Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/31/2018 Env Board PacketCity of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:30 PM Community Room AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Approval of Minutes 4. Open Mike 5. Action Items A. Natures Refuge/Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review B. Environmental Board Goals for 2018 6. Discussion Items A. North Metro Cable PR Assistance B. Recycling Updates 7. Adjourn CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JOINT MEETING WITH PARK BOARD DATE : November 29, 2017 TIME STARTED : 6:31 P.M. TIME ENDED : 9:17 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Steve Heiskary, Paula Andrzejewski, Liz Kaufenberg, Shawn Holmes, Nancie Klebba, Alex Schwartz, John Sullivan MEMBERS ABSENT : None STAFF PRESENT : Marty Asleson, Maddie Pelon Pre Environmental Board and Park Board meeting at the Target EAB site at 5:30 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Mr. Heiskary called the Lino Lakes Environmental Board meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. on November 29, 2017. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOVE- Discussion Item - Emerald Ash Borer Discussion Item before Action Item Mr. Sullivan made a MOTION to approve the Agenda with the minor change. Ms. Holmes seconded the motion. Motion carried 6 - 0. 3. APROVAL OF MINUTES: October 25. 2017 Ms. Kaufenberg made a MOTION to approve the October 25, 2017 Meeting Minutes. Mr. Schwartz seconded the motion. Motion carried 6 - 0. 4. OPEN MIKE Mr. Heiskary declared Open Mike at 6:34 p.m. Open Mike closed at 6:35 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES Enivornmental Board November 29, 2017 Page 2 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Emerald Ash Borer Discussion Mr. Asleson started the discussion by introducing the Park Board and Ms. Burington from Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Ms. Burington regulates insect infestation such as emerald ash bore, was present to address EAB and answer questions. A representative from YTS was also at the meeting. Mike Hoffman from parks department was there as well. Mr. Asleson stated the history of Emerald Ash Borer, the discovery in Lino Lakes and the plan for treatment and removal of the infected trees. In 2010, the City of Lino Lakes changed the `Disease Tree Ordinance" to include EAB, which addresses the removal, replacement and treatment. Up to this point, most of the city's park tree removals, and many of the street tree removals/replacements were removed and replaced by the City's Parks Department. City's boulevard ash trees will be treated on a three-year cycle until the trees can be removed and replaced Anoka County has thousands of ash trees in the regional park. The county's policy is to allow the trees to die on the stump, and remove only trees that pose a public health problem V Ms. Burington, presented information about the Emerald Ash Borer and added that the website - www.mda.state.mn.us/eab- that shows the status of the borer. The MDA can assist with trainings, presentations, visual survey, confirm infestation and be an information resource. Mr. Schwartz wanted to know what the city could do to improve our results with the Emerald Ash Borer. Ms. Burington, answered the city is already doing everything that the city can do. Communicate is a big thing, do not move firewood and educate the residents. You could offer the residents the same rate the city is paying for removal. Mr. Asleson showed a GIS map to look at parks and inventory of ash trees in Lino Parks. Tim Schumacher and Tim Sether from YTS — a tree service/solution company who works with the cleaning division and works with municipalities to remove large areas of trees. YTS will be doing a clean out of Country Lakes Park this winter. Ms. Holmes was questioning at what year you could not treat an infected tree. DRAFT MINUTES Enivornmental Board November 29, 2017 Page 3 Ms. Burington stated it all depends on the age, diameter and the location of the growing area. Many variables come in to play. Mr. Schumacher replied that YST would treat a tree up to 25% infested and still guarantee the treatment. Ms. Holmes wanted to know how is the city notify homeowners if they have an infected tree. Mr. Asleson replied that if the city workers see a tree that is infected they would notified the homeowner. It would give out recommendations. Ms. Burington mentioned that some cities would notify the homeowner about the infected tree, and ask the homeowner to remove the tree. In addition, if the infected tree has not cut down in a certain amount of time the homeowner will be asset on his taxes. Ways to educate the public are public information release, the cities website and the Department of Agriculture offers recommendations 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Local Surface Water Management Plan Review and Consider Approval, Katy Thompson WSB Katie Thompson from WSB presented the Local Surface Water Management Plan Updates. Full version is on the City's website. The plan to submit to Rice Creek Watershed District by January 31, 2018 by state statue. • The plan last updated in 2015. • We had to include the Rice Creek Watershed District rules updated in 2017, watershed plan updated in 2016. • Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management organization watershed management plan updated 2016 • TMDLs for Golden Lake and the upper Mississippi River bacteria. • New RCWD floodplain modeling. Local water plan goals fall in several categories: • Surface water • Public drainage systems • Groundwater • Wetland & natural resources • Education • Financing DRAFT MINUTES Enivornmental Board November 29, 2017 Page 4 Future Condition Issues • Water quality concerns • Increase flooding potential • Groundwater management Ms. Thompson went through lakes, creeks and wetlands describing the water issues and strategies for improvements. The next steps are to • Incorporate staff; Environmental Board and Council comments • Submit to RCWD by January 31, 2018 • Planning & Zoning February 2018 • City Council March 2018 Looking for recommendation from the Environmental board for approve the plan for distribution. Mr. Heiskary would like to suggest some text edits which he will relay directly to Ms. Thompson Mr. Sullivan wanted to know how often the document is updated and why the recent precipitations statics are not included. He also thought that improving an impaired lake would be a great goal for the board. \/ Ms. Thompson replied that data comes out every 10 years. Ms. Holmes suggested that the information on impaired lakes such as, how many are impaired and what the definition is of impaired lakes, to be included in the report. Ms. Kaufenberg made a MOTION to approve the distribution of the Surface Water Management Plan. Ms. Andrzejewski seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0 B. 2018 Environmental Board Goals Mr. Heiskary would like to make the goals a two-part document. One part would be 2017 accomplishes or a 2017 recap and then what the goals would be for the upcoming year. Mr. Heiskary would like ideas sent to him in a word document. 1) Promote Education Mr. Asleson mentioned that in 2017 we did an Enviro show at Earth Day collaborating with Rice Creek Watershed District and VLAWMO Mr. Asleson also mentioned that NorthMetro would like to do a few videos in 2018, and a few suggestions were; surface water/ recycling/ organics/ EAB — topics to be determined DRAFT MINUTES Enivornmental Board November 29, 2017 Page 5 Mr. Sullivan questioned about in which ways we collaborate with watershed districts. It might be better to say consult with the two watershed districts. Ms. Klebba stated that the Pelitier Lake drawdown is one project in which we do collaborate with the watershed district. In addition, the Local Surface Water Management Plan will go to Rice Creek Watershed District and can be used for acquiring grants that in turn helps the city Mr. Heiskary suggested have members of the watershed districts come to our meeting so we can ask questions and better understand about what is happening in our area 2) Promote Earth Day/ Recycling Days/Blue Heron Day For 2018, we should promote the garbage haulers that work with organics recycling Continue to collaborate with County on projects Increase the volunteer base at city events 3) Meet our Recycling Goal In 2017, we meet our recycling goal. Continue in 2018 to meet the goal and continue to promote organics recycling. a AV 4) Continue to monitor AUAR Mr. Asleson remarked that these plans would be in the upcoming 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 5) Continue to perform site evaluation on past projects In 2017, we visited a variety of projects and we should continue in 2018 6) Support Conservation Development Through site review processes by incorporating The Resources Management System Plan components of the City Comprehensive Plan. 7) Partnership with Parks Department on the Community Gardens Make residents aware of the garden plots 8) Review the EAB Implement Plan 9) Continue to work on Woolan's Park Wetland bank 10) Monitor the heron rookery — persuade Emerald Ash Borer and release some parasite wasp 11) Support Stormwater efforts DRAFT MINUTES Enivornmental Board November 29, 2017 Page 6 12) Support the maintenance of established conservation easement areas where funding is available such as Foxbourgh and The Preserve Mr. Heiskary would like members to send him any notes on the goals, so he can create a document for review Ms. Kaufenberg would hike to see about becoming a Greenstep City C. Recycling Updates Ms. Pelon announced that on December 4, Walter's would be going to the work session to present the Blue Bag organics recycling program. So far, 15 residents have signed up for this program. Mr. Asleson and Ms. Pelon are looking at getting an industrial shredder. The county would own the unit and John would operate it for us on Recycling Saturday Simple Recycling is going to the work session for the second time on January 22. December meeting will not be held 7. ADJOURNMENT 7 Ms. Andrzejewski made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:17 p.m. Mr. Schwartz seconded the motion. Motion carried 7 - 0. Respectfully submitted, Mary Fogarty DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson, Environmental Coordinator MEETING DATE: January 31, 2018 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review for Nature's Refuge APPLICANT: Pete Kocisak/Preferred Builders Inc. 10500 Bren Road East Minnetonka, MN 55343 OWNER: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Pete Kocisak The proposed Nature's Refuge site is located north of Main Street and .3 mile west of Lake Drive. The property is bordered on the west by single-family homes, on the south by Main Street (CSAH 14) and single-family homes, on the east by Lino Lakes Elementary School and single-family Homes, and on the north by undeveloped wetland, woodlands, cropland, and grassland. Preferred Builders, Inc. is proposing to develop an approximately 95 -acre site in the City of Lino Lakes to provide 60 new single-family residential lots with associated streets, utilities, stormwater treatment areas, and buffers on avoided wetlands. The proposed residential subdivision is guided for low density and single family residential use. The proposed land disturbance area is 40 acres. The developer is proposing new 7.2 acres of impervious land. A municipal street system will include storm sewers that will route runoff from impervious surfaces to stormwater treatment basins. These stormwater management facilities will provide the required treatment of runoff prior to discharge to wetlands. The developer is proposing 32 foot wide streets and a 60 foot road right -of way. The developer is proposing to start construction in the Spring of 2018 and take 3 to 8 years to complete. The site is part of a multi- owner conservation development project proposed in 2006. 1 All developments are now considered to be conservation development. New Rice Creek Watershed (RCWD) rules have changed the applications of volume control and required buffers along Wetland Management Corridors (WMC). Wetland Management Corridors are areas with significant, and high value wetlands. These corridors require 50 -foot buffers, and form the City greenway system with trail corridors, park connections, and unique resources. The corridors require conservation easements, a management plan and documented maintenance in future years. SITE CHARACTERISTICS Site Evaluation/Land Cover The southern and central parts of the site consist of annually -tilled cropland. During the wetland delineation, the northeastern part of the site was occupied by a large wet meadow/shallow marsh wetland complex dominated by reed canary grass and cattail. This wetland continues offsite to the northeast. The northwestern part of the site included woodland dominated by quaking aspen and red oak trees, and upland grassland dominated by reed canary grass, Canada goldenrod and Kentucky bluegrass. Most wetlands on the site are dominated by reed canary grass and cattail, with farmed wetland fringes, but some wetlands on the site also support rare plant species identified and protected/regulated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR). Ground elevations on the site range from 912 feet above msl in the southern part of the site where an equipment building is located, down to 902 feet above msl in the open water parts of the large wetland in the northeastern part of the site. Prior to 2006 when Natures Refuge was first proposed, the site consisted mostly of Oak woodland, with small suppressed wetland areas in the woodlands. Upon removal of the trees in later years, rare species emerged in some of these wetlands. There was also winterberry present on the perimeters of the wetlands. The winterberry was also removed. Winterberry is an indicator of high quality wetland. In 2017, Critical Connections performed a plant community assessment delineating plant communities existing to date. Critical Connections mapped and evaluated fifty-nine (59) unique land cover areas (polygons) within the 94 -acre project boundary to be classified as a NPC or otherwise. Of these fifty-nine polygons, thirty-six polygons totaling 58.8 acres were classified as one of five native plant community types. The remaining twenty three Polygons were classified as Cultural Cover Types (Not Native Plant Communities) and totaled 36.4 acres. See Attachment 6. Soils It is the soils and hydrology of Natures Refuge land that support rare plant species. Isanti wet and Solderville soils, banding around muck soils on the site, with wet floodplain characteristics. This soil profile dominates this site. 2 Significant Resources Attachment 3 maps show delineated wetlands and rare plant and animal species locations. The location of documented State listed plant species and Blanding's Turtle locations. Every wetland on this site and around this site has rare plant species located in them. Figure 4 and 5 have the NPC (Native Plant Community) and Condition Ranking Classifications associated for Nature's Refuge site. These exhibits show that although the native classified areas for the site are a bit rough, they non the less exist and with proper restoration techniques these plant communities can be brought up to higher standards. As the exhibits show, the rare plants found on this site, and in every wetland area of this site range from special concern up to the endangered status. In addition, Blanding's Turtle has been recorded in Natures Refuge in 1992, and in adjacent areas to Natures Refuge land in 1990. Recommendation: Design consideration must protect the rare features of this sit to the greatest and least invasive design possible; including turtle barrier elimination (dropped curbing, and preservation of continuity in turtle travel and breeding areas). Design should be should emphasize avoidance of rare plant species locations. Surface Water/Ground Water The site has relatively flat topography that drains west off the site through Anoka County Ditch #10-22-32. This ditch flows west (outlet elevation of approximately 901) and then south to Marshan Lake, which drains to Rice Creek and eventually to the Mississippi River. Water from Columbus Township slowly drains to the site over almost flat land. Ground water upwells in the Wollan's Park area to add to surface water, and most likely in the School lake -type area as well. The ground water for most of the site is very high. Areas to the North still have existing Oak woodlands where the water table may be as high as 2 feet from the surface. Fen characteristics on the site present upwelling ground water in places, creating a Lake Type of ecosystem. It is because of this the large wetland in early survey days was known as Pin Oak Lake. The proposed borrow pits may create wetland drawdown impacts. Any decrease in the elevation of surrounding wetlands will damage the rare wetland areas. Nature's Refuge developer is intending to route all impervious area surfaces through a series of storm sewers (also impervious), ponds, an infiltration basin, and wetlands before discharging to ACD 32. The narrative describes three build -out impervious surface totals; 7.2 Acres, 7.8 Acres, and 5.8 Acres. All of the treatment issues including volume and rate control, and exactly how much impervious area the proposal has, will be looked at by RCWD and our City engineers. Water draining off wetland edge properties will have pollutant loads. Nitrogen