD is preparing to make a major revision to their water management plan. As part of this process, they are requesting representatives from the cities within the District for both a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and a citizen task force. These representatives are in addition to those representing the City on the standing Advisory Committee. The TAC will largely be made up of City Engineers from the member communities and Mr. Powell volunteered to attend these meetings as part of his duties. As for the citizen task force, Mr. Brian Bourassa, a resident of Lino Lakes who is also a registered civil engineer and is familiar with the City, has been contacted and is willing to serve as a citizen on this task force. The duties of both of the representatives should be completed in four (4) to six (6) months with an average of one meeting per month. Council Member Elliott moved to appoint John Powell to the TAC and Brian Bourassa to the Citizens Task Force. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING AND ZONING REPORT, MARY KAY WYLAND SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 02 - 95 Amending the Zoning Code, Bl, Fences and Walls Provision - Ms. Wyland explained that the City Council approved the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 02 - 95 at their February 27, 1995 meeting. The proposed changes were initiated by citizen request and involve the following: PAGE 5 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 A. Change ordinance to allow a six (6) foot fence to be installed from the front of the home to the rear property line. The existing ordinance provides for a six (6) foot fence from the back of the house to the rear property line. B. Change the requirement providing for 30% open area to 10%. This change would allow purchase of standard type privacy fences offered for sale at Knox, Mennards, etc. C. Clarify the section relating to the side of the fence considered to be the face. Staff is recommending that the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 02 - 95 be approved. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 02 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 02 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. ATTORNEY'S REPORT, BILL HAWKINS Consideration of Accepting Right -of -Way Easement for Apollo Drive from Douglas and Delores Ramsden - Mr. Hawkins explained that with the replatting of the Lino Industrial Park into Apollo Business Center, additional right-of-way was needed for the construction of Apollo Drive. Negotiations have continued with the property owners in an effort to obtain the necessary right-of-way to extend Apollo Drive to Lilac Street. Mr. and Mrs. Ramsden have agreed to grant the City an easement of Parcel 22, City of Lino Lakes Right -of -Way Plat No. 2. The Council must take formal action accepting the easement deed so that it can be filed at the Anoka County Recorders office. Council Member Bergeson introduced a motion accepting the easement deed from the Ramsdens. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 32 ACCEPTING GRANT FROM MINNESOTA D.A.R.E., INC., POLICE CHIEF PECCHIA Chief Pecchia explained that commencing in 1995, the Lino Lakes Police Department began teaching the D.A.R.E. Program in the local elementary schools. The goal of the Lino Lakes Police Department is to ensure that the D.A.R.E. Program will become totally funded through grants and donations from the community. Minnesota D.A.R.E, Inc. is aware of this goal and has awarded the City a grant of $4,000.00 to be used in administering the program in the PAGE 6 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 Lino Lakes Elementary School and the Rice Lake Elementary School. The purpose of Resolution No. 95 - 32 is to publicly thank Minnesota D.A.R.E., Inc. for the generous grant. Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 32. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 32 can be found at the end of these minutes. CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTING A GRANT FOR ADDITIONAL POLICE OFFICER, POLICE CHIEF PECCHIA Chief Pecchia explained that commencing in 1995, the Clinton Administration adopted a new program entitled "COPS FAST". President Clinton promised to put 100,000 new community officers on America's streets. This program allows law enforcement agencies to hire a Law Enforcement officer and the funding of this is to be paid through this grant program. This program also allows law enforcement agencies to increase the size of their force and expand community policing in their City. The Lino Lakes Police Department has been selected to receive grant funds in the amount of $75,000.00 spread over a period of three (3) years to hire one officer. The funds are proposed to be disbursed as follows: 1st year, June, 1995 2nd year, June, 1996 3rd year, June, 1996 $35,000.00 $25,000.00 $15,000.00 Chief Pecchia explained that the cost to the City for one officer the first year would be approximately $3,800.00, the second year would be approximately $22,000.00 and $39,000.00 the third year. After the first three (3) years, the City would be responsible for all costs for the officer. Mayor Reinert asked what would happen if the City accepted the grant and at the end of the first year decided not to continue the program. Chief Pecchia said that Lino Lakes is in a position where growth is anticipated in our population, need for additional services and in the personnel in the Police Department. Lino Lakes is in a position to address this issue on an annual basis and budget appropriately for the growth. Council Member Bergeson noted that it seems likely the City will be adding additional officers during the next five (5) year period. Even if there were some changes in the funding, the City can deal with that at budget time each year. PAGE 7 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 Mayor Reinert asked if the City does not use the grant this year, will the City lose the grant. Chief Pecchia explained that there are multiple rounds of awarding grants. In the event that other cities do not accept their federally granted officers, there are cities like Lino Lakes who have requested three (3) officers and may be in line to add additional officers through the program. Mr. Schumacher asked if the funding is an annual allocation. Chief Pecchia said yes. Council Member Elliott moved to accept the grant funds to hire a Law Enforcement Officer through the "COPS FAST" program. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS FOR THE ONE -TON TRUCK EQUIPMENT, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher explained that the purchase of a utility service truck was budgeted for 1995. This purchase it to take place in two (2) steps. The City Council awarded a bid for the first step which was the purchase of the cab and chassis. The second step is to award the bid for the body equipment to be installed on the cab and chassis. Three (3) quotations were received from equipment dealers as follows: Truck Utilities, $11,624.00; Crysteel, $12,079.00 and J - Craft, $13,025.00. The Public Works Department Supervisor has reviewed the bids and has recommended that the bid be awarded to Truck Utilities in the amount of $11,624.00 Council Member Elliott :roved to accept the bid of $11,624.00 from Truck Utilities as recommended by the Public Works Department Supervisor. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 33 SETTING THE PERMIT FEES FOR CONNECTION TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM AND THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher noted that the Gopher One -Call is a program mandated by the State of Minnesota which requires the City to locate City - owned utilities. The cost of complying with the Gopher One -Call system has been off -set by a fee charged on the building permit for a new home. The City has been notified that it is illegal to charge a separate fee for this program. Therefore, Resolution No. 95 - 33 is proposed which will increase the fee for a permit to connect to the municipal water system and the sanitary sewer system. The increase in the permit fees will cover the cost of complying with the Gopher One -Call program. The costs include PAGE 8 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 providing locations in the field, inspections and office administration of the program. The proposed increase fee for a permit to connect to the municipal water system will increase from $100.00 to $125.00 and the permit to connect to the sanitary sewer will increase from $75.00 to $100.00. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 33. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 33 can be found at the end of these minutes. CONSIDERATION OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT RESOLUTIONS, RANDY SCHUMACHER Resolution No. 95 - 28 Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the General Fund to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund - As of December 31, 1994, there remains a pre -audit negative cash balance in the CDBG fund of approximately $11,261.00 ($6,939.00 from 1993, and $4,322.00 from 1994). A transfer from General Fund should be made to eliminate the negative cash balance. The negative cash balance is primarily due to excess Senior Coordinator wages and benefits not reimbursed through CDBG dollars. Mr. Schumacher noted that the senior program is growing and very active. He would like to monitor the program in 1995 to see at what level it should be funded in 1996. Mr. Schumacher has met with the governing board of the Senior Program. They are energetic, appreciative of the facility and satisfied with the coordinator. They have many activities and trips planned which generate a user fee to help fund these activities and trips. In addition, fund raisers such as meals help subsidize the activities. Mr. Schumacher explained that the senior coordinator had been in an automobile accident but was recovering and doing some of her duties from her home. Other events have continued as previously scheduled. Mr. Schumacher also noted that City staff has access to the senior facility and this has helped to alleviate some of the current space needs. Mr. Schumacher was asked to met with the Senior Program Governing Board and discuss their user fee structure as well as monitor the senior activities. Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 28. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PAGE 9 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 Resolution No. 95 - 28 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 29 Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Closed Bond Fund to the Escrow Fund - Mr. Schumacher explained that three (3) older projects, that staff contributed some time to, have been completed or diverted to other areas. The negative cash balances in the three (3) escrow accounts (Apollo Business Center - $56.95, Reshanau Escrow - $636.70 and Pond View - $854.42) should be determined uncollectible and a transfer made to the accounts to delete the deficit balances. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 29. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 29 can be found at the end of these minutes. OLD BUSINESS Consideration of 1995 Budget Document - Mr. Schumacher has sent to the City Council their 1995 Annual Budget. He said he wanted to bring the document itself to City Council attention. He noted that it takes months of work by the staff and City Council to prepare an annual budget and the final document has been prepared. Mr. Schumacher noted that it is a working document and is used all year long. He encouraged the residents to come in and review the document or purchase it for a small fee. He highlighted several areas of the budget including, the 1995 Sewer and Water Department Budget, Local Government Aid revenues from 1988 to 1995, Permit Valuations for the years of 1988 to 1994, personnel and what department they work for, detail of General Fund revenues and expenditures. Mayor Reinert referred to a request from the State to increase the state sales tax from 6% to 6.5%. The municipalities were asked to support the increase and the entire amount of the increase was promised to be returned to the municipalities to make up for the loss in local government aid. To date the municipalities have not received any support from the increased sales tax. Mr. Schumacher said this event helped to diminish the level of trust between the municipalities and the state. Mr. Schumacher continued with his report noting significant changes in the Police Department, the Community Development Department as well as other departments. Mr. Schumacher explained that certificates of indebtedness are used to purchase equipment each year. He noted that the City has a very limited amount of debt` and the bond consultant will be asking PAGE 10 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 Moody's to increase our bond rating. Mr. Schumacher explained that additional information regarding bonded debt will be added to the document. Mayor Reinert asked that a copy of this document be added to the Citizens Library for reference. Consideration of Approving Contract for Fire Chief Bennett, Randy Schumacher - At the last Steering Committee, a recommendation was made to enter into another two (2) year employment contract with Fire Chief Milo Bennett. Chief Bennett has been with the Fire District over four (4) years and Mr. Schumacher said he has done an outstanding job. He meets with the City Administrators on a monthly basis and puts the Steering Committee meetings together on a quarterly basis. Council Member Elliott moved to approve a two (2) year employment contract with Fire Chief Milo Bennett. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Consideration of Minutes from February 27, 1995 - Council Member Elliott moved to approve these minutes as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried with Mayor Reinert abstaining. Consideration of Request for Gambling License from the Dead Broke Saddle Club - Mrs. Anderson explained that the Dead Broke Saddle Club is requesting a gambling license to operate a gambling booth at the 49 Club beginning July 1, 1995. This organization is a non- profit organization meeting all eligibility regulations of the State for a gambling license. This organization is headquartered in the City of Hugo and does not have at least 15 members who are residents of Lino Lakes or have been members for at least six (6) months. As such, this organization does not meet the qualifications of the Lino Lakes Gambling Ordinance until August 1, 1995. Mrs. Anderson explained that she received a letter from the Dead Broke Saddle Club this evening. The letter contains background information about their organization. They have also requested that the City Council modify the requirement for membership to provide a smooth transition on July 1, 1995 from the Centennial Fire District to the Dead Broke Saddle Club. Mrs. Anderson noted that the City Attorney has not reviewed the letter and request. She suggested that the City Council consider two (2) options; 1) PAGE 11 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 deny the request because the Dead Broke Saddle Club does not meet the requirements of the City Gambling Ordinance or, 2) delay action for two (2) weeks and have the City Attorney review the letter that was presented this evening. Mr. Eric Wesman, a member of the Dead Broke Saddle Club and a member of the Dead Broke three (3) member gambling oversight committee, Mr. Tom Schaffhausen, Mr. Dan Ramberg and Mark Larson were in the audience. Mr. Wesman explained that most of the members of the Club live in surrounding communities and most are also members of the Northwest Saddle Club on Old Birch Street. Mr. Wesman explained that he presented a letter this evening indicating that the Lino Lakes members will not meet eligibility requirements until August. The letter also indicates that the owner of the 49 Club has formally signed a lease with the Dead Broke Saddle Club and would like them to take over the gambling operation on July 1, 1995 when the present lease expires. However, if necessary, the lease can be rewritten to begin on August 1, 1995 so that the Lino Lakes residents will meet the requirements of the Lino Lakes City Code. Mr. Wesman explained that the owner of the 49 Club had previously determined that he would seek a new operator for the pull tab gambling operation and he felt it would be asking too much of the 49 Club to go without pull tab gambling for a month although the owner has indicated that he is willing to do this. Mr. Wesman asked that the City Council waive 30 days or so the eligibility requirement to allow the Dead Broke Saddle Club to start operations at the 49 Club on July 1, 1995. Mayor Reinert referred to the letter submitted by the Dead Broke Saddle Club and asked how the Dead Broke Saddle Club feels it would be an asset to the community. Mr. Wesman said that this organization has particular emphasis on youth activity with a focus on horses. Included with the letter is a list of recipients of 1994 donations. The activities are fairly broad, the largest single donations having gone to a memorial scholarship foundation formed within recent months for scholarships for post secondary education to any applicant. In addition, substantial contributions have been made to 4H programs throughout the state, the State Horse Show and various youth programs at various saddle clubs, etc. A special mission to support the Minnesota Special Olympics, Equestrian Program is also a large part of the program. Other programs supported by Dead Broke Saddle Club include the Insights Program, an equestrian program for the blind. The Dead Broke Saddle Club is also supporting a charter school equestrian program in Washington County. Many of the participants in the horse show activities are Lino Lakes residents. Others who have received donations have requested donations and described the programs they PAGE 12 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 want the Dead Broke Saddle Club to support. Mr. Wesman said that the Dead Broke Saddle Club would be open to receive such applications and make donation to any qualified group in Lino Lakes in the same manner as in other area. The particular interest of the Dead Broke Saddle Club is in promoting youth and family activities with a particular, but not exclusive, emphasis on horses. Council Member Neal explained that he is on the University of Minnesota 4H Board and asked if there were any Anoka County 4H programs supported by the Dead Broke Saddle Club. Mr. Wesman said not to his knowledge and listed several 4H Clubs supported by the Dead Broke Saddle Club. He said he has responded to and supported every 4H Club that has requested support. Mr. Hawkins explained that he has only had time to scan the letter presented this evening by the Dead Broke Saddle Club. He told the City Council that if they wish they can refer the letter to him and he will investigate whether the ordinance conditions as they are written are in fact valid conditions. Obviously the City Council has the right to change the ordinance conditions. However, if the City Council is not willing to change the ordinance, then the Council can direct him to investigate the conditions. Mr. Hawkins asked the City Council if they wanted the conditions of the present ordinance to stand or did the City Council want to allow the conditions to be varied. Council Member Neal said that there have been several other requests for gambling licenses and the City Council upheld the gambling ordinance. He felt that if the City Council upheld the gambling ordinance in the past, the City Council should continue to uphold it. Mayor Reinert said that he is also thinking along the same line. Mr. Hawkins pointed out that there is a requirement in the Gambling Ordinance that a certain percentage of the net profits be spent to benefit the citizens of Lino Lakes. Mr. Wesman said he was aware of this requirement. Council Member Bergeson suggested that this portion of the Gambling Ordinance be reviewed. Council Member Neal moved to direct Mr. Hawkins to review the requirements of the Gambling Ordinance as challenged by the Dead Broke Saddle Club. Mr. Hawkins said he could review the conditions of the ordinance and prepare a report for the City Council. He also said another issue is what can the City Council require the gambling organizations to donate to the benefit of the citizens of the City. Does the City Council want to make a change in this requirement? Mayor Reinert said that if the City Council feels that the Gambling Ordinance is lawful, the Dead Broke Saddle Club should challenge the ordinance. PAGE 13 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 Mr. Wesman said his purpose is not specifically to challenge the ordinance, but to as the City Council for approval to operate pull - tab gambling at the 49 Club. The request is for an accommodation to the existing ordinances. In recent days, it has come to their attention, the City of Cloquet asked for an Attorney General's opinion regarding ordinances that are essentially the same as what Lino Lakes presently has and it was the opinion of the Attorney General's office that these ordinances raised significant questions with respect to equal protection under both the State and Federal constitutions. He said the purpose of this information is to call the matter to the attention of the City. Mr. Wesman said that the Dead Broke Saddle Club would like to become an active contributing member of the business and social community and not a contestant in a legal action. Mr. Wesman asked the City Council for approval to begin pull -tab gambling on July 1, 1995 and if this is not possible, then approval for pull -tab gambling effective August 1, 1995. Council Member Elliott asked Mr. Hawkins if the City Council can arbitrarily take 30 days off of an ordinance waiting period. Mr. Hawkins said that there is no provision in the Gambling Ordinance that allows the City Council to grant a variance from the requirements. Council Member Elliott said that she appreciates the fact that the Dead Broke Saddle Club want to become a part of the community and also appreciated the fact the 49 Club does not want to be without pull -tabs for a month, however, the ordinances should not be rewritten to accommodate certain situations. Mayor Reinert called for a second to Council Member Neal's motion. There was no second to the motion. Council Member Elliott moved to deny the request for a gambling license. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Neal abstaining. Consideration of a Request for a Gambling License from the Centennial Fire Relief Association for Miller's on Main - Mrs. Anderson explained that an application for a gambling license to operate a gambling booth at Miller's on Main was included in the Council packets. The Centennial Fire Relief Association meets the requirements of the Lino Lakes Gambling Ordinance (has more than 15 members who live in Lino Lakes) and does operate another gambling site at the 49 Club. There have been no reported problems with the 49 Club site. Miller's on Main is the former Lee's of Lino Lakes. Mr. James Miller will be requesting liquor licenses for this establishment shortly. PAGE 14 COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1995 Council Member Bergeson asked if the Gambling Ordinance required that gambling take place at a certain type of establishment such as an establishment with a liquor license. Could an establishment without a liquor license be licensed for lawful gambling? Mrs. Anderson said that she did not know. Council Member Bergeson asked if the City could legally approve a gambling license for an establishment before the liquor license is approved. Mrs. Anderson explained that the application for a gambling license must be submitted approximately 60 days prior to the date that gambling will commence. Therefore, a decision regarding the gambling license is being requested at this time. Mr. Hawkins said he was not aware of any requirement that gambling must be in a liquor establishment. (The Minnesota Gambling Board says that lawful gambling can be conducted by non-profit organizations in many different places such as a community centers, Knights of Columbus, Shriner's organizations and other places where liquor is not available.) Council Member Elliott moved to approve the gambling license for the Centennial Fire Relief Association for operation at Miller's on Main. