HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-013 Council ResolutionCITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 18-13
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2017 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 17-109 Authorizing the Update of the Pavement Management
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the 2017 Pavement Management Report was completed and presented to Council;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it would be in the best interests of the City to accept the
2017 Pavement Management Report,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the
Mayor and Clerk are do hereby accept the 2017 Pavement Management Report.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 2018.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
Maher and was duly seconded by Council Member Rafferty and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Maher, Rafferty, Mantheyy,Stoesz, einert
The following voted against same:
none
ATTEST:
Ju tan,.e Bartell, City Clerk
Jeff Reinert, ayo
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
C. C. MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6B
Diane Hankee
February 12, 2018
Pavement Management Program
i. Consider Resolution 18-13, Accepting 2017 Pavement
Management Report
ii. Consider Resolution 18-14, Authorize the Preparation
of Plans and Specifications, 2018 Mill and Overlay
Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council authorized the 2017 Pavement Management Report on September 25, 2017 to
evaluate the current condition of the City's roadway system and to generate a 5 -year Capital
Improvement Plan. The 2017 Pavement Management Report was presented at the Council on
February 5, 2018 along with the proposed 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan.
The proposed 2018 Mill and Overlay project includes Ware Road and the Brandywood
neighborhood. After further evaluation of pavement ratings and pavement core data completed
in the Brandywood area it was determined that this was a priority. The estimated project cost is
$715,000. The project would be funded through the pavement management budget and state aid
funds. The project includes the following roadways:
Ware Road (Ash Street to 300' south of Birch Street)
Buckthorn Lane
White Oak Road
Whitetail Trail
Chokecherry Road
Velvetleaf Lane
The proposed schedule for this project is as follows:
City Council Authorizes Plans and Spec's
City Council Orders Project & Approves Plans and Specifications
City Council Authorizes Ad for Bids
City Open Bids
City Council Awards Contract
Feb. 12, 2018
Mar. 12, 2018
Mar. 12, 2018
April 16, 2018
April 23, 2018
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 18-13
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2017 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 17-109 Authorizing the Update of the Pavement Management
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the 2017 Pavement Management Report was completed and presented to Council;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it would be in the best interests of the City to accept the
2017 Pavement Management Report,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the
Mayor and Clerk are do hereby accept the 2017 Pavement Management Report.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 2018.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
and was duly seconded by Council Member and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
WSB
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis. MN 55416
(763) 541-4800 ( wsbeng corn
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT
Lino Lakes, MN
Prepared for
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
WSB Project No. 010884
1/8/2018
•
WSB
Pavement Management Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary 1
II. Introduction 2
What is a Pavement Management Program? 2
Why establish a Pavement Management Program? 2
What is Pavement Forensics? 2
III. Pavement Condition Report 3
EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDI FION 3
Pavement Rating Examples 5
IV. Pavement Management Report 9
Special Maintenance Actions Recommended 9
Preventative Maintenance 9
Preservation 11
Reclamation 11
Reconstruction 11
PAVER Modeling and Analysis 12
Introduction 12
PCI Deterioration Models 12
Condition Performance Analysis 13
Work Planning Models 13
Recommendations and 5 -year CIP 22
Appendices 23
Appendix A 24
Pavement PCI Map 24
Appendix B 25
Pavement PCI Ratings 25
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 11
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report summarizes the findings for the pavement inspection of the road segments performed by WSB &
Associates in the city of Lino Lakes completed in October 2017. This report gives an overview of the road condition
in the city and provides recommendations on pavement management.
Per the City plan, pavement conditions for one-fourth of the City roadways are rated annually. Roadways not
rated in the current year are then projected using the PAVER software. The projections are based on past
inspection ratings and decreased based on a deterioration curve. Recent roadway improvement projects were
updated in the condition ratings. Private roadways and gravel roadways were not evaluated.
A summary of the pavement condition findings are as follows:
• WSB's GIS system states that there are currently 97 miles of bituminous roadways in Lino Lakes,
which 22 miles were inspected in 2017.
• The current weighted average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for bituminous roads in Lino Lakes is
71.32. The PCI is based on a 0 to 100 scale, with increasing PCI as better condition roadways. This
weighted average is taken from the PCI values generated on each segment based on the distresses
identified in the field, and averaged depending on the area of each segment. Any type of road
maintenance (i.e. patching or crack sealing) done prior to inspections would be accounted for in each
PCI value.
• Percentage of bituminous roadways in respective category, in terms of area, are as follows:
o "Adequate" category requiring preventative maintenance — 62.8%
o "Marginal" category requiring preservation — 22.8%
o "Problem" category requiring reconstruction — 14.4%
• There are 3.99 miles of gravel roadways and 3.67 miles of private roadways within Lino Lakes, which
are not included in the pavement management.
A majority of the roadways within the City are currently in adequate condition. The City has been adding new
roadways constructed with development, and has also completed roadway maintenance/reconstruction on
existing roadways.
In modeling the pavement condition over 20 years, it was found that the marginal category roadways drop into
problem category roadways if not preserved within a certain time frame. A budget driven model and a target PCI
model were analyzed to determine the level of funding needed to cost effectively maintain the roadways. An
analysis of the preservation budget showed an 8 to 10 percent per year increase matched the maintenance needs.
It was also concluded that if funding is available in the near future, the City should consider a larger preservation
project to keep marginal roadways from becoming problem roadways.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 12
INTRODUCTION
WHAT IS A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM?
A pavement management program includes a systematic method of inspecting and rating the pavement condition
of roads in a network, followed by performing a cost-effective analysis of various maintenance and rehabilitation
strategies, which assists decision makers in making the best decision on the use of available resources. The
pavement management ideology, if successfully implemented, can result in drastic improvement of the life cycle
costs, performance, and life of roads. The main objectives of a pavement management program are to maintain a
high-level network, evaluate the effectiveness of different alternatives, and optimize timing of maintenance and
construction activities. These objectives can be met by routinely inspecting the road conditions. The data is
typically managed with pavement management software that can manage, sort, and store the collected data.
Using the software, various models can be generated that allows the user to run different budget scenarios.
WHY ESTABLISH A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM?
A Pavement Management Program can serve as a good guide for the City to make strategic and appropriate
decisions relating in maintenance and reconstruction activities to maximize the life cycle of the pavements. The
program will also provide some financial strategies to help the City to allocate available resources in an efficient
manner.
WHAT IS PAVEMENT FORENSICS?
Pavement forensics involves taking cores on the roadways to identify the pavement structure and condition under
the visible layer of the pavement, such as the depths of pavement layers, signs of bonding or de -bonding, and
distresses that might not be visible from the surface. Recommendations can then be made on certain
maintenance or reconstruction activity is best suited for the roadway. Several factors should be considered when
determining the number of cores to be taken, which include the pavement condition or visible distresses present
on the pavement and the variability in the pavement depth as the cores are being taken. The findings from the
pavement forensic have been proven to lead to cost savings and better solutions for roadway maintenance.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 13
III. PAVEMENT CONDITION REPORT
EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDITION
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) was used to measure pavement condition on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being
a perfect roadway with no distress. This report provides the latest pavement conditions. PAVER, which is an asset
management software, was used to record and estimate the conditions of the roadways. The software calculates
the PCI using the deduct values, which are based on the distress type, distress severity, and distress quantity.
Examples of distress type are alligator cracking, pothole, and rutting. Distress severity is divided into low, medium,
and high. Distress quantity is either the number of counts, length, or area depending on the distress type.
Majority of the bituminous roadway systems at the time of inspection are in good condition, and are in need of
maintenance to preserve the road structure. The following is the breakdown of the pavement overall condition in
the City:
Pavement Condition Index Mileage Percent of System
Adequate Category (70.01-100.00) 59.8 62.8
Marginal Category (40.01 — 70.00) 21.9 22.8
Problem Category (0.00-40.00) 15.6 14.4
Pavements that fall into the adequate category are recommended to have surface treatment preventative
maintenance performed. The lower the PCI, the less effective a preventative maintenance activity is in preserving
the life of the roadways. Each type of preventative maintenance serves its own function, and project selection
depends on the type and severity of distresses observed on the surface of the road. Streets that fall into the lower
range of the adequate category, with PCI in low the 70s, may be prompted to perform a Texas Underseal or mill
and overlay in order to extend the life of the road. It is recommended to evaluate the road condition prior to
project selection to determine the appropriate type of construction for the roadways.
Pavement preservation is recommended to be conducted on roadways that fall into the marginal category. Some
of the pavement preservation methods are partial and full depth mill and overlay. Roadways that fall into the
lower range of the marginal category, with PCI in the 40s, may be monitored without performing any maintenance
activities since they have degraded to the point that pavement preservation methods are no longer effective and
the roadways still have another few years' time before a reconstruction is needed. Prior to any mill and overlay or
full depth bituminous removal and replacement, coring is strongly recommended to determine if the bituminous
layer thickness is sufficient and underlying pavement is in good condition. If there are issues in the base and
subgrade layers, pavement preservation methods are not recommended and those roadways would fall into the
problem category that a reclamation or reconstruction needs to be done.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 14
Reclamation or reconstruction is recommended to be performed on streets that fall into the problem category.
Reclamation can only be done if there is enough gravel underneath the bituminous layer. Thus, coring would be
recommended prior to any design work to determine the appropriate improvement.
The PCI values obtained were based on visual inspection and the recommended strategies for each category shall
only be used as guidelines. Recommended maintenance activities are further explained in the Pavement
Management Report.
