HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/08/1996 Council PacketAGENDA
6:00 P.M., Economic Development Authority
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday
July 8, 1996
6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call
Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the
Agenda?
1. Consent Agenda
A. Consideration of Minutes:
June 10, 1996 (Approved)
Closed Council Meeting, June 10, 1996 (Approved)
B. Consideration of Disbursements:
June 30, 1996 - $851.80 (Removed from Agenda, question regarding
$700.00 expense )
July 8, 1996 - $341,034.16, Check Numbers 44873 through 44944
(Approved)
Centennial Fire District, June 27, 1996 (Approved)
2. Open Mike
A. Senior Housing Sewer and Water Rates, Terry Schmidt (Randy and M.
Vaske will work issues)
3. Consideration of the Annual Centennial Fire District Report and 1997 Budget,
Chief Milo Bennett (Approved)
4. Consideration of FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 08-96, Amending the
Ordinance on Mandatory Septic Pumping, Peter Kluegel (Approved)
PAGE 1
AGENDA -
5. Planning and Zoning Board Report, Mary Kay Wyland
A. Consideration of Rezone, PDO and Preliminary Plat, Sea Plane Base,
Bruce Hanson (Mr. Hanson withdrew his application)
B. SECOND READING, Ordinance 03-96, Amending Section 506 of the
City Code, Animal Ordinance (Approved)
C. Consideration of MUSA Designation, Pheasant Hills Preserve, 7th
Addition (Approved)
6. City Engineer's Report, David Ahrens
A. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 76, Accept Bids and Award
Construction Contract, Pheasant Hills Preserve, 7th Addition Street and
Utility Improvements (Verbal, Bids will be received on Monday)
(Approved)
B. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 77, Request Anoka County to
Conduct a Speed Study, Apollo Drive from Sunset Road to Lilac Street
(Approved)
C. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 72, Municipal State Aid Street
Revisions (Verbal, will have handout on Monday) (Approved)
7. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 78, Assigning the City Clerk -Treasurer as
Responsible Authority for Data Practice Act, Randy Schumacher (Approved)
8. Old Business
A. Consideration of Charter Commission Update, Randy Schumacher
(Randy will add language as suggested by Bergeson)
9. New Business
A. Reconsideration of Off -Sale Liquor License for Steve J. Arhip, Jr., 7860
Lake Drive, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, Marilyn Anderson (Delayed action
until July 22, 1996)
B. PROCLAMATION, National Night Out 1996, Randy Schumacher
(Approved)
C. Confirm Annual Budget Meeting for Thursday, August 8, 1996, 9:00
A.M., Tautges, Redpath & Co., LTD, Randy Schumacher
PAGE 2
AGENDA-
D.
GENDA
D. REMINDER: Grand Opening of Senior Housing Complex, July 11, 1996,
1:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M.
10. Adjourn (9:25 P.M.)
July 3, 1996,9:45 A.M.
PAGE 3
AGENDA
6:00 P.M., Economic Development Authority
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday
July 8, 1996
6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call
Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the
Agenda?
1. Consent Agenda
A. Consideration of Minutes:
June 10, 1996
Closed Council Meeting, June 10, 1996
B. Consideration of Disbursements:
June 30, 1996 - $851.80
July 8, 1996 - $341,034.16, Check Numbers 44873 through 44944
Centennial Fire District, June 27, 1996
2. Open Mike
A. Senior Housing Sewer and Water Rates, Terry Schmidt
3. Consideration of the Annual Centennial Fire District Report and 1997 Budget,
Chief Milo Bennett
4. Consideration of FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 08-96, Amending the
Ordinance on Mandatory Septic Pumping, Peter Kluegel
5. Planning and Zoning Board Report, Mary Kay Wyland
PAGE 1
AGENDA-
A.
GENDA
A. Consideration of Rezone, PDO and Preliminary Plat, Sea Plane Base,
Bruce Hanson
B. SECOND READING, Ordinance 03-96, Amending Section 506 of the
City Code, Animal Ordinance
C. Consideration of MUSA Designation, Pheasant Hills Preserve, 7th
Addition
6. City Engineer's Report, David Ahrens
A. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 76, Accept Bids and Award
Construction Contract, Pheasant Hills Preserve, 7th Addition Street and
Utility Improvements (Verbal, Bids will be received on Monday)
B. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 77, Request Anoka County to
Conduct a Speed Study, Apollo Drive from Sunset Road to Lilac Street
C. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 72, Municipal State Aid Street
Revisions (Verbal, will have handout on Monday)
7. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 78, Assigning the City Clerk -Treasurer as
Responsible Authority for Data Practice Act, Randy Schumacher
8. Old Business
A. Consideration of Charter Commission Update, Randy Schumacher
9. New Business
A. Reconsideration of Off -Sale Liquor License for Steve J. Arhip, Jr., 7860
Lake Drive, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, Marilyn Anderson
B. PROCLAMATION, National Night Out 1996, Randy Schumacher
C. Confirm Annual Budget Meeting for Thursday, August 8, 1996, 9:00
A.M., Tautges, Redpath & Co., LTD, Randy Schumacher
D. REMINDER: Grand Opening of Senior Housing Complex, July 11, 1996,
1:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M.
10. Adjourn
PAGE 2
AGENDA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MONDAY
JULY 8, 1996
6:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Consideration of Minutes of Monday, April 29, 1996
3. Consideration of Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and Emergency
Apparatus Maintenance
4. Public Hearing on the proposed sale of property in the Apollo Business Park to Emergency
Apparatus Maintenance
4A. Consideration of Resolution No. 96-06 authorizing the sale of property to Emergency
Apparatus Maintenance
5. Consideration of Contract for Private Develop entetween Lino Lakes EDA 2 and Blue Hero
Development Corporation — 3Si5 6 fp � — �� �,c �� O j
o
6. Adjourn
ci to '1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES
DATE: Monday, April 29, 1995
MEMBERS
PRESENT: J. Landers, J. Bergeson, A. Neal, S. Kuether
MEMBERS
ABSENT: C. Lyden
OTHERS
PRESENT: Brian Wessel, Ron Batty, Mary LaForest
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
Ms. LaForest noted in the March 25, 1996 minutes that "EDA President Lyden..." should be
corrected to read "EDA President Landers..." EDA Member Kuether moved to approve the
minutes with the correction noted. EDA Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion passed
unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN LINO
LAKES EDA AND PROGRESSIVE ENGINEERING
Mr. Wessel explained to the Authority that the substance of the development contracts to be
considered had been agreed to by all parties, but some minor details still needed to be worked out.
He requested that if the Authority approves the contracts, they do so contingent upon staff
approval of any minor changes. He outlined the Progressive Engineering agreement for financial
assistance and for the conveyance of public property in the Apollo Business Park. The company is
building on 2.3 acres and is paying for 1/2 acre of land and assessments for later expansion. The
city is contributing $129,962 in a combination of upfront and pay-as-you-go tax increment
financing to subsidize 1.8 acres of land and assessments, which is 17% of the total project cost.
Mr. Batty explained that he had received a letter from the company's attorney acknowledging
receipt of the agreement, but had not heard from him regarding any problems. Two minor issues
had been raised by the company, but they were resolvable.
EDA Member Kuether requested that in the future the green sheets for development agreements
specify the total amount of TIF and what percent of the project cost the city is subsidizing.
EDA Member Kuether moved to approve the development agreement between Lino Lakes EDA
and Progressive Engineering contingent upon staff approval of the final details. EDA Member
Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN LINO
LAKES EDA AND NORTHERN WHOLESALE
Mr. Wessel explained that Northern Wholesale was purchasing nine acres in the Clearwater Creek
Development Center. The company is receiving $608,449 toward the cost of the property,
assessments and site preparation costs in a combination of upfront and pay-as-you-go TIF. The
subsidy is 15% of the total project cost. Mr. Batty noted that he had talked with the company's
attorney, and only minor changes were required in the agreement. EDA Member Kuether asked
that staff find out what the company was charging for its leasable space.
EDA Member Kuether moved to approve the development contract contingent upon staff
approval of final changes. EDA Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion passed
unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN LINO
LAKES EDA AND TAYLOR CORPORATION
Mr. Wessel explained that the development agreement outlined the conditions for public
assistance for the construction of the new Taymark facility in the Clearwater Creek Development
Center. The company is receiving $800,000 in subsidy toward the cost of land, special
assessments and site improvements in a combination of upfront and pay-as-you-go TIF, which is
12% of the total project cost. Mr. Batty said he had discussed the company's concern regarding
the assessment agreement. The attorney requested the agreement be written so that it expired
when TIF has recovered the subsidy. Mr. Batty said that was workable.
EDA Member Kuether moved to approve the development contract contingent upon staff
approval of final changes. EDA Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Wessel thanked the Authority and noted the cooperative effort of these companies, the city
council and staff.
ADJOURNMENT
EDA Member Neal moved to adjourn. EDA Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion
passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 5:26 p.m.
STAFF ORIGINATOR: R: Brian Wessel
DATE: 7/8/9
TOPIC: Consideration of the Contract for Private Development between Lino
Lakes EDA and Emergency Apparatus Maintenance (EAM)
BACKGROXIND;
A development contract between the EDA and EAM outlines the c itions for
public assistance and for the conveyance of city property to the company. EAM
is purchasing 1.12 acres of land in the Apollo Business Park. Land,
assessments, and admininstrative fees total $75,276.39.
In this agreement the EDA will remove the special assessments of $27,596.39
on the property, and write down $9,654 toward EAM's purchase of the land and
administrative fees, for a total of $37,250.39 in TIF assistance. EAM will pay the
remaining $38,026 on the land at closing. This TIF assistance amounts to 14%
the total proms cost, with a complete payback to the EDA within 41/2 years.
act for private development between L
AGENDA ITEM 4
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Brian Wessel
DATE: 7/8/96
TOPIC: Public Hearing on the proposed sale of property in
Park to Emergency Apparatus Maintenance
BACKGROUND:
Emergency Apparatus Maintenance is purchasing 1.1 acres in the city -owned
portion of the Apollo Business Park. The land is being purchased for $39,000
per acre, plus assessments. A public hearing is required when the city is writing
down the cost of city -owned property.
e Apollo Business
TOPIC. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 -Ce authori s l of orooerty.
to nergencv Ao aratus Maintenance
BACKGROUND:
Resolution No. 96-06 will complete the process required by the EDA for selling
city -owned land in the Apollo Business Park to Emergency Apparatus
ntenance. Closing onthe sale of ttproperty will be scheduled late July.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. 96-06
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF PROPERTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority as follows:
Section 1. Recitals
1.01. The Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") approved a tax
increment financing plan (the "Plan") for the Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 (TIF
District No. 1-7) on May 22, 1995.
1.02. On May 22, 1995, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes (the "City") approved
the Plan.
1.03. The EDA entered into a development agreement with Emergency Maintenance
Apparatus, (the "Developer") whereby the EDA agreed to purchase property legally described as
Lot 1, Block 1, Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota (the "Property") from the City
for $43,680 and to resell it to the Developer for $38,026 subject to the EDA's compliance with
the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.105.
1.04. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. section 469.105, the EDA has held a public hearing
on the proposed sale of the Property to the Developer, following authorization to staff to publish
legal notice as required by law, at which hearing all persons wishing to express an opinion were
given an opportunity to do so.
Section 2. Findings.
