The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-06-2017 Council PacketCITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, November 6, 2017 Community Room (not televised) 6:00 P.M. Previous to the regular work session, the council will meet at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Work Room for a closed session for the purpose of discussing labor negotiations. 1. Air Park Hanger Access - Mayor Reinert 2. Resolution of Support for Anoka County's Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Rick DeGardner, Karen Blaska (Anoka County Parks and Recreation) 3. Country Lakes Park Remaster Planning Proposal - Rick DeGardner, Candace Amberg (WSB) 4. ACE Program Update - John Swenson 5. Comprehensive Plan Update - Michael Grochala, Kendra Lindahl (Landform) 6. Surface Water Management - Michael Grochala, Katy Thompson (WSB) a. Local Water Management Plan b. Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan 7. Proposal to Replace ACU's and Controllers at Civic Complex - Rick DeGardner 8. Public Works Facility - Jeff Karlson 9. 2018 West Shadow Lake Drive and LaMotte Drive - Diane Hankee 10. Park & Trail Management Plan - Jeff Reinert 11. 2018 Budget - Sarah Cotton 12. Concept Plans Woods Edge and 49/J - Michael Grochala 13. Requests for Proposals Jeff Karlson 14. Council Updates on Boards/Commissions - City Council 15. Monthly Progress Report - Jeff Karlson 16. Review Regular Agenda 17. Adjourn 16. Review Regular Agenda 17. Adjourn WS — Item 2 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 2 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director Re: Resolution of Support for Anoka County's Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment Background The Anoka County Parks and Recreation Department has been working on a master plan amendment for the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve that includes redeveloping the Peltier Fishing Pier access (across from the park entrance road), adding some additional camper cabins to the campground, creating an interpretive area near the burial mound off CSAH 14 and Mound Trail, and incorporating the projects outlined in the Wargo Master Plan. Ms. Karen Blaska, Park Planner, will attend the November 6 work session to provide a brief presentation and ultimately request the City Council pass a resolution of support for the master plan amendment. The Park Board reviewed the master plan amendment during the community engagement phase of the project at their May 15, 2017 Park Board meeting. Below is a dropbox link for the amendment: https://www. dropbox. com/s/95 5kn54nfy8 a9cs/2017%2ORCCOL%2OMP%20Amendmen t.pdf?d1=0 Requested Council Direction Approve resolution of support at the November 13, 2017 City Council meeting. Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Anoka County Parks and Recreation 2017 Anoka County PARKS & RECREATION 550 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER MN 55304 ANOKACOUNTYPARKS.COM Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ANOKA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Rhonda Sivarajah, Chair Julie Braastad Mike Gamache Jim Kordiak Matt Look Scott Schulte Robyn West ANOKA COUNTY PARKS COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE CommissionerJim Kordiak, Chair Commissioner Gamache Commissioner West METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ANOKA COUNTY PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION John Vondelinde, Division Manager ANOKA COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Jeff Perry, Planning and Resource Manager Karen Blaska, Park Planner Danielle Sanborn, Landscape Architect Crystal Passi, Landscape Planner Andy Soltvedt, Marketing and Visitor Services Manager Nicole Greenwell, Communication Specialist 2 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Executive Summary The 5,300 -acre Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is one of the largest in the seven -county metropolitan area and contains some of the most significant native wildlife habitat and water resources in the region. It is also rich in cultural resources with several known significant archaeological sites within its boundary. The park reserve is located in the Cities of Centerville, Lino Lakes and Columbus. Figure 1 illustrates the location within the seven -county metropolitan area. The park reserve offers a wide variety of amenities, including the Wargo Nature Center, Chomonix Golf Course, Rice Creek Campground, and Centerville Lake Beach. Wargo Nature Center also plays host to the YMCA's Camp Heritage during the summer months and offers the Heritage Living History Lab, where students can participate in hands on activities related to varying historical themes. Other amenities include picnic areas, boat launch facilities, biking and hiking trails, playgrounds and a fishing pier. The park reserve also connects to the Central Anoka County and Bunker -Chain of Lakes Regional Trails. RICE CROW • .a r o COMM OF LANES PARK RE YE T Carver a Scott 10 20 Min Figure 1 RICE CREEK CHAIN OF LAKES PARK RESERVE MASTER PLAN AMENDM ENT REGIONAL CONTEXT The original master plan was developed in 1975 and revised in 1999. In 2003, 2012 and 2013, the master plan was amended to adjust the boundaries of the park reserve to what is existing today. Refer to Figure 2 for existing park boundary and amenities. With this amendment Anoka County proposes to improve Wargo Nature Center based on the master plan developed for the Nature Center in 2015, which is included in the appendix; plus, add the following projects to the master plan for the park reserve: • Improve the Peltier Lake fishing access • Add alternate camping accommodations to the campground • Add a self-service canoe/kayak rental program and establish an access point at the campground for easy water access to and from Wargo Nature Center • Create an interpretive area for cultural resources 3 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve • Create additional multi -use trails and connections to local neighborhoods • Move the existing compost site out of the park, but allow the ingress road to remain within the park reserve boundary • Continue to improve the maintenance facilities within the park reserve to optimize operating efficiencies. The total development cost for the projects outlined in this Master Plan Amendment are approximately $10,725,000. 4 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Boundaries and Acquisition There will be no boundary modifications related to this master plan amendment. The park boundary will remain as illustrated in Figure 2. Legend ROADWAY PARK RESERVE COLUMBUS LAKE CONSERVATION AREA PARK RESERVE IN- P HOLDINGS WATER BLA NE LINO LA *- Wargo Nature Center Picnic Pavilion E;BoatLaunch gjFishing Pier IEFuNi Beach/Swimming Campground 131 Chomonix Golf Course Boat Launch IRC LE FINES 0 Figure 2 5 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Park Boundary 2 Miles Date: 091'117 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve STEWARDSHIP PLAN Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is a highly used regional facility in Anoka County and as such, the County will continue to manage it as regional recreational open space. Since the park has over 5,000 acres, the size allows the county to provide many different activities for visitors. Visitors can utilize picnicking facilities to gather with family and friends, use the trails for exercise or enjoyment of nature, allow children to release some energy on the various playgrounds in the park, enjoy the sun and water at Centerville Beach, perfect their golf techniques at Chomonix Golf Course, enjoy an evening with the family around a campfire at Rice Creek Campground and learn about the area and its environment at Wargo Nature Center. In the winter months, visitors can use the plowed and multi -use trails within the park reserve, cross country ski at the golf course and snowshoe or kick -sled at Wargo Nature Center. View of Peltier Lake Cross Country Skiing Council's O&M grant program, the Lottery in 6 Lieu of program Expenses generated from the park reserve are related to the maintenance and operations of the park and amenities. Chomonix Golf Course is budgeted separately from park operations; the only course -related items included within the park budget is the operations and maintenance of the cross-country ski trails that are groomed within the golf course. Park expenses are partially offset through revenues generated through daily and annual vehicle passes, rental fees and special use permit fees in the parks general operating budget. The remaining funds used to offset operations and maintenance are provided by the Metropolitan and the local tax levy. Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve The nominal rental fees for the camper cabins proposed in the master plan amendment are anticipated to offset the operations and maintenance costs related to the cabins. While the other proposed projects will not specifically generate revenue, it's anticipated that the operations and maintenance of these facilities can be absorbed into the general operating budget and be offset with an anticipated increase in revenue through other rental fees and annual and daily pass sales. Therefore, Anoka County believes the stewardship plan for the park reserve to be sustainable with assistance from the Metropolitan Council as outlined above. The only non -recreation related service offered within the park is the current existing composting facility, but within this Master Plan Amendment, that is proposed to be relocated north of the park, with only an entrance road within the park reserve boundary. While this facility does not generate any revenue for the County, any expenses related to the entrance road will be paid for by the Resource & Recycling Solutions Department. DEMAND FORECAST The Metropolitan Council's Thrive 2040 regional forecast estimates that the Twin Cities metropolitan area will become more racially and ethnically diverse over the next 30 years and that by 2040 the region's population of color will double to about 40% of the total population. In addition, one in five people in the metropolitan region will be age 65 or older. These shifting demographics require changes to the way the County operates and manages the park system and its amenities. According to the Metropolitan Council's November, 2016 Regional Parks System Visitor Study Report, non - Caucasians are significantly more likely to participate in fishing, special events and picnicking activities than Caucasians. In addition, the Metropolitan Councils March 2014 Regional Park Use Among Select Communities of Color Report, showed that Asian Immigrant/Asian American focus groups identified their top three preferred activities as walking, fishing and rest or relaxation. Two of the proposed projects in this amendment, the fishing access improvements and Wargo Nature Center projects, will help meet the needs for fishing and special events access. Demand for additional camper cabins is shown through the rise in revenues for the cabins and camping in general over the last 3 years. Since 2014, the overall camping revenues have increased about 20% and the camper cabin revenues have increased by about 13%, as shown in Figure 3. Camper Cabins are a great way to introduce visitors to camping and provide an alternate form of camping with less equipment required. 1 1 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve $30,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 1 Camper Cabin Revenues 1 I 1 Similar to the increase in the use of the camper cabins, daily and hourly rentals of canoes and kayaks have increased. From 2015 to 2016, daily rentals of equipment have nearly doubled and hourly rate rentals have increased by 10%. Overall, there has been a steady increase in park visits over the last decade. In 2005, the 2014 2015 2016 Metropolitan Council's Annual Use Estimate of the Metropolitan Regional Parks Figure3 System showed an average annual use of 335,900. By 2016, the average use estimate was 496,000, that's just under a 50% increase in visits. In addition, according to the Metropolitan Council's Thrive MSP 2040 - Population Forecast dated January 1, 2017, the surrounding cities populations are anticipated to increase anywhere from 7-55%, creating additional demand to be met by the park reserve. RC Cabins Bunker Cabins -Total DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT The existing park amenities have been outlined in Figure 2 and include many recreation opportunities, such as walking and biking, canoeing and kayaking, boating, fishing, picnicking and playing on the playgrounds within the park reserve. Visitors can also take advantage of Wargo Nature Center, Chomonix Golf Course, Rice Creek Campground and Centerville Lake Beach. Wargo Nature Center also hosts Heritage Lab, which is an outdoor historical program where students participate in hands-on activities related to a historical theme. The projects proposed in this amendment will build upon the approved 1999 master plan and improve and enhance existing facilities within the park reserve. Wargo Nature Center was built in the early 1990's and will be celebrating their 25th anniversary in 2018. A master plan for the Nature Center was developed in 2015 with the following goals: • Increase awareness of Wargo Nature Center and County -wide outdoor recreation and environmental education programs and events • Increase connectivity to Wargo Nature Center 8 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve • Improve the entry experience and sense of welcome from CSAH 14 to the building • Increase programming around 'Essential Experiences': Access to water and four Ecotypes, Birding, and Tree House (Outdoor Classrooms) • Improve the drop-in visitor experience • Better serve current core program audiences and expand new program audiences • Improve financial sustainability The Development Concept Plan, strategies and specific projects to meet these goals are illustrated in Chapter 4: The Plan in the Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — March 2015, which can be found in the appendix of this document. The total cost for the proposed improvements is just over $7,000,000 with a 15% contingency in 2017 dollars. During the public engagement process, the County asked for input what projects the public would want the County to focus on first. Out of the twelve projects selected by staff for input on, expanding the boardwalk and/or extending the dock into George Watch Lake was the top choice, followed by a trail connection around George Watch Lake to the Lino Lakes YMCA and an expanded nature play area. The next project is to construct a trail connection from the nature center to the existing Central Anoka County Regional Trail adjacent to CSAH 14/Main Street, which connects to the rest of the park reserve. In addition, the County plans to improve the indoor interpretation displays within the Nature Center and also continue working with the University of Minnesota, College of Design — Architecture Program on outdoor classroom structures for Heritage Lab. There is no schedule for completion on these WARGO NATURE CENTER CreadiA,9 .eotle-, a mat, cpp,-ccLaFioh, of o -un- -al, wo-r[S. if 4:7 • Master PI s Approved by the Parks & Committee Services Committee on April 7, 2015 HK 1 miller dunwiddie Figure 4: Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Cover 9 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve projects, but it is generally anticipated to be within the next 5-15 years. With this amendment, the County proposes to include all projects outlined in the Wargo Nature Center Master Plan from March 2015 into the park's overall master plan. The other proposed projects for the park reserve include: • Making improvements to the Peltier Lake fishing access • Adding alternative camping accommodations to Rice Creek campground • Stormwater management improvements to address drainage issues within the campground. • Adding a self-service canoe/kayak rental program and establishing an access point at the campground • Creating an interpretive area near a burial mound • An additional Fishing Access/Pier on Centerville Lake • Create additional multi -use trails and connections to local neighborhoods • Moving the existing compost site out of the park, but allowing the ingress road to remain within the park boundary • Continuing to improve the maintenance facilities within the park reserve to optimize operating efficiencies. These projects are highlighted in Figure 5, the development concept map. 10 ompost (proposed Facility relocation} Wargo Nature (improvements proposed) Launch ishing Pier! Access (improvments Campground (improvements proposed) Picnic Pavilion Beach/Swimming Boat Launch proposed) Interpretive (improvments proposed) Maintenance Facility (I ,r,v. spr,,, Legend — PAVED PARK TRAIL — — PROPOSED PAVED PARK TRAIL UNPAVED PARK TRAIL PROPOSED UNPAVED PARK TRAIL — EXISTING REGIONAL TRAIL - EXISTING CITYTRAL ROADWAY PARK RESERVE WATER Development Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Development Concept Figure 5 05 N Date 101022017 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Improvements to the Peltier Lake fishing access include paving the parking lot and reconstructing the fishing pier to ensure ADA access. This project is proposed to occur in 3-5 years and could look like Figure 6. The estimate for these improvements is around $250,000. Figure 6: Peltier Lake fishing access improvements Originally, the County was proposing to add two additional camper cabins to the campground, but due to the feedback received during the public input process, the County is now proposing to add six alternate camping facilities, such as camper cabins, tent platforms or yurts. Half of the six proposed accommodations are anticipated to be constructed in 5-10 years. The rest to be constructed in 10-15 years. The cabins will be similar to the existing cabins and provide an area for sleeping and a small gathering space. The capacity for these will be 4 to 6 people. Water and electricity will be available at the Figure 7: Example of Camper Cabin sites. The surrounding area will include a picnic table, fire ring and small parking area. The cabin could look like the examples in Figure 7. The yurts or 11 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Figure 8: Example of Yurt tent platforms could look similar to those in Figures 8 and 9. The cost estimate for design, engineering, materials and installation for the alternate camping facilities is approximately $600,000. Figure 10: Example of self -serve station installation of the Figure 9: Example of Tent Platform Drainage at the campground has been an issue in recent years, therefore the County is proposing improvements that will reduce the amount of camp sites that are affected by standing water on a seasonal basis. The improvements proposed are to bring in fill to raise the campsites out of the flooded areas. This will involve coordination with the watershed district to ensure there is a net zero impact to the floodplain, but will allow all campsites to be available for camping during the spring season. Cost for this project are estimated to be about $200,000 and is anticipated to occur within 10-15 years. Additionally, the County is proposing to develop a self -serve canoe/kayak rental program in the park to allow visitors to easily access the lakes. The system would be similar to self -serve systems used in the area, such as the paddleshare.org program on the Mississippi River. Refer to Figures 10 & 11 for examples. The station is proposed to have six to eight canoes or kayaks for use. An accessible dock and launch, as shown in Figure 12, is proposed with the station as well as the addition of an accessible dock/launch at Wargo Nature Center. The estimated cost for access development, system and equipment is approximately $50,000. There is no timeframe for installation of the station at this time. 12 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve i Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Figure 11: Example of self -serve station Figure 12: Example of accessible canoe/kayak dock Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve has numerous documented cultural resource sites throughout the park. One such resource is a burial mound located within the park. With this amendment, the County is proposing to create a node to provide interpretation of burial mounds and other cultural resources in the area that are of significance. The node will educate visitors and create a rest stop along the Central Anoka County Regional Trail. The interpretive area may look similar to Figure 13. The cost estimate for the interpretive area is approximately $50,000 and is anticipated to be completed within the next five years depending on funding availability. 13 Figure 13: Example of interpretive area Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Another proposed project is the installation of a fishing pier on Centerville Lake near the existing boat launch area. This will provide additional fishing opportunities and provide additional access to the lake. Estimated cost for construction of this project is approximately $50,000. At this time, there is no timeframe for installation. Figure 14: Example of fishing pier There are several trail connections between the park reserve and the existing surrounding neighborhoods. But, The County is proposing to create an additional neighborhood connection to Mallard Lane in Lino Lakes and to create an additional multi -use natural surface trail loops within the park reserve. Refer to Figure 15 for locations of proposed trails. A trail from the YMCA to Wargo Nature Center is proposes within the Wargo Master Plan, but additional trails are proposed for the south side of Centerville Lake. The current natural surface trail would be converted to a multi -use trail in this area, so the County is proposing to incorporate those trails into the park system, by inventorying them, assessing them and bringing them up to County standards. The length of this network is estimated to be approximately 2.5 to 3 miles, and would include the construction of several hundred feet of boardwalk and a small bridge. The estimate for developing these trails is $500,000. Park and Boat Launch Fishing Pier/ Access Picnic Pavilion Beach/Swimming Boat Launch Legend PROPOSED PAVED PARK TRAIL 1..JORROA MAY MIMED PARK TRAIL ROADWAY PROPOSES WAVED TAW Loa ESIST 111-G REGIONP.LT RAIL emit RESERVE RICE GWEN WAT ER TRAIL RICE GWEN SNOWLIOBILE TRAIL o-- 1.. - t Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Park Trails 2,250 4,500 Feet Figure 15 14 Date, 10/02,2017 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve The proposed changes to the existing compost site are shown on Figure 16. The existing facility is proposed to be moved about 1300 feet to the north, out of the park boundary and an existing maintenance service road is proposed to serve as ingress access to the facility and an existing drive will serve as egress access out of the facility. The County acknowledges that any costs related to these improvements will not be eligible for financing through the Metropolitan Council Parks Capital Improvement Program or Parks and Trails Legacy Program appropriations. In 2016, the County hired a consultant to conduct a Maintenance Facility Assessment to project the long term system -wide needs for maintenance support building and infrastructure within the County's park system. The assessment helped identify gaps in service coverage, identified where new facilities are anticipated and allows the County to plan for future improvements. The 0 300 improvements and expansion proposed for the Figure 16 Maintenance Facilities within Rice Creek Chain of Proposed Relocated Compost Facility A ► ► Park Boundary f Proposed One -Way Road for Compost Facility • Existing Compost Facility •to be relocated +To Wargo Nature Center Parkway G Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Compost Facility Relocation Proposal 600 Feel Lakes Park Reserve include addressing items at the Campground Facility and Chomonix Golf Course. Refer to Figure 17 for locations and the Appendix for more information on these improvements. Improvements proposed for the Campground maintenance facility include an expansion to a 3840 square foot cold storage building being constructed in 2017. The expansion will include 1025 square feet of space for an office, work room, restrooms, break area and mechanical room. Site work will include paving the drive and yard area, security lighting and security fencing. This project will include the necessary utility connections to provide a fully functioning maintenance facility. The costs for this project is approximately $650,000 and is scheduled to occur in the next 3 to 5 years. 15 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Ivild:g /1 Addlnon Rice Creek Campgro b nd re -meter / GNIe r encing Areefe AJ:ORM Paint Legend NAHTENANCE FAGGOT IX137110 MRK TRA( (STING REGIONAL TRAIL . - . DOSED REGIONAL TRAIL AAT=t 0 0-2 0-4 Miles Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Maintenance Facility Improvements Figure 17: Locations of Maintenance Facilities Other maintenance facility improvements include the expansion of the existing Chomonix Golf Course maintenance facility. Chomonix Golf Course provides a premier 18 -hole golf experience, and includes a driving range and clubhouse. The golf course also serves as one of the County's cross-country ski rental and trailhead locations. This project proposes to add about 4800 square feet of storage for golf carts, 3400 square feet of cold storage, 800 square feet of heated shop and office space as well as yard and security fencing improvements. The cost estimate for this project is approximately $1.3 million; there is no schedule for construction of these improvements at this time. 16 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Way -finding within the park includes several different types of signage. Vehicular way -finding associated with the park includes entrance signs similar to Figures 18 & 19, as well as vehicular scaled directional signs at road intersections for additional way -finding. Those signs may look as illustrated in Figure 20. Park trail way - finding signage includes trailhead signs and trail intersection signs. Trailhead signage is typically placed near parking areas with access to the park trails and provides an overall view of the park and amenities, such as Figure 21. Figure 18 Figure 19 Intersection signs are smaller in scale and are 1 �fl PICNIC SHELTER �•. BOAT ACCESS t i BEACH ) PLAYGROUND �.. Figure 20 Figure 23: Example of interpretive sign 17 Figure 21 Figure 22 located where trail intersections or decision points occur to provide confirmation and additional way -finding information. Figures 22 illustrates an example of these signs. Additional wayfinding information can be found in the Appendix. In addition to the way -finding signs, the County is proposing to develop and install additional interpretive signs highlighting the historical and cultural significance in the area. An example of an interpretive sign is shown in Figure 23. In addition, the County will also be providing Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve additional benches, picnic tables and other site furnishings as needed throughout the park for the convenience of park patrons. In an effort to update marketing strategies within the park, the County is proposing to implement digital monitors for indoor and covered locations throughout the park system to provide relevant, up-to-date materials for our patrons. This makes changing/updating the materials easy and more efficient. The total development cost for the projects outlined in this Master Plan Amendment are approximately $10,725,000. Conceptual Development Costs Summary Wargo Nature Center Improvements $ 7,000,000 Maintenance Facility Improvements 1,950,000 Park Improvements 1,775,000 Total $ 10,725,000 CONFLICTS Conflicts related to the park development will be kept to a minimum through the proper planning and community engagement. See additional information regarding engagement in the Public Engagement and Participation section of this document. The greatest potential for conflict related to the proposed projects are the archaeological resources in the area. The park is within a well-known archaeological area and therefore every care will be taken to ensure those conflicts will be minimized. An archaeological survey will be conducted prior to any project being constructed. If resources are found, some previously used strategies could be implemented within the project sites. One of the strategies may be "cap" the site and not excavate down, but rather build up and over the site. This removes disturbance to the site and provides preservation of the cultural resource. Other mitigation techniques used in the past have included the excavation and curation of found artifacts or avoidance. There are no conflicts anticipated with any of the surrounding land uses, which is mostly residential. Refer to the Appendix for the planned land uses in the area. The greatest conflict arises in relation to the burial mound interpretive site and because we are aware of the potential for conflict, the County will be cautious in designing and constructing this area to avoid impacts to the mound. The County will also work with members of the local Dakota community to ensure the plans and design of the interpretive node are respectful of the culture and traditions of the Dakota people. Conflicts between pedestrians and vehicular traffic will be kept to a minimum by reducing the number of trail and road crossings within the park and by working with the local cities and the County Highway Department to ensure safe crossings at road intersections. Treatments for these areas may include signing, striping and signalized pedestrian crossings. In addition, signs within the park will alert users of potential conflict areas, i.e. 18 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve street crossings, driveway crossings, pedestrian cross -traffic, etc., and will provide way -finding and interpretive information. PUBLIC SERVICES Public services are already provided within the park reserve, with the exception of the Heritage Lab at Wargo Nature Center. Ultimately, the County would like city water and sewer services installed at the Nature Center and Heritage Lab, but due to the remote location within the park, that is unlikely to happen. The Nature Center currently has a well for water and a septic system for sewage. At the Heritage Lab, the County has a functioning well for drinking water and will provide portable toilets when Heritage Lab is in use. The County will continue to operate and manage these services until a better option becomes available. OPERATIONS Anoka County Ordinance #2012-01, regulates the parks and trails under the jurisdiction of Anoka County and is enforced by the local police departments as well as the Anoka County Sheriff's Department. Park Service Specialists (formerly known as Park Rangers) provide education to the public regarding ordinances and other park information. Ski Trail Grooming Annual operations and maintenance costs for the park are estimated to be about $600,000. This includes all daily operations including the picnicking areas, campground and gatehouses as well as the general routine maintenance within the park, such as mowing, sweeping, plowing, debris removal, sign maintenance, etc. Expenses are typically offset by revenue generated through daily and annual park pass sales, picnic pavilion rentals, programs, special events and the parks operating budget. Additional supplementary funding is provided through the Regional Park Operations and Maintenance Grant Program. Anoka County currently employs a remote building automation system that saves the department $5,000- 10,000 annually compared to traditional energy systems by realizing energy reductions in heating, cooling, lighting, and domestic water during unoccupied and off-peak periods. The program enables staff to monitor, 19 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve adjust, and troubleshoot building mechanical systems at all of the wide -spread park facilities from wireless devices, aiding in prompt management and repair. The County has recently undertaken a project to convert lighting in key facilities to LED technology, in an effort to reduce energy demands. The Maintenance and Parks Services Units utility vehicle fleets include a growing number of electric powered vehicles. Turf irrigation systems employ "rain sensor" technology to avoid using valuable water during periods of precipitation. The County has encouraged employees to go "digital" to reduce the amount of paper in the workplace, by utilizing smaller more portable laptop computers and tablets. The county also recently consolidated its contract filing system so as to reduce the amount of paper files, as well as digital files. The County, through the Recycle & Resource Solutions Department employs a refuse and recycling program that requires recycling of paper, plastics, etc. Refuse that cannot be reused or recycled is collected and disposed of consistent to applicable laws. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The public participation plan proposes to engage local cities, population groups and organizations in an inclusive and accessible manner to develop an amendment to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Master Plan. It describes the goals of engagement, who was engaged, the methods used for engagement, as well as results of the engagement. Goals anticipated by the engagement process associated with the development of this master plan were as follows: • Build positive relationships with local communities/residents. • Build community ownership of and understanding of the park and the County's planning process • Receive feedback from the community on the plans/projects. Earth Day Engagement Event Since previous engagement efforts showed the County was lacking in engagement with seniors or the elderly, elementary age school children and their families and diverse population groups not currently represented in the park system, the County chose to target those specific groups for discussion and engagement. This was done through a variety of ways at the local senior center and local library. In addition, residents in the local and regional area, as well as city staff and government officials were also engaged in the process. Questions and 20 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve comments received from the process, including the County's response are listed in the Appendix of this document. Lino Lakes Senior Center Engagement with the overwhelming responses, the County is proposing to add six, for a total of eight once all are constructed and the County is adding two accessible canoe/kayak launches to the park to make it easier for people with disabilities, seniors and people with small children to get onto the water. A summary of comments and the County's responses is located in the Appendix. While the multilingual surveys created for online engagement have received fewer than expected responses, the County focused its efforts on pop-up events at various locations in the community. At these events, the County set up information and picture boards regarding the projects to discuss with the public. These events occurred at the Lino Lakes Senior Center, Wargo Nature Center's Earth Day event, Centerville Beach, and Centennial Library. For more information about these events and other engagement conducted, a Community Engagement Summary matrix is located in the Appendix. Some item's incorporated into the master plan include additional interpretive information throughout the park and an additional fishing pier on Centerville Lake. The County was originally proposing an additional two camper cabins to the campground, but Centerville Beach Engagement PUBLIC AWARENESS Public awareness is an important component of the regional parks and trails system. As shown in the engagement process for this amendment, there is a lack of knowledge of the parks and trails system. The County will continue to work the Metropolitan Council's regional parks and trails system program to create 21 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve awareness about the regional system, through public information maps, websites, social media, publications and brochures, as well as the Parks Ambassador Program. The County will continue community engagement activities throughout the year to not only receive feedback on master plans, but also to provide information on the parks and trails system and promote park amenities and recreational opportunities throughout the County. Other information shared will include information maps, websites, publications and brochures. ACCESSIBILITY Anoka County continually strives to provide equal access to all residents of Anoka County. The regional parks and trails are open to any and all citizens. The park reserve does have a nominal $5.00 a day vehicle entrance fee, which can be applied to a $25.00 annual permit if desired. Pedestrians and bicyclists can enter the park for free. Environmental, recreational and interpretive programs are offered at the park for a nominal registration fee. While Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is not directly served by transit, Figure 24 shows that the park can be accessed via regional trails from existing park and ride locations that serve Routes 250 and 275. The park can be accessed via Central Anoka County Regional Trail from the east and via Bunker — Chain of Lakes Regional Trail from the west. Bunker - "ain Regional Trail Express Route •i 275 Central Anoka County Regional Trail Legend 1110 VEHICULAR ACCESS PEDESTRIAN ACCESS IN PARK AND RIDE TRANSIT ROUTE — EXISTING PARK TRAIL — EXISTING REGIONAL TRAIL - - - - PROPOSED REGIONAL TRAIL EXISTING CITYTRAIL ROADWAY CITY PARK PARK RESERVE PARK RESERVE IN -HOLDING'. WATER Figure 24: Transit in Area In addition, the Anoka County Traveler Transit Link and Metro Transit's Mobility Link provide transportation services for a minimal fee. Transit Link will pick up and drop off passengers anywhere there is an address. There are multiple addresses for facilities within the park, so users should verify the address prior to calling. Currently, all of the vehicles are equipped with bike racks so passengers wishing to bike on the trail could use Transit Link to preschedule a drop-off and return trip. The proposed facilities and amenities within the park will conform to the standards mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act. 22 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve NATURAL RESOURCES As part of the master planning process, the existing natural resources within the park are examined. Anoka County has maintained a strong commitment to preserving and restoring natural resources within its park, trails and open space system. The expansive 11,000 -acre park system contains a diverse system of wildlife species and natural areas including upland forests, deciduous woodlands, upland prairies, forested wetlands, shrub wetlands and open wetlands. The existing land cover, consistent with the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System, can be found in the Appendix of this document. To manage the natural resources and maintain the parks and trails identity, Anoka County will provide for: • The protection, restoration and enhancement of native plant and animal habitats throughout the park; • Protection and improvement of water and soil resources; • Increase public awareness regarding the diverse natural resources in the area; • Sustainable practices related to park development, operations and maintenance. General natural resources management strategies include identifying and assessing remnant plant and animal communities, monitoring rare species, controlling invasive species, ecologically restoring native plant and animal habitat, controlling detrimental insects and disease, wildlife management, enhancing water quality, erosion control and cooperative land stewardship. Protecting, restoring and enhancing natural resources help to ensure enjoyment of those resources in the future. A sustainable development framework is utilized in all new park and trail development and redevelopment to ensure ecologically sound land stewardship with an emphasis on maintaining the longevity of the facilities for public benefit. The following natural resource management components are an integral part of Anoka County's planning efforts associated with the development and redevelopment of Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve: 23 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Anoka County's Natural Resources Unit will be directly involved with the design, construction and monitoring of the proposed park projects. A concerted emphasis will be placed on avoiding and minimizing any adverse impacts to the plant and animal habitat, as well as to the lakes and wetlands. In addition, Anoka County will focus on incorporating local native seed and plant material that will complement the ecology and function of the surrounding native plant communities. View of Peltier Lake Protection of wetlands and surface water resources will be a top priority for these projects as Peltier Lake is impaired for aquatic consumption and aquatic recreation and George Watch, Centerville, Marshan, Reshanau and Rice Lakes are impaired for aquatic recreation. Anoka County will work very closely with the Cities of Lino Lakes and Centerville, the Rice Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and the Metropolitan Council to ensure that the standards and requirements for resource protection are met as these projects proceed. Storm -water management within the park is typically managed on site through vegetated swales and infiltration basins. The County utilizes MPCA's best management practice recommendations in the design and incorporation of storm water pollutant and runoff flow reduction measures constructed in conjunction with park improvements. The MPCA best management practices guidance documents can be found at: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water-types-and-programs/storm water/index.html. The County also has been working with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources on an annual basis through a Delegation Agreement to provide aquatic invasive species (AIS) prevention through inspections of water -related equipment. The County currently has 41 public access points that it monitors through this program. The program provides funds to staff launches on a random basis to insure boat owners are complying with the state laws and regulations as related to AIS. The overall vegetation management goal for Anoka County is to identify restoration needs and to define and implement adaptive management strategies that will sustain the biological diversity, production, and function of 24 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve native plant communities. Vegetation management within the park will focus on preserving native plants, introducing local native plants, eradicating invasive species, maintaining water quality within the watershed and providing for plant and wildlife corridor connections. Considering that ecosystems are dynamic and continually changing over time and space, an adaptive management approach and framework fits very well with the County's practice of ecological restoration and stewardship. In the context of ecological restoration, the following adaptive management principles will guide the stewardship plan for Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve: 25 Problem Assessment: Define the scope of degradation to the site, synthesize the existing knowledge about it, and explore the potential outcomes of alternative restoration actions. Design: Design a restoration plan and monitoring program that will provide reliable feedback and information about the effectiveness of restoration methods. Implementation: Effective restoration is usually a multi -step process, requiring not only installation, but many years of maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring: Biological indicators are monitored to determine how effective the restoration methods are in meeting the project objectives. Evaluation: Fall Colors The actual outcomes are compared to the anticipated outcomes. In addition, the reasons for the underlying differences are interpreted. Adjustment: Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Practices, objectives, and models used during the restoration process may lead to reassessment of the problem, new questions, and new options to try in a continual cycle of improvement for a given project. Management and stewardship practices for natural resources maintenance in the park will include periodic mowing, prescriptive fire management, invasive species surveys, hazard tree assessments, seed collection and propagation, invasive species removal, turf management, brush and tree maintenance, erosion control, forest health assessments and maintenance, wildlife surveys and management as needed, and interpretive signage. Maintenance and stewardship practices also include regular pruning of trees and vegetation along roadways, trail corridors, park facilities and structures. Priority projects for natural resources within the park will focus on the following native community restorations: 1. Mesic Prairie 2. Colonial Water Bird Nesting Habitat 3. Higher Quality Wetland Complexes 4. Higher Quality Woodlands These projects will be conducted in an on-going basis with an average annual cost of $25,000. Review of the Natural Heritage Information System (NNIS) conducted by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) revealed that there is known occurrences of threatened and special concern features within the park, as well as others that are on a watch list. Some of the unique features within the park reserve include a Heron Rookery, Bald Eagles, Tubercled Rein -Orchid, Least Moonwort, St. Lawrence Grapefern, and Bell's Vireo. Prior to implementation of these projects, a flora and fauna survey will be conducted to ensure rare features are located and protected. For projects where avoidance of a rare feature is unavoidable, the County will work closely with the DNR and follow DNR recommendations and guidelines pertaining to the rare feature. Flora & Fauna within the park 26 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve i Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve APPENDIX 27 ©® C e. i.41 k/vLowLtoL ei, aVLol, a p re /I,o4Lo-Vv of o -t r aster Plan Approved by the Parks & Committee Services Committee on April 7, 2015 Anoka County PARKS 8 COMMUNITY SERVICES Rospecti ul, inra: atiYe, Fiscally Respvn5ible miller dunwiddie ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Anoka County Board of Commissioners Matt Look, Vice -Chair, District I Julie Braastad, District 2 Robyn West, District 3 Jim Kordiak, District 4 Carol LeDoux/Mike Gamache, District 5 Rhonda Sivarajah, Chair, District 6 Scott Schulte, District 7 Anoka County Parks & Community Services Committee Commissioner Jim Kordiak, Chair Commissioners Carol LeDoux/ Mike Gamache Commissioner Scott Schulte, Vice Chair Anoka County Parks & Community Services Division Staff John VonDeLinde, Division Manager, Parks & Community Services Cory Hinz, Recreation Services Manager Jeff Perry, Planning and Resources Manager Karen Blaska, Park Planner Andy Soltvedt, Visitor Services Manager Mike Jacobson, Parks Superintendent Brad Fields, Director of Integrated Waste Management and License Bureau Services Paula Anderson, Manager of License Bureau Services - Operations Wargo Nature Center Staff Lisa Gilliland, Operation Supervisor Todd Murawski, Recreation Specialist Bob Holtz, Interpretive Naturalist KristaTommerdahl, Interpretive Naturalist Krista Harrington, Program Supervisor Maria Pierz, Interpretive Naturalist HKGi Planning Team Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Miller Dunwiddie Architects Acknowledgements Sherry Taplin, Interpretive Naturalist Gael Zembal, Interpretive Naturalist Katie Everett, Interpretive Naturalist TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Trends 5 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs 11 Chapter 4: The Plan 31 Chapter 5: Implementation 45 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Al LIST OF FIGURES Figure3.1 Regional Context 12 Figure 3.2 Regional Nature Center Market 13 Figure 3.3 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Area Context 14 Figure 3.4 2013 Program Highlights 16 Figure 3.5 Full Site Existing Conditions 21 Figure 3.6 Immediate Site Existing Conditions 23 Figure 3.7 Existing Building Condition - Main Level 27 Figure 3.8 Existing Building Condition - Lower Level 28 Figure 4.1 Full Site Concept Plan 37 Figure 4.2 Wargo Campus Concept Plan 38 Figure 4.3 Entry Walk Rendering 39 Figure 4.4 Building Improvements Concept Plan -Main Level 41 Figure 4.5 Building Improvements Concept Plan -Lower Level 41 Figure 4.6 Treehouse and West Entry Gathering Area Rendering 42 Figure 4.7 Building Improvement Concept - North Elevation 42 Figure 4.8 Building Improvement Concept - East Elevation 42 Figure 5.1 Cost Estimate 54 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Wargo Nature Center Building Cultural interpretation at Heritage Lab George Watch Lake - Wargo Nature Center Table of Contents -or . . V. • 4. • . • „!. • ko , " • ! , • I, . ' • , •C7' 1, A -40 er •••• At% 4, ...., 4.4 .4. 14..... 4, •• .-...---#7'1.• ..11.4* ° ,... --lrat,e • :---.....„ ..!-.. - ..,..-t- 4 11011146,-• • . - ' _ - 4,- Z. •,,4,er •_,..,.. • ,II. (...•,, ,....41' • • 44 ..,;"/ • -.......e- - "ft • „Jr. S.,• , 4. -• . j" NO, . * .,.• ) r . ... • ,.. .- III, Alt- _4; ,.. . ., .., - ..i. • --, • •••'..a2F, • „ ...A> . r .414.0.--14.e., 4.• 7:4 NATURE CENTER HISTORY AND BACKGROUND The Wargo Nature Center, located in Anoka County's Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve, is devoted to increasing the awareness and appreciation of natural and cultural resources for all, regardless of age, ability, or background. The nature center sits on a peninsula surrounded by George Watch Lake. The Heritage Lab, located on Peltier Lake, is used for Anoka County's programs and the YMCA's Camp Heritage program. The development of the nature center fulfilled the dream of Joseph E. Wargo, a long-time Anoka County resident and District Judge. David Torkildson, Anoka County's first Parks Director, was also a long-time advocate for the nature center and played a key role in building the facility to educate Anoka County residents about the natural world. Given the variety of natural habitats and the wonderful water resources available, the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes area was high on their list of ideal locations. Joseph Wargo died in 1987, but thanks to his wife, Edith - who shared his dream - his estate provided funding for the construction of the Wargo Nature Center. This fund, combined with grants from the Metropolitan Council, resulted in the construction of the nature center in honor of Joseph Wargo in 1993. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 The Nature Center currently serves as the hub for Anoka County Parks environmental education and outdoor recreation programming, as well as off-site environmental outreach. The 10,000 square foot building houses office space for outdoor education and recreation staff and provides storage for a variety of county -wide programs. In 2013 Anoka County served 47,000 people though its organized programs, events, and drop in visitors. Wargo Mission Statement The Wargo Nature Center is dedicated to creating awareness, knowledge, and appreciation of the natural and cultural environments and their resources. We strive to foster responsible stewardship and lifelong learning in people of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds though environmental and recreational programs and actions. Chapter 1: Introduction 1 The master plan addresses 'hardscape' elements such as existing gardens and other physical site elements Programming is part of the'softscape' elements addressed in the master plan 2 Chapter 1: Introduction MASTER PLAN PURPOSE Society's relationship with the outdoors and nature is very different today than it was 20 years ago when the Wargo Nature Center was constructed. People are participating in outdoor recreation less and, on average, Americans are spending significantly less time outdoors. According to a 2014 National Recreation and Parks study, only one in ten adults spend time recreating outside every day. This concerning trend makes Wargo's mission all the more important. As the nature center enters its third decade, it is an opportune time to re -envision the nature center — its building, site, programs, and operations - so that it can better fulfill its mission to create awareness, knowledge, and appreciation of natural and cultural environments. This master plan serves as a guide to future updates to Wargo Nature Center so that it can better serve the community today and into the future. The master plan is unique in that it does not only guide physical improvement, or'hardscape' but also addresses marketing, programs, and operations, or 'softscape.' By addressing both, the master plan provides a holistic approach to recommended goals and strategies that will improve the visitor experience, increase visitorship, and promote greater program participation in the years to come. The Master Plan: • Integrates physical site improvements with recreation, education, interpretation, and outreach opportunities. • Provides strategic guidance for program development. • Delivers recommendations for improving building interiors and outdoor classroom options. • Identifies new trail alignments, site access, and links to area amenities. • Recommends implementation strategies for development phasing, capital and operations budgets, and funding. PLANNING PROCESS In late 2013, Anoka County hired Hoisington Koegler Group (HKGi) and Miller Dunwiddie Architecture (MDA) to prepare a master plan for Wargo Nature Center. The planning process lasted a year, beginning in January 2014 and concluded in January 2015. The process was guided by a core project team of staff from HKGi, MDA, Anoka County Parks & Community Services Division, and Wargo Nature Center. To increase nature center awareness and foster partnerships with other Anoka County departments, representatives from management, planning, programs, maintenance, marketing and guest services areas were included in staff work sessions. Input from other stakeholders, peer groups, and the general public was also obtained during the planning process. Meetings and input included: • A project kick-off meeting on January 23, 2014 with staff from HKGi, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, Anoka County Parks & Community Services Division, and Wargo Nature Center. • Two stakeholder focus group input sessions on March 27, 2014, including: Session 1: Wargo volunteers & other nature center/outdoor recreation professionals. Session 2: Wargo visitors and homeschool parents, and representatives from the Anoka County Library Department. • A stakeholder questionnaire conducted in winter/spring 2014, available online and as hard copy. • Four hands-on work sessions with Anoka County Staff held, April 21, 2014, May 7, 2014, June 10, 2014, and October 7,2014. • Peer group planning session on July 15, 2014 with the core project team and representatives from the Minnesota History Center, Eastman Nature Center, Minnesota Naturalist Association, Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, and Westwood Hills Nature Center. • Presentation of the master plan development at the Minnesota Recreation & Park Association Annual Conference on September 24, 2014, by the core project team. • Presentation by HKGi staff of draft plan to Anoka County Parks and Community Services Committee on October 7, 2014. MASTER PLAN ORGANIZATION The Wargo Nature Center Master Plan is organized into 5 Chapters. • Chapter 1 -Introduction covers the master plan purpose and process • Chapter2- Trends explores demographic, social, recreation, and nature center trends • Chapter 3- Existing Conditions and Needs discusses existing programs, marketing efforts, natural resources, and amenities, their condition and future needs • Chapter4 - The Plan - outlines the vision for Wargo Nature Center as well as supporting goals, strategies and recommend physical improvements that support the vision. • Chapter 5 -Implementation covers actions, phasing, costs, and funding sources needed to realize the vision for Wargo Nature Center. Hardscape and Softscape The Wargo Nature Center master plan is unique in that it does not just guide physical improvement, or `hardscape' but also addresses marketing, programs, and operations, or `softscape'. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 The peer group planning session on July 15 included a site tour for participants The peergroup discussion included programming and marketing Chapter 1: Introduction 3 wA R TRENDS Over the last 20 years, society's relationship with nature has been changing. The state of the environment is frequently discussed in the news, yet we are increasingly disconnected from nature. We no longer view ourselves as being an integral part of nature; the natural world is an unfamiliar place to visit. This disconnect makes the educational role of nature centers more important than ever and, along with other changing demographic, social, and recreation trends, has implications for the future physical and operational needs of Wargo Nature Center. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Changing Demographic and Social Trends Increasing Awareness of the Health Benefits of Nature • Time in natural environments is important to children's intellectual, emotional, social, spiritual, and physical development • Exposure to natural areas can help reduce anxiety, and other mental health and learning disorders related to attention deficit disorder Increasingly Diverse Population • Changing outdoor recreation and nature education demands • Need to expand and adapt outreach methods • Opportunity to increase diversity within the fields of conservation/environmental sciences 6 Chapter 2: Trends Children's Nature -Deficit Disorder • Children's play has changed from being outdoors to indoors since the 1950s • Adolescents'concerns about conservation and the environment have generally declined since the early 1990s -Children & Nature Network Children's Nature Deficit: What We Know — and Don't Know September2009 Financially Pinched Need for partnerships Focus on quality Increased need for revenue Balance between new and existing Life -cycle cost considerations r 100 / Aging Population • More senior recreation and leisure • More mid-day programs • More focus on lifelong learning • Volunteer opportunities Increased interest in Local Food Production • Gardening • Foraging • Organics • Animal husbandry • Beekeeping • Farmers Markets Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Transportation Challenges • Bussing costs for K-12 schools have become a barrier to visiting Nature Centers • In Anoka County 17.5% of rent -occupied households do not have access to a vehicle, compared to 2% of owner -occupied households Interest in Sustainability • Sustainable building & maintenance practices (reduced use of fertilizers, pesticides, mowing, hybrid vehicles, etc.) • Water conservation and management (on-site stormwater treatment, rain gardens, cisterns, grey water -reuse) Increased awareness of native plants versus invasive species • Volunteer opportunities Chapter 2: Trends 7 Changing Nature -Based Recreation Demands Increased Trail Use • Walking • Hiking • Mountain/Fat Tire biking • Road biking • Cross country skiing/snowshoeing Increased participation in Kayaking & Paddle Boarding • Expanded water access • Equipment acquisition & rental • Greater audience potential • Niche opportunity 1 sm. • 40. 