Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/26/1995 Council PacketAGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday June 26, 1995 6:30 P.M. - Call to Order and Roll Call - Setting the Agenda: Are There Any Items to be Added or Deleted from the Agenda? CONSENT AGENDA A. Consideration of Minutes: 1. Closed Meeting, January 11, 1993, Lake Amelia Estates, Ron Birch Litigation REGULAR AGENDA 1. Open Mike A. Brian Winges Representing Brandywood Association B. Shelly Beaupre, 7064 Rice Lake Lane, Concern C. 20/20 Vision Update, Kim Sullivan 2. Consideration of Disbursements: A. June 26, 1995 B. Centennial Fire District Neighborhood Swimming Pool 3. Consideration of Hiring and Swearing In Police Officer, Chief Pecchia AGENDA 4. Consideration of a Proclamation, National Night Out, Chief Pecchia 5. Planning and Zoning Board Report, Mary Kay Wyland A. Minor Subdivision, Mag -Con, Inc. B. Site Plan Review, Mag -Con, Inc. C. Minor Subdivision, Harvey Meredith, 8301 - 20th Avenue D. Site Plan Review, Marshan Condominiums, Lake Drive/Aqua Lane E. Rezone, Willow Ponds for 10 Single Family Homes FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 11 - 95 F. Preliminary Plat Review, Willow Ponds G. FIRST READING, Flood Plain Management Ordinance No. 12 - 95 H. FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 13 — 95 Amending Sign Ordinance I. FINAL PLAT, Country Lakes Estates Plat #2 6. City Engineer's Report, John Powell A. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 76 Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement of Bids for the 1995 Sealcoating B. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 77 Receiving the Trappers Crossing Feasibility Report and Setting a Public Hearing for August 14, 1995, 6:40 P.M. C. Consideration of Bids for the Black Duck Pumping Station D. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 75 Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement of Bids for Well No. 4 (Clearwater Creek) E. Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 80 Adoption of Standards to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution F. Watering Ban Update PAGE 2 AGENDA 7. Attorney's Report, Bill Hawkins A. Consideration of Citizen Petitions 8. Consideration of an Addendum to the CDBG Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Lino Lakes and the County of Anoka, Randy Schumacher 9. Consideration of Waiving or Not Waiving Monetary Limits on Tort Liability Per Mn. Statute 466.04., Randy Schumacher 10. Consideration of General Fund Fixed Assets Policy and Procedures, Mary Vaske 11. Consideration of Extending CDBG Funds for a Pilot Adaptive/Integrated Recreation Program, Marty Asleson 12. Old Business 13. New Business A. Consideration of Minutes for June 12, 1995 (Council Member Kuether was absent.) B. Recognition of Donna Carlson's Appointment to the Fairview Divisional Board Effective July 1, 1995, Mayor Reinert C. REMINDER, Special Economic Development Authority Meeting, June 29, 1995, 5:00 P.M D. REMINDER, Special Council Meeting, June 29, 1995, 5:15 P.M. E. REMINDER, City Council Budget Work Session, Monday, August 21, 1995 14. Adjourn PAGE 3 AGENDA ITEM -No . 1A STAFF ORIGINATOR Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer DATE TOPIC Brian Winges Representing Brandywood Neighborhood Association June 23, 1995 Mr. Winges called me and asked to speak under Open Mike. He explained that he and his neighbors did not like the plan for the Brandywood neighborhood park and did not have the opportunity to give their input into the design. After the Council work session on Wednesday evening, Bruce who also lives in Brandywood Estates called me to say they he and his neighbors are meeting with Mr. Winges to address his concerns. Bruce felt that the neighborhood could resolve this concern without. the aid of the City Council. Bruce said that Mr. Winger will appear under Open Mike to let the Council know that he does have concern but is working with the neighborhood to resolve it. Take input from Mr. Winges and Bruce if he is present. Hopefully, the City Council will not have to take any action on the. matter. RECOMMENDATION To be determined after Mr. Winges and Bruce speak' AGENDA ITEM NO. 1B STAFF ORIGINATOR Tom Jackson, Assistant Building Inspector DATE June 23, 1995 TOPIC Shelly Beaupre, 7064 Rice Lake Lane, Swimming Pool Concern KGROUND On June 13, 1995, City Hall received a complaint from Lisa Larson who resides at 7072 Rice Lake Lane. Her complaint was that the owner of the property at 7064 Rice Lake Lane, Shelly Beaupre, had drained water from her swimming pool onto Ms. Larson's property. After stopping at the property several times to talk with the pool owners, I was able on June 19, 1995 to speak with Ms Beaupre's father. I explained the basis of the complaint to him and asked him to forward the correction notice to his daughter and to have her please call if she had any questions. The following day, I returned Ms. Beaupre's call and explained to her the neighbor's concerns and my concerns regarding detrimental effects the pool drainings could have on area, septic systems. Ms. Beaupre disagreed with my assessments and interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance and expressed a desire to be heard by the City Council under Open Mike. I would estimate in the fall that the pool drains 12" of water for winterizing. Ms. Beaupre has indicated that the pool is 20' by 40'. This amounts to 800 cubic feet of water at 7.5 gallons per cubic foot or 6,000 gallons of water drained in the full for winterizing. Take input from Ms. Beaupre. It is likely Ms. Larson wild also attend the meeting. If she does, she will also want to speak on the matter. SHELLY BEAUPRE, 7064 RICE LAKE LANE Page -2- The matter could be directed to the City Attorney to determine if the Lino Lakes Pool Ordinance adequately addresses this situation. RECOMMENDATION To be determined after Ms. Beaupre presents her position. CITY OF ACTION NOTICE Date A_S()O Name of Caller �. t 5 � Address «t a LN) Telephone No. y 0 ` J �� Project 7 O Contractor Engineer Reference -;\ G -AJ \ alt'L riNot Valid, No Action Taken Referred to j a N.r- C� kLZYN-- Date Approx. Schedule Date / : Action Taken/Remarks: /55u-�� J —/ % pis 3 2 Date Completed Representative Copies to: Address: CORRECTION NOTICE CITY OF LINO LAKES u-8ifder: --Permit ,0,-i/2-77-01-- ii277-01-- r ve/� ;�ns✓, iG �7 f v ' C F . L' � G i�� : l / ' j V/ cm c_ ., s }/•30. 3 / 7, 4-7- /,5)- An 7/7el ✓e-- ✓ic/17/ L_ - 2 5 - "s / o f",eaz/i p€ This Notice Must Remain Posted On Job Site Complete Corrections Before Calling For Re -Inspection 464-5562 DATE ISSUED INSPEOTdR DISBURSEMENTS JUNE 26, 1995 Page: 1 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount 1990 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBTEDNESS DEBT SERVICE FIRSTAR BANK OF MN(INTEREST/1990A CERTIFICATE) 619.75 Total for Department 619.75 Total for Fund 619.75 1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND A & B SANITATION(SERVICE/COUNTRY LAKES ESTATE) 585.00 BONINE EXCAVATING(COUNTRY LAKES ESTATES II) 82,656.75 RICHARD KNUTSON, INC.(COUNTRY LAKES ESTATES I) 36,986.16 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/HWY 49 & LAKE) 67.50 Total for Department 120,295.41 Total for Fund 120,295.41 1995 CONSTRUCTTON GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC.(WOODS OF BALDWIN II) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/WOODS OF BALDWI) APOLLO DRIVE CONSTRUCTION FUND 60,983.64 67.50 Total for Department 61,051.14 Total for Fund 61,051.14 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/APOLLO DRIVE) 1,552.50 Total for Department 1,552.50 Total for Fund 1,552.50 AREA AND UNIT CHARGE SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM, INC.(ADVERTISEMENT/WELL #3) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/WELL #3) 67.50 1,019.50 Total for Department 1,087.00 Total for Fund 1,087.00 Page: 2 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.(COMPUTER PARTS) 110.44 Total for Department 110.44 COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT BLOCK GRANT DELUCA'S RESTURANT SUPPLY, INC(SUPPLIES) K-MART(3 CARD TABLES) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(SERVICE) CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS Total for Fund 110.44 1,706.72 79.72 166.00 Total for Department 1,952.44 Total for Fund 1,952.44 HOLMES AND GRAVEN, INC.(SERVICE/BLUE HERON) 117.00 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(STREET LIGHTS/WOODS OF BALDW) 4,000.00 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(SERVICE/SENIOR COTTAGES) 457.23 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(SERVICE/BEHM'S CENTURY FARM) 443.55 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(SERVICE/MARSHAN TOWNHOMES) 890.32 UHDE, GARY(PURCHASE LAND -BLUE HERON) 97,408.00 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/NOL-TEC) 742.50 Total for Department 104,058.60 Total for Fund 104,058.60 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AKERVICK, CAROL(MILEAGE) 12.60 CENTERVILLE FLORAL(FLOWERS) 29.99 CUSTOM OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.(RECYCLE SUPPLIES) 7.46 D.C.A. INC.(FLEX INSURANCE) 159.60 * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 99.95 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 1,391.00 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 44.07 MN. CITY/CNTY MANAGE ASSN(DUES) 64.50 Total for Department 1,809.17 Page: 3 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount BUILDING INSPECTIONS * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) JACKSON, THOMAS(MILEAGE) * ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC.(SERVICE) CONSULTANTS 390.00 6.00 7.72 Total for Department 403.72 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(CRIMINAL ATTORNEY) 1,334.00 6,917.00 Total for Department 8,251.00 BRUCE NELSON PLUMBING(REIMBURSE CONTRACTOR LICENSE) 30.00 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE/FLEX) 1,405.00 STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY(ELECTRIC PERMITS) 25.00 FINANCE FUNDWORKS(SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) FIRE DEPARTMENT * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) FLEET MANAGEMENT Total for Department Total for Department Total for Department 1,460.00 243.75 484.50 728.25 437.00 437.00 * AMERICAN FASTENERS(SUPPLIES) 80.24 * CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC(PARTS) 295.64 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 12.75 GRAFFCO, INC.(GAS PUMP REPAIR) 16.50 JULEEN DESIGNS, INC.(PARTS) 227.38 LAWSON PRODUCTS(PARTS) 152.01 LINO AUTO MACHINING(PARTS) 15.00 MN. CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY(PARTS) 87.45 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC.(PARTS) 75.00 SNAP-ON TOOL,INC.(SMALL TOOLS) 715.68 TRACY FUELS, INC.(FUEL) 2,863.13 ZAHL EQUIPMENT(SMALL TOOLS) 31.53 Page: 4 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC.(PARTS) ZIEBART OF FRIDLEY(RUST PROOF) FORESTRY DEPARTMENT 608.38 407.46 Total for Department 5,588.15 DNR, DEPT OR NATURAL RESOURCES(PHOTO SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 113.84 280.00 Total for Department 393.84 A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 82.69 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 5.35 BEST LOCK SYSTEMS OF MN, INC.(TOOLS) 4.97 BEST LOCK SYSTEMS OF MN, INC.(SUPPLIES) 21.47 DALCO, INC.(SUPPLIES) 270.40 DALCO, INC.(SUPPLIES) 29.24 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 36.37 INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC.(SUPPLIES) 11.18 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 381.78 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC.(SUPPLIES) 74.55 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,213.29 Total for Department 2,131.29 MAYOR AND COUNCIL NEAL, ANDY(MEALS) 38.63 PARK BOARD DONLIN, AMY(STIPEND) JOHNSON, KENNETH(STIPEND) LANE, SHARON(STIPEND) LINDY, GEORGE(STIPEND) PIPER, BETTY A.(STIPEND) SCHMIDT, JOE(STIPEND) TASCHUK, PAM(STIPEND) PARKS DEPARTMENT Total for Department 38.63 150.00 150.00 150.00 225.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 Total for Department 1,125.00 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 2.75 * AMERICAN FASTENERS(SUPPLIES) 29.82 * AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS(SUPPLIES) 109.93 AUTO -MEDICS, INC.(SERVICE) 120.00 BIFF'S, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 964.63 Page: 5 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount * CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 31.67 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF(MONTHLY SERVICE) 17.97 * FOGARTY, MARY(COMPUTER CLASS) 64.10 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 53.42 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 3.65 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 2.11 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 995.00 J & E SMALL ENGINE & SPORT, IN(TOOLS) 85.40 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC.(SUPPLIES) 123.33 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 62.27 URICH, TRACY(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE) 20.40 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 116.65 * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 31.74 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD GELBMANN, RICK(STIPEND) HERR, GUY C.(STIPEND) JOHNSON, WILLIAM C.(STIPEND) MESICH, THOMAS(STIPEND) ROBINSON, AL(STIPEND) SCHAPS, JAMES(STIPEND) SCHONES, EDWARD L.(STIPEND) PLANNING DEPARTMENT Total for Department 2,834.84 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 225.00 150.00 Total for Department 1,125.00 * CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 34.22 CHYLE, JULIE(FACILITATOR - 20/20 VISION) 378.00 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 437.00 NEU AND COMPANY, INC.(SERVICE - 20/20 VISION) 1,942.58 * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(SERVICE) 1,668.50 Total for Department 4,460.30 POLICE DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 34.05 * ANOKA COUNTY(PERMIT 95-16) 15.00 B & S INDUSTRIES, INC.(SUPPLIES) 69.76 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC.(UNIFORM SUPPLIES) 352.55 D C. HEY COMPANY, INC.(SUPPLIES) 136.14 * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 67.23 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 2,251.00 MCGRUFF HOUSE NETWORK(SUPPLIES) 6.90 MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT (SERVICE) 940.00 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/OISM(SERVICE) 390.00 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 3.14 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER(SERVICE) 292.05 * ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC.(SERVICE) 61.76 Page: 6 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount STREICHER'S, INC.(PARTS) 16.74 TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC.(DARE SUPPLIES) 134.92 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 294.39 Total for Department 5,065.63 RECREATION DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 2.75 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 140.96 AUSLAND, KARL(PERFORMANCE IN THE PARK 7/09) 600.00 BREWER, JEFF(PERFORMANCE IN THE PARK 7/16) 500.00 * CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 27.76 * FOGARTY, MARY(COMPUTER CLASS) 64.10 * GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 7.49 GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 50.50 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 390.00 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, INC.(ADVERTISMENT) 46.70 TRIARCO ARTS/CRAFTS INC.(SUPPLIES) 290.06 Total for Department 2,120.32 SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT ACE SOLID WASTE, INC.(RECYCL REIMBURSEMENT (2266) COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES, INC.(RECYCLE OIL FILTERS) CONSTANT, JACKIE(RAM LUNCHEON) LAKE SANATATION(RECYCLING REIMBURSEMENT) WASTE MANAGEMENT BLAINE(RECYCLING REIMBURSEMENT (190) WOODLAKE SANATATION - BFI(RECYELING REIMBURSEMENT (780) STREETS 793.10 50.00 10.00 88.20 66.50 273.00 Total for Department 1,280.80 * AMERICAN FASTENERS(SUPPLIES) 4.87 * AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS(SUPPLIES) 109.93 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.(DECORATIVE ROCK) 666.98 * CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC(RENTED EQUIPMENT) 527.07 * CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 177.88 * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) 862.00 JACKSON-HIRSH, INC.(SUPPLIES) 57.60 LINO LAKES BLACKTOP, INC.(ASPHALT PATCH) 600.00 MICKELSON, LESTER(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE) 39.98 * NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP, INC.(SUPPLIES) 221.20 STATE OF MN CPV PROGRAM(CPV SUBSCRIPTION 1995/1996) 350.00 * VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.(TOOLS) 31.74 Total for Department 3,649.25 Total for Fund 42,902.19 Page: 7 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped Vendor Company (Entry Description) PROGRAM RECREATION WELLS, GAIL(PROGRAM REC REIMBURSEMENT) RECREATION DEPARTMENT by Invoice Total for Department ALL STAR SPORTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) ALL STAR SPORTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC.(SUPPLIES) GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC.(SUPPLIES) GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC.(SUPPLIES) GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC.(SUPPLIES) PIONEER COMPANY, INC.(SUPPLIES) Total for Department SEWER OPERATING SEWER DEPARTMENT * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) * HILLESHEIM, TIM(MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) Total WATER OPERATING WATER DEPARTMENT * AMERICAN FASTENERS(SUPPLIES) * ANOKA COUNTY(PERMIT 95-17) FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC.(CHEMICAL CONTAINER) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(INSURANCE) * HILLESHEIM, TIM(MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP, INC.(SUPPLIES) Total for Fund for Department Total for Fund Total for * - Invoice split to different Departments Department Total for Fund ** Total ** Amount 14.00 14.00 31.16 12.51 36.49 52.83 29.41 21.67 88.75 272.82 286.82 18.71 54.25 240.75 47.18 936.47 1,297.36 1,297.36 20.37 45.00 5.00 28.51 54.25 328.75 47.19 1,451.99 35.91 2,016.97 2,016.97 $337,230.62 Page: 1 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 000010 - A & B SANITATION 000050 - A T & T 000052 - A T & T 000093 - ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 000117 - AKERVICK, CAROL 000158 - ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 000210 - AMERICAN FASTENERS 000390 - ANOKA COUNTY 000510 - AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 000540 - AUTO -MEDICS, INC. 000680 - BEST LOCK SYSTEMS OF MN, INC. 000700 - BIFF'S, INC. 000703 - B & S INDUSTRIES, INC. 000740 - BONINE EXCAVATING 000852 - BREWER, JEFF 000877 - BRUCE NELSON PLUMBING 000880 - BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. 000930 - WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 000980 - CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 001030 - CELLULAR ONE 001054 - CENTERVILLE FLORAL 001110 - CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 001122 - CHYLE, JULIE 001171 - COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES, INC. 001189 - CONSTANT, JACKIE 001251 - CUSTOM OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 585.00 82.69 44.90 793.10 12.60 184.63 135.30 60.00 219.86 120.00 26.44 964.63 69.76 82,656.75 500.00 30.00 666.98 11,700.50 822.71 271.53 29.99 17.97 378.00 50.00 10.00 7.46 Page: 2 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 001255 - CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 001260 - D.C.A. INC. 001261 - D C. HEY COMPANY, INC. 001270 - DALCO, INC. 001292 - DNR, DEPT OR NATURAL RESOURCES 001298 - DELUCA'S RESTURANT SUPPLY, INC. 001329 - DONLIN, AMY 001480 - FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC. 001510 - FIRSTAR BANK OF MN 001528 - FOGARTY, MARY 001560 - FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 001583 - FUNDWORKS 001604 - GELBMANN, RICK 001608 - GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY 001618 - GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC. 001621 - GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC. 001680 - GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 001709 - GRAFFCO, INC. 001825 - HEALTH PARTNERS 001833 - HERR, GUY C. 001840 - HILLESHEIM, TIM 001860 - HOLMES AND GRAVEN, INC. 001970 - INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC. 001980 - INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC. 002025 - J & E SMALL ENGINE & SPORT, INC. 002036 - JACKSON-HIRSH, INC. 352.55 159.60 136.14 299.64 113.84 1,706.72 150.00 5.00 619.75 128.20 155.52 243.75 150.00 174.67 60,983.64 190.90 108.50 16.50 9,892.00 150.00 94.37 117.00 11.18 44.07 85.40 57.60 Page: 3 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 002040 - JACKSON, THOMAS 002095 - JOHNSON, KENNETH 002100 - JULEEN DESIGNS, INC. 002102 - JOHNSON, WILLIAM C. 002104 - K -MART 002243 - LANE, SHARON 002278 - LAKE SANATATION 002300 - LAWSON PRODUCTS 002355 - LINDY, GEORGE 002360 - LINO AUTO MACHINING 002380 - LINO LAKES BLACKTOP, INC. 002513 - MCGRUFF HOUSE NETWORK 002555 - MESICH, THOMAS 002590 - MICKELSON, LESTER 002720 - MN. CITY/CNTY MANAGE ASSN 002781 - MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/OISM 002832 - MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT SY 002870 - MN. CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY 003070 - MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 003150 - NEAL, ANDY 003164 - NEU AND COMPANY, INC. 003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 003270 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 003280 - NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP, INC. 003320 - NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 003443 - OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER 6.00 150.00 227.38 150.00 79.72 150.00 88.20 152.01 225.00 15.00 600.00 6.90 150.00 39.98 64.50 390.00 940.00 87.45 123.33 38.63 1,942.58 2,835.65 4,000.00 257.11 3,625.60 292.05 Page: 4 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 003510 - PIONEER COMPANY, INC. 003521 - PIPER, BETTY A. 003783 - RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. 