2.01. It is hereby found and determined that the sale of the Property to the Developer is in
the best interest of the EDA.
2.02. It is hereby found and determined that the sale of the Property furthers the EDA's
general plan of economic development of the community.
Section 3. Authorization.
3.01. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized and directed to execute
a quit claim deed and other appropriate documents to facilitate sale of the Property to the
Developer.
3.02. The President, Executive Director, staff and consultants are hereby authorized and
directed to take any and all other steps necessary or convenient in order to accomplish the sale of
the Property.
Dated: , 1996.
President
ATTEST:
Executive Director
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
AGENDA ITEM 5
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Brian Wessel
DATE: 7/8/96
TOPIC: Consideration of the Contract for Private Development between Lino
Lakes EDA and Blue Heron Development Corporation
BACKGROUND;
This development contract between the EDA and Blue Heron Development
Corporation opines the conditions for public assistance. The cost of the 3.09
acres of land, plus, assessments and administrative fees, total $205,081.79. The
EDA's TIF subsidy totals $146,421.79. The assessments and reimbursement of
administrative fees will be disbursed to Blue Heron upfront when the Certificate
of Completion is issued. A total of $61,850 toward the cost of the land will be
reimbursed to Blue Heron on a pay-as-you-go basis. Blue Heron is contributing
$93.660 in costs in this second phase of development. The TIF subsidy is 12%
total project cost and reimbursement will be complete in less than 3 years.
4PTI
1. Approve the contract for private development between
Blue Heron Development Corporation
2. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION;
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
KAHLER HOTEL (HOUSING)
TOTAL
$ 151.80
FINANCE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION $ 700.00
(CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT)
$ 700.00
TOTAL
$ 151.80
TOTAL JUNE MANUAL DISBURSEMENT $ 851.80
Page 1
DISBURSEMENTS
1
JULY 8, 1996
•
Page: 1
Date: 07/02/96
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND
* FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING, INC.(CONTRACTOR/49 & LAKE DRIVE) 117,243.36
Total for Department 117,243.36
Total for Fund 117,243.36
1996 CONSTRUCTION FUND
* C. W. HOULE, INC.(CONTRACTOR/MARSHAN LK CONDOS)
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.(CONSTRUCTION TESTING/T CROSS)
SCHIELD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,(CONTRACTOR)
AREA AND UNIT CHARGE
85,886.75
2,587.84
85,797.49
Total for Department 174,272.08
Total for Fund
174,272.08
BLAINE, CITY OF(ASSESSMENT/6920 SUNSET ROAD)
SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM, INC.`(ADVERTISING/35E & MAIN ST)
SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM, INC.'(ADVERTISING/WATER TOWER #2)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
5,095.03
213.30
251.10
Total for Department
Total for Fund
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC(PLANS/SPECS 2 UST'S)
STS CONSULTANTS LTD.(ENGINEER SERVICE/TANK REMOVE)
CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS
5,559.43
5,559.43
1,487.29
1,832.50
Total for Department 3,319.79
Total for Fund 3,319.79
ANOKA COUNTY(RECORDING FEE/SHORES OF MAR)
E. G. RUD & SONS, INC.(SURVEY/PROGRESSIVE ENGINEER)
120.00
563.20
Page: 2
Date: 07/02/96
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(STREET LIGHTS/MARSHAN CONDOS) 6,220.00
Total for Department 6,903.20
GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(PRINTING SERVICE)
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE)
* LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE)
OFFICEMAX, INC.(SUPPLIES)
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.(SUPPLIES)
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA(CLASS)
TESCH, DAN(MILEAGE/MEALS/PARKING)
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
Total for Fund 6,903.20
140.80
21.20
151.76
176.19
65.37
109.00
107.76
Total for Department 772.08
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE)
* LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE)
SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC.(24 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS)
10.60
45.58
854.66
Total for Department 910.84
ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.`(INSURANCE)
MN. DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY(LICENSE TABS)
ENGINEERING/PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN WATER WORKS(MEMBERSHIP)
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE)
WYLAND, MARY KAY(MILEAGE)
FINANCE
10.60
46.50
Total for Department 57.10
300.00
21.20
30.54
Total for Department 351.74
CURTIS 1000 INC.(DISBURSEMENT CHECKS) 631.75
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 15.90
* LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) 140.95
FIRE DEPARTMENT
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE)
Total for Department 788.60
5.30
Total for Department 5.30
Page: 3
Date: 07/02/96
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department,_Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
FLEET MANAGEMENT
BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(PARTS) 543.58
* FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING, INC.(HAUL TROJAN LOADER TO AUCTIO) 237.50
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 5.30
FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GEO, INC.(SENSOR) 128.99
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC.(CASE SKID STEER) 728.20
THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET,(PARTS) 153.83
Total for Department 1,797.40
FORESTRY DEPARTMENT
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 5.30
Total for Department 5.30
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
BOB'S CIRCLE PLUMBING(SENIOR CENTER MEN'S ROOM)
GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE)
INTERIOR COMM SYSTEM, INC.(LABOR/TRIP CHARGE -PHONES)
* MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (MONTHLY SERVICE)
MN. CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY, INC.(INSTALL DOOR CLOSER/RECHARGE)
Total for Department
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
73.15
110.22
347.82
91.93
168.29
NEAL, ANDY(MILEAGE/MEALS) 40.16
Total for Department 40.16
PARKS DEPARTMENT
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1.03
* A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 25.52
* AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOT(SUPPLIES) 15.97
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF(MONTHLY SERVICE) 21.85
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 21.20
* MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (MONTHLY SERVICE) 46.83
MTI DISTIBUTING, INC.(PARTS) 149.55
NORTHWAY SPTS & GARDEN, INC.(SUPPLIES) 21.69
TOMARK SPORTS, INC.(BATTER BOX TEMPLATE) 179.09
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC(ADJUST DOOR/BIRCH PARK) 61.25
Total for Department 543.98
Page: 4
Date: 07/02/96
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department,_ Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
POLICE DEPARTMENT
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE(MONTHLY SERVICE)
AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(SIREN MAINTENANCE)
ANOKA COUNTY(RANGE USE)
CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE(TWO ROLLS STAMPS)
D C. HEY COMPANY, INC.(COPIER SUPPLIES)
DORADUS CORPORATION, INC.(SIREN MAINTENANCE - 7 SIRENS)
ESI COMMUNICATIONS NORTH, INC.(HOOK UP NEW LINE)
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE)
* GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES)
* MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (MONTHLY SERVICE)
MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATIO(PERMITS)
ST. PAUL CITY OF(COURSE - 5)
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
21.30
1,815.96
120.00
64.00
89.81
1,554.00
118.00
106.00
198.48
13.21
12.78
1,000.00
Total for Department 5,113.54
* A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 2.29
* A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 38.04
BLAINE DISCOUNT CENTER(SUPPLIES) 29.78
BOB & THE BEACHCOMBERS(PERFORMANCE IN THE PARK 7/14) 1,000.00
FESTIVAL FOODS(SUPPLIES) 14.22
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 5.30
* GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN(SUPPLIES) 17.99
J & A HANDY -CRAFTS, INC.(CRAFT SUPPLIES) 201.75
KILLER HAY SEEDS, THE(PERFORMANCE IN THE PK/07-21) 800.00
STAR TRIBUNE(ADVERTISING) 25.00
TRIARCO ARTS/CRAFTS INC.(CRAFT SUPPLIES) 411.75
Total for Department 2,546.12
SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 5.30
Total for Department 5.30
STREETS
* A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 25.52
ASHLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY(CALCIUM.CHLORIDE) 431.11
CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC(DOUBLE WHEEL MEASURE) 60.39
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 21.20
RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.(REPLACE PRESSURE LAMPS) 178.80
T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC.(ASPHALT) 4,907.65
WALGREENS(PHOTO FINISHING) 4.58
WATERPRO SUPPLIES CORPORATION(SUPPLIES) 443.01
Total for Department 6,072.26
Total for Fund 19,801.13
Page: 5
Date: 07/02/96
City of Lino Lakes
Claims Roster sorted by Department,_Grouped by Invoice
Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount
PROGRAM RECREATION
CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS(TENNIS LESSONS) 35.00
Total for Department 35.00
Total for Fund 35.00
SEWER OPERATING
SEWER DEPARTMENT
* A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE(MONTHLY SERVICE) 34.58
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE) 7.95
Total for Department 42.53
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
BRW, INC.(CLEARWATER CREEK BUS PARK)
* C. W. HOULE, INC.(CONTRACTOR/736 FOX ROAD)
WATER OPERATING
WATER DEPARTMENT
Total for Fund 42.53
270.00
5,461.20
Total for Department 5,731.20
Total for Fund 5,731.20
* A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE(MONTHLY SERVICE)
* AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOT(SUPPLIES)
FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC.(CHEMICALS)
* FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.(INSURANCE)
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE CLAIM)
MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY, INC.(SERVICE/WELL #2)
MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY, INC.(SERVICE/WELL #2)
* MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (MONTHLY SERVICE)
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE)
34.58
22.68
4,230.73
7.95
425.06
2,739.05
600.00
30.24
36.15
Total for Department 8,126.44
Total for Fund 8,126.44
Total for Checking Account 1010 341,034.16
** Total ** $341,034.16
* - Invoice split to different Departments
' Page: 1
Date: 07/02/96
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
Checking Account 1010
000050 - A T & T
000100 - AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.
000110 - A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE
000210 - AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOTA, IN
000300 - AMERICAN WATER WORKS
000400 - ANOKA COUNTY
000420 - ANOKA COUNTY
000479 - BLAINE DISCOUNT CENTER
000487 - ASHLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY
000705 - BRW, INC.
000720 - BLAINE, CITY OF
000730 - BOB'S CIRCLE PLUMBING
000900 - BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.
000950 - C. W. HOULE, INC.
000980 - CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.
001050 - CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS
001100 - CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE
001110 - CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
001240 - CURTIS 1000 INC.
001261 - D C. HEY COMPANY, INC.
001330 - DORADUS CORPORATION, INC.
001350 - E. G. RUD & SONS, INC.
001361 - ESI COMMUNICATIONS NORTH, INC.
001390 - ECM PUBLISHERS, INC
3.32
1,815.96
179.54
38.65
300.00
120.00
120.00
29.78
431.11
270.00
5,095.03
73.15
543.58
91,347.95
60.39
35.00
64.00
21.85
631.75
89.81
1,554.00
563.20
118.00
140.80
' Page: 2
Date: 07/02/96
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
001480 - FEED RITE CONTROLS, INC. 4,230.73
001486 - FESTIVAL FOODS 14.22
001531 - FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING, INC. 117,480.86
001550 - FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 270.30
001578 - FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GEO, INC. 128.99
001608 - GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY/INC 216.47
001620 - GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 110.22
001628 - GME CONSULTANTS, INC. 2,587.84
001940 - INTERIOR COMM SYSTEM, INC. 347.82
002009 - J & A HANDY -CRAFTS, INC. 201.75
002320 - LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TUT 425.06
002340 - LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC. 338.29
002511 - MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY, INC. 3,339.05
002700 - MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 182.21
002711 - MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION 12.78
002780 - MN. DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 46.50
002870 - MN. CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY, INC. 168.29
003070 - MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 149.55
003150 - NEAL, ANDY 40.16
003270 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 6,220.00
003310 - NORTHWAY SPTS & GARDEN, INC. 21.69
003390 - OFFICEMAX, INC. 176.19
003789 - RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 178.80
003870 - S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 65.37
003880 - SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. 1,487.29
003921 - SCHIELD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 85,797.49
Page: 3
Date: 07/02/96
City of Lino Lakes
Summary Claims Roster
Vendor - Company Name Amount
004070 - SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM, INC.
