HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 16-01 EDALINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. 16-01
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING BUILDINGS AS STRUCTURALLY SUBSTANDARD
WITHIN LINO LAKES REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the Lino Lakes
Economic Development Authority ("Authority") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10(d), the Authority is authorized
to deem parcels as occupied by structurally substandard buildings despite prior demolition or
removal of the buildings, subject to certain terms and conditions as described in this resolution.
1.02. The Authority intends to cause demolition of the buildings located on the property
described in Exhibit A hereto (the "Designated Property"), and may in the future include the
Designated Property in a redevelopment or renewal and renovation tax increment financing district
as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174, Subd. 10 or Subd. 10a.
Section 2. Buildings Designated Substandard; Other Proceedings.
2.01. The Authority finds that the buildings on the Designated Property as described in
Exhibit A are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance,
based upon the analysis of such buildings by LHB Architects dated March 27, 2015 and on file in
City Hall.
2.02. After the date of approval of this resolution, the buildings on the Designated
Property may be demolished or removed by the Authority, or such demolition or removal may be
financed by the Authority, or may be undertaken by a developer under a development agreement
with the Authority.
2.03. The Authority intends to include the Designated Property in a redevelopment or
renewal and renovation tax increment financing district, and to file the request for certification of
such district with the Anoka County auditor within three years after the date of demolition of the
buildings on the Designated Property.
2.04. Upon filing the request for certification of the new tax increment financing district,
the Authority will notify the Anoka County auditor that the original tax capacity of the Designated
Property must be adjusted to reflect the greater of (a) the current net tax capacity of the parcel, or
(b) the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the buildings were demolished or
removed, but applying class rates for the current year, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, subd. 10(d).
460586v1 LN140-114
2.05. Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry
out the intent of this resolution.
Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Lino Lakes Economic Development
Authority this 11th day of April, 2016.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Board Member
Maher and was duly seconded by Board Member Rafferty and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Maher, Rafferty, Reinert, Manthey, Kusterman
The following voted against same:
none
ATTEST:
arlson, Executive Direct r
460586v1 LN140-114
2
William Kuste , President
EXHIBIT A
Description of Designated Property
6007 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, Minnesota
PID Nos. 31-31-22-43-0007, 31-31-22-43-0006, and 31-31-22-43-0017
460586v1 LN140-114 3
LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala
MEETING DATE: April 11, 2016
TOPIC: i. Consider Resolution No. 16-01, Designating Building as
Structurally Substandard, 49 Club
ii. Consider Resolution No. 16-02, Approving Preliminary
Development Agreement with DM Land, LLC
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The 49 Club, located at the corner of Hodgson Road and County Road J, has been vacant since
approximately 2003. The site has become a blighted location with illegal dumping and
vandalism taking place on a regular basis. The city has received numerous complaints regarding
the property. The site has been the topic, along with the neighboring 17 acre Jensen property, of
several development proposals. However, none have advanced past the concept phase due to a
number of complicating factors including the need for public improvements, multiple property
owners, and council concern over the intensity of prior commercial development proposals.
In March of 2015 LHB Corporation was retained to determine the eligibility of the property for
TIF purposes and to document the condition of the building. As noted in the report the buildings
are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. Staff has
been working with the owner of the property regarding potential demolition of the buildings
either as a City project or by the owner. The owner is proposing to remove both the principal
structure and accessory garage with their own contractor.
Staff is very interested in this project as a means to clean up the site, eliminate the blight and
assist redevelopment efforts. The use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) has previously been
discussed to help offset utility, road or land assemblage costs to facility redevelopment of the
corner.
However, removal of the building has the potential to eliminate one of the financial tools
available to assist with redevelopment. In order to establish a TIF District after demolition, the
request for certification of the TIF District must be filed with the County within three years of
the parcel being occupied by a substandard building. An actual project would need to occur
within 4 years of district certification or the site would be dropped from the district and no longer
eligible for TIF.