Appendix A includes maps of all the pavements in the City showing their PCI classification. The specific PCI rating
for each pavement segment is included in Appendix B.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 15
PAVEMENT RATING EXAMPLES
PCI Rating = 27
Tolle Lane (Segment ID: 541)
Detailed Distresses:
• Patching, Low Severity, 50.17%
• Alligator Cracking, Low Severity, 10.03%
• Alligator Cracking, Medium Severity, 1.00%
• Alligator Cracking, High Severity, 10.05%
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 16
PCI Rating = 43
Timberwolf Trail (Segment ID: 564)
Detailed Distresses:
• Patching, Low Severity, 3.94%
• Patching, Medium Severity, 7.87%
• Alligator Cracking, Low Severity, 10.01%
• Alligator Cracking, Medium Severity, 0.98%
• Block Cracking, Medium Severity, 10.03%
A
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 17
PCI Rating = 77
Tele Drive (Segment ID: 553)
Detailed Distresses:
• Alligator Cracking, Low Severity, 2.83%
• Alligator Cracking, Medium Severity, 0.28%
• Linear Cracking, Low Severity, 0.02%
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 18
PCI Rating = 97
Rolling Hills Drive (Segment ID: 454)
Detailed Distresses:
• Linear Cracking, Low Severity, 0.04%
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 19
IV. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT
This pavement management report includes a systematic method of inspecting and rating the pavement condition
of roads in a network, followed by performing a cost-effective analysis of various maintenance and rehabilitation
strategies, which assists decision makers in making the best decision on the use of available resources. It is also
used to supply updated information regarding the current management plan.
SPECIAL MAINTENANCE ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Lino Lakes has many options available for pavement preventative maintenance, preservation, and reconstruction
including reclamation, mill and overlays, and Texas underseal to extend the life of a roadway. These maintenance
actions are anticipated to last several years and be cost effective.
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
Preventative maintenance can be defined as a treatment to an existing road that will help preserve and protect the
road, while also slow future deterioration. This type of maintenance will improve the condition of the system
without increasing its structural capacity.
Implementing a preventative maintenance strategy is both cost effective and appropriate since maintenance costs
increase with pavement age. Preventative maintenance actions can be completed at a much lower cost than
preservation actions such as mill and overlays. By applying the appropriate preventative maintenance strategy at
the right time, it can keep the good roads in good condition at a lower cost, which is a better strategy than waiting
for the road to deteriorate before applying an improvement. With preventative maintenance techniques, you can
extend the life of a pavement from 20 years to close to 50 years if the maintenance is done at the correct time.
Preventative maintenance is best performed on newer pavements prior to the appearance of significant and/or
severe distresses. Types of preventative maintenance include crack sealing, fog sealing, chip sealing, micro
surfacing.
Crack Seal
Crack sealing is a type of preventative maintenance done to prevent the intrusion of water and incompressible
materials into cracks. When water enters the cracks, it can soften the sub -base and base layers and lead to further
cracking and the development of more severe alligator cracking and subsequently the formation of potholes. In
Minnesota where freeze/thaw cycles exist, the water that enters the system through cracks can lead to frost
heaving issue. Crack sealing should be completed as preventative maintenance early in the life of a new pavement
or overlay, typically in 2 to 4 years, and roughly every 7 years or as determined to be necessary. This technique
will not improve the structural capacity of the pavement but will slow down future structural deterioration that
could be caused when water enters the system. It is recommended that crack sealing is done prior to either fog
sealing or chip sealing.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X10
Chip Seal
Chip sealing process involves an application of a uniform layer of emulsified asphalt followed immediately by a
layer of cover aggregate across the pavement surface. Pre -sweeping and filling of all cracks shall be done prior to
the chip seal application. Chip sealing creates a waterproof surface membrane to the existing membrane, which
helps to slow down the deterioration of the pavement from oxidation as well as to prevent the intrusion of water.
Chip sealing is typically completed one year after crack sealing. Normally, a good chip seal placed on a newer road
can last 5 to 10 years. This assumes the chip seal is protected during placement to allow proper time to cure.
Other factors which affect a chip seals performance include the type of binder that is used, the condition of the
underlying road and external factors such as plow damage. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that
these external factors do not contribute to premature failure of a chip seal. It is important to note that chip seals
can be effective if constructed properly and if placed on a road that is a good candidate for chip seal. Field surveys
will assist in determining which roads are candidates for a chip seal.
WSB would recommend the City to reference MnDOT Spec 2356 or the 2006 Minnesota Chip Seal Handbook for
guidelines to use when chip sealing. It would be our recommendation that on residential streets, the City use CRS -
2 oil with 1/8" Dresser Trap Rock at a rate of .24 to .26 gallons per square yard. On arterials with no bike traffic, it
would be our recommendation to use FA -2 aggregate with CRS -2P emulsion at a rate of .26 to .28 gallons per
square yard. On heavy commercial streets, it would be our recommendation to use FA -3 aggregate with CRS -2P
emulsion at a rate of .35 to .4 gallons per square yard. The larger size aggregate will withstand the heavier vehicle
traffic.
Fog Seal
WSB would recommend the City reference MnDOT Spec 2355 for more information on fog sealing guidelines. Fog
sealing is typically completed one year after crack sealing. Typically, a fog seal will last 3 to 5 years. It is important
to note that while the color of a fog seal may fade as early as a year after its application, a fog seal remains
effective for as many as 2 to 4 years. Fog sealing is another type of preventative maintenance in which only the
asphalt emulsion is applied to the roadway to protect the roadway surface from environmental aging, moisture
damage, and oxidation. This preventative maintenance technique will not add any strength to the pavement.
Micro surfacing
WSB would recommend the City reference MnDOT Spec 2354 for more information on micro surfacing guidelines.
Micro surfacing is a mix of crushed aggregate, mineral filler, and latex -modified emulsified asphalt. It is applied by
a truck equipped with a squeegee or spreader box. Micro surfacing can be applied in multiple layers. It is effective
at sealing low -severity cracks, including fatigue cracking, longitudinal cracking, and transverse cracking. It also
addresses raveling, friction loss, moisture infiltration, bleeding, and roughness. Micro surfacing is often selected to
inhibit raveling and oxidation, as well as improving surface friction and filling minor irregularities and rutting in a
roadway. A micro surfacing treatment can be expected to extend a roadway's life by 3 to 6 years, depending on
the number of layers applied.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 111
This treatment provides resurfacing from 3/8" to 3/4" thick and returns traffic use in one hour under average
conditions. This can be applied in multiple applications and provide minor reprofiling. Micro surfacing can also fill
wheel ruts up to 1 1/2" in depth in one pass and produces high surface friction.
PRESERVATION
An overlay involves placing a new layer of bituminous material on top of an existing asphalt surface. A mill and
overlay involves grinding all or a portion of the in-place asphalt surface and topping it with a bituminous wearing
course over the entire surface. This type of action provides a structural improvement to the roadway. We
recommended pavement coring to evaluate the subsurface conditions. Information such as depths of pavement
layers, signs of bonding and de -bonding, and distresses that are not visible from the road surface can be obtained
through pavement coring.
Texas underseal is a non -conventional pavement preservation method, which a chip seal is placed under an
overlay. The chip seal layer acts as stress relief membrane providing a crack resistance asphalt layer. We
recommend that the City consider Texas undersea) for overlay projects.
RECLAMATION
There are two conventional types of reclamation, which are full depth reclamation (FDR) and stabilized full depth
reclamation (SFDR). FDR involves grinding the asphalt pavement with a portion of the underlying base, followed
by an overlay or a surface treatment. SFDR is FDR with the addition of stabilizing additive, which are asphalt
based, chemical based, or compaction aids. The asphalt additives can be foamed asphalt or asphalt emulsion.
Reclamation brings the pavement condition back to a 100 (perfect condition) rating.
RECONSTRUCTION
Reconstruction includes removing and replacing the existing pavement and subgrade. Subsurface water
management is a significant component of a reconstruction project. Thus, addressing roadway drainage is
included in roadway reconstruction projects. Reconstruction also brings the pavement condition back to a 100
(perfect condition) rating.
A
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 112
PAVER MODELING AND ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
PAVER software was utilized in the pavement management for the streets in the City of Lino Lakes. First step in
the pavement management process was to develop a pavement deterioration curve for bituminous roadways.
Next step was to apply the deterioration curve to all the roadways, and run the 20 -year design model. Two main
models of interest were budget driven model and target PCI driven model. A curve was also generated when there
will not be any maintenance activities done over the years to show the importance of performing maintenance
actions to prolong the life of pavements.
PCI DETERIORATION MODELS
Pavement performance curve, which was based on the Army Corps of Engineer data (Figure IVa), was used to
estimate pavement performance for roadways that were not inspected this year. The graph below represents
typical pavement deterioration rate, and it may varies depending on the type of maintenance activities done over
the period of pavement life. In order to predict pavement performance, all the bituminous roadways were
assigned to the following deterioration curve.
Figure IVa. Pavement performance curve applied to all bituminous roadways in Lino Lakes.
A
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 113
CONDITION PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Work history obtained from the City was included in the model to accurately portray the condition of the streets
with respect to the year since construction. The three main inputs for the model were chip seal, mill and overlay,
and reclamation / reconstruction. Chip seal was treated as a surface treatment and it does not affect the
structural capacity of the pavement, while mill and overlay was treated as major maintenance and repair activity
since it improves the structural capacity of the pavement. Reclamation and reconstruction were input as new
construction. A condition performance analysis was performed to predict the PCI ratings for the roadways that
were not inspected this year.
WORK PLANNING MODELS
Maintenance cost increases considerably with the age of pavement. Thus, implementing a preventative
maintenance strategy proves to be both cost effective and appropriate. Preventative maintenance activities such
as crack seal, fog seal, chip seal, and micro surfacing are done at a much lower cost compared to preservation
actions such as mill and overlay. The main idea behind the preventative maintenance strategy is that applying the
appropriate maintenance action at the right time will keep the good roads in good condition at a lower cost. This
is often a better strategy than leaving the road to deteriorate over time before performing maintenance. With the
application of proper preventative techniques, the pavement life often can be extended from 20 years to up to 50
years, provided the maintenance is done at the correct time frame.
