HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/19/1994 Council Packet- Call to
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday
December 19, 1994
6:30 P.M.
Order and Roll Call
- Setting the Agenda: Are There Any Items
Deleted from the Agenda?
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Consideration of Minutes:
1. Regular Council Meeting, December 12, 1994
to be Added or
REGULAR AGENDA
1. Open Mike
2. Consideration of Disbursements:
A. December 19, 1994
3. Introduction of Kim Sullivan, 20/20 Facilitator, Randy
Schumacher
4. Planning Report, Mary Kay Wyland
A. Consideration of the Renewal of the Joint Powers
Agreement for the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management
Organization (VLAWMO)
5. City Engineer's Report, John Powell
A. Consideration of Resolution No. 94 - 99 Supporting
Placement of Traffic Control Devices at the
Intersection of State Highway 49 (Hodgson Road and
County State Aid Highway 10 (Birch Street)
6. Consideration of Request for Classification of Economic
Development Assistant, Brian Wessel
7. Consideration of Resolution No. 94 - 100 To Support
Cooperative Efforts to Provide for Integrated Recreation
Programs Between the City of Lino Lakes and Other
Surrounding Public Agencies, Marty Asleson
AGENDA
8. Consideration of Resolution No. 94 - 101 Supporting Ramsey
County Sheriff's Patrol on Bald Eagle Lake, Council Member
Kuether
9. Attorney's Report, Bill Hawkins
A. Consideration of an Easement Grant from Darlene H. and
Wendlin A. Linderman, Hodgson Road Watermain Project
B. Consideration of an Easement Grant from Anthony R.
Cutinella, Hodgson Road Watermain Project
C. Consideration of an Easement Grant from Raymond J.
Miller and Harlan LaValle, Hodgson Road Watermain
Project
10. Consideration of Extending the 1993-1994 CDBG Grant for
Anoka County Community Action Project (ACCAP), Randy
Schumacher
11. Consideration of FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 18 - 94
Amending the City Code by Eliminating the Requirement for
Individual Surety Bonds and Purchasing a Blanket Public
Employee Dishonesty Bond, Randy Schumacher
12. Old Business
13. New Business
A. Consideration of the Minutes of November 16, 1994
(Council Member Kuether and Neal were absent.)
B. Consideration of the Minutes of December 8, 1994
(Council Member Neal was absent.)
14. Adjourn
PAGE 2
DISBURSEMENT LIST
DECEMBER 19, 1994
Page: 1
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
1990 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBTEDNESS
DEBT SERVICE
FIRSTAR BANK OF MN('90 CERTIFICATE)
FIRSTAR BANK OF MN('90 CERTIFICATE/INTEREST)
1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND
1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND
17,500.00
1,197.25
Total for Department 18,697.25
Total for Fund 18,697.25
* APPRAISAL ENGINEERING BUREAU,(APPRAISALS/BIRCH ST PARCELS) 800.00
RICHARD KNUTSON, INC.(CONTRACTOR PAYMENT/CNTRY LK) 23,904.41
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/COUNTRY LAKE ESTATES) 996.94
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/CNTRY LK EST) 942.50
Total for Department 26,643.85
Total for Fund 26,643.85
APOLLO DRIVE CONSTRUCTION FUND
APOLLO DRIVE
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/APOLLO DRIVE)
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/APOLLO DR)
AREA AND UNIT CHARGE
OTHER
3,986.05
975.00
Total for Department 4,961.05
Total for Fund 4,961.05
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/AREA CHARGE) 1,896.98
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/AREA UNIT CHARGE) 1,387.81
*WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/AREA UNIT) 91.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
ADMINISTRATION
FUNDWORKS(COMPUTER SOFTWARE TAX)
FUNDWORKS(COMPUTER SOFTWARE)
FUNDWORKS(COMPUTER SOFTWARE TAX)
Total for Department 3,375.79
Total for Fund 3,375.79
312.00
4,800.00
156.00
Page: 2
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
FUNDWORKS(COMPUTER SOFTWARE) 2,400.00
SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT
SMITH OFFICE EQUIPMENT(PRINTER TAX)
SMITH OFFICE EQUIPMENT(PRINTER)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT BLOCK GRANT
OTHER
Total for Department 7,668.00
116.68
1,795.00
Total for Department 1,911.68
Total for Fund 9,579.68
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(PLANNING CONSULTANT) 3,085.35
Total for Department 3,085.35
Total for Fund 3,085.35
CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS
Default Department
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(PLANN CONSLT/SR COTTAGES) 51.00
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(PLANN CONSLT/BEHMS C FARMS) 91.75
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(PLANN CONSLT/TRAPPERS CROSS) 119.63
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(PLANN CONSLT/CLEAR WATER CRK) 209.78
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(PLANN CONSLT/MARSHAN LK TWNH) -11.25
REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION(CONTRACTOR PMPT/RESH 4 & 5) 3,102.07
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/PINERIDGE) 1,666.47
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/BIRCHWOOD ACRES) 741.95
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/BRANDYWOOD ESTATES) 984.50
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/PHEASANT HILLS) 4,735.89
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/QUAIL RIDGE) 190.47
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/BLACK DUCK ESTATES) 116.98
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/PARK GROVE) 62.99
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/TRAPPERS CROSSING) 222.42
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/CLEAR WATER CREEK) 255.36
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/RESHANAU PARK EST) 123.60
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/PHEASANT HILLS) 80.15
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/WENZEL FARMS) 6,947.66
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/RESHANAU 4TH & 5TH) 98.50
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/QUAIL RIDGE) 241.90
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/SHORES OF MARSHAN) 736.51
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/LINO AIR PARK) 175.75
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/OAKS OF LINO) 1,497.30
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/FOX TRACE) 396.64
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/CLEAR WATER CREEK) 569.83
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/MARSHAN LAKE TWNHMS) 30.90
Page: 3
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/WOODS OF BALDWIN 2) 1,000.18
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/PHEASANT HILLS) 212.50
Total for Department 24,651.43
Total for Fund 24,651.43
GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 0.54
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 30.33
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 16.54
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS) 10.41
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS TAX) 0.68
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 2,005.00
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE/TAX) 14.88
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 246.51
* VIGER, JEAN(REIMBURSE SUPPLIES) 35.07
* VIGER, JEAN(REIMBURSE SUPPLIES TAX) 0.32
Total for Department 2,360.28
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 0.41
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 9.43
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 12.40
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE/TAX) 11.16
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 183.74
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) 59.50
Total for Department 276.64
CONSULTANTS
D.C.A. INC.(FLEX BENEFITS) 150.00
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) 2,851.60
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(PLANNING CONSULTANT) -719.60
* S.E.H.(MUNINCIPAL ENGINEER) 165.00
* T.K.D.A.(MUNICIPAL ENGINEER) 598.05
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) 7,913.50
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY/CRIMINAL) 5,838.50
Total for Department 16,797.05
Default Department
FUNDWORKS(COMPUTER SUPPORT/1995) 10,800.00
* HEALTH PARTNERS(WITHHOLDING) 127.00
* HEALTH PARTNERS(FLEX HEALTH INSURANCE) 1,136.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(PREMIUM FOR WORKERS COMP) 652.00
Page: 4
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description)
LINO LAKES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIAT(WITHHOLDING)
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(PLANN CONSLT/SHORELAND GRANT)
* S.E.H.(SHORELAND GRANT)
* TOP TRAILER(INSURANCE REFUND)
Total for Department
ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX)
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE)
DEAN GALLERY, INC.(BALLOONS)
DEAN GALLERY, INC.(BALLOONS TAX)
LAFOREST, MARY(MILEAGE/MATERIAL)
* NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT(PLANNING CONSULTANT)
PRINTING ENTERPRISES, INC.(POSTER/BROCHURES)
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE/TAX)
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE)
Total for Department
ELECTIONS AND VOTER REGISTRATION
* COAST TO COAST(SUPPLIES)
* COAST TO COAST(SUPPLIES TAX)
FIRE DEPARTMENT
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE)
FORESTRY DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN FORESTS(MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL)
* INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY CONTRACT)
INTL SOC OF ARBORICULTURE(MEMBERSHIP)
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
Total for Department
Total for Department
Total for Department
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX)
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* COAST TO COAST(SUPPLIES)
* COAST TO COAST(SUPPLIES TAX)
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE)
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX)
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE)
Amount
308.00
850.25
716.19
476.35
15,065.79
0.27
14.38
8.28
387.12
27.09
82.79
826.95
4,695.00
7.44
128.39
6,177.71
62.37
4.05
66.42
437.00
437.00
30.00
5.95
100.00
135.95
0.41
9.43
12.40
35.82
2.33
437.00
21.12
324.84
Page: 5
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
* REMINGTON ELECTRIC(REDIRECT PARKING LOT LIGHT) 53.00
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE/TAX) 11.16
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 183.74
Total for Department 1,091.25
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
REINERT, VERN(MILEAGE/MEALS) 75.04
Total for Department 75.04
PARKS DEPARTMENT
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 0.41
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 10.92
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 12.40
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS) -10.00
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS TAX) -0.65
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 1.54
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 23.83
GOPHER BEARING CO(PARTS) 93.71
GOPHER BEARING CO(PARTS TAX) 6.08
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 1,307.00
* INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY CONTRACT) 41.64
MIDWEST SPECIALTY SALES(PARTS) 37.59
MIDWEST SPECIALTY SALES(PARTS TAX) 2.44
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 3.16
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 48.64
* REMINGTON ELECTRIC(HOCKEY LIGHTS/SUNRISE PARK) 353.60
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC.(PARTS) 130.96
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC.(PARTS TAX) 8.51
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 7.08
