Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-04-2017 Council Work Session MinutesCITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 4, 2017 APPROVED 1 CITY ur LINO LAKES 2 MINUTES 3 4 DATE : December 4, 2017 5 TIME STARTED 6:00 p.m. 6 TIME ENDED 10*40 p.m. 7 MEMBERS PRESENT Council Member Rafferty, Kusterman, 8 Maher, Manthey and Mayor Reinert 9 MEMBERS ABSENT None 10 11 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director John 12 Swenson; Community Development Director Grochala; Finance Director Sarah Cotton; 13 Public Services Director DeGardner; City Planner Katie Larsen; City Clerk Julie Bartell. 14 15 1. Watermark Architectural Design Standards — City Planner Larsen provided an 16 overview of the discussions that have brought the council to this point of considering 17 design standards for this proposed development. Based on the Lennar submittal, there 18 are over forty types of homes which have been reviewed by staff. 19 20 - Single Family Homes - what meets the city standards and review of what doesn't meet 21 those standards; staff is trying to avoid too much garage out front; recommendation is six 22 foot porch & six foot garage extended as maximum. 23 24 Council Member Maher suggested that the six foot porch is almost too small to use. 25 Mayor Reinert said it's a city standard so maybe that's no longer appropriate; the standard 26 for the lot size is smaller also so that may be impacting the shrinking of the homes. Ms. 27 Larsen noted that if the garage doesn't protrude at all, then a porch wouldn't be required. 28 Council Member Rafferty asked if the homes will generally be without steps. Joe 29 Jablonski, Lennar Homes representative, noted that the one shown is an empty nester 30 model so steps are left out; others will have steps according to grading plans. 31 32 - Townhomes -review of types, all on 32 foot wide lots, 1700 — 1900 square feet. 33 Review of elevations shown, indicating exterior materials. Council Member Rafferty 34 recalled there is a couple of feet relief between units in the rear and he wonders if 35 something alike could be done in the front. Mr. Jablonski pointed out the vertical trim 36 used to separate homes; their buildings are generally not protruded. He added that these 37 units actually back up to Interstate 35 and others to a parking garage. 38 39 Ms. Larsen reviewed how the townhome element proposal meets the city's requirements. 40 The flexibility is being requested in garage sizing and exterior material. She reviewed 41 the garage sizes proposed and staff s analysis of what is provided in the townhomes over 42 city requirements. Council Member Rafferty argued that the smaller garage make 43 one stall unusable. Mayor Reinert asked staff to provide the council with a list of all the 44 areas that are shrinking with this proposal. Mr. Jablonski, regarding the garage, 45 remarked that Lennar builds this type of garage throughout the metro area and they are 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 4, 2017 APPROVED 46 used. Council Member Manthey suggested that if these models didn't work then they 47 wouldn't sell; the developer is bringing forward what they sell under their business 48 model. Council Member Maher agreed; the products are the developer's trade and if 49 they aren't right for the city, that's the council's decision; it's not to tell a developer what 50 product to offer. Council Member Kusterman asked if other cities have pushed back on 51 any of these products and, if so, what was the response. Mr. Jablonski remarked that 52 normally cities would talk about exteriors only. 53 54 Ms. Larsen reviewed the request of the developer to use vinyl siding as opposed to the 55 city's requirements approved by resolution. 56 57 Mayor Reinert asked that all the concessions be listed and sent to the city council 58 members. 59 60 Ms. Larsen noted that the Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the amendments 61 proposed to architectural design standards and recommended approval. 62 63 On the discussion of porches, Mr. Jablonski explained that he doesn't believe they have 64 any models that would meet the city required eight foot depth. Ms. Larsen added that 65 the Woods Edge townhomes have 6 foot porch depth. 66 67 Council Member Manthey said he wants to have an understanding of the where the 68 concessions (models/plans not usuable under city requirements) leave the development. 69 Mr. Jablonski responded said Lennar is attempting to meet requirements while still 70 avoiding the monotony of too few models; he feels they can do it at this point. 71 72 Mr. Jablonski noted items that exceed the Mattamy plans, such as the percentage of 73 garages with windows. There are things that will be better. Mayor Reinert asked that 74 the list of those items be provided to the council as well. 75 76 2. Comprehensive Phan Update —Parks -Community Development Director Grochala 77 and Candace Amberg of WSB & Associates reported. Ms. Amberg explained that the 78 comp plan section dealing with parks will be increased by the addition of the separate 79 document, Parks, Natural Open Space/Greenways and Trail System Plan that was 80 updated in 2004, while at the same time excluding what they feel is no longer needed. 