11111-Z- ,.141111 � r 8 Chapter 2: Trends Increased Viewing & Photography of Plants, Animals & Scenery Increased popularity of wildlife'cams' Increased participation in Wildlife Observation Data Collection programs • 2,155,000 Minnesotans participated in wildlife watching (2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife - Associated Recreation -US Fish &Wildlife Service) Increased Interest in Birding • 82 million Americans participate in birding National Survey on Recreation and the Environment -USDA Forest Service • Birding ranks as the 15th most popular outdoor activity Increasing interest in birding among younger people Changing Nature Center Trends Fostering Environmental Stewardship Through Demonstration of Green Infrastructure • Gray and black water systems • Stormwater treatment • Pervious pavement Increased demand for Interactive Learning Environments Increased understanding of different learning styles • Technology is making interactivity easier to implement • Current social trends require more analytical thinking and synthesis skills Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Increased interest in Rental Space for Meetings & Events • Multi -use classrooms • More flexible/unprogrammed areas • Comfortable, inviting facilities Creating Memorable Experiences • Distinctive programming • Special events Integration of art • to ►rr ".."4" An evaluation of Wargo Nature Center's existing site, building conditions, programming and operations was conducted at the beginning of the master planning process. The project team used site visits, walking tours, input from nature center and county staff, an online questionnaire, stakeholder/peer group evaluations, and map and photo analysis to assess existing conditions and understand needs. LOCATION & REGIONAL CONTEXT Wargo Nature Center is located within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, 25 miles north of Minneapolis and Saint Paul. The 20 acre nature center campus is located on a peninsula on George Watch Lake, within the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve in Anoka County. Vehicle access to the Nature Center can be obtained from both Interstates 35W and 35E. The nature center's distinctive features include an outstanding outreach program to area schools through its relationship with Connexus Energy, wonderful birding opportunities, great proximity to wetlands and the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes, and rare access to four different ecotypes of lake, wetland, wood, and prairie. Three other nature centers are within 15 miles of Wargo; Lee & Rose Warner, Tamarack, and Springbrook Nature Centers. Additionally, there are 15 nature centers within the Twin Cities seven county metropolitan area, each Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 cultivating and relying on a distinct niche to attract and retain visitors. For example, Tamarack Nature Center has developed a popular interactive nature play area, Dodge Nature Center has a well-known preschool program, and Eastman Nature Center's newly constructed 14,000 square foot building has a strong event space rental program and exceptional indoor/outdoor relationship. Among Twin Cities area nature centers, Wargo's niche is outreach and recreation -based environmental programs, but it lacks a strong regional identity. While the nature center's location on a peninsula gives it outstanding potential access to wetland and lacustrine habitats, it also results in limited access and connectivity within the larger Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve. The wetlands and water surrounding Wargo Nature Center make it difficult to create additional trail connections to the park beyond, although the center does benefit from the Central Anoka County Regional Trail along County Road 14. Needs identified throughout this chapter are based on input from Anoka County Parks staff, focus group input, on-line survey feedback and site and building assessment by the consultant team. Chapter 2: Existing Conditions & Needs 11 2 • `EG.IO'NA'L arNTiE"XT • WARGO NATURE CENTER • OTHER NATURE CENTERS ANOKA COUNTY PARKS OTHER PARKS &OPEN SPACES REGIONAL TRAILS METROPOLITAN AREA COUNTY vv S +V .• v/410 • • is 9- • 7 207 *it WM 24114 111-4 „7_ 707 u r - — m ;l7) 24 9 ANOKA COUNTY :n • r 2.4 7° • • CEDAR CREEK ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE RESERVE 7e EASSTIMANINNATURE CENTER SPRINGBRBOOKINATLU�R,ECCENTj R HENNEPIN COUNTY HARRIET r �le AI! =EXANDER NATURE CENTE.RO F21.' RAMSEY '° �WES,TWOOD HI NALLIt CENTERV T J COUNTY „o �y ER or ,_411,030.1M_ T .STARING LAKE QU,TDII.RCENTER J " CARVER ACOUNTY S1 4 7e. 7e Sc CO • TT NTY R 47) VARGO NATURE itEr &AROSE !ENTER ,_„-WARNER NANTTUREER �+ LTC CE wNIATURE CENTER WASHI GT COUNTY DISCOV41 EENIM MAP l = IOD NATURE CENTERI 0 L IDODGNATURE CENTER WOOD ILAKEiNATURE CENTER CEN ICHARDSON�NATl1RE T CARP NTE_, RjST;mp VALLEYiIVAT,,URE CENTER 7e 7e L. II n 27 DAKOTA L COUNTY M 7 0 � -5- 10 Miles s FIGURE3.1 Regional Context 2 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs Ji FIGURE3.2 Regional Nature Center Market 651 • WARGO NATURE CENLTER • OTHER NATURE CENTERS ANOKA COUNTY PARKS OTHER PARKS & OPEN SPACES REGIONAL TRAILS • 6 15 -MILE DRIVE RADIUS FROM WARGO C ] ANOKA COUNTY /16 47 22 95 • I 4 d �? ,_•CEDARICREEK ECOSYSTEM ,�- - ' ECS IENCE RESERVE 65 . 2421 - 35 SEAS,�S MANOATURE SPRINGBROOK NATURE CENTER 97 , 1 3 6 95 WARGO]NATURE •i& ROSE CENTER WARNER NATURE 3564 CENTER 87 L_ 12 1. • 36 • • UU II ±1- 20 29 71 42 46 66 25. 09 35 46 2 2 316 (� Y q18 1 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs 13 FIGURE 33 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Area Context ANOKA COUNTY PARKS OTHER PARKS & OPEN SPACES ANOKA COUNTY TRAILS REGIONAL TRAILS RICE CREEK CHAIN OF LAKES WATER TRAIL ▪ LINO LAKES MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY r -1 OTHER MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY .i • EXISTING ACCESS FROM 135 HAM LAKE BLAINE 1 18 I • I • •. • I LINO LAKES VIARGO NATURE CENTER i L • HERRTAGE LABIYMCA HERITAGE CAMP • FOREST ▪ LAKE • • • • • I I • 1 HUGO ---,,;1-- CENTERVILLE I, r TC r • VIEW MOUNDS viEw ARDEN HILLS 0 0.5 1 ME=1 Miles NORTH OAKS 4 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs PROGRAMS Existing Program' Wargo Nature Center is home base for Anoka County Parks and Recreation program staff. Programs are offered both at Wargo Nature Center and other locations throughout Anoka County's parks system. Current program offerings focus on outdoor recreation, environmental education, outreach, cultural heritage, and special events (see Figure 3.4 on page 16). The outreach program, where Anoka County staff conduct environmental education in area schools, is one of the most successful programs. In total, there are approximately 40,000 annual program and event participants. This is an impressive number, given the County's relatively small programming staff. Many of programs and events are the result of partnerships with area organizations, including: • Local schools • Connexus Energy • School Forest Partnership Program • YMCA Camp Heritage • Anoka County Libraries • Local park and recreation departments • Volunteers Programs are developed by staff based on current recreation trends, equipment availability, and the interests of staff and visitors. Staff capacity, budget, and equipment needs are all considered during the program development process. Participant feedback is collected via survey monkey and informal oral feedback. Paper surveys distributed to summer camp parents is one of the more successful mechanisms currently used. Programs are monitored and adapted based on numbers of participants and participant feedback. While programs are offered for all age groups, the County's most successful programs are focused on preschool and school age children. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Summary of the Online Survey Results Conducted spring of 2014 with 61 responses » » » Why people visit Wargo: • Trails • Bird watching • Special events • Family program/activities Why people don't visit Wargo: • Unaware of Wargo or programs • Location not convenient What people like most about Wargo: • Nature center building • Natural character • Birding • George Watch Lake • Programs • Trails Suggested Improvements: • Observation dock at lake • Expand hours (weekends and evenings) • More trails/connectivity • Cross country ski rental • Enhanced nature play area • Entry experience and character Most visitors learn about Wargo and Programs through the Anoka County Parks website People list email as their preferred communication method to learn about Wargo Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs 15 FIGURE 3A 2013-14 Program Highlights PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Environmental Education Environmental Education Programs • over 12,000 students served in 2013 Homeschool Preschool • 15 students enrolled in 2013, ages 4-5 Natural Living Series — Adult Classes Outdoor Recreation Podcasts • Programs offered at the Wargo Nature Center, Coon Rapids Dam Regional Park, and at schools • Curriculum aligned with MN State Standards • First grade to 12th grade environmental education programs allow homeschool children to discover the natural world through hands-on outdoor activities • Partnership between Wargo Nature Center and Forest Lake Early Childhood Programs • Taught by a licensed preschool teacher and interpretive naturalist • The Natural Living Series are adult programs that focus on natural and healthy lifestyle options. Classes include; food preservation, shop local, sustainable gardening, rain barrel workshops and cooking classes • Paddle boarding • Fishing programs • Kayaking • Cross Country Skiing • Snowshoeing • Canoeing • Birdwatching with Bob series Outdoor Recreation Outdoor Recreation Programs • Paddle boarding • Fishing programs • Kayaking • Cross Country Skiing • Snowshoeing • Canoeing Cultural Heritage Heritage lab (in partnership with Connexus Energy) • 2,805 students served in 2014 • Program focused on the Native American People of Minnesota with 8 interactive outdoor learning stations 16 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Outreach School Forest partnership with Oneka and Linwood Elementary Schools Outreach in partnership with Connexus Energy • 16,300 students served in 2014 Anoka County Library Partnership • Over 800 students on two campuses (Oneka Elementary and Hugo Elementary) and over 400 at Linwood Elementary • A Wargo naturalist visits each classroom in the school once per season (fall, winter, and spring) • Music and local authors at public events Rentals Birthday Parties, weddings, community gatherings • Space rental Special Events Special Events • Snow Day, Ski by the Light of the Moon, Kids Fishing Clinic, Bunker Prairie Stampede 5K, Earth Day Celebration, Fall Fest Needs One of the biggest challenges for programming is the need to keep it dynamic; programs must periodically change to reflect evolving trends and participant interests.To maintain successful programs, fill offered programs to capacity, and grow participation there is a need to: • Expand and enhance the existing program evaluation system, including improving participant and volunteer questionnaires, and annual stakeholder focus groups, tracking programs with waiting lists and new program topic requests. • Increase teen and adult program participation. • Expand volunteer and service learning programs. • Develop distinct programs based on unique park assets and facilities. • Improve self -guided interpretation opportunities. • Continue to monitor and adapt programs based on recreation and education trends, education standards, and participant interests. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Wargo special events such as the Bunker Prairie Stampede 5K are well attended Wargo offers programs for homeschool students, and should target that group of users for special marketing efforts Existing natural trails Main entrance to the existing Nature Center building The existing sign at the Nature Center's main entrance MARKETING AND PROMOTION Existing Conditions Marketing and advertising for Wargo Nature Center is currently handled by the Anoka County Parks and Recreation Department in coordination with the County's Public Information Office. Primary marketing activities include: • Monthly internal Anoka County Parks Marketing &Visitor Services meetings • Distribution of three program brochures annually, mailed to all vehicle permit holders and recent program participants • These brochures cover activities held during the summer, fall/winter, and winter/spring • Approximately 6,000 copies are distributed • A dedicated webpage for Wargo Nature Center and its programs within the Anoka County website • Social Media: including Facebook, Twitter, Constant Contact, and Instagram • Staff participation in cooperative meetings with municipalities, school districts, and other potential partner organizations in order to promote activities, provide efficient use of resources, and collaborate to develop services • Programs and events advertised at electronic message/display boards within the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park, Bunker Hills Regional Park, Licensing Centers, and Government Center The oversight of the County Public Information Office of the Nature Center's marketing materials results in the distribution of content that is county -approved, and very attractive graphically. The downside of this arrangement, however, is the lack of control it allows nature center staff on a day to day basis Needs Developing tools that allow the nature center and recreation staff to better coordinate needs with the Public Information Office and allows for more flexibility in spreading the word about specific programs and events would be beneficial. Needed staff actions and tools include: • Email distribution of announcements regarding specific upcoming programs and events • Email distribution lists of previous and potential visitors, including a general list and more specific, targeted groups such as adults interested in natural living courses, or homeschool families and groups • Expanding social media presence to include Twitter, Instagram, and others as they arise • More video offerings accessible via the web • Working with other nature centers and groups to cross market • Increased communication between programming staff and the County's Public Information Office 18 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs Visitor's Bill of Rights A list of important human needs as seen from the visitors' perspective, the Visitor's Bill of Rights was used to help asses existing conditions and identify needs at Wargo Nature Center, as well as prioritize future improvements. #1. COMFORT "MEET MY BASIC NEEDS." Visitors need fast, easy, obvious access to clean, safe, barrier -free restrooms, fountains, food, baby -changing tables, and plenty of seating. They also need full access to exhibits. #2. ORIENTATION "MAKE IT EASY FOR ME TO FIND MY WAY AROUND." Visitors need to make sense of their surroundings. Clear signs and well-planned spaces help them know what to expect, where to go, how to get there and what it's about. #3. WELCOME/BELONGING "MAKE ME FEEL WELCOME." Friendly, helpful staff ease visitors' anxieties. If they see themselves represented in exhibits and programs and on the staff, they'll feel like they belong. #4. ENJOYMENT "I WANT TO HAVE FUN!" Visitors want to have a good time. If they run into barriers (like broken exhibits, activities they can't relate to, intimidating labels) they can get frustrated, bored, confused. #5. SOCIALIZING "I CAME TO SPEND TIME WITH MY FAMILY AND FRIENDS." Visitors come for a social outing with family or friends (or to connect with society at large). They expect to talk, interact, and share the experience; exhibits can set the stage for this. #6. RESPECT "ACCEPT ME FOR WHO I AM AND WHAT I KNOW." Visitors want to be accepted at their own level of knowledge and interest. They don't want exhibits, labels or staff to exclude them, patronize them or make them feel dumb. #7. COMMUNICATION "HELP ME UNDERSTAND, AND LET ME TALK, TOO" Visitors need accuracy, honesty, and clear communication from labels, programs, and docents. They want to ask questions, and hear and express differing points of view. #8. LEARNING "I WANT TO LEARN SOMETHING NEW." Visitors (and their kids) come to learn something new, but they learn in different ways. It's important to know how visitors learn, and access their knowledge and interests. Controlling distractions (like crowds, noise and information overload) helps them, too. #9. CHOICE AND CONTROL "LET ME CHOOSE; GIVE ME SOME CONTROL." Visitors need some autonomy; freedom to choose, and exert some control, touching and getting close to whatever they can. They need to use their bodies and move around freely. #10. CHALLENGE & CONFIDENCE "GIVE ME A CHALLENGE I KNOW I CAN HANDLE." Visitors want to succeed. A task that's too easy bores them; too hard makes them anxious. Providing a wide variety of experiences will match their wide range of skills. #11. REVITALIZATION "HELP ME LEAVE REFRESHED, RESTORED." When visitors are focused, fully engaged, and enjoying themselves, time stands still and they feel refreshed: a "flow" experience that exhibits can aim to create. -1996 Judy Rand, "The 227 -Mile Museum, or, Why We Need a Visitors' Bill of Rights," Visitor Studies Association. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs 19 Existing entry walk at Wargo Nature Center Existing kayak storage at the main dock Existing signage and entry to compost site WARGO NATURE CENTER EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NEEDS The Wargo Nature Center extends from the peninsula within George Watch Lake, where the nature center building is located, to the Heritage Lab site located across County Road 14 on Peltier Lake. Most visitors access Wargo Nature Center along the 3/4 mile entry drive that is shared with the Anoka County Compost Site, passing through upland, wetland, and prairie areas. Existing conditions and needs at Wargo are discussed at three scales; the full site, the nature center campus, and the nature center building. The full site includes the peninsula within George Watch Lake where the nature center building is located, as well as the Heritage Lab area east of County Road 14.The nature center campus focuses in on the area within the peninsula around the nature center building. Full site Main Entrance and Entry Drive Existing Conditions Public access for the Wargo Nature Center site is along the 3/4 mile, 24' wide paved entry road that is shared with the Anoka County Compost Site. The entrance/entry drive: • Provides a pleasant driving experience as it passes through uplands, wetlands, and prairie • Lacks a dedicated lane or trail for bicycles and pedestrians • Currently relies on a main entrance sign that does not provide visual interest or reflect Wargo Nature Center's mission and vision Needs • A more prominent entry sign on County Road 14 • Bicycle and pedestrian trail and amenities along the entry drive to connect Wargo Nature Center to the regional trail along County Road 14, and the wider park system • A parking lot for"after-hours"trail access The Heritage Lab Existing Conditions The Heritage lab is utilized jointly with the Lino Lakes YMCA and is used to host outdoor programs for three weeks each fall, rotating students through eight different stations and camps in the summer. The area is not open to the general public. Currently, the area is unimproved, and would benefit from permanent restrooms, reliable shelter, and water. Needs 20 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs • Permanent restrooms • Reliable shelter/designated program space • Water FIGURE3.5 Full Site Existing Conditions and Needs Summary ' RESTORED PRAIRIE COMPOST SITE ENTRY DRIVE© CI REGIONAL TRAIL COUNTY PARK TRAIL SNOWMOBILE TRAIL COUNTY PARK BOUNDARY WETLAND POND co Need to add facilities to interpret prairie and accommodate maintenance and access p Need for interpretation at compost site Q Need to enhance entry experience and public access to site for bicycles, pedestrians, and after-hours visitors Q Need to enhance entry signage on County Road 14 © Accessibility improvements and bathrooms needed • Overall Lack of trail connections/safe pedestrian routes throughout the full site • Wetlands limit development throughout the full site Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs 21 Existing conditions at the buildings lower west entry The existing entry walk as seen from the parking lot Existing entrance to the prairie Compost Site Existing Conditions One of two Anoka County Compost sites is located near the main entrance to Wargo Nature Center. The site is a drop-off location for Anoka County residents to properly dispose of leaves, grass and tree waste. In its current configuration, the compost site: • Feels disjointed from the nature center • Detracts somewhat from the entry experience to the nature center Needs • Improved physical and programmatic integration with the nature center • A partnership with Anoka County's Integrated Waste Management Division to implement proposed improvements • Parking lot outside of entrance gate, near compost site Natural Resources Existing Conditions Wargo Nature Center is unique in that there are four distinct habitats — prairie, woodland, wetland, and water- in a relatively small area. This provides the opportunity for a diversity of visitor experiences. There are extensive wetland areas, a maple -basswood forest, and a restored prairie: • The restored prairie area provides nice natural surface walking trails and currently houses an observation blind in poor condition • The extensive wetland system provides excellent bird habitat • The pine plantation in the upland area south of the entry drive is overgrown • The Maple Basswood forest on the peninsula includes a strong presence of green ash and buckthorn Needs • More proactive utilization and access to the four ecotypes within the full site • Replacement or removal of the existing blind in the prairie area • Forest management plans that: • Guide actions within in the Maple Basswood forest in anticipation of a potential Emerald Ash Borer invasion and existing buckthorn • Guide thinning within the pine plantation to improve stand health 22 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs FIGURE3.6 Nature Center Campus Existing Conditions and Needs Summary 0 RESTORED PRAIRIE AREA • Need to make parking lot part of th-e Nature Center experience © Entry walk improvements needed to address erosion issues and provide a pleasant entry experience for visitors 4 Garage space is limited; need for additional storage O Small prairie area is difficult to maintain • Amphitheater works well but needs upgrades I0 Trail to dock needs to be ADA accessible and accommodate kayak and canoe trailers • Dock improvements should result in a highly functional, ADA water access station 0 Potential to incorporate green infrastructure and best practices that address stormwater managment, as well as provide interpretive opportunities at the parking lot and near the building • Overall lack of ADA accessible trails throughout the site • Need to provide more dedicated places throughout the site that support programming • General need for better storage and access to outdoor equipment • General need to reconsider evening, weekend, and seasonal hours/access to better align resident needs and desires with budget and staff availability Existing dock and kayak/canoe storage Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Existing parking lot Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs 23 Existing program/picnic space Existing nature play area Existing amphitheater Nature Center Campus The nature center campus consists of the peninsula on George Watch Lake where the nature center building and outdoor amenities are located. The nature center building and surrounding site is the focal point for most visitors. Much of the daily environmental education and outdoor recreation activities take place in the areas adjacent to the building, including the existing dock, trails, open lawn, nature play area, and picnic areas. Circulation Existing Conditions • Landscaping around the building that is minimal and does not improve the building as viewed from outside, or reflect a sense of care for nature and our outdoor environment • An entry walk from the parking lot to the building that lacks experiential character, does not provide orientation to the site, has erosion issues, is shared with vehicle access to the building, and does not provide visitors with a clear path to the building's main entrance • A lack of well-defined places for outdoor programming • Trails throughout the site provide access to a large portion of the peninsula but are not ADA accessible Needs • A more welcoming pedestrian experience from the parking lot to the building along the entry walk • Greater connectivity between site amenities • Better indoor/outdoor relationship between the building and the area surrounding the building • Improved landscaping around the building that includes green infrastructure, and stormwater management practices to contribute to a sense of place and provide interpretive/demonstration opportunities Amenities Existing Conditions Amenities are the things that attract and retain visitors.Their appeal and cohesion are essential to creating a memorable place that people return to again and again, and tell their friends about. Wargo Nature Center's main campus amenities and their existing conditions include: • An amphitheater that is utilized but lacks'curb appeal' • Picnic areas with tables and trash receptacles that are also used as gathering/ programming space • A nature play area east of the building that is underutilized due to a lack of visibility from the building/main walk, an overabundance of tall, exotic grasses, and a lack of attractive play elements • A prairie garden north of the building that provides visual interest, but poses a maintenance issue and is not designed to be interactive or experiential 24 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs • A dock that provides access to George Watch Lake, and is utilized for environmental education and recreation programming, but is not wide enough to comfortably accommodate student groups Needs • Screen the amphitheater from the maintenance garage and picnic area with vegetation to create an "outdoor amphitheatre room" • Widen the dock west of the nature center building to better accommodate groups, and provide universal accessibility to the dock and water for kayaker/ boaters with disabilities • To be welcoming and inclusive, provide at least one loop of ADA accessible trails on site • Improve the nature play area by controlling tall exotic grasses, adding a signature play feature, clarifying circulation, creating strategic openings in the tree canopy to create areas of sunshine, and make the play area entrance more visible • Create more self -guided activities for drop-in visitors Support Facilities Existing Conditions Support facilities are the elements necessary to facilitate the smooth operation of the Nature Center. They may not be highlights of the physical site, but they will enhance or detract from user experience based on how well they fit with other elements. Support facilities at Wargo Nature Center and their existing condition include: • The parking lot is in fair condition and provides adequate parking. The parking area lacks shade and runoff filtration • The canoe/kayak storage is separated into three different locations. Boats are stored on racks along the trail to the dock. Rack space is insufficient to accommodate all boats at this time, and leave boats outside during the winter season. The Center's voyageur canoe is housed offsite • The garage is currently too small to meet every day needs, and lacks visual separation/screening from core campus area • Small storage shed is an outbuilding southwest of the main building that stores life vests, paddles, and other equipment. While functional, this small building's cottage -style appearance is incongruous with the rest of the campus architecture Needs • Add planting islands, trees, and stormwater filtration areas to the parking lot to capture pollutants and be more welcoming and harmonious with the Nature Center experience • Expand and improve current boat storage to accommodate all boats and ensure proper storage during the winter • Create additional cold storage to supplement the existing garage • Replace or refurbish the existing storage shed to better accommodate gear storage and fit in with the look and feel of the rest of the site Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Existing canoe and kayak storage Existing storage garage Existing storage shed Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs 25 Existing display cases Existing fireplace and fireside seating tl1111'•!:,y',1\ Existing reception desk Existing library The Nature Center Building The two level, 10,000 square foot Nature Center building was built in 1993, and features two multi-purpose classrooms, a display area, a small library, staff office space, fireside seating, preschool space, storage areas, a kitchen, and lunchroom/ craft area. Existing Conditions • Arrival inside the building does not lead to a clear orientation or circulation of the space • The display area, including some animal mounts and display cases, feel static and outdated • The library feels private and visitors are not sure if it is a public space, resulting in the underutilization of a great resource • An overall lack of indoor/ outdoor relationship — no access to outside from upper classrooms, limited number of windows, views to outside do not add to natural experience • Staff space is not fully separated from preschool area; noise from one area travels to the other area easily • Limited staff space restricts the flexibility to add staff members or have more separated staff space • Storage capacity does not fully meet program needs • Aging building means that capital repairs will be needed in the near future Needs • Entrance needs distinction to attract visitors from the outside • Orientation inside the building needs improvement • Display area needs incorporation of sensory, interactive displays • Library should be welcoming and comfortable • Additional windows and attention to views from inside the building • Reconfiguration of space to provide quiet, private space for staff • Improved storage • Full assessment of mechanical systems 26 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs FIGURE3.7 Existing Building Floor Plan - Main Level Provide some lower coat hooks Ensure no abrupt rise greater than 1/4" Provide a 36" wide section of counter at 36"above the ground Latch issue Ensure accessible door hardware throughout Ensure appropriate signage throughout Ensure appropriate tension at all doors Ensure single effort operation faucet hardware at all sinks Ensure fully compliant parking Q Office pRpJ,v2 4d I � UW eO /Our"' ear0 «1 or PFR Lobby and Display Area ¢n1M�V� A �oMPNA Y, YJ 'COF Classrooms hid Provide top edge of sink at 34" Provide towels at 40" roc oAr ni, Ensure a fully compliant elevator Ensure tactile identification sa 4 GRAJVD PACED GMu sMyTh ppCiD LN- gver- Scale �1/4"= 1'- O" Existing display window Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Existing lower level staff office Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs 27 FIGURE3.8 Existing Building Floor Plan - Lower Level Lower towels to 40" Latch issue Provide a 5' wide stall within toilet rooms .4'. wrgrog*. v,1 'Tw nw> 6 e.,.31 ee.rs«h re ,raver 1N..�w:nrm,o..,,, ma..+ ten . T4'' Ensure tactile » Ensure accessible hardware throughout » Ensure appropriate tension on all doors Kitchen �o r> e �: identification A oe., .e°mer Au- n rmEo. = It is encouraged that a stove vvoltrzgs= with front controls be provided - v'w,6N5tRv6 Ensure bench seat in shower - ,900ge tot 0064 a Ensure fully compliant elevator Multi-purpose room Eir Ensure tactile identification Ensure tactile identification — Lower towels to 40" Ensure no abrupt rise greater than 1/4" 61E0J1.10 ROW al. SMGGTH rPcSO GMu 0 G Existing preschool classroom 28 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs Existing staff space NEEDS SUMMARY Needs that cover programs, marketing, as well as physical improvements to the nature center site and building outlined in this chapter are the basis for goals and strategies presented in Chapter 4. Overall, there is a need to: • Improve awareness about the nature center and programs • Increase connectivity to other activity areas within the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park and nearby communities • Enhance the Wargo experience by improving the entry and sense of welcome • Develop a regional niche among nature centers • Improve the drop in visitor experience by enhancing existing activities and providing more to do • Improve outreach and program participation Existing display mounts in main entry area of building i Existing programming includes homeschool courses Existing rain garden Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Existing parking lot looking north Chapter 3: Existing Conditions & Needs 29 • _ - -zdagro.i. .111111111* iw 2.&la— This chapter is divided into two sections; goals and strategies and the development plan. Goals and strategies address both the softscape (programs, marketing and operations) and the hardscape, or physical improvements to the Wargo Nature Center site and building. The development plan provides more detail on the recommended physical improvements that are needed to support enhanced programs and operations. VISION The prevailing vision for Wargo Nature Center's future is to increase visits to the nature center, improve the visitor experience, and promote greater program participation. Six goals and associated strategies for physical improvements, marketing, programs, and operations are identified that work to achieve this vision. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Goals #1 Increase awareness of Wargo Nature Center and County -wide outdoor recreation and environmental education programs and events #2 Increase connectivity to Wargo Nature Center #3 Improve the entry experience and sense of welcome, from CSAH 14 to the building #4 Increase programming around 'Essential Experiences': Water Access, Access to four Ecotypes, Birding, and Tree House (Outdoor Classrooms) #5 Improve the drop-in visitor experience #6 Better serve current core program audiences and expand new program audiences #7 Improve financial sustainability Chapter 4: The Plan 31 A prominent entry sign along Highway 14 will improve the visibility of Wargo A striped lane for bicycles and pedestrians will promote the shared -use of the entry road Water trail wayfinding would increase connectivity to Wargo Nature Center via George Watch Lake GOALS & STRATEGIES Goal #1: Increase awareness of Wargo Nature Center and County -wide outdoor recreation and environmental education programs and events Strategies: 1. Add prominent and welcoming signage: a. At the main entrance on Highway 14 that is reflective of Wargo's vision as a place to interact with nature b. That is visible from Interstate 35W northwest of the prairie c. At the entrance to the Heritage Lab area, promoting the use of the walking/hiking trails east of Highway 14 d. At the Peltier Lake boat launch to indicate to boaters the location of the Nature Center on George Watch Lake 2. Improve Wargo's digital presence on the web with video, an Instagram feed, smart phone apps, etc 3. Improve marketing: a. Work with the Anoka County Public Information Office to improve awareness of programs and events b. Conduct additional special events to increase awareness c. Expand cross and target marketing (home schools, other nature centers, cities, partner organizations, YMCA, etc) d. Create an -on line video of Wargo activities to give potential visitors a sense of what the site and programs have to offer e. Direct e-mail market to past visitor and program participants Goal #2: Increase connectivity to Wargo Nature Center Strategies: 1. Create a non -motorized trail / boardwalk connection to the YMCA and Lino Lakes 2. Improve the pedestrian and bicycle connection along the entry drive to the Central Anoka County Regional Trail 3. Establish the water trail between Wargo Nature Center and the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve campground: a. Provide maps at Wargo, the campground, and on-line b. Expand canoe and kayak rentals to the campground Goal #3: Improve the entry experience and sense of welcome, from CSAH 14 to the building Strategies: 1. Create nature experience pullouts along the entry road that are accessible after hours, adding a few parking spaces and interpretation at the compost site and prairie 2. Partner with Integrated Waste Management to use the compost site as a learning experience — for example compost demonstration area with interpretive information 3. Add welcome and wayfinding signage 4. Enhance the natural experience between the parking lot and the building by adding native plantings, a learning station, and seating along the entry path 5. Make the building's main entry more visible 6. Screen the dumpsters and garage with vegetation 7. Separate visitor access (by foot) along the main entry walk from maintenance and operational access (by vehicle) 8. Improve the landscaping around the building a. Screen the service area on the southwest corner of the building b. Reflect the center's vision by investing in and caring for native plantings c. Add a 'pollinator pathway'thru the garden north of the building to provide an interpretive opportunity and provide easier access for maintenance d. Screen the amphitheater with vegetation to create an 'outdoor room' experience Goal #4: Increase programming around 'Essential Experiences': Water Access, Access to Four Ecotypes, Birding, and Tree Houses (Outdoor Classrooms) Strategies: 1. Create indoor exhibits 2. Build and utilize new learning station platforms, dock access, and boardwalks to create water stewardship demonstrations and water - oriented recreation 3. Create interpretive exhibits that introduce visitors to the four ecotypes at Wargo, and provide a deeper understanding of their ecology 4. Add an outdoor classroom structure to the restored prairie area for programs 5. Improve birding programs with focused exhibits, habitat improvements, viewing areas, nest cams, and special events tailored around seasonal bird activities 6. Build and utilize a "Tree House" classroom for outdoor programs, events, and rentals 7. Create an ADA accessible 'Wild Things' trail loop that showcases the four ecotypes and birding 8. Create a trail segment thru the uplands area, south of the entry drive and compost site 9. Prepare a forest management plan to address Emerald Ash Borer, thinning of existing pine plantings, management of the maple basswood and floodplain forests Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 WHAT IS COMPOSTING? Thin mon] recoxi frrilw WA p.n. IM x:F add .edea q.a. Fir [w . Llwr:Y.iameLai].:_m,brmw.leaLL'uM1mo*M.l.4.Wm �.; Interpretation would help integrate the compost site with the Nature Center Features that filter runoff and provide vegetative buffers soften the parking lot experience A boardwalk and observation deck brings visitors in close contact with water and wildlife, adding to Wargo's "Essential Experiences" Native plantings provide visual interest, as well as opportunities for observing and fostering wildlife A tree house classroom is a memorable learning space A signature feature in the nature play area will help draw visitors to the nature play area Goal #5: Improve the drop-in visitor experience Strategies: 1. Expand access and/or hours of operation: a. Expand building hours on weekends and evenings b. Allow non -staffed after-hours access by the moving the entry gate further west and adding an easterly parking/turnaround for trail access near the prairie entrance c. Create a trailhead at the Heritage Lab Site to encourage hiking/walking during un -programmed hours 2. Create temporary, flexible outdoor learning stations/ demonstration tables (staffed or stand-alone) on select weekends 3. Bring nature indoors: a. Provide interactive exhibits in the lobby b. Provide a viewing balcony that extends over the current lunchroom area to bring visitors closer the west windows/views c. Enhance views from other building windows by improving the landscape d. Create an outdoor'tree house'classroom accessible from the building e. Construct an outdoor deck off the classrooms on the south side of the building 4. Make the nature play area more visible and functional: a. Add a second entrance to the nature play area that is visible from the main entry sequence b. Add a signature play feature c. Clarify circulation within nature play area d. Control tall exotic grasses within nature play area 5. Create a longer walking experience on site by connecting the Nature Center to the Heritage Lab Site, restored prairie, upland trail, and regional trail system 6. Improve infrastructure and support facilities with a 'light touch' in keeping with the natural setting: a. Consider the use of sustainable building materials and technologies for all future capital improvements. Goal #6: Better serve current core program audiences and expand new program audiences Strategies: 1. Expand adult outreach & programs: a. Expand adult program offerings b. Improve volunteer participation and outreach c. Develop service learning programs d. Develop a young naturalist program to train high school students as volunteer weekend naturalists 2. Enhance or formalize communication with local schools and homeschool organizations to align programming with curriculum needs 3. Consider off-site program expansion beyond schools to other groups/settings 4. Expand on-line video programs along the lines of'Birding with Bob' series 5. Improve the visitor and program participant feedback system: a. Continue to administer program participant feedback surveys b. Conduct quarterly focus group meetings with stakeholders such as volunteers, homes school participants, program participants, non- participants, teachers, and potential partners to measure program satisfaction, identify program improvements, identify new program and partner opportunities, identify new markets and communication/ marketing opportunities 6. Improve the Heritage Lab site with eight outdoor classroom structures and a weather shelter 7. Increase staff resources with increases in program participation: a. Renovate building to allow for modest staff expansion 8. Improve storage capacity: a. Consider enhancing access to the existing storage building with access off the parking lot and/or offsite storage b. Add covered, all season boat and equipment storage near the dock, replacing the current shed west of the building Goal #7: Improve Financial Sustainability 1. Increase revenue a. Fill current programs and expand programs b. Expand equipment and rental opportunities 2. Expand Partnerships 3. Seek more grant opportunities 4. Consider a State Bond Request for improvements outlined in this plan 5. Create a Friends of Wargo group for funding and advocacy 6. Continue phased upgrades to reduce building energy use/costs 7. Maximize use of volunteers Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 An outdoor observation deck and birding platform will encourage visitors to enjoy and study the prairie ecotype Outdoor classrooms shelters in the Heritage Lab will provide shade and other ammenities for daycampers Bituminous ADA accessible trails will allow for use of the 'Wild Things' loop by people of all abilities Boardwalks provide connections and experiential opportunities DEVELOPMENT PLAN The master plan development concepts are organized by full site, the nature center campus, and the nature center building. The full site includes the entire Wargo peninsula, as well as the Heritage Lab site east of Highway 14. The Wargo campus area focuses on the areas adjacent to the nature center building, including the parking lot and primary water access site. The building improvement concepts focus on plans for the building itself. Full Site Concept The full site concept shows the relationship between the Nature Center building and the larger site. Elements include connections to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Water Trail, the Lino Lakes YMCA, and the Heritage Lab Area. Also shown are the locations of primary signage, proposed connections and additions to the prairie and upland area, and the secondary water access site and viewing platform. Wargo Full Site Concept O Additional signage: wayfinding, and welcome signage at major roadways/boat launch O Entry drive improvements: lane re -striping for shared vehicle/bicycle/pedestrian use; relocation of entry gate; added parking and interpretive stations o New trail in uplands O Heritage lab weather shelter O Add Heritage Lab trailhead and parking CO Heritage Lab classrooms o Secondary water access site & birding platform O Trail connection to YMCA and Lino Lakes City Center O Boardwalk from Nature Center to Prairie O Prairie building 36 Chapter 4: The Plan FIGURE4.1 Full Site Concept Plan • AO. •w• RESTORED PRAIRIE MICOMPOST/SOIL INTERPRETIVE SITE'.: B 1— ■MWMr111 B ENTRY DRIVE J. .,, PARKING LOT PROVEMENTS PELTIER * KE ff. PRIMARYWATER • ACCESS SITE & PLATFORM d 114 ..r . DETAILED SITE PLAN ON PAGE 38 ... r HERITAGE LAB4• ■ D HERITAGE LAB in CLASSROOMS/ SHELTERS BIRD VIEWING PLATFORM & SECONDARY WATER ACCESS SITE LIU GEORGE WATCH LAK Tf'Ciyy{{pp 1, • R _,. 0 250 500 Feet 4 .:. , '- i .,. PROPOSED PARKING PROPOSED SIGNAGE PRAIRIE ECOTYPE koWili FOREST ECOTYPE • WETLAND ECOTYPE • r:. •. - .; • .,. •'BOAT LALN EXISTING REGIONAL TRAIL EXISTING UNPAVED TRAIL PROPOSED UNPAVED TRAIL ■ ii BM PROPOSED SHARED SURFACE ROAD mw PROPOSED PAVED ADA TRAIL EXISTING WATER TRAIL in • • PROPOSED WATER TRAIL CONNECTION • •.. ■ PROPOSED BOARDWALK 1 DOCK ammo= PROPOSED SERVICENEHICULAR ACCESS Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Chapter 4: The Plan 37 FIGURE4.2 Wargo Campus Concept Plan 1 'Wild Things' ADA trail loop Building entrance element Q Entry walk i Q Pollinator garden © Entry interpretive node Q Connection to prairie 0 Amphitheatre plantings Entry node with bicycle parking, signage & wayfinding O Parking lot improvements 0 Gravel service area & drive� Q Welcome signage • ••O a• -• Nature play area improvements 0 • additional entrance • signature play element • woodchip path Vegetable garden 0 Bird thicket O open field Treehouse classroom addition O West entry and landscape improvements 0 • raingarden/ dry stream feature • gathering node/service access • picnic area • gathering space adjacent to building at west entry • additional plantings -. Restore Edith Wargo Woodland Garden 0 • • • • .• Covered boat and equipment storage 0 10' dock 0' • • • 0' • • • • • . • • - • • ... • " , .. Primary water access site and accessible boat launch 0 20 40 so Feet 38 Chapter 4: The Plan Wargo Campus Concept The Wargo Campus concept shows improvements around the Nature Center Building, and include redevelopment of the parking lot, entry walk, primary water access station, and landscaping around the building. New items include FIGURE4.3 Entry Walk Rendering the ADA 'Wild Things' loop, a gravel service area and drive, the proposed treehouse classroom, additional storage, and a signature play feature for the nature play area. A landscaped entry and walkway helps create a sense of place and orient visitors to Wargo. Amenities include bicycle racks, welcome signage and wayfinding, benches, ADA trail access, seating, and seating areas that can be utilized as outdoor program space or interpretive nodes. 1 o Improved entry node and walkway o `Wild Things' ADA interpretive trail loop Q ADA access to water station/dock improvements O Nature play area improvements; new entrance and signature play feature O West entry gathering area and landscape improvements Cl Improve boat rental and storage area O Restore woodland garden O Parking lot improvements Wargo Campus Improvements Summary o Separate service area / drive o Add plantings around amphitheater to provide screen o Bird thicket plantings o Treehouse classroom addition o Create larger open field / play space o Improve primary water access site and add accessible boat launch Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Indoor learning spaces should encourage hands-on experiences Indoor interpretive learning opportunities should also be fun Indoor exhibit space and interpretation follows a clear path and is well -lit 40 Chapter 4: The Plan Building Improvements Physical improvements to the Nature Center building focus on making the interior space more dynamic and welcoming for visitors, as well as modifications that improve functionality for staff. Improvements that call attention to the main entrance to the building from the entry walk will help orient visitors to the center. Reorientation of the current reception desk will help visitors know where to go upon arrival. Other important improvements include the updating of current displays in the main lobby to provide visitors with a more hands-on, interactive experience. Improvements to the indoor/outdoor relationship include the addition of windows, and additional doors that provide greater access between the inside and out. A balcony that extends over the lower level cafeteria/craft area will bring visitors closer to the west facing windows that provide views of the Wargo campus. Staff and storage spaces are also reconfigured to allow for more convenient access to equipment and flexible space to accommodate staffing needs and provide the appropriate separation of public and private space. With the addition of an outdoor 'Treehouse' classroom Wargo will gain a memorable space that visitors will enjoy for a variety of programs and events. Building Improvements Summary Reconfigure interior space New artful structure to draw attention to main entrance Reconfigured welcome desk area Redesigned lobby with interactive interpretive displays `Treehouse' outdoor classrooms Reconfigured lower level with more staff space and full walls to separate offices and public space *Concept plans for building improvements are flexible FIGURE4.4 Building Improvements Concept Plan -Main Level ENTRANCE STRUCTURES SIGHT LINES/DAYLIGHT TO ENTRANCE ADD DOORS TO EXPAND STAFF SPACE INTO UNDERUTILIZED CORRIDOR - ri ADD DOOR TO SECURE COAT ROOM TO ADD FLEXIBILITY OF USE POSSIBLE GATE FOR OFF HOURS- ALWAYS USE OF TOILET ROOMS WHEN BUILDING IS CLOSED OPEN STAFF AREA • ADDED WINDOW SEAT AND FLEXIBLE TABLES / CHAIRS TO ENHANCE USE OPEN WALL FOR DAYLIGHTNISUAL ACCESS FIGURE4.5 Building Improvements Concept Plan -Lower Level REMOVE RAIL EXTENSION 0=. ADDITIONAL DAYLIGHT FOR OFFICES a ..Yd *iM.144 • Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 lig e. me -.~w sir 11r,.. 40 it UPGR DE LIGHTING AND ADD .EILING FANS TO IMPR•VE CIRCULATION IN SPAC ADD ' DDITIONAL LEDGE AT ENIS OF ROOM TO ORGA IZE MOUNTING DISPL YS PROJ: TING BALCONY EXTE DS VIEWS TO LAKE w ui hit fltWt �+�nh Yd. STAFF ACCESS DOOR AND TRANSOM WINDOWS FULL HEIGHT SEPARATION — BETWEEN SCHOOL AND STAFF WITH TRANSOM WINDOWS REORIENTS BUT MAINTAINS PRESCHOOL SIZE DECK ADDITION OUTDOOR CLASSROOM ACCESS ADDITIONAL DAYLIGHT FOR PRESCHOOL OFF SITE STORAGE ACCESS STORAGE SPACE PROVIDES 40 LINEAR FEET OF STORAGE SHELVING Chapter 4: The Plan 41 FIGURE4.6 Treehouse and West Entry Gathering Area Rendering mmnlll'lilllllllf II Improvements to the building and surrounding landscape improve the indoor/ outdoor relationship. FIGURE4.7 Building Improvement Concept - North Elevation ENTRANCE STRUCTURE FIGURE4.8 Building Improvement Concept - East Elevation ACCESSIBLE TREE HOUSE DIRECT ACCESS FROM INTERIOR CLASSROOMS TO OUTDOOR CLASSROOMS AND SITE COVERED CLASSROOM WITHIN ACCESSIBLE TREE HOUSE ACCESSIBLE CONNECTION OUTDOOR CLASSROOM/LEARNING DECK 42 Chapter 4: The Plan A water access site/outdoor classroom provides a comfortable space for water -related programming '44 1101i,tor,-14J Stormwater features provide ecosystem services and interpretive opportunities A welcoming entry walk invites visitors into the site 7 Themed details help create a sense of place and overall site character Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 r Boardwalks can also be gathering places 1 The Master Plan identifies the future vision for Wargo Nature Center and the goals, strategies, including physical improvements, to achieve that vision. Implementing the plan will take continued effort in terms of staff time and funding and is intended to be phased over time, as resources are available. This chapter addresses phasing, funding resources, costs and to implement the plan. The chapter is divided into four sections. The operational plan addresses timing and actions for the 'softcape' elements of the plan: staffing, marketing, and operations. The phasing plan addresses physical improvements, the 'hardscape' elements. This is followed by a cost estimate for site and building improvements and potential funding resources. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Chapter 5: Implementation 45 OPERATIONAL PLAN The operational plan addresses timing and actions for the 'softcape' elements of the plan: staffing, marketing, and operations. Goal Strategies Action Required Timelin, #1: Increase awareness of Wargo Nature Center and county- wide outdoor recreation and environmental education programs and events Signage/wayfinding at the Peltier Lake boat launch that indicates the location of the Nature Center on George Watch Lake Design and install sign 2015 Improve Wargo's digital presence on the web with video, an Instagram feed, smart phone apps, etc. Develop an annual digital media plan with recreation, nature center, and marketing department staff Annually • Improve marketing • Work with the Anoka County Public Information Office to improve awareness of programs and event • Expand cross and target marketing (home school community, other nature centers, cities, partner organizations, YMCA, etc) • Create an -on line video of Wargo activities to give potential visitors a sense of what the site a programs have to offer • Direct e-mail market to past visitor and program participants • Conduct additional special events to increase awareness Develop an annual strategic marketing plan for in coordination with Anoka County Public Information Office. Meet quarterly to track progress. Formally coordinate marketing activities between the nature center and marketing staff Address as part of the annual marketing strategic plan Develop a series of short (less than 3 minute) viedos highlighting specific programs at Wargo — water sports & rentals, winter sports, summer drop in activities, and summer camps. Develop mechanisms to allow recreation and nature center staff greater control over direct email marketing to past program participants Develop and hold one additional annual special event Annually Quarterly Monthly Annually 2015 On-going Annually 46 Chapter 5: Implementation Goal Strategies Action Required Timeline 1 #2: Increase connectivity to Wargo Nature Center Establish the water trail between Wargo Nature Center and the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve campground Develop and provide maps at Wargo, the campground, and on-line Expand canoe and kayak rentals to the campground 2016 #3: Improve the entry experience and sense of welcome, from CSAH 14 to the building Obtain funding for capital projects Expand partnerships Budget for phased physical improvements in the County's annual Capital Improvement Plan Identify partnerships for implementation Apply for grants On-going 2015-2020 #4: Increase programming around 'Essential Experiences': Water Access, Access to Four Ecotypes, Birding, and Tree House (Outdoor Classrooms) Improve birding programs with focused exhibits, habitat improvements, viewing areas, nest cams, and special events tailored around seasonal bird activities Prepare a forest management plan to address Emerald Ash Borer, thinning of existing pine plantings, management of the maple basswood and floodplain forests Develop programs around new program spaces as they are built (boardwalks, expanded docks, tree house, etc.) Install nest cams & stream on-line Repair bird blinds at Wargo Nature Center Create birding exhibit in Wargo Nature Center Lobby detailing birding opportunities in Anoka County Host one seasonal birding event Prepare forest management plan 2015-2020 During the design process for new spaces identify potential programs, space/design requirements, equipment, staff needs, and partnership opportunities On-going #5: Improve the drop-in visitor experience Expand access and/or hours of operation Create temporary, flexible outdoor learning stations/ demonstration tables (staffed or stand-alone) on select weekends Expand building hours on weekends and evenings Expand staff hours to coincide with rental demands 2015-2016 Staff or develop volunteer program for temporary learning stations (touch and feel tables, water resources, geocaching) on weekends On-going Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Chapter 5: Implementation 47 Goal Strategies Action Required Timelin( #6: Better serve current core program audiences and expand Expand outreach & programs Expand adult program offerings Train volunteers to assist naturalists with programs Develop service learning programs On-going new program audiences Develop a young naturalist program to train high school students as volunteer weekend naturalists Consider off-site program expansion beyond schools to other groups/ settings Identify and meet with potential other off- site program audiences to test market and specific audience needs 2017 Expand on-line video programs along the lines of'Birding with Bob' Produce an on line video program that highlights each of Wargo's four ecotypes 2015 Enhance or formalize communication with local schools and homeschool organizations to match programming with curriculum needs Hold an annual focus group meeting with each group On-going Improve the visitor and program participant feedback system Continue to administer program participant feedback surveys Conduct semi-annual or annual focus group meetings with stakeholders such as volunteers, homeschool participants, program participants, non-participants, teachers, and potential partners to measure: On-going • program satisfaction • identify program improvements • identify new program and partner opportunities • identify new markets and communication/marketing opportunities Increase staff resources Add staff along with increases in program participation As needed 48 Chapter 5: Implementation Goal Strategies Action Required Timeline #7: Improve Financial Increase revenue Fill Adjust program mix based on trends, participation rates, and participant feedback On-going Sustainability • current programs and expand programs Coordinate hours for equipment rental at 2015 • Expand equipment and rental opportunities Wargo Nature Center with rental demand Expand rental offerings at the campground 2015-2020 Offer and market the tree house and other new program spaces for private rental As spaces are developed Expand Partnerships Actively work to enhance partnerships with: On-going • Anoka County Integrated Waste Management through incorporated recycling into the on-site and off-site programs and interpretive displays • The Cities of Lino Lakes, Blaine, and Centerville • Connexus Energy, YMCA, and municipal parks and recreation departments • Rice Creek Watershed District Seek more grant opportunities Dedicate staff time to grant writing. On-going Use Edith Wargo Powers Endowment as leverage for matching grant funds On-going Consider a State Bond Request Identify priority projects and begin State 2015-2016 Bond Request Process Create a Friends of Wargo group for funding and advocacy Work with Anoka County Parks and Community Services Committee to identify potential founding members 2016-2020 Hold focus group with existing volunteers to test idea Continue phased upgrades to reduce building energy use/costs As building system upgrades are needed, replace systems with energy efficient models On-going Maximize use of volunteers Develop new programs that combine education with volunteer training & events (service learning, teen naturalists, wildlife counts, invasive species control, construction of small wildlife viewing blinds, bird boxes, etc.) On-going Expand opportunities for trained volunteers Coordinate volunteer activities with Friends of Wargo group Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Chapter 5: Implementation 49 PHASING AND PRIORITIES The Wargo Nature Center master plan has been developed to support phased implementation. Improvements are organized into near term (0-5 years), mid-term (5-12 years), and long term (12+ years) phases. Phasing allows for areas of the overall project to be completed in independent stages. It is anticipated that near-term projects will be built first, but the Master Plan remains flexible so that projects can be implemented as partnership or funding opportunities arise. Priorities were developed based on input from the core project team, and reflect the needs and knowledge of staff, visitors, and other stakeholders that provided input throughout the process. The first phase focuses on more easily implementable improvements, as well as improvements that address issues such as visitor safety, ADA accessibility, place -making, and erosion. Long-term, or third phase improvements, include items that will require larger capital investments and may take more time to secure partnerships and funding for implementation. 