004120 - ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC.
004125 - ST. PAUL CITY OF
004150 - STAR TRIBUNE
004251 - SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC.
004340 - T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC.
004400 - TESCH, DAN
004410 - THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC.
004452 - TOMARK SPORTS, INC.
004485 - TRIARCO ARTS/CRAFTS INC.
004540 - TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO.,,INC
.
004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
004762 - WALGREENS
004790 - WATERPRO SUPPLIES CORPORATION
004860 - WYLAND, MARY KAY
900007 - SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA
900017 - STS CONSULTANTS LTD.
900030 - KILLER HAY SEEDS, THE
900031 - BOB & THE BEACHCOMBERS
464.40
728.20
1,000.00
25.00
854.66
4,907.65
107.76
153.83
179.09
411.75
61.25
36.15
4.58
443.01
30.54
109.00
1,832.50
800.00
1,000.00
Total for Checking Account: 1010 341,034.16
** Total ** $341,034.16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
STAFF ORIGINATOR Fire Chief, Milo Bennett
DATE July 3,1996
TOPIC
BACKGROUND:
Consideration of Annual Centennial Fire District
Report and 1997 Operating Budget
2. Rctwrn t+o for
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
PROPOSED
1997 BUDGET
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
1997 BUDGET
The 1997 Budget that we are submitting for your approval represents just over 1/4
of one percent increase over the 1996 budget amount.
This small amount of increase is possible because of significant decreases in some
of the accounts.
The accounts that have any significant changes will be explained on the attached
sheet.
The 1997 Budget as proposed will allow us to continue to lower the cost per
household for the fire district.
The action sought from this group is approval of the budget so that it can be taken
forward.
The budget must be approved by each of the three city councils.
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
1997 BUDGET
Changes from 1996 Budget:
5030 Fire Calls:
5035 Rescue Calls:
This account is the payroll account for the firefighters when they
are responding to fire calls. The amount budgeted in 1996 was too
high after reviewing our past history.
This account is the payroll account for the firefighters to medical
type calls. Medical calls represent 58% of our emergency calls.
History indicates that this account needed to be raised for 1997.
5045 Maintenance Drills: This is the payroll account for the firefighters doing maintenance on
the buildings and equipment. This account was reduced in 1996 by
2000 and history has indicated that the amount should be increased
by $1,000 for 1997.
5050 Inspection Wages: This is the payroll account which is used when the inspections of
the businesses are being conducted. We are inspecting more
commerical property each year.
5060 Vehicle Maintenance: This account represents the cost of maintenance for the vehicle
used by the fire district. This account continues to be reduced
because of the fact we now have newer vehicles.
5310 Insurance: Insurance costs have been lowered because of improved workman's
compensation rates.
5312 Medical Physicals: The physicals did not cost us as much as we planned for 1996.
Medical physicals is an ongoing program for the firefighters.
5350 Office Supplies: We are using more office supplies than we planned in 1996.
5380 Telephone:
5400 Salaried Positions:
Depreciation:
This covers the cost of all the phones in three stations. Included is a
leased line for each station which is connected to Anoka County
dispatch center. History has shown us we need to increase this
amount.
This account represents the salaries paid to the officer's of the fire
district. These salaries are for management responsibilities over
and above fire and medical calls. We want to have a small increase
in these salaries.
Because we have sold a vehicle that was being depreciated this
amount has been taken out of the depreciation schedule.
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT BUDGET
Accouit
1996
1997
Change
% Change
5020
Logistic Supplies
1,000
1,000
0
0.00%
5030
Fire Calls
36,000
32,000
(4,000)
-12.50%
5035
Rescue Calls
21,000
28,000
7,000
25.00%
5040
Training Calls
20,000
20,000
0
0.00%
5045
Maintenence Drills
8,000
9,000
1,000
11.11%
5050
Inspection Wages
8,000
9,000
, 1,000
11.11%
5060
Fire Prevention Wages
3,000
3,000
0
0.00%
5210
Vehicle Maintenence
23,000
20,000
(3,000)
-15.00%
5211
Fuel and Lube
5,500
5,500
0
0.00%
5212
Other Maintenence
10,000
10,000
0
0.00%
5300
Uniforms
2,000
2,000
0
0.00%
5305
Equipment
30,000
30,000
0
0.00%
5310
Insurance
28,000
25,000
(3,000)
-12.00%
5312
Medical Physicals
5,000
3,000
(2,000)
-66.67%
5320
Accounting Services
3,200
3,200
0
0.00%
5325
Legals
2,000
2,000
0
0.00%
5350
Office Supplies and Printing
4,500
6,000
1,500
25.00%
5355
Community Service
, 5,000
5,000
0
0.00%
5360
Dues and Memberships
2,000
2,000
0
0.00%
5365
Subscriptions
1,000
1,000
0
0.00%
5370
Travel and Conferences/Schools
14,000
14,000
0
0.00%
5375
Cleaning Supplies and Services
6,000
6,000
0
0.00%
5380
Telephone
5,000
7,000
2,000
28.57%
5385
Utilities
18,000
18,000
0
0.00%
5390
Medical Supplies
500
500
0
0.00%
5395
Breathing Air
3,000
3,000
0
0.00%
5400
Saleried Positions
15,000
15,500
500
3.23%
5425
Part Time Secretery
9,000
9,000
0
0.00%
5510
District Chief
48,600
50,500
1,900
3.76%
5511
Steering Committee Secretery
250
250
0
0.00%
5999
Payroll Taxes and Benifits
13,000
13,500
500
3.70%
Total
350,550
353,950
3,400
0.96%
Relief Association
19,000
19,500
500
2.56%
Depreciation
11,237
9,570
(1,667)
-17.42%
Common Area Charges
28,052
27,149
(903)
-3.33%
Total
408,839
410,169
1,330
0.32%
Capital Equipment
100,000
100,000
0
0.00%
Total Budget
508,839
510,169
1,330
0.26%
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
STAFF ORIGINATOR Peter Kluegel, Building Official
DATE July 3,1996
TOPIC
BACKGROUND:
Consideration of FIRST READING, Ordinance
No. -08.96, Amending the Ordinance on
Mandatory Septic Pumping
On September 25, 1995, the Lino Lakes City Council approved a resolution supporting a
revision to the Lino Lakes City Code relating to the inspection ofitidtvidual sewage
teeniest systems. This resolution to the Code was required by the Metropolitan Council
because the City's current is tri satisfactory. The current code on inspections of
;e tre fitment systems regi p rty owners wit. sewage t atment s
tab1
again.
a biennial inspection by a certified
met in which the inspection can occur on
is as follows:
1 an inspection report form by March 1 of each year to properties
coWinning on-site sewage disposal systems due to be inspected. All systems will
be inspected biennially except for those systems that have less than 50% of the
allowable sludge and scum and meet the current MPCA 7080 design criteria aft
re -inspection that request triennial inspection.
property owner receiving an inspection report form is to have their septic
pumped, the tank and system inspected, and return the report form to the City
by September 1 of the same year.
ORDINANCE NO. 08 - 96
Page -2-
3. The system inspection will include pumping of the tank, evaluation of the
condition of the tank and baffles, and an examination of the drainfield for
evidence of system failure.
4. The inspection of the tank and system is to be made by a certified inspector. A
listing of certified inspectors is available from the MPCA and will also be
available from the City.
5. Failure by the property owner to complete the form and return it to the City will
be cause for the City to have the system pumped and inspected. The City will
contract to have the work done with all costs to be assessed to the property.
Staff has contacted Metropolitan Council and reviewed the proposed Code changes to
insure that all Metropolitan Council concerns have been addressed. Ordinance No. 08 -
96 will meet their requirements. I woifld recommend that the City Council adopt a
motion approving the FIRST READING or Ordinance No. 08 - 96.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 08 - 96..
2. Return to staff for further information or corrections.
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE Na a8 - 96
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 403, INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE
TREATMENT SYSTEMS
SECTION 403.04, Subd. 2, is hereby deleted and replaced by the following:
SECTION 403.04 Inspection, Subd. 2. Existing System Inspection Procedure:
1. The City will mail an inspection report form by March 1st of each year to
properties containing on-site sewage disposal systems due to be inspected. All
systems will be inspected biennially except for those systems which are up to
code and have less than 50% of the allowable sludge and scum after re -inspection.
These property owners may request a triennial inspection of their systems.
2. Each property owner receiving an inspection report form is to have their septic
tank pumped; the tank inspected; and the report form returned to the City by
September 1 of the same year.
3. The system inspection will include pumping the tank, evaluation of the condition
of the tank and baffles, and an examination of the drainfield area for evidence of
system failure.
4. The inspection of the tank and system is to be made by a qualified person as
determined by the City according to MPCA rules and regulations.
5. Failure by the property owner to complete the form and return it to the City will
be cause for the City to have the system pumped and inspected. The City will
contract to have the work done with all costs to be assessed to the property.
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE -2-
This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication according to the
City Charter.
Passed this day of
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
, 1996.
John L. Landers, Mayor
Motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
AGENDA ITEM : 5A
STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland/Northwest Associated
Consultants
July 3, 1996
96-20-PDO/Rezone/Preliminary Plat
Bruce Hanson, Surfside Seaplane Base
DATE
TOPIC
......................................
Northwest Associated Consultants has reviewed this request and
prepared a report that will be outlined at the Council Meeting.
The Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the rezoning,
preliminary plat and PDO at their June 12th meeting with the
conditions outlined in the staff report. Their comments are
attached for your information. The Board also discussed this item
at their May P & Z meeting in a concept form and indicated at that
time that they concurred with the concept. Mr. Hanson then
proceeded with his application.
As the Council is aware, work is being initiated on the City's
Comprehensive Plan and this area is included in one of the first
neighborhood_ groups to be studied. Council directed staff, at the
Work Session of June 19, 1996 to defer any rezoning requests in
study areas untiLcompletion of , that portion of the plan. For that
reason, it mayJbe apropriate for this matter to be delayed. The
applicant has. been advised of this information and will be present
at the Council meetingto discuss his options.
1. Deny PDO, Rezoning and preliminary plat.
2. Table request until completion of Comprehensive Plan.
3. Request applicant to withdraw request until completion of
Comprehensive Plan.
Council discretion
.06/20/96 THU 15:49 FAX
i-► + LINO LAKES 140013
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
NNE 12, 1996
He intends to fence the property and request rezoning Staff recommends approval of the
rezoning of Parcel B to conform to the zoning of Parcel A.
Chair Schaps asked what type of equipment will be rented.
Ms. Wyland stated that lawn and garden equipment will be for rent, i.e., roto tillers, lawn
mowers, etc.
Mr. Carlson stated that there is an existing pole barn on the property which he plans to
remove to build a permanent structure at some later date.
Mr. Dunn asked if the rental equipment would be contained within a building, or stored
outside.
Mr. Carlson stated that there will be some outside storage. Screened fencing will prevent
visibility of the site.