To retain our ability to use TIF staff has listed out the steps that the EDA/City would need to
follow in order to demolish a building prior to a redevelopment TIF District being established:
1) The EDA Board finds by resolution (adopted before demolition) that the parcel was
occupied by a structurally substandard building and that after demolition and clearance
the EDA intends to include the parcel within a TIF district;
2) The City Council adopts resolution and makes blight findings regarding the building
(based on report);
3) EDA and owner of property enter into a preliminary development agreement (before
demolition) regarding demolition of the buildings and redevelopment of the property.
The proposed development agreement does not bind the EDA and/or City to use of Tax
Increment Financing. Rather the City and Developer (owner) are agreeing cooperate with respect
to potential future redevelopment of the Property. The agreement sets for the conditions and for
consideration of city redevelopment assistance and responsibilities of each party.
The City Council will be considering the blight findings at their April 11, 2016 regular meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 16-01 and Resolution No. 16-02.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 16-01
2. LHB Recommendation March 27, 2015
3. Resolution No. 16-02
4. Preliminary Development Agreement
PERFORMANCE
DRIVEN DESIGN.
LHBcorp.com
March 27, 2015
Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
TIF ANALYSIS FINDINGS FOR 6007 HODGSON ROAD, LINO LAKES,
MINNESOTA 55014
LHB was hired to inspect the 49 Club building at 6007 Hodgson Road in Lino Lakes, Minnesota, in
order to determine if it meets the definition of "Substandard" as defined by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, subdivision 10. The building parcel may potentially be part of a future
Redevelopment TIF District, so will need to be compliant with all of the statutes pertaining to a
Redevelopment District.
The building is located on a three -parcel property at the northwest corner of Ash Street and
Hodgson Road (see Diagram 1).
C B
30,381 SF 36,305 SF
33% 39%
21%
Covered
45% 98%
Covered Covered
Ash Street..
A
25,358 SF
28%
9B.
0
c
0
0
Diagram 1
21 West Superior Street, Suite 500 1 Duluth, MN 55802
701 Washington Avenue North, Suite 200 1 Minneapolis, MN 55401
63 East Second Street, Suite 150 1 Superior, WI 54880
1 218.727.8446
I 612.338.2029
1 715.392.2902
Page: 2
Date: March 27, 2015
CONCLUSION
After inspecting and evaluating the building on March 13, 2015 and applying current statutory criteria for a
Redevelopment District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdiviion 10, it is our professional opinion that
the building qualifies as substandard.
The remainder of this letter and attachments describe our process and findings in detail.
MINNESOTA STATUTE 469.174, SUBDIVISION 10 REQUIREMENTS
The property was inspected in accordance with the following requirements under Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.174, Subdivision 10(c), which states:
Interior Inspection
"The municipality may not make such determination [that the building is structurally substandard] without
an interior inspection of the property..."
Exterior Inspection and Other Means
"An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that
(1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to
obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and
(2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally
substandard."
Documentation
"Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must
be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3(1)."
Qualification Requirements
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 (a) (1) requires two tests for occupied parcels:
1. Coverage Test
..."parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets,
utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots"
The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined under Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which states: "For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not
occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures unless 15
percent of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other
similar structures."
The LHB team reviewed parcels 31-31-22-43-0007, 31-31-22-43-0006 and 31-31-22-43-0017:
• Parcel A (31-31-22-43-0007) is approximately 25,358 square feet and is 98 percent covered by
buildings, parking lots or other improvements.
• Parcel B (31-31-22-43-0006) is approximately 36,305 square feet and is 45 percent covered by
buildings, parking lots or other improvements.
• Parcel C (31-31-22-43-0017) is approximately 30,381 square feet and is 21 percent covered by
buildings, parking lots or other improvements.
Page: 3
Date: March 27, 2015
Findings:
The parcels are all covered by buildings, parking lots or other improvements, exceeding the 15 percent
parcel requirement.