fertilizers in the runoff will change biodiversity by favoring non-native, and nitrogen -loving plants. Basically this favors the non-native plants to out -compete the natives. This has been observed to happen in a small fen in Clearwater Creek. Development. Wetlands that have rare plant communities or seed bank rare plants that will be restored must be protected from this runoff. A drainage swale and treatment system must be designed in the backs of houses to filter and utilize nitrogen, and phosphorous for that matter, before it enters the unique wetlands of Natures Refuge. This swale and filtering system should be placed on the lots affected and not in the wetland buffer, unless the buffer is widened to accommodate the BMP and protect (by not disturbing) the wetland. Recommend that design should capture all yard surface water runoff especially to the backs of lots that can pollute the surrounding wetlands. Bio swales is an example of a BMP that can mitigate this concern Flood Plain Flood Plain in this area drives the rare and unique wetland characteristics that support rare plants. Flood plain elevations in the larger wetland must not change in wetland and rare plant species locations... Changing the flood plain elevations either way will either destroy a very unique wetland including our Wollan's Park wetland, or flood residents if it increases. This is always an issue in project design review, but needs reiteration in this report because of the two very sensitive issues. Wetlands This area has a wetland preservation corridor. There are 7 delineated wetlands on the site totaling 41.55 acres Wetland boundaries have been approved by the Watershed District. The wetlands are located on Figure 2 of the Klolhaug Environmental Services Report for Natures Refuge. The proposed buffer area for these wetlands is 15.87 acres. The project proposes 87,747 square feet (2.0144 acres) of permanent fill in four wetland locations and 154,527 square feet (3.5475 acres) of temporary/No Loss wetland impact associated with shallow excavation and enhancement within one wetland basin. Wetland fill areas can be seen in the Grading Plan included in the Plan Sheet Attachments. The developer proposes to mitigate for all filled wetlands and compensate for all destroyed rare plants, in the large wetland to the East (outlot A) by future restoration and banking credits. The Developers position is that the proposed wetland impacts are unavoidable due to the need for a cohesive functional neighborhood with residential land use efficiency, an interconnected street network, and sustainable wetland functions. With that, a plant/wetland destruction and mitigation plan has been submitted to the Minnesota DNR. M The DNR will make a determination on direct destruction amounts allowed and mitigation amounts needed. All of the wetlands in this area contain rare plant and rare plant seed bank. These plants and seed bank make up the most unique resource in Lino Lakes. To that end, as always required in all wetland management corridors, a conservation easement is required over these areas with a 50 foot buffer. The City should be named as a holder or co -holder of the conservation easement with the watershed district. With the easement and buffer, and with the developer's desire to mitigate destroyed rare plant areas in the larger wetland in particular, a restoration plan must be submitted to the RCWD for review. This plan should also be given to the city for review. Most importantly, Out Lot A is a 34.45 Acre wetland area that is in the same wetland system, and has the same characteristics of the Wollan's Park wetland bank. The destruction of rare plants in the banded soils surrounding this wetland in particular must be avoided. Wollan's Park Wetland Bank is part of the same large wetland complex and was very successful in bringing back rare plant features and the indigenous cover by simply removing thatch and the use of chemicals. Very little organic soil material (the part that holds historic rare seeds) was lost in Wollan's Park. In the Nature's Refuge proposal, the over excavation of the wetlands for restoration, Restoration of wetlands with rare plant should be limited to Reed Canary Thatch removal with no more than an inch or two of organic soils removed. The areas of concern for rare plants include all Isanti Wet and Solderville soils in adjacent wetlands and proposed buffer areas. A Wollan's Park restoration strategy, (management plan) should be required in these areas. The possible borrow pit impacts to the surrounding wetlands were not seen in the 2006 plan. The proposed borrow pits are 30 to 40 feet deep with undetermined impacts to rare plant areas, and possibly contaminating area wells. Any draw down to surround wetland caused by the borrow pits must not be allowed. All soil needed for house pads and roads should be imported to the site rather than digging borrow pits. Importing soils is consistent with the original 2006 plan. Dewatering practices should be evaluated in more detail for no impact to adjacent wetlands. Public Education Since this is one of the most diverse natural communities in Lino Lakes, the developer should create a new resident education brochure that informs them of the uniqueness of the site, the existence of conservation easements and signage, the existence of buffers and how they can help to maintain this uniqueness. This brochure must be approved by the 5 City early on in the development process. Residents must be informed at the time of their house closing, and wetland buffer signs must be in place before any new house permits are issued for houses that are scheduled to have signage in the back of their property. Information of the conservation easement, buffers and signage must be placed in the city property folders for affected properties so that this information follows to new property owners. In addition, alternative lawn options should be given to property owners. The option discussion should site where by ordinance alternative lawns are allowed, what alternative lawns can be composed of and look like, and suppliers and contractors that can help with alternative lawns. Alternative lawn performance should also be discussed. Trail In 2006, a trail corridor was designed into the western edge of the large wetland area known as Pin Oak Lake. Since that time, we have come to understand the uniqueness of the rare plant communities of Pin Oak. We have come to understand that the rare plant communities of Pin Oak wetland are in saturated, and banded soils usually consisting of muck, Isanti Wet, and Solderville. This soil and water relationship exists in the proposed trail corridor, particularly on the northern half of the proposed trail. The trail should be repositioned in the development away from this area, or enough additional buffer provided to maximize the protection of this area. The trail should be moved off of rare species areas. No disturbance or reseeding of the Isanti Wet or Solderville (a generally saturated soil) soils in the proposed trail area should occur. The areas in the Isanti Wet and Solderville soil areas of the proposed trail area should be managed for the indigenous soils in the seed bank. Other areas disturbed along the trail corridors should have no loss of indigenous soils and if the soils are hydric, management techniques should allow the seed bank to come in. No seeding of other seed types should be employed in the area of the large wetland. Again, it is recommended to relocate the trail and provide an adequate buffer that would protect the large wetland rare plant areas. Drinking Water Protection The developer must ensure that ground water is not contaminated by ponds and borrow pits dug into the water table. The designed basins/borrow pits, if allowed should have enough separation between the ordinary high ground water level, and the bottom of the basin. The basins must at least 3 feet of sand separation between the two surfaces (the standard for infiltration basins). There are many private wells around the proposed development property. Some of the wells are as shallow as 50 feet. The City has a duty to ensure wellhead protection. Digging a borrow pit 40 feet into the groundwater could pollute the drinking water of surrounding private wells. The pit and 2 digging into the ground water is the same as digging a well hole 40 feet down in the area and leaving it open. Well holes of this type are known as injection wells, and inject non -hazardous fluids underground. Non-polluting fluids in Class 5 injection wells are injected either into or above an underground source of water. Pollutants still have opportunity to enter into an injection well if left open. Staff doesn't see the difference between an injections well and the proposed borrow pits. Recommend documentation clarifying this matter. Tree Preservation A tree inventory and map was submitted with the application. Trees are generally on the edge of existing wetlands and along property lines. There are 1300 trees surveyed on the property. Out of the 1300 surveyed trees, there are 141 total tree replacements required. Ash Trees on the site, and Siberian Elm must be removed from the site regardless of the tree locations. No compensation will be required for these trees. All replacement trees must not be replaced in areas of significant wetlands that harbor rare plant features. Aspen, Cottonwood, and Willow trees are detrimental to the management of unique wetland vegetation and should be removed. No compensation should be required for the removal of the wetland fringe trees. cwppp A Stormwater Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP) was submitted. A SWPPP is a required federal, state and city mandatory program to prevent the pollution of our surface water. Staff had the following comments about the Nature's Refuge SWPPP submittal: • Describe the phasing and sequencing of the stated phasing of grading • Under the "Spills and Contamination" section, must have provision to have all fueling stations in a containment structure. • Under "Inspections and Repair", add all inspection and repair reports must be emailed to City Hall Environmental and Engineering by the next day. An inspector certifications must be received and accepted at City Hall prior to Grading. • In the "Basement and Footing Excavation" section, add the following: "An initial City Inspection must take place for perimeter control before a building permit is received. Perimeter control must be in place around the entire perimeter of each house project regardless of slope. Alternative perimeter control to silt fence is only allowed when the ground is frozen. In addition, inspections must take place on each lot in the same manner as project inspection and repair, i.e. Inspector certification and timing issue requirements must be met. All Storm Drains within 200 feet must be protected including back -drain parts of all storm drains. Must be the basket type of protection. No fabric is allowed to be protruding from the edges of storm grates." 7 The following required parts of a SWPPP are missing and must be provided: • Maps showing the locations of all surface waters, including wetlands, stormwater ponds or basins within one mile of the site • A determination whether surface waters within lone mile of the site are special or impaired for one of the construction -related parameters and additional or enhanced BMPs that will be utilized to address the special or impaired waters. • Estimated quantities of all erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's to be used for the life of the project. • The following factors must be accounted for in design of BMP's to use at the site; o The amount, frequency, intensity and duration of precipitation o Storm water runoff and run-on and expected flow from impervious surfaces o Slope lengths and steepness, site location and drainage features o Flow rates and volume of channelized flow o Soils • Timing of installation for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's to be installed at the site along with the procedures to establish additional BMPs as necessary. • Methods to minimize soil compaction and preserve top soil at the site. • Documentation why certain design requirements or SWPPP components are not feasible and the methods to be substituted as allowable by permit. • Procedures for terminating permit coverage. Archeological _. An archeological study performed in 2006 by the 106 Group. The study found no impacts in the Nature's Refuge land. Landscape Plan Enough money will have to be escrowed at a rate of 1 tree per household frontage for boulevard trees... All trees must be 2" to 2.5" in diameter. A species list was submitted. The City will determine the species and location of each boulevard tree and plant them. Most likely, the Lindens and Sugar Maple will be changed to something else like Bur Oak, White Oak, and Red Oak, a species of disease resistant Elm, Hackberry, or Ginkgo. There are 70 landscape overstory trees required for the development project. These should not be planted in wetland restoration or preservation areas. There are 141 Tree Preservation Trees required. These trees should not be planted in wetland restoration or preservation areas. American Lindens and Sugar Maples in the Landscape Legend should be changed to Bur Oak, White Oak, and Red Oak, a species of disease resistant Elm, Hackberry, or Ginkgo. Indigenous shrubs should be planted. Sunrise Forsythia and Sugarplum Lilac should be changed to winterberry and gray dogwood. Both of these species are found, or were found in wetland areas of Nature's Refuge prior to land clearing. No willows should be planted in wetland restoration, conservation easement, or pond areas. No trees should be planted in rare plant restoration areas such as along the eastern edge or buffer area of the large wetland. Again, the best thing for this area is to eliminate the trail and move it to another area if possible. If the trail that is presently proposed for this area is not moved, than any back yard trees must be planted far enough away from the trail so as to not encroach into the trail area as they grow, or add another species that would be more upright and not spreading. A revised detailed landscape plan must be submitted that shows a planting plan for each shrub species and changes to tree species. The Plan must be approved by the City. The plan listed wetland seed mix 33-261 for wetland fringe areas (that are not in a rare plant areas) is ok. However; areas where there are listed or potential rare plant areas, the wetland seed bank will be enough to restore those areas. The plan should be more specific on the location of those different areas and tailor a restoration plan that is similar to Wollan's Park. The plan calls out a MN DOT 25-131mix for construction disturbed areas, areas not intended to be sodded, or retention basin. Staff recommends a native seed mix approved by the city for these areas. The MN DOT 25-131 mix is a low maintenance turf type seed, but still requires fertilization. Nitrogen runoff will change plant biodiversity by driving out native plants that don't need the nitrogen, and favoring non-native plants that need more nitrogen. As stated earlier, areas like wetlands in Outlot A, and on the east side bordering the large wetland to the north and east should not be excessively excavated (no more than an inch or two) and managed for the seed bank available and supplied by nature. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Design consideration must protect the rare features of this sit to the greatest and least invasive design possible; including turtle barrier elimination (dropped curbing, and preservation of continuity in turtle travel and breeding areas). Design should emphasize avoidance. 2. Recommend that design should capture all yard surface water runoff especially to the backs of lots that can pollute the surrounding wetlands. Bio swales is an example of a BMP that can mitigate this concern. 3. Recommendation is to move the trail location to a non -impacting alignment. 4. Manage all wetland restoration in this area in a manner similar to the Wollan's Park Management and Restoration Plan. Than is, restoration must look at thatch removal with little to no native soil removal. No additional native plant seed mixes should be used. 5. Look closer at the proposed borrow pits and make sure surrounding wells will not be contaminated with surface water runoff. 0 6. Staff requests documentation that supports no adverse effects of the proposed borrow pits and the water levels in surrounding wetlands. 7. Flood plain elevations in all preserved wetland areas must not change. 8. Soils for house pads and roads should be imported to the area instead of using borrow pits. Imported soils must be approved by the city. 9. An educational plan must be written, given to the homeowners before closing on the property, and placed in the city address folders to follow with the property. The plan must be approved by the city. The plan should educate and inform the resident of the uniqueness of natural resources on the site, alert them to the presence of conservation easements and rules associated with the easements, and offer advice on how they can help to protect the resources by minimizing contaminated runoff from their lot. Alternative lawn options should also be given to property owners. 