003805 - ROBINSON, AL 003850 - ROYAL OAKS CAR WASH, INC. 003900 - SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 003915 - SCHAPS, JAMES 003935 - SCHMIDT, JOE 003985 - SCHONES, EDWARD L. 004010 - SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC. 004030 - SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 004060 - SNAP-ON TOOL, INC. 004070 - SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM, INC. 004130 - ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, INC. 004160 - STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY 004200 - STATE OF MN CPV PROGRAM 004240 - STREICHER'S, INC. 004367 - TASCHUK, PAM 004470 - TRACY FUELS, INC. 004479 - TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC. 004485 - TRIARCO ARTS/CRAFTS INC. 004576 - UHDE, GARY 004660 - URICH, TRACY 004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 004730 - VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 004780 - WASTE MANAGEMENT BLAINE 88.75 150.00 36,986.16 150.00 69.48 75.00 225.00 150.00 150.00 74.55 110.44 715.68 67.50 46.70 25.00 350.00 16.74 150.00 2,863.13 134.92 290.06 97,408.00 20.40 1,624.33 63.48 66.50 Page: 5 Date: 06/23/95 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 004797 - WELLS, GAIL 004837 - WOODLAKE SANATATION - BFI 004890 - ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC. 004895 - ZIEBART OF FRIDLEY 004923 - ZAHL EQUIPMENT 00529 - AUSLAND, KARL 14.00 273.00 608.38 407.46 31.53 600.00 ** Total ** $337,230.62 STAFF ORIGINAT?R DAVID J. PECCHIA, CHIEF OF POLICE DATE JUNE 26, 1995 TOPIC NEW OFFICER I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE OUR NEWEST OFFICER, KURT BAUSCH. KURT HAS OVER 12 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITS THE MINNEAPOLIS PARKS OF WHICH THE LAST TWO YEARS HAVE BEEN SPENT AS A MINNEAPOLIS PARK PATROL AGENT. KURT ALSO HAS EXPERIENCE AS AN ARMED SECURITY GUARD WITH THE FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICES. KURT BAS EXPERIENCE WITH COMMUNITY POLICING CONCEPTS SUCH AS SAFETY CAMP, CRiXE PREVENTION ACTIVITIES, AND VOLUNTEERISM WITHIN THE' CEUNITY. BIS EDUCATIONALEXPERIENCE INCLUDES: DEGREE FROM RMANDALE CONMUNITY COLLEGE, COURSE WORK AT 'THEunivERsITY Off' MI , NORTH DAKOTA`STATi UNIVERSITY. HE ALSO GRADUATED FROii'� GENTER OTA AND FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT. [N WELCOMING KURT TO OUR ORGANIZATION AND Pia C, 4.4441- L ,itS, / 57- 7 7` )L/�t iGENDA ITEM NO. 4 STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC BACKGROUND Chief David J. Pecs; June 26, 1995 National Night Out NATIONAL NIGHT OUT WAS DESIGNED TO HEIGHTEN CRIME AND DRUG PREVENTION AWARENESS, GENERATE SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL ANTICRIME EFFORTS, STRENGTHEN NEIGHBORHOOD SPIRIT AND POLICE COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND SEND A MESSAGE TO CRIMINALS LETTING THEM KNOW THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS ARE ORGANIZED AND FIGHTING BACK. RESIDENTS LOCK THEIR DOORS, TURN ON THEIR OUTSIDE LIGHTS FROM 7:00 PM TO 10:00 PM AND GET TOGETHER WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS. NATIONAL NIGHT OUT I5 FOR ALL NEIGHBORHOODS AND BUSINESSES IN LINO LAKES, NOT JUST ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH GROUPS. 1. MOTION TO APPROVE 2. MOTION TO DENY RECOMMENDATION OPTION 1 PROCLAMATION NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 1995 WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) is sponsoring a unique, nationwide crime and drug prevention program on August 1, 1995 called "National Night Out"; and WHEREAS, the "12th Annual National Night Out" provides a unique opportunity for Lino Lakes to join forces with thousands of other communities across the country in promoting cooperative, police -community crime and drug prevention efforts; and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes plays a vital role in assisting the Lino Lakes Police Department through joint crime and drug prevention efforts in Lino Lakes and is supporting "National Night Out 1995" locally; and WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of Lino Lakes be aware of the importance of crime prevention programs and impact that their participation can have on reducing crime and drug abuse in Lino Lakes; and WHEREAS, police -community partnerships and neighborhood safety and awareness and cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out" program; NOW, THEREFORE I, MAYOR REINERT, do hereby call upon all citizens of Lino Lakes to join the Lino Lakes City Council and the National Association of Town Watch in supporting "12th Annual National Night Out" on August 1, 1995. FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT I, MAYOR REINERT, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 1, 1995 as "National Night Out" in Lino Lakes. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer STAFFORIOI* TOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 22, 1995 TOPIC 95-20 P, City of Lino Lakes, for Apollo Business Park Apollo Drive Rai The property in question is located within the Apollo Business Park. and Zoned General Industrial. The City's Comprehensive Plan indicates the area as Industrial. As the P & Z is aware, a portion of the Lino Industrial Park was replatted into the'Apollo Business Park by the City Council in August of 1994. The City has been platting the property in the Business Park as parcels are sold. This latest request is for a site that is 2.3 acres in size. A site plan review for Mag -Con Inc will follow this minor subdivision request. Staff would recommend approval of the minor subdivision to facilitate the development of Mag -Con Inc. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval o Subdivision at their June 14, 1995 meeting. 1. Approve minor subdivision as proposed. No park dedication will be required as it was collected when the Lino Industrial Park was platted. 2. Return to staff for further consideration //:LL:/i:I:Lj B1 9l1 "12l MARSHAN LAKE N i ryfiwrilubtic ,41111 gip uo: CI • ata: FroFY to Discancna Elm. miroarmgc,:c Dili. ic MEM 030INIGOCIM NMI Lawaxiiimac: IniiGrO Elam FA wag RN HOMOMEo ANOKA W COUNTY E Site Location Map er- APOLLO BUSINESS' PA RIS" T (-IT)' OF 1./N0 /,AKE ,IA'0A'I CQ(/K7'). MINNESOTA 1INDUSTRIAL STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC AGENDA ITEM 5 B Mary Kay Wyland June 22, 1995 95-21--S, mag -con, Inc. XXX Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review Mag -Con Inc. is requesting site plan review for a 15,000 square foot production and office building to be located in the Apollo Business Park, with a 5,000 square foot expansion area. Mag -Con Inc. designs and constructs electrical transformers and currently employs 40 people. The property is Zoned General Industrial and consists of 2.3 acres in size. Brian Wessel, the City's Economic Development Director has been working with Mag -Con Inc. on this project for, several months and would recommend approval of the submitted site plan. Site and Building Plan Review: Setbacks: The proposed building meets the setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for a General Industrial District. Building Height: The Zoning Ordinance provides a maximum height of 45'. The proposed building will be 14' in height. Green Area: The Zoning Ordinance provides a minimum of 10% green area. The proposed construction, including the proposed expansion area, meets the requirement of the Code. Landscaping/Buffering: A Landscaping plan has been provided which indicates a combination of ash trees, junipers and misc. plantings. Aesthetic Compatibility: The proposed construction is designed to fit with the aesthetics required for construction in the Apollo Business Park. The exterior will be a combination of smooth and textured painted block - Off -Street Parking: The developer is proposing 50 parking stalls. This should be adequate according to the City's Parking Ordinance. As a condition of approval, handicapped parking shall be provided as dictated by the ADA Rules and Regulations. Circulation and Access: Access is to be provided from a shared driveway on the western side of the property. The utility/drainage plan does not indicate this configuration. A shared driveway agreement shall be made a part of the development contract. Loading and Trash: Trash handling areas shouldbe located on the plan and properly screened as provided in the Zoning Ordinance. Lighting: Off street parking areas will be required to be illuminated so as to reflect light away from adjoining property. Signs: Signage shall be in accordance with the City Sign Ordinance. A sign permit will be required prior to installation of any signage. Utilities, Grading and Drainage: Utilities, Grading and Drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Utilities are available to serve the site. CONCLUSION: City Staff and the EDAB would recommend approval of the Site Plan as submitted with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall sign a development agreement and post financial guarantees as specified by City Staff prior to issuance of any building permits. 2. The City Engineer shall review and approve utility, drainage and storm sewer plans. 3. Proper sign permits shall be obtained prior to installation of signage. 4. The Site Plan dated 6/2/95 and the Landscape Plan dated 6/8/95 shall be made a part of this approval and shall incorporate all landscaping, parking, building location, trash handling, loading docks, etc. The Landscaping Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Forester. 5. The parking area shall be provided with a hard surface with concrete curb surrounding all access drives and parking areas. 6. Handicapped parking shall be provided according to ADA Rules and Regulations. 7. Roof top heating and ventilating units shall be properly screened. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this request with the conditions outlined above at their June 14, 1995 meeting. OPTIONS 1. Approve Site Plan Review with the conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION Option 1 6171819 1:111 III 5 bl ) B 191'9 MARSHAN LAKE almontigno pitatrZEI ant 000 loon Vj 3,46 b a 11111314 ,Drn1 y- DSO 11 N . 6 ., ANOKA COUNTY E Site Location Map APOLLO BUSINESS PARK 1_INO ('IT) OF LINO LAKES, a.VOA'A COUNTY, MINNESOTA Oukrr ou,Ln, 33 OR,NACC vsroErn (INDUSTRIAL DR/ 1E. O//ACE «,EuE" L SITE PLAN SUIS 5Z d 0 • A-1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SOW r. PpM a516� date b. IDS 2124 Int Sheet New. A-2 n I I7 ❑ Ci Ci Fri C:; n n n a TI SOUTH ELEVATION r - 1o• n n n a SPAWN (MSH CONC. BLOCK PANT) PAUPOTTIED MST COPING Tri. TIP 'MED CONC. !LOCK PANT. • SMOOTH ENi311 CONC. STOCK PT. NSUTAtmm GLAzNG N A. ALUM. THERMO. IRK. FRAMES EAST ELEVATION SCAT( 1.r . lv SM00111 441544 CONC. BLOCK PANTO) NORTH ELEVATION SCAT( 1 r . 10• WEST ELEVATION SCAT( I r . IC le. d 4.86121 �t16 b. TOS ill! fi 3sRi 2121 Z {�li F, NOT/ NA A-3 zt-t REA \ • •,t..c._r>LL a, CA \le f't.t" 11 1 PLEA °Akekd jekVAM 111.111110 5LALL &AP S SEELen Arr-S. LAS tu.144.1tE '4( .r.t, NOBLE LANDSCAPE AND GARDEN CENTER 8660 CENTRAL AVE. SLANE, UN. 66434 PHONE 764-6076 • SCALE: \ I • 1143. DESIGNED FOR. •4g144' ADDRESS: ..kuagx,rmotoomel, -14/40iNWILAM4—}.. PRONE No DESIGNED BY t -um., N 0 30 0 20 SCALE IN FEET F I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1i 1 // / / —` N 69.400• W J6aA1----- —.$ t rEEKIMIrtIESEDIE PART OF OUTLOT A, APOLLO BUS6ESS PARK. ANOKA COUNTY, ANESOTA THIS SURVEY 5 SUBJECT TO CHANGE tPON RECEPT OF LEGAL CESCRPTION FROM PROPERTY OWNER. r INC 0.0 11.1104 JUNE 1995 1645 1 AGENDA ITEM 5 C STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 22, 1995 TOPIC 95-19-P, Harvey Meredith, Minor Subdivision/Variance EAU= 8301 20th Avenue, Mr. Harvey Meredith owns approximately 30 (29.4 +/-) acres on the west side of 20th Avenue just south of our border with Columbus Township. He would like to subdivide the site into three building sites. The property is zoned Rural and a 10 acre minimum lot size is required with a minimum lot width of 330 feet. The zoning in Columbus Township, adjacent to this site, is also rural with a 5 acre minimum lot size. The City's Comprehensive Plan indicates this property as rural. Utilities are not available to serve the site. Mr. Meredith is proposing the following: Parcel A - 10 Acres with 374.61' of lot width on 20th Ave. Parcel B - 9.4 Acres with 343.62' of lot width on 20th Ave. Parcel C - 10 Acres with 330' of lot width on 20th Ave. Parcel D - .03 Acres physcially separated from the balance of the property by I -35W. A Variance is being request for Parcel B for .6 acres. According to the City Zoning Code, "variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance may be granted in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undo hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration." The City must make findings of fact that: A. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. Mr. Meredith has the ability to split the parcel into two lots rather than three. Therefore a reasonable use of the property exists. B. That the plight of the landowners is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. In this case, when 135 W was constructed, Public Action was required to take a portion of this property for highway purposes. Prior to that, there was adequate acreage to make three 10+ acre parcels of property. Therefore, circumstances are unique to this property and were not created by the landowner. C. That the hardship is not due to economic consideration alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. If the hardship, in this case, is considered to be the construction of 135 W, it is not an economic consideration. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on. the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Should the City determine to grant this variance request, stipulations could be made that other properties with similar circumstances, loss of acreage due to highway construction, could be considered for similar variance requests. E. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. Property values should not be adversely affected with the granting of this variance. Property to the north can be platted at 5 acre minimums (in Columbus Township) while property to the south is at 10 acre minimums. Additionally, there is a 5 acre parcel immediately south of this property. F. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of the Ordinance is to provide for large parcels that can be further divided when utilities are available. The purpose and intent of the ordinance would remain in tack should this variance be granted. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their June 14, 1995 meeting and recommended Option No. 1 which denys the variance request and allows a subdivision of two lots (one 10 acres in size, the other 19.4 acres in size). Mr. Brixius advised the Board that the public action to condemn the I -35W property could be used to justify the variance request. Mr. Meredith was unable to attend the P & Z meeting, however, since that time he has advised me that he owns 12.5 acres of property immediately north of this parcel, located in Columbus Township. He asked if it would be possible to add .6 of an acre from those 12+ acres to the Lino Lakes property and thereby meet the 10 acre minimum requirement. I have spoken with the County Assessors Office and they indicated that the County would not allow the separation of any property that would stradle taxing jurisdiction lines (municipality, school district, or watershed district). OPTIONS 1. Deny subdivision of property into three parcels. Approving a split of the property into one 10 acre parcel and one 19.4 acre parcel. Two Park Dedication fees shall be required for the newly created lots to be collected at the time the Deed is signed by the City for Recording with the County. ($500 per lot) 2. Approve variance to allow two 10 acre parcels and one 9.4 acre - parcels for the reason indicated above in items B, D, E, F. Three Park Dedication fees shall be required for the newly created lots, to be collected at the time the Deed is signed by the City for Recording with the County. ($500 per lot) 3. Return to Planning & Zoning Board for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION Option 1, concur with the Planning & Zoning Board Action REVISED RQNDEAU SBERG E,7ATES A'JOITOR'S VUMBIR 56 PELTIER LAKE RICE CREEK 3 REVISED GTV Oi LulO LAMES OF CENTERNLLE-. LPEGSim[o • MEREDITH , , R I `n '9 AREA = 0 0.3* Ac / / U 8',`5.? .3' 557 ;8 3 1 - PP PP 359 94 N 89°3855 R' AREA = 9 4i. A 0 0 1 1 AGENDA ITEM 5 D STAFF ORIGINATOR NAC, Bob Kermis/Alan Brixius DATE June 23, 1995 TOPIC Site Plan Review, Marshan Condominiums Lake Drive/Aqua Lane BACKGROUND Hokanson Development Inc. has nested site plan approval of a Phase I 110 unit townhome development eutided Marshan Lake Condominiums The proposed development overlays a 25.5 acre parcel of land located north of. Aqua Lane and east of Lake Drive_ The development itself proposes an interior loop stmt (public easement) from Aqua Lane. which would access 14 individual multiple family strucnires as Phase 1. The development also includes a 3.0 acre park along the site's northern border. Because the proposed development application pro -dates the enactment of the City's updated shoreland regulations, the City's site and building plan review procedures and the State Stbnreland Standards for multiple family development are applicable. The applicant is proposing common ownership of the site through a condominium homeowners association. The Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance does not addresss condominium subdivisions. The i .ino Lakes Zoning Ordinance also allows for more than one principal building on a single site.' Under these circumstnaces, this application is being treated as a site plan review. Consistent with the 1990 Lino Lakes Coinnnehenisve Land Use Plan, the subject prverty is zoned R-4, High Density Residential and lies within the Shoreland Overlay District of Marshan Lake. R-4 District lists multiple family dwellings as permitted uses. The R-4 District allows for a maximum density of up to 15 units per buildable acre, however, the Shoreland Oveclay District significantly reduces the site's density poieaital. 5775 Wayzata Blvd. State 555 -St. Lour Park, MN 55416 (612) 595 -9636 -Fax. 595-9837 JUN -23-1995 11:27 NAC 612 595 9837 P.03 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY The following is a chronological history of the Marshan Lake Townhome project_ Date Comments 1990 The 1990 Lino Lakes Land Use Plan identifies the site for high density residential development. The site's zoning is R-4, which allows for a variety of high density housing alternatives as a permitted use. Maximum density in an R-4 Zoning District is 15 units per buildable acre. The 1990 Shoreland Ordinance allowed the base zoning district to regulate density. 1992 The City is notified by DNR that the City needs to update its Shoreland Ordinance to comply with State standards, State Statutes requires any multiple family residential development within a shoreland are to comply with State density standards until local ordinances are adopted. 6/17/94 Applicant submits requests for rezoning, preliminary plat and site and building plan approvals. Original development plan proposes 216 dwelling units and a 1.6 acre commercial site on 25.5 acres of land (see Exhibit A). 10/7/94 In review of the 6/17/94 concept plans, the following comments were made by staff: 1. While the proposed rezoning of the 1.6 acre parcel from the current R-4, High Density Residential District to GB, General Business is consistent with policies outlined in the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan, it was the position of staff that decisions regarding land use and zoning are policy matters to be determined by City officials. Staff does recommend that if the City feels that the rezoning of the property is appropriate, it should only be rezoned in conjunction with final plat approval of the Marshan Townhomes project. 2. Due to insufficient information submitted for the application, staff could not recommend approval. In order for staff to review any proposed -preliminary plat, the applicant must submit a plat which includes all proposed lots and blocks, including the proposed park and business district_ 2 JUN -23-1995 11:27 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04 Datee, Comments 3. In regard to the Planned Development Overlay/site plan review, staff found that the proposed site design attempts to maximize the development potential of the site through the use of private street which required a variance and housing design that fails to comply with the R-4 green space requirements, exclusive of the dedicated park land. The result is a site that is aver -utilized, presenting concerns for traffic circulation, open space, and Ing. Above the City regulations, staff was informed by the DNR that upon notification that the City must update its shoreland regulations, any development that is defined as a PDO under the new State Shoreland Statutes, must be reviewed by the DNR and comply with the State density and design standards. Based on staff's review, the proposed site plan did not comply with all City performance standards and did not meet the State shoreland standards. Under these conditions, staff could not recommend approval of the PDO or site plan. The City was updating its Shoreland Ordinance in compliance with State Statutes. As part of this update, the City is requesting flexibility from a number of State shoreland performance standards specifically related to development density and multiple family development. To avoid the strict enforcement of the current State standards, staff advised the applicant to pursue site development after the City finalizes its Shoreland Ordinance update. 10/12/94 Applicant requests postponetuent of City consideration to a future, unspecified date. 4/17/95 Prior to finalization of Lino Lakes Shoreland Ordinance, applicant requests site plan review of a revised development concept. The revised site plan calls for the development of 112 condominium/townbome units upon a 25.5 acre site (see Exhibit B). The site plan complies with the State shoreland regulations and is approved by DNR. 3 JUN -23-1995 11:29 Nnc 612 595 9837 P.05 Date Comments 4/17/95 Applicant proposes condominium comnmon ownership of all land area by the homeowners association. The Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance does not address condominium subdivision. The Lino J alms Zoning Ordinance allows more than one principal structure per lot. Staff agrees to review the application as a site plan provided the applicant complies with DNR density rules, park land dedication, public street requirements. 5/4/95 In review of the 4/17/95 application, staff recommended site plan approval subject to the following specific conditions: 1. Typical building plans (floor plans and elevations) are submitted for City review and approval. The submission of such plans is necessary to determine compliance with City height and dwelling unit area requirements. 2. Either buildings/off-street parking areas or the proposed loop street right- of-way are relocated such that all applicable 30 foot front yard setbacks are satisfactorily met. If such options are not viewed as viable, a setback variance may be pursued. 