In PAVER, Preventive Maintenance involves crack seal, patching, and joint seal, along with surface treatments such
as chip seal, fog seal, and micro surfacing. The critical condition index used was 70 PCI, which is the threshold that
mill and overlay, surface reconstruction, reclamation, and complete reconstruction or new construction will be
carried out.
Using PAVER, the funding level needed to maintain the current weighted average PCI can be predicted. This dollar
budget will continue to expand if a pavement management plan is not implemented. A good pavement
management plan will budget for preventative maintenance to maintain the pavements in good condition, and
preservation to improve the structural capacity of the existing roadway.
Figure IVb shows the pavement condition over a course of 20 years, with a variable annual budget available.
Figure IVc shows the budget required to maintain various PCI levels for the pavements, including the weighted
average PCI of 71.32 at the time of inspection, with no condition tolerance. These scenarios include maintenance
activities listed above to be performed, which are Preventative Maintenance, Preservation and Reconstruction.
These models also accounted for an inflation rate of 3%. Preservation was set to only be done when the PCI
ranges from 70 to 100, when the roads are still in adequate condition. Re -planning of projects was set to every 3
years after recommended maintenance activities were performed since routine inspection and planning help to
keep track of the condition of the streets thus appropriate maintenance can be applied.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 14
Unit pricing for the maintenance activities that were included in the 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and
PAVER analysis were provided by the City, which were obtained from recent project costs. The unit pricing
includes engineering, legal, financial, and administrative costs. Following are the unit pricing for each type of
maintenance activity.
Type of Activity Unit Pricing (Per Linear Foot)
Mill and overlay $ 65
Full depth reclamation $ 95
Reconstruction $ 235
Under the 5 -year CIP, reconstruction costs were used to evaluate all the projects that fall under the "problem"
category. Although some of the roadway segments may be a candidate for full depth reclamation, further
investigation such as pavement forensics needs to be performed on the roadways to determine if there are
enough underlying good materials for a full depth reclamation. Thus, a more conservative approach was
conducted by applying the reconstruction costs than to utilizing the reclamation costs.
PAVER runs the analysis using unit pricing for all the maintenance activities in terms of square foot instead of linear
foot. All the unit pricing listed above was converted to the unit pricing that PAVER uses. An average road width of
32 -feet was used to run the model.
WS1
B
Pavement Management Report
Page 115
BUDGET DRIVEN MODEL
Two scenarios were analyzed to determine if the current City budget is sufficient to maintain the streets in a cost-
effective manner. The City's Preservation "Mill and Overlay" budget was specifically reviewed. These marginal
roadways are the focus due to the aging infrastructure in this category and the time dependent structural
maintenance.
A model was analyzed with the existing funding and another one where the Preservation funding was increased.
The first model was based on:
• Existing budget for Preventative $50,000 (crack fill, pothole patching) + $80,000 (chip seal, other)
• Existing budget for Preservation $580,000 (2018 budget, increase 5% per year)
• Proposed budget for Reconstruction including $5,200,000 allocated in 2018 and $2,600,000 allocated in
2021. After that $3,250,000 was programed in every 3 years.
A second model was performed with:
• Existing budget for Preventative $50,000 (crack fill, pothole patching) + $80,000 (chip seal, other)
• Increase budget for Preservation $580,000 (2018 budget, increase 10% per year)
• Proposed budget for Reconstruction as in the first model
A
WSB
Table IVa. Existing Annual budget
Pavement Management Report
Page 116
Year
Preventative
Budget
2018
$130,000
Preservation
Budget
$580,000
Reconstruction
Budget
Total Existing Annual Budget
$5,200,000
$5,910,000
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$609,000
$639,450
$671,423
$704,994
$740,243
$2,600,000
$739,000
$769,450
$3,401,423
$834,994
$870,243
2024
$130,000
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$777,255
$816,118
$3,250,000
$856,924
$899,770
$944,759
$991,997
$3,250,000
$4,157,255
$946,118
$986,924
$4,279,770
$1,074,759
$1,121,997
2030
2031
2032
2033
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
2034
2035
2036
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$1,041,597
$1,093,677
$1,148,360
$1,205,778
$1,266,067
$1,329,371
$1,395,839
$3,250,000
$3,250,000
$3,250,000
$4,421,597
$1,223,677
$1,278,360
$4,585,778
$1,396,067
$1,459,371
$4,775,839
2037
$130,000
$1,465,631
$1,595,631
Average
$130,000
$958,913
$3,435,714
$2,291,413
Total
$2,600,000 $19,178,253
$24,050,000
$45,828,253
A
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Table IVb. 10 % Increase Per Year in Budget for Preservation
Page 1 17
Year
Preventative
Budget
Preservation
Budget
Reconstruction
Budget
Total Annual Budget with
10% Increase Per Year
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$580,000
$638,000
$701,800
$771,980
$849,178
$934,096
$1,027,505
$1,130,256
$1,243,282
$1,367,610
$1,504,371
$1,654,808
$1,820,288
$5,200,000
$2,600,000
$3,250,000
$5,910,000
$768,000
$831,800
$3,501,980
$979,178
$1,064,096
$3,250,000
$3,250,000
$4,407,505
$1,260,256
$1,373,282
$4,747,610
$1,634,371
$1,784,808
$5,200,288
2031
2032
2033
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$2,002,317
$2,202,549
$2,422,804
$3,250,000
$2,132,317
$2,332,549
$5,802,804
2034
2035
2036
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$2,665,084
$2,931,593
$3,224,752
$3,250,000
$2,795,084
$3,061,593
$6,604,752
2037
$130,000
$3,547,227
$3,677,227
Average
$130,000
$1,660,975
$3,435,714
$2,993,475
Total
$2,600,000
$33,219,500
$24,050,000
$59,869,500
WSB
80
75
a 70
00
ca
Q 65
Op
60
55
50
Pavement Management Report
Budget Driven Annual Condition
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
Years
........Current Budget 10% Increase for Preservation
Figure IVc. Annual weighted average PCI with different budget available.
Page 118
A.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 119
As shown in Figure IVc, if the City maintains its current budget for pavement management it will result in a
pavement condition difference of approximately 10 PCI in 20 years. By increasing the Preservation budget by 10%
per year the City can maintain a more reasonable PCI. The Reconstruction budget could also be reviewed to
increase the PCI however that has been modeled at this time.
Initially, the weighted average PCI drops and that is due to a significant number of roadways deteriorating before
Preservation and Reconstruction activities are performed. The drop is then followed by a gradual increase after
appropriate maintenance activities are carried out. Figure IVc shows that by increasing the annual budget for
Preservation, the City would be able to maintain their roadway condition over time. Since there will be an increase
in the percentage of roadways that falls under the marginal category in a few years, we would recommend the City
consider a larger scale of mill and overlay project in the near future to address the roadways before needing a
reclamation or reconstruction.
A
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X20
TARGET PCI DRIVEN MODEL
Three scenarios were run to determine the budget required to maintain or achieve a certain target PCI. Models
ran include decreasing to a PCI of 65, maintaining current PCI (71.32), increasing to a PCI of 75. Maximum iteration
was employed for each model to achieve the most accurate results, with no condition tolerance.
Table IVc. Annual budget required to maintain desired condition rating.
Year
65 PCI
Maintain Current PCI
75 PCI
2018
$2,164,204
$2,596,375
$2,975,384
2019
$2,164,705
$2,591,058
$2,977,368
2020
$2,159,715
$2,589,842
$2,976,986
2021
$2,158,969
$2,593,401
$2,976,239
2022
$2,155,974
$2,562,111
$2,948,787
2023
$2,157,451
$2,577,644
$2,939,425
2024
$2,120,846
$2,554,443
$2,974,845
2025
$2,164,801
$2,596,961
$2,975,335
2026
$2,159,990
$2,579,632
$2,966,675
2027
$2,150,392
$2,595,832
$2,973,715
2028
$2,160,778
$2,587,333
$2,976,734
2029
$2,163,895
$2,593,600
$2,974,830
2030
$2,151,566
$2,583,764
$2,939,283
2031
$2,164,796
$2,596,533
$2,981,384
2032
$2,162,524
$2,596,594
$2,981,519
2033
$2,164,330
$2,596,774
$2,981,235
2034
$2,161,290
$2,596,781
$2,979,862
2035
$2,164,013
$2,596,995
$2,981,382
2036
$2,163,878
$2,597,268
$2,981,718
2037
$2,162,397
$2,596,801
$2,978,314
Average
$2,158,826
$2,588,987
$2,972,051
Total
$43,176,513
$51,779,743
$59,441,020
The results above show budget representation annually and that differs from the City's reconstruction budget that
is bonded every 3 years. Although the budgets could not be compared directly, the average and total annual
budget over a period of 20 years could be compared to determine if the City's current funding is sufficient to
maintain and improve the condition of the roadways.
The current annual budget is insufficient to maintain the current weighted average PCI. Based on an iterative
review of the total budget it shows that a budget increase of 8 to 10 percent per year would better match the
maintenance needs.
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
w
CCw
w
ri $2,500,000
$2,000,000
Pavement Management Report
TARGET PCI DRIVEN ANNUAL FUNDING
—4-65 PCI Maintain Current PCI 75 PCI
NEM
2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 Average
YEARS
Figure IVc. Annual funding required to maintain desired weighted average PCI.
Page X21
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 22
RECOMMENDATIONS AND 5 -YEAR CIP
Using the PAVER software analysis, different alternatives were run to determine the optimal actions to extend the
pavement life in a most cost-effective manner. The key to achieving that goal is performing maintenance when it
is required to preserve the road structure.