2. Condition of Buildings Test
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a) states, "...and more than 50 percent of the
buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial
renovation or clearance;"
a. Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision
10(b), which states: "For purposes of this subdivision, `structurally substandard' shall
mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in
essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate
egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or
deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or
clearance."
We do not count energy code deficiencies toward the thresholds required by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b)) defined as "structurally
substandard", due to concerns expressed by the State of Minnesota Court of Appeals
in the Walser Auto Sales, Inc. vs. City of Richfield case filed November 13, 2001.
Findings:
The 49 Club building at 6007 Hodgson Road exceeds the criteria required to be determined a
substandard building (see the attached Building Code, Condition Deficiency and Context Analysis
Report).
b. Buildings are not eligible to be considered structurally substandard unless they meet certain
additional criteria, as set forth in Subdivision 10(c) which states:
"A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code
applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less
than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and
type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally
substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such
as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural
repairs, or other similar reliable evidence."
"Items of evidence that support such a conclusion [that the building is not disqualified]
include recent fire or police inspections, on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections,
exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence."
LHB counts energy code deficiencies toward the 15 percent code threshold required by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c)) for the following reasons:
• The Minnesota energy code is one of ten building code areas highlighted by the
Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry website where minimum construction
standards are required by law.
• The index page of the 2007 Minnesota Building Code lists the Minnesota Energy
Code as a "Required Enforcement" area compared to an additional list of "Optional
Enforcement" chapters.
Page: 4
Date: March 27, 2015
• Chapter 11 of the 2015 Minnesota Residential Code incorporates Minnesota Rules,
Chapters, 1322 and 1323 Minnesota Energy code.
• The Senior Building Code Representative for the Construction Codes and Licensing
Division of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry confirmed that the
Minnesota Energy Code is being enforced throughout the State of Minnesota.
• In a January 2002 report to the Minnesota Legislature, the Management Analysis
Division of the Minnesota Department of Administration confirmed that the
construction cost of new buildings complying with the Minnesota Energy Code is
higher than buildings built prior to the enactment of the code.
• Proper TIF analysis requires a comparison between the replacement value of a new
building built under current code standards with the repairs that would be necessary
to bring the existing building up to current code standards. In order for an equal
comparison to be made, all applicable code chapters should be applied to both
scenarios. Since current construction estimating software automatically applies the
construction cost of complying with the Minnesota Energy Code, energy code
deficiencies should also be identified in the existing structures.
Findings:
The building has code deficiencies exceeding the 15 percent building code deficiency criteria
required to be determined substandard (see the attached Building Code, Condition Deficiency
and Context Analysis Report).
TEAM CREDENTIALS
Michael A. Fischer, AIA, LEED AP - Project Principal/TIF Analyst
Michael has 28 years of experience as project principal, project manager, project designer and project
architect on planning, urban design, educational, commercial and governmental projects. He has become
an expert on Tax Increment Finance District analysis assisting over 100 cities with strategic planning for
TIF Districts. He is a Senior Vice President at LHB and currently leads the Minneapolis office.
Michael completed a two-year Bush Fellowship, studying at MIT and Harvard in 1999, earning Masters
degrees in City Planning and Real Estate Development from MIT. He has served on more than 50
committees, boards and community task forces, including a term as a City Council President and as Chair
of a Metropolitan Planning Organization. Most recently, he served as Chair of the Edina, Minnesota
planning commission. Michael has also managed and designed several award-winning architectural
projects, and was one of four architects in the Country to receive the AIA Young Architects Citation in
1997.
Philip Waugh — Project Manager/TIF Analyst
Philip is a project manager with 13 years of experience in historic preservation, building investigations,
material research, and construction methods. He previously worked as a historic preservationist and also
served as the preservation specialist at the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission. Currently, Philip
sits on the Board of Directors for the Preservation Alliance of Minnesota. His current responsibilities
include project management of historic preservation projects, performing building condition surveys and
analysis, TIF analysis, writing preservation specifications, historic design reviews, writing Historic
Preservation Tax Credit applications, preservation planning, and grant writing.