50 Chapter 5: Implementation KEY: )A) See Full Site Phasing Plan )A) See Wargo Campus Phasing Plan A Signage & wayfinding B Entry drive improvements: bike & pedestrian lane and parking areas c Entry node and walkway D 'Wild Things'ADA interpretive trail loop E ADA trail/dock to water station Nature play area entrance and improvements G Heritage Lab classroom structures H Interior space reconfiguration 1 Rental storage improvements J Woodland garden restoration K Parking lot improvements 1 Service area and drive v Indoor interpretation/displays F M Upland trail loop N Heritage Lab area parking o West entry gathering area and landscape improvements P Amphitheatre screen planting Q Bird thicket plantings R Treehouse classroom s Open field r Heritage Lab weather shelter u Secondary water access site & birding platform v Connection to the Lino Lakes YMCA w Boardwalk connection to the prairie X Prairie building u g 'v N 1 rn (/) g r N O + z - rn g Full Site Phasing Plan V X B _ ;;- - = _j.................... M See Campus Phasing Plan �U Proposed Phasing - Full Site Wargo Campus Phasing Plan D A A - NI F % S ♦i W. ,. r2' I ........... baa - K 1• R i Ng Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 G Chapter 5: Implementation 51 Our Backyard Nature Preschool is offered at the Nature Center through a partnership with the Forest Lake Family Center Wargo naturalists provide programming at desig- nated school forests offered in collaboration with area elementary schools With the aid of a Minnesota Agriculture in the Classs- room grant, Wargo added a Farm to Market Summer camp in 2013 FUNDING & PARTNERSHIPS At present, Wargo has a wide array of funding sources, ranging from its own operating budget to private grants and endowments, with approximately 75% of its operating budget coming from the Anoka County budget. Current funding sources include: • Wargo Nature Center Operations Budget • Metro Regional Parks Rehab and Enhancement Program • Metro Regional Parks C.I.P. • Metro Regional Parks and Trails Legacy Program • Edith Wargo Powers Endowment • Koch Pipeline Company Easement Funding (one-time) • Connexus Energy Grant In order to realize the funding required to make the proposed improvements in this plan, additional funding strategies will need to be pursued. Staff currently devotes some capacity to pursue federal, state, and foundation grants to help support the operations and development of the Center, but grant funding should be supplemental to other additional sources. Potential new funding strategies include: • Increase revenue return from rentals, programs, and events • Seek grants through new opportunities • Seek matching funds using the Edith Wargo Powers Endowment as leverage • Consider a State Bond Request • Create a Friends of Wargo group for funding and advocacy • Continue phased upgrades to reduce building energy use/costs • Partnership with the University of Minnesota's College of Design Architecture Department As the mission, vision and goals of Wargo Nature Center match or overlap with other organizations, potential partnerships should be explored to share resources to help implement the redevelopment plans. As such, Wargo should actively work to increase and enhance partnerships with: 52 Chapter 5: Implementation • Anoka County Integrated Waste Management through incorporated recycling into the on-site and off-site programs • The Cities of Lino Lakes, Blaine, and Centerville • Connexus Energy, YMCA, and municipal parks and recreation departments • Rice Creek Watershed District CURRENT PARTNERSHIPS Wargo Nature Center currently has several successful partnerships with the University of Minnesota, Connexus Energy, the YMCA, Anoka County Libraries, Forest Lake Family Center, and Oneka and Linwood Elementary School Forests. Two important partnerships are highlighted below. University of Minnesota Partnership The University of Minnesota School of Design - Architecture Program, will be partnering with the Anoka County Parks and Recreation Department in the design and installation of a variety of structures and enhancements at the Wargo t Nature Center. There are several exciting initiatives outlined in the new Nature Center Master Plan that are well suited to this endeavor. Starting in the spring of 2016, graduate level students will be engaged in a design/build program focusing on "real life" projects at the Nature Center. This will be followed with hands on production during the summer months. It is anticipated that the program could last for several years. The new collaboration will also include the development of strategies for securing matching funds to advance the projects from alumni and enthusiasts of the University of Minnesota Architecture Program. The County will also be seeking grants to be combined with the Edith Wargo Fund to underwrite the cost of these projects. Connexus Energy Partnership Connexus Energy has been an outstanding support organization for the Anoka County Parks and Recreation Department for over 20 years. Connexus Energy, a local customer -owned utility, has provided financial support of over $500,000 for two award-winning programs. Thanks to Connexus's generous continuing financial support, over 600,000 students in Anoka County have been able to participate in the Wildlife Outreach and Heritage Lab programs. The Wildlife Outreach program is provided free to local schools and provides presentations on Minnesota animals in an informal and fun manner.The Wildlife Outreach Program is conducted by staff naturalists at various school sites in the northern metro area. School groups choose a topic from a list of eight possible MN animals to augment their curriculum. The presentations are about 45 minutes each and focus on the animal's habitat, adaptations and conservation issues. Artifacts such as furs, bones, mounts, and costumes are used to bring the animals to life. Each student takes home a brochure that covers key points of the presentation. Participants to the Heritage Lab travel through a daylong living history program that focuses on different time periods of MN history. Heritage Lab is a full day, out -door environmental and historical program. Students come for the entire day and participate in hands-on activities that typify an historical period such as: theVoyageur Era, Minnesota Milling, Mining, & Lumbering, Native Americans and the Civil War Era. Students fully engage in the time period as the area is transformed into a specific time period and staff members take on the persona of individuals from various walks of life in a given time period. Without the tremendous financial assistance of Connexus Energy, these programs would not happen. Wah 1 1 4� 1 ill in Wargo's Wildlife Outreach program is supported by Connexus Energy Heritage Lab day camps are also supported by an annual grant from Connexus Energy Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Chapter 5: Implementation 53 Cost Estimate The preliminary cost estimate shows a total redevelopment cost of approximately $6.0 million (2015 dollars) to implement all proposed improvements. Near term phase redevelopment is estimated at $2.4 million; mid-term phase at $1.2 million; and long-term phase at $2.4 million. These figures include contingencies for construction and engineering. FIGURE 5.1 Cost Estimate 54 Chapter 5: Implementation Wargo Nature Center Hugo, Minnesota 03.11.15 Preliminary Schematic Cost Estimate: based on MasterPlan Prepared by Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Description Qty. Unit Unit price Totals with 3096 escalation Subtotals Near term Mid term Longterm A CIRCULATION Entry Walk +Node 8' permeable path 355 If $ 120 $ 42,600.00 $55,380 $ 55,380.00 bicycle parking and entry plaza permeable paving 1000 sf $ 15 $ 15,000.00 519,500 $ 19,500.00 Bike hoops 4 ea $ 300 $ 1,200.00 51,560 $ 1,560.00 plantings/landscaping (9 x 125 sf areas) 1125 sf $ 10 $ 11,250.00 514,625 $ 14,625.00 seating + gathering area 2 ea $ 2,500 $ 5,000.00 $6,500 $ 6,500.00 ADA Loop Paved bituminous or limestone ADA trail to water station 28'0890' 890 If $ 35 $ 31,150.00 540,495 $ 40,495.00 Paved bituminous or limestone ADA trail 8'51620' 1620 If $ 35 $ 56,700.00 573,710 $ 73,710.00 Paved bituminous service drive 10' x 230' 230 If $ 50 $ 11,500.00 514,950 $ 14,950.00 Paved bituminous ADA trail to main dock l0x360' 360 If $ 45 $ 16,200.00 $21,060 $ 21,060.00 Wayfrnding/Interpretation/Signage Main entrance sign 1 ea $ 5,000 $ 5,000.00 56,500 $ 6,500.00 Site welcome sign/directional 1 ea $ 2,500 $ 2,500.00 53,250 $ 3,250.00 Site orientation sign/wayfindingat entry node 1 ea $ 300 $ 300.00 5390 $ 390.00 mist. interpretive signage (compost, prairie, forest restoration/invasives) 3 ea $ 800 $ 2,400.00 53,120 $ 3,120.00 Miscellaneous wayfnding 7 ea $ 500 $ 3,500.00 54,550 $ 4,550.00 Heritage Lab entrance signage 1 ea $ 1,000 $ 1,000.00 51,300 $ 1,300.00 Heritage Lab wayfinding sign 1 ea $ 500 $ 500.00 5650 $ 650.00 subtotal $267,540 $ 267,540.00 C PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS + SITE Bioswale/Dry Stream 300 SF $ 20 $ 6,000.00 57,800 57,800 Plaza/Rear Circulation Permeable pavers 2000 sf $ 15 $ 30,000.00 039,000 539,000 Landscape allowance 1 EA $ 2,500 $ 2,500.00 $3,250 $3,250 subtotal $50,050 $ 50,050.00 D NATURE PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS New Entrance woodchip path (4' x 55' path ) 55 LF $ 5 $ 275.00 3358 $ 35750 oncrete stairs (4' wide with 12 stairs) 0 LS $ 115,000 $ - $ - limber stairs (4'wide, l2steps) 12 ea $ 2,500 $ 30,000.00 539,000 $ 39,000.00 Signature Feature new nature play/discovery element 1 ea $ 35,000 $ 35,000.00 $45,500 $ 45,500.00 Landscaping Allowance $ - selectivetreeclearing(ash) 1 L5 $ 2,000 $ 2,000.00 $2,600 $ 2,600.00 woodchip trails 1 LS $ 1,000 $ 1,000.00 $1,300 5 1,300.00 understory tree planting 20 EA $ 200 $ 4,000.00 55,200 5 5,200.00 sledding hill clearance and landscaping .6 ac $ 4,000 $ 2,400.00 33,120 $ 3,120.00 Restoration/invasive species control .5 ac $ 3,000 $ 1,500.00 01,950 $ 1,950.00 Picnic table 5 EA $ 1,500 $ 7,500.00 59,750 5 9,750.00 subtotal $108,778 $ 108,777.50 MIL EQUIPMENT STORAGE RELOCATION new structure (200 sf) 1 LS $ 10,000 $ 10,000.00 $13,000 $ 13,000.00 covered boat storage 30'x 18' 1 15 $ 20,000 $ 20,000.00 526,000 $ 26,000.00 canoe racks 3 ea $ 1,000 $ 3,000.00 $3,900 $ 3,900.00 subtotal 542,900 $ 42,900.00 Mr BUILDING MODIFICATIONS InteriorSpace reconfiguration (main and lower level, MEP) 1 LS 0 352,788 5 352,788.00 $458,624 $458,624 Treehouse addition 1 LS $ 136,477 $ 136,477.00 5177,420 $177,420 Front Entrance 1 LS $ 31,866 5 31,866.00 $41,426 $41,426 Indoor interpretation 1 1_5 $ 105,000 $ 105,000.00 5136,500 5136,500 subtotal 5813,970 $ 813,970.30 TRAIL CONNECTIONS Connection to Prairie East Boardwalk 8' 01200'(1200 LF) 1200 If $ 175 $ 210,000.00 $273,000 3273,000 West Boardwalk 8' x 2000' If $ 175 $ - $ Connection to YMCA Boardwalk 10'x 3,540' 3,540 If $ 175 $ 619,500.00 $805,350 $805,350 Paved bituminous trail 10'03,400' 3,400 If $ 80 $ 272,000.00 $353,600 $353,600 Repaving entry drive 4210'e24'(includes base material, prep, mobilization and 101040 sf $ 3 $ 328,380.00 $426,894 $ 426,894.00 Upland natural surface trail loop 1500 If $ 2 $ 3,000.00 $3,900 $3,900 subtotal $1,862,744 $ 426,894.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 1,431,950.00 54 Chapter 5: Implementation Description Qty. Unit Un it price Totals with 30% escalation Subtotals Near term Midterm Long term H HERITAGE LAB OUTDOOR CLASSROOM/SHELTER Outdoor Classroom Shelters Ah. 8 LS $ 25,000 _ $ 200,000.00 0260,000 $ 260,000.00 Weather Shelter 1 LS $ 75,000 $ 75,000.00 097,500 $ 97,500.00 Heritage Lab trail access/parking lot $ - gravel parking -4 cars 1600 sf $ 8 $ 12,800.00 $16,640 $16,640 subtotal 5374,140 5 357,500.00 $ 16,640.00 .16.OBSERVATION/TREE HOUSE STRUCTURES Prairie classroom/structure LS $ 150,000.00 0195,000 $195,000 Primary Water Access/ Platform/shade structure $ - Wooden Dock/Pier (2,200 sf,10' x 220') 2200 sf $ 60 $ 132,000.00 0171,600 $ 171,600.00 Covered structure (650 sf, 25' x26') 650 sf $ 50 Secondary water access* bird viewing platform Wooden Dock/Pier (2,200 sf, 10' 0220') 2200 sf $ 60 $ 132,000.00 0171,600 5171,600 Covered structure (650 sf, 25' x26') 450 sf $ 50 $ 22,500.00 $29,250 $29,250 subtotal 5567,450 $ 171,600.00 $ - 5395,850 Prairie observation deck (125SF@ $505F) 2 LS $ 17,500 $ 35,000.00 $45,500 $ 45,500.00 Parking- 3 lots for cars (Heritage Lab, Compost, Prairie) 4800 sf $ 3 $ 14,400.00 $18,720 $ 18,720.00 subtotal Restoration- woodland plantings 2 AC $ 2,500 $ 5,000.00 $6,500 564,220 $ 64,220.00 $6,500 Bird thicket .5 ac $ 6,000 $ 3,000.00 03,900 03,900 tree 1 ea $ 300 $ 300.00 0390 0390 understory trees 3 ea $ 200 $ 600.00 0780 0780 shrubs (5'or) 80 ea $ 20 $ 1,600.00 02,080 02,080 Pollinator Garden .3 ac $ 6,000 $ 1,800.00 02,340 $ 2,340.00 Woodland Garden improvements .2 acres) 1 LS $ 3,000 $ 3,000.00 03,900 $ 3,900.00 post fence 115 If $ Amphitheatre Screen -woodland establishment 0.03 ac $ - tree 2 ea $ 300 $ 600.00 $780 $780 understory trees 9 ea $ 200 $ 1,800.00 02,340 02,340 shrubs(5'oc) 60 ea $ 20 $ 1,200.00 01,560 01,560 subtotal 524,570 $ 6,240.00 $ 78,330.00 L PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS Replace bituminous parking lot 25610 sf $ 3 $ 83,232.50 0108,202 0108,202 Precast concrete bumpers 30 ea $ 100 $ 3,000.00 03,900 03,900 30 stall parking lot (permeable pavers with concrete curbing) 41 per stall $ 3,000 $ 123,000.00 0159,900 0159,900 Parking lot lighting 2 ea $ 4,500 $ 9,000.00 $11,700 $11,700 Stormwaterraingardens allowance 3500 sf $ 15 $ 52,500.00 068,250 068,250 Landscaping allowance 700 sf $ 8 $ 5,600.00 07,280 07,280 subtotal 5359,232 5359,232.25 Overall site lighting- per light pole ea $ 4,500 $ - subtotal Construction subtotal $ 3,488,918.50 54,535,594 $ 4,535,594.05 $ 1,804,903.75 $ 902,890.30 $ 1,827,800.00 15% construction contingency $ 523,337.78 $ 680,339.11 $ 270,735.56 $ 135,433.55 $ 274,170.00 Construction total $ 4,012,256.28 $ 5,275,933.16 $ 2,075,639.31 $ 1,038,323.85 $ 2,101,970.00 15% Engineering andDesign $ 607,838.44 $ 782,389.97 $ 311,345.90 $ 155,748.58 $ 315,295.50 SCHEMATIC PARK IMPROVEMENT TOTAL $ 4,614,094.72 $ 5,998,323.73 $ 2,386,985.21 $ 1,194,072.42 $ 2,417,265.50 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Chapter 5: Implementation 55 I‘ Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 MEETINGS & OUTREACH Master Plan Kick Off Meeting A2 Focus Group Session A7 WargoNatureCenterQuestionnaire Al 5 Vision Meeting A33 Goals & Strategies Meeting A37 Programming&Marketing Meeting A40 Peer Review Meeting A43 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 1 Creating Places that Enrich People's Lives Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Anoka County Parks Master Plan Kick Off Meeting Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:30 AM - Noon Wargo Nature Center Agenda 1. Introductions County staff, HKGi and MDA 2. County goals, desires. needs and outcomes for the Master Plan Desired outcomes? Key needs and opportunities? Niche/ role? Audience? 3. Master planning process overview Discuss any additional data/information needs 4. Programs and activities at Wargo Overview by County staff 5. Building tour/evaluation and site tour/evaluation 6. Next steps Stakeholder and visitor on-line survey with display board — Draft survey questions Stakeholder focus group sessions (2) County to ID participants. Set target dates for sessions. Needs assessment summary Feb. -March — Vision Work sessions (2) one at Wargo and one at HKGi Peer group session 4-6 participants ID participants — MN Tourism, Science Museum,... 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 Ph (612) 338-0800 A 2 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach www.hkgi.com Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Summary of January 23, 2014 kick off meeting with Anoka County staff Consulting staff from HKGi and MDA met with representatives of Anoka County to discuss Wargo Nature Center existing conditions, programs, desires and opportunities for the future. The purpose of the meeting was to set the stage for the master plan process. Key elements of the discussion are summarized below. Master Plan Goals: — Increased use of Wargo and recreation program visits county -wide. — Increased awareness of Wargo. Find what is special and unique (niche) about Wargo compared to other nature centers. More involvement of cultural communities/minorities in recreation programs and env. ed. to reflect the increasingly diverse population of the County. Sustainability—financial, maintenance, volunteers and partnerships. Involve the County Board in the planning process. — Increase Wargo's connectivity to Rice Creek Park (campground, visitor center, trails and beach) and to the Lino Lakes YMCA. Continue to utilize technology to effectively deliver information. Improve the visitor experience and "curb appeal" of the site and building. 10 year plan - The Master Plan is to be a vision and 10 year phased action plan to improving Wargo Nature Center. The master plan will also include programming strategies reflecting Wargo's role as the hub for County recreation and env. ed. program staff. Wargo's unique location on a peninsula, surrounded by water and cattails, offers opportunities (woodland and water based programs) and challenges (connectivity and limited land for programming and trail use). Current use of Wargo: — Environmental education and recreation programs School groups/classes — up to 85 children at a time in the five usable spaces Nature pre-school (15 students enrolled) Homeschool programs Special events — natural resource, cultural heritage and recreation General use — Birders, cross country skiers Heritage Lab — Cultural, wildlife and recreation day camps (rotating annual heritage themes) Hub for County recreation and environmental education program staff and recreation program equipment storage County compost site Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — Jan. 23, 2014 kick off meeting summary Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 1 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 3 — Site for harvesting firewood for Rice Creek campground Issues and Opportunities (site, building and operations): Site — Need to improve the visitor entry experience and the pre-school drop off (long walk to the building). Need for more outdoor storage capacity and better access to recreation equipment — canoes, kayaks, snow shoes, etc. High levels of use in some areas wear out the turf. Trail connections are needed to the YMCA and better connections are needed to the main portion of Rice Creek Park. Need a forest management plan to address Emerald Ash Borer in Green Ash, thinning of existing pine plantings, management of the Maple Basswood forest and establishment of a working forest to supply firewood for the campground. There is an interpretive opportunity with the working forest. There is lots of bounce (up and down fluctuations) in the water level of the lake which makes dock access difficult at times. The dock area also becomes hard to find when out on the lake and a bottleneck when returning to shore. A floating dock hasn't worked in the past — research new methods and alternatives for water access. Desire to develop a water trail between Wargo and the campground. A canoe landing is needed at the campground. Need more things for children to do. Group program use is limited by the entry road which inhibits groups walking along the road (safety issue). A trail separated from the road is needed, at least to access the prairie area. Take more advantage and better reflect the water based nature of the park through programs, displays and facilities. Better awareness and connections between Wargo and Rice Creek Park and Chamonix Golf Course clubhouse. Deer management program could be an interpretive opportunity (deer exclosures, etc.). There is a lack of accessible trails at Wargo. Trail to the dock should be accessible. The trail to the dock is also the "driveway" for trailer access to move canoes and kayaks to and from the water's edge. Look at alternative materials (permeable pavers, flagstone) for accessible trails rather than bituminous surface. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan —Jan. 23, 2014 kick off meeting summary A 4 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach An outdoor classroom is desired (beyond the amphitheater area). Outdoor classroom criteria include: a roof, seating, electricity (solar panels?), a display screen, program storage, and access to water (could be a cistern with rain water). A prairie shelter could be added as well with tables, roof with skylights, water, power, restrooms. Lots of storage needs. Garage could be 4X larger than current size. Need for an additional vehicle for transporting staff to programs. The amphitheater works well but needs upgrading. Add green infrastructure (best practices and as public demonstration/interpretation). There is no storm water control features in place at Wargo. Difficult to maintain the small prairie area in front of the building (can't burn it for regeneration). Erosion issue along the entry walk. Entry walk is also used as a driveway to the building. Heritage Lab — issues with restroom accessibility, porta-potties only there now Building — Building has some functional issues —under -whelming visitor entry experience, storage needs (?), mechanical issues, "cold" feeling in the classrooms, static displays, lack of indoor/outdoor connections, lack of use of "green" environmental -friendly materials and measures, lots of digital technology opportunities, dynamic interpretive and information displays, need for digital media/screens in each room, add a theater room? Enhance the inside/outside relationships between the building and the outdoors. Add doors to access outside. Create a place(s) to relax/hang out inside and enjoy nature/view birds. Add a tree house/canopy level space? The building entry experience is stale and should be more interesting. Need more changeable dynamic exhibits (beyond the static stuffed animals). For example, add an "osprey camera" to the existing nesting platform and web link/display. Staff offices are isolated by the touch and see room and affected by program noise/activity. Operations — Desire to have the Center hours and program offerings align with resident needs. The Center is closed evenings. The Center is not open on weekends during the winter. Is this the best fit with people's desires for programs and access and the available staff time/budget? Partnerships — Connexus Energy, area schools, Rice Creek Watershed, Anoka County Libraries, MN DNR, MN Historical Society, Lino Lakes YMCA,Forest Lake School District, Banfill-Locke Center for the Arts (need to connect with them), Springbrook Nature Center (can we connect with them?) area cities. Grants are available from Integrated Waste Dept. for sustainable materials. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan —Jan. 23, 2014 kick off meeting summary Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 3 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 5 There is a group of active volunteer s at Wargo who assist with event and programs. Next Steps (February and March) Post the master plan questionnaire on-line (and potentially available at the nature center) Conduct two focus group sessions with key stakeholders. County staff to identify stakeholders to invite. Needs Assessment summary Vision plan work session with County staff Peer group planning session. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan —Jan. 23, 2014 kick off meeting summary A 6 Appendix: Meetings & Outreac Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Focus Group Session Wargo Nature Center - 7701 Main Street, Lino Lakes, MN March 27, 2014 Anoka County Parks is preparing a master plan for Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center. The master plan for the Nature Center will be a guide to improving the building, grounds, programs and operations. The planning process will also include strategies and actions to enhance environmental education and recreation programming in the County. The County is interested in your thoughts and ideas about how to improve Wargo's facilities and programs and how partnerships and connections can be enhanced. AGENDA A. Introductions B. Nature Center and Master Plan Overview C. Focus Group Questions 1. Do you currently visit Wargo Nature Center? If so, what do you like most about Wargo Nature Center? 2. Do you visit nature centers other than Wargo? If so, why? 3. What trends (social, economic, environmental, etc.) do you see affecting the future of nature centers, environmental education and outdoor recreation programs? 4. What should be improved at Wargo Nature Center? a. Activities and programs — at Wargo and County -wide b. Indoor facilities — building, exhibits, meeting rooms, technology, etc. c. Outdoor facilities —trails, gardens, program space, interpretive experiences, etc. d. Operations - partnerships, hours of operation, maintenance, communications, marketing, etc. 5. What other suggestions do you have for improving Wargo Nature Center or enhancing delivery of recreation programs within Anoka County? C. Next Steps and Use of Focus Group Information Wargo Nature Center Master Plan —Anoka County Parks Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 7 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Focus Group Session Wargo Nature Center - 7701 Main Street, Lino Lakes, MN March 27, 2014 Anoka County Parks is preparing a master plan for Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center. The master plan for the Nature Center will be a guide to improving the building, grounds, programs and operations. The planning process will also include strategies and actions to enhance environmental education and recreation programming in the County. The County is interested in your thoughts and ideas about how to improve Wargo's facilities and programs and how partnerships and connections can be enhanced. AGENDA A. Introductions B. Nature Center and Master Plan Overview C. Focus Group Questions 1. Do you currently visit Wargo Nature Center? If so, what do you like most about Wargo Nature Center? 2. Do you visit nature centers other than Wargo? If so, why? 3. What trends (social, economic, environmental, etc.) do you see affecting the future of nature centers, environmental education and outdoor recreation programs? 4. What should be improved at Wargo Nature Center? a. Activities and programs — at Wargo and County -wide b. Indoor facilities — building, exhibits, meeting rooms, technology, etc. c. Outdoor facilities — trails, gardens, program space, interpretive experiences, etc. d. Operations - partnerships, hours of operation, maintenance, communications, marketing, etc. 5. What other suggestions do you have for improving Wargo Nature Center or enhancing delivery of recreation programs within Anoka County? C. Next Steps and Use of Focus Group Information Wargo Nature Center Master Plan —Anoka County Parks A 8 Appendix: Meetings & Outreac Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Summary of March 27, 2014 Focus Group Meetings Consulting staff from HKGi and representatives of Anoka County met with two stakeholder groups to discuss Wargo Nature Center existing conditions, programs, desires and opportunities for the future. The purpose of the meeting was to gather stakeholder input to inform the master plan. The first stakeholder group included Wargo volunteers and other outdoor education and recreation professionals. The second stakeholder group included a Wargo visitor whose children attend homeschool programming at Wargo. Key elements of the discussions are summarized below. SESSION 1: 3:00-4:30 ATTENDEES: Greg Ingraham, HKGi Anna Springer, HKGi Nancy Fitzgerald, Volunteer Glennie Giller, Volunteer Sean Gokey, Warner Nature Center Alex McKinney, Outdoor Recreation Supervisor, Three Rivers Park District Julie Grecian, Warner Nature Center Maggie Snow, Anoka County Librarian John VonDeLinde, Anoka County Parks & Recreation Director Cory Hinz, Anoka County Recreation Services Manager Todd Murawski, Recreation Specialist Wargo Nature Center Lisa Gilliland, Interpretive Naturalist, Wargo Nature Center Krista Harrington, Program Supervisor, Wargo Nature Center OVERVIEW OF WARGO: Wargo is the county -wide hub for outdoor recreation -all county recreation programming is housed at Wargo. Wargo's operating budget comes from a variety of sources • about 75% from levy dollars from the County • Capital projects accounted for more than $50,000 last year • Legacy fund money • Met Council • Do need to generate some income revenue • Connexus partnership -for school visits and heritage lab Three Rivers has as a revenue goal of making 40% of its operating costs. They can overspend their budget but they have to recover 100% of their over -budget costs. The building has 2 classrooms, a small library, naturalists downstairs, a larger kitchen, a preschool room, indoor storage, a garage for storage and a van, visitor center with interpretive displays, new bike trail from access road. Hours are Tues -Fri 8-4:30; Sat -Sun 12-5. Gates are locked when Wargo is closed. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — March 27, 2014 Focus Group Meetings Summary Page 11 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 9 Compare to 3 Rivers daytime hours are the norm, although some Three Rivers facilities have bathrooms/vestibules open when the nature center is closed, and gates are left open until 10pm. AUDIENCE: 45 schools come out to Wargo every year, and staff visit 60 schools/year, going into Sherburne and Isanti Counties. Bulk of students at Wargo are k-5, but camp attendance is k-7. Adult visitors come mostly for birding. It's hard to get high school students to come in, although some alternative schools do send kids. Older kids & alternative high schools are more involved in outdoor recreation activities They are getting a few more requests for accommodating specials needs kids. The nature play area (built by eagle scouts) gets used by local moms clubs, but is not a draw for the general public, especially when compared with Tamarack. VOLUNTEER PROGRAM: Currently not too many volunteers, but Wargo is trying to tap into the volunteer resource from Parks & Recreation. Do have MN Conservation Corp volunteers for 10 months in the park system. Need to update & expand. Volunteers are not currently used for programming. Volunteers do some maintenance, as there is no on-site maintenance person. Both volunteers present report helping out with whatever is assigned to them. Mostly desk duty, envelope stuffing, bird programs, maple sugaring, etc. WHAT OTHER NATURE CENTERS DO PEOPLE VISIT & WHY? Eastman -likes the new nature center building(2 years old) with a great indoor/outdoor relationship. Dodge Nature Center has great events and festivals Tamarack for its great outdoor nature play area Richardson NC has new sculptures and 3D interpretive displays. Green Bay nature center has a great interactive display -beaver lodge slide for staircase Walk-ins versus Pre -registration programs. Pre -registration programs are generally experiencing declining interest, especially with families. Warner NC recently cancelled a Saturday pre -registered event for lack of interest. MARKETING& OUTREACH AWARENES: Email list serve, twitter, newspaper, a printed Activities Guide gets sent home with every kid and is also available online, does not get sent out to every resident in the county, but is sent to those on the mailing list. Find the links Three Rivers Program Outreach: website, repeat visitors, events calendar mailing, word of mouth (in order of effectiveness from high to low). Warner NC would like to do more targeting marketing -who does what? Cross marketing of Chamonoix, Bunker Hill, & Wargo TRENDS: Alex sees a renaissance in Conservation sports; fishing, archery. Has had over 5,000 participants in archery last season and would like to have an indoor/outdoor archery range. (Wargo used to have an Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — March 27, 2014 Focus Group Meetings Summary Pa g e 12 A 10 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach archery range, but there is one at Bunker Hills, and they were more successful with it so Wargo stopped pursuing it. Fishing is big at Wargo and fishing camps fill up.) Trend towards outdoor recreation as a springboard for natural education. Lifelong Learning trend, including programs for adults. Three Rivers just commissioned a study regarding what people want that got a 95% response rate. Satelite/ mobile units, with the nature center as a hub that serves others locations. (Three Rivers has mobile programs at libraries, funded by legacy dollars). Another example is a mobile sailing club. TECHNOLOGY: Wargo will be introducing iPads this spring. Warner uses iTouches for bird sounds and has GPS technology classes (Geo-caching/GPS is popular, although people now do this using their smart phones) Warner NC recently had their exhibits redone and like to think of their exhibits as a springboard to get people outside —" The Hidden Wonders of Warner" • new apiary for pollinator exhibits • Jumping wall -how does your jumping distance compare to the animals • Destination teaching spots -get people to outdoor 'classrooms' Audobon Center has solar panels to power and is a good link to nature/green energy QR codes for interpretive information, such as flower identification on trails Trail Cameras -live feeds from nests High Ropes Course is an approach to outdoor activities Glennie laments all the apps and just wants kids to get outside, but agrees that it may be part of getting kids interested. She mentioned Carol Henderson and her practice of giving kids cameras to photograph nature. Overall discussion of the benefits of digital literacy, ease-of-use, and 'unplugging', the quandary of keeping current with the technology expectations of visitors while balancing the cost and benefit. TRANSPORTATION: Transportation is a barrier, especially for school groups. Busing is a cost issue, and often costs more than the programs that schools are trying to attend. $400/bus trip cost. Warner has a bus scholarship program from a private family scholarship of $5,000) Three Rivers has satellite schools with mobile Rec & Env. Ed programs Flexibility to move/bring programs to the people Wargo does outreach visits in Anoka County to 60 Schools, 25,000 kids (big volume) School visits to Wargo have been stable STAFF: Todd & Krista are full time staff members at Wargo, all others are Pt: 4 at 29 hrs/wk , and 1 at 19 hrs/wk. This can affect morale. All recreation leaders at Wargo are also naturalists. Members of MN Naturalist Association, which does have annual conference. MN Master Naturalist program is more volunteer related and requires a 40 hour training course and a 'capstone/ service project'. Wargo hosted a 40 hour course and got 8 volunteers from that. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — March 27, 2014 Focus Group Meetings Summary Page 13 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 11 PROGRAMMING: For adults, Warner NC offers Woodcocks and Wine program. Wild Edible/food related programming is popular with adults. For Three Rivers, the educational Farm is popular; there are wait lists to get into the farm. Three Rivers has new Log Rolling and Slacklining program WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT WARGO? Access to Rice Creek/ Rice Creek Watershed and to the Mississippi -22 miles Canoe, Kayak, and paddle board rentals are successful and distinctive. Warner NC's advanced canoeist program comes to Rice Creek to canoe in a natural and more advanced setting. Wargo's recreation and nature center combination is unique Wargo is great for birding-upland, wetland, and shorebirds. Interest in birding recently has increased. They currenty offer 'feeder watch' and 'phrenology' programs for birding. Other wildlife is also great -turkeys, deer, otter, etc. Overall, the natural setting is great, and the tie with camping is unique. The entry sequence is very peaceful and welcoming, and well developed like a state trail, and the length is nice, relaxing, and paved. Can get 600-800 visitors here for events. Many panel members said they loved the wildlife mounts in the building. The smartboard is nice. WHAT WOULD MAKE WARGO BETTER? #1 Build on the Lakes & Water Niche. Put it all together by improving connectivity. Make it 'triathalon- friendly' Conservation activities (hunting & fishing) Compost area is a question mark -what is it and why is it Advertise more to Washington County Need a big Welcome sign on 14 Add ADA accessible bird blind (mobility mats) An elevated platform for bird watching that can accommodate about 20 students Heritage Site lacks infrastructure • No shelter • Only port -a -potties • Has hand pump for water (should get an electric pump) • It is in the 100 year floodplain so permanent structures are not -allowed by the city of Lino Lakes • Lean-to is an eyesore Wayfinding improvements Enhance the entry experience A library collaboration with Anoka County Hide some of the clutter when you enter -make it more about nature Consider the aging population ADA accessibility overall-eg. nature trails, bird platform, boardwalk, boats, dock Boat launch for the voyager canoe Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — March 27, 2014 Focus Group Meetings Summary Page 14 A 12 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Need to approach low -hanging fruit first (John); entrance (Wargo has a $300,000 fund from Edith Wargo and should use it to leverage more funds) SESSION 2: 5:30-6:30 ATTENDEES: Greg Ingraham, HKGi Anna Springer, HKGi Jill, Homeschool parent John VonDeLinde, Anoka County Parks & Recreation Director Cory Hinz, Anoka County Recreation Services Manager Todd Murawski, Recreation Specialist Wargo Nature Center Lisa Gilliland, Interpretive Naturalist, Wargo Nature Center Krista Harrington, Program Supervisor, Wargo Nature Center OVERVIEW: Home School Audience: Home schoolers usually have larger families. 60 hours of coursework is1/2 a credit. MACHE - MN Association of Christian Home Educators HERO -Home Education Resource Organization WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT WARGO: • Teachers • Variety of topics • Affordable • Convenient- Like to have all age kids together for classes for convenience (Tamarack didn't offer multi-age programming so it didn't work for Jill) • Love the Heritage Camp/Lab Area —like the rustic feel • Rentals are a positive -canoe, Kayak, cc ski, snowshoe • Bird Banding was Awesome(done years ago) • Like the winter recreation trial/sampler program -cc ski, snowshoe, etc WHAT WOULD MAKE WARGO BETTER? • The library is underutilized& feels like you maybe aren't supposed to be there. • Sometimes it is hard to find a quiet place • Date night once a month? -focusing on foraging, cooking, wild foods, etc. • Nature Play area could have more things to do/ more variety • Survival Skill Training program for kids • a program for young teens to assist/volunteer for heritage camps ; ' teacher -in -training' • Offer school credit for recreation /nature/science programs (an alternative to biology) (High School or Middle school credits) Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — March 27, 2014 Focus Group Meetings Summary Page 15 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 13 • More project -based, longer-term curriculum • Foraging classes for families/adults • More events geared toward younger children TECHNOLOGY: Why use it here? Kids have enough at home. MARKETING: Should advertise at the MACHE conference in April HERO fliers Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — March 27, 2014 Focus Group Meetings Summary Pa g e 16 A 14 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire Q1 Do you or your family members visit Wargo Nature Center? Answered: 45 Skipped: 0 Yes No Answer Choices Yes No Total Mi 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Responses 82.22% 37 17.78% 8 45 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 15 Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire What are your reasons for not visiting Wargo Nature Center? Please check all that apply. Not enough time Not aware of Wargo and it... Location is not convenient Prefer other nature centers Nature center is not open... Not enough to do at the... The programs are too... Not interested in nature or... Answer Choices Answered: 7 Skipped: 38 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Not enough time Not aware of Wargo and its programs Location is not convenient Prefer other nature centers Responses 28.57% 2 71.43% 5 28.57% 2 0.00% 0 Nature center is not open when I can visit 0.00% 0 Not enough to do at the center and grounds 14.29% 1 The programs are too expensive 14.29% 1 Not interested in nature or recreation 0.00% 0 Total Respondents: 7 A 16 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire Q3 How often do you or members of your household visit Wargo Nature Center? Answered: 23 Skipped: 22 Daily Weekly Monthly Annually Answer Choices Daily Weekly Monthly Annually Total r 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Responses 0.00% 0 30.43% 7 26.09% 6 43.48% 10 23 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 17 Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire 4 What are your reasons for visiting Wargo Nature Center? Please check all that apply. Attend family program/acti... Nature preschool Children visit through a... Special events Nature day camps Homeschool activ ities I volunteer at Wargo Use the centers trails Watch birds Other (please specify) Answered: 23 Skipped: 22 not 1nox 7nOi Answer Choice Attend family program/activities Nature preschool Children visit through a school program �nO/ Special events Nature day camps Homeschool activities I volunteer at Wargo FnoI, 7n%% Flo ox, ani tno%u Responses 30.43% 7 8.70% 2 8.70% 2 30.43% 7 4.35% 1 0.00% 0 8.70% 2 Use the centerstrails 56.52% 13 Watch birds 39.13% 9 A 18 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Other (please specify) Total Respondents: 23 30.43% 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Other 0 nature walks experience nature kayak Nature walks/explore Enjoy nature Boat rental, play day in touch and see room / Maple Hollow biridings, especially, ospreys. Date 4/28/2014 12:41 PM 4/28/2014 12:38 PM 4/27/2014 10:55 AM 4/25/2014 4:44 PM 3/14/2014 10:28 AM 3/14/2014 9:21 AM 3/7/2014 9:28 AM Q5 What do you like most about Wargo Nature Center? Answered: 22 Skipped: 23 Responses Date ' 4/28/2014 8:42 PM 1 Convenient location. Handicap accessible building. 2 everything 4/28/2014 12:45 PM 3 proximity to Rice Creek, nature preschool 4/28/2014 12:43 PM 4 natural/not built up. no paved paths 4/28/2014 12:41 PM 5 absolutely natural environment! Kids rope -play area is awesome 4/28/2014 12:38 PM 6 trails& library 4/27/2014 10:55 AM 7 that the trails are not paved and left natural feels like you are out in the wild 4/25/2014 4:44 PM 8 1. That there isa nature center with indoor plumbing. 2. The bird feeders3. George Watch Lake 4/20/2014 8:03 PM 9 Variety of programming 4/17/2014 3:24 PM 10 Trails and outdoor nature playground 4/11/2014 9:05 AM 11 quiet! 4/10/2014 12:24 PM 12 trails, canoes and indoors of the nature center building 4/8/2014 3:16 PM 13 Walks in the Heritage area across the road. MANY more birds and animals observed if no dog walkers. 4/7/2014 6:21 PM 14 gorgeousnaturre center; beautiful environment outdoors 4/7/2014 2:36 PM 15 so close to my home 4/6/2014 8:38 PM 16 Minimal "improved" features 3/28/2014 2:50 PM 17 That they have kept it natural, and not full of lights and asphalt and siigns. 3/14/2014 10:28 AM 18 Variety of thingsto do for all ages 3/14/2014 9:21 AM 19 The people 3/12/2014 1:17 PM 20 The quiet setting 3/7/2014 6:06 PM 21 The naturalists and the functions they do to teach about living in nature. 3/7/2014 4:01 PM 22 watching bird feeder, butterfly, and birds, of course see the resident Red-tailed Hawk 3/7/2014 9:28 AM Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 19 Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire vvnat snouiu oe improveu at vvargo Nature Center? Answered: 18 Skipped: 27 Responses Date 1 A family member usesa wheelchair, so a longer paved walling path would be appreciated. 4/28/2014 8:42 PM 2 more trails 4/28/2014 12:43 PM 3 nothing 4/28/2014 12:38 PM 4 love it the way it is. possibly have handoutsfor birds 4/25/2014 4:44 PM 5 It would be very nice if you could have at least one observation deckthat extended beyond the cattails and closer to the lake. The two that exist now are very poor for observing waterfowl on the lake. It would also be nice if you would open up the center in March, at least during warm years when the lake opens early. 4/20/2014 8:03 PM 6 More general neutral programming, there are currently several programs offered to only women and many would pertain to men as well. 4/17/2014 3:24 PM 7 More structured rental programs -X -country skiing rental 4/11/2014 9:05 AM 8 need some character-e.g. lady slippers garden 4/10/2014 12:24 PM 9 expand open hours (if possible) 4/8/2014 3:16 PM 10 restrict dogs since they impact wildlife. 4/7/2014 6:21 PM 11 nothing 4/7/2014 2:36 PM 12 Birding walking trips through other organizations don't cost anything. 4/6/2014 8:38 PM 13 Expand trail to go around north side of George Watch Lake and eliminate snowmobile trail. Add connection to Chomonix ski trail. 3/28/2014 2:50 PM 14 More natural hiking trails around the shorelines and other areas. Make some observation decks near open water areas. 3/14/2014 10:28 AM 15 Roadway, pathway leading up to building, improve the trails 3/14/2014 9:21 AM 16 Flexibility of staff and marketing 3/7/2014 6:06 PM 17 Updating some of the outdoor structures in the play area. 3/7/2014 4:01 PM 18 Road isclosed at the entrance gate and can not come in the area before 8 or 9:00 am (not sure the exact time) at weekend. 3/7/2014 9:28 AM A 20 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire Q7 Are there activities or facilities that are missing from the Nature Center building or the Nature Center outdoor campus? No Yes (please list... Answered: 19 Skipped: 26 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices No Yes (please list suggestions) Total. Responses 68.42% 13 31.58% 6 Yes (please list suggestions) 1 Connection to the main street trail and connection to the trail behind the YMCA in Lino Lakes. More interpretave signs. XC ski rental 3 a bonfire area would be kinda cool expand the trail system 4 5 X-C skiing Provide a seasonal comfort statio, rest rooms on the Heritage site. Themed Birthday parties! Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 4/17/2014 3:24 PM 4/11/2014 9:05 AM 4/8/2014 3:16 PM 3/28/2014 2:50 PM 3/14/2014 10:28 AM 3/7/2014 4:01 PM Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 21 Answer Choices Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire Q8 Are there improvements or new additions that you would like to see made to the displays inside the Wargo Nature Center? No Yes (please list... Answered: 17 Skipped: 28 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Responses No 88.24% 15 Yes (please list suggestions) 11.76% 2 Total # Yes (please list suggestions) Date 1 Displays could be updated, maybe focus on Minnesota species. 4/17/2014 3:24 PM 2 connect trail from osprey pen (14 acre prairie) to YMCA (in lino lakes) 4/10/2014 12:24 PM A 22 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire Q9 Do you participate in natural resource, recreation or learning programs, or activities within Wargo and/or Anoka County? No Yes Answer Choices No Yes Total Respondents: 22 Answered: 22 Skipped: 23 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Responses 40.91% 9 59.09% 13 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 23 Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire Q1C Please indicate which programs you participate in. Answered: 14 Skipped: 31 School environmenta... Summer day camps Public programs (ie... Preschool and preschool... Bird watching Homeschool Special events (Snow Day,... Recreation programs... Other (please . specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses School environmental education and school forest programs (at Wargo and in schools) Summer day camps 21.43% 3 7.14% 1 Public programs(ie. Explore Wargo, Appreciating Plants, Wild Edibles, Technology in Nature, Searching for the Stars, etc.) Preschool and preschool programs(nymphsand nuthatches, nature play) Bird watching Homeschool 42.86% 6 0.00% 0 42.86% 6 0.00% 0 Special events (Snow Day, Moonlight Ski, Fishing Clinic, Earth Day, Bunker Stampede 5K, Apple Cider/Fall Festival, etc.) 50.00% 7 Recreation programs(canoe/kayak, nordic walling, natural living, snowshoe, cross country ski, team building, etc.) 42.86% 6 Other (please specify) 7.14% 1 Total Respondents: 14 1 Other (please specify) earth day, bunker stampede, apple cider fest, canoe;kayak) Date 4/8/2014 3:17 PM A 24 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire Q11 Anoka County Parks and Wargo Nature Center offer several outdoor recreational opportunities (listed in previous questions). Please comment on any additional recreational activities you would like to see offered. Answered: 5 Skipped: 40 1 2 4 Responses great variety Date 4/28/2014 12:46 PM The only other change I'd like to see in the county is to have the hiking trail restored on the east side of Linwood Lake. That is one of the most interesting trails for birdwatching in the entire county, and I've been actively birding in the county for 25 years. XC ski rental for lads & adults access to the canoe route to the lakes further down the chain would be nice. They have been overgrown recently. Botany based programs 4/20/2014 8:16 PM 4/11/2014 9:09 AM 4/7/2014 6:22 PM 3/28/2014 2:51 PM Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 25 Q12 Do Wargo Nature Center's spring/summer/fall hours of operation (see below) match up well with the times you or members of your household would want to visit the center? Spring, Summer, Fall Hours: Tuesday -Friday (8:OOam-4:30pm); Saturday (9:OOam-5pm); Sunday (Noon- 5:OOpm); Closed on Monday Answered: 27 Skipped: 18 Yes No - Please list how the... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Yes No - Please list how the hours could be adjusted to best meet your needs. Responses 51.85% 14 Total No - Please list how the hours could be adjusted to best meet your needs. close too early - can't take pm walks close too early 48.15% 13 4/28/2014 12:42 PM offer a later evening once during the week- i know that is difficult with a budget closes early, could be open later in the evening for walks 5 4/28/2014 12:39 PM It would be great if the Center was open with the daylight - or there were night hours for bonfires etc. As noted previously, I would like to see the center open earlier in the spring, at least during warm years. 4/27/2014 10:57 AM 4/25/2014 4:46 PM It would be nice if the center would be open later in the evenings as it is difficult to go there when both parents work and the kids are at school during the day. please keep the center opened later and oen on mondays, too later hours in the weekend in the summer 10 Keep it open every day with longer hours. 11 Possibly stay open a little later on the weekdays (1 or 2 of the days) 4/22/2014 1:21 PM 4/20/2014 8:20 PM 4/17/2014 3:29 PM 4/8/2014 3:19 PM 4/7/2014 2:38 PM 3/14/2014 10:40 AM 3/14/2014 9:47 AM 17 could visit in Tate Spring into Summer and Fall if nncn until bpm of least 2/10/701d 10:AR, AM 13 during the week it is hard to visit 3/7/2014 6:08 PM A 26 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Answer Choices Yes Q13 Do Wargo Nature Center's winter hours of operation (see below) match up well with the times you or members of your household would want to visit the center? Winter Hours: Tuesday -Friday (8:OOam-4:30pm); Closed Saturday -Monday Yes No - Please list how the... Answered: 27 Skipped: 18 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No - Please list how the hours could be adjusted to best meet your needs. Total - Responses 51.85% 14 No - Please list how the hours could be adjusted to best meet your needs. I 1M one weelFnd day might be nice it would be nice to have a way to rent snowshoes after 4:30 48.15% 13 27 Date 4/28/2014 12:44 PM 4/27/2014 10:57 AM I will always be working during these hours. Adjusting for weekend time would help the most. 4/22/2014 1:21 PM I can only visit on weekends, so having the center open on weekends is ideal for me. Same as previous, also with no weekend hours there is no opportunity fora working family to visit. Please offer open hours on at least one weekend day! please expand hrs to the other days of the wek and weelInd, too Saturday and/or Sunday hours Saturday, Sunday 4/20/2014 8:20 PM 4/17/2014 3:29 PM 4/11/2014 9:10 AM 4/8/2014 3:19 PM 3/28/2014 2:52 PM 3/27/2014 12:39 PM 10 Open Saturday 11 keep it open every day. 3/24/2014 9:18 AM 3/14/2014 10:40 AM 12 Would like to open on the weekends, possibly stay open a little later on the weekdays (1 or 2 of the days) 3/14/2014 9:47 AM 13 would be neat to have one or two eves per week open for movie or 'study' night or enlightenment night or a theme of some kind 3/10/2014 10:45 AM Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 27 Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire u 14 vvriat auuitionai programs, activities, or facilities would bring you to the nature center more often? Answered: 12 Skipped: 33 Responses Date 1 canoe, kayak programs 4/28/2014 12:44 PM 2 no 4/28/2014 12:42 PM 3 Adult outdoor leaming opportunities- i.e. syruping, mushroom hunting, etc. 4/22/2014 1:21 PM 4 Better observation decks. 4/20/2014 8:20 PM 5 Year round weekend programs for kids. Current programs are developed for the weekdays which does not allow working families to have their kids attend without taking a vacation day. 4/17/2014 3:29 PM 6 XC ski rental, organized nature hilus 4/11/2014 9:10 AM 7 maple syrup classes (if possible) identifying edible and herbal plant in nature center 4/8/2014 3:19 PM 8 Botany based programs 3/28/2014 2:52 PM 9 Male more programs available for youth year around. 3/14/2014 10:40 AM 10 Monthly Idd clubs, family programs- possibly offer guided hikes/programs at offsite locations or variety of Anoka County Parks 3/14/2014 9:47 AM 11 building garden trellis— I 3/10/2014 1:11 PM 12 see above; starwatch, advanced birding or insects or arts classes - drawing/painting nature -fish printing, AIS training classes; group building projects like build a chimney swift chimney, large bat housesforthe center; game night! board games in winter - do you have the Food Web game made by a MN inventor, James D. Lux? nighthikes, rare species of Anoka county. 3/10/2014 10:45 AM A 28 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Q15 How do you find out about facilities and programs at Wargo? Check the information methods that you use. Answered: 28 Skipped: 17 Anoka County Parks web site Local newspaper Word of mouth Anoka County quarterly pa... Social media Information provided at ... Other (please specify) Answer Choices Anoka County Parks web site 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Responses 60.71% 17 Local newspaper I 17.86% 5 Word of mouth 21.43% 6 Anoka County quarterly parks and recreation activity brochures 14.29% 4 Social media 10.71% 3 Information provided at the Nature Center 28.57% 8 Other (please specify) 32.14% 9 Total Respondents: 28 1 # Other (please specify) Date 1 girl scouts 4/28/2014 12:48 PM 2 drove by the entrance to the nature center 4/8/2014 3:19 PM 3 bob holtz 4/7/2014 2:38 PM 4 emailsfrom Bob Holtz 4/6/2014 8:39 PM 5 mna, nature center network 3/27/2014 12:39 PM 6 My employer 3/24/2014 9:18 AM 7 By volunteering there. 3/14/2014 10:40 AM 8 WNC staff 3/10/2014 10:45 AM O C......d 1 ..L =is= "I/7/0/11A A •07 SRA Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 29 Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire Which newspaper do you get information from? Answered: 2 Skipped: 43 1 2 Responses ' st paul pioneer press city pages Citizen Q17 What communication methods should be used to provide information about Wargo and Anoka County Parks environmental education and recreation? Answered: 18 Skipped: 27 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Responses television web site, social media, local newspapers email email the signage out front email Devoted website The county website has always been good about posting activities at the parks. Maybe have an email signup for notices. Bulletin boards are good. I heard about this survey from a posting in the mens' room at Coon Rapids Dam. email, website web site st paul pioneer press large LED sign at the entrance to the park email listserv? might already have it! Improve the website All including the use of the latest technology that young people are so into these days. Also a advertising video and more coverage of special events in all the local prints in all forms. County Website, local paper, email blasts, brochures, handouts at schools/libraries, Public Radio/TV stations periodic email brochures All avenues: paper, social media,- add an e -newsletter and email list, please! Email and facenook A 30 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach 4/7/2014 2:38 PM 3/7/2014 6:08 PM 4/28/2014 12:48 PM 4/28/2014 12:44 PM 4/28/2014 12:42 PM 4/28/2014 12:40 PM 4/27/2014 10:58 AM 4/25/2014 4:49 PM 4/22/2014 1:22 PM 4/20/2014 8:30 PM 4/11/2014 9:11 AM 4/10/2014 12:25 PM 4/8/2014 3:20 PM 3/27/2014 12:39 PM 3/24/2014 9:20 AM 3/14/2014 10:57 AM 3/14/2014 9:47 AM 3/10/2014 1:12 PM 3/10/2014 10:52 AM 3/7/2014 6:09 PM Q18 Do you visit nature centers other than Wargo? No Yes - Please list which o... Answer Choices No Answered: 27 Skipped: 18 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Yes- Please list which ones and why do you visit them. Total 1 Responses 29.63% 8 70.37% 19 27 # Yes - Please list which ones and why do you visit them. Date 1 springbrook 4/28/2014 12:48 PM 2 roseville/springbrook/tamarack 4/28/2014 12:47 PM 3 tamarack, wamer, carlosavery 4/28/2014 12:44 PM 4 tamarack -variety 4/28/2014 12:42 PM 5 variety of other ones 4/28/2014 12:40 PM 6 wamer tamarack 4/27/2014 10:58 AM 7 have visited Tamarack in Ramsey Co but Wargo is MUCH BETTER!! Tamarack is too built up with paved paths. Today we spotted many deer tracks in the ground on the path. This would not be possible if the paths were paved. 