10. Ash Trees on the site, and Siberian Elm must be removed from the site regardless of the tree locations. No compensation will be required for these trees. All replacement trees must not be replaced in areas of significant wetlands that harbor rare plant features. Aspen, cottonwood and Willow trees are detrimental to the management of unique wetland vegetation and should be removed. No compensation should be required for the removal of the wetland fringe trees. 11. The "road issue" (extending the road to the north) must be resolved before conservation easements are placed over any WMC areas to the North. 12. Enough money will have to be escrowed at a rate of 1 tree per household frontage for boulevard trees. 13. The City should be named as a holder or co -holder of the conservation easement with the watershed district. 14. Ash Trees on the site, and Siberian Elm must be removed from the site regardless of the tree locations. No compensation will be required for these trees. All replacement trees must not be replaced in areas of significant wetlands that harbor rare plant features. Aspen, cottonwood and Willow trees are detrimental to the management of unique wetland vegetation and should be removed. No compensation should be required for the removal of the wetland fringe trees. 15. Landscaping: Enough money will have to be escrowed at a rate of 1 tree per household frontage for boulevard trees... All trees must be 2" to 2.5" in diameter. A species list was submitted. The City will determine the species and location of each boulevard tree and plant them. Most likely, the Lindens and Sugar Maple will be changed to something else like Bur Oak, White Oak, and Red Oak, a species of disease resistant Elm, Hackberry, or Ginkgo. There are 70 landscape overstory trees required for the development project. These should not be planted in wetland restoration or preservation areas. There are 141 Tree Preservation Trees required. These trees should not be planted in wetland restoration or preservation areas. American Lindens and Sugar Maples in the Landscape Legend should be changed to Bur Oak, White Oak, and Red Oak, a species of disease resistant Elm, Hackberry, or Ginkgo. 10 Indigenous shrubs should be planted. Sunrise Forsythia and Sugarplum Lilac should be changed to winterberry and gray dogwood. Both of these species are found, or were found in wetland areas of Nature's Refuge prior to land clearing. No willows should be planted in wetland restoration, conservation easement, or pond areas. No trees should be planted in rare plant restoration areas such as along the eastern edge or buffer area of the large wetland. Again, the best thing for this area is to eliminate the trail and move it to another area if possible. If the trail that is presently proposed for this area is not moved, than any back yard trees must be planted far enough away from the trail so as to not encroach into the trail area as they grow, or add another species that would be more upright and not spreading. A revised detailed landscape plan must be submitted that shows a planting plan for each shrub species and changes to tree species. The Plan must be approved by the City. The plan listed wetland seed mix 33-261 for wetland fringe areas (that are not in a rare plant areas) is ok. However; areas where there are listed or potential rare plant areas, the wetland seed bank will be enough to restore those areas. The plan should be more specific on the location of those different areas and tailor a restoration plan that is similar to Wollan's Park. The plan calls out a MN DOT 25-131mix for construction disturbed areas, areas not intended to be sodded, or retention basin. Staff recommends a native seed mix approved by the city for these areas. Areas like wetlands in Outlot A, and on the east side bordering the large wetland to the north and east should not be excessively excavated (no more than an inch or two) and managed for the seed bank available and supplied by nature. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location map 2. Nature's Refuge Concept Plan 3. Nature's Refuge Plan Sheets 4. Wetland Management Corridor, Kjolhaug Environmental Services 5. Delineated Wetlands and Rare Plants 11 N Proposed Development Site CIT NCf, OF I , / E Feet K 10/10/2016 0 250 500 1,000 Tf- rd- 16 Li ` r 43\1---- 4V L1.2, or 45� • ^ lip �,• 41 46 �. !r� q.- -71 J - N 4j I 48' ir � --- /50 51.9 "OEM r� G / 5 \ I z 2 ` .29 —_� / 4 10 % 34 �( 30 31 32 11 6 r�8 I 24r—, 123 22 / 21 20 / ► '� I I —a;, 18 ------------------ - , - 1 110 1 -- 1 17AF or 16 Ir dip 76 --- _ .� `` -�_ . � - --- - ( '; _ . � � � �•'r�i�_��,'•f ice_ I I I I I 'I I J I I I J I I I / AI / J I I rAIr— — — — — — — — — — II I I_J I I I ----------- CALL-- CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 5 JIW Know what's below.— "``11����"^^��kkkk Call before you dig. ------------ -T - -T ---I T- --� I i I I SITE Y g. 5 N NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX t COVER 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT & EXISTING CONDITIONS INDEX 3-7. EXISTING CONDITIONS 8-12. PRELIMINARY PLAT & 13. PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 14. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN INDEX 15-17. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 18. DETAILS R1 -R4. RESOURCE INVENTORY T1 -T7. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L1. LANDSCAPE PLAN F1. FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT N ------------ -T - -T ---I T- --� I i I I SITE Y g. 5 N NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP 0 150 300 600 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 set 1"—. the ground in ere, lube located 150 feet westerly Df the centerline of Nord— Road Wesl and 40 feet northerly of the centerline of C.S.A.R. No. 14. Elevation=894.878 (NAVD 88) 2. Top Nut Hydrant East of the Southeast entrance to Lino Lakes Elementary School. Elevation=920.009 (NAVD 88) `(/� 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Revisions: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. Carl I : en viranm Suite 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian ]. Krysto, a Drawn: ]]0 1 ental Blaine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my 1' NATURES REFUGE of • engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 tlirect supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature: 3 i Designed: elk 10500 Bren Road E. COVER Mc in surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 UcensedProfessionalEngineerunder Lino Lakes, Minnesota ww.ca rlsonmccain. com the laws of the state of Minnesota Date: 11/14/17 License ft: 25063 Date: 11/14/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 18 SHEET INDEX 1. COVER 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT & EXISTING CONDITIONS INDEX 3-7. EXISTING CONDITIONS 8-12. PRELIMINARY PLAT & 13. PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 14. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN INDEX 15-17. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 18. DETAILS R1 -R4. RESOURCE INVENTORY T1 -T7. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L1. LANDSCAPE PLAN F1. FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT N 0 150 300 600 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 set 1"—. the ground in ere, lube located 150 feet westerly Df the centerline of Nord— Road Wesl and 40 feet northerly of the centerline of C.S.A.R. No. 14. Elevation=894.878 (NAVD 88) 2. Top Nut Hydrant East of the Southeast entrance to Lino Lakes Elementary School. Elevation=920.009 (NAVD 88) `(/� 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Revisions: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. Carl I : en viranm Suite 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian ]. Krysto, a Drawn: ]]0 1 ental Blaine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my 1' NATURES REFUGE of • engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 tlirect supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature: 3 i Designed: elk 10500 Bren Road E. COVER Mc in surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 UcensedProfessionalEngineerunder Lino Lakes, Minnesota ww.ca rlsonmccain. com the laws of the state of Minnesota Date: 11/14/17 License ft: 25063 Date: 11/14/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 18 N PROPOSED LEGEND EASEMENTSGARENSHOWNITTHUS: OO - Denotes Anoka County Monument Bearings shown are based on the South line f the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast • - Denotes Found Iron Monument D 25 50 100 __ -- ` - - Quarter of Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 which is assumed to bear North 89 degrees O - Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch rebar, _ y o a = 33 minutes 46 seconds West marked with RLS 40361 ( SCALE IN FEET) 0 -1 1 --5 0 - - / ) J ____1_ �- / i OWNER: KCR IN4ESTMENTS LLC PID:05-31-22-42-0003 , / L- U 1 I U I V `i ZONING-RURAL EXECUTIVE being 5 feet inw idth. and adjoining side lot lines, and 10feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and rear lot lines unless 1L _ --North line of the South half of otherwise shown on this Plat. �� I fig-+ S89°24'40"E of theO� southeaatw�uarterorof rseotion 5, 1309.54 Township 31, Range 22 z 3mN 02•j� 1 O / �UL ILL AL nv .% .1 %% 1 , 1 s`1 \, t 11,388,075 sq.ft. G H 0 ST PLAT-_�--� 1 ' L, I (n o� W N t F / -,--tLy 44.4o �- ��/ 14 111,180 111.525 aq.ft. \ pol eq.ft. \ \ AL,\ 1 /-'�IIU ----- + 1101.00-- ^ N u N89°2o7'42"W '-'Soutter�n 30 O 2 a _ I �? s Quar the et f Sou ,east / f -30 I 13�• 111,312 eq.ft. , Quarter of Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 j I 111,352 aq.ft. ` W J II _— \� I� L-- I 135.0 ___ _J I _ - W i^ ` L---- 135.0 ___ ♦J _ — _ _ — ____, o 8:5 (0 wvi .. on 'O C \ 1 � slllc r----- ---- ` I :C 1/ JL >JL 00 An 00 An O^ OWNER: FOREST z I \ :7 mo 12 m 3 I o Q) / UI LAKE SCHOOL DIST /8,11 PID:05-31-22-44-0001 L�7 110800 0 110,800 q.ft. O sq.ft. ,.�`�—J1 ---------_� % � •�� SEE SHEET 11 ; I II All II �' � A (Carlson •environmental • •engineering 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 3oo Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: (763) 489-7900 I hereby certify that this plan, specifcation Print Name: Thomas R.Belluff,L.S. or rep-p—mreparedbymeorundermy direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: DRAWN By: 3AB ISSUE DATE: 11/14/2017 Revisions: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. / 10500 Bren Road E. NATURES REFUGE PRELIMINARY PLAT O of •surveying In Fax: (763)489-7959 ww.carlsonmccamxom under the lawsnsed oandstateofMinne the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: 11/14/2017 License#: 40361 FILE NO: 957 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Lino Lakes, Minnesota y y =C SEE SHEET IO L_____1350 ---r_______ 3 g al N 0 / m 310,800 eq.k. a 110.800 aq.ft. to l -_- i 135.D as - + I � -- --__J 1350` L _ _ _ _ _ _ _♦,_ �INr - 1 I _ , 1 JL JJ Jlc �Ilc \ �- 1 I ml II c I ♦♦ _ 4 m J ^ i aq�ft-- r I � / 311,211 aG ft. \ 1 1 MIL ---311.201 , I I �� 1 JLc � ♦ `. 1 I ---J L____ 135.0 r --i --__--__ ♦ OUTLOT B(�yI OUTLOT B 31,366,075 .,.ft.1 1 "^ 5 10 1 l0 1 ` 311,809 q.ft. I .JJ 11,366,075sq.ft. LJ J- ILI 11 / 311,533 aq.fl. I----141.7 311,915 q.ft. I IiL �\ L 30 30-_ J 15\0 /µN 97. - -___ 14.7 60.9 106.1 -7 ILL 310,800 q.ft. m ` . v� \`-� 82.5 ±13.996 a B n 3�0� 9\0 .. _1.2 41.2 ---BI IN, 311,731 •k. / 11,929 q.ft. / 2! \_J 10 / 110101 `\ NO \ / 312,739 eq.k. N_ \' P / / /") ry % d 4� 1 / / N ss\ L / 310,800 aq.ft. / -J L____ \eB,S 53.3 L-� R/i 71.7--_/ / \ 83.3 '1� / \ \ 4 314.515 q.ft. 5 / / / / / / 20 i \ , �/ �\ �J3 \ \/ / 312740 III 312.458 eq.k. 110 / / o' / / �' .../'� \46 5 / R=275 101 I.- 8 w 2 \ \ 3 �� / M"' N Irl Y - ♦/ R60L�� / 311.114 sq.fL27.5 �/---9.4- \ \.i \ 4 \� �„I 3 i ....30 j -�--- °se r ' bio n .eq.ft. 315255 Z� N (` \\6\ _ IN l l l l l l / \ ���\\/a � 10 \\\ / 12 \ \ / �\ /h / o 314,652 eq.ft. / 312.739 &1 ol\ \ L___132.1 1 \ ro �/ / ) / i /� / ♦;'/ 311.318 sq.k. / � � \ \ _-'� '��� ``` / / n/ I / 5 /o gim m/ ^/ / '/ / 311,6 sq.ft. '/ / \\w� \ 138.1 -_-_, ,f to X63.6- aq.k. --/ `\ rcN \\• \\\\35.476 314,655 aq.ft. `x\\1.7 /// 2 <g 310.983 eq.ft o,� ♦ 6� 1 r --80.00.3- //� 3O / / 10 76.8 / 1 r-- --1 ��\ ly �� 30 pr��� 109 \\J___- l / / 527 ��i� J_ _30-/ - _30 q -- } \ 13 14 Jl 78.8 L / / i� i�� ` / N 311.838 sq.ft. I L---135.0 �/ I 7 , � � /\\ ,\ 160.1 ` i' �Illc ni \` I _---J 3g�U F f%/ vvvv III I> i �r---------� -- -� q 314.623 aq.ft. _ ♦ � DralEasemenkblityr----/ I ---- aN 1m Co313, 2 aq.fL n 310,800 aq.ft. //e° 3 %/ 11 v I I 311.022 sq.ft. I I`o / / ±13,757 sq.ft. N/ \ / 8 n / 3 < ni \ �� 311.920 q.ft. , I / % 1 30 I 30 /' L----- 140.5 mi / 14 m 318,149 eq.k. of -` I I I / =I I o 2�s o m\\ 12 / °, 318.827 aq.ft __-- r-----____-- J 310,803 k. I d 'I 'sem-------J L ------J J----119 .5e %1 / /I /ryo �20 86.2 80.0 74.9 39: \ �\ 135.0 ----J 1 1 /-/ 9 9 117.6; ✓ / / X111 ,5504 'p R-20 R\ 6 // 4 �;/ / 9 �\ // °J 311,0957 sq.ft. w 1 o 11 ,r-----------, ,m F 274.9-/, 25.71 98 / STREET C 3 \ R BJs �I 6,/' \\9J ��+ i \ %' 13 � L--_- 136.9 ----F� 15 I °' 310.803 aq.ft. � I ` \� 318.912 aq.tL \ r ----------- I � 31.1 80.0 80.0 78.8 ♦� 668 �-\ 2/ \ \ \ ��6. /^y �\ 0 i r------, r------1 r-------1 Tv---- \1010\ ♦ �\ _�� \\Rv Amo �\ to \ \\ 3 R 17.511 ®\ ' / L---- 135.0 --_- J r' sq.'6 \ ' m r----------- 1,ye 110101 ♦, I 1 I (I I I I I -'15 o I I I 310.947 1l `/ I I I I I I3800 I I I I 3 0 < 24 � 20 --_- 133.5 m __/=--- /3 _- 16 /`� •�•� ] 311.249 q.ft. n_ 892 e k - ,1 05 q.f.14 1311.369 q•ft a , 312.361 aq.k. ------ ---- 11I mM 000 313.346 N 1 q.ft.i \ ,,0Q I 4- II IL-__-- L J L / /±15,328ge9.ft. 1� `ry� mI / 3 0 o 0 y° Imml J I _ L 57.0 _ 2J _ 80.0 7 so�� I' ------J L- �0j0�`> 1 31.9 J 1--Draioa ___-J f ---__--0--__ --310,804 sq.ft. I I / -_-_--__ Im �J R2O- a s., 27.a a1s -J zo.o II o 100.00 N89°33'46"W 77.5 , �l 135.00 1 44s 1'y1` \ / / e s \ M / I / -- 1416 / STREET B rR EXCEPTION (Parcel B, Description 2) �_-�---_--_ 1 N89°33'46"W 4Ss & \ / /' //� h Eae �mr v A s / , 2 / \x / I 04.1 mens \ //Y" _ -� -J r------- e 100.8 87� -� R=230 N / � s 15 /I 104.0 (S'4 �}o°j \\ R=8057 M 9 TIMOTHY J &HELEN KESSLER PID: 05-31-22-43-0003 1 6�/ � ±16,788 //^\ \ ±16,788 sq.ft A6 I Oee -6' a/ /'� \\ ZONING=SINGLE FAMILY 1 SEE SHEET 12 i 20 2F_ \\ \ i f m j /12, 2 RESIDENTIAL 17 a .ft. Nasoo.00„W (�CarIS011 •environmental 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite loo 111 Blaine, MN 55449 1herebycertify that this plan, specifcation Print Name: ThomasR.Balluff,L.S. or report was prepared by me or under my direct duly DRAWN BY: ]AB Revi.ians: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. F NATURES REFUGE • •engineering Phone: 489-7900 supervision and that I am a Signature: ISSUE DATE: 11/14/2017 10500 Bren Road E. •surveying McCain Fax: (763)489-7959 ww. carlsonmccain.rom Licensed LandSurveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota. Data: 11/14/2017 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 957 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Lino Lakes, Minnesota 3 MN O�a QCI 07 0 O PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: -F-S y II I i being 5 feet 111idth, and adjoining side lot lines, and 10wfeet in width and adjoining right of way Ilnes and rear lot lines unless otherwise shown on this plat. LEGEND 0• - Denotes Anoka County Monument • - Denotes Found Iron Monument O - Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch rebar, marked with RLS 40361 Bearings shown are based on the South line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 which is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 33 minutes 46 seconds West N 0 25 50 100 ( SCALE IN FEET ) / PRELIMINARY PLAT of �181 W °j/ I I _ 81.4 - J 1 Bearings shown are based on the South u' / z�Ha, L---135.0 - - - - J F I �`�'/ I I 7 / / /\ 160.1 ��� ��� 1 m \ line of the Southwest Quarter of the \ r __ I \ Southeast Quarter of Section 5, o�^o?---------- W / / \ - M L % 135.0 4 / 1 �/ ---- ----_ -J Township 31, Range 22 which is Edi -I 7 W / '\ / / i assumed to bear North 89 de 33 L 314,623 a k. \\ Drains grass }oN r d', I 1 0. <„ q• /wry �r8 / / \ 9e&Unlit 1 ---- --I N / Eosementy n f I I r---- N minutes 46 seconds West .lot C, 313,342 aq.ft. n Al aq.k. f 311,022 eq.n I Im / / 313,757 aq.ft ^ / / \ I \ 311.920 ft. ¢ 30 30 NI I 1 A N / / / \� mL---- 140.s ----J t ♦ 310.803 eq.n �m / -J wro ±1 ft. aq.n I of I 1 //1, �\ z M / / 12 ti� /// \ r nl h ♦'� 14 �.. ���--------L L ------J L------ L i7/ d'd, 0 4� / // ry.----------- / 135.0 0 25 50 100 318,827 eq.ft. / 0 0/\ /ry0 0l ��09 86.2 80.0 74.9 S\ q / ---- ----JN_ 5 I/ v­jgQ (SCALE IN FEET ) \ \ / // i \� I rl W 4 \ m 9a/ n.61 ��/'moo•\ / \s\ / // \ in,o97aq.n rlm rF �_ ---z7a.9 z5.7 !-mss/.� PROPOSED STREET C mlil 6,%'/ \\ sA�51 6j :\/0,// 13 \\ L---- 1369 ----'r I ' ml 31o,ao3 aq.ft. m o< EASEDMENTSGAREND UTILITY SHOWN THUS: / / 561 /N 31.1 80.0 80.0 ` 78.8 �� 668 �, 0\ 21 1\ \\6 SEE SHEET 11 --_l 1�7 6a.9 _--------- --------- JI / \. N� I u - r----- 1 r------1 fv---- \10 \ 19 317,511 aq.ft. / \ \Rs �4,0�0 r� I I/ L---- 135.0 ----J Wu 4 --------- 0 / 110 101 19.1v I \\\ sn tz 0.947 1 eq k.l *10,800 q.ft. 3 \\ 1 / n 5 " 41.2 41. o 23 22 20 w\ 21 I� \ 113.9 q.f.\30 v8 311,731 e •fLD 311.929 982.5 aq.k. '\-------/---- 33s Jm - i - N ' -30 - - 16 \ y - ----J y - - - - - I J 311,249 aq. l l 10 MI 310,892 eq•n MI ±10,800 sq.ft. // 311,369 314,045 eq.ft. \ eq.ft. !o \ 9 Odliiz m -V6j912V8 �� i' 14 312,361 1\ --- -1 tJ�� ly „�' v�\ l l o - / / 312,739 aq.n " a�G ,a6 :S.-, N 1010 P L' / % i 2 r------ m aq.ft. o o o =a al \`� P' I \ / 310,800 aq.ft. _ / ---- N 1 II , �Illt I ♦ I I - 2 / \ 1 1110101 53.3 L ---__-J ♦ /%o �eB.3 ;11. 71.7 --J 18 '° `"�,� L-- a I � / 3 '� ` - 3061 _27-----815 J /" \ �\.0 /0 83.3 e O K•k � -- - L L ---J - - - - -T- 0'0// 25�/ 4 314,515 aq.ft.I -130.0 -J -- --- r--- ------ I _J R3�4 ?