Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-26-2015 Council Packet EXPANDED AGENDA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, January 26, 2015 *********** City Council Meeting 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members Kusterman, Rafferty, Roeser and Stoesz City Administrator: Jeff Karlson COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M. Community Room (not televised) 1. Review Regular Agenda 2. Advisory Board Process CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.  Roll Call - Council Members Stoesz, Rafferty, Roeser, Kusterman, and Mayor Reinert were present  Pledge of Allegiance  Open Mike / Public Comment - none  Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items The agenda was amended to move consideration of Item 4A to follow Item 6B 1. CONSENT AGENDA A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) January 26, 2015 (Check No. 99580 through 99715) in the amount of $382,680.71; B) Consider approval of January 5, 2015 Work Session Minutes C) Consider approval of January 12, 2015 Council Meeting Minutes Council Member Roeser absent D) Consider Resolution No. 15-08 Authorizing the Issuance of 2015A Certificates of Indebtedness Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Stoesz, to approve Consent Agenda Items 1A, 1B and 1D, as presented, was adopted Motion by Kusterman, seconded by Stoesz, to approve Consent Agenda Item 1B, as presented, was adopted; Council Member Roeser abstained 2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT A) Consider Approval to Purchase a Ricoh MP 6002SP Copier, Al Rolek Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by Kusterman, to approve the copier purchase as recommended, was adopted Council Agenda -2- January 26, 2015 EXPANDED AGENDA 3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT A) Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment, Jeff Karlson (i) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 01-15, Approving Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by Kusterman, to approve the second reading and passage of the Ordinance as presented, was adopted; Yeas, 5; Nays none (ii) Consider Resolution No. 15-10, Summary of Ordinance No. 01-15 for Publication Purposes Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by Kusterman, to approve Resolution No. 15-10 as presented, was adopted 4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT A) Grant Funding for Police Officer Dedicated to Traffic Safety, Consideration of Resolution 15-11, John Swenson Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Stoesz, to approve Resolution No. 15-11 as presented, was adopted B) Public Safety Department Update 5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT No report 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A) Public Hearing. Consider Resolution No. 15-09, Approving Municipal Consent, I-35E MnPass Lane, Diane Henkee Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Stoesz, to approve Resolution No. 15-09 as presented, was adopted; Nays – Kusterman, Roeser B) Consideration of Resolution No. 15-02 Approving Classification of Tax Forfeited Properties, Michael Grochala Action Taken: Motion by Kusterman, seconded by Roeser, to approve Resolution No. 15-02 as presented, was adopted 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. NEW BUSINESS None Council Agenda -3- January 26, 2015 EXPANDED AGENDA Adjournment Following adjournment of the regular meeting, the council will reconvene for a closed meeting to discuss labor negotiations with AFSCME, Local No. 2454 Community Calendar – A Look Ahead January 26, 2014 through February 9, 2015 Wednesday, January 28 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board Monday, February 2 6:00 pm, Council Chambers Council Work Session Monday, February 2 6:30 pm, Community Room Park Board - Cancelled Thursday, February 5 8:00 am, Community Room EDAC Monday, February 10 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting Updated 1/23/15 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, January 26, 2015 *********** City Council Meeting 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members Kusterman, Rafferty, Roeser and Stoesz City Administrator: Jeff Karlson COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M. Community Room (not televised) 1. Review Regular Agenda 2. Advisory Board Process CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.  Call to Order and Roll Call  Pledge of Allegiance  Open Mike / Public Comment  Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items 1. CONSENT AGENDA A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) January 26, 2015 (Check No. 99580 through 99715) in the amount of $382,680.71; ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. xxxxxx through xxxxxx) in the amount of $___________; To Follow B) Consider approval of January 5, 2015 Work Session Minutes C) Consider approval of January 12, 2015 Council Meeting Minutes Council Member Roeser absent D) Consider Resolution No. 15-08 Authorizing the Issuance of 2015A Certificates of Indebtedness 2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT A) Consider Approval to Purchase a Ricoh MP 6002SP Copier, Al Rolek 3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT A) Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment, Jeff Karlson Council Agenda -2- January 26, 2015 (i) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 01-15, Approving Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment *Council may vote to dispense with full reading of ordinance *Roll call vote is required for adoption of full ordinance (ii) Consider Resolution No. 15-10, Summary of Ordinance No. 01-15 for Publication Purposes 4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT A) Grant Funding for Police Officer Dedicated to Traffic Safety, Consideration of Resolution 15-11, John Swenson B) Public Safety Department Update 5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT No report 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A) Public Hearing. Consider Resolution No. 15-09, Approving Municipal Consent, I-35E MnPass Lane, Diane Henkee B) Consideration of Resolution No. 15-02 Approving Classification of Tax Forfeited Properties, Michael Grochala 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. NEW BUSINESS None Adjournment Following adjournment of the regular meeting, the council will reconvene for a closed meeting to discuss labor negotiations with AFSCME, Local No. 2454 Community Calendar – A Look Ahead January 26, 2014 through February 9, 2015 Wednesday, January 28 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board Monday, February 2 6:00 pm, Council Chambers Council Work Session Monday, February 2 6:30 pm, Community Room Park Board - Cancelled Thursday, February 5 8:00 am, Community Room EDAC Monday, February 10 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting WS – Item 2 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 2 Date: February 2, 2015 To: City Council From: Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues Re: Annual Board Appointments Background December 15, 2014 council reviewed the advisory board list of applicants. It was decided to interview only the Environmental Board candidates. These interviews took place January 12, 2015. Attached is an outline of the applicants for each of the boards or committee. - Park Board – 1 seats, 1 applicant - New - Environmental Board – 2 seats, 3 applicants - Interviewed - P&Z – 3 seats, 2 applicants - EDAC – 4 seats, 2 applicants Requested Council Direction The council interviewed Environmental Board candidates. There were three candidates interviewed and two seats available. Since the last work session we have received an application for the Park Board. 1. Which candidates will be selected for the Environmental Board? 