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Elliott moved to Member Neal seconded the motion. These minutes were considered, regular City Council meeting held Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer adjourn at 8:52 P.M. Council Aye. corrected and approved at the on May 22, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor PAGE 15 Council Member Elliott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 2-95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4, SUBD. 29 FENCES AND WALLS OF THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE APPENDIX B1 The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: SECTION NO. 1. Section 4, Subd. 29 Fences and Walls, is hereby deleted and replaced by the following: Subd. 29. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall require a building permit and shall be permitted in all yards subject to the following: (1) Prior to issuance of a building permit for any boundary line fence, abutting property owners shall be notified. 2) Solid Walls (such as masonry construction) in excess of forty-two (42) inches in height shall be prohibited. (3) Fences in residential districts may be located in any yard to a height of four (4) feet, except that a fence up to six (6) feet in height may be erected from the front facade of the principal building to the side and/or rear lot line. Wire fences shall not be permitted in residential areas, with the exception of chain link fences. (4) Should the rear lot line of a lot be common with the side lot line of an abutting lot, that portion of the rear lot line equal to the required front yard of the abutting lot shall not be fenced to a height of more than four (4) feet. (5) Fences located eight (8) feet or more from the rear lot line may be up to eight (8) feet in height, except that fences for tennis courts may be up to twelve (12) feet in height with (ten ) foot setback from the rear and side lot lines behind the principal structure. (6) Fences in Business and Industrial districts may be erected on the lot line to a height of six (6) feet; to a height of eight (8) feet with a security arm for barbed wire. (7) That side of the fence considered to be the face (facing as applied to fence posts) shall face abutting property. The finished side shall face away from the fence owner's lot. (8) No fence shall be permitted on public rights-of-way. (9) Fences which are ninety percent (90%) open (barb wire, chain link, woven wire, and other similar type fences) which are for the sole purpose of containing non-domestic animals are not subject to the provisions of this ordinance and do not require a building permit. Chain link fences shall have round street parts and braces. (10) Fences shall be at least ten percent (10%) open to provide space for the passage of air. No used material shall be used in construction of fences. SECTION NO. 2. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passed this 13th day of March, 1995. ._. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor / !' iCi.''L< ��, ��. l_, Marilyn GJ. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Whereupon said ordinance was declared -duly passed and adopted. Council Member Bergeson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NUMBER 95-28 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND(CDBG) WHEREAS; As of December 31, 1994, there remains a pre -audit negative cash balance in the CDBG Fund of approximately $11,261.00 ($6,939 from 1993 and $4,322.00 from 1994) and, WHEREAS; A transfer must be made to cover the deficit in the fund, NOW THEREFORE BE IT -RESOLVED, that $11,261.00 be transferred from the General Fund to the CDBG fund to cover the negative cash balance as of December 31, 1994. Vernon Reinert, Mayor Marilyn i. Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Council Member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NUMBER 95-29 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE CLOSED BOND FUND TO THE ESCROW FUND WHEREAS; As of December 31, 1994, certain escows have negative cash balances and have been determined to be uncollectable and, WHEREAS; A transfer must be made to cover the deficit escrows. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that $ 1,548.07 be transferred from the Closed Bond Fund to the Escrow fund to cover the negative cash balances as of December 31, 1994 (Apollo Business Center $56.95, Reshanau escrow $636.70, Pond View $854.42 Vernon Reinert, Mayor Marilyn q. Anderson, City Clerk/Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Council Member Kuether was absent. Council Member Neal moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution and CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 — 32 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM MINNESOTA D.A.R.E, INC. FOR THE D.A.R.E. PROGRAM WHEREAS: the Lino Lakes Police Department began teaching the D.A.R.E. program in local elementary schools in January, 1995; and WHEREAS: the curriculum, developed by educators, is an elementary school drug prevention curriculum taught by specially selected and trained uniformed police officers; and WHEREAS: Minnesota D.A.R.E., Inc. was made aware of the desire for the Lino Lakes Police Department to teach this program in the elementary schools and has awarded the City a grant of $4,000.00 to defer the cost of this program, and WHEREAS: the monies will be appropriated to the General Fund in the following manner: Increase Revenue - Contributions $4,000.00 Increase D.A.R.E Expenditures: $4,000.00 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the grant of $4,000.00 to help fund the D.A.R.E. program and wishes to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to Minnesota D.A.R.E., Inc. for the grant. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council thjs-13th day of March, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor / j l t . ( ,_ )i i Marilyn g. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion or adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 — 33 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PERMIT FEES FOR CONNECTION TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City code provides in Chapter 401, Municipal Water System, Section 401.19, Service Charges, Subdivision 1, Permit Fees and in Chapter 402, Sanitary Sewer System, Section 402.04, Permits, Licenses, Fees, Bond and Insurance, that fees for permits shall be established by City Council resolution, and WHEREAS, such fees require adjustment due to increasing cost of providing inspections, location of utility stubs and record keeping, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes hereby establishes permit fees as follows: 1. Permit fee to connect to the municipal water system, $125.00. 2. Permit fee to connect to the sanitary sewer system, $100.00. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of March, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ---" Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Whereupon said 'resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES ;MEMBERS MEMBERS ABSENT ..................................................... ESENT Planning Coordinator Wyland, Manning Consultant:Brixius Economic Development Coordinator Wessel,> Consulting City Engineer Powell.; I. II. IV. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Commissioners Herr and Gelbmann were absent at roll call. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve the minutes of the April 12, 1995 meeting as submitted and was supported by Tom Mesich. All voted aye. Motion was carried. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve the agenda as presented and was supported by Ed Schones. All voted aye. Motion carried. Commissioners Rick Gelbmann and Guy Herr arrived at 6:32 p.m. OPEN MIRE: Chair Schaps recognized Kim Sullivan from 20/20 Vision. Ms. Sullivan gave a brief update as to the actions of the Community groups. Ms. Sullivan indicated the last town meeting is available on video cassette at City Hall. Ms. Sullivan indicated the next step in the process would be for the citizens to work with City Staff on a detailed plan for the community. Ms. Sullivan indicated if there are any questions from the Board or citizens, Mr. Dan Tesch (?) could be contacted also. Mr. Schones inquired in regards to growth, has the community group made any specific recommendations or goals. Ms. Sullivan indicated no, the community will continue to work with the City Staff, the real concern is to keep flexibility in terms of growth. Hearing no further questions or comments, Chair Schaps thanked Ms. Sullivan for the information. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:36 p.m. Hearing no public comment, Al Robinson made a MOTION to CLOSE the Open Mike portion of the meeting and was supported by Rick Gelbmann. All voted aye. Motion carried. The Open Mike portion was CLOSED at 6:41 p.m. V. PLANNING ITEMS: A. 95-12-P, Blue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive, Minor Subdivision Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the request to create a 2.4 acre lot in the Apollo Business Center. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated staff has reviewed this request and would recommend approval of the minor subdivision as requested with the condition that a 50' utility easement be provided over the existing sewer and water main on the eastern portion of the site. Mr. Johnson inquired if the triangular portion of the lot is included in this site. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated it is not included. Mr. Johnson inquired as to who is responsible for the maintenance of this area. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated although this has not been identified, it would most likely be the responsibility of the City. Economic Development Coordinator Wessel indicated the process of this project began nearly three years ago. He indicated the goal is to break ground by July of this year. He highly recommended approval of this project. Mr. Johnson expressed concern for the portion of the site that would need to be maintained, he felt this area should be landscaped. Consulting Engineer Powell indicated he believed this area would be considered an amenity and would be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain. Mr. Dan Richmann, developer for the project, indicated there is a landscaping plan in the area of concern, and it would be in the best interest of the company to maintain this area. Mr. Richmann anticipated that there would be future expansions. Chair Schaps inquired if the developer anticipates that they will be doing the maintenance of this area. Mr. Richmann indicated they would if requested, also they 2 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 would not want that area to grow unsightly in front of their building. Chair Schaps asked about the underground sprinkling system for the landscaping. Mr. Richmann indicated the sprinkling system would extend up to the corner of Apollo Drive. Economic Development Coordinator Wessel indicated although this area is not in the site plan, the Board can be assured that this area will be maintained. Consulting Engineer Powell also indicated a portion is maintained by the County. Ed Schones made a MOTION to approve application 95-12-P, Blue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive, Minor Subdivision with a 50 inch utility easement over existing sewer and water main on eastern border of site and was supported by Al Robinson. All voted aye. Motion carried. B. 95-13-S, Blue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the request for a Site Plan Review involving construction of a 20,196 square foot building containing 6,720 square feet of office and 13,440 square feet of warehouse. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated staff has reviewed the submitted site plan and would recommend approval with the following conditions. 1. Proper building permits shall be obtained prior to construction. 2. The proposed construction shall meet all building and parking setback and height requirements. 3. A minimum of 10% green are shall be provided. 4. Landscaping shall be provided according to the site plan dated 5/7/95. A sprinkler system shall be provided for maintenance of all green areas. The City Forester shall review said Landscaping plan to insure suitability of selected species. 5. The exterior construction will be rock face block with breakoff design. 6. An interior sprinkling system will be provided per State Fire/Building Code. 7. B6-12 curbing shall be provided around perimeter of parking area and access drives. 8. Parking areas shall be surfaced and stripped with handicapped parking provided per ADA requirement. Adequate parking has been provided on site (50 spaces shown). 3 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 9. Trash shall be stored behind seven foot masonry enclosures which match the building. 10. Screening to match building shall be provided for rooftop heating/ventilating equipment. 11. All drainage, utility and grading plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. 12. Access to the site shall be provided by one shared access drive. The developer shall sign a "shared driveway agreement" prior to occupancy. 13. A development agreement shall be signed by the developer and made a part of this site plan review. Planning Coordinator Wyland noted the City Staff and the EDAB Board have reviewed this request and would recommend approval with the outlined conditions. Mr. Richmann outlined the project, detailing the materials proposed for construction. Chair Schaps inquired if the developer has had any commitment for spaces in the building as of yet. Mr. Richmann stated there has been interest, but they did not want to finalize any action until receiving City approval. Mr. Robinson indicated on the site plan only 47 parking spaces have been noted, and the requirement would be 50 spaces. Mr. Richmann indicated this issue has been resolved and additional spaces have been gained to meet the requirement. Mr. Schones inquired as to the green space, is it 105 or 25%. Mr. Richmann indicated the requirement is 10%, but the project is actually at approximately 20% to 25%. Mr. Mesich asked about a lighting plan. Mr. Richmann indicated a lighting plan will be submitted to Staff, the developer would like the lighting to be congruent with the others on Apollo Drive. Ms. Wyland noted the lighting requirement is minimal and can be achieved with Staff review. Mr. Johnson inquired as to where the sign would be. Mr. Richmann indicated the monument sign plan is usually submitted to Staff at a later date. Mr. Wessel indicated a sign permit is required, so the size, etc. will be reviewed prior to issuance. Chair Schaps request to add condition number 14: 14. Lighting requirement be fulfill prior to a building permit being issued. 4 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Ed Schones made a MOTION to approve application 95-13-3, Blue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review with stated conditions and was supported by Guy Herr. All voted aye. Motion carried. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated regarding Tax Increment Financing, if any board members have any questions Mr. Wessel would be glad to answer them. Mr. Schones indicated he had spoken with Mr. Wessel prior to the meeting and Mr. Wessel indicated he would be willing to hold a one hour informational class regarding Tax Increment Financing for those interested. Mr. Wessel indicated he would schedule this class and notify Board members. C. 95-14-S, Willow Ponds Senior Cottages, Elm Street, Site Plan Review Planning Consultant Brixius briefly reviewed a request to construct a 48 unit elderly residential development upon a 13.6 acre site located east of Sunset Road between Interstate 35W and Elm Street (County Road 12). The development itself consists of four 12 unit multiple family structures and ten single family residential lots. Mr. Brixius indicated in August of 1992, the City approved an elderly multiple family development that included 90 units upon the subject site upon condition that final site plans be submitted and approved by the City. The proposal now being considered has been downscaled from that conditionally approved development proposal. Mr. Brixius indicated that a 10 lot subdivision for a portion of this site will be reviewed by the P & Z in June. Mr. Brixius indicated based on review, his office recommends approval of the submitted site and building plans subject to the following conditions: 1. "Typical" building elevations and floor plans are submitted which identify structure height, exterior finish materials, and proposed dwelling unit areas. 2. A landscape plan be submitted which identifies the location, variety, and size of all proposed site landscaping. Specific attention should be given to that portion of the site abutting Interstate 35 and area east of the proposed single family homes. 3. To provided an assurance that parking supply shall meet parking demand, the following condition should be upheld through deed restriction: 5 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 A. The dwelling units are occupied only by elder residents (55 years and over). B. All garage spaces are provided without fee. C. There shall be no dwelling unit conversion for family use. D. No outdoor storage be allowed in the designated parking spaces. 4. Deadend driveway concerns are resolved. 5. No parallel parking is allowed on the private streets narrower than 28 feet on the site. 6. The off street parking areas, driveways, and private streets are surfaced in bituminous material. 7. A perimeter curb is provided around all off- street parking area driveways and private streets. 8. The site plan is revised to illustrate required handicapped parking stalls. 9. The site plan is modified to illustrate exterior lighting locations. 10. The proposed site access locations are subject to review and approval of Anoka County Highway Department. 11. If applicable, the site plan is revised to illustrate proposed trash handling areas. 12. All site signage comply with applicable provisions of the City Sign Ordinance. 13. All restrictive covenants are submitted for City review and approval. These covenants must include the provision that limits occupancy to elderly residents. 14. The applicant enter into a development agreement with the City. 15. Comments from other City Staff. Mr. Roger Derek, from Cottage Homesteads of America, Inc., indicated this is for low and moderate housing, financed by tax credits. Mr. Derek indicated NSP will be receiving tax credits and will be funding this project. Mr. Derek indicated there are areas in which the developer would like flexibility: 1. The developer would like a waiver on required curbing. 2. The developer would like the capability to rent out the garages not in use to other tenants. 3. The developer would like a release of restriction to garage fees, this would give them a capability of not exceeding the rental cap. 6 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Mr. Derek expressed concern for the issue regarding the time frame of the covenants, the government mandates 15 years and they would like 30 years. Mr. Johnson inquired if an elderly person over 55 could have a grandchild living with them. Mr. Derek indicated no, that would not be allowed. Mr. Brixius addressed the flexibilities requested; 1. Mr. Brixius indicated it is his feelings that the curb requirement should not vary, the Staff reviews a project for the lifetime of the project and the curbing would enhance the looks of the project and be consistent with other developments in the City. 2. Mr. Brixius indicated he would not be concerned with rental of garages if the tenant did not own a car, but he was concerned with outside parking. 3. With regards to garage fees, Mr. Brixius indicated parking requirements are met for the units by including the garages, if the garages were added by choice, the requirement would not be met and also the concern for outside parking would arise. Mr. Mesich expressed concern for delivery truck traffic and the ability to turn around. Mr. John Johnson, engineer for the development indicated this could be easily resolved. Chair Schaps inquired if the Fire Marshall had reviewed this project. Ms. Wyland indicated he had, and indicated no concerns. Mr. Bill Johnson inquired if there would be a buffer between the development and I35W. Mr. John Johnson indicated a three to four foot berm would be added for buffering the development. He also noted another buffer between the single family homes and the elderly development. Mr. Mesich inquired if part of the 30 year covenant indicates that there will be single ownership of the development. His concern was that units would be sold to individuals, such as townhomes and the development would become inconsistent with varying owners. Mr. Derek indicated through the covenant there would be single ownership. Mr. Brixius indicated in the PDO it could indicate that this is for single ownership and any changes to the subdivision would have to be reviewed by the City. 7 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Mr. Schones inquired about buffering for the single family homes to the Freeway. Mr. Derek indicated they would not be developing the single family homes, but just grading the site and selling the lots. Mr. Herr inquired if there is a mechanism to make sure future owners are aware of the view of Highway 35. Mr. Schones expressed concern that if the developer did not received the waiver on the curbing would the rents be raised. Mr. Derek indicated no the rents would not be raised, there is enough room in the project for adjustments. Mr. Powell indicated the City has worked with the developer in other areas, but does not wish to vary in regards to the curbing. The curbing better defines the roadway and is more attractive. Mr. Brixius indicated the curbing would be around the perimeter, and parking bays, but not on the individual driveways. Mr. Mesich inquired if pets would be allowed. Mr. Derek indicated no pets would not be allowed. Mr. Mesich inquired if rent was based on income. Mr. Derek indicated that HUD sets the guidelines and it would be based on income. Mr. Mesich inquired as to the reason for the substandard street. Mr. Brixius indicated due to configuration of site, the elderly occupancy and the private street, Staff felt it was acceptable. Mr. Powell indicated the street would be 28 feet and the requirement is 32 feet. Mr. Mesich expressed concerns regarding the narrower street, the fire truck ability to turn around and no circulation trail for the elder to walk within the development. Mr. Powell indicated there is a trail to the north side of Elm Street and around the perimeter of the development. Mr. Mesich reiterated his concern for a narrow street and the elderly walking on that street. Ed Schones made a MOTION to approve application 95-14-S, Willow Ponds Senior Cottages, Elm Street, Site Plan Review subject to conditions outlined by Staff, and was supported by Bill Johnson. Vote: 6 aye, 1 nay (Mr. Mesich). Motion carried. 8 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Chair Schaps requested item I be reviewed at this time. I. 95-18-V, Bill Green, 6693 East Shadow, Variance Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the application. She noted Mr. Green has applied for a building permit to add approximately 755 square feet to his property. Mr. Green's property became nonconforming in 1982 when the City adopted its current Flood Plain Ordinance. Therefore he would need a variance to add to an existing nonconforming structure. Ms. Wyland indicated Staff would recommend approval of a Variance to allow construction of the proposed addition at an elevation of 886.53, the elevation of the existing structure. Mr. Mesich indicated perhaps an added condition could state, Mr. Green and future owners would hold the City harmless in the case of flooding. Bill Johnson made a MOTION to approve application 95-18- V, Bill Green, 6693 East Shadow, Variance with the condition that the City be held harmless of damages due to flooding and this condition be a restriction registered with the deed and was supported by Guy Herr. All voted aye. Motion carried. D. 95-15-S, Lino Lakes Correctional Facility, 7545 Fourth, Site Plan Review Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the request for Site Plan Review for the Lino Lakes Correctional Facility located at 7545 Fourth Avenue And Zoned Public/Semi Public (PSP). Ms. Wyland indicated Staff would recommend approval of the proposed construction/remodeling with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction. 