It is recommended to maintain a roadway network condition under PCI rating of at least 70 in the long term. To
achieve this goal, the funding of maintenance activities should be increased by 8 to 10 percent per year. It is
recommended to allocate additional funding to preserve "marginal" roadways such as mill and overlay and Texas
Underseal. These maintenance activities are cost effective and increase the pavement life if applied at the
appropriate time. Roadways that are in need of reconstruction prior to the City being able to fund could be
considered with a temporary solution such as chip sealing to hold the pavement together. WSB recommended the
City perform preventative maintenance treatments in the early life of the pavement, normally within the first 5
years, as it would be the optimum time frame to maximize its performance.
A 5 -year CIP from 2018 to 2022 was developed based on the funding information provided by the City. Upon
reviewing the roadways that are currently under the "problem" category, it would take the City roughly 15 years to
reconstruct all these roadways. There would also be roadways that are currently under the "marginal" category
that will be gradually deteriorating into the "problem" category if there is no increase in funding to lengthen the
service life of these streets.
A map showing the 5 -year project areas and a spreadsheet presenting the respective project cost are attached to
the report. This is intended to be used as a guide and assist engineers in decision making on road maintenance.
Other factors such as scheduling of other projects, use of the road, expected life, cost, public perception should
also be considered.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 123
APPENDICES
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 124
APPENDIX A
PAVEMENT PCI MAP
Figure A.1. Map showing PCI category and recommended maintenance activity for all the roadways in the City of
Lino Lakes.
17k"v#
r
I
i
j.. i 1
ri
I
IJ
-!_
� r F
i)__
Figure A.1. Map showing PCI category and recommended maintenance activity for all the roadways in the City of
Lino Lakes.
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 125
APPENDIX B
PAVEMENT PCI RATINGS
Table B.1. PCI ratings for each bituminous segment, recommended maintenance activity for each segment was
based on visual inspection. Streets with Section ID "TBD" are newer roadways that do not have Section ID
assigned to them yet.
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft2)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
81stStree
49
1,034.25
24.
24,82202
.00
Reconstruction
Diane Cour
192
46.
30.
1,380.00
.00
Reconstruction
Lamotte Dr
342
281.22
28.
7,874.25
.00
Reconstruction
Rondeau La
463
1,966.13
24.
47,187.11
.00
Reconstruction
Shadow Lak
494
3,32736
24.
79,856.69
.00
Reconstruction
Woodland D
636
1,363.65
22.
30,000.38
.00
Reconstruction
Lamotte Dr
978
839.32
28.
23,501.00
.00
Reconstruction
Lamotte Ci
1221
825.63
28.
23,117 68
.00
Reconstruction
Shadow Cou
480
281.94
28.
7,894.29
.29
Reconstruction
Shadow Lak
485
3,362.7
24.
80,704.83
2.44
Reconstruction
Diane Cour
191
213.71
30.
6,411.27
4.23
Reconstruction
Danube Str
177
502.41
30.
15,072.20
5.23
Reconstruction
Shadow Lak
493
846.5
24.
20,315.95
5.66
Reconstruction
Carl Stree
132
1,315.64
24.
31,575.40
6.22
Reconstruction
4th Avenue
22
1,363.48
24.
32,723.57
8.28
Reconstruction
Evergreen
215
1,13521
28.
31,785.92
8.28
Reconstruction
Orange Str
674
827.17
28.
23, 160.69
8.28
Reconstruction
Sandpiper
473
333.47
22
Z336.28
9.08
Reconstruction
4th Avenue
20
3,83756
24.
92,101.38
9.31
Reconstruction
Shadow Lak
487
330.57
24.
Z933.69
11.45
Reconstruction
Rehbein St
443
2,080.78
30.
62,423.29
11.51
Reconstruction
Rondeau La
465
1,349.3
24.
32,383.19
11.51
Reconstruction
Red Maple
439
431.72
28.
12,088.14
12.69
Reconstruction
Rondeau La
455
1,68202
24.
40,368.41
12.72
Reconstruction
Karth Road
317
1,220.16
30.
36,604.77
12.99
Reconstruction
Rondeau La
464
2,60266
24.
62,463.92
13.93
Reconstruction
81st Stree
1000
1,252.54
24.
30,060.85
13.93
Reconstruction
Evergreen
214
884.24
30.
26,52732
14.52
Reconstruction
Red Maple
441
1,110.58
28.
31,096.32
14.92
Reconstruction
Peltier La
408
2,901.63
22.
63,835.82
16.42
Reconstruction
Rondeau La
462
1,293.84
24.
31,052 16
16.42
Reconstruction
Olive Stre
673
799.32
24.
19,183.66
16.64
Reconstruction
Nordin Str
1261
221.45
28.
6,200.48
16.64
Reconstruction
Oak Lane
663
2,256.07
18.
40,609.26
16.66
Reconstruction
Joyer Lane
316
1,971.86
30.
59,15573
16.99
Reconstruction
Rondeau La
456
2,471.38
24.
59,313. 17
17.68
Reconstruction
Main St
1260
623.84
22.
13,724.41
17.68
Reconstruction
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X26
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ftz)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Red Maple
438
1,514.78
28.
42,413.94
18.31
Reconstruction
Gaage Lane
235
831.47
30.
24,944.13
18.99
Reconstruction
Diane Stre
193
1,549.55
30.
46,486.35
19.85
Reconstruction
64th Stree
30
708.41
24.
17,001.94
19.99
Reconstruction
Rondeau La
458
1,505.11
24.
36,12274
20.25
Reconstruction
Canfield R
128
5624
30.
16,872.13
20.99
Reconstruction
Gladstone
1020
643.49
22.
14,156.73
21.55
Reconstruction
Olive Stre
672
498.4
24.
11,961.64
22.00
Reconstruction
Gordon Ave
249
452.92
30.
13,58758
22.88
Reconstruction
Lamotte Dr
344
306.84
28.
8,591.39
22.88
Reconstruction
Diane Stre
194
510.87
30.
15,326.12
25.26
Reconstruction
Rustic Lan
471
784.51
18.
14,121.26
25.54
Reconstruction
Otter Lake
679
1,24277
24.
29,826.47
25.99
Reconstruction
64th Stree
1001
374.3
24.
8,983.14
25.99
Reconstruction
Evergreen
213
502.57
28.
14,071.87
26.35
Reconstruction
Gordon Ave
250
224.41
30.
6,73244
26.91
Reconstruction
Talle Lane
541
1, 129.55
30.
33,886.43
26.99
Reconstruction
Holly Driv
1008
3,893.9
24.
93,453.50
27.99
Reconstruction
James Stre
307
2,202 17
28.
61,660.81
28.55
Reconstruction
Knoll Driv
989
1,018.61
28.
28,520.95
30.76
Reconstruction
Fairmont D
216
603.96
22.
13,28712
30.99
Reconstruction
77th Stree
37
2,086.95
22
45,91294
31.04
Reconstruction
Lakeview D
1042
1,307.31
24.
31,375.34
32.39
Reconstruction
Old Birch
671a
900.
24.
21,600.00
33.74
Reconstruction
Cedar Stre
135
727.81
28.
20,378.54
33.98
Reconstruction
Barbara La
994
542.71
28.
15,195.98
35.18
Reconstruction
Lakeview D
1045
1,316.06
24.
31,58536
36.63
Reconstruction
77th Stree
38
623.83
22
13,724.31
38.03
Reconstruction
Glenview D
244
629.58
22
13,850.70
38.03
Reconstruction
Karth Road
318
454.09
30.
13,62273
38.99
Reconstruction
Timberwolf
563
260.05
32
8,321.73
38.99
Reconstruction
Gladstone
239
619.12
22
13,620.61
39.39
Reconstruction
Oak Lane
662
2,012.74
24.
48,305.77
39.67
Reconstruction
Holly Driv
1012
7258
18.
13, 064.38
39.99
Reconstruction
Fairmont D
217
620.08
22.
13,641.83
40.75
Preservation
Buckthorn
127
499.75
28.
13,99297
40.99
Preservation
Ware Road
597
2630.32
35.
92,061.03
41.06
Preservation
81st Stree
50
414.95
30.
12448.61
41.89
Preservation
Maple Stre
389
926. 16
24.
22,227.85
41.89
Preservation
Timberwolf
564
423.35
30.
12700.56
42.99
Preservation
77th Stree
40
1,264.26
24.
30,34229
43.01
Preservation
Glenview D
1098
654.96
22
14,409.20
43.45
Preservation
Orange Str
675
1,01734
24.
24,416.21
44.10
Preservation
Black Duck
111
498.04
28.
13,94505
44.68
Preservation
Shadow Lak
491
498.
40.
19,920.01
44.69
Preservation
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X27
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft=)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
White Owl
612
726.1
28.
20,330.73
44.69
Preservation
Lakeview D
1044
1,324.03
24.
31,776.80
44.74
Preservation
Merganser
642
55248
28.
15,469.31
44.99
Preservation
Terra Cour
556
365.9
28.
10,24523
45.20
Preservation
Fox Road
228
634.26
28.
17,759.20
45.85
Preservation
Hickory PI
269
184.68
28.
5,171. /8
45.85
Preservation
Shadow Lak
489
15715
40.
6,286.14
45.85
Preservation
Pondview C
426
425.13
28.
11,903.77
46.00
Preservation
Black Duck
109
32733
28.
9,165.35
46.99
Preservation
Black Duck
112
149.05
28.
4,173.46
46.99
Preservation
Pheasant R
418
505.22
28.
14,146.15
46.99
Preservation
Pheasant H
412
323.44
28.
9,056.46
47.00
Preservation
Whitetail
618
335.73
28.
9,400.42
47.00
Preservation
Whitetail
619
555.9
28.
15,565.07
47.00
Preservation
Painted Tu
681
47527
28.
13,30745
47.00
Preservation
Glenview D
245
475.3
22
10,456.61
47.17
Preservation
Service Ro
477
459.65
24.
11,031.54
47.18
Preservation
81st Stree
51
348.44
30.