2. Should candidates who applied for P & Z & EDAC be appointed at their next meetings? 3. When would council like to schedule an interview with the new Park Board candidate? Attachments List of applicants (applications will be provided to council previous to the interview date) WS – Item 2 Attachment 2014/2015 Advisory Board Applicants Park Board 1. Clark Gooder - NEW APPLICANT Environmental Board 1. Paula Andrewjewski (current board member) - INTERVIEWED 2. Alexander Schwartz - INTERVIEWED 3. John Sullivan - INTERVIEWED EDAC 1. Julie Jeffrey-Schwartz (current board member) 2. Lou Masonick (current board member) 3. 4. Planning & Zoning 1. Paul Tralle (current board member) 2. Lou Masonick (current board member) 3. Park Board – 1 seat, 1 applicants Environmental Board – 2 seats, 3 applicants P&Z – 3 seats, 2 applicants EDAC – 4 seats, 2 applicants CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 5, 2015 DRAFT CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 MINUTES 2 3 DATE : January 5, 2014 4 TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5 TIME ENDED : 8:10 p.m. 6 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, Kusterman, 7 Rafferty, Roeser and Mayor Reinert 8 MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9 10 11 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development 12 Director Michael Grochala; Finance Director Al Rolek; Public Services Director Rick 13 DeGardner; Public Safety Director John Swenson; City Planner Katie Larsen; City 14 Engineer Diane Hankee; City Clerk Julie Bartell 15 16 1. Final Design of Fire Station at Birch Street and Centerville Road – Public Safety 17 Director Swenson noted the council’s decisions on site and scope of a new fire station. 18 Based on discussions and review, staff has worked with CNH Architects to bring forward 19 plans for a final design of the facility. He introduced CNH Architects principal Quinn 20 Hutson who reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file) outlining the fire house plans, 21 including exterior, site, floor plan, interior, a cost update and schedule for moving ahead. 22 23 Mayor Reinert noted that the project is on the pace needed and expected. He requested 24 that the council receive a copy of the PowerPoint. 25 26 3. Council Meeting with Advisory Boards (from 12/15/14 W.S. discussion)- 27 Administrator Karlson reviewed the openings on the city’s advisory boards; the process 28 of filling vacancies and considering reappointments occurs every year. The council 29 previously established a time to interview candidates and staff would like further 30 direction as to whom the council will interview (i.e. new applicants, all applicants 31 including incumbents)? 32 33 The council concurred that they will interview three applicants, namely those for the 34 Environmental Board. Staff will schedule the interviews for January 12, 2015 beginning 35 at 5:30 p.m. 36 37 4. 2015 Capital Equipment Replacement Schedule- Finance Director Rolek reviewed 38 the proposed capital equipment list. The council heard from Public Safety Director 39 Swenson about emergency siren needs. 40 41 Mr. Rolek explained that the Equipment Certificates to purchase items on the “A” list 42 will be brought to the council for consideration in the near future. The council discussed 43 the amount of capital authorization in 2014, how new fire equipment impacts the 2015 44 numbers and the need to keep on track for city equipment. Public Services Director 45 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 5, 2015 DRAFT DeGardner explained that the city will either trade in or auction old equipment in order to 46 get the best value. 47 48 Finance Director Rolek then reviewed the proposed fire department capital purchases. 49 Public Safety Director Swenson added that the department is receiving some assets as a 50 result of the split from the Centennial Fire District and have identified what will be 51 needed in addition to those items. He noted that the city has submitted a grant application 52 to FEMA requesting funding for the purchase of fire apparatus/gear; receipt of the grant is 53 an unknown so the city must plan funding in case it isn’t received. Mr. Rolek also 54 explained that the financing is internal so it can be adjusted depending on changes in 55 what is spent. 56 57 2. NE Drainage Area Study Update – Community Development Director Grochala 58 reviewed the history of the council’s consideration of how to address drainage in the NE 59 area of the city. Staff has been working with the city’s engineering firm, WSB and the 60 area watershed district to develop options for drainage and will now receive an overview 61 from WSB staff Pete Willenbring. 62 63 Mr. Willenbring reviewed the problems: 64 - Ditches in place do not handle much; 65 - One area is landlocked; 66 - Must deal with increased discharged downstream. 67 68 Mr. Willenbring distributed a map outlining the idea of installing a large capacity line to 69 handle drainage. An important element of the project would be to determine alignment; 70 any study and modeling need to be clear about impacts such as environmental. He is 71 working with the watershed district on those details. He noted that the model, he 72 believes, demonstrates that Peltier Lake will not be impacted and it will be important to 73 show no impact to water quality. Since the watershed would like to see the drainage 74 solution limit the volume of water moved, they will also be looking at irrigation options 75 along the route. The council’s consideration now is relative to the need for the system. 76 There are property owner considerations as well as work ahead with developers who 77 could possibly be building in the area. The mayor suggested the city will need a 78 statement of need and a defensible solution for what is being recommended; he asked 79 about the AUAR for the area. Mr. Grochala said it basically calls for expansion of 80 drainage systems but the storm water rules have changed somewhat. Council Member 81 Roeser offered funding ideas: water/land banking; grant funding (Legacy?). 82 83 Mr. Willenbring clarified that staff is looking for concept approval from the council and 84 from the watershed. Mr. Grochala added that eventually a feasibility study will be 85 needed. 86 87 The council also heard from Bruce Miller (area developer) who said his group has worked 88 on addressing storm water elements in the past, received instructions from the watershed 89 district, but ultimately couldn’t do what they said. As a result they had to develop an 90 2 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 5, 2015 DRAFT irrigation solution using land that should be developed. In light, he suggests that the 91 drainage issues for the area need to be addressed. Mr. Grochala added that another 92 impacted developer, Mattamy, is facing a similar situation. If the watershed is 93 comfortable, that allows for a game plan to move forward. Mayor Reinert suggested 94 that the city needs to work with landowners and he’d like the council to be kept up to date 95 as information becomes available. 96 97 5. City Auditor Discussion- Finance Director Rolek indicated there is no written staff 98 report on this matter. He understands that the council is requesting information the city’s 99 contract for auditing services. He explained that the city’s current auditor, 100 CliftonLarsonAllen LLP, has been providing services to the city for 16 years. Three 101 years previous the city did issue an RFP and ended up staying with that company. He 102 suggests that it would be appropriate to do an RFP again, if the council wishes, but he 103 would advise waiting until after the 2014 audit is complete. As far as best practice for 104 audit services, the GFOA (Government Finance Officers Association) calls for a contract 105 of at least five years because a level of continuity is important. 