81 The council viewed a map of Parks, Trails and the Greenway system. She explained the 82 titling of neighborhood parks, community parks, and the regional park. Each park is 83 noted on the map and the service area for that park indicated. The trail system (existing 84 and proposed) was noted and reviewed on a map. They are interconnecting. Wetland 85 banking areas are also noted. Implementation and priorities are highlighted. Most of the 86 park system was developed many years ago and parks do have a life. They were 87 originally funded with park dedication funds. The city has done an amazing job of 88 preserving the natural environment. The recreation complex concept is also seen as a 89 way to improve park options. 90 2 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 4, 2017 APPROVED 91 Mayor Reinert asked that the council be provided with the items that have been removed 92 from the plans. He also noted the Parks and Trails Management Plan idea that he 93 introduced and asked how that infiltrates into these plans. Mr. Grochala said Public 94 Services Director DeGardner is working with Ms. Amberg to incorporate that concept. 95 He explained the master planning that proceeds planning and identifies needs and costs. 96 That information provides for funding discussion and other planning activities. It all gets 97 wrapped into the capital improvement plan. Mayor Reinert noted that the Plan he 98 mentioned looks ahead in that fashion and he'd like to understand how this complements 99 that planning Mr. Grochala said that plan is well underway already and this information 100 will be filtered in as is appropriate. Finance Director Cotton added that the council will l01 see funding plans ahead as part of the budget discussion later this evening. Council 102 Member Manthey questioned if repair costs should be included in planning for future 103 development. 104 105 4. Body Worn Cameras — Public Safety Director Swenson reviewed the process the city 106 has followed in accordance with state requirements. Questions they have received were 107 reviewed as well as the department's response (all included in the staff report). A public 108 hearing is a requirement and is scheduled for council consideration of approving purchase 109 of the cameras. Data storage will be a cost involved and will be handled in conjunction 110 with Metro INet but he anticipates costs to go down as more departments move to this 111 technology. He is also proposing some upgrades to squad equipment that will insure 112 proper coordination with the cameras. He reviewed the costs included in the staff report. 113 114 Mayor Reinert remarked that the process will provide good protection for the police. 115 Council Member Manthey concurred and asked if the other agencies in the county are 116 using the recommended product? Director Swenson said there isn't a lot of experience 117 but he noted those cities that have moved on the equipment (various). 118 119 Council Member Kusterman clarified that this is not a leasing arrangement but a 120 purchase. How long are they to last? Director Swenson said the manufacturer gives four 121 to five years but they are hopeful to get more longevity. 122 123 5. Textile Recycling/Reuse —Environmental Coordinator Asleson reviewed the staff 124 report outlining the proposed program. Questions were asked about the length of the 125 contract and why the program would be successful with other programs (i.e. ARC) 126 availabl. Council Member Maher said she is supportive because she sees what could be 127 accomplished. 128 129 Mayor Reinert asked, if this request is brought forward to the council for approval, it 130 should clearly include language allowing the city to opt out of the contract. 131 132 6. Emerald Ash Borer Update —Environmental Coordinator Asleson noted that the ash 133 borer has been identified within Lino Lakes (Target parking lot). As a result the 134 Environmental Board and Park Board held a meeting to discuss. He can report that it 135 seems as if the city has been preparing properly and is in a good place. The city did 3 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 4, 2017 APPROVED 136 begin treating trees last year (about 86 done last year). He spoke on another state's 137 experience with ash tree mortality under this bug. Minnesota has a better curve due to 138 preparation and good sanitation. The city is managing the public trees, communication 139 efforts are underway with the residents on the situation, training will be offered to people 140 answering the phones, etc. 141 142 Mayor Reinert said the plans are sound and he applauds staff for staying on top of it. 143 144 7. West Shadow/LaMotte Street Reconstruction Update - City Engineer Hankee 145 reviewed her written report. She updated the council on the neighborhood meetings that 146 were held. 147 148 LaMotte — about four property owners attended. A survey will be sent out seeking 149 resident interest. 150 151 West Shadow Lake — a very good showing of those residents. It is her understanding that 152 they are interested in sewer and water utility extension. 