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 124.60
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE/TAX) 11.16
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 184.09
* VIGER, JEAN(REIMBURSE SUPPLIES) 6.88
WALDOCH SPORTS(4 WHEEL RENTAL) 50.00
Total for Department 2,455.59
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 0.27
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 8.67
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 8.27
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 437.00
NATIONAL BUSINESS INSTITUTE, I(TAPES/MANUAL TAX) 8.45
NATIONAL BUSINESS INSTITUTE, I(TAPES/MANUAL) 142.00
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE/TAX) 7.44
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 123.34
Page: 6
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
Total for Department 735.44
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AIRSIGNAL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 1.94
AIRSIGNAL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 30.00
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS) 156.17
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS TAX) 10.25
CIRCLE PINES -LEXINGTON POLICE(FIELD SOBREITY TESTING) 31.14
FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.(PARTS) 157.32
FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.(PARTS TAX) 10.23
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 2,188.00
MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) 53.09
MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES TAX) 3.45
PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF(PARKING/MEALS) 52.70
Total for Department 2,694.29
PUBLIC WORKS
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX)
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* ALLIED BLACKTOP(SEAL COATING)
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS)
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS TAX)
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX)
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* COAST TO COAST(SUPPLIES)
* COAST TO COAST(SUPPLIES TAX)
COMPUSA, INC.(SUPPLIES)
COMPUSA, INC.(SUPPLIES TAX)
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE)
JC AUTO SUPPLY(PARTS)
JC AUTO SUPPLY(PARTS TAX)
LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC.(PARTS)
LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC.(PARTS TAX)
MYHRER, RANDY(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE)
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX)
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE)
PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(SERVICE TAX)
PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO(SERVICE)
* TOP TRAILER(TRAILER TAX)
* TOP TRAILER(TRAILER)
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE/TAX)
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE)
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
0.41
13.69
12.40
57,457.34
50.39
3.28
2.19
33.96
8.51
0.55
7.99
0.52
1,101.00
14.14
0.92
19.68
1.08
45.09
0.19
2.95
0.55
8.50
57.85
442.15
11.16
183.74
Total for Department 59,480.23
BERNSTEIN, BARRY(MILEAGE/MEALS) 49.78
Page: 7
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 1.59
* CELLULAR ONE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 24.60
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 437.00
* INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS(MONTHLY CONTRACT) 71.39
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 3.36
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 67.31
Total for Department 655.03
SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT
COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES, INC.(RECYCLE OIL FILTERS)
Total for Department
50.00
50.00
Total for Fund 108,553.71
INTERIM ASSESSMENT FUND
Default Department
BIRCHWOOD BUILDERS(ASSESSMENT REIMBURSEMENT)
CONTRACTORS PROPERTY DEVELOPER(ASSESSMENT REIMBURSEMENT)
CONTRACTORS PROPERTY DEVELOPER(ASSESSMENT REIMBURSEMENT)
MARCEL EIBENSTEINER(REIMBURSE BIRCHWOOD ASSMTS)
INTERIM CONSTRUCTION FUND
INTERIM CONSTRUCTION
25.26
6,210.87
731.00
12,295.58
Total for Department 19,262.71
Total for Fund 19,262.71
* APPRAISAL ENGINEERING BUREAU,(APPRAISALS/HODGSON PARCELS) 4,600.00
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/HWY 49 & LAKE DR) 994.73
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/INDUSTRIAL PARK) 123.60
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/HWY 49/LAKE DRIVE) 61.80
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/HODGSON ROAD) 263.73
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/35 E & MAIN) 3,135.16
* US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(INSTALLATION/FORJAY) 1,146.93
* WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY/HODGSON ROAD) 1,918.50
Total for Department 12,244.45
Total for Fund 12,244.45
PROGRAM RECREATION
Default Department
FESTIVAL FOODS(BREAKFAST W/SANTA TAX) 1.27
FESTIVAL FOODS(BREAKFAST W/SANTA) 47.71
Page: 8
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description)
TRIARCO ARTS/CRAFTS INC.(BREAKFAST W/SANTA SUPPLIE TX)
TRIARCO ARTS/CRAFTS INC.(BREAKFAST W/SANTA SUPPLIES)
SEALCOATING
Default Department
* ALLIED BLACKTOP(SEAL COATING)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/SEAL COATING)
SEWER OPERATING
Default Department
Amount
3.93
60.44
Total for Department 113.35
Total for Fund 113.35
3,991.00
61.80
Total for Department 4,052.80
Total for Fund 4,052.80
METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(MONTHLY SEWER SERVICE) 21,267.00
Total for Department 21,267.00
SEWER DEPARTMENT
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS) 34.82
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS TAX) 2.06
* GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 0.88
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 140.00
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX) 46.97
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE) 722.63
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
OTHER
* S.E.H.(MUN ENG/SURFACE WATER)
* T.K.D.A.(MUN ENG/SURFACE WATER)
WATER OPERATING
Total for Department 947.36
Total for Fund 22,214.36
3,511.22
370.80
Total for Department 3,882.02
Total for Fund 3,882.02
Page: 9
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description)
Default Department
BLAINE, CITY OF(STATE WATER TESTING FEE)
Total for Department
Water Department
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX)
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS)
* BUMPER TO BUMPER(PARTS TAX)
FEED RITE CONTROLS(SUPPLIES)
FEED RITE CONTROLS(CHEMICAL TANK DEPOSIT)
FEED RITE CONTROLS(SUPPLIES TAX)
* GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE)
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE TAX)
* NORTHERN STATES POWER(MONTHLY SERVICE)
Total
* - Invoice split to different Departments
for Department
Total for Fund
** Total **
Amount
98.99
98.99
0.07
2.47
34.83
2.06
42.42
5.00
2.75
0.87
140.00
1.99
30.65
263.11
362.10
$261,679.90
Page: 1
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
000050 - A T & T
000052 - A T & T
000110 - AIRSIGNAL, INC.
000160 - ALLIED BLACKTOP
000220 - AMERICAN FORESTS
000469 - APPRAISAL ENGINEERING BUREAU, INC.
000670 - BERNSTEIN, BARRY
000709 - BIRCHWOOD BUILDERS
000720 - BLAINE, CITY OF
000900 - BUMPER TO BUMPER
000930 - WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES
001030 - CELLULAR ONE
001101 - CIRCLE PINES -LEXINGTON POLICE DEPT.
001171 - COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES, INC.
001191 - COMPUSA, INC.
001194 - COAST TO COAST
001260 - D.C.A. INC.
001288 - DEAN GALLERY, INC.
001297 - CONTRACTORS PROPERTY DEVELOPERS CO.
001480 - FEED RITE CONTROLS
001486 - FESTIVAL FOODS
001510 - FIRSTAR BANK OF MN
001530 - FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.
001583 - FUNDWORKS
001660 - GOPHER BEARING CO
001680 - GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.
82.69
102.11
31.94
61,448.34
30.00
5,400.00
49.78
25.26
98.99
294.30
17,951.00
87.71
31.14
50.00
8.51
113.63
150.00
414.21
6,941.87
50.17
48.98
18,697.25
167.55
18,468.00
99.79
1.75
Page: 2
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
001825 - HEALTH PARTNERS 9,892.00
001980 - INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS 118.98
001990 - INTL SOC OF ARBORICULTURE 100.00
002050 - JC AUTO SUPPLY 15.06
002230 - LAFOREST, MARY 82.79
002320 - LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST 652.00
002401 - LINO LAKES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 308.00
002440 - LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC. 20.76
002478 - MARCEL EIBENSTEINER 12,295.58
002570 - METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 21,267.00
002608 - MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS 56.54
002670 - MIDWEST SPECIALTY SALES 40.03
003076 - MYHRER, RANDY 45.09
003111 - NATIONAL BUSINESS INSTITUTE, INC. 150.45
003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER 1,203.14
003320 - NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT 7,355.46
003478 - PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF 52.70
003590 - PREMIERE VIDEO & PHOTO 9.05
003621 - PRINTING ENTERPRISES, INC. 4,695.00
003720 - REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION 3,102.07
003750 - REINERT, VERN 75.04
003760 - REMINGTON ELECTRIC 406.60
003783 - RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. 23,904.41
003880 - S.E.H. 16,261.15
004030 - SMITH OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,911.68
004120 - ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 139.47
Page: 3
Date: 12/16/94
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
004350 - T.K.D.A.
004454 - TOP TRAILER
004485 - TRIARCO ARTS/CRAFTS INC.
004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
004720 - VIGER, JEAN
004760 - WALDOCH SPORTS
22,884.66
976.35
64.37
2,657.23
42.27
50.00
** Total ** $261,679.90
AGENDA ITEM NO.
STAFF ORIGINATOR Randy Schumacher, C.A.
DATE December 16, 1994
TOPIC Introduction of Kim Sullivan, 20/20 Facilitator
BACKGROUND
Last fall, Mayor Reinert outlined a visioning plan for City Council
consideration. The Council supported the plan which included the
need for an intern a well as a professional consultant to assist in
the delivery of the program.
The City advertised for the intern position in the Assistant City
Administrators news letter and also in the Public Administration
Department at Hamline University. We received a recommended list
of six (6) candidates from Hamline, as well as two (2) local
prospects. 'Irian Wessel and Dan Tesch completed the first set of
interviews. They reduced the short list to three (3) candidates
for Mayor Reinert and Randy Schumacher to interview. j After
checking references and determining the best qualified candidate,
the staff recommended Kim Sullivan.
OPTIONS
1. Accept recommendation of Kim Sullivan.
2. Request new interviews to be conducted.
3. Re -advertise and start process over.
................................................................
RECOMMENDATION
Based on qualifications of candidates, Kim Sullivan was selected
for the internship position.
AGENDA ITEM 4 A
STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland
DATE December 16, 1994
TOPIC VLAWMO - Extension of Joint Powers Agreement
ORO
The Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization is requesting
that the City of Lino Lakes extend our joint powers agreement with
them for another 10 years. The existing agreement expires on
January 1, 1995.
The Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources advises that all of
the Metro Area will be served by a Water Management Organization
(or watershed district) of some type. VLAWMO currently has
jurisdiction over an area of the City located in the south/east
corner (Lake Amelia).