3. The City Engineer provide comment/recommendation in regard to street construction standards, street lighting and street signage. 4. The Fire Chief provide =commendation in regard to preferable fire hydrant locations. 5. No off-street parking is to be allowed along the development's private parking area drive aisles. 6. The site plan is revised to designate required handicap parking stalls. 7. The City Park Board provide comment/recommendation in regard to the adequacy of the pnuposed park land dedication. 8. A landscape plan is submitted which identifies the location, variety and size of all proposed plantings. Special emphasis (landscaping treatments) should be placed along the site's northern and western borders. 9. The site plan be revised to either relocate structure #11 within the confines of the subject site or the property exception be added to the proposed development site via minor subdivision. 4 JUN -23-1995 11:28 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06 hate Comments 10, If applicable, the site plan is modified to identify all trash handling locations. 11. The applicant submit a snow removal plan which identifies snow storage areas upon the subject site. 12. The grading/drainage and utility plan is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 13. Detailed plans for the proposed lake access (i.e. , docks) are submitted subject to City review and approval. 14. If any outdoor activities (i.e., lake access, tennis courts, swimming pool, etc.) are proposed upon the subject site; detailed plans for such activities be submitted subject to City review and approval. 15. Any covenants governing the use of the property's open space (i.e., lake access) be subject to City review and approval. 16. All signage erected upon the site comply with applicable provisions of the City's Sign Ordinance. 17. The applicant enter into a development agreement with the City which provides an assurance that all proposed improvements will be completed within a time frame specified by the City. 18. Comments from other City staff. 5/10/95 Planning Commission tables request. pending additional information being provided regarding the ultimate development of the property. 6/9/95 In revonse to the directive of the Planning Commission, the applicant submits an ultimate development plan for review. The plan calls for total of 139 units upon the property, 110 of which would be constructed in the development's first phase (see Exhibit C). In review of the revised application, staff recommended approval of Phase 1 of the project subject to the following specific conditions: 5 JUN -23-1995 11:29 NRc 612 595 98sr P.07 Date 1. The developer is to either expand the amount of residential land or reduce the number of housing units in Phase 2 prior to proceeding with Phase 2 development. 2. A parking setback variance to allow guest parr within five feet of the project's internal loop street. Parking areas must be shown to comply with the five foot setback. These parking spaces must be landscaped to reduce the visual intrusion into the front yard areas. The site plan must show handicapped parking stalls. No parking will be allowed in the 28 foot wide private drive lanes. 4. A detailed landscape plan must be submitted for City approval which identifies location, species, and size of plantings. Landscape plans should. specifically address areas along Highway 49, landscaping around the building perimeters, and landscaping around guest parking areas. 5. Conditions addressing use and design of the proposed lake access will be incorporated into the development agreements and homeowners association deed covenants. 6. Developer enter into a development agreement with the City for the Phase 1 development which provides assurance that all proposed improvements and performance standards are completed in accordance with the approved plan. 7. Comments from other City staff. 6/14/95 Planning Commission approves application subject to conditions listed in staff's 9 June 1995 planning report. 6 JUN -23-1995 11:29 DEFINITIONS NAC 612 595 983? P.08 As requested, we have also attempted to provide definitions of the terms "condominium" and "townhome" and explain the differences between these land use terms. Condominium The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance defines condominium as: A building, or group of buildings, in which units are owned individually, and the structure, common areas and facilities are owned by all the owners on a proportional, undivided basis. By definition, a condominium has common areas and facilities and there is an association of owners organized for the purpose of maintaining, administering and operating the common areas and facilites. It is a legal form of ownership of real estate and not a specific building style. The purchaser has title to his or her interior space in the building and an undivided interest in parts of the interior, the exterior, and other common elements. The property is identified in a master deed and recorded on a plat with the local jurisdiction. The common elements usually include the land underneath and surrounding the building, certain improvements on the land, and such items as plumbing, wiring, and major utility systems, the interior areas between walls, the public interior spaces, exterior walls, streets and recreational facilities. Towuhome. As you are aware, the request under consideration makes reference to "townhames". The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance does not, however, define the term "townhome". A reference document entitled "The Illustrated Book of Development Definitions" (Moskowitz and Lindblom' 1981) does, however, provide a commonly accepted definition for the term as follows: A one -family dwelling in a row of at least three such units in which each unit has its own front and rear access to the outside, no unit is looted over another unit, and each unit is separated from any other unit by one or more common fire resistant walls. A townhome unit is a specific type of housing unit. SI1l: ISSUES/ANALYSIS Zoning. The subject property is zoned R-4, High Density Residential. The R-4 District is intended to provide settings for multiple family housing in areas that have good thoroughfare access, have proper relationship to other uses, and are accessible to major activity centers, recreation areas and shopping areas. The proposed multiple family development is consistent with both the intent of the property's R-4 zoning designation and the provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 7 JUN -23-1995 11:29 t'flC 612 595 9837 P.09 Shureland Density Requirements. Phase I development upon the subject site will be governed by the State's shoreland regulations. If Phase II proceeds in the future, it will be subject to the City's new shoreland regulations which require a CUP/PDO to be processed. Using the State's and City's new Shoreland Ordinance, the following density calculations were prepared for the Marshan Townhome project for the first and second phase of development: 1. Site "Suitable Area" Evaluation. Suitable arra for development within a shoreland planned overlay district (PDO) shall exclude all wetland, watercourses, land below the ordinary high water level of public waters, public street rights-of-way, and public parks. This suitable area and the proposed project are subject to PDO performance standards governing density and design. Gross Land Area Land Below OHWLL Street Easement Park Land Proposed Commercial Site Phage 1 Phase 2 29.9 acres 30.5 acres - 4.4 acres -4.4 acres -3.2 acres -3.2 acres - 3.0 acres -3.0 acres -1.7 acres -1.7 acres Total Suitable Area 17.6 acres 18.2 acres 2. The City PDO Ordinance requires 50 percent of the total project area be preserved as open space. With the application of this performance standard, the 35 percent impervious surface standard for townhome development is not applied. This interpretation has been verified with DNR. staff. Pmjea;t. Ares Maximum 50% impervious Surfnre Phase 1 17.5 acres x .5 = 8.75 Phase 2 18.2 acnes x .5 = 9.10 3. Impervious Surface Per Dwelling Unit. The average impervious surface per unit for Marshan Townhomes, exclusive of the public street, is estimated to be 2,900 square feet. Utilizing this estimate, the following maximum density calculations are applicable to the subject property: Maximum Impervious Surface, Impervious Surface Maximum P_er_b t No Of—Units Phase 1 8.75 AC (381,150 SF) _ 2,900 SF = 131 Phase 2 9.10 AC (396,396 SF) 2,900 SF W 136 8 JUN -23-1995 11:30 NAC 612 595 9837 P.10 As shown above, Phase 1 of the proposed development would support a total of 131 townhome units. Phase 2 development, on the other hand, would support a total of 136 units. To accommodate the 139 units being proposed as part of Phase 2, the residential acreage must be expanded by approximately .3 acres. In discussion with the applicant, this additional residential land area may be obtained by reducing the size of the proposed commercial site float 1.7 to 1.4 acres, through shifting the mad slightly to the west. According to Mr. Toni Hovey, a DNR Hydrologist, State shoreland standards applicable to the subject property allow a maximum of 115 units upon the subject cite. The proposed dwelling unit distribution (via tiers) on the site for Phase I has been found to satisfy State Shoreland Ordinance requirements. Building Elevations. The applicant has submitted building elevations that illustrate the building appearance and height. The taller units are the 12 unit townhomes which have a height of 32 feet. These units comply with the R-4 height standards and bring the site plan into conformance with the setback requirements between buildings. Setbacks. In previous review, concern was cited over interior site setbacks where the majority of structures and parking auras failed to meet minimum requires 30 foot setbacks from the intetn.car street. While all proposed structures upon the revised plan have been found to meet required setback requirements, off-street parking area setbacks remain in non-compliance. In some cases, off-street parking areas are shown to abut the proposed street easement. To accommodate the proposed parking area setbacks, the processing of a variance will be necessary. It is the opinion of staff that the front yard setbacks for off -stmt parking areas should not be less than five feet. The applicant has indicated that the guest parking will be shifted to comply with the five foot minimum setback. Landscaping. As required by Ordinance, a landscape plan has been submitted for review. As shown on Exhibit D. landscaping upon the site is to be focused along Lake Drive and near the site's off-street parking areas. While the landscape plan does identify possible planting types and site locations, an additional level of detail must be provided. Rather than indicate possible planting types, the plan should specifically indicate the species of planting and its size. To fully address this issue, the developer must submit the preparation of typical landscaping details applicable to areas bordering structures, off-street parking areas and along Lake Drive. Parking. As a condition of development approval, parallel parking along proposed 28 foot wide driveways shall be pioln`bited. Such prohibition relates to the desire to retain a minimum 24 foot drive width necessary to accommodate two-way vehicular traffic movement. 9 JUN -23-1995 11:38 f iRC 512 595 98.E r P. 11 Snow Storage. As requested, the developer has submitted a snow storage plan for e.eview. While the plan may be adegii e, it should be subject to further review and comment by the City Engineer. Parks. In compliance with recommendations of the City Park Board, a 3.0 acre park has been proposed in the northern portion of the subject site. Trash. The applicant has indicated that each individual dwelling unit is to have individual trash removal service similar to that provided to a single family home. Dock. The developer has submitted a dock detail drawing for review. In discussion with the developer, the following use and design conditions will be imposed on the dock development. The developer has issued a letter agreeing to the following items (see Exhibit E): 1. The dock will be designed consistent with attached concept plans. Any change m use or design will be subject to City approval. 2. The dock design shall be subject to DNR approval. 3. The dock design shall be for pedestrian access only. No automobile or boat trailers shall be permitted. 4. Lake access from the dock will be canoe access only. 5. The dock shall be signed "private property". 6. The developer shall outline the lake access restrictions in the townhome deed restrictions and disclose the lake access restriction to all townhome owners. These conditions shall be specifically included in the development agreement required for this project. Handicap Parking Stalls. The revised site plan does not illustrate any handicap parking stalls. According to a representative of the Minnesota State Council on Disability, the American Disability Act does not address handicap parking requirements of owner occupied dwelling units. The proposed owner occupied residential deveJopine t must, however, comply with the handicap parking provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act. Such act stipulates that one in 25 off-street parking spaces (visitor stalls) mast be devoted to use by the handicapped. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities. The applicant has submitted grading, dniinage, and utility plans that have been reviewed by the City Engineer. The Engineer will provide review comments in a separate Mort.. 10 JUN -23-1995 11:31 NAC 612 595 9837 P.12 Restrictive Covenants. The developer has submitted a copy of restrictive covenants for review. The covenants ants must be expanded to specifically address the use and maintenance of the dock and open spaces. Specific dock design shall be subject to City and DNR approval. Use of the dock will be limited in use to private residents of the development and non -motorized watercraft. In this regard, signs should be posted which specify only private use of the dock. Any dock modifications will be subject to City/DNR approval. CONCLUSION In review of the submitted site; plan, the proposed Pie 1 development is consistent with uses and density requirements of the R-4/ShoreIand Overlay zoning standards. In this regard, we are recommending site plan approval with the conditions outlinri within our 8 June 1995 planning report.. This recommendation is consistent with the recommendations of the Planning Commission, pc: Randy Schumacher John Powell 11 JUN -23-1995 11:31 r ❑ SO 166 ,SO yea 4 4 1 i NRC l/ / 4 / / `J / ELM ST. 1-4 --- / u 41/ el 1111' It Veil nip 611111411117 4 nl , r # II GAM: ,II/ s ii rli. �rrf 7( '1 I ry 1 612 595 98S/ P.13 1 - HURL } U MARSHA( LAKE / , �1 J 1rs1. s POST ROAD Ifo PARK. 7 12 1 1 4i 1 1 i-- 5 4 13 1 2 1 ) ifs ,�rri , L �� I� LLL' J ' / nfir >/ f tE{ill r 1.11117 aufrah �;'� -x!7'7 FM A( . . " LGOMM iu il!! 1 • M AIPI thiliblibilin 11 IliiMitRiPP hro i�1 i 2 1 / 1 1!!7-►**; air 1 ! 11411meal PE aloe' i ■� 9r# 1 11/! I L _A AQUA LANE EXHIBIT A - ORIGINAL SITE PLAN (4)19/95) JUN -23-1995 11:31 NAC s tl R _ 612 595 9837 P.14 t " POT tteiNi.)\ / / / / / /• 3 ACIAE. PARK/ / / / I , /.„. • / ,••• / ! 11.! „ .7_4 I fri • 1L 4j r. Itrrir4 . t ;I r p I 2r -Iz 1 JOT fp ler 0 elfb 1111. viriprirptet 2." "CW• • C.11:11 01101011 • -111 1.,t.•_.:•irt.1,1,.? d i fl I air 4.-• {WM P.M Menne fr •'I") 111 I 3 7-4116i/ A - it_ s 4 1- r Ae/ /941.4 T -7(C so,c;e4 sit r!. : re -0.1/f t VI DOW 41.444, Widai 448.'44, 2t SJ ri- / / / / / 11 1 - --• ti 11 111 1 1 1 1 - 1H TIER 1 \ EXHIBIT B - REVISED SITE PLAN JUN -23-1995 .' 1• 1 r' 11 1132 f-. tug.. M.R.44 „y.Y 1 .. 6 pn„, )1 ipsailbon , liparivit s 10-0 ,4•”' i I/o' Curr-e41 u' rt v.,'is v 01-01 31 47.47- 5'. .l ACr 0 ins 4.41 //-j ifs• -°"f �Ie 4- a Nftc AG=e Pal'c t 1 ! S r oRAc 11 11! RI I „. ,-. — anm e.prear 1044 triliess ►►04 rorittotte iI01_ 440016 1 t 1 :natty" Wall raillai -111411. 1 /711�7 i i 1 1P' ti MIMIt I t cf-.oma,,_ t $7f 1 Ora 1 1 1 it I Ern 1TIER =0; Ise i...._,.. awtwm-an 612 595 9837 11 �x -t r 1 t 0 61 EXHIBIT C - SNOW STORAGE PLAN JUt+-23-1995 r 1 I (/(fe et J n . r 1e, ft II Ate i II 4: 4 .y SI' •..-. 1132 a.+rw Sighigibra e, ihr t. Ca • • 4 "/". I'prtr.x .0 J. :010 1Ek3 t 1 t' c 011. if I iclrR 11 . atm% 0. � f1in Di 111 w dr a • v.M1l Krs.0 F 111 0 'orator I • 1, ill 11 0111 Santa* *olio os 11� u , i .0 ti r „I :0.0 .0 ‘016.414 01 • 1i is 4 Mire Pral adm 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 512 595 983; P. 16 •-J J Lkw 1 swammiqii11:3 wim illi CI\ t t sL:i1 !IL*1,..... .... , t mid (�P , - ray . ,v 5I f r lJ V t .- 1 /7 0r C o.,.. j' A.- j 0"0r..{I14/d/ J1 -Y/(. fr C, �7....if P XI/ l+fir Tee?4•. ' f! cr+a,.-, "k 0 f-__ EXHIBIT D - LANDSCAPE PLAN JUN -23-1995 11:33 NAC 612 595 9837 P. 17 EXHIBIT E - DOCK DETAIL JUN -23-1995 11:33 NAC 612 595 9837 P.18 HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. June 7, 1995 Robinson Development Inc. does hereby a.gree to the following items to be placed in the development agreement with the City of Lino Lakes regarding the Marshan Lake Condominium site plan. 1. The dock shall be intended for condominium member use only and have signage in front of it stating "private property", 2. The dock shall conform to DNR standards. 3, The dock shall not have access by motor vehicles or be designed to launch anything other than canoes. 4. Any changes to the structure shall be approved by the City of Lino Lakes. 5. Members of the condominium association shall be made aware of their common ownership of the dock. 9174 Isanti Street N.E_, Blaine, Minnesota 55449 (612) 786-3130 • Fax (612) 784.9136 EXHIBIT F - BUILDING ELEVATIONS 1 ENWr -. A fVTAT. SIDE ELEVATIONS 5T'd L286 S6S ,7T9 -z • ‘......._ _ -,;,.., ., - ..,... .4---=---. .- ----4,--- ..:....., -.___-.2I-.-14_----"----„,..sMu,I.'=..g.--.-----,'--.."'.;;r.;i:c.a.'_-.‘_.--.-_-l-‘_i--_•. l---- --"--...___ rdemMiNNeiieereee--n--mme-1-f MleeIPlre...._.&.sr"o.L1---1.-1-'-M-:.MZIllEeI2----, =H e[.M.rer I MO el .r — --,..----- ,- - ,''.'-'....-.• - ...-.. 2. ...r_mee_ ..."--•"" ---=-1--. ---•".---r-- ,7-,----_—___.,. 7- IIPSIMIMI_;• v% ' II - ,...-- -==- 1 ie— . AIIIII..4 • ---- ---'-- -,-, el 'Mee me --7. r-' ..--r-:'•-i.-2 _ ......ke e. ^e • Ink , V „... , ..,4.,,,,eme.MFAM. 1.-- --.-----.,,-; .:,-..e, _ mmear ••71 OI.171; 7 *a? • • - 7avess.r.gbeT. • W." FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS i i 3 UNIT SL --D 1/ U NIT SSL --C •REVERSED UNIT SL -B .REVERSED ,FRONT ELEVATIONS UNIT SL --C !REVERSED UNIT SL -B •REVERSE° JUN -23-1995 11:35 NAC 612 595 9837 P.22 LEFT - ELEVATION • R I(KT ELE ATI'r/! N: l TOTAL P. 22 TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS , ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM Mary Kay Wyland To: Planning Coordinator 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE:612292-4400 FAX:612/292-0083 Reference: Site Plan Review Copies To: Alan Brixius, NAC Marshan Lake Condominiums From: John Powell'?" Lino Lakes, Minnesota Date: May 5, 1995 Commission No. 10414-953 As per your request, we have reviewed the site plan dated March 18, 1995 and revised April 19, 1995 for the referenced site. Our comments are as follows: Streets 1. The entire site is accessed exclusively via Lake Drive and Aqua Lane. Although Aqua Lane was recently resurfaced it is substandard for the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the site. Aqua Lane will require upgrading including storm sewer, to accommodate the turning movements for this site as well as for any future business development on the northeast comer of Lake Drive/Aqua Lane. The developer should be responsible for the cost of the required upgrading. 2. According to this site plan a cul-de-sac is proposed at the south end of Stagecoach Trail. This cul- de-sac should be built along with the other site improvements. 3. All roadways within the subdivision are to be constructed to City standards including a 32' wide (B -B) roadway and a 60' right-of-way. Around the radiuses of the horseshoe the centerline slope will have to be increased to provide for a minimum gutter line slope of 0.50%. 5. Similar to the Shores of Marshan subdivision, the developer will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way along the east side of Lake Drive. The exact amount of this additional right-of-way will be determined by MnDOT. 6. The access driveways to condominium No. 6, 8-11, are to be constructed to City Street Standards. Sanitary Sewer 1. A feasibility study must be prepared to determine adequacy of the existing sanitary sewer system and the impact on the system due to this development. A preliminary review has been prepared by OSM for the developer which indicated the lift station at the south end of Stagecoach Trail would need significant improvements to accommodate the flows generated by this development. Memorandum Page 2 May 5, 1995 2. Each of the 14 buildings is shown to be served by a single watermain and sanitary sewer connection. Instead, each of the condominiums within the building should have an individual service. At the very least, manholes should be provided at each lateral to a building. 3. Though the capacity of the lift station is limited, sewer stubs should be provided to serve the remainder of the area northeast of the Lake Drive/Aqua Lane intersection. 4. The minimum sanitary sewer lateral size diameter is 8". Watermain 1. A feasibility study must be prepared to evaluate the adequacy of the existing water system and the impact of the proposed development on the system. 2. If each condominium unit is not served individually, gate valves will be required at each building lateral. 3. As part of the Shores of Marshan improvements, a 12" trunk watermain was installed along the east side of Lake Drive. The Comprehensive Water Plan calls for this 12" trunk watermain to be extended south along Lake Drive and east along Aqua Lane. These trunk watermain improvements must be constructed with this project. Storm Sewer 1. A detailed review of the storm sewer system and drainage computation will be completed along with the feasibility study to be prepared for the other improvements. 