4/25/2014 4:49 PM 8 I visit numerous parks in the county for birdwatching. My favorites are Coon Rapids Dam, Rice CreekWest Reg Trail (including Locke Park), and Linwood Lake. 4/20/2014 8:30 PM 9 tamarack- trailsspringbrook- trailsand to watch the snacks feed (On saturday momings) 4/8/2014 3:20 PM 10 Springbrook, Bunker Hills, CR Dam + state and federal parks 4/7/2014 6:24 PM 11 tamarack- nice trails 4/7/2014 2:38 PM 12 various centers- all for birding 4/6/2014 8:39 PM 13 Crex Meadows, Tamarack, Ritter Farm Park, Deep Portage, numerous State Parks 3/28/2014 2:54 PM 14 Wamer Dodge Tamarack 3/27/2014 12:39 PM 15 As someone who likes all Nature and Environmental areas, they all have some very different areas of interest to explore. I have visited many all over this state and other areas but having lived here in Anoka County all my life I support Wargo the most as it is only some miles away. 3/14/2014 10:57 AM 16 Minncoota arboretum 3/10/2014 1:12 PM 17 Tamarackfor location and wamer for programming 3/7/2014 6:09 PM 18 Tamarack nature center and Wamer nature center 3/7/2014 4:03 PM 19 Richardson Nature Center, Bloomington, Lowy Nature Center etc. 3/7/2014 9:31 AM Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 31 Wargo Nature Center Questionnaire Q19 What other suggestions do you have for improving Wargo Nature Center? Answered: 14 Skipped: 31 4 5 6 7 11 12 13 14 Responses GREAT job!! DON'T PAVE THE PATHS! Keep it natural nothing. keep the way it is! thanks! My 8 year old sons LOVE the climbing rope and hollow tree in the play area. It is so much fun after a walk in the woods. Have a devoted website like Springbrookdoes- it helps greatly - [currently going thru the Anoka Parks webstie is cumbersome - and there isnot enough information on there] Have more weekend programming available for kids as their are numerous programs that we are interested in having our kids attend however they are primarily during the week during normal working hours when we cannot bring our kids. kids nature scavenger hunts, more kids programs, programs during non-traditional businesshours(so that working parents can take their kids) connect trail to YMCA perhaps having available a few living animals in house to interact with Move more staff to full time status Keep it natural. Also provide some form of routine transportatation to and from Wargo for those who may not have any form of transportation available to them. Also the highway department needs to provide a sound barrier along the freeway. When improving the grounds, keep it as natural as possible. No paved trailways or large obtrusive items outdoor to take away from the nature experience. Do not change animal habitats, leave fallen trees, and hollowed out trees Outreach; Would love to see Wargo more at schools, going to senior centers disability centers- Let the disabled community know about your accessible programs! Access Press newspaper will list them...accesspress.org I like to visit Wargo Nature Center although I have never joined any activities held. A 32 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Date 4/28/2014 12:47 PM 4/28/2014 12:42 PM 4/28/2014 12:40 PM 4/25/2014 4:49 PM 4/22/2014 1:22 PM 4/17/2014 3:31 PM 4/11/2014 9:11 AM 4/10/2014 12:25 PM 4/8/2014 3:20 PM 3/28/2014 2:54 PM 3/14/2014 10:57 AM 3/14/2014 9:47 AM 3/10/2014 10:52 AM 3/7/2014 9:31 AM Creating Places that Enrich People's Lives Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Anoka County Parks Vision Meeting Monday, April 21, 2014 1:00 PM — 3:00 PM Wargo Nature Center Two work session meetings will be used to create a vision, goals, strategies and framework plan for Wargo Nature Center and for county -wide programming. At the April 21 session we will review the needs assessment findings and define the vision and goals (the big picture and direction). The second meeting (at HKGi) will develop the framework plan which will focus on physical improvements and program actions/strategies (implementation focus). The vision and framework plan will lead to the Draft and Final Master Plan. Agenda 1. Needs Assessment Findings 2. Nature Center Best Practices/Ideas Presentation 3. Vision and Goals a) Role — within the County, within the region, within the park b) Audiences — Define core audiences and desired experiences/take aways c) Programs, activities and service delivery d) Operational goals e) Physical improvements/experiences 4. Process Overview and Next Steps Framework Plan work session - Date at HKGi Draft Vision and Framework Plan Peer group review session Draft Master Plan Community and stakeholder review 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 www.hkgi.com Ph (612) 338-0800 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 33 Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Summary of April 21, 2104 Vision Meeting Consulting staff from HKGi and representatives of Anoka County met at Wargo Nature Center from 1 to 3pm to discuss the vision for Wargo Nature Center. The purpose of the meeting was to create a vision, goals, strategies, and framework for the center and its programming. Key elements of the discussions are summarized below. ATTENDEES: Greg Ingraham, HKGi Lil Leatham, HKGi Anna Springer, HKGi John VonDeLinde, Anoka County Parks & Recreation Director Cory Hinz, Anoka County Recreation Services Manager Lisa Gilliland, Interpretive Naturalist, Wargo Nature Center Krista Harrington, Program Supervisor, Wargo Nature Center Bob Holtz, Anoka County Naturalist Mary Morris, Interpretive Naturalist Deb Gallup, Interpretive Naturalist SITE ASSESSMENT COMMENTS: • Harriet Alexander in Roseville is another nature center near Wargo. It is smaller, but worth mentioning. • Bob suggested a installing a dam to raise the water level of George Watch Lake. • Timber management plan is still a consideration • A wildflower interpretive trail in the prairie would be good • Connectivity to the YMCA is ideal • Focus should be on getting kids OUTSIDE • Bob: Wargo is the 3rd highest recipient of grant money of all nature centers in MN • There is a current trend for nature centers to host wedding events as a revenue generator. Wargo has had smaller weddings but is limited by size/capacity TRENDS PRESENTATION COMMENTS: • Would be great to incorporate digital technology with signage on trails • There is a need for programming to meet the needs of school curriculum • Trails need to be longer around Wargo -currently the longest loop is 25 minutes, and they should be longer than 30 minutes • Drop in visitors did rise with addition of trail along hwy14 • Potential to keep grounds open from sunrise to sunset -but can't rely on volunteers for staffing as their availability is not always clear • John would like to see a parking lot near the compost site Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — April 21, 2014 Vision Meeting Summary Pa g e 11 A 34 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach GOALS DISCUSSION: 1. Take better advantage of ecosystem amenities • George Watch Lake is not great for recreation -very shallow and poor water quality. The curly pond weed takes over from June to July. • It is very muddy, also. Might be a good spot for a Tough Mudder race. • Centerville Lake is a better option. A Wargo Outpost there is an option. • Water play: very cool, but very expensive • They do a lot of pond study activities with kids • Current dock is too narrow and hot (it's metal) 2. Improving first Impressions • A welcoming chalk board for visitors makes students excited • Embrace the compost site: it could be a funding source/ pay for parking • Parking areas/ pull outs along the entry road would be good. Should also put one by the osprey nest and the proposed managed forest area • Move the gate further back • Install a nature cam • Need to hide the garage • People mistakenly drive up to the building • Erosion along the front walk • Interpret Edith Wargo's daylilies • Too much handicapped parking, too far away • Too much parking on a daily basis, but too little for large events, just right amount for preschool/homeschool (which is only once a month). • Bus parking could be more organized, but it seems to work ok • It would be nice if there was a closer drop off area • Dumpsters need to be screened 3. Programs • Would need more staff to increase programming, but feel limited right now by workspace for staff. • Need wifi (its coming soon) • Current program costs are competitive with other nature centers • Need to fill current programs they do offer (lack of awareness issue) • Daycamp tattoos • More grants -Lisa and Karen write grants currently • Wargo's niche is 1)outreach 2)Water 3)Birds • Potential to tie mobility funding into recycling Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — April 21, 2014 Vision Meeting Summary Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Page 12 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 35 • Do want to increase drop in visitor numbers (low numbers attributed to low awareness and a lack of things to do) • Cost recovery? • Interested in foundation/friends groups for financial support 4. Niche • Birding, water, ecosystems, intimacy, mobile outreach, location in a Regional Park • Wants help with indoor displays • Potential as a place for research? FMR uses the facilities every weekend to categorize invertebrates • Library -mobile vending opportunity • Getting a free little library 5. Raise Awareness • Podcasts-Bob has done about 24 Birding with Bob Holtz (link available on county website • They have an ad on a bus • Billboard (are prohibitively expensive-clearchannel billboard on 694 is $12000 for 2 weeks) • Do advertise on stand ups at bunker hills • Potential to cross market more with homeschool associations and in the homeschool market in general • Have pamphlets at city hall • Have 2 videos, but doesn't know where the public can access them 6. Sustainable Operations • Edith Wargo Funds $340,000 (generally designated for Wargo campus improvments) • Storage: Would need to have more equipment to go 'off site', because everything they use has dual purpose, really (ie if there was a Centerville Outpost) • A second vehicle would likely be a Prius for outreach -currently use mileage reimbursement for staff General Comments • Desired building updates -1 or 2 flush toilet would be nice, general water conservation methods, use green cleaning chemicals • Life cycle strategy will get done by Anoka County in the next 6 months as a county -wide initiative • Big need is to get more people here. • Lisa is connection point for staff feedback on todays content Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — April 21, 2014 Vision Meeting Summary Page 13 A 36 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Creating Places that Enrich People's Lives Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Anoka County Parks Goals and Strategies Meeting Wednesday May 7, 2014 1:00 PM — 3:00 PM HKGi (2nd floor meeting room) — #100 123 N. Third St., Minneapolis, MN 55401 This work session will build on the needs and goals identified at the April 21 work session. HKGi, MDI and Anoka County staff will confirm/revise goals for Wargo Nature Center and identify physical improvements and actions to implement the goals. A subsequent work session will focus on recreation and environmental education program strategies. The goals, strategies and framework plan will lead to the Draft and Final Master Plan. Agenda 1. Goals and Strategies Review draft nature center goals and strategies. Refine and add as needed. 2. Design Ideas and Actions — Hands on session to develop key physical design strategies and actions 3. Process Overview and Next Steps Programming and Marketing Work Session - Outdoor Recreation and Env. Ed. Goals, Strategies and Framework Plan Peer group review session Draft Master Plan Community and stakeholder review 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 www.hkgi.com Ph (612) 338-0800 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 37 Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Summary of May 7, 2014 Goals & Strategies Meeting Consulting staff from HKGi and Miller Dunwiddie, and representatives of Anoka County met to continue the discussion from April 21st vision meeting. Purpose of the meeting was to confirm/revise goals for Wargo Nature Center and identify physical improvements and actions to implement the goals Key elements of the discussions are summarized below. ATTENDEES: Greg Ingraham, HKGi Lil Leatham, HKGi Jen Cater, HKGi Anna Springer, HKGi Denita Lemmon, Miller Dunwiddie Architects John VonDeLinde, Anoka County Parks & Recreation Director Cory Hinz, Anoka County Recreation Services Manage Lisa Gilliland, Interpretive Naturalist, Wargo Nature Center Krista Harrington, Program Supervisor, Wargo Nature Center Sue Doll, Anoka County Solid Waste Specialist Jeff Perry, Park Operations Manager Andy, Marketing & Public Relations Crystal Passe, Graduate Landscape Architect Anoka County Increase Awareness of Wargo: Add Signage • Used to have a brown sign along the Interstate but it fell down. Check city ordinances and see Signage document sent by Crystal • Sign along CR 14; new sign must address issues with road ROW and wetland soils, and shouldn't be too flashy or large. Improve the Wargo Site Experience: Improve Water Access • There is no dipping station near the prairie; that was an eagle scout project and it is not very functional. Besides: the prairie is too long of a walk for kids from the nature center so it will not be used for kids programming. Find another location for dipping station • There is a current water platform that is overgrown closer to the parking lot between the parking lot and the prairie. Not used much. • However, there is potential for the upland area that is about 1 acre in size on east side of road south of prairie • Main water access site should accommodate about groups of 20 • Second platform should be at the end of the point and include higher observation tower • Boardwalk is good and may warrant some creative fund seeking Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — May 7, 2014 Goals & Strategies Meeting Summary Page 11 A 38 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Improve the Wargo Site Experience: Improve External Physical Connections • A northern connection to the YMCA would be great. Potential to finance with a T21 grant or other grants? (reminder: snowmobiles cannot go on boardwalks) • Strengthen water connection to the Group Campsite • Shared surface entry road could work and should be pursued! Improve the Wargo Site Experience: Expand Access • Abandon the managed forest idea, consider a compost interpretation/demonstration site instead • Still resistant to abandoning the gate altogether, but like the idea of moving it further west • Consider a boardwalk loop connecting the main peninsula area to the entry drive thru the wetlands north east of the building and a trail thru the uplands area near the compost site. Improve the Wargo Site Experience: Enhance the sense of Place • Need to check feasibility and soils for adding driveway to the garage -Jeff thinks they are hydric soils that won't support a drive. • Consensus was to keep access trail to backside/first floor of basement but make it more trail -like Improve the Wargo Site Experience: Improve the Heritage Site • Adding parking facilities at the Heritage site would be fine. • There is a permanent climbing wall going in at the Heritage Site this fall • Staff really liked the look and scale of the classroom shelter precedent Improve Entry and Sense of Welcome: Create a Natural Experience • No objections to what was proposed Improve the Nature Center Building • Staff really liked the rearrangement of the reception desk and the enhanced reading /reference nook over the first level. • Some resistance to moving staff space to the area next to the utility room; concern about noise and access to utility sink/cleaning suppies. Denita thinks these issues can be addressed. • Denita has not found a skylight system that lasts more than 10 years. • Accessible tree house idea is well received and would help achieve views to the lake Closing Comments • Staff looks forward to seeing more renderings and budget/cost estimates later in the process Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — May 7, 2014 Goals & Strategies Meeting Summary Page 12 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 39 Creating Places that Enrich People's Lives Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Anoka County Parks Programming and Marketing Work Session Tuesday June 10, 2014 10:O0AM — 12:00 PM Wargo Nature Center This work session will focus on recreation and environmental education program strategies. The intent is to develop a long term approach to program identification, development and delivery rather than specific programs to offer. Meeting Goals: 1) Enhance the approach and process for program development and execution and 2) Identify and prioritize physical improvements and other resource needs to support programs Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Meeting Goals and Objectives (HKGi) 3. Confirm programming goals identified in previous work sessions (HKGi) 4. Review existing program development process, marketing and feedback process (Staff) 5. Identify program development, marketing, and feedback process improvements (discussion) 6. Identify and prioritize resource needs to enhance program delivery (Physical improvements, staff needs, partners, equipment, storage) (All) 7. Next Steps 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 www.hkgi.com Ph (612) 338-0800 A 40 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Summary of June 10, 2014 Programming & Marketing Meeting Consulting staff from HKGi and representatives of Anoka County met from 10 am to 12 pm at Wargo to discuss recreation and environmental education program strategies.The purpose of the meeting was to develop a long term approach to program identification, development and delivery rather than specific programs to offer. Key elements of the discussions are summarized below. ATTENDEES: Lil Leatham, HKGi Anna Springer, HKGi Jen Cater, HKGi Cory Hinz, Anoka County Recreation Services Manager Lisa Gilliland, Interpretive Naturalist, Wargo Nature Center Krista Harrington, Program Supervisor, Wargo Nature Center Bob Holtz, Anoka County Naturalist Mary Morris, Interpretive Naturalist Maria Pierz, Homeschool Coordinator Deb Gallup, Interpretive Naturalist Sherry Taplin, Interpretive Naturalist Confirm program priorities: In addition to birding programs, water programs, ecotype -based programs, treehouse programs, and volunteering, staff mentioned: • Programming for adults ages 20-35ish (eg. Art and wine) • Overnight programmings (currently one overnight kayak camp) -for kids, families. At least 2/per summer or one per quarter • Homeschool- need to bring in new people, especially in the 1st and 2nd grade group (currently seeing a decline in that group). Need to focus on recreation/physical education credits and longer-term science credits • New recreation programs • Special drop-in events Current program development process: • Consider staff capacity and potential staffing needs • Budget/equipment considerations • 'Dream them up' (no formal system or process) • Personal interest of staff • Current trends • Equipment -based (ie they got new ipads and tried to hold classes) Wargo Nature Center Master Plan —June 10, 2014 Programming & Marketing Meeting Summary Page 11 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 41 • Current programs don't fill. They cancel programs if there is less than 3 people signed up. Class attendance is down by 1/3 this year. Potential factors affecting success of programming: • Not a priority for County marketing person • Have little control over marketing • Lost hometown connection- do fewer ads in local newspapers Current Marketing Efforts: • Krista and Lisa do marketing (communicate with county marketing person) • Program brochure • Email blasts • Press releases • Blinking kiosk at end of drive • Facebook (although this does not seem to be an effective tool for them) Current Feedback Collection • Survey Monkey surveys after class completion (don't get constructive feedback, however) • Oral feedback after classes (not formalized) • Summer school/day camp -paper surveys distributed and feedback is considered 'pretty good' Volunteers • Sherry is the on-site volunteer coordinator. • Weekend volunteer at front desk would be helpful • Current volunteers are older • Mixed response/excitement from staff regarding a volunteer recognition program/dinner • Would like to see more volunteers to assist naturalists during programs Competition/Partnerships • Do we know who our competitors are? Eg. REI? • Is there any benefit to partnering with REI? Staff thinks not Physical site improvements. Staff would like to see: • Alternative energy options (eg. Solar panels) • Non -potable water in the prairie • Storage/drying racks for pond study equipment • Prius for outreach • Truck for recreation • An additional laptop? • Canoe/kayak racks for long and short term storage (covered would be ideal, and easy for Todd to access) Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — June 10, 2014 Programming & Marketing Meeting Summary A 42 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Creating Places that Enrich People's Lives Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Anoka County Parks Peer Review Session Tuesday July 15, 2014 Wargo Nature Center 7701 Main St, Hugo, MN 55038 11:OOAM — 1:00 PM Peer Session Goals: 1) Test and refine the draft, goals, recommendations, and physical improvements 2) Gather additional informed input, ideas and strategies for programs, marketing, activities, and facilities at the Wargo Nature Center. Agenda 1. Welcome & Introductions (20 min) • Peer Session Goals and Objectives • Introduction to Wargo • Identified Needs & Draft Goals 2. SITE TOUR (20 min) We will give a short tour of the immediate area, talk about some of the needs on the tour, followed by returning to the meeting room and having lunch Lunch Break (get food...eat during next presentation) 3. Proposed Physical Improvements (30 min.) • Overview presentation • Peer discussion & input 4. Proposed Strategies for Programs, Activities, and Marketing (30 min.) • Overview presentation • Peer discussion & input 5. Next Steps/How we will use input (5 min.) 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 www.hkgi.com Ph (612) 338-0800 Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 43 Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center Master Plan Summary of July 15, 2014 Peer Review Meeting Consulting staff from HKGi and representatives of Anoka County met with a group of selected peers in the area of environmental education/recreation/interpretation to discuss Wargo Nature Center's existing conditions, programs, desires and opportunities for the future. The purpose of the meeting was to test and refine the draft, goals, recommendations, and physical improvements, and gather additional informed input, ideas and strategies for programs, marketing, activities, and facilities at the Wargo Nature Center. The meeting was held at Wargo and included a brief walking tour of the Nature Center. ATTENDEES: Lil Leatham, HKGi Anna Springer, HKGi Cory Hinz, Anoka County Recreation Services Manager Lisa Gilliland, Interpretive Naturalist, Wargo Nature Center Krista Harrington, Program Supervisor, Wargo Nature Center Dan Spock, MN History Center Vicky Wachtler, Naturalist, Eastman Nature Center, Three Rivers Park District Katie Pata, Dakota County Naturalist, MN Naturalist Association Sandy Tanckt, MN Landscape Arboretum Mark Oestreich, Westwood Hills Nature Center St. Louis Park CHANGES TO DRAFT MASTER PLAN: • Add main entrance to nature play area off main entrance path • Add turf area on the current meadow(reed canary grass area) and bring nature closer to the building • Include current plans to improve dock • Trailhead somewhere within the property? COMMENTS ON DRAFT MASTER PLAN: Physical improvements: • Bring vegetation/nature in closer proximity to the building • replace the 'sterile' turf lawn with naturalized plantings (no current opportunity for birding/wildlife observation from the building). Create views into the surrounding woods, as well. Get invasive species under control (Reed Canary Grass, Burdock, etc). • Tree houses are great additions-eg Landscape Arboretum had a successful exhibit. • Changes need to reflect the overall intent of the center • Essential experiences-whats the bread and butter? -for Dakota County it's trails. Make better connections to the nearby trail system to draw people in week after week. • Need to improve the view to the building Wargo Nature Center Master Plan —July 15, 2014 Peer Reveiw Meeting Summary Pa g e 11 A 44 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach • Need to improve signage • Don't underestimate the entry road as a part of the experience -'mall moms' may never get out of the car. Inside Exhibits: • What's the purpose/intent? Who's the audience? Is it to introduce people to what they can do here? The childrens education building at the arboretum has an abstract underpinning theme: photosynthesis. They gain an understanding of whats going on outside and then go out and see it in action. 'a deeper look'. • Taxidermy: literature review shows that the public really likes diaramas, but they like a story and dramatic tension, not static displays. • Inside generally needs to be lighter, brighter, softer, cleaner. Wayfinding improvements: • strip signage down to the most basic information for clarity, and ensure a continued experience - visitors should make a visual connection with what and where to go next. The lobby at Wargo is overwhelming -not sure where to start. People need landmarks with variety and cohesion to draw them throughout the site (eg. 4 choices right away). Keep it clean and connected. • Interpretation can be a way to attract/connect with visitors without asking them to come to an event or program-eg Dakota County's 10 interpretive nodes along the MRT. • ADA is important, especially when we look ahead to baby boomers -who will desparately try to stay busy despite physical limitations MARKETING: • Signature special events: really draw people in (non-commital, whole family, seasonal and annual -to get on people's mental calendars). Ideally events are part spectacle part participation. Music and food are critical components.(sensory-see, smell, taste, hear, touch) • MN naturalist Association has found that the exposure from events and word of mouth is what brings people to your site- not expensive advertising. Consider having a presence at related county events. • See MIA "Matisse Inspires" hands-on experiences. • Reconnect with local papers • Try to get a spot in the county mailer • Constant contact and twitter • Network with other groups for exposure (eg. Moms groups use Lebanon Hills for meetings) Wargo Nature Center Master Plan — July 15, 2014 Peer Reveiw Meeting Summary Wargo Nature Center Master Plan - March 2015 Page 12 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach A 45 OPERATIONS: Volunteers: • cannot be relied upon to perform the duties of paid staff. Are looking for social interaction as well as service opportunities. Volunteer groups may be able to perform specialized tasks, however (eg the 'Grumpy Old Mens' club who build things collectively, such as a new raptor cage at Westwood, Volunteers assembling and maintaining the WWII planes and helicopters at the History Center). • Warner Nature Center has had success in training adult volunteers for program assistance • Service learning for teens. Westwood (successful since 1990) and 3 Rivers has a successful junior naturalist program/youth leadership program. Treated like work where they commit to a certain number of hours, and have to get someone to fill in if they are absent. • Improvements to rental program not mentioned in the draft program, and they should be. The after-hours policy: • the gate locking at 5pm is 'strange'. People need water and bathrooms to access after hours (canoes need to be locked and hawk secured). Also consider expanding staff hours to coincide with rental demands (ala Dakota County). Most other facilities have automated gate closure systems. PROGRAMMING: • Date night and beer has been successful for adult programming. Eg. Craft beer and mountain biking event. Candelight ski -beer and chocolate. Use licensed providors. Adults seem to come to outdoor recreation based events more than nature education events. • Dan Spock has found that his programming designed for millenials also attracts the baby boomers (eg. Retrorama, history of hip, off-site programs such as a history pub crawl). He tries to be extroverted in developing programming -network with other groups to come up with innovative/current programming, keep reciprocity in mind -how would both groups benefit mutually PHASING: • Phase 1: Curb Appeal/exterior improvements $70K, funding from Integrated Waste • Phase 2: inside 2015 $100k • Phase 3: Tree house next 5 years —additional funding • Phase 4: connecting to the YMCA (5-6 years) • Phase 5: observation deck at the point —CIP • »»Near term (within 5 years) and Far term ( in 5 to 10 years) Wargo Nature Center Master Plan —July 15, 2014 Peer Reveiw Meeting Summary Page 13 A 46 Appendix: Meetings & Outreach Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. i23 North Third Street Suite 100 ©© Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 ©� 612.338.0800 www.hkgi.com Overall Location Plan — Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve The 5,500 -acre Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is one of the largest parks in the seven - county metropolitan area. The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve contains (3) locations within the Park that Anoka County Parks Maintenance supports: • Rice Creek Campgrounds • Chomonix Golf Course • Wargo Nature Center In addition, the County purchased a building recently to help support this Regional Park (identified as `Storage Building'). Location Plan Peltier :Rice Creek . Marshon Lake qca' Campgrrpundi) " Elm St ' :, ;. Storage _tow. :� Building Ricect- p :Creek rt," •. - •Aqua [owe . F '�:.. Centerville Lake ef I. Chorrionix . ��: Golf RCourse Rice Lake SoreE 5#. Bafdwrrr Anoka County Parks and Recreation - Maintenance Facility Assessment Rice Creek Campgrounds — Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve The Rice Creek Campground area offers a variety of camping options, from rustic campsites, sites with water/electric provisions, group camp sites and camper cabins. Items of Assessment • Rice Creek Campground: There is currently some minimal storage at this site, but no real maintenance spaces or staff office/break area/toilet room. These functions are needed at this site and within Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park. • Existing Storage Building: 40'-0" x 60'0" in size. The site for the building is tight, and there are challenges in regard to trailer access into the building. This site could also use more hard - surface area (bituminous). Needs • Rice Creek Campground: Provide a medium sized maintenance building that would provide 3 vehicle stalls, office/break area and a toilet room. • Existing Storage Building: This building will be used primarily for Wargo Nature Center Storage. The site and building entry points will be reviewed to assess if there is a solution for improved trailer circulation. Proposed Program Scope • Maintenance Building: 3968 SF • Site Clearing/Access • Utility Connections Lake kw, ;s-tMdr•me (..Lr (ieeA SwJ l:�fwrvJ Lke. (Wdmbus Lake; Coon Location Plan Proposed _ building location Storage Building - Aerial View Looking West Rice Creek Campground - Aerial View Looking South Rice Creek Campground - Site Plan Anoka County Parks and Recreation - Maintenance Facility Assessment Proposed Solution: Rice Creek Campgrounds - Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Anoka County Parks Rice Creek Campgrounds - High Level Costs HCM Architects New Construction Description Square Feet CostISF Total Park Maintenance Bldg. 3,986 $175.00 $697,550 Earthwork for Paving - Clear & Grub, Subgrade Prep 15,000 $0.30 $4,500 Subtotal Site Work / Utilities $697,550 Description SF/LF/ or quantity Cost Total Bituminous Paving - Heavy Duty 15,000 $3.65 $54,750 Earthwork for Paving - Clear & Grub, Subgrade Prep 15,000 $0.30 $4,500 Site Clearing/Grubbing 15,000 $0.25 $3,750 Water - Ductile Iron 50 $120.00 $6,000 Sanitary - PVC 50 $85.00 $4,250 Water Connection To Building 1 $20,000.00 $20,000 Sanitary Connection To Building 1 $12,000.00 $12,000 Electricity to Building - Service 100 $75.00 $7,500 Electricity to Building - Feeder 1 $25,000.00 $25,000 Perimeter Site Fencing (black vinyl coated chain link) 500 $35.00 $17,500 Security Gate(s) for Site Fencing 1 $2,000.00 $2,000 Location Plan Subtotal $157,250 Subtotals - 2016 dollars: - New Facility (Additions) $697,550 -Site Work $157,250 TOTAL - Construction Costs $854,800 *2017 dollars (with 5% increase) *2018 dollars (with 5% increase) *2019 dollars (with 5% increase) $897,540 $942,417 $989,538 doe Concept Plan — Maintenance Building (3968 SF) Anoka County Parks and Recreation - Maintenance acility Assessment Chomonix Golf Course - Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Chomonix Golf Course supports a high demand of rounds played, and increased maintenance and storage facilities are needed to support this demand. Items of Assessment • The existing Maintenance/Storage building is approx. 4960 S.F., which includes 2600 S.F. of Cold Storage, 1400 S.F. of heated Shop Area, and 960 S.F. of Office/Break Room/Toilet Room. • There is approx. 2600 S.F. of remote storage (out -buildings) that will no longer be available and need to be replaced. • The site area is tight - either the exterior yard area or parking will need to be used for any building expansion. Needs • The existing 4960 S.F. of building area will need to be maintained, and an additional 9,000 S.F. has been requested. Square footage requests include 4800 S.F. for golf cart storage (cold storage), 800 S.F. for Shop Area expansion (heated), and 3400 S.F. of general Cold Storage which includes 2600 S.F. (remote storage that was lost) and 800 S.F. of additional storage. • Approx. 1300 S.F. of storage at the Central Maintenance Facility has been requested by Chomonix Golf Course. This area needs to include a new wash rack, floor drains, fuel point, chemical storage and run-off water treatment. Proposed Program Scope • Golf Cart Storage: 4800 SF • Heated Shop Space: 800 SF • Cold Storage: 3400 SF • Bituminous Modifications • Fencing Modifications . Geo,. ;s-tMdrx�e h fP. Airmf.Jont Nerd,,. Location Plan Proposed building expansion area Aerial View L. • ing South Anoka County Parks and Recreation - Maintenance Facility Assessment Proposed Solution: Chomonix Golf Course - Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Anoka County PK Chomonix Golf Course - High Level Costs HCM Architects New Construction Description Square Feet Cost/SF Total Cold Storage - Golf Carts 4,800 $140.00 $672,000 Cold Storage - General 3,400 $140.00 $476,000 Heated Shop Space 800 $170.00 $136,000 Site Fencing and Security Gate (black vinyl coated chain link) 165 $35.00 $5,775 Subtotal Site Work 1 Utilities $1,284,000 Description SFILFI or quantity Cost Total Bituminous Paving - Heavy Duty 5,000 $3.65 $18,250 Earthwork for Paving - Clear & Grub, Subgrade Prep 5,000 $0.30 $1,500 Utilities - 2000 gal. Gray Water Storage Tank and associated piping - Includes flammable waste tank 1 $22,500.00 $22,500 Site Fencing and Security Gate (black vinyl coated chain link) 165 $35.00 $5,775 Site Fencing and Security Gate (gate) 1 $2,000.00 $2,000 Site Demolition 15,000 $1.00 $15,000 Location Plan Subtotal $65,025 Subtotals - 2016 dollars: - Existing Facility Renovation $1,284,000 - Site Work $65,025 TOTAL - Construction Costs $1,349,025 *2017 dollars (with 5% increase) *2018 dollars (with 5% increase) *2019 dollars (with 5% increase) $1,416,476 $1,487,300 $1,561,665 Building Addition Perimeter / ` Gate Fencing Access Addition Point Concept Plan — Chomonix Addition and Yard Extension Anoka County Parks and Recreation - Maintenance acility Assessment 1 Wargo Nature Center - Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve The Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center is nestled on a beautiful peninsula overlooking George Watch Lake, and is part of the 5,000 acre Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve. Items of Assessment • There is a separate garage building near the Interpretive Center that is used for rental storage (canoes, kayaks, snow shoes, etc). Anoka County Parks Maintenance has a small portion of this garage. Needs • There are no current needs to be addressed at this Facility. The off-season storage of the Wargo rental equipment will be kept at the Storage Building recently purchased by the County adjacent to Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve. Magl If HON d C„vi Leek �ql RkM( Location Plan Aerial View Looking East Site Plan Anoka County Parks and Recreation - Maintenance Facility Assessment RV. RESHANAU LAKE WARDS LAKE CENTERVILLE LAKE SHERMAN LAKE Legend EXISTING ENTRANCE SIGN EXISTING ROAD DIRECTIONAL SIGN EXISTING TRAILHEAD SIGN ilEXISTING TRAIL INTERSECTION SIGN D EXISTING TRAIL DIRECTIONAL SIGN EXISTING TRAIL MILE MARKER SIGN ▪ EXISTING WATERTRAILTRAILHEAD SIGN PROPOSED TRAIL DIRECTIONAL SIGN IIPROPOSED TRAIL INTERSECTION SIGN ED PROPOSED TRAILHEAD SIGN EXISTING PARK TRAIL EXISTING REGIONAL TRAIL PROPOSED REGIONAL TRAIL EXISTING CITY TRAIL ROADWAY PARK RESERVE WATER 0 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Park Wayfinding and Local Trails Plan 0.5 1 Miles N Date: 04/06/2017 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Planned Land Use 0 0.75 1.5 Miles Date: 06/20/2017 PLANNED LAND USE Legend ROADWAY WATER PARK RESERVE COLUMBUS LAKE CONSERVATION AREA 11 PARK RESERVE IN -HOLDINGS PLANNED LAND USE 10+ Housing Units/Acre 2-3 Housing Units/Acre 4 Housing Units/Acre 4-8 Housing Units/Acre CBD/Mixed Use City & County Parks City Park Civic/Institutional Commercial Commercial/Industrial Community Commercial High Density Residential High Density Residential/Planned Commercial Industrial Light Industrial Light Industrial / Suburban Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Use Open Water Park Park/Open Space Permanent Rural Planned Commercial / Planned Industrie Private Airfield Public/Sem i -Public Regional Open Space Regional Park Reserve Residential Single -Family Rural Residential Schools, Churches, & Nonpark Land Urban Reserve Vehicular Right -of -Way Wildlife Management Area COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY H J uJ W cc Survey developed and implemented in English, Spanish and Somali languages. Website developed with survey link and project information. Site was posted to social media and reached over 650 people. Boards with pictures and symbols were developed to allow the public input on amenities, trail surfacing, access to parks, etc. These displays were located at the Lino Lakes Senior Center and Centennial Library located in Circle Pines. Over 150 people participated. Four events occurred. One at the Lino Lakes Senior Center, one at the Wargo Nature Center Earth Day Event, one at Centerville Beach at Rice Creek Chain of Lakes and one at Centennial Library. Approximately 250 people were engaged. City staff were provided an opportunity for comment. The County attended each city's park board/commission meeting to get feedback on the projects. Comments/questions and responses are listed in the appendix of the amendment. Both the City's of Lino Lakes and Centerville will be asked to pass resolutions of support. The Committee will be asked to review the master plan and recommend to the County Board to pass a resolution of support for the plan. County Board will be asked to review the master plan and pass a resolution of support for the plan. TIMEFRAME N ,-i 0 N 's7 Q r, ‘-i 0 N a Q April —July 2017 April —July 2017 June & September 2017 May & October 2017 October 2017 DESCRIPTION Develop a multi-lingual survey to receive input from the public. Update website to engage the public. Conduct survey at a minimum of 2 locations within County Lino Lake Senior Center Centennial Library Conduct a minimum of 2 events at different locations within the County. Lino Senior Center — April 11— 2 hours Wargo Nature Center— Earth Day RC Beach - Little shade shelter Centennial Library Share master plan with City Staff/Officials for comment/input/support. Master Plan Review Master Plan Review/Resolution of Support STRATEGIES Multi-lingual surveys Plan your Parks website update Static Survey/Voting H c C CU> W by N Q .E c D C O Q +O+ w O .0 N d J N City Staff/Officia Is Engagement County Committee Engagement County Board Engagement 7k i --I N M V VI lO I. Summary of comments received relating to Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment: Relating to the Park: 1. Add 1 bench between the entrance and the 1" turn looking out over the field and one at the boat launch dock area. a. Response: These bench locations will be reviewed and installed if feasible. 2. We need to include the importance of the historical and cultural resources in the area. a. Response: The Campground Visitor Center contains information regarding the significance of the history and cultural resources in the area. The County is proposing to provide additional interpretive information as part of this master plan amendment. 3. With Waterworks finally being torn down, the unofficial boat and snowmobile access will be gone. How will that affect the park? a. Response: The County works with the snowmobile club on a regular basis, which provides the maintenance for the snowmobile trails. The County does not anticipate there to be any adverse effects to the park because of this change. The boat launch may see an increase in traffic, but the launch parking lot is limited to 28 vehicle and trailer stalls and 10 vehicle only stalls. 1. Add a fishing pier on Centerville Lake. a. Response: This has been incorporated into the development concept of the master plan amendment. 2. Add a longer fishing pier at Peltier. a. Response: The County is currently in the process of procuring and installing a 104 feet long pier. This will be the longest pier in our system and the longest that we can purchase from the vendor. Due to maintenance challenges, 104 feet is our maximum length. 3. Upgrade the marketing info within the park. Create a kiosk of some sort to promote the programs at Wargo. a. Response: Going forward, the County is planning on implementing digital monitors in indoor and covered locations throughout the park system to provide relevant, up-to- date information for our patrons. 4. Trim/remove the trees for ease of seeing the park entrance sign. a. Response: The vegetation at all vehicular entrances will be reviewed and trimmed if necessary. 5. Aqua Lane needs to be addressed. a. Response: The County is anticipating receiving funds to address the issues related to Aqua Lane in 2018/19. 6. Add a Micro -brewery a. Response: While the County understands the desire of micro -breweries, a micro - brewery is not considered a compatible use for a regional facility and does not meet an outdoor recreational need in the system. Refer to Minn Stat. 473.147, Subd. 1 and Minn. Stat. 473.121, Subd. 14. 7. Add horse trails wide enough for two people to ride side by side a. Response: Horse trails are currently offered at Rum River Central and Bunker Hills Regional Parks and the County has looked into adding horse trail in this area on previous occasions and discovered there was not a high demand for this amenity. The Parks Department will study the issue again to determine demand in the region and will consider this in the future. 8. Improve trail interpretive signs a. Response: Improving interpretive signage throughout the park is included in this park master plan amendment. 9. Maintain trails better, it's difficult for roller blading in RCCOL and bumpy for biking. a. Response: Trails are assessed annually trails in need of repair and maintenance are prioritized and addressed as funding allows. 10. How will entrance road to the compost site change? a. Response: Included in the master plan amendment is an illustration and description of the proposed compost location change with the proposed entry and exit drives shown. 11. Will there be changes to the trail route with Hodgson road? If so what changes and when? a. Response: There are no plans to change the Rice Creek North Regional Trail route along Hodgson. The trail will remain where it currently exists. 12. Users need to pick up dog waste and keep dogs on leashes. a. Response: Per Anoka County Ordinance, dogs must be leashed and it shall be unlawful for any person to: Have custody or control of any dog or domestic pet in a park/trail without possessing an appropriate device for cleaning up pet feces and disposing of the feces in a sanitary manner. The County is currently researching different methods of enforcement of this ordinance. 13. Surprised there are not more dog parks a. Response: At this time, the County has no plans for additional dog parks. Relating to the campground: 1. There were numerous comments regarding the need for more camper cabins. a. Response: The County was originally proposing to add two additional camper cabins to the campground, but based on the numerous comments received from the public about the topic, the County is now proposing to add six new camper cabins. 2. My wife and I do a lot of walking in the campground in the off season. Last week (April) we walked all the loops and 50% of the fire rings were in standing water, a lot of sites had standing and sometimes flowing water in them. a. Response: The County will be addressing the drainage issues in on on-going manner to reduce the sites that are seasonally under water. 3. Take one loop a year and bring in fill to raise sites. a. Response: This may be one solution to the drainage issues. The County will consider this. 4. Blacktopping the loops would be nice. a. Response: While the County understands that paving the loops would be nice, it is not the standard practice for the County campgrounds. 5. Add a 20' x 20' shelter at the group camp site. a. Response: The County has reviewed this request, but does not feel that a shelter at this site would be an economical option for the group camp site. 6. Eradicate the grapevines that are killing the trees. Vines are killing more trees and bushes than bugs or campers. It's their weight and sun blocking that do it. Some vines have been growing for a long time and have 6 inch diameter bases. a. Response: The County does not typically address grapevines as they are not considered an invasive species and are native to the state. While they may add to the decline of some trees, they are also a valuable food source for birds and other animals in the park. The only vine the County currently actively seeks out and destroys is Oriental Bittersweet, which is on the MN Department of Agriculture's 'Eradication' list. 7. Address the buckthorn issue. a. Response: Buckthorn is a very large problem throughout the park system. Unfortunately, there is not enough time, materials or staff to address this completely, but in general, the County's focus is on eliminating new infestations so that area's not currently over -run with buckthorn can be managed and infested area's can be contained. As time and funding allows, the County does work to remove it in infested areas. 8. Add severe weather shelters. a. Response: The County currently utilizes the existing campground restroom for severe weather shelters and when necessary, the visitor center building. The County follows State requirements for severe weather shelters for campgrounds. Relating to Wargo Nature Center: 1. Improve Wargo's canoe/kayak entrance so it is more accessible and inviting. It's hard to get in and out of canoe/kayak's for able bodied people. a. Response: This master plan amendment proposes to add two accessible canoe/kayak launches within the park and the County will consider adding these at additional locations throughout the system. 2. Get a pontoon for programming classes out on the water — birding, fishing, seniors, etc. a. Response: The County is reviewing funding options and staffing levels to be able to provide this type of programming. 3. Wargo is understaffed on weekends a. Response: The County is reviewing options to fund additional staff on weekends. 4. Expand the boardwalks at Wargo a. Response: Expanding the boardwalks at Wargo Nature Center is included in this master plan amendment. Relating to trails: 1. Designated bike lanes or additional trails are needed along roads that connect to trails. At minimum, pave the shoulders so bikers can use them. a. Response: This item relates more to residential and county roads. This information was shared with the local cities and the County Highway Department. 2. Need more residential trail connections to parks. a. Response: This information was shared with the local cities. 3. More drinking water along trails a. Response: While the County understands the convenience of having drinking water/fountains available along the trails, it is not economically feasible. The County typically locates drinking water/fountains where water service is currently available at trailhead locations, near restrooms and/or shelters. Senior needs: 1. Need a senior center that's up to code so they can have larger gatherings. Need a dedicated city employee that puts together the senior programming, trips, events. a. Response: While the County doesn't have jurisdiction of the Senior Center, this comment will be shared with the City of Lino Lakes. Related to Centerville Lake: 1. DNR should do something about the garbage left on the lake from icehouses, that the neighbors end up cleaning up in the spring. a. Response: Resident's may contact their local MNDNR Conservation Officer about this. 2. DNR needs to put a buoy at the sandbar/boulder in SE corner of lake. They were going to do it, but it never happened. Props hit sandbar and boulder. a. Response: Resident should feel free to contact the MnDNR —Trails and Waterways directly about this issue. 3. Can anything be done about the weeds in the lake? a. Response: Resident's concerned with this should contact the DNR directly. 4. The City is having erosion issues on the east side of the lake that they may want to partner with the County on. a. Response: Typically, the Parks Department does not partner on these types of projects that fall outside of the county park jurisdiction. Rice Creek Watershed District or the Anoka Conservation District may be helpful resources. 5. A few comments were received regarding the need to improve the water quality on Centerville Lake. a. Response: While Centerville Lake is a public water and falls under the jurisdiction of the State of Minnesota, the County follows best management practices for storm water mitigation and water quality to ensure that current park development and maintenance practices do not add to the water quality issue. Other miscellaneous comments, where no response is required. 1. We love our park system 2. Visit Wargo 3. Nice park system GEORGE WATCH LAKE /5461 fi2300% fes -''..81630 % 0 sr 81E/241E2300 61810ireill �I 11 F-' .*5.-T �1141 P2�5'2306 j • `48163.0 . . elEso 61.30 61530 61633 .51530._- 61220 -- _88\58\ 59p 311 61813 2030, 81830; 32100 /f,� et18t',0 81810 ;,l-�v.{ i8/1 61830 t1 8 ;` 21110 &15, 921 15 52400 1 \` eY5 r____, "'. t, 61610'51 0 l tee, `81830kt81510 N, 14.1.2 PELTIER LAKE 388 1/2- I. ;_3§11`'[ - 1j3z000 05200 13115 52300 I !\1a.WW 00, i 1 3220 14122 0 61530 f 81000 c CENTERVILLE LAKE 0 300 0 8\I 81830 32000` 14122 :61510 \ is 61220 81810\ 81810 X300 0 0 61810 (-112000 --32000-1412 4- Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Land Cover - Campground/Beach Area 0 1 200 2 400 Feet N Date: 03/13/2017 21110 52000 - ,81000 91_4 65\4360, -_'03-.fl'113.6C � •CH's. 52300 =ID0 81810 -1! 61510 61810 0 ! I'7 61610 `J ;1111221 61610 / 1530 61810 92 0 61220 0 f ." 81510 oSg0._...��52300, i J 13212 61630 '0 810 16 5 0 92 81610 / 61610 T52400 (x'810 j __/ ( /' v 52400 T^ 1 Z }81530 �V� I,, 61510) ',.1480 \ ., E2300( .1480- - ' , 52300 • 8148 fin0. 081530, I i 81630 "115 v. --\52000 h_ an oon /L. -^ +f/ 5 . i` • l H , ''��ljyyyyJJJJ n 7 ,81@36'1 VVV`"ri r�I J l Ir `LI9�h 81510, . 92 GEORGE WATCH LAKE 'x$15 61810 \ 1 �y N. `,/-)-61630`. lI 1__() 1,..: 13145 + ,1 �'T 141.22 !000 81003 ` 21110 `•\1830\..'., 81510 `, ) 52400 ) ,� "1 61 61220 ,':: 61,5 81810 L—�:'.1... 300: 530 ""00 22300 0 Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve Land Cover - Wargo Nature Center Area 1 200 2 400 Feet J N Date: 03/13/2017 Legend 11220, 11% to 25% impervious cover with deciduous trees 11231, Oak (forest or woodland) with 26-50% impervious cover 11234, Boxelder-green ash (forest) with 26-50% impervious cover 11320, 11% to 25% impervious cover with mixed coniferous/deciduous trees 13114, Short grasses and mixed trees with 4-10% impervious cover 13115, Long grasses and mixed trees with 4-10% impervious cover 13124, Short grasses and mixed trees with 11-25% impervious cover 13134, Short grasses and mixed trees with 26-50% impervious cover 13141, Jack pine barrens with 51-75% impervious cover 13144, Short grasses and mixed trees with 51-75% impervious cover 13145, Long grasses and mixed trees with 51-75% impervious cover 13211, Short grasses with 4-10% impervious cover 13212, Non-native dominated long grasses with 4- 10% impervious cover 13220, 11% to 25% impervious cover with perennial grasses 13221, Short grasses with 11-25% impervious cover 13222, Non-native dominated long grasses with 11- 25% impervious cover 13231, Short grasses with 26-50% impervious cover 13240, 51 % to 75% impervious cover with perennial grasses 14122, Pavement with 91-100% impervious cover 14123, Buildings and pavement with 91-100% impervious cover 14220, 11% to 25% impervious cover -exposed earth 21111, Spruce/fir trees on upland soils 23110, Upland soils with planted or maintained grasses and sparse tree cover 23111, Short grasses with sparse tree cover on upland soils 23112, Long grasses with sparse tree cover on upland soils 23120, Hydric soils with planted or maintained grasses and sparse tree cover 23211, Short grasses on upland soils 23212, Long grasses on upland soils 24000, Cultivated herbaceous vegetation 24110, Upland soils - cropland 24200, Close grown or solid seeded cropland 24210, Upland soils - close grown cropland 24217, Hayfield 31210, Tamarack swamp 32000, Deciduous forest 32100, Upland deciduous forest 32110, Oak forest 32112, Oak forest mesic subtype 32113, Oak forest dry subtype 32150, Maple -basswood forest 32170, Altered/non-native deciduous forest 32200, Temporaily flooded deciduous forest 32230, Aspen forest - temporaily flooded 32300, Saturated deciduous forest 32320, Mixed hardwood swamp 32330, Aspen forest - saturated soils 52000, Deciduous shrubland 52210, Native dominated temporarily flooded shrubland 52300, Saturated deciduous shrubland 52400, Seasonally flooded deciduous shrubland 52410, Alder swamp 52420, Wet meadow shrub subtype 52430, Willow swamp 61000, Grassland or emergent vegetation 61120, Tall grass altered/non-native dominated grassland 61220, Medium -tall grass altered/non-native dominated grassland 61400, Saturated graminoid vegetation 61420, Wet meadow 61480, Saturated altered/non-native dominated graminoid vegetation 61510, Cattail marsh - seasonally flooded 61530, Seasonally flooded altered/non-native dominated emergent vegetation 61610, Cattail marsh - semipermanently flooded 61620, Mixed emergent marsh 61630, Semipermanently flooded altered/non- native dominated vegetation 62100, Grassland with sparse deciduous trees 92100, Limnetic open water 93300, Palustrine open water High Biological Diversity Significance Moderate Biological Diversity Significance WS — Item 3 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 3 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director Re: Country Lakes Park Remaster Planning Proposal Background City staff has been working with Candace Amberg, Senior Landscape Architect with WSB and Associates to explore options to enhance Country Lakes Park. Attached is some information that Candace will review at Monday's meeting. Requested Council Direction Requesting feedback whether the City Council wants staff to proceed with enhancing Country Lakes Park. Attachments Country Lakes Park Information (2 pages) • 4 40• 41IM■ — Lino ■NEW -—tElementary N WIN G■„I�■■■1 �\ 1 II11111 1 ,■�.�m ,I�:/011111111 :IMMUIMJ I! limo IIr ,7 11 r 01111W19, iighland Meadows :' ■■■ ■Fffa�, Park .LPIj11v■ : Mama MI .S►�; o �Ot►%.�► �m�� uni1.: ■ n■■ x 111 i' �t■.��11f111111\��i� IIIIIIMMal O �� ". •.,. llllllllll� .a,/1 /11111111 Lino I. 80th St E L 1/'�■ ■�in�i 11111111MOLCAPPARETITIONL/: ar JIII'�� 111111111111111111:■ .- :: ■/I.Iii: - g;pqiiiiiiii- - ► ��!��IIIIIIIIII -•11,�� r�=X1111=tea, • ;VIP= - �_faNM N MAW ::IIIIII City Hall Parks and Recreation 600 Town Center Pkwy Centennial Middle School and Blue Heron Elementary Marshan Lake OHWL 883.3 100 -yr 886.1 �u w■or■a■ir�fIfliiiilliPM1111;1411111101.111MIE am ��E�� •,I■ ■• 11111111 �� ► JANEmmy op �� _�■■t111111111111I�. ova Sunrise Park ILm1■.e aF I1 ■ ■_�-■ -- ■t•-- , -.111■ _• __ e arms 1 U __I +III iti) mookrMNIMarL1 Wenz I F imm ::`-; -- • 1mnni -- N. minims mg Emma == .11i.1n=1. -- En .IIImIIII. ME 1•2 IIIIIIII ■■ .■€C- m1!Ts 10 it —■■ m. Wim. IIII. nilliimiNNII � NB MIM =LEM `IT WM oz. —■I=MIN :OM nil ■::p .� ;Bii .0�p ` --— . —�P"-/ mw �i ■111rr1 Lour ■11 p �* �. . ��/z �. : ■111111■ ; � 1��■��-111 ■11111111111 -■ ��I■!Ili/ll"!-: • ,`��\ 111■= E� /i ��■_111111I■ �__ �Ilt/lammow 14.5:1114.0 • i ■ .■ �� r :.. reir rkj. ' :.••••e_,44.014•1 ■ Centerville Lake OHWL 885.0 100 -yr 886.3 i... .41 PAM mod MI ■ %%111 11/2 4 1'::.: i►i0 C :nalEMATin �p:1111 s1111111111.n■_�r Reshanau Lake OHWL 883.5 100 -yr 886.0 Ai Ulm imitilikt Baldwin Lake OHWL 883.1 100 -yr 886.1 1111 �J1 i i,, • IIII:1 1 ■ ■ 7111. 1111111�> � wimulikanu d117n ilYp� � • —€ 1kri ■1111 ■ ■■ ■ c41-1 :D•a1v• � I• • iiiiia , .. . ' .. �, m■■ . AIity►I�1■■IimpInI■u►�i� �a 3 Q .i'v\111111. NI: ■�'� go 0 _ BE ►II X11 —r ■�4JO ,l = : =_ ��nQ� ti 1� nn..li n: D!Flri•! -� t\111111II Il■Illlla �1•11�11111■ ■ 1_:■ :11 ■moi �tl�■ 11I■g �, iIII..r ■iI ■_:i■■�r_tii 1■7 ■oun �a1 .: ":oi1 . br.It■�IIII�•• X11 .. Ak .r� Av. . ■:I/ I M 11111I!!ithi• ■■ ■ ■ .Film110 Pi rat Brandywood � ��'�1� I` Park a•e innt�itd 1IHIIIuUI jiiiu:iAilmmiow 1111 —I- i� son Iul" Lake .HWL 895.2 It o 'U• • e Lake 11.0 2.6 Amelia Lake OHWL 908.1 100 -yr 910.0 Country Lakes Park Otter Lake OHWL 911.5 100 -yr 912.6 Country Lakes Park is a 22 acre park, though somewhat underutilized for recreation, with many opportunities for recreational improvements. Some existing opportunities include: • Access and views of Reshanau Lake • Connection to community wide and regional trail systems • Connection to the Chain of Lakes Park Reserve along trails • Open lawn spaces • Varying ecological systems • Adjacent to the Rice Lake Elementary School (potential partnership opportunities) Existing development includes: 22 acre park located along Reshanau Lake Gravel parking lot Bituminous trails Picnic areas / lawn spaces Fishing pier Country Lakes Park Reshanau Lake 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 200 Country Lakes Park Aerial COUNTRY LAKES PARS Park Changes Upcoming Changes to Country Lakes Park What is taking place? Step One: The City will be undertaking park cleanup and removal of existing undesirable vegetation during the winter of 2017-2018. Some of the vegetation being removed includes: • Ash trees due to the ash borer • Cottonwoods due to the nuisance of the seeds • Buckthorn and other invasive species • Vegetation that is in decline or deemed a potential hazard • Vegetation that needs "thinning out" Step Two: West Shadow Lake Drive will be reconstructed in 2018. Road improvements will provide opportunities to make modifications to the park entrance with improved vehicular access, trail access and storm water improvements. How will this affect the park? The removal of this vegetation will make the park space look drastically different when complete. Some will find this alarming, as the park will look much more open, while others will appreciate having some more open views of the lake from the park use areas, and an increased sense of safety while in the park. Providing information on the upcoming changes will decrease the amount of negative feedback. The road improvements will enhance the appearance of the park entrance. Master Plan Consideration 1 The City of Lino Lakes may consider this a perfect time to undertake a master plan process for Country Lakes Park. The process could include the following steps: • Community/Stakeholder Input — talk with park users, residents and other stakeholders to determine what ideas and concerns they have regarding the future of Country Lakes Park. • Programming — work with the City of Lino Lakes and other park stakeholders to establish a "wish list" of amenities that are desired or needed. • Conceptual Design — prepare several conceptual plans that look at varying ways to improve the park based on the program elements. This would include review and discussion of the conceptual design plans to determine which elements and design ideas are most preferred. • Master Plan — prepare a preliminary master plan that illustrates the most desirable approach to the future of Country Lakes Park. This would include review and discussion with stakeholders for any necessary refinements. Once refinements are made, the master plan would be complete. • Estimate — a corresponding estimate of probable costs will be prepared that will allow the city to consider future funding and phasing approaches. Items for consideration in a Master Plan process may include: • Ease of access to park and lake • Safety of users • Improved park experience and views • Improved natural resources • Improved or new recreational amenities • Amenities for more age groups/demographics • Others? Example Master Plans Holli -tae Nulurr Trail FYdrnlinl Furore itorsr Trail Connections Group CampA Hone Trail Support Farilily A rem . it Risk Ilan.. wUSI w.t Ilam Park Supp: A Prrililiea •rvn* . Pr= Mull., r> ■..a. Erma • vial.PalmiPalmitinAdditional Parking Area Eaeenienr Artess Uhsenvlion Paint Sweat Lodge PnttRiiiiI F'ylur r I lorse trait Cnorierrlimi Second urn. .� Ih rk I.R. Signs Existinwl Ntalategmwe 5 . Building 4 - Observe lion rower Pedmiri an Nature Till Imp fa Ric Part. If.I, of Ri.LrVIIe Pedenlrian Bridge Crossings Y rimary York /Primary ranee Sign lin lign Ment of Co. Rd, R. Bealignmenr� a Pa, ReMrealade Eagle Neat 'riming Poinl Crane Vimei to Pninl • y,..n.ra.. Bridge Crossing, �irle AtrnS Route to Group Camp • Picnic Avea.i Trail fnn nerfum to County Road lag S Eagle Park Existing Co. Rrl. 1191 Bridge Crrrsxing Rea I ign Ment of Glac ler Road 8 Sauk River (toad Pm enfixl I Future Ilorse Tr I C..anrrli.. Ca nor Camping h.rea R icer Viewing •en... ant n.nne �fulli-llxc Yalu re Trail � Pllll'n l la l Future I: row Camp .i ml Realignment liwa'„o ` f Sauk River Roaa'y .r LE 'I marurk Bog Vkwing i'ofni Kt" .rra i l to pur 101 LtaitIL Ilse fad! !Mae! 2 a do Har 0 Hume Ilan!) 1.75 min Torah t.?t �eues ?rail L uo:rrlinn In the Royal Trail x �L MonrH OBSERVATION PLATFORM / CANOE LAUNCH AREA • WOOD bECKING • SEATING — CANOE RACK CONCRETE PAD iJTABLE SPACE NIC PN. ION TED DECK E4 TABL ES INFORMATION KIOSK FOR PARK Sal, CITY TRAIL SYSTEM„ PARKING AREA . SPAC,E FUR 8 VEHICLES 1�1 + 1 H.C. STALL SII PARKING EXPANSION AREA - • SPACE FOR 5 VEHICLES • IF WARRAOTED BENCH — TYP. Ot BRIDGE • C:OLLECTIQN AREA F PARKING LOT RUNOFF NATURAL SURFACE TRAIL • REefoRLko NATIVE PRAIRIE GRASS SIMPI F S FATINCO ARFAS Examples of Park Images Main COUNTRY LAKES PARS WS — Item 4 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item 4 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: John Swenson, Public Safety Director Re: Achieving Compliance through Education (ACE) — Traffic Diversion Background The ACE Program is an educational program that was offered through the Public Safety Department. The primary goal of this program was to make our community roadways safer by providing individuals that received a citation an opportunity to participate in the educational program. This educational program provided information on traffic safety in the hopes it would improve the individuals driving thereby making our community's roadways safer. During the 2017 Special Legislative Session, legislation was passed which prohibits City's from administering traffic diversion programs. City Prosecuting Attorney Robb Olson will be at the Work Session to address any questions the Council may have. Attachments Email to Council dated October 19, 2017 John Swenson From: John Swenson Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:44 PM To: Jeff Reinert; Bill Kusterman; Rob Rafferty; Michael Manthey; Melissa Maher Cc: Jeff Karlson Subject: Achieving Compliance though Education (ACE) - Suspended Mayor and Members of the City Council Our City Prosecutor Robb Olson was made aware of legislation that was passed during the 2017 Special Sessions that requires that we suspend the City of Lino Lakes Achieving Compliance through Education (ACE) Program. Below is the legislation: M.S.A. § 477A.0175 477A.0175. Aid reductions for operating an unauthorized diversion program Currentness Subdivision 1. Penalty for operating an unauthorized diversion program. Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, a county or city that operated a pretrial diversion program that a court determines was not authorized under section 169.999 or another statute or law must have its aid under sections 477A.011 to 477A.03 reduced by the amount of fees paid by participants into the program for the years in which the program operated. A court shall report any order that enjoins a county or city from operating a pretrial diversion program to the state auditor as required under subdivision 2. The state auditor shall determine the amount of fees collected under the diversion program and notify the commissioner of the amount. The commissioner shall reduce the county program aid paid to a county or the local government aid paid to a city by this amount beginning with the first aid payment made after receiving notice of the reduction amount. No aid payment may be less than zero but the amount of the reduction that cannot be made out of that payment shall be applied to future payments until the total amount has been deducted. Subd. 2. Court challenge to authority to operate a pretrial diversion program. Any taxpayer may challenge a city or county operation of a pretrial diversion program by tiling a declaratory judgment action or seeking other appropriate relief in the district court for the county where the city is located or in any other court of competent jurisdiction. if the court finds that the county or city has exceeded its authority under law in operating the pretrial diversion program, the court must transmit a copy of the court order to the state auditor. Credits Laws 2017, 1st Sp., c. 1, art. 4, § 18, eff. May 31, 2017. M. S. A. § 477A.0175, MN ST § 477A.0175 Current with laws of the 2017 Regular and First Special Sessions. The statutes are subject to change as determined by the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. (These changes will be incorporated later this year.) After reviewing the legislation, speaking with Mr. Langel and Mr. Olson, consulting with other law enforcement agencies that utilized traffic diversion programs, it was decided that the ACE program must be suspended until a legislative remedy takes place. As articulated in the above legislation the City's state aid would be in jeopardy if the ACE program continues. During the 2016 Legislative Session, Representative Runbeck authored HF1860, which addressed traffic diversions programs but as far as I know that bill did not get a hearing. I will contact Rep. Runbeck about this issue to determine if a legislative effort could take place during the next session to address the matter. 1 I have been speaking with other Chiefs on this matter as well as the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association (MCPA). I will be attending a meeting at the MCPA later this month to seek legislative assistance on this matter as well. Please let me know if you have any questions. Confidentiality Statement: This transmission and documents accompanying this transmission may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities listed above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return. 2 WS — Item # 5 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 5 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Re: Comprehensive Plan Update — Land Use and Housing Plans Background Staff has been working with the consultant team and the Planning & Zoning Board to prepare the Land Use and Housing plan elements of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Representatives from Landform, our consulting planner will be present to discuss: 1. Proposed Changes to the Future Land Use Plan and Development staging Plan 2. Compliance with Metropolitan Council regional planning policies including: a. Responding to the growth forecasts b. Meeting goals for overall development density; and c. Accommodating the city's share of the regional affordable housing need. As we have previously discussed, proposed changes to the plan are fairly minimal and it appears we are meeting both our overall density and affordable housing goals. Requested Council Direction Discussion Only. Based on feedback from the Council we will proceed with preparing the plan maps and text for these two chapters. Attachments 1. Landform Memo, dated November 1, 2017 2040 COMP PLAN Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Date: November 1, 2017 for November 6, 2017 Meeting To: Lino Lakes City Council From: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform Professional Services Subject: Comprehensive Plan Update—Land Use and Housing Plans On November 6th, consultants and staff will brief the City Council on the Comprehensive Plan Update, specifically the Land Use and Housing Plans. We will discuss: • The proposed changes to the Future Land Use Plan and Development Staging Plan, and • Compliance with Metropolitan Council regional planning policies including: o responding to the growth forecasts; o meeting goals for overall development density; and o accommodating the city's share of the regional affordable housing need. Based on feedback from the Council we will proceed with preparing the plan maps and text for these two chapters. Please see the attached schedule for the remainder of the Comprehensive Plan Update. Proposed Plan Changes Future Land Use Plan Changes—A process involving the Planning & Zoning Board and citizen and landowner input identified a list of potential changes to the city's Future Full Build Land Use Map. In some cases, the changes requested concerned not the future land use, but involved possible changes to the Development Staging Plan map to accelerate extension of public utilities to a given site. After evaluating the potential changes, there are only a few proposed changes for the 2040 Full Build Land Use Map. The locations are marked on the attached map. A. Approximately 10.4 acres on the west side of Lake Drive north of Diane Street would change from Medium Density Residential to Commercial. This change recognizes some of the existing land uses and the configuration of existing parcels which would make it difficult to assemble a suitable housing development site. This area is in the post -2040 Development Staging Area. B. Approximately 628 acres in the northeast corner of the city lying north of 80th Street and west of the regional park would change from Low Density Residential (120 acres), Medium Density Residential (333 acres), Industrial (104 acres) and Commercial (71 acres) to the new classification of Business Campus (538 acres) and Mixed Use 90 acres). The Mixed Use area is designated west of I -35E and south of Hardwood Creek, with the remainder designated Business Campus. This change recognizes that long-range plans for the northeast area of the city include interchanges on I -35E and I -35W. Access combined with high visibility at a key intersection of major transportation facilities will make this City Council November 6, 2017 1 C1TY C0F LUNL KES 2 0 4 0 COMP PLAN Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update area desirable for business development, and less desirable for residential development. Including Mixed Use would allow opportunities for higher -density housing and other uses compatible with intense business-related uses. This area is in the post -2040 Development Staging Area. "Business Campus" will be a new designation in the 2040 Plan Update. Its purpose is to create a strong image for the city and designate areas to serve primarily as employment centers, with office, service, research and development and light industrial uses. Warehousing and outdoor storage would be limited, as accessory to these primary uses. Other uses would include those that support the businesses and their employees, such as convenience retail or services, hotels, restaurants, daycare facilities, banks or other financial institutions, and park and ride facilities. Additional uses may include destination uses that have a market draw beyond the local area, such as entertainment, public institutions or non-profit or semi-public facilities. A master plan/ PUD plan will ensure a cohesive development pattern, and provide standards for good aesthetics and architectural quality, while protecting the natural resources of the area. None of the Business Campus area is planned for development before 2040. Implementation will require new zoning ordinance language. Future updates to the I -35E Corridor AUAR area will also need to consider the new designation before development may occur in the area. C. Approximately 9.75 acres on West Cedar Street adjacent to I -35E, west of the Northpointe development, would change from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential. This recognizes the need for a transition from the adjacent single-family homes and the highway right-of- way and the interest in the site for higher density housing styles. This area was in Stage 1A of the 2030 Staging Plan and is also in Stage 1A of the new 2040 Staging Plan. Utility Staging Plan Changes—The 2030 Comprehensive Plan provided for about the same amount of growth that must be accommodated by the 2040 Plan. Because of slower growth, some areas planned for development between 2010 and 2020 have been delayed into the next decade (between 2020 and 2030.) Much of the land planned for development between 2020 and 2030 will not be needed to accommodate growth until the second decade of the updated plan (between 2030 and 2040.) There is less need to add areas previously planned to urbanize after 2030 to the 2040 urbanizing area. The Utility Staging Plan Map would be updated as shown on the following table, with a few exceptions noted and discussed below. The map from the 2030 plan, marked with the proposed changes, is also attached. City Council November 6, 2017 2 L OL S CIT Y,� v or IN KE 2040 COMP PLAN Lino Lakes Utility Staging Areas, 2030 and 2040 Plans Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 1. Approximately 52 gross/44 net acres on the east side of Lake Drive (CSAH23) guided Mixed Use and Medium Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 3 to 2040 Stage 2B. 2. Approximately 174 gross/135 net acres west of 20th Ave and east of Peltier Lake guided Low, Medium and High Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 2A & 2B to 2040 1A & 1B. 3. Approximately 101 gross/ 90 net acres west of 20th Avenue and north of Birch Street guided Low and Medium Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 2A & 2B to 2040 1A & 1 B. 4. Approximately 47 gross/ 28 net acres east of 20th Avenue, west of I -35E and south of the Northpointe development guided Low Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 3 to 2040 Stage 1 B. 5. Approximately 36 gross/ 31 net acres west of County Road J/Ash Street, north of the City of North Oaks, guided Low Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 2A to 2040 Stage 1B. 6. Approximately 191 gross/ 123 net acres east of Holly Drive, north of County Road J and south of Cedar Lake, guided Low and Medium Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 3 to 2040 Stage 2B. Land Use and Staging Plan Changes, Existing Single -Family Subdivisions—In addition to the other changes identified above, we are proposing that the city change the Staging Plan designation of six existing, developed single family subdivisions guided Urban Reserve/Stage 3 by the 2030 Land Use Plan to Low Density Residential/Stage 1A on the 2040 Land Use Plan. The areas encompass a total of about 335 acres and 250 existing homes, with only a few vacant lots. These large -lot single family subdivisions are surrounded by urbanized area but currently use individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS). The 2030 Comprehensive Plan Utility Staging plan mapped these areas within Staging Area 3/ Post 2030, indicating that these areas would not receive service within the 20 -year span of the plan. The only reason for this was that a formula used by the Metropolitan Council included these areas when calculating whether the city's proposed development density met regional policy standards, effectively penalizing the city in its efforts to meet density goals. The current staging plan conflicts with city policy to extend public utilities to these neighborhoods when either requested by the homeowners or when necessary to replace failing ISTS. It also adds an additional bureaucratic step (a Comprehensive Plan Amendment) to the process of extending utility service should it become necessary. Including these areas in Staging Area 1-A is consistent with the city's policy of preserving and maintaining existing neighborhoods. We have discussed this change with Metropolitan City Council November 6, 2017 3 2030 Comprehensive Plan 2040 Comprehensive Plan Stage 1A 2008-2015 2018-2025 Stage 1B 2015-2020 2025-2030 Stage 2A 2020-2025 2030-2035 Stage 2B 2025-2030 2035-2040 Stage 3 Post 2030 Post 2040 1. Approximately 52 gross/44 net acres on the east side of Lake Drive (CSAH23) guided Mixed Use and Medium Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 3 to 2040 Stage 2B. 2. Approximately 174 gross/135 net acres west of 20th Ave and east of Peltier Lake guided Low, Medium and High Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 2A & 2B to 2040 1A & 1B. 3. Approximately 101 gross/ 90 net acres west of 20th Avenue and north of Birch Street guided Low and Medium Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 2A & 2B to 2040 1A & 1 B. 4. Approximately 47 gross/ 28 net acres east of 20th Avenue, west of I -35E and south of the Northpointe development guided Low Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 3 to 2040 Stage 1 B. 5. Approximately 36 gross/ 31 net acres west of County Road J/Ash Street, north of the City of North Oaks, guided Low Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 2A to 2040 Stage 1B. 6. Approximately 191 gross/ 123 net acres east of Holly Drive, north of County Road J and south of Cedar Lake, guided Low and Medium Density Residential, change from 2030/Stage 3 to 2040 Stage 2B. Land Use and Staging Plan Changes, Existing Single -Family Subdivisions—In addition to the other changes identified above, we are proposing that the city change the Staging Plan designation of six existing, developed single family subdivisions guided Urban Reserve/Stage 3 by the 2030 Land Use Plan to Low Density Residential/Stage 1A on the 2040 Land Use Plan. The areas encompass a total of about 335 acres and 250 existing homes, with only a few vacant lots. These large -lot single family subdivisions are surrounded by urbanized area but currently use individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS). The 2030 Comprehensive Plan Utility Staging plan mapped these areas within Staging Area 3/ Post 2030, indicating that these areas would not receive service within the 20 -year span of the plan. The only reason for this was that a formula used by the Metropolitan Council included these areas when calculating whether the city's proposed development density met regional policy standards, effectively penalizing the city in its efforts to meet density goals. The current staging plan conflicts with city policy to extend public utilities to these neighborhoods when either requested by the homeowners or when necessary to replace failing ISTS. It also adds an additional bureaucratic step (a Comprehensive Plan Amendment) to the process of extending utility service should it become necessary. Including these areas in Staging Area 1-A is consistent with the city's policy of preserving and maintaining existing neighborhoods. We have discussed this change with Metropolitan City Council November 6, 2017 3 2040 COMP PLAN Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Council staff and are hopeful that it will not create an issue for compliance with regional policy in the plan update. If it does, we will recommend retaining the current planning designations for these six areas. Consistency with Regional Planning Policies The Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires cities to submit their Comprehensive Plans to the Metropolitan Council for review for conformance with regional systems plans, consistency with Council policies, and compatibility with adjacent and affected governmental units. The key issues for the Land Use and Housing plans are whether the plan responds to the growth forecasts, meets goals for overall development density, and accommodates the city's share of the regional affordable housing need. Growth Forecasts—The 2030 Comprehensive Plan anticipated that Lino Lake's population would increase to 22,500 by 2010 to 26,300 by 2020 and to 30,700 by 2030. Growth has lagged the forecasts, largely due to the Great Recession of 2007-2009 which slowed development throughout the region in the late 2000's and early 2010's. The 2040 forecasts are similar to the 2030 forecasts, anticipating that the city will reach 31,100 population by 2040. Approximately 1,700 new households are expected between 2020 and 2030 and about 1,600 new households are expected between 2030 and 2040. To determine whether the city can accommodate the forecasts, the city's existing land use inventory was combined with the development staging plan and natural resource information to determine the amount of land available to accommodate projected growth. The city must ensure that there is enough land area to accommodate the forecast for new households and employment growth. The inventory showed that between 6,152 and 11,162 residential units could be built at the density allowed by the Comprehensive Plan between 2020 and 2040, more than enough to meet the projected demand of 3,300 units. The city must also accommodate the forecasted growth in employment, which is expected to increase from 3,944 in 2014 to 6,000 in 2040, an increase of about 50%. According to the 2017 land use inventory, the city has about 405 net acres of existing commercial and industrial land uses. A 50% increase would require roughly 200 acres. The draft plan includes about 540 net acres within the 2040 growth area. Overall Development Density—The city must also demonstrate that it meets the regional density policy of 3 to 5 residential units per net acre in "Emerging Suburban Edge" communities. The Metropolitan Council has determined that lower density development does not make efficient use of its investments in the regional sewer system. Under state law, the Metropolitan Council has authority to require cities to modify their comprehensive plan if there is an adverse impact on a regional system. The Metropolitan Council has a complex method for determining compliance with the density policy. The residential density of the proposed 2040 plan, with the changes describe above, was calculated using their process. The plan would comply with the policy, allowing a minimum average density of exactly 3.0 units per acre. Accommodating Affordable Housing Need—The Metropolitan Council has calculated Lino Lakes' share of the region's need for low and moderate -income housing for the decade of 2021-2030 to be 515 new City Council November 6, 2017 4 2 0 4 0 COMP PLAN Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update units. In comparison, the goal for 2011-2020 was 560 units. (The regional and local plans will be updated again in ten years, at which time the city will need to accommodate the need for affordable units in the following decade of 2031-2040.) For the 2040 plan update, the Metropolitan Council will consider land guided for development at a minimum density of 8 units per acre to be potentially available to meet affordable housing needs. The draft plan includes sufficient residential development within the Mixed Use areas (a minimum of 597 to a maximum of 1,157 units) to accommodate the need for affordable units from 2021 to 2030. The city does not actually have to provide affordable housing, but simply needs to provide areas where the land use density could make affordable housing viable. Conclusions The proposed 2040 Future Land Use Plan shows only three changes from the 2030 map. The proposed 2040 Utility Staging Plan reflects the slow -down in growth in the last decade, and would extend the plan from 2030 to 2040 by adding a modest amount of land to the urban service area. With these changes, it appears that the plan will be consistent with the applicable regional policies. Attachments: • Comprehensive Plan Meeting Schedule, Updated October 10, 2017 • 2040 Future Full Build Land Use, Proposed • 2030 Utility Staging Map with Proposed Changes for 2040 Plan City Council November 6, 2017 5 CITY, LNOL KE Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Get Involved! Let's talk about the future of Lino Lakes. There are many opportunities to participate in the 2040 Update. All meetings are open to the public. Mark your calendar and join us! Date Meeting Topic July 10, 2017 (6:30 p.m.) July 12, 2017 (6:30 p.m.) July 13, 2017 (8:00 a.m.) July 26, 2017 (6:30 p.m.) August 7, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) August 9, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) August 19, 2017 September 13, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) September 27, 2017 (6:30 p.m.) October 2, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) October 9, 2017 (6:30 p.m.) October 11, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) Park Board Planning and Zoning Board Economic Development Advisory Committee Environmental Board City Council Work Session Planning and Zoning Board Blue Heron Days Planning and Zoning Board Environmental Board City Council Work Session Park Board Planning and Zoning Board October 25, 2017 (6:30 p.m.) Environmental Board November 6, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) City Council Work Session November 8, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) November 29, 2017 (6:30 p.m.) December 4, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) Planning and Zoning Board Environmental Board City Council Work Session Meeting Schedule, Updated October 10, 2017 Parks & Trails Land Use Economic Development Surface Water/ Natural Resources Land Use Land Use/ Housing Key Issues Transportation Surface Water/ Natural Resources Transportation Review Draft Park Plan Water (supply, sewer, surface) Local Water Management Plan Land Use/ Housing Local Water Management Plan Parks, Trails & Natural Resources Local Water Management Plan Parks Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Date Meeting Topic December 11, 2017 (6:30 p.m.) December 13, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) January 2, 2017 (6:00 p.m.) January 10, 2018 (6:00 p.m.) February 5, 2018 (6:00 pm.) February 21, 2018 (6-8 p.m.) March 14, 2018 (6:00 p.m.) March 26, 2018 (6:30 p.m.) TBD (October or November, 2018) City Council Planning and Zoning Board City Council Work Session rias ii ling anu LUI IU I9. oudi u City Council Work Session Open House / Workshop Planning and Zoning Board City Council City Council Local Water Management Plan Economic Development, Community Facilities Sewer) Water Draft Plan Draft Plan Draft Plan Public Hearing Approve Draft Adopt Final Plan All meetings are held at Lino Lakes City Hall, unless otherwise noted. Starting times and topics of meetings are subject to change. Meetings may be added or cancelled, please check the website for the latest information. Questions? Contact Community Development Director Michael Grochala at 651-982-2427 or E-mail compplan@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us For more information and additional opportunities to engage in the Comprehensive Plan Process visit us online at www.ci.lino-lakes.mn.us Meeting Schedule, Updated October 10, 2017 CIT OF INOL KES CITY OF _ RNOLKES 1 MDR i.' �� _ var►ovs 40 65WIPAtradl. +b 2 4 - 13 1 Rondec. UsvleSS Ut vs/ Mt yet( VAe— COMP PLAN i Lake . 2040 Future Full Build Land Use Proposed ,„ _r.,:J; -1 Legend _� Permanent Rural 1 -- ,IIeg MUM I 1 ' -= _ Pr, �� Georg "+`'E watch C Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential IIP -, Lake ••�► �� 1 1 _LINN 1 • ,., • arse Commercial ,.--... . •i • .--.Y.. .�,`. v so - „ 1, i,L w . q Marshan La ' s I t . ;` , n ----= City of Centerville 1►4). •- _. __:. Mixed Use Business Campus ®i'oms ' Centerville _{ , Lake i' ®®� --2 ► "ea, lir ::"�" LI-" .wl (� � Industrial ' r-/« ® S pJ �.4t ' j _ -. a� 1' - 1 - ' —tai . '"-s-',..- -- �- i0r Civic and Institutional �- J _ _ _ , it _ ' -.... Park and Open Space , , _nw, 1 Ilu �° 4111g�.�"1117=8 ►Olu .q 1� irpo Airport ' Rice Lake _„�„ ' s . Reshanau Lake t-., �.w$ _ _ - Iia? I LI Open Water $ ,._• O\..� - f yy .� ` '- o .-mil as•" - ► I.4, z . a: 16. BI I iy1 Cle 1 ,. I � :.- _ 1 1 ! — —, I_ _ _ Municipal Boundary . ,.,1, ,..,1— .a,`lii 1 Parcels y �,�_ ■ Y _ ICIWni -- %, , Tmr-- I 1 ,—_, '.�_ jl R:7i 7115 ko, �i4� t 1 r �! ) �--/J'�q�C �-' �.0 '6.`�. _. �-I it I��vJV� I p��y1p'-*�4 I ... 1eropsCb&jes Amelia ZIPCH ° immil 203 0 Bid I LLake ti j - Ea le -;:-.--,./ Otter Lake e LT±LAtwnso 'O; 17 3,500 1,750 0 3,500 Feet N Date: 10/12/2017 IS . 1 . . In NCI 1 E w = I di rill isImmai in mo so EN m LAII =well now 14 itttt was i J " /IVA f w w _f (L .11110 Wig / .Ili/ .0' '' ea � li• •iNM t m�'r�I�III,. "'Sr - lb.." i:35W �� -J o 1.10011 11,11,11 wet". City of Shoreview City of North Oaks White Bear Township rest Lake 0 0 0 CITY. IiNOL KES 2 04 0 COMP PLAN 2030 Utility Staging Map Legend Stage 1A Planned Service Area (2008 - 2015) Stage 1B Planned Service Area (2015 - 2020) Stage 2A Planned Service Area (2020 - 2025) Stage 2B Planned Service Area (2025 - 2030) Stage 3 Planned Service Area (Post 2030) No Service Open Water ROW L." Municipal Boundary Parcels Proosed CM.i3€s -car- 2.04.0 car-Z0'b 'Plate L� 5+49i1 tho.t X(s'tmc O,mevjcred Wq1119OthootA I¢.;raR. l esdehi�t+r)L i� R 3,500 1,750 0 3,500 a Feet N WS — Item 6a WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 6a Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Katy Thompson, WSB & Associates, Inc. Re: Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan Update Background As part of the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan update, the City's Engineer WSB & Associates, is updating the Local Surface Water Management section of the plan. The City's Surface Water Management Plan was last updated in 2015, however updates with the Rice Creek Watershed District and Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization, as well as new TMDLs for Golden Lake and the Upper Mississippi, require the plan to be updated with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. WSB staff will be present at the meeting to review the Goals and Policies section of the plan. Requested Council Direction Discussion Only. Attachments 1. 2040 Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan Summary Summary of the 2040 Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan City of Lino Lakes, MN Goals & Policies The City of Lino Lakes continues to actively manage and protect its water resources. The Surface Water Management Plan supports the City by outlining twelve policies, goals and issues related to the following: 1. Water rate and quantity 2. Water quality 3. Wetland management 4. Floodplain management 5. Public ditch management 6. Groundwater management 7. Natural resources 8. Erosion and sediment control 9. Regulations, permitting and reporting 10. Monitoring, maintenance and inspection 11. Public participation, information and education 12. Financing Existing Water Resources The City of Lino Lakes existing water resources include fifteen lakes, nine within the Chain of Lakes Regional Park, three creeks, and a network of public and private ditches and municipal storm sewer. Of the lakes and creeks, nearly all are impaired for excess nutrients, mercury, dissolved oxygen, or bacteria (Figure 7-7). Future Conditions In addition to water quality concerns, the City of Lino Lakes is expected to experience more frequent flooding in the future with future development and increased runoff rates. The Rice Creek Watershed District has modeled the future flood impacts on Lino Lakes, which will include increased overtopping of small ditches and culverts, as well as increasing the demand on existing stormwater and ditch infrastructure (Figure 7-8). Major Improvements Expected • Continue Implement water quality improvements via the existing Subwatershed Plans, including: — Water quality improvements in the LaMotte and West Shadow Lake neighborhoods help improve water quality in Centerville and Reshanau Lakes. — Review and address floodplain areas with inadequate freeboard during flood events — The City will consider joining the Community Rating System to better manage floodplain development and allow residents to receive a discount on flood insurance — Work with MnDOT to evaluate wildlife crossings in future projects near Lake Amelia — Evaluate the potential to implement volume reduction practices in stormwater-sensitive wetlands near Baldwin and Sherman Lakes — Continue to incorporate neighborhood stormwater planning and education into street reconstruction programs. For 2018, both the West Shadow Lake and LaMotte neighborhoods have engaged in several outreach meetings to provide input used in the preliminary stormwater management designs. • Continue to work with RCWD and VLAWMO to establish wetland banks and approaches to maintain or restore existing wetland functions • Continue to work with RCWD and VLAWMO to address flooding and flow constraints in the existing system, including: — The implementation of a multi -functional greenway corridor in Northeast Lino Lakes to address the existing and future flooding concerns with Anoka County Ditches 55 and 72, including modifying existing ordinances to ensure implementation of all water quality, flood control, and natural resources components during development through the Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan • Evaluation of streambank erosion along 10-22-32 and Clearwater Creek • Implement the City's Wellhead Protection Plan and Water Conservation Management Plans • Incorporate pollinator habitat in future city projects • Educate residents and local businesses on smart irrigation and alternative landscaping options to reduce water use Continuing Activities • Continue to implement Better Site Design (BSD) techniques for new development • Protect high priority wetlands and high-quality habitats • Complete the remaining Subwatershed Management Plans and existing implementation practices as opportunities arise • The City of Lino Lakes will continue to address the Total Maximum Daily Loads to address nutrient, mercury and bacteria impairments in its surface waters. • The City of Lino Lakes will continue to work with regulating agencies to monitor, inspect and maintain the existing stormwater infrastructure, best management practices, and additional requirements as specified in the City's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. • The City will also continue its efforts to obtain grant funding for future water quality, flood control, invasive species and groundwater protection projects. City of Ham Lake Unnamed City of Columbus MN- IF N ` ain Centerville St Ced, r St Birch St N o d 2 >+ c V U a Golden r Lake 1 Golden Lake Holly Dr E 1jald E e e City of Shoreview City of North Oaks MN IM White Bear Township City of Forest Lake o 0 U Figure 7-7. Surface Water Resources 2040 COMP PLAN Legend Public Drainage System Public Ditch Tile, Public Ditch Private Ditch Public Waters DNR Public Waters DNR Public Wetlands Public Watercourse Shoreland Classification General Development Natural Environment Recreational Development Impaired Waters 410- MPCA Surface Water Monitoring Locations Impaired Lakes - Impaired Streams 0 1,100 2,200 4,400 6,600 8,800 Feet I.. _ Municipal Boundary Adjacent City Boundary Road Centerline City of Ham Lake 1 City of Columbus City of Forest Lake City of Shoreview City of North Oaks White Bear Township Figure 7-8. RCWD Future Flood Increases 2040 COMP PLAN Legend Max Elevation Change • < 0 (reduction) 0-0.ft tk 0.5 - 1.0 ft • >1.Oft Areas of Future Flooding Concern Overtopping at Future 100 -year Events Overtopping at Existing & Future 100 -year Events Municipal Boundary Adjacent City Boundary Road Centerline Future Floodplain Data Source: Courtesy of Rice Creek Watershed District, 2016 0 1,100 2,200 4,400 6,600 8,800 Feet WS — Item 6b WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 6b Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Katy Thompson, WSB & Associates, Inc. Re: Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Background The Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project is in the northeast area of Lino Lakes bounded by Main Street to the south, the City of Hugo to the east, Peltier Lake to the west, and Rehbein Street to the north. The site is approximately 1,350 acres and is largely agricultural or undeveloped within the City of Lino Lakes. The surface water in this area is effectively landlocked, with the only the aging agricultural field drains, installed in the early 20th century, providing drainage in the region. These agricultural drains are at capacity and unable to meet the demands of future development within the watershed, consistent with the City of Lino Lake's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. As allowed under Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Rule C.5(f), this Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) is presented as an alternative means to meet the requirements of Rule C.6 (Water Quality Treatment) and Rule C.7 (Peak Stormwater Runoff Control) for future development in this area, anticipated to be completed in several phases, using a regional stormwater management approach. This CSMP is intended to streamline RCWD permit approvals for future development in the Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement area, provide landowners with options for managing their stormwater runoff in the future, and provide a framework to distribute future regional treatment benefits and requirements amongst future developments, so no single project is burdened with more challenges in meeting the RCWD requirements. Katy Thompson of WSB will go through and will solicit comments on the plan. Requested Council Direction 1. Provide feedback on the Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan 2. Direct staff to place on the November 13, 2017 City Council meeting for consideration. Attachments Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Aar, CITY OF LOL ES NORTHEAST LINO LAKES DRAINAGE AREA COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER - MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Draft October 19, 2017 Prepared for: City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 WSB PROJECT NO. 02029-790 WSB Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Project Location 2 1.2 Drainage Areas and Resources of Concern 2 1.3 Water Resources Design Criteria 3 1.3.1 Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan 3 1.3.2 Northeast Lino Lakes Alternative Urban Areawide Review 3 1.3.3 Resource Management Plan (RMP) 3 1.3.4 Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) 4 1.3.5 Regulations and Policies 4 1.3.6 Regulatory Requirement Overview 5 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 2.1 City of Hugo 6 2.2 City of Lino Lakes 6 2.3 Existing Land Uses 6 2.4 Soils and Geology 7 2.5 Groundwater 7 2.6 Surface Water Hydrology 7 2.6.1 I -35E Construction 7 2.6.2 Drain tile systems 7 2.6.3 Wetlands 8 2.7 Cultural Resources 8 3 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC Analyses 9 3.1 Hydrology 9 3.2 Upper Rice Creek 10 3.3 Clearwater Creek 11 3.4 Hardwood Creek 12 3.5 Rice Creek HEC -RAS 13 4 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 14 5 PROPOSED CONDITIONS MODELS 15 5.1 Hydrology Updates 15 5.2 Hydraulic Updates 16 5.2.1 Upper Rice Creek InfoSWMM — Proposed Conditions 16 5.2.2 Clearwater Creek InfoSWMM — Proposed Conditions 17 5.2.3 Hardwood Creek InfoSWMM — Proposed Conditions 18 5.2.4 Rice Creek HEC -RAS — Proposed Conditions 18 6 RCWD RULE C REQUIREMENTS 19 Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 6.1 Rule C Overview 19 6.2 Water Quality Treatment [RCWD Rule C.6] 19 6.2.1 Volume Reduction Practices 20 6.2.2 NURP Basins 20 6.2.3 Additional BMPs for Consideration of Future Development 21 6.3 Peak Stormwater Runoff Control [RCWD Rule C.7] 21 6.3.1 Allowable Peak Discharges 21 6.3.2 Flood Control Storage 21 6.3.3 Outlet Control Structures 22 6.3.4 Low Floor and Low Entry Freeboard REquirements 22 7 CSMP STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 23 7.1 Regional BMP Capacity Analysis 23 7.2 Operation and Maintenance 23 8 Future Development Submittals 24 8.1 Interim Conditions 25 9 References 26 List of Appendices Appendix A — Figures Figure 1. Location Map Figure 2. Existing Land Uses Figure 3. Drainage Areas and Resources of Concern Figure 4. Lino Lakes Full Build Land Use Figure 5. Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan Figure 6. Lino Lakes Park, Greenway and Trail System Figure 7. Lino Lakes I -35E AUAR Area Figure 8. CSMP Soils Figure 9. CSMP Surficial Geology Figure 10. InfoSWMM Model Updates Figure 11. Proposed InfoSWMM Model Figure 12. Infiltration Suitability Appendix B — Existing Modeling Inputs and Results Appendix C — CSMP Regional System Conceptual Design Appendix D — Proposed Modeling Inputs and Results Appendix E — Total Phosphorus Event Mean Loading Calculations Appendix F — CSMP Design Standards by Parcel Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project is in the northeast area of Lino Lakes bounded by Main Street to the south, the City of Hugo to the east, Peltier Lake to the west, and Rehbein Street to the north. The site is approximately 1,350 acres and is largely agricultural or undeveloped within the City of Lino Lakes. The surface water in this area is nearly landlocked, inhibiting site improvements and future development in line with the City of Lino Lakes' 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The area was historically landlocked until the installation of agricultural field drains in the early 20th century. These agricultural drains are now at capacity and are incompatible with the proposed land uses within the watershed. In addition, these agricultural drains do not provide any water quality benefits to the receiving waterbody—Peltier Lake—an impaired water of the state. As allowed under Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Rule C.5(f), this Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) is presented as an alternative means to meet the requirements of Rule C.6 (Water Quality Treatment) and Rule C.7 (Peak Stormwater Runoff Control) for the development of this area, which will be done in several phases, using a regional stormwater system. This CSMP is intended to streamline RCWD permit approvals for future development in the Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement area, as well as to distribute the regional treatment benefits amongst future developments, so no single project is burdened with more challenges in meeting the RCWD requirements. Projects in this area will conform to the design requirements in the CSMP detailed in Sections 6 through 8, or will be allowed to demonstrate how the stormwater runoff will be treated to meet the applicable Lino Lakes ordinances and current RCWD Rules and requirements. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 1 1 INTRODUCTION The City of Lino Lakes submits this CSMP to the RCWD for the Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project. The goal of this CSMP is to document how future development within the project area will meet RCWD Rule C requirements using a regional stormwater management approach. This CSMP presents the approach for meeting the water quality treatment and peak stormwater runoff control requirements. The RCWD Rules adopted at the time of printing were effective on January 1, 2017. This CSMP documents the existing and proposed stormwater-related impacts for the Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project. The main components of this plan include a detailed analysis of the existing site conditions and limitations, as well as a conceptual design of the proposed regional best management practices (BMPs). These BMPs have been modeled based on recently -submitted development plans, ghost plats and discussions with landowners. The goal of this plan is to document a conceptual design that will guide future development of the area, while alleviating stress on the existing drainage system, and meeting the intent of the RCWD Rules C.6 and C.7. 1.1 Project Location The Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project is in Anoka County primarily within the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, but includes portions of the City of Hugo. The site is a 1,350 -acre area that is bounded by Main Street to the south, the City of Hugo to the east, Peltier Lake to the west, and Rehbein Street to the north (Figure 1, Appendix A). The City of Lino Lakes is the largest municipality by percentage of area within the RCWD and project site is located entirely within the RCWD boundary in the Middle Rice Creek planning region (RCWD 2016). Land use in this area is predominantly agricultural (Figure 2, Appendix A). Much of this watershed currently drains to the south to Clearwater Creek via field drains. Clearwater Creek is impaired for aquatic life and has had a history of significant bank erosion problems. Additional information and discussion of existing conditions is provided in Section 2. 1.2 Drainage Areas and Resources of Concern The CSMP area is located within the Clearwater Creek Drainage Area and the Peltier Lake Resource of Concern (RCWD Drainage System Data 2017) (Figure 3, Appendix A). The area is currently serviced by three Anoka County drainage systems: ■ Anoka County Ditch (ACD) 72 in the north ■ Judicial Ditch (JD) 2 in the north ■ ACD 55 in the south ACD 72 and JD 2 discharge directly to Peltier Lake, while ACD 55 enters Clearwater Creek (also known as JD 3), to the south before discharging to Peltier Lake. The remainder of the study area surface flows directly to Peltier Lake. Peltier Lake has been listed as an impaired waterbody within the greater Anoka Chain of Lakes since 2002 for aquatic recreation, with the main pollutant identified as excess phosphorus from watershed runoff and internal loading (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2013). RCWD has an average total phosphorus concentration within the lake of 224 pg/L, average chlorophyll a of 107.0 pg/L, and a transparency of 1.0 meters, all indicating relatively opaque water and poor water quality (RCWD 2016). Additionally, the Anoka Chain of Lakes has limited flood storage capacity (Houston Engineering, Inc. 2013). Any improvements to the drainage system will need to show no adverse impacts to receiving waters, as defined below: ■ No damage to structures, buildings, and infrastructure as a result of an increase in flooding (increased water surface elevations, velocities, or number of days of inundation); Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 2 ■ No property damage or increased maintenance costs resulting from an increase in the amount of erosion, bank failure, or accelerated sedimentation; ■ No decrease in water quality resulting from an increase in phosphorus and sediment loads; and ■ No permanent loss of the use of flood storage volume during the flood peak within the Anoka Chain of Lakes. 1.3 Water Resources Design Criteria A number of documents, studies, and guidelines are already in place to guide the development within the CSMP study area. It is expected that portions of the study area may be developed by the Cities of Lino Lakes and Hugo, Anoka County, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), and yet to be determined private developers. The following sections outline the supporting planning, studies and regulations, leading to the development of this CSMP, as well as regulatory agencies' roles during development. 1.3.1 Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan The City of Lino Lakes' 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Lino Lakes 2010) has defined the Land Use Plan (Figure 4, Appendix A) which was prepared in conjunction with the Resource Management System Plan (Figure 5, Appendix A), the City's Parks, Natural Open Space/Greenways and Trail System Plan (Figure 6, Appendix A), and the City's Local Surface Water Management Plan to manage and protect community resources. As part of this process, the Land Use Plan was analyzed to determine impacts to the natural environment and identify appropriate mitigation measures, which are identified in the Resource Management System Plan. This process ensures that adequate infrastructure is in place to accommodate the community's growth and that natural resources are protected. The ultimate purpose of this Land Use Plan is to implement the community vision developed by the Citizen Vision Committee, and to manage future growth in an efficient manner while protecting Lino Lakes' valuable natural resource and community assets. The land use plan is in the process of being updated for the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. While it is not expected to change significantly, the Northeast Drainage area is expected to play a prominent role in the Local Surface Water Management Plan and the prioritization of future infrastructure funding. 1.3.2 Northeast Lino Lakes Alternative Urban Areawide Review The I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was a proactive, citizen driven environmental review process that comprehensively assessed the environmental impacts of development in a 4,600 -acre growth area in the City (Figure 7, Appendix A) and was completed in 2005. The overarching goal of the whole project was to balance development with natural resource conservation. The result of the AUAR process was a Mitigation Plan that documents the actions the City will take to mitigate environmental impacts. The foundation of the Mitigation Plan is the Conservation Design Framework (CDF). The goals of the CDF are to: 1) Conserve the most ecologically significant natural resources within the AUAR area 2) Protect ecologically sensitive natural resources from adjacent land uses by through buffering 3) Connect ecologically significant resources via multifunctional greenway corridors - corridors for wildlife, trails, and surface water management features The AUAR defined Stormwater Management Areas to address stormwater issues by implementing an integrated system of bio-swales, wet prairie, and wetlands aligned in series to effectively reduce post - development runoff rates and volume, as well as to enhance water quality. 1.3.3 Resource Management Plan In partnership with RCWD, the City of Lino Lakes developed a Resource Management Plan (RMP) to provide a watershed -based approach to wetland management and evaluation of the Clean Water Act Section 404 permit applications. As part of the RMP, a Wetland Preservation Corridor was identified, linking high priority wetlands to enhance multiple wetland functions and reducing habitat fragmentation; it has been incorporated within this CSMP study. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 3 1.3.4 Special Area Management Plan Prepared for the City of Lino Lakes and the RCWD, this Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) facilitates the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Clean Water Act Section 404 permit evaluations within the subwatersheds addressed by the SAMP and prioritizes future restoration projects and management of aquatic resources. Areas within the CSMP study area were identified as having medium to high restoration potential. It also recognized that the existing ACD 55 and ACD 72 tile systems are ineffective for traditional urban runoff volumes and were preliminarily scoped for wetland restoration and volume credits for future development. The Peltier RMU ACD 72 and ACD 55 tile systems scored second and third, respectively, of all preferred projects for their roles in urban runoff management and a conceptual restoration plan was developed. Due to the uncertain nature of future development, the SAMP suggested to wait until a more -concrete development plan was presented for the area (Lino Lakes 2010). 1.3.5 Regulations and Policies A great number of rules, ordinances, regulations and policies are expected to govern the development of land within the CSMP study area. The following is not intended to be an exhaustive list, but provide a summary of the prominent stormwater and flood control policies. 1.3.5.1 Main Street Shoppes RCWD Permits #13-029 and #13-040 In 2013, a landowner within the CSMP study area applied for a RCWD permit to develop an 18.5 -acre lot located at the northeast corner of Main Street (CSAH 14) and Otter Lake Road in Lino Lakes. Under this permit, stormwater treatment was provided for the street development and a future commercial site. RCWD informed the applicant that the downstream drainage system (ACD 55 Branch 8) was constrained and under 2008 Rule C.5(d), adverse impact requirements must be met by one of the following methods: ■ Meet the volume control standard of 1.1 -inches over the proposed impervious surface (Rule C.6) and show no increase in runoff volume for the 2 -year 24-hour event (6,511 cubic feet per Rule C.5(d)); or ■ Reduce the peak runoff rate for the 2 -year 24-hour design event to 0.03 cfs, as determined by the District Engineer (2008 Rule C.5(d) and Houston Engineering 2013), from the proposed 1.5 cfs. This would result in a nearly 99 percent reduction in peak rate from the existing runoff rate of 2.5 cfs. The developer chose to meet the volume control option and designed a water reuse system to irrigate 0.65 acres of existing agricultural land with water from the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) pond, installed for rate control. The irrigation pool volume was established between elevations 908 and 911, to be drawn down over three weeks of irrigation during a period without rainfall. This volume (6,607 cubic feet) is equivalent to the increase in volume generated from the 2 -year 24-hour design event. As companion permit to RCWD #13-029, #13-040 approved the development of the present-day McDonald's site on the commercial site and used the volume reduction from Permit #13-029 to offset the proposed impervious surface. 1.3.5.2 RCWD Resolution #2015-31 The RCWD Board of Managers approved Resolution #2015-31 on September 23, 2015, recognizing the limitations on the existing regional drainage system in the Northeast Lino Lakes area and affirming that should the proposed projects be constructed as proposed, the RCWD would be able to issue permits in line with their Rules and standards based on this CSMP. 1.3.5.3 City of Lino Lakes Overlay District The City of Lino Lakes will update Chapter 1011: Stormwater, Erosion, and Sediment Control of the City Code to reflect the requirements of this CSMP, define the Northeast Drainage Overlay District, and the regulations and policies for development within it. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 4 1.3.5.4 Rice Creek Watershed District Rules The RCWD Rules in effect at the time of writing this CSMP are dated January 1, 2017. Future rule revisions will require detailed review of this CSMP for compatibility with the proposed rule revisions and may require updates to the CSMP itself. 1.3.5.5 Minnesota Statute 103E Minnesota Statute 103E defines the drainage authority powers, benefitted party rights and procedures for petitioning maintenance, alterations, diversions, impoundments and abandonment of the ditch and tile system in the CSMP area. The RCWD is the drainage authority for ACD 55 and ACD 72 and any proposed modifications or abandonment of the ditch system will require a petition by the benefitted landowner to begin the public hearing proceedings. 1.3.6 Regulatory Requirement Overview The approval of this CSMP does not waive any regulatory requirements for development within the study boundaries, it simply provides a framework to review development projects within this area as part of a greater regional system. All future projects must obtain all necessary and required permits prior to construction from the appropriate regulatory agencies. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 5 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The CSMP area is almost entirely within the City of Lino Lakes, however the CSMP does include upstream contributing land from the City of Hugo. This section provides a brief overview of the existing conditions used in the conceptual design of this CSMP. 2.1 City of Hugo The City of Hugo contributes 215 acres of the nearly 1,350 -acre area and has an existing flow rate of 50.3 cfs into the City of Lino Lakes and ACD 55 drain tile system. Hugo has existing stormwater infrastructure and storage related to commercial and residential development east of Elmcrest Avenue. These sites were permitted under the City of Hugo's permit program, followed RCWD rules, and instituted a more stringent rate control standard of 0.1 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre limit on the 100 -year event (Hugo 2002). 2.2 City of Lino Lakes The majority of the CSMP area is located within the City of Lino Lakes and serviced by the agricultural drain tile systems, ACD 55 and ACD72. ACD 55 and ACD 72 drain tiles were designed to provide drainage for agricultural lands and are already at capacity, limited by the existing crossings under 1-35E. The City of Lino Lakes has also identified this area as being a Runoff Sensitive Area for stormwater rate and volume control given the limitations of the existing ditch system (Lino Lakes 2005). Low points in the area can remain inundated for weeks following the 100 -year event due to the limited pipe capacity in the County Ditch systems. Because the low-lying areas take so long to drain back to their normal water levels, the next rain event may compound flooding beyond the 100 -year flood level. Constraints of the drain tile system have limited landowners' ability to develop their land consistent with the City of Lino Lakes' Comprehensive Plan. Development must meet RCWD Rule C for Stormwater Management Plans, which includes water quality and rate control. However, since the existing drainage system is at capacity under existing conditions, RCWD has established reduced peak rates for the maximum discharge rate under development on all sites draining to ACD 55 and ACD 72 (Houston Engineering, Inc. 2013). Unfortunately, the soils underlying most the area are poorly suited for infiltration, have a high groundwater table, or are wetlands, all of which limit stormwater management opportunities and the volume reduction requirement of Rule C. As discussed in Section 1.3.5.1 there is a small commercial development in Lino Lakes at Main Street and Otter Lake Road. Due to the limited capacity of the existing ACD 55 Branch 8 drain tile system, the McDonald's development was required to install a water reuse and spray irrigation system in addition to meeting the standard RCWD rules to reduce the stormwater runoff volume for the 2 -year event from their site (RCWD Permits #13-029 and #13-040) and alleviate some of the burden on ACD 55 Branch 8. 2.3 Existing Land Uses Most the land in the CSMP area is agricultural or undeveloped (Table 2-1 and Figure 2, Appendix A) (Metropolitan Council 2017) and drains to one of the county ditch systems via unbuffered surface inlets. Table 2-1. Metropolitan Council Generalized Existing Land Use within the CSMP Land Use Hugo East Central West Lino Total CSMP Total Agricultural 59.2 385.8 400.6 98.4 884.8 944.1 Farmstead 4.7 7.5 0.0 0.0 7.5 12.2 Institutional 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.9 Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 6 Land Use Hugo East Central West Lino Total CSMP Total Major Highway 0.0 13.6 24.8 0.0 38.4 38.4 Park, Recreational, or Preserve 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 15.4 Retail and Other Commercial 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5 Single Family Attached 21.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 21.2 Single Family Detached 32.5 6.0 7.8 4.2 18.0 50.5 Undeveloped 82.1 119.5 13.7 49.9 183.1 265.2 Total Areas 215.6 533.9 447.3 152.5 1,133.7 1,349.3 2.4 Soils and Geology Soils in the CSMP area are mapped as primarily loam and sandy loam. Depressions and areas adjacent to Peltier lake are mapped as peat or muck (Figure 8, Appendix A) (Soil Survey Staff 2017). The surficial geology of the CSMP area is loamy till with peat and muck around Peltier Lake and in isolate pockets (Figure 9, Appendix A). The loamy till is from the New Ulm formation and is chiefly loam texture with unsorted sediment. Peat and muck was deposited in the quaternary era and is composed of partially decomposed organic matter deposited in marshes. Peat and muck also includes fine grained organic matter laid down in ponded water and marl (Setterholm 2013). 2.5 Groundwater Groundwater within the CSMP is generally close to the ground surface. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) modeled much of the project area as having a depth to the water table as 0- 10 feet (MnDNR 2017) and the NRCS soils data shows the annual minimum depth to groundwater table to be less than 2.3 feet below the ground surface for the entire study area (NRCS 2017). Groundwater reaches the surface at Peltier Lake, the wetlands around Peltier Lake and within closed depressions. 2.6 Surface Water Hydrology Surface water in the study area ultimately drains to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes through Peltier Lake, Rice Creek, Hardwood Creek (Jurisdictional Ditch 2), Clearwater Creek (Jurisdictional Ditch 3), Anoka County Ditch 55 and Anoka County Ditch 72, as shown on Figure 1, Appendix A. 2.6.1 I -35E Construction I- 35E, running from Burnsville, through Lino Lakes, and ending in Columbus was constructed in 1970. The construction of the four -lane highway effectively separated the East and Central CSMP regions by placing fill to elevate the roadway through swamp sections (Minnesota Department of Transportation 1972). While the two regions remain connected by the 10 -inch and 12 -inch drain tiles on ACD 55 Branch 8 and Main Trunks, Interstate I -35E acts as a berm preventing overland flows from flowing downstream from the east to west. 2.6.2 Drain tile systems The ditch and tile network was developed to manage stormwater runoff and to keep fields dry during the growing season. They have significantly altered drainage basins and changed the pre -settlement subwatershed divides. The existing capacity of the tile networks are insufficient to convey stormwater runoff from future development within the Northeast Drainage Area. Alterations to the ditch and drain tile system must go through legal proceedings as defined under Minnesota Statutes 103E, to ensure ditch capacity and landowner drainage rights are preserved. The properties that are serviced by the ditch system are entitled to the benefits of the drainage system and, in effect, own the drain tile system under Minnesota Statutes 103E. The drainage of the systems must be Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 7 maintained in perpetuity, until such time the assessed land owners choose to petition RCWD for the abandonment of the drain tile on their property. 2.6.3 Wetlands There are a number of wetlands within the CSMP area. Wetlands range in size from an extensive wetland complex that fringes Peltier Lake to wetlands in small farm field depressions. Wetlands range in type from seasonally flooded depressions to shallow and deep marshes. The quality of wetlands likely varies. Some of the wetlands appear to be farmed and are likely degraded. Wetland delineations have been completed for the West and Central regions of the CSMP area (WSB & Associates, Inc. 2017 and Kjolhaug Environmental Services 2014). 2.7 Cultural Resources A cultural resources survey was completed for the West region of the CSMP area (Blondo 2016). The survey reviewed historical records and past surveys. An archaeological systematic surface survey was conducted and concluded in the finding of no previously unidentified cultural resources. No additional cultural materials were identified during this survey. No further investigation or evaluation of the project area is required at this time. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 8 3 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSES The models used in the CSMP have been derived from the RCWD district -wide modeling efforts for Rice Creek. InfoSWMM models for Upper Rice Creek (URC), Hardwood Creek (HWC), and Clearwater Creek (CWC) (Figure 11, Appendix A) were refined to be divided along the boundaries of the study area (Figure 12, Appendix A). The hydrographs from the revised InfoSWMM models were incorporated into the Rice Creek unsteady state HEC -RAS model. The models used in the CSMP have been derived from the RCWD District -wide modeling efforts for Rice Creek. InfoSWMM models for URC, HWC, and CWC were refined to include the boundaries of the study area. The hydrographs from the revised InfoSWMM models were incorporated into the Rice Creek unsteady state HEC -RAS model. There are several interactions between the different models, Figure 1 highlights the model interactions, the following discussion attempts to clearly state the specific changes made to each of the received RCWD models. Hardwood Creek InfoSWMM J3MT_001 Figure 1. Hydraulic Model Interactions Peltier Lake Stage LEAVING SYSTEM2 Upper Rice Cre InfoSWMM PELTIER_LAKE 1 LEAVES Peltier Lake Stage Rice Creek HEC - RAS LEAVE4 Clearwater Creek InfoSWMM J3MT_001 Peltier Lake Stage 3.1 Hydrology A total of 40 subcatchments from the three RCWD InfoSWMM models are part of the Northeast Lino Lakes CSMP. To compare the CSMP existing and proposed conditions directly, subcatchments along the CSMP boundary were required to be subdivided. The InfoSWMM and HEC -RAS models were updated to reflect this change, and the revised existing conditions modeling is discussed in detail by model below. For all the InfoSWMM models, the hydrologic inputs for the 40 subcatchments were revised based on recent land use data from the City of Lino Lakes, City of Hugo, and the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) (Table 3-1). All areas were recalculated based on the GIS data and weighted curve numbers and depression storage were recalculated for all the subcatchments within the CSMP area as well (Table 3-2). Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 9 Table 3-1. Existing Land Uses, Impervious Percentages, Curve Numbers, and Total Phosphorus Concentrations. LAND USE DESCRIPTION 1 ESTIMATED IMPERVIOUS A3 B3 C3 03 TP a [MG/L] l AGRICULTURAL 0% 67 78 85 89 0.32 FARMSTEAD 10% 59 74 82 86 0.46 INSTITUTIONAL 65% 49 69 79 84 0.18 MAJOR HIGHWAY 75% 83 89 92 93 0.25 PARK, RECREATIONAL, OR PRESERVE 10% 39 61 74 80 0.04 RETAIL AND OTHER COMMERCIAL 75% 89 92 94 95 0.22 SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED 65% 77 85 90 92 0.40 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 40% 51 68 79 84 0.30 UNDEVELOPED 0% 30 58 71 78 0.04 1 Metropolitan Council Generalized Land Use 2016 2 Lino Lakes 2030 Comprehensive Plan 3 NRCS National Engineering Handbook 4 MPCA Minnesota Stormwater Manual Table 3-2. Existing Land Uses by Region (in acres) Land Use Description HUGO EAST CENTRAL WEST TOTAL Agricultural 59.2 385.8 400.6 98.4 944.1 Farmstead 4.7 7.5 0.0 0.0 12.2 Institutional 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 Major Highway 0.0 13.6 24.8 0.0 38.4 Park, Recreational, or Preserve 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.4 Retail and Other Commercial 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 Single Family Attached 21.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 Single Family Detached 32.5 6.0 7.8 4.2 50.5 Undeveloped 82.1 119.5 13.7 49.9 265.2 Totals 215.6 534.1 447.3 152.6 1,349.6 3.2 Upper Rice Creek The URC model was updated to split existing catchments MRC_RC_001 into MRC_RC_001 and MRC_RC_001.5 along Peltier Lake Drive on the west CSMP boundary. Existing catchment MRCRC_002 was also split into two subcatchments (MRC RC_002 and MRC_RC_002.5) along the southwest CSMP boundary. A nearly five -acre discrepancy in drainage area between the received model input and GIS data was noticed at CWC_RC_PELTIER_008. As a precaution, all drainage areas were recalculated, but this subcatchment appeared to be an anomaly. The URC model was re -run and the inflow hydrograph at junction PELTIER_LAKE was exported from InfoSWMM and inserted into the existing conditions Rice Creek HEC -RAS model at storage area SA Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 10 Peltier Lake. The URC model contains three interactions between the CWC and HWC InfoSWMM models. Table 3-3 summarizes the URC model interaction results. Table 3-3. Upper Rice Creek Model Outflow Summary [cfs] URC NODE LEAVING_SYSTEM2 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY RCWD 2014 INCLOUDED NOT INCLUDED 13.5 4.5 Revised Existing 0 1.7 30.0 5.9 Difference [cfs] 0 1.7 16.5 1.4 LEAVING_SYSTEM3 RCWD 2014 0 0 0.6 0 Revised Existing 0 0 0.7 0.6 Difference [cfs] 0 0 0.1 0.6 LEAVING_SYSTEM4 RCWD 2014 0 0 0 0 Revised Existing 0 0 0.1 0 Difference (cfs] 0 0 0.1 0 PELTIER_LAKE RCWD 2014 1,389.5 2,417.5 4,515.7 883.7 Revised Existing 1,448.8 2,523.1 4,726.6 896.4 Difference [cfs] 59.3 105.6 210.9 12.8 3.3 Clearwater Creek The CWC model was updated to split existing catchment ACD55MT_007 into ACD55MT_007 and ACD55MT007.5 along the south central CSMP boundary. Inflows from the Upper Rice Creek model at LEAVE3 and LEAVE4 were input at storage areas SA55MT_009 and SA55MT_028. The CWC model was re -run and the inflow hydrograph at junction J3MT_001 was exported from the InfoSWMM model and replaced in the existing conditions Rice Creek HEC -RAS model at RS 125483.9. A summary of the CWC model interactions is provided in Table 3-4. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 11 Table 3-4. Clearwater Creek Model Outflow Summary [cfs] CWC NODE 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY J3MT_001 2.7 3.8 5.0 4.3 RCWD 2014 201.8 337.8 563.9 446.0 Revised Existing 217.3 350.0 566.0 443.6 Difference [cfs] 15.5 12.2 2.2 -2.4 Finally, the CWC model includes the existing flows entering Lino Lakes from Hugo under Elmcrest Avenue. Table 3-5 summarizes the existing flows entering the CSMP study area. Table 3-5. City of Hugo Existing Outflows [cfs] CWC LINK 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY CA55MTL_013 2.7 3.8 5.0 4.3 CA55MTL_012 0.3 1.2 3.6 1.6 CA55MTL_011 1.8 6.8 21.5 6.4 CA55MTL_014 5.2 9.9 16.4 12.5 CA55MTL_014B 0.0 0.8 5.9 2.8 TOTAL HUGO 10.0 22.5 52.4 27.6 3.4 Hardwood Creek The HWC model was updated to split existing catchment SMT_002 into SMT_002 and SMT 002.5. The soils data for subcatchment SMT_004A was updated to reflect the subcatchment hydrologic input data. The HWC model was unstable when first run, the initial water surface elevation at the outlet node OUT (El. 885.67) was higher than the next two upstream nodes' starting water surface elevations, creating a backflow from Peltier Lake into Hardwood Creek. The lower HWC model nodes were adjusted, per Table 3-6, to prevent water from backing up into the system at the start of the model runs. Table 3-6. HWC Initial Water Surface Elevation Corrections INFOSWMM RCWD 2014 NODE INVERT ELEV RCWD 2014 REVISED INVERT INITIAL WSEL ELEV ELEV. REVISED INITIAL WSEL ELEV. OUT 860 885.67 882 885.67 JMT_001 882.44 885.19 882.44 885.67 JMT_002 881.66 885.18 881.66 885.67 JMT_003 883.1 883.96 883.1 885.96 Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 12 INFOSWMM RCWD 2014 NODE INVERT ELEV RCWD 2014 INITIAL WSEL ELEV. REVISED INVERT REVISED INITIAL ELEV WSEL ELEV. JMT_004 883.25 886.11 883.25 886.11 J MT_005 883.64 886.114 883.64 886.114 JMT_006 884.49 886.357 884.49 886.357 Finally, the inflow hydrograph from the URC model node LEAVING_SYSTEM2 was input at junction node JM_016 in the HWC model as ACD72_LEAVE2_100YR. The HWC model was re -run and the total inflow hydrograph at junction JMT_001 was exported from InfoSWMM and imported into the existing conditions HEC -RAS model at RS 125004.6. Table 3-7. Hardwood Creek Model Outflow Summary [cfs] HWC NODE 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY JMT_001 RCWD 2014 80.7 202.5 685.6 932.0 Revised Existing 99.8 214.3 669.3 903.2 Difference [cfs] 19.1 11.7 -16.3 -28.8 3.5 Rice Creek HEC -RAS The existing conditions HEC -RAS model was updated with the inflow hydrographs from all the InfoSWMM models and re -run to establish the existing water surface elevations in Peltier Lake for the CSMP study and the results are summarized in Table 3-8. Table 3-8. Peltier Lake Stage Summary [ft] Due to the relatively minor changes in stage at Peltier Lake, it was assumed that re -importing the stage hydrograph into the InfoSWMM models would result in negligible changes to the overall InfoSWMM results. As a result, the Peltier Lake stage data was not updated in the revised existing conditions InfoSWMM modeling and the models presented above were used as the baseline existing conditions. Detailed input and result tables from the existing conditions modeling may be found in Appendix B. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 13 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY PELTIER LAKE STAGE RCWD 2014 885.73 886.28 887.20 887.53 REVISED EXISTING 885.76 886.41 887.22 887.51 DIFFERENCE [FT] 0.03 0.13 0.02 -0.02 Due to the relatively minor changes in stage at Peltier Lake, it was assumed that re -importing the stage hydrograph into the InfoSWMM models would result in negligible changes to the overall InfoSWMM results. As a result, the Peltier Lake stage data was not updated in the revised existing conditions InfoSWMM modeling and the models presented above were used as the baseline existing conditions. Detailed input and result tables from the existing conditions modeling may be found in Appendix B. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 13 4 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The City of Lino Lakes proposed to improve drainage in the Northeast Area by developing a regional stormwater management plan, accomplished through improving stormwater conveyance, adding water quality BMPs, and managing stormwater runoff rate and volume control. The proposed improvements will benefit not only the landowners within the Northeast Area, but also the downstream waterbodies by improving stormwater runoff water quality, increasing to the extent feasible water reuse and irrigation practices, and maintaining existing flood elevations throughout the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes. The proposed improvements to the CSMP area include: ■ Replacement of the existing culvert under Peltier Lake Drive ■ Open channel system from Peltier Lake Drive to 20th Avenue, including a public greenway corridor with additional water quality features, such as iron -enhanced filtration or biofiltration within the floodplain areas ■ Regional storage facilities, phased with future developments, to provide flood control storage and additional water quality treatment opportunities ■ Outlet control structures with gates on selected regional storage facilities to minimize the risk of adversely impacting flood levels on Peltier Lake ■ New 60 -inch storm drain crossing under I -35E to the proposed regional storage facility sited between 20th Avenue and I -35E ■ Construction of new storm sewer along the future Otter Lake Road extension ■ Preservation of the agricultural drain tile system to maintain drainage rights until all land within the study area develops. Drain tile may be abandoned or realigned as development progresses, at the benefitted landowners' expense and discretion. A conceptual layout and system details are provided in Appendix C. Additional design requirements proposed for land development within the CSMP area are outlined in Sections 6 through 8. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 14 5 PROPOSED CONDITIONS MODELS After establishing the revised existing conditions models to use as a baseline for comparison in Section 3, we developed the proposed conditions modeling in cooperation with RCWD to ensure compatibility with the District modeling procedures. The proposed conditions reflect future land uses in the study area, assumed site grading to drain the study area to the central storm drainage system, assumed private disconnection of agricultural drain tile within the study area, and conceptual regional stormwater storage BMPs connected by a new open conveyance system and revised outlet to Peltier Lake (Figure 13, Appendix A and Appendix C). 5.1 Hydrology Updates Curve numbers were estimated using the MLCSS, City of Lino Lakes, and City of Hugo 2030 projected land uses, NRCS soil data, recent wetland delineations, and the National Wetland Inventory. The following assumptions were made: 1. Hugo and Lino Lakes will be fully built out per their 2030 approved land use plans 2. Future development will be graded to drain to a regional BMP; this may include the use of drain tile or imported fill to improve drainage in clay soils. A hydrologic soil group type B was assumed for new development. 3. Existing wetlands within the RCWD Wetland Management Corridor (WMC) will be preserved or restored per RCWD Rules within the WMC in Lino Lakes. Many of the existing wetlands have been drained and are currently farmed. By protecting and improving the quality of the existing wetlands, the proposed curve number is reduced in several subcatchments. Tables 5-1 and 5-2 provide a summary of the land uses and curve numbers used in the modeling: Table 5-1. Proposed Land Uses, Impervious Percentages, and Curve Numbers LAND USE DESCRIPTION MAX. IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE 1 A 2 B 2 C 2 D 2 TP s [MG/L] Large lot residential 10% 59 74 82 86 0.46 Low density residential 40% 47 65 76 82 0.50 Medium density residential 50% 54 70 79 84 0.30 High density residential 65% 70 81 87 90 0.40 Commercial 75% 86 91 93 94 0.22 Industrial 75% 81 88 91 93 0.25 Public semi-public 65% 39 61 74 80 0.18 Vehicular right-of-way 75% 83 89 92 93 0.25 Mixed use 75% 77 85 90 92 0.22 Wetland management corridor 0% 30 58 71 78 0.03 1 Lino Lakes 2030 Comprehensive Plan 2 NRCS National Engineering Handbook 3 MPCA Minnesota Stormwater Manual Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 15 Table 5-2. Proposed Land Uses by CSMP Region (in acres) LAND USE DESCRIPTION HUGO EAST CENTRAL WEST TOTAL Right -of -Way 0 14.1 27.9 2.5 44.5 Large Lot Residential 46.1 0.2 0 0 46.3 Low Density Residential 150.6 0.3 0 42.8 193.7 Medium Density Residential 3.9 0.1 15.9 51.1 71 High Density Residential 0 0 0 18.9 18.9 Commercial 0.3 82.1 1 0 83.4 Industrial 0 346.7 29.9 0 376.6 Mixed Use 0 0 353.7 0 353.7 Public/Quasi-Public 14.7 0 0 0 14.7 Wetland Protection Zone 0 90.6 18.9 37.3 146.8 Totals 215.6 534.1 447.3 152.6 1,349.6 Like the revised existing conditions, the proposed models were updated and model interactions were evaluated. 5.2 Hydraulic Updates 5.2.1 Upper Rice Creek InfoSWMM - Proposed Conditions The URC model contains the vast majority of the CSMP study area, so this model was updated to include the re-routed ACD55 subcatchments from the CWC model and the re-routed ACD72 subcatchments from the HWC model (Table 5-3 and Figure 13, Appendix A). It was assumed that future site grading would eliminate the existing outflows into each of these systems. Table 5-3. Proposed Upper Rice Creek Outflows URC NODE 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY LEAVING_SYSTEM2 Revised Existing 0 1.7 30.0 5.9 Proposed 0 0 0 0 Difference [cfs] 0 -1.7 -30.0 -5.9 LEAVING_SYSTEM3 Revised Existing 0 0 0.7 0.6 Proposed 0 0 0 0 Difference [cfs] 0 0 -0.7 -0.6 LEAVING_SYSTEM4 Revised Existing 0 0 0.1 0 Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 16 URC NODE 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY Proposed 0 0 0 0 Difference [cfs] 0 0 -0.1 0 PELTIER_LAKE 2.1 7.3 17.7 6.4 Revised Existing 1,448.8 2,523.1 4,426.6 896.4 Proposed 1,069.3 2,032.3 4,128.4 856.4 Difference [cfs] -379.5 -490.8 -598.2 -40.1 With the reconfiguration of the URC model now including the re-routing of ACD 55 main trunk and Branch 8, the flows entering from the City of Hugo are now included in this model. A summary of the Hugo flows entering the City of Lino Lakes is presented in Table 5-4. Table 5-4. City of Hugo Proposed Outflows [cfs] URC LINK 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY CA55MTL_013 2.0 3.5 5.0 4.3 CA55MTL_012 0.3 1.2 3.3 1.6 CA55MTL_011 2.1 7.3 17.7 6.4 CA55MTL_014 3.6 8.3 13.9 12.5 CA55MTL_014B 0.0 0.1 3.9 2.8 TOTAL HUGO 8.0 20.4 43.8 27.6 The flows leaving the City of Hugo are somewhat decreased from the existing conditions due to the conversion of agricultural lands to low density residential, as the slightly lower curve numbers provides more infiltration and less runoff. 5.2.2 Clearwater Creek InfoSWMM - Proposed Conditions The CWC model was updated to reflect the re-routing of ACD 55 mainline and Branch 8 into the CSMP study area, contained in the URC model discussed above. The result is a minor decrease in flows through the Clearwater Creek system for all design events (Table 5-5). Table 5-5. Clearwater Creek Proposed Outflows CWC NODE 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY J3MT_001 Revised Existing 217.3 350.0 566.0 443.6 Proposed 219.7 349.0 593.5 439.1 Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 17 Difference [cfs] 2.4 -1.0 27.5 -4.5 5.2.3 Hardwood Creek InfoSWMM - Proposed Conditions The HWC model was updated to reflect the re-routing of ACD 72 into the CSMP study area, contained in the URC model discussed above. The result is a negligible change in flows through the Hardwood Creek system for all design events (Table 5-6). Table 5-6. Hardwood Creek Proposed Outflows HWC NODE 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY JMT_001 PELTIER LAKE STAGE Revised Existing 99.8 214.3 669.3 903.2 Proposed 101.5 212.5 669.3 902.9 Difference [cfs] 1.7 -1.8 0.02 -0.3 5.2.4 Rice Creek HEC -RAS - Proposed Conditions The proposed conditions HEC -RAS was updated with the inflow hydrographs from the InfoSWMM models and run to establish the proposed water surface elevations in Peltier Lake for the CSMP study (Table 5- 7). Table 5-7. Peltier Lake Stage Summary [ft] The detailed input and result tables from the proposed modeling is provided in Appendix D. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 18 2 -YR 24 -HR 10 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 24 -HR 100 -YR 10 -DAY PELTIER LAKE STAGE Revised Existing 885.76 886.41 887.22 887.51 Proposed 885.73 886.27 886.98 887.51 Difference [ft] -0.03 -0.14 -0.24 0.00 The detailed input and result tables from the proposed modeling is provided in Appendix D. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 18 6 RCWD RULE C REQUIREMENTS 6.1 Rule C Overview The Northeast Lino Lakes CSMP area is located within a single resource of concern drainage area (Figure 3, Appendix A). General drainage patterns as documented in this CSMP will be maintained with any future developments so that stormwater runoff will remain within the Peltier Lake ROC drainage area and be managed to meet RCWD's Rule C requirements. As allowed for under RCWD Rule C.5(f), this CSMP has been prepared as an alternative means to meet the requirements of Rule C.6 Water Quality Treatment and Rule C.7 Peak Stormwater Runoff Control for the development of the area, which is anticipated to be completed in several distinct phases. The peak runoff control and water quality treatment requirements will be met, in aggregate, for the area as a whole. 6.2 Water Quality Treatment [RCWD Rule C.6] RCWD's water quality treatment requirements will be met through a variety of measures, including stormwater detention ponds, biofiltration, and infiltration, as is feasible. Figure 14, Appendix A shows the locations and suggested types of regional BMPs. It is anticipated that the study area will include water quality treatment trains with sedimentation BMPs located in upland areas designed to remove solids and particulate matter. These will be combined with surface and media filtration to remove dissolved particulates, nitrogen, and phosphorus prior to entering the new system and discharging into the regional BMPs. Total phosphorus loading under existing and proposed land use conditions was estimated using event mean concentrations from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2016). Under existing conditions, the CSMP area contributes approximately 12.6 pounds of total phosphorus annually to Peltier Lake. With the proposed full -build out land uses, in absence of any stormwater treatment, the CSMP area loading would increase to approximately 14.4 pounds per year (Table 6-1 and Appendix E). Table 6-1. Summary of Total Phosphorus (TP) Loading by Region without Stormwater Treatment REGION Area Existing TP Proposed TP Load TP Load Change [ac] Load [Ib] [Ib] [Ib] HUGO 215.6 0.72 1.36 +0.64 EAST 553.9 4.90 6.43 +1.53 CENTRAL 447.3 5.89 6.30 +0.41 WEST 152.5 1.06 0.31 -0.75 TOTALS 1,349 12.6 14.4 +1.83 The proposed land uses in the West region, including the wetland management corridor and medium density residential have a lower total phosphorus concentration (0.03 and 0.3 mg/L, respectively) than the existing land use of agricultural row crops (0.32 mg/L) and contribute to the reduction in the proposed total phosphorus loading. However, as required by RCWD Rule C.6, water quality treatment is a necessary component of development and we expect the TP loading to be reduced significantly with the required stormwater treatment practices in place. A challenge for the CSMP area will be to infiltrate stormwater to meet the water quality volume reduction in Rule C.6. Review of the CSMP area led to the development of Figure 15, Appendix A (Infiltration Suitability). This map was developed using the following four criteria: Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 19 1. Located outside of a vulnerable Drinking Water Source Management Area (Minnesota Department of Health 2014); 2. Must have a type A or B hydrologic soil group; 3. Depth to water table greater than 24 -inches; and 4. Located outside of the National Wetland Inventory wetlands. Only 19.3 percent of the CSMP area meet the majority of these four criteria for infiltration. RCWD Rule C.6 requires that, where feasible, infiltration must be used. However, most the CSMP area will need to use alternative BMPs to treat stormwater runoff. For the purposes of this conceptual analysis, we have assumed NURP stormwater ponds, with a TP removal factor of 0.50 will be used. The summary of the required water quality volumes is presented in Table 6-2. Table 6-2. Assumed Water Quality Treatment Summary (Lino Lakes) 6.2.1 Volume Reduction Practices As discussed above, Rule C.6 requires that where feasible, infiltration must be provided for stormwater runoff from new and/or reconstructed impervious surfaces. The proposed impervious surface area is based on the City of Lino Lakes 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Water quality treatment volume required for phosphorus removal is calculated as follows: Required WQ Treatment Volume (ac -ft] = Aimpervious * 1.1 inches / TP Removal Factor / 12 in/ft Infiltration practices are allocated a TP Removal Factor of 1.0. On-site infiltration is not feasible for most of the CSMP are due to poor soils, high groundwater and the presence of wetlands. Using NRCS soils data and the National Wetland Inventory, only 19 percent of the area may be suitable for infiltration practices within Lino Lakes. As development proceeds within the CSMP area, developers will be required to demonstrate that infiltration is not feasible on-site before utilizing the regional NURP basins or other BMP alternatives (Appendix F for infiltration requirements by parcel). 6.2.2 NURP Basins Stormwater ponds used for water quality treatment must use a TP Removal Factor of 0.5, per Rule C.6, and sized per the NURP criteria, which includes a permanent dead pool sized to store the runoff volume from a 2.5 -inch rainfall event of the tributary area. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 20 Impervious Surface Constructed to Date 38 acres Proposed Impervious Surface 706 acres Area Suitable for Infiltration 218.5 ac Required Volume Reduction [1.1" runoff from impervious] 11.8 ac -ft Required NURP Volume [2.5" runoff from drainage area] 89.4 ac -ft Required Water Quality Volume for Lino Lakes Full Build Out 101.2 ac -ft Estimated TP Reduction through Infiltration and Ponding 60% Proposed TP Loading with Stormwater Treatment 6.62 lbs 6.2.1 Volume Reduction Practices As discussed above, Rule C.6 requires that where feasible, infiltration must be provided for stormwater runoff from new and/or reconstructed impervious surfaces. The proposed impervious surface area is based on the City of Lino Lakes 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Water quality treatment volume required for phosphorus removal is calculated as follows: Required WQ Treatment Volume (ac -ft] = Aimpervious * 1.1 inches / TP Removal Factor / 12 in/ft Infiltration practices are allocated a TP Removal Factor of 1.0. On-site infiltration is not feasible for most of the CSMP are due to poor soils, high groundwater and the presence of wetlands. Using NRCS soils data and the National Wetland Inventory, only 19 percent of the area may be suitable for infiltration practices within Lino Lakes. As development proceeds within the CSMP area, developers will be required to demonstrate that infiltration is not feasible on-site before utilizing the regional NURP basins or other BMP alternatives (Appendix F for infiltration requirements by parcel). 6.2.2 NURP Basins Stormwater ponds used for water quality treatment must use a TP Removal Factor of 0.5, per Rule C.6, and sized per the NURP criteria, which includes a permanent dead pool sized to store the runoff volume from a 2.5 -inch rainfall event of the tributary area. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 20 6.2.3 Additional BMPs for Consideration of Future Development Additional onsite water quality practices will be encouraged as part of future development, and as part of the Lino Lakes AUAR requirements. The following may be considered, if feasible: • Stormwater reuse for irrigation — initial estimates indicate that up to 36 acre-feet of stormwater could be used for irrigation purposes over public open spaces, however the actual amount of volume infiltrated will be defined based on RCWD Rule C.6 • Soil amendments — consistent with the RCWD Soil Amendment Guidelines • Small-scale BMPs such as tree trenches, raingardens, cisterns, etc. • Mechanical separators • Media filtration to improve water quality 6.3 Peak Stormwater Runoff Control [RCWD Rule C.7] All stormwater runoff from the area either surface flows directly to Peltier Lake or is conveyed to the lake via the county ditch system (Figure 1, Appendix A). As discussed in Sections 3 and 5, InfoSWMM and HEC -RAS models were developed to evaluate the existing discharge rates entering Peltier Lake. The proposed land uses will result in more impervious surface and higher runoff rates and volumes leaving the CSMP study area and entering Peltier Lake. The regional BMPs will include outlet control structures to regulate the flood releases from the BMPs so they do not impact flood levels on Peltier Lake. 6.3.1 Allowable Peak Discharges Per RCWD Rule C.7, the proposed discharge rates are limited to the existing discharge rates from a site; however, because this area has been identified as a Runoff Sensitive Area, the City will impose a restriction of 0.1 cfs per acre on new private developments for the 100 -year peak discharge rate, which is also the same rate requirement the City of Hugo implemented in 2003 as part of their Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. This will result in a maximum peak discharge rate from the CSMP area into Peltier Lake of no more than 135 cfs. Table 6-3. Northeast Lino CSMP Allowable Peak Discharge Rates Storm Event Rainfall Depth Discharge to Peltier Lake [in] [cfs] 2 -year 24-hour 2.83 68 10 -year 24-hour 4.21 133 100 -year 24-hour 7.06 135 100 -year 10 -day 7.20 135 Future development in the CSMP area must not exceed the NOAA Atlas 14 permitted rates to Peltier Lake, as shown in Table 6-3. 6.3.2 Flood Control Storage To meet the proposed discharge rates, a significant amount of land is needed to provide live storage for flood control. As part of the City's land use practices, the existing wetlands are intended to remain in place where possible and will provide some incidental flood storage capacity. Table 6-4 shows the live storage assumed for flood reduction used in the modeling. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 21 Table 6-4. Required Live Storage by Region BMP ID Estimated Live Storage Required [ac -ft] Allowable Bounce [ft] Min. Area for Live Storage [ac] Max. Release Rate [cfs] EAST 250 4 63 75 CENTRAL 260 4 65 120 WEST 50 4 13 135 TOTAL 560 141 135 6.3.3 Outlet Control Structures Each regional NURP pond's water levels will be controlled by an outlet control structure and operable gate. In the event of a 100 -year design storm, the gated will be closed to minimize the risk of increasing flood stage on Peltier Lake, the ponds will be sized to include enough live storage to hold the water until the gates are reopened after the flood threat on Peltier Lake has passed. The exact location and design of these facilities will be determined as development in the CSMP area progresses. It will be expected that the storage areas will experience a significant bounce in elevation during the 100 -year storm event and will need to be planted with a suitable planting palette that can tolerate periodic inundation to maintain the vegetated buffer around the pond. The estimated peak discharges and timing of the 100 - year 24-hour event is shown in Table 6-5. Table 6-5. 100 -yr 24 -hr Maximum Discharge Rate between Regions BMP ID Estimated Peak Discharge [cfs] Estimated Event Runoff Volume [ac -ft] Timing of Peak Elevation [hrs. after start of rainfall] EAST 75 257 77.8 CENTRAL 120 470.2 78.0 WEST 135 526 78.2 The gates will be operated by the City of Lino Lakes and shall be placed to control the release of water from each regional storage facility. Each gate must be closed when Peltier Lake reaches an elevation one foot below the 100 -year flood elevation of 887.7 [NAVD88] on the rising limb of the lake stage hydrograph and remain closed until the flood elevation on Peltier Lake recedes below the 100 -year flood elevation of 887.7, on the falling limb of the lake stage hydrograph. 6.3.4 Low Floor and Low Entry Freeboard Requirements The lowest floor and lowest opening of future buildings and structures near the regional BMPs must adhere to the freeboard requirements presented in RCWD Table C6 and Chapter 1011: Stormwater, Erosion, and Sediment Control of the City Code. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 22 7 CSMP STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 7.1 Regional BMP Capacity Analysis Since the area is not fully developed, it is the goal of this CSMP to lay the framework for future developments within the City of Lino Lakes CSMP area to utilize the regional BMPs to meet the RCWD stormwater management requirements. Table7-1 summarizes the existing impervious surfaces and the proposed infiltration requirements based on the City of Lino Lakes' Comprehensive Plan land uses (Figure 4, Appendix A) and applicable RCWD Rules at the time of development. The details of the water quality volume calculations can be found in Appendix E. Table 7-1. Maximum Impervious Area at Full Development As conceptually designed, the regional BMPs provide enough water quality volume to mitigate the proposed impervious surface per the requirements in the RCWD Rule C.6. 7.2 Operation and Maintenance The outlet control gates will be operated by the City of Lino Lakes and shall be placed to control the release of water from each regional storage facility. The gates will be operated by the City of Lino Lakes and shall be placed to control the release of water from each regional storage facility. Each gate must be closed when Peltier Lake reaches an elevation one foot below the 100 -year flood elevation of 887.7 [NAVD88] on the rising limb of the lake stage hydrograph and remain closed until the flood elevation on Peltier Lake recedes below the 100 -year flood elevation of 887.7, on the falling limb of the lake stage hydrograph. The City of Lino Lakes will maintain permanent easements for all regional stormwater facilities to perform routine and periodic maintenance activities as required by their MS4 permit. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 23 Existing Impervious ac Proposed Impervious ac EAST 14.5 332.3 CENTRAL 22.0 317.3 WEST 1.69 56.8 TOTAL 38.1 706.4 As conceptually designed, the regional BMPs provide enough water quality volume to mitigate the proposed impervious surface per the requirements in the RCWD Rule C.6. 7.2 Operation and Maintenance The outlet control gates will be operated by the City of Lino Lakes and shall be placed to control the release of water from each regional storage facility. The gates will be operated by the City of Lino Lakes and shall be placed to control the release of water from each regional storage facility. Each gate must be closed when Peltier Lake reaches an elevation one foot below the 100 -year flood elevation of 887.7 [NAVD88] on the rising limb of the lake stage hydrograph and remain closed until the flood elevation on Peltier Lake recedes below the 100 -year flood elevation of 887.7, on the falling limb of the lake stage hydrograph. The City of Lino Lakes will maintain permanent easements for all regional stormwater facilities to perform routine and periodic maintenance activities as required by their MS4 permit. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 23 8 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTALS It should be noted that the design standards outlined in this document will only be applied to the parcels in Lino Lakes. Developments within the City of Hugo must obtain permit approvals from their respective government and regulatory agencies independent of this CSMP. Future developments will be responsible to submit a proposal to the City first. The submittal will document which parcel (or portion of a parcel) will be developed. The application must document that the land use proposed and proposed impervious area are consistent with this CSMP (Figure 4, Appendix A) and the planned impervious areas as shown in Appendix F. If future developments wish to deviate from the standards outlined in this CSMP, it is the responsibility of the developer to prepare an application documenting the proposed deviation(s) and how that difference will be mitigated. The developer's application must include: • Name of the parcel or portion of the parcel(s) proposing development • Name of the CSMP Region • Existing and proposed topography and narrative of infrastructure proposed to convey stormwater • Document the total area for existing and proposed conditions, broken down by pervious and impervious areas • Document infiltration potential on site based on soil boring data • Name of the regional BMP (if constructed) to which the proposed project is tributary • Proposed method of pre-treatment prior to stormwater discharge entering the regional system • Requested water quality allocations from regional BMP (if constructed) and maximum allocated to proposed development (Appendix F) Developers also must meet current Lino Lakes and RCWD Rules to the extent practicable, including: • Compliance with maximum post -development discharge rate for the 100 -year event to be less than or equal to 0.1 cfs per acre • Maximize volume reduction practices on site and infiltrate where practicable and in accordance with RCWD Rules • Compliance with current RCWD Rule C.6 Water Quality If the development exceeds the CSMP planned impervious area (Appendix F), the applicant must demonstrate how the additional runoff will be treated to meet the applicable RCWD rules and does not cause adverse impact as defined below. • No damage to structures, buildings, and infrastructure as a result of an increase in flooding (increased water surface elevations, velocities or number of days of inundation); • No property damage or increased maintenance costs resulting from an increase in the amount of erosion, bank failure or accelerated sedimentation; • No decrease in water quality resulting from an increase in phosphorus and sediment loads; and • No permanent loss of the use of flood storage volume during the flood peak within the Anoka Chain of Lakes. If developers choose to exceed the impervious limits or request any other deviations to the assumptions laid out herein, they will be required to address any additional stormwater requirements on that parcel at their own expense to ensure all applicable RCWD rules and requirements are met. Any such BMPs will be considered private and be maintained by, and at the expense of, the owner/developer of the parcel. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 24 8.1 Interim Conditions The intent of this CSMP is to define the final build -out conditions for the Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Area; however, it is highly unlikely the entire study area would develop at once. At this point in time, it is anticipated that the proposed stormwater conveyance system would be built from the downstream outlet at Peltier Lake to the east as private landowners choose to develop their property and abandon the agricultural drain tiles. The City will review all proposed development projects in this area against the CSMP design standards and require a detailed hydraulic review of temporary construction conditions from the developer. It is expected that developers may wish to utilize the existing drain tile system to discharge stormwater until the downstream regional BMPs and outlet are constructed. This hydraulic review will be at the developer's expense, must utilize the modeling presented in this CSMP for consistency, and will summarize the following information: ■ Identification of the drain tile system and existing allocation of drain tile capacity ■ Incorporation of any watershed changes since the previous modeling was completed, including update of curve numbers, time of concentration, and man-made infrastructure changes ■ Current capacity of the drain tile system, reflective of the watershed updates, for the 2-, 10-, and 100 -year 24-hour design storms, as well as the 100 -year 10 -day snowmelt event. ■ Proposed discharge rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100 -year 24-hour design storms, as well as the 100 -year 10 -day snowmelt event. ■ Identification of any proposed impacts to upstream or downstream benefitted landowners and Peltier Lake Compliance with the design standards outlined in this CSMP does not alleviate the developer from obtaining all necessary and required permits. It is highly recommended that developers submit permit applications to RCWD and the City of Lino Lakes early to facilitate the design review, especially for any variances or temporary use of the existing drain tile system. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 25 9 REFERENCES Bauer, Emily J. (2016). C-39, Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/178852. Blondo, Steven J. and Kelly Wolf. November 23, 2016. "A Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed City of Lino Lakes Northeast Lino Drainage Study." City of Hugo. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. May 2002 City of Hugo. 2030 Comprehensive Plan. March 15, 2010. http://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/index.asp?SEC=4A42E80D-D1 B1 -48A1 -940D - F92071 D6D492&Type=B LIST (accessed October 20, 2015). City of Lino Lakes. 2030 Comprehensive Plan. September 12, 2011. http://www.ci.lino- lakes.mn.us/index.asp?SEC=67FBFAB1-0B78-448F-85B7-AFF5C3B73FEF&Type=B BASIC (accessed October 20, 2015). City of Lino Lakes. City of Lino Lakes Special Area Management Plan (SAMP). Prepared by Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. October 2010. City of Lino Lakes. I -35E Corridor Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). September 26, 2005. http://www.ci.lino-lakes.mn.us/index.asp?SEC=581 A5670-E592-4178-B9B2- 7B0B72922A8E&Type=B BASIC (accessed October 20, 2015). City of Lino Lakes. Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan. June 2008. City of Lino Lakes. Surface Water Management Plan. December 2005. http://www.ci.lino- lakes. m n. us/vertical/Sites/%7B92EFC BF5-B800-4B28-AD6A- B8C3B7009FB0%7D/uploads/SWMP-Final with Appendix.pdf (accessed October 20, 2015). Houston Engineering, Inc. Hydraulics and Hydrology Evaluation Anoka County Ditch 55 memo. May 6, 2013. Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. Wetland Delineation Report for Mattamy Homes Site, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. February 10, 2014. Metropolitan Council. Generalized Land Use 2016 data. Published June 28, 2017. https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metc-plan-generl-Induse2016. Accessed August 28, 2017. Minnesota Department of Health. Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability. September 1, 2014. https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/water-drinking-water-supply (accessed October 15, 2015). Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Anoka County Geologic Atlas, Part B. February 2, 2017. http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater section/mapping/cga/c27 anoka/c27b.zip (accessed May 1, 2017). Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Minnesota Public Drainage Manual. September 1991. http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/publications/waters/Minnesota Public Drainage Manual.pdf (accessed October 20, 2015). Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 26 Minnesota Department of Transportation. Construction Plans for Grading and Bridges: Trunk Highway No. 35E-390 between S. Anoka Co. Line and 0.2 mi N. of N. Corp. Limits of Lino Lakes. February 24, 1972. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Event Mean Concentrations for Total Phosphorus. http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Event mean concentrations for total phosphorus (accessed April 5, 2016). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient TMDL. July 2013. http://www.pca.state.mn. us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=17164 (accessed October 20, 2015). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake TMDL. July 2013. http://www.pca.state.mn. us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=20171 (accessed October 20, 2015). National Stormwater Quality Database. Event Mean Concentrations of Pollutants in Stormwater Runoff by Land Use. http://www.bmpdatabase.org/nsqd.html (accessed April 5, 2016). Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Custom Soil Resource for Anoka County, Minnesota and Washington County, Minnesota. September 4, 2017. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Part 630 Hydrology, National Engineering Handbook. July 2004. Rice Creek Watershed District. Resolution #2015-31. 2015. Rice Creek Watershed District. Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Plan. Adopted January 4, 2010, amended November 9, 2016. Rice Creek Watershed District. Drainage System GIS data. 2017. http://rcwd.houstonenq.net/ditchportal/gisdata/drainagesystemsgis.zip (accessed July 18, 2017). Rice Creek Watershed District. Rice Creek Watershed District Rules. Adopted December 14, 2016, effective January 1, 2017. Setterholm, Dale, R. C-27 Geologic Atlas of Anoka County, Minnesota [Part A]. Minnesota Geological Survey, 2013. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/116119. Accessed July 27, 2017. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/ (accessed May 1, 2017). WSB & Associates, Inc. Northeast Drainage Study Level 2 Wetland Delineation Report. April 5, 2017. Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 27 Appendix A — Figures Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. Figure 6. Figure 7. Figure 8. Figure 9. Figure 10. Figure 11. Figure 12. Location Map Existing Land Uses Drainage Areas and Resources of Concern Lino Lakes Full Build Land Use Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan Lino Lakes Park, Greenway and Trail System Lino Lakes I -35E AUAR Area CSMP Soils CSMP Surficial Geology InfoSWMM Model Updates Proposed InfoSWMM Model Infiltration Suitability Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Appendices Document Path: K:\02029-790\GIS\Maps\CSMP\Fig LocationMan.mxd Date Saved: 8/25/2017 12:12:22 PM 6.[\10 IT IBES Figure 1 - Project Location Northeast Drainage Area CSMP City of Lino Lakes A Legend CSMP Boundary RCWD Watercourses Drain Tile Open Ditch Stream Lakes 0 2,000 �i Feet 1 inch = 2,000 feet • WS } fr441.11 1 1.:16 1 i i 4117.4 1 gittwtehitev 1 114 • • Y • � t :, • t_ 1• r• • ~ f5 J at F I • Jt 1 N. •'* f!. ~ �r JVD 1 t di 1 I l l T f iJl ,itiimil 1 / • • D_ • f 41. ir • X'. � r I I�ODo Gtr ital'lobe GeoEye F .r i -cubed D° U 0 b Getmaop Aerog swisstopo Document Path: K:\02029-790\WR\CSMP\InfoSWMM\Fig ExLanduse.mxd Date Saved: 9/4/2017 5:11:01 PM CIT O F IN IBES Figure 2 - Existing Land Uses Northeast Drainage Area CSMP City of Lino Lakes A Legend CSMP Boundary Farmstead Single Family Detached Single Family Attached Retail and Other Commercial Institutional Park, Recreational or Preserve Major Highway Agricultural Undeveloped 0 1 inch = 1,153 feet 2, / - WSB Document Path: K:\02029-790\GIS\Maus\CSMP\Fig ROC.mxd Date Saved: 10/19/2017 4:46:15 PM CIT O F UNTO K. S Figure 3 - Drainage Areas and Resources of Concern Northeast Drainage Area CSMP City of Lino Lakes A Legend CSMP Boundary RCWD Resources of Concern Centerville Peltier RCWD Watercourses Drain Tile Open Ditch Stream Lakes 0 Mi 1 1 inch = 1,153 feet 2,00 • ( 8 Full Build Cul Futuna Land Us8 Slap lAi cif I.FF 1H h Hi V 111 fi.riTTHptlir.pliI 151-I IT 'Q imwmpi om.im Pfea FFJJ L.7+.`I•- 1I — Y`T -F.jr.0.4 N.Imimi 1 Ceei d 4 ODD MI is mw . _11=1L'. MI LfdmF.J —41.mas'_ MI Milo AlA ii *PP riii•r Figure 4. Lino Lakes Full Build Out Land Use Fke•muur Mahn trnerit Sey5[ern Plan LrM Lis 26W evmpicercrarra Pim d WI *FI *,w,:—F— r —iiim•-- 1. r 1 rmilir.N Rai -P•-•• ¥ 1 .LIN -- ILS 13i 'Al r1_F ttylieFi Napa 1 L Mem -iN L. NiL_ Figure 5. Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan �Ir f T 1 f1 ti a .LI .J -.J . - .1...;.1...;. .....- .1...1.1.1...1.1 ..1.11•11.01.••••••••••9▪ 101-i. Pari. G rLL''iawayr E Trail Sy 1i ni Plan 'ty'AtrH...1{#4 2414 co"fEt+*egz.4 Rion Ctr& M w ■ r• -- •.ar. Irma. -i I �.1� - r u r4+ _. ., GO id 1917S rte. r.* - -. fir,.. x 7-01 4,414 1-1+'•1F7{{01 • J• •11 1i• 1 Figure 6. Lino Lakes Park, Greenway, and Trail Plan t S LLrr L Li. II •6 1 r 1 A 1 t 1 L Pia Li x nm• 1701•1 •Plior p L F lrWt Lra•.l L1,I ti mmrr.m. 1116— � r L w SL ogit,4} I -35E rIQFrill "WAR Anis cotr 21 I' u+'rPl•PIn OEM G I -- Q liber4: B ' ...»'a =I AMU IVO c.1 c Weird 1 It um. I4 • Lit x r • Lye .1.1%n:'z Figure 7. I -35E Corridor AUAR Area Ne } r *t I - Val NeA eA Bm Bin HdC2 dC2 NeA dC2 NeA Wb b NeA NeANeA HdC2 Wb NeA NeA Wb eDu 4' It 41. Wb Du NeA Wb NeA NeA NeA NeA b Wb c Wb NeA�'� Dupu NeAN A f NeA 4 Gc • Wb NeA . ,r .NeA.". D WbJ Gc Gc NeA 1 • Gc, Wb NeA C�iWb _ / I\reA - - ` b NeANeA GcMa Gc NeA NeA 11 NeA Wb ..,Du Du NeA GcMaMaNeA Du Du GcDu "rte DgDU Du Gc • GDu• D Ulu W b b- b p 1 NeANeA l� —rte `eANeA NeA Du NeA Gc NeA_ . AGCNeA Ne�idC2 HdB eA Gc 4.,. •' Hd BHd B 1 ANeA NeA A s,�t• C� j C2NeA Wb NeAAtie Bm Bm J '\Gc Gc '--� NeA Gc Du NeA Gc i NeANeAN Wb NeA Gc Du Du 1 Du _A Du .Du Du . r BmBm Du1�b DUGC NeA NeA .,....")1,.NeA Ne NeA 75 113 225 11 75 ,__ `... NeA ----r•— V� Wb' Wb tWb NeANeA NeA Wb - 1 Wb v Du NeA i NeA NeA Du Nek > Wb Du NeA Du. tQ ...pp - �2i'•., Rf NeA NeA di i �iT NeANeANeA NeA�4 NeA Wb 't NeA NeA `3 Nek4oWb Wb NeADU "'GcGc NeANeA e NeA NeANeA NeANA Du Du G Du Wb Wb Wb _ . 6c. . Gc Gc NeA Du Gc NeA Gc—r.. c Bm eADuwb Du Wb Wb Gc Bm Gc NeA c NeA GcGc Du NeA Wb Du W6 Wb Wb Wb Bm Wb Wb Wb Wb NeA NeA - - Wb WbNeA BtB Bm Wb m B NeA Du . BtB Bm NeA Du W CENTERVILLE Bm Bm i Cb � X Cb Wb NeA NeA 225 225 225 113 113 NeA75 113 7 NeA123 Gc Gc 123 132C 113225 • •544 75 75 225 113225 75 22 123 2' Cb 75 1 - Wb Cb ; 123123_ 123 2251 25225123 225 113 - 1 W 113 113 225 123123 757575 Cb544113 123 123 123 13 • CbCb•Cb225 '2251320]23123.225 225 123 123 225 Wb NeA Wb Wb PG NeA Bm rf NeA NeANeANeA i Wb 1131320 123 12 32C Wb225b22225225225 123 1320 1113326 132B13 C 13261326 1231 Wb 1326 1326 HdB 1326 132 Hd6 Z 225132• Ne v 225 132' t 132013261 ll3 123 132 12322H1326 1320123225 HdB 132B132C B132B.132B 123 No 0 132012375No Hd132C 1326 7526 '1326 132B75 HdBHd 1326 HdB Hd32B NANeA 'Wb NeA W NeA m 1' NeA NeANeA Wb Gc Wb,,... ---ACD ++ 55.8r'8,— ' ' MB HdB / WIJWb b Nb BmDu i�J' ailGc WbWPWb d Du Bm i �c NeA Bm Bm BmDu NeA • Gc Cbi Wb - Du NeA NeA Wb Gc Gc 1 Bm t N-' Li Du Wb Wb ) ' - -Gc i' b • NeA NeA Gc Du Du NeA C 3 32B •Cb; • HdB- • 12 _ Coil] Wb Cb Cb 1-1f11375 1:2-4 N— A Wb 1123 7 HdB H 2B HUGO WbNeA W eA 44s, italtlobe, Ge®E e, i-subed,'U�$DA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping',CAe_rogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Document Path: K:\02029-790\GIS\Maps\CSMP\Fig Soils.mxd Date Saved: 9/5/2017 1:29:14 PM CIT OF 11\10 K. S Figure 8 - NRCS Soils Northeast Drainage Area CSMP City of Lino Lakes Legend CSMP Boundary RCWD Watercourses Drain Tile Open Ditch Stream Lakes NRCS Soils Data 113/Wb Webster loam 123 Dundas fine sandy loam 132B/HdB Hayden fine sandy loam, 2-6% slopes 132C/HdC2 Hayden fine sandy loam, 6-12% slopes 225/NeA Nessel fine sandy loam, 1-4% slopes 544/Cb 75 Bm Cathro muck Bluffton loam Blomford loamy fine sand BtB Braham loamy fine sand, 2-6% slopes Dundas loam 111. Glencoe loam Markey muck Nowen sandy loam Rifle mucky peat N A0 2,000 A p FEWSO 1 inch = 1,200 feet - DV . - I.til l t Q' yac f / - "`v . — — — ' 1 , P oo, Qbt 5 o QII '' 2J - - - l , c I T OF �'- _ �1 •IN fES QP -• Qbs ' - Figure 9 - Surficial Geology Northeast Drainage Area CSMP —�� ._. _ QP — + ' - . �+ r' QI City of Lino Lakes —� . Legend 7 ..- '-- C�! CSMP Boundary - - QI Qbt ' .�''''' ..` 1 1 QI RCWD Watercourses IQ / P Qbt ACD_7,2,Main.Trk Qbt - QI QI z •. QI Drain Tile Open Ditch . - Qbt on( ' v '^ ACD [ 11 �f 1 ' — 01 • - — — 01 -- - - - Stream LI Qbt 5 co , i QI t _ _ _ 01 01 QI , r Lakes I Surficial Geology ��qC' �'� ` -...7.,..,.>. Y �`-- 1 ---• --' %/ . QP for Qbt - t i I ! I - - QI Q� —� Qnt t' QI 01 QI QUATERNARY UNITS v i Eu \OO 01 a ., `¢'._ ��` j Hudson [ Qa Episode Alluvium QII 8 % o % - - 01• 01 QI 01 Lake sand s. QI , 011 Lake silt and clay ---- — — — — — — — — 1 t .• ,a��.. Lop na f . z QI �' , > • r I 5.1\10'-' P;°-- r . r • New Brighton Peat and muck Formation .9e1 ..- I ; . �+: Qbs Sand facies • . � t Qbt Qbt Sand loamy to till t IF — _ ___,ACD.55,Br.8�"; •• ..--- 0-- i - I New Ulm over gray sandy Formation . int ! ,• . _ QI "P �' j ; = Qnt Loamy till ' % L ---- .s._ QI _ - ' Qna Sandy till LE ' I t �I � 1, ;RVI QI I _ _ _ Qnd Mixed till • t .. .. . _ Main . 1 , Street - _ Y 1 _ t r -i Arg. LINO LAKES '''104, rck. _ - % `, Frenchman Ro: ad -__. `y , 1 I. aI •_ ).' .. — l✓p . - .,... -' Qbs QI 01 . .' ' pi, 4- � 01 QI N0 . I• - _ t { • 2,000 1 .," --- e_..F - ' - L. Feet QT_i __ y Vin. .. - III III 1 inch = 1,500 feet Document Path: K:\02029-790\GIS\Maus\CSMP\Fia SurfGeolouv.mxd Date Saved: 9/5/2017 12:43:22 PM _ •r i 5 I.t { # 1 I • •• , — n� t—+� I.Pli __ ��—ir_i flyy7VirriWillihri"li'" �sr?7ariLres.. -• .... FV �-IF -fir f t -,ki �' , CITY OF J , ` _ -.1r, -... -.1r,•.,1•1,4 - _ • • `.. RNA) K ES a ,1211,,_,._...... __...,... ,---_, • •t •21.11ki.l _� All I - _ , - -, -,,•,:1 �, �- „�'• ' - `. �t Figure 11 InfoSWMM Updates Northeast Drainage Area CSMP . .. .i - f i I ;I rr .,� 1.1 rT1. _T _ I --1"" _ _ ;'. _ _'' - City of Lino Lakes - - Legend - .- - ' = Hardwood Creek .- -- • CSMP Boundary ' _ � � - Lr r- - t * s oaf -, _ ._ _ f.: — — — — InfoSWMM Model .'' ,, RCWD Watercourses ' ik4100 - = - _ 4 - - - - ,�' r Ilk r— Drain Tile Open Ditch --....,•_ Upper Rice Creek I• - — - — -- � - ,✓ - InfoSWMM Model Stream _ _ ....,p- * _- _ SMT_004A ,-'' Revised CSMP._...... Existing Subcatchments - - — — ._ - � ��,-- URC • � - _ ; w -,, i. is.4p612=T4**-.AlvD72_15 t 4 • , '' •• t --�' --' ; �_ : _ •' Existing HWC Subcatchments ' �� •A2=`2i` MRC_RC PELTIER 001 �.` �;� ACD551Vj'T_028 '� Existing CWC Subcatchments — - I. . .— ' - _ _�#?r . `1 A 72_05! �� ` ` - ' ' ` ' ' A F ,. r�-�� • ACD -t6 r i A D,i2_1 - — _- f ' yr . . .%. ' ..r. -• — -- # 112 I ACS) 2.516''', i A�D52�,99.� _. p ,,, , _. i ACD55MT_025 - ; , • , ...... • . _ -..-:•-• ._. - AollACD 1 4 1 L. T CWCRCPELTIER008 ' AcD55MT 009dr reit -_-- — -7 `� - - L71ER001' CWC_RC' LTIER 009 ACD55MT018 L J. �� 1 ACD55M 1 �Y kk - • C RC PELTIER 002 A ,c�5'0�8i — 1 ACD55MT 01. - \ r , ' t y -• b L AV ACD551pl� V-:''L� ACD55M 114 -.• ; '^ .y%' i�� ACD55BR8.001 ACp55MT_1 {�%SI-.1 .' ,-' 5MT01 .... i,,riea'f.t _ ---- A 31UT 09& i C■ 011 f—• -;T ' r - - F - _ .011.4674�. — - _ - -- - - Clearwater i ,�_ - CreeII �1'007 x • • WI�M MOdEl- ACD5llIv ♦' - r CD •T •. • ACD55MT_010+• I - i - i . i. 1 t r.,. WW1. � � • -A AN JJ 4 lull' • . ..__. y I• • �` ' ' -`- ' ' Cot rf•h 2013 National Geo rai,hic Societ i-cubed,.Sources: Esri, DeLorme, USGS, NPS 9 9 p Y, . _ _ ,pY . _ . ,_ _ _ 1 inch 2,000 feet Document Paths K102029-790\GIS\Maps\CSMPTio InfoSWMM-Updates.mxd Date Saved: 10/19/2017 5:07:01 PM 1 CITY' OF — ,• - - • IN E�, t • -I - - . - _ _ - - _ __ r__ __004A - Figure 12 - Proposed InfoSWMM Northeast Drainage Area CSMP _ City of Lino Lakes • l AED72_14 ACD72 9g - - ��111 — — - ,f Legend CSMP Boundary t --- —- ACD7212 ACD55MT — Subcatchment ACD72_j URC Subcatchments — — — — — ACD72_05 - , -• ACD72_1D - �• Ilir HWC Subcatchments SMT_002.5Cimilw CWC Subcatchments ACD7�2_09 ACD55MT_025 ACD72_07 ACD72_06 • ACD72_10 - - - ili.# Proposed Open Channel - Proposed Culvert - - ACD72_08 .-,. Proposed Regional BMP Location RCRCiPEL•TIER_001.5 ' CWC_RC_PEL•TIER_009 ACD55MTr02.1,M ACD55MT_009 ACD55MT_019 ACD55MT_022 - MT_02 - - - _ ACD72_11 � , - ACD 55 ACD55MT_017 ACD55MT_016 •F ME - - CWC RC' PELTIER 002.5 - - CWC_RC _ PELTIER_008 T_026 - -'_ ACD55MT•0018 ' ACD55MT_015 'r -`x ACD55MT_027 ACD55MT_014 t ' ACD55MT_013 1111 1111 ter, a. - 1 • - `lr, 1 -` - f.. _ 1 ,ACD55MT_019 ACD55BR8_001 ACD55MT_0W ' L. • ACD55MT_008 K - -- y:� — - I ., y '� ACD55MT_007.5 -- — — -` ACD55MT ACD55MTR024 's ..•% yl rt_ —I—.I- 0 2 {' { � Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye,..i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, G_ etmappin_g, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User . — A - Community - — -- 1 inch = 1,153 feet Document Path' K/02029-790\GIS\Maps\CSMP\Fio InfoSWMM-Proposed.mxd Date Saved: 9/4/2017 4:59:55 PM a }-4 SUMMARY OF INFILTRATION FEASIBILITY DRAINAGE AREA FEASIBLE AREA Hugo 215.6 ac 54.0 ac East 533.9 ac 93.6 ac Central 447.3 ac 94.1 ac West 152.5 ac 30.8 ac TOTAL 1,349.3 ac 272.3 ac I all, INF w• i ,i r / r 1 11 I'. r 1 4 411111111.01 a • pQLKfco aaaQ AIR 10111" .r-Iridir !or SP" tot VF -14,0, /.4166A aLr. .dide OW, WAWA; fill' . ' ' ' ' ' " ' A�&4 % :x.7-4•. J ` I SILO . tit .. , �: r • , • : :j 1 1• •M•r.IMEr MIT ;awe j Street A a ly__��= • � ,.' �i ouzoo DDS p o Coo & p o�M©G� Moo / rf Com iGl,�B i prrr dr • „rwmardrem, • 0p ° - 0 dkl, OC i o o• 9 SWIS opo • the GIS' Document Path: K:\02029-790\GIS\Maps\CSMP\CSMP InfiltrationSuitability 050217.mxd Date Saved: 10/19/2017 4:57:46 PM CIT O F IN IBES Figure 13 - Infiltration Suitability Northeast Drainage Area CSMP City of Lino Lakes A Legend Depth to Groundwater < 24" M Marginal Infiltration Suitability =::_"' NWI Wetlands Unsuitable Soil Hydrologic Group 1777 DWSMA 0 1,200 % — — Feet 1 inch = 1,153 feet • WS Appendix B — Existing Modeling Inputs and Results Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Appendices APPENDIX B - EXISTING INFOSWMM INPUTS Subcatchment ID CSMP Region Area [ac] Impervious Calcs WCN la [in] Slope [%] Width [ft] Tc [min] Area [ac] % ACD55BR8_001 EAST 97.893 2.606 2.662 83.92 0.383 2.623 1448.157 48.943 ACD55MT_007 15.426 6.492 42.085 86.392 0.315 3.994 842.32 14.243 ACD55MT_007.5 CENTRAL 28.801 0.27 0.937 83.309 0.401 1.921 1432.659 41.07 ACD55MT_008 CENTRAL 67.641 2.929 4.33 83.661 0.391 2.211 1901.152 47.811 ACD55MT_009 EAST 183.161 4.941 2.698 80.744 0.477 2.732 2224.56 71.466 ACD55MT_010 EAST 62.93 1.756 2.79 81.159 0.464 2.69 1492.03 32.658 ACD55MT_011 HUGO 3.786 0.51 13.471 64.693 1.092 5.042 403.227 13.546 ACD55MT_012 HUGO 35.618 2.189 6.146 70.134 0.852 3.866 1734.4 52.683 ACD55MT_013 HUGO 11.098 0.849 7.65 64.529 1.099 4.518 680.302 22.179 ACD55MT_014 HUGO 5.4 2.785 51.574 79.447 0.517 5.124 412.514 11.946 ACD55MT_015 HUGO 5.531 1.051 19.002 67.218 0.975 6.032 505.331 15.851 ACD55MT_016 HUGO 3.326 1.903 57.216 84.489 0.367 4.547 372.214 7.245 ACD55MT_017 HUGO 13.926 2.738 19.661 70.353 0.843 4.733 757.112 14.894 ACD55MT_018 HUGO 3.327 1.748 52.54 85.141 0.349 8.157 551.035 11.84 ACD55MT_019 HUGO 10.416 2.803 26.911 74.272 0.693 5.082 688 19.414 ACD55MT_020 HUGO 6.666 3.746 56.196 84.303 0.372 4.571 605.766 8.784 ACD55MT_021 HUGO 0.94 0.597 63.511 87.103 0.296 8.891 145.006 5.002 ACD55MT_022 HUGO 4.717 2.644 56.053 84.883 0.356 5.321 462.272 6.886 ACD55MT_024 HUGO 1.905 0 0 78.97 0.533 5.759 377.6 12.071 ACD55MT_025 HUGO 108.941 5.54 5.085 75.944 0.634 3.413 2125.104 50.431 ACD55MT_026 CENTRAL 14.835 0 0 83.86 0.385 1.947 747.365 21.106 ACD55MT_027 CENTRAL 68.153 14.25 20.909 86.642 0.308 3.694 2562.48 35.808 ACD55MT_028 EAST 79.294 0.542 0.684 81.005 0.469 2.751 1642.512 54.456 ACD72_01 65.858 18.642 28.306 74.686 0.678 3.357 1859.984 50.243 ACD72_02 29.642 2.958 9.979 82.006 0.439 2.947 990.642 46.065 ACD72_03 14.011 5.599 39.961 75.735 0.641 4.667 714.949 35.11 ACD72_04 9.337 2.843 30.449 73.817 0.709 4.533 510.846 33.887 ACD72_04B 12.063 4.305 35.688 73.871 0.707 4.065 803.469 42.85 ACD72_05 CENTRAL 18.806 1.169 6.216 73.054 0.738 3.939 823.824 20.601 ACD72_06 WEST 58.465 0.042 0.072 84.663 0.362 1.918 1511.829 41.142 ACD72_07 CENTRAL 6.461 1.573 24.346 72.832 0.746 4.582 586.395 13.794 ACD72_08 CENTRAL 4.943 0 0 83.872 0.385 1.855 377.011 12.432 ACD72_09 CENTRAL 56.87 0.348 0.612 81.134 0.465 2.527 1526.32 34.619 ACD72_10 CENTRAL 29.044 0.519 1.787 83.141 0.406 2.477 1076.064 21.697 ACD72_11 CENTRAL 15.616 0.179 1.146 83.093 0.407 2.481 807.602 22.992 ACD72_12 CENTRAL 54.612 0.645 1.181 82.763 0.417 2.382 1535.963 43.825 ACD72_14 EAST 22.761 1.946 8.55 83.26 0.402 3.065 895.154 20.349 ACD72_15 EAST 20.515 0 0 76.274 0.622 2.248 705.899 26.563 ACD72_16 EAST 16.123 1.998 12.392 83.199 0.404 3.327 814.832 15.796 ACD72_17 EAST 2.514 0 0 75.592 0.646 3.275 286.424 8.357 CWC_RC_PELTIER_001 9.39 3.756 40 76.529 0.613 5.025 915.954 12.302 CWC_RC_PELTIER_002 81.513 19.035 23.352 72.982 0.740 3.913 1955.04 49.709 CWC_RC_PELTIER_002.5 WEST 41.091 0 0 75.001 0.667 1.69 1241.749 53.468 CWC_RC_PELTIER_003 14.456 5.443 37.652 74.82 0.673 4.31 1318.4 15.471 CWC_RC_PELTIER_004 19.176 7.67 39.998 76.572 0.612 4.81 1052.8 14.314 CWC_RC_PELTIER_005 4.37 1.481 33.89 79.956 0.501 4.698 383.493 10 CWC_RC_PELTIER_006 18.884 7.552 39.992 79.531 0.515 4.795 1049.6 18.963 CWC_RC_PELTIER_008 CENTRAL 58.298 0.003 0.005 85.479 0.340 1.831 1889.84 31.093 CWC_RC_PELTIER_009 CENTRAL 21.211 0 0 84.681 0.362 1.826 941.146 27.839 L_PELTIER_07 49.286 20.395 41.381 82.103 0.436 3.602 2052.512 34.637 MRC_RC_PELTIER_001 1273.83 87.291 6.853 84.246 0.374 1.555 10258.94 62.15 MRC_RC_PELTIER_001.5 WEST 52.956 1.646 3.108 75.591 0.646 2.576 1554.475 48.632 MRC_RC_PELTIER_002 126.454 18.542 14.663 66.827 0.993 3.293 3248 108.645 MRC_RC_PELTIER_003 13.412 4.543 33.873 80.493 0.485 7.193 710.306 11.773 1 of 2 APPENDIX B - EXISTING INFOSWMM INPUTS Subcatchment ID CSMP Region Area [ac] Impervious Calcs WCN la [in] Slope [%] Width [ft] Tc [min] Area [ac] % MRC_RC_PELTIER_004 3.183 1.273 39.994 71.109 0.813 4.325 373.661 13.445 MRC_RC_PELTIER_006 87.354 1.633 1.869 82.325 0.429 2.182 1788.768 47.406 MRC_RC_PELTIER_009 38.801 9.219 23.76 75.187 0.660 4.161 1315.488 10 SMT_002 314.096 38.51 12.261 81.019 0.469 3.556 5123.472 101.506 SMT_002.5 CENTRAL 1.986 0.067 3.374 78.479 0.548 1.827 278.718 10.515 SMT_004A EAST 48.753 0.675 1.385 86.1 0.323 1.815 1186.091 34.849 2 of 2 Appendix C - Regional BMP Conceptual Layout Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Appendices K:\02029-790\Cad\Plan\NE Area 6-22-16 Final.dwg • - ' '.. / 1 ,l l, ,` 5OLF-8'x4' BOX N CULVERT � I � I III .1 %� 44 11:1''''':1// I1 i �� '�.��•''� ! lll� II ( Ill lily'-1111 6 Oxw �• •�.�1�,`. y A �� 084' ��,.= -- 885.5 W..* �' �.�= I , - � ....„,-041 � Il i li � _,Ir ., 'f0liiitV••� %'°- • ' IOW ` • ,• i �� st‘str-lititircli,,A LEIBELHALL I iti Er re ti')ill.iii � \sAtEI AL AS NOTED `��- - , • - 1111 oo a 0 .. I - 4�� , 60LF-60' RC PIPE O 020�!.%-_�_''�iAlliatts..-11_11.1rAtti.,/`_:'= o - l e - ' jirriti ~ 8 -\� �,.s.• �, •, w-•a•- �, � . -- -„ Be a i• HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OF RAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERV AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENG! ANDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA ENGINEER DATE; DATE LIC. NO: LIC -NO num �� i®N� * OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (DESIGN SPECIAL 1) -_: \�� ` "- • 4G4 p--�� ., 6'X8' BOX CULVERT ��®� ftw_`=-Ca GATE 0 .. `-`�'�I,'aI ii■1�a9miL rm'c.a;rW/SLUICE sL, tm• -' ino Lakes e Stormwater ent Plan Lakes, MN -,�_-.e_••_.I:__••"°_�. 