2. The City engineer review and approve all utility and drainage plans. Chair Schaps inquired as to an anticipated start date. Mr. Rich McCarthy indicated this summer. Ed Schones made a MOTION to approve application 95-15-S, Lino Lakes Correctional Facility, 7545 Fourth, Site Plan Review with stated conditions and was supported by Tom Mesich. All voted aye. Motion carried. Chair Schaps called a brief recess at 8:30 p.m. 9 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Chair Schaps reconvened the meeting at 8:38 p.m. F. 95-17-C, PUBLIC HEARING, Rehbein Transit, 6298 Hodgson Road, Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review Chair Schaps OPENED the Public Hearing at 8:40 p.m. Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the request for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to allow the construction of a 24,075 square foot metal sided pole barn for the storage of buses. Ms. Wyland indicated City Staff would recommend approval of the application with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and indicated that a sprinkler system will be required for the new building. 2. All buildings on site must be coordinated to color scheme and brick treatment. Plans to be submitted at time of building permit review. 3. A 15 foot easement for trail purposes is to be provided along the front property line connecting with the Fox Trace Trail immediately south of the Rehbein Transit Site. The trail shall be graded and rocked per City Trail standards. The City will provide bituminous surfacing in the Fall of 1995. 4. Landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the City Forester prior to issuance of building permits and shall include treatment of the fuel area and front property line. The plan shall be modified to provide screening that coordinates with the trail system. It is suggested that plantings be grouped rather than evenly disbursed. 5. The additional parking area noted on the plan dated 5-26-94 shall be provided with a dustless, durable surface (gravel is acceptable). 6. Grading of the site shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Future increases in impervious surfaces shall require review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. Timing of the proposed construction must be coordinated with the trunk watermain project to be constructed this summer. Mr. Schones inquired about the trunk water main. Ms. Wyland indicated the east side of Hodgson Road will be torn up. Mr. Powell indicated there is a temporary easement the City would like to maintain until all the improvements are completed. 10 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Mr. Mesich inquired if the applicant is resistant to hooking up to sewer. Ms. Wyland indicated sewer is not available, just water. Mr. Gelbmann indicated screening is critical for this project. Ms. Wyland indicated Staff has given the applicant various suggestions and the applicant will be working with Staff on the landscape plans. Mr. Gelbmann inquired if there would be berming along Highway 49. Mr. Powell indicated a two to three foot berm could be accomplished. Mr. Robinson inquired if improvements to Highway 49 are planned in the near future. Mr. Powell indicated some improvements are set for this year. Al Robinson made a MOTION to CLOSE the Public Hearing and was supported by Tom Mesich. All voted aye. Motion carried. The Public Hearing was CLOSED at 8:53 p.m. Chair Schaps requested to add condition number eight: 8. A berm be constructed along Highway 49 conforming with the ditch and topography of the area. Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve application 95-17-C, PUBLIC HEARING, Rehbein Transit, 6298 Hodgson Road, Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review including all eight stated conditions and was supported by Bill Johnson. All voted aye. Motion carried. E. 95-16-S, Marshan Condominiums, Lake Drive/Aqua Lane, Site Plan Review Planning Consulting Brixius briefly reviewed the request for site plan approval of a 112 unit town home development entitled Marshan Lake Condominiums. Mr. Brixius also noted that the subject property is zoned R-4, High Density Residential and lies within the Shoreland Overlay District of Marshan Lake. R-4 District provisions list multiple family dwellings such as that being proposed as permitted uses. Mr. Brixius indicated his office recommends approval of the Marshan Lake Condominium site plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Typical building plans (floor plans and elevations) are submitted for City review and approval. The submission of such plans is necessary to determine compliance with City height and dwelling unit area requirements. 11 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 2. Either buildings/off-street parking areas or the proposed loop street right-of-way are relocated such that all applicable 30 foot front yard setbacks are satisfactorily met. If such options are not viewed as viable, a setback variance may be pursued. 3. The City Engineer provide comment/ recommendation in regard to street construction standards, street lighting and signage. 4. The Fire Chief provided recommendation in regard to preferable fire hydrant locations. 5. No off-street parking is to be allowed along the development's private parking area drive aisles. 6. The site plan is revised to designate required handicap parking stalls. 7. The City Park Board provided comment/recommendation in regard to the adequacy of the proposed park land dedication. 8. A landscape plan is submitted which identifies the location, variety and size of all proposed plantings. Special emphasis (landscaping treatments) should be place along the site's northern and western borders. 9. The site plan could be revised to either relocate structure #11 within the confines of the subject site or the property exception be aided to the proposed development site via minor subdivision. 10. If applicable, the site plan is modified to identify all trash handling locations. 11. The applicant submitted a snow removal plan which identifies snow storage areas upon the subject site. 12. The grading/drainage and utility plan is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 13. Detailed plans for the proposed lake access (i.e., docks) are submitted subject to City review and approval. 14. If any outdoor activities (i.e., lake access, tennis courts, swimming pool, etc.) are proposed upon the subject site, detailed plans for such activities be submitted subject to City review and approval. 15. Any covenants governing the use of the property's open space (i.e lake access) be subject to City review and approval. 16. All signage erected upon the site comply with applicable provisions of the City's Sign Ordinance. 17. The applicant enter into a development agreement with the City which provides an assurance that all proposed improvements will be completed within a time frame specified by the City. 12 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 18. Comments from other Staff. Chair Schaps inquired if the applicant had asked for a review from the Park Board. Mr. Brixius indicated they had gone before the Park Board who recommended approval of 3 acres of park land, a trail along the lake side, grading of the park, and grading of a trail along Aqua Lane. Mr. Schones expressed concern that there might be large piles of dirt on the site for long periods of time, as with the other development of this developer. Mr. Brixius assured the Board that this would be monitored. Mr. Powell also indicated grading would be minimized to prevent this concern. Mr. Gelbmann inquired as to the open space. Mr. Brixius indicated there is 75% open space. Mr. Mesich inquired if the site plan review covered the entire site, or can the applicant come back and request a change to add more homes. Mr. Brixius indicated they could come back, but there would be a number of standards the site would have to meet. Chair Schaps inquired as to how many more units could be built. Mr. Brixius indicated he had not researched this. Mr. Bill Johnson expressed concern for the request of approval with outstanding questions. Mr. Kirk Corsan, briefly reviewed the site plan. He indicated there would be approximately 110 feet between the single family development to the north and the nearest condominium in this development. Mr. Corsan indicated the applicant has met with the DNR and this is the maximum allowed by the DNR, unless additional sites were purchased. Chair Schaps inquired as to how long it would take Staff to review and identify how many units could possibly be added. Mr. Brixius indicated not very long, but the site indicates there would be 25% available to develop. Mr. Corsan indicated the applicant would like to retain the right to put a dock in so those owners could have access to the lake. This access would be for canoe use only. Discussion was held regarding the dock. Mr. Brixius indicated under condition number 15, it could be expressed to limit access solely to the Home 13 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Association, by pedestrian traffic for canoe use. This would need to be posted as such. Mr. Bill Johnson indicated if this development is built to the maximum DNR regulations, the whole development should be moved to the south, so as to even out the green space. Mr. Corsan indicated even though there is no current plans, the applicant would like to have the area in the south open. Chair Schaps inquired if rental units could be added to the south. Mr. Brixius indicated that would need City review. Mr. Brixius indicated the applicant has addressed all the City's concerns presented by Staff with this proposal, his recommendation would be to approve this application. Mr. Herr reiterated the concerns of others on the Board and felt the development should be moved to the south. Mr. Corsan indicated the development would not meet the DNR requirements if it was moved, the DNR has established tiers and the move would change the density of those tiers. Mr. Mesich inquired if the developer was aware of their responsibility for improvement to Lake Drive and Aqua Lane. Mr. Corsan indicated they were aware. Mr. Powell also indicated staff had held discussions with the applicant regarding this issue. Ms. Karen Hoppe of 497 Forshan Lake Drive, expressed concern regarding the open space to the south and future development. She felt the units were too close together. Ms. Hoppe inquired as to the difference between townhomes and condominiums. Mr. Brixius explained this is just in reference to ownership. The units will be owned by the occupants. Mr. Brixius indicated any addition would come before the City for review. Mr. Richard Hermans 7200 Stage Coach Trail, also expressed concern for the unidentified open space, and suggested to the Board to table until further information is given, due to all the unanswered questions. Mr. J.P. Houchins, 7284 Stage Coach Trail, indicated he calculated only 45,000 cubic feet of permanent water storage, but the utility plan denotes 55,000, he 14 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 suggested someone might want to review this. He inquired if there was a possibility of extending the pond a bit to the north and suggested that if the storm water inlet were to come to the north end of the pond it would function better. He also expressed concern for the unidentified space to the south. Mr. Houchins inquired as to the ordinance and limitations. Mr. Brixius indicated this site is under a tiered arrangement, but any subsequent additions would be viewed under the City's Shoreland regulations. Ms. Ann Woodmeir, 440 Post Road, indicated the density is noted as 5.7 units per acre, she inquired as to the density if the open space was not included. Mr. Powell inquired as to the response of the residents regarding the trail. Mr. Hermans indicated the trail is closest to his lot. He believes it would increase traffic but feels it is important to include in the plan. Ms. Wendy Anderson 7246 Stage Coach Trail, inquired as to the type of material that would be used on the trail. Mr. Powell indicated it would be an asphalt trail. Mr. Houchins indicated he is in support of the trail, he enjoys using the trails. Mr. Brixius indicated with the conditions and comments of Staff he would hope the Board would move the application forward. Mr. Gelbmann inquired if the Staff was to review the remaining portion of the site, what kind of development could be allowed. Mr. Brixius indicated anything that would be allowed in a R-4 designation. Mr. Gelbmann indicated he would rather see the buildings spread out on the site. Mr. Mesich inquired if there are any other outstanding issues with the City and this developer that have not been resolved. Mr. Powell indicated he was not aware of any concerns that are not being worked on currently. Mr. Schones inquired about the feasibility study. Mr. Powell indicated the feasibility has been initiated and did not foresee any problems. Chair Schaps indicated he would like to add a condition that the developer provide specific disclosure to buyers 15 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 that any bylaws would be subservient to the City's approval. Mr. Brixius indicated additions could be made to condition number 15 to reflect this. Mr. Bill Johnson indicated he would be concerned with approving of a long range plan that the Board does not have details to. Continued discussion was held regarding concerns for unanswered questions regarding the open space to the south. Bill Johnson made a MOTION to deny application 95-16-S, and was supported by Ed Schones. Mr. Brixius indicated rather than denial of the application, perhaps the item could be tabled. The denial would need reasons and the applicant has complied with the requirements. Mr. Bill Johnson removed his motion. Rick Gelbmann made a MOTION to table application 95-16-S, Marshan Condominiums, Lake Drive/Aqua Lane, Site Plan Review until the June meeting when additional information can be provided regarding the open space to the south and was supported by Ed Schones. All voted aye. Motion carried. Chair Schaps directed the applicant to provide answers for the question posed at the meeting and give specific plans for the unidentified area. G. PUBLIC HEARING, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Chair Schaps OPENED the Public Hearing at 10:47 p.m. Al Robinson made a MOTION to continue the Public Hearing, Flood Plain Management Ordinance until June 14, 1995, and was supported by Ed Schones. All voted aye. Motion carried. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Chair Schaps reminded Board members to hand in their Conflict of Interest forms and Beneficiary Forms. VII. ADJOURNMENT: Guy Herr made a MOTION to adjourn and was supported by Rich Gelbmann. All voted aye. Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. 16 DISBURSEMENT LIST MAY 22, 1995 Page: Date: 1 05/19/95 Claims Roster Vendor Company 1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND City of Lino Lakes sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice (Entry Description) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/HODGSON ROAD) Total for Department Total for Fund APOLLO DRIVE CONSTRUCTION FUND * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING ISSUES/APOLLO DRIVE) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/APOLLO DRIVE) Total for Department Total for Fund AREA AND UNIT CHARGE * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/WELL #3) Total for Department Total for Fund COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT BLOCK GRANT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) Total for Department Total for Fund CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC.(EXCAVATION/WOODS OF BALD II) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(PINERIDGE III) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING ISSUES/GEN ESCROW) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING ISSUES/SR COTTAGES) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING ISSUES/M TWN HOMES) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING ISSUES/BEHMS C FMS) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(SERVICE/NOL-TEC) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(SERVICE/TRAPPERS CROSSING) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/WOODS OF BAL 2) Amount 19.50 19.50 19.50 193.75 4,590.00 4,783.75 4,783.75 508.50 508.50 508.50 17.85 17.85 17.85 11,028.79 2,933.00 602.37 825.05 691.85 514.48 8.50 99.88 72.00 Page: 2 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/PINERIDGE) Total for Department GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Amount 36.00 16,811.92 Total for Fund 16,811.92 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 4.50 ANOKA COUNTY(RECORDING FEE) 17.40 * BUSINESS RECORDS CORP.(SUPPLIES) 19.40 D.C.A. INC.(FLEX INSURANCE) 155.80 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 5.27 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 1,391.00 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER(SEMINAR) 139.00 * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(SUPPLIES) 50.11 * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(SERVICE) 113.69 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 108.46 Total for Department 2,004.63 BUILDING INSPECTIONS * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 390.00 Total for Department 390.00 CHARTER COMMISSION * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(SERVICE) 6.38 Total for Department 6.38 CONSULTANTS * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING ISSUES/MUN ATT) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(CRIMINAL ATTORNEY) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) 43.75 5,401.20 2,927.00 Total for Department 8,371.95 * BUSINESS RECORDS CORP.(SUPPLIES) 4.09 GOLD STAR BUILDERS(ASSESSMENT REIMBURSEMENT) 185.94 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE FLEX) 1,405.00 INFRATECH, INC. SUIT(TELEVISING SERVICE) 300.00 * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(APRIL SAC) 29,750.00 * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(APRIL SAC) -297.50 WAHLIN, CHRIS(REIMBURSE REMOVE RISK TREE) 100.00 Total for Department 31,447.53 Page: 3 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION(BOOK) * SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION(MEETING) FINANCE * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) FIRE DEPARTMENT * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) FLEET MANAGEMENT Total for Department Total for Department Total for Department 0.51 20.00 25.00 45.51 0.55 484.50 485.05 437.00 437.00 * BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(PARTS) 414.97 * BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(SMALL TOOLS) 3.83 * CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC.(PARTS) 213.91 CATCO PARTS, INC.(PARTS) 40.41 COOLANT RECOVERY COMPANY(RECYCLE ANTIFREEZE) 99.00 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC.(PARTS) 46.71 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 26.61 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC.(PARTS) 31.33 GOPHER BEARING COMPANY, INC.(PARTS) 21.88 J-CRAFT(PARTS) 350.65 MIDWEST SPECIALTY SALES, INC.(PARTS) 59.43 MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY(VEHICLE REGISTRATION) 257.50 S.O.S. SAFETY(PARTS) 152.08 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC.(PARTS) 181.58 TRACY FUELS, INC.(FUEL) 1,536.29 * WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.(PARTS) 106.50 * WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.(PARTS) 11.31 FORESTRY DEPARTMENT * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) * INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC.(SUPPLIES) * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY SERVICE) JEWELL NURSERIES, INC.(TREES) * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(SUPPLIES) Total for Department 3,553.99 280.00 21.79 6.39 1,656.90 80.57 Total for Department 2,045.65 Page: 4 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 10.60 A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 82.69 AABOTT APPLIANCE AND HEATING(REPAIR SENIOR CENTER FREEZER) 113.46 * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 893.04 BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES, IN(MONTHLY SERVICE) 155.84 * COAST TO COAST, INC.(SUPPLIES) 8.53 DALCO, INC.(SUPPLIES) 219.80 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 10.25 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 27.32 HUGO HEATING AND COOLING(REPAIR HEATING/COOLING) 97.00 INTERIOR COMM SYSTEM, INC.(VOICEMAIL REPAIR) 85.00 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 322.72 REMINGTON ELECTRIC, INC.(REPAIR SECURITY LIGHT) 249.82 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,209.98 Total for Department 3,486.05 PARKS DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 5.50 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 14.62 ANOKA FLIGHT TRAINING(FUEL) 21.74 BIFF'S, INC.(UNITS/SERVICE) 819.03 BOY SCOUT #136(SUPPLIES) 35.97 * BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.(BALL DIAMOND AGG) 468.49 * CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC.(PARTS) 51.82 * CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 31.17 * COAST TO COAST, INC.(SUPPLIES) 113.55 * COBB GROUP THE(SUBSCRIPTION) 24.50 DALCO, INC.(SUPPLIES) 179.98 DNR, DEPT OR NATURAL RESOURCES(A PRINT) 62.99 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 47.77 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 995.00 * INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC.(SUPPLIES) 65.01 * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 44.68 KEN'S RADIATOR SERVICE(PARTS) 38.00 * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(SUPPLIES) 80.57 MENARDS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 30.75 MENARDS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 20.51 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 81.94 * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(SERVICE) 32.40 TODORA, GAIL(PROFESSIONAL FILE DATA ENTRY) 120.00 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 55.66 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 116.65 * WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.(PARTS) 106.50 Total for Department 3,664.80 Page: 5 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) PLANNING DEPARTMENT Amount * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE -20/20 VISION) 7.87 * CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 27.13 CHYLE, JULIE(FACILITATOR - 20/20 VISION) 117.00 DNR, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES(BOOK) 13.53 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 437.00 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING ISSUES) 2,229.49 * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(SERVICE - 20/20 VISION) 40.20 * SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION(MEETING) 25.00 SULLIVAN, KIM(SUPPLIES - 20/20 VISION) 28.16 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1.92 Total for Department 2,927.30 POLICE DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 18.94 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 12.24 ANOKA COUNTY(MOBILE DATA TERMINALS) 450.00 * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(CD SIRENS) 10.65 * BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(PARTS) 16.62 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 2,251.00 * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(SUPPLIES) 252.18 MEMA(REGISTRATION (2) 30.00 METROPOLITAN AREA(MEAL) 13.50 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 3.14 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 79.37 PETTY CASH(MEALS) 53.46 PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 9.98 ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC.(CAR WASHES) 46.32 SAFE -T -FLARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 574.99 U S WEST CELLULAR, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 189.52 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 295.93 Total for Department 4,307.84 RECREATION DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 4.14 BURTIS, ROBERT(PERFORMANCE IN THE PARK) 300.00 * CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 42.19 * COBB GROUP THE(SUBSCRIPTION) 24.50 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 390.00 * INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 76.60 * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(SUPPLIES) 80.57 * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(SERVICE) 32.40 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS(CLASSIFIED AD) 28.02 Total for Department 978.42 Page: 6 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT Amount ACCAP(RECYCLING DAY) 150.00 BFI TIRE RECYCLERS OF MN, INC.(RECYCLING DAY) 577.25 CONSTANT, JACKIE(MILEAGE/PARKING) 24.30 CONSTANT, JACKIE(SUPPLIES) 139.10 * JULEEN DESIGNS(SERVICE) 58.58 * LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(SUPPLIES) 222.85 LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB(RECYCLING DAY) 300.00 MIDWAY ELECTRONICS(RECYCLING DAY) 126.00 MR. BAKERY(RECYCLING DAY) 15.60 MYER, SCOTT(RECYCLE DAY/TR ATTENDANT) 50.00 * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(SERVICE) 339.80 TODORA, GAIL(RECYCLING NEWSLETTER) 90.00 Total for Department 2,093.48 STREETS A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO,INC(SOD) * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC.(STREET LIGHTS) * BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.(ROCK) * CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC.(PARTS) * CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) * JULEEN DESIGNS(STREET SIGNS) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(STREET LIGHTS) NORTHWAY SPTS & GARDEN, INC.(SUPPLIES) T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC.(ASPHALT) TWIN CITY SCALE COMPANY(RENTED SCALE) * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) * WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.(PARTS) Z'S LAWN MAINTENANCE(CLEAN DITCH - LOIS LANE) WATER DEPARTMENT 31.96 2.95 190.63 171.30 51.83 27.68 862.00 50.00 1,488.00 43.00 300.44 159.75 1.43 106.50 213.00 Total for Department 3,700.47 WATERPRO, INC.(SUPPLIES) 961.45 Total for Department 961.45 PROGRAM RECREATION RECREATION DEPARTMENT ALL STAR SPORTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) ALL STAR SPORTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) ALL STAR SPORTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) CENTURY FENCE COMPANY(INSTALL FENCE) PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION(SUPPLIES) WHITE, BARB(PROGRAM REFUND) Total for Fund 70,907.50 18.09 43.30 77.03 4,516.00 136.00 22.00 Total for Department 4,812.42 Total for Fund 4,812.42 Page: 7 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount SEWER OPERATING SEWER DEPARTMENT AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(BLACK DUCK LIFT STATION) 188.16 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 75.38 * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MARCH/APRIL SERVICE) 113.75 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 240.75 * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(MONTHLY SERVICE) 21,267.00 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 109.18 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 210.33 Total for Department 22,204.55 Total for Fund 22,204.55 WATER OPERATING WATER DEPARTMENT AWWA CUSTOMER SERVICE(PRINTED MATERIAL) 39.00 C. W. HOULE, INC.(REPAIR WATERMAIN) 1,445.55 FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC.(CHEMICALS) 15.00 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 10.40 * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MARCH/APRIL SERVICE) 113.75 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 328.75 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 579.52 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 46.25 WARNING LITES OF MN, INC.(SUPPLIES) 52.28 Total for Department Total for Fund ** Total ** * - Invoice split to different Departments 2,630.50 2,630.50 $122,696.49 Page: 1 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 000020 - A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO,INC 000040 - A T & T 000050 - A T & T 000052 - A T & T 000083 - AABOTT APPLIANCE AND HEATING 000090 - ACCAP 000100 - AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 000110 - A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 000158 - ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 000370 - ANOKA COUNTY 000420 - ANOKA COUNTY 000430 - ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 000450 - ANOKA ELECTRIC, INC. 000451 - ANOKA FLIGHT TRAINING 000551 - AWWA CUSTOMER SERVICE 000700 - BIFF'S, INC. 000706 - BFI TIRE RECYCLERS OF MN, INC. 000760 - BOY SCOUT #136 000870 - BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES, INC. 000880 - BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. 000900 - BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 000923 - BURTIS, ROBERT 000930 - WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 000940 - BUSINESS RECORDS CORP. 000950 - C. W. HOULE, INC. 000960 - CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC. 31.96 32.47 82.69 55.56 113.46 150.00 188.16 12.24 138.42 450.00 17.40 20.00 1,094.32 21.74 39.00 819.03 577.25 35.97 155.84 639.79 435.42 300.00 13,554.20 23.49 1,445.55 317.56 Page: 2 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 001000 - CATCO PARTS, INC. 001006 - COBB GROUP THE 001030 - CELLULAR ONE 001070 - CENTURY FENCE COMPANY 001122 - CHYLE, JULIE 001157 - COOLANT RECOVERY COMPANY 001189 - CONSTANT, JACKIE 001194 - COAST TO COAST, INC. 001230 - CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 001260 - D.C.A. INC. 001270 - DALCO, INC. 001292 - DNR, DEPT OR NATURAL RESOURCES 001294 - DNR, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 001480 - FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC. 001560 - FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 001610 - GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 001618 - GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC. 001620 - GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 001627 - GOLD STAR BUILDERS 001660 - GOPHER BEARING COMPANY, INC. 001680 - GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 001825 - HEALTH PARTNERS 001881 - HUGO HEATING AND COOLING 001940 - INTERIOR COMM SYSTEM, INC. 001970 - INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC. 001971 - INFRATECH, INC. SUITE 100 40.41 49.00 128.17 4,516.00 117.00 99.00 163.40 122.08 46.71 155.80 399.78 62.99 13.53 15.00 175.68 31.33 11,028.79 27.32 185.94 21.88 227.50 9,892.00 97.00 85.00 86.80 300.00 Page: 3 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 001980 - INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS 002030 - J -CRAFT 002070 - JEWELL NURSERIES, INC. 002100 - JULEEN DESIGNS 002130 - KEN'S RADIATOR SERVICE 002141 - KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER 002340 - LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC. 002410 - LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB 002547 - MEMA 002550 - MENARDS, INC. 002570 - METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 002580 - METROPOLITAN AREA 002610 - MIDWAY ELECTRONICS 002670 - MIDWEST SPECIALTY SALES, INC. 002900 - MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY 003018 - MR. BAKERY 003074 - MYER, SCOTT 003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 003270 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 003310 - NORTHWAY SPTS & GARDEN, INC. 003320 - NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 003443 - OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER 003492 - PETTY CASH 003578 - PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION 003600 - PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 003760 - REMINGTON ELECTRIC, INC. 127.67 350.65 1,656.90 108.58 38.00 139.00 766.85 300.00 30.00 51.26 50,719.50 13.50 126.00 59.43 257.50 15.60 50.00 1,353.08 4,421.00 43.00 5,100.74 79.37 63.44 136.00 673.25 249.82 Page: 4 Date: 05/19/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 003850 - ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC. 46.32 003870 - S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 108.46 003873 - SAFE -T -FLARE, INC. 574.99 003875 - S.O.S. SAFETY 152.08 003900 - SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 181.58 003973 - SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION 50.00 004130 - ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS 28.02 004340 - T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 300.44 004346 - SULLIVAN, KIM 28.16 004456 - TODORA, GAIL 210.00 004470 - TRACY FUELS, INC. 1,536.29 004542 - TWIN CITY SCALE COMPANY 159.75 004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1,681.57 004671 - U S WEST CELLULAR, INC. 189.52 004748 - WAHLIN, CHRIS 100.00 004770 - WARNING LITES OF MN, INC. 52.28 004790 - WATERPRO, INC. 961.45 004809 - WHITE, BARB 22.00 004840 - WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 330.81 004878 - Z'S LAWN MAINTENANCE 213.00 ** Total ** $122,696.49 STAFF ORIGINATOR Brian Wessel DATE May 22, 1995 TOPIC Hot Air Balloon Contract Amendment The City of Lino Lakes entered into a contract on Sept. 26, 1994 with . Mary Alice LaForest (Blue Yonder Balloon Company) to fly a Lino Lakes banner for promotional purposes. A question regarding the limits of liability she was required to carry came up several months later. The question has been resolved with the Kelly Agency and its underwriter (see attached). Since the "aircraft exclusion" in the city's comprehensive municipal coverage does not apply to non -owned aircraft, the city is covered to the required limits. All that is required is that Mary Alice maintain her current limits of liability and continue to list the city as an additional insured on her policy. Since the city is covered to the required limits, l am requesting an amendment to the contract showing the correct limits of liability she currently carries. 1. Approve the First Amendment to the Contract between the City of Lino Lakes and Blue Yonder Balloon Co. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. May 8, 1995 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT between the City of Lino Lakes and Blue Yonder Balloon Co. for advertising services Term 6a under Insurance, page 4, will be amended to read that the Contractor will keep in force the following insurance protections in the limits specified: Commercial general liability ($100,000.00 per individual; $300,000.00 all passengers) FOR THE CITY OF FOR BLUE YONDER BALLOON CO. LINO LAKES Vernon Reinert, Mayor Mary LaForest, Contractor Marilyn Anderson, City Clerk MAR -08-1995 13:46 FROM KELLY AGENCY INC KLL.Y AINC TO 4644568 P.01 INSURANCE & BONDS March 8, 1995 Mr. Brian Wessel Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Re: League of Minnesota Cities Policies #CMC -14755 & IM.EL-1883 Dear Brian: It is our understanding that the City of Lino Lakes has their name on a hot air balloon as a public relations exposure. The balloon is not owned, leased, or operated by the City. The owner, Mary LaForest, is an employee of the City in the administration or clerical department. I have today confirmed that the above exposure is covered by policies CMC -14755 and MEL -1883. The exclusion for aircraft does not apply to a hot air balloons. We have requested a written confirmation of this from the underwriter. We will forward a copy of this in the next few days. The above policies will defend the Mary LaForest. We have received a Mary on her personal policy. This an additional insured. We request policy with the City as additional the renewal to our office. City of Lino Lakes and not certificate of insurance from policy does name the City as that Mary continue this insured and send a copy of Brian, please give me a call if this Ver truly yours, Robert P. Kelly, CPCU RPKIksr cc: Lisa Tarara, Underwriter needs further. discussion. 2U25 CENTRE PoiNn BoLitkvARD, SUITE 470 • P.O. Box 21128 • ST. PALL M1NNEWA.A 55121-012n e (612)452-5752 • FAX (612)452-5286 r FILE No. 108 04/19 '95 09:53 I D : BERKLEY 612 376 4297 Beekley Risk Services, Inc. 920 Second Avenue South Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402-4023 Telephone #: (612) 376-4200 Fax #: (612) 376-4297 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Date: APRIL 19, 1995 To: CANDACE KELLY Fax: 457-5786- Re: 52-5286Re: CITY OF LINO LAKES Sender: LISA TARIRA YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 1 PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL . CANDACE: WITH RESPECTS TO THE HOT AIR BALLOON AS A PUBLIC RELATIONS EXPOSURE, REFERENCE TIM COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL COVERAGE, FORM CMC(REV. 11 /93) PAGE 3 OF 19 LETTER E UNDER EXCLUSIONS_ E. DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE OWNERSHIP, MAINTENANCE, USE OR ENTRUSTMENT TO OTHERS OF ANY AIRCRAFT, AUTO OR WATERCRAFT OWNED OR OPERATED BY OR RENTED OR LOANED TO ANY "COVERED PARTY". USE INCLUDES OPERATION AND LOADING OR UNLOADING. THIS EXCLUSION DOES NOT APPLY TO NON -OWNED AIRCRAFT. WHICH IN THIS CASE, THE CITY UTILIZING MARY LAFORESTS' HOT AIR BALLOON FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF ADVERTISING THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, NON -OWNED WOULD APPLY. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR I CAN BE OF FURHTER ASSISTANCE PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. THANK YOU CANDACE! PACE 1 Renewal Declarations Named Insured: LaForest, Mary Address: 4819 Wood Avenue White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Policy No.: 95MN002585 Effective Date:(Standard Time at Locations of Risk) From: 12:OIAM 4/01/1995 To: 12:OIAM Agent or Broker: Roth Insurance Agency, Inc 325 Gibbs Street Maumee, Ohio 43537 (800) 78 -FLY ME 4/01/1996 General Insurance Company of Trieste and Venice and/or Generali, U.S. Branch One Liberty Plaza, New York, l icw York 10006 Tel: (212) 602-2633 Coverage is provided only where an amount is shown and a prenniuni charged. Insured Balloons Balloon #1 Balloon #2 Balloon #3 Balloon #4 Year Make 1979 Raven Model S -55A Coverage I - Liability Coverage A. Combined Bodily Injury Liability Coverage including passengers but not more than $100,000 each passenger each occurrence or $300, 000 all passengers B. Bodily Injury/Property Damage, excluding passengers C. Liquor Liability Combined Annual Aggregate for Coverage A, 13 R . C Coverage II - Medical Expense Coverage A. Medical Expense Coverage Including Pilot(s) [X] if box checked Endorsements Attached 01 G-03-91 Additional insured Special Conditions N-Nwnbcr Usage N5563Y Limited Comm_ 25% 3 Passengers Limits of Liability Premium $459.00 $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 annual aggregate $1,000,000 each occurrence $Included $100, 000 each occurrence $Included $100,000 annual subaggregatc for this coverage only $1,000,000 annual aggregate $5, 000 cacti person $20,000 each occurrence TOTAL PREMIUM Policy Fee & Taxes $46.00 $505.00 $0.00 Notice_ This policy is issued through your risk purchasing group. Your risk purchasing group may not be subject to all of the insuranc laws and regulations of your state. State insurance and solvency guarantee funds may not be available for your risk purchasing grout i Date of Issue Pilot Schedule Coverages afforded apply only while balloon is operated by the following: LaForest, Mary Mogren, Patricia Rae Counters' gh5ed By AGENDA ITEM 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR Brian Wessel DATE May 22, 1995 TOPIC Public Hearing for the Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7, Not -Tec Systems, Inc. and Mag - Con, Inc. in the Apollo Business Park BACICGROLM This hearing is to allow public comment regarding the establishment of a new Tax Increment Financing District to encourage industrial development in the Apollo Business Park. TIF District No. 1-7 will allow the city to provide financial assistance for land and special assessments to Nal -Tec Systems, Inc. and Mag -Con, Inc. TIF District 1-7 also includes the remaining unsold parcels within the city -owned portion of the business park. Df 1. Open the public hearing 2. Continue the public hearing DA Option 1 EXHIBIT B APOLLO BU.S1.1NE.',`-')` PARK 1 INDUSTRIAL CeLL.,1•1 c Irr ofi. /./N77 Oki 1 r'H T. 1. F. District 1-7 111, ye. "--- 7N". , '-. ...,, VI...NAGE FASEWE';1 ..- / / ..-----....--•' ... /---- . e''' z ./ el 7 1 TOTAL P.03 AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR Brian Wessel DATE May 22, 1995 TOPIC Resolution No. 95-63 Approving the Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 The final step in the process for establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 in the Apollo Business Park calls for the city council to adopt a resolution approving the plan. This resolution will be sent to Anoka County for certification of the District. 1. Adopt the resolution approving the plan for Tax Increment Financing Ditrict 1-7 2. Return to staff for further consideration ' AINL Option 1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 9 5 - 6 3 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-7 BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. On January 26, 1987, the City adopted a Development Program for Development District No. 1, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.124 through 469.134. 1.02. Since 1987, the City has established six tax increment financing districts within Development District No. 1, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 through 469.179. 1.03. The City has subsequently transferred authority regarding economic development within Lino Lakes, including administration of Development District No. 1, to the Economic Development Authority (the "Authority"). 1.04. In response to a development proposal in an area of the community which has not developed to its potential despite substantial public investment, the Authority has proposed to establish a seventh tax increment financing district within Development District No. 1. 1.05. The Authority has investigated the facts and has caused to be prepared a tax increment financing plan (the "Plan") for a new tax increment financing district ("Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7), describing the assistance which may be provided for the benefit of and to encourage development of two industrial projects. 1.06. All actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption of the Plan and establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 have been performed, including approval of the Plan by the Authority on May 22, 1995. 1. 07. The Authority has notified Anoka County and Independent School District No. 12 of the public hearing on the Plan to be held before the City. 1.08. The Plan is contained in a document entitled "Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7, Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority" dated May 22, 1995, and is on file at city hall. RHB88883 LN140-36 1.09. The Council has fully reviewed the contents of the Plan and has on May 22, 1995 conducted a public hearing thereon at which the views of all interested persons were heard. Section 2. Findings Relating to the Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7. 2.01. It is found and determined that it is necessary and desirable for the sound and orderly development of the Development District and the City as a whole, and for the protection and preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare, that the authority of the TIF Act be exercised by the Authority and the City to establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7. 2.02. It is further found and determined, and it is the reasoned opinion of the City, that the industrial projects proposed in the Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 could not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that therefore the use of tax increment financing is necessary to assist the projects. 2.03. The expenditures proposed to be financed through tax increment financing are necessary to permit the City to realize the full potential of the Development District in terms of development intensity and tax base. 2.04. The Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for development of the Development District by private enterprise. 2.05. The City has relied upon the opinions and recommendations of its staff, the Authority and the personal knowledge of the members of the city council in reaching its conclusions regarding the Plan and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7. 2.06. Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 is an economic development tax increment financing district within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174, subd. 12. Section 3. Approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan; Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7. 3.01. The Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 is hereby approved as adopted by the Authority. 3.02. Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 is hereby established. The boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 are as described in the Plan and incorporated herein by reference. 3.03. The City elects for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 to be treated as described in Minnesota Statutes, section 469.177, subd. 3(a) with regard to fiscal disparities. RHB88883 LN140-36 3.04. The Executive Director of the Authority is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution together with a certified copy of the Plan to the auditor of Anoka County with a request that the original tax capacity of the property within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 be certified to the Authority and the City pursuant to section 469.177, subd. 1 of the Tax Increment Financing Act and to file a copy of the Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 with the Minnesota department of revenue. 3.05. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to transmit a copy of this resolution to the Authority. DATED: , 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RHB88883 LN140-36 AGENDA ITEM 4 STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. Acting City Engineer DATE May 19. 1995 TOPIC Public Hearing - Well Site No. 4 BACKGROUND: The Feasibility Report for this project was received and a Public Hearing date was set at the City Council meeting held on April 10, 1995. The information contained within the report will be presented. OPTIONS: Public Hearing only, no further action is requested at this time. STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE May 18, 1995 TOPIC 95-12-P,, Slue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive Minor Subdivision This case involves a request to create a 2.4 Acre lot in the Apollo Business Center. The property is Zoned Light Industrial and intended for the Blue Heron Project - an office/warehousing complex. Utilities are currently available to serve the site. A 50' utility easement will be required over the existing sewer and water main that run along the approximate eastern border of the proposed lot. The City Zoning Ordinance, as amended by Ordinance No. 12-94, provides one acre lots with 100 feet of lot width in the Light Industrial Zoning District. The proposed lot meets those requirements. For P & Z information, staff, and the owner of the Apollo Business Center, G. M. Development, have determined to plat the property as parcels are sold rather than plat the entire site. This has allowed greater flexibility for potential purchasers and expands the options in marketing the site. Staff has reviewed this request and would recommend approval of the minor subdivision as requested with the condition that a 50' utility easement be provided over the existing sewer and water main on the eastern portion of the site. A site plan review follows this item which will deal with site improvements including drainage and utility concerns. The Planning and Zoning Hoard recommended approval. of the minor subdivision with the condition outlined above. 1. Approve minor subdivision with 50' utility` easen existing sewer and water main on eastern border of site. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. 