Ms. Wyland noted that a Conditional Use Permit for outside storage is required, and the
applicant will have to come back to the Board for its approval.
Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to approve the minor
conditions: Y ` o .
Tract A and B shall be combined to provide for one
parcel.
2. No park dedication shall be required as no additional structures are proposed to be
constructed.
3. The applicant shall apply for rezoning of Tract B prior to any additional land use
applications..
Mr. Johnson seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0, with Mr. Robinson abstaining.
H. 96-20-PDO/Rezone, Bruce Hanson, Surfside Seaplane Base, Rezoning, Planned
Development Overlay and Preliminary Plat
City Planning Consultant, Bob Kermis stated that Mr. Hanson has submitted plans for five
single family lots with access to the Surfside Seaplane Base. With this application is a
proposal to rezone 11 acres to R 1X from General Business to build the homes. The Hansons
intend to retain the existing General Business portion shown as Lot 7 along Lake Drive. A
number of approvals are necessary to accommodate the proposed development:
13
.06/20/96 THU 15:50 FAX
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
JUNE 12, 1996
LINO LAAES LOU14
1. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Land Use Plan which now
suggests a business use of this property.
2_ A finding that indicates the appropriateness of the proposed land use to justify
rezoning the portion that will be designated residential.
3_ A PDO overlay of air strip accessible lots is necessary to accommodate oversized
accessory buildings
4. Preliminary plat.
Mr. Kermis stated that he believes there is justification for either rezoning the property or
denying its coition. It is the City's policy not to down -zone commercial property unless
there is an equitable land exchange or unique conditions that make the change appropriate.
In order to approve the proposal, the Board must make findings that support the special
conditions that make the proposed land use acceptable. The proposed use could be found to
be compatible with the lots to the north toward Aqua Lane which is south of a multi-fsmily
development. This development could be a natural barrier to a higher intense commercial use.
The Comprehensive Plan provides for the following conditions that would support the
proposed residential use:
'Future community development shall take into account social, economic, and
environmental opporpities and consraints in an effort to provide an optira
arrangement of future Land use actio lies.
A variety of residehn9l dev�eiopnsent typesfis desirable and shall be e�n �couraged
in the.commtunty. Panic lar areas ofth�e Ci y shall be designated for each of
the desired housing types which range from muni y residential to Waal."
Mr. Kermis fiuther stated that the City is in the process of updating its Comprehensive Plan.
This site is included in that study, and the Planning Board may wish to make a finding that
rezoning is premature until the Comprehensive Plan document is completed. Should the City
find this particular use to be appropriate, he would recommend approval of the preliminary
plat, subject to the 12 conditions listed in the staffreport.
Mr. Johnson asked if Lot 6 and Outlot A are contiguous and could be combined.
Mr. Kermis responded that they would be combined to the seaplane base to the east.
Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 8:50 p.m.
Mr. Wessel, Economic Development Director, stated that he believes this project is
premature. The Comprehensive Plan review process has been underway since the beginning
of the year. Sessions have been held with the City Council, and meetings will be scheduled
14
.06/20/96 THU 15:50 FAX
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
JUNE 12, 1996
+ +� LINO LArit.S c U15
for input from residents. It will take a year to complete the review process. The review will
focus on the Highway 49 corridor from Hodgson Road to Lila because of the increased
activity in that area and its strategic importance. Comprehensive land use valuations will be
done to develop direction to reorganize that corridor. Secondly, there is the issue of not
losing commercially zoned property in the City. Also, there is the possibility of setting a
precedent that precludes the Comprehensive Plan update process. There is a lot of interest
in rezoning, and approval of this project could snowball into similar requests.
Mr. Bruce Hanson, Owner of Surfside Seaplane Base, stated that he is opposed to any further
studies and would like to see the project approved at this time. With regard to the
Comprehensive Plan, Surfside Seaplane Base is part of the metro airport system and should
be protected against planning for conunamity development. Land use changes were attempted
in 1977 and again in 1984. It is time to move ahead and approve the appropriate land use.
As of this date, he has three, and perhaps four buyers for the proposed residential lots.
Chair Schaps asked ifthere has been any response to this project from residents to the north
Mr. Hanson stated that he has heard nothing.
Ms. Wyland stated that she received one phone call from Mr. McFee, who lives in the
townhomes. His only question was the purpose of the taxiways whether
wheels, the hours of operation.and noise that may be generated from those
dims the daily hours of operation and the special equipment used to move the p
the base, he had no objections. •
Mr. J.P. Houchins stated that he has no objections. The sea planes are fun, and there
are not many around. Residents do not want to see the area rezoned for more townhomes.
He does not have an opinion on what type of commercial business might fit the area, but
upscale housing would be attractive to local residents.
Mr. Johnson noted that although the land would be zoned residential, the property owners
would be supporting a Lino Lakes business. The City would not necessarily lose business
property because this residential property would be part of a larger commercial complex,
which is a significant economic component.
Mr. Wessel agreed with Mr. Johnson but stated that the land use must be separate between
private residential and commercial use.
Mr. Robinson was excused and left at 9:00 p.m.
Mr_ Dunn asked if anyone else has come forward with a better use for this land.
15
.06/20/96 11iU 15.51 FAA
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
JUNE 12, 1996
y-+� L11vV LAAtJ culla
Mr. Wessel stated that this land is zoned General Business and no other business candidates
have made a proposal. It is a difficult parcel because it is split by wetland, and the parcel off
Aqua Lane is somewhat removed. EDAB is concerned about protecting current land uses
until the Comprehensive Plan review is complete and a design for the whole area can be
developed. A decision to consolidate should be made by the community as well as public
officials.
Mr. Johnson asked if this development would attractother kinds of businesses to locate close
to the landing site.
Mr. Hanson responded that it would be a possibility.. He has an inquiry about space from a
company in Anoka that is recognized as the premier plane engine rebuilder. The issue of
generating the same tax dollars as General Business zoning is addressed by the fact that the
land has been vacant for a number of years generating no tax dollars. His project will be bulk
within the next year and will bring tax dollars to the City.
Mr. Wessel stated that he can understand the Zoning. Board's position to deem this project
appropriate for the site. He noted an earlier meeting of interested parties, including Mr.
Hokanson and Mr. Hanson, that was held to consider a study of land use designations for the
area : The decasion of the group was to not pursue a study. It would have been helpfiil now
in reviewing a specific proposal.
Mr. Herr noted that for the project to move forward, approval of a Comprehensive Plan
amendment is needed.
Mr. Kermis stated that the amendment is a minor one. The Metropolitan Council will only
respond if there is a problem.
Mr. Herr asked if utilities are installed on Aqua Lane.
Ms. Wyland answered, yes.
Qty Engineer Ahrens added that the utilities were put in when the Marshan Townhomes were
built. This property was then stubbed. If business development is considered in the area,
Aqua Lane could support a business lice Mr. Hanson's. It could not support a business that
uses semi trucks.
Mr_ Dunn asked how long Mr. Hanson has been in business.
Mr_ Hanson answered, since the 1960's.
16
.06/20/96 THU 15:51 FAX
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
JUNE 12, 1996
LINU LAALb t(y Ul!
Mr. Dunn noted that Mr_ Hanson has been a good neighbor and has an excellent reputation
in the business community. He would support this proposal and urged other Board members
to support it.
Mr_ Johnson stated that office/business would fit on Aqua Lane, but there is not a high
demand for that type of development in Lino Lakes, and there are other sites that would be
appropriate for office development. He would not anticipate office development on this site
in the foreseeable future. To retain General Business District zoning would mean that the
land will be vacant for a long time. This proposal would be a unique economic asset to the
community that would link a residential development to the sea plane base. He stated that
he also would support the project.
Mr_ Herr agreed that this residential project would uniquely fit this area and would support
it.
Mr. Gelbmann stated that this development would provide a good buffer along the edge of
the residential area to the north and would make a nice transition from residential to
commercial areas. The sea plane base bas been a long-standing business in the community
and he would support the economic viability of keeping existing businesses. He expressed
concerns, however, about losing a General Business District and suggested that options.be
explored to arrange some type of land exchange.
Ms. Dahl stated that she agrees with the other Board members and would have no opposition
as long as residents are not opposed. It is an opportunity to put land to use that has stood
vacant. Rezoning to R -1X will bring expensive, large homes on big lots.
Mr. Johnson asked about the air safety zones south of the base along Lake Drive. The area
is zoned light industrial, and there is an area zoned R-1 that fronts Lake Drive south of the
Marshan Townhomes. Much of this property is vacant, and he asked if some of it could be
reclaimed for General Business, or Limited Business or Neighborhood Business to make up
for rezoning Mr. Hanson's property.
Mr_ Wessel agreed that there would be potential in that approach. He stated that he is not
surprised that this General Business property bas stood vacant so long. The City is just
beginning to make headway in attracting commercial development. If the Board approves this
project, it would make sense to find an equitable exchange of land along Lake Drive as part
of the planning process.
Chair Schaps stated that he likes Mr. Hanson's proposal and the size of the lots. The property
is unique and the business is unique. There are not many sea plane bases, particularly in the
Twin Cities. He would be interested to have community input on what happens to this
17
.Ub/20/96 111E tA&
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
JUNE 12, 1996
-+-+-+ L11'U LAA .J
property but noted that only one person came to the public hearing. General Business zoning
has been retained on the corner, and he agrees with the idea of an equitable land exchange.
In light of the future residential development to the north, this project is a consistent use of
the property in all respects, and he would favor it.
Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing. Ms. Dahl seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6-0.
Chair Schaps stated that the specific findings of . the Board to justify down -zoning this
property from General Business to R 1X are as follows:
1. The property is rmique in itself in its proximity to Rice Lake and an existing Surfside
Seaplane Base.
2. This proposal would compliment existing business and surrounding new future
residential construction.
3. There is general community approval which would be consistent and necessary for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment.
Mr. Johnson added a further finding that there is a good possibility that the City may be able
to claim land for General Business use in the area.
Chair Soaps added a 13th condition to approval of the preliminary plat, which is that the City
focus on obtaining land for limited business or other business related zoning in exchange for
the land rezoned to R -1X in this project.
Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to recommend approval of an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation of this property to R 1X based on the
following findings:
1. The property is unique in itself in its proximity to Rice Lake and an existing Surfside
Seaplane Base.
2. This proposal would compliment existing business and surrounding new future
residential construction.
3_ There is general community approval that which would be consistent and necessary
for a Comprehensive Plan amendment.
4. There is a good possibility that the City may be able to claim land for General
Business use in the area.
Mr. Dunn seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0.
18
.06/20/96 THU 15:52 FAX
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
JUNE 12, 1996
LINO LAKES 10019
Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to rezone the eastern portion of the site (air strip accessible lots)
from General Business to R -1X, Single Family Executive. Mr_ Gelbmann seconded the
motion_ Motion carried 6-0.
Mr. Herr made a MOTION to recommend approval of the PDO overlay of air strip accessible
lots to accommodate oversized accessory buildings. Ms. Dahl seconded the motion. Motion
carried 6-0.
Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to recommend approval of the preliminary plat with the
conditions listed below from the staff report and including the 13th condition stated above.
1. The preliminary plat is revised such that Lot 6 and Oudot A are combined with the
adjacent Surfside Seaplane Base property.
2. Hanger building materials and heights are specified and found to comply with
applicable City requirements.