VLAWMO is comprised of representatives from the Board of Water
Commissioners of the City of St. Paul, the City of White Bear Lake,
White Bear Township, City of Vadnais Heights, City of Gem Lake, and
the City of Lino Lakes. They are also requesting, at this time,
that the City select a new Commissioner from Lino Lakes to serve on
the VLAWMO Board. The position was previously filled by Darrell
Schneider, City Engineer. Staff would recommend that the question
of a replacement to the VLAWMO Board of Commissioners be deferred
to a future Council Work Session.
OPTIONS`
1. Extend Joint Powers Agreement to January 1, 2005.
2. Table matter for further consideration.
RECO
........................
Option 1
AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
AMONG THE UNITS OF GOVERNMENT
COMPRISING THE VADNAIS LAKE AREA
WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
The constituent units of government comprising the Vadnais
Lake Area Water Management Organization hereby amend such joint
powers agreement by amending Section 5, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to
read as follows:
SECTION V
DURATION
Subdivision 1. Duration of Agreement. Each governmental unit
agrees to be bound by the terms of this Agreement until January 1,
1995 January 1, 2005, and it may be continued thereafter at the
option of the parties to this Agreement.
Subdivision 2. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement may
be terminated prior to January 1, 1995 January 1, 2005, by the
unanimous consent of the parties to this Agreement.
Dated:
, 1994 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OF
THE CITY OF ST. PAUL
By:
Its: President
By:
Its: Secretary
Dated: , 1994 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE
By:
Its: Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated: , 1994 WHITE BEAR - TOWNSHIP
By:
Its: Chairman of Town Board
Attest:
Town Clerk
Dated: , 1994 CITY OF VADNAIS HEIGHTS
By:
Its: Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated: , 1994 CITY OF GEM LAKE
By:
Its: Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated: , 1994 CITY OF LINO LAKES
By:
Its: Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated: , 1994 CITY OF NORTH OAKS
By:
Its: Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM 5-A
STAFF ORIGINATOR John PoweU. P.E.. Acting City Engineer
DATE
TOPIC
December 15.1994
Resolution No. 94-99
Supporting Placement of Traffic Control Devices at the
Intersection of State Highway 49 (Hodgson Road) and
County State Aid Highway 10 (Birch Street)
BACKGROUND:
The City has recently received 25 letters from property owners within the Reshanau Lake Estates
South subdivision expressing concern regarding the safety of the Hodgson Road/Birch Street
intersection. Earlier this year, property owners in the Ware Road area notified the City that they
noticed an increase in traffic along Ware Road, probably due to delays at this same intersection.
City staff has previously been in contact with State and County highway representatives
regarding this matter but to date no specific additional traffic control has been installed.
To formally express the City's concern regarding this matter, the attached resolution has been
prepared. This information will be forwarded to the State and Anoka County in an effort to
develop a more specific timetable for installation of additional traffic control at the
Hodgson/Birch intersection.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 94-99.
2. Refer the matter to staff for further discussion.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 1.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 99
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AT THE
INTERSECTION OF STATE HIGHWAY 49 (HODGSON ROAD) AND COUNTY STATE
AID HIGHWAY 10 (BIRCH STREET)
WHEREAS, due to development within Lino Lakes and surrounding
communities, the traffic on Highway 49 and CSAH 10 has
increased, and
WHEREAS, this increased traffic has caused traffic delays at the
Highway 49/CSAH 10 intersection, and
WHEREAS, many residents along Ware Road have noticed a significant
increase in traffic on Ware Road due to the delays at the
intersection, and
WHEREAS, other residents in the area have also written letters to
the City of Lino Lakes expressing concern regarding the
safety of the intersection, and
WHEREAS, a traffic study has been prepared which indicates an "all
ways" stop sign or semaphore is warranted, and
WHEREAS, to date no traffic control has been erected by the State
at the intersection,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES that the
Lino Lakes City Council supports installation of additional traffic
control at the intersection of Highway 49 (Hodgson Road) and County
State Aid Highway 10 (Birch Street) and directs the City Engineer
to contact the State of Minnesota and Anoka County to facilitate
installation of same.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 19th day of December,
1994.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
AGENDA ITEM 6
STAFF ORIGINATOR Brian Wessel
DATE December 19, 1994
TOPIC Economic Development Job Reclassification
As a result of the accelerated momentum established in economic development in
1994, I am requesting Mary LaForest's full time Economic Development clerical
position scheduled for 1995 be upgraded to the professional position of Economic
Development Assistant. This specifically would mean that in addition to in-house
community development administrative support, her new role with the City would
include selected "in the field" representation of the City on matters of economic
development, public relations, marketing and promotions.
Mary Alice has the educational credentials for this position and over the past 18
months as a part time (3/5) Economic Development employee, has demonstrated a
capability and commitment to providing excellent economic development se vices on
behalf of the City of Lino Lakes. This job reclassification will incr ase the
department's productivity as a part of a collaborative team effort to a festively
implement project economic development.
The Economic Development Assistant position would begin on Jan. 1, 1995 ($28,500
annual salary) and would have a midyear adjustment on July 1, 1995 ($30,000
annual salary).
OPTIONS
1. Reclassify the position to Economic Development Assistant
2. Retain the Economic Development Secretarial position
3. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMENAATION
1. Option 1
Job description
Economic Development Assistant
Introduction
The Economic Development Assistant works in cooperation with the Community
Development Director to establish a positive environment to promote economic
development and to provide information and marketing services to businesses and
industries locating or expanding within the City.
Duties and Responsibilities
Public Relations
1. Employ effective promotions and advertising techniques to increase awareness of
the City and to cultivate a "City Image."
2. Write, design and oversee pre -press production of marketing brochures, packet
materials, newsletter inserts, press releases and other materials using desktop
publishing for marketing and promoting the community to prospective businesses.
Provide support to all City departments to effectively promote City services by
maintaining updated resident packets for distribution.
3. Organize and promote groundbreakings, grand openings, and other promotional
events to support new and existing businesses. Provide media with articles and
photographs about specific economic development activities and business news.
4. Represent the city at public functions such as Chamber of Commerce and other
local business meetings, and take other appropriate steps to maintain a working
relationship with the business community.
5. Prepare and provide information regarding land availability, markets, workforce
availability, taxes, transportation, utilities, etc. to City businesses and prospective
businesses.
6. Produce and update a guide to standardize the style and format of City written
materials.
Existing Business Program
1. Coordinate the Existing Business Program to maintain an on-going dialogue and
support for local businesses. Maintain an existing business roster for mailings.
Encourage community support of local businesses.
Sales and Marketing
1. Work in cooperation with the Community Development Director in preparing and
implementing economic development sales and marketing strategies. Provide support
and assistance to businesses to encourage their consideration of the City as a location
for their business.
2. Responsible for discovery research, qualification and marketing phases of the
economic development process for preselected prospects.
3. Assist in the development of long range plans and action plans for economic
development and coordinate activities to implement the plans.
Staff Support
1. Provide staff support services to EDAAB. Prepares meeting agendas, staff reports,
and serve as recording secretary at EDAAB meetings.
2. Write grant proposals.
3. Provide research and writing for special projects, meetings and proposals.
4. Serve as recording secretary to the EDA.
5. Perform general clerical duties such as word processing, maintaining files, mailings,
phones, and other duties as directed.
Education and experience
Graduation from an accredited college or university with major course work in a
comprehensive field of study, such as urban planning, public affairs, public relations
or a related field of study. Course work in journalism, marketing or related field
desirable. Minimum five years experience in public or private sector information and
communication activities.
Ski//s
Ability to effectively coordinate the many activities involved in implementing
successful promotional strategies.
Knowledge of the principles and objectives of community development.
Working experience in local government.
Experience in media relations.
Excellent written/oral communication skills.
Experience using desk top publishing.
AGENDA ITEM No. 7
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson
DATE: December 16, 1994
TOPIC: Cooperative Integrated Recreation Resolution
BACKGROUND
For the past several months the Parks and Recreation Department has
been working on a pilot project, funded through Community
Development Block Grant moneys, aimed at addressing the city's
Americans with Disabilities requirements. A program supervisor was
hired and it was found that the municipal therapeutic recreation
programs that have been successful are those that were part of a
coalition of other cities, school districts, and other ;public
agencies.
We have began some preliminary discussions with other public
agencies in this area. Since Our Program supervisor is no longer
with us, we would like to proceed with a position replacement with
the moneys left over in the grant or be considered for funding in
the next cycle of CDBG.
In order to qualify (or disqualify), this as a consideration the
attached resolution of support for this initiative will be sent to
the other public agencies.
OPTIONS
1. Continue with this next discovery phase and pass resolution No.
94 - 100.
2. Refer back to staff for more consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
Council Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 100
A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT COOPERATIVE EFFORTS TO PROVIDE FOR
INTEGRATED RECREATION PROGRAMS BETWEEN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES AND
OTHER SURROUNDING PUBLIC AGENCIES
WHEREAS: The City of Lino Lakes has a continuing effort to provide
an appropriate living environment for its residents, and
WHEREAS: The Americans with Disabilities Act was passed as a civil
rights law for persons with disabilities, and
WHEREAS: The Americans with Disabilities Act provides
protection/opportunities for any individual with a
disability who chooses to use programs, services and
benefits within the City of Lino Lakes, and
WHEREAS: The City of Lino Lakes desires to cooperate in providing
integrated recreation programs and related services for
disabled persons including but not limited to, persons
who are physically disabled, hearing impaired,
chronically mentally ill, learning disabled or mentally
handicapped, and
WHEREAS: The City of Lino Lakes believes that recreation program
integration for such persons can be provided on a more
efficient basis with programs of high quality and with
broader participation if joint and cooperative programs
are pursued with other surrounding public agencies.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA,
that the City of Lino Lakes supports the continued movement towards
the goal of providing a framework and authority for joint and
cooperative agreements with surrounding communities, school
districts and other public agencies to provide for integrated
recreation programs, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a similar resolution be adopted by
other interested agencies.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 19th day of December,
1994.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8
STAFF ORIGINATOR Council Member Ruether
DATE December 16, 1994
TOPIC Consideration of Resolution No. 94 - 101
Supporting Ramsey County Sheriff's Patrol on
Bald Eagle Lake
BACKGROUJ
Attached you will find a resolution approving an agreement with
White Bear Township to contract with the Ramsey County Sheriff's
Patrol for enforcing applicable ordinances and state statutes on
Bald Eagle Lake. The resolution is self-explanatory.