10,453.14
47.37
Preservation
Sherman La
504
481.81
28.
13,490.76
48.00
Preservation
Sherman La
506
458.41
28.
12,835.48
48.00
Preservation
Timberwolf
565
468.54
28.
13,119.00
48.00
Preservation
White Oak
608
496.75
28.
13,908.99
48.00
Preservation
White Oak
611
851.52
28.
23,84247
48.00
Preservation
Fox Road
229
1,056.47
28.
29,581.07
48.11
Preservation
Shadow Lak
488
21257
44.
9,353.15
48.11
Preservation
Gladstone
236
345.46
27
9,32745
48.32
Preservation
Chokecherr
146
42507
28.
11,902.09
49.00
Preservation
Chokecherr
147
476.68
28.
13,34718
49.00
Preservation
Sherman La
505
611.38
28.
17,118.68
49.00
Preservation
Linda Lane
371
331.96
28.
9,294.90
49.18
Preservation
Shadow Lak
495
38787
40.
15,514.99
49.20
Preservation
Green Bria
254
909.65
27
24,560.61
49.42
Preservation
Ulmer Driv
588
928.32
27
25,064.77
49.42
Preservation
Bloom Cour
121
471.38
24.
11,313.02
50.00
Preservation
Sherman La
498
228.81
28.
6,406.61
50.00
Preservation
White Pine
616
90732
28.
25,404.83
50.24
Preservation
Lonesome P
384
333.82
28.
9,34708
50.26
Preservation
Post Road
429
84527
27
22,822.36
50.45
Preservation
Stage Coac
524
589.36
28.
16,50216
50.45
Preservation
Nancy Driv
963
1,156.26
30.
34,687.86
50.51
Preservation
Meadow Cou
403
585.34
28.
16,389.56
50.52
Preservation
Sherman La
503
51582
28.
14,442.98
51.00
Preservation
Timberwolf
558
212.71
48.
10,210.19
51.00
Preservation
White Oak
610
23267
28.
6,514.75
51.00
Preservation
Black Duck
113
1,651.78
28.
46,249.76
51.29
Preservation
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X28
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft2)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Deerwood L
182
988.09
28.
27,666.55
51.29
Preservation
Hawthorn R
263
59549
28.
16,673.86
51.29
Preservation
River Birc
450
769.47
28.
21,545.14
51.29
Preservation
Shadow Lak
490
41752
40.
16,700.79
51.29
Preservation
77th Stree
39
551.34
24.
13,232.15
51.54
Preservation
Elbe Stree
203
864.09
30.
25,922.68
51.55
Preservation
White Oak
609
4529
28.
12,681.25
52.00
Preservation
Linda Lane
372
1,038.94
28.
29,090.32
52.28
Preservation
Lantern La
356
55584
28.
15,563.47
52.30
Preservation
Elbe Stree
202
176.81
30.
5,304.16
52.55
Preservation
Sherman La
501
1,07787
28.
30,180.40
53.00
Preservation
Timberwolf
560
585.73
28.
16,400.32
53.00
Preservation
Kingfisher
324
489.63
28.
13,709.73
53.29
Preservation
Lonesome P
386
523.07
28.
14,646.07
53.29
Preservation
Stage Coac
525
290.98
28.
8,147.39
53.39
Preservation
Antelope D
62
333.29
27
8,998.79
53.41
Preservation
Heather Co
265
477.66
28.
13,374.47
53.55
Preservation
Timberwolf
559
268.49
28.
7517.74
54.00
Preservation
Black Duck
117
48735
28.
13,64591
54.25
Preservation
Shadow Lak
482
558.28
28.
15,631.90
54.25
Preservation
Fox Circle
970
17258
28.
4,83227
54.25
Preservation
Stage Coac
527
344.65
28.
9,650.09
54.32
Preservation
Lakeview D
1043
1,324.57
24.
31,789.58
54.32
Preservation
Rondeau La
461
678.16
24.
16,27586
54.34
Preservation
Snow Owl C
518
393.24
28.
11,010.71
54.34
Preservation
Shadow Lak
496
538.01
40.
21,520.27
55.21
Preservation
Green Brie
255
383.98
27
10,36736
55.25
Preservation
Sherman La
497
101.66
50.
5,083.17
56.00
Preservation
Fawn Lane
218
801.77
28.
22,449.59
56.15
Preservation
Linden Lan
373
1,317.35
28.
36,885.74
56.15
Preservation
Painted Tu
682
46293
28.
12,961.91
56.15
Preservation
Coyote Tra
990
746.54
28.
20,903.23
56.15
Preservation
Eva Street
212
325.3
30.
9,758.88
56.48
Preservation
Velvetleaf
591
277.51
28.
7,770.18
57.00
Preservation
Hunters Ri
1019
983.24
28.
27530.59
57.00
Preservation
Antelope D
61
176.27
27
4,759.28
57.04
Preservation
Caribou Ci
130
363.44
27
9,81289
57.04
Preservation
Wildflower
622
603.94
27
16,306.30
57.04
Preservation
Sandhi!! D
472
891.46
28.
24,960.97
57.07
Preservation
Fox Road
225
164.01
28.
4,59239
57.09
Preservation
Ironwood C
301
220.62
28.
6,177 37
57.09
Preservation
Gladstone
237
383.23
28.
10,730.46
57.93
Preservation
Beaver Tra
99
533.67
28.
14,942.84
58.02
Preservation
Black Duck
119
583.36
28.
16,333.97
58.02
Preservation
Coyote Tra
169
37763
28.
10,573.72
58.02
Preservation
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X29
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft2)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
River Birc
449
651.6
28.
18,244.72
58.02
Preservation
Shadow Lak
492
330.6
40.
13,224.00
58.02
Preservation
Coyote Tra
991
773.45
28.
21,656.68
58.02
Preservation
Cinnamon T
148
340.37
28.
9,530.36
58.81
Preservation
Gray Heron
252
1,159. 3
28.
32,460.27
58.81
Preservation
Sunfish Co
529
265.92
27
7179.95
58.81
Preservation
White Pine
613
208.48
28.
5,83745
58.93
Preservation
Birch Cour
104
128.65
28.
3,602.09
58.95
Preservation
Fox Road
231
341. 13
28.
9,551.61
58.95
Preservation
Lonesome P
385
861.99
28.
24,135. 75
58.95
Preservation
James Stre
308
441.9
28.
12,373.22
59.38
Preservation
Antelope D
63
483.83
27
13,063.48
59.70
Preservation
Ware Road
601
1,461.14
35
51,139.83
59.85
Preservation
Linda Circ
368
204.02
28.
5,71259
59.86
Preservation
Linda Cour
369
471.93
28.
13,214.00
59.86
Preservation
Black Duck
108
1, 146.55
28.
32, 103.31
59.88
Preservation
Coyote Cou
166
335.28
28.
9,38798
59.88
Preservation
Deerwood L
184
230.13
28.
6,443.58
59.88
Preservation
Fawn Lane
219
22284
28.
6,239.49
59.88
Preservation
Lonesome P
387
586.24
28.
16,414.79
59.88
Preservation
Coyote Tra
992
33794
28.
9,46224
59.88
Preservation
Sherman La
507
323.88
28.
9,068.54
60.00
Preservation
Elm Street
1034
34261
28.
9,59296
60.56
Preservation
Pelican PI
406
1,381.83
28.
38,691.31
60.78
Preservation
Black Duck
114
695.19
28.
19,465.39
60.81
Preservation
Deerwood L
188
484.75
28.
13,573.02
60.81
Preservation
Red Hawk T
436
296.05
28.
8,289.35
60.81
Preservation
Ruffed Gro
469
630.7
28.
17659.64
61.00
Preservation
Lea Court
361
360.56
28.
10,095.67
61.29
Preservation
Grey Squir
259
336.03
27
9,072.79
61.48
Preservation
Snow Owl L
519
1,361.26
28.
38,115.25
61.48
Preservation
Sunflower
531
208.05
27
5,617.41
61.48
Preservation
Ware Road
603
309.33
35
10,826.59
61.71
Preservation
Ware Road
944
541.64
35.
18,95730
61.71
Preservation
Deerwood L
183
22291
28.
6,241.45
61.74
Preservation
Cedar Stre
136
646.25
28.
18, 095.02
61.99
Preservation
Sunrise Dr
535
1,00259
24.
24,06224
62.36
Preservation
Sunrise Ro
537
316.38
24.
7,593.19
62.36
Preservation
Smoketree
515
603.1
27
16,283.63
62.38
Preservation
Snow Owl L
520
35528
28.
9,94787
62.38
Preservation
Ruffed Gro
468
356.88
28.
9,99267
63.00
Preservation
4th Avenue
24
1,327.
36.
47771.89
63.22
Preservation
Forsham La
223
678.22
28.
18,990.06
63.25
Preservation
62nd Avenu
28
404.34
22.
8,89552
63.61
Preservation
Deerwood L
187
488.17
28.
13,668.72
63.61
Preservation
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 130
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (fr)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Killdeer D
321
15783
28.
4,419.34
63.61
Preservation
White Birc
607
578.28
28.
16, 191.97
63.61
Preservation
Painted Tu
680
152.35
28.
4,265.75
63.61
Preservation
Ruffed Gro
470
269.59
28.
7,548.39
64.00
Preservation
Wildflower
621
33298
27
8,990.56
64.18
Preservation
Linda Aven
366
182.4
28.
5,10730
64.53
Preservation
Black Duck
105
408.99
28.
11,451.61
64.55
Preservation
Black Duck
116
426.27
28.
11,935.69
64.55
Preservation
Deerwood C
180
118.79
28.
3,326.12
64.55
Preservation
Deerwood C
181
278.92
60.
16,735.12
64.55
Preservation
Deerwood L
186
441.88
28.
12,372.67
64.55
Preservation
Hawthorn R
262
1,981.44
28.