Page: 5
Date: March 27, 2015
Phil Fisher— Inspector
For 35 years, Phil Fisher worked in the field of Building Operations in Minnesota including White Bear Lake
Area Schools. At the University of Minnesota he earned his Bachelor of Science in Industrial Technology.
He is a Certified Playground Safety Inspector, Certified Plant Engineer, and is trained in Minnesota
Enterprise Real Properties (MERP) Facility Condition Assessment (FCA). His FCA training was recently
applied to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Facilities Condition Assessment project
involving over 2,000 buildings.
ATTACHMENTS
We have attached a Building Code, Condition Deficiency and Context Analysis Report, Replacement
Cost Report, Code Deficiency Report, and thumbnail photo sheets of the building.
Please contact me at (612) 752-6920 if you have any questions.
LHB INC.
MICHAEL A FISCHER, AIA, LEED AP
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
M:\15Proj\150099\400 Design\406 Reports \Final Report\150099 Lino Lakes 49 Club Letter of Finding 20150327.docx
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District Letter of Finding
Building Code, Condition Deficiency and Context Analysis Report
March 26, 2015
Map No. & Address:
Inspection Date(s) & Time(s):
Inspection Type:
Summary of Deficiencies:
Map A - 6007 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014
March 13, 2015 4:00 PM
Interior and Exterior
It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard
because:
Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found.
Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of
replacement cost, NOT including energy code deficiencies.
Estimated Replacement Cost:
Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies:
Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies:
Defects in Structural Elements
$940,500
$575,019
61.14%
1. A code required wind uplift system is missing on the exterior wall connection to the roof.
2. East and West wall are tied together with a suspect system to prevent movement.
Combination of Deficiencies
1. Essential Utilities and Facilities
a. Water service to the building has been disconnected.
b. Electrical service is disconnected.
c. There are no code accessible restrooms.
d. There is no code required accessible parking spaces.
2. Light and Ventilation
a. Electrical branch wiring has been removed.
b. All light fixtures have been removed.
c. The exhaust system has been removed.
d. The ventilation system has been disconnected. The age and condition of it make it suspect if
it would work as designed.
3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress
a. There is not a code compliant fire protection system in the kitchen.
b. Stairs do not have code compliant hand rails.
c. The exterior steps leading from the kitchen area are missing and required by code.
d. The East and West exterior doors do not have code approved thresholds.
e. The East glass door does not have the code required 10 inch kick plates.
f. Flooring is missing, torn, or damaged preventing code compliant exiting from the building.
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099
Page 1 of 2
Building Report
Map A
,.� 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials
a. The ceiling in the residence is stained from water intrusion and damaged by vandals.
b. Code approved wall surfacing is absent in the kitchen and restaurant areas.
c. Wall surfaces in the residence have been damaged by vandals with holes and graffiti.
d. All insulation in the kitchen and restaurant has been removed.
5. Exterior Construction
a. Roof is in need of code required replacement to prevent water intrusion.
b. Code required siding is missing on the North side of the building.
c. Soffit and fascia are missing from the North side of the building.
d. Exterior siding is damaged and in need of repair and paint to prevent water intrusion.
e. Window glass is missing and is allowing water intrusion.
f. Door glass on the west side of the building is broken.
Description of Code Deficiencies
1. Provide adequate water supply for fire and life safety system.
2. Replace all electrical wiring and electrical panels in order to provide adequate illuminated egress.
3. Install adequate plumbing for restroom accessibility.
4. Replace HVAC system that is non-existent.
5. All exit doors have non-compliant steps down to landing.
6. Thresholds at egress doors exceed allowable 1/2".
7. Aluminum and glass doors lack required 10" high kick plate.
8. Flooring needs to be securely installed to create a slip resistant pathway to egress.
9. Replace roof to prevent water intrusion.
10. Replace exterior siding to prevent water intrusion.
11. Commercial kitchen exhaust shall have a separate fire suppression system.
12. Stairways shall have handrails on both sides.
13. Exterior walls do not conform to fire restrictive construction.
14. Install required wind up lift connection system to exterior wall and roof.
Overview of Deficiencies
The original structure was built in 1967 and has several additions, the latest having burned down several years
ago. The interior is void of all essential utilities and necessary facilities to be considered a functional place of
business.