I have a copy of the Agreement and will have it available at the
Council meeting for reference.
OPTION
1. Adopt Resolution No. 94 - 101 approving the Agreement
2. Do not adopt Resolution No. 94 - 101.
3. Obtain further information (details) on the matter.
RECOMMENDATION
Council should decide the option.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 101
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
BE IT RESOLVED that the attached Agreement for Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services be enacted by White Bear Township with the
Ramsey County Sheriff's Department.
This supplemental law enforcement to be for the purpose of
enforcing all applicable ordinances and state statutes on Bald
Eagle Lake from January 1, 1995 through March 31, 1995.
Total cost (at a rate of $31.00 per hour) not to exceed $5,000.00.
With the cost apportioned as follows:
White Bear Township
Bald Eagle Area Association
City of Hugo
City of Lino Lakes
$2,000.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
(or White Bear Township 40%, and 20% for each of the others of the
total bill.) To be billed at the end of the Winter Patrol season.
Any revenues generated by fines and paid to the Township would be
distributed back to the above governmental participants according
to their contribution to the total cost.
A detailed activity report is to be submitted by Ramsey County
Sheriff's Department with the bill to White Bear Township; White
Bear Township will then submit a copy of the activity report with
the apportionment bills to the City of Hugo, the City of Lino Lakes
and the Bald Eagle Area Association. An evaluation of effect on
the compliance with all applicable ordinances and state statutes
will take place in June, 1995.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 19th day of December,
1994.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9A
STAFF ORIGINATOR Bill Hawkins, City Attorney
DATE December 16, 1994
TOPIC Consideration of an Easement Grant from Darlene
H. and Wendlin A. Linderman, Hodgson Road
Watermain Project
BACKGROUND
This easement was negotiated for the Hodgson Road watermain
improvement project. The Linderman's have agreed to give the
easement for the amount indicated in the appraisal.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt a motion approving the easement and dispersing the
negotiated amount.
2 Return to staff for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
EASEMENT GRANT
THIS EASEMENT, made this day of December, 1994, by Wendlin A.
Linderman and Darlene W. Linderman, husband and wife, Grantors, to the City of Lino
Lakes, a municipal corporation, Grantees, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
WITNESSETH, that Wendlin A. Linderman and Darlene W. Linderman for value
received do hereby dedicate to the City of Lino Lakes a permanent easement over the
land located within the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota,
described as follows:
A permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes over the West ten (10) feet
of Lot 15, Arthur E. Thom Acres No. 2, Anoka County, Minnesota
The City of Lino Lakes further makes the following covenants to Grantor(s):
1. The City of Lino Lakes shall pay to Wendlin A. Linderman and Darlene W.14-
Linderman
.1 I -Linderman the sum of Nine Hundred Ninety-nine and no/100 ($999.00) Dollars
as and for the permanent easement.
State Deed Tax Due: None
14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Wendlin A. Linderman and Darlene W. Linderman have
caused these presents to be executed or have set their hands the day and year first
above written.
IN PRESENCE OF:
rtier-L
vVendlin A. Linderman
Darlene 1t. Linderman
H
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
On this /.2' day of December, 1994, before me, a notary public within and for
said County, personally appeared Wendlin A. Linderman and Darlene W. Linderman,
husband and wife, to me known to be the person(s) described in and who executed
the foregoing instrument and they executed the same as their free act and deed.
BARBARA E LONGERBONE
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
ANOKA COUNTY
MY COMM!SS1ON EXPIRES 05-2&96
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of
Minnesota, has accepted on , 19_, the above described easement
in this document.
Dated:
(SEAL)
, 19 CITY OF LINO LAKES
By
Clerk
This instrument was drafted by:
William G. Hawkins and Associates
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
LAW OFFICES OF
William G. Hawkins and Associates
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
BARRY A. SULLIVAN
December 6, 1994
Legal Assistants
MARY K. KOZLAK
WENDY B. DEZELAR
Wendlin A. Linderman and
Darlene W. Linderman
6308 Hodgson Road
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Linderman:
SUITE 101
299 Cools; RAPIDS BLVD.
CooN RAPms, MLNiNESOTA 55433
PHONE (612) 784-2998
Enclosed herein please find a copy of the Easement Grant with regard to the
permanent easement over your property required by the City of Lino Lakes for
improvements. The original has been forwarded to Marilyn Anderson at the Lino
Lakes City Hall. Please contact her to make arrangements to sign and date this
document. As soon as this has been completed, we can present it to the City
Council for acceptance and payment to you.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Willliam G. Hawkins
Lino Lakes City Attorney
WGH:mk
Enc.
cc: Ms. Marilyn Anderson
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9B
STAFF ORIGINATOR Bill Hawkins, City Attorney
DATE December 16, 1994
TOPIC Consideration of an Easement Grant from Anthony
R. Cutinella, Hodgson Road Watermain Project
• BACKGROUND
This easement was negotiated for the Hodgson Road watermain
improvement project. Mr. Cutinella has agreed to give the easement
for the amount indicated in the appraisal.
OPTIONS;:
Adopt a motion approving the easement and dispersing the
negotiated amount.
2 Return to staff for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
EASEMENT GRANT
DEC 1 1994
THIS EASEMENT, made this j 3 day of December,:1T994*by'Art'hbny R.
Cutinella, a single person, Grantor, to the City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation,
Grantee, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
WITNESSETH, that Anthony R. Cutinella for value received does hereby
dedicate to the City of Lino Lakes a permanent easement over the land located within
the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, described as follows:
A permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes over the west ten (10) feet
of Lot 18, Arthur E. Thom Acres No. 2, Anoka County, Minnesota
The City of Lino Lakes further makes the following covenants to Grantor(s):
1. The City of Lino Lakes shall pay to Anthony R. Cutinella the sum of One
Thousand Two Hundred Ninety-nine and no/100 ($1,299.00) Dollars as and for
the permanent easement.
State Deed Tax Due: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Anthony R. Cutinella has caused these presents to be
executed or has set his hands the day and year first above written.
IN PRESENCE OF:
L.
POeSCt�
A k -tg
Anthony R. Cutinella
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
On this /3 / h day of December, 1994, before me, a notary public within and for
said County, personally appeared Anthony R. Cutinella, a single person, to me known
to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and he
executed the same as his free act and deed.
LOWELL L. POESCH
NOTARY PUBLIC MINNESOTA
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
JANUARY 31, 2000
OeiLck
Notary Public
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of
Minnesota, has accepted on , 19, the above described easement
in this document.
Dated:
(SEAL)
, 19 CITY OF LINO LAKES
By
Clerk
This instrument was drafted by:
William G. Hawkins and Associates
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
LAW OFFICES OF
William G. Hawkins and Associates
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
BARRY A. SULLIVAN
December 6, 1994
Legal Assistants
MARY K. KOZLAK
WENDY B. DEZELAR
Anthony R. Cutinella
6336 Hodgson Road
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Dear Mr. Cutinella:
SurrE 101
299 COON RAPIDS BLVD.
COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433
PHONE (612) 784-2998
Enclosed herein please find a copy of the Easement Grant with regard to the
permanent easement over your property required by the City of Lino Lakes for
improvements. The original has been forwarded to Marilyn Anderson at the Lino
Lakes City Hall. Please contact her to make arrangements to sign and date this
document. As soon as this has been completed, we can present it to the City
Council for acceptance and payment to you.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Willliam G. Hawkins
Lino Lakes City Attorney
WGH:mk
Enc.
cc: Ms. Marilyn Anderson
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9C
STAFF ORIGINATOR Bill Hawkins, City Attorney
DATE December 16, 1994
TOPIC Consideration of an Easement Grant from Raymond
J. Miller and Harlan LaValle, Hodgson Road
Watermain Project
BACKGROUND
This easement was negotiated for the Hodgson Road watermain
improvement project. Mr. Miller and Mr. LaValle have agreed to
give the easement for the amount indicated in the appraisal.
OPTIONS:
1. Adopt a motion approving the easement and dispersing the
negotiated amount.
2. Return to staff for further information.
RECOMMENDATIO
Option No. 1
EASEMENT GRANT
THIS EASEMENT, made this day of December, 1994, by Raymond J.
Miller and Harlan LaValle as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated November 7, 1983,
by and between Raymond J. Miller as Trustor and Raymond J. Miller and Harlan
LaVaile as Trustees, Grantors, to the City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation,
Grantees, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
WITNESSETH, that Raymond J. Miller and Harlan LaVaile for value received do
hereby dedicate to the City of Lino Lakes a permanent and temporary easement over
the land located within the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota,
described as follows:
A permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes over the West twenty (20)
feet of the following described property:
All that part of Government Lot numbered 6 in Section numbered 30, Township
numbered 31, Range numbered 22 which lies East of the road now constructed in a
Northerly and Southerly direction through said property, and containing about 34 acres
of land, EXCEPT therefrom the following described property: Commencing at a point
on the North line of said Government Lot 6 which is 198 feet West of the Northeast
corner of said lot; thence South parallel to the East line of said lot, 660 feet; thence
West and parallel to the North line of said lot, 198 feet; thence North and parallel to
the East line of said lot, 660 feet; thence East along the North line of said Lot 6, 198
feet to the point of beginning, said exception containing 3 acres more or Tess, Anoka
County, Minnesota.
Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes to terminate on
October 1, 1995, over the West 70 feet of the following described property:
All that part of Government Lot numbered 6 in Section numbered 30, Township
numbered 31, Range numbered 22 which lies East of the road now constructed in a
Northerly and Southerly direction through said property, and containing about 34 acres
of land, EXCEPT therefrom the following described property: Commencing at a point
on the North line of said Government Lot 6 which is 198 feet West of the Northeast
corner of said lot; thence South parallel to the East line of said lot, 660 feet; thence
West and parallel to the North line of said lot, 198 feet; thence North and parallel to
the East line of said lot, 660 feet; thence East along the North line of said Lot 6, 198
feet to the point of beginning, said exception containing 3 acres more or less, Anoka
County, Minnesota.