55,480. 19
64.55
Preservation
Pheasant R
420
961.49
28.
26,921.76
64.55
Preservation
Lacasse Dr
330
50551
28.
14,154.39
64.99
Preservation
Wild Turke
620
699.72
28.
19,59209
65.00
Preservation
Grey Squir
257
269.67
27
7281.13
65.10
Preservation
Sunflower
532
44565
27
12,03256
65.10
Preservation
4th Avenue
19
479.09
41.
19,64258
65.15
Preservation
77th Stree
41
74725
24.
17,934.05
65.15
Preservation
77th Stree
43
494.79
24.
11,875.02
65.15
Preservation
Egret Lane
198
183.77
28.
5,14553
65.47
Preservation
Black Duck
106
318.12
28.
8,90746
65.49
Preservation
Deerwood L
185
1,241.63
28.
34,765.53
65.49
Preservation
Hawthorn R
264
383.2
28.
10,729.48
65.50
Preservation
Elm Street
1037
361.28
28.
10, 115.85
65.99
Preservation
Ruffed Gro
467
36232
28.
10, 14508
66.00
Preservation
Phelps Roa
421
1,31758
28.
36,892.35
66.02
Preservation
Egret Lane
199
449.97
28.
12,599.19
66.41
Preservation
White Pine
615
576.51
27
15,565.79
66.42
Preservation
Killdeer D
1342
561.96
28.
15,734.91
66.44
Preservation
Sunrise Dr
536
1,317.04
24.
31,608.98
66.91
Preservation
Mourning D
644
334.37
27
9,02795
66.93
Preservation
Blue Heron
123
639.44
28.
17904.43
67.36
Preservation
Woodridge
227
262.11
27
7,076.91
67.37
Preservation
Laurene Av
357
674.81
24.
16, 19542
67.37
Preservation
Linda Aven
367
379.91
28.
10,63747
67.37
Preservation
Black Duck
110
249.71
28.
6,991.89
67.39
Preservation
Pheasant R
995
398.79
28.
11,166.25
67.39
Preservation
Sunrise Dr
533
586.04
24.
14,064.88
67.83
Preservation
Sunrise Ro
539
50507
24.
12,121.72
67.83
Preservation
Red Clover
435
593.99
27
16,037.72
67.85
Preservation
Timberwolf
566
461.78
28.
12,929.75
67.99
Preservation
Egret Lane
200
418.81
28.
11,726.56
68.31
Preservation
Baldwin La
95
55736
28.
15,606.20
68.32
Preservation
Beaver Cir
98
528.5
28.
14,798.07
68.34
Preservation
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X31
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ftz)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Red Hawk T
437
26734
28.
7,485.63
68.34
Preservation
Shadow Lak
481
4075
28.
11,409.94
68.34
Preservation
Robinson D
1163
40.
32.
1,279.99
68.50
Preservation
Stage Coac
526
251.53
28.
7,042.93
68.75
Preservation
Antelope D
60
16745
27
4,521.09
68.78
Preservation
Glenview D
243
363.24
28.
10,170.76
68.78
Preservation
Whippoorwi
606
1,328.92
28.
37,209.62
68.78
Preservation
Lacasse Co
326
236.65
28.
6,626.17
68.99
Preservation
Timberwolf
562
900.02
28.
25,200.68
68.99
Preservation
Marilyn Dr
396
1,043.5
28.
29,21787
69.03
Preservation
Blue Heron
122
474.95
28.
13,298.57
69.27
Preservation
Egret Lane
201
463.8
28.
12,986.38
69.27
Preservation
Laurene Av
358
28507
24.
6,841.74
69.27
Preservation
Laurene Av
360
469.8
24.
11,27531
69.27
Preservation
Mallard La
388
336.68
28.
9,42715
69.29
Preservation
Sioux Cour
509
16797
28.
4,703.11
69.61
Preservation
Post Road
428
442.11
27
11,936.89
69.68
Preservation
Gray Heron
253
374.16
28.
10,476.60
69.70
Preservation
Teal Court
551
649.85
28.
18,195.77
69.99
Preservation
Cripple Cr
174
281.38
28.
7,878.69
70.00
Preservation
Oakwood La
669
586.89
28.
16,433.03
70.23
Preventative Maintenance
Crystal Co
176
188.57
28.
5,279.89
70.25
Preventative Maintenance
Fawn Lane
221
698.35
28.
19,553.70
70.25
Preventative Maintenance
Shadow Lak
483 \
2, 166.98
28.
60,67546
70.25
Preventative Maintenance
Partridge
694
798.56
28.
22359.54
70.25
Preventative Maintenance
Gray Heron
251
328.72
28.
9,204.05
70.63
Preventative Maintenance
Tele Lane
555
37734
28.
10,56559
70.99
Preventative Maintenance
Laurene Av
359
558.16
24.
13,395.79
71.18
Preventative Maintenance
Linda Aven
365
93544
24.
22,450.60
71.18
Preventative Maintenance
Rohavic La
452
47735
30.
14,320.42
71.18
Preventative Maintenance
Schlavin C
476
478.18
30.
14,34544
71.18
Preventative Maintenance
Woodridge
638
1,058.86
27
28,589.13
71.18
Preventative Maintenance
Woodridge
640
1,44232
27
38,94253
71.18
Preventative Maintenance
Baldwin La
1139
1,80272
21.
37,85703
71.18
Preventative Maintenance
Lantern Ci
354
582.03
28.
16,296.81
71.20
Preventative Maintenance
Lantern La
355
52705
28.
14,757.53
71.20
Preventative Maintenance
Aqua Lane
1004
450.
36.
16,200.15
71.53
Preventative Maintenance
Mourning D
646
486.18
27
13,126.76
71.55
Preventative Maintenance
Royal Pine
1179
531.68
24.
12760.24
71.99
Preventative Maintenance
Rohavic La
451
44545
30.
13,363.43
72.14
Preventative Maintenance
Black Duck
115
311.55
28.
8,723.35
72.16
Preventative Maintenance
Red Birch
434
575.19
28.
16,10519
72.16
Preventative Maintenance
Muskrat Ru
647
330.87
28.
9,264.38
72.16
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
149
213.72
28.
5,984.29
72.99
Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road
942
624.98
35.
21,874.40
73.08
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 132
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft')
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Oakwood Dr
668
570.25
28.
15,966.90
73.09
Preventative Maintenance
Killdeer C
319
155.02
28.
4,340.44
73.11
Preventative Maintenance
Killdeer D
323
331.7
28.
9,28757
73.11
Preventative Maintenance
Smoketree
516
328.43
27
8,86758
73.37
Preventative Maintenance
Mourning D
645
370.89
27
10,013.93
73.37
Preventative Maintenance
Wolf Circl
623
310.25
28.
8,687.13
73.99
Preventative Maintenance
Black Duck
118
408.25
28.
11,430.97
74.06
Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road
230
505.97
28.
14, 16709
74.06
Preventative Maintenance
Partridge
693
719.48
28.
20,14539
74.06
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1041
1,070.99
28.
29,98783
74.24
Preventative Maintenance
Sunrise Ro
540
864.64
24.
20,751.27
74.25
Preventative Maintenance
Sunflower
530
319.95
27
8,638.58
74.27
Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road
599
1,044.55
35.
36,559.41
74.97
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
155
936.05
28.
26,209.32
74.99
Preventative Maintenance
Ellen Cour
204
200.22
28.
5,606. 18
74.99
Preventative Maintenance
Service Ro
479
1,360.61
24.
32,654.68
75.17
Preventative Maintenance
4th Avenue
1169
546.4
24.
13,113.60
75.19
Preventative Maintenance
White Pine
614
1,216.94
27
32,857.39
75.92
Preventative Maintenance
Woodridge
639
1,378.79
27
37,22728
75.92
Preventative Maintenance
Aspen Lane
85
641.59
28.
17,964.54
75.94
Preventative Maintenance
Tamarack L
542
571.01
28.
15,988.15
75.94
Preventative Maintenance
Aspen Lane
1220
163.72
28.
4,584.06
75.94
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C
584
253.57
28.
7,099.95
76.00
Preventative Maintenance
Sunrise Dr
534
451. 15
24.
10,82766
76.02
Preventative Maintenance
Oak Lane
664
839.41
24.
20, 145.84
76.83
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1040
59738
28.
16,726.67
76.87
Preventative Maintenance
Aqua Lane
1005
303.17
24.
7,276.01
76.88
Preventative Maintenance
Jane Avenu
1211
182.97
32.
5,855.12
76.93
Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr
334
200.94
36.
7,233.77
76.99
Preventative Maintenance
Tele Drive
553
630.87
28.
17,664.50
76.99
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers X
579
398.45
28.
11, 156.60
76.99
Preventative Maintenance
Oakwood La
670
529.94
28.
14,838.32
77.24
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1036
591.06
28.
16,549.55
77.72
Preventative Maintenance
Grey Squir
258
330.8
27
8,931.70
77.75
Preventative Maintenance
Killdeer D
320
126.84
28.
3,551.58
77.79
Preventative Maintenance
77th Stree
42
1,245.88
24.
29,901.17
77.80
Preventative Maintenance
Glen Circl
240
263.6
28.
7,380.88
77.80
Preventative Maintenance
Sherman La
502
1,593.
28.
44,603.98
77.99
Preventative Maintenance
Tele Lane
554
355.
28.
9,939.93
77.99
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1033
338.98
28.
9,491.36
78.55
Preventative Maintenance
Country La
161
1,410.53
28.
39,494.86
78.71
Preventative Maintenance
South Glen
993
518.93
28.
14,530.10
78.71
Preventative Maintenance
Apollo Cou
1226
432.7
26.
11,250.31
78.74
Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr
336
418.4
28.
11,71514
78.99
Preventative Maintenance
Sherman La
500
49755
28.