2. A culvert will be required beneath the Stagecoach Trail cul-de-sac. Miscellaneous 1. Any approval of this site plan is contingent upon the findings of a detailed feasibility study to be prepared for the proposed site development. If you have any questions, please contact me. JMP/mha Attachments STAFF ORIGI i DATE TOPIC AGENDA ITEM 5 E and 5 F Mary Kay Wyland June 22, 1995 95-18-P/Z, Willow Ponds Rezoning Plat, Elm Street Cottage Homesteads of America is requesting a rezoning and preliminary plat for the western portion of their property on Elm Street. The eastern portion of the site received site plan approval at the May P & Z and City Council meetings for a: 47 unit senior rental project. Attached are excerpts of the Planning Report prepared by NAC which addressed the site plan review, rezoning and preliminary plat. The excerpts relate to the rezoning and preliminary plat portionsof the report. Staff would recommend approval with the conditions outlined in the report The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing on the Rezoning and Preliminary plat at their June 14, 1995 meeting and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Entrance locations to the site must be reviewed and approved by the Anoka County Highway Department. 2. 40 feet of ROW shall be provided centerline of Elm Street. 3. Utility and grading plans must be approved by the City Engineer. 4. A Development Agreement and Financial Guarantees as determined by City Staff shall be submitted prior to any construction or utility work. 5. A Park Trail shall be provided along Elm Street and Park Dedication as determined by City Staff. 0 1. Approve First Reading of Ordinance No. 11-95 Rezoning Ponds from R4 to Rl: 2. Approve Preliminary Plat for 10 Lots with conditions outlined above. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. Option 1 and 2 STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland/Alan Brixius DATE June 22, 1995 TOPIC Willow Ponds - Rezoning and Subdivision Cottage Homesteads of America Inc. is requesting a rezoning from R- 4 PDO to R-1 Single Family Residential and a preliminary plat to develop 10 single family lots on the western portion of a site recently approved for senior housing. In August of 1992, the City approved an elderly multiple family development that included 90 units upon the subject site upon condition that final site plans be submitted and approved by the City. Final plans were approved by the Council in May of 1995 for a 47 unit elderly development which included 10 single family lots on the western one-half of the site. To accommodate the 10 single family lots, a rezoning from R-4 to R- 1 and a preliminary plat is necessary. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Site Location Land Use Plan Preliminary Plat Site Plan Grading and Drainage Plan Following formal application and proper public hearing notification, our office recommends the following: 1. Approval of the requested rezoning from R-4/PDO to R-1, Single Family Residential for the western single family portion of the proposed subdivision subject to the following conditions: A. City approval of the Willow Ponds Subdivision. 2. Approval of the Willow Ponds preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: A. All access points from County Road 12 are subject to approval by the Anoka County Highway Department. B. The submitted grading plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. C. The submitted utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. D. The Fire Chief provide recommendation in regard to preferable fire hydrant locations. E. Comments from other City staff. ISSUES ANALYSIS Rezoning As noted previously, a rezoning of the western portion of the subject site from R-4/PDO to an R-1 designation will ultimately be necessary to accommodate the single family home component of the proposed development. While it is recognized that a formal rezoning application is pending, it is considered appropriate to examine the rezoning issue as it will impact ultimate land uses in the area and design of the proposed multiple family component. In August of 1992, the City rezoned the entire site from an R-1 designation to the current R- 4/PDO designation in anticipation of a 90 unit senior housing project. The current submission represents a change from the originally considered development proposal in that a single family residential component is now being offered. Single family homes are not permitted under the property's current R-4 zoning. Judgement Criteria. In review of rezoning requests, the Planning Commission and City Council should consider its possible adverse effects. Judgement should be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. d. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. e. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Comprehensive Plan. The City's Land Use Plan (attached as Exhibit B) designates the subject site as "urban residential" or low density single family development. The intent of the urban residential designation is to provide a development density which will provide a high level of public services (sewer, water, parks, police, fire). Acknowledging the proposed use's consistency with the City's Land Use Plan, the proposed R-1 zoning designation is consistent with the provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Land Use Compatibility. To determine the appropriateness of the proposed use, it is considered beneficial to examine adjacent land uses and zoning designations. The following is a listing of uses and zoning designations which surround the subject site: Direction TJse Zoning North Undeveloped/low density residential R-1 (Interstate 35W) South Low density residential R-1 East Undeveloped (Future multiple family residential) R-4 West City of Blaine Recognizing that low density residential development exists south of the subject site and that buffering is to be provided to the north and east of the proposed R-1 District, the proposed single family residential use is considered compatible with surrounding uses. Public Services. As noted previously, a determination should be made that the proposed use will not overburden the City's service capacity. Considering that a recent finding was made that multiple family residential use of the property would not overburden the City's service capacity, a less intense single family residential use is not anticipated to overburden City services. Traffic Generation. In consideration of the requested rezoning, an evaluation of anticipated traffic generation should be conducted. Traffic generated by the proposed single family dwellings is within the capabilities of Elm Street, which serves the subject property. In review of the submitted site plan, direct single family lot access is proposed onto County Road 12. As a result, some concern does exist in regard to the desirability of such access condition. This item will be discussed later in this report. Performance Standards. As a condition of plat approval, the proposed single family residential portion of the development will be required to comply with applicable performance standards. Specific issues will be discussed in latter sections of this report. Preliminary Plat Review In addition to the rezoning request, ultimate approval of the Willow Ponds subdivision will also be necessary to accommodate the proposed development (see Exhibit C). The subject subdivision includes ten single family residential lots within the western portion of the site (R-1 zoning area), and a single larger lot within the eastern half of the site (R-4 zoning area). The larger lot (Lot 1, Block 1) is to accommodate four 12 unit multiple family structures. Density. As noted previously, the proposed subdivision is to accommodate two differing dwelling unit types and densities. Within R-1 Zoning Districts, the maximum number of dwelling units per buildable area must not exceed 3.2. The proposed density of the single family residential component of the subdivision is 3.2 DU/acre and meets maximum allowable density requirements of the R-1 District (10 DU divided by 3.2 acres). To satisfy applicable density requirements, the single family lots should be expanded in size or the number of lots should be reduced. Within R-4 Zoning Districts, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed per buildable acre is 15. In review of the site plan, the multiple family component of the development proposes a density of 8.3 dwelling units per acre (48 DU divided by 5.8 acres) and complies with applicable density requirements. Lot Sizes. Proposed single family residential lots range in size from 13,360 to 16,018 square feet and satisfy minimum R-1 District lot area requirements of 10,800 square feet. While all single family residential lots meet minimum 10,800 square foot lot area requirements imposed in the R-1 District, such lots fails to meet minimum R-1 density requirements. To satisfy such requirements, an expansion of lot sizes or omission of a lot or lots may be necessary. Within R-4 Zoning Districts, a minimum lot size of 25,000 square feet is required. At + 10.5 acres in size, the multiple family component of the development (Lot 1, Block 2) greatly exceeds the ordinance requirement. Lot Width. In the R-1 District, a minimum interior lot width of 80 feet is required. All single family lots have been found to meet such lot width requirements. Within R-4 Districts, a minimum lot width of 150 feet is required. At 650+ feet in width, Lot 1, Block 1, as illustrated upon the preliminary plat, greatly exceeds minimum lot width requirements of the R-4 District. Lot Depth. All proposed R-1 lots (Block 2) have been found to meet applicable 135 foot minimum lot depth requirements. No minimum lot depth requirements are imposed in R-4 Zoning Districts. Streets. The subject site is to receive its access via Elm Street (County Road 12) from the south. As a County road, all access points must be approved and issued permit by the Anoka County Highway Department. While Elm Street is currently classified as a County road, it is anticipated that at some future point, the street will be turned over to the City. The anticipated loss of County designation relates directly to the street's function and traffic volumes. In consideration of the street's current and anticipated function, the proposed direct single family lot access being proposed is considered acceptable. The plat shows a 7' street right-of-way dedication along Elm Street to bring the full right-of-way to an 80' width which complies with City standards for a collector street. CONCLUSION Based on the preceding review, our office recommends approval of the requested rezoning preliminary plat _ _ subject to the conditions listed within the Executive Summary of this report. pc: Randy Schumacher John Powell Michael Saxton, Cottage Homesteads of Willow Ponds MEMORANDIIM TO: Mary Kay Wyland, Planning Coordinator Alan Brixius, Planning Consultant FROM: John Powell, Acting City Engineer DATE: May 5, 1995 SUBJECT: Site Plan Review, Willow Ponds of Lino Lakes As per your request we have reviewed the site plan dated March 23, 1995 for the reference project. Our comments are as follows: STREETS: 1. The proposed roadways are shown to be 28 feet in width and the driveways serving multiple units are 22 feet wide. Both of these widths are below City standards but consistent with the preliminary site plan approval they will be allowed with the following conditions: a. Curb and gutter is installed throughout the roadway and parking areas. b. The pavement section in the roadways is equal to the City Standard. The driveways are to be constructed with no less than 4" of Aggregate Base and 2" of bituminous c. The minimum roadway transverse slope is 0.50%. d. No parallel parking is allowed on the roadways within the site. 2. The parking areas near the end of the shared driveways need to be oriented such that they allow for the turning around of emergency vehicles. 3. The areas adjacent to the driveways must be landscaped such that the termination point of the paved areas is emphasized. 4. Elm Street is an Anoka County roadway which will likely be turned over to the City sometime late in 1995. The entrance locations to the entire site must be reviewed and approved by Anoka County Highway Department representatives. 5. 40 feet of right-of-way is provided north of the Elm Street centerline. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sanitary sewer is accessible at the east end of the proposed site. The City will need to evaluate what depth should be maintained for sewer service beyond this site. WATERMAIN 1. The extension of watermain throughout the site is consistent with the plan for this area. 2. Additional hydrants may need to be added to provide adequate coverage. STORM SEWER 1. A minimum velocity of 3 fps must be maintained for storm sewer design. 2. The City typically uses a minimum culvert diameter of 18 inches. The majority of the storm sewers as shown are 12 or 15 inch at flat slopes which will be more susceptible to freezing. MISCELLANEOUS 1. Final approval of the site grading and utility plans is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer 2. No erosion control is indicated on the grading plan. 3. Separate services should be provided to the individual units. The termination point of the City's maintenance responsibilities must be clearly defined. 4. Trail location is subject to review and approval of Anoka County. 5. Easements must be provided over all public utilities. If you have any questions, please contact me. SUBJECT SITE NORTH 1 MILE CITY OF LINO LAKES MINNESOTA EXHIBIT A SITE LOCATION CITY OF LINO LAKES LAND USE MAP LEGEND A - RURAL B - PUBLIC C USINESS D - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL E - BUSINESS RESERVE F - INDUSTRIAL G - MULTIPLE FAMILY H - B US 1NESS WITH SENIOR HOUSING I - SEE INTERCHANGE STUDY - M.U.S.A. - PARK RESERVE 11",—Tv.m1 •ei IFJ .—...,....•,--.—.. " . • •-• ".1)/ 'A q —3 I A4- .1 ".4..."t2••••••••• :I, Li .• ••)Vi'.1-• .71-4 • —N• r TYPICAL LOT NOTES: I. 1(0300, 001 IID1 YM61 N 1,4000101 1071 11 10'. ]. I(71.0 101 f 10� MD d 0011.EA 107 010071.0 A 111010 ]71017 11 .10'. WILLOW PONDS OF LINO LAKES, MN ---^' ROAD N0. 12 lVld )diVNIINI13Ud S43 2IS N er77'20' E 1556.671 DEVELOPMENT DATA �p M1tl 1 1 11.0::>; X11 vall1�1 stir... .o i.[1 �k.'� . :!I ..r'1.,:.,1s.2" 40..04 ••.0.11 Arrsarde wale w0.. 41.11 wtl./N414 1 Iwll I�I L r ELy STREET I 0 03 30 100 : Or.p*l.. 1..1. 11. 1..11 "ET I „ b "I >tn�ne enazn� °iOS01 WILLOWPONDS OF L NO LAKES . MN ( PREL I WARY PLAT PREPAR D FOR i COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF AMERICA M 4 . r.+.. � .. ra"Te. J C JOHNSON COMLLTANTS, W. SITE PLANNING AND DESGN 6601 - 75t1N Aro. N. lreeYr. Poi. W 55426 Maw (6Q5 566 M FAX tofu 566-4374 ... w Imo ... PRELIMINARY REVIE* COPY NOT FOR CONSTRRUC ION 'hie pl.. 1. • pr.11.l..ry r..l.. .0py u/ ..y .N.q. •. 0...11 .1 r. 1...,...y 1.. igruemeseg —w.NINNY..~'0w ■ e. WILLOW PONDS OF LINO LAKES, MN NVld3IIS-01191 N sr27.20. E 1556.671 .�. 1 DEVELOPUEMT DATA I rc�rlr��t.� a I.ru t IK rif1�Y t$ oot.1N.O. • I. .1.4? N.d..Wftl e 1, 00 leo 0,01.6 1..1. *IIEET WI WILLOW ONDS OF LINO LAKES. MN PREL I I NARY SITE PLAN PREPARED FOR: COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF AMERICA — J C J J C JOFNSON CONSULTANTS . NC. SITE PIANNNO ANDDESIdJ 66 - 751h ►... K k.dry. P.rl w 55.426 flm... I62 566.66e FAX: 1612) 566-4374 ,�,A� easccw "°s°I i:" ::d , .,... lts+s w PREL I ISI I NARY REV I E* COPY NOT FF OR CONSTRUC ION 11l. ,1.. 1. . ,r.11.l..ry r.rl.. ..py ..4 ..y .hoop...t ...11 .f ...rho. *gooey ......I.. SIM .Ma: w M4►r rn x e,. .n' wti— 1. ^'P -.l '. . WILLOW PONDS OF LINO LAKES, MN m46 LW l 740 •_ __"•1.4 • COUNTY ROA0 NO. 12 NV1d 39VNIVUO 5.34115 - I !I I W IJ'. -N"68'27`20' E a 1556 671- ..,-7-.'--.7"----------'.------.--- --hr-- DE'VELO.,.ENt DAts -- I --- r— 7%. it :< I 0 25 4 100 I.\ PRELIMINARY REVIEW COPY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION rI SNEEr s 2 Detc._ 3/ 23/0S mut/J0:.PREPARED "m" 'VI- i..6��M '���aC ..7r•.'..•"' �_�', ... ....s16 -' :%�^ � �: '•• ,-J J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS. INC. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN '- 6601 - 75.h 6... N. B•oo41 Pork ON 55426 J Phone. 16121 S66.61SS FAY : 71"6121 566-0774 ..-lhi sf .....NA pr, ri. ?_'1! � - ^ 77121..4 - ••per-- � _ - _ j:.. , ��(( " 4ry4pi �Y•.. 4) 1 ) eTj n,....... .... 6.. .....r .. _• - 7: • r �-.�, Jr -24-411+ '.-4- . :i Ti., J,0 }b•0� .e. '_y- .3:,:+b::'-' . otrt 4r ...In � .-e, .nN 2..1SF —�I. ,e,.t. "--:s= .�i. • ww �— � ' f. - _ e.r m46 LW l 740 •_ __"•1.4 • COUNTY ROA0 NO. 12 NV1d 39VNIVUO 5.34115 - I !I I W IJ'. -N"68'27`20' E a 1556 671- ..,-7-.'--.7"----------'.------.--- --hr-- DE'VELO.,.ENt DAts -- I --- r— 7%. it :< I 0 25 4 100 I.\ PRELIMINARY REVIEW COPY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION rI SNEEr s 2 Detc._ 3/ 23/0S mut/J0:.PREPARED "m" WILLOW PONDS OF LINO LAKES. MN PREL I M I NARY GRAD I NG PLAN FOR: . '--' COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF AMERICA '���aC ..7r•.'..•"' �_�', ... ....s16 -' :%�^ � �: '•• ,-J J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS. INC. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN '- 6601 - 75.h 6... N. B•oo41 Pork ON 55426 J Phone. 16121 S66.61SS FAY : 71"6121 566-0774 ..-lhi sf Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKE COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 11-95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. B1 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-4) AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) (WILLOW PONDS) I The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Ordinance No. B1 of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 13, 1992 is hereby amended by rezoning from R-4 (PDO) High Density Residential and Planned Development Overlay, to R-1 Single Family Residential, pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: insert legal description II Save as above amended, said Ordinance No. B1 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. III This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this day of , 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: The following voted against same: Whereupon said Ordiannce was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM 5 G STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland/Alan Brixius DATE June 22, 1995 TOPIC Ordinance No. 12-95 Flood Plain Ordinance BACKER©1 The Minnesota State Legislature has mandated that local government units adopt regulations to minimize flood loses by updating or adopting floodplain regulations. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has provided a model ordinance for communities to use as a guide in this process. The City's existing Floodplain Management Ordinance was adopted in 1988. The ordinance enclosed with this packet reflects recommended language contained in the DNR model ordinance and has been reviewed by Tom Hovey, DNR Area Hydrologist. Some minor differences between the City's draft ordinance and the DNR Model concern language consistency with our Zoning Ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this Ordinance at their May and June meetings and have recommended approval. OPTIO] 1. Approve first reading of ordinance subject to final review and approval by the DNR. 2. Return to staff for further consideration and reschedulePublic Hearing for later date. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CHAPTER 1103 FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE No. 12-95 1103.01 Statutory Authorization, Findings of Fact and Purpose 1103.02 General Provisions 1103.03 Definitions 1103.04 Administration 1103.05 Establishment of Zoning District 1103.06 Floodplain Overlay District Uses 1103.07 Standards for Flood Plan Overlay District Uses 1103.08 Subdivisions 1103.09 Manufactured Homes/Travel Trailers and Travel Vehicles 1103.10 Amendments 1103.01 Statutory Authorization, Findings of Fact and Purpose. Subdivision 1. The legislature of the State of Minnesota has, in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 104, delegated the responsibility to local government units to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. Therefore, the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota does ordain as follows: Subd. 2. Findings of Fact. A. The flood hazard areas of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota are subject to the periodic inundation which results in potential loss of life, loss of property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures or flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. B. The City Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) is a comprehensive planning tool that specifically identifies goals and policies for water management. Standards for flood control, erosion and sediment control, water quality enhancement, and the preservation of natural features have been identified. The plan also includes flood plain delineation, necessary freeboard requirements and recommended building elevations. This ordinance is based upon the recommendations of the LWMP, which is hereby adopted into this ordinance by reference and incorporated in its entirety, including all amendments. C. Methods Used to Analyze Flood Hazards. This ordinance is based upon a reasonable method of analyzing flood hazards which is consistent with the standards established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. D. Statement of Purpose. It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare and to minimize those losses described in A above by provisions contained herein. 1103.02 General Provisions. Subdivision 1. Jurisdiction. This ordinance shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of the City of Lino Lakes shown on the Official Zoning Map and/or the attachments thereto as being located within the boundaries of the 100 -year regional flood. Subd. 2. Establishment of Official Zoning Map. The Official Zoning Map together with all materials attached thereto is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. The attached material shall include the Flood Insurance Study for the City of Lino Lakes prepared by the Federal Insurance Administration dated November 11, 1981, and the Flood Insurance Rate Map dated May 17, 1982, along with subsequently approved Letters of Map Revision (LOMR) and Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA). The Official Zoning Map shall be on file in the office of the City Clerk -Treasurer and the Building Inspector/Zoning Official. Subd. 3. Rules for Interpretation of District Boundaries. The boundaries of the Floodplain Overlay District shall be determined by scaling distances on the Official Zoning Map. Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the district, as shown on the Official Zoning Map as for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions, the City Engineer shall make the necessary interpretation. The persons contesting the locations of the district boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case and to submit their own technical evidence. Subd. 4. Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the 100 year base regional flood elevation plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. Subd. 5. Compliance. No new structure or land shall hereafter be used and no structure shall be located, extended, converted, or structurally altered without full compliance with the terms of this ordinance and the applicable regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of 2 this ordinance. All uses not listed as permitted uses or conditional uses in Sections 1103.06 shall be prohibited. In addition, a caution is provided here that: A. New manufactured homes, replacement manufactured homes and certain travel trailers and travel vehicles are subject to the general provisions of this ordinance and specifically Section 1103.09 and Section 6, Subd. 10 and Subd. 11 of the City Zoning Ordinance. B. Modifications, additions, structural alterations or repair after damage to existing nonconforming structures and nonconforming uses of structures or land are regulated by the general provisions of this ordinance and specifically Section 1103.06, Subd. 4 and Section 4, Subd. 5 of the City Zoning Ordinance. C. As -built elevations for elevated or flood proofed structures must be certified by ground surveys and flood proofing techniques must be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer or architect as specified in the general provision of this ordinance and specifically as stated in Section 1103.04 of this ordinance. Subd. 6. Penalties for Violation. A. Violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as defined by law. B. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City of Lino Lakes from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remed any violation. Such actions may include, but are not limited to: 1. In responding to a suspected ordinance violation, the Zoning Administrator and City of Lino Lakes may utilize the full array of enforcement actions available to it including but not limited to prosecution and fines, injunctions, after -the -fact permits, orders for corrective measures or a request to the National Flood Insurance Program for denial of flood insurance availability to the guilty party. The community must act in good faith to enforce these official controls and to correct ordinance violations to the extent possible so as not to jeopardize its eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. 2. When an ordinance violation is either discovered by or brought to the attention of the Zoning 3 Administrator, the Zoning Administrator shall immediately investigate the situation and document the nature and extent of the violation of the official control. As soon as is reasonably possible, this information will be submitted to the appropriate Department of Natural Resources and Federal Emergency Management Agency Regional Office along with the Community's plan of action to correct the violation to the degree possible. 3. The Zoning Administrator shall notify the suspected party of the requirements of this ordinance and all other Official Controls and the nature and extent of the suspected violation of these controls. If the structure and/or use is under construction or development, the Zoning Administrator may order the construction or development immediately halted until a proper permit or approval is granted by the Community. If the construction or development is already completed, then the Zoning Administrator may either: a. Issue an order identifying the corrective actions that must be made within a specified time period to bring the use or structure into compliance with the official controls, or b. Notify the responsible party to apply for and after -the -fact permit/development approval within a specified period of time not to exceed 30 days. 4. If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the Zoning Administrator within the specified period of time, each additional day that lapses shall constitute an additional violation of this ordinance and shall be prosecuted accordingly. The Zoning Administrator shall also, upon the lapse of the specified response period, notify the landowner to restore the land to the condition which existed prior to the violation of this ordinance. Subd. 7. Interpretation. In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this ordinance shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the governing body and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by State Statutes. Where a specific use or performance standard is not specifically referenced in this Ordinance it shall be prohibited. Subd. 8. Abrogation and Greater Restrictions. It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, 4 where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this ordinance shall prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only. Subd. 9. Warning and Disclaimer of Liability. This chapter does not imply that areas outside of the Flood Plain Overlay District or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages. The chapter does not create liability on the part of the City of Lino Lakes or its officers or employees for any flood damage that may result from reliance on this chapter or any administrative decision lawfully made under it. Subd. 10. Severability. If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. 1103.03 Definitions. Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. Subdivision 1. Accessory use or structure. "Accessory use or structure" means a use or structure on the same lot with, and of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to, the principal use or structure. Subd. 2. Basement. "Basement" means any area of a structure, including crawl spaces, having its floor or base subgrade on all four sides, regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. Subd. 3. Conditional use. A land use or development that may not be appropriate generally within a certain district but may be allowed in that district with appropriate restrictions, conditions or limitations as imposed by the City Council. Subd. 4. Equal degree of encroachment. "Equal degree of encroachment" is a method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that flood plain lands on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows. Subd. 5. Flood. "Flood" means a temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a wetland or lake that results in the inundation of normally dry areas. Subd. 6. Flood frequency. "Flood frequency" means the frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood stage or discharge may be equaled or exceeded. Subd. 7. Flood plain. "Flood plain" means the beds proper and areas adjoining a wetland, lake or watercourse which have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. 5 Subd. 8. Flood -Proofing. "Flood -proofing" means a combination of structural provisions, changes, or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding, primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. Subd. 9. Obstruction. "Obstruction" means any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill, structure, or matter in, along, across, or projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory flood plain which may impeded, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water. Subd. 10. Regional flood. "Regional flood" means a flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100 -year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in the Flood Insurance Study. Subd. 11. Regulatory flood protection elevation. "Regulatory flood protection elevation" is an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain that result from designation of a floodway. Subd. 12. Variance. A modification of the strict provisions of this Ordinance as applied to a specific piece of property in order to provide relief for a property owner because of undue hardship imposed upon the property by this Ordinance. A variance shall normally be limited to height, density and yard requirements. A modification in the allowable uses within a district shall not be considered a variance. 1103.04 Administration. Subdivision 1. Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator shall administer and enforce this ordinance. The Zoning Administrator shall review all development proposals to determine whether the proposed use lies within the Flood Plain Overlay District. No development shall be permitted unless it complies with all provisions of this ordinance. If the Zoning Administrator finds a violation of the provisions of this ordinance, he shall notify the person responsible for the violation in accordance with Section 1103.02, Subd.3 of this ordinance. Subd. 2. Permit Requirements. A. Permit Required. A permit issued by the Zoning Administrator in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance shall be secured prior to the erection, addition, or alteration of any building, •structure or 6 portion thereof; prior to the use or change of use of a building, structure, or land; prior to the change or extension of a nonconforming use; and prior to the placement of fill, excavation of materials, or the storage of materials or equipment within the Flood Plain Overlay District. B. Application and Fee. A use permit shall be applied for from the Zoning Administrator. Said application shall be made in duplicate and shall include the following where applicable: plans in duplicate drawn to scale, showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the lot; existing or proposed structures, fill, or storage of materials; and the location of the foregoing in relation to the stream channel. An application fee amount will be in accordance with City resolution and shall be required for each use permit. C. State and Federal Permits. Prior to processing an application for a Conditional Use Permit or Variance, the Zoning Administrator shall determine that the applicant has obtained all necessary State and Federal permits. Subd. 3. Certificate of Zoning Compliance. It shall be unlawful to use, occupy, or permit the use or occupancy of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created, erected, changed, converted, altered, or enlarged ion its use or structure until a Certificate of Zoning Compliance is issued by the Zoning Administrator stating that the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements of this ordinance. Subd. 4. Permits, conditional use permits, or certificates of zoning compliance issued on the basis of approved plans and applications authorize only the use, arrangement, and construction set forth in such approved plans and applications, and no other use, arrangement or construction. Any use, arrangement construction at variance with that authorized shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance and punishable as provided by Section 1103.02, Subd3. of this ordinance. Subd. 5. Certification. The applicant shall be required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished fill ad building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. Flood - proofing measures shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. Subd. 6. Record of First Floor Elevation. The Zoning Administrator shall maintain a record of the elevation of the first floor (including basement) of all new structures or additions to existing structures in the Flood Plain District. The Zoning Administrator shall also maintain a record of the elevations to which structures or additions to structures are 7 flood -proofed. Subd. 7. Variances. A. The City Council may authorize upon appeal in specific cases such variance form the terms of this ordinance as will not be contrary to public interest, where, owing to special conditions, literal enforcement of the provisions of this ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship so that the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done. No variance shall have the effect of allowing in any district uses prohibited in that district, permit a lower degree of flood protection than the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation for the particular area, or permit standards lower than those required by State law. B. The City Council Shall hear and decide requests for variance in accordance with the rules that it has adopted for the conduct of business in Section 5, Subd. 7 of the City Zoning Ordinance. Subd. 8. Conditional Use Permits. The City Council shall hear and decide applications for conditional uses permissible under this ordinance. A. Application. The applicant shall be required to furnish such of the following information and additional information as deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator for determining the suitability of the particular site for the proposed use. 1. Plans. Plans in triplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions and elevation of the lot, existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, flood -proofing measures, and the relationship of the above to the location of the Flood Plain Overlay District boundaries. 2. Specifications. Specifications for building construction materials, filling, dredging, grading, channel improvement, storage of materials, water supply and sanitary facilities. 3. Certification. The applicant shall be required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. Flood -proofing measures shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. B. Review. The City shall transmit one copy of the 8 information described in subsection 1 above to a designated engineer or other expert person or agency for technical assistance, where necessary, to evaluate the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities, the seriousness of flood damage to the use, the adequacy of the plans for protection, and other technical matters. C. Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated engineer or expert, the City Council shall determine the specific flood hazard at the site and evaluate the suitability of the proposed use in relation to the flood hazard. D. Decisions. The City Council shall arrive at a decision on a conditional use within 60 days. In granting a conditional use permit the City Council shall prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards, in addition to those specified in Subsection 6 below, which are in conformity with the purposes of this ordinance. Violations of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the conditional use permit is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance punishable under Section 1103.02, Subd.3. E. Basis of Decision. In passing upon conditional use applications, the City Council shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this ordinance and: 1. The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. 2. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others or they may block bridges, culverts or other hydraulic structures. 3. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions. 4. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner. 5. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. 6. The requirement of the facility for a waterfront location. 7. The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. 8. The compatibility of the proposed use with the existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. 9. The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and the Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan. 10. The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. 11. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. 12. Such other factors which are relevant to the purpose of this ordinance. F. Determination of Flood Hazards. 1. Upon receipt of an application for a Conditional use Permit for a use within the Flood Plain Overlay District where the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation is unknown, the applicant shall be required to furnish such of the following information as is deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator for the determination of the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. a. A typical cross section showing the channel of the stream, elevation of land areas adjoining each side of the channel, cross-sectional areas to be occupied by the proposed development and high water information. b. Plan (surface view) showing elevations or contours of the ground; pertinent structures, fill or storage elevations; size, location and spatial arrangement of all proposed and existing structures on the site; location and elevation of streets; photographs showing existing land uses and vegetation upstream and downstream; and soil type. c. Profile showing the slope of the bottom of the channel or flow line of the stream for at least 500 feet in either direction from the proposed development. 2. One copy of the above information shall be transmitted to a designated engineer or other expert person or agency for technical assistance in determining whether the proposed use adversely affects the capacity of the flood plain and to determine the Regulatory Flood Protection elevation. Procedures consistent with Minnesota Regulations NR 86-87 shall be followed in this expert evaluation. The designated engineer or expert shall: a. Estimate the peak discharge of the regional flood. b. Calculate the water surface profile of the 10 regional flood basedupon a hydraulic analysis of the stream channel and overbank areas. c. Compute the area necessary to convey the regional flood without increasing flood stages more than 0.5 feet. An equal degree of encroachment on both sides of the stream within the reach shall be assumed in computing the area of the regional flood. 3. Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated engineer or expert, the City Council shall determine whether the proposed use adversely affects the capacity of the flood plain or the Regional Flood Protection Elevation at the site. G. Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. Upon consideration of the factors listed above and the purpose of this ordinance, the City Council shall attach such conditions to the granting of the conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the purpose of this ordinance. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Modification of waste treatment and water supply facilities. 2. Limitations on period of use, occupancy and operation. 3. Imposition of operations controls, sureties, and deed restrictions. 4. Requirements of construction of channel modifications, compensatory storage, dikes, levees, and other protective measures. 5. Flood -proofing measures, in accordance with the State Building Code and this ordinance. The applicant shall submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the flood - proofing measures are consistent with the Regulatory Flood Protection elevation, the Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan and associated flood factors for the particular area. Subd. 9. Amendments. A. The floodplain designation on the official Floodplain Map shall not be removed from floodplain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regional flood and is contiguous to lands outside the floodplain. Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by the Commissioner of Natural Resources if he determines that, through other measures, lands are adequately protected for the intended use. 11 B. All amendments of this ordinance, including amendments to the official Floodplain Map, must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of Natural Resources prior to adoption. Changes to the official Floodplain Map must meet the FEMAA Technical Conditions and Criteria and must receive FEMA approval before adoption. The Commissioner of Natural Resources must be given (10) days written notice of all hearings to consider an amendment to this Ordinance and said notice shall include a draft of the Ordinance amendment or technical study under consideration. Subd. 10. Notification to the Department of Natural Resources. A. Copies of all notices of any public hearings to consider variances, amendments, or conditional uses under local flood plain management controls must be sent to the Commissioner or the Commissioners designated representative and postmarked at least ten (10) days before the hearings. B. A copy of final decisions granting variances or conditional uses under local flood plain management controls must be sent to the Commissioner or the Commissioners designated representative and postmarked within ten (10) days of final action. 1103.05 Establishment of Zoning District. Subdivision 1. Flood Plain Overlay District. The Flood Plain Overlay District shall include those areas designated as unnumbered A Zones on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 1103.02, Subd. 2. Subd. 2. District Application. The FP, Floodplain Overlay District shall be applied to and superimposed upon all zoning districts as existing or amended by the text and map of this Ordinance. The FP, Floodplain Overlay District regulations shall not be construed to allow any use or structure otherwise not allowed in the underlying zoning district where the property is located. The regulations and requirements imposed by the FP, Floodplain Overlay District shall be in addition to those established by all other districts of this Ordinance. The FP, Floodplain Overlay District shall be established based upon the specific information contained in the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and subsequently approved Letters of Map Revision (LOMR) and Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA) and the Flood Insurance Study for the City of Lino Lakes. All aforementioned official road maps and documents are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be an integral part of this Ordinance section. Subd. 3. Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments 12 on the flood plain that result from designation of a floodway. 1103.06 Floodplain Overlay District Uses. Subdivision 1. Permitted Uses. The following uses have a low flood potential and do not obstruct flood flows. These uses shall be permitted within the Flood Plain Overlay District to the extent that they are allowed in the underlying base zoning district, they are not prohibited by any other ordinance and provided they do not require structures, fill, or storage of materials or equipment. In addition, no use shall adversely affect the capacity of the channels or flood plains or any tributary to the main stream or of any drainage ditch, or any other drainage facility or system. A. Agricultural uses such as general farming, pasture, grazing, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, forestry, sod farming and wild crop harvesting. B. Industrial -commercial uses such as loading areas, parking areas, and airport landing strips. C. Private and public recreational uses such as golf courses, tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges, picnic grounds, swimming areas, parks, wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries, shooting preserves, target ranges, trap and skeet ranges, hunting and fishing areas, and single- or multiple -purpose recreational trails. D. Residential accessory uses such as lawns, gardens, parking areas and play areas as long as no permanent structures are constructed. E. Boat launching ramps and docks on riparian lots accessory to a permitted principal use. Subd. 2. Conditional Uses. A. The following use and structures may be permitted in the Floodplain Overlay District only after the issuance of a conditional use permit, as provided for in Section 1103.04, Subd. 9 of this Ordinance. These uses shall be permitted within the Floodplain Overlay District to the extent that they are allowed in the underlying base zoning district, they are not prohibited by any other ordinance, and they comply with the provisions of Section 1103.07, which applies to all Floodplain Overlay District conditional uses. 1. Principal residential, commercial, and industrial structures. 