106 107 Mayor Reinert indicated that he and Council Member Stoesz requested this discussion. 108 They believe it is good to look at options once in a while. 109 110 Council Member Kusterman remarked that it’s really about relationships, method and 111 quality. He doesn’t think that a change is necessarily needed since there can be a cost 112 involved. When the mayor asked if there is ever a good reason to change, Council 113 Member Kusterman said that would probably be to get a better deal but you have to 114 weigh that with the possibility of losing people that you trust. Council Member Rafferty 115 recalled that when the city looked at RFPs for city engineering services, interested 116 companies actually came in and met with the council. Finance Director Rolek added that 117 staff’s perspective on the matter is that they don’t have a bias; while they have a good 118 relationship with the current provider, there is also no concern about looking at an RFP. 119 120 The council concurred that they’d like the city to have a policy on looking at outside 121 providers on a regular basis and that would be any professional contracts. The City 122 Administrator was directed to bring forward a policy for council consideration. 123 124 6. Charter Commission – 2014 Budget Request- Administrator Karlson reviewed his 125 staff report that outlines 2014 actions on the Commission’s budget and the current request 126 of the Commission for additional funds to pay an outstanding legal bill. He has reviewed 127 their budget and what they had to spend and suggested to them that they use their 2015 128 budget to cover the outstanding balance. The Mayor recalled that the council did 129 authorize additional funds for the Commission in 2014 but, in the end, didn’t get a 130 recommendation on the proposed amendments; he concurs that they should pay from their 131 2015 budget. Council Member Roeser expressed concern about the request and past 132 overspending. 133 134 There was no additional funding authorized for the Charter Commission. 135 3 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 5, 2015 DRAFT 136 7. Schedule Dates for Strategic Planning Meetings- Mayor Reinert recalled the 137 council’s past efforts in this area; he’s seen good results and supports setting up a 138 meeting. Administrator Karlson said he’ll look at setting up a couple of evening 139 sessions and asked that council members let him know about dates they would not be 140 available. 141 142 Not on Printed Agenda – Updates 143 144 Police Sergeants Labor Contract – Administrator Karlson reported that this union 145 group has rejected the city’s proposed contract and have requested mediation. 146 147 He will update the council soon on negotiations with the AFSCME union. 148 149 Legacy Grants- Mayor Reinert indicated that these state funds may be a source of 150 funding for certain efforts in the city. He recommends that the discussion continue so 151 that proposals can be submitted for legislative consideration. Council Member Roeser 152 added his support to the concept, noting that Senator Chamberlin and Representative 153 Runbeck are interested in discussing possibilities; he’s interested in park development, 154 water projects and trail connections (to new park and ride). Mayor Reinert asked that 155 council members forward any ideas to him. 156 157 Boat Race- Regarding the council’s recent discussions about having a speed boat 158 race/show as part of Blue Heron Days, a communication was received indicating issues 159 with Anoka County permission for lake use. Public Services Director DeGardner was 160 asked to report on the possibility of a boat show and he indicated he will continue to work 161 with the organizations that would sponsor such events and will update the council as 162 information is available. On the boat races, the mayor asked if there could be some 163 consideration of another time (other than the Blue Heron Days weekend) but Mr. 164 DeGardner said that a boat race after the park closes for the year would be of little interest 165 to the organizers. 166 167 Regular Agenda of January 12, 2015 168 169 Item 3A – Cable TV Franchise Agreement – Administration Karlson explained that 170 North Metro Telecommunications Commission (NMTC) and their legal staff have been 171 working with Comcast on a change of franchise ownership and an extension of the 172 franchise term. Basically a reorganization is occurring and there will be a new provider 173 and with that an extension of the franchise has been negotiated that includes certain 174 conditions. He can report that the proposal is good for the NMTC and the cities they 175 serve. The NMTC attorney involved in the negotiations will be at the council meeting. 176 Council Member Stoesz noted that he is the city’s representative on NMTC and has 177 followed this matter; he is comfortable with what the city will receive as result of the 178 conditions; he noted that there may be some impact on email addresses. 179 180 4 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 5, 2015 DRAFT 3B – Annual Appointments- The council reviewed the list, concurred with continuing 181 the appointments as noted but with the following changes: 182 183 Acting Mayor – Rob Rafferty; 184 Anoka County Fire Protection Council (new) – Jeff Reinert; Bill Kusterman (alternate); 185 John Swenson (staff representative) 186 187 The council requests that Anoka Co./Blaine Airport Advisory Commission representative 188 Dean Quimby provide an update to the council. 189 190 6A – Plans and Specifications for Fire Station- Community Development Director 191 Grochala indicated that the plans and specs are still being finalized and will be provided 192 to the council in a Friday update. 193 194 6B – Plans and Specifications for the 2015 Street Reconstruction Project – 195 Community Development Director Grochala indicated that staff is also finalizing this 196 report. There was a neighborhood meeting held and information responding to questions 197 from that is being developed and will be posted on the Website. All of the comments 198 received through the meeting process will be reviewed. 199 200 Economic Development Authority (EDA) Annual Meeting- Officers of the Authority 201 will remain the same. 202 203 The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. 204 205 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 206 January 26, 2015. 207 208 209 210 211 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 212 213 5 COUNCIL MINUTES January 12, 2015 DRAFT CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 MINUTES 2 3 DATE : January 12, 2015 4 TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 5 TIME ENDED : 7:20 p.m. 6 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, Kusterman, Rafferty, 7 and Mayor Reinert 8 MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member Roeser 9 10 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development Director Michael 11 Grochala; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Chief of Police John Swenson; and City Clerk Julie Bartell 12 13 ADVISORY BOARD INTERVIEWS 14 15 Previously to the regular council meeting, the council conducted interviews for open positions on the 16 Environmental Board. Interviewees were John Sullivan, Paula Andrewjewski and Alexander 17 Schwartz. 18 19 PUBLIC COMMENT 20 21 No one was present to address the council regarding a matter not on the agenda. 22 23 SETTING THE AGENDA 24 25 The agenda was approved as presented. 26 27 CONSENT AGENDA 28 29 Council Member Kusterman moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1E, as 30 presented. Council Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. Council 31 Member Roeser was absent. 