153 154 The council, on December 11 b, will see a request for approval of the amended feasibility 155 study along with project costs and an assessment roll. The assessments would be per 156 unit and limited to properties with homes today. The council will also have a request to 157 set a public hearing date for each of the neighborhoods (LaMotte based on survey results). 158 159 Ms. riankee reviewed the presentations from the neighborhood meeting. For LaMotte, 160 the plans indicate matching existing width of the roadway, including surface water quality 161 basins, a channel outlot on LaMotte Drive restoration, on LaMotte Circle clean storm 162 sewer system and address rear yard drain issue that has been lingering. Because Rice 163 Creek recently changed their rules, storm water management isn't required without an 164 increase in impervious surface; the storm water improvements provided will be as good 165 stewardship and to prolong life of the roadway. 166 167 Ms. Hankee reviewed the presentation on West Shadow Lake. The roadway design 168 includes a memo to staff on the roadway width pluses and minuses. They are looking at 169 a 24 or 26 foot wide road on the south section (past culvert section and into the woods) 17o and then wider further down to accommodate parking at the request of residents. Curb 171 and gutter is going to be recommended as needed for drainage and for connections for 172 aesthetics and drainage operation. Council Member Rafferty asked if there is a 173 difference in curb planned for the different projects. Ms. Hankee suggested they are 174 alike — the renderings are just different. Drainage will be accommodated differently in 175 different areas — storm basins, using existing drainage in County Lakes Park that needs to 176 be opened (including tree work), pervious pavement for filtration, vegetative channeling 177 (existing easement) outlet to lake, replacement lake culverts, adding system of pipes and 178 catch basins. 179 L� CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 4, 2017 APPROVED 180 The actions to be requested are acceptance of amended feasibility report, setting public 181 hearing dates, beginning of 60 day waiting period under city charter. 182 183 Council Member Rafferty asked about Chapter 429 process. Ms. Hankee explained that 184 process: feasibility, public hearing, no waiting period. 185 186 Council Member Maher asked what data is indicating that the West Shadow Lake 187 residents want water (which may be a change from the past). Ms. Hankee said that is the 188 purpose of the public hearing. The two projects themselves are not apples to apples. 189 Council Member Maher said she's hearing about storm water management but not 190 necessarily about flood plain; Ms. Hankee responded that it is part of design planning. 191 Council Member Maher noted that ditches are under discussion and Ms. Hankee 192 concurred. Ms. Maher asked when the watershed report is submitted and Ms. Hankee 193 said January. Council Member Maher said there are some unknowns then as far as what 194 the watershed will say about those ditches; Ms. Hankee said based on experience and 195 knowledge, staff can anticipate somewhat and doesn't expect significant change 196 recommendations. Council Member Maher asked if a permit is required related to flood 197 plain and Ms. Hankee concurred, noting that the Army Corps of Engineer permit can take 198 up to about four months. 199 200 Mike Trehus. 675 Shadow Court, said at the neighborhood meeting staff told residents 201 that the ditches will be protected wetlands. They couldn't be filled. His radar went up 202 based on environmental information — ditches are alongside a road and they will be wet. 203 If the ditches were dug in an existing wetland they would require special consideration, 204 but not if they are not in wetland. He has spoken with Anoka County on that information. 205 The Minnesota Bureau of Water and Soil Resources (BOWSR) does have a grant 206 program and if it's a scenario of a wetland, they will just take care of it. Mr. Grochala 207 remarked that BOWSR gets involved if there are safety issues being addressed. Mr. 208 Trehus suggested that is the case. Ms. Hankee added that the city is proposing that the 2o9 ditches be incidental wetlands but at this point she doesn't know if that will be accepted. 210 211 Mr. Trehus suggested that the report hasn't been submitted but staff is moving ahead with 212 an assumption. If the ditches are protected, how could they be regraded them. Ms. 213 Hankee said the actual proposal is to regrade the ditches. Mr. Trehus asked why not 214 refill them; doesn't staff have to work with the other agencies and then report back about 215 what will be allowed? Ms. Hankee said staff understands what the neighborhood wants 216 and is working to that; some of the concerns she feels are premature. Mayor Reinert 217 said he hears that from staff. Community Development Director Grochala spoke to the 218 need to balance flow and control volumes since there are different flows on each side of 219 the road. Mayor Reinert asked how far away the process remains from those answers — 220 Ms. Hankee said January. 