2. Accessory structures. 13 3. Placement of fill. Cumulative placement of fill in excess of 1,000 cubic yards or in excess of requirements outlined in Section 4, Subd. 33 of the City's Zoning Code, whichever is less. 4. Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines and pipelines. 5. Extraction and storage of sand, gravel and other materials. 6. Marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves and water control structures, 7. Storage yards for equipment, machinery or materials. 8. Travel trailers and travel vehicles either on individual lots of record or in existing or new subdivisions or commercial or condominium type campgrounds, subject to the exemptions and provisions of Section 1103.09, Subd. 4. 9. Structural works for flood control such as levees, dikes and floodwalls constructed to any height where the intent is to protect individual structures and levees or dikes where the intent is to protect agricultural crops for a frequency flood event equal to or less than the 10 -year frequency flood event. Subd. 3. Prohibited Uses. All other uses or structures not listed as permitted or conditional uses in the Flood Plain Overlay District shall be prohibited. Subd. 4. Nonconforming Uses. A structure or the use of a structure or premises which was lawful before the passage or amendment of the Section but which is not in conformity with the provisions of this section may be continued subject to the following conditions: A. No such use shall be expanded, changed, enlarged or altered in a way which increases its nonconformity. B. No structural alteration or addition to any nonconforming structure over the life of the structure shall exceed 50 percent of its assessed value at the time of its becoming a nonconforming use, unless the entire structure is permanently changed to a conforming use or unless the alteration or addition would substantially reduce potential flood damages for the entire structure. C. Any alteration or addition to a nonconforming use which would result in substantially increasing the flood damage potential of that use shall be accomplished in 14 accordance with Section 1103.07. D. If any nonconforming use is discontinued for twelve (12) consecutive months, any future use of the building premises shall conform to this ordinance. The assessor shall notify the Zoning Administrator in writing of instances of nonconforming uses which have been discontinued for a period of twelve (12) months. 1103.07 Standards for Flood Plain Overlay District Uses. Subdivision 1. All Uses. A. No structure (temporary or permanent), fill (including fill for roads and levees), deposit, obstruction, storage of materials or equipment or other uses may be allowed as a conditional use which, acting alone or in combination with existing or reasonably anticipated future uses, adversely affects the capacity of the flood plain or increases flood heights subject to the provisions of Section 1103.06, Subd. 2C. B. All conditional uses shall be subject to the standards contained in Section 1103.06, Subd. 2B5 and the following standards in Subd. 2 and Subd. 8 below. Subd. 2. Principal Use. A. Residential Use. 1. Principle and accessory residential structures shall be constructed on fill with the lowest floor (including basement) at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The finished fill elevation shall be no more than one (1) foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation for the particular area and shall extend at such elevation at least fifteen (15) feet beyond the limits of any structure or building erected thereon. 2. Residences that do not have vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two (2) feet below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation shall not be permitted unless granted a variance by the Board of Adjustment. In granting a variance, the Board shall specify limitations on the period of use or occupancy of the residence. B. Non -Residential Use. 1. Commercial, manufacturing, and industrial structures shall ordinarily be elevated on fill so that their lowest floor (including basement) is at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation, but may where floodplain fill may result in an increase in the regional flood elevation, change in the natural course of the floodplain 15 drainage or result in potential flooding of neighboring properties be flood proofed in accordance with the State Building Code. Structures that are not elevated to above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation shall be flood proofed to FP -1 or FP -2 classification as defined by the State Building Code. Structures flood proofed to FP -3 or FP -4 classification shall not be permitted. 2. Commercial, Manufacturing and Industrial. Accessory land uses, such as yards, railroad tracks, and parking lots may be at lower elevations. However, a permit for such accessory facilities to be used by the general public shall not be granted, in the absence of a flood warning system, if the area is inundated to a depth greater than two (2) feet or subject to flood velocities greater than four (4) feet per second upon the occurrence of the regional flood. Subdivision 3. Accessory Uses. Accessory structures shall be elevated on fill or structurally dry flood proofed in accordance with the FP -I or FP -2 flood proofing classifications in the State Building Code. As an alternative, an accessory structure may be flood proofed to the FP -3 or FP -4 flood proofing classification in the State Building Code provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 500 square feet in the size, and for a detached garage, the detached garage must be used solely for parking of vehicles and limited storage. All flood proofed accessory structures must meet the following additional standards, as appropriate: A. The structure must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure and shall be designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls; and B. Any mechanical and utility equipment in a structure must be elevated to or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or properly flood proofed. C. Whenever possible, structures shall be constructed with the longitudinal axis parallel to the direction of flood flow. D. So far as practicable, structures shall be placed approximately on the same flood flow lines as those of adjoining structures. Subdivision 4. Structural Flood Proofing Standards. Alternative elevation methods other than the use of fill may be utilized to elevate a commercial and industrial structure's lowest floor above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. These alternative methods may include the use of stilts, pilings, parallel walls, etc., or above grade, enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages. The base or floor of an enclosed area shall be considered above grade and not a 16 structure's basement or lowest floor if 1) the enclosed area is above grade on at least one side of the structure; 2) is designed to internally flood and is constructed with flood resistant materials; and 3) is used solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage. The above noted alternative elevation methods are subject to the following additional standards: A. Design and Certification. The structure's design and as built condition must be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect as being in compliance with the general design standards of the State Building Code and, specifically, that all electrical heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or be designed to prevent flood water from entering or accumulating within these components during times of flooding. B. Specific Standards for Above Grade, Enclosed Areas. Above grade, fully enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under gar -ages must be designed to internally flood and the design plans must stipulate: 1. The minimum area of openings in the walls where internal flooding is to be used as a flood proofing technique. When openings are placed in a structure's walls to provide for entry of flood waters to equalize pressures, the bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of flood waters. 2. That the enclosed area will be constructed of flood resistant materials in accordance with the FP -3 or FP -4 classifications in the State Building Code and shall be used solely for building access, parking of vehicles or storage. C. Basements, as defined in Section 1103.3 of this Ordinance, shall be subject to the following: -1. Residential basement construction shall not be allowed below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. 2. Non-residential basements may be allowed below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation provided the basement is structurally dry flood proofed in accordance with Section 1103.07, Subd. 4 of this Ordinance. D. All areas of non-residential structures, including basements to be placed below the Regulatory Flood 17 Protection Elevation, shall be flood proofed in accordance with the structurally dry flood proofing classifications in the State Building Code. Structurally dry flood proofing classification in the State Building Code and this shall require making the structure water tight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. Structures flood proofed to the FP -3 or FP -4 classification shall not be permitted. Subd. 5 Fill. A. Any fill deposited in the Flood Plain Overlay District shall be no more than the minimum amount necessary to conduct a conditional use listed in Section 1103.04,Subd. 2. B. The effects of any fill on the stage of the regional flood shall be analyzed as required by Section 1103.04, Subd. 2C. C. Fill shall be protected from erosion by vegetative cover. An erosion and sedimentation plan shall be required for any fill in excess of 1,000 cubic yards or in accordance with Section 4, Subdivision 33 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, whichever is less. D. Fill for Construction. Fill shall be adequately compacted and the slopes shall be protected by the use of rip rap, vegetative cover or other acceptable method. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has established criteria for removing the special flood hazard area designation for certain structures properly elevated on fill above the 100 year flood elevation. FEMA's requirements incorporate specific fill compaction and side slope protection standards for multistructure or multi -lot developments. These standards must be investigated prior to the initiation of site preparation if a change of special flood hazard area designation will be requested. Subd. 6. Storage of Materials and Equipment. A. The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal or plant life is prohibited. B. Storage of other materials or equipment may be allowed if readily removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning and in accordance with a plan approved by the City Council. Subd. 7. Public Utilities. All public utilities and facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer and water supply 18 systems to be located in the flood plain shall be flood proofed in accordance with the State Building Code or elevated to above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. Subd. 8. Public Transportation Facilities. A. Railroad tracks, roads and bridges to be located within the Flood Plain Overlay District shall comply with Subd. 1 above. B. Elevation to the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation shall be provided where failure or interruption of public transportation facilities would result in danger to the public health or safety or where such facilities are essential to the orderly functioning of the area. C. Minor or auxiliary roads or railroads may be constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger the public health or safety. Subd. 9. On-site Sewage Treatment and Water Supply Systems. Where public utilities are not provided: A. On-site water supply systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems; and B. New or replacement on-site sewage treatment systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters and they shall not be subject to impairment or contamination during times of flooding. C. Any sewage treatment system designed in accordance with the State's current statewide standards for on-site sewage treatment systems shall be determined to be in compliance with this section. 1103.08 Subdivisions. No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by the City of Lino Lakes for the reason of flooding, inadequate drainage, water supply or sewage treatment facilities. Subdivision 1. All lots within the Flood Plain Overlay District shall contain a building site at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. Subd. 2. All subdivisions shall have water and sewage disposal facilities that comply with the provisions of this ordinance and have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower than the elevation of the 100 -year regional flood. Subd. 3. Removal of Special Flood Hazard Area Designation: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has established 19 criteria for removing the special flood hazard area designation for certain structures properly elevated on fill above the 100 -year flood elevation. FEMA's requirements incorporate specific fill compaction and side slope protection standards for multi -structure or multi -lot developments. These standards should be investigated prior to the initiation of site preparation if a change of special flood hazard area designation will be requested. 1103.09 Manufactured Homes/Travel Trailers and Travel Vehicles. Subdivision 1. New manufactured home parks and expansions to existing manufactured home parks shall be subject to the provisions placed on subdivisions by Section 1103.08 of this ordinance. Subd. 2. The placement of new or replacement manufactured homes in existing manufactured home parks or on individual lots of record that are located in a Flood Plain Overlay District will be treated as a new structure and may be placed only if elevated in compliance with the L@ and Section 1103.07 of this ordinance. If vehicular road access for pre-existing manufactured home parks is not provided in accordance with Section 1103.08, Subd. 2, then replacement manufactured homes will not be allowed until the property owner(s) develops a flood warning emergency plan acceptable to the City Council. Subd. 3. All manufactured homes must be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system that resists flotation, collapse and lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over - the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable sate or local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. Subd. 4. Travel trailers and travel vehicles that do not meet the exemption criteria specified below shall be subject to the provisions of this ordinance and as specifically spelled out in Subsections C and D below. A. Exemption. Travel trailers and travel vehicles are exempt from the provisions of this ordinance if they are placed in any of the area listed in Subsection B below and further they meet the following criteria: 1. Have current licenses required for highway use. 2. Are highway ready meaning on wheels or the internal jacking system, are attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities commonly used in campgrounds and trailer parks and the travel trailer/travel vehicle has no permanent structural type additional attached to it. 3. The travel trailer or travel vehicle and associated use must be permissible in any pre-existing, 20 underlying zoning district. B. Areas Exempted for Placement of Travel/Recreational Vehicles. 1. Individual lots or parcels of record. 2. Existing commercial recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds. 3. Existing condominium type associations. C. Travel trailers and travel vehicles exempted in Subsection A above lose thisexemption when development occurs on the parcel exceeding dollars for a structural addition to the travel trailer/ travel vehicle or an accessory structures such as a garage or storage building. The travel trailer/travel vehicle and all additions and accessory structures will then be treated as a new structure and shall be subject to the elevation and flood -proofing requirements and the use of land restrictions specified in Section 1103.06 of this ordinance. D. New commercial travel trailer or travel vehicle parks or campgrounds and new residential type subdivisions and condominium associations and the expansion of any existing similar use exceeding five (5) units or dwelling sites shall be subject to the following: 1 . Any new or replacement travel trailer or travel vehicle will be allowed in the Flood Plain Overlay District provided said trailer or vehicle and its contents are placed on fill above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation and proper elevated road access to the site exists in accordance with Section 1103.08, Subd. 2 of this ordinance. No fill placed in the Flood Plain Overlay District to meet the requirements of this section shall increase flood stages of the 100 -year regional flood. 2. All new or replacement travel trailers or travel vehicles not meeting the criteria of Subpart 1 above may, as an alternative, be allowed as a Conditional Use if in accordance with the following provisions and the provisions of Section 1103.06, Subd. 2 of this ordinance. a. The applicant must submit an emergency plan for the safe evacuation of all vehicles and people during the 100 -year flood. Said plan shall be prepared by a registered engineer or other qualified individual and shall demonstrate that adequate time and personnel exist to carry out 21 the evacuation. b. All attendant sewage and water facilities for the new or replacement travel trailers or other recreational vehicles must be protected ' or constructed so as to not be impaired or contaminated during time so of flooding in accordance with Section 1103.07, Subd. 9 of this ordinance. 1103.10 Ordinance No. 88, Flood Plain District, as originally written, amended and approved is hereby deleted. Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be in force after its passage and official publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this day of 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: The following voted against same: Whereupon said Ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. 22 AGENDA IT'. 5 H STAFF ORIGINATOR Alan Brixius/Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 22, 1995 TOPIC First Reading of Ordinance No. 13-95 Amending the City's Sign Ordinance The City Attorney working on the Adam's Sign Lawsuit has discovered an inconsistency in the Amended Sign Ordinance and original Sign Ordinance contained in the City Code. This discrepancy relates to the numbering of certain sections and subdivisions of the ordinances, not the content of the Ordinance. The recently amended ordinance must be formatted to be consistent with the ordinance in the City Code. The attached Ordinance reflects this correction. City Staff would recommend approval of the Sign Ordinance as submitted. This Sign Ordinance Amendment was originally approved by the P & Z and City Council in March of 1995. The purpose was to eliminate advertising signs in all zoning districts except the Rural and Rural/Business Reserve District. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their June 14, 1995 meeting and recommended approval. 1. Approve First Reading of Ordinance No. 13-95 Amending the City's sign Ordinance. 2. Return to staff for further consideration Option 1 JUN -08-1995 11:44 NRC 612 595 9837 P.02/03 Council Member introduced the following Ordinance and moved its adoption. CTT OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 95 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX C OF THE cm- CODE (SIGN REGULATIONS) REPEALING ADVERTISING SIGNS IJTRIN THE SC, GB, LI AND GI ZONING DISTRICTS. The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes ordains: Section 1. Section �, Subd. B (Residential District Sign Requirements) is amended to add the following: 5. Ar1vrrtising Signs:. Advertising signs, as defined by Section II, Subd. F of this Ordinance, are prohiibited in. the RI, R-1 X, Iia, R4, R6, and R7 Zoning Districts. Section 2. Section III, Subd.. C (LB District Sign Requirements) is amended to add the following: 4. Advertising Sips- Advertising signs, as defined by Section II, Subd_ P of this Ordinance, are prohibited in the LB Zoning District. Section 3. Section III, Subd. D (NB District Sign Requirements) is amended to add the following: 3. Admettisi g s : Advertising signs, as defined by Section II, Snbd. F of this Ordinance, are prohibited in the NB Zoning District. Section 4,. Section III, Subd_ E3 (SC District Advertising Sign Requirements) is amended to read as follows: 3. Advertising Signs- Advertising signs, as defined by Section II, Subd. F of this Ordinance, are prohibited in the SC Zoning District_ JUN -08-1995 11:44 NAC b12 5'J3 .J8S? P.0/03 Section 5. Section III, Subd. F.4 (GB and PSP District Advertising Sign Requirements) is amended to read as follows: 4. Advertising Signs: Advertising signs, as defined by Section II, Subd. F of this Ordinance, are prohibited in the GB and PSP Zoning Districts. Section 6. Section III, Subd. G.3 (L -I and G -I District Advertising Sign Requirements) is amended to read as follows: 3. Advertising Signs- Advertising signs, as defined by Section IT, Subd. F of this Ordinance, are prohibited in the LI and GI Zoning Districts. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective upon its passage and publication, according to the City Charter. BY: ADOPTED by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 1995. ATTEST: BY: Marilyn Anderson, City Clerk 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES Vernon Reinert, Mayor TOTAL P.03 AGENDA ITEM 5 I STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland DATE June 22, 1995 TOPIC FINAL PLAT Country Lakes Birchwood Developers Inc. is requesting final plat approval for Country Lakes Estates Plat 2. The property is located on Reshanau Lake just north of Birch Street and consists of 28 R-1 Single Family Lots. The preliminaryplat for this development was approved by the Council in June of 1993. Country Lakes Estates Plat 1 was final platted in May of 1994 and contains 25 lots, 10 of those lots have been built on or have permits pending as of 6/22/95. The Development Agreement for Plat 2 was signed by the City and the Developer in November of 1994 and financial guarantees are in place. The:City Attorney reviewed the title work in 1994 prior to approval of the first plat. Street and utility. construction is underway and should be completed by the end of July. City staff would recommend approval of the Final Plat for Country Lakes Estates Plat 2. 1. Approve Final Plat for Country Lakes Estates Plat 2 2. Return to staff for further consideration COUNTRY LAKES ESTATES PLAT 2 RESHANAU LAKE WATER SURFACE ELEV.= 88161 (00VD-1929) (MARCH 18. 1994) ORDINARY HIGH WATER SURFACE ELEVATION = 8035 ACCORDING TO THE DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES. STATE OF MINNESOTA %•) rn _n 4� •=480. 0+ I 356 Z 17"11.49 S,89'18'1VE :.:,;r:,i�. _�: 00� 'E D- 28.1615 r 28N, 1'3'3 0 :12612 R-=420.20:49 ^,"62.28, rK 386.37 6= Sss„ 1? R.snt ,, -1",,,-,..‘.1.113.3' 55 _n•ol• 5�0--16LII- NET 7 . e=1).47'254,..r113.:......, r m� 5 a 14 3 . 4 : LAND �� 588 37'j95. O y44'35'�. 8.52'591 z j0•��, �—BOTB f ti-gj14 i ASEwEN1 _r r?�o.00- N X3.310993 596„Teu•`a":` i i+ N" is �\ 11 Q$ X1O '.4" o.08 z l$, 8.23 i G 12 17. ,D.:fA _ , 4.9-GLSfi_1 Z.6 D 16 _3 8, - S 88-52'59_,E 160.00 z 150.01 b a 46 6 4. a 01 N 88'50.10•W 5 88'52'59•E 344.56 11' a<2A8i3 DEERWOOD LANE 813 5 88.52'595. 435.00 „ DRAINAGE EASEMENT sa m r 0a ; e=14.49'18 4 h r 48 67 ___ 1 O� IN OT'07'Oi E rip :5687 Z 180.00 N 88 52'58 W 250.00 i Z:a_,. H ._, . p_..._ . DENOTES RON MONUMENT FOUND o DENOTES RON MONUMENT SET FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT 11-8 EAST LINE OF OUTLOT C OF 'COUNTRY LAKES ESTATES" 6 ASSUMED TO BEAR 11 00•41'49-E NOTE: T1* MR4IESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. UNITED STATES CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND OTHER WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCIES HAVE CATEGORIZED VARIOUS WETLANDS. WHICH ARE NOT ACKNOWLEDGED BY CHAPTER 505.02. SUBDIVISION 1 OF MINNESOTA STATUTES AW MAY NOT. BE SNOWI4 /EREON. OEVELOPEEM OF LAN405 CONTANNG SAID WETLANDS MAY BE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL CONIXTDNS OR LIMITATIONS. D' 1A6.,- 1 314.4(023.45'09 14° Ser 55 107 SCALE N FEET 1 NCH = 100 FEET DRAINAGE 6 UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: f t 8ENG 5 FEET N WIDTH AND AAIOI IG LOT LANES. AND BEING 10 FEET N WIDTH AND ADJOfNC 5(181.0 (NES. UNLESS OTIEKwr. SHOWN ON TIE PLAT. 0 O Ln KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. That (3 nnl.er of Pm following described properly 941041ed Uullut5 H and C. 0JUNIR0 LAKES ESTATES. have caused the same ,o t surveyed and planet toreve,Oeerwood Laneand also 0edn;ate the ea, n wnoOSS whereof sa,0 9trchwood guiders Inc ;r A )1 r:4 1,114Ni SCUP fed 5a=1 1,sl Slate San' of Wycr: M A Zauha_ E,ecunve s _4 P,81140' SIAII to MINNESOTA (.01UN10 Vi the l(00yoop ,nsirument by M A Zawoa Lxecul:1 corporallun was acknowledged ()Mord me this I hereby cerldy that 1 have surveyed and platted 1 d,slances are correctly snows on the oral In le0t correctly designated on the platand that there art ),001 (N MINNESOTA ( .011N1Y (4 CHISAI30 1111. loregoinq Surveyor 5 Ceri,1,cate v.a5 acirnowlr Ire plot of COUNTRY LAK15 L S1A9L5 1'LAI 7 Ire written comments and recommendations of tn. nos elapsed without fecerpr 01 such Cuntmems a' !West Clerk Hits Pla, was appoved and accepted t), I80 Boar Charman (:flecked and approved thl5 day dt Fi P T 1 .' _ -4- ••••41•••••••••••••••111 • Mal.* t. • r FtES%1ANAL) LAKE hs ii�� 4111111P01 . • rra�w.i[1 �,,��►„i7' "17':1%!11; 1 v iR 4 10 1_1_ar ..2 ,11+', ,'I S A, alp EXHIBIT B - DETAILED SITE LOCAT AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. Acting City Engineer DATE June 23. 1995 Resolution No. 95-76 Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize TOPIC Advertisement for Bids for 1995 Seal Coating Project BACKGROUND: Seal Coating of roadways within the City is a maintenance item which is budgeted for on a yearly basis by the City. Applying a thin coat of aggregate to an existing roadway helps extend the usefulness of the roadway by providing a new driving and wearing surface. Included in this year's project are roadways within Sunnygate 3 and 4, Carole's Estates 2, Lake View Woodlands, and on 77th and 79th Streets. The total quantity of sealcoating is about 78,000 square yards. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 95-76. 2. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1. - Approve Resolution No. 95-76 Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the, 1995 Seal Coating project. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-76 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 1995 SEAL COATING PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 1995 Seal Coating Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published to ten days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened and bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:30 A.M. on Friday, July 21, 1995 at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will be tabulated and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 P.M. on Monday, July 24, 1995 in the Council Chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given the opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of June, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1995. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM NO. 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR Steve Heth, P.E., Consulting Engineer DATE June 21, 1995 TOPIC Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 77 Receiving the Trappers Crossing Feasibility Report and Setting the Public Hearing for August 14, 1995, 6:40 P.M. ........................................... BACKGROUND The City Council adopted Resolution No. 95 - 51 ordering the preparation of the feasibility report. The report can now be received and a public hearing set at which time the details of the report will be presented. ................................ OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution No. 95 - 77 Receiving the Trappers Crossing Feasibility report and Setting a Public Hearing. 2. Return the matter to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 77 RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE TRAPPER'S CROSSING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the City Council adopted June 12, 1995, a report has been prepared by Steve Heth (SEH) with reference to the improvement of Trapper's Crossing, and this report was received by the City Council on June 26, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Council will consider the improvement in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the Lino Lakes City Charter at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $954,000.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such improvement on the 14th day of August, 1995, in the council Chambers of the City Hall at 6:40 P.M. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of June, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR Steve Heth, P.E., Consulting Engineer DATE June 21, 1995 TOPIC Receiving Bids for Black Duck Pumping Station ROU The City council adopted Resolution No. 95 62 authorizing advertisement for bids for the Black Duck Pumping Station. Bids were received on June 21, 1995 at 10:00 A.M. The apparent low bid was 40% higher than the engineers estimate. The bid is being reviewed to determine the discrepancy with the engineers estimate. A written report will be delivered to the acting City Engineer upon completion. A recommendation on award will then follow. OPTItONS 1. Adopt a motion receiving bids for the Black Duck Pumping Station • Return the matter to staff for further consideration. AGENDA ITEM 60 STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell. Acting City Engineer DATE June 23, 19Q5 TOPIC Resolution No. 95-75 Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Well No. 4 (Clearwater Creek) BACKGROUND: The Plans and Specifications for this project were ordered by the City Council on June 12, 1995. The drilling of the well is scheduled to begin in early August of 1995 with pumphouse construction to begin when the drilling is completed. The pumphouse will be bid as a separate project. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 95-75. 2. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1. - Approve Resolution No. 95-75 Approving Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for Well No. 4. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95-75 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR WELL NO. 4. WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on June 12, 1995, the Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for Well No. 4 Improvements and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published to ten days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened and bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:00 A.M. on Friday, July 21, 1995 at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will be tabulated and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 P.M. on Monday, July 24, 1995 in the Council Chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given the opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of June, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on , 1995. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM 6 E STAFF ORIGINATOR John Powell, DATE June 23, 1995 TOPIC Acting City Engineer Resolution No 95-80 Adoption of Standards to Source Pollution Non -Point Source Pollution involves pollutant materials which are carried off of the land into receiving waters through rainfall and snowmelt. The Metropolitan Council has adopted a strategy to reduce this source of pollution to water bodies in the Metro Area. The City, through the recent completion of the Surface Water Management Plan and updating of the Floodplain and Shoreland Ordinances has met most of the technical requirements of the strategy. The remaining area to address to comply with the Met Council's strategy is to amend the City's Land Use Control to incorporate the Plan and revised ordinances. City Staff would anticipate completion of the Land Use Controls by the Spring of 1996 in conjunction with an updating of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. oP 1. Adopt Resolution No. 95-80 Return to staff for further review Option 1 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 95-80 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO STANDARDS TO REDUCE NON -POINT SOURCE POLLUTION FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAMES, MN. WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes, MN has adopted a Local Surface Water Management Plan which incorporates the Nation Wide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards for the design of new stormwater ponds and the MPCA's urban best management practices titled Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas to the review of any proposed development occurring in the City of Lino Lakes to reduce nonpoint source pollutant loadings in stormwater runoff, and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Lino Lakes to complete a Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment, by Spring of 1996, and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Lino Lakes to amend Land Use Controls to incorporate the Local Surface Water Management Plan by the Spring of 1996, and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has adopted a Shoreland Management Ordinance and a Floodplain Management Ordinance, reviewed and approved by the MN Department of Natural Resources, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby authorizes the initiation of studies to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan including Local Land Use Controls to incorporate the Metropolitan Council's recommended NURP Standards, the MPCA's urban best management practices and the City's Local Surface Water Management Plan by Spring of 1996. Approval of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan including Local Land Use Controls are subject to review and response of the Metropolitan Council. Approved by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes, MN this _ day of , 1995 Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer AGENDA ITEM 6F F ORIGINATOR John Powell. &ctir g Qity Engineer June 23. 1995 Watering Ban Update AROUND: aesday, June 20, 1995 in response to continued hot weather and severe demand VS the City instituted a total watering ban. The Council will be updated at the ig with a recommendation on whether the ban should be continued or modified. AGENDA ITEM NO. 7A STAFF ORIGINATOR Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Trey DATE June 23, 1995 TOPIC Consideration of Citizen Petitions Attached are copies of the two (2) petitions presented to me by the CALL group. CALL asked that the petitions be directed to Mr. Hawkins to determine if the language satisfies the requirements of the City Charter. Mr. Hawkins will give his opinion to the City Council on Monday. Mr. Hawkins will provide options. Mr. ha ins will provide a recommendation We, the undersigned registered ordinance be placed on a city Majority vote, it will becoalH ordinance cannot bA repealed, Lino Lakes. NOTIFWATION REQUIREMOI2 voters ballot_ effective by of except the City of Lino Lakes. retest that an If the following ordinance iv approved by a 31 days, after voting is co+letee. This a majority vote of the regf4tered voters of 5, Subd_ 3(2) , is !hereby appended in 640 any property pl-oposed for Zoning in writing, although failure by shah not invalidate the t notificationjhas been made. tie tease of any Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance appendix d-1, Sections its entirety. Property district to read as follows_ owners or occupants within amendment (rezoning) shall any property owner to receive such proceedings --provided that Notification shall be rezoning which property notified amendment owners in abuts feet. of ba notified notification proof of an attempt a by registered mail_ In tI shoreland, as defined by Lino Lakes ordinances, all or occupants of property, which but the shvrelland shall be writing, of any property proposed for any zoning c'istrict (rezoning), even though their property Pay be beyond the 500 previously contemplated in this section. fleet Lino Lakes Zoning fsrdinastce Appendix B-1, Section 5, Sub& 3(7), i hereby a*epded in its entirety, to read as followsz Notice for the purpose, time, and place of such public hearin,, shall be published twice in the official newspaper of the City, And snaffled to the appropriate property owners, at least 14 days prior to the pulic hearing. the proposed zoning district ametx1 ent shall be The following ordinance shall be added to Lino Lakes 7rdinancet, tir read as follows: NOTSFIco I N USW.___ Y .kgtEL_i.t fisOUNWAL. Property owners or occupants within 504 feet of any proposed changes to the ttetropolitan tlrbafl service Area (hereinafter MUSA) boundaries, sheiil be notified in writing, although failure by any property owner to receive such ndtification shall not invalidate the proceedings -'-provided that proof of an attempt,at notification has been made. Notification shall be by registered mail. Notice for the purpose, time, and place of the action to change a MUSA boundary, shall be published twice in the official newspaper of the City, ar'1d mailed to the appr0briate property owners, at least 10 days prior to the publichesring_ A clear and concise soap of the proposed changes shall be included in ail MeiTings. bdrgNFrrasra*#+Mrt�� +rP*****Asa.#+k ***** ****.mm****4.4*** kaa ew►* afamul sgutpms***** mwr�lra We, five registered voters of the City of Lino takes, as a comaittee A t=iear and concise included map of in all mailings_ this petition for initiative: 2_ 3. 4. 5. 4..6101 are s.ponsorins being fust duly sworn upon, oath, state that eve*.y signature au the attached petirio❑ was made it my E presence and I believe these signatures tc be the i genuine Signatures of the person •.i',-.o^:dame appearsi on the petition. As certifier I further declare that 1 I are a =eaicleut of the City of Lino Lakes and t am a registered voter in the City of Lico Lakes_ Dated this day of , 1995. Subscribed and svocn to oe£ore me this 1995. cay e AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 ORIGINATOR Randy Schumacher June 22, 1995 Consideration of an Addendum to the CDBG Joint Agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and the of Anoka :ROUND Powers County y, the City of Lino Lakes and the County of Anoka have a joint Cooperation ent allowing the City to participate in the Urban Anoka County Community ment Block Grant (CDBG) Program. inty has sent the City an addendum to the current agreement which includes wing: Allowing the City to participate in the HOME Program (see attached memo for definition of HOME Program) in addition to the CDBG Program, and, Changing the term to cover the 1996-1998 programs, and, Addition of definitions required by the change. inty will need the signed addendum returned to them by June 30, 1995. NS pprove addendum as presented to include addition of the Home Program, ranging the term to cover 1996-1998 and addition of definitions required by e change. 4MENDA TION: MEMORANDUM TO: Randy Schumacher FROM: Paula Schloer DATE: June 22, 1995 SUBJECT: HOME Program The HOME Program was created by the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990. HOME is federally funded and it is a grant program for housing. Dollars are allocated from HUD to Anoka County which accepts bids from local communities and/or nonprofit organizations with the intent to: -Expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing, primarily rental housing. -Strengthen the abilities to state and local governments to provide housing. -Ensure that federal housing services, financing and other investment are provided to state and local governments in a coordinated, supportive fashion. -Expand the capacity of nonprofit community-based housing development organizations. For 1995, Anoka County had a budget of $400,000 for the Home Program. The organizations that did apply and received funding were the cities of Fridley and Columbia Heights and the organizations of RISE, ACCAP, CEAP and ELAM, a homeless prevention program. The dollars are used in a variety of ways, including keeping homeless people in an apartment, group home programs and other assistance programs for the low income. Each organization requesting funds from the HOME Program must provide a 25% match. The eligible beneficiaries of the program are homeowners and tenants with very low and low incomes. No funding is used to assist first-time home buyers or homeowners with an annual gross income greater than 80% of the median income ($40,200 for a family of four). HOME funds generally are used to provide incentives to develop and support affordable rental housing and home ownership through acquisition, new construction, reconstruction or moderate or substantial rehabilitation of affordable housing. COUNTY OF ANOKA Urban Anoka County Community Development Block Grant GOVERNMENT CENTER 2100 3rd Avenue • Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 • (61 2) 323-5709 Ms. Paula Schloer City of Lino Lakes 1 189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Dear Paula: June 13, 1995 RFr►\/E.D O\\I A', 1(19,5 rci-v, , ANO M.FS Attached are three copies of the Addendum to the Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and Anoka County. The Agreement allows the City to participate in the Urban Anoka County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The Addendum to the Agreement is necessary to: 1) allow cities to participate in the HOME Program in addition to the CDBG Program. 2) change the term to cover the 1996 - 1998 programs. 3) add some definitions required by the change. Please have the documents signed and return all three copies to me with Council/Board action authorizing participation in the Anoka County CDBG and HOME programs. HUD has a strict timetable so I must receive these from you no later than June 30, 1995. Sincerely, AAO:sw Enclosures (3) cc: Jay McLinden Tom Durand Alyce A. Osborn Community Development Manager Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer Anoka County Contract No. ADDENDUM TO JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT THIS ADDENDUM is made and entered into this day of 1995, the date of the signature of the parties notwithstanding, by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as the "County," and the City of Lino Lakes, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014, hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality," said harries to this Addendum each being governmental units of the State of Minnesota, and is made pure.;::nt to Minn. Stat. § 471.59 WITNESSE'111: WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Joint Cooperation \::eentent (the Agreement) under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. as :_n;ended, to provide for a program of community development block grants; and and WHEREAS, said Agreement has been amended by two suhstqucnt Addendums to the Agreement; WHEREAS, the parties wish to again amend said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual c v, enants and understandings contained herein, the parties do hereby agree that said Agreement, as amended. is hereby amended as billows: Section I. DEFINITIONS, Paragraph A. is her ehy amended to read as follows: The "CDBG Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 USC § 5301, et seq_. as :,mended. 