Said temporary easement to terminate on October 1, 1995.
The City of Lino Lakes further makes the following covenants to Grantor(s):
1. The City of Lino Lakes shall pay to Raymond J. Miller and Harlan LaValle as
Trustee under Trust Agreement dated November 7, 1983, by and between
Raymond J. Miller as Trustor and Raymond J. Miller and Harlan LaValle as
Trustees, the sum of Twelve Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-five and no/100
($12,325.00) Dollars as and for the permanent and temporary easements.
State Deed Tax Due: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Raymond J. Miller and Harlan LaValle have caused
these presents to be executed or have set their hands the day and year first above
written.
IN PRESENCE OF:
du'o/ (2(MI/44
4-4.AJ
Raymond J. Miller
Harlan LaValle
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF .� )
On this - day of December, 1994, before me, a notary public within and for
said County, personally appeared Raymond J. Miller and Harlan LaVaile as Trustee
under Trust Agreement dated November 7, 1983, by and between Raymond J. Miller
as Trustor and Raymond J. Miller and Harlan LaVaile as Trustees, to me known to be
the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they
executed the same as their free act and deed.
ss.
MARY KAY WY AND
NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA
No. 6139798
RAMSEY COUNTY
=•' My Commi$sion Expires May 31, 1999
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of
Minnesota, has accepted on , 19, the above described easement
in this document.
Dated:
(SEAL)
, 19 CITY OF LINO LAKES
By
Clerk
This instrument was drafted by:
William G. Hawkins and Associates
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
LAW OFFICES OF
William G. Hawkins and Associates
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
BARRY A. SULLIVAN
December 6, 1994
Legal Assistants
MARY K. KOZLAK
WENDY B. DEZELAR
Raymond J. Miller, Trustee
330 Birch Street
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Harlan LaValle, Trustee
14845 Everton Avenue North
Hugo, MN 55038
Dear Mr. Miller and Mr. LaValle:
SurrE 101
299 COON RAPIDS BLVD.
COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433
PHONE (612) 784-2998
Enclosed herein please find a copy of the Easement Grant with regard to the
permanent and temporary easements over the property required by the City of Lino
Lakes for improvements. The original has been forwarded to Marilyn Anderson at
the Lino Lakes City Hall. Please contact her to make arrangements to sign and
date this document. As soon as this has been completed, we can present it to the
City Council for acceptance and payment to you.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Willliam G. Hawkins
Lino Lakes City Attorney
WGH:mk
Enc.
cc: Ms. Marilyn Anderson
AGENDA ITEM 10
STAFF ORIGINATOR Randy Schumacher
DATE December 16, 1994
TOPIC Consideration in extending the 1993-1994 CDBG Grant for
Anoka County Community Action (ACCAP).
The City appropriated $4,125.04 of the 1993-1994 Community Development Block
Grant(CDBG) dollars to ACCAP. These dollars were to be spent between July 1,
1993 through June 30 1994. In June of 1994, ACCAP asked for an extension of
the June 30th deadline to December 1994. The extension was needed due to
decreased funding of the 1994-1995 grant in which they were appropriated $500.00.
ACCAP was granted an extension to December 31, 1994 with the understanding that
all funds be spent by this date.
The December 31, 1994 deadline is now approaching and ACCAP has estimated that
they will have an estimated balance of $785.00 remaining at the end of December.
ACCAP has asked for another extension to March 4, 1995.
The County has been contacted on this issue. They informed the City that in early
January, they will be sending out letters to cities informing cities that any remaining
1993-1994 balances will be redistributed to the county -wide rehab fund.
The County suggested that ACCAP send the City a letter informing the City why the
dollars have not been spent and what they plan on spending the funds on. The City
can then inform ACCAP whether or not they will allow the extension. If the City
allows the extension, the County would need to be notified so that the extension is
considered by the County Board in January, 1995. It is possible that the Board can
deny the extension.
OPTIONS
...................................
City to allow ACCAP another extension to March 9, 1995, with the
understanding that the County Board can deny the extension.
2. City to disallow extension to ACCAP. The County will then redirect funds to
the County -Wide Rehab Fund.
3. City to disallow extension to ACCAP. City should submit a request to the
County Board asking for a reappropriation of funds to a different city project
with the understanding that the County Board can deny request.
RECOMMENDATION
City Council policy decision
(SEE ATTACHED LETTER FROM ACCAP DATED DECEMBER 16, 1994)
DEC -16-1994 134R
F.
1,101010.11trA rgeNvikrrg, r.egmeastegtma eirt--rtheggs ririe.tiegriesa tate%
aetiregaPirgaei g.pliattaett 1 ...1.01vitsi1../tyi 1 14$41t.01 1%.4FINI I-
1201 89Th Avenue NE - Suite 345 iairi, MN 55434 • Phone 783-4747 • FAX 783-4700 - TTY 783-4724
AkOkSrkt'd
Lino Lakes City Council
Lino Lakes City -Offices
1189 Main Street
Lino Lakes, MSI
nfteomihdlop 116,„ 410QA
Deer Mayor Reinert and City -Council, Members:
I am writing on behalf of the Senior Outreach Program to request
e -deadline extension for the continued usage of the residual 93-
94 CMG funds.- As of December 6, 1994 the balance in the account
was $1410.09 with an estianted year end (December 31,1994)
balance of $785.00. Mesa funds would be used to supplement the
1994-A:995 grant to provide Senior Outreach services ie your
COMMunity.
the residual (loiters exists due to adciltlonal and unexpected
sunning we received last spring tnrougn tne Energy assistance
Program, as weii as througn on-going itisiten county fundingine
grant request made for coo 14-i5 program year was in tne amount
OL 54175, however, on iinrcii i,ALLAY wan notified chat tnin
Pcugram ',mad only 4e aijacmLon S5t-e) in ..WP6.k; funcia. i/iLO auun a
dzAismaLiu luttaims eui, mauh eiiort_ has been made co ricrecca
"divine road* ZuLading Settior Cioureatua pubition, wiles:Lever
Eisoi48.7 AooioLautm. aLta CouaLy luada. L -am r4t.i4tva
I
.24.w&A.,7 itrAn
177 hz;u_r-6 ccAlaty .13,C Iii"ac. in 13514. 4.
taAt_sa6r 1."" —21'
4.14,
Iloe—r tor =dor si,
LIC- ;..%!
1.,kkokip
.rs.
11-0- t_ -c
Al 140c
1 am hopeful that some arranaement can be made i we MMY C:OPtitInP
serving the senior and disabled residents of Lino Lakes in the
moat beneficial way possible. 1 appreciate your consideration of
the extension request. Please feel free to contact me if you
have any lineations or concern at 783-47411
71/—
WrOL11.0[4eX 111A/41i,
, -
.4411,1444 ‘414ey4. 4. 11I1cmaa t1L ...7=4.v4.A-uft
AN ECIAL PCNITAMM." LMPLO'1
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11
STAFF ORIGINATOR Randy Schumacher
DATE December 16, 1994
TOPIC Public Employee Dishonesty Bonds
BACKGRO/I
Currently, the City Code Section 206.01 requires that the Assessor ($10,000),
Clerk/Treasurer ($30,000), Administrator ($30,000), Deputy Clerk/Treasurer
($10,000), and Building Inspector ($10,000) be bonded on separate bonds. In 1984,
the State Statute 418.25 was amended to allow blanket bonds for all employees. The
cost of the separate bonds and blanket bond for all other employees is $1,473. The
City has been quoted on three levels of bonds:
$ 100,000 $1,003
$ 300,000 $1,244
$500,000 $1, 490
The Municipal Finance Officers Association has put together a formula for determining
levels of coverage. The City would need about $700,000. The $500,000 IeveI will
be sufficient. This level will cost the City $17 more than the previous bonding
method.
The City Code will have to be amended to read: All City employees will be covered
by a blanket Public Employee Dishonesty Bond with coverage determined by the City
Council.
A resolution with the amount determined will be presented at the second reading of
the Ordinance amendment.
OPTIONS
1. Leave the City code as is.
2. Amend the City code. Adopt FIRST READING Ordinance No. 18 94.
3. Determine level of bond.
RECOMMEN3A TION
Council Member introduced the following ordinance and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
ORDINANCE NO. 18 - 94
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 206.01 OF THE CITY CODE, OFFICER AND
EMPLOYEE BOND AMOUNTS
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota
does ordain:
SECTION I.
Chapter 206, Section 206.01 is hereby amended to read as follows:
206.01 All City employees will be covered by a blanket
Public Employee Dishonesty Bond with coverage determined by the
City Council.
SECTION II.
Save as above amended, said City Code shall stand as initially
passed and as previously amended.
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication according to the City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of January,
1995.
Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly
seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
DEC -08-1994 16:54 FROM KELLY AGENCY INC TO
'T fi TIT
KtLL •i 1 INC
L
Y
IMPORTANT FAX
4644568 P.01
INSURANCE & BONDS
ATTENTION: Paula Schloer
COMPANY: City of Lino Lakes
FAX NUMBER: 612-464-4568
DATE: December 8, 1994
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE: 1
********************************************************************
FROM: Candace Kelly
PHONE NUMBER (612) 452-5752
FAX NUMBER (612) 452-5286
COMMENTS: RE: Public Employee Dishonesty Bond
Paula,
I did get Great American to reconsider and agree to write the Public
Employee Dishonesty Bond (Form 0) including the position of
clerkitreasurer. This would eliminate the need to carry a separate
bond on Marilyn Anderson as soon as your city code no longer requires
it. The estimated annual premiums are as follows:
EMPLOYEE DISHONESTY BOND -- FORM 0
LIMIT 100,000 300,000 500,000
DEDUCTIBLE 250 1,000 1,000
PREMIUM $ 1,003 1,244 1,490
Paula, I think this is the deal of the century! Let me know what. you
think.