221 222 Mr. Trehus said staff is going to try and fill ditches and keep both sides of the roadway 223 looking the same and Plan B would be other options mentioned. Ms. Hankee said to 224 accommodate the water management, there will no doubt have to be something on the 5 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APPROVED December 4, 2017 225 west side. Mr. Trehus said the water can't be moved from one side to the other but he 226 wonders where that regulation exists. Ms. Hankee said there are resource of concern 227 considerations— you cannot shift drainage areas. Mr. Grochala further explained the 228 process. Mr. Trehus suggested that the city shouldn't proceed now with predetermined 229 ideas about the project when there is still time to get answers through the report process. 230 Mayor Reinert suggested that, based on what staff knows now on the stormwater 231 management situation, the full desire of the residents will not be able to be met. He 232 confirmed that in January staff will be 60-70% sure of where this needs to go; between 233 now and January, Mr. Trehus was directed to work with staff on any questions. Mr. 234 Trehus explained his concerns, including past allowance to people to fill their ditches and 235 punishment now for those who didn't. Mayor Reinert asked why the west and not east? 236 Ms. Hankee explained that it gets back to the inability to move water to a different place. 237 238 8. Zoning Interpretation -City Planner Larsen reviewed the written staff report. She 239 explained the situation at hand that involves a home that burned down. The council is 240 being asked how that language impacts a current situation. Mayor Reinert asked if it's 241 the same owner from the date of the regulation and staff said no. Staff clarified that sale 242 of the house wouldn't have changed the allowance — it burned down. 243 244 The council concurred that the split should be allowed. The Planning and Zoning Board 245 made that same recommendation. 246 247 9. 49/J Update — Morris Property NW Quadrant — Community Development Director 248 Grochala brought up a map for review. The site in question was reviewed (17 acres), and 249 it is zoned General Business. He discussed how the property has been guided. Council 250 Member Manthey asked about the zoning across the highway — it is mixed use, the whole 251 area. What they are proposing is single level townhomes, senior living and a market rate 252 apartment structure. The plans are very conceptual. Generically it would meet density 253 requirements. It does make a connection to the south as is called for by the city. He 254 discussed utility plans for the area which will have a lot to do with a project moving 255 forward. He discussed traffic implications and needs. The mayor recalled discussions 256 about height in the past so Director Grochala explained the preliminary height 257 implications. 258 259 The report was informational for the council and additional information wouldn't be seen 260 by the council until at least March 2018. 261 262 10. Advisory Board Appointments — Administrator Karlson reviewed the written report 263 indicating the board opening and corresponding applicants. There's been a good 264 response to advertising the openings. He is requesting direction on how the council 265 would like to move on the process. 266 267 With so many applicants, the mayor suggests the council may want to meet them all. 268 Director Grochala asked that the Planning and Zoning Board applicants be interviewed 269 first. 0 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 4, 2017 APPROVED 270 271 11. Code of Conduct Policy Update — Administrator Karlson recalled that the 272 document was discussed and recommended for review at a recent council meeting. 273 274 The council reviewed the document. 275 276 Council Member Kusterman offered a recommendation on work sessions and that would 277 be a time limit. Limiting the work sessions to three hours is recommended as well as 278 trying to set times for agenda items. Mayor Reinert suggested that's a good idea used as 279 an outline only because sometimes the council needs to handle important business. 280 Mayor Reinert said taking a break at three hours to refresh is also an option. Council 281 Member Kusterman said at two hours, you could take stock and plan for the evening. 282 283 Council Member Manthey said he likes the idea of taking stock after two hours. 284 285 Mayor Reinert suggested it's time to deal with the question of social media; would that 286 belong under advocacy? When posting, members should keep in mind that they are a 287 council member. Perhaps the city should look at what other groups like the council have 288 done. 289 290 Council Member Kusterman mentioned respect for staff time as an area that needs 291 attention. He isn't certain that council members go through the administrator as this 292 code calls for. Staff has work to do and too often they are besieged with questions that 293 take them away from their work. "Staff will estimate the time commitment required to a 294 council member's question, and if deemed appropriate, report to the rest of the council on 295 that commitment" 296 297 (The council recessed for a short break.) 298 299 Administrator Karlson noted a recent situation where he was put in a difficult position 300 relative to seeking a legal opinion. Council Member Manthey suggested looking at other 301 policies. Mr. Karlson said he thinks the language is fine but needs to be confirmed. 