7 B 9 tO 5 6 NO_ l 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 1_ � 5 z 30' 3 6 o S d 5 7 73- I 2 3 7 I9 LINO LAKES REHABILITATION CENTER 6UO: / 5U8 MARSHAN LAKE • i N Site Location Mag— 74TH STREET CITY OF APOLLO BUSINESS CENTER 0 200 .00 ------------------- -------- --- ---- _ - - PHASE 11 PROPOSED OW STORY DIJILDING PROPOSED BLUE HERON PROJECT , 0 / / // / / //). /'''' / / ,' / / / I/ // SITE PLAN cT Al `.1 OWNER III, `T. I LOCATION MAP SITE 7 I CONTRACTOR \ F k 1,1 \ I I \ s.1 CORP ARCHITECT \ IS I R \ P1011 API .417, Apollo BONN*, P1 SITE DATA DONT INDUSTRIAL .01 ACRES 49.300 XIfl 1994 USC B/P,S CONST,C,ON V I/O PROTECTION AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM OFFICE wARE4OVSE 0/550/0 PROJECT_ 11 IA I PON 01,11CP S111 )1 \ ROM! 00 \I0l 1 IOUSE 20.1(05051 5)205051 5,0205051 Q SO 0255 AGENDA ITEM 5B STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE May 18, 1995 TOPIC 95-13-S, Blue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review The Blue Heron Project involves the construction of a 20,196 square foot building containing 6,720 square feet of office and 13,440 square feet of warehouse. The property is located in the Apollo Business Center which is Zoned Light Industrial. Office and warehousing are permitted uses within this Zoning District. It is the developers intent to offer space for rent in 2500 square foot increments. A dock area is provided to access the warehousing portion of the building. Phase IS involves a similar building planned for future construction. This phase will also require a subdivision and site plan review. SITE AND BUILDING REVIEW: Staff has reviewed the submitted site plan and would recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits shall be obtained prior to construction. 2. The proposed construction shall meet all building and parking setback and height requirements. 3. A minimum of 10% green area shall be provided. 4. Landscaping shall be provided according to the site plan dated 5/7/95. A sprinkler system shall be provided for maintenance of all green areas. The City Forester shall review said Landscaping plan to insure suitability of selected species. 5. The exterior construction will be rock face block with breakoff -block design. 6. An interior sprinkling system will be provided per State Fire/Building Code. 7. B6-12 curbing shall be provided around perimeter of parking area and access drives. 8. Parking areas shall be surfaced and stripped with handicapped parking provided per ADA requirements. Adequate parking has been provided on site (50 parking spaces shown). 9. Trash shall be stored behind seven foot masonry enclosures which match the building. 10. Screening to match building shall be provided for rooftop heating/ventilating equipment. 11. All drainage, utility and grading plans shall be submitted to review and approval by the City Engineer. 12. Access to the site shall be provided by one (1) shared access drive. The developer shall sign a "shared driveway agreement" prior to occupancy. 13. A development agreement shall be signed by the developer and made a part of this site plan review. 14. A lighting plan be reviewed and approved by staff prior to construction. The City Staff and the EDAB Board has reviewed this request and would recommend approval with the conditions outlined above. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the site plan and recommended approval with the conditions outlined above. «OPTIONS 1. Approve site plan review with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION Option 1 6 / 7I B19�q�ll�l.l 5 6I'7' 8 1Ii 9 10 11 12 NU. . -../ / IJ -, R E HA BIIITATIOIt CENTER 111 `EN DD . o mm mm my SF Es inmonimpi to in �0 •p w- attk UN Mk ter, MEN MI o=ESE/ eIMI oZIE QMH ME MI Mmom aMI1113110 Wirili WIN! ao d, MIMI MEI MINIM IMIa E® -- mi.■ ,�T o.ami am = MI= MEM a© MEM MUM =Uri MEM MMIIIII aM11 OEM IMMO MEM ©� M 11111111011MMI MAW EM MARSHAN LAKE Site Location Map DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 3, 1995 Attention: Economic Development, City Council, and City Planning City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 To whom it may concern, Blue Heron, Ltd. proposes to build a 20,196 square foot building containing 6,720 square feet of office and 13,440 square feet of warehouse. That may change, depending upon the tenants. It also calls for the zoning to be light industrial, the GENERAL -site area being 2.38 acres, the green area is 26,000 square feet, with 25% for landscaping and green and sod areas. The code in this particular project is the 1994 UBC code. The construction type of this building is V and it will have an CONTRACTOR automatic sprinkler system for the green areas. It will also have fire protection or fire sprinkling inside of the building. It will be located on Apollo Drive in the city property of Lino Lakes. This will be a shared driveway for a project that will be 1500 going west of this particular building. This building is to be broken down into a 2500 square foot base, where as any one tenant can take 2500 square feet, 5000, 10,000, 15,000, or the whole building. It also has a dock level height in the back JACKSON for semi's to drive up to for unloading and it also has drive in doors for the other tenants. It has black top, which is five inches of base, two inches of wearing surface, and an inch and a half of top surface. It also, depending upon the civil STREET N.E. engineering, will have a medigation pond ori, lower area for drainage in the northeast corner of the lot. Outside construction will be rock face block and breakoff block design. It also will have reflective colored glass and colored MINNEAPOLIS frames. It will have B6-12 curb in all of the sod areas and the parking areas. The parking area will be SO cars, which more than meets the standard for Lino Lakes, MINNESOTA and the stripes will be painted white in accordance with the other parking sites in the City of Lino Lakes. Please also note on this proposed project for the Blue Heron 20,000 square foot building that all exterior trash areas are to be stored in 55413 seven foot high masonry enclosures to match the building. All rooftops HVAC units will be screened with standings seam metal panels to match the building. We will be glad to work with the city staff to do any recommendations made by City 612 Council, City Planning, or the City Staff. We are lookingforward to a long relationship and appreciate the amount of effort that the City of Lino Lakes has put in this project. We will look forward to digging. Thank you. 788-6840 FAX 612 789-0608 -------- ------- - - - / PROPOSED / , -- BLUE HERON PROJECT , „ , ,.. ,, , ...„ 7 7 ,„ ., I! -n F-71 1 /n 1 i / / , /Q... / " / / ' 1 ---='. 1 / ' WIROPCS2.0 ' ' . /23‘. i / I 1• 1 11011 DIND, 4 / LOCATION MAP 4 OW 6-06, 1 / / / / 0 0:11 ...---- . /..."'"....-,' -.4 ......, _ - -----..-- .------.- _- -• ------- ,,--;-- ---- ;..9......., -- '-'- . • „-:< ...-/''''' ...------ — ---;;;--- -----'- - - / // / ▪ / / SITE PLAN scm.E1 .40 SITE OWNER 111 L 1/ 11 R/1\ I Apollo Bonin, PArk SITE DATA Wit APIA 94.294 AR. 1864 COOL oCCURIA9M4 CONS/Run. 1,94( PRoRECTMN BUILDING AREA OFFMC WAREHOUSE PARKING CONTRACTOR ARC 17111:MOT. PRJI 1:11 1 14 WOO/. CHAKI.ISJ RADLorr BLUE I If.RON Loror 01 CIIKii CORI' ‘"-""'' SI (X\I wn LALLI.1.0-44 . 4,1/2 /1/, WARI.1 'OUSE t1.1,11.6/40 4149 4444, 1,11,1,111, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 04 ACRES 49,300 60 /2 1994 UUD El/M, Au909./AMC SPIRDIMFR SYSTEM 20.196 5091 6.1406011 13(429433 SO CA95 a 11 EES_CIAT_A `WI 1 I 1,111 1 - 3 •. •Ai MH 1:aP Il1L' t JOIST 120 ,0 .yrryy,,I4I4e::VV.Ir..— G10„[r4•LLN[A �Nwyn.•w wM IIW •.e.•MANM111 • 6$1••• t$1.0.1$ wan...... must.. UNC +N -0w $200$1.0 mvA r 1. nw NY w,..4 r wmwn was f<9✓tY IM SCIMT .1 MASONRY .1 MASONS, .t HASOMY .1 MASONRY t1 MASONRY.T MASONIT.t MASONRY et �o><_errs f terie 141I190 Mi.um. WALE SFCTICN MIOFNSNED METAL FLASHING r-------1 SOCF TOP EQUIPMENT PNNTOD TO MATCH FLASH NG �lf .... (iii/ 1I t. PREFNSIQD MET/A , • ' I"�" Ill' - rM _ f ii ill 11 11 4�F 8! I . ' 11 "r,---- :I i1"'•'!' �'! i ii . f t�: .;i;. �:yi 1t; 'i .(t ' IHS •: !. � ;,:,, .!' 1 '.; II„11 _;,;I i 1 �s1ti 11 (,k =' i . I �Ir"�.i 'I..If I [ I”" .� NORTH ELEVATION Scat Mr • Ta MEF9*SHED METH. SANG WEST ELEVATION ';III • iIE WALL SECTION !:1I4 EAST ELEVATION PREFNSNEO MEIN. SAND IMMO 411111.1 SOUTHFlFVATION SCALA Yr • 1'.tr OWNER BLUE HERON LTD INMOAIl:S.1N ST N.E MINNEAINLIS, MN S..413 VOICE 7ne emu FAO 7.9 WM CONTRACTOR RIVER WOODS DEVELOPMENT CORP INAlfACKSLIN ST N.E MINNEAPOLIS, MN 05400. VOICE 718 6M0 FAX 709060E ARCHITECT CHARLES J. RADLOFF AROHITECT 9V71 VALLEY VIEW IND SUITE +YS1 EDENI'NAIWE. MN SRAM VOICE, %II S47+ FAX 940 *2AI PROJECT BLUE HERON OFFICE SHOWROOM WAREHOUSE INTERSTATE MW APOLLO DRIVE LINO LAOF.S, MN SHEEi'r2571V) ;'1l�501 RNEE?FStit rA•,1 UNIT 'A' 5040 SQ FT UNIT 'D' 5040 SQ FT 2t• 0• 2P• 0• b R -i ---D 1 lY' WIG G G. m. II OFFICE - -- Cr OFFICE. . /7/ .7e7 allu E. b b GBEAN U2t i P.,. 6 r • WAIEN.01.111 i % G ........-._._._._._._._—._—•__—.__..�__._._._ SEAM UNE 0 i Y VG IOX17 G DANE N 011 DOO1 G TOUT TOUT WAREHOUSE WV N DOOR SEAM UNE WAREHOUSE SEAM INE 10XI2 ORNE N O1 OOOR TAUT taut WAREHOUSE Ir' W ODOR i I I I I ' I I 10X12' OE I OM ._._.__f.__._._.__.__.__._.___._.. 1CrX OWE OH PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN SGAE S/E• • i'0 l_� 04 A WART IAAI)1 WAREHOUSE 21 AM LOA n rvr 51A IIII. IMA21 1/Z/2/1/1.Z.4, Y/1 e e 10 LOCK 1110 OI DAN d"'—'7U!!1/IUUL OWNER BLUE HERON LTD ' I%XIJAO:St1N ST N.E MINNEAI2XIS. MN 341.1 VOICE 71422.4,1 FAx ley IRON WAREHOUSE SEAM UNE I • 2. 210 COCK HEC 0.1 DOOR 1/12lu1/u22::=1i CONTRACTOR RIVER WOODS DEVELOPMENT CORP I SW JACKSON ST N.E MINNEAPOLIS, MN SSEU VOICE TAT tow FAX 729 060e WAREHOUSE 0 0 3'510 O R000RC ARCHITECT PROJECT $HEttt'A CHARLES). RADLOFF AROIITECT 9901 VALLEY VIEW RD SUITE 5231 EDEN PIMAINIE MN 55.114 VOICE 911 SW FAX MI 22.1u BLUE HERON OFFICE SHOWROOM WAREHOUSE INTERSTATE 13w APOLLO DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN Walla AGENDA ITEM 5 C STAFF ORIGINATOR Alan Brixius, Northwest Associate Con-ultants DATE May 18, 1995 TOPIC 95-14-S, Willow Ponds Senior Cottages, Elm Street, Site Plan Review Planning Consultant Brixius will be present to review t e staff report on this item. The Planning and Zoning Board rec mmended approval of the Site Plan Review with Board Member Mesic voting nay. The approval was contingent upon the developer mee ing all requirements outlined in the staff report with the under tanding that garage units could be rented out to other tenants if the occupant did not own their own vehicle. 1. Approve site plan review with conditions outlined in the Planner's report dated May 4, 1995. NOTE: these conditions include concrete curb and gutter and the provision that tenants be allowed to rent their garages, to other tenants, if they do not own a vehicle. 2. Return to staff for further consideration Option 1 ISA C Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. URBAN P L A N N l N G • D E S I G N • M A R K E T RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: Bob Kirmis/Alan Brixius DATE: 4 May 1995 RE: Lino Lakes - Willow Ponds Rezoning/Preliminary Plat Review/Site and Building Plan Review FILE NO: 194.01 - 95.03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Cottage Homesteads of America Inc. Has submitted a request to construct a 48 unit elderly residential development upon a 13.6 acre site located east of Sunset Road between Interstate 35W and Elm Street (County Road 12). The development itself consists of four 12 unit multiple family structures and ten single family residential lots. In August of 1992, the City approved an elderly multiple family development that included 90 units upon the subject site upon condition that final site plans be submitted and approved by the City. The proposal now being considered has been down scaled from that conditionally approved development proposal. Single family homes are now being proposed on the western one-half of the property. To accommodate the proposed development, the following approvals will ultimately be necessary: 1. Rezoning of the western portion of the site from R-4, High Density Residential/PDO to R-1, Single Family Residential. 2. Preliminary plat. 3. Site and building plan review. At this time, only approval of site and building plans (multiple family component) has been formally requested. 5775 Wayzata Blvd.- Suite 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837 Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Recommendation Site Location Land Use Plan Preliminary Plat Site Plan Grading and Drainage Plan Utility Plan Based on the following review, our office recommends approval of the submitted site and building plans subject to the following conditions: 1. "Typical" building elevations and floor plans are submitted which identify structure height, exterior finish materials, and proposed dwelling unit areas. 2. A landscape plan be submitted which identifies the location, variety, and size of all proposed site landscaping. Specific attention should be given to that portion of the site abutting Interstate 35 and area east of the proposed single family homes. 3. To provide an assurance that parking supply shall meet parking demand, the following conditions should be upheld through deed restriction: A. The dwelling units are occupied only by elderly residents (55 years and over). B. All garage spaces are provided without fee. C. There shall be no dwelling unit conversions for family use. D. No outdoor storage be allowed in the designated parking spaces. 4. Deadend driveway concerns are resolved. 5. No parallel parking is allowed on the private streets on the site. 0t6 ' i P,4096J 6. The off-street parking areas, driveways, and private streets are surfaced in bituminous material. 7. A perimeter curb is provided around all off-street parking area driveways and private streets. 2 8. The site plan is revised to illustrate required handicapped parking stalls. 9. The site plan is modified to illustrate exterior lighting locations. 10. The proposed site access locations are subject to review and approval of Anoka County Highway Department. 11. If applicable, the site plan is revised to illustrate proposed trash handling areas. 12. All site signage comply with applicable provisions of the City Sign Ordinance. 13. All restrictive covenants are submitted for City review and approval. These covenants must include the provision that limits occupancy to elderly residents. 14. The applicant enter into a development agreement with the City. 15. Comments from other City staff. Following formal application and proper public hearing notification, our office recommends the following: 1. Approval of the requested rezoning from R-4/PDO to R-1, Single Family Residential for the western single family portion of the proposed subdivision subject to the following conditions: A. City approval of the Willow Ponds Subdivision. 2. Approval of the Willow Ponds preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: A. All access points from County Road 12 are subject to approval by the Anoka County Highway Department. B. The submitted grading plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. C. The submitted utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. D. The Fire Chief provide recommendation in regard to preferable fire hydrant locations. E. Comments from other City staff. 3 ISSUES ANALYSIS Rezoning As noted previously, a rezoning of the western portion of the subject site from R-4/PDO to an R-1 designation will ultimately be necessary to accommodate the single family home component of the proposed development. While it is recognized that a formal rezoning application is pending, it is considered appropriate to examine the rezoning issue as it will impact ultimate land uses in the area and design of the proposed multiple family component. In August of 1992, the City rezoned the entire site from an R-1 designation to the current R- 4/PDO designation in anticipation of a 90 unit senior housing project. The current submission represents a change from the originally considered development proposal in that a single family residential component is now being offered. Single family homes are not permitted under the property's current R-4 zoning. Judgement Criteria. In review of rezoning requests, the Planning Commission and City Council should consider its possible adverse effects. Judgement should be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. d. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. e. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Comprehensive Plan. The City's Land Use Plan (attached as Exhibit B) designates the subject site as "urban residential" or low density single family development. The intent of the urban residential designation is to provide a development density which will provide a high level of public services (sewer, water, parks, police, fire). Acknowledging the proposed use's consistency with the City's Land Use Plan, the proposed R-1 zoning designation is consistent with the provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 4 Land Use Compatibility. To determine the appropriateness of the proposed use, it is considered beneficial to examine adjacent land uses and zoning designations. The following is a listing of uses and zoning designations which surround the subject site: Direction Use Zoning North Undeveloped/low density residential R-1 (Interstate 35W) South Low density residential R-1 East Undeveloped (Future multiple family residential) R-4 West City of Blaine Recognizing that low density residential development exists south of the subject site and that buffering is to be provided to the north and east of the proposed R-1 District, the proposed single family residential use is considered compatible with surrounding uses. Public Services. As noted previously, a determination should be made that the proposed use will not overburden the City's service capacity. Considering that a recent fmding was made that multiple family residential use of the property would not overburden the City's service capacity, a less intense single family residential use is not anticipated to overburden City services. Traffic Generation. In consideration of the requested rezoning, an evaluation of anticipated traffic generation should be conducted. Traffic generated by the proposed single family dwellings is within the capabilities of Elm Street, which serves the subject property. In review of the submitted site plan, direct single family lot access is proposed onto County Road 12. As a result, some concern does exist in regard to the desirability of such access condition. This item will be discussed later in this report. Performance Standards. As a condition of plat approval, the proposed single family residential portion of the development will be required to comply with applicable performance standards. Specific issues will be discussed in latter sections of this report. Preliminary Plat Review In addition to the rezoning request, ultimate approval of the Willow Ponds subdivision will also be necessary to accommodate the proposed development (see Exhibit C). The subject subdivision includes ten single family residential lots within the western portion of the site (R-1 zoning area), and a single larger lot within the eastern half of the site (R-4 zoning area). The larger lot (Lot 1, Block 1) is to accommodate four 12 unit multiple family structures. 5 Density. As noted previously, the proposed subdivision is to accommodate two differing dwelling unit types and densities. Within R-1 Zoning Districts, the maximum number of dwelling units per buildable area must not exceed 3.2. The proposed density of the single family residential component of the subdivision is 3.2 DU/acre and meets maximum allowable density requirements of the R-1 District (10 DU divided by 3.2 acres). To satisfy applicable density requirements, the single family lots should be expanded in size or the number of lots should be reduced. Within R-4 Zoning Districts, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed per buildable acre is 15. In review of the site plan, the multiple family component of the development proposes a density of 8.3 dwelling units per acre (48 DU divided by 5.8 acres) and complies with applicable density requirements. Lot Sizes. Proposed single family residential lots range in size from 13,360 to 16,018 square feet and satisfy minimum R-1 District lot area requirements of 10,800 square feet. While all single family residential lots meet minimum 10,800 square foot lot area requirements imposed in the R-1 District, such lots fails to meet minimum R-1 density requirements. To satisfy such requirements, an expansion of lot sizes or omission of a lot or lots may be necessary. Within R-4 Zoning Districts, a minimum lot size of 25,000 square feet is required. At + 10.5 acres in size, the multiple family component of the development (Lot 1, Block 2) greatly exceeds the ordinance requirement. Lot Width. In the R-1 District, a minimum interior lot width of 80 feet is required. All single family lots have been found to meet such lot width requirements. Within R-4 Districts, a minimum lot width of 150 feet is required. At 650+ feet in width, Lot 1, Block 1, as illustrated upon the preliminary plat, greatly exceeds minimum lot width requirements of the R-4 District. Lot Depth. All proposed R-1 lots (Block 2) have been found to meet applicable 135 foot minimum lot depth requirements. No minimum lot depth requirements are imposed in R-4 Zoning Districts. Streets. The subject site is to receive its access via Elm Street (County Road 12) from the south. As a County road, all access points must be approved and issued permit by the Anoka County Highway Department. While Elm Street is currently classified as a County road, it is anticipated that at some future point, the street will be turned over to the City. The anticipated loss of County designation relates directly to the street's function and traffic volumes. In consideration of the street's current and anticipated function, the proposed direct single family lot access being proposed is considered acceptable. The plat shows a 7' street right-of-way dedication along Elm Street to bring the full right-of-way to an 80' width which complies with City standards for a collector street. 6 The submitted site plan calls for the construction of a privately owned interior street. According to the City Code, private streets are not to be permitted and that pavement widths (curb to curb) for residential streets less than 32 feet. In recognition of such requirements, a PDO, Planned Development Overlay zoning designation has been applied to the subject property. While the PDO designation may provide for deviances from the strict provisions of the Ordinance, in no case may proper site functioning or safety be compromised via the application of the PDO. Specific issues relating to the private street will be discussed under the site and building plan review section of this report. Grading and Drainage. In accordance with Ordinance requirements, a grading plan has been submitted for review. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, such plan should be subject to comment/recommendation by the City Engineer. Utilities. As required by Ordinance, a utility plan has been submitted for review. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, such plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, the Fire Chief should provide specific comment in regard to fire hydrant locations. Park Dedication. As a condition of subdivision approval, the applicant must satisfy City park dedication/cash contribution requirements, as determined by the Lino Lakes Park Board. Site and Building Plan Review As noted previously, the applicant wishes to construct four 12 unit multiple family structures upon the subject R-4 site with a PDO Overlay District to accommodate some design flexibility.. As per Ordinance requirements, a review of project site and building plans is required. R-4 Zoning. The site is zoned R-4, Multiple Family. The proposed Cottage townhomes are permitted land uses within this zoning district. Building Design. Generally speaking, the proposed building configuration is considered positive and presents some design diversity. Prior to final project approval, however, "typical" building elevations and floor plans should be submitted which identify structure height, exterior finish materials, and proposed dwelling unit areas. All dwelling units must meet minimum floor area requirements stipulated in the Ordinance. Landscaping. In accordance with Ordinance requirements, a landscape plan should be submitted. Such plan should identify all planting locations, varieties and sizes proposed on the property. Particular attention should be given to that area of the site which abuts Interstate 35 (i.e., berming) and are between the single family residential component and higher intensity uses to the east. 7 Setbacks. In review of the proposed development, the following principal setbacks apply: Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard R-1 District 40 feet 10 feet 30 feet R-4 District 40 feet 20 feet 30 feet NOTES: 40 foot front yard setback applicable to collector streets R-4 setbacks apply to site perimeter All proposed lots illustrate an ability to conform to the aforementioned setback requirements. Section 6, Subd. 8.E of the Zoning Ordinance stipulates that within PDO Districts, no structure may be closer than 36 feet to another building. The proposed building placements upon Lot 1, Block 1 conform to this separation requirement. Off -Street Parking. According to Section 8, Subd. 1. (2)(B), an off-street parking requirement of two and one-half spaces per unit is required in the R-4 District. As calculated below, a total of 120 spaces are required of the proposed multiple family component of the project. Parking Units Ratio Reanirement 48 2.5 per dwelling unit 120 The subject proposal illustrates 128 spaces of which 48 are considered tandem. It should be noted that tandem stalls typically are not considered in the off-street parking supply. Considering, however, that 1) the subject development caters toward the elderly, 2) the tandem stalls meet minimum dimensional requirements, and 3) the City has control over the use of the subject property via the PDO, the tandem stall arrangement is considered acceptable. To provide an assurance that the parking supply will meet demand, the following conditions should be upheld: 1. The dwelling units should be occupied only by elderly residents (55 years and over). 