2025 CLNIRL.kmm1,3001,,rARD, Sun 470 Ni.13,6x 2;128 • Si PAui, MINNESOTA 55121-(128 w (o12) 452-5752 a FAX (612)452-5286
LAW OFFICES OF
William G. Hawkins and Associates
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
BARRY A. SULLIVAN
September 28, 1994
Legal Assistants
MARY K. KOZLAK
RITA A. DANINGER
Ms. Mary M. Vaske
Finance Director
Lino Lakes City Hall
1189 Main Street
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Dear Mary:
SUITE 101
299 COON RAPIDS BLVD.
COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433
PHONE (612) 784-2998
I am responding to your letter of September 26, 1994 regarding the surety bonds
for employees. I believe that Section 206 of the City Code should be amended to
provide for a blanket bond covering all of the individuals listed in Section 206.01.
In terms of the amount of the bond, it would vary with the position and the amount
of cash and negotiable securities that an individual is handling.
In reviewing the information you sent me, it seems that the formula developed by
the Municipal Finance Officers Association is a helpful guideline in determining the
City's exposure and the necessary bond size for covering City employees. You
should calculate the bond amount using this formula.
If you have any other questions, please contact me.
-'�ir`cerely,
Willliam G. Hawkins
WGH:mk
fiG1✓O A=
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING
WITH THE CITY OF HUGO
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT :
November 16, 1994
7:30 P.M.
10:00 P.M.
Reinert, Elliott,
Kuether and Neal
Bergeson
Staff members present: Acting City Engineer, John Powell, City
Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn
Anderson. City of Hugo Council members: Francis Miron, Debra
Barnes and Jim LeRoux. Newly elected Hugo Council members Marvin
LaValle and Andy Goiffon, Hugo City Administrator Bob Museus and
Consulting Engineer, Joel Dresel were also present.
The purpose of the meeting, which was held at the White Bear
Country Inn, was to discuss issues of mutual interest to both the
City of Lino Lakes and the City of Hugo.
The City of Lino Lakes and the City of Hugo have entered into an
agreement to prepare a study of the Clearwater Creek drainage
area. The study is being prepared by Hugo's consulting engineer,
OSM and is expected to be completed in February, 1995. Rice
Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is aware that the study is being
prepared and has noted that it meets their criteria. Mr. Dresel
said that he would present the completed study to both the City
of Lino Lakes and the City of Hugo.
Mr. LaValle and Mr. Miron discussed elements of the study noting
that the intention was to coordinate the study with RCWD because
the study area involves several entities as well as Bald Eagle
Lake, Otter Lake and the entire Clear Watercreek area. Mr. Miron
said he could envision a control structure at Bald Eagle Lake and
a revision of the structure that lies under I35E. The result of
the study will be a plan to control drainage in the entire
Clearwater Creek basin. The impact of the plan will be known and
communicated to the public to avoid a situation that now is
occurring in the City of Centerville.
Mr. LaValle explained that when I35E was constructed, a mistake
PAGE 1
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 16, 1994
WITH THE CITY OF HUGO
occurred in the size of the pipes laid under the highway. He
indicated the Minnesota Department of Transportation realized
their mistake but did not correct it. Mr. Dresel explained that
if another pipe is installed under I35E, Centerville will be
impacted. Mr. LaValle asked Mr. Dresel to obtain a copy of the
study that was completed in 1977 or 1978 to use as background
information.
Mr. Powell outlined the proposed Clearwater Creek subdivision in
Lino Lakes noting the location, the proposed traffic pattern, and
the plan for providing utility services. He also noted a desire
to work with the City of Centerville and the City of Hugo to
jointly provide services for the corridor.
This area appears to be ready for development and mutual
cooperation by all three (3) cities could benefit each city. Mr.
Powell noted that the proposed Clearwater Creek subdivision will
be constructed in phases and could ultimately include 450 homes.
The developer has submitted a request for a rezone and
preliminary plat approval. Eventually two (2) municipal wells
and a water tower may be constructed to service the subdivision
and the commercial development expected at the intersection of
I35E and Main Street. Mr. Powell explained how services would be
provided for the area and noted that the proposed subdivision and
future commercial development is consistent with the Lino Lakes
Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
Mr. Dresel asked Mr. Powell if any studies have been prepared to
determine the ultimate land use for the area. Mr. Powell
explained that an intersection study was prepared in 1992 and
outlined how development is planned for the area.
Mr. LaValle explained that originally the frocemain along Cedar
Street between the City of Centerville and the Forest Lake
interceptor in the City of Hugo was constructed to alleviate a
problem in the City of Centerville. He suggested that with
additional flow from Lino Lakes, the capacity would be restricted
for the City of Hugo. Mr. Schumacher explained that connection
to the interceptor has been in the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Land
Use Plan for at least 14 years and Metropolitan Council has never
indicated that the connection was not possible. Mr. LaValle
explained that Lino Lakes was approached when the intercepter was
installed but Lino Lakes was not interested at that time. He
asked that this matter be investigated since the MCWS is
experiencing a maintenance problem with the Forest Lake
interceptor. Mr. Powell explained that all changes to the MUSA
boundaries and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan have to be
approved through the Metropolitan Council and based on
information from them, there is capacity for Lino Lakes.
PAGE 2
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 16, 1994
WITH THE CITY OF HUGO
Ms. Barnes asked Mr. Powell to explain the traffic pattern for
the proposed subdivision and the commercial area to the north.
Mr. Powell explained that there was concern about mixing the
residential traffic with the business traffic. A plan has been
discussed which would move Otter Lake Road, north of Cedar
Avenue, to the east. An additional concern is that Otter Lake
Road approaches Main Street too close to the freeway exit and
entrance. The proposed traffic pattern would route traffic to
24th Avenue (Elmcrest) and then north to Main Street. There will
be a traffic signal at the intersection.
Mr. LeRoux asked Mr. Powell if this area in Lino Lakes falls
within the MUSA boundaries. Mr. Powell said yes except for a
small area south and east of the proposed subdivision.
Mr. LaValle asked if the proposed drainage for this area in Lino
Lakes proposes to use Clearwater Creek. Mr. Powell said
ultimately yes. He noted that he has met with the developer and
RCWD regarding the proposed drainage plan. Mr. LaValle asked Mr.
Powell if Tart Lake could be used for overflow storage. Mr.
Powell said that he is hoping the drainage study will determine
where overflow for the entire watershed could be kept.
Mr. LeRoux asked if the City of Lino Lakes has considered how
utility infrastructure is to be financed. Mr. Powell explained
that the first phase of the Clearwater Creek subdivision would
include about 150 units and this should generate enough
assessments to cover the infrastructure costs.
Mr. LaValle suggested that the Clearwater Creek drainage study
may affect how this proposed subdivision should be developed and
how many units are allowed to develop. Mr. Powell felt that the
study may affect the design parameters and restrict volume of
runoff, not just the rate of runoff from the development. Mr.
LaValle felt that some of the issues are district wide issues and
not just Lino Lakes issues. Mr. Powell explained that he and the
developer have been in constant contact with RCWD on this issue
and they are looking at more than rate of runoff from the
subdivision. Soils are being examined and a plan to encourage
infiltration to reduce runoff was also discussed.
Mayor Reinert noted that the Clearwater Creek proposed
subdivision is only in the concept stages. There are many
questions to be examined before it is approved by the Planning
and Zoning Board and the City Council. He also suggested that by
phasing in the project, a higher quality subdivision will be
developed. Mayor Reinert felt that the development of the
Clearwater Creek subdivision would provide the impetus for future
commercial development around the freeway intersection and
PAGE 3
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 16, 1994
WITH THE CITY OF HUGO
ultimately to the City of Centerville and the City of Hugo.
Mr. Jay Caine said that the Clearwater Creek subdivision is being
discussed as if it were a foregone conclusion. He noted that the
Planning and Zoning Board did consider the proposal and
recommended that it be denied. Mr. Powell explained that the
Planning and Zoning Board focused on the traffic that will be
generated on Otter Lake Road, wetland issues and the impact on
the school district. All these items need additional study.
Mayor Reinert said that the concept/preliminary plat is still
open for discussion and the school district issue is an entirely
separate issue. He explained that he feels that if the
subdivision is not constructed, utilities for commercial growth
in this area will be delayed for many years. Mayor Reinert said
that Lino Lakes is preparing for commercial/industrial growth and
already has the Economic Development staff to help develop this
growth. He noted that he may be criticized for opening new
housing development areas but a policy has already been
established to slow residential growth to 150 to 200 homes per
year. Mayor Reinert felt that the Planning and Zoning Board
should have delayed their decision on the preliminary plat until
all questions have been answered. He felt that the City Council
will delay any decision on the preliminary plat until the
drainage study has been completed and the other issues addressed.
Mr. Goiffon asked if the Lino Lakes tax base would benefit from
the proposed subdivision and would it provide the infrastructure
for commercial development. Mayor Reinert said yes and from a
visionary concept, there is benefit to the City of Hugo. Mr.
Goiffon said he could see a big potential for the I35E
intersection. Mayor Reinert suggested that a joint effort to
expand the MUSA would benefit both Lino Lakes and Hugo. Mr.
Goiffon said that if the MUSA is restricted in the City of Hugo,
then Hugo will not have the same development opportunies as Lino
Lakes.
Mr. Powell explained that at this time, he believes action on the
proposed subdivision would be delayed until the drainage study is
completed. Mr. Schumacher noted that the City Council has 60
days to act on the plan and it is possible that the City will ask
the developer for a letter granting the City Council permission
to take more than 60 days to complete action on this matter.