32 33 ITEM ACTION 34 35 Consideration of Expenditures: 36 37 January 12, 2015 (Check No. 99494 – 99579, 38 $255,792.83) Approved 39 40 Centennial Fire District (Check No. 6696 – 6732, 41 $27,249.63) and Visa Pmt of $2,112.51 Approved 42 43 December 15, 2014 Council Work Session Approved 44 45 1 COUNCIL MINUTES January 12, 2015 DRAFT December 15, 2014 City Council Minutes Approved 46 47 December 29, 2014 Special Council Meeting Minutes Approved 48 49 Application of Aquinas Roman Catholic Home Education 50 Services for Excluded Bingo Permit Approved 51 52 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 53 54 There was no report from the Finance Department. 55 56 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 57 58 3A) Cable Television Franchise Agreement: 59 i. Resolution No. 15-01, Granting Consent to Transfer Cable TV Franchise from 60 Comcast to Greatland Connections; 61 ii. Ordinance No. 01-15, Approving Cable Television Franchise Ordinance 62 Amendment 63 64 City Administrator Karlson noted that the council discussed this franchise transfer and franchise 65 extension request at the recent work session. He introduced Mike Bradley, attorney for North Metro 66 TV to review the proposed amendment and agreement. 67 68 Mr. Bradley gave some background on the city’s franchise for television services that is set to expire 69 in three years. The franchise holder, Comcast, applied to transfer the franchise to another company, 70 Greatland Connections. He explained that, as a result of that request, this became a good time to look 71 at any issues with the franchise agreement. He has worked with Comcast to address issues and has 72 negotiated the following terms to be included in the agreement for a transfer and extending the 73 franchise: 74 - The franchise agreement will be extended an additional three years; 75 - Extension of a Memorandum of Understanding that continues the provision of financial 76 support to North Metro Telecommunications Commission (NMTC); 77 - Provision of HD channel(s); 78 - Access to a programming guide across multiple platforms; 79 - A refund related to a franchise fee underpayment; 80 - Complimentary drops and outlets for municipal locations; 81 - A small refund to cable subscribers; 82 - Payment of all legal fees. 83 84 Mr. Bradley reviewed the requested action of approving a transfer of the franchise through resolution 85 and first reading of an ordinance that amends the city’s franchise by the extension noted. 86 87 The council discussed the role of the City in denying or supporting the transfer. Mr. Bradley 88 explained that this involves a very large scale business deal with many cities and subscribers 89 involved. Mayor Reinert confirmed the future owner of the city’s franchise. 90 2 COUNCIL MINUTES January 12, 2015 DRAFT 91 Council Member Stoesz noted that he represents the City on the NMTC so he has been following 92 these actions as they have developed and come forward and can recommend council approval . He 93 noted the additional connectivity that the city will receive. Mr. Bradley confirmed that cities will 94 receive additional cable drops and boxes as part of the agreement. Council Member Kusterman 95 suggested that he’s heard only good sides to this action; staff wasn’t any to provide any negatives. 96 97 Council Member Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 15-01 as presented. Council Member 98 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Roeser was absent. 99 100 Council Member Stoesz moved to approve the First Reading of Ordinance No. 01-15 as presented. 101 Council Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member 102 Roeser was absent. 103 104 3B) Approval of Annual Appointments- Administrator Karlson noted that each year the council 105 approves a number of assignments and appointments as indicated in the staff report. This list was 106 reviewed and updated by the council at the last work session and is presented for consideration of 107 approval. 108 109 Council Member Kusterman moved to approve the list of annual appointments as presented. Council 110 Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Roeser was 111 absent. 112 113 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 114 115 4A) Public Safety Department Update- Chief Swenson updated the council. The development 116 of the fire department into the Public Safety Department is moving ahead on schedule. He noted the 117 following: 118 119 - South Side Fire Station Project – location, architect and schedule noted; consideration of 120 approval to seek bids for the project is on the agenda this evening; 121 - Thanks to Community Development Director Grochala and other staff for their hard work in 122 keeping the fire station project moving forward, on schedule and high quality; 123 - Recruitment for Fire Department – Centennial Fire Relief has hired a consultant to assist in 124 developing a legislative proposal to allow the transfer of pensions from Centennial Fire to the 125 city’s new firefighter pension plan; 126 - New Fire Recruits – four paid on-call firefighters have been hired as of January 5 and have 127 begun their training; there is an additional applicant in the loop; more applications are coming 128 in; a special mailing will not be necessary considering recruitment response but information 129 will be included in the next regular newsletter; 130 - Training in Progress – There are 12 staff members currently in training as firefighters; a 131 second group of trainees will begin on April 8; by the end of August, the department will have 132 at least 35 trained firefighters; 133 - Equipment – the city will receive some equipment with the disbursements from Centennial 134 Fire District; and grant request is pending with FEMA for apparatus funding; the department 135 3 COUNCIL MINUTES January 12, 2015 DRAFT continues to seek the purchase of additional equipment from other departments who are 136 selling; 137 - Policy Development – should be completed by March. 138 139 Mayor Reinert noted, on the matter of firefighter training, that the new fire station will include 140 training facilities that will serve the city well by allowing training to occur on site rather than taking 141 personnel out of the area. It’s a good long term approach and will save money down the line. He 142 also noted that the council’s assumptions about the public safety department model and the provision 143 of fire services are proving true. Regarding fire pensions, the legislative change noted would allow 144 the transfer of firefighters into the city fund; he wonders if those individuals would then be under the 145 city’s pension rules. Chief Swenson verified that the city’s pension rules would apply, including 146 vesting at five years. 147 148 Council Member Rafferty noted, regarding the fire station and training facilities, that he is happy that 149 the city had the opportunity to look at that with a broad approach that he agrees will pay off in the 150 long term. 151 152 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 153 154 There was no report from the Public Services Department. 155 156 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT 157 158 6A) Lino Lakes Fire Station 159 i. Resolution No. 15-03, Approving Plans & Specifications and Authorizing 160 Advertisement for Bids; 161 ii. Resolution No. 15-04, Amending Professional Services Contract with CNH 162 Architects 163 164 Community Development Director Grochala provided a picture of the proposed fire station. Staff has 165 worked over the past six months to get the project to this stage and is requesting approval of plans and 166 specifications so that the project can go out for bid. The design will meet both the immediate and 167 long term service needs of this community. He reviewed the planned schedule to continue with this 168 project, with construction beginning in April or May. He noted that the architect was present to 169 answer any questions. 