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099
Page 2 of 2
Building Report
Map A
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District Letter of Finding
fIacement Cost Report
E .late Name: Map A - 49 Club
City of Lino Lakes
Building Type:
Location:
Story Count:
Story Height (L.F.):
Floor Area (S.F.):
Labor Type:
Basement Included:
Data Release:
Cost Per Square Foot:
Building Cost:
6007 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Restaurant with Wood Siding / Wood
Frame
SAINT PAUL, MN
1
12
5150
OPN
No
Year 2015
$182.62
$940,500
Costs are derived from a building model with basic components.
Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly.
A Substructure
8.89%
A1010 Standard Foundations
Strip footing, concrete, reinforced, load 11.1 KLF, soil bearing
capacity 6 KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide
Spread footings, 3000 PSI concrete, load 25K, soil bearing capacity
3 KSF, 3' - 0" square x 12" deep
f 30 Slab on Grade
Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced
A2010 Basement Excavation
Excavate and fill, 4000 SF, 4' deep, sand, gravel, or common earth,
on site storage
A2020 Basement Walls
Foundation wall, CIP, 4' wall height, direct chute, .148 CY/LF, 7,2
PLF, 12" thick
B Shell
24.80%
81010 Floor Construction
Wood column, 8" x 8", 20' x 20' bay, 12' unsupported height, 160
BF/MSF, 160 PSF total allowable load
B1020 Roof Construction
Wood roof, truss, 4/12 slope, 24" O.C., 30' to 43' span
B2010 Exterior Walls
Wood siding, 2"x4" studs 16"OC, insulated wall, 1" x 12" sawn cedar,
1" x 4" battens
B2020 Exterior Windows
Aluminum flush tube frame, for 1/4"glass,1-3/4"x4", 5'x6' opening, no
intermediate horizontals
Glazing panel, plate glass, 1/4" thick, tempered
B2030 Exterior Doors
Door, aluminum & glass, without transom, full vision, double door,
hardware, 6'-0" x 7'-0" opening
Door, aluminum & glass, with transom, non-standard, double door,
hardware, 6'-0" x 10'-0" opening
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099 Page 1 of 3 Map A
$14.76
$76,000.00
$3.44 $17,700.00
$5.69 $29,300.00
$0.57 $2,950.00
$5.03 $25,900.00
$41.17
$212,000.00
$1.17 $6,050.00
$7.69 $39,600.00
$6.85 $35,300.00
$10.58 $54,500.00
$5.65 $29,100.00
Replacement Cost Report
B3010
B3020
%riof Total Cost
Door, steel 18 gauge, hollow metal, 1 door with frame, no label, 3'-0"
x 7'-0" opening
Roof Coverings
Wood roofing, cedar shingles, 16" x 5", 4" min slope, 5" exposure,
1.6 PSF
Insulation, rigid, roof deck, fiberglass, 3'x4' or 4'x8' sheets, 15/16"
thick, R3.70
Gutters, box, aluminum, .027" thick, 5", enameled finish
Downspout, aluminum, rectangular, 2" x 3", embossed mill finish,
.020" thick
Roof Openings
Skylight, plastic domes, insulated curbs, nominal size to 10 SF,
double glazing
C Interiors
15.50%
C1010 Partitions
Wood partition, 5/8"fire rated gypsum board face, none base,2 x 4,@
16" OC framing,same opposite face, 0 insul
5/8" gypsum board, taped & finished, painted on metal furring
C1020 Interior Doors
Door, single leaf, wood frame, 3'-0" x 7'-0" x 1-3/8", birch, hollow
core
C1030 Fittings
Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, plastic laminate
91k10 Wall Finishes
Painting, interior on plaster and drywall, walls & ceilings, roller work,
primer & 2 coats
Ceramic tile, thin set, 4-1/4" x 4-1/4"
C3020 Floor Finishes
Carpet tile, nylon, fusion bonded, 18" x 18" or 24" x 24", 35 oz
Tile, quarry tile, mud set, minimum
Tile, quarry tile, mud set, maximum
C3030 Ceiling Finishes
channel grid, suspended support
D Services
50.82%
D2010 Plumbing Fixtures
Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung
Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung
Lavatory w/trim, vanity top, PE on CI, 20" x 18"
Kitchen sink w/trim, countertop, stainless steel, 44" x 22" triple bowl
Service sink w/trim, PE on Cl,wall hung w/rim guard, 24" x 20"
Shower, stall, baked enamel, terrazzo receptor, 36" square
Water cooler, electric, wall hung, dual height, 14.3 GPH
D2020 Domestic Water Distribution
Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 500 MBH input, 480
GPH
D3050 Terminal & Package Units
Rooftop, multizone, air conditioner, restaurants, 3,000 SF, 15.00 ton
Commercial kitchen exhaust/make-up air system, rooftop, gas, 2000
CFM
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099 Page 2 of 3
$9.07 $46,700.00
$0.10 $500.00
$25.73
$132,500.00
$4.50 $23,200.00
$2.17 $11,200.00
$0.70 $3,600.00
$2.04 $10,500.00
$9.05 $46,600.00
$7.26 $37,400.00
$84.37
$434,500.00
$10.78 $55,500.00
$8.31 $42,800.00
$36.89 $190,000.00
Replacement Cost Report
Map A
0
D4020
D5010
D5020
D5030
D5090
% of Total
Sprinklers
Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, 1 floor, 2000 SF
Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, ordinary hazard, 1 floor, 1000 SF
Standpipes
Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1
floor
Electrical Service/Distribution
Overhead service installation, includes breakers, metering, 20'
conduit & wire, 3 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 400 A
Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire,
400 A
Switchgear installation, incl switchboard, panels & circuit breaker,
120/208 V, 1 phase, 400 A
Lighting and Branch Wiring
Receptacles incl plate, box, conduit, wire, 10 per 1000 SF, 1.2 watts
per SF
Miscellaneous power, 1.8 watts
Central air conditioning power, 6 watts
Fluorescent fixtures recess mounted in ceiling, 1.6 watt per SF, 40
FC, 10 fixtures @32watt per 1000 SF
Communications and Security
Communication and alarm systems, fire detection, addressable, 12
detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire
Fire alarm command center, addressable without voice, excl. wire &
conduit
Other Electrical Systems
Generator sets, w/battery, charger, muffler and transfer switch,
gas/gasoline operated, 3 phase, 4 wire, 277/480 V, 15 kW
• •u -I
1.1 •S
E1090
Other Equipment
F Special Construction
G Building Sitework
S u bTotal
Contractor Fees (General Conditions,Overhead,Profit)
Architectural Fees
User Fees
0%
0%
0%
100%
10.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Total Building Cost
.-y
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099
Page 3 of 3
$8.70 $44,800.00
$2.00 $10,300.00
$4.35 $22,400.00
$9.48 $48,800.00
$3.50 $18,000.00
$0.32 $1,650.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$166.03 $855,000.00
$16.60 $85,500.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$182.62
$940,500.00
Replacement Cost Report
Map A
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District Letter of Finding
Fide Deficiency Cost Report
Map A - 6007 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 - PID 31-31-22-43-0007
Code Related Cost Items
Accessibility Items
Restrooms
Install plumbing fixtures for accessible restrooms
Structural Elements
Exiting
Unit Cost
Units
Unit
Quantit
Total
$ 10.78 SF 5,150 $ 55,517.00
Wind up lift requirement
Install code required wind up lift system between
trusses/rafters and exterior wall $ 1.75 SF 5,150 $ 9,012.50
Thresholds
Correct elevation drop from interior to exterior landing $ 1,000.00 Ea 4 $ 4,000.00
Reduce threshold elevation to less than 1/2 inch $ 250.00 Ea 4 $ 1,000.00
Glass D000rs
Install code required 10 inch kick plate $ 150.00 Ea 4 $ 600.00
Flooring
Install level flooring to allow emergency egress $ 9.05 SF 5,150 $ 46,607.50
Lighting
Install branch wiring and lights for egress $ 9.48 SF 5,150 $ 48,822.00
Fire Protection
Commercial Kitchen
Install code required fire suppression system $ 3.70 SF 2,000 $ 7,400.00
Entire building
Install code required fire alarm system $ 3.50 SF 5,150 $ 18,025.00
Interior walls/ceilings
Install code required wall and ceiling finishes $ 9.30 SF 5,150 $ 47,895.00
Exterior Construction
Wood Siding
Repair/replace wood siding to prevent water intrusion $ 5.00 SF 5,150 $ 25,750.00
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District Code Deficiency Cost Report
Letter of Finding Page 1 of 2 Map A
LHB Project No. 150099
Code Related Cost Items
'"\of Construction
Replace roof that has failed.