Mr. Miron noted that the City of Hugo is also experiencing a push
for development in the Clearwater Creek drainage area. He asked
that Lino Lakes delay any action on the proposal until the study
is completed. He also asked that OSM not be pushed to complete
the study. Mr. LaValle noted that the first phase of the
proposed subdivision totally impacted the Hugo. Mr. Powell felt
PAGE 4
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 16, 1994
WITH THE CITY OF HUGO
the entire proposal impacts Hugo. Mr. Dresel noted that the City
of Hugo already has a water tower in the Clearwater Creek basin
vicinity. He suggested that Lino Lakes look at this facility for
short term use since there may be capacity. Mr. LaValle felt
that Lino Lakes should consider a major sewer interceptor for
this area because he felt that the current force main interceptor
could not service the entire area. Mr. Dresel said that he would
contact the old Metropolitan Waste Control Commission to
determine what data they have on the Forest Lake interceptor.
Mr. Powell felt the current interceptor would handle the needs of
the first and second phase of the proposed subdivision. Future
needs will have to be studied. Mayor Reinert felt it would be
appropriate for both the City of Lino Lakes and the City of Hugo
to meet with the Metropolitan Council staff on this matter.
Future street improvement plans were discussed. Mr. Dresel used
the overhead projector and explained that the City of Hugo's
transportation plan includes a proposal to eventually connect
Elmcrest (24th Avenue) to Highway 61 by extending Washington
County Road 8A (140th Street) west. The Hugo transportation plan
also includes provisions to improve Frenchman Road (County Road
14 in Lino Lakes) from Highway 61 west to the Lino Lakes/Hugo
border, Cedar Street from the connection with 140th Street west
to Elmcrest and Elmcrest (24th Avenue) north to Frenchman Road.
There was discussion regarding Otter Lake Road and its ability to
support the traffic generated by proposed subdivision in Lino
Lakes. Ms. Barnes suggested that Lino Lakes and Hugo plan street
extensions and improvements cooperatively. She noted that some
of the streets discussed may have to be upgraded to collector
status in Lino Lakes.
Mr. LeRoux noted that oil is being used for dust control on
Elmcrest Avenue. This situation creates pot holes. He also
noted that the access to Bald Eagle Lake in the City of Hugo has
been closed due to safety concerns. He asked if another access
site in Lino Lakes could be constructed. This matter will be
investigated.
Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence Winters, 7703 - 24th Avenue, Lino Lakes
said that they did appreciate the dust control provide by the
City.
Mr. Miron explained that the meeting this evening has raised more
questions and suggested that a meeting set for January or
February, 1995 after the Clearwater Creek drainage study is
completed and a more complete discussion could be held. He
expressed appreciation for being offered the opportunity to work
with the City of Lino Lakes on matters of mutual interest. Mr.
Schumacher said that he and Mr. Museus will continue to work
PAGE 5
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 16, 1994
WITH THE CITY OF HUGO
together on the issues raised this evening and will schedule a
joint meeting when the drainage study is completed and after
further discussion with the RCWD.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M.
These minutes were consider, corrected and approved at the
regular City Council meeting held on December 19, 1994.
Marilyn G. Anderson, Vernon F. Reinert,
Clerk -Treasurer Mayor
PAGE 6
il‘abi4 136
COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 8, 1994
FACILITIES STUDY
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNCIL MINUTES
DATE December 8, 1994
TIME STARTED : 5:10 P.M.
TIME ENDED;:: 6:20 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Reinert, Kuether, Elliott, Bergeson
MEMBERS ABSENT : Neal
Staff members present: Community Development Director, Brian
Wessel; Planning Coordinator, Mary Kay Wyland; Community
Development Secretary, Mary LaForest; City Administrator, Randy
Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn Anderson.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the Facilities Study
and present a proposal for a Town Center.
Council Member Bergeson explained that Mr. Wessel and Ms.
LaForest will be presenting a concept for a Town Center. The
presentation is only to provide information for the City Council
to think about.
A map of the City of Lino Lakes was displayed showing several
sites that have been proposed for a new City facility. The map
also indicates how many acres are available at each site. The
acreage for each site varies and final acreage requirements will
depend on how many acres are needed for the new facility.
Mr. Wessel explained that Ms. LaForest had prepared a notebook
outlining the concept for a Town Center. Ms. LaForest developed
the notebook as a presentation for a class that she is taking for
her Masters Degree in Economic Development. Mr. Wessel read
paragraph four (4) of the Introduction. "This Town Center
proposal incorporates 'Neo -traditional' planning, the return to a
more traditional Midwest design with shop front retail, lower
building profiles and a town square. This concept is one
alternative to the standard suburban strip mall that has come to
signify uncontrolled sprawl, lack of community identity and
unimaginative design. A well planned Town Center can enhance the
City's special qualities the community seeks to preserve and
provide an appealing place to visit". Mr. Wessel noted that this
PAGE 1
COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 8, 1994
FACILITIES STUDY
is a 1990's neighborhood concept.
Mr. Wessel referred to page three (3) of the notebook, Needs
Assessment. He noted that the proposed city hall will require
about 24,000 square feet of space and the Police Department will
require about 14,000 square feet. Mr. Wessel also noted that the
Centennial School District is looking for about 10,000 square
feet to rent/lease. Several proposals have already been
submitted to the District. Mr. Wessel explained that a growing
city like Lino Lakes will be requiring retail services and this
concept could provide these services as well as provide the best
use of land and a broad housing profile.
Mr. Wessel requested that the City Council review the information
provided in the notebook, discuss the advantages and
disadvantages of a Town Center concept and determine if a
definitive program should be prepared. He explained that he
envisioned that the program would be phased -in starting with the
construction of the City facilities. These facilities would be
the anchor for the development.
Ms. LaForest referred to the Summary on page 15 noting that Town
Center concepts have been gathering momentum in recent years as
marketing concepts and as design ideas. These projects are
usually located in suburbs and are designed to become focal
points in their communities. Some of these projects revolve
around the concept of an open air gathering place reminiscent of
the Main Street of a small town, and include street front retail,
town squares, city facilities, offices and residential uses.
They are meant to act as new downtowns for suburban ares that
evolved without such traditional cores. Ms. LaForest briefly
mentioned a Town Center concept for Buffalo Grove, Illinois,
Tualitin, Oregon and Orlando, Florida.
Ms. LaForest further explained that a Town Center plan calls for
extensive public interaction, community input and review, the use
of consultants, developers and contractors. A city interested in
using the impetus of public development to stimulate private
development should first come to a consensus on its needs and
objectives.
Although the concept is complicated to complete, strategic public
investment and concentrated marketing efforts can have a dramatic
effect on encouraging private investment.
Mayor Reinert had several questions including what would the tax
base be and how much square footage would be designated for the
public buildings. Ms. LaForest explained that this has not been
determined since only the concept is being introduced this
PAGE 2
COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 8, 1994
FACILITIES STUDY
evening.
Mr. Schumacher explained that he and the Financial Director did
put figures together for a new city hall. He noted that Elk
River recently completed a new city hall at the cost of
$2,300,000.00. Space requirements for Lino Lakes would cost
approximately $4,000,000.00. This would not include the cost of
land or furnishings. Council Member Bergeson said that would
provide a building that is needed 10 years from now. The need at
this time is for approximately 34,000 square feet not including
Public Works. Total costs would be approximately $5,000,000.00.
Mayor Reinert asked how such a project would be financed. Mr.
Schumacher outlined several areas from which to pull financing
including TIF, MWCC SAC refund, and a lease/purchase situation
similar to what was used to finance the new fire station.
Mayor Reinert asked if a Town Center is a realistic project. Mr.
Schumacher said yes. A financing plan covering a 20 to 25 year
period with only interest being paid for the first several years
would not require a significant tax increase. Mayor Reinert
asked that the financing plan be outlined, and then go to the
community and sell the plan, possibly through the 20/20 project.
He felt the idea of the Town Center must grow out of the need of
the community.
Mr. Wessel also noted that the plan would need strong public
support. He felt there is a need to focus on location and
obtaining the property soon. He felt that the need for a City
facility and a Town Center could be combined and the project
completed in stages with the government facilities constructed
first.
Council Member Kuether said she liked the philosophy of a Town
Center but felt the City Council needed to take the initiative
and make it happen. She felt that many businesses would like to
be located near city hall.
Council Member Bergeson felt that the City could build another
city hall in a different location but it would only be a city
hall that would not be much different that what the City already
has.
Mr. Wessel explained that the EDAAB has been trying to put
together a plan to "kick off" commercial development and a Town
Center appears to be workable. Ms. LaForest said that the City
could use government facilities to attract businesses. This
concept would be a good marketing tool.
PAGE 3
COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 8, 1994
FACILITIES STUDY
Council Member Kuether asked that a scenario of the project and
the financing be completed. Further discussion involved the need
to develop a program and the need to hire consultants such as a
planner, and a real estate market consultant. Public input would
also be needed.
Council Member Bergeson reminded the City Council that a market
study was completed for the two (2) freeway intersections several
years ago. Council Member Kuether felt that the study
concentrated on what should be located at the intersections and
would not relate to this concept.
Mr. Schumacher noted that former City Planner, John Miller also
prepared a study. Mayor Reinert suggested that a survey to
determine where competition is located should also be prepared.
Council Member Bergeson felt that the City should not be involved
with commercial development and should let the private sector
take the risk.
Council Member Kuether felt a community center would draw private
development. Mr. Wessel noted the need to include "people
activity" centers.
Mayor Reinert said that much of what government does is planned
in a vacuum and felt the need to get the public involved to give
them "ownership" in the project. He suggested that groups of
proponents who see something in the concept be formed to "carry
the ball". The concept must include something that citizens
want. Ms. LaForest felt that residents would rather see the Town
Center than another K -Mart or Walmart.
Mr. Schumacher expressed concern regarding the timing explaining
that he wanted a new city hall before the Centennial School
District approaches the public with a new referendum.
Council Member Bergeson said he did not feel the need for a new
city hall in the next two (2) years but did feel the need to get
a commitment on a piece of property. Mr. Wessel said he did not
want to complicate the issue but felt the need to bring this
concept to the City Council for consideration.
Mayor Reinert asked Mr. Schumacher how soon a new city hall was
needed. Mr. Schumacher said he felt the need within the next two
(2) years. Mayor Reinert felt that the Town Center would take
more than two (2) years. Council Member Bergeson felt that both
projects could be done if the right piece of property were
secured. Mr. Wessel said he could see construction starting
within the next two (2) to three (3) years.