3. Seaplane hangers shall not exceed 2,400 square feet in size.
4. No detached accessory buildings. other than seaplane hangers, are allowed.
S. A copy of restrictive covenants shall be applied to the proposed residential lots and
submitted for City review and approval. Such covenants must address architectural
requirements for hangers and include a provision that such hangers are to be used
solely for airplane (seaplane) and related equipment storage.
6. It is demonstrated to the City that wetland boundaries have been delineated by a
qualified
7. Drainage and utility easements are provided along all lot lines and a drainage
is provided over the site's wetland. This issue should be subject to further
comment by the City Engineer.
8. All park dedication requirements as determined by the City Park Board are
satisfactorily met.
9. A grating and drainage plan shall be submitted. Such plan shall be subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer.
10. All conditions of operation, as required by the FAA and/or Minnesota Department of
Aeronautics, are satisfied.
11. The Qty Engineer shall provide comments and recommendations in regard to utility
issues.
12_ Comments from other City staff.
13. The City ofLino Lakes shall focus on obtaining additional business related property
in the area for an equitable land exchange for the property rezoned R 1X.
Mr. Dunn seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0.
19
JUN-{'J'(-1'Jyb 1G.4I
A
NHL b1G 5`J5 'JdS( H.01
Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
C COMMUNITY PLANNING • DESIGN • MARKET RESEARCH
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Mary Kay Wyland
FROM: Bob Kirmis
DATE: 7 June 1996
RE: Lino Lakes - Surfside Addition Rezoning and Final Plat
FILE NO: 194.01 - 96.05
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
Bruce and Mim Hanson have submitted plans to develop five, air strip accessible single
family residential lots upon a portion of a 18.6 acre parcel of land located east of Lake, and
south of Aqua Lane. Specifically, such lots are Intended to be provided accessto:
adjacent Surfside Seaplane Base via a taxiway easement. The subject P roPee
rty is
currently zoned GB, General Business.
To accommodate the proposed development, the following approvals are necessary:
1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Land Use Plan).
2. Rezoning of the eastem portion of the site (alr strip accessible Tots) from GB,
General Business to R -1X, Single Family Executive.
3. PDO overlay of air strip accessible lots to accommodate oversized accessory
buildings.
4. Preliminary plat.
Attached for reference:
Exhibit A - Site Location
Exhibit B - Detailed Site Location
Exhibit C - Land Use Plan
Exhibit D - Preliminary Plat
Exhibit E - House/Hanger Detail
Exhibit F - Air Safety Zones
5775 Wayzata Blvd. - Suite 555 • St. Louis Park. MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837
JUIN-el1G•YJG I71G D7D ib)( r.l7G
Recommendation
The City's 1991 Comprehensive Plan suggests commercial use of the subject property.
While the down zoning of property is commonly discouraged within the City (unless a land
trade is negotiated) a rezoning of the eastern portion of the subject property may be
justified in consideration of the site's context and physical characteristics of the site. Also
to be noted is that the area in question is to be subject to specific study as part of the
Comprehensive Plan Update. In this Tight, rezoning at this time may be considered
premature. Matters of land use appropriateness are, however, considered City policy
issues to be determined by City officials.
If the City finds the proposed R-1X/PDO rezoning to be acceptable, it should be approved
only upon fulfillment of the following:
• The necessary Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved by the Metropolitan
Council.
• The City approve the proposed subdivision (parcel must be created to which R -1X
zone is to be applied).
Should the City approve the requested rezoning, our office recommends approval of the
Surfside Addition preliminary plat subject to the following conditions:
1. The prefiminary:plat is revised such that Lot.6 and Oudot A are combined with the
adjacent Surfside Seaplane base property.
2.Hanger building materials and heights are specified and `found to comply with
applicable City requirements.
3. Seaplane hangers not exceed 2,400 square feet in size.
4. No detached accessory buildings other than the Seaplane hangers are allowed.
5. A copy of restrictive covenants be applied to the proposed residential lots are
submitted for City review and approval. Such covenants must address architectural
requirements for hangers and indude a provision that such hangers are to be used
solely for airplane (seaplane) and related equipment storage.
6. It is demonstrated to the City that wetland boundaries have been delineated by a
qualified individual.
2
JUN-0'?-19ybb 12=0i
NHL 612 595 983'l H.03
7. Drainage and utility easements are provided along all lot lines and a drainage
easement is provided over the site's wetland. This issue should be subject to
further comment by the City Engineer.
8. All park dedication requirements as detem,ined by the City Park Board are
satisfactorily met.
9. A grading and drainage plan be submitted. Such plan shall be subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer.
10. All conditions of operation as required by the FAA and/or Minnesota Department
of Aeronautics are satisfied.
11. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation in regard to utility issues.
12. Comments from other City staff.
13 Ockti Set,. 4?), IS), oR some_ evvrmeir.est a\ ono
f4 0.a..ISSUES ANALYSIS Bei '�� �
a C>'Gk ss
Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Amendment:
As noted previously, both a Comprehensive Plan amendment (minor) and rezoning will be
necessary to accommodate the proposed use: These requests are interrelated
considering that a basis for rezoning evaluation is the use's consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Specifically, the applicants have proposed to rezone the eastern ane -half of the subject
property from GB, General Business to R 1X, Single Family Executive. The portion of the
subject property which flanks the Lake Drive corridor is to retain its existing GB, General
Business zoning designation. That portion of the site proposed for R -1X zoning is to be
overlaid by a PDO, Planned Development Overlay zoning designation. Such designation
will allow some flexibility from the strict provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, particularly in
regard to accessory building requirements. In review of all rezoning requests, the
following criteria should be considered.
Comprehensive Plan. As shown on Exhibit B, the City's Land Use Plan suggests
commercial (business) use of the subject property. While the western 7.6 acres of the
subject property (along Lake Drive) is proposed to retain its current GB zoning
designation, the proposed residential use (rezoning) of the eastem 11.0 acres will require
an amendment to the City's Land Use Plan.
3
111-1‘..
b1G D 7 70J (
While the City's economic development policy discourages the down zoning of commercial
property, it is believed the physical characteristics of the eastern portion of the site make
future commercial use questionable (i.e., visibility, wetland containment, etc.). In this
regard, the proposed air strip accessible residential Tots may represent an appropriate use
of the eastern portion of property.
The proposed residential use is also supported by the following Comprehensive Plan
policies:
• Future community development shall take into account social, economic, and
environmental opportunities and constraints in an effort to provide an optimal
arrangement of future land use activities.
• A variety of residential development types is desirable and shall be encouraged in
the community. Particular areas of the City shall be designated for each of the
desired housing types which range from multi family residential to rural.
While the preceding policies would tend to support the proposed land use, a change to the
City's Land Use Plan is considered a matter of City policy to be determined by City
officials.
Also to be noted in this matter Is that the issue of land use appropriateness of the area will
be specifically examined as part of the City's pending Comprehensive Plan Update. If the
City feels rezoning of the subject property would, at this time, be "premature", the
postponing of action may be considered. Such action should, however, be contingent
upon a request for extension by the applicant.
The requested rezoning request should be subject to recommendation by the EDAB.
Compatibility. To determine the compatibility of the proposed use, it is considered
beneficial to examine existing and anticipated land uses which surround the subject
property. The following is a listing of land uses and zoning designations which lie adjacent
to the subject property:
Direction
Land Use
Zoning
North
Multiple Family
R-4
South
Residential
R-1
East
Surfside Seaplane Base
R-1
West
Commercial
GB
4
JUDY -YJ( -1770 1G•104 IVYIt_. 01G J7J 70Jf
In many ways, the proposed land use represents a westward expansion of the Surfside
Seaplane Base, as all residential units are to have base access via a taxiway easement.
Considering the orientation of dwelling units and the existence (and location) of the site's
wetland, it is believed the proposed residential use can compatibly exist upon the subject
property.
Public Services. Public sanitary sewer and water service is available to the subject
property as a result of the Marshan Townhomes development This issue should be
subject to comment by the City Engineer.
Performance Standards. As part of the City's consideration of the preliminary plat and
forthcoming final plat, the proposed use will be required to comply with applicable
performance standards. Specific items of issue will be discussed in the preliminary plat
review section of this report.
Preliminary Plat:
In addition to the rezoning/Comprehensive Plan amendment request, the applicant has
also requested preliminary plat approval of a seven lot subdivision, six lots of which are
to be rezoned to an R -1X zoning designation. The remaining lot along Lake Drive is to
retain its existing GB, General Business zoning designation.
Lot Layout. While the general lot layout is viewed as acceptable, some concerns exist
in regard to the designations of Lot 6 and Outlot A Technically, a lot cannot be created
within the City which is not provided public street access.: While It is acknowledged that
Lot 6 is to overlay a wetland, It Is recommended that the lot be combined with the acjacent
Surfside Seaplane Base property which Iles to the east.
Likewise, it is also recommended that Outlot A (located in the northeast portion of the
subject site) be combined with the existing Seaplane Base property to avoid the creation
of a lot remnant.
Lot Dimensional Requirements. M proposed lots have been found to comply with R -IX
and GB District dimensional requirements, as listed below:
5
JUN -07-1996 12:04 NAC
612 595 9837 P.06
interior lot width requirement applicable.
As noted previously, it is recommended that Lot 6 (which is overlaid almost entirely by a
wetland) and Outlot A be legally combined with the adjacent Seaplane Base property.
Streets. No new streets have been proposed as part of the proposed subdivision. The
air strip accessible Tots are to receive access from Aqua Lane while the commercially
zoned parcel (Lot 7) is to be provided access from the west via Lake Drive.
PDO, Planned Development Overlay. To accommodate the unique and creative
circumstancessurrounding the proposed air strip accessible residential lots (e.g. air
hangers), a PDO, Planned Development Overlay of such Lots has been proposed. The
PDO designation will allow for some flexibility from the strict provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance, particularly in regard to accessory building requirements. Appropriately, the
applicant has submitted plans detailing hanger locations, sizes and relationships to
principal structures.
According to the submitted plans, Seaplane hangers are to measure a maximum of 2,400
square feet in size (40 feet by 60 feet).
As part of the PDO, the following conditions should be upheld:
1. Hanger building materials and height are specified.
2_ Seaplane hangers not exceed 2,400 square feet in size.
3. No other detached accessory buildings other than the referenced hangers are
allowed.
4. A copy of applicable restrictive covenants to be applied to the Airpark lots should
be submitted for City review and approval. The aforementioned site plan should
require architectural controls be placed upon hangers and specify that such
hangers are to be used solely for airplane (seaplane) and related equipment
storage.
6
R -1X District
(Lots 1-5)
GB District
(Lot 7)
Required
Proposed
Required
Proposed
Lot Area
12,825 SF
37,500 SF
20,000 SF
7.6 acres
Lot Width*
90 feet
125 feet
100 feet
900+ feet
Lot Depth
135 feet
300 feet
None
280 feet
interior lot width requirement applicable.
As noted previously, it is recommended that Lot 6 (which is overlaid almost entirely by a
wetland) and Outlot A be legally combined with the adjacent Seaplane Base property.
Streets. No new streets have been proposed as part of the proposed subdivision. The
air strip accessible Tots are to receive access from Aqua Lane while the commercially
zoned parcel (Lot 7) is to be provided access from the west via Lake Drive.