2. Section 1. DEFINITIONS is hereby amended by adding, the following paragraph: E. "Home Act" means the Home Investment Partnership Act, Title II of the Cranston -Gonzales National Affordable Horsing Act, 42 USC § 12701 , et seq., as amended. - 1 - 3. Section H. PURPOSE is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Municipality and County have determined that it is desirable and in the interest of its citizens that the County qualifies as an urban county within the provisions of the CDBG Act and Horne Act. This Agreement contemplates that identical agreements will be executed between the County and other cities and towns in the County and such numbers will enable the County to so qualify under the CDBG Act and Home Act. B. The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize the County to cooperate with the Municipality in undertaking, or assist in undertaking, essential community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing pursuant to the CDBG Act and Hoene Act as authorized in said acts. 4. Section 111. TERM OF AGREEMENT is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph: Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall remain in effect until the CDBG and Horne funds and program income received with respect to the activities carried out during the three-year qualification period (and any successive qualification period) are expended and the funding activities completed, and neither the County nor the Municipality may terminate this Agreement during said time period. 5. Section V. SPECIAL PROVISIONS is hereby amended (o by adding the following paragraphs: 13y executing this Agreement, the Municipality understands that it: May not apply for grants from appropriations under the Small Cities or State CDBG Programs for fiscal years during the period in which it participates in the County's CDBG Program; and May participate in the Home Program only through the Urban County Consortium of Anoka, Dakota, Ramsey and Washington counties. Thus, even if the Urban County Consortium does not receive a home formula 2 allocation, the participating Municipality cannot form a home consortium with other local governments. The County and Municipality shall comply with Section 104(b) of Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Housing Act, Section 109 of Title I of the Community Development Act of 1974, and other applicable laws. It is specifically understood and agreed that the County shall not provide funding for activities in or in support of any Municipality that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes the County's actions to comply with its fair housing certification. 6. This Addendum is hereby nrrdc a part of and shall he amended to the Agreement of the parties. 7. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Addendum on the dates written below. COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES By: Dan Erhart, Chairman Board of Commissioners Dated: ATTEST By: John "Jay" McLinden County Administrator By: Its: Dated: By: Its: Dated: Dated: Upon proper execution, this Addendum will CITY MUST CIIECK ONE: he legally valid and binding. By: Dan Klint Assistant County Attorney APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION By: Dan Klint Assistant County Attorney Dated: dk\contract\ 1995\jc-linolake. add -4- I'he City is organized pursuant to: Plan A Plan 13 Chartered AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 STAFF ORIGINATOR Randy Schumacher DATE June 22, 1995 TOPIC Consideration of waiving or not waiving monetary limits on tort liability per MN Statute 466.04. `CGRiND Each year, the City has the option of waving its monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. This limit of liability insurance is currently $600,000. 00 per each occurrence or incident. The City of Lino Lakes does carry an additional $1,000,000.00 in excess liability coverage ($1,000,000.00 per occurrence and annual limit) in the event that the limits were ever declared to be unconstitutional. The City of Lino Lakes has never waived its monetary limits on tort liability. a. The City of Lino Lakes does not choose to waive its monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. The City of Lino Lakes chooses to waive its monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Recommend option a. LMCIT EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE Cities obtaining excess coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide whether or not to waive the statutory liability limits to the extent of the excess coverage purchased. This decision must be made by the city council. CITIES PURCHASING EXCESS COVERAGE MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM TO LMCIT BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE COVERAGE. For further information, refer to the accompanying memo. City officials may also want to discuss these issues with the city attorney. The City of limits of $ Check one: accepts excess liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. -OR- The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Date of city council meeting: Signature: Position: Return this completed form to Berkley Risk Services, 920 Second Avenue South, Suite 700, Minneapolis, MN 55402-4023. 4/92 LMCIT31 (2) AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Vaske DATE June 22, 1995 TOPIC Consideration of General Fixed Assets Policy and Procedures BACKGROUND:: Currently, the City is in the process of establishing a fixed asset system. The City shall assign responsibility for the custody and control of it's property. The system shall incorporate proper accounting procedures according to generally acceptable accounting principals. Department Heads will be responsible for the notification of purchase, deletion or transfer to the Finance Department. inventory will be taken annually to prove accountability. 1. Approve General Fixed Assets Policy and Procedures as submitted. 2. Send Policy and Procedures back to Staff for additional changes per City Council fa-• CITY OF LINO LAKES GENERAL FIXED ASSET POLICY AND PROCEDURES A. PURPOSE: The objective of this policy is to establish and maintain a fixed asset system. The City shall assign responsibility for the custody and control of it's property. The system shall incorporate proper accounting procedures according to generally acceptable accounting principals. Department Heads will be responsible for the notification of purchase, deletion or transfer to Finance. The inventory should be taken annually to prove accountability. B. DEFINITIONS: Asset Life: Asset Value: Automobiles: Building: Fixed Asset: Furniture: Improvements: Land: Consideration of a fixed asset inventory item must set the life at greater than one year. Value for inclusion of an item shall be set at $500 (current insurance deductible). Other fixed assets below this amount shall be tagged and included in the inventory without a value. 4 wheel vehicle used mainly for passenger transportation. A City owned roofed and walled structure. An item that has a useful life that exceeds one year and is valued at $500 and above. Equipment used to ready a facility for occupancy. ie chairs, desks, credenzas, file cabinets etc. Additions or new construction to improve the infrastructure of the City. This category includes water and sewer mains, pumphouses, lift stations, wells and water towers. Any City owned land whether developed or undeveloped. Machinery: Mobile construction and maintenance equipment. Page 2 Office Equipment: Equipment used to perform a mechanized task. ie computers, calculators, copiers, fax machines etc. Other Equipment: Equipment that does not fit into a previous category. Trucks/ Pickups: 4 wheel vehicle used mainly for maintenance and hauling. C. ACQUISITION: When an item is acquired that should be added to the fixed asset inventory, the appropriate department shall complete an Addition Form. It should include the following information: department, description, model number, serial number, VIN number(if appropriate), vendor. The form should than be returned to Finance for addition to the fixed asset inventory. Purchase: An acquisition through the direct outlay of cash. Cost will be based on invoice plus additional costs of preparing the asset. An item traded for the a new item does not decrease the cost of the new item. Lease/Installment: Cost will be determined and assigned as if the item was purchased outright. Donations: Cost will be determined by fair market value and any costs associated with preparing the asset for use. Eminent Domain: Cost will be determined by the court plus any additional costs incurred for the acquisition. Forfeiture: Cost will be determined by fair market value and any costs associated with preparing the asset for use. Contribution: Cost will be determined at the completion of construction as determined by the City Engineer. The additional costs of preparing the asset for intended use includes, but is not limited to the following: Land: legal fees, appraisal and negotiation fees, demolition, site preparation, and survey fees. Buildings and Improvements: architect fees, legal fees, appraisal fees, cost of fixtures, bonding fees, and interest. Page 3 Automobiles, Trucks, and Machinery: transportation charges, licensing, painting and installation of additional equipment. Maintenance costs will not be capitalized as they do not add to the value of the asset. Replacements will be capitalized as they add to the value. ie furnaces, pumps, engines etc. D. RETIREMENT: This term is used to describe the removal of a fixed asset from the inventory. An asset may be retired through the following ways: sale, trade-in, obsolescence, lost, stolen or damaged beyond repair. A retirement form will be completed by the appropriate department including the following information: date retired, method of disposition, salvage and trade-in value. The form is then returned to Finance for deletion from the fixed asset inventory. E. TRANSFERS: When an asset is transferred to a different department, the appropriate department will complete a transfer form including the following information: date transferred, from department, to department and why. The form is then returned to Finance to make the change to the fixed asset inventory. F. DEPRECIATION: Depreciation expense will be determined on all asset items that are acquired within the Utility Departments. Depreciation will be determined on the following basis: Type Years Land Improvements 10 Watermains 50 Sewermains 50 Lift stations 20 Well and Pumphouses 30 Water Towers 50 Furniture 10 Office Equipment 5 Compressors 10 Generators 7 Pumps 5 Dehumidifiers 7 Furnaces 10 Fans 10 Page 4 Meters/Gauges/Analyzers 10 Trucks 5 Pickups 5 Trailers 5 Radios 10 G. IDENTIFICATION TAGS: Identification tags will be affixed to all fixed asset inventory items including items that will not be capitalized. Tags will be placed in a readily accessible place. Following are locations that the tags should be placed: Desks, tables, benches: inside right top corner File Cabinets: right top corner Chairs: bottom or right front leg Vehicles: inside left door Office Equipment: right side All Others: bottom City of Lino Lakes Fixed Assets I.D. Number: Department: Description: Model Number: VIN Number: Vendor: ADDITION FORM Serial Number: Location: ................. .................. I.D. Number Disposal date: I.D. Number FROM: ................................................................. ................................................................. Finance Department Only: Date Received: Check Number: Fund Number: Acquisition Type: Fixed Asset: yes no RETIREMENT FORM Disposal Value: How Disposed of: TRANSFER FORM DATE: TO: Amount: Fund Type: Useful Life: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: June 15, 1995 TOPIC: Adaptive/Integrated Recreation Program BACKGROUND Please find attached the original proposal requesting CDBG funds to start a pilot program establishing an integrated recreation program for persons with disabilities. Since the ADA act is very clear concerning the need to pro -actively approach programs and services, and I believe we are probably the largest department that provides for publicly advertized programs, this program was intended to act as a pilot project to initiate a process to begin compliance. This program was approved in February of 1993: The direction that we have discovered to have worked in other Parks and Recreation/ Community Services areas is that of combined efforts between agencies. Residents, Facilities, advertizing, and where there were eventually some expenses have been shared in these consortium city programs so'that quality programs could be offered in as cost effective manner as possible. In most cases successful recreation programs are offered on the same fee -structured basis as all other programs. Again, since this was intended to be a pilot project to establish our intended goals, and has evolved into a different approach, I feel that we are still on track even with the loss of our program supervisor, Becky Dvorak. I have attached letters and resolutions of support from surrounding agencies. We have a limited amount of dollars left in the 1994 CDBG grant to initiate this program. These dollars can be extended upon request. The total zen4ekng funds are $3811.93. RC' jirulh% I am requesting that these dollars be extended for the purpose of hiring another person to organize this cooperative program. We have the agencies ready to participate. OPTIONS 1. Approve the request to extend CDBG dollars allocated for the Pilot Integrated Recreation Program. (To 12/31/95) 2. Refer back to staff RECOMMENDATION Approve the extension of the remaining 1994 CDBG funds allotted for the Integrated Recreation Program. (To 12/31/95) JUN 22 '935 15 19CITY COF NO LAKES CE14TENN i rlL QCs C L . • 15rr 44 id 002 A RBBOLu rON TO SUPPORT COOPERATIVE EFFORTS TO PROVIDE FOR INTEGRA'1!XO RECREATION PROGRAMS BZTWESN CENTENNIAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND OTHER SURROUNDING G COMMUNITXES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES WHEREAS; WHEREAS: WHEREAS. WHEREAS; The nietrict 12 centennial Public Schools has a continuing effort to provide appropriate reCreational experiences for its students, and The Americans with Disabilities Act was passed as a civil rights law for persons with disabi) iuea, and The Americana with Disabilities Act provides protection opportunities for any individual with a disability who chooses to use programs, services and benefits within the.. Centennial Public schools, and centennial Public Schools desires to cooperate in providing integrated recreation programs and related services for disabled persons including but not limited to, persons who are physically disabled, hearing impaired, chronically mentally 111, learning disabled or mentally handicapped, nd WHEREAS; centennial Public Schools believes that recreation progra4i integration for such persons can be provided on a more efficient basis with programs of high quality and with broader participation if joint and cooperative programs a e pursued with otter surrounding communities and other public agencies. NOW THERE2s'OR$, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT 12 SCHOOL CENTZNNIAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS, that the school -District 12 Centennial Public Schools supports the continued movement towards the goal of providing a framework and authority for joint and cooperative agreements with surrounding communities, school districts and other public agencies to provide for integrated recreation programs. Adopted by the District 12 centennial Public Schools this 20th day o March, 1995. Thomas car in, cath Treasurax Y Stre t, Secretary C ar'1ee Cheese rough, C ueairperson JUN 22 '95 15:11 CITY OF LINO LAKES :Arc of Anoka & Ramsey Counties A dvncacy. and Supp«rt for people with level oprn en tul (1L.5'Cljlllt 11 c�_�'. and rll+rir f lnii it i'.S May 10, 1995 Marty Asleson City of Lino Lakes Park, Recreation and Forestry Departments 7204 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 5501.4 Dear Marty, P. 3/5 As an advocate for people with developmental disabilities, 1 am in support of the city of Lino Lakes developing an inclusive recreation program for individuals with disabilities. Arc of Anoka and Ramsey Counties believes in and supports inclusive environments for individuals with disabilities. Inclusion has many benefits, not only for individuals with disabilities but also for people who do not have disabilities_ The benefits of inclusion are numerous. An increase in options and choices for people With disabilities is just one of the benefits. Inclusion also allows for people with disabilities to develop social skills in an age appropriate setting. Positive relationships with others are started and nurtured, leading to the development of friendships. People develop better self concepts and self esteem_ Individuals with disabilities can be seen as typical not as "special". Individuals experience personal growth and development through risk taking, and by experiencing both success and failures. Persons without disabilities become more accepting of differences and begin to appreciate the capabilities of persons with disabilities. Arc actively supports the inclusion of people with disabilities , across all environments (i.e. school, work, recreation, etc.). Arc believes that everyone benefits from the concept of inclusion! The mission of Arc is to build bridges between people who have developmental disabilities and the larger community through advocacy, service, and support. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that environments be accessible for people with disabilities. Now that we have accessible buildings, let us open the doors !?!nine Office • 1201 89th Avenue NE • Suite 305 • !Aline, MN_ 553,34-3373.612 7A3-4958 • FAX 713--1700 Smut Paid f1, jfice • -125 Etna Street • Suite 36 • Saint Pact, MN 55106.612 771-1414 • FAX 77R-0419. +''" -'` JUN 22 '95 15:11 CITY OF LINO LAKES so that people with disabilities can become more active participants in the communities in which they live! P. 4/5 Please contact me at 783-4958, if I can be any assistance in developing an inclusive recreation program in the City of Lino Lakes. S ncerely, �iUU kUtiila( Stacey iyDonald Adult Services Coordinator JUN 22 '95 15:12 CITY OF LINO LAKES City of Blaine 91500-i11.ral Avenue F'J.E..Ol�ainc- IVlintleixtt 55434-3499 April 4, 1995 Marty Asleson, Superintendent Park., Recreation and Forestry 7204 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN., 55014 Dear I1a1:ty: P.5/5 tG12) 71s4-6700 (tt2) 784.3844 We would like to express our support for cooperative efforts to provide for integrated recreation programs artd related services for disabled persons. We feel that recreation program integration for such persons can be provided on a more efficient basis with programs of high quality and broader participation if joint and cooperative programs are pursued with other surrounding public agencies. Our department staff will participate in developing and promoting cooperative efforts to provide integrated recreational opportunities to people with disabilities. 2ncere ly, . Jirn Peterson, Director Park & Recreation Department .7P.js JUN 22 '95 14:19 CITY OF LINO LAKES Ni -04.1c' "95 15=21 C6rUTEP'v1LLE CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 95-5 A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT COOPERATIVE EFFORTS TO PRoVIDt? FOR INTEGRA'T'ED RECREATION PROGRAMS BE'T'WEEN THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE AND OTHER SURROUNDING PUBLIC AGENCIES WHEREAS: The City of Centerville has a continuing effort to provide an appropriate living environment tor its residents, and WHEREAS: WHEREAS: The Americans with Disabilities Act was passed as a civil rights law for persons with disabilities, and The Americans with Disabilities Act provides protection/opportunities for any individual with a disability who Chooses to use programs, services and benefits within the City of Centerville, and WHEREAS: The City of Centerville desires to cooperate in providing integrated recreation programs and related services for disabled personae including but not limited to, persons who are physically disabled, hearing 5npai.red, chronically mentally 111, learning disabled or mentally handicapped, and WHEREAS: The City of Centerville believes that recreation program integration for such persons can be provided on a more efficient basis with programs of high quality and with broader participation if joint and cooperative programs are pursued with other surrounding public agencies. NOW THEREFORE, BE I1 RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF CENTERV i LLE , MINNESOTA, that the City of Centerville supports the continued movement towards the goal of providing a framework ani authority for joint and cooperative agreements with surrounding communities, school districts and other public agencies to provide for integrated recreation programs, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a similar resolution be adopted by other interested agencies. Adopted by the Centerville city Council this stta day of March, 1955. Tom Wilharbeer, Mayor Roger? nberg, Clemm/Adm .nistrator P.6/7 N 22 '95 14:20 CITY OF LINO LAKES 65/f8f it: c7 (-11r Ex Lt1111.31Lxi b 612 464 4568 Post -it Fax Nota 7671 /47 ter~ / 70 // `.. - +j' fF.C.tw ro "114(.4,' t.t.. -' 4.-,,0 CoAocm v co`. ' r-- :Ili -)5).- Fax * ��l - ' J i Fax . RESOLUTION -#95.09 RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT COOPERATIVE EFFORTS TO PROVIDE FOR INTEGRATED RECREATION PROGRAMS BETWEEN THE CITY OF LEXINGTON AND OTHER SURROUNDING PUBLIC AGENCIES WHEREAS, the City of Lexington has a continuing e f f tr L to prov an appropriate living environ lent for its residents: and WHEREAS. the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed as a civil rights law for persons with disabilities; and WHEREAS, the Americans with Disabilities Act pr>v7de pr'trLectiOu/ oppor'tur i L res for, any individual with a disability who chooses to use programs, services and benefits within the City of Lex r ngton : and WHEREAS, the City of Lexington desires to cooperate 1H providing integrated recreation programs and related Services for disabled persons including but not, limited to, persons who are physically disabled. hearing impaired, chronically mentally ill_ learning disabled or mentally trend r capped : and WHEREAS, the City of Lexington believes that recreation program intecratiori for such persons can be provided on a more efficient basis with programs of high quality and with broader participation if joint and cooptcraL,ve programs are pursued with other Surrounding pelt ;t, agencies_ NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LEXINGTON. ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MiNPIESOTA , as follows: 13 i'hat the City of Lexington does hereby support the continued movement towards the goal Ofroviding a framework and authority for joint and cooperative agreements with surrounding communities. school districts and other public agencies to provide for integrated recreation programs. . ?l That the City of Lexington does hereby support a similar resolution be adopted by other interested agencies. PASSED by the Lexington City Council this the 6th day of April, 1 1995 1e ATTEST: 46-1 Mayor F7/7