0 \nom • ��' '/i `� 49 iiIIIV 6) SAI T l ISTFF RFRNIC P R C/XI fl TRI IST IO nuc yrs 590LF 60"RC PIPE 0.20% It �� J > E 0 R i ai N a) R s. c ° >, Don Oh o� Nf ^� 940 r L o _ 2 o Z E O ,r) a + O Pt co + 00 a CO II 0° N 11 � II L OUTLET S_UICE COt`TROL VAL STRUCTURE rE BOX STRUCTURE +I ,d a w w 930 U Na w w a > Ex15TInG PROFILE �; > a a 5.E DETAIL > aa a 920 a - - _ - - - - __ _ 910 _ - 590LF-60"RC PIPE ®0.20 0.20% T_ 01 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 linneapolis, MN 55416 el: (763) 541-4800 • Fax: (763) 541-1700 tsbeng.com SOLF-8'z4' BOX CULVERT - .34% 900 J J 0 57% 6OLF-6."RC PIPE ® 0.20% = z - L.' > rn oa �a +a p + M z a a ,off ,� x 890 K 6, F N b N K. d Q fn b 0,,: N , O V m� to coo 2 0_ 880 a 0 870 860 0) 0 om ro 0) ,0 p0 N0 woo m CO M 00 C00 WO rn 00 01 O, 00 0 ooO 0/3) CO O O 0 0 WO CO a0 O 0) O 40N m CO 0 0) O CON 0, CO O N (0O C0N 0, CO O N 0 0 0a 0, CO 0, M 0 0 Na rn 00 O a 0 0 Wu) rn CO ,r) ,10 0 0 CO. 0 0) CO O c0 0, O, W. 0, CO 0) ,O m o 0000 0) CO 0) , 0) O 00 CO.00 0, CO O co 0 O 0 00 O m 0) 0 N0 0 0, O O 0 0 6,0 00 0, O O 0 0 O,0 0) O O 0 0 00 0 0, a O 0 0 MN O 0) O N 0 N O,0 0 0 1 0 0 6,0 O 0, O O 0 0 TO 0 0, 0 O 0 0 6,0 O 0, O O 0 0 O,N 0 0, 0, 0 0 0,0 O 0, M 0 0 ma 0 0 O a 0 0 Ta 00000 0, O a 0 0 O,a 0, O a 0 0 Ta 0, O a 0 0 6,a 0, O a 0 0 O,a 0, O a 0 0 Ta 00 0, O a 0* O,a 0) N a 0 O, ma 00000 0, 0) a 0 <0 00 0) N ,f) 0 0 00 O 0, O <0 0 0 00 O 0, O CO 0 0 00 0 03 O CO 0 0 00 O 0, O N 0 0 0,0 O 0) O 00 0 0 ON 00000 0, O CO 0 0 0,00 0) O 00 0 0 TO 0, O CO 0 0 0,00 0, O 00 0 0 MCO 0, O CO 0 0 .00 00 0, O CO 0 0 0,00 0, O CO 0 0 ON 00 0, O CO 0 0 O,0 0) 0 N 0 0 O,0 O 0, ,7 N 0 u0 00 O 0, a N 0 0 O,0 0 0 0) N 0 0 00 O 0, O N 0 0 O,0 0 03 N N 0 ,10 6,0 0 0, a N 0 0 O,0 0 0 a0 N 0 0 mN 000 0, 0) N 0 0 O,0 0) 0 N 0 0 O, CO.0 0 0, N 0 0 O 0, cO N 0 0 00 0 0, 7 0 0 o 00 0 0, 0) ,O 0 (0 00 O 0) N CO O N 00 O 0, N to O N 00 O 0) CO 0 0 00 O 0, O ,O 0 0 00 O 0, O O CO CO 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 O 0, 0, O ,O 0 0 000 0 0, 00 0 0 00 0 m O T 0 M 0- 0) N 0 0 00 0 0, W ,O 0 M 00) 0) co N 0, of 0 +50+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+039+50 PROFILES PROJECT NUMBER 2029-790 SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS DALE PROPERTIES LLC U \ X111 I I II11IIi IIII I (IIII 1 I IIII I I IIII I I IIII I I I II 4011 IIII II III, 11 III, 11 1011 I 11111 II 111 1111111 1;11111 11I11I I 11 101111 II 1111111 II 11111111 II 111111 1 1 I I I ,111111 '111111 I I 111 '1,11111111 11 :111;11:11h1 1 1 11 I 111 17;1711;1 I I 111111 1111 60"0 STORM MANHOLE 40 EASEMENT 84"0 STORM MANHOLE 11+UU 211111110111111 0nlnm,e�' it . III ' . - ��ARV �iii��iiiHiiillbi�'' '� '� �'"" ""i� I� I 11 EASEMENT— ANTI—SEEP COLLAR 84"0 STORM MANHOLE 72"0 STORM MANHOLE K:\02029-790\Cad\Proposed\WSB_CWF_Optlon 12-04-15.dwg 0 FT 100 200 PROPER IES LL I1 M 930 920 910 900 890 880 870 860 FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION O N 01 0 0) 0O L1:3 m 0) c0 0 m N O O 01 0) m N O 0 0 h 0 0 O M M 0 O O O O M 01 r u7 0) 0 0 0 0 N O m 0 0 N 0 07 0 0 0 0 m O p p N p m p 0 p O p 01 p m O p _ M O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,T; 01 0 ^ O N O 0 O 40 0 0 00 m 00 u60) 060 0 m -0 0 m (00 ' 'm 0 0 0m 00 00 0m 0 0m m m O O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 mm mO 0, m m m mmm m m m m O [0 0 m O N_ 0.- N O m 0 M O N m m O m m m O CD m m m m 121 -0+500+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 8 9 8 PROJECT NUMBER 2029-790 SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS 8 "0 STMH (7.9') 72"0 STMH (6.8') 48"RC W/7RASHGUAI2D / APRON// \ \— IN -909.2 .-901.3 RIM -908.8 INV. -902.0 _ _ _ — — INV. -900. \_ _ _ — — — — — _ — _ / / 230LF-42"RC PIPE 0 0.15% 250LF-48"RC PIPE JACKED BORED) 0 0.15% 970LE-42"RC PIPE 0 0.15% / O N 01 0 0) 0O L1:3 m 0) c0 0 m N O O 01 0) m N O 0 0 h 0 0 O M M 0 O O O O M 01 r u7 0) 0 0 0 0 N O m 0 0 N 0 07 0 0 0 0 m O p p N p m p 0 p O p 01 p m O p _ M O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,T; 01 0 ^ O N O 0 O 40 0 0 00 m 00 u60) 060 0 m -0 0 m (00 ' 'm 0 0 0m 00 00 0m 0 0m m m O O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 mm mO 0, m m m mmm m m m m O [0 0 m O N_ 0.- N O m 0 M O N m m O m m m O CD m m m m 121 -0+500+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 8 9 8 PROJECT NUMBER 2029-790 SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS K:\02029-790\Cad\Proposed\WSB_CWF_Option 12-04-15.dwg iv \ \\,_ / \ _ ��- v / ,�A o -w NQ 1 \ \ ,/1"- I°)-4 /1"- /� \ D E3 REGIONAL 907.90 HWL— 1.45 RAGE B W 0 ill Q / Q o \ I� kr_—PCZ_--_�LJL___J .r� 00 11 ,��+Ot' 2 •• • •• 0•MIL A /n ��_� , / / _ _ _�� - / ��\ �� -\ A 'imp \ �-� � L.I. TI o�>� I 0 J ZZ W J LN o N Q X o OND E2 REGIONAL STORAG' :ASIN NWL-903.90 HWL-908.47 84"0 STMH (10.3' RIM -911.8 FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 72"0 STMH (7.8') RIM _911.4 P 1 84'• STMH (3.6') 720 STMH (4.7') INV. -904.4 INV. -905.0 84'0 STMH (4.2') RIM -910.0 INV. -905.8 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE SLUICE VALVE BOX STRUCTURE— 920 SEE DETAIL 2230LF-42"RC PIPE 0 0.150 11 1 11 INV. -9 06.0 M (0 (0 N O N M M 0 0 <0 c0 c0 0 N O O O O C (0 ONMMOOOM N 0 (0 u7 0 O O O O O O O O O 0) N M I0 O M N t0 N N 0 O 0) N. M 0 N N M 0 0 0 0 "0 0) 0 c0 M ,() 0 M 0 M ,0 M N 0) 0) 0) O O O O O O O O O T O N O O O N M _ M N O p T of N N 9 o) r r N r r n o) of N m 9 9 m T T m O O O O O O O O O n p M M 0 O 0 O p M h M N N O 0 O 0) 0 6 M 0) 0 p 0 p .0 O p O p .9 I0 p rn p O p "0 p M p <0 O O p r') p 0 p M p 0) p 0) p 0) O O p m p O p O O O O O 0) O 0) O 0) O 0) O 0) n 0) O T m N m O 0) O m O 0) - 0) N m M m M a) N T N T ,– T m O m O 0) 0 0) c0 0) T m 00 m 0) 0 m r 0) 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 a) 0 0) 0 0) 0 T 07 m 0 m 0 cs 0 T O 0) m T O m O m O 0) O T O T O T O m O m O 0) O T O O 0 0 0 0 O O O D O O O O 0 0 O O O O n m T T T m m m T T T m m m 0) m T m m m 0) T T m m O) 0) T T m m m 0) T T m m m 0) T T m m m 0) T T m m 910 900 890 880 870 860 1+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+0039+50 0 FT 0 a 9 6 0 Northeast Lino Lakes G) 3 z E m oO65i c c G) G) J > E O 'v) G. .5 . O w va a2 U E 0 U PROJECT NUMBER 2029-790 SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS K:\02029-790\Cad\Proposed\WSB_CWF_Option 12-04-15.dwg 1 REGIONA TORAE BASIN; NWL-906.4 HWL-911.3, 8+OJ •+e. 1: 10 2+x �t�� 10 5+'� .0 8+:. 1,200 - e 00 1+:: \ ..AlahL �, 1eYd��®'1 °0 3+C. �� ..�� v , e:� :e 7 �T��aRs� w �''�1 CJll! ® �� _ .44 if il 41, 111 TER -STATE 35 940 930 920 910 900 890 880 FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 FT OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE SLUICE VALVE BOX SEE DETAIL STRUCTURE 60"0 .TMH (5.2') RIM- • 08 0 INV.- 02.8 60"0 TMH (8.0') RI 910.0 INV. -902.0 60"0 STMH ( RIM -907.1 INV. -901.3 5.8') 60"0 STMH (7.5') RIM -9 08.0 INV. -9 00.5 84"0 STMH (9 RIM -909.2 INV. -9 175LF-36"RC PIPE 0 0.15% ▪ c0 c) CO MT 000000 M CO OJ O O O M W rn M ▪ O N m m o o m m m o do o o do Om Om yi 00orn om o LT, LT, LT, LT, m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0, <3, rn rn rn 0, m 0, m mooo oo ° 958+500+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 rn 00.2 940 930 920 910 900 890 880 -d d 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+0022+50 100 PROJECT NUMBER 2029-790 200 6 8_ 5 Northeast Lino Lakes cz E t42 °acn - 4) W > E o "(7) w .E • 0-) G) cos a2 U E 0 U SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS Appendix D - Proposed Model Inputs and Results Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Appendices APPENDIX D - PROPOSED INFOSWMM INPUTS Subcatchment ID CSMP Region g Area [ac]Area Impervious Calcs WCN la [in] Slope [%] Width [ft] Tc [min] [ac]% ACD55BR8_001 EAST 97.893 66.771 68.208 88.125 0.270 2.623 1448.157 42.056 ACD55MT_007 15.426 6.492 42.085 86.392 0.315 3.994 842.320 14.243 ACD55MT_007.5 CENTRAL 28.801 20.985 72.862 87.965 0.274 1.921 1432.659 34.770 ACD55MT_008 CENTRAL 67.641 50.731 75 88.151 0.269 2.211 1901.152 40.674 ACD55MT_009 EAST 183.161 99.514 54.331 83.626 0.392 2.732 2224.560 65.029 ACD55MT_010 EAST 62.93 38.407 61.031 88.768 0.253 2.69 1492.030 24.983 ACD55MT_011 HUGO 3.786 0.51 13.471 64.693 1.092 5.042 403.227 13.546 ACD55MT_012 HUGO 35.618 2.189 6.146 70.134 0.852 3.866 1734.400 52.683 ACD55MT_013 HUGO 11.098 0.849 7.65 64.529 1.099 4.518 680.302 22.179 ACD55MT_014 HUGO 5.4 2.785 51.574 79.447 0.517 5.124 412.514 11.946 ACD55MT_015 HUGO 5.531 1.051 19.002 67.218 0.975 6.032 505.331 15.851 ACD55MT_016 HUGO 3.326 1.903 57.216 84.489 0.367 4.547 372.214 7.245 ACD55MT_017 HUGO 13.926 2.738 19.661 70.353 0.843 4.733 757.112 14.894 ACD55MT_018 HUGO 3.327 1.748 52.54 85.141 0.349 8.157 551.035 11.840 ACD55MT_019 HUGO 10.416 2.803 26.911 74.272 0.693 5.082 688.000 19.414 ACD55MT_020 HUGO 6.666 3.746 56.196 84.303 0.372 4.571 605.766 8.784 ACD55MT_021 HUGO 0.94 0.597 63.511 87.103 0.296 8.891 145.006 5.002 ACD55MT_022 HUGO 4.717 2.644 56.053 84.883 0.356 5.321 462.272 6.886 ACD55MT_024 HUGO 1.905 0 0 78.97 0.533 5.759 377.600 12.071 ACD55MT_025 HUGO 108.941 5.54 5.085 75.944 0.634 3.413 2125.104 50.431 ACD55MT_026 CENTRAL 14.835 11.126 74.998 87.999 0.273 1.947 747.365 18.183 ACD55MT_027 CENTRAL 68.153 48.062 70.521 88.104 0.270 3.694 2562.480 33.893 ACD55MT_028 EAST 79.294 48.292 60.902 83.651 0.391 2.751 1642.512 49.918 ACD72_01 65.858 18.642 28.306 74.686 0.678 3.357 1859.984 50.243 ACD72_02 29.642 2.958 9.979 82.006 0.439 2.947 990.642 46.065 ACD72_03 14.011 5.599 39.961 75.735 0.641 4.667 714.949 35.11 ACD72_04 9.337 2.843 30.449 73.817 0.709 4.533 510.846 33.887 ACD72_04B 12.063 4.305 35.688 73.871 0.707 4.065 803.469 42.85 ACD72_05 CENTRAL 18.806 9.792 52.068 77.511 0.580 3.939 823.824 18.111 ACD72_06 WEST 58.465 26.355 45.078 71.683 0.790 1.918 1511.829 61.122 ACD72_07 CENTRAL 6.461 4.846 75.004 88.3 0.265 4.582 586.395 8.391 ACD72_08 CENTRAL 4.943 3.707 74.995 88.028 0.272 1.855 377.011 10.703 ACD72_09 CENTRAL 56.87 38.368 67.466 84.609 0.364 2.527 1526.320 30.841 ACD72_10 CENTRAL 29.044 21.251 73.168 87.84 0.277 2.477 1076.064 18.352 ACD72_11 CENTRAL 15.616 9.699 62.109 85.313 0.344 2.481 807.602 21.305 ACD72_12 CENTRAL 54.612 38.978 71.373 87.56 0.284 2.382 1535.963 37.003 ACD72_14 EAST 22.761 17.071 75.001 88.455 0.261 3.065 895.154 16.877 ACD72_15 EAST 20.515 12.668 61.75 83.046 0.408 2.248 705.899 21.514 ACD72_16 EAST 16.123 11.203 69.485 85.996 0.326 3.327 814.832 14.334 ACD72_17 EAST 2.514 1.824 72.554 87.037 0.298 3.275 286.424 5.766 CWC_RC_PELTIER_001 9.39 3.756 40 76.529 0.613 5.025 915.954 12.302 CWC_RC_PELTIER_002 81.513 19.035 23.352 72.982 0.740 3.913 1955.040 49.709 CWC_RC_PELTIER_002.5 WEST 41.091 11.984 29.165 75.745 0.640 1.69 1241.749 36.837 CWC_RC_PELTIER_003 14.456 5.443 37.652 74.82 0.673 4.31 1318.400 15.471 CWC_RC_PELTIER_004 19.176 7.67 39.998 76.572 0.612 4.81 1052.800 14.314 CWC_RC_PELTIER_005 4.37 1.481 33.89 79.956 0.501 4.698 383.493 10 CWC_RC_PELTIER_006 18.884 7.552 39.992 79.531 0.515 4.795 1049.600 18.963 CWC_RC_PELTIER_008 CENTRAL 58.298 42.354 72.651 87.418 0.288 1.831 1889.840 28.965 CWC_RC_PELTIER_009 CENTRAL 21.211 15.908 74.999 88 0.273 1.826 941.146 24.673 L_PELTIER_07 49.286 20.395 41.381 82.103 0.436 3.602 2052.512 34.637 MRC_RC_PELTIER_001 1273.83 87.291 6.853 84.246 0.374 1.555 10258.944 62.150 MRC_RC_PELTIER_001.5 WEST 52.956 18.452 34.844 73.035 0.738 2.576 1554.475 52.300 MRC_RC_PELTIER_002 126.454 18.542 14.663 66.827 0.993 3.293 3248.000 108.645 1 of 2 APPENDIX D - PROPOSED INFOSWMM INPUTS Subcatchment ID CSMP Region g Area [ac]Area Impervious Calcs WCN la [in] Slope [%] Width [ft] Tc [min] [ac]% MRC_RC_PELTIER_003 13.412 4.543 33.873 80.493 0.485 7.193 710.306 11.773 MRC_RC_PELTIER_004 3.183 1.273 39.994 71.109 0.813 4.325 373.661 13.445 MRC_RC_PELTIER_006 87.354 1.633 1.869 82.325 0.429 2.182 1788.768 47.406 MRC_RC_PELTIER_009 38.801 9.219 23.76 75.187 0.660 4.161 1315.488 10 SMT_002 314.096 38.51 12.261 81.019 0.469 3.556 5123.472 101.506 SMT_002.5 CENTRAL 1.986 1.489 74.975 88.166 0.268 1.827 278.718 7.574 SMT_004A EAST 48.753 36.537 74.943 88.285 0.265 1.815 1186.091 32.125 NOTES: 1. Subcatchments in Hugo and outside the CSMP study area proided for reference only. No changes from existing conditions were made to these subcatchments. 2 of 2 Appendix E — Water Quality Calculations Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Appendices Appendix E - Existing Total Phosphorus Loading by Subcatchment Subcatchment ID CSMP Region Area CN S TP Load 1.1 -in Event Runoff [ac] [in] [in] [ac -ft] ACD55BR8_001 EAST 97.893 83.92 1.92 0.384 0.19 1.55 ACD55MT_007 15.426 86.392 1.58 0.316 0.26 0.33 ACD55MT_007.5 CENTRAL 28.801 83.309 2 0.4 0.18 0.43 ACD55MT_008 CENTRAL 67.641 83.661 1.95 0.39 0.19 1.07 ACD55MT_009 EAST 183.161 80.744 2.38 0.476 0.13 1.98 ACD55MT_010 EAST 62.93 81.159 2.32 0.464 0.14 0.73 ACD55MT_011 HUGO 3.786 64.693 5.46 1.092 0 0 ACD55MT_012 HUGO 35.618 70.134 4.26 0.852 0.01 0.03 ACD55MT_013 HUGO 11.098 64.529 5.5 1.1 0 0 ACD55MT_014 HUGO 5.4 79.447 2.59 0.518 0.11 0.05 ACD55MT_015 HUGO 5.531 67.218 4.88 0.976 0 0 ACD55MT_016 HUGO 3.326 84.489 1.84 0.368 0.21 0.06 ACD55MT_017 HUGO 13.926 70.353 4.21 0.842 0.01 0.01 ACD55MT_018 HUGO 3.327 85.141 1.75 0.35 0.23 0.06 ACD55MT_019 HUGO 10.416 74.272 3.46 0.692 0.04 0.03 ACD55MT_020 HUGO 6.666 84.303 1.86 0.372 0.2 0.11 ACD55MT_021 HUGO 0.94 87.103 1.48 0.296 0.28 0.02 ACD55MT_022 HUGO 4.717 84.883 1.78 0.356 0.22 0.09 ACD55MT_024 HUGO 1.905 78.97 2.66 0.532 0.1 0.02 ACD55MT_025 HUGO 108.941 75.944 3.17 0.634 0.06 0.54 ACD55MT_026 CENTRAL 14.835 83.86 1.92 0.384 0.19 0.23 ACD55MT_027 CENTRAL 68.153 86.642 1.54 0.308 0.27 1.53 ACD55MT_028 EAST 79.294 81.005 2.34 0.468 0.13 0.86 ACD72_05 CENTRAL 18.806 73.054 3.69 0.738 0.03 0.05 ACD72_06 WEST 58.465 84.663 1.81 0.362 0.21 1.02 ACD72_07 CENTRAL 6.461 72.832 3.73 0.746 0.03 0.02 ACD72_08 CENTRAL 4.943 83.872 1.92 0.384 0.19 0.08 ACD72_09 CENTRAL 56.87 81.134 2.33 0.466 0.14 0.66 ACD72_10 CENTRAL 29.044 83.141 2.03 0.406 0.18 0.44 ACD72_11 CENTRAL 15.616 83.093 2.03 0.406 0.18 0.23 ACD72_12 CENTRAL 54.612 82.763 2.08 0.416 0.17 0.77 ACD72_14 EAST 22.761 83.26 2.01 0.402 0.18 0.34 ACD72_15 EAST 20.515 76.274 3.11 0.622 0.06 0.1 ACD72_16 EAST 16.123 83.199 2.02 0.404 0.18 0.24 ACD72_17 EAST 2.514 75.592 3.23 0.646 0.06 0.01 CWC_RC_PELTIER_002 81.513 72.982 3.7 0.74 0.03 0.2 CWC_RC_PELTIER_002.5 WEST 41.091 75.001 3.33 0.666 0.05 0.17 CWC_RC_PELTIER_008 CENTRAL 58.298 85.479 1.7 0.34 0.23 1.12 CWC_RC_PELTIER_009 CENTRAL 21.211 84.681 1.81 0.362 0.21 0.37 MRC_RC_PELTIER_001 1273.83 84.246 1.87 0.374 0.2 21.23 MRC_RC_PELTIER_001.5 WEST 52.956 75.591 3.23 0.646 0.06 0.26 SMT_002 314.096 81.019 2.34 0.468 0.13 3.4 SMT_002.5 CENTRAL 1.986 78.479 2.74 0.548 0.09 0.01 1 of 4 Appendix E - Existing Total Phosphorus Loading by Subcatchment SMT_004A EAST 48.753 86.1 1.61 0.322 0.25 1.02 2 of 4 Appendix E - Existing Total Phosphorus Loading by Subcatchment Weighted TP TP Load [mg/L] [Ib] 0.277 1.17 0.356 0.32 0.318 0.37 0.316 0.92 0.201 1.08 0.248 0.49 0.174 0 0.142 0.01 0.084 0 0.326 0.04 0.137 0 0.355 0.06 0.124 0 0.338 0.06 0.18 0.01 0.363 0.11 0.399 0.02 0.381 0.09 0.192 0.01 0.214 0.31 0.32 0.2 0.298 1.24 0.299 0.7 0.266 0.04 0.32 0.89 0.281 0.02 0.32 0.07 0.311 0.56 0.318 0.38 0.282 0.18 0.305 0.64 0.309 0.29 0.279 0.08 0.308 0.2 0.241 0.01 0.188 0.1 0.145 0.07 0.307 0.94 0.32 0.32 0.051 2.94 0.19 0.13 0.229 2.12 0.317 0.01 3 of 4 Appendix E - Existing Total Phosphorus Loading by Subcatchment 0.319 0.88 4 of 4 Appendix E - Proposed TP Loading by Subcatchment Subcatchment ID CSMP Region Area CN 5 TP Load 1.1 -in Event Runoff Weighted TP TP Load [ac] [in] [in] [ac -ft] [mg/L] [Ib] ACD55BR8_001 EAST 97.893 88.125 1.35 0.27 0.32 2.61 0.221 1.57 ACD55MT_007 15.426 86.392 1.58 0.316 0.26 0.33 0 0 ACD55MT_007.5 CENTRAL 28.801 87.965 1.37 0.274 0.31 0.74 0.215 0.43 ACD55MT_008 CENTRAL 67.641 88.151 1.34 0.268 0.32 1.8 0.222 1.09 ACD55MT_009 EAST 183.161 83.626 1.96 0.392 0.19 2.9 0.189 1.49 ACD55MT_010 EAST 62.93 88.768 1.27 0.254 0.34 1.78 0.186 0.9 ACD55MT_011 HUGO 3.786 64.693 5.46 1.092 0 0 0.46 0 ACD55MT_012 HUGO 35.618 70.134 4.26 0.852 0.01 0.03 0.449 0.04 ACD55MT_013 HUGO 11.098 64.529 5.5 1.1 0 0 0.468 0 ACD55MT_014 HUGO 5.4 79.447 2.59 0.518 0.11 0.05 0.5 0.07 ACD55MT_015 HUGO 5.531 67.218 4.88 0.976 0 0 0.462 0 ACD55MT_016 HUGO 3.326 84.489 1.84 0.368 0.21 0.06 0.5 0.08 ACD55MT_017 HUGO 13.926 70.353 4.21 0.842 0.01 0.01 0.285 0.01 ACD55MT_018 HUGO 3.327 85.141 1.75 0.35 0.23 0.06 0.499 0.08 ACD55MT_019 HUGO 10.416 74.272 3.46 0.692 0.04 0.03 0.356 0.03 ACD55MT_020 HUGO 6.666 84.303 1.86 0.372 0.2 0.11 0.5 0.15 ACD55MT_021 HUGO 0.94 87.103 1.48 0.296 0.28 0.02 0.499 0.03 ACD55MT_022 HUGO 4.717 84.883 1.78 0.356 0.22 0.09 0.5 0.12 ACD55MT_024 HUGO 1.905 78.97 2.66 0.532 0.1 0.02 0.3 0.02 ACD55MT_025 HUGO 108.941 75.944 3.17 0.634 0.06 0.54 0.5 0.73 ACD55MT_026 CENTRAL 14.835 87.999 1.36 0.272 0.31 0.38 0.22 0.23 ACD55MT_027 CENTRAL 68.153 88.104 1.35 0.27 0.32 1.82 0.216 1.07 ACD55MT_028 EAST 79.294 83.651 1.95 0.39 0.19 1.26 0.21 0.72 ACD72_01 65.858 74.686 3.39 0.678 0.05 0.27 0 0 ACD72_02 29.642 82.006 2.19 0.438 0.15 0.37 0 0 ACD72_03 14.011 75.735 3.2 0.64 0.06 0.07 0 0 ACD72_04 9.337 73.817 3.55 0.71 0.04 0.03 0 0 ACD72_04B 12.063 73.871 3.54 0.708 0.04 0.04 0 0 ACD72_05 CENTRAL 18.806 77.511 2.9 0.58 0.08 0.13 0.229 0.08 ACD72_06 WEST 58.465 71.683 3.95 0.79 0.02 0.1 0.42 0.11 ACD72_07 CENTRAL 6.461 88.3 1.33 0.266 0.32 0.17 0.224 0.1 ACD72_08 CENTRAL 4.943 88.028 1.36 0.272 0.31 0.13 0.221 0.08 ACD72_09 CENTRAL 56.87 84.609 1.82 0.364 0.21 1 0.219 0.6 ACD72_10 CENTRAL 29.044 87.84 1.38 0.276 0.31 0.75 0.216 0.44 ACD72_11 CENTRAL 15.616 85.313 1.72 0.344 0.23 0.3 0.188 0.15 ACD72_12 CENTRAL 54.612 87.56 1.42 0.284 0.3 1.37 0.228 0.85 ACD72_14 EAST 22.761 88.455 1.31 0.262 0.33 0.63 0.25 0.43 ACD72_15 EAST 20.515 83.046 2.04 0.408 0.18 0.31 0.211 0.18 ACD72_16 EAST 16.123 85.996 1.63 0.326 0.25 0.34 0.234 0.22 ACD72_17 EAST 2.514 87.037 1.49 0.298 0.28 0.06 0.243 0.04 CWC_RC_PELTIER_001 9.39 76.529 3.07 0.614 0.07 0.05 0 0 CWC_RC_PELTIER_002 81.513 72.982 3.7 0.74 0.03 0.2 0 0 CWC_RC_PELTIER_002.5 WEST 41.091 75.745 3.2 0.64 0.06 0.21 0.19 0.11 CWC_RC_PELTIER_003 14.456 74.82 3.37 0.674 0.05 0.06 0 0 CWC_RC_PELTIER_004 19.176 76.572 3.06 0.612 0.07 0.11 0 0 CWC_RC_PELTIER_005 4.37 79.956 2.51 0.502 0.12 0.04 0 0 CWC_RC_PELTIER_006 18.884 79.531 2.57 0.514 0.11 0.17 0 0 CWC_RC_PELTIER_008 CENTRAL 58.298 87.418 1.44 0.288 0.29 1.41 0.215 0.82 CWC_RC_PELTIER_009 CENTRAL 21.211 88 1.36 0.272 0.31 0.55 0.22 0.33 L_PELTIER_07 49.286 82.103 2.18 0.436 0.16 0.66 0 0 MRC_RC_PELTIER_001 1273.83 84.246 1.87 0.374 0.2 21.23 0 0 MRC_RC_PELTIER_001.5 WEST 52.956 73.035 3.69 0.738 0.03 0.13 0.258 0.09 MRC_RC_PELTIER_002 126.454 66.827 4.96 0.992 0 0 0 0 MRC_RC_PELTIER_003 13.412 80.493 2.42 0.484 0.12 0.13 0 0 MRC_RC_PELTIER_004 3.183 71.109 4.06 0.812 0.02 0.01 0 0 1 of 2 Appendix E - Proposed TP Loading by Subcatchment MRC_RC_PELTIER_006 87.354 82.325 2.15 0.43 0.16 1.16 0 0 MRC_RC_PELTIER_009 38.801 75.187 3.3 0.66 0.05 0.16 0 0 SMT_002 314.096 81.019 2.34 0.468 0.13 3.4 0 0 SMT_002.5 CENTRAL 1.986 88.166 1.34 0.268 0.32 0.05 0.226 0.03 SMT_004A EAST 48.753 88.285 1.33 0.266 0.32 1.3 0.248 0.88 2 of 2 Appendix F — CSMP Design Standards by Parcel Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project WSB Project No. 2929-79 Appendices Proposed CSMP Allocations by Parcel Parcel Identification Number CSMP Parcel Area Planned Impervious Area Suitable for Infiltration Regional BMP Allocation Live Storage Allocation Max. Rate Ex. Max Rate Region [ac] [ac] [ac] [ac -ft] [cfs] [cfs] 11-31-22-43-0005 WEST 1.05 0.16 0 0.3% 0.13 0.11 - 11-31-22-43-0006 WEST 1 0.22 0 0.4% 0.18 0.10 - 12-31-22-31-0001 CENTRAL 58.93 7.92 4.92 2.8% 7.3 5.89 0.15 12-31-22-31-0002 CENTRAL 19.8 7.41 5.29 2.4% 6.23 1.98 0.12 12-31-22-33-0001 CENTRAL 19.68 10.33 7.55 3.5% 9.1 1.97 0.19 12-31-22-33-0003 CENTRAL 9.88 4.67 6.98 2.2% 5.75 0.99 0.12 12-31-22-33-0004 CENTRAL 11.12 6.47 6.05 2.5% 6.47 1.11 0.13 12-31-22-34-0003 CENTRAL 39.21 27.69 18.57 8.8% 22.8 3.92 0.43 12-31-22-34-4GAP CENTRAL 0.18 0.14 0.02 0.04% 0.11 0.02 0.00 12-31-22-41-0001 EAST 37.34 22.55 18.16 7.0% 17.49 3.73 0.20 12-31-22-41-0002 EAST 2.34 1.76 0 0.4% 1.1 0.23 0.01 12-31-22-42-0001 EAST 31.66 22.28 16.4 5.8% 14.58 3.17 0.13 12-31-22-43-0002 CENTRAL 5.16 0.004 0 0.001% 0 0.52 0.00 12-31-22-43-0003 EAST 30.65 20.16 10.69 5.7% 14.36 3.07 0.12 12-31-22-44-0001 EAST 39.64 23.32 8.58 7.4% 18.56 3.96 0.11 J 13-31-22-11-0001 EAST 39.52 17.94 0.03 7.4% 18.51 3.95 0.11 13-31-22-12-0002 EAST 30.39 4.18 0 5.7% 14.23 3.04 0.08 13-31-22-13-0002 EAST 30.22 22.66 2.85 5.7% 14.15 3.02 0.08 13-31-22-14-0001 EAST 39.33 24.41 11.49 7.4% 18.42 3.93 0.11 13-31-22-21-0003 CENTRAL 40.03 29 13.29 9.0% 23.27 4.00 0.48 13-31-22-21-0004 CENTRAL 34 24.33 14.4 7.6% 19.76 3.40 0.40 13-31-22-22-0002 CENTRAL 1.4 1.05 1.4 0.3% 0.81 0.14 0.00 13-31-22-22-0003 CENTRAL 4.76 3.58 2.9 1.1% 2.77 0.48 0.06 13-31-22-23-0003 CENTRAL 39.91 28.2 0 8.9% 23.2 3.99 0.35 13-31-22-23-0004 CENTRAL 39.97 29.54 7.61 8.9% 23.23 4.00 0.29 13-31-22-31-0001 CENTRAL 39.6 29.45 0 8.9% 23.02 3.96 0.62 13-31-22-31-0002 CENTRAL 20 15 0 4.5% 11.63 2.00 0.41 13-31-22-32-0001 CENTRAL 19.55 14.66 0 4.4% 11.36 1.96 0.28 13-31-22-33-0001 CENTRAL 39.01 28.72 0 8.7% 22.68 3.90 5.15 13-31-22-34-0001 CENTRAL 37.9 28.43 0 8.5% 22.03 3.79 2.71 13-31-22-41-0003 EAST 10.33 7.63 0 1.9% 4.84 1.03 0.04 13-31-22-41-0004 EAST 10.22 7.42 0.8 1.9% 4.79 1.02 0.04 13-31-22-41-0005 EAST 25.13 16.75 8.93 4.7% 11.77 2.51 0.09 13-31-22-42-0001 EAST 30.57 21.87 0 5.7% 14.32 3.06 0.11 13-31-22-43-0002 EAST 10.82 7.49 0 2.0% 5.07 1.08 0.04 13-31-22-44-0001 EAST 54.6 33.67 0 10.2% 25.54 5.46 0.23 14-31-22-11-0001 WEST 19.47 7.75 5.73 12.7% 6.35 1.95 0.24 14-31-22-11-0002 WEST 19.48 9.25 6.11 12.8% 6.39 1.95 0.22 14-31-22-12-0002 WEST 44.18 15.28 16.77 28.6% 14.3 4.42 0.21 1 of 2 Proposed CSMP Allocations by Parcel Parcel Identification Number CSMP Parcel Area Planned Impervious Area Suitable for Infiltration Regional BMP Allocation Live Storage Allocation Max. Rate Ex. Max Rate Region [ac] [ac] [ac] [ac -ft] [cfs] [cfs] 14-31-22-13-0002 WEST 49.82 8.76 0 16.1% 8.06 4.98 - 14-31-22-14-0001 WEST 38.96 12.3 0 25.5% 12.77 3.90 0.04 14-31-22-21-0001 WEST 0.9 0.45 0.35 0.6% 0.29 0.09 - 14-31-22-21-0004 WEST 2.34 0.96 0.81 1.5% 0.77 0.23 - 24-31-22-11-0005 EAST 18 5.17 0 1.8% 4.45 1.80 0.04 24-31-22-11-0007 EAST 1.24 0.84 0 0.2% 0.52 0.12 0.01 24-31-22-11-0008 EAST 16.54 9.35 0 2.8% 7.06 1.65 0.06 24-31-22-12-0001 EAST 28.12 8.79 0 2.4% 5.9 2.81 0.05 24-31-22-21-0002 CENTRAL 5.45 0.28 0 0.1% 0.22 0.55 5.87 24-31-22-21-0003 CENTRAL 14.16 0.47 0 0.1% 0.36 1.42 6.97 2 of 2 WS — Item 7 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 7 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director Re: Proposal to Replace ACU's and Controllers at Civic Complex Background City staff recommends replacing the remaining two original air conditioning units for the Civic Complex (The other two units were replaced in 2016). Both air conditioning units are experiencing random failures and the stage one compressors are starting to fail. These units are approaching the average life expectancy of twenty years as tracked by industry standards of the American Society of Heating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). Also, the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer calls for the phasing out of R22 refrigerant. No new or imported R-22 will be allowed in the United States on or after January 1, 2020. The attached memo, "Summary of conditions of City Hall campus air conditioning units" provides additional information. Total estimated project cost is $90,000. If authorized, staff will purchase the air conditioning units directly from the manufacturer through a competitive bidding process. This saves us from incurring sales tax charges. The installation work will be performed by NAC. Also, staff recommends replacing the controllers and control valves throughout the entire Civic Complex. Johnson Controls has discontinued the manufacture and support of these controllers. The pneumatic building heating valve controls have been obsolete for some time and should be converted to electric. The accompanying memo "Lino Lalces Automation Integration and Upgrade" provides more details. Staff is recommending this upgrade be completed in 2018-2019. Tim Hillesheim, Utilities Supervisor and Dave Carlson from NAC will attend Monday's work session to provide more detailed information and answer any questions. Requested Council Direction Direct staff to proceed with above improvements Attachments • Summary of conditions of City Hall campus air conditioning units memo, dated October 12, 2017 • Lino Lakes Automation Integration and Upgrade memo, dated August 22, 2017 A r` David W Carlson 651-255-3536 Direct 1001 Labore Industrial Court, Suite B 651-230-7705 Cell Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 dcarlson@nac-hvac.com October 12, 2017 Mr. Tim Hillesheim City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Re: Summary of conditions of City Hall campus air conditioning units Mr. Hillesheim We are experiencing random failures and lock out of the City Hall 20 -ton unit which supplies air conditioning to the City Hall data equipment and production equipment, council chambers, conference rooms and city hall vestibule area. Stage one compressors run the most and is starting to fail. If this unit fails during cooling season there would be a good chance that the City computer servers could go down due to extreme temperatures, affecting all aspects of the city infrastructure. This would also affect the production equipment and may not allow council meetings to be broadcast if equipment overheats. New Creations wing is having random failures of the first stage cooling causing the unit to lock out and prevent cooling for their leased space of the City Hall complex. The age of the Campus has approached and in some instances exceeds the average life expectancy of most of the mechanical equipment as tracked by industry standards of the American Society of Heating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). We have experienced minor failures of some of the mechanical equipment over the last few years and have now experienced two major failures and are in need of making a decision for the best solution moving forward. NAC is recommending that the city replace the two air conditioning systems that are experiencing failure and are at end of life expectancy. Our recommendation for replacement of this equipment is driven by its age and the 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer which called for the phase out of R22 refrigerant. This has caused volatility of the market and has driven the cost of R22 refrigerant extremely high with limited supplies now, and less in the future. Factoring these items together with the comparable cost to repair versus replace we believe it is in the best interest of the City to start moving forward with a plan to replace the units to help control the cost by replacing on a scheduled install and not an emergency need. Mechanical $ Electrical : Fabrication 4 Building Technology s 24 Hour Service pi. _ _,... ., Jnr+ David W Carlson 651-255-3536 Direct 1001 Lahore Industrial Court, Suite B 651-230-7705 Cell Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 dcarlson@nac-hvac.com The following is a summary of the existing air conditioning equipment that serves the various departments within the City Hall Campus. Unit # Serves Age Life expediency Cond. coils replaced Compressors replaced Current repairs needed notes 1 City Hall 1 20 NA NA none Unit replaced 2016 2 Council Chambers IT equipment 19 20 9/6/08 warranty "Falcon claim" *1 NA 1st stage comp bad, locking out Random lock outs, Recommend replacement 3 New Creations 19 20 7/5/2004 warranty "Falcon claim" *1 2002-2 compressors warranty 1st stage comp bad, locking out Random lock outs, Recommend replacement 4 Police 1 20 NA NA none Unit replaced 2016 Notes: 1. * "Falcon Claim" while these parts were supplied under this warranty, it was never expressed as warranty. Trane knew there were "issues" with these units and had unwritten warranty coverage when we asked if less than 10 years old. If you have any questions, feel free to contact us anytime. Sincerely, David W CarCson David W Carlson Service Sales Manager Mechanical 4 Electrical 4 Fabrication 4 Building Technology 0 24 Hour Service id _ .. _,,,, David W Carlson 651-255-3536 Direct 1001 Labore Industrial Court, Suite B 651-230-7705 Cell Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 dcarlson@nac-hvac.com R22 Refrigerant Facts: Excerpts taken from "The News" publication: November 2014 Contractors who have found virgin hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) -22 readily available at their local supply houses had best prepare for a drastic drop-off in such supplies very soon. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its final phasedown schedule regarding production and importation of HCFC -22 on Oct. 16. The order calls for an immediate drop from 51 million pounds allowed in 2014 to 22 million pounds beginning Jan. 1, 2015. Subsequently, 18 million pounds of new and imported R-22 will be allowed in 2016, 13 million pounds in 2017, 9 million pounds in 2018, and 4 million pounds in 2019. No new or imported R-22 will be allowed in the U.S. on or after Jan. 1, 2020. Immediate Impact The impact on virgin R-22 supplies will be almost immediate. "The agency settled on a much more aggressive schedule — a 57 percent reduction from the 2014 allocation," said Gordon McKinney, vice president, ICOR Intl. Inc. "We encourage all of our associates to prepare for a dramatic increase in R-22 pricing and a major spike in alternative refrigerant sales and reclaim activity." Steve Melia, CEO, ComStar Intl. Inc., predicted immediate and future shortages and price increases. "These are normal results and will be expected by the industry at large. [But] as this moves forward, the market will dictate what fills the vacuum and the direction the industry takes. Once the word gets out to all levels of our industry, we should hear a sigh of relief. The five-year allocation plan will give the industry the ability to make financial decisions that will help the overall industry and economy." Maureen Beatty, vice president of operations, National Refrigerants Inc., said some suppliers may limit the quantity of R-22 they are offering, but that does not mean R-22 is unavailable. "Contractors should make sure they are buying from a reputable supplier who will assure the legitimacy and quality of the R- 22 they sell," she said. Honeywell Intl. Inc. addressed immediate implications in an announcement: "One model suggests this ruling will result in existing channel inventory to be drawn down at an accelerated rate as end users attempt to build stock in anticipation of limited supply, while others hold inventory. The combined effect could be limited supply near-term. Contractors should prepare accordingly." Honeywell's statement also referenced an existing base of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants that can be retrofitted into existing R-22 systems, a process that has been successful for a number of years, adding, "these are proven alternatives to R-22 for every application. Contractors should take steps to educate themselves and their customers on the alternatives." Mechanical 4 Electrical 4 Fabrication 4 Building Technology s 24 Hour Service Jnr Plik 1 MEW IF.1L MI v 1...MMI• David W Carlson 1001 Labore Industrial Court, Suite B Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 651-255-3536 Direct 651-230-7705 Cell dcarlson@nac-hvac.com The Montreal Protocol The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer was designed to reduce the production and consumption of ozone depleting substances in order to reduce their abundance in the atmosphere, and thereby protect the earth's fragile ozone Layer. The original Montreal Protocol was agreed on 16 September 1987 and entered into force on 1 January 1989. The Montreal Protocol includes a unique adjustment provision that enables the Parties to the Protocol to respond quickly to new scientific information and agree to accelerate the reductions required on chemicals already covered by the Protocol. These adjustments are then automatically applicable to all countries that ratified the Protocol. Since its initial adoption, the Montreal Protocol has been adjusted six times. Specifically, the Second, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, Eleventh and Nineteenth Meetings of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol adopted, in accordance with the procedure laid down in paragraph 9 of Article 2 of the Montreal Protocol, certain adjustments and reductions of production and consumption of the controlled substances listed in the Annexes of the Protocol. These adjustments entered into force, for all the Parties, on 7 March 1991, 23 September 1993, 5 August 1996, 4 June 1998, 28 July 2000 and 14 May 2008, respectively. The Parties to the Montreal Protocol have amended the Protocol to enable, among other things, the control of new chemicals and the creation of a financial mechanism to enable developing countries to comply. Specifically, the Second, Fourth, Ninth and Eleventh Meetings of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol adopted, in accordance with the procedure laid down in paragraph 4 of Article 9 of the Vienna Convention, four Amendments to the Protocol — the London Amendment (1990), the Copenhagen Amendment (1992), the Montreal Amendment (1997) and the Beijing Amendment (1999). Unlike adjustments to the Protocol, amendments must be ratified by countries before their requirements are applicable to those countries. The London, Copenhagen, Montreal and Beijing Amendments entered into force on 10 August 1992, 14 June 1994 10 November 1999 and 25 February 2002 respectively, only for those Parties which ratified the particular amendments. In addition to adjustments and amendments to the Montreal Protocol, the Parties to the Protocol meet annually and take a variety of decisions aimed at enabling effective implementation of this important legal instrument. Through the 22nd Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, the Parties have taken over 720 decisions. The decisions adopted by the Parties are included in the reports of the Meetings of the Parties and, along with other documents considered during the meetings, can be accessed under the meetings' links Mechanical o Electrical Fabrication : Building Technology : 24 Hour Service I I .� .A.9. Walk WadeMPP' CHP /ELI Combustion Heat & Power Mechanical & Electrical Services A Division of NAC 1001 Labore Industrial Court, Suite B Vadnais Heights, Minnesota 55110 tel: 651-490-9868 fax: 651-490-1636 August 22, 2017 Mr. Tim Hillesheim City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes MN 55014-1182 Re: Lino Lakes Automation Integration and Upgrade Mr. Hillesheim Current Situation: The city of Lino Lakes currently utilizes Johnson Metasys Automation to control the main air handling equipment and HVAC system in the City Hall, Early Learning Center, and Police Station. As of June 30, 2015, Johnson Controls discontinued the manufacturing and sales of these controllers (see attached bulletin from Johnson). The remainder of the individual vav and thermostats that make up the building controls are using pneumatics (air) automation, which at the time of installation was a practice not widely used anymore. The pneumatics are not currently and cannot be interfaced with today's automation controls and have to run as a basic unintelligent system that cannot adapt to today's changing interior climates and needs. As interior heat and cooling loads change and the amount of fresh air requirements change per codes, pneumatics cannot change with these needs. Pneumatics is less efficient than electronic controls and require constant service to maintain and operate the system as efficiently as possible. Preventative maintenance is crucial and time consuming for a pneumatic control system as a controller can fall out of calibration within a 4-8 month period and should be calibrated at minimum 2 times per year. Pneumatic controls also require the use of an air compressor and air drier to supply the correct air pressure with minimum moisture circulation in the pneumatic lines. This added equipment requires preventive maintenance and yearly replacement of air & oil filters, oil changes and belts to keep the system running at peak performance. Currently the city hall office wing has had conversion of VAV's to Alerton automation as the existing pneumatics have failed and the new fire station #2 has full Alerton building automation. The City currently owns the Alerton automation software and by extending this existing infrastructure this can be a very cost effective way to replace the failing pneumatics and legacy Johnson system. Some Advantages to extension of the Alerton automation are the city staff is familiar with the software and operations and the integration between Fire Station#2 and City Hall would allow the Lino Lakes Maintenance staff to monitor and view any city site with Alerton from anywhere in the city or at home for afterhours calls or monitoring. wwM'.nac-hvac.com, 24 Hour Service An Affirmative Action, Equal Employment Opportunity Employer Direct (651) 255-3527 Fax (651) 490-1636 Cell (651) 230-8971 Email skotzmacher@nac-hvac.com HVAC Mechanical - Building Automation - Electrical - Plumbing - Sheet Metal - Preventative Maintenance - Service Repairs - Combustion Services - Communications Mechanical & Electrical Services CHP L Combustion Heat & Power A Division of NAC Current Solution: NAC proposes to continue building on existing Alerton Automation system furnishing and installing to replace the failing pneumatics and legacy Johnson system. Alerton System Features: • Powerful alarm management through interactive alarm table allowing for sorting, filtering, categorizing. • Configurable tree -style navigation provides intuitive and guided browsing sessions • LDAP integration for managing user authentication • Create systems that are easy to upgrade and improve • TRENDLOGS View trend logs in graph or text format with multiple points per log. Archived in database format for compatibility with office applications. • A wide range of building management tools are available, some including: - Temperature and humidity monitoring - Display capability Scheduling - Alarms - Optimum start - Tenant activity - Zones Reporting and printing - Auto archiving Option #1 Controls Base Bid Scope of Work: • NAC will replace the existing obsolete Johnson DX 9100 Controls with new Alerton Controls o Boiler Plant (1) • Burnham Boilers (2) • K&N Boiler (1) • Building Hot Water Pumps (2) o AHUs (4) • DDC Control Valves to remain as existing • NAC will replace the existing Johnson FX -60 controller with a new Alerton controller • Reuse existing DDC System wiring, devices, enclosures, actuators, relays, transformers etc. will remain and be reused • Tie in existing Alerton VAVs (8) in City Hall • Alerton BAS Operator Interface (1) o Alerton BAS workstation/computer & software o NAC will provide BAS programming, graphics, checkout, & owner training o NAC will coordinate setup & installation with Building Owner NAC Controls Upgrade/Enhancements $ 71,595.00 www.nac-hvac.com, 24 Hour Service An Affirmative Action, Equal Employment Opportunity Employer Direct (651) 255-3527 Fax (651) 490-1636 Cell (651) 230-8971 Email skotzmacher@nac-hvac.com HVAC Mechanical - Building Automalion - Electrical - Plumbing - Sheet Metal - Preventative Maintenance - Service Repairs - Combustion Services - Communications CHP h v � Mechanical & Electrical Services Combustion Heat & Power A Division of NAC Option #2 City Hall Bid Scope of Work: • General Temperature Controls/BAS Scope of work o NAC will replace the existing obsolete Johnson Controls DDC Controls with new Alerton Controls o Existing DDC System wiring, devices, enclosures, actuators, relays, transformers etc. will remain and be reused • Existing DDC System wiring, devices, enclosures, actuators, relays, transformers etc. will remain and be reused • Flat plate zone sensors • Existing Non-Alerton VAVs (20) o Includes VAV with reheats and shared radiation and VAV controls NAC Controls Upgrade/Enhancements $ 32,500.00 Optional Touch Screen Microset 4 sensors Add $50.00 per sensor Option #3 Early Learning Center Base Bid Scope of Work: • General Temperature Controls/BAS Scope of work o NAC will replace the existing obsolete Johnson Controls DDC Controls with new Alerton Controls o Existing DDC System wiring, devices, enclosures, actuators, relays, transformers etc. will remain and be reused • AHUs (1) o DDC Control Valves to remain as existing • Existing Non-Alerton VAVs (16) o Includes VAV with Reheats and shared Radiation and VAV controls • Zone sensors NAC Controls Upgrade/Enhancements $ 24,600.00 Optional Touch Screen Microset 4 sensors Add $50.00 per sensor Option #4 Police Station Base Bid Scope of Work: • General Temperature Controls/BAS Scope of work o NAC will replace the existing obsolete Johnson Controls DDC Controls with new Alerton Controls o Existing DDC System wiring, devices, enclosures, actuators, relays, transformers etc. will remain and be reused • AHUs (1) o DDC Control Valves to remain as existing • Existing Non-Alerton VAVs (24) o Includes VAV with Reheats o Includes shared Radiation and VAV controls • Zone sensors NAC Controls Upgrade/Enhancements $ 34,400.00 Optional Touch Screen Microset 4 sensors Add $50.00 per sensor www.nac-hvac.com, 24 Hour Service An Affirmative Action, Equal Employment Opportunity Employer Direct (651) 255-3527 Fax (651) 490-1636 Cell (651) 230-8971 Email skotzmacher@nac-hvac.com HVAC Mechanical - Building Automation - Electrical - Plumbing - Sheet Metal - Preventative Maintenance - Service Repairs - Combustion Services - Communications CHP avffi Mechanical & Electrical Services Combustion Heat & Power A Division of NAC Option #5 Pneumatic Radiation Valve Replacement Base Bid Scope of Work: • VAV Reheat and Radiation Control Valves (84) o NAC will furnish and install new DDC control valves NAC Controls Upgrade/Enhancements $ 25,200.00 Exclusions/clarifications: 1. Pricing is subject to escalation after thirty (30) days. 2. Existing DDC control valves will be reused. 3, Existing relays, devices, control wiring, etc. will be reused, all controllers and thermistors will be replaced. 4, Providing overtime/after-hours labor, 5. Providing, installing, wiring, and/or BAS monitoring for combination fire smoke dampers. 6. Providing and/or installing smoke detectors. 7. Providing testing and/or balancing. Please contact me with any questions or concerns (651-230-8971). Thank you for your valued business. Sincerely, Stephen %otzmachea Stephen Kotzmacher Account Manager www.nac-hvac.com, 24 Hour Service An Affirmative Action, Equal Employment Opportunity Employer Direct (651) 255-3527 Fax (651) 490-1636 Cell (651) 230-8971 Email skotzmacher@nac-hvac.com HVAC Mechanical - Building Automation - Electrical - Plumbing - Sheet Metal - Preventative Maintenance - Service Repairs - Combustion Services - Communications WS — Item 8 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 8 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator Re: Public Works Facility Background During the Council Work Session on May 1, 2017, Quinn Hutson, Principal Architect for CNH Architects, presented a Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study. Mr. Hutson identified three options in the study along with the cost estimates for each option. Mayor Reinert was of the opinion that CNH did not provide an option to remodel the existing facility. There has been much discussion and debate the last several months about what the City Council should do. Public Services Director Rick DeGardner requested that Mr. Hutson provide a more in- depth explanation of his evaluation regarding Option Al, which was to remodel and expand the existing public works building. Attached is an Addendum that Mr. Hutson prepared last week. The Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study is also attached. Hutson specifically references pages 28 through 33, which illustrates the deficiencies and scope of noncompliant code issues in the public works building. Requested Council Direction Staff is looking for further direction from the Council. Attachments October 30, 2017 Addendum to Public Works Facility Study April 11, 2017 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Addendum City of Lino Lakes Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Addendum October 30, 2017 The following information is intended to expand on information provided in the original study dated April 11, 2017, to provide a more in-depth discussion of Layout Option Al, the remodeling and expansion of the existing City of Lino Lakes Public Works facility. The information in this Addendum does not change the space needs data, schematic layout design, estimated costs or other information in the original study; but instead provides a more comprehensive view of the background on which the data, design and cost estimates were based. The Addendum also reviews broad cost potentials for future expansion labeled Phase II in the study. Existing Public Works Remodeling Scope The remodeling of the existing Public Works facility is shown in the study to be a relatively complete interior gutting and rebuilding along with exterior envelope upgrades. To expand on this it is necessary to consider how the building code evaluates maintenance versus remodeling. First of all, ongoing maintenance of an existing building does not trigger code updates. However, maintenance of an existing building only allows minor ongoing operational items such as changing light bulbs (not fixtures), painting, recarpeting, patching an existing roof or repairing existing mechanical units. Replacement of roofing systems, new mechanical units, replacement of light fixtures, and similar upgrades however are specifically excluded from the maintenance definition and are instead considered remodeling. In comparison, the Minnesota State Building Code and referenced International Building Code require all remodeled portions of a building to fully comply with current building code requirements. Further, if the scope of a remodeling is such that the majority of the existing facility is remodeled, then the entire facility is required to be brought into compliance with the current building code standards. Under these provisions, the proposed remodeling and expansion of the existing Public Works facility as represented in Layout Option Al would trigger a complete code compliant end result. Finally, any items that are not in compliance with ADA accessibility standards, MPCA regulations, OSHA safety standards or other similar safety, environmental, and civil rights requirements are not "grandfathered" or allowed to remain noncompliant until a future remodeling date, but instead are to be addressed when identified. When reviewing the existing Public Works facility, see pages 28 through 33 for a general summary, it was determined that the scope of code noncompliant spaces is such that no interior room was reasonably reusable in its current basic existing condition due to configuration, construction or operational deficiencies. This level of noncompliance was more extensive than was anticipated prior to CNH ARCHITECTS the start of the study however as the documentation of existing conditions completed, the evidence was extensive. The noncompliant items include the following partial list: corridors to narrow to meet accessibility standards, restrooms and countertops of improper size or without accessible heights, combustible construction in a non-combustible defined building including wood paneling and some wood wall construction, mechanical units that did not provide minimum air quality requirements, storage in areas without proper headroom, floor drains in vehicle accessed areas that flow into a septic system, among many other items. The deficiencies identified in the existing Public Works facility are not maintenance items as defined in the earlier paragraph, but can only be addressed in an extensive remodeling of the entire existing building which is what led to the findings represented in the original study. While providing for more upgrade costs than originally would have been anticipated, the extent of the needed remodeling upgrades identified in the study is valuable knowledge for use by the City of Lino Lakes in effectively planning for the current and future needs of the Public Works Department in a manner to ensure that upgrades budgeted address the short-term and long-term goals developed for the facility. Future Expansion (Phase II) Timing and Cost The future expansion labeled as Phase II in the study represents possible future growth needs for the Public Works department looking out at least 15 to 20 years. This data is based on typical anticipated additional departmental needs to serve the increase in the population of the City of Lino Lakes as projected by the Metropolitan Council by the year 2040. This population projection is more than two decades in the future and only time will indicate if this growth level materializes. Further, the additional square footage of vehicle storage needed to serve this larger population is estimated based on staff input and comparison to other cities of similar population to the Metropolitan Council's future population estimate and also may not fully materialize. The intent of the study is to identify the maximum potential departmental facility needs within the requested timeframe reviewed such that, if needed, the site and building masterplan layout can accommodate this future facility growth without relocation or other inefficiencies. The study is not intended to indicate that the Phase II storage building expansion will be required, only that if the projections both for growth of population and equipment needs achieves the maximum envisioned levels, the site and building masterplans developed remain viable. The City of Lino Lakes would need to revisit actual needs based on updated data over the coming decades. Due to the unknown size and timing of the potential future expansion (Phase II) a cost estimate for this building addition was not included in the study results. However, to provide some concept of potential future expansion costs, the following table has been added to this Addendum. Future Expansion Size Building Area (sf) Low Cost /SF* High Cost /SF* Low Range High Range Minor Addition 15,000 $110 $150 $1,650,000 $2,250,000 Maximum Addition 30,000 $110 $150 $3,300,000 $4,500,000 *Costs in 2017 dollars and does not include inflation CNH ARCHITECTS As the table indicates, the low end cost for a small addition of a scope that still allows for efficient construction costs represents a construction cost of $1.65 million for a low-temperature heated open plan storage addition. Conversely, if the population and equipment growth projections hit their most aggressive levels represented in this study, the maximum addition cost would range from $3.3 million to a high end of $4.5 million. As noted, these construction estimates are based on recent construction costs for Public Works facilities of similar types and are listed in 2017 dollars. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this additional data to better explain the study methodology and the intended limitations of the future expansion cost ranges. Best Regards Quinn Hutson, AIA, LEED AP Principal CNH Architects, Inc. CNH ARCHITECTS 11 CITY OF LINO LAKES Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study 1ILTS i CNH ARCHITECTS 7300 West 147th Street, Suite 504 Apple Valley, MN 55124 952.431.4433 www.cnharch.com 04/11/17 16088 TEAM CNH Architects Quinn Hutson, AIA Principal Architect Jessica Johnson, LEED AP BD + C Architectural Designer 7300 West 147th Street, #500 Apple Valley, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 www.cnharch.com Engineering Design Initiative, Ltd. (edi) Larry Svitak, PE Mechanical Engineer 1112 Fifth Street North Minneapolis, MN 55411 (612) 343-5965 www.edilimited.com Professional Project Management (PPM) Doug Holmberg Cost Estimator 1858 East Shore Drive Maplewood, MN 55109 651-776-5590 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA PRINT NAME: QUINN HUTSON SIGNATURE: DATE: 4/11/17 LICENSE NO: 21234 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Overview of Study 6 Site A: Existing Public Works Site Introduction Site Analysis Site B: Fire Station Site Introduction Site Analysis Program Overview Space Needs Program Comparison Matrix 8 10 12 14 16 20 Option Al: Existing Building Expansion Introduction 22 Layout 23 Option A2: New Facility - Existing Public Works Site Introduction 24 Layout 25 Option B1: New Facility - Flre Station Site Introduction Layout 26 27 Existing Facility & Site Review Architectural Review 28 Accessibility and Code Review 31 Mechanical Systems Review 32 Cost Estimate Option Al 35 Option A2 35 Option B1 35 CNH ARCHITECTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Site A Site B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The main facility of the current Lino Lakes Public Works Facility was built in 1971 with several additional cold storage sheds, salt and brine shed, and a mobile office out -building added to the site, since that time. The current site is on the northwest portion of Lino Lakes, off Main Street. While the facility has functioned in the past 45 years, the City Council and staff determined that it would be appropriate to analyze the condition of the current buildings along with the operational needs of the Public Works Department to best serve the community for the next 20 years. The long-term growth anticipated for the Public Works facility was also selected to be analyzed with two possible sites to be considered - the current location labeled Site A in this study and the site adjacent to Fire Station #2 on Centerville Road and Birch Street referred to as Site B. With this goal in mind, the City of Lino Lakes contracted CNH Architects to perform an analysis of three approaches for the Public Works Facility, now and into the future. The goal of this study is to provide evidence based recommendations to address the needs of each department and analyze site conditions for each site. This study evaluates each of the sites identified, rating them for a broad series of attributes. The information provided in this study includes site data, gathered and analyzed by CNH Architects and valuable input from Lino Lakes city staff. The report includes this Executive Summary followed by supporting data and diagrams. Process Over the past few months, CNH Architects and our consulting team performed a detailed study and analysis. The study process evaluated the following four major steps: Step 1: Assess conditions of the current facility, including taking photos of the existing site. This step includes reviewing current code and accessibility compliance, deferred maintenance, and short-term anticipated maintenance requirements. Step 2: Develop a Space Needs Program of current space needs, as well as evaluating impacts on the space needs based on the projected growth of the City of Lino Lakes by 2040. This step started by gathering data from Lino Lakes city staff regarding current and projected space and site needs. Other public works facilities in similar, neighboring communities were reviewed as comparative case studies to create proper metrics for gauging the appropriate scope of work. Step 3: Develop an analysis of relevant site attributes for the two sites being considered. This analysis includes availability of public utilities, buildable area after easement and wetlands were located, efficiency of potential space use, and adjacent land uses. Step 4: Develop a total of three preliminary site and building layouts on the two proposed sites and obtain cost estimates for each option. The three options that have been identified for evaluation for the Public Works Facility are shown on the Public Works Facility Site Option Map and consist of the following: Option Al: Remodel & Building Expansion on Existing Public Works Site (Site A) Option A2: New Facility on Existing Public Works Site (Site A) Option B1: New Facility at Birch Street & Centerville Road adjacent to Fire Station #2 (Site B) CNH ARCHITECTS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site A Statistics 0000. Adjacent Land Uses 00000 Infrastructure 1 O•••• Buildable Area 000•• Easements - Existing or Future 1 000•• Floodplain 000•• Wetland 0•••• Site Visibility 00000 Noise Issues 100000 Potential Neighborhood Resistance) Site B Statistics 00000 Adjacent Land Uses 1100000 Infrastructure 1 00••• O••• Buildable Area • Easements - Existing or Future 100••• Floodplain 100000 Wetlands 100000 Site Visibility 00••0 Noise Issues 1000•• Potential Neighborhood Resistance Conclusions The study determined that the existing facility, while having served the city well for 45 years, has fallen well behind current standards both for codes, safety, facility maintenance and appropriate size for a Public Works Department serving a city, the size of Lino Lakes. The building's code deficiencies include total lack of accessibility standards, multiple building code noncompliance items, OSHA workplace concerns, inappropriate sanitary waste conditions, and significant HVAC air quality issues. Similarly, the existing building has deferred maintenance issues such as leaking roof and windows as well as future near-term maintenance items that will require attention in the next 1 to 5 years. These items can all be addressed by remodeling or replacement, but need to be factored into the cost of relevant options being evaluated. The review of the Space Needs for the Public Works Department, evaluated current space use, shortfalls in needed space, and the future growth in staff and equipment projected within the study timeframe of looking forward to 2040 needs. The approach included storage of all vehicles, equipment and equipment accessories within a weather -protected semi -heated facility as is typical within current public works facilities. This approach will provide long term value to the city in significantly longer lifespan of the equipment and reduced upkeep. The results of the Space Needs Program indicate a need for a total building area around 80,000 square feet by the end of the 2040 timeframe. The study indicates that all categories are short of space, currently with the largest shortage being in the Vehicle Storage category. Based on this review, we recommend a two-step construction with Phase 1 addressing current and near-term shortfalls and Phase 2 adding additional Vehicle Storage space later in the masterplan. With this phased approach, the Space Needs Program indicated a Phase 1 size of approximately 55,000 square feet with Phase 2 adding the remaining 30,000 square feet of Vehicle Storage. These Space Needs were then compared to facilities at Hugo, Shoreview, Otsego and Hopkins. The areas of each category of space were translated in square feet per population to equalize the comparisons. The results indicate that Phase 1 Space Needs area goals are very conservative being at or under the areas represented by all the cities in comparison. The Phase 2 Space Needs area goals for the Vehicle Storage category rise into the middle of the comparison data still remaining conservative as this phase for Lino Lakes looks out to 2040 and beyond. The next step of the study analyzed site characteristics of the two potential sites being considered for the future Public Works Facility, Site A, the current Public Works site and Site B, adjacent to Fire Station #2. Site A scored moderately positive on buildable area and site visibility and moderately negative on six other statistics. It scored negative on the infrastructure due to the current lack of municipal water and sanitary sewer serving the site, which would be required to remodel or replace the facility on this site. In review of Site B, this location rated infrastructure as a positive since all utilities are already stubbed to the site from the fire station work. This site rated moderately positive for four statistics, neutral for buildable area and flood plain, and moderately negative for two remaining items. However, understanding not all statistics are of equal weight, Site A scored an average of 2.22 out of 5 total points and Site B scored an average of 3.44 out of 5 total points. While Site B has features that result in a better analysis, both sites are workable and can be considered for the future of the Public Works Department, assuming of course that municipal water and sanitary sewer is extended to Site A. Finally, the study developed three public work facility masterplan site layout options representing both a remodel / expansion approach as well as all new facilities. All three options result in facilities that function and meet the minimum goals of the Space Needs Program. The following are highlights of each option with more detailed information to be found in the main body of the study report. As shown in the cost analysis, there is approximately a 5% range in initial costs between the options however there are other factors for the City of Lino Lakes to consider in the selection such as long-term location within the city, life -cycle maintenance and utility costs, operation of public works staff during construction, and best uses of city property. 