302 Mayor Reinert said other people besides him asked about the situation; Brian Bourassa 303 was mentioned. Council Member Manthey said it's a problem for someone representing 304 the city to have influence in that type of situation. 305 306 Council Member Kusterman suggested that the use of the public newsletter violated four 307 areas of the code. Mayor Reinert said that is opinion. Council Member Kusterman 308 suggested that it's probably a campaign finance violation. He also noted language that 309 he felt was abusive to staff. Council Member Kusterman remarked that the newsletter is 310 supposed to speak for the group and not one member's opinion. 311 312 Council Member Manthey said he was also offended by use of the newsletter. He'd like 313 to see concerns discussed in this situation. He'd like to see that language updated. Can 314 the council discuss individual items in the policy in order to improve it? Can "use of 7 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 4, 2017 APPROVED 315 public resources" as it shows up in the policy be addressed, so going forward there can be 316 a better understanding. 317 318 Council Member Rafferty suggested getting back to the basics of the concerns. 319 - Newsletter concerns; 320 - Making an opinion clear as what it is; 321 - Use of social media (does it come across positive for the entire council); opinion 322 based things clear again. 323 324 Mayor Reinert pledged to do a better job. 325 326 Administrator Karlson, given what he's heard, said he recommends looking at examples 327 and using League of Minnesota Cities resources to bring back some update 328 recommendations in January. 329 330 12. Legal Spending Limits for City Staff — Administrator Karlson said the question did 331 come up the same night as the previous question. He mentioned the budget for these 332 services. He feels that trust is needed as staff has to make a decision about when a legal 333 opinion is needed. He is conservative and he feels trust is merited. 334 335 13. Replacement of Council ipads/Tablets — Mayor Reinert suggested waiting until 336 January for the discussion, after the new council member is on board. 337 338 14. Election Polling Places — City Clerk Bartell reported that the city must designate 339 polling places for the coming year prior to the end of this year. A resolution that 340 maintains the current locations will be on council agenda. She reviewed additional 341 information in the staff report that was intended to update the council on the possibility of 342 future precinct/polling place changes. 343 344 15. 2018 Budget - Finance Director Cotton recalled previous discussions of the 2018 345 budget that have brought a proposed budget forward to this point. She also mentioned 346 consideration of the 2017 budget and a proposed surplus (mostly revenue based). She 347 noted the possibility of designating some of that surplus to an air conditioning unit for the 348 city hall complex. She noted that the Public Services Director, Mr. DeGardner, would be 349 speaking on parks. 350 351 Mayor Reinert noted the recent loss of the tennis courts in one area of the city and the 352 lack of replacement of those facilities. His opinion is that some surplus funding could be 353 allocated for some replacement use in that area, perhaps decided by the residents. Those 354 residents feel that they've lost something and he'd like to advocate for something there. 355 356 Council Member Rafferty said he spoke with some people who felt the courts could have 357 been redone. It was a safety situation that required the removal and he understands that. 358 0 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APPROVED December 4, 2017 359 Director DeGardner remarked that ultimately it's up to the council on now funds are 1 earmarked. 361 362 Director DeGardner then reviewed his report, including an inventory of park facilities 363 with assumptions on the life of equipment at those locations and estimated replacement 364 costs. This is really a first look at the system and what could be done. 365 366 Council Member Manthey said he appreciates having all the information for use as the 367 council considers questions about these facilities. 368 369 Director DeGardner then reviewed the sheet indicating cost estimates based an the future 370 master plan. 371 372 Director DeGardner then reviewed the third list of possible future park developments that 373 are not a part of the master plan. 374 375 Director DeGardner then reviewed a trail projects sheet. They are components that are 376 being followed with estimated costs. 377 378 The next sheet reviewed is seen as a tool to put all the information into perspective to 379 give the council an idea of an annual investment requirement, based on a timeline out to 380 2045. It does give a sense of the magnitude of the work. 381 382 Mr. DeGardner's final information presented was on the $30,000 that has traditionally 383 been budgeted for trails. 384 385 Mayor Reinert suggested that he was looking for something with a little more consistency 386 in cost. He doesn't like the heavy front end and lighter back end. Ms. Cotton said it's 387 heavy on the front end due to the assumptions on life. 388 389 Mayor Reinert suggested that it looks as if the city could dedicate $300,000 for next year. 390 He would support the recommendation. 