13,931.43
78.99
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X33
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ftz)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
ElmcrestA
1187
914.95
24.
21,958.86
78.99
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C
582
322.35
28.
9,025.91
79.00
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C
583
218.77
28.
6,125.43
79.00
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1032
358.5
28.
10,038.09
79.37
Preventative Maintenance
ElmcrestA
1233
5,618.32
28.
157,313.07
79.41
Preventative Maintenance
Linda Lane
370
313.36
28.
8,774.20
79.58
Preventative Maintenance
Hollow Lan
286
483.47
28.
13,537. 15
79.61
Preventative Maintenance
South Glen
521
134.39
28.
3,763.01
79.61
Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr
391
424.87
28.
11,896.28
79.69
Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr
331
407.35
28.
11,405.87
79.99
Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Ci
981
244.03
28.
6,832.95
79.99
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C
585
402.08
28.
11,258.27
80.00
Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv
973
583.
24.
13,991.94
80.00
Preventative Maintenance
Marshan Co
1197
142.
24.
3,408.00
80.20
Preventative Maintenance
Northern L
1002
356.47
36.
12,83298
80.21
Preventative Maintenance
Aspen Lane
83
581.93
28.
16,293.92
80.50
Preventative Maintenance
Killdeer D
322
259.27
28.
Z259.63
80.50
Preventative Maintenance
Hollow Lan
285
656.85
28.
18,391.71
80.51
Preventative Maintenance
South Glen
522
49724
28.
13,922.73
80.51
Preventative Maintenance
South Glen
523
360.14
28.
10,083.95
80.51
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1038
973.6
28.
27,260.91
80.95
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
158
679.17
28.
19,016.69
80.99
Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Co
980
275.07
28.
7,701.98
80.99
Preventative Maintenance
Country La
160
221.95
28.
6,214.69
81.38
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1035
485.57
28.
13,595.97
81.72
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1039
338.31
28.
9,47269
81.72
Preventative Maintenance
Ulmer Driv
589
643.14
27
17,364.71
81.75
Preventative Maintenance
Arthur Cou
82
548.51
28.
15,358.32
81.99
Preventative Maintenance
62nd Avenu
26
96239
22.
21, 17262
82.25
Preventative Maintenance
Shadow Lak
484
1,614.28
44.
71,028. 18
82.25
Preventative Maintenance
Park Court
1198
560.53
32.
17,937.07
82.47
Preventative Maintenance
21stAvenu
7
908.46
30.
27,253.68
82.51
Preventative Maintenance
Quarter Ho
433
285.91
28.
8,005.42
82.51
Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr
332
529.47
28.
14,825.11
82.99
Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr
333
764.35
28.
21,401.89
82.99
Preventative Maintenance
Fawn Lane
220
473.24
28.
13,250.60
83.10
Preventative Maintenance
Robinson D
1168
83.28
24.
1,998.66
83.20
Preventative Maintenance
Ulmer Driv
590
374.1
27
10, 100.58
83.24
Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv
293
244.96
24.
5,879.01
83.99
Preventative Maintenance
Osprey Cou
676
522.81
28.
14,638.73
83.99
Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv
972
286.99
24.
6,88778
83.99
Preventative Maintenance
Cherokee T
142
514.12
28.
14,395.43
84.00
Preventative Maintenance
Stage Coac
1202
174.38
32
5,580.01
84.54
Preventative Maintenance
Stage Coac
1218
342.39
32
10,956.47
84.63
Preventative Maintenance
Rice Lake
447
1,77514
28.
49,703.83
84.66
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 34
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft')
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
62nd Avenu
29
2,31263
22.
50,87778
84.74
Preventative Maintenance
Prairie FI
431
573.47
28.
16,057. 15
84.74
Preventative Maintenance
Ravens Cou
1177
472.65
24.
11,343.50
84.75
Preventative Maintenance
Oak Hollow
1178
975.99
24.
23,423.65
84.75
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
152
350.46
28.
9,813.01
84.99
Preventative Maintenance
Mineral Po
643
418.24
28.
11,710.67
85.00
Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv
974
759.85
24.
18,236.33
85.00
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C
1254
155.6
90.
14,003.62
85.00
Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente
1258
481.23
40.
19,249.26
85.36
Preventative Maintenance
21stAvenu
6
386.02
34.
13,124.58
85.37
Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road
605
570.86
28.
15,984. 19
85.56
Preventative Maintenance
Lakota Tra
1154
553.68
26.
14,395.68
85.56
Preventative Maintenance
Oak Hollow
1256
146.51
24.
3,516.33
85.57
Preventative Maintenance
Country La
162
160.19
28.
4,48532
85.60
Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake
546
32735
28.
9,165.87
85.99
Preventative Maintenance
Meadowlark
641
243.02
28.
6,804.70
85.99
Preventative Maintenance
Cripple Cr
173
785.08
28.
21,98211
86.00
Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv
975
899.25
24.
21,582.02
86.00
Preventative Maintenance
Cherokee T
1090
324.38
28.
9,08266
86.00
Preventative Maintenance
Aqua Circl
1227
2,399.37
24.
57,584.90
86.01
Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente
574
75564
44.
33,248. 17
86.04
Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr
395
1,313.32
28.
36,77283
86.17
Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L
683
358.32
28.
10,033.08
86.17
Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Lane
511
35795
28.
10,02268
86.37
Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Lane
512
63727
28.
17,843.61
86.37
Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Lane
513
288.98
28.
8,091.40
86.37
Preventative Maintenance
Ware Circl
596
20575
28.
5,761. 12
86.37
Preventative Maintenance
Ojibway Pa
1158
1,098.61
26.
28,563.91
86.37
Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road
1170
67742
24.
16,258.04
86.37
Preventative Maintenance
Chippewa T
1232
263.44
28.
Z376.25
86.37
Preventative Maintenance
62nd Avenu
27
61737
22
13,58209
86.41
Preventative Maintenance
Aspen Lane
84
183. 19
28.
5,129.41
86.41
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant R
1341
1,50562
28.
42,157.34
86.41
Preventative Maintenance
Marshan La
400
93769
20.
18,753.85
86.71
Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente
575
343.94
44.
15, 133.44
86.71
Preventative Maintenance
Villiage D
595
791.85
22.
17,420.77
86.71
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
150
407.74
32.
13,04774
86.99
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers X
577
794.74
28.
22,25278
86.99
Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan
1105
700. 16
25.
17,504.03
86.99
Preventative Maintenance
Stella Lan
1110
52769
24.
12,664.57
86.99
Preventative Maintenance
Molitor Dr
1133
781.29
28.
21,876.25
86.99
Preventative Maintenance
Cripple Cr
172
34549
28.
9,673.61
87.00
Preventative Maintenance
Nancy Driv
962
39288
30.
11,786.51
87.06
Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L
685
80271
28.
22476.00
87.07
Preventative Maintenance
Patti Driv
696
736.81
30.
22, 104.16
87.07
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X35
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft2)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Lilac Stre
1191
89531
28.
25,068.75
87.07
Preventative Maintenance
Lilac Stre
1264
1,78789
28.
50,060.79
87.07
Preventative Maintenance
Prairie FI
430
243.04
28.
6,80501
87.17
Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Look
514
736.32
28.
20,616.83
87.17
Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road
947
241.05
28.
6,749.51
87.17
Preventative Maintenance
Lakota Tra
1156
223.63
26.
5,814.48
87.17
Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead
1224
276.04
24.
6,62502
87.17
Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Lane
1335
184.82
28.
5,174.96
87.17
Preventative Maintenance
Linda Lane
1174
444.2
24.
10,660.69
87.18
Preventative Maintenance
Ravens Cou
1175
350.55
24.
8,413.10
87.18
Preventative Maintenance
Ravens Cou
1176
530.55
24.
12,733.10
87.18
Preventative Maintenance
Rice Lake
446
528.29
28.
14,792.00
87.37
Preventative Maintenance
NULL
1333
52778
40.
21,111.16
87.37
Preventative Maintenance
Stage Coac
1200
13246
32.
4,238.57
87.49
Preventative Maintenance
79th Stree
46
441.7
28.
12,367.72
87.95
Preventative Maintenance
Oak Court
661
369.63
28.
10,349.73
87.95
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
1222
520.44
30.
15,613.09
87.95
Preventative Maintenance
Behm Lane
101
788.39
28.
22,074.81
87.96
Preventative Maintenance
Savanna Co
475
423.97
26.
11,023.26
87.96
Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead
1171
186.25
24.
4,470.09
87.96
Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead
1172
759.48
24.
18,22745
87.96
Preventative Maintenance
Lakota Tra
1225
198.
26.
5,148.00
87.96
Preventative Maintenance
Pine Stree
1323
3,84598
30.
115,379.53
87.96
Preventative Maintenance
Linda Lane
1173
229.38
24.
5,50516
87.97
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
157
7358
28.
20,60244
87.98
Preventative Maintenance
65th Stree
1007
750.34
24.
18,008. 13
87.98
Preventative Maintenance
Cassiopeia
134
360. 15
28.
10,084.21
88.00
Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv
292
449.4
24.
10,78570
88.00
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C
581
221.88
28.
6,21261
88.00
Preventative Maintenance
Hudson Tra
997
673.47
28.
18,857. 15
88.00
Preventative Maintenance
Carpenter
1161
343.42
32
10,989.38
88.00
Preventative Maintenance
Rice Lake
448
1,768.77
28.
49,52543
88.02
Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente
1195
618.36
40.
24,734.31
88.02
Preventative Maintenance
Villiage D
1196
863.82
40.
34,552.95
88.02
Preventative Maintenance
Woods Edge
1223
667.74
40.
26,709.71
88.02
Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente
1337
325.76
28.
9,121.24
88.16
Preventative Maintenance
20th Ave S
1340
1,241.77
28.
34,769.50
88.16
Preventative Maintenance
Otter Lake
1343
599.34
28.