PAGE 4
COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 8, 1994
FACILITIES STUDY
Mayor Reinert suggested that a model of the Town Center be
constructed and placed in the entry of city hall so that
residents and visitors could give their opinions.
Further discussion continued around the issue of the location for
a Town Center. Council Member Kuether suggested that it be
placed north of I35W so that it would not be in direct
competition with the businesses in Circle Pines and Lexington.
Mayor Reinert suggested that a professional be hired to research
the location.
Mr. Wessel said he would formalize a program for a Town Center
and include square footage for the development. Mr. Schumacher
asked the City Council to think about the presentation this
evening. Another facilities study meeting will be scheduled
after the first of the year. Council Member Bergeson noted that
it is a "pain" to hold all of these meetings, however this issue
warrants meetings and more meetings.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:20 P.M.
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a
regular Council meeting held on December 19,1994.
Marilyn G. Anderson, Vernon F. Reinert,
Clerk -Treasurer Mayor
PAGE 5
AGENDA ITEM
8TAFF ORIGINATOR CHIEF DAVID J. PECCHIA
DATE
11-10-1994
TO1 IC PROPOSED SNOWMOBILE ORDINANCE
TO ESTABLISH A SNOWMOBILE ORDINANCE TO REGULATE USAGE OF SNOWMOBILES AND ALL TERRAIN
VEHICLES WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF LINO LAKES.
1. APPROVE ORDINANCE AS SUBMITTED.
2. TABLE AND REFER TO STAFF FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
3. DO NOT APPROVE
OPTION #1
TIIn
Council Member _ introduced the following
ordinance and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 17 - 94
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE OPERATION OF SNOWMOBILES
AND ALL -TERRAIN VEHICLES
Definitions. Unless the context `learly indiw._..tes
otherwise, the words, combinations of words, terms, and
phrases, as used in Ordinance No. 17-94 shall have the
meanings set forth in the subdivisions of this section which
follow.
Snowmobile shall Mean any self-propelled ed vehicle used for
recreational purposes whether steered by wheels; skis, or
runners and designed for travel on snow or ice or natural
terrain including, but not limited to, snowmobiles and all -
terrain vehicles regulated pursuant to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 84, and said definition shall
appy throughout this Ordinance unless said Statute clearly
provides otherwise.
Owner means a person, other than a 1.en holfil^ having the
property in or title to snowmobile and ent--_t.?es t^ the uee
of possession thereof.
Operate means to ride in or on and control the
a snowmobile.
Operator means every person who operates
physical control of a snowmobile.
or is
operatio : of
1,T refine W u- 1
Roadway means that portion of a highway improved denigned,
or ordinarily used for vehicular travel incl uding the
shoulder, but not including the boulevard.
Street or highway means the entire width betsie n boundary
lines of any way or place when any part thereof ie. open to
the use of the public, as a matter or right, free the
purposes of vehicular traffic.
Right of way means the entire strip of land traversed sed by a
highway or street in which the p'- hlic ewne the fee or an
easement for roadway purposes. -
Safety or deadman throttle is defined ee a device :s„ na.
when pressure is removed from the engine eecelerator or
throttle, causes the motor to be disengaged from the driving
track.
Opera ion an St ets andcjhways
Operation of snowmobiles upon the roadway, shoulder, inside
bank, slope of any street or highway, ditch or on the
outside bank within the right-of-way of any street or
highway is permitted in conformance with State law and City
ordinance within the corporate limits of the City of Lino
Lakes.
Operation Generally. Except as
permitted and authorized, it is
operate a snowmobile within the
of Lino Lakes in the manner set
otherwise specifically
unlawful for any person to
corporate limits of the City
forth in the following:
1. Anywhere within any public right of way (i.e.
boulevards) except on the roadway surface or otherwise
provided in this ordinance.
2. On a public sidewalk or walkway provided or used for
pedestrian travel.
On private property of another without lawful authority
or consent of the owner or occupant.
4 On any publicly owned lands and frozen waters
including, but not limited to, school grounds, park
property, playgrounds, recreation areas and golf
courses, except areas previously listed or authorized
for such use by the proper public authority, in which
case such use should be lawful and snowmobiles may be
driven in and out of such areas by the shortest route.
Authorized areas in the city or Lino Lakes owned by the
City Miall be designated by council resolution.
5. At any place, while under the influence of
liquor or drugs.
6. At any speed in excess of 15 miles per hour
street or highway or elsewhere at a rate of
greater than reasonable or proper under all
surrounding circumstance.
intoxicating
on a public
speed
the
7. At any place in a careless, reckless or negligent
manner so as to endanger the person or property of
another or to cause injury or damage thereto.
8 so as to tow any person or thing on a public street or
highway except through use of a rigid tow bar attached
to the rear of the snowmobile.
9. At a speed greater than 15 miles per hour when within
one hundred (100) feet of any riverbank or lake shore,.
or within one hundred (100) feet of fishermen, ice
houses or skating rinks, nor shall operation be
permitted within one hundred (100) feet of any sliding
area, nor where the operation would conflict with the
lawful use of property or would endanger other persons
or property.
10. In a manner so as to create loud, unnecessary or
unusual noise which disturbs, annoys, or interferes
with the peace and quiet of another.
11. Snowmabiling shall be prohibited after 11:00 PM and
before 8:00 AM Sunday through Thursday, and between the
hours of 1:00 AM and 8:00 AM Saturday and Sunday_
12. Such operation is not permitted within fifteen (15)
feet of any public sidewalk, walkway or trail.
13. Such operation is not permitted when such ditch or
outside bank is within the right-of-way of any
interstate highway or freeway.
A snowmobile may make a direct crossing of a street
highway provided:
1. The crossing is made at an angle of approximately
ninety (90) degrees to the direction of the street or
highway and at a place where no obstruction prevents a
quick and sate crossing.
2. The snowmobile is brought to a complete stop before
crossing the shoulder or main traveled way of the
highway.
3. The driver yields the right of way to all oncoming
traffic which constitutes an immediate hazard.
4 In crossing a divided street or highway, the crossing
is made only at an intersection of such street or
highway with another public street or highway.
5. If the crossing is made between the hours of one-half
(1/2) hour after sunset to one-half (1/2) hour before
sunrise or in conditions of reduced visibility, only if
both front and rear lights are on.
No snowmobile shall enter any uncontrolled intersection
without making a complete stop. The operator shall then
yield the right of way to any vehicles or pedestrians which
constitute any immediate hazard.
Notwithstanding any prohibition by current City Ordinance or
State Law, a snowmobile may be operated on a public
thoroughfare in an emergency during the period of time when
and at locations where snow upon the roadway renders travel
by automobile impractical.
Equipment. It is unlawful for any person to operate a
snowmobile any place within the cnrperatc limits of Lino
Lakes unless it is equipped with the equipment net forth
toliowst
standard mufflers whiei,i are properly attached and .in
cnn tant operation, and which reduce the noise of
nperat -i on of tie motor to the minimum necessary for
Operation. No person shall
use a muffler cutout, by-
pass; straight pipe or similar ar Device on a snowmobile
motor, and the exha x t system shall not emit or produce
a sharp popping or crackling noise.
2. Brakes adequate to control the movement of =. ,d to stop
and hold the snowmobile under any conditions of
operation.
3. A safety or so called "deadman" throttle in cp rating
condition, as that when 'pressure is removed from the
accelerator or throttle. the motor is disengaged from
tete driving track.
4. At least one clear lamp attached to the front, with
sufficient intensity to reveal person s arra vehicles at
a distance of at least one hundred: (100) feet ahead
during the hours of darkness under normal, atm. sphe±-e
conditions.
a. Such head lamp shall be so aimed that
are not projected into the eyes of nn
vehicle operator.
b.It shall be '
equipped with a l Qat- one red tail
lamp having a minimum candle power of sufficient
intensity to exhibit a red light plainly visib?c
from a distance of five hundred (500) Feet to the
rear during the hours of darkness under norral
atmospheric conditions.
(T1t1,-i„rr -"e.
C,nr,e1WiTc
c. Such equipment shall be in use when, the vehicle is
operated between the hours of one-half (i/o) Floor
after sunset or one-half (1/2) hour before vsnnri se
or at times of reduced visibility.
peL Sura. under J„_d Years of Age. No person under 14 years of
age shall operate on streets or highways or make a direct
crossing of u street or highway as the operator of a
snowmobile. A person 14 years of age or older, but less
that: l.° sears of aye, may operate a snowmobile on streets or
highwayo as permitted under this ordinance and make a direct.
nrossing thereof only if to has in his immediate possession
a valid snowmobile safety certificate -
f.i.ficat:e issued by the
Commissioner of Natural ieso ices as provided by Minnesota
Statutes, SRct i ron A n. 4 G as amended.
It is unlawful for the owner of a snnsrrw+ob ] n to permit the
snowmobile to be operated contrary to the rY-ovis4 ons cf this
section.
Leaving Snowmobile Unattended. F.zrery person 1 oav� r.g
snowmobile in a public place shall lock the ign :icn, remove
the key and take the same with him,
Chasing Animals _Fn bidden_ It i q unlawful to intentionally
drive, chase, run over.__.._� attempt 4o
kill. or othr-ei, �A �-a1�� *„� tet+-^�^n� �-.�
take any animal, wild or domestic; with a sn^..o.•ilc.
Penalty. Any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more
thin $7uu.u0 or by imprisonment of not more than 90 days; or
bol, plus the costs of presecution in either case.
This ordinance shall take effect ,upon its passage and p•_ , s -at -
according to the City Charter.
Vernon F. RP%nQr+ , m.4y__
Mar 3 iyn C , Anderson, Cl erk Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the or foregoing
7 ordinance was
seconded by Council Member and upon vote being L QhKli
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same=
Whereupon said ordinance was declared dill„
9
the Lino Lakes City Council this 4th days of Atovembey ,
1 q41 A