2. Garage stalls should be provided without fee. 3. There should be no dwelling unit conversions for family use. 4. Parking spaces will not be used for storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. 8 To allow efficient vehicular movement throughout the site, no parallel parking should be allowed. All parking stalls have been found to conform to minimum dimension standards of the City Zoning Ordinance. According to Section 8, Subd. 4 of the Zoning Ordinance, all off-street parking areas must be designed in conformance with the following standards: 1. Bituminous surfacing. 2. Perimeter curbing. 3. Striped stalls. 4. Designated handicapped stalls (per State requirements). 5. Parking lot lighting. Open Space. According to the Zoning Ordinance (Section 6, Subd. 8.2.E.(iv), at least 35 percent of the site must be devoted to open space. In review of the submitted site plan, it is estimated that + 4.8 percent of the R-4 District (Block 1) is devoted to open space. Site Circulation. Several concerns exist in regard to site circulation, as listed below. 1. Several multiple family structures (Buildings 2 and 4) are accessed by dead-end driveways without vehicular turnaround space. Such an arrangement does not provide for traffic turnaround without use of the designated parking area. While this arrangement may not present a concern for automobiles, it will complicate the egress of large vehicles servicing the site. It should be noted that van -type trucks (17 to 35 feet in length) require a minimum inside turning radius of approximately 25 feet. In many instances, turning radii, as illustrated on the site plan, will not allow for turning maneuvers of such. As a condition of site and building plan approval, this dead-end driveway should provide for truck turn around areas. 2. The subject site is to be accessed via two points from Elm Street (County Road 12). While the location of such access drives appear acceptable, the site plan will be subject to review by the Anoka County Highway Department and City Engineer in regard to access requirements. Trash Handling. If applicable, the site plan should be modified to identify specific trash handling areas. All trash handling areas must be demonstrated to be accessible to trash handling equipment. Signage. According to the submitted site plan, a monument sign is to be erected in the southeastern corner of the subject property. Prior to the erection of any site signage, detailed sign plans must be submitted and approved by the City. Such plans should specify the location, size, and type of all site signage. 9 Drainage and Utilities. Prior to final site plan approval, the submitted drainage and utility plans (referenced in preliminary plat review) should be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Development Agreement/Covenants. As a condition of project approval, the applicant should enter into a PDO development agreement with the City and post all the necessary security required by it. Additionally, any restrictive covenants applicable to the property should be submitted subject to City review and approval. CONCLUSION Based on the preceding review, our office recommends approval of the requested rezoning, preliminary plat and site/building plans subject to the conditions listed within the Executive Summary of this report. pc: Randy Schumacher John Powell Michael Saxton, Cottage Homesteads of Willow Ponds 10 SUBJECT SITE NORTH 1 MILE CITY OF LINO LAKES MINNESOTA EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATION CITY OF LINO LAKES LAND USE MAP LEGEND A - RURAL B - PUBLIC C - BUSINESS D - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL E - BUSINESS RESERVE F - INDUSTRIAL G - MULTIPLE FAMILY H - BUSINESS WITH SENIOR HOUSING I - SEE INTERCHANGE STUDY - M.U.S.A. =2:1 - PARK RESERVE 7.7 • / . .......- ...j."'. " • 'T1 0 A ,/ '•-..31 • NOTES: 1, '00$0t00 t Fur."' 0.400 N 1005,101 1 i t. 1'01101 00l 1154 .40 00 CO.IG 10t 10)00100 ♦ 0)1L IC 1T1"T I1 30'. WILLOW PONDS OF LINO LAKES, MN N' T 10011 41 (1 S 4440 .1 11 5 11100 .. 1.- R ' W_.:OONTY ROAD N0. 12 ELY STREET 1 lVld AHVNIIN1138d 1r 543`2I5 271.611' N er27'20' E 1556.67( r DEVELOPMENT DATA42 .p 1 Y4 A NL.1i.1 .lm/Yeti 1013 wrn 0611 I 11. MY11 • IM 11.11 01011/1.111 11 11110.14.1 ; eal 0 t0 t0 100 0r.p01.. 0..1. 111 1...1 MEET 1 v. Dtit"_ "mg MQ* „0101 WILLOW ONDS OF LINO LAKES. MN P R E L I M I NARY PLAT PREPARED FOR : COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF AMERICA +�- SITE LA► CONING AND TANDESIGS. NC. (J'` J C JOHNSON v 6.01- 750i A... IL kkeelAye Perk w 55420 j MO*01 16121566-066 fAXI 16121 566-4374 =' a t_ `� -� ..,,, I1i4e ... PRELIMINARY REVIE* COPY NOT FOR CONSTRRUC ION TNM, pl.. 1. • pr.Il.l.oy r..1.. espy ..1 ..y ,• 1resell ...11 e1 reel" wise).wise).......le. WILLOW PONDS OF LINO LAKES, MN /`. 65 cn rn 1 271,611' DEVEELO►11ENT DATA tarp/AmutOgi er :A MI ... ina9...l.lnrin.l »ra 6.0•661 r An.eo 'MTN . N 11.4r M.d.N1111 'I1/ r'""T •'I 0 IS S0 100 0ryhl.. 11.1. II. 1..11 MEET ' ut """' msc�..m� 1 "w"COTTAGE WILLOW' PONDS OF LINO LAKES. MN PREL I III NARY SITE PLAN"1010 PREPAR D FOR: HOMESTEADS OF AMER ICA W:= -.r- C J C JOF�JSON CONSILTAIJTS. NC. SITE PLANNSVO AND NOESN3N 6601 - 7511. Aw. K /reAD P.4. 161 SS426 LJ P16.... My s66-666 PAXI 16L2) 566-4374 ' �s-.� ... „. 0. PRELIMINARY REVIE* COPY NOT OR CONSTRRUC ION 1h1. p1.. 1. • ,r.11.l6•ry •610.1.. espy 04 ..y .h..,. ..r ...11 .1 r•rl.• •)•.ty I.. S/116110.6•4111100. .0161 ».1041. .`.. Y fid•• S ti"�:..•11 S iweer'w.e.I! 'tr•iti WILLOW PONDS' OF LINO LAKES, MN —"— • 7 1 6 - kat Tentt��� - - •Cr•.y- -- NVld 3OVNIVUO COvntr Boo NO. 12�_—. �_— - -�'_.�._._�. _.-N ee 27 io E-IS36. 672 e . ._ -_ — /rr--- . �— 543.215 > _/ DE'lELOPMENt bate / I 7(` I a a� �;.«. I PRELIMINARY REVIEW COPY I I L � 1 is"4.:,°. :it Ka; 1 t+ +° 1, 1 Q I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �Z�r 1 I :: 05r• ' 11 eNEEr 1 2 °"IE— 1,=e,T7 » nbn., WILLOW PONDS OF .LINO LAKES . MN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PREPARED FOR:. COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF AMER ICA. '' "`C a-«-• � -- i -' :'r ,---- J C J J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS. INC. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN 6601 • 7511. Aro. N. Brooklyn Pork. MN 55,28 Phone: 16121 566-6156 FAX: 16121 566.4374 „°e°i .., " .434 ,,..}„(}f r�.�. ,.[ rtf , '.! -i 15.E r•br - 4 R ro-.. Ffwrrwwrri .... .. V.r 1ha.. III q• ®.IMMI Pr. 1N IJIN11111 I •'Tom.• �11 1x11. lOOta MICA'• 1.11.71n. IS1t.1. • .1 lN L tiff /lA0�01�J4'T1fl 01111M1 � 1O ice. n, I itill•tmE11L:.:]r �0101r1 MAIL: LM. aa. .m-ai�- I�eQjO�c- 1 I• MTC 1 a nan 4ITlfJ ••!0�.0��!!1.00[. C: i••••>H WILLOW PONDS' OF LINO LAKES, MN —"— • 7 1 6 - kat Tentt��� - - •Cr•.y- -- NVld 3OVNIVUO COvntr Boo NO. 12�_—. �_— - -�'_.�._._�. _.-N ee 27 io E-IS36. 672 e . ._ -_ — /rr--- . �— 543.215 > _/ DE'lELOPMENt bate / I 7(` I a a� �;.«. I PRELIMINARY REVIEW COPY I I L � 1 is"4.:,°. :it Ka; 1 t+ +° 1, 1 Q I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �Z�r 1 I :: 05r• ' 11 eNEEr 1 2 °"IE— 1,=e,T7 » nbn., WILLOW PONDS OF .LINO LAKES . MN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PREPARED FOR:. COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF AMER ICA. '' "`C a-«-• � -- i -' :'r ,---- J C J J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS. INC. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN 6601 • 7511. Aro. N. Brooklyn Pork. MN 55,28 Phone: 16121 566-6156 FAX: 16121 566.4374 „°e°i .., " .434 ,,..}„(}f Mon144.9'y /slum*. MC. 1,11-430-0/011 AGENDA ITEM 5 D. STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Nyland DATE May 18, 1995 TOPIC 95-15-S, Lino Lakes Correctional Facility, 7545 Fourth Avenue, Site Plan Review The Lino Lakes Correctional Facility is located at 7545 Fourth Avenue and Zoned Public/Semi Public (PSP). According to the City Zoning Ordinance, public buildings for county and state government are permitted uses in this Zoning District. Additionally, any construction other than single family requires site plan review. The proposed request is to allow six components of construction/reconstruction including the following: 1. Replacement of one boiler 2. Upgrade of existing perimeter fence with supplemental wire barrier and replacement of electronic perimeter surveillance 3. Remodeling and addition for the reception/segregation unit (2,450 square foot addition) 4. Construction of a new 232 bed minimum security chemical dependency unit (approximate footprint 34,425 square feet) 5. Increase capacity and remodeling of existing food service and dishwashing area 6. Remodeling to provide space for new dental exam room and x- ray unit in existing infirmary Areas to be constructed and/or remodeled are shaded on the attached site plan. The Building Inspector and Fire Chief have reviewed the proposed construction plans with the Correctional Facility. Because this is a State owned prison facility, extensive review is conducted on the State level. Additionally, numerous items are considered highly confidential and not for public information. Staff would comment that plans meet all requirements imposed by the Uniform Building Code and Fire Code. Engineering plans have been reviewed by the City Engineer and utilities are adequate to serve the proposed expansion. Staff would recommend approval of the proposed construction/remodeling with the tollowing conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction. 2. The City Engineer review and approve all utility and drainage plans. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this Site Plan Review with the conditions outlined above. OPTIONS 1. Approve Site Plan with conditions listed above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION_; ............................................................... Option 1 III. BID PACKAGE 1 - BOILER REPLACEMENT ("A" BUILDING) A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The work will consist of removal of an existing 300 HP boiler to be replaced with a new 500 HP boiler/burner system, including replacement of an existing boiler feed water pump and existing duplex fuel oil pumps. Use of #5 fuel oil will be eliminated. All work necessary to facilitate removal and replacement of the boiler will be part of the project. Page 40 IV. BID PACKAGE 2 - PERIMETER SECURITY UPGRADE A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION General The proposed Perimeter Fence Upgrade addresses two primary areas of improvements including replacement of existing and supplemental concertina wire barriers, and replacement of existing electronic perimeter intrusion and associated video assessment systems. Wire Replacement Existing galvanized short barbed tape helical coils will be replaced with wire reinforced stainless steel long -barb razor ribbon concertina coils. In general, a different approach from the existing multiple coil ground barrier will be provided. Two coils will hang vertically from the existing fence and a single ground barrier below will be provided in addition to the fence top coil at the outer perimeter fence. Special conditions are addressed with supplemental vertical and horizontal coils as the drawing indicates. Additional fence deficiencies and recommended improvements which may be addressed, budget permitting, include: replacement of fabric ties; removal of unused accessories; covering of exposed tension bar straps; and selected area nuisance fencing. Page 41 �°-—'--ti-----i-----T----1 -T------------T-----F<>------------ 1 i � i 1 1— I 1 p 1 oCD .40 ) SCALE M . 40'-O" �OONINI Y Y Q Y Y© Y Y Y KEY: O EXISTING CAMERAS (PM -TILT) 0 EXISTING MOTION DETECTOR ZONE' EXISTING MICROWAVE ZONES UA F 1 04111111111.1111011 1 lDINESOTA CORRECrIONA FACILITY at LINO LAKE AMON an Erissa WNW I — L G ,60 W W W W 9 _i • W W W W W W. W W W W W W W W W W W i W. W W W 1 Y W W 1 W W W y .-r >,w empum712m raw o *a NCRTH Y= K 011011 OCM1111 K D&C. alk7_11Sagnisriffra AU .,...Swim how P.m 101 DLL MAN IN III MOM' MI MM ..0. M e°ne r. • CE 1w1 Mor S1 70'4 EXISTING/DEMO 1/i" •I' CRVOZT5I5T3114C.5 CR30SZT515TSukc.5 (Q' COIL SPACAC• TO RENWNJ CR30SZT5tST&1SC5 0230SZTSISTSUSCS CRSOSZTSIST5115CS IS' OROINO BARRIER STAKES A7 MAXAVI R11.'04 U SH - '3 C. REDAR W?H 4' U - SHAPED 1NCCK PROVIDE EXISTING GRAVEL EEC - TTPICAL S.E. CORNER STERILIZAflaN IR" •1' airla ADD I) 30' DIA. CONCERTINA COIL TO TOP OF vICTORY ARMS LENGTH TO MATCH EXISTING CRDOSZTSISTSLUSOS SEC. OF NT. FEN. Imo" •I' EAST ELEVATION OF EEC. FENCE ATB BUILDING I/4" . I' MINNESOTA CORRECTIONA FACILITY at LINO LAKE ADMIX MID 113110011116 MIC IstrIM ..moll. MOM. Swim `.n Olt gr11 ye W ..1111M OS 1411•61 MOHR ON Ire lib — actais Y FQICE SEGTIQtl S2 r i. !�",ititAaTaizc.!z,a Viri�crsv51=P-47-11S_gSi.S1g._*-7fi�. �*�•►�Oi�1S� It��� ��� t•• i�ii.�. ♦.t����,�i •�:�: i..► �i • NV. p, t O vv� VA'r4 ._..i � � Al ��►�:: tisr jei I ►- P b•• • f• •44'..4•40 MINNESOTA CORRECTIONA) FACILITY t LINO 8LAKE 14D PAC= I P OMR r IMMOtOW INN . rr a fa *Wad a la Eff NMI . rra. alba amomim.e �tTL. co Ma *Iv IMO awn aa 664 Griot 1p faN SONS RSot =NIr. N Abut lb VIDEO A66E6SIIENT CAPIENA VIEW PLAN l��t �r it ES1.1 STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC AGENDA ITEM 5 Mary Kay Nyland May 18, 1995 PUBLIC HEARING - 6298 Hodgson Road, Plan Review E 95-17-C, Rehbein Conditional Use Pe 02_ ,&-ke•AG ransit, it/Site Rehbein Transit is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to allow the construction of a 24,075 (107' x 225') square foot metal sided pole barn for the storage of buses. The site currently contains an existing bus storage building f 12,950 square feet and a 5,940+ square foot shop/office. The pr erty is Zoned General Business and is located at 6298 Hodg on Road (immediately north of the Fox Trace Development). According to the City Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 5, Subd. 4. "Pole barn construction and sheet metal exteriors may permitted in all commercial, industrial and public semi-public zoning districts as a conditional use un the following circumstances: (iii) be er (a) The new pole barns are accessory structures used or storage of boats, lumber and building supplies, nd buses." Rebhein Transit provides transportation services to the Centennial School District. The School Districts' expansion plans will required the need for approximately 40 more buses to be stored at the Rehbein site. The proposed construction will provide interior storage for these buses. The City's EDAB Board has reviewed the site plan. The applicant has indicated that the exterior, although metal, will contain brick treatment along the front of the building similar to that existing on the office/shop building. Additionally, they do plan tq upgrade the front of the existing pole building with the overall color scheme in earth tones. City Staff has reviewed the request and would comment that the proposed construction meets the setback requirements, building height standards, and green space requirements. The existing on- site septic system is located to the north of the existing buildings and should not be affected by the proposed construction. We would recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and indicated that a sprinkler system will be required for the new building. 2. All buildings on site must be coordinated as to color scheme and brick treatment. Plans to be submitted at time of building permit review. 3. A 15' easement for trail purposes is to be provided along the front property line connecting with the Fox Trace Trail immediately south of the Rehbein Transit Site. The trail shall be graded and rocked per City Trail standards. The City will provide bituminous surfacing in the Fall of 1995. 4. Landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the City Forester prior to issuance of building permits and shall include treatment of the fuel area and front property line. The plan shall be modified to provide screening that coordinates with the trail system. It is suggested that plantings be grouped rather than evenly disbursed. 5. The additional parking area noted on the plan dated 5-26-94 shall be provided with a dustless, durable surface (gravel is acceptable). 6. Grading of the site shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Future increase in impervious surfaces shall require review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. Timing of the proposed construction must be coordinated with the trunk watermain project to be constructed this summer. A berm <be designed and provided along Hodgson Road. This o berm shall be incorporated into landscaping and trail plan. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review with the addition of condition No. 8 above. OPTIONS 1. Approve conditional use permit and site plan with conditions listed above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 Totals Report ZIP NUMBER 14 1090 5 - 1 55014 3346 55014- 62 55025 29 55025- 11 55038 362 55038- 92 55110 135 55110- 34 55126 34 55126- 1 55434- 11 Total: 5222 N Site Location Map racy. .co I OI A,, 11 rJil Proposed Building .2S L'_:JLL L' J (1 11 N�)✓ �. N. Sc4-.5 �-1 50 L0 lj i ft]i nut z - (,nivel Ai1,4 go(o. I 514r(uie -- Proposed tBIL 215 Landscu pc Buse nA•vo,r or TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM Mary Kay Wyland, To: Planning Coordinator Copies To: Alan Brixius, NAC From: John Powell Date: P May 4. 1995 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE:612292-4400 FAX:612/202-0083 Reference: Site Plan Review Rehbein Transit 6298 Hodgson Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota Commission No. 10414-950 We have reviewed the site plan dated May 26, 1994 prepared for the referenced property. Our comments are as follows: 1. The plan does not show the existing topography for the site. Although the plan also does not show any proposed grading it does indicate an area of "additional parking". If this area is created by placing gravel in what is currently a grassy area, the amount of impervious surface will be increased and also the amount of runoff leaving the site. The runoff rate from the site must not increase. 2. There is a large hill immediately south of the site in question which was created as part of the Fox Trace project. Any site landscaping must take the presence of this hill into account. 3. The City has obtained a permanent easement for utility purposes and a temporary easement for construction purposes along the west edge of this property as part of the Hodgson Road trunk watennain project. These easements are not shown. 4. The location of any existing on-site sewer systems is not shown. It cannot be determined if it is affected by the proposed additions. 5. The timing of the proposed construction is not given. It must be coordinated with the trunk watermain project to be constructed this summer. If you have any questions, please contact me. JMP/mha AGENDA ITEM 5 F STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Nyland DATE May 18, 1995 TOPIC 95-18-V, Bill Greene, 6693 Drive, Variance East Shadow Lake Mr. Bill Greene has applied for a building permit to add approximately 755 square feet to his property at 6693 East Shadow Lake Drive. In review of the permit application, it was determined that the lowest floor was constructed, in 1978, at an elevation of 886.57. This is .57 feet above the 100 year flood elevation. In 1982 the City adopted our current Flood Plain Ordinance which requires the lowest floor elevation to be 1' above the 100 year flood elevation or at an elevation of 887 in this location. Mr. Greene's property, therefore, became nonconforming. In order for Mr. Greene to meet the requirements of the Flood Plain Ordinance he would have to raise the proposed addition .43 feet. Mr. Greene believes this creates a hardship from both an aesthetic and functional standpoint. To allow the proposed construction at 886.57, the same elevation as the existing structure, requires a Variance from the Flood Plain Ordinance. According to the existing Flood Plain Ordinance, a "variance from the terms of this Ordinance" may be granted provided it "will not be contrary to the public interest, where, owing to special conditions, literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship...". Staff has determined that granting of this Variance is not contrary to the public interest and could be considered to create a hardship to the property owner. For P & Z information, the structure will meet all setback requirements of the R-1 Zoning District and the City's Shoreland Ordinance. We would, therefore, recommend approval of a Variance to allow construction of the proposed addition at an elevation of 886.53 - the elevation of the existing structure. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this request and recommended approval with the condition that the applicant sign a form to be registered with the property deed holding the City harmless of damages due to flooding. 1. Approve Variance as requested. 2. Deny Variance 3. Return to staff for further consideration Site Location ...4 _• Armen,• ••� j ,.. ,•. `. ,. N 17 •"..."16antiltit:I.i;f r )ight Guardrail Req'd Air Space Between ,indles, Rails, Etc. FIELD Cpy CITY Cr ULt, LAI( ?thLDIt4Q i7EPARl 4,1 NT AR nor. .. ,. _ - I. v. 1 COI • o -. 0 .1�..w^ CC to z �a*m sl J�. 2o`�y xTG 15- YF L. r Or GSC. G-27'10/ I \ 2- N'xQ%�M,I,, C4'J 2G -� 3.(/4x611/4'NU, UNDe42 EX(51". WPV.I. 4m 6 RT(--` t5,,cf I t 1 N Z- Ru, 3ELo W WPsL .- LOvJ f MIN,4'O" N 2.2x10 ?,SIDE 3L rnal> �CorT' LONG, Fid, i?P.N.YfSu- 1 �'0"MINI ',TUC WPsU, F.Ps1 L —4-4 L S G, POURED IN Flece Fi)(1'T: C., S(.,br6 14-A44 plc. I �5W5 a bel o,h, Z-2>oz.g02 , o� 2' 28' 2Vit' 6,g3j4' D` 2.248��� 25 J/V1 0. „✓G plc?' 601D C. -Lt i 2-2rlo cw1Co55R CN SITTft c� fit-^, Smoke D tactor Required Et461t,1 f2 � WO, In (l 5 /2,5t,-^ UP,—IA-IA 0,4 Tv Sipstio4, O/t- LocC JK. KIYGH5-N -4, �vE t r -,4)-7)7.----lta Smoke Detector Required In ,140, ` *WEj LNG )(2E 1.1\11r-10 FOOM ---Wz AM-vr.o• 12IN4.10 {2 'i cmov WAR- LIN o o.- t;XIgT. E cv GSC I ST. w > �t,ur+C� --- --r-- Y za W.C. �ro�f C /eara�ce 5'• 1 fie' -- 2 JPcoK STOPS, I 10N60 STC....; —2 -J -K 1-1.)q�? 2 I<NC( 5111.)P5 — -i JA .srut, I KING-,57D°-MiJ 4t.1e1gM VENT 1.486e> 6thrt6Lt t 4 f-ooF 411 kX TUBE 16.0 'ft /o f2CN-r I,VATloN 1/8" -1=a" —c 4-r Ficx ; Vhf U�N j 5 vr- _ 'Jlrr(L 510r -To Ma10-1 540511r-6 - Kr1-1 (2-eA1/ 5117E f✓L�VATLO-1 — 1 r Lu 1 36" Mi; Leu Th Baluste E, dYE{�ttt;AD I • Le'crTICe,F L 1 1 1 n 'cot4G. f2051"f2051"I I 1 I 1 I I 1 11 11 1 I 11----- cp 71rifoc11r.) Lu1 Lu1 _LuI 44_ A,1- -L _i_1:11_t_L,1 LI , L�,. �:«. 12Pc1E.1.-.