170 171 Council Member Kusterman moved to approve Resolution No. 15-03 as presented. Council Member 172 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Roeser was absent. 173 174 Community Development Director Grochala reviewed staff’s recommendation to amend the city’s 175 contract with CNH Architects to reflect an increase in the size and scope from original project 176 discussions. Staff has negotiated the proposed increase and is comfortable that it is an appropriate 177 amount for the scope of services. He noted that the amount is within industry standards as explained 178 in the staff report. Mayor Reinert recognized that the city increased the scope of the project/plans so 179 he understands this amendment; the increase is actually below industry standards and for the services 180 4 COUNCIL MINUTES January 12, 2015 DRAFT of a company that is really the best of the best in this area. Council Member Stoesz asked why this 181 increase wasn’t available for discussion at the last work session and Mr. Grochala explained that the 182 amount was just recently finalized. Council Member Rafferty concurred that this request is 183 reasonable; he added that he hopes the bid process will go in a positive direction. 184 185 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 15-04 as presented. Council Member 186 Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Roeser was absent. 187 188 6B) Resolution No. 15-05, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the 2015 189 Street Reconstruction Project- Community Development Director Grochala explained that moving 190 to plans and specifications is the next step in this project. WSB Engineering has submitted a 191 proposal to provide the services. He noted the schedule for the Reconstruction Project. 192 193 Mayor Reinert noted that there was recently a public hearing held for the residents; there were some 194 questions and he wants to make sure they are being answered. City Engineer Hankee noted that 195 updated information is being provided on the city website. Council Member Rafferty noted that he 196 has reached out to the residents on the cul-de-sac to discuss that situation. 197 198 Council Member Kusterman moved to approve Resolution No. 15-05 as presented. Council Member 199 Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Roeser was absent. 200 201 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 202 203 There was no Unfinished Business. 204 205 NEW BUSINESS 206 207 There was no New Business. 208 209 COMMUNITY EVENTS 210 211 MONTHLY RECYCLE DAY will be held at Lino Park (7850 Lake Drive) on Saturday, January 17 212 from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Furniture will now be accepted for a flat fee of $5.00 apiece. See city 213 website for a list of accepted items. 214 215 COMMUNITY CALENDAR 216 217 Community Calendar – A Look Ahead 218 January 12, 2015 through January 25, 2015 219 Monday, January 19 CITY HALL CLOSED Martin Luther King 220 Monday, January 26 5:30 pm, Community Room Council Work Session 221 Monday, January 26 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting 222 223 224 225 226 5 COUNCIL MINUTES January 12, 2015 DRAFT ADJOURN 227 228 There being no further business, Council Member Kusterman moved to adjourn at 7:20 p.m. Council 229 Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried. 230 231 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, January 26, 2015. 232 233 234 235 236 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 237 238 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF 2015A CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS WHEREAS, the 2015 budget calls for the issuance of certificates amounting to $198,250.00, and WHEREAS, the Area and Unit Fund (406) has sufficient reserves to issue a loan, and WHEREAS, a special levy will pay for these certificates in 2016, 2017 and 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES: 1. It is hereby found and determined that it is necessary and expedient for the City to issue a Certificate of Indebtedness for the purpose of financing the purchase of capital equipment, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301; and that the sale of said Certificates to the Capital Equipment Revolving Fund (402), on terms hereinafter set forth, is hereby ordered. 2. The City shall issue a Certificate of Indebtedness in the amount of $198,250.00 authorized by the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301; for the purpose of financing the purchase of capital equipment. Said Certificate shall be dated on February 1, 2015 and shall be payable to the Area and Unit Fund of the City of Lino Lakes. 3. Said Certificate shall be as follows: CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2015A CERTIFICATE OF INDEBTEDNESS Know All Men By These Presents that the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, hereby acknowledge the Capital Equipment Fund to be indebted and for values received promises to pay the Area and Unit Fund of the City of Lino Lakes, the sum of $198,250 plus interest at 1.0% per annum in three installments in 2016, 2017 and 2018 per attached schedule. This Certificate is issued for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for the City and is authorized by a duly adopted resolution of the City Council of Lino Lakes, dated January 26, 2015 and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301, and is to be effective as of February 1, 2015. It is Hereby Certified and Recited, that all acts, conditions and things required by law to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Certificate have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, time and manner; that a direct, annual, irrepealable ad valorem tax will be duly levied by said City in an amount sufficient to pay the principal and interest on this Certificate, together with all other existing indebtedness of the said City, does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation on indebtedness. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 26th day of January, 2015. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member and was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:. The following voted against same: Page 2 _____________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Page 3 SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS 2015A CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS FEBRUARY 1, 2015 PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL December 31, 2016 $ 65,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 68,800.00 December 31, 2017 67,000.00 1,333.00 68,333.00 December 31, 2018 66,250.00 663.00 66,913.00 Total $ 198,250.00 $ 5,796.00 $204,046.00 Interest Rate – 1.0% Levy 2015 Payable 2016 $ 72,240.00 (includes required 5% overlevy) Levy 2016 Payable 2017 71,749.00 Levy 2017 Payable 2018 70,258.00 Total $214,247.00 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE January 26, 2015 TOPIC Consider Resolution 15-08 Authorizing the Issuance of the 2015A Certificates of Indebtedness VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority (3/5) The 2015 budget calls for the issuance of Certificates of Indebtedness in the amount of $198,250 to be used for the purchase of capital equipment as part of our equipment replacement program. The interest rate on the certificates will be 1.00%. The Area and Unit Fund has sufficient reserves to these purchase the certificates. A special levy will pay for this certificate in 2016, 2017 and 2018 and the levy proceeds will be credited to the Area and Unit Fund. The equipment to be funded with the 2015A Certificate of Indebtedness is listed on the attached schedule. Staff recommends approval of Resolution 15-08. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 15-08 2015 Capital Equipment Replacement Schedule BACKGROUND RECOMMENDATION City of Lino Lakes 2015 Capital Equipment Replacement Department Description Amount Police (3) Squad Cars & Equipment $ 96,000 (2) Emergency Sirens 42,000 Total Police 138,000 Fleet Ford F-550 4WD Truck with Dump Box & Plow (For Hotbox) 69,500 Ford F-350 4WD Truck with Dump Box & Plow 53,000 Chevy 1500 V6 4WD 28,000 Toolcat w/Attachments (Trade in 143) 45,000 Z-Turn Mower (Trade in 141) 15,000 Total Fleet 210,500 Total $348,500 Equipment Levy 0 Capital Equipment Fund 150,250 Certificates to be Issued $198,250 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 2A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Al Rolek MEETING DATE: January 26, 2015 TOPIC: Consider Approval to Purchase Ricoh MP 6002SP Copier VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION Staff is seeking City Council approval to purchase a Ricoh MP 6002 SP Copier to replace the current Ricoh Aficio 2060 copier. BACKGROUND The City purchased the current Ricoh Aficio 2060 copier in May, 2006. The copier has performed very well over the last 9 years. However, maintenance calls and down time for the copier has been steadily increasing over the last 2 years. Copiers are listed on our equipment replacement schedule to be replaced after 7 years of service. Staff has researched and done demos on replacement copiers. Staff feels the Ricoh MP 6002SP copier is the best replacement for our current copier. The 6002SP will perform all functions of our current copier and the operational functionality is very similar to our current copier, leading to fast learning curve for employees on the new copier. The copier could be leased or purchased through the State contract from Metro Sales, Inc. The purchase price of the copier is $10,201. The cost to lease the copier is $219.05 per month and requires a 5 year lease term. The total payments over the lease term would equal $13,143. In addition to either purchase or lease, the City would carry a maintenance contract covering all parts, labor and toner for the copier – virtually everything but paper – at a cost of $50.75 per month for up to 7,000 copies per month, which is our current volume. Any overages would be charged at $0.0065 per copy. Since the City has had great experience with Ricoh copiers and the cost to purchase is less than the cost to lease, staff is recommending purchase of the Ricoh MP 6002SP. The City accumulates funds in an office equipment replacement fund to finance the replacement cost. There are currently funds available to cover the replacement costs of this copier. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the purchase of a Ricoh MP 6002SP copier from Metro Sales, Inc. at a cost of $10,201. ATTACHMENTS Metro Sales, Inc. Quote Sheet CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Karlson MEETING DATE: January 26, 2015 TOPIC: Consider 2nd Reading and Passage of Ordinance No. 01-15, Cable Franchise Amendment Ordinance VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The Cable Franchise between Comcast and the City is presently set to expire in November, 2017. Comcast recently sent correspondence requesting the franchise be renewed. Comcast also recently filed an application with the North Metro Telecommunications Commission (the “NMTC”) requesting that its franchise be transferred to Midwest Cable. There also remains pending certain franchise compliance issues and certain needs and interests of the NMTC that need to be addressed. Mike Bradley, attorney for the NMTC, in consultation with NMTC leadership, negotiated a Franchise Settlement Agreement with Comcast that addresses several of these issues. The following are some highlights of the Agreement: • Cable Franchise to be extended through December 31, 2020. This will allow the NMTC to avoid the costs of a typically expensive renewal process for another 3 years, allowing it to focus its resources on its member cities’ needs. • A MOU from 1996 will also be extended through December 31, 2020. The MOU contains a financial commitment from Comcast for the support of the NMTC. It results in approximately $800,000 of funding per year. • In the event the Franchise rolls over past the expiration date, the MOU will do the same. This helps to ensure the Member Cities that the funding for the NMTC will not end until a renewed franchise is agreed upon. • NMTC upon 90 days’ notice will receive one high definition (HD) channel (replacing a standard definition (SD) channel) with provisions for channel placement and quality. NMTC currently has no HD channels. This will give HD subscriber’s access to NMTC programming with the best signal quality. • NMTC will have the option after 12 months to replace an additional SD channel with an HD channel, giving the NMTC 2 HD channels and 4 SD channels. • NMTC will have access to the Electronic Programming Guide, which will allow viewers to view programming information of the NMTC across multiple platforms. • Comcast will pay NMTC approximately $31,000 for a franchise fee underpayment. NMTC benefitted from findings by another of Mr. Bradley’s clients without having to expend any additional resources on a financial expert. • Comcast will provide 3 digital converters to all municipal locations receiving complementary drops and outlets. Comcast will also provide an additional 30 HD boxes to be placed at municipal locations at NMTC’s discretion. This should cover all of the outlets at municipal locations currently receiving complementary service. • Small refund of approximately $20,000 total to cable subscribers. • Payment of legal fees associated with the transfer application. • Comcast will be relieved of its commitment to provide Universal PEG Service in the future, but existing Universal PEG Service subscribers will be grandfathered. There are only 81 such subscribers and Comcast recovers the cost of providing the service out of the PEG fee currently. • Consent to the Transfer Application. Comcast has submitted an application requesting that the NMTC approve a transfer of the Comcast franchise to Midwest Cable. Midwest Cable will do business as GreatLand. The attached resolution was negotiated with both Comcast and GreatLand. The resolution lists several contingencies, including the actual closing of the proposed transaction, receipt of necessary federal approvals, executing a guaranty of performance and executing a guaranty regarding rates. The Franchise Ordinance Amendment extends the existing Cable Television Franchise Ordinance through December 31, 2020 and updates the PEG channel commitments of Comcast consistent with the Franchise Settlement Agreement. It also requires Comcast’s acceptance. RECOMMENDATION On January 12, 2015, the City Council approved the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 01-15, Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment. Staff is presenting the ordinance for the Council’s consideration of 2nd Reading and final approval. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance No. 01-15, Franchise Amendment Ordinance 1st Reading: 01/12/15 Publication: 2nd Reading: Effective: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 01-15 CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT The City of Lino Lakes (the “City”) ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 2.4, entitled “Franchise Term” of the City’s Cable Television Franchise Ordinance (Ord. No. 83-08), shall be amended as follows: 4. Franchise Term. Pursuant to the Franchise Settlement Agreement dated December 17, 2014, this Franchise shall be in effect through December 31, 2020 for a period of fifteen (15) years, such term commencing on the Effective Date specified in Section 2.10, unless sooner renewed, revoked or terminated as herein provided. Section 2. The following shall be added to the end of Section 6.1.2 of the City’s Cable Television Franchise Ordinance: Upon 90 days’ notice, Grantee will carry one of the PEG channels in a high definition (HD) format on the cable system such that the City will continue to have 6 PEG Channels; 5 carried in standard definition and 1 carried in high definition. The City represents that it has or will have available by that date sufficient local, non-character generated programming in HD format so as to provide content of value to viewers and not have a blank channel. Any time after December 16, 2015, Grantee will carry an additional PEG channel in high definition in the same manner as the first high definition channel, such that the City will continue to have 6 PEG Channels; 4 carried in standard definition and 2 carried in high definition. Grantee will deliver the high definition signal to subscribers so that it is viewable without degradation, provided that it is not required to deliver a HD PEG Channel at a resolution higher than the highest resolution used in connection with the delivery of local broadcast signals to the public. Grantee may implement HD carriage of the PEG channel in any manner (including selection of compression, utilization of IP, amount of system capacity or bandwidth, and other processing characteristics) that produces a signal as accessible, functional, useable and of a quality comparable (meaning indistinguishable to the viewer) to broadcast HD channels carried on the cable system. The HD PEG Channel will be assigned a number near the other high definition local broadcast stations if such channel positions are not already taken, or if that is not possible, near high definition news/public affairs programming channels if such channel positions are not already taken, or if not possible, as reasonably close as available channel numbering will allow. City acknowledges that HD programming may require the viewer to have special viewer equipment (such as an HDTV and an HD-capable digital device/receiver), but any subscriber who can view an HD signal delivered via the cable system at a receiver shall also be able to view the HD PEG channel at that receiver, without additional charges or equipment. By agreeing to make PEG available in HD format, Grantee is not agreeing it may be required to provide free HD equipment to customers including complimentary municipal and educational accounts and universal service accounts, nor modify its equipment or pricing policies in any manner. City acknowledges that not every customer may be able to view HD PEG programming (for example, because they don’t have an HDTV in their home or have chosen not to take an HD capable receiving device from Grantee or other equipment provider) or on every TV in the home. Grantee will provide a bill message announcing the launch of the HD PEG channel; however City acknowledges that not all customers may receive the bill message notice in advance of the channel launch in the interests of launching the channel sooner. Grantee will make available to the City the ability to place PEG channel programming information on the interactive channel guide by putting the City in contact with the electronic programing guide vendor (“EPG provider”) that provides the guide service. Grantee will be responsible for providing the designations and instructions necessary to ensure the channels will appear on the programming guide throughout the jurisdictions that are part of the City and any necessary headend costs associated therewith. The City shall be responsible for providing programming information to the EPG provider and for any costs the EPG provider charges to programmers who participate in its service. This obligation shall not apply to any PEG channels for which there is a technical impediment to providing guide listings, for example, in the event a PEG channel is narrowcasted or split among more than one PEG programmer or source such that not all viewers see the same programming on that channel. Section 3. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter and upon the acceptance of Comcast of Minnesota, Inc. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this ____ day of __________________, 2014. 2 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council Member _____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: CITY OF LINO LAKES: ____________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk ACCEPTED: This Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment is accepted and we agree to be bound by its terms and conditions. COMCAST OF MINNESOTA, INC. Dated: ____________________________ By: ________________________________ Its: ______________________________ 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 15-10 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 01-15 CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. 01-15 approved by the Lino Lakes City Council on January 26, 2015. The purpose of the ordinance amendment is to extend the Cable Franchise with Comcast of Minnesota through December 31, 2020 and to update the PEG channel commitments of Comcast consistent with the Franchise Settlement Agreement that was approved by the Lino Lakes City Council on January 12, 2015. Published in the ___________________ on _____________________. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Public Safety Director John Swenson MEETING DATE: January 26, 2015 TOPIC: Approval Resolution 15-11 Accepting Grant Funding for one Police Officer dedicated to Traffic Safety VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION The Lino Lakes Public Safety Department is requesting Council approval to accept grant funding from the Minnesota Office of Traffic Safety to fund one Police Officer for up to four years and one squad with equipment. BACKGROUND The Public Safety Department has been awarded grant funding to add one police officer for up to four years and the purchase of one additional squad car for this officer. This grant funding is narrowly focused on traffic safety programing, specifically DWI prevention and enforcement, in our community. The basic requirements of the grant are as follows:  Officer must work between the hours of 1700 and 0500 hours;  Officer must work at least two Fridays and two Saturdays per month;  Officer must work specific holidays outlined in the grant requirements;  Officer must only work on duties related to traffic safety (any time not related to traffic safety, such as assisting or responding to 911 calls, that the grant funding officer spends more than 15 minutes on will not be reimbursed under this grant);  Court overtime related to DWI offenses will be reimbursed under this grant;  Officer must attend the Minnesota Towards Zero Death (TZD) annual conference with all fees and related travel expenses reimbursed under this grant;  The squad car and equipment purchased under this grant can only be used by the grant funded police officer. The primary goal of this grant program is to enhance safety on community roads and freeways through community outreach and traffic safety education focused on prevention (forums at local businesses, schools, and social media), analysis of traffic and crash data for targeted intervention strategies, and enforcement of traffic offenses. Below is the forecasted grant funding break down for the four year grant cycle: 2015 Police Officer Salary & Benefits 102,238.61$ 2015 Vehicle 40,747.06$ 2015 Enforcement Equipment 4,240.00$ 2015 Grant Award 147,225.67$ 2016 Grant Award *102,238.61$ 2017 Grant Award *102,238.61$ 2018 Grant Award *102,238.61$ Total 4 Year Grant Award 453,941.50$ * All amounts are based on 2015 numbers, but funding will bases on current labor costs for 2016, 2017, & 2018. The grant awards also include reimbursement for court overtime stemming from DWI arrests. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 15-11 accepting the traffic safety grant from the Minnesota Office of Traffic Safety for one additional police officer with equipment. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 15-11 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 15-11 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Public Safety Department be authorized to enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, for traffic safety enforcement projects during the period from October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2016. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of the Lino Lakes Public Safety Department is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Lino Lakes Public Safety Department and to be the fiscal agent and administer the grant. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 26th day of January, 2015. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: ______________________________ _ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer MEETING DATE: January 26, 2015 TOPIC: Public Hearing. Consider Resolution No. 15-09, Approving Municipal Consent, I-35E MnPass Lane VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION Council is to consider approving municipal consent for the I-35E MnPass Lane project. BACKGROUND MnDOT has studied the I 35E corridor from Little Canada Road to County Road (CR) J, to improve highway transit performance. They are proposing a 2016 construction project to install additional traffic lanes. Within Lino Lakes, a third northbound lane would be constructed up to CR J and then taper off as you go north to just beyond the bridge. MnDOT is paying for the construction project with no participation from the City of Lino Lakes. They are seeking municipal consent before March of 2015 to meet the project schedule. If Council holds the public hearing and does not act on the Resolution, after 90 days, it is automatically considered approved. RECOMMENDATION Consider Resolution No. 15-09, Approving Municipal Consent, I-35E MnPass Lane ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 15-09 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF LINO LAKES WHEREAS, a Minnesota Department of Transportation Recommended Layout No. 1A, dated October, 2014, for State Project No. 6281-47, showing proposed roadway improvements for Interstate 35E within the limits of the City of Lino Lakes as a State Project, has been prepared and presented to the City; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes that said Minnesota Department of Transportation Recommended Layout be in all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of The City of Lino Lakes supports the Minnesota Department of Transportation continuing with the development of final plans necessary for the construction of the project. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 26th day of January, 2015. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: _______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk PUBLIC HEARING I –35E MnPass Lane January 26, 2015 Background Reviewed Project at Dec. 1 Council Work session Improve highway transit performance and mobility NO cost share for the City Project Improvements along I-35E : Little Canada Road CR J tapers off just north of the CR J bridge Schedule Municipal consent March 2015 Construction 2016 Add New MnPASS Managed Lane from County Road E to County Road J Length of expansion:5.1 Miles No Changes from Current Conditions- Gap in MnPASS lane from Little Canada Road to County Road E- Length of MnPASS Gap: 2.9 Miles Future Phase: Extend MnPASS Managed Lane From County Rd J to County Rd 14 Length: 3 miles Proposed Improvements Northbound Add New MnPASS Managed Lane from Goose Lake Rd Bridges to County Rd E Length of Expansion: 1.3 Miles Convert Inside Southbound Lane of I-35E to MnPASS in AM Peak -2.9 miles (Without a Gap option) Future phase: Add MnPASS Managed Lane from County Rd 14 to Goose Lake Total length: 7.1 Miles Proposed Improvements Southbound Consider Resolution 15-09 Approving Municipal Consent I-35E MnPass Lane CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala MEETING DATE: January 26, 2015 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 15-02 Approving Classification of Tax Forfeited Properties VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION Anoka County has notified the city that 4 parcels of property (see map) in Lino Lakes have been tax forfeited to the State of Minnesota. BACKGROUND Minnesota Statutes Section 282.01, subdivision 1(h), states that if a tax-forfeit property is located within the boundaries of an organized town or incorporated municipality, a classification, reclassification and sale must first be approved by the town board of the town or governing body of the municipality in which the lands are located. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 15-02. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 15-02 2. General Location Maps. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 15-02 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CLASSIFICATION OF TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY WHEREAS, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners has prepared a list, designated as Classification List Number 2007 which describes land forfeited to the State of Minnesota pursuant to Chapter 282 of the Minnesota Statutes, and has determined that it is advisable to sell said land; and, WHEREAS, four properties within Lino Lakes listed as: Exhibit A and, WHEREAS, the Anoka County Land Commissioner has requested the Lino Lakes City Council approve classification of the parcels. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes that the classification of parcels are hereby approved. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 26th day of January, 2015. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: _______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Exhibit A 17-31-22-21-0026 THAT PRT OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SEC 17 TWP 31 RGE 22 DESC AS FOL: COM AT NE COR OF SD 1/4 1/4, TH S ALG E LINE THEREOF 495 FT, TH N 70 DEG 22 MIN W 577.5 FT, TH N 17 DEG W 330 FT +OR- TO N LINE OF SD1/4 1/4 & POB, TH E ALG SD N LINE 8.08 FT +OR- TO A PT 630 FT W OF NE COR OF SD 1/4 1/4, TH SELY AT AN ANG OF 72 DEG 28 MIN 30 SEC, AS MEAS FROM E TO S 315 FT, TH WLY PRLL/W N LINE OF SD 1/4 1/4 7.55FT +OR- TO INTER/W A LINE BRG S 17 DEG E FROM POB, TH N 17 DEG W ALG SD LINE TO POB, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC 29-31-22-34-0008 THE E 60 FT OF N 345.8 FT OF SE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF SEC 29 TWP 31 RGE 22, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC 17-31-22-33-0046 LOT 1 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO 54 DESC AS FOL: LYG NWLY OF WLY R/W LINE OF CSAH NO 23 & LYG NELY OF FOL DESC LINE: COM AT PT OF INTER OF SLY LINE OF N 300 FT OF SD LOT WITH WLY R/W LINE OF CSAHNO 23, TH SWLY ALG SD WLY LINE 127.34 FT, TH NWLY AT RT ANG 272.63 FT, TH NELY AT RT ANG 159.80 FT TO POB OF SD LINE, TH SELY AT RT ANG 272.63 FT TO SD WLY R/W LINE OF CSAH NO 23 & SD LINE THERE TERM 17-31-22-33-0052 LOT 2 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO 54 DESC AS FOL: COM AT INTER OF S LINE OF N 300 FT SD LOT & WLY R/W LINE OF CSAH NO LAKE 23, TH S 25 DEG 20 MIN 49 SEC W, ALG SD R/W LINE 127.34 FT, TH N 64 DEG 39MIN 11 SEC W 272.63 FT, TH N 25 DEG 20 MIN 49 SEC E 160 FT TO POB, TH S 64 DEG 39 MIN 11 SEC E TO INTER/W E LINE OF SD LOT 2, TH N ALG SD E LINE TO NE COR THEREOF, TH W ALG N LINE OF SD LOT 2 TOINTER/W LINE BRG N 08 DEG 23 MIN 05 SEC E FROM POB, TH S 08 DEG 23 MIN 05 SEC W 156.7 FT TO POB