`20 20.0 312,740 .q.rt. I Ts 312.458 eq.ft. 80.0 31.9 1 \ �' / -\ \465 ! R:275 1 Ra �.\ 0000 uJ ' \ \ 101 n I / 100.00 N89°33'46"1 II_--� / � 6 /w - "'/ \ s ,41.s ' / / \ p° o R-80 69 \ / ------- _� L �, _ 79.4 2T5 58.4 -- 1 M/ --- __ -_�__ y106 "%j 3 i x \✓ 2 �ILc ♦ % / / ----7 r--- /��� ��13s.\ / 'T0 _ - l / 109e r ------- -m - 2� o Rn Z w 315.255 aq.ft. o /N o - Denotes Anoka Count Monument f `1 1 \s 426 04.0 \ // /p9 \ 15 ♦' p / ,� 1 (8j471 X56" 3 \ \ \ % p { o _ l l 10 / l \\ i �\ 12 312,739 eq.ft. • -Denotes Found Iron Monument TIMOTHY J & HELEN KESSLER PID: 1 32.1 1 O�ew �6b✓ I d) i / / 57 � / 20 r /^\ \ 316,788 sq.n \ �''D`� l 1 1 m / 314.852 eq.k. / / ±11,3188 Ill / / l / / \ \\ � O -Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch rebar, marked with RLS 40361 ZONING -SINGLE ZONING=SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL g I _ m \\ 1 r 2. q• \ � 31 z7a a n , / .,/ ../ / m/ / g 5 /o / �> / 311,699 n/ / a ft./'• ^/ \ $ \ 138.1 \ 1 o DANIELA21? BRENDA L MERRILL ry PID: 05-31-22-43-0002 \ 31619 ' 5 aq.k. `> / / / / I N IJ ii _g, 311.476 eq.n / / / , % 11 N a: _ I I 3ZONING-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN77AL OWNER: \ l J� 1u'o�\\ 0 L ♦ 161.0 a`+ / / // 314.655 aq.k. at I W z NR 25 `o° N m agI Cm 2 oIN 310,963 aq.ft. ,• M \, ` , 63.6 �b'�----1 r------1------, 220.3 80.0 76.8��. /��\ �\/\5 , �� / 3p 101.7 _-' \� �� , -._� ,30 rvr�� 109 _J l l / / J 30 2�i� 30 q \ „, 13 m 1 311.636 aq.ft. pu W °j/ I I _ 81.4 - J 1 Bearings shown are based on the South u' / z�Ha, L---135.0 - - - - J F I �`�'/ I I 7 / / /\ 160.1 ��� ��� 1 m \ line of the Southwest Quarter of the \ r __ I \ Southeast Quarter of Section 5, o�^o?---------- W / / \ - M L % 135.0 4 / 1 �/ ---- ----_ -J Township 31, Range 22 which is Edi -I 7 W / '\ / / i assumed to bear North 89 de 33 L 314,623 a k. \\ Drains grass }oN r d', I 1 0. <„ q• /wry �r8 / / \ 9e&Unlit 1 ---- --I N / Eosementy n f I I r---- N minutes 46 seconds West .lot C, 313,342 aq.ft. n Al aq.k. f 311,022 eq.n I Im / / 313,757 aq.ft ^ / / \ I \ 311.920 ft. ¢ 30 30 NI I 1 A N / / / \� mL---- 140.s ----J t ♦ 310.803 eq.n �m / -J wro ±1 ft. aq.n I of I 1 //1, �\ z M / / 12 ti� /// \ r nl h ♦'� 14 �.. ���--------L L ------J L------ L i7/ d'd, 0 4� / // ry.----------- / 135.0 0 25 50 100 318,827 eq.ft. / 0 0/\ /ry0 0l ��09 86.2 80.0 74.9 S\ q / ---- ----JN_ 5 I/ v­jgQ (SCALE IN FEET ) \ \ / // i \� I rl W 4 \ m 9a/ n.61 ��/'moo•\ / \s\ / // \ in,o97aq.n rlm rF �_ ---z7a.9 z5.7 !-mss/.� PROPOSED STREET C mlil 6,%'/ \\ sA�51 6j :\/0,// 13 \\ L---- 1369 ----'r I ' ml 31o,ao3 aq.ft. m o< EASEDMENTSGAREND UTILITY SHOWN THUS: / / 561 /N 31.1 80.0 80.0 ` 78.8 �� 668 �, 0\ 21 1\ \\6 318,912 lVil \ \ r --------- JI / N� I L------, - r----- 1 r------1 fv---- \10 \ 19 317,511 aq.ft. / \ \Rs �4,0�0 o'\ , '\ 154.6 iii I I/ L---- 135.0 ----J Wu 4 --------- 0 / 110 101 I \\\ sn m 0.947 1 eq k.l 1 / n 5 " 24 �I o 23 22 20 w\ 21 I� \ // m '\-------/---- 33s Jm - i - N ' -30 - - 16 y - ----J y - - - - - `• / `0 9 311,249 aq. ft. n MI 310,892 eq•n MI ±10,800 sq.ft. // 311,369 314,045 eq.ft. \ eq.ft. !o \ 9 / 14 312,361 --- -1 313,346 o - " a�G N I 1 \ aq.k. r------ m aq.ft. o being 5 feet in idth, and adjoining side \`� P' I N 1 II , �Illt I ♦ I I lot linea, and lOwfeet In width and adjoining linea unless right of way lines and rear lot ' - ^,M� VVVV 1 1110101 J L J � 0 101/ o / L--- L 18 '° `"�,� L-- a I � / 3 '� ` - 3061 _27-----815 J 's la otherwise shown on NI plat. e O K•k � -- - L L ---J - - - - -T- 0'0// 25�/ 315,328 p.ft. 1 -130.0 -J -- --- r--- ------ I j pal x310,804 eq.k. ♦ 11' �!N1 ?`20 20.0 I Ts 57.0 23.1 80.0 31.9 1 \ 100.00 N89°33'46"1 II_--� 54s ora;n 1i� 135.00 age \ �� // /� "'/ ,41.s ' n STREET B 1,E''�iE'ND ------- N89°3346"W aQg & boli \\ / \ M/ --- __ -_�__ 67y6 100.9 EXCEPTION p PTP �N) (Po y_\ I I N,2a0.¢' 14 Easement t \ /// / // \x r ------- -m - 2� o Rn o - Denotes Anoka Count Monument OWNER: 1 \s 426 04.0 \ // /p9 \ 15 ♦' p / ,� 1 (8j471 X56" ♦ \o ♦ n m • -Denotes Found Iron Monument TIMOTHY J & HELEN KESSLER PID: O�ew �6b✓ I d) i / / 57 � / 20 r /^\ \ 316,788 sq.n \ �''D`� \o / 2 O -Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch rebar, marked with RLS 40361 ZONING -SINGLE ZONING=SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL g I i I \ I OWNER: 20 15 / / \ \ / �'' / m r 2. q• \ � 31 z7a a n 100.00 I`1 1 N89°3346"W �.d < \ 1 o DANIELA21? BRENDA L MERRILL ry PID: 05-31-22-43-0002 \ 31619 ' 5 aq.k. `> / / \ / \\\ \ss/ r / I N IJ ii � N a: I I 3ZONING-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN77AL OWNER: \ l J� \' / L ♦ 161.0 a`+ Ll A t\ 1 at I W z NR 25 _ E&A RIVAS&J&1 SALAS E a' EXCEPTION \\ \ ulllc /--------- Y - - - - N1• gm i non ,n- u) C)f 2_ IN a ZONING=SINGLET-2-0005 340,579 ft. OtN W I°N (Parcel D, Description 1) FAMILY RESIDENRAL / o, \ G4? / 317,352 sq.ft. I\ \ __ r - - - - - - - - - T,;-3 _ „� I N d N i Nn� 12 w EXCEPTION (Parcel 6, Description 4) 41 I'n 20 o I v 39 �J / ...nn Qri1 v °? / _��♦ 1 N 1 vNi 2w til rn -- --^ - --------- -- 2&.3 L ----- �♦ \ 318.053 aq•n to ✓1 N n I F u mN1 �rco2 0 / r N� in ~---- y\�------II �--- -�- I 0.1- I� N // � �oN li rallel to the Soum oe po line th I /�IITLOT D t5 I =vt 4'--------J m � __ of the Southeast Q carter a� Section 5, 324,516 ft. s9� � L \�` - - - m Township 31, Range 22 386.3 ' N89°33'46"W I EXCEPTION 167.51 __ ____ ____ __ o II 1 ♦ 12 ..7 ti _ zl 1- 33.00 ° ' " PARCEI. ;3(Parcel B, Description 51 o _---- 5893346 E• h 301.59 13s.00 /,_- N89%9'35' -Dead \ RI I n1r STREET o i _� m N01°54'53"E �`. _, -------- -------------------------------- --- ------------ i zzl9.00♦.1 --------------------------I--- _-------'----------__�--� 'T �V. rvV rY100.00so°5214 ` `� ---Utility Easement per Document ' 1 m No. 2167939.003--j--� � 05 ['-__33S N89 °3346W ---------------_______________________________________ 'o ------------ \ „`�--Utility w ---_ 300.46 - 20(.26 -- MAIN STREET Easement per Document No. 2167939.003 ----Io / {{ 589.8 1C.S.A.11. NO. 14) 609.56 m --Southwest N89°33'46"W RI STREET N89°33'45eW ivinily JIi�L�i (200.27-Ded) N893346"W irv. �Y (v.$.n.f� r J Southeast / Southeast Corner of-/ corner of the Southwest m Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of (N89%9'35"W-Deed) South line of the South -C-- corner of the Southwest -- Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of m Section 5, Township Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 puarter of the Southeast m Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 m 31, Range 22 (South Quarter Corner) _ A A In It A /' I IA IT\/ I/VI IA/ A \/ 7)1/VI I nr T /�I V\JT\rl \i \JVIV I I STI\JAI YV /-1 1 I\I\JF7 I VI T IA/ A \/ ��I A T A In /J ,r VV II l , L_/-11 IVIJ. ` puarter of Section 5, Township 31, Range , 22 m T \- A �VI A n n IA/ IA/ r- T 11� /- T�_ \�7 I \J J rT L. r1 II V/ IAVI L_\ /-1 V \J VV V V L_ I I\ L-1 A 11 r� I I n AI V V I I' I lJ I V / (Carlson environmental 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 1hereby certify that this plan, speciia,tion Print Name: Thomas R.Balluff,L.S. by me or ret-p-preparedhatI.. d.ly y //yy�� direct duly DRAWN BY: JAB Revlalana PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. NATURES REFUGE • • engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 supervision and that I am a Signature: y�,.,y ISSDE DATE: 11/14/201] 10500 Bren Road E. PRELIMINARY PLAT In•surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 ww.carlsonmccam.rom the law, LanofthStateounderfMinne the laws of the State of Minnesota. Data: 11/14/2017 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 957 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Lino Lakes, Minnesota - OUTLET \ CONTROL /- STRUCTURE _ _— - - - OUTLET - - CONTROL STRUCTURE POND POND 1 a. OUTLOT C i1 1�' I . I �, ~I---------' I, �i------r�--------� 1 F I POND \ lo, 4 I I •\ ll IE 884.80-N / TEMPORARY x, ✓ I I 5 Rryr \k 10 j I R I TIE 9DO.01 ]E 899.91-.� OUTLOT C I Know what's below. (DiN <i 15 4 5 \ 1? ----- 14 6, i,33 //5 r / 9 10 \� ^ L IE 898.91-N,E IE 899.87 SIE 98.81- IF 3IE 899 57 9oz.31 ��� FsclFACK u"RTI I IE 800.27 i \ au SEM J 11 _2 5i 6 i 4 _! 2 3 i 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: (763) 489-7900 I o a Drawn 0 Designetl: elk Revisions: ' PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. ' 10500 Bren Road E. SITE PLAN LEGEND PRELIMINARY SITE & 1 ? Of e surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 \111 ft: 25063 Data: 11/14/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Lino Lakes, Minnesota UTILITY PLAN 18 EXISTING PROPOaED ww.ca rlsonmccain. conn of of LIGHT POLElII SANITARY MANHOLE Q MISCELLANEOUS SIGN I _ � EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION ,0000.o EXISTING TREE TELEVISION BOX FIRE HYDRANT GATE VALVE Dd ►t CLEANOUT o ELECTRIC BOX ❑ I` GAS METER O I CATCH BASIN RAIN GUARDIAN II ELECTRIC METER O RG _ TELEPHONE BOX ❑ UTILITY POLE A FLARED END SECTION I -' STORM MANHOLE I w SERVICE r[ SOIL BORING/TEST HOLE 0. RETAINING WALL WATERMAIN --�i—I- SANITARY SEWER ---------------- _ STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE - - - - --- - - - - - - J CURB ------- _--------- _---------- -__-__-__-__- ___L__-__-__- WETLAND DITCH UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE -•-•-•-•-•- I p.m,,.1 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC -•-•-•-•-•- I AI UNDERGROUND GAS -•-•-•-•-•- �..m ' v UNDERGROUND FIBEROPTIC ----------- FENCE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC CONCRETE SURFACE I ----------------- BITUMINOUS SURFACE I I I __ , I I I I I I _J C.7 I L --------------------- I I I I a I I I � i •, I � i - OUTLET \ CONTROL /- STRUCTURE _ _— - - - OUTLET - - CONTROL STRUCTURE POND POND 1 a. OUTLOT C i1 1�' I . I �, ~I---------' I, �i------r�--------� 1 F I POND \ lo, 4 I I •\ ll IE 884.80-N / TEMPORARY x, ✓ I I 5 Rryr \k 10 j I R I TIE 9DO.01 ]E 899.91-.� OUTLOT C I Know what's below. (DiN <i 15 4 5 \ 1? ----- 14 6, i,33 //5 r / 9 10 \� ^ L IE 898.91-N,E IE 899.87 SIE 98.81- IF 3IE 899 57 9oz.31 ��� FsclFACK u"RTI I IE 800.27 i \ au SEM J 11 _2 5i 6 i 4 _! 2 3 i 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: (763) 489-7900 I o a Drawn 0 Designetl: elk Revisions: ' Q'I IE 89.42-E 2411 23 I" ___ I 22 j11 21 ISI, 20 I —12 !1 N I i1 1�' I . I �, ~I---------' I, �i------r�--------� 1 F I ix ' �J lo, 4 I I •\ ll IE 884.80-N / TEMPORARY x, ✓ I I 5 Rryr \k 10 j I R I TIE 9DO.01 ]E 899.91-.� OUTLOT C I Know what's below. AIL <i 15 1? ----- 14 6, i,33 --- r �T I I of 16 r / 9 10 \� ^ L IE 898.91-N,E IE 899.87 SIE 98.81- IF 899 57 I —12 !1 N I i1 1�' I . I �, ~I---------' I, �i------r�--------� 1 F I ix ' �J lo, 4 I I •\ i 14 IE 884.80-N / I ✓ I I 5 Rryr \k 10 j I R I TIE 9DO.01 ]E 899.91-.� OUTLOT C I Know what's below. --_-+- <i 15 1? ----- 4 6, i,33 --- r �T I I of 16 r / 9 10 \� ^ L IE 898.91-N,E IE 899.87 SIE 98.81- IF 899 57 7 0 ' ��� FsclFACK u"RTI I IE 800.27 i \ au SEM J 11 IE 900.77 6 i E 900.87 a,� -x,/10 12 / % ` IE 897.54-N,SW S&,897. 897.44-E 12 ­ " W C- %/^ A1+ 4 13 e yNF l-- E 895.55 I�l \�\Ne y �a\ yE 898;55 i 0 \ - 14 4i ! I I I I ' 15 ; X ----- . 9cil % ` • IE 898.05 , 17 tE 895.95 16 ' i1 \� 1 6 i; 6 �i------r�--------� 1 F \ ix ' �J i 14 IE 884.80-N / I ✓ I I 5 Rryr - - IE 902.97 --I =1 IE 901.97 I Know what's below. --_-+- <i 15 1? ----- 4 6, --- r �T I I of 16 I ! aiw /.91 %A ri�d��■�o��i OUTLOT A I � I � I � I � I I I I I I I I I I -------- I I I I I I ---------------JI I I I I I I I I I I I I I / / I / / I / I SINGLE FAMILY 80' MIN. WIDE LOT 30 REAR SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACKS GARAGE: 10 FT. HOUSE: 10 FT. / / 0 50 100 210 BLDG PAD CORNER: 30 FT. I L-1-- —--- —� 30FRONT SETBACK BENCHMARK Ell, R/W I 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 set I in the I9in a cov­­d lube 150 0 westerly ML- ocated 15o feel terly of the TYPICAL SERVICES SHALL BE: I centerline Rondeau Road West and WATER: AS SPECIFIED BY CITY 40 feet nort,t herly of the centerline of & i SEWER: 4' PVC SCH.40 C.S. A.H. No. 14. Elevation=894.878 CURB STOP TO BE PLACED 1' INSIDE R/W I op VD 88 ) /- _ 2. Top Nul Hotl.Lia Ease of the Element -au - --------`------------------------------------------------ r--J----------1------1---snttance_talin¢lakes_ Eleentay--- ----- I I School. Elevation=920.009 (NAVD 88) ~� CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ^M -�h-------------�--- -0(. IE893.90-E.W---- �i------r�--------� 1 F -- -- -- -- -- \ IE 884.80-N / O / Know what's below. Cal before you dig. (� Carlson • enviranm ental I .engineering 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: (763) 489-7900 herebyWasCertify that this plan, specification Print Name Brlan J. Krys orreport was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature: o o a Drawn 0 Designetl: elk Revisions: ' PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. ' 10500 Bren Road E. NATURES REFUGE PRELIMINARY SITE & 1 ? Of McCain surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 LicensedprofessionalEngineerunder thelaws the State Minnesota Data: 11/14/17 License ft: 25063 Data: 11/14/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Lino Lakes, Minnesota UTILITY PLAN 18 ww.ca rlsonmccain. conn of of :III N,jIII,jIII,jIII„ N`� sV,jIII„INO, N4',, • • L . ..`hi�iIO1IN/jlNdj101/j1•Ipjli•I,jINOjIOI,jINp, � p • • .•.-`''^�^•�'•OjAIIOIi'II'•Ii'I i+Ii'I,IOIp�Ii•I`�IOIIpI�IOI, .�.� © '� 1 � � . • IOI,jIII,j.IpjlNpjlN,jlll,j1011 N � ` �_ - - ,IN„Iio NO,N„N„OIVN4•IOI, �C� :•.� -- ” y�oi,�I000i�olo ei - ♦ �< -• �`sII`,! _ �• • ILII„I / �� od w► �.� < ���� v%!e°oi`��o`I��o`���i`��oi`� © • � � ,qy � •IIIA �' Vii„ oi„ oi„ oi„ oi„ oi,� � \ •• �� ” ' � �ol0000ll000l00000l000l 1 • y �Io„oo„000,000,000 C� —� ,�• J , i • fj oi„ of„oil, oil, oi„ i Op�� _,� ”, aI ,,,,, v IOI plot plot plot plot �� �f vo,olololololololol<' �� \ � � • � 000l000l0000l oI„oI � ; a . •' • ,oI oolloo plot plot o �oi000iooeioloi000io' l - �I- � � ' = : • - Iy' Ii�il` ei_'IL',iI` lI `� �` �;.11io�ooi`�oei`�Ioio�Ioi`��o, •��. • a . i` �PII'•Ii`II'•IO,II4•IO,II4•IOII'•Ii`I l � • � l a � � � ' s: SNP N%.I • .. :.:..` -�-TREET C�4e �. 13.2 - --�- mo^ 15 Z I / PN 7+50 • X 913.00 \ os0 r (n I •i ,/ so'va a----------� r —� r----_1 \ 0 \ y ��\� \ I J o l � I I �$` ',y of oo� O I 916 1 976.0 G 916.5 G 6s 9,6. QW _ -e°\ i 916.0 c s 4/ WO(2) WO(2) �_ / o� 16 9 J I / • ry� / I Pole Bar I — /— — T e epee . 14 0 f � k • • I 909.5 909.0 909,0.o5 909.5 I I 909. \ I , � N 1 * �f - - - A° • , • .. ,� • • • � I I 909.0 I so 24 T J l I I — 1\18 i I 25 1 i �: / p / h 4 1 s LJ & \ , °� 15 % ma; o o / d popF1 lI /�� I s A N N—anrn J ,s \ / ( 'r I•iL L`\ 'I''W_ o� House ' ) 914 /J J• / / q06 1 I 8� L---� •`— °— --- UTLOT D 1 T RAVEL °� D 25 50 100 --—/ _ ,906 _ ---- ----- CONSTRUCTION a • him. a,. a,. —ter— m.--i`+L+ utn a,. °n. m. —�°•s— TRANCE (IN FEET) m m° _L—_1_�—- ----- �x - �--->-->--»--- --- --- -=5 -- -z=-- -I--- ;-i BENCHMARK -----5—/_—S---S---S---S—-----T� - 21' PVC 21' PVC - T ' x- ° xv ° Ixv ag3.g I -x �� z . 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 set xiu sos.a xiu-e��o - P in the ground in a covered tube xi MV( located 150 feet westerly of the -�� MAIN STREET C S A H N0. 14 a-- >-_- �; feaine of Rondeau Road f the tads and ( ) MAIN STREET (C.S.A.H. N0. 14) -0, -- --2 I ----s 1-- C. A.H. N. 14. YEl—ti n-894.878 n.°f - - - - -- - ---------------------- ------------------------------------ --------------- -- -- -- --------- \g-¢� ,f'�\°pe 2. Top Nut Hldrant East of the Southeast p — —---«— i _ _ —��1_ c<� entrance to Lino Lakes Elementary — �� � —��— Schod. Davation�920.009 (NAND 88) I I I 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Revisions: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. (� Carlson enviranm Suite , M I hereby Certify that this plan, specification Print Name Man ] Krys o Drawn LOC 1 C ental Blaine, MN 55449 or report waspreparetlbymeorundermy '� ' NATURES REFUGE PRELIMINARY GRADING of • I .engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature: 2 Designad: B” 10500 Brien Road E. McCain surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 ensedProfessionalEngineerunder Lino Lakes, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN ww.ca rlsonmccain. cpm the laws of the State of Minnesota Dale: 11/14/17 License#: 25063 Date: Lt/ta/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 1.8 Is -n- 1-1 r:u.1saot-saz°,eatz-�.wre. aNa.�a�°•m x•g1P.enmW.•,�sarz_aaa°.awe • - - .. ��' ■•� •■ iC• ��='r -` - �..� ,r -^is+� • it - ' U ,♦�'�� - • • �� oi�'�i � O`JG � BGG � iii ♦,%♦♦io%♦�' � o �'♦e % %♦♦ieoi ♦i � � � � � : � '-1 ri` ♦♦i ''♦oi ♦♦oi :�i � of oi, JO �♦i,�♦oi,%♦♦i,.%♦oi,9♦♦i,�♦oi,%♦oi,�� - %♦oi,9 ♦♦ ♦i , .. AGO a G �� ori`��%`%`♦�♦�`♦�♦%�i`��%`%`♦�♦%%`%`, ♦:`♦�♦%% � ♦% I , J�Ji ''""`%:%':�`�':�`% :��%%�`'%'''%%�.♦. Dpi �-gyp ' �° �`',� � "% • • %ANO%♦N„ ♦N �,. , `';,%♦o%,%♦`;,�♦o %♦off,% !� � • V '' � ei„`%i, n!��iY1�. � • � SII” , � , � � . . � , do • �Od� � ` �� �..� ♦�-%.♦.-%.♦�-%.♦. � gee � �, ♦I„ ♦I„ ♦I„ N„ 0 G -. �� %SOI,%�OI�.%♦♦I,%♦✓I,%� ��//� • � ' � � � ` . s—ey,ng Fa.. (76( Licensed Professional Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLA i •mom .. .... ...... .. .. ,•..., I A 1 1 � r.• — - II _ '°• �I DITCH PER RCWD MODEQ-'iii Jiwii.��♦=� ILNUU I ... tied 150 feet westerly of the Zed no of Roodea, R -d West Imd feet north,rly of the orterlin, of C.S.A.H. No. 14. Elowtion-894.878 iui r al o .. ��♦� i♦i, a :.. ���`♦� _� - _. �� p� p � ' ~ I- �i,�♦eio ' • • �♦�♦.•i �, `JPO ��G ✓ ✓♦♦♦ ♦♦.•♦ ♦♦o♦ ✓♦o♦ ✓♦.•♦ ♦♦.�i • . ♦oi oi,� of ei,. , ✓i♦, .,� ✓♦♦� ♦♦o� ♦♦✓� ♦♦♦� ✓♦♦� ♦♦.