391 392 Council Member Rafferty asked about a culvert at Clearwater Creek; is that because the 393 trail is always underwater? Mr. DeGardner concurred. He concurs with the $300,000 394 range to get things going and he wonders about adding more even if it's borrowed. He 395 touched on the recreation complex land. Mr. DeGardner suggested that this time of a 396 budget surplus is something that may not occur again. Council Member Rafferty asked 397 about putting some surplus funds into roads as well. Director Cotton warned that the 398 surplus may still be impacted by future needs. Council Member Rafferty asked if 399 $50,000 to roads is unrealistic. Director Grochala said there will be a surplus update in 400 January. 401 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 4, 2017 APPROVED 402 Council Member Manthey said he'd like to wait and see with more data. But he'd love 403 to see the tangible impact on the community that parks and trails can bring. It's good to 404 not let assets fall apart. 405 406 Mayor Reinert noted the levy of 42.3. The 42.756 that went out in the Truth in Taxation 407 statements is a change based on a change in valuation. 408 409 Council Member Kusterman suggested using more funds to a need that's there at a time 410 when funds are available. Mayor Reinert noted that the city was forced into a position of 411 austerity by the loss of value during a difficult period. Council Member Kusterman 412 suggested dedicating $500,000. Council Member Manthey clarified that if the funds are 413 dedicated, what specifically would they be spent on. Mayor Reinert said the funding 414 keeps up with the schedule presented; he wouldn't support going higher than presented. 415 There is $400,000 put aside if more is needed and could be used with a future decision. 416 The funding would be used for maintenance of current facilities. Council Member 417 Manthey said he'd like to see trail projects done. Mayor Reinert asked that the council 418 look at the situation in January, with up to date surplus information, and with a dedication 419 to trails 420 421 Council Member Rafferty asked that the council make a direction this evening. Mayor 422 Reinert said how about the $300,000 discussed and $100,000 for trails. Council Member 423 Rafferty said he's more in line with the $500,000 mentioned; it could be a rare 424 opportunity. Director Grochala warned the council again about the expenses that exist in 425 the area of building permit revenues; many inspections related to the revenue remain 426 outstanding. 427 428 Council Member Maher said she'd love to put as much as possible into the goals but she 429 understands the need for caution. She'd like to do $500,000 but sees the $400,000 may 430 be more appropriate at this time. 431 432 The council concurred that the figure is $400,000 but that doesn't include the $30,000 433 that is already budgeted for trails. Ms. Cotton explained that the funds will be held in a 434 management fund and the Park Board will make recommendations that come back to the 435 council. 436 437 Council Member Kusterman said he feels $500,000 is reasonable with a unique funding 438 opportunity such as this. 439 440 Council Member Rafferty concurred with Council Member Kusterman. He'd like to see 441 the positive move forward. That would be $500,000 total. 442 443 Council Member Manthey said he concurs; that would be $400,000 plus the $100,000. 444 445 Council Member Maher said she'd join with the group and support. 446 I[Q CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 4, 2017 :''' 1 /DI 447 Council Member Rafferty asked about investigation vehicles. Director Swenson 448 explained that there is one vehicle in the capital vehicle replacement plan that would be 449 discussed next year. There is one vehicle that will be discussed based on condition 450 (Toyota Corolla). Council Member Rafferty asked Director DeGardner about a vehicle 451 that is currently being used by Brian Finke. Director Swenson explained that when the 452 temporary inspector came on the vehicle that is used as spare was put into rotation for use 453 by that new inspector. Council Member Rafferty suggested not buying the truck right 454 now and that the 60,000 mile truck be used instead. The city doesn't have the kind of 455 money it takes to have spare vehicles. 456 457 Council Member Maher noted, regarding building inspections, that she's heard from 458 people that inspectors are missing things that need to be redone by contractors. She 459 noted Birch Court and 6495 Deerwood. She was on the phone with someone who was 460 basically getting a driveby inspection and that is not acceptable. Community 461 Development Director Grochala pledged to investigate. 462 463 16. Council Updates on Board/Commissions 464 465 17. Monthly Progress Report — no changes noted by City Administrator. 466 167 18. Review Regular Agenda — the agenda was reviewed and there were no changes. 468 469 The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m. 470 171 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 472 January 8, 2018. 473 474 475 476- 477 u ' Bartell, Ci Clerk 478 11