-V ATIOt-i 116'.11-0" STAFF ORIGINATt R` Brian Wessel DATE May 22, 1995 TOPIC First Reading of Ordinance No. 10-95 Authorizing the Sale of City of Lino Lakes in the Apollo Business Park to Mag- Con, Inc, Mag -Con, Inc. is purchasing a parcel of land in the city -owned portion of the Apollo Business Park for its manufacturing facility. According to Chapter XII, Section 12.05 of the Lino Lakes City Charter, an ordinance is required to authorize the sale of real property owned by the city. 1. Adopt the First Reading of Ordinance #1O- 5 2. Return to staff for further consideration Councilmember introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 10-95 AN ORDINANCE OFFERING THE SALE BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES OF 2.2 ACRES IN THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF OUTLOT B The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: The real property is described as approximately 335 feet fronting on the north side of Apollo Drive and approximately 333 feet in depth, Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota. (The "Property") is owned by the City of Lino Lakes (the "City"). The city council of the City has determined that the Property is no longer needed by the City for any public purpose. The city council of the City authorizes sale of the Property to Mag -Con, Inc. for $85,800. The mayor and city clerk -treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to execute such deed and other documents as may be necessary in order to sell the Property. Proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used in accordance with the requirements of the city charter. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the city charter. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by councilmember and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. First Reading Approved on , 1995 Second Reading Approved on , 1995 Published in the official newspaper on , 1995 AGENDA ITEM 8A STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell, Acting City Engineer DATE May 19. 1995 TOPIC BACKGROUND: Resolution No. 95-49 Accepting Bids for Hodgson Road Trunk Watermain improvements At the March 27, 1995 Lino Lakes City Council meeting, the City Council passed Resolution No. 95-37, approving plans and specifications for this project and ordering the Advertisement for Bids. The bids were opened at 10:00 A.M. on Monday,►pril 24, 1995. The lowest responsible bid for this project was received from Bonine Excavating in the amount of $237,947.86 which was about 13% over the Engineer's Estimate and could not be awarded due to City Charter restrictions. We have since contacted Bonine Excavating and have negotiated a reduction in the bid amount to $230,200.50 which would comply with Charter restrictions. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 95-49 accepting the bids and awarding the contract at the reduced amount. Reject the bids. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1- Approve Resolution No. 95-49 accepting the Bids for the Hodgson Road Trunk Watermain Project and awarding the contract to Bonine Excavating in the amount of $230,200.50. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-49 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR HODGSON ROAD TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, Pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Hodgson Road Trunk Watermain Improvements, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name and Address Amount of Bid Bonine Excavating 12669 Meadowvale Road Elk River, Minnesota 55330 $237,947.86 C.W. Houle, Inc. 1300 West County Road I Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 $245,932.40 Burschville Construction 11440 -8th Street NE Hanover, Minnesota 55341 $291,865.75 Glenn Rehbein Excavating 8651 Naples Street NE Blaine, Minnesota 55449 $297,137.20 Northdale Construction 14450 Northdale Boulevard Rogers, Minnesota 55374 $298,864.65 Penn Contracting 1697 Peltier Lake Drive Centerville, Minnesota 55038 $299,113.20 Brown & Cris, Inc. 19740 Kenrick Avenue Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 $316,758.05 Ro-So Contracting 7137 -20th Avenue Centerville, Minnesota 55038 $330,636.50 Sue's Excavating Route 1, Box 151 Isle, Minnesota 56342 $340,670.24 Engineer's Estimate $209,29220 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Bonine Excavating, EIk River, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder, AND WHEREAS, through negotiation with the lowest responsible bidder the low bid amount has been reduced to $230,200.50, which would conform to City Charter requirements, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Bonine Excavating of EIk River, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for Hodgson Road Trunk Watermain Improvements, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of May, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1995. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer TKDA TOLTZ. KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS May 19, 1995 Honorable Mayor and City Council Lino Lakes, Minnesota Re: Hodgson Road Trunk Watennain Lino Lakes, Minnesota Commission No. 10632-02 Dear Mayor and Council Members: 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE:612/292-4400 FAX:612/292-0083 Bids for the referenced project were received on April 24, 1995, with the following results: Contractor Amount of Bid Bonnie Excavating C.W. Houle, Inc. Burschville Construction Glenn Rehbein Excavating Northdale Construction Penn Contracting Brown & Cris, Inc. Ro-So Contracting Sue's Excavating Engineer's Estimate $237,947.86 245,932.40 291,865.75 297,137.20 298,864.65 299,113.20 316,758.05 330,636.50 340,670.24 $209,292.20 A complete Tabulation of Bids is attached for your information. As the lowest bid received was greater than 10% over the Engineer's Estimate, the contract cannot be awarded at the original bid amount due to City Charter restrictions. We have contacted representatives of Bonine Excavating and have negotiated a reduction in their bid amount to $230,200.50. The contract can be awarded at this reduced amount. It is recommended that a contract be awarded to the low bidder, Bonine Excavating, in the amount of $230,200.50 Sincerely yours, eve ohn M. Pjbwell, P.E. Acting City Engineer JMP: j Attachment HODGSON ROAD TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 10632-02 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 24, 1995 10:00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION OUANTITY TABULATION OF BIDS ENGINEER ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS * Denotes error in this line on original bid BONINE EXCAV EXTENSION UNIT PRICE C W HOULE INC EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 1 MOBILIZATION 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 3 6" DIP CLASS 50 WATERMAIN 4 12" DIP CLASS 50 WATERMAIN 5 12" DIP CL 50 WM THRU CASING 6 6" MJ RES SEAT GATE VALVE 7 12" MJ RES SEAT BUTTERFLY VLV 8 6" MJ HUB HYDRANT 8'-6" 9 MJ CIE FITTINGS 10 22" DIA CASING PIPE FOR WM 11 DEWATERING 1 CLEARING 2 GRUBBING 3 REM/DISE EXIST BIT PAVEMENT 4 SALV/REINST EXIST DWY CULVERTS 5 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 6 BIT WEAR COURSE MIX 2331 T41 7 CRS -1 BIT MATERIAL FOR TACK 8 ROADSIDE SEEDING COMPLETE 9 SODDING 10 REM/REPL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 11 SILT FENCE 12 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1.00 2.00 25.00 3710.00 70.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 3385.00 70.00 1.00 14.00 15.00 3629.00 7.00 1682.00 727.00 30.00 1.80 5436.00 58.00 4000.00 1.00 LS EA LF LF LF EA EA EA LB LF LS TR TR SY EA TN TN GA AC SY SY LF LS 4000.00 600.00 15.00 23.00 21.00 360.00 730.00 1350.00 1.90 170.00 28000.00 60.00 50.00 1.50 170.00 7.00 27.00 1.00 1000.00 1.70 21.00 1.50 1200.00 4,000.00 1,200.00 375.00 85,330.00 1,470.00 1,800.00 2,920.00 6,750.00 6,431.50 11,900.00 28,000.00 150,176.50 840.00 750.00 5,443.50 1,190.00 11,774.00 19,629.00 30.00 1,800.00 9,241.20 1,218.00 6,000.00 1,200.00 59,115.70 209,292.20 11000.00 2400.00 28.90 34.66 25.22 295.70 997.00 1341.25 1.56 84.28 0.01 40.00 40.00 1.30 200.00 6.56 23.17 1.33 871.25 1.54 69.70 2.06 10300.00 11,000.00 4,800.00 722.50 128,588.60 1,765.40 1,478.50 3,988.00 6,706.25 5,280.60 5,899.60 0.01 170,229.46 560.00 600.00 4,717.70 1,400.00 11,033.92 16,844.59 39.90 1,568.25 8,371.44 4,042.60 8,240.00 10,300.00 67,718.40 237,947.86 4250.00 700.00 18.00 25.80 25.80 595.00 893.00 1210.00 1.90 141.00 48710.00 70.00 70.00 1.50 300.00 6.55 25.50 2.00 950.00 2.30 31.00 1.80 2300.00 4,250.00 1,400.00 450.00 95,718.00 1,806.00 2,975.00 3,572.00 6,050.00 6,431.50 9,870.00 48,710.00 181,232.50 980.00 1,050.00 5,443.50 2,100.00 11,017.10 18,538.50 60.00 1,710.00 12,502.80 1,798.00 7,200.00 2,300.00 64,699.90 245,932.40 HODGSON ROAD TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 10632-02 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 24, 1995 10:00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY TABULATION OF BIDS BURSCHVILLE CONST UNIT PRICE TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS * Denotes error in this line on original bid GLENN REHBEIN EXTENSION UNIT PRICE NORTHDALE CONST EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 1 MOBILIZATION 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 3 6" DIP CLASS 50 WATERMAIN 4 12" DIP CLASS 50 WATERMAIN 5 12" DIP CL 50 WM THRU CASING 6 6" MJ RES SEAT GATE VALVE 7 12" MJ RES SEAT BUTTERFLY VLV 8 6" MJ HUB HYDRANT 8'-6" 9 MJ CIP FITTINGS 10 22" DIA CASING PIPE FOR WM 11 DEWATERING 1 CLEARING 2 GRUBBING 3 REM/DISP EXIST BIT PAVEMENT 4 SALV/REINST EXIST DWY CULVERTS 5 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 6 BIT WEAR COURSE MIX 2331 T41 7 CRS -1 BIT MATERIAL FOR TACK 8 ROADSIDE SEEDING COMPLETE 9 SODDING 10 REM/REPL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 11 SILT FENCE 12 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1.00 2.00 25.00 3710.00 70.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 3385.00 70.00 1.00 14.00 15.00 3629.00 7.00 1682.00 727.00 30.00 1.80 5436.00 58.00 4000.00 1.00 LS EA LF LF LF EA EA EA LB LF LS TR TR SY EA TN TN GA AC SY SY LF LS 2000.00 500.00 26.00 29.00 25.00 400.00 800.00 1200.00 1.75 150.00 52500.00 100.00 100.00 3.00 300.00 9.00 45.00 6.00 890.00 2.50 80.00 2.50 5000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 650.00 107,590.00 1,750.00 2,000.00 3,200.00 6,000.00 5,923.75 10,500.00 52,500.00 193,113.75 1,400.00 1,500.00 10,887.00 2,100.00 15,138.00 32,715.00 180.00 1,602.00 13,590.00 4,640.00 10,000.00 5,000.00 98,752.00 291,865.75 11000.00 1000.00 22.50 26.50 22.00 385.00 975.00 1700.00 2.70 180.00 62600.00 135.00 125.00 2.00 300.00 6.70 50.00 6.00 940.00 1.80 32.00 2.00 2800.00 11,000.00 2,000.00 562.50 98,315.00 1,540.00 1,925.00 3,900.00 8,500.00 9,139.50 12,600.00 62,600.00 212,082.00 1,890.00 1,875.00 7,258.00 2,100.00 11,269.40 36,350.00 180.00 1,692.00 9,784.80 1,856.00 8,000.00 2,800.00 85,055.20 297,137.20 5000.00 1200.00 37.50 45.50 110.00 420.00 800.00 1350.00 1.75 32.00 1.00 125.00 125.00 2.50 450.00 7.50 42.00 5.25 2500.00 1.65 48.00 2.10 10000.00 5,000.00 2,400.00 937.50 168,805.00 7,700.00 2,100.00 3,200.00 6,750.00 5,923.75 2,240.00 1.00 205,057.25 1,750.00 1,875.00 9,072.50 3,150.00 12,615.00 30,534.00 157.50 4,500.00 8,969.40 2,784.00 8,400.00 10,000.00 93,807.40 298,864.65 HODGSON ROAD TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 10632-02 BIDS OPENED: ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION APRIL 24, 1995 10:00 AM OUANTITY TABULATION OF BIDS PENN CONTR UNIT PRICE TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS * Denotes error in this line on original bid BROWN & CRIS EXTENSION UNIT PRICE RO-SO CONTR EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 1 MOBILIZATION 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 3 6" DIP CLASS 50 WATERMAIN 4 12" DIP CLASS 50 WATERMAIN 5 12" DIP CL 50 WM THRU CASING 6 6" MJ RES SEAT GATE VALVE 7 12" MJ RES SEAT BUTTERFLY VLV 8 6" MJ HUB HYDRANT 8'-6" 9 MJ CIP FITTINGS 10 22" DIA CASING PIPE FOR WM 11 DEWATERING 1 CLEARING 2 GRUBBING 3 REM/DISP EXIST BIT PAVEMENT 4 SALV/REINST EXIST DWY CULVERTS 5 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 6 BIT WEAR COURSE MIX 2331 T41 7 CRS -1 BIT MATERIAL FOR TACK 8 ROADSIDE SEEDING COMPLETE 9 SODDING 10 REM/REPL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 11 SILT FENCE 12 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1.00 2.00 25.00 3710.00 70.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 3385.00 70.00 1.00 14.00 15.00 3629.00 7.00 1682.00 727.00 30.00 1.80 5436.00 58.00 4000.00 1.00 LS EA LF LF LF EA EA EA LB LF LS TR TR SY EA TN TN GA AC SY SY LF LS 4000.00 1675.00 23.20 37.50 28.00 415.00 800.00 1475.00 2.00 170.00 52525.00 100.00 75.00 2.00 350.00 7.10 25.00 3.00 1600.00 1.75 90.00 0.80 3000.00 4,000.00 3,350.00 580.00 139,125.00 1,960.00 2,075.00 3,200.00 7,375.00 6,770.00 11,900.00 52,525.00 232,860.00 1,400.00 1,125.00 7,258.00 2,450.00 11,942.20 18,175.00 90.00 2,880.00 9,513.00 5,220.00 3,200.00 3,000.00 66,253.20* 299,113.20* 7200.00 585.00 20.35 33.25 21.25 442.00 1095.00 1520.00 1.35 116.00 58800.00 204.00 204.00 2.55 255.00 9.95 40.80 5.10 1836.00 2.00 69.35 2.00 7650.00 7,200.00 1,170.00 508.75 123,357.50 1,487.50 2,210.00 4,380.00 7,600.00 4,569.75 8,120.00 58,800.00 219,403.50 2,856.00 3,060.00 9,253.95 1,785.00 16,735.90 29,661.60 153.00 3,304.80 10,872.00 4,022.30 8,000.00 7,650.00 97,354.55 316,758.05 5000.00 1250.00 27.00 33.50 40.00 400.00 800.00 1325.00 3.00 185.00 56000.00 50.00 50.00 2.50 500.00 12.00 50.00 2.00 2000.00 2.50 80.00 2.00 4000.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 675.00 124,285.00 2,800.00 2,000.00 3,200.00 6,625.00 10,155.00 12,950.00 56,000.00 226,190.00 700.00 750.00 9,072.50 3,500.00 20,184.00 36,350.00 60.00 3,600.00 13,590.00 4,640.00 8,000.00 4,000.00 104,446.50 330,636.50 HODGSON ROAD TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED COMMISSION NO. 10632-02 ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: APRIL 24, 1995 10:00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION 1 MOBILIZATION 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 3 6" DIP CLASS 50 WATERMAIN 4 12" DIP CLASS 50 WATERMAIN 5 12" DIP CL 50 WM THRU CASING 6 6" MJ RES SEAT GATE VALVE 7 12" MJ RES SEAT BUTTERFLY VLV 8 6" MJ HUB HYDRANT 8'-6" 9 MJ CIP FITTINGS 10 22" DIA CASING PIPE FOR WM 11 DEWATERING TABULATION OF BIDS * Denotes error in this line on original bid SUE'S EXCAV OUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 1.00 LS 18000.00 18,000.00 2.00 EA 1000.00 2,000.00 25.00 LF 42.00 1,050.00 3710.00 LF 32.00 118,720.00 70.00 LF 48.00 3,360.00 5.00 EA 1100.00 5,500.00 4.00 EA 1600.00 6,400.00 5.00 EA 1985.00 9,925.00 3385.00 LB 2.00 6,770.00 70.00 LF 176.00 12,320.00 1.00 LS 50000.00 50,000.00 234,045.00 1 CLEARING 14.00 TR 50.00 700.00 2 GRUBBING 15.00 TR 50.00 750.00 3 REM/DISP EXIST BIT PAVEMENT 3629.00 SY 1.80 6,532.20 4 SALV/REINST EXIST DWY CULVERTS 7.00 EA 30.00 210.00 5 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 1682.00 TN 22.00 37,004.00 6 BIT WEAR COURSE MIX 2331 T41 727.00 TN 42.80 31,115.60 7 CRS -1 BIT MATERIAL FOR TACK 30.00 GA 5.30 159.00 8 ROADSIDE SEEDING COMPLETE 1.80 AC 1000.00 1,800.00 9 SODDING 5436.00 SY 1.79 9,730.44 10 REM/REPL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 58.00 SY 28.00 1,624.00 11 SILT FENCE 4000.00 LF 3.00 12,000.00 12 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1.00 LS 5000.00 5,000.00 106,625.24 340,670.24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8B STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell, Acting City Engineer DATE May 19, 1995 TOPIC Resolution No. 95 - 61 Approving Plans and Specification and Authorizing the Advertisement for Bids for Municipal Well No. 3 On September 26, 1994, the City Council ordered plans and specifications and authorized eminent domain for Municipal Well No. 3. This project was initiated at that time to insure that another well was "on line" before the peak water use demand occurred in the summer of 1995. SEH has submitted plans for the well construction, the pumphouse construction will be bid separately and will begin after the well digging is completed, about mid-August. The construction schedule presented indicates this well will not be "on line" for our peak demand. City staff will evaluate the options for addressing the anticipated demand, will monitor actual demand, and will bring appropriate recommendations to the City Council. Approve Resolution No. 95 61 Approving the Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids. 2. Return to staff for further review. Option No. 1 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 61 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR MUNICIPAL WELL NO. 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the City Council on September 26, 1994, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for Municipal Well No. 3 and has presented such plans and specifications to Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and the Construction Bulletin and advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published two (2) days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened and bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:00 A.M. on Friday, June 9, 1995 at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the city hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will be tabulated and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 P.M. on Monday, June 12, 1995 in the Council Chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given the opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of May, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM NO. SC STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell, Acting City Engineer DATE May 19, 1995 TOPIC Resolution No. 95 - 62 Approving Plans and Specification and Authorizing the Advertisement for Bids for the Black Duck Pumping Station The preparation of Plans and Specification for this project was begun early last fall. The documents have now been submitted to the City for approval by SEH with a projected construction completion date of August 31, 1995. 1. Approve Resolution No. 95 - 62 Approving the Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for the Black Duck Pumping Station. 2. Return to staff for further review. Option No. 1 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 62 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE BLACK DUCK PUMPING STATION WHEREAS, pursuant to a need to update and repair the Black Duck Pumping Station, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the Black Duck Pumping Station and has presented such plans and specifications to Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and the Construction Bulletin and advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published two (2) days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened and bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:00 A.M. on Monday, June 26, 1995 at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the city hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will be tabulated and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 P.M. on Monday, June 26, 1995 in the Council Chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given the opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of May, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. SNDA ITEM STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE john Powell. Actin g City Fhgineer May 19. 1995 Change Order No. 1 Country Lakes Estates - Phase 1 The final design alignment for the trunk sanitary sewer along the north side of Birch Street between West Shadow Lake Drive and Fawn Lane called for the removal of many trees of various sizes. In response to concerns raised by a nearby property owner and through discussions held between the property owner, the developer, and the City, a compromise was reached. This compromise calls for the jacking of about 220 feet of sanitary sewer instead of installing it via the open cut method. This will result in increased project costs to the developer and to a lesser extent the City, but will allow many of the larger trees to remain undisturbed. The contract is being modified to address the increased project costs. The Change Order also in of Fawn Lane which would provide indicated a desire to connect to City util quantities to inti er for a pro a stub to the east ner who has OPTIONS: Approve Chi Return to City staff for further review. RE+. oPtio the Country Lakes Estates - Phase 1 CHANGE ORDER TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Engineers -Architects -Planners Saint Paul, MN May 22, 19 95 Comm. No. 10416-02 Change Order No. 1 To for for Richard Knutson, Inc. Country Lakes Estates - Phase 1 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated June 14, , 19 94 . The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. This Change Order will (increase) (decrease) (not change) the contract sum by Thirty-six Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-two and - 25/100 Dollars ($ 36,922.25 ). This Change Order provides for the additional bid items and quantities required to jack a casing pipe beneath a wooded area on the north side of Birch Street at the Barott property instead of installing the sanitary sewer via the open cut method. It also includes additional quantities to provide a sanitary sewer lateral east of Fawn Lane on the north side of Birch Street. Birch Street Casing: Add: 24" Steel Casing, Jacked or Bored 220 LF $ 127.00 $27,940.00 12" DIP Class 50 Carrier Pipe 235 LF 41.35 9,717.25 Const. Std. 4' Dia Manhole 1 EA 1,140.00 1,140.00 Extra Depth of 4' Dia. Manhole 9.4 LF 69.00 648.60 Delete: 12" PVC SDR 26 SS 24-26' Lateral East of Fawn Lane: Add: 8" PVC SDR 35 12-14' Const. Std. 4' Dia. Manhole Extra Depth of 4' Dia. Manhole 235 LF 33.45 -7,860.75 Add $31,585.10 135 LF $ 29.25 $ 3,948.75 1 EA 1,140.00 1,140.00 3.6 LF 69.00 248.40 Add $ 5,337.15 NET CHANGE ORDER Add $36,922.25 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 COMMISSION NO. 10416-02 PAGE TWO Amount of Original Contract $ 431,609.50 Additions approved to date (Nos. ) $ 0.00 Deductions approved to date (Nos. ) $ 0.00 Contract amount to date $ 431,609.50 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) (Not Changed) $ +361922.25 Revised Contract Amount $ 468,531.75 TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON Approved CITY OF LINO LAKES, MN AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Owner By By Date John M. Powell, P.E. Approved RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. Contractor By Date White - Owner* Pink - Contractor* Blue - TKDA AGENDA ITEM 8E STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. Acting City Bngineer DATE May 19. 1995 Metropolitan Council/Lino Lakes TOPIC Conveyance Agreement BACK ROU Most of the issues related to this agreement have been outlined in the report to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Committee prepared by Metropolitan Council staff. A copy of this report has been attached. In summary, the agreement turns over to the City facilities which will no longer be useful to the Metropolitan Council system after the new Ware Road Lift Station has been constructed. This project is scheduled for completion in December, 1996. In order to ao mmodate the changes to the system proposed by the Metropolitan Council the City will need to modify our sewer system. These modifications include retrofitting the laurene Avenue list station for smaller pumps; reversing the flow in the forcernain between Ware Road and Lauren Avenue; and terminating the maintenance agreement with the Metropolitan Council for the Black Duck Ltft Station. The end result of all this activity will be the Metropolitan Council having a single point of seryice to this part of the City with a dear delineatkn between Regional and City'fac . Approve Conveyance Agreement with the Metropolitan Council and return It to the Metropolitan Council for further processing. Eaff for further negotiation with the Metropolitan Council. tion No. 1.- Approve Conveyance Agreement with the Metropolitan Counckl and retum it to the Metropolitan Council for further processing. Environmental Committee Meeting of May 9, 1995 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 Phone (612) 291-6359 TDD (612) 291-0904 FAX (612) 291-6550 Metro Info (612) 229-3780 DATE: May 1, 1995 TO: Chair and Members of the Environment Committee FROM: Jeanne Matross, Office of General Counsel (229-2108) SUBJECT: Authorization to Execute an Agreement to Convey Interceptor Facilities to the city of Lino Lakes, Committee Item No. 95-025-E EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ISSUE: The Metropolitan Council approved the Facility Plan for Lino Lakes on August 19, 1993 by Resolution No. 93-47. However, the Facility Plan approval was conditional upon resolution of conveyance and cost sharing issues prior to initiation of preparation of plans and specifications for the proposed project. Upon completion of construction of a new lift station, the Metropolitan Council Environmental Division is proposing to convey to the City of Lino I iilo s the lift station and interceptor facilities that are no longer necessary for the regional metropolitan interceptor system. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Policy 1-6A of the Metropolitan Council's Water Resources Management Plan adopted in 1988 provides as follows: Interceptors that no longer have a role in providing metropolitan -level sanitary sewer services should be removed from the metropolitan system and either capped and abandoned or reconveyed to local units of government with fair compensation made to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission All facilities that are conveyed to local units of government should be fully functional. FUNDING IMPLICATIONS: Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services Department had determined that the facilities to be conveyed to the City of Lino Lakes will have been fully depreciated by the time the new system has been completed. It is therefore proposed to convey ownership of the facilities to the City in an "as -is" condition for zero cost. The termination of the Land Use Agreement with the City of Lino Lakes would cost $22,00.00. PREVIOUS ACTIONS: The Metropolitan Council approved the Facility Plan for Lino Lakes on August 19, 1973 by Resolution No. 93-47 conditional upon resolution of conveyance and cost sharing issues prior to initiation of preparation of plans and specifications for the proposed project. DISCUSSION: As part of the Facilities Plan for Lino Lakes, MCWS is proposing to build a new lift station in Lino Lakes. When the new lift station is complete, a portion of sanitary sewer and lift station facilities now serving the City of Lino Lakes will no longer be necessary for the metropolitan interceptor system. Therefore MCWS has proposed that that portion of the sanitary sewer and lift station facilities be conveyed to the City of Lino Lakes. The conveyance would take place when the new lift station becomes fully operational and, because the proposed interceptor and lift station facilities will have been fully depreciated by the time the new lift station has been completed, the facilities would be conveyed at no cost to the City. In addition, as part of the metropolitan system serving lino Lakes, the MWCC had entered into an Agreement with Lino Lakes to share on an annual basis operation and maintenance costs of a Lino Lakes lift station. When the new MCWS lift station becomes operational, the MCWS will no longer need the services of the Lino Lakes lift station. The City of Lino I aces is planning to build a new lift station in the summer of 1995 to replace the lift station subject to the agreement. As part of the conveyance of excess facilities to Lino Lakes, MCWS has proposed that the maintenance agreement be terminated effective at the end of 1996 and that MCWS pay $22,000 (average annual operating fees for 1995 and 1996) to Lino Lakes immediately for use by Lino Lakes in constructing its new lift station. Finally, the Council approval of the Facility Plan for Lino Lakes was conditioned upon resolution of cost- sharing issues. The design alternative for location of the new lift station which would have required cost- sharing was eliminated from consideration by MCWS. There are, therefore, no cost sharing issues at this time. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Metropolitan Council declare that upon full operation of MCWS Project 91-06, a certain portion of the Lino Lakes Interceptor system will no longer be necessary for the metropolitan interceptor system. 2. That the Metropolitan Council authorize the Regional Administrator to enter into an Agreement to convey to the City of Lino Lakes, at no cost to Lino Lakes, that portion of the Lino Lakes Interceptor, Project 76-50, determined to be no longer necessary for the metropolitan interceptor system. Such conveyance will take place upon MCWS Project 91-06 becoming fully operational. 3. That the Metropolitan Council terminate the Land Use Agreement with the City of Lino Lakes effective December 31, 1996 for the cost of $22,000 to be paid immediately. -2- MAY 12 '95 16.21 MET C—GEN COUNSEL 114 Metropolitan Council Working for the Region. Planning for the FV4tum P.2 ofaaa of Genexat Couosel writer's Direct Dial: (612) 229-210$ Writer's Direct Fax. (612) 291-6640 May 12, 1995 Mr. John Powell Acting City Engineer 1189 Main Street Lino J b's, MN 55014- Re: 5014 Re: MC - Lino Lakes Conveyance Agreement MCWS Interceptor No. 76-50 Dear Mr. Powell: Enclosed for your review is a DRAFT T of the proposed Metropolitan Council - Lino Lakes Conveyance Agreement. At this time the business .item recommending the Agreement has been acted upon and passed by the Environment Committee of the Metropolitan Council. The full Council is scheduled to vote on the business item at its May 25, 1995 meeting. Therefore the Council will not be in a position to execute the Conveyance Agreement until that date. The copy attached to this letter is a draft for discussion purposes. If you have any questions about the draft, please call me at 229-2108. Sincerely, ne K. Matrons Associate General Counsel. JKM:am 230 EstPIFthStrseet St. Paul, Minnesota 55/01-1634 1812) 291-8359 F$x291-6550 IDD/TIY29/-0904, Metro jab ne 2293780 An Equot 4ijx Cy E.rjil[�te MAY 12 '95 16:21 MET C -GEN COUNSEL P.3 CONVEYANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between Metropolitan Council (hereinafter called the Council), and the City of Lino Lakes (hereinafter called Municipality); WITNESSETH THAT, in the joint and mutual exercise of their powers and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto, recite and agree as follows: Section 1. Council Action_ The Council, by its Council Action No. A 2E, determined to convey the ownership of a portion of the Interceptor described in Section 2 hereof which is owned and operated by the Council, and directed that all of its right, title, and interest in and to such portion of the interceptor should be transferred to the Municipality as of the date listed in Section 2 hereof tether, the Metropolitan Council, by its Resolution No. 88-53 dated September 8, 1988, has approved the reconveyance to local units of government of the interceptors which no longer have a role in providing metropolitan -level sanitary sewer services. Section 2. Transfer of Interceptors The Council will transfer to the Municipality, by quit claim deed or other appropriate instruments of conveyance in form satisfactory to the Municipality, all of its right, title, and interest in and to the portion of MCWS Interceptor Project 76-50 described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto, and any permits licenses, easements and other property rights which it has and which are necessary for the location, operation and repair of the portion of such interceptor. The Council will transfer such portion of Interceptor No. 76- 50 upon determination that MCWS Project 91-06 is fully operational. The Council anticipates that project 91-06 will be fully operational no later than December 31, 1996. Section 3. The Council will convey and Municipality agrees to accept the portion of the interceptor described in Exhibit A in "as is" condition, i.e., the condition the interceptor is in as of MAY 12 '95 16:22 MET C -GEN COUNSEL P.4 the date of the deed or other instrument conveying the portion of the interceptor. AU costs for repairs to the portion of the interceptor described in Exhibit A will be the responsibility of and borne by the City of Lino Lakes. tion 4. The Council will transfer the portion of Interceptor No. 76-50 described in Exhibit A attached hereto to the Municipality at no cost to the Municipality. Section 5. Municipality acknowledges that it is the intent of Council to abandon that portion of MCWS Interceptor Project 76-50 south of Lift Station No. 53 and that no portion of MCWS Project 76-50 south of Lift Station No. L-53 will be transferred to the City of Lino Lakes. Section 6. Council and Municipality hereby agree that the Land Use Agreement dated January 29, 1980 between City of Lino Lakes and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission will terminate effective December 31, 1996. In consideration thereof, Council will, effective upon execution of this conveyance agreement, pay to Municipality the sum of $22,000.00. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of this day of 1995. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CITY OF LINO LAKES By 13y James Solem Its Its k g peal Administrator Approved as to Form Approved as to Form - 2- NAY 12 '95 16;22 MET C -CEN COUNSEL EXHIBIT A PIPE DESCRIPTION: 5 That portion of MCWS Interceptor Project 76-50 described as follows: An eight inch diameter ductile iron forcemain located within highway tight of way starting at the intersection of Birch Street (CSAH 10) and Blackduck Lane, then proceeding westerly along Birch Street to the intersection of Birch Street and Hodgson Road (MN State Trunk Highway 49), then proceeding southerly along Hodgeson Road to the extension of the northerly border of Lot 40, Arthur E. Thom Acres, then proceeding Westerly along the northerly border of Lots 40 and 55, Arthur E. Thorn Acres to and including Lift Station 53 located at the end of' Laurene Avenue in Lino Lakes. EASEMENTS AND PERMITS J EE TITLE TO L-9 SITE AGENDA ITEM NO. 10B STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson DATE May 19, 1995 TOPIC Arbor Month Proclamation The City of Lino Lakes has taken an active part in the annual Arbor Day celebration over the past several years. This year the celebrations will take place on Tuesday, May 23, 1995 at the Anoka County Day School in the Correctional Facility and Friday, June 2, 1995 at the Lino Lakes Elementary School. A proclamation is part of the Arbor Month ceremonies, therefore, we are asking the City Council to approve the attached proclamation regarding the Arbor Month celebration, and extend Arbor Month to June 2, 1995 to include the Lino Lakes Elementary School. 1. Approve the proclamation. 2. Do not approve the proclamation. Option No. PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, In 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world, and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce oxygen and provide habitat for wildlife, and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products, and WHEREAS, trees in out city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community, and WHEREAS, trees wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has been recognized as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue it's tree -planting ways, WHEREAS, two Arbor Day celebrations are planned, one at Lino Lakes Elementary on June 2nd, and one at Anoka County Day School on May 23rd; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes, do hereby proclaim May as ARBOR MONTH in the City of Lino Lakes, and I urge all citizens to support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands and to support our City's urban forestry program, and FURTHER, I urge all citizens to plant trees to gladden the hearts and promote the well-being of present and future generations. DATED this of May 1995 SIGNED, MAYOR ItMetropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future May 8, 1995 RECEIVED MAY - 9 1995 «{T' OF LINO I_A> E� FOR YOUR INFORMATION TO: Metropolitan Area Legislators and Local Governing Bodies Heaving Jurisdictions Within Metropolitan Council Districts 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 The Metropolitan C ,un c:, the appointing authority for members of the Met:.ij litari Palk,and Open Space Commission. Currently four seats on the Commission have terms that have expired. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 473.303, Subd. 2(b) we are notifying "in writing the governing bodies of the statutory and home rule charter cities, counties and towns having territory in the districts for which members are to be appointed" that the Council's Appointments Committee will hold a public meeting to hear from candidates and others who wish to. speak on their behalf. This meeting will afford each candidate the opportunity to present information about their background and experience in public policy issues, with particular emphasis on any expertise or special interest they may have in the commission's area of endeavor. In making its recommendations; the committee will also consider evidence of the candidate's commitment to communicate regularly on issues before the commission with Council members, legislators and local elected officials in their district. The public meeting will be held on Thursday, June 1, 1995, at 7 p.m.`in the Metropolitan Council Chambers, Mems Park--Centrej 230 East Street, St. Paul: This location was selected because it is centrally located amidst the districts that candidates must reside within. This date was selected because it follows the legislature's adjournment, thus enabling legislators to participate, and also permits additional holiday leave, if desired, for the Memorial Day weekend. If you have any questions regarding the appointment process or wish to forward letters of support or nominations in writing, feel free to contact me at the address below or by calling 291-6390. Sincerely, Sandi Lindstrom Chair's Office 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TTY 291-0904 Metro Info Line 229-3780 An Equal Opportunity Employer AGENDA ITEM 10A STAFF ORIGINATOR Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer DATE TOPIC May 16, 1995 Classification and Sale of Tax Forfeit Lands Seven (7) parcels ofland in the City of Lino Lakes have forfeited to the State of Minnesota because of delinquent property taxes. The Anoka County Land Commissioner has asked that the City Council approve the classification and sale of the parcels. The parcels include: Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 Rice Lake Estates. - These two (2) 1 is are located east of the well house on Sandhill Drive. Soil con itions on both lots are very poor and may not support a foundation. Two other lots in Rice Lake Estates have also forfeited to the State because of poor soil conditions. New homes have been constructed on lots that have not forfeited to the State. Lot 13, Block 4, Lakes Addition No. 1 - This parcel is 1/17th of the lot which is the lake access lot on the west side of Reshanau Lake for the homes located on the golf course side of West Shadow Lake Drive. This is the fourth parcel of the 17 parcels that has forfeited to the State of Minnesota. Outlot A, Sunrise Meadows - This is a landlocked parcel. T e City already has an easement over the eastern portion of the lot ecause it is part of the Section 18 drainage area. Mr. Pow 11 has recommended that the City obtain title to the entire pa cel to insure that it will always remain a part of the Section 18 area wide drainage system. Outlot A, Lakeview Place - This is a very narrow strip of land. When Lakeview Place was platted, LaMotte Circles -w s platted over an o� existing lot. This is the remainder of the, t. would recommend that Anoka County offer this parcel to the adjoinin ot owner. AGENDA ITEM NO. 10A Page -2- Parcel 25-31-22-21-0004 - This is a small triangle shaped parcel located on Cedar Street. The parcel was divided from a larger parcel by a 50 foot wide NSP power line corridor. The parcel is not a legal building site. I do not know of any reason why the City would want to obtain title to this parcel. Parcel 36-31-22-14 -0004 This is a large parcel of approximately 18 acres located on the northwest corner of Rolling Hills Drive and Bald Eagle Boulevard. The entire parcel is low with cattails and other wetland vegetation. The Building Inspector indicates that there has been interest in the lot, however, both the Rice Creek Watershed District and the Department of Natural Resources have never issued a permit to place fill dirt for a house foundation or septic system. Kate Drury, Rice Creek Watershed District says they have received many calls on this parcel. She noted that the entire parcel is in the flood plain and development of the parcel would be governed by the State Wetland Conservation Act. Ms. Drury explained that, although no one has performed an evaluation of the site, it is unlikely that the Rice Creek Watershed District would issue a permit for any improvement. I do not know of any reason why the City would want to obtain title to this property. .................................. .................................. OPTIONS .................................. .................................. 1. Adopt a motion approving the classification and sale of the parcels by the Anoka County Land Commissioner with notice stating that the City would like to obtain title to Outlot A, Sunrise Meadows for drainage purposes. RECOMMENDATION;: .......................................................... Option No. 1 e eV Uleitt Z_ w J U m o6) PARK / 0u77"o5-7' %A/C - O ¢3 A`• u_ o. J C Arl .k 5 6v le 71'ID. A/77 >7Se44f ,2 417 ,y 3 L/ A 1' —37 .yam (9Z \ 7j y 4'.1 \ 15 X36.. �j1D/tt N�L�.f s \\.t.,..:: \8. J ,t /1;,,'-1 ",;;;'4,1:7 '3 a1ki, s\ 3 0 i4 X33,_` ' 97 �� X53 ';',.,,e ye :°29 \ ::;-J 'g l ;s e , " y — 1/ ° t ..Y6D 29 \ -_` �'• -H, �b.'i' /dill '0 /O� yyla i .( , tla /O o 9 j 9E. �D.w:� Lo�✓f5 4iA4/O' - (PRRK) 7 -Zs -JS u_ C (1) 2 J w Cr 0 0. 0 (1) H 2 J Q a 0 oe Fw l:t PARK 2 • L' /10.7'5 J ti 5 0'o m ly / j �}b A'5 et~ ,%s /I , t h m 7- A. h 4,uv > A:.ti• u (26) o d!/S) $ % tir � ,yt°`4° 3 2 `',111.'(r� a i 6Yso /•.77 h' EGRET ra le z 7e r, la ,,, lA „ /o 4(A) �'oc) <3c) r, 0`; ''(3s) 4 6 o a a - ' .��2 �v3 ',4 Z. s �, > 7 �o B 9'7,,14. 1J� �e � v � � v° v ��' o(4d% t t4O u (,./ R fi) le la x \ le t-• 70 .,b ' >v x LANE P,'112')/( ID41 JA ✓PJ -SJ 67/Y. CEN SEC. W 2 EPARK4 o cP /o\ 5 o) /�®ot / 74 587.4 2.D9585�9/ SC E I J4 5- 79° E 3+ / Logi' ) ASS IX 01 Tr, i i ' • ' / `•%' 2 ! 3 '6, 4 El:.! 5 .-,,,`.. 6 ', ,--,,i'',. . \ .1 •,• 1 ir: / , •' -•; (7,Z) 1 (7y) ' !-: (74) D__,_ _ _—_-..— 0' :4- r- ---;.=7-, I s''. .-='' i•-• ''' /2 ' '.: // :',-, /0 ' 9 . 8 7 ->-* ••'- i.:•.;-.•' '''1,' )! (7w ,/77) 711:7•,,,) . ',1.-,-- •' - LLI s" ,. , , , g, • F,. : X", ' .1,- : .",- .5111V/VYqArE 1-) 7' .7 1 'RED CLOVER LANE fouRrms,' 2 ADD.4 1 /..•,, 4.., , , ' .8, ;P P•91-` - L. i. : I , ' 12 S..,i /J ''‘, /4 .•::, ii., --L.! /6 •••.... {,:, ,., BRIAR „,„, DRIVE - 4 '- 5 --' 6 4. 7 ' ' 8 1 . 1 -2v ....t iN'5° 1 - -) /7 '1 16 '", /5 - 2:- ,,..3 , 1.2 , BIER DRIVE y _ , , ..f" , r 5 • - - E D °61 /4 4{1 • /6 1,5 ie ; 5 4 • 9 0 _J w 8 , • j a • /7 K. •2'.5 9.r• ! id 4,0' ' ' ,, : )‘ ' (..) ,...::, ''!, '-- ' ',' './ ^,.,, , ', /5 ,.1 /6 '4.; Cr /7 ..7. /6" /I,., /9 ,.!•L', 20 0 . I , :-...• ,,-, ,,..- • 1 gi : , e / ...?„. i ...,,, ..,,.....; ---‘9:i , 1---A--- , 4; -v•-77-•,iT-T- ,,,•-• D ,•-,„y zi.,-. 0, ,.... a) : 0 14 , / •,-,-,1 ,,,,,, 4„.„24' --,\; 23 i 22 "':1 2/ i 'i • <1 .:-•-4,/l(fe8t1,----*-:.-, ;-•+>,,\'' ;:°., I, -..7,12• /-.0,;• 4-.., r•-- ...• ii _ ..., .!, .,-7 2,0);,=2;,.., 2. j'''''''N..2 "'" i •,,..‘ ,,. GLADSTONE CIR. P ,,,0 Sr --, -2.-• ,,,, Z i• /2 .1".,. !„,V-,3-14.$, I :4;2 1 A.,; Si , ) , k '‘•() '-u..' ,27 ‘1 7 26 ,(1) 28 •:,,, 29 c.i.1) :,/•.( .• ii..2.) . R .- 72, ' •>/ (106) • . ..- . :,•1••, ... ,- I\ -'56. ei'd e "s.'" a'"''''i / /2..76' IN ‘82 2,7 1 AO - 'Si/ 6 g • ' ' 58 i4-,(4,--• FLOWER DRIVE ULMER 2 c RI cE ULMER DRIVE w ifL • TiON r; 4 • de 01117_07- CENTER OF NB9 7 , '2, -' /V.BS'E ;-.* J 5 r• "Ia 41-:.7 rD ,' - $ - i >S TI2 0 4:7—Q v (49 �4°' 50,4 G (2) C%ry of ST 4,a/ S. ///c. // 8- /891 g 3 `.,`,(t1') 0o n10 3 0� / Appy, (> o 1 as (i ) !it% R Pq ir J. Bj mootis tea....... •1 G7scfc 1 Ja t B.. ")v . „pZ 49i / c I r.� (j8). 2 ‘40.t. r y. 7/ LAMOTTE t1,3 'E- -4, 47, /e *. /1s 7S sLse '4444 - AG. easy - k4 (0 /O : allUMEIL COUNTY"' ROAD s.a9'sw s,�---------• - t out ' &otic► 4Aavikii 0V-31 a s - 3�2 (z) 39. S4*41c. �urTTy of A.✓o4:1 CITY 9 , — Y„CIT.( r t� ic7 a. 859, (22 QF ¢�o OF '3 ? IP /WEL. vae`1 2641-22 •ar (J4) i2C 7.7,0 (az) of 7zc 22, AGENDA ITEM NO. 10B STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asieson DATE May 19, 1995 TOPIC Arbor Month Proclamation The City of Lino Lakes has taken an active part in the annual Arbor Day celebration over the past several years. This year the celebrations will take place on Tuesday, May 23, 1995 at the Anoka County Day School in the Correctional Facility and Friday, June 2, 1995 at the Lino Lakes Elementary School. A proclamation is part of the Arbor Month ceremonies, therefore, we are asking the City Council to approve the attached proclamation regarding the Arbor Month celebration, and extend Arbor Month to June 2, 1995 to include the Lino Lakes Elementary School. 1. Approve the proclamation. 2. Do not approve the proclamation. Option No. 1 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, In 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day -be set aside for the planting of trees and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world, and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce oxygen and provide habitat for wildlife, and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products, and WHEREAS, trees in out city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community, and WHEREAS, trees wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has been recognized as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue it's tree -planting ways, WHEREAS, two Arbor Day celebrations are planned, one at Lino Lakes Elementary on June 2nd, and one at Anoka County Day School on May 23rd; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes, do hereby proclaim May as ARBOR MOIVTH in the City of Lino Lakes, and I urge all citizens to support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands and to support our City's urban forestry program, and FURTHER, I urge all citizens to plant trees to gladden the hearts and promote the well-being of present and future generations. DATED this of May 1995 SIGNED, MAYOR Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future May 8, 1995 RECEIVED MAY - 91995 FOR YOUR INFORMATION ITY OF LINO l_AK.ES TO: Metropolitan Area Legislators and Local Governing Bodies Having Jurisdictions Within Metropolitan Council Districts 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 The ivieetron titan Co a;^ appointing tin., ,tl for - 1 e : _`':h M"t _. itit� '.-c 'r _ r C.1: .. � ..::G=, .,, __.., $r.t.v..7_. .� c:�:7Gc.�✓ o; ;itl,(n„ ;S i:_.Jj:L.., i _ ....._, and Open Space Commission. Currently four seats on the Commission have terms that have expired. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 473.303, Subd. 2(b) we are notifying "in writing the governing bodies of the statutory and home rule charter cities, counties and towns having territory in the districts for which members are to be appointed" that the Council's Appointments Committee will hold a public meeting to hear from candidates and others who wish to speak on their behalf. This meeting will afford each candidate the opportunity to present information about their background and experience in public policy issues, with particular emphasis on any expertise or special interest they may have in the commission's area of endeavor. In making its recommendations the committee will also consider evidence of the candidate's commitment to communicate regularly on issues before the commission with Council members, legislators and local elected officials in their district. The public meeting will be held on Thursday, June 1, 1995, at 7 p.m.' in the Metropolitan Council Chambers,- Meals Park --Centre, 23-0 East-Fifthh Street, St. -Patti. This location was selected because it is centrally located amidst the districts that candidates must reside within. This date was selected because it follows the legislature's adjournment, thus enabling legislators to participate, and also permits additional holiday leave, if desired, for the Memorial Day weekend. If you have any questions regarding the appointment process or wish to forward letters of support or nominations in writing, fee! free to contact me at the address below or by calling 291-6390. Sincerely, Sandi Lindstrom Chair's Office 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TTY 291-0904 Metro Info Line 229-3780 An Equal Opportunity Employer