PDO, Planned Development Overlay. To accommodate the unique and creative
circumstancessurrounding the proposed air strip accessible residential lots (e.g. air
hangers), a PDO, Planned Development Overlay of such Lots has been proposed. The
PDO designation will allow for some flexibility from the strict provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance, particularly in regard to accessory building requirements. Appropriately, the
applicant has submitted plans detailing hanger locations, sizes and relationships to
principal structures.
According to the submitted plans, Seaplane hangers are to measure a maximum of 2,400
square feet in size (40 feet by 60 feet).
As part of the PDO, the following conditions should be upheld:
1. Hanger building materials and height are specified.
2_ Seaplane hangers not exceed 2,400 square feet in size.
3. No other detached accessory buildings other than the referenced hangers are
allowed.
4. A copy of applicable restrictive covenants to be applied to the Airpark lots should
be submitted for City review and approval. The aforementioned site plan should
require architectural controls be placed upon hangers and specify that such
hangers are to be used solely for airplane (seaplane) and related equipment
storage.
6
J UIY-YJ! J- -II, 1G•UY Ilink-
of J7J DO.) ( r. 4d (
5. PDO performance standards shall be recorded with the properties in question and
shall apply regardless of ownership.
Setbacks. All R -1X Tots (proposed) have been found to have an ability to comply with the
following R-1 X District setbacks:
Wetland. Lot 6 of the proposed subdivision is overlaid almost entirely by a wetland.
WhIIe no wetland impact/ mitigation has been proposed, specific wetland boundaries must
be delineated by a person recognized as qualified by the City for such work. To ensure
that such wetland is reserved for the storage of storm water, It is recommended that a
drainage easement over the wetland be provided. This issue should be subject to further
comment and recommendation by the City Engineer.
Easements.. As mentioned previously, a drainage easement should be placed over the
subject site's wetland. Additionally, drainage and utility easements should be placed along
all lot lines.
To gain access to hangers, a 50 foot wide private taxiway easement has been proposed.
Applicable restrictive covenants should address maintenance responsibilities for such
easement.
Parks. The proposed subdivision should be subject to review and comment by the City
Park Board in regard to preferred dedication requirements.
Grading and Drainage. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, a grading and
drainage plan must be submitted subject to review and comment by the City Engineer.
Air Space Obstruction Zoning. The subject property lies directly adjacent to the
Surfside Seaplane Base landing strip. According to the FAA, the following setback
requirements are imposed on private landing strips:
• 125 foot setback from runway centerline_
▪ 200 foot setback from roadway ends.
7
Required Setback
Front Yard
30 feet
Side Yard - Principal Building
Side Yard - Accessory Building
10 feet
5 feet
Rear Yard - Principal Building
Rear Yard - Accessory Building
30 feet*
5 feet
Wetland. Lot 6 of the proposed subdivision is overlaid almost entirely by a wetland.
WhIIe no wetland impact/ mitigation has been proposed, specific wetland boundaries must
be delineated by a person recognized as qualified by the City for such work. To ensure
that such wetland is reserved for the storage of storm water, It is recommended that a
drainage easement over the wetland be provided. This issue should be subject to further
comment and recommendation by the City Engineer.
Easements.. As mentioned previously, a drainage easement should be placed over the
subject site's wetland. Additionally, drainage and utility easements should be placed along
all lot lines.
To gain access to hangers, a 50 foot wide private taxiway easement has been proposed.
Applicable restrictive covenants should address maintenance responsibilities for such
easement.
Parks. The proposed subdivision should be subject to review and comment by the City
Park Board in regard to preferred dedication requirements.
Grading and Drainage. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, a grading and
drainage plan must be submitted subject to review and comment by the City Engineer.
Air Space Obstruction Zoning. The subject property lies directly adjacent to the
Surfside Seaplane Base landing strip. According to the FAA, the following setback
requirements are imposed on private landing strips:
• 125 foot setback from runway centerline_
▪ 200 foot setback from roadway ends.
7
JUIN -!'J I-1770 IC. UJ IVI-K.
• 20 to 1 approach may not be obstructed.
01e J7J 70J( r. 1b
in addition to the aforementioned requirements, uses proximate to the landing strip must
comply with the safety zone requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (see Exhibit F for
reference).
Zone A. Areas designated as Zone A shall contain no buildings, temporary
structures, exposed transmission lines, or other similar above -ground land
use structural hazards, and shall be restrictive to those uses which will not
create, attract, or bring together an assembly of persons thereon. Permitted
uses may include, but are not limited to, such uses as agriculture (seasonal
crops), horticulture, animal husbandry, raising of livestock, wildlife habitat,
light outdoor recreation (non -spectator), cemeteries, vehicle parking lots,
and single family dwellings.
Zone B. Areas designated as Zone B shall be restricted in use as follows:
1. Each use shall be on a site whose area shall not be less than one (1)
acre.
2. The following uses are specifically prohibited in Zone B: churches,
hospitals, schools, theaters, stadiums, hotels and motels,
campgrounds, and other places of frequent public or semi-public
assembly.
As shown on Exhibit F, the land use safety zones do not appear to have an
Impact on the submitted development plan.
As a condition of preliminary plat approval, all applicable conditions of operations are
specified by the FAA and/or Minnesota Department of Aeronautics must be satisfied.
Utilities. Utilities for the proposed single family dwellings are to be extended from Aqua
Lane. The City Engineer should provide comment and recommendation in regard to utility
issues.
CONCLUSION
While our office believes justification exists to approve the requested R -1X rezoning and
PDO overlay, changes In land use are considered matters of City policy to be determined
by City officials. Should the City approve the requested rezoning, our office recommends
approval of the Surfside Addition plat subject to the conditions listed in the Executive
Summary of this report.
8
b1G J7J 70J ( t- . 1b
NORTH
1 MILE
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINNESOTA
EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATIO
?hiuika'tLAY
EXHIBIT B - DETAILED SITE LOCATI(
J - bob
RAMU 1L6
;nom.
.30
I I
-
s
•
7
NHL
612 595 98Se P . 12
RESI
IZ 54 4 if •
-' • "-
it:: •••
MARSHAN LAKE
i f
MULTIPL
FA
0
teat- 1:ff.:
EXHIBIT C - LAND USE PL
JUN -Id (-177b 1 G
NHL
b1G J7J 70J(
r. 1.5
PRELIMINARY PLAT
OP: PROPOSED SURPSIDE ADDITION
FOR: BRUCE 4 MIM HANSON
is £cpMIESPA.
a
' NARSHAN.LAKE CONCHA
"
__. .. ar. 413I1
..a—r
SS
w
1
GRAPHIC SC=
•
StIrtFtiglc
SEAri.A? S
ACREAGE/WIDTI-1/DEPTH TABULATION:
RAT j,.
SQUARE FEET
ACREAGE
SETBAOC WIDTH
, DEPTH .
RAT 1
LOT 2
LOT 3
LOT 4
LOT 5
LOT 6
LOT 7
OUTLOT A
37.501 sq.ft
37.501 sq.ft.
37.501 sq.ft.
37.501 sq.fL
36,127 sq.ft.
265.083 sq.ft.
329,602 sq.ft
27,908 sq.ft.
0.86 acres
0.86 acres
0.86 acres
0.86 acres
0.83 acres
6.09 acres
7.56 acres
0.64 acres
125.0 fL wide .
125.0 ft. wide
125.0 ft. wide
125.0 ft. wide
125.0 ft. wide
1350 ft. wide
900+ ft. wide
300 ft. deep
300 ft. deep
300 ft. deep
300 ft. deep
300 ft. deep
100-420 ft. deep
280-400 ft. deep
_
TOTAL AREA
808.724 sq.ft.
, 18.57 acres
,
EXHIBIT D - PRELIMINARY PLA
JUIN -G( -177p 1C• ju INC1L
XISTWG SAN. MH
INV=8.85.34
Cor. of Gov't
t 3. Sec. 20
._- EXISTING O4ERHEA0
POWER LINES
WATERUAIN
IUA_
C/
i5 w
32.5'
t0�
ROD
0
co
0
N
45-1r.
0.
f1�
1 EXISTING rP.v.G
•,"• ...• 1 • •. • • .• • •
SANITARY SElt R 0 0.4OXr
PROPOSED SANITARY
.,PROPOSED
385" • 0.40%
• •• EXISTING 12
1.. .,:• 111
D1/4PROpQ V SAN_ NH
INll�g$7.00
bld 5y5 yC.Sf
N. line of Gov't
Lot 3. Sec. 20
H.14
EXISTING HYDRANT k
EX IS11NG 12' O.I.P.
qv, sse
EXIST1N•
POWER
In
n
0
•
•
•
.
•
• .
3.
�QQIsSi4ADEA AREA FROM
SSS TO R- I
es
moi.`: .
' • ' ,
• -J t •
.•
•
i
1 •
.
• �i
JUN -e)( -WD L 146 NHL bid D7b 7b-5( H.15
PROPOSED OUSEM NC ER L.40'OUT
0
0
0
O
co
32.5'
125.00 f
T
PROPOSED
HOUSE
PAD
60.0'
1
0
i
o PROPOSED
HANGER
CONCRETE 15' 15' }
APRON
0
t 125.00
T
PROPOSED
HOUSE
PAD
1 60.0'
0
co
o PROPOSED o
HANGER
4.10
_-
O 50' GRASS TAXIWAY EASEMENT
o
15'
15'
ES
0
0
32.5'
CONCRETE
— APRON
125.00'
125.00'
EXHIBIT E - HOUSE/HANGER DETAIL
612 595 983?
P. 16
,, • "4::::?....•••,
•-•••:•
wtrq
"0,"-• **1 — '46
•-•••--r
MARSHAN LAKE.
ZONE Et
NE A
NE B
'cs
RICE
LAKE
EXHIBIT F - AIR SAFETY ZONES
TflTOI P 1 a
AGENDA ITEM 5C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland
DATE: 7/3/96
TOPIC: Consideration of MUSA Designation, Pheasant Hills
Preserve 7th Addition, Ed Vaughan
BACKGROUND:
The preliminary plat for Pheasant Hills Preserve was approved in August of 1990. Nine
(9) phases were included in this development and MUSA was allocated to eight (8) of
those phases. Mr. Vaughan has switch Phase 9 with Phase 7 and therefore needs
additional MUSA designation on that Phase.
The Council approved the Final Plat of Pheasant Hills 7th Addition at their June 24, 1996
meeting. That plat consists of 19 lots on 9.44 net acres. Staff would recommend that
9.44 acres of our recently approved 150 Acre MUSA Reserve be allocated to the Pheasant
Hills Preserve 7th Addition.
OPTIONS:
1. Allocate 9.44 net acres of MUSA Reser
Addition.
2. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
to the Pheasant Hills Preserve 7th
589'37'25"E
30.82
—
—
— N89218'34"E 698.82 — — y---
PI-EASANT 1 -ILLS PRESERVE 7TH ADDITION
110277 LINE OF NE 1/4, NW 1/4 SEC. 27
2
H KASANT
u
1f1 LL.L..:
PRESERVrE
uu pwNllnnd2r24 Er
N "FFx 22448
Men elem .4 2 -2.
rJ
'J
rJ
Mal
20.00
l`NIr
vv I
V46,"
•
2004
I 7 �I
L J
r- Iw.D4 -1
It. 2 al
‘ 5
bif!ao,saJ
I� 'I
I` I
Lou J
e
HEATHER III
•
Atm
A I_II_'IIn
1 A1
nV VI 1vIW
•1
TIMBERWOLF •
1
66.-63 -�
6 3 s1
•
100.00 6
It;
I I
2._
8 i
444
•
— — — 58922114"W 1319.87 — — —
50004 070 OF NE 1/4. NW 1/4 SEC, 47,5
NE PMALLFL WI74 7M�
EA51 LINE Of x10 I/4 C. 27.E
1: 7_
-•44)r
2
1
Ii
r�
I
nFE55R:E STH. A0r3MC"
`NE 002 5E 1/4. x02 1/4 SEC. 27
i
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
-69111P—
NORTH
0 100 200
SCALE IN FEET
o DENOTES I/2 RCM % N NC7 NRI
ONWFN7 SR. WI2*2 •275 w09S•
2 DENOTES ROM 20xWEN7 0040.
2UAIN45 ARE .5aL6D
MAINAM AMp miry EASENEN7S ME 92W9 TISK:
4 I—a
J J
L .2
MINO91
5 FEET 10 0711, MUSS 07402025E RC2m
A70 LOT 42u& AND 2324 *FIST SI
MIN.10N22
MOTH, MUSS oTNuwsE ROYCA.. AND ADxwwAi
RpIT-OF-MAT MIES. AS SOWN ON 744 PUT.
/4
/4 6 5E 1/4 c sw 1/4 5E1/4
C.2 31,202.22
TW .31.24E.
I nrAn9N u42
NO SCALE
_duas
mon
Murat
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
AGENDA ITEM 5 C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland
DATE: 7/3/96
TOPIC: Consideration of MUSA Designation, Pheasant Hills
Preserve 7th Addition, Ed Vaughan
BACKGROUND:
The preliminary plat for Pheasant Hills Preserve was approved in August of 1990. Nine
(9) phases were included in this development and MUSA was allocated to eight (8) of
those phases. Mr. Vaughan has switch Phase 9 with Phase 7 and therefore needs
additional MUSA designation on that Phase.
The Council approved the Final Plat of Pheasant Hills 7th Addition at their June 24, 1996
meeting. That plat consists of 19 lots on 9.44 net acres. Staffwould recommend that
9.44 acres of our recently approved 150 Acre MUSA Reserve be allocated to the Pheasant
Hills Preserve 7th Addition.
OPTIONS:
1. Allocate 9.44 net acres of MUSA Reserve to the Pheasant Hills Preserve 7th
Addition.
2. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION;
Option 9
589'37'25"E
30.82
PHEASANT FILLS PRESERVE 7TH ADDIEi'ION
NORTH UNE OF NE /4, NN 1/4 SEC. 27
�.
— — — 1189.18.34.`E 698.82-- \„—
PH n=s,SANT
HILLS
CJI:Ec'E R's L_
t\ OWetland tecation
o-ryC
fVW(`V MI'"n4iy 4,•tl• In•J
rsro0 Je
NT.
Y
100.00
•
844x0
1
11 7
I5
Lo J
L J
r-.10.0°-1
IS 2 I
5 81
*t? *5.32
'4.
HEATHER •
Alk
nr
nrIrSA
/IVVII 1,/I•1
1
Nei IwT�"�oe'c I
12 1
1
131_Y
'NJ
414.
4 t '3t,
7 ,)"\
\0 3, •
I`"'\2 \
8 SM•3e'se
1,1
11
TIMBERWOLF •
TRa
•
1
/ — — — 589'21'14"W 1319.87 — — —
504/7l ONE. OF of NL /4. Nw sec. 07
•••••••N N;',:S F'
isPiweOLNvri•IO. n--/
WEST UNE OF PHEASANT HILLS ./I Ir
PRESERVE STH AODITNN /� )
8
1
9,04.4Y"W
nFEStK:E 5 -FI Avv1;1C
SNE c0R SE V4. NW I/4 SEC. 27
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
NORTH
0 100 200
1.71.1
SCALE IN FEET
• YONUM0IT 507,NAXNm %b..
• DENOTES NW NGHLAeNT F000.
2EARN06 NRC ASWAIM
DRAWN. AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ME SNOW THUS
5010 5 FEET IN 507X, UNLSSs OTHERWISE INDICATED
N0 ADJOINING LOT LINES. AND WHO 10 FEET N
WIDTH, 04E'E OTHERWISE •0C.A100. AND AOaIEI*
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT.
ITW
NE
IT
I/4 5E I/O SW I/4 5E 1/4
.020.31,004. 0.2 . ,01_.3I,R'CE,22
J OCATION NAP
NO SCALE
Auzks
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
',Ar 6t a'rtfw.aic
CENTERVILLE
LAKE
immaavaaaaooacommum
-'
Da* •MMIC11111
10.YroMMI..0.., • a aw.um
r145141°.'!..'itZ:111151:etMtt.
• Lino Lakes
fl
• Centerville
Birch Streec
County Rd. J.
Phase 3 Phase East Phase
Phase Phase Y) Neett-Pftase 1-/
Phase 5 Phase in Completed "built -out"
P easan - 1 s 'reserve is mar ete
actor Property Developers Company -627-0823.
AGENDA ITEM' 6 A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Dave Ahrens, City Engineer/Public Works Director
DATE: 7/3/96
TOPIC:
BACKGROUND
Consideration of Resolution No. 96-76, Accept
Bids and Award Construction Contract, Pheasant
Hills Preserve 7th Addition, Street and Utility
Improvements.
The City has received bids for the above mentioned construction project
and should consider awarding a contract on July 8th. A verbal report will
be provided to the Council at the meeting.
OPTIONS:
1. Accept Bids and Award Contract for Pheasant Mills Preserve 7th
Addition.
2. Reject Bids
RECOM END TION
Option 1.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, Public Works Director/City Engineer
DATE: July 2, 1996
TOPIC: Resolution No. 96-77, Request for a Speed Study on Apollo Drive
BACKGROUND:
The current speed limit on Apollo Drive is 55 mph. This speed limit is posted on newly
constructed County State Aid Highways and in order to change the speed limit a speed
study must be performed. Staff feels that a speed study is justified as the roadway
currently has curves that are posted at 45 mph and extends through a residential area
at the west end and a business park to the east. Staff is requesting Council to adopt
the attached_ resolution requesting a speed study on Apollo Drive.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 96-77 requesting a speed study along Apollo Drive from
Sunset Road to Lilac Street.
IAi,TION:
taff recommends that Resolution No. 96-77 be adopted.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 96-77
RESOLUTION REQUESTING A SPEED STUDY ON APOLLO DRIVE FROM COUNTY
ROAD 53 (SUNSET ROAD) TO COUNTY ROAD 153 (LILAC STREET).
WHEREAS, the posted speed limit on Apollo Drive is 55 mph,
WHEREAS, the construction of Apollo Drive was completed in 1995,
WHEREAS, a speed study has not been completed on said segment of roadway.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. The City of Lino Lakes requests that a speed study on Apollo Drive from County
Road 53 (Sunset Road) to County Road 153 (Lilac Street) be completed.
Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of July, 1996.
John L. Landers, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson
Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted
and approved by the City Council on July 8, 1996.
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
AGENDA ITEM 6 C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Dave Ahrens, City Engineer/Public Works Director
DATE: 7/3/96
TOPIC:
BACKGROUND:
Consideration of Resolution No. 96-72, Municipal
State Aid Street Revision
will supply a verbal report to the Council on Monday Evening concerning
Municipal State Aid Street Revisions.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA ITEM 7
STAFF ORIGINATOR: RANDY SCHUMACHER, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: 3 JULY 1996
TOPIC:
BACKGROUND
APPOINTING THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY FOR
THE DATA PRACTICES ACT.
Whereas the City is required to appoint a staff member to be the Responsible Authority for the
Data Practices Act, and the City Clerk:. Treasurer is required to maintain the City's records and
legal documents, I would recommend the Council appoint the Clerk -Treasurer to this position,
syn has inted to this position in past.
Practi
•
City `le rk-T asuz as t nsible Aut rity the
a digit staff member as the
RECO M ENDATION:
1.
nsible Authority.
Council Member
adoption:
introduced the following resolution and moved its
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION 96-78
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CITY CLERK -TREASURER AS THE
RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY FOR THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT.
WHEREAS, The Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn SS 13.01-99, regulates the
collection, creation, storage, maintenance, dissemination and access to government data in all
cities, and
WHEREAS, The Commissioner of Administration has promulgated rules to assist in the
implementation of state statutes, and
WHEREAS, The city council of each city must designate a city employee as the responsible
authority who is responsible for the collection, use and dissemination of government data, and
WHEREAS, The City Clerk -Treasurer is responsible for all records and data collected for the
City of Lino Lakes;
NOW THEREFORE BE IS RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES, MINNESOTA:
That the City Clerk be designated the Responsible Authority for the City of Lino Lakes as it
relates to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of July, 1996.
John L. Landers, Mayor
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and
approved by the City Council on
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9A
STAFF ORIGINATOR
DATE
TOPIC Reconsideration of Off -Sale Liquor License for
Steve J. Arhip, Jr., 7860 Lake Drive, Lino Lakes,
arilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
July 3,1996
BACKGROUND:
Mr. Arbil) applied for an Off -Sale Liquor License earlier this year.
approved by the City Council on April 8,1�. At that tini Mr. A
date the business would actually be opo to the public. Since tha
period covered by the City Council's apptoval`expired. (June 30,
Mr. Arhip has indicated that he plans to open his business about August 1, 199. Since
the earlier approval of the License expired, I am asking the City Council to adopt a
motion approving the Off -Sale License for the period of July 1, 1996 through June 30,
1997. Mr. Arhip has paid the appropriate fee and has submitted the required Certificate
of Insurance. All other matters covered in the fiat application, including t e Police
vestigation, remain unchanged.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt a motion approving an Ofd Sale Liquor License for Mr. Arhip for 7860
Lake Drive, Lino Lakes Minnesota.
2. Return to staff for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 4i---„°,�.,
190 5th St. E., Suite 105, St. Paul, MN 55101
(612)296-6430 TTY(612)282-6555...;,;
OFF SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
7`kt
r .- 1
�
.,...”
APPLICATION FOR
No license will be approved or released until:the 520 Retailer ID Card fee is received by MN Liquor Control
Workers compensation insurance company.
LICENSEE'S SALES & USE TAX ID # /y5(0
Name CLU A U ,ciA (L Policy# 03 %b -6C)-- iZo.3 a _
G j L/
To apply for sales tax #, call 296-06181 or 1-800-657-3777
a partner shall execute this application.
If a corporation, an officer shall execute this application If a partnership,
Licensee Name (Individual, Corporation, Partnership)
£i) F.
S TF. 0- Q le, 1-1 i
Trade Name or DBA
Steve J. Arhip, Jr
License Location (Street Address ac Block No.)
Z4.90 LAK E 0r ;of_
I License Period
From 7 � y6 To 6-30--77
Applicant's Home Phone
_ - =
City
L.; n)e i AI<.S
County
A /V cy kA
State
nix
Zip Code
5--o)4/
Name of Store Manager
P RC4et /)l' -cj doY�
Business Phone Number
DOB (Individual
Applicant)
If a corporation, state name, date of birth, address, title, and shares held by each officer. If a partnership, state
names, address and date of birth of each partner.