Remove old roof
Replace with new roof
Mechanical- Electrical
Unit Cost
Units
$ 0.90 SF
$ 9.07 SF
Unit
Quantit
Total
5,150 $
5,150 $
4,635.00
46,710.50
Electrical
Install new electrical service $ 4.35 SF 5,150 $ 22,402.50
Plumbing
Install domestic water distribution system $ 8.31 SF 5,150 $ 42,796.50
Mechanical
Install HVAC system $ 36.89 SF 5,150 $ 189,983.50
Provide electrical service to new HVAC $ 0.75 SF 5,150 $ 3,862.50
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099
Total Code Improvements $ 575,019.50
Code Deficiency Cost Report
Page 2 of 2 Map A
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District Letter of Finding
Map A, 6007 Hodgson Road - Photos
P 1020945.J PG
P1020946.JPG
P1020948.JPG
P1020949.JPG
P1020950.JPG
P1020951.JPG
P1020953.JPG
P1020957.JPG
P1020955.JPG
P1020956.JPG
P1020958.JPG
Page 1 of 6
P1020959.JPG
P1020960.JPG
P1020961.JPG
P1020963.JPG
P1020964.JPG
P1020967.JPG
P1020968. J PG
P1020970.JPG
P1020971.JPG
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099
Page 2 of 6
P1020962.JPG
P1020966.JPG
P1020969.JPG
P1020972.JPG
Photos
Map A
P1020973.JPG
P1020974.JPG
P1020976.JPG
P1020977.JPG
P1020980.JPG
P1020983.JPG
P1020981.JPG
•t
M
P1020984.JPG
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099
Page 3 of 6
P1020975.JPG
P1020979.JPG
P1020982.JPG
P1020985.JPG
Photos
Map A
P1020986.JPG
P1020987 J PG
P1020989.JPG
P1020994.JPG
P1020990.JPG
P1020995.JPG
P1020997.JPG
P1020998.JPG
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099
Page 4 of 6
P1020988.JPG
P1020991. J PG
P1020996.JPG
P1020999.JPG
Photos
Map A
P1030001.JPG
P1030002.JPG
P1030004 JPG
P1030005.JPG
P 1030007. J PG
P1030008.JPG
P1030010.JPG
P1030011 JPG
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099
Page 5 of 6
P1030003.JPG
t
P1030006.JPG
P1030009. J PG
P1030012.JPG
Photos
Map A
P1030013.JPG
P1030014.JPG
P1030018.JPG
P1030019.JPG
P1030021.JPG
P1030024.JPG
P1030022.JPG
P1030025.JPG
Lino Lakes 49 Club Redevelopment TIF District
Letter of Finding
LHB Project No. 150099
Page 6 of 6
P1030017.JPG
P1030020.JPG
P1030023.JPG
Photos
Map A