4 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Option Al Option A2 Option Bl EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Option Al: Remodel & Building Expansion on Existing Public Works Site (Site A) Remodeling and expansion of the existing public works building is the first option reviewed and provides the main advantages of reuse of the existing building structure. There is also the advantage of a somewhat larger overall site. However due to the extensive code, accessibility and safety issues, the building's interior would need to be mostly rebuilt to address these minimum requirements. There would also need to be exterior upgrades of the existing structure such as reroofing the building to replace the currently failing roof. For either option on Site A, the project also includes the requirement to bring municipal water and sanitary service to the site to provide mandatory fire suppression and treatment of vehicle floor drain sanitary flows. This option also impacts the public works department's operations, related to working around the remodeling and addition process. Based on the detailed preliminary cost estimates done by the cost consultant, this option's cost falls in the middle of the three options reviewed. However, when the increased maintenance costs of the remodeled portion of the building is factored in; this option is likely the costliest over the next decades. Option A2: New Facility on Existing Public Works Site (Site A) The approach on this option is the demolition of the existing public works facility and construction of an all-new facility on Site A on Main Street. This option has several advantages including the flexibility to place the new facility on the site to maximize the use, providing a more compact building and better screening of the outdoor storage and salt building area. This option also allows the continued use of the newer, of the two existing cold storage garages for the next 10 to 20 years until its life -expectancy is reached and Phase 2 is completed. The other main benefit of a new facility is the elimination of the increased maintenance and replacement requirements inherent in remodeling the existing building under Option Al. Similar to the first option however, this option would require the extension of municipal water and sanitary service to the site to provide mandatory fire suppression and treatment of vehicle floor drain sanitary flows. Operations of the Public Works Department would also be significantly impacted between the demolition and new construction of the facility, although the construction timeline would be reduced by not working around ongoing operations. Finally, this option has the highest initial cost of all the options considered, but would be less than Option Al over the next few decades when increased maintenance costs of the remodeled building is factored in. Option B1: New Facility at Birch Street & Centerville Road adjacent to Fire Station #2 (Site B) This option represents a new facility at the south Site B location where preparations for future city facilities were provided in the Fire Station #2 project. The advantages of this site include existing municipal utilities stubbed into the site, a location closer to the future population density projections, and the smallest most efficient building footprint of the three options. Other benefits of building on this site is the ability to not impact the operations of the Public Works Department during the construction process as they will be able to work from the existing facility until the new building opens. Also, by not building on Site A, there is not the loss of the one ballfield and hockey rink, maintaining more park and recreation usage within the city. Replacement costs for these recreational areas were not included in the study. Under this option, the existing salt storage building, material storage bins, as well as the existing cold storage buildings would remain on the north Site A location, at least through Phase 2 construction, providing the benefit of more available storage space in the short term. However, there will be a mixed impact of having public works elements on two sites. Option B1 has the lowest initial cost as well as the lowest life -cycle cost of the three options analyzed. CNH ARCHITECTS 5 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY SITE OPTION MAP Option Al: Option A2: Option B1: Existing Site: Expand to meet future needs Existing Site: New Facility Birch St. & Centerville Rd.: New Facility Public Works Facility Option Location Map The map above shows the two sites that were identified by city staff for consideration as potential properties for the proposed Public Works Facility. Options Al and A2 are located at the current Public Works Facility. Option B1 is located adjacent to Fire Station #2. 6 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study OVERVIEW OF STUDY Project Needs Assessment CNH interviewed appropriate City Staff to understand both their current needs as well as future operational changes and anticipated growth areas. We compared these areas to similar nearby cities, providing not only relational size comparisons but interjecting potential issues that may not have been considered. To create accountability and clarity in our investigation, we made it a priority to gather initial information with rigor such that assumptions are minimal, collaborating closely with our engineers to pinpoint existing and potential issues that may or may not already be identified. Option Analysis After gathering all the information on space needs, CNH evaluated the existing public works cam- pus, and developed future needs based on expected growth; CNH reviewed three approaches for the City of Lino Lakes to meet their Public Works needs. These include: Option Al — Renovate the existing building and expand to meet future needs. Option A2 — Build an all new facility at the existing site to provide long-term value. Option Bl — Build an all new facility at the city property at Birch Street and Centerville Road leaving some appropriate elements at the existing site. The study has reviewed each of the above options, analyzing and listing comparative data on each option in order to provide the City of Lino Lakes with the tools to make an informed decision on the future of the Public Works department facilities. Among others, the review of each option will include the following topics: • Space needs — current and future • Growth potential for each option • Existing facility conditions Deferred and short-term maintenance Building code / OSHA compliance • Accessibility compliance • Capital costs for construction / remodeling proposed • Site location relative to population and infrastructure CNH ARCHITECTS 7 Site A consists of the existing site for the current Senior Citizen Center and Public Works Facility. The property's current zoning designation is for Public and Semi -Public District (PSP). It has a gross area of 27.46 acres of which 17.6 acres are suitable for building. The city owns the property of this existing facility. The site is surrounded by residential neighborhoods to the east and south, baseball fields to the west and agricultural land to the north. Photograph: View of the existing Vehicle Maintenance portion of the Public Works Facility • 8 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study SITE A CNH ARCHITECTS 9 Site A i Site Analysis PSP i Public and Semi -Public District 80 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55025 2 Properties Owned by City of Lino Lakes Gross Site Area 17.6 Acres Wetlands 000•• There are designated wetlands running through the middle of the property which reduces the buildable area and mostly separating the northwest storage area from the main buildable area. The wetlands represent approximately 40% of the overall site. Infrastructure 00000 This city owned property is served by electricity and natural gas utilities, but does not have municipal sanitary or water service. The current facility uses well water and has a private mound - style septic system limiting the ability to install fire suppression and requiring storage tanks for future vehicle wash and floor drain sanitary flows. Extension of municipal sanitary is highly recommended. Municipal water and sanitary are located approximately 1 mile to the west. Floodplain 000e* There is a large floodplain running through the middle of the property mostly duplicating the wetland areas. 10 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Easements 000 There is one gas easement running on the southwest corner of the site. This easement defines the southwest edge of the main buildable area. Site Analysis Site Statistics Public Works Analysis Site A 1000•• 00000 Infrastructure Adjacent Land Uses 0•••• 000• Buildable Area • Easements - Existing or Future 00000 Floodplain 100000 Wetland 00000 Site Visibility 000110Noise Issues 00000 Potential Neighborhood Resistance! Rating Scale ••••• o•••• oo••• 000•• 00000 Positive Moderately Neutral Moderately Negative Positive Negative Buildable Area 0•... This site is approximately 27.4 acres, of which 12 acres is buildable area. This buildable area is separated into three distinct blocks with only the southeast block of 7.7 acres large enough to be considered for this project. CNH ARCHITECTS 11 Site B: Site B is located on the southeast intersection of Birch Street and Centerville Road. The property's current zoning designation is for Public and Semi -Public District (PSP). It has a gross area of 17.6 acres of which 3 acres are suitable for building. It is adjacent to Fire Station #2 to the north and agricultural land on the east and west sides. To the south the property extends toward 46 acres of land owned by the City. There is one private residence on agricultural land to the southwest. Photograph: View of the site from the east 12 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study CNH ARCHITECTS 13 B i Site Analysis • PSP Public and Semi -Public District • 1710 Birch Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 1 Property Owned by City of Lino Lakes Gross Site Area 17.6 Acres - i i i i i Wetlands 000.0 The designated wetlands run along the North, East and West sections of the property and decreases the buildable area within this parcel. Infrastructure •0000 This city owned property is served by all public utilities including electrical, natural gas, municipal water, and municipal sanitary services. The water and sanitary pipes were stubbed into the site as part of the recent Fire Station #2 project. The site is also served by the new city street with completed connections to both Centerville Road (County 21) and Birch Street (County 34). Floodplain 00000 The floodplain runs through the East part of the property, but since the construction of the fire station the FEMA map should be updated to reflect the correct contours of the site. The diagram above represents the approximate corrected floodplain zone. It is our understanding that the floodplain update is in process. 14 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Easements 000% There are no easements on the south buildable area being considered for this project other than standard drainage and utility setbacks along the property lines and roads. Site Analysis Site Statistics Public Works Analysis Adjacent Land Uses II 0000. Infrastructure 1 00••• Buildable Area 0.... Site B Easements - Existing or Future 1 00••• Floodplain 000•• Wetlands 1 00000 Site Visibility 1 00.00 Noise Issues 1000.0 Potential Neighborhood Resistance I Rating Scale ••••• o•••• oo••• 000 00000 Positive Moderately Neutral Moderately Negative Positive Negative Buildable Area 00.0. This site is approximately 17.6 acres not including the over 46 acres to the south. After deducting the fire stations' built area, there is 3 acres of remaining buildable area for this potential project. CNH ARCHITECTS 15 SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM 16 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study ARCHITECTURAL CONSIDERATIONS - SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM Overview The current Lino Lakes Public Works Facility was built in 1971. While the facility has functioned in the past 45 years, the City Council and staff determined that a space needs program be developed to assess the existing, current and future needs. The Space Needs Program captures the conclusions made from the assessment exercise over the last months to express the scale and scope of modifications needed to the facility for both short and long term operational demands. A comparison matrix at the end of this section reflects other Public Works facilities as they relate to the scale of this project. Public works facilities in the Twin Cites metro of Hugo, Shoreview, Otsego, and Hopkins were used as references. While each city's needs and approaches are different, the comparisons can provide additional insight when considering the best fit for the City of Lino Lakes. Space Needs Analysis Approach The space needs reviewed are based on the following assumptions to address the long-term needs of the Public Works Department for the City of Lino Lakes. While other approaches may be pursued, the assumptions indicated in this study represent the facility designs commonly taken by other similar municipalities within the greater region. A. Departments Included within the Facility: This space needs program for the overall Public Works Department includes the streets, utilities, vehicle maintenance and park & recreation operations. This combination of operations creates efficiencies in operations and facilities as many functions overlap and require similar facilities. B. Protection of Equipment: This space needs program provides space for all vehicles and equipment to be stored within the protection of the proposed building. This would include fully heated operational areas as well as partially heated storage areas, depending on the needs of the individual spaces. Much of the current equipment and many vehicles are currently stored outside within the current Public Works site significantly reducing its life -expectancy and increasing maintenance requirements. The space needs program assumes that all equipment and vehicles would be stored within the facility providing reduced life -cycle costs for the equipment and vehicles within the public works department. C. Growth Projections: The space needs program allows room for the anticipated growth needs within the following 20 years at a minimum as is typical for a public facility built to operate for a period approaching 50 years. The City of Lino Lakes is projected by the Metropolitan Council's study to expand in population to 31,100 by 2040, or a growth of 49% from current. The growth built into the space needs program represents only the added staff and equipment that was determined to be needed with the increase in population and associated streets, parks, and utilities. Consequently the building space needs growth is only 14% above the current needs, significantly less than projected population growth. CNH ARCHITECTS 17 SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM Office Area Vehicle Storage 1 Space Name Public Works Superintendent Open Office Area - r 1 7 • Quantity 1 Size I Area 1 Total 1 1 1 12'x14' 168 I 168 1— 4 1 1_ 1 I 15'x20' 1 300 1 300 Reception 1_ 1 16'x10' 160 160 Private Offices I 9 1 12'x10' 1 120 1 1,080 Shop Supervisor Office 1 1 12'x10'120 120 Copy Room 1 1 1 9'x10' I 90 1 90 IT/Server Room 1 9'x10' 901 90 Multi -Purpose Room 1 1 1 40'x45' 1 1,800 1 1,800 Lunch Room 1 30'x40' 1,2001 1,200 Men's Restroom & Locker Room 1 1 1 30'x40' 1 1,200 1 1,200 Women's Restroom & Locker Room 1 15'x25' 375 1 375 L 1 1 1 Storage 1 1 1 10'x25' 1 250 1 250 1 Janitor's Closet 11 10'x12' 120 r 120 L 4 1 1 Mechanical/Electrical Room 1 1 1 20'x30' 1 600 1 600 Public Restrooms I- 2—[ 9'x10' 90 L 180 Subtotals Circulation Total 15% Space Name Quantity Large Spaces (Angled 60°) Medium Spaces 7,773 1 1,160 8,893 1 Size Area Total 16 18'x36' 835 13,360 4 1 1- 49 1 12'x24' I 288 1 14,112 Small Spaces Mezzanine Storage 20 I 8'x12' 96 1,920 1 1- 1 1 30'x40' I 1,200 I 1,200 General Storage 1 1 1 L 20'x100' 2,000 L 2,000 1 Vehicle Wash Bay 1 1 1 35'x50' 1 1,750 1 1,750 J Circulation 1 1 30'x6600' 19,789 19,789 1 L 1 1 L Total 54,131 1 18 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Vehicle Maintenance Departmental Shops Total Area Summary SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM Space Name Quantity Large Maintenance Bay Size Area Totali 2 1 24'x48' 1 1,152 1 2,304-1 Small Maintenance Bay 2 i 20'x40' 800 L 1,600 Welding Bay / Fabrication 1 1 I 28'x40' 1 1,120 1 1,1201 Small Engine Repair Bay 1 20'x40' 1 800 800 1 L Tire & Brake Shop 1 1 1 20'x28' I 560 1 560_1 Tire Storage ( Mezzanine) 1 1 1 30'x10' 1 300 I 300 Lube Room I 1 7 12'x16' 192 r 192 Parts Storage & Tools Room L 11 20'x50' 1,000L 1,000 J Subtotals Circulation Total 15% 7,876 1,181 9,057, Space Name i Quantity1 1 Size Area Total Sign Storage 1 1 1 30'x40' 1 1,200 1 1,200 J Woodworking Shop 1 20'x30' 600 600 Parks Storage 1 1 30'x40' 1,200 Water Meter Shop / Storage 1 15'x30' 450 r 450 1 1 L 1 1,200 Subtotals Circulation Total 15% 3,450 518 3,968, Subtotals 76,049 Exterior Wall and Building 10% 7,605 Services Total 83,654 1 As this Space Needs Program indicates, the Public Works Department will need a total building area approaching approximately 84,000 square feet by the end of the study target of 2040. While the population of the City of Lino Lakes is projected to grow 50% by 2040, the projected total Space Needs Program is only 15% more than the current space needs because of operational efficiencies of a larger city. Due to this future growth and also the potential use of some existing cold storage space over the next 10 to 15 years, the Space Needs Program can be met in a two phase approach with Phase 2 encompassing approximately 25,000 square feet of future Vehicle Storage needs. CNH ARCHITECTS 19 COMPARISON MATRIX Comparative Square Footage Calculation The Comparison matrix reflects size of areas in comparative Public Works Facilities. The following formula was used to create comparison factors. Formula for Comparison: Square feet Population __ Comparison Factor The comparative factors are not a definitive means for determining the appropriate size and scale of Lino Lakes' expansion needs, particularly con- sidering many other factors can influence how and why departmental allocations are established. However, this information can be helpful in guiding the space needs program with a larger perspective that acknowledges the external factor of city population and growth and how that impacts the operational capacity of the Public Works facility. From the chart below, we can see that Hopkins' has a somewhat smaller population. Hopkins' total square footage for their Vehicle Storage space (shown to the right) is 37,800 square feet which is 85.5% larger than Lino Lakes' actual area of 5,512 square feet. Lino Lakes has a much smaller Vehicle Storage area. It is not surprising that Lino Lakes' Public Works facility is smaller than comparison facilities given Lino Lakes' growth in popula- tion and service needs since the current facility was built approximately 45 years ago. City Population (2013 Census) ' Lino Lakes Hugo 1 Shoreview Otsego Hopkins � ,, '20,862 14,082 ' 25,931 14,524 18,025 ' Projected Population (2040) . Lino Lakes � l , 1. 31,100 ,l 20 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study •I Existing L Phase 1 Phase 2 0 I Vehicle Storage Square Feet O .`'S ?S•j0 ^ ^ O^ S^ Lino Lakes (Existing) (5,512 sf / 20,862) Lino Lakes (Proposed) (24,359 sf (54,131 sf) / 31,100) Hugo (15,000 sf / 14,082) Shoreview (38,410 sf / 25,931) Otsego (18,300 sf / 14,524) Hopkins (37,800 sf / 18,025) ••' COMPARISON MATRIX / Population 0000000G O 00000001000000001 00••••1 000 v 1 O Lino Lakes (Existing) (3,545 sf / 20,862) Lino Lakes (Proposed) (8,893 sf / 31,100) Hugo (6,400 sf / 14,082) Shoreview (15,620 sf / 25,931) Otsego (4,300 sf / 14,524) I y v) Hopkins (13,596 sf / 18,025)_ Lino Lakes (Existing) (5,742 sf / 20,862) Lino Lakes (Proposed) (13,025 sf / 31,100) Hugo (6,400 sf / 14,082) Shoreview (13,990 sf / 25,931) Otsego (5,850 sf / 14,524) Hopkins • (10,917 sf / 18,025) oc O 000 O 000.1 00( D 410001 • 1111 • 111 CNH ARCHITECTS 21 Option Al Layout Description Option Al is located at the current Public Works and Senior Center Facility site. This option includes extensive remodeling of the existing Public Works and Senior Center Facility into Public Works' office space and vehicle maintenance area. The expansion includes additional office, additional vehicle maintenance, departmental shops and vehicle storage. The existing salt building and material storage bins will be reused. Due to the limitations of the buildable area and the location of the existing cell tower, a portion of the vehicle storage is rotated at a 120 degree angle. This option would involve a total gutting of the existing building as needed to address deficiencies in the current building related to accessibility, energy code, fire suppression and mechanical systems. Option Al and the following option by using the existing public works site will also require an extension of the municipal water service and municipal sanitary service to the site. Due to the site layout limitations working around the existing office and maintenance building, the existing cold storage buildings will not be able to remain. This will reduce the total available storage for the Public Works department until Phase 2 is built, and may also result in the need to build Phase 2 sooner than the other option in order to meet the city's growth. 1 Pros I I • Re -use of existing Public Works building structure I • Use of existing Salt Building I • Use of existing Material Storage Bins I • Use of existing miscellaneous site storage I • Re -use of existing site I • Large buildable area I I I I • • . • Cons • Potential long construction period of existing building disrupting operations • Cost of bringing new Water main to site due to fire suppression requirements • Loss of use of existing ice rink and cost to remove • Loss of use of existing baseball field and cost to remove • Cost of remodel based on code and handicapped accessibility deficiencies • Non -efficient floor plan of vehicle storage to fit site and keep existing building • Cost of bringing municipal sanitary sewer to site (or impacts of large storage tank and regular pumping for floor drains and wash bay sanitary) • Reduced facility life expectancy and increased maintenance for the remodeled portion of the building compared to an all new facility Total Square Footage • Remodel 12,752 s.f. • New 67,582 s.f. • Total 80,334 s.f. • • • 22 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Wetlands Fuel Trailer Island Storage Vehicle Storage Wash ` Bay • Vehicle Maintenance eau Lake Dr. Existing Baseball Field 55 Parking Stalls Ex. Retention Pond Main Street CNH ARCHITECTS 23 Option A2 • • • Layout Description Option A2 is located at the current Public Works and Senior Center Facility site. This option provides for an all-new Public Works Facility which includes office, vehicle maintenance, departmental shops and vehicle storage. The existing salt building, cold storage garage and material storage bins will be reused. Since this option removes the existing 45 year old building, it provides the flexibility to place the building on the site in a more advantageous layout. This results in a more compact building footprint, better screening of the building to the east neighborhood, and the option for drive-through parking for large equipment within the storage garage. This site option also allows for the continued use of the newer of the two existing cold storage garages which will provide more available space for the Public Works department, especially until Phase 2 is added. Option A2, using the existing public works site, requires an extension of the municipal water service and municipal sanitary service to the site. Pros • Use of existing salt building • Use of existing material storage Bins • Use of existing miscellaneous site storage • Use of existing cold storage garage • Longer life -expectancy and reduced maintenance for an all new facility • Large buildable area • Drive through stalls for large vehicle storage parking • Flexibility in building placement to best fit uses and site Cons • Cost of demolishing existing facility • Disruption of operations during construction period • Cost of bringing new water main to site for fire suppression requirements • Loss of use of existing ice rink and cost to remove • Loss of use of existing baseball field and cost to remove • Cost of bringing municipal sanitary sewer to site (or impacts of large storage tank and regular pumping for floor drains and wash bay sanitary) Total Square Footage • Remodel None • New 79,503 s.f. • Total 79,503 s.f. • Existing Cold Storage 4,835 s.f. • • • 24 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Option " 2 Existing Material Storage Bins es. v//ty em eht Existing Baseball Field Existing Roa Wetlands 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Salt Building Trailer Storage I Existing Garage 1 Existing Cell Tower Phase 2 - r 1 1 Vehicle Mainten 55 Parking Office Stalls = — Vehicle Storage # ■ ;nce Wash Bay 1 Shops woe itr-V t 1 1 1 1 4• ee e c� a e Ex. Retention Pond Main Street ondeau Lake Dr. CNH ARCHITECTS 25 Option B1 Layout Description Option B1 is located adjacent to Fire Station #2. This option includes a new Public Works Facility which includes office, vehicle maintenance, departmental shops and vehicle storage. The existing salt building and material storage bins will be reused at the existing Public Works site. This option would allow for the use of the existing public works storage buildings throughout the construction period reducing operational disruption and cost during construction. Option B1 would also allow for the continued use of the north site facilities after construction until they reach there anticipated life -expectancy allowing for more flexibility and space for the Public Works department, especially until Phase 2 is added to the building. • I, I 1 Pros • • • Existing municipal sanitary sewer connection located on site • Existing municipal water main connection located on site • Use of existing ice rink on Site A • Use of existing baseball fields on Site A • Efficient floor plan of vehicle storage • No disruption at the current Public Works facility during construction • Located adjacent to Fire Station #2 • Closer to future population density as Lino Lakes grows • Existing storage buildings at north site can continue to be used Cons • Smaller buildable area creates minimal clearances for site functions • Existing salt building is located on Site A • Existing material storage bins are located on Site A • High visibility from future road Total Square Footage • Remodel None • New 76,017 s.f. • Total 76,017 s.f. • Ex. Public Works Storage 14,799 s.f. • • 26 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Layout Option B1 Birch Street Iron0tits Infiltration Basin Infiltration Infiltration Basin Wetlands Basin Existing Fire Station Wetlands Infiltration Basin Fuel Island Existing Road Phase 2-\ 55 Parking Stalls Maintenance Vehicle Storage Was ;,� Bay CNH ARCHITECTS 27 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Introduction The current Lino Lakes Public Works Facility was built in 1971 and does not have access to municipal water or municipal sanitary sewer. Due to fire code requirements that limit the square footage of the facility the existing Public Works building cannot be expanded unless municipal water is brought to the site. The additions to this facility include 4 separate buildings. The majority of the vehicles are stored outdoors, which inherently reduces their life span. Equipment is currently stored in 3 buildings and is not conducive to an efficient work flow. The building has water damage and leaking in several locations. Equipment Storage Public Works is currently storing most of their equipment outside where they are covered in snow and have a greater chance of being rusted, therefore reducing their life span. Vehicle Storage Public Works is currently storing vehicles outside, where they are covered in snow and have a greater chance of being rusted, therefore reducing their life span. Vehicle Maintenance The current Vehicle Maintenance area and tool storage area does not provide adequate space to service the city's fleet of vehicles. 28 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Exterior Brick Exterior brick on the building has severe water damage in multiple places and is in need of repair. Roof leakage The existing standing seam roof needs to be replaced as there are multiple locations where leaking has occurred. Gutters There are several locations around the building where gutters are failing or not in place, snow is melting off of the roof and causing water damage and icy conditions, which are hazardous for the public and employees. Offices and Storage Current offices and storage areas are intermingled and do not provide an efficient use of space. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CNH ARCHITECTS 29 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Break Room/Office One of the additional buildings on-site houses one office and a break room due to limited space in the main facility. Locker room The current locker room does not have adequate lockers to accommodate employees and is used as a circulation space which doesn't have privacy for employees. Lunch Room The current lunch room does not have adequate appliances and chairs to accommodate Public Works employees. Server / Telephone Storage The current server is located in the main hallway, isn't easily accessible and is an eyesore. The data and telephone phone board is currently in the storage room. 30 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study ACCESSIBILITY & CODE REVIEW Introduction The current Public Works facility was built in 1971 and has major deficiencies related to accessibility, energy code, fire suppression and mechanical systems. Our accessibility review identifies conditions in the existing building that require immediate attention including; restroom clearances (water closet, lavatory and shower), non -accessible door hardware, accessible door clearances and accessible counter heights. The existing building does not meeting current energy code requirements, fire suppression requirements, exiting requirements and mechanical system requirements as discussed on the following page. We did not complete a full OSHA safety assessment as a part of this study, but there are several items in the building that should be assessed further, including proper headroom clearances under the Vehicle Maintenance mezzanine. As a result of the extent and variety of code, accessibility, and safety deficiencies in the current building, it is our opinion that the most economical approach if remodeling is considered would be to remove all existing interior rooms and reconstruct the interior build -out of the vast majority of the existing space. This also results in the best design fit with the long-term needs of the Public Works department. The existing Women's Restroom does not have proper clearances for accessibility, with any amount of remodeling the restrooms would need to comply with the latest Minnesota State accessibility code. The existing Men's Restroom does not have proper clearances for accessibility, with any amount of remodeling the restrooms would need to comply with the latest Minnesota State accessibility code. CNH ARCHITECTS 31 MECHANICAL SYSTEMS REVIEW - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Ventilation System Current ventilation system is inadequate. Current codes require .75 cfm per square foot of ventilation interlocked with an outdoor air intake. The current system operates manually with independent control switch for both the fan and intake damper. The exhaust fans appear dated and most likely have exceeded their expected service life. Exhaust System Vehicle Maintenance requires carbon monoxide sensors (gasoline engine fumes) and nitrogen dioxide sensors (diesel engine fumes) to enable the exhaust system in the event that the concentrations exceeds code minimum set point. These sensors are not installed. Heating General heating is accomplished with gas fired infrared heaters. These units are dated and most likely have exceeded their expected service life. Sanitary Waste The sanitary waste from the trench drains and floor drains are routed directly to the septic system. This is a code violation. For buildings served with a septic system, the flammable waste from trench drains must be routed to a storage tank separate from the septic system. Tanks are emptied periodically and trucked to a proper waste facility. 32 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study MECHANICAL SYSTEMS REVIEW - OFFICES/SENIOR CENTER Furnace Room - Offices The office space is served by three furnaces and associated split system air conditioning units. The units were installed in 2010 and are in good condition. The ductwork connected to these units would need to be replaced based upon the condition of the current ductwork and the change in zoning due to renovation schemes. In addition, current requirements for ventilation air will require an air-to-air energy recovery unit to temper the outdoor air before it is introduced into the furnaces. Furnace Room - Senior Center The community space is also served by three furnaces and associated split system air handlers. They were installed in 2010 as well and are in good condition. The comments for item 1 above applies to these systems as well. - One of the units has a capacity of 5 tons. The Mn Energy Code requires a system of this capacity to be equipped with an economizer. The economizer introduces outdoor air into the space when outdoor air temperatures are favorable and cooling is required by utilizing outdoor air for cooling as opposed to operating compressors. CNH ARCHITECTS 33 COST ESTIMATE 34 Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Option Al Remodel & Expansion Phase 1 • Option A2 New Facility at Existing Site Phase 1 • Option B1 New Facility at Fire Station Site Phase 1 • Cost Estimate Summary Low Cost Public Works Facility Sanitary Sewer and Water Total (2017 Dollars) $ 9,707,342 $ 360,000 $ 10,067,342 T COST ESTIMATE *Inflation not taken into account in this estimate High Cost Public Works Facility Sanitary Sewer and Water Total (2017 Dollars) • $ 12,195,113 $ 360,000 $ 12,555,113 1 Low Cost Public Works Facility Sanitary Sewer and Water Total (2017 Dollars) $ 10,040,359 $ 360,000 $ 10,400,359 *Inflation not taken into account in this estimate High Cost Public Works Facility Sanitary Sewer and Water Total (2017 Dollars) • $ 12,458,171 $ 360,000 12,818,171 Low Cost Public Works Facility Total (2017 Dollars) 9,922,715 $ 9,922,715 *Inflation not taken into account in this estimate High Cost Public Works Facility Total (2017 Dollars) • $ 12,380,093 $ 12,380,093 The cost estimates shown above represent our teams professional opinion of probable construction cost based on the uses proposed, and typical construction costs for similar facilities within the greater metropolitan area. The low cost to high cost range represents the preliminary level of the designs done within this study, as well as the range in quality, life -cycle, and aesthetic choices that would be reviewed and selected by the city during the design process. The costs, as indicated are current construction costs and an inflation factor would need to be applied when a specific time line is developed. The prices shown represent the estimated hard costs of the site and building construction shown in each option layout and vary only about $500,000 when comparing the Low Cost for each option or 5% of the total cost. However, there are other cost factors not indicated that should also be taken into consideration when comparing options that would create a greater final cost differential between options. A partial list of these items include: • Operational cost to move Public Works functions off-site during construction for Site A options • Loss of use of ball field and hockey rink at Site A if expansion occurs there • Additional maintenance costs for reused portions of the existing structure under Option Al, compared to an all-new facility in the other options • Ability to continue to use one existing cold storage building under Option A2 and two existing cold storage buildings under Option B1, thus postponing the date when Phase 2 of the Public Works storage shown in each option layout would be needed CNH ARCHITECTS 35 WS — Item #9 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 9 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Diane Hankee, City Engineer Re: West Shadow Lake and LaMotte Project Update Background Final design is in progress for both project areas and will continue over the next several months. The project team is currently working through preliminary roadway/utility alignments and stormwater management improvements. Any remaining field work will be finished by the end of November. Another neighborhood meeting will be noticed, and held towards the end of November, 2017. As a reminder, the project website can be found linked to the City's website or at: https://www.lamottewestshadow.com/ Requested Council Direction None, information only. WS — Item 10 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 10 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Jeff Karlson Re: Park and Trail Improvement Plan Background As part of the 2018 budget discussion during the September 5, 2017 Council work session, Mayor Reinert suggested the City create a more comprehensive park and trail management plan for repair or replacement of park and trail assets. It would begin with an inventory of existing parks and trails with a rating based on age and condition, which would indicate the probable timeline for repair or replacement of an asset. Attached is a Neighborhood Parks Capital Improvement Worksheet, which was prepared by staff last month. Requested Council Direction Staff is looking for further direction from the Council. Attachments Neighborhood Parks Capital Improvement Worksheet Neighborhood Parks Capital Improvement/Replacement Worksheet October 17, 2017 Behm's - (1999) YEAR INSTALLED RATING* ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST** PROPOSED YEAR COMMENTS Arena Acres Original 3 $175,000 2027+ Playground Equipment 1999 2 $40,000 2025 Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Tennis Courts N N $65,000 2023 Original removed 2017 1/2 Court Basketball 1999 3 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 TOTAL ARENA ACRES Original 2 $105,000 2018 Fog Seal - $1,200 Behm's - (1999) Open Air Shelter Original 3 $175,000 2027+ 1/2 Court Basketball Original 3 $40,000 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Playground Equipment Original 2 $40,000 2023 Irrigation Shed Original 2 2024 Fog Seal - $800 Trail Loop - 2,000 feet Original 2 $221,500 2018 Fog Seal - $1,200 TOTAL BEHM'S 2 $40,000 2018 Fog Seal - $300 Birch - (1990) Open Air Shelter 2003 3 $175,000 2027+ Park Building 1992 1 $40,000 2027+ Playground Equipment 1998 1 $70,000 2018 Hockey Rink 1992 2 2023 Fog Seal - $800 Hockey Rink Lights 1992 1 $221,500 2023 Internal Trails - 450 feet 2 2018 Fog Seal - $300 Backstop 1992 1 $6,000 2022 Parking Lot (925 sy) 2 2021 TOTAL BIRCH $76,000 Birchwood Acres - (1996) Develop Southern Portion Per Master Plan N N $175,000 Playground Equipment Original 2 $40,000 2020 Backstop Original 1 $6,500 2023 Internal Trails - 1,300 feet 1998 2 2018 Fog Seal - $800 TOTAL BIRCHWOOD ACRES $221,500 *RATING N - NEW 1 - POOR CONDITION 2 - FAIR CONDITION 3 - GOOD CONDITION Page 1 of 4 City Hall YEAR INSTALLED RATING* ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST** PROPOSED YEAR COMMENTS Brandywood - (1992) 1995 2 2027+ Playground Equipment 2000 2 $40,000 2023 Internal Trails - 1,350 feet N 2 2018 Fog Seal - $850 TOTAL BRANDYWOOD 1975 1 $40,000 2019 Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 City Hall Park Building 1995 2 2027+ Playground Equipment 1997 2 $50,000 2020 Pave Parking Lot N N 2027+ Fog Seal - $1,100 Ball Fields (2) Fencing 1975 1 $13,000 2019 Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Hockey Rink 1995 2 $4,000 2025 Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Hockey Rink Lights 1995 2 $4,000 2025 TOTAL CITY HALL $63,000 Clearwater Creek - (2002) Open Air Shelter Original 3 2027+ Playground Equipment Original 2 $70,000 2024 Internal Trails Bituminous - 1,800 feet Original 2 2018 Fog Seal - $1,100 Internal Trails Concrete - 570 feet Original 2 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 1/2 Court Basketball Original 3 $4,000 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Irrigation Shed Original 1 $4,000 2020 TOTAL CLEARWATER CREEK $74,000 Country Lakes Develop Park Per Master Plan N N Highland Meadows - (2003) Open Air Shelter Original 3 2027+ Playground Equipment Original 2 $50,000 2026 Internal Trails - 2,060 feet Original 2 2018 Fog Seal - $1,300 1/2 Court Basketball Original 3 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Irrigation Shed Original 1 $4,000 2020 TOTAL HIGHLAND MEADOWS $54,000 *RATING N - NEW 1 - POOR CONDITION 2 - FAIR CONDITION 3 - GOOD CONDITION Page 2 of 4 Marshan YEAR INSTALLED RATING* ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST** PROPOSED YEAR COMMENTS Lino 1970 3 $40,000 2027+ Playground Equipment 1998 1 $70,000 2018 Fog Seal - $600 Internal Trails - 1,700 feet 2007 2 $52,000 2018 Fog Seal - $1000 Open Air Shelter 1986 1 $28,000 2021 Parking Lot (3,600 sy) 1986 2 $12,000 2020 Fog or Chip Seal Irrigation Shed 2007 2 $4,000 2022 Fog or Chip Seal TOTAL LINO $102,000 Marshan Park Building 1970 3 $40,000 2027+ Playground Equipment 1999 2 $50,000 2022 Fog Seal - $600 Internal Trails - 1,110 feet Original 2 $52,000 2018 Fog Seal - $700 Open Air Shelter N N $45,000 2027+ 1/2 Court Basketball N N $12,000 2018 Fog Seal - $400 Parking Lot (600 sy) 2 2021 Fog or Chip Seal TOTAL MARSHAN $107,000 Pheasant Hills - (1996) Playground Equipment Original 2 $40,000 2021 Internal Trails - 900 feet Original 2 $40,000 2018 Fog Seal - $600 1/2 Court Basketball Original 3 $52,000 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 TOTAL PHEASANT HILLS 1975 2 $40,000 2027+ Shenandoah 1/2 Court Basketball N N $12,000 Playground Equipment 1998 2 $40,000 2021 TOTAL SHENANDOAH 1998 2 $52,000 2018 Sunrise Full Size Basketball Court N N $22,000 Tennis Courts N N $65,000 Playground Equipment 1998 2 $70,000 2018 Park Building 1975 2 2027+ Internal Trails - 540 feet 2 2018 Fog Seal - $400 *RATING N - NEW 1 - POOR CONDITION 2 - FAIR CONDITION 3 - GOOD CONDITION Page 3 of 4 Sunset Oaks - (1993) Playground Equipment Original 1 [ $40,000 2022 Quail Ridge Develop Per Master Plan N N $225,000 Wenzel Farms - (1996) YEAR INSTALLED RATING* ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST** PROPOSED YEAR COMMENTS Open Air Shelter 2011 3 $30,000 2027+ Ball Field Fencing (4) 1997 1 $26,000 2021 Scoreboards (2) 2000 3 2027+ Parking Lot (5,500 sy) 2003 2 $40,000 2022 Fog or Chip Seal TOTAL SUNRISE Original 2 $183,000 Sunset Oaks - (1993) Playground Equipment Original 1 [ $40,000 2022 Quail Ridge Develop Per Master Plan N N $225,000 Wenzel Farms - (1996) Playground Equipment Original 2 $30,000 2025 Woods of Baldwin Lake - (1994) Playground Equipment Original 2 $40,000 2019 Internal Trails - 460 feet Original 2 TOTAL WOODS OF BALDWIN LAKE $40,000 **ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS PRIMARILY RESEARCHED FOR PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT WITHIN 5 YEARS *RATING N - NEW 1 - POOR CONDITION 2 - FAIR CONDITION 3 - GOOD CONDITION Page 4 of 4 WS — Item 11 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 11 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Sarah Cotton, Finance Director Re: 2018 Budget Background The preliminary 2018 Budget and Tax Levy was adopted during the September 25, 2017, City Council meeting. The preliminary levy of $9,776,732 was estimated to result in a city tax rate of 42.474% for 2018. Staff has since received updated Truth in Taxation (TNT) values from Anoka County. The TNT tax rate for 2018 increased slightly to 42.756%. The 2018 Budget includes $100,000 for park & trail improvements. During the September 5, 2017, work session, Council discussed potential uses for an estimated $300,000 in 2017 budget surplus. Staff was directed to prepare a Park & Trail CIP for Council review. The Neighborhood Parks Capital Improvement/Replacement Worksheet was sent to the Council for review in the October 20, 2017, weekly update. Staff is seeking Council direction regarding any additions or modifications to the 2018 Budget. Attachments General Fund Forecast Gap Analysis Net Tax Capacity Rate Calculation Neighborhood Parks Capital Improvement/Replacement Worksheet Tax Levies General Fund Levy Debt Levies Total Tax Levy Year -over -Year Change Levy $ Drill -Down on Year -Over -Year Levy Changes Revenues Expenditures Debt Service GENERAL FUND FORECAST GAP ANALYSIS 2017-2018 6/30/2017 7/17/2017 7/31/2017 9/5/2017 9/25/2017 11/6/2017 Adopted Estimate Proposed Proposed Proposed Preliminary Proposed 2017 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 Change % Change 7,360,431 8,412,875 8,399,613 8,399,613 8,165,859 8,165,859 8,165,859 805,428 10.9% 2,131,424 1,610,873 1,610,873 1,610,873 1,610,873 1,610,873 1,610,873 (520,551) -24.4% 9,491,855 10,023,748 10,010,486 10,010,486 9,776,732 9,776,732 9,776,732 284,877 3.00% 531,893 518,631 518,631 284,877 284,877 284,877 Adopted Estimate Proposed Proposed Proposed Preliminary Proposed 2017 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 Change % Change Property Taxes (Delinquent, Penalties/Interest) 64,500 49,000 49,000 49,000 49,000 49,000 49,000 (15,500) -24.0% Intergovt Revenue 681,409 658,988 646,526 646,526 646,532 646,532 645,367 (36,042) -5.3% Business Licenses/Permits 126,229 125,779 130,515 130,515 130,515 130,515 130,515 4,286 3.4% Non -Business Licenses/Permits 486,524 556,532 556,532 556,532 556,532 556,532 556,532 70,008 14.4% Charges for Services 34,600 29,571 29,571 29,571 29,571 29,571 29,571 (5,029) -14.5% Public Safety Service Charges 189,200 201,200 201,200 201,200 201,200 201,200 201,200 12,000 6.3% Municipal Fines 175,600 160,600 160,600 160,600 160,600 160,600 134,132 (41,468) -23.6% Miscellaneous 317,348 307,848 307,848 307,848 307,848 307,848 308,855 (8,493) -2.7% Trf from Closed Bond Fund/Program Rec 317,717 10,000 - - - - (317,717) -100.0% Use of Reserves 518,000 - 325,000 325,000 325,000 (193,000) -37.3% Total Revenues/Funding Sources 2,911,127 2,099,518 2,081,792 2,081,792 2,406,798 2,406,798 2,380,172 (530,955) -18.2% Personal Services 6,975,377 7,245,885 7,202,147 7,202,147 7,193,399 7,193,399 7,166,773 191,396 2.7% Supplies 488,700 470,025 472,025 472,025 472,025 472,025 472,025 (16,675) -3.4% Other Services and Charnges 1,311,140 1,262,950 1,264,200 1,264,200 1,264,200 1,264,200 1,264,200 (46,940) -3.6% Contracted Services 758,526 712,587 672,087 672,087 672,087 672,087 672,087 (86,439) -11.4% Capital Outlay 122,014 53,045 53,045 53,045 53,045 53,045 53,045 (68,969) -56.5% Others 615,800 767,900 817,900 817,900 917,900 917,900 917,900 302,100 49.1% Total Expenditures 10,271,557 10,512,392 10,481,404 10,481,404 10,572,657 10,572,657 10,546,031 274,474 2.7% Bonds 1,494,292 1,046,341 1,046,341 1,046,341 1,046,341 1,046,341 1,046,341 (447,951) -30.0% Certificates of Indebtedness 637,132 564,532 564,532 564,532 564,532 564,532 564,532 (72,600) -11.4% Total Debt Service 2,131,424 1,610,873 1,610,873 1,610,873 1,610,873 1,610,873 1,610,873 (520,551) -24.4% Year -over -Year Change Levy $ 531,893 518,631 518,631 284,877 284,877 284,877 Total Levy Supported by Valuation Increase ($10,245,847) 778,839 778,839 758,829 813,160 813,160 753,992 Gap to Maintain Flat Tax Capacity Rate (246,946) (260,208) (240,198) (528,283) (528,283) (469,115) CITY OF LINO LAKES 2018 Proposed General Fund Net Tax Capacity Calculation Actual Actual Adopted Actual 2015 2016 2017 2017 TNT 2018 Taxable Market Value 1,694,366,064 1,699,288,883 1,810,747,853 1,808,417,118 1,962,454,648 Annual % Change 12.22% 0.29% 6.56% 6.42% 8.52% Total Net Tax Capacity Value 18,339,615 18,440,817 19,682,584 19,643,805 21,320,744 Less FD Contribution in Value 1,072,910 1,115,822 1,168,161 1,168,180 1,215,580 Less Captured Value for Tax Increment 236,559 261,525 294,599 293,970 421,342 Total Net Tax Capacity Value 17,030,146 17,063,470 18,219,824 18,181,655 19,683,822 Annual % Change 12.46% 0.20% 6.78% 6.55% 8.26% Total Levy Less FD Distribution Total Net Levy for Tax Rate Annual % Change Net Tax Capacity Rate Calculation Actual Actual Adopted Actual 2015 2016 2017 2017 TNT 2018 8,686,072 1,232,171 9,058,428 9,491,855 1,206,188 1,284,902 9,491,855 9,776,732 1,284,902 1,360,639 7,453,901 5.44% 7,852,240 8,206,953 5.34% 4.52% 8,206,953 8,416,093 4.52% 2.55% Projected City Tax Capacity Rate 43.770% 46.019% 45.044% 45.140% 42.756% Neighborhood Parks Capital Improvement/Replacement Worksheet October 17, 2017 Behm's - (1999) YEAR INSTALLED RATING* ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST** PROPOSED YEAR COMMENTS Arena Acres Original 3 $175,000 2027+ Playground Equipment 1999 2 $40,000 2025 Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Tennis Courts N N $65,000 2023 Original removed 2017 1/2 Court Basketball 1999 3 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 TOTAL ARENA ACRES Original 2 $105,000 2018 Fog Seal - $1,200 Behm's - (1999) Open Air Shelter Original 3 $175,000 2027+ 1/2 Court Basketball Original 3 $40,000 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Playground Equipment Original 2 $40,000 2023 Irrigation Shed Original 2 2024 Fog Seal - $800 Trail Loop - 2,000 feet Original 2 $221,500 2018 Fog Seal - $1,200 TOTAL BEHM'S 2 $40,000 2018 Fog Seal - $300 Birch - (1990) Open Air Shelter 2003 3 $175,000 2027+ Park Building 1992 1 $40,000 2027+ Playground Equipment 1998 1 $70,000 2018 Hockey Rink 1992 2 2023 Fog Seal - $800 Hockey Rink Lights 1992 1 $221,500 2023 Internal Trails - 450 feet 2 2018 Fog Seal - $300 Backstop 1992 1 $6,000 2022 Parking Lot (925 sy) 2 2021 TOTAL BIRCH $76,000 Birchwood Acres - (1996) Develop Southern Portion Per Master Plan N N $175,000 Playground Equipment Original 2 $40,000 2020 Backstop Original 1 $6,500 2023 Internal Trails - 1,300 feet 1998 2 2018 Fog Seal - $800 TOTAL BIRCHWOOD ACRES $221,500 *RATING N - NEW 1 - POOR CONDITION 2 - FAIR CONDITION 3 - GOOD CONDITION Page 1 of 4 City Hall YEAR INSTALLED RATING* ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST** PROPOSED YEAR COMMENTS Brandywood - (1992) 1995 2 2027+ Playground Equipment 2000 2 $40,000 2023 Internal Trails - 1,350 feet N 2 2018 Fog Seal - $850 TOTAL BRANDYWOOD 1975 1 $40,000 2019 Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 City Hall Park Building 1995 2 2027+ Playground Equipment 1997 2 $50,000 2020 Pave Parking Lot N N 2027+ Fog Seal - $1,100 Ball Fields (2) Fencing 1975 1 $13,000 2019 Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Hockey Rink 1995 2 $4,000 2025 Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Hockey Rink Lights 1995 2 $4,000 2025 TOTAL CITY HALL $63,000 Clearwater Creek - (2002) Open Air Shelter Original 3 2027+ Playground Equipment Original 2 $70,000 2024 Internal Trails Bituminous - 1,800 feet Original 2 2018 Fog Seal - $1,100 Internal Trails Concrete - 570 feet Original 2 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 1/2 Court Basketball Original 3 $4,000 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Irrigation Shed Original 1 $4,000 2020 TOTAL CLEARWATER CREEK $74,000 Country Lakes Develop Park Per Master Plan N N Highland Meadows - (2003) Open Air Shelter Original 3 2027+ Playground Equipment Original 2 $50,000 2026 Internal Trails - 2,060 feet Original 2 2018 Fog Seal - $1,300 1/2 Court Basketball Original 3 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 Irrigation Shed Original 1 $4,000 2020 TOTAL HIGHLAND MEADOWS $54,000 *RATING N - NEW 1 - POOR CONDITION 2 - FAIR CONDITION 3 - GOOD CONDITION Page 2 of 4 Marshan YEAR INSTALLED RATING* ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST** PROPOSED YEAR COMMENTS Lino 1970 3 $40,000 2027+ Playground Equipment 1998 1 $70,000 2018 Fog Seal - $600 Internal Trails - 1,700 feet 2007 2 $52,000 2018 Fog Seal - $1000 Open Air Shelter 1986 1 $28,000 2021 Parking Lot (3,600 sy) 1986 2 $12,000 2020 Fog or Chip Seal Irrigation Shed 2007 2 $4,000 2022 Fog or Chip Seal TOTAL LINO $102,000 Marshan Park Building 1970 3 $40,000 2027+ Playground Equipment 1999 2 $50,000 2022 Fog Seal - $600 Internal Trails - 1,110 feet Original 2 $52,000 2018 Fog Seal - $700 Open Air Shelter N N $45,000 2027+ 1/2 Court Basketball N N $12,000 2018 Fog Seal - $400 Parking Lot (600 sy) 2 2021 Fog or Chip Seal TOTAL MARSHAN $107,000 Pheasant Hills - (1996) Playground Equipment Original 2 $40,000 2021 Internal Trails - 900 feet Original 2 $40,000 2018 Fog Seal - $600 1/2 Court Basketball Original 3 $52,000 2027+ Resurfaced/Repainted 2017 TOTAL PHEASANT HILLS 1975 2 $40,000 2027+ Shenandoah 1/2 Court Basketball N N $12,000 Playground Equipment 1998 2 $40,000 2021 TOTAL SHENANDOAH 1998 2 $52,000 2018 Sunrise Full Size Basketball Court N N $22,000 Tennis Courts N N $65,000 Playground Equipment 1998 2 $70,000 2018 Park Building 1975 2 2027+ Internal Trails - 540 feet 2 2018 Fog Seal - $400 *RATING N - NEW 1 - POOR CONDITION 2 - FAIR CONDITION 3 - GOOD CONDITION Page 3 of 4 Sunset Oaks - (1993) Playground Equipment Original 1 [ $40,000 2022 Quail Ridge Develop Per Master Plan N N $225,000 Wenzel Farms - (1996) YEAR INSTALLED RATING* ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST** PROPOSED YEAR COMMENTS Open Air Shelter 2011 3 $30,000 2027+ Ball Field Fencing (4) 1997 1 $26,000 2021 Scoreboards (2) 2000 3 2027+ Parking Lot (5,500 sy) 2003 2 $40,000 2022 Fog or Chip Seal TOTAL SUNRISE Original 2 $183,000 Sunset Oaks - (1993) Playground Equipment Original 1 [ $40,000 2022 Quail Ridge Develop Per Master Plan N N $225,000 Wenzel Farms - (1996) Playground Equipment Original 2 $30,000 2025 Woods of Baldwin Lake - (1994) Playground Equipment Original 2 $40,000 2019 Internal Trails - 460 feet Original 2 TOTAL WOODS OF BALDWIN LAKE $40,000 **ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS PRIMARILY RESEARCHED FOR PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT WITHIN 5 YEARS *RATING N - NEW 1 - POOR CONDITION 2 - FAIR CONDITION 3 - GOOD CONDITION Page 4 of 4 WS — Item 12 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 12 Date: November 6, 2017 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Re: Woods Edge Senior Housing Development Update 49/J Concept Plan Background Woods Edge Senior Housing Development Staff reviewed a proposed senior housing development concept with the City Council at the October 2, 2017 work session. The council expressed some concern over additional senior housing in the development. However, staff was directed to continue conversations and obtain more specific information about the development. Both the Economic Development Advisory Committee and the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed and discussed the concept at their October meetings. Both groups expressed strong interest in pursuing the development. Staff is continuing to work with the development team and will be refining the proposal for additional consideration. 49/J Development Staff has had ongoing conversations with Richard Morris, owner of the 17 acre parcel north of the liquor store and insurance agency, regarding potential development. Staff will be discussing the latest concept plan with the Planning & Zoning Board on November 8, 2017. This is the site that has previously been considered for a grocery store. The land is currently guided mixed use, intended for both commercial and residential development. The Hodgson Road & CRJ Master Planning Study was prepared for the mixed use area and approved by the City Council in 2007 and incorporated into the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The plan is intended to establish a general land use design with some specified important design elements. While the Master Plan includes specific design elements, future amendments of the Plan may be appropriate to address evolving community needs, market forces, and regulatory requirements. The planning study assumed that approximately half of the area would develop with residential uses at approximately 10 units per acre overall. This Comprehensive Plan allows the density to range from 8 to 15 units per acre. While the property owner has had discussions with adjacent commercial properties, the plan does not address redevelopment of those sites. The entire Morris property is proposed for residential development. The proposal currently includes single level row homes, an assisted living facility and a proposed market rate multi -family building. The owner is currently seeking feedback on the proposal. Staff is proposing to have a more detailed discussion with the Planning and Zoning board at the November 8 meeting. Comments received at the meeting will be forwarded to the City Council for discussion in December. On a related note staff is working with WSB and Associates on a proposal to extend sanitary sewer and water to the 49/J area. Requested Council Direction 1. None required. Information update only. Attachments 1. 49/J Master Plan 2. Morris Concept provide green 1714 aroun4 resi4ential etesiqn new streets and intersections toJ,e safe anApe4estrian-frien#17 0 connect residential streets c: - c 1, rairduTitrairec.., 7 i'dfilliai liNiiiP ' :::W 1111;11.14111% .A1. k •• ,II.) "VA al l' IP • 0 ---SF ili.i;1 Jr -ill' -s4,,, i ,. connect to existin ankpropose4 trai 5 0.4 - "14 • 14y hia" .! 1'7; plan. for a pnix o kousinl tiipes ,tPtL. '&7411 LANDFORM otanale 1;141 fitter storm water mina witk T 5, cfrii creeks cvn.k rain/arrens oz? connect mil ftSorkoo4s to local commercial, with tri4ts, sidewalks welcoming plazas and open spat enkance tive corners to cizi't i, latewmi into Lino lakes 3iiirtim, nik- 4 Iii: tea conserVe protect nati4 rat resources wetlancs, water wimp, flaSitat an4 Vegetation connect to m:stinq an4proposec traits 1 reatir ware JZoicq intersection c CONCEPT PLAN Master Planning Study for County Road J & Hodgson Road December 13, 2006 2oU N roac(anc intersection improvements include wider rit-of-w, new traffic signal k access ntanalemeni witk ni,ekans and tintite4 entrii points 0 100 200 400 kjteg 9NInne 1INf1 l£ QT�O�T NOSDa0H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' iiiiiiiiiiii +4-1 -1444-q -H44 1 J IIIIIIIJII _. PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA TOTAL ROW AREA PROPOSED HODGSON ROAD PROPOSED INTERNAL ROW ±17.33 AC. ±1.88 AC. ±1.27 AC. ±0.61 AC. TOTAL LOT AREA ±15.46 AC. PROPOSED TOWNHOME AREA ±10.72 AC. PROPOSED 2 -LEVEL BUILDING AREA (LOT 51)—±1.84 AC. PROPOSED 3 -LEVEL BUILDING AREA (LOT 52)—±2.90 AC. TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS 162 PROPOSED TOWNHOME UNITS 50 PROPOSED 2 -LEVEL BUILDING AREA (LOT 51) 32 PROPOSED 3 -LEVEL BUILDING AREA (LOT 52) 80 WETLAND AREA ±0.31 AC. NET DENSITY ±10.3 UNITS/AC. (EXCLUDES WETLAND, PROPOSED HODGSON ROAD ROW) GB R ZONING DATA GENERAL BUSINESS RURAL R -1X SINGLE FAMILY EXECUTIVE 0 40 80 160 ( IN FEET ) CC y)3 �U U� :8101a E PT PLA AM PTWits10]uI►MI -11X. REVISIONS 1-1 fV 0 4J 4J L 0 z 0) c 4) c 0 •c X a) J 0 N LNVIRONM N A NGINE RING 0 SURVEYIN W z 0) 'L 0 a) ro c 0) a 0 rn CO Cr) Dcb •NR•ADPR•PERT 0) c ro Eb 0 0 a) 4J c ino La es Minnesot. MNWAIOEIMIIMM 0 0 co 0 a) c 0 a 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: C# ISSUE DATE: 10/12/17 FILE NO: XXX I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Signature: Date: License #: 1 of 1 Save Date: 10/12/17 f: obs\7061 - 7080\7064 - hod.son road\cad c3d\surve \la outs\7064_Ia out 3 overview.dw. Item #15 Monthly Progress Report November 6, 2017 Item Last Action Taken Staff Status Digital Scanning Project 8/7/17 — City Clerk provided a written report of what has been completed Julie Staff is utilizing a volunteer and employee on light duty assignment White Bear Lake Restoration Assn. v. Dept. of Natural Resources (DNR) 8/30/17 — A Ramsey County judge ruled that the DNR failed to protect WBL from excessive groundwater pumping Jeff The DNR announced it will appeal the Court ruling Location of Veteran's Memorial 12/5/16 — The Council's preferred location is the island in front of city hall Mike The Council may need to make a decision on who will prepare a design Upgrade of HD Audio/Visual Equipment in Council Chambers and Control Room 8/28/17 — Council awarded bid to Alpha Video in the amount of $96,220.189 Jeff Installation will begin December 12th Culvert Maintenance ACD 10-22-32 7/5/17 — Staff was directed to monitor the culvert and to work with the RCWD on a longer term solution Mike RCWD cleaned the culvert. Staff continues to monitor it. Updates are shown in italics.