HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/01/2005 EDAC Minutes 1
APPROVED
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
DATE: Thursday, December 1, 2005
MEMBERS
PRESENT: J. Milbauer, J. Schwartz, B. Combs, K. Corson, J. Kuschke, K. Hansmann, J.
Helgemoe (part), T. Vacha, S. Rymer
MEMBERS
ABSENT: Bill Combs
OTHERS
PRESENT: M. Divine, M. Grochala
GENERAL/MINUTES
Minutes of September 22, 2005 were approved.
EDAC APPOINTMENTS
Ms. Divine reminded members that Mr. Milbauer, Mr. Helgemoe and Ms. Schwartz
appointments are up in December, and to reapply if they wish to continue on the committee.
VIKINGS STADIUM DISCUSSION
Ms. Divine informed the committee that the city council would be considering the passage of a
resolution that supported a voter referendum for a county-wide .75% sales tax for the Vikings
Stadium. Currently, state law requires that local governments hold a referendum if a sales tax is
proposed. The Anoka County Board of Commissioners is seeking legislation that would not
require a referendum for the Vikings stadium. A representative of a group called Taxpayers
Against Anoka County Stadium came to a recent open mike and proposed the resolution and
requested that the city council take action. To date, the only city to pass such a resolution is
Centerville. At the next work session on December 7, representatives from Anoka County will
address the council and explained the stadium bill that is being proposed.
Mr. Grochala explained that three years ago, Governor Pawlenty set up a task force to look at
stadium proposals. Anoka County proposed a package partnering with the Vikings for funding
sources and location. Originally, Lino Lakes was one of three sites being considered. The Blaine
site became the preferred site. Anoka County’s agreement with the Vikings expires December
31, but could be renewed.
The stadium bill being proposed lays out the establishment of an overseeing authority, state
participation for road improvements, and requirements of the Vikings, and the option for the
state to provide the legislative authority for a local government to decide whether to hold a
referendum to adopt a sales tax. Anoka County has taken the stance that if given the authority, it
would adopt a sales tax without the referendum.
2
Mr. Milbauer stated that he did not understand the city getting involved. He questioned how
much consideration the council has given it, and why they would act so quickly on a request
from a small group of people. Ms. Kuschke questioned what impact passing this resolution might
have, since Anoka County holds the responsibility for this decision. Mr. Grochala responded that
this has been a major push by the majority of the county board for several years and it doesn’t
appear to have any benefit for the city to take a stand against it. Mr. Milbauer pointed out that the
county pulled dollars for road improvements when the city council voted against Hodgson Road.
Mr. Grochala said there are a lot of road projects in the hopper with Anoka County, including a
$14 million project on County Rd. 14. Mr. Grochala also noted that this resolution could get
discussed during the legislative session and it wouldn’t help Lino Lakes to be one of a large
minority in opposition. Mr. Milbauer added that a stadium in Blaine could have a positive impact
on commercial development in Lino Lakes, which is a goal of EDAC. He added that residents
against the sales tax should take their opposition to the county, not to the city.
This item was put on the agenda by Councilmember Carlson. Mayor Bergeson is opposed to
approving this resolution. Mr. Grochala stated that all councilmembers have some concerns
about the sales tax, but are divided on whether the city should take a position.
Ms. Schwartz stated she had concerns about bypassing a state law to let the voters have a choice.
Mr. Grochala stated that “bypassing” the state law, as used in the resolution, is misleading. The
county is asking for a whole new state law. The legislature must give the county authorization
through a special law.
Mr. Helgemoe had to leave, but said he agreed with Mr. Milbauer’s point of view.
Ms. Divine stated the MetroNorth Chamber has not taken a position on this other than it supports
the county’s attempt to get the stadium in Anoka County.
After discussion, Mr. Milbauer moved that since this is an Anoka County issue, EDAC
recommends the City Council should not get involved. As a county issue, the parties promoting
Resolution 05-186 should submit it to the appropriate governing body. Mr. Corson seconded the
motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Grochala noted that about $115 million in accelerated road projects, including additional
lanes on 35W, could be a result of the stadium. These are all needs that are currently identified,
but are not included in the funding plan. The Federal Reserve Bank did a study that showed $177
per capita positive economic impact on a stadium in the community.
2005 PROGRESS REVIEW
Ms. Divine summarized the progress toward the goals in the EDAC 2005 Action Plan, including:
1. Woods Edge development. City land was sold, improvements are underway, and three
projects have been approved (Betty’s Pies, Country Inn & Suites, and the Workforce
Housing/commercial project). Hartford has a preliminary proposal to do the Town Center
Parkway/Village Drive corner. The YMCA has submitted an application. It was tabled at
Planning & Zoning and staff is working with the YMCA architect on the building site
and elevations. It will go back to P&Z in January.
3
2. 35E Corridor. The EDAC plan focused on industrial development, based on the current
Comprehensive Plan. With the completion of the AUAR, a potential Comp Plan
amendment is being requested by Hardwood Creek LLC for housing and commercial on
a 362-acre site.
3. Town Center Development. Ryan Companies is completing a multi-tenant area.
Schwan’s has almost completed its new facility in the Marshan Park, and the former
Schwan’s site will have the buildings removed for new commercial development.
4. Lake Drive. The city’s Lake Drive/Hodgson Road site was sold to RUD Surveyors. That
new facility is nearing completion. Mr. Grochala noted that budget constraints have
scaled back Lake Drive master planning, but in 2006 the city will concentrate master
planning at Main Street and Lake Drive and 77th Street and Lake Drive.
5. Apollo Park. The last site has been sold to Pomps Tire and is going through approvals.
6. Local Business Retention. The city has worked with Mountain Machine and Schwan’s to
keep them in the community. Ms. Divine is on the Quad Area Chamber board and a
member of the MetroNorth Chamber. Quad Chamber is beginning more networking
opportunities.
7. Promotional Program. The city will be looking at a promotional package in 2006.
PRIORITIES FOR 2006
1. City Survey. Decision Resources will be telephoning 400 randomly selected residents in
early January. Generally, the surveyors will set up a time for respondents, it takes about
20 minutes.
2. Comprehensive Plan. The survey will be the first step toward redoing the Comp Plan.
The city is planning a visioning process in 2006.
Ms. Schwartz asked if the City Charter will be studied now that the street reconstruction
referendum failed. Mr. Grochala stated there will likely be additional conversation about it.
BLUE HERON DAYS
Ms. Divine stated that this is an important year for the festival’s success. The major sponsor of
the parade may not take it on in 2006. The Lions are interested in sponsoring the fireworks. The
Jaycees are the corporate parent committee, and the Quad Area Chamber will take over a softball
tournament. In January, the Blue Heron Committee will be trying to get other sponsors and
helpers.
HARDWOOD CREEK UPDATE
The developers of Hardwood Creek have asked for the Comprehensive Plan amendment to be
tabled to January.
OTHER BUSINESS
Mayor Bergeson stopped in and thanked the committee for its work.
Mr. Grochala stated the VFW sheriff’s sale is on December 16. The problem was cost overruns.
Meeting adjourned.