•� ♦♦�� ♦♦♦� ♦ ♦ ✓♦♦� ♦ 000 `�� Diol ♦♦✓i ♦�✓i ✓poi ♦moi ♦♦✓i ♦�✓i ♦ o o ♦,,.v✓� L;_ i o♦✓i o♦oi o♦oi o♦✓i o♦✓i♦♦oi o♦oi o♦✓i o ♦ o♦a �. �oio♦oio�oi♦�✓io♦oio♦oio♦oi♦�✓io�o ♦ o♦oi _ r�oio♦oio♦oio♦oio♦oio♦oio♦♦io♦oio♦oi o♦oi moi o♦oi oo♦ o♦oi „o♦ „o♦ oo♦ „o♦ oo♦,, o i ,. _ . 9S� moi o♦oi o♦oi o♦oi o♦✓i ♦♦oio♦oi o ♦✓ion♦M o♦oi o- io �o✓,�♦oio�♦oi,.�♦✓ion♦oio�♦oio�♦oi,.�♦oio�♦o, � of of ♦oio�♦oi,�♦oio�♦oio�♦o ♦Diol • � � :/3i._ `,. �1 ' ♦♦♦„♦✓♦♦,�.•♦♦,�♦♦„♦ ♦♦„♦✓.�,, ani - � � w�'�;�'Vi`I�'V, ♦O♦i`I�O,I��4 ��,.�♦O,♦I•.�'♦OI`j�i',I:�♦O✓I,��,I • `j • • i•I ♦♦OI ♦SOI ♦SOI ♦♦O� `�✓I ♦SOI'•♦OI ♦♦✓I ♦�✓I • • s PREFERRED BUILDERS, INC. t 100 eiCarlson uaini .. ,_g or ralm� was propred lh� me or under my NATURES REFUGE PRELIMINARY GRADING eng,n s I♦OI,j ♦OIC. j♦OIC. j♦OIC: j .;I�.�♦OIC. j♦OIC. j♦✓I`. j♦✓I�.��•I � 1 www � mi m the laws of the State of Minnesota Do.: 11/14/17 U.— 25063 Minnetonka, MN 55343 --Phone: - _ 0500 Road nsed Professional Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota sur,,ey,ng Fax. (763) 489-7959 & EROSION CONTROL PLAN McCaini LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY LINE ' g� Ili �;'\�`/"I 0 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE \ °i II. 0 IW SECTION LINE I I I , J / ` \ /�/ ( j 1/4 SECTION LINE —__—_ _—_ — \ / // WETLAND / \ W. / �� 1/16 SECTION LINEo,�' z' CONTOUR - - - - - - - - - - _ - >_ \ �� <\ - \ DFAINAG�' 10. CONTOUR - -- -;/ •�1� - \\ (� BREAK wEAND wnTER - - - - - - r;�" �t,�� WETLAND _✓ /�_/ , TREE LINE rv-.-.-.^rrm-.�-.w. i // \\\ '� ••L \ \••1 \\\ '1 i IW FENCE LINE --- .--- .--- .--- .— / \ - _____ _ 1 . '1 1 OVERHEAD ELft ECTRIC----------- '—� , \ \ \ \ So Al . �/� \ SoA \ ♦� UNDERGROUND TEL ----------- �_ , t✓ 1'� (\ AJ L1 _ /� MANHOLE II i ao •v,o // --sN \\ \ \ \♦♦♦♦� SOA HYDRANT \ _—\ yY — \ \ / / 1--- / I ♦♦ , w / / - - ' GATE VALVE / fes_ --'h \\ ♦♦ / / / - / \ __ FLARED END SECTION \I� %o \ Iilk POWER POLE 'o. I - - - - /�/y / \ ,� TELEPHONE BOX ❑ / ` o WETLAND F _ \\ 1 I \\ `' II ♦♦♦1A TELEVISION BOX ® I /J \ % \ : al 1 IW \ i '�' / ✓ ' % / \\ j" 1 • / i WETLAND MAIL BOX o SIGN WETLAND AV'I I ♦♦%� d' U /; ------•V-- /' , i / i jjjpum� 11 !1111111111 11 ft set IW SITE DATAv to;; IW �rti l CD ;kms O'P P TOTAL SITE AREA 59.0 AC. / 1 j . 4t\\\ \ I EXISTING ZONING—SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R7) I / \--\ / \\\ \\Q\ i ,\\ Sofj,� �A WETLAND f J \ I 1 \ NOTES - v l / _t ''•qi��� - - v 1101.00 ' -- 1. SOIL DATA SHOWN IS BASED ON NATIONAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION '? ' / \ �•• —� �\ N8.9 27 42 W SERVICE WEB SOIL SURVEY. / / i 1 \ \ . k,&A \ i r \\ 1 _ - 1 SOIL TYPES i f�N ; I WETLAND - V vv/%i Iv / I ' I—Is fro sandy ZoomX0.1 Ma Markey muck, Ocasslonally pondedCD I (' I \\o \ / fir' j " •1 ♦ \ ' "a /� \ / I — / soA somer,iu e fine -rd WETLAND zmB Zion—mon fine cord �• IV A v\ / ,� r A / .♦ V / /� , r-- W/ o \ WETLAND \, \ �_.� IW / -- I»r -<- f --- / SoA L 7001 Ed Is q0 TW e� w s \I /� / a I \` / /� : DRAINAGE,' BREAKi------ I-------------- j TYPE d i I i (TYP) l _ % v', T� /� \V �/---------------( I --- "�l SOA --- — -- I i —'SOIL DELINEATION ♦♦♦♦ / / LINE (TYP)♦♦ ,1 '•V / d _� / — I / / I 1 / .,� / .\ a\\ / I I / � ♦♦ \ / /WETLAND �/ SoA ♦♦.♦` i—— J� _ - ♦♦♦ ( / r ( / 0 50 100 zoo , I 1 - - - ,.__-y♦♦ J- //� SLOPE (T�) (IN FEET) Uz AW � A `v o �ITl —�I�I I (III .,.• �� /� i i i i �� -- i __7 I r _ I �p V IK1 II / I ♦♦♦ / SoA / 1 1 I IL-r-----rl 4-- 0 01 N�yg14 ♦ / \ i ! % 00' NJ 33(46"V� I `I /�', ` '� II 3 _/"`- i I ♦ / % WETLAND , ! ' "Aoe •r -_—_-- -\ i I, i I�re3 i9 i it ,,,:;'� ii � O♦,.�n„ i �!/�� ���' / \� I 1 I __ i___---�--- 1 i4 SoA I I� ♦o♦ �u- I �-- l ' v�a ; , _ I I 1 I `1 I l �� 1 1 I I N III ♦♦ I 1 %/ �� a �I \\ 1 I I I I � � �J ' I �J01'54' 3" N89'33'46'iWrI ♦♦♦♦ / / / ZM \ \® LLLJJJ U , 3. , ---.------------------1- 167.51 - ---- - _r --- ----------------- ------ 1' ---- 'I I ass --eoe— \ 589 33'46"E x ,'♦ S03.52'Wez'ro 30046 1A --- - -- - -----------=------- - _a= h =----- - 4 - ----- _ 609.58M ----- _ ---- --- - o8e - - __ h- _4- --- -- r-------- — ----- ------ — ------------------- 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Revisions: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. R1 (� Carlson envirrnm Suite 100 I hereby certify y that this plan, specification Pont Name Brlan J. Krys o a Drawn O ental Blaine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my 1' NATURES REFUGE of • I .engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and thatIamaduly Signature: Q Designetl: B1K 10500 Brien Road E. RESOURCE INVENTORY McCainSurveying Fax: (763)489-7959 ensedProfessionalEngineerunder Lino Lakes, Minnesota 4 ww.ca rlsonmccain. Com the laws of the state of Minnesota Dale: 11/14/17 License ft: 25063 Date: 11/la/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 sa.r Dace: tvoan, r:uom�saot - sazo�sau - yawn•. n•N,.�a\.�m�nagla.enmWa�,usarz_.�a� LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY LINE /I EXISTING PROPERTY LINE i SECTION LINE/----------------- / 1/4 SECTION LINE ----------- - � ' I L---------- 7 1/16 SECTION LINE ---------------- \\ k/\��� , T--- I 2'CONTOUR- - - - - - - - - - , �sos \------ // I 10' CONTOUR - -- WETLAND------------- - ' WATER TREE LINE ' FENCE LINE --- --- --- --- - - - - - , ------ -1------------------------ OVERHEAD ELECTRIC1 UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE - u / •S // Ir ' - - _ _ \ -/I T i MANHOLE O // `` / 9'2138 E -------- - ------ ------ HYDRANT 1309.29 ' 58'"-I I GATE VALVE pd _ _ _ A� / FLARED END SECTION / ^ I -ill POWER POLE •o, - - - II / / j / V '�V I / Y l / \ i TELEPHONE BOX TELEVISION BOX MAIL Box Tw SOIL TYPE I \ l TYP a SIGN - / v v>D ( ) WETLAND - " ---__ �-=--- °' ' SOA j ' �1 ZmL as\\ j I SOIL DELINEATION \�A° \ I If WETLAND LINE (TYP) I r' SITE DATA // '' �- w I �� I / Irl 11 I � i / I ------------------J I TOTAL SITE AREA 59.0 AC. //. yC �\ EXISTING ZONING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R1) NOTES 1. SOIL DATA SHOWN IS BASED ON NATIONAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION--soz-- SERVICE WEB SOIL SURVEY.- ---i----�----- ------ I I I SOIL TYPES 906 = SLOPE (TYP) Iw Isonti fine sandy loom WETLAND �-- ar muck, Oca _ ---- Ma M key ssiordly ponded ----� -n'-li ) I J // / \ / / \•, -- // SOA Solderville fine sand c=, �4t€-mss ----- ---- yI zr,B zimmerman fine sand i\ --- �_--'.1-sos$89-24'40"E 6�4 a�. IW \\\\ ♦♦♦1� \���-` \\ - _ \•' \\ DV�2AINAC�' % /Aoz / '\ �/ / - --- - - - - ���♦1♦♦ ��� �'•\ WETLANDS'-v 1vv \� vI ' IW o so 100 200 1 �. I 1 "•\ v / So d% ° %' SoA �� / ;' �' //) / i/ B IN FEET i / .� > - par%/ �� / SoA (1 ♦♦ / / / / - - - - - - j ---� ----1/ l �> WETLAND % _ 1W\\ I I Q♦' % tl�« i'I 1\ i WETLAND "/� I j /// �-�-� \ • _-/ WETLAND \\ ♦ i \ / ,/ '90 -`+ \ ----� �. I /� X111rr- _ - // �/ / ,/ �V /tel 1 V 2D8- I Q o _ 42"W _ s \ CD - - - - - - ' vv - , /� // �'�� ( /,CO;-"/ ,rs,o� -f-L ----- IW v SOT \ w7bAj//- -- -\\I r��hc----�'-•••••�' - }----------- _ I \ ` WETLAND sss 1101.00 ' T /.�, _ ♦♦ \ N89'2742"W I`/ \ \ 1 ,' 1 \ I I---='-- --� 1 ♦i _ / / m /---- I--------- \ \\ �'' Ma WETLAND\ \\ ♦ \/-/ J I - �/ 1 1 / /N \\ �' �A •i I, WETLAND \ l I ♦ I / � I i �\ �� it I / ' \ - W IW WETLAND , �•,\ \\ ��06�------ - \�1 i� �•�«� J I , ' -' i;♦�l '/ .✓I �L------- - - - - -� I - - - � /' I - e SOA =; F - \-- \ �� \\\ o --- -1---- -1- j; \ iLLJ SEE SHEET R1 I ♦� �v '—" Q 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Ravisions: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. R2 (� Carlson enviranm Suite , M I hereby c as y that this plan, specification Print Name Brian J. Krys o a Drawn. ental Blaine, MN 3) 49 or report was prepared by me or under my 1' NATURES REFUGE • I .engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 tlirectsupervisionandthatIamaduly Signature: Q Deslgnetl: B1K 10500 Brien Road E. RESOURCE INVENTORY of McCainsurveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota 4 ww.carlsonmccam.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Data: 11/14/17 License ft: 25063 Data: 11/la/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 sa.r Dace: rvoan� r:uom�sam - sazo�sau - aawre. Wa�,usarz_.�a� LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE SECTION LINE ------- 1/4 SECTION LINE ------------- 1 WETLAND °24'40"E 589 \ % s 09.54 1/16 SECTION LINE --------- z' CONTOUR — — — - - �� A - - _DAINAGE' To' CONT UP --- / �.1� - _ B LAK / - - wETLAND-------------< \ �ii+t�.. \ WETLAND\ WATER — — — — — — TREE LINE •,L IMF - - - FENCE LINE r-, / - ----- - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC - - - - C 1 1 s SoA ' ' / e UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE - - - - \ \ \ SoA S ` �� J 1J oA ♦♦ ' / ' MANHOLE \\ 1 /"� _ ♦♦♦♦ • N/ / _ SOA , HYDRANT •• \ \ 1__— ` _ _- ' ♦♦♦ / _ _ _ /— ar -- f GATE VALVE pd �1 IY TT�T / '� i i %, � �,. % � ♦♦♦ �/ / _ — _� J FLARED END SECTION � a � �o / �•,\ : � \ � ♦♦♦ ��a, j � - ... � . _ . POWER POLE TELEPHONE BOX ❑ q{p� WETLAND _ •\ \ ♦♦♦♦ , d / \ TELEVISION Box ® " A l _ Iwo ♦♦♦ ,� "x��':. - /' i WETLAND MAIL BOXo _ /�°� - - - - -�` / `I. Q♦ ,//jjj� V / i SIGN T adi Pia / V ---WETLAND I ♦♦♦♦� _ _ _ , j / , - V i�—__ i " ��a�iau�i�n . /3� ����� �i 0♦♦ i Ma 41 __ _--- SITE DATA _ - %i/ �� F TOTAL SITE AREA 59.0(AC. � � . IW �V 0 / f �� EXISTING ZONINGSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R1 O WETLANDA SoA �� - - - ♦ , A -- ------------ - ---------------- NOTES -- --NOTES -- — /' 171 , - 1. SOIL DATA SHOWN IS BASED ON NATIONAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION I /1--� �.. �'1�I / N89'27 42"W SERVICE WEB SOIL SURVEY. W ' -_\ ♦I•'l OA // 1 Ma SOIL TYPES N WETLAND\ Iw Isantl forsa a ndy00 .— �\_ \ ,,— ----\ ♦� ' Ma Markey muck, Ocassionclly ponded _ oh / Li / 1 ♦ / / I ���_v e S,A Soldar«lua fr. send 1"°� z�- \ Q / I�, WETLAND ,✓ 1 ZmB Zimmerman fine sand m' _ / 'i \ / ♦ e \ _ \ , WETLAND A �X' IW e �. SoA •. / z z --------------- Ed ' IW \• /� DRAINAGE, j c V %' BREAK i------ vo �------------------ M , (TYP) /, j', � � � �� I � i I e �' `•. I ,� � �. � SOA € -----------------------� � I SOIL DELINEATION ♦♦♦ s LINE (TYP) ♦♦ �, - I / � J... _ ♦♦♦♦♦ /WETLAND SoA ♦♦♦° 3 ��P i --------- 0 - O 50 100 ,� � � ♦♦i ) / {J - r/ / ' ,-I♦♦♦ SLOPE (TYP) (IN FEET) .. C)� ZmBSoA 46 W OI ago 27 w 41 F4 303046"W C _ �� st>♦ % WETLAND I SoA I♦ j � � I I I I__ �., v ♦ / I 1 I `v ran � ♦♦♦ � - �. � s � I I F U �J01'54'53 N89'33'46"W' 7 a o 1♦♦ GmB ---------- - 33. 167.51 L� ♦♦ / / \'�� -----------1----r -- I ------ - o M � _ — L -- --------------------- S89T33'46'E��T .. I I T •� �♦S l � -� � _ e3, 30146 MAIN SeTRE (CSAH spa.o� 09.58 1 r 1i r 3690 Pheasant Ridge Drwe NE, Revision: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. ftcCainl arlson environm 5 rte,MI hereby certify that this plan, specification Prn[ Name Brin ] KrY%a Drawn O R3 ental Blaine, MNss449 or report was prepared by me or under my NATURES REFUGE RESOURCE INVENTORY •engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that i am a dulysignature: � Designetl: 81K 10500 Bren Road E. of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under � Lino Lakes, Minnesota WITH AEREAL IMAGERY 4 ww.ca rlsonmccain. com the laws of the State of Minnesota Dale: 11/14/17 License 25063 Data: Ltna/v Minnetonka, MN 55343 s—onm: 1v 7 f:Nom,slot-11za,1112-«.w,•.,.m u. �a�.«m�nns�,enmW.«,­_. m..«w,v.=nron.a.e SEE SHEET R4 LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE -------- SECTION LINE ------- ' I r 7/4 SECTION LINE ------------- ' 1/16 SECTION LINE ---------------- , -p/ -T---� _ 2'CONTOUR - - - - - - - - - - r 10' CONTOUR - —- WETLAND----------- ' / WATER - - - - - - TREE LINE i FENCE LINE --- --- --- ---- , - - - - -' /-_----------------- - --- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC// /% JJ UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE —•- • - - - - - _ \ MANHOLE Q __---------------- HYDRANT qp-_____-__-__-__-__-__- ----__- a��a�" // 518309 29E - GATE VALVE pd - - - ' _1Y. FLARED END SECTION / POWER POLE TELEPHONE BOX ❑ �A 3 I r o TELEVISION BOX MAIL BOX o - - g�� / Iw SOIL TYPE - _ _ _ - _ SIGN T . - , (TYP) WETLAND - �.._---1----J SoA I Zm� WETLAND SOIL DELINEATION l:lii SITE DATA f LINE (TYP) / e � TOTAL SITE AREA 59.0 AC. EXISTING ZONING—SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R1) . Nlb s , ------------------ 1 I SoA -- ro��' I , NOTES 1. SOIL DATA SHOWN IS BASED ON NATIONAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION J SERVICE WEB SOIL SURVEY. I --------'-----f/j------- SOIL TYPES SLOPE (TYP),- 11 TYP), Iw Isanii fine sand loam Me Markey m�,,k, .... ionelly ponded WETLAND =� SoA Solderville fine sandy,,// ZmB Zimmerman fine sand ------------------- J e 9'24'40"E V % �� - - - - M 309.54 Iw 'ice �� • /mo D i �. Y. AINAGF � � -_ ------------------ J/ o so loo zoo j WETLAND r - - ' - d (IN FEET) SDA SDA �`• ' /� % ,� B � 3 �_ -- -- O•' i SoA � .ii / /f WETLANDY _ _ - �� \ �i��Iw /.j �•�•�� '«jWETLAND / • 3 _ _ - - - - - - / . ♦ I � ID _ ag WETLAND I �� - �� „/ Y / ...,L ' F- a■n... ,�qq����� ����.• - - �' Ma v — �Z , LJ 40 00s� ----- ------ �� ! Iw SoA SDA �� WETLAND -- /, Iw _ \ N8_9'2742"W .,SDA WETLAND -- .,\ • �% I 1 a WFTI ANC — / y�- --------- LLJI Y./ WETLAND �. —fro Iw - SoA z 1 ---- -1 • / '� - - - /'� SEE SHEET R. ��♦ - --- -J W ILI 3890 Pneasanc Rmge Drive NE, Revisions: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. Carlson Pnm Bite loo here6ycertifyethat ed pier, me rL.dcrmy Print Name Brian Krystnfak,RE Drawn "° RESOURCE INVENTORY R4 C ental Blaine'MN 3) 48 orreportwaspreparedby hameorundermy 10500 Bren Road E. , NATURES REFUGE • engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature: � i Designetl: 81K Of McCain surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 ensedProfessionalEngineerunder Lino Lakes, Minnesota WITH AEREAL IMAGERY 4 ww.ca rlsonmccain. com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 11/14/17 License ft: 25063 Date: 11/14/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 sa.e Dace: rvoan, r:uom�sam - sazo�sau - �.w,�.,.mu.�a�.�eincen�s�,enmW.�,�sarz_.��� m..�w,v.=nron.a.e KEY DENOTES TREE O TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED NOTE: REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT INFORMATION. s !ESG CALL BEFORE YOU DIG I� , O Know what's below. `�`�k Call before you dig. The subsurface utility information shown on this plan is utility Quality Level D. This quality level w s determined a cording to the guidelines of CI/ASCE 38-02, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." SITE F 5 sTN NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX T1. INDEX T2—T6. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T7. TREE MITIGATION N 0 100 200 400 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK 1. AnokaCounty Benchmark No. 2011 set n the ground in , —ered tube located 150 feet westerly of the -marline of Rondeau Road West and ,,0 feet northerly of the centerline of C.S. A.H. No. 14. Elevation=894.878 (NAVD 88) 2. Top Nut Hydrant East of the Southeast entronce to Lino Lakes Elementary School. Elevation=920.009 (NAVD 88) Cr 1 Carlson environm }a,u n,ee,a5r rt,uye ur ve Revisions suite loo Therebycertifythat this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J.Krystofiak,P.E. D2wn: ADB PREFERRED BUILDERS NATURES REFUGE TIO ental Blaine, MN 55449 orreportthat under my 10500 Brien Road E. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN • •engineering phone: (763)409-7900 direct supervision andthatlamatluly Signature: � ® Deslgnetl: BJK Lino Lakes, Minnesota McCain ' surveying Fax (763) 489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under www. ca rlson mcca In.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: unaw u<ense x: zso63 Date: u�Law Minnetonka, MN 55343 T% LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB LINE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER ----->— STORM SEWER WATER MAIN DE10TS I—T OVERHEAD UTILITY = STORM CATCH BASIN (D Ea I®j _® STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE Q MANHOLE 0 HYDRANT xro CP µ GATE VALVE D4 TELEVISION BOX ❑ TELEPHONE BOX ❑ UTILITY POLE -RETAINING WALL FENCE 10' CONTOUR 2' CONTOUR ---- FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE CG SPOT ELEVATION -••---- . ----e 00.0 � x E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 4 4 x 000.0 SILT FENCE . • • • • • . TREE FENCE GRADING LIMITS- TREELINE f Y- Y --Y SOIL BORING KEY DENOTES TREE O TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED NOTE: REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT INFORMATION. s !ESG CALL BEFORE YOU DIG I� , O Know what's below. `�`�k Call before you dig. The subsurface utility information shown on this plan is utility Quality Level D. This quality level w s determined a cording to the guidelines of CI/ASCE 38-02, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." SITE F 5 sTN NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX T1. INDEX T2—T6. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T7. TREE MITIGATION N 0 100 200 400 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK 1. AnokaCounty Benchmark No. 2011 set n the ground in , —ered tube located 150 feet westerly of the -marline of Rondeau Road West and ,,0 feet northerly of the centerline of C.S. A.H. No. 14. Elevation=894.878 (NAVD 88) 2. Top Nut Hydrant East of the Southeast entronce to Lino Lakes Elementary School. Elevation=920.009 (NAVD 88) Cr 1 Carlson environm }a,u n,ee,a5r rt,uye ur ve Revisions suite loo Therebycertifythat this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J.Krystofiak,P.E. D2wn: ADB PREFERRED BUILDERS NATURES REFUGE TIO ental Blaine, MN 55449 orreportthat under my 10500 Brien Road E. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN • •engineering phone: (763)409-7900 direct supervision andthatlamatluly Signature: � ® Deslgnetl: BJK Lino Lakes, Minnesota McCain ' surveying Fax (763) 489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under www. ca rlson mcca In.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: unaw u<ense x: zso63 Date: u�Law Minnetonka, MN 55343 T% ° POND 100 A SEE SHEETT3 /R e \ / / aao�ep x ''�4 ' CJ NWL — 902.5/ 100 YR HWL = 905.2 \ ,� \ ` l ;•� �\ l l R r obs os ••.R \\ tea, R� — / I / 894 WETLAND BUFFER / ,•/\ / // / /1II � I 1 ��_ / / \ 1 O� •(bis ••, — , i' SIGN (TYP.) /7+^ I T��•• �� WETLAND 906 I NWL = �se 902.0 /' / / o�� / / / \ \ \% pm� / ,�• • • —I— 100 YR HWL — 903. 4498 /WET ND FILL / s o j / / 1 1 l-- / SF '� ash `'� 1 / \ so , rp• >R ,� p Ms7 10 DAY SNOWMELT = 904.2 / / .�R ,'4 i lO I \ • \ \ (PER RCWD MODEL) / // / \ \� 9v \-� 1 I--___�- l / / / \ \ •�ptm Jo aaa� / 51 RUlp J - - - - i 011 \v>ae a� — � \ I / \ / �, // / % L---___ --/ \ /// m \\� ham 6)%S T -E—T M 1140 . \\ 4j /' /' ��\ --_ EL. 914.00 _�1 7-- 67. ]it\\�aoe�� 904 — / ,.%/^\ °l/ 8'N %—�1 O / g 3 4/ / p9A °B ------ L 8 J/ / �I c W �T J 13 2 1 1 908 /I INFILTRATION BASIN / i/ \\\ 100 YR WL000009076, -WETLA °D r I I 5738 . W—l— as /14 I — —--- •.most as / � o% so\ \ /// \\ bol / i i Qlf _�-__- �__-J 7— TREET C a+aa --- - "� — Ae F< 9°, ~•w S \ 4 \ e�000e I 5 1.12 I - --138 14.3 J!, Toys - Pvl 7+50 ' \ \ \ q so� P - / 6 I 916 \ ■mae q / 916—o� --------- - R; 4/ 14 L __ J ��° 16 / \m• • ,_ �s ° • L_{6F-__J L ___--__-/ I 0. h°MAT' .� • l 20 p 24 i23 41 / 21�--- °It o p p o-- _ 2. 9 15 / F Il i / / \ 7 -- / --- — — Honael \I i I [h[ T —� R p —— ) I\\ `\ o° I F N 2 I �\ L ---j J Housei I House I I or �\ M R I ��i•—i2_ _J i I -- �� xR�aoss� v` /V 16 y RAVEL 0 25 50 100 --- -- V CONSTRUCTION -----— •�� -- °I '•�.— I _ tee._-�...1--_evT--� .,t ~a,�,a —_R�� ��w..—...—w.,—a..—R=... _�.._— — tt RTRANCE (IN FEET) • .n m. �mz m a �. /7F a m. a a. I I ---- --- _--L----I------r---=�-Y�--��----_ - an. -->—�—>-1->-- -�->--�-->--->---�� =5='-- -=--��=- - --- _ — _ _v -1f-- — -- I�--> \--1T---1----I-z o_IP-1�----I-----I---_- - --_ice• '-� •_<_ — BENCHMARK -- Rlu_stois N \ zl. P TT� 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 set wwN)l%'g groan �g(p Rlra-9p9.a alry=rasa wv-esas � >� I -- — INv-esao yr l oa In the d it a aovereao tube located 150 feet westerly f the _ \\ �- 2i P, ->--- _ centerline of .,1 of Road West and MAIN STREET (C.S---- N0. 14) - MAIN STREET (C.S.A.H. N0. 14) /— �°—�--�I-__-_-____ _ 40 A.H.rherl of Ne-894.,ne ---__-__� _ 2 S (NAVIH. No. 14. of of 88) _ , ----------1 _ ____ -- ____-___---________ --�.}<_ `F--- «- _-«___«_____ �__�<_/ 2. Top Nut Hydrant East of Ne Southeast Ji \ — — - — _ r G _ — — — _ _ R� _ — _— — — _ R — — — — J t` i entrance to Lino Lakes Elementary a.— �I \ Schod. Dewtion-920.009 NAVD BB \ i -- — — — — 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Revisions: OCarlson enyironm Suite 100 hereby that this plan,speci0wtian PnntName: Brian Krystoia Drawn: ADB PREFERRED BUILDERS ental Blaine, MN 55449 9r report was prepared by me or under my ' NATURES REFUGE T2 aen9lneering phone: (763)489-7900 dlrectsupervisionandthaUamaduly Signature: �- h Deslgnetl: eix 10500 Bren Road E. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of McCain•surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 LlcensedPrafessionalEngineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota W" ca rlson mcca In.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: unaiv ueen:e x: zsos3 Date: unaiv Minnetonka, MN 55343 T7 Sava Dau: tL05/t/ f:�obs\scat - sa30\sa,3 -natures refuge\waknelneenne\orellminary\satLtree.tlwg / / m 137, os- li I i // / // I \ 1��z a°i/ / 0 IR 734 } o,x at6 \� meal o /^ �.e� li I i m mo. mins o m en o m w5 9 m — \ \ DITCH os.s li +I i B•90 Ta 70} _m m5 ° m a,e 1 m ° m 100 YR HWL = 903.8 'DAI �Y <(PER SNOWMELT RCWD MODE 2 = 904.2 I 4 ---� --- o a•N_ ( em�Il/ '° v L) 05.5 �, / tt T0. ° yo W ,b6 ,� \ \ ° /•�. / / - — +65 fid°'""' m(',a�avo'� \ ��WETLAND -�m-a� 2-z—s } OND 4 90 g— \� ya*e••e• om-556 'i'>'• Cg \\�a\�\m"2R.a+�'�j-*—/ BUFFER i m ° x1 8 ° — 90 o + 1+ /t,: KI x �_ K 1R•JJe � 1i1�11 go 1 A St(;VVWELT/= K,,.20 �� •• �'j�x., / e om�``�� o m7a,no(•m I� (PER RCWD MODCL/}� TC 07.3 °O TC 08.0 • • • • • • . • • • • ' • \ oo�l 1 I / FOND 200 it / // \ '•• o g 10 BINM=an TRAIL *08.5908 /• o,�+� \ / os I I NWL 901.5 % / t 9oB _ III m,75 Ii i 100 YR HWL = 903.8 , / i/ m'a_s ego- ^'� gto — Sx �\ I_ DITCH a ; 10 DAY SNOWMELT = 904.2 •• �, SII / \ m 7s °moo yy 3:1 (PER RCWD MODEL) j/ / i I TC 08.0 / 318 100 YR HWL = 904,1 1 J oo�p. / I °o .'• olfm m s ommu710 DAY SNOWMELT — 904.5 om,5,•' II I I 0UTL e ' / i 1I / S. ' / \ a,_(PER RCWD MODEL) —64 ' li i 00° m \\ 05.5 r .17.- - - - ` - o r- I TOP OF BERM O ° TVP 2 I WETLAND ------------- I NWL = 902.0\ 100 YR HWL = 903.8- - k T r- I WETLAND I 1 10 DAY'SNOWMELT - 904.2 BUFFER ( (PER RCWD MODEL) 142 \ om25l m o 71 o e, %/ WETL ND FILL m o m in ---- 41 33= '\ \ TOP aF BERM i \ \ / : / I /I m L -r = oma' ---� � ��_ / ! r I � � t� iU I I I ••• I OUTLOT B WETL,�ND FILL 5 A 8712\F o \ oesOUTLOT B WETLAND 1 / x;M� j WETLAND BUFFER °�o \ 902 ENHANCEMENT / �"/ / \\F •� •• SIGN ZTYP, 154,527 S.F. j 9 / D �� �/ 6 I �o _ �—.•• 3UFFERD / a \ \ POND 100 NWL — 902.5 /\\\ / // / �// L -- OII \ \ / / IF--- moo 21 100 YR HWL'— 905.2 -- \ \ / / / / /-- °s \ 08. — — 06.5 � ••� \ i — 394 WETLAND BUFFER % lo/ SIGN (TYP.) / \ / 10\ WETLAND / o / / I v I NWL = 902.0 m _ /WET ND FILL \ \ / ,�•' • 100 YR HWL = 903.8 / s b / 449 SF O �• 1 10 DAY SNOWMELT = 904.2 / //'`j �• ice^ // I I \ •• ` \ (PER RCWD MODEL) / // �� \�9v \ ` 1 I l / / / \ •�+�{}ao mJJJ • • Z'y 5 \ / l ,{/ l '",� 1 I — / /,� I \ s 1 1 \ \ °°a o �^ o zs so low IN FEE»/ • \ \ \ /� / J \,\ o / / I l 6 0 ®xX� AK 1. Maka Cou fy Benchmark No. 2011 set 'n the g d o co red tube L �• / / I / / j c.e.°4, loathed reel .eat<dy or the 4,• / / ` _ EL 91400 / tented' / Randeou Road West and / 8^0oentedine or \ \ \yElevatlon�89"Im „2 0. -� / / / / N VD 88 09, : •I o0 I 1 / / l l --916 _ \ \ ( A ) � VGETLA �,(\ J/ / ^ / -- - "s� / � �\ \ o � \ 2 -/,/Nut H 6 y \ p ydrant East of the Southeast PUFF / / / / \, e \ \ natran°e m Lino Lake, Elementary School. Elevation=920.009 (NAVD 88) Ain o SEE SHEET12 ^n 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Revisions: (�ear�sOn enyo-oDm suite too Ihereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J.Krysto�a D2wn: ADB PREFERRED BUILDERS ental Blaine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my NATURES REFUGE T3 •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 dlreatsupervisionandthatIamaduly Slgnafure: _ h Deslgnetl: six 10500 Bren Road E. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of McCain•surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Pr°fiessionalEngineerunder Lino Lakes, Minnesota www. ca arson mcca In.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 11/14/17 1-1—se x: 25063 Date: 11/ Minnetonka, MN 55343 T7 Sava °a[e: tLas/t7 f:�obs\scat - sa2a\sa,2 -natures refuge\waknuineenng\oreliminary\satLtree.tlwg F II /\ e 1 V ^"R ora - 50' m— / 7v \ \ �7 \ I I WETLAND 1 \ BUFFER / 11 II i i WETLAND / / I OU OT B I 10 DAYS SNORCWD MODELWMELT�= 904.5 BUFFER PER —50p o°s // 50 om 1 1 ` o °aw moor lit 111 mm �`lx eio. c_ \ ; omels o DITCH mni a 0—a �o8mbe%/ \ / / /�• m m e / li I i ey — o m roa ° _/ 0. �' o m 3as�� / - oss hal 1 0 � '----- -- �n� ------- 100 YR HWL = 903,E 'DAI �Y SNOWMELT - 904.2 I I I - o -- �o�osi° ""�� h' PER RCWD MODEL) 05.5 �—I / 111 — — – �tN�m�\ioo�5 2s' H _ w=sem m ds= / 3B3 \\ o WETLAND -� � 0s �, I : �x'Ir': a POND430 g� sg- \ Ne�a'e' °p5 \� .�y�e\ �\° ,�,aa` a ��/ � / / BUFFER t 11 >R x 100�t1'R�'4W� = 903.8 900 x 1R:sre •�' x.�\\ of •R o ``�/� S`1�+NINELT69 4.2 �/ I � • 1� 1 I i / � (PER RCWD MODCL)� >0a °'° TC 08.0 • • \�• �j/ �,A \ o m BJB \/•' °p� 1 ofi �T I / SND 20� i� • • TC 07.3 o g 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL . 0$ 5908 \ / ' • \ l"°\.,� 'i \ I os SI I I I N WL = 901.5 % / , a soe m 175 �m h i 100 YR HWL = 903.8 , / i/ m T4s •• \ '"I� 9\0 _ _ / �'' �\ DITCH SNOWMELT = 904.2 1 (PER RCWD MODEL)/'�}„ 100 YR HWL = 904.1 (�T'I–,{/6 000 �o""�'• \ -"fR ��ms��e\x1710 DAY SNOWMELT = 904.5 / o m ,at • I I I OU TLIMY °� / r I / `°}$ \ 1 \ o tP o m �g (PER RCWD MODEL) m lea II /' / ;' I s• \ �` s� -�'� as ddd i I i as° ; �,' ;'%� \ os.5 \ 14 1 \1 .•. om R IN a i\1` 1 1,1 /a^f / TOP ° OF BERM • I / 'T (TVP.) I ( 1y ° 1??�ao • h 111 I i A /°ti �j, / 1 U g 30 2 \ T" --- 9015-' WETLAND �5: I NWL = 902.0 100 YR HWL = 913.8 o o zs so 100 WETLAND I 10 DAY SNOWMELT = 904.2 Z / om,4a 111 \ r / \\�BU FFER 1 (PER RCWD MODEL) / \t` \ r' / �'/ (IN FEET) 0 1.12 BENCHMARK �° m )a o �° II 1 i / / / \ C / — J 1 I — 1 • I 1. Aa County Benchmark No. 2011 at 'y a> a / i - - - - -1 F in nokthe d in o coven tube o ° °/ , \\'1 / \ \ / ocatedg160 feet westerly r the \ 11 tedine of Ronde.. Rood Weat and \ / \ WETL ND FILL °feet northad f the oenterane of 189''/ 17.1 6 SF I j 4 co.S.A.H. No. 14. yElevation�894.8]B Top N 88) \ • m 1 I 2. Top Nut Hydrant Easf of the t.,y et o m entrance to Lino Lake. Elementary 43 I \\ \\ / i j 8 of L _ — I 8chool. El evotion-920.009 (NAVD 88) \ \ TOP OF BERmmM 1 — J \ ($ otR Y, "06.5— �- \J OUTLOT B WFTL4:moo \\ 96\�\ SEE SHEET T3 I 10 \\� I W 5 A 8712 \SF FILL 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Revisians: �)Carlson envir°nm Bla e, IM I he port wa i e a red bylme or cifwtion Ptlnt Name: Bdan J Krys o a D2wn: ADB PREFERRED BUILDERSental Blaine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my NATURES REFUGE T4 •00 engineering phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision andthatlamaduly Signature:_ h Deslgnetl: BJK 10500 Bren Road E. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of McCain'surveying Fax (]63)489-]959 LicensedPr°fessionalEngineerunder Lino Lakes, Minnesota www. ca dson mcca In.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Data: 11/14/17 U -se x: 25063 Date: 11/14/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 T7 Sava °a[e: tL05/t7 f:�obs\scat - sa30\sa13 -natures refuge\waknuineenne\oreliminary\satLtree.tlwg I OUTLOT A /&Z- 12. --_--- — — — — — — — m 82J 0 � ,235 e ,2 z.oZ I°O 0120 / VI 9 1 °�1� I I I pa2Y9° 0 / r m 12.e e/ / ora- 0 ra — PJ I I o931°s .m m6 41 o o°U,tR 539 0,820 crRo--1om5� n'2dpo .,e °,g0ooaazI il' � 536 � � � m fie, m y� / � °)' ee ato aaaTa 5se�5eF3m' F°�S�1�,O �emo2'aR1sgR a16p TR 0J 8\3 mSae / 1 t°o,ds3"ma/�" saz 9 5°"_o/m9I\ ie}9se,o" b ia)m5aa° o O 1P� /R Q;; 5080 S 0 pe]3 m o m 363 /" /p m 1004 60, 559!1®` odea po•N,,�4,0- 683 o m 8] o m 89. / �C 1R a ®� 5 e o aO m '"f -�" a° °®�� O m a98 �"362 a y ° s,> m sae ea$m s� o >R ? F , / - ae4 op 1 m 'R . m 602 °o m 59) set ./ 5�° `i m 589 / o J �/ 5 ¢p 1 59 `p m 6.9 5 / 0-1 �,p sis ° a 61)0 0 otjP 84603 Z o m S9S O ..( %",a", 22�P 8 µ 2A ?3 0 08m X56 1R B9P/pi'a83 ° / ra 56, ° 03 6,1 O m 6580 m 599 m �9 o m 63, p m 890 ` 1 / 1 5M 0 0 1P 9 B 2tr—'- 0o m e3o$ m e518p ,F o0 "R S5,ogy0 _—_ y�0°o ��-- �>A — —� a. o m 65, o m 598 �B1R W �/ / \f O m 694 p m 559m 527 p 45. , Ip�,'F— 6� W9 /L m 593 O m 698 190,Ti \ Tit O�/w >R rhe o m -a hi all, _ °-,2Ja, ,P. O m ,�ol s'� 0 9� o m BW o/1k A 2� o 19'888' \ /� l�R 1181 0� X29} ��\ / ,mp/ o m 1198 M a40 m 644tH 6g0a56 O p m 1153 3a\p 1R R]8� t6\ -1991Y m ,188 / �9f0 (/ /mils ° 9° / m n3mo,2as° °m n.3 / \ 1 m „9e r'erpo m „° — — — — 1P 0�o'i m ° {a "'S ° �o o m n]�o m°,i, ,a2�n, w m 9se / �,p oo\°m m9 m „s2/ / / \ \- 9a3 ° :8 l o o sFse " ^�0 m p m ,,.I m n55 ° r I / m 8390 /i IS) >� °� w o m,9 ,ie. m m 0°5 f o m n35 1 \ 95a o liie]6o°BOG 4L_ o) 0 o�H 853 X1,52 O 'TFYM2 %�o�gC�21R >8"" 1,18 1IL 1195 / m 1016, O O G („9° m ]82 °'08 m 4111 J89 M11128> ° >O80 1 ,6 za)' II90 m ry g,5 e 19 'A 1R /Ba mt'J°° \ o m ]81 m 853 oo o',R U199� r ° T9 11Bd m \o o m a32 m 1 95 Y 1e12po1f111283 m9a mo s9 m,1920 01 6m„ o m O O 181 ,290 ;�, -,12.1 Ta 12,9 `� hi , 8 m „38 ,92 °5m 1'2az,,g, p o.'�,o pellRm „ �,�pm 1294 6 0 99' 9�' 1i 128 \ 1 / oVR 90U m ]90 (l mm12,4 6 0 0 310 2`115000 �8 m 12]2 ° m >ea 0 0 )N 18 ,295 6' 12 /1^ 'b" ` \ OPo O \ R� _ --- 1R 4Po m SSB 7a5s om356j ° 02°651 \ 39 pm11 L j 1 023,5 I 1 \\ I I — — — — — — — — — — — N / I 0 25 50 100 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK �\ / I y / / 1. An oke Count Benc mo" No. a set / \VI in the ground at dy tube I / located 150 feet westerly of the tenine o Fiord— Rood West and 40n feat northerly of the centerline of / /(NANDH. BBo. 14. El—ti.-894.878 2. Top Nut Hydrant E..t of the Southeast entrance to Lino Lakes Elementary School Elevol:w-920.009 (NAVD 88) F-- — —— — — --- -be/ SEE SHEET T3 (� Carlson enyirenm 3p,p Y11eOtl11 R'"ye �r'°e Revi6ian6 Sul l"o t hereby certify that this plan, specification Pdnt Name: Brian J. Krystofiek, P.E. Drawn: ADB PREFERRED BUILDERS ental Sul e,MN55449 report was prepared by me or under my 1. NATURES REFUGE T5 • •engineering phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly Blgnature: �_ 2 Designed: eix 10500 Bren Road E. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of McCainI 'surveying Fax: (7 63) 489-7959 Licensed Pr°fessi°nal Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota www. ca rlson mcca In.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 11/14/17 U—se x: 25063 Date: 11/14/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 / T7 � 1 I / ------------- ��� I--------------- / �\ T — — — 7 i I � 1R t0I2 I II I I I I Pa �s a I I I I I I ----4--- I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I � 1R t0I2 I II I I I I Pa �s a I I I I I I ----4--- I I I I I I I (� Carlson enyironm Blame, .nea,an, nm9e �r e Re l=ion= sDiteloo Iherebycertifythatthisplan,specification PdntName: Brian J.Krystofiak,P.E. Drawn: ADB PREFERRED BUILDERS ental Blaine,MN55449 report was prepared by me or under my 1. NATURES REFUGE T6 • •en9lneering phone: (763)489-7900 dirertsupervisionandthatIamaduly Slgnature: Z — /L Designed: BJK 10500 Bren Road E. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of McCainI 'surveying Fax: (763) 489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota www. ca dson mcca In.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 11/14/17 Ll—.x:25063 Date: 11/14/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 / T7 SEE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN BY KIOLHAG ENVIRONMENTAL FOR AND BUFFER SEEDING REQUIREMEP I I'J ! SEE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN PREPARED s BY K)OLHAG ENVIRONMENTAL FOR WETLANDS AND BUFFER SEEDING REQUIREMENTS \I / MAIN STREET (w^^ 14) / ', a3 0 100 T)McCain - - rtluyevrwerver Revisions: Carlson 5U o100L hereby c as y that this plan, spetif or Trn Print Name: lames A. Kalkes RLA Dawn: JAK environmental Blaine,MN 55449 or report was prepared ha me or undermy�n/ Sl-cy, g Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature hymn 4 % aLka Designed JAK rveying Fax: 1, 489-7959 Licensed Landscape of MI.. under III 1, the the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 11/14/2017LIcense #: 45071 Date: 11/14/201 SaraOace. E3/B5/IT f:VaUstsaOl-5+30\sa1E nawres refuaeVea\ In..rn PremIn, E3_ImJawce-dw \1 PLAN S' 2 -PLY NYLON STRAPS PPANB 0 FLUUORESCENT ORANGE WHITE FLAGGING (TYP ) TREE WRAP 41NCHES HARDWOOD MULCH 11 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER 4 S' STEEL TEE POST- S REQUIRED AT 120 BACKFILL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL REMOVE BURLAP S ROPE FROM TOP I/3 OF THE BALL NOTE SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. HDECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL I. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE HOTS GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT PRIOR TO PLANTING SEE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN PREPARED e I RE$PONNOIWTY FOR MAINTAINING TREE DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE NOT PAINT CUTS. / 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOL GUT ASSEMBLY- 16" 4P POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR 01 1 I i Cr DOUBLE STRAND IB GA. WIRE, 2-1" o ww eoa �v SNOwUELi - 90as ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MOOT 3401) 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH P 150° O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. COMMERCIALTURF-SOD MAIN STREET (w^^ 14) / ', a3 0 100 T)McCain - - rtluyevrwerver Revisions: Carlson 5U o100L hereby c as y that this plan, spetif or Trn Print Name: lames A. Kalkes RLA Dawn: JAK environmental Blaine,MN 55449 or report was prepared ha me or undermy�n/ Sl-cy, g Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature hymn 4 % aLka Designed JAK rveying Fax: 1, 489-7959 Licensed Landscape of MI.. under III 1, the the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 11/14/2017LIcense #: 45071 Date: 11/14/201 SaraOace. E3/B5/IT f:VaUstsaOl-5+30\sa1E nawres refuaeVea\ In..rn PremIn, E3_ImJawce-dw \1 PLAN S' 2 -PLY NYLON STRAPS PPANB 0 FLUUORESCENT ORANGE WHITE FLAGGING (TYP ) TREE WRAP 41NCHES HARDWOOD MULCH 11 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER 4 S' STEEL TEE POST- S REQUIRED AT 120 BACKFILL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL REMOVE BURLAP S ROPE FROM TOP I/3 OF THE BALL NOTE SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. HDECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL I. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE HOTS GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT PRIOR TO PLANTING CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL '110 RE$PONNOIWTY FOR MAINTAINING TREE DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE NOT PAINT CUTS. DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOL GUT ASSEMBLY- 16" OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOL POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR (40 MIL) 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP (TYP) UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINSHED GRADE, DOUBLE STRAND IB GA. WIRE, 2-1" o ww eoa �v SNOwUELi - 90as ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MOOT 3401) 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH P 150° O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. COMMERCIALTURF-SOD BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12` OF THE COORDIN4TE TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE STAKING TONSURE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO 2 12 UNFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS GREATE 12 NES AND STAKES III Ol I/3 OF THE BALL REMOVE ALL TWINE. STAKING DIAGRAM _ 5. PLUMB AND BACKFILL. WITH 1 : I I GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING - -J RM VOD5. 2.5" 4`e SHREDDED BARK 1, WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST BE 15' F-EjNB NG GRADE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE MINIMUM Ih WIDTH OF ROOT BALL _ ROOT BALL AND PLANTING MOLE. PLANTING 80L M1 -URE (SEE SPEC.) S. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOLII€11111 iuu _ - UNDISTURBED OR STABIUZED MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. k j OUTLOT A oT To scAEE C3 / 1 SEE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN PREPARED Celtic occidentalis m BY K)OLHAG ENVIRONMENTAL FOR WETLANDS BB / O AND BUFFER SEEDING REQUIREMENTS w . D--- Acer saccharum SUGAR MAPLE 2.5" BB 17 MAIN STREET (w^^ 14) / ', a3 0 100 T)McCain - - rtluyevrwerver Revisions: Carlson 5U o100L hereby c as y that this plan, spetif or Trn Print Name: lames A. Kalkes RLA Dawn: JAK environmental Blaine,MN 55449 or report was prepared ha me or undermy�n/ Sl-cy, g Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature hymn 4 % aLka Designed JAK rveying Fax: 1, 489-7959 Licensed Landscape of MI.. under III 1, the the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 11/14/2017LIcense #: 45071 Date: 11/14/201 SaraOace. E3/B5/IT f:VaUstsaOl-5+30\sa1E nawres refuaeVea\ In..rn PremIn, E3_ImJawce-dw \1 PLAN S' 2 -PLY NYLON STRAPS PPANB 0 FLUUORESCENT ORANGE WHITE FLAGGING (TYP ) TREE WRAP 41NCHES HARDWOOD MULCH 11 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER 4 S' STEEL TEE POST- S REQUIRED AT 120 BACKFILL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL REMOVE BURLAP S ROPE FROM TOP I/3 OF THE BALL NOTE SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. HDECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL I. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE HOTS GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT PRIOR TO PLANTING CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL 2. TRIM CUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/OR RE$PONNOIWTY FOR MAINTAINING TREE DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE NOT PAINT CUTS. DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOL GUT ASSEMBLY- 16" OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOL POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR (40 MIL) 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP (TYP) UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINSHED GRADE, DOUBLE STRAND IB GA. WIRE, 2-1" • OVERSTORY/ EVERGREEN TREES ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MOOT 3401) 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH P 150° O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. COMMERCIALTURF-SOD BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12` OF THE COORDIN4TE TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE STAKING TONSURE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO 2 12 UNFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS GREATE 12 NES AND STAKES REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP Ol I/3 OF THE BALL REMOVE ALL TWINE. STAKING DIAGRAM _ 5. PLUMB AND BACKFILL. WITH BACKFILL SOL GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING 6. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL FLAGGING- ONE PER WIRE VOD5. 2.5" 4`e SHREDDED BARK 1, WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST BE 15' F-EjNB NG GRADE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE MINIMUM Ih WIDTH OF ROOT BALL _ ROOT BALL AND PLANTING MOLE. PLANTING 80L M1 -URE (SEE SPEC.) S. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOLII€11111 iuu _ - UNDISTURBED OR STABIUZED MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. SUBSOIL CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL *C oT To scAEE MNDOT 25-131 SEED MIX 29 L- i 200 C SCALE 1" = 100' 300 NORTH -Tree Preservation Replacement Trees •• REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED SHEET T7 141 REQUIRED Q •• TREES PER LANDSCAPE CODE "302.03" / 1 PER LOT +60 OVERSTORY TREES •• OPEN AREA TREES .10 OVERSTORY TREES ADDITIONAL REPLACEMENT TREES ♦71 TREES TOTAL REPLACEMENT TREES =141 TREES CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ju. Know what's below. IE �c Call before you dig. PREFERRED BUILDERS, INC. 10500 Bren Road E. Minnetonka, MN 55343 LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN DECIDUOUS TREES HEIGHT HEIGHT SEED MIX �\� EXISTING TREES ONSITE TO REMAIN WETLAND FRINGE MN SEED MIX 33-2611omewsauGl MNDOT260 SP 3 ALL AREAS BY CONSTRUCTION HE /�\/''��Jjj -LINO LAKES LANDSCAPE CODE "302.03" BH 3 • OVERSTORY/ EVERGREEN TREES BB 2 •. ONE TREE PER LOT S0' COMMERCIALTURF-SOD (60 LOTS) -60 OVERSTORY TREES var. Ii'lla master' •• OPEN AREA =31515SF HL 1 TREE PER 2000SF 3 LARGE SHRUBS PER 20005E =16 0VERSTDRY TREES =48 LARGE SHRUBS 2 =70 OVERSTORY TREES MNDOT 25-131 SEED MIX 29 L- i 200 C SCALE 1" = 100' 300 NORTH -Tree Preservation Replacement Trees •• REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED SHEET T7 141 REQUIRED Q •• TREES PER LANDSCAPE CODE "302.03" / 1 PER LOT +60 OVERSTORY TREES •• OPEN AREA TREES .10 OVERSTORY TREES ADDITIONAL REPLACEMENT TREES ♦71 TREES TOTAL REPLACEMENT TREES =141 TREES CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ju. Know what's below. IE �c Call before you dig. PREFERRED BUILDERS, INC. 10500 Bren Road E. Minnetonka, MN 55343 LANDSCAPE LEGEND KEY 60TANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT QTY. INT DECIDUOUS TREES HEIGHT HEIGHT SEED MIX WETLAND FRINGE MN SEED MIX 33-2611omewsauGl MNDOT260 MN SEED MIX 25-1311OMMNDOl ALL AREAS BY CONSTRUCTION HE /�\/''��Jjj O imll Glediter triacantho5 SHADEMASTER HONEYLOCUST 2.5" BB 2 30' S0' COMMERCIALTURF-SOD HIGHLAND SOD (1EAT-0I1 UNACCEPTARU) W var. Ii'lla master' 0 BL TIIia a merIcara'Boulevard BOULEVARD NNDEN 2.5" BE 24 15' 60' i HB Celtic occidentalis HACKBERRY 2.5" BB 29 15' 50' w SM Acer saccharum SUGAR MAPLE 2.5" BB 17 14' 50' RM 0 Acerrubrum'Nothwoods' NORTHHWOODS MAPLE 2.5" BB d24 14' 50' WO 0Quercus bicolor SWAMPWHITEOAK 2.5" BB 15' 50' ORNAMENTAETREES TL 0 Syringa Reticulata JAPANESE TREE LILAC 2.5" BE 5 8' 20' EVERGREEN TREES BH Pitea glauca will. Densata BLACK H I LLS SPRUCE V BB D CH Tsuga canademIS CANADIAN HEMLOCK 6' BB O AL �( Larlx ladcina AMERICAN LARCHSp 6' BB t126' pa@ Pinus ryNestris SCOTCH PINE 6' BB SHRUBS DBW Salix purpurea'Nana' DWARF BLUE ARCTIC WILLOW N5 CONT. 17 V 3'x4' ® RTD Cornus Sericea'Bailey' RED TWIG DOGWOOD H5 CONT. 21 1.S' 5'x5' 'E BOB Aronica melonoczrpa elata BLACK CHOKEBERRY F5 CONT, 28 1.5' 414' TEC Forsythia'Sunrise' SUNRISE FORSYTHIA N5 CONT. 45 1.5' 5'x5' SPF Syringe x "Bailsugar' SUGAR PLUM LILAC N5 CONT. 47 1.5' 4'x4' 0111111111111111ESEED MIX LEGEND (FORALLSHEETS) SYM. TYPE SEED MIX WETLAND FRINGE MN SEED MIX 33-2611omewsauGl MNDOT260 MN SEED MIX 25-1311OMMNDOl ALL AREAS BY CONSTRUCTION (USE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET FOR SLOPES OVER 3:1) NOT INTENDED TO BEDSODDED, OR RETENTION BASINS HARDWOOD MULCH (NATURALCOLOR) SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH COMMERCIALTURF-SOD HIGHLAND SOD (1EAT-0I1 UNACCEPTARU) MPLANTING NOTES 1. ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND BURLAPPED AS INDICATED IN THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 2. ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. 3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. 4. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK," ANSI -Z60, LATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 6. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC. WITH 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. 7, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 8. LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS PLANTERS AND BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE ACCESS TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED IN AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. 11. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454-0002 (TWIN CITIES METRO AREA) OR 800-252-1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION, 12. PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS: FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COMPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL. MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HARDPACK SUBSOIL. STONES, CHEMICALS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, ETC. SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND NATURES REFUGE Lino Lakes, Minnesota 10-0-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. IN PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY ROTOTILUNG IT INTO THE TOP 12" OF SOIL, 13. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO COMPLETE GROWING SEASON (APRIL 1 - NOVEMBER 1), UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. 15, SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING AND SEEDING: NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO PLANT IN OFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK. DECIDUOUS POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6 1; 9/21 - 11/1 DECIDUOUS /B&B: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 / 11/1 / EVERGREENPOTTED PLANTS 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21-11/1 EVERGREEN B&B: 4/1 - 5/1; 9/21 - 11/1 TURF/LAWN SEEDING: 4/1 - 6/1; 7/20 - 9/20 NATIVE MIX SEEDING: 4/1 - 7/20; 9/20-10/20 16. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING,CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE -SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 17. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. 20. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TURF SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 4" TOP SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. 21. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE NATIVE WETLAND SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE ENGINEERED SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN I of 1 I OUTLOT A / LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED 1 (� i PROPERTY LINE ------ EASEMENT LINE ___________ ___________ \ // \\ •� 1 I \., ,'` \ ' % /� \ \-vor/ j CURB LINE OUTLOT B- w BITUMINOUS u0 \ s_ \ / / CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER----'--_-'— \ � _-1�� /r�_eW' wi � � / I •I"__ � - _ I DRr�s STORM SEWER —--- —___yam WATER MAIN --- OVERHEAD UTILITY sic" � — • \ a?(% / 1 n / 1' \\�\ \ �i % / \ STORM CATCH BASIN rcnad AJ 1 ( \• \\ / \ \ I / j' \�� STORM MANHOLEy� I �'� 1 I V 1 i•%' /- OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE ry °� A E TELEVISION BOX ❑ .e !.a ` V / TELEPHONE BOX 1-1 a AHEzo UTILITY POLE to ov soUEE / LJ✓: RETAINING WALL (PER RCM MODE) � ° esu • ��-v=_a - �� --- - - - -. �� ^..)r••s�4��� " FENCE ..-v—�✓// I -: 'PBa �, % / j 10 ' CO NTOUR ------- /;J�DAYSIOWELT 90 _ \'— _— \ \`L`.\ •/ \—�/% �,,Dd Y CONTOUR — —{I/ // 0 (IERRCID of FEMA FLOOD PLAIN `y /r iii WETLAND LINE -- �0.� / ao� ➢1 _ \'• goo rR w� 50at °. t0 Dim RCNDE:T t— SPOT ELEVATION o— . —� C d'\ f / r - 1EQ \ EMERGENCY OVERFLOW r- SILI' FENCE t t TREE: FENCE ................. � — •_ _ _ __ _— _ _-- V .g __—__—__—__— TREELIKEM'WVYYI I _ — / l-�--- R, .T z SOIL BORING i „ /;%/ 13 ` - _ •f \ `/I i e TFi FEMA FLOODPLAIN —� — wtX 902'03 <a % / RCWD FLOODPLAIN I rte. I I\ \ � tl I � I 4 ' •\ �,_/ i / I I OUTLOT B , L---------}----------- /r''' 1 e ' _ \ I s 100 AP H/ft 90! _ - -AX — I as // N I v-� / .• ,-4 I� sly-,' � / / _ i \ `� .• 1 ,�' 0 oar srvovn E eoao ET a a. _ L—9 -------------/_ i / i s \ /� STR ' I ' • r ------ i 0 50 100 200 I J i; (IN FEET) A / ) a a /. �� "�' -__io �'' g i , r sa �l •I� °� _ °>�� / / - _ aR \ ; / mil �°°vv:°'a•''°•°•'•'ns _- � � ____ - __ / /� \ --� i I I I E:--m / I a {---`----J -------' FLOODPLAIN SUMMARY PER RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MODEL L— _-------_—�— Il ; as .\ •I f i5 1 II I EAST NWL ELEVATION =902.0 II 1 --- „w a- -- �e--1-- -- �' 13 •`. Ij r--- -(I / I �`\ \I 1 EAST FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION 1 WEST NWL ELEVATION WEST FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION I I m AREA FLOODPLAIN FILL = 37 CY 22 4 2t \ ; --' L—r---- ® FLOODPLAIN MITIGATION = 29533 CY NOTE: ALL CALCULATIONS BASED ON ELEVATIONS BETWEEN: I a+ t / 15 —904.5 EASTERN SIDE !902.0 ; z -� % �901.5-904.2 POND 200 ` I 902.0-904.2 WETLAND 1 _ I 901.8-904.2 POND 400 4/A, - iunOT D �e eDaa / \ --------- r— lns �� aDs---NAIN STREET C.S.A.H. NO. 14 .H. NO. 14) —�� •` 8uy,:;.,"`I--? �Fsw NAIN STREET (O.S.A cl - _ ----------------- -- -------------r — soa=—-- {—=----- -- --^---©-------- ---- t---- -- ---� r---- -- ---- --- --- - -- ---�— --- —T- --F— —T— T— \ I I I 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Reaiaiona: PREFERRED BUILDERS INC. Carlson Bl 100 O hereby certify y that this plan, specification Print Name Brlan J. KrystoFlak, P.E.Drawn F P ental Blaine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my 1' 11O ' NATURES REFUGE of • I .En......I" Phone: (763)489-7900 directsup—isionandthatIamaduly Signature: Designetl: BOK 10500 Bren Road E. FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT McCain Surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 ensedProfessionalEngineerunder Lino Lakes, Minnesota 1 www.carlsonm«ain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Data: 11/14/17 License ft: 25063 Date: 11/la/17 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Figure 4 - Landscape Scale Wetland Management Corridor (WMC) N 0 400 Feet gj� KjoL AuG F.NVIRONMF.NTAL SERVICES COMPANY •+'�r+V Source: SSRI Streets Sesemap Nature's Refuge (KES 2015-031) Lino Lakes, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Nature's Refuge Residential Development Classifications Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota September 2017 NPC Classification MHc26b OPn92a WFs55a WMn82a - WMn82b Cultural Cover Types (Not Native Plant Communities) Corn/Soybean Field - Farmed Wet Meadow Corn/Soybean Field - Open Water _ Residential Developement with Lawn and Trees 0 400 800 Feet Appendix A, Figure 4 Project Survey Boundary cne of rangy Hees hefogieaf 5ervitta for. Nature's Refuge Residential Development Current Condition Ranking Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota September 2017 Appendix A, Figure 5 [NNml fonnerNons A ha(ogiral SeMrex In<. Current Condition Ranking 0 1 0 C D = Cultural Cover Types (Not Ranked) j Project Survey Boundary 200 400 r�Feet Nature's Refuge Residential Subdivision and Conservation Areas, Lino Lakes, MN Native Plant Communities Assessment Report Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc. September 15, 2017 Table 4.0: Summary of NPCs classified within the Project boundary NPC Code No. of Polygons Total Acres WMn82a 1 9.31 WMn82b 12 16.57 OPn92a 10 18.59 WFs55a 12 13.84 MHc26b 1 0.48 According to the Minnesota DNR's Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (MN DNR, 2005), the above listed plant community classes and types identified within the Project boundary can be described as follows (descriptions are taken directly from the cited field guide): V.1A. Wet Meadow/Carr System General Description According to the Minnesota DNR's Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province, Wet Meadow/Carr (WM) communities are graminoid- or shrub - dominated wetlands that are subjected annually to moderate inundation following spring thaw and heavy rains and to periodic drawdowns during the summer. The dominant graminoids are broadleaved species such as lake sedge (Carex lacustris), tussock sedge (C. stricto), and bluejoint (Calomogrostis canodensis). Shrubs such as willows (Salixspp.) and dogwoods (Cornus slop.) are likely to be dominant on drier sites. Peak water levels are high and persistent enough to prevent trees (and often shrubs) from becoming established. However, there may be little or no standing water present during much of the growing season. As a result, the substrate surface alternates between aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Any organic matter that accumulates over time is usually oxidized during periodic drawdowns and may even burn during severe droughts. Soils range from mineral soils to muck and peat. Silt from flooding sometimes is intermixed with organic matter in muck or peat soils. Although WM communities can be present on deep peat, they are not "peat -accumulating" communities. Rather, the peat was usually formed previously on the site by a peat -producing community, such as a Forested Rich Peatland, that was