Partner Officer (First, middle, last)
DOB
Title
Shares
Address, City, State, Zip Code
Partner Officer (First, middle, last)
DOB
Title
Shares
Address, City, State, Zip Code
Partner Officer (First, middle, last)
DOB
Title
Shares
Address, City, State, Zip Code
Partner Officer (First, middle, last)
DOB
Title
Shares
Address, City, State, Zip Code
1. If a corporation, date of incorporation
capital - . If a subsidiary
, state
incorporated
incorporated
No
second
. - -
so state
in , amount paid in
of any other corporation,
. If
and give purpose of
is corporation
building, so state.
_
corporation
under the laws of another state,
floor, basement, etc.) or if entire
authorized to do business in the state of Minnesota? 0 Yes 0
2. Describe premises to which license 'plies; such as (first floor,
ST Lo 0, . . _i
3. Is establishment located near any state university, state hospital, . . ii , g school, reformatory or prison? 0 Yes .R No If yes
state approximate distance. )
4. Name and address ofbuilding owner
-Pot'ST LA k P cS S Q a S
Pella Si'mD. So ) 97S% 5GA/OrirA TR. O,
Has comer
of building any connection, directly or indirectly, with applicant? 0 Yes li(No -�j
a member of the governing body of the municipality in which this license
5. Is applicant or any of the associates in this application,
is to be issued? 0 Yes .13'No If yes, in what capacity?
6. State whether any person other than applicants has
license is applied and if so, give name and details.
7. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly
0 Yes No If yes, give name and address of establishment.
any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures or equipment for which
/V 0
or indirectly,
m any other liquor establishment in the state of Minnesota?
8. Are the premises now occupied or to be occupied by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive from any other business
establishment? Yes 0 No
9. State whether applicant has or will be granted, an On sale Liquor License in conjunction with this Off Sale Liquor License and
for the same premises. 0 Yes (S No ❑ Will be granted
10. State whether applicant has or will be granted a Sunday On Sale Liquor License in conjunction with the regular On Sale Liquor
License. 0 Yes fEcNo 0 Will be granted
11. If this application is for a County Board Off Sale License, state the distance in miles to the nearest municipality.
1. State whether applicant or any of the associates in
any municipality or state authority; if so, give dates
this application, have ever had an application for a liquor license rejected by
and details. A) o
2. Has the applicant or any of the associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever
had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give dates
and details. .y 0
3. Has applicant, partners, officers, or employees ever
Liquor Control penalties? 0 Yes 0 No If yes, give
had any liquor law violations in Minnesota or elsewhere, including State
dates, charges and final outcome. .v 0
•
4. During the past license year, has a summons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Law (Dram Shop) M.S. 340A.802.
0 Yes fNo If yes, attach a copy of the summons.
This licensee must have one of the following: (ATTACH CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE TO THIS FORM.)
Check one
N' A. Liquor Liability Insurance (Dram Shop) - $50,000 per person, $100,000 more than one person; $10,000 property
destruction; $50,000 and $100.000 for loss of means of support.
or
❑ B. A surety bond from a surety company with minimum coverage as specified in A.
or
❑ C. A certificate from the State Treasurer that the licensee has deposited with the state, trust funds having market value of
$100,000 or $100,000 in cash or securities.
I certify that I have read the above questions and that the answers are true and correct of my own knowledge.
Print name of applicant & title
.STEL). J. Anh;r ira
I Signature of Applicant
1 2frfJA.E'4CSA
I Date
13-9/-?(
REPORT BY POLICE\SHERIFF'
This is to certify that the applicant and the associates named
laws of the State of Minnesota or municipal ordinances relating
DEPAR
herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of
to intoxicating liquor except as follows:
///Viv k-/ g dJ • ("7/`77Lc76-- i� �L C�e,„44..
Police/SheriffsDeP artment Title Signature
PS 9136-94
County Attorney's Signature
IMPORTANT
liquor Special
NOTICE
Occupational Stamp. This stamp is issued by the Bureau of Alcohol,
For information call (612)290-3496.
All retail licensees must have a current Federal
Tobacco, and Firearms.
106,25,96 07:46 LAW OFF I Ltb d1441 41 H Hilt. -> b1d4b44 ib
May 16, 1996
Bili Hawkins
2140 4th Ave. No.
Anoka, MN. 55303
Dear Mr. Hawkins:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8A
NU.1bki D02
I am writing you as a member of and on behalf of the Lino Lakes Charter Commission.
The Charter Commission is in search of a legal opinion regarding what section is
applicable to improvements to existing roads (ie. reconstruction, replacement, upgrades).
The Lino Lakes Charter Commission is currently trying to come up with a sound plan
to allow for the necessary reconstruction of aging roads in the city. Many cities with
charters currently have plans for periodic capital improvements for roads as well as the
means to assess for such improvements. Often such funding is shared between those
benefitting by the improvements and the city. Part of the benefit would be assessed to
abutting households with the remainder coming from a pool of monies designated from
the general fund or from a separate capital improvement fund.
The question that needs to be addressed is whether the Minnesota 4
to this situation and whether Chapter 6 or 8 of the Lino Lakes Charter wil
reconstructive improvements. Is a capital improvement plan for road =construed'o
considered as a maintenance item (Chapter 6) or is such an improvement to be designated
as new infrastructure (Chapter 8)?
Tlw Charter Commission needs to know whether the City of Lino Lakes can utilize the
existing Charter format or if the charter must be amended to allow for road improvements
on existing streets.
Please supply die Charter Commission with something in writing so boat the Charter
Commission can discuss and propose ideas to meet the toad improvement needs in our
community. We would like to have something prior to the July 1 lth meeting.
Thank you for your attention in this matter and I look forward to reviewing your opinion
in this matter. Please feel free tocall me any time if I can provide any additional
information on what the Charter Commission is attempting to accomplish.
.06/25/96 07:46 LAW OFFICES 2140 4TH AVE -> 612464456E NU.16U LM0.
LAW ORION OF
William G. Hawkins and Associates
Legal Assistant
WILLLAM G. HAWKINS WENDY B. DEZELAR
BARRY A_ SULLIVAN
June 24, 1996
Mr. Kirk Corson
6662 Ruffed Grouse Road
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
2140 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH
ANOKA, MINNESOTA S5303
PHONE (612) 427-8877
Re: Charter Requirements for Improvements to Existing Roadways
Dear Mr. Corson:
1 am responding to your letter of May 16, 1996 for my legal opinion concerning the
applicable sections of the Lino Lakes City Charter, City Code and State Law for
improvements to existing streets including reconstruction, replacement and upgrading.
In your letter you raised the question of the applicability of Minnesota Statute, Chapter
429, Chapter 6 and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Code. 1 believe Chapter 7 Is the
operative section as opposed to Chapter 6 cited in your letter which merely deals with
administrative items.
The first question that must be addressed is whether or not the proposed construction
activity for the street constitutes routine maintenance or is an improvement It would
be my opinion that. if the construction activity lengthens the useful life of the road
and results in market value Increase to the adjacent properties, it would be deemed a
local improvement and would be governed by Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City
Charter. Construction activity such as widening the surface of roadways, placing a
second lift of blacktop on streets, or removal of existing road surfaces and
replacement with new blacktop would constitute improvements. Maintenance items
would be those activities which are normally anticipated at the time of the initial
construction of the roadway in order to allow the roadway to reach its normal useful
life. Maintenance items would be pothole repair and sealcoating of roadways,
restriping and regrading of gravel shoulders. Routine maintenance items as those
listed above would not be governed by Chapter 8 since they are not be deemed
improvements which would increase the market value of adjacent properties. Such
maintenance items could be paid from the general fund.
Section 8.02 of the Charter and City Code Section 303, Subd. 1 define local
improvements as "public improvements financed partly or wholly from special
'assessments." Section 8.02 requires that any improvement of this nature must be
carried out exclusively under the provisions of the Lino Lakes City Charter. Therefore,
if a road improvement plan results in benefits which would be specifically assessed to
abutting households. Chapter 8 of the Charter would govem the procedures.
Minnesota Statute 429 is not the primary governing legislation in this area, however,
.06'25/96 07:46 LAW OFFICES 2140 4TH AVE 4 6124b445bb
Mr. Kirk Corson
June 24, 1996
Page 2
NO.166 E04
various sections of the M.S. 429 are incorporated by reference to the Lino Lakes City
Code through the adoption of Code Section 303. Section 8.04 governs the procedure
for special assessments of public improvements which will be financed partly or
wholly from special assessments. If the cost of the improvement is not assessed
100% to the benefited properties, subdivision 2 of the section requires that the city
council must hold an election on the proposed local improvement and assessment
formula. Therefore, if it is the intent of the city to establish a street reconstruction
plan which specifically assesses a portion of the cost and funds the remainder from
general funds, this funding plan would have to be submitted to the residents for
approval.
In summary, it is my opinion there is a mechanism In the charter which would allow
improvements to existing streets. The procedures that must be followed by the city
are more cumbersome than those found under Minnesota Statute 429, however, the
decision concerning the necessity for changes to these provisions should be made by
the charter commission and the council.
Sincerely,
William G. Hawkins
City Attorney
WGH:wbd
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9B
STAFF ORIGINATOR
DATE
TOPIC
BACKGROUND:
Jeanie Kenow, CSO
July 3,1996
PROCLAMATION, National Night Out 1996
National Night Out was designed to heigban crime and drug prevention awareness,
generate - mai participation in` lc l anti-crime efforts, strengthen neighborhood
spirit and police -community relations amt send a message to criminals letting them know
neighborhoods are organized and fightingback. On National Night Out, residents lock
their doors, tum on their outside lights from 7:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. and
with neighborhood watch groups.
In previous years, the City Council was invited to ride with the Police Officers as they
visit each neighborhood group. The City Council is invited to ride with the Police
Officers again this year. If the City Council or any resident would like more information
about this event, you are invited to call the Lino Lakes Police Department, 780-0605 and
ask for CSO Jeanie Kenow.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt a motion Proclaiming August 6, 1996 as National Night
2. Return to staff for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
PROCLAMATION
NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 1996
WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) is sponsoring a
unique, nationwide crime and drug prevention program' on August 6, 1996
called "National Night Out", and
WHEREAS, the "13th Annual National Night Out" provides a unique
opportunity for Lino Lakes to join forces with thousands of other communities
across the country in promoting cooperative, police -community crime prevention
and efforts; and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City. Council plays a vital role in assisting the Lino
Lakes Police Department through joint crime and drug prevention efforts in Lino
Lakes and is supporting "National Night Out 1996" locally; and
WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of Lino Lakes be aware of the
importance of crime prevention programs and impact that their participation can
have on reducing crime, drugs and violence in Lino Lakes; and
WHEREAS, police -community partnerships and neighborhood safety and
awareness and cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out"
program;
NOW, THEREFORE WE, Lino Lakes Mayor and City Council Members, do
hereby call upon all citizens of Lino Lakes to join the Lino Lakes Police
Department and the National Association of Town Watch in supporting "13th
Annual National Night Out" on August 6, 1996.
FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT, WE, Lino Lakes Mayor and City
Council Members, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 6, 1996 as
"NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" in Lino Lakes.
Mayor
Clerk/Treasurer