flooded by beaver activity and converted to a WM community. Deep peat may also be present in some WM communities because of debris that has been transported into the wetland, forming sedimentary peat. Because surface water is derived from runoff, stream flow, or groundwater, it is circumneutral (pH 6.0-8.0) and has high mineral and nutrient content. WM communities are present statewide and are common throughout the Eastern Broadleaf Forest (EBF) Province in wetland basins, along streams and drainage ways, in drained beaver ponds, in shallow bays, or as semifloating mats along sheltered lake shorelines. Page 6 of 16 Nature's Refuge Residential Subdivision and Conservation Areas, Lino Lakes, MN Native Plant Communities Assessment Report Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc. September 15, 2017 integrity of a specific occurrence of a native plant community. The condition rank considers the species composition, vegetation structure, ecological processes and functions, level of human disturbance, and presence of non-native species, among other factors. Individual community occurrences are then assigned one of the following rankings as described below in Table 3.0. Table 3.0: Condition Rankings for Native Plant Communities, Description of Rankings Condition Ranking I Description of Ranking Show strong evidence of human disturbance, but retain some C: Fair Ecological Integrity characteristic species and have some potential for recovery with protection and management. The original composition and structure of the community has been D: Poor Ecological Integrity severely altered by human disturbances or invasion by exotic species. They have little chance of recovery to their natural or historic condition." Page 4 of 16 Nature's Refuge Residential Subdivision and Conservation Areas, Lino Lakes, MN Native Plant Communities Assessment Report Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc. September 15, 2017 Types (Not Native Plant Communities) polygons are shown in Appendix A, Figure 4. Table 5.0 below provides a summary of the areas that were not classified as native plant communities. Table 5.0: A summary of unclassified areas within the Project boundary Description No. of Polygons Total Acres Active Cornfield/Soybean Field - Farmed Upland 5 21.05 Cornfield/Soybean Field - Farmed Wet Meadow 11 8.30 Open Water 5 4.07 Residential Development 2 1.94 VI. Conservation Status Ranks for Identified Native Plant Community Types In addition to classifying the thirty-six (36) native plant community polygons mapped within the Project boundary, CCES ecologists also assigned the appropriate conservation status rank to each native plant community polygon based on the Minnesota DNR's Conservation Status Rank for Native Plant Community Types and Subtypes (August, 2009). This guidance document provides information on the currently assigned conservation status ranks (S -Ranks) that reflect the risk of elimination of each native plant community type from Minnesota. The S -Ranks associated with the five native plant community types identified within the Project boundary are presented Table 6.0 below. Of the five Native Plant Community types classified within the Project boundary, none are considered to be rare (having an S - Rank of S1- S3) in the State of Minnesota. Table 6.0 below provides a summary of S -Ranks for the NPC located within the Project Boundary. Table 6.0: The current Conservation Status Ranks (S -Ranks) for NPC types within the Project Boundary Native Plant Community Type Classification Status Rank t Status Rank Definition Apparently secure, uncommon Northern Wet Meadow/Carr Willow - 55 but not rare/Secure, common, Dogwood Swamp Type (WMn82a) widespread and abundant Northern Wet Meadow/Carr Willow - Sedge Secure, common, widespread S4/S5 Meadow Subtype (WMn82b) and abundant Northern Rich Fen (Basin) Native Plant Apparently secure, uncommon Community - Graminoid Rich Fen Type S4 but not rare (OPn92a) South Wet Aspen Forest Native Plant Apparently secure, uncommon Community -Lowland Aspen Forest S4 but not rare (WFs55a) Central Dry-Mesic Oak -Aspen Forest: Red cure, uncommon Oak - Sugar Maple - Basswood - (Large- S4 but no raretly but not rare flowered Trillium) Forest Type (MHc26b) Page 14 of 16 •S'•' , r •t/ ?� y .-- '.T �t .lipi' t �• t� �..�. )j•�� 7Y#_%FZ f rp O 4� � { r• a bh t ? � � . Lo' m t, I C� N AGI►• • r • ✓ l f� �Jr ah/ ' r {: z tvpr -.:. ,7s�. 9 ' £ � o (i,' / 33 y t;a - 11 �, J el' I 1 lyre" .+� '. �R �y Q�rj"' r. LC,', •m la _rij I.. U �. V N y } , P F''�4M"'�, r`"f' _ • 4f ` �•{r IC R• I;y.I yl°"" •Y:� A., J r, RM Q = N O v ' �iY$`•.. t`t� ,'J 4, .ri'+"x 3 ►:A �(p I i N m a� (V E ` fz . •{� I �:.. ,$qvv� �,< n ✓'jp. .,,,, `�.�`✓ '!, r. _ _ t i1� ♦ O RJLs' W ! f ..r(L •f w �i nn f j 3 J J W O 4. �,5 �•J` rr r i i0'rr� / f f 7'rtii'A� N y v ��h}f �.}`I °IYFi� ',� ,'�F+ c �O �W,. t%.j :i, yo,�� 'dCr .i'i`��•' jf ;t Z LL C r O . k, 'i%,5�,' yr ,� : p� r �4� t ,a .xr�s ,, •}'�' � 1 �n�, :a � "E c N l4 linkF x � wl W 0 I— c w U ate+ ice( M N •� 4) yF�" f i � r �` • SIJ , ��''y" IA c` p90 + ' f �;�- �, y p m Y�R w - ; - �t irhD, r tii ''1�t'$lt. ,4i •, ! = a '- = N i ti � '•6 r' ' `. O 9 �...N � 'T � e, l�f•i r c. It t .,' M T ,'. ,t i D --J 1� .�<, .� ! afA vi N d a s a. u CA I ..1 5� . • r jd i'' %.` h. it "M, i V LL 0 N N CD Z C Q O !L Ir , i • tr. ., rr .. � r !r ,+ ??'k: •. r�rt �. I '•ej'. 1 N + _ . ry �• _ m K a �S(lt�'}ly� W I �- f' u Cly ar l0 0 0 N O ` lJ{h.:?}•.: i/Etr r ni `" ; IN,�7 ` t` ''•-� f,��+.s rl n e c+� � N V V Q „ W � L O b �nR ago m UC LL U o ao rya O �Q Uw FCN J H'; '; 'eH Si 0 �U C, N C 0. O y� + y O y N _ N O Cn 00 = 0 U tC U m fN/1 Q O O N vi ami tC f0 � 3 ' O 0 Z J W e ar S � N V V Q „ CN b �nR ago m UC !? V o ao rya c�AM �Q Uw FCN H'; '; 'eH Si 0 ami ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AGENDA ITEM 5B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson, Environmental Coordinator MEETING DATE: January 31, 2018 Action Item: Environmental Board Goals/Finalize report to City Council Background Each year the Environmental Board develops a set of Goals for the following year and reviews actions taken on those goals at the end of the year. New goals for each year are taken to the City Council for approval, as well as reporting to the Council on action taken on the previous year goals. Attached are the Environmental Board Goals for 2018. The goals were discussed at the October and November Environmental Board and reorganized in the attached papers for consideration by Environmental Board Chair Steve Heiskary. The Board needs to look at this for approval and/or modifications that are still needed before they are sent on to the City Council in February. RECOMMENDATION Approve with any new modifications and forward on to the City Council for consideration. ATTACHMENTS 1. 2018 Draft Environmental Board Goals 2. 2017 Environmental Board Action Items in support of Goals Lino Lakes Environmental Board 2018 goals 1. Promote environmental stewardship with the citizens of Lino Lakes and conservation opportunities by communicating environmental initiatives in the city using various means of communication such as: • Mailings • Multi -media including social media such as Facebook, and possibly Twitter • School "enviro- shows" and other promotions in schools • Partnerships with our two watershed districts • Newspaper, Environmental Board article 2. Promote Lino Lakes environmental issues to the public by: • Participate in Earth Day (April 21) • Participate in Blue Heron Days (August 18) • Partner with Anoka County Recycling Resource Solutions 1. Utilize County Select Committee on Recycling (SCORE) and Local Recycling Development Grant (LRDG) Funds to the maximum extent possible to increase our recycling totals. 2. Assist Anoka County, as requested, to ensure business recycling within the City is conducted as mandated 3. Increase our volunteer base in organics recycling. 4. Promote hauler -based organics recycling. 5. Increase services available to residents at the monthly Recycling Day event including additional paper shredding, events, hard drive destruction and the "Bridging Program" and or other charity organizations. 6. To meet or exceed our city recycling goal of 50 (2158 tons) percent or greater of our municipal solid waste. 7. Find innovative ways to promote and encourage recycling as a city. 8. Continue effort to establish curbside textile recycling. 9. Continue to look into ways for school facilities to reduce waste and increase recycling. Continue to enhance recycling efforts through grants from Anoka County Integrated Waste 3. Collaborate with Rice Creek Watershed District, Vadnais Lakes Area Water Management Organization, and city staff to promote development and practices that renews, preserves, and restores surface water including lakes, stream and wetlands through project review processes and public education. When possible, seek opportunities to do likewise in existing developments. Practical examples may include maintaining and enhancing stormwater conveyance and citizen education on yard waste management. 4. Monitor any activity in the AUAR as well as other proposed development areas, focusing on the values that citizens of Lino Lakes have expressed in the 2040 vision for our city and the unique ecological aspects of our wetlands, lakes and streams and subsurface waters, vegetation and wildlife populations. 5. Perform evaluation of past Environmental Board recommendations for development projects. Review a sampling of a variety of projects by on-site visits, discussion with city staff, landowners, and neighbors, on the outcomes of the board's recommendations. If necessary, submit a summary of significant findings resulting from the review in writing to the Community Development Director. 6. Support Conservation Development within the city through site review processes by incorporating The Resources Management System Plan components of the City Comprehensive Plan. The use of the planning documents within the Comprehensive Plan that enable Conservation Development include: • The Lino Lakes Handbook For Environmental Planning and Conservation Development, • The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System and Natural Resource Inventory for Lino Lakes • The Minnesota County Biologic SurveX • The Lino Lakes Assessment of Existing Ecological Conditions and Management Opportunities • The Lino Lakes Handbook For Environmental Planning and Conservation Development • The Minnesota DNR Regionally Significant Ecological Areas Assessment, Rare Wildlife and Plant Models built by the City • The Lino Lakes Parks, Natural Open Space/Greenways, and Trails System Plan • The I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Area -wide Review (AUAR) assessment • The Rice Creek Watershed District/Lino Lakes Resources Management Plan • The Assessment of Development, Suitability and Natural Resources Conservation Opportunities study, • The City of Lino Lakes Local Surface Water Management Plan 7. Support the Community Garden site in conjunction with the Parks Department. Assist with any garden modifications that may be needed because of the 2017 land sale. 8. Continue implementation of the Lino Lakes EAB Plan. Update the plan as needed based on the 2017 identification of EAB in Lino Lakes, experience gained during implementation, and rapidity of the spread of EAB throughout the City's forests. Offer residents opportunities for tree purchasing and possibly tree treatment. 2 Obtain interns and train them in Ash Tree Treatment. Continue treating a third of our City boulevard trees. 9. Continue to work on Wollan's Park Wetland bank to achieve wetland bank credits by the end of the year 2019 and investigate new banking opportunities. Help to establish a city-wide process to fund wetland banking. 10. Continue to monitor the Heron rookery in the northern one-third of Peltier Lake and to support the protection of resources in that area. Update Council on these matters. Recruit volunteers, as needed, to help with rookery maintenance and monitoring. 11. Support efforts of our Community Development engineering department in the development of a NPDES inventory (2018) of our ponds. Support adequate funding for needed maintenance efforts as well. 12. Support the maintenance of established conservation easement areas where funding is available. Conduct education as needed for homeowners near or adjacent to these easements. 13. Consider becoming a "Green Step City, which would serve to support the 2040 City of Lino Lakes' Comprehensive Plan. This initial step recognizes previous (2012) EB interest in the program and would serve to familiarize the current board with this voluntary program and its benefits. In turn, should the EB express interest in moving forward, this would allow for effective communication of the program to the Mayor, City Council, and City staff as needed. 2017 Environmental Board Actions in Support of Goals This is a short summary of actions that were done in support of established EB goals for the year. Numbers correspond to the actual goals. 1. Promoting environmental stewardship with citizens of Lino Lakes. We used various media to convey conservation opportunities to the citizens of Lino Lakes 2. Promote Lino Lakes environmental issues to the public by: Most of these goals were achieved via participation in Earth Day, Blue Heron Days, and various activities associated with Anoka County Recycling Resource Solutions. For example, we collaborated with Anoka County in several areas including securing grant funding, hiring of interns, and assisting as needed on efforts to encourage business -based recycling and ways for schools to increase recycling. We continue to expand home organics recycling and successfully engaged one hauler to institute hauler - based organics recycling. The monthly recycling events (metals, electronics and other items) continue to be in high demand and help ensure the City meets its recycling goals. 3. Collaborate with RCWD, VLAWMO, and city staff to promote sound development practices... We continue to collaborate with the RCWD and VLAMO on development and environmental issues in the City. As needed, we have requested representatives from the organizations to make presentations to the EB to ensure we are up to date on their activities within the City. 4. Monitor any activity in AUAR In those areas where the AUAR applies, due consideration was given to requirements in that plan. S. Perform evaluation of past EB recommendations for development projects. We have incorporated field visits prior to EB meetings when possible. We visited Diversified Industries new development this past fall. At the site we reviewed handling of stormwater on the property. This visit followed a period of high rainfall and it appeared that ponding was adequate. We expect further stabilization of banks once vegetation becomes better established. A review of native planting on the easement, indicated more work needs be done (apparently by the city based on signed agreement) to improve soils so that more desirable vegetation will grow and prosper in this area. 6. Support Conservation Development within the site review process and employ various planning documents as needed to direct these efforts. The various documents/plans are incorporated into these efforts. 7. Support Community Garden site in conjunction with Parks Department. We continue our support as needed. With the City selling a portion of the land that the Community Garden is on, any expansion will need to occur toward the back of the property. However, at this time we are not aware of any funds to support an expansion. 8. Do an annual review/update in regards to the Lino Lakes EAB Implementation Plan. The City has an EAB plan and has been implementing it for the past few years. Example efforts have included targeted removal of ash trees on public property, treatment of select trees, and public education. With the identification of EAB in ash trees in the Target parking lot, the city has moved into a new phase of the plan. EB members met with a Department of Agriculture specialist, private contractors, and other interested individuals on-site to review the damage to identified trees. A follow- up meeting was held to discuss next steps for this site and the City as a whole. The DOA specialist felt that since we already had a plan and were well into implementation that the City was very well postured to address this threat, more so than some other cities she has worked with. A 9. Continue work on Wollan's Park Wetland bank. The Wollan's Park wetland is coming along very nicely thanks to the various management efforts that have been undertaken, including periodic burns and other efforts to address invasive plants and encourage the growth of native and sometimes rare plants. A late summer visit allowed EB members to see the range of improvements and view several native and in some cases rare plants. The current condition of the wetland is a stark contrast to conditions we saw a few years back on one of our site visits. 10. Continue to monitor Blue Heron Rookery. The EB continues to monitor status of nests in conjunction with local volunteers. Winter maintenance of sheathing on trees and related issues are addressed in conjunction with Anoka County staff and volunteers. The number of active nests continues to grow. 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 500 500 400 300 200 100 0 Ii. �'99G ""q9 "'99� "'999 �% it Blue Heron Nest Count, tier Lake, Anoka County est Abandonment ��� 2°°�2�.���Q2°°s2°°s2°°��°°�2°°92°�°2°�� 2°ICI°�.�°�°mss