16,781.65
88.16
Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente
1336
598.07
40.
23,92288
88.66
Preventative Maintenance
Peltier La
409
655.88
22.
14,429.43
88.67
Preventative Maintenance
Rondeau La
457
3,088.24
24.
74,117.72
88.67
Preventative Maintenance
Lakota Tra
1155
61.85
26.
1,608.09
88.75
Preventative Maintenance
79th Stree
45
763.09
28.
21,366.43
88.84
Preventative Maintenance
Highland D
274
488. 15
28.
13,668. 17
88.84
Preventative Maintenance
Arlo Lane
1102
441. 19
29.
12,794.46
88.84
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X36
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft2)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Patti Driv
695
663.19
30.
19,895.59
88.85
Preventative Maintenance
Thomas Str
999
1,349.47
30.
40,484.17
88.85
Preventative Maintenance
Pine Stree
1324
1,811.45
30.
54,343.65
88.85
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
151
438.88
28.
12,288.66
88.98
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
1112
740.84
28.
20,743.44
88.98
Preventative Maintenance
Durango Po
197
474.86
28.
13,296.18
89.00
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C
587
440.55
28.
12335.33
89.00
Preventative Maintenance
Bluebill L
968
882.75
28.
24,71700
89.41
Preventative Maintenance
Stage Coac
1201
336.03
32.
10,752.80
89.45
Preventative Maintenance
Arlo Lane
75
818.34
28.
22913.46
89.72
Preventative Maintenance
Oak Lane
97
473.06
28.
13,245.67
89.72
Preventative Maintenance
Carl Stree
131
773.37
24.
18,560.84
89.72
Preventative Maintenance
Highland C
270
128.74
28.
3,604.83
89.72
Preventative Maintenance
Highland C
271
333.06
28.
9,325.62
89.72
Preventative Maintenance
Highland D
275
146.55
28.
4,103.28
89.72
Preventative Maintenance
Highland L
277
196.49
28.
5,501.85
89.72
Preventative Maintenance
Joseph Cou
314
225.24
28.
6,306.81
89.72
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
374
452.74
30.
13,582.09
89.72
Preventative Maintenance
4th Avenue
25
1,317 12
40.
52684.61
89.73
Preventative Maintenance
Jeanne Dri
311
720.46
30.
21,613.65
89.73
Preventative Maintenance
Marcia Lan
390
750.04
30.
22,501.11
89.73
Preventative Maintenance
Pinto Lane
425
403.05
28.
11,285.26
89.73
Preventative Maintenance
Teckla Cou
552
315.86
28.
8,844.06
89.73
Preventative Maintenance
Mustang La
652
498.33
28.
13,953. 13
89.73
Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L
684
481.56
28.
13,483.58
89.73
Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L
687
698.19
28.
19,549. 19
89.73
Preventative Maintenance
Pine Stree
1327
1,542.14
30.
46,264.29
89.73
Preventative Maintenance
Apollo Dri
1259
474.99
36.
17099.61
89.74
Preventative Maintenance
Iverson Co
302
60281
28.
16,878.72
89.98
Preventative Maintenance
Tart Court
543
34244
28.
9,588.39
89.98
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
411
144.79
28.
4,054.19
89.99
Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv
971
339.89
24.
8,157.30
89.99
Preventative Maintenance
Oakview Co
1121
311.
28.
8,70787
89.99
Preventative Maintenance
Arlo Lane
73
421.9
28.
11,813.29
90.59
Preventative Maintenance
Highland D
272
809.35
28.
22661.89
90.59
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
383
296.77
30.
8,903.03
90.59
Preventative Maintenance
Vicky Lane
592
1,343.23
30.
40,296.91
90.59
Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck
626
70205
28.
19,65754
90.59
Preventative Maintenance
Appaloosa
68
1,199.1
28.
33,574.73
90.60
Preventative Maintenance
Behm Lane
100
152.6
28.
4,27273
90.60
Preventative Maintenance
Connie Lan
159
661. 15
30.
19,834.44
90.60
Preventative Maintenance
Mustang La
651
793.
28.
22203.95
90.60
Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L
686
784.84
28.
21,975.44
90.60
Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L
688
586.1
28.
16,410.72
90.60
Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr
1125
6072
28.
17,001.65
90.60
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X37
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft')
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Albert Cou
54
266.88
24.
6,40513
90.98
Preventative Maintenance
Delina Cir
189
260.25
24.
6,246.06
90.98
Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan
352
453.86
24.
10,892.61
90.98
Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake
545
173.06
28.
4,845.82
90.98
Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake
548
671.81
28.
18,810.78
90.98
Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan
1103
45585
25
11,396.33
90.98
Preventative Maintenance
Stella Lan
1109
350.89
24.
8,421.41
90.98
Preventative Maintenance
Stella Lan
1111
309.62
24.
7,430.90
90.98
Preventative Maintenance
Hawk Ridge
261
163.2
21.
3,42711
90.99
Preventative Maintenance
Meadowview
1124
232.79
28.
6,51824
90.99
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
1137
403.09
28.
11,286.45
90.99
Preventative Maintenance
Holly Cour
287
1,871.99
24.
44,927.75
91.00
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant R
1357
1,118.45
28.
31,316.52
91.14
Preventative Maintenance
Saddle Clu
1358
18211
28.
5,099.02
91.14
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant R
1359
454.69
28.
12,731.23
91.14
Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road
1360
376.81
28.
10,550.79
91.14
Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road
TBD
645.86
28.
18,084.08
91.14
Preventative Maintenance
Black Berry Ct
TBD
465.8
28.
13,04240
91.14
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant R
1361
321.41
28.
8,999.53
91.14
Preventative Maintenance
Marshan Co
1203
340.42
32.
10,893.49
91.41
Preventative Maintenance
Highland D
273
66262
28.
18,553.30
91.46
Preventative Maintenance
Highland T
278
661.53
28.
18,522.77
91.46
Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr
392
213.55
28.
5,979.44
91.46
Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr
398
457.21
28.
12,801.92
91.46
Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck
624
169.43
28.
4,743.99
91.46
Preventative Maintenance
Myrtle Lan
653
766.43
28.
21,459.98
91.46
Preventative Maintenance
Oak Court
660
343.72
28.
9,624.18
91.46
Preventative Maintenance
4th Avenue
21
1,299.95
40.
51,998.09
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Appaloosa
66
367.04
28.
10,277.11
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Appaloosa
67
438.74
28.
12,284.79
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Jeanne Dri
312
1,251.98
30.
37,559.27
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Marvy Stre
402
61267
28.
17,154.89
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Mustang La
650
364.66
28.
10,210.34
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Stallion L
1129
1,355.05
28.
37941.43
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Pinto Lane
1130
290.8
28.
8,142.39
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Robinson D
1162
402.93
32
12,893.67
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Carl Stree
1164
59737
28.
16,726.26
91.47
Preventative Maintenance
Carole Dri
133
1,483.47
30.
44,503.96
91.49
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
153
214.97
28.
6,019.09
91.98
Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater
154
1,235.81
28.
34,602.57
91.98
Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr
335
581.21
28.
16,273.90
91.98
Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan
350
1,712.3
24.
41,095.17
91.98
Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake
547
33745
28.
9,448.70
91.98
Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake
549
916.3
28.
25,656.48
91.98
Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake
550
6154
28.
17,231.12
91.98
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page X38
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft2)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Sherman La
1115
271.45
28.
Z600.72
91.99
Preventative Maintenance
Osprey Cou
1253
122.09
80.
9,766.96
91.99
Preventative Maintenance
4th Avenue
23
2,661.12
40.
106,444.65
92.32
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
376
1,428.15
30.
42,844.45
92.32
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
381
306.7
30.
9,200.96
92.32
Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr
393
32754
28.
9,171.19
92.32
Preventative Maintenance
Meadowview
404
1,461.56
30.
43,846.90
92.32
Preventative Maintenance
Nottingham
659
1,319.39
30.
39,581.65
92.32
Preventative Maintenance
Arlo Lane
1101
272.02
25.
6,800.45
92.32
Preventative Maintenance
Behm Lane
102
230.59
28.
6,456.55
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Jeanne Dri
310
658.79
30.
19,763.67
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Marvy Stre
401
1,936.98
28.
54,235.53
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Patti Driv
405
1,27526
30.
38,25768
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L
689
642.86
28.
17,999.99
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr
1127
854.14
28.
23,915.83
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Pinto Lane
1131
550.75
28.
15,421.01
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Robinson D
1263
425.67
32.
13,621.57
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Robinson D
TBD
1,492.31
32.
47,753.92
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr
1320
641.64
28.
17,965.78
92.33
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
380
2, 168.01
30.
65,040.30
92.34
Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead
77
21724
28.
6,082.77
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead
78
4574
28.
12,80708
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead
79
53587
28.
15,004.49
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead
80
580.61
28.
16,25700
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead
81
779.52
28.
21,826.51
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Chippewa T
144
759.05
28.
21,253.34
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Chippewa T
145
19267
28.
5,394.70
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv
279
15279
68.
10,389.40
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv
280
473.43
28.
13,256.05
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv
281
47565
30.
14,269.44
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv
282
664.89
28.
18,616.85
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv
283
806.57
30.
24,196.96
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv
284
868.53
30.
26,056.01
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Rice Court
445
404.08
28.
11,314.17
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Tomahawk C
567
252.83
28.
7079.32
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Tomahawk T
568
34527
28.
9,66767
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Tomahawk T
569
291.52
28.
8,16263
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Tomahawk T
570
533.61
28.
14,940.97
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Totem Trai
571
541.86
28.
15,17213
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Totem Trai
572
282.02
28.
7896.63
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Totem Trai
573
32572
28.
9,120.29
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead
1140
557.38
28.
15,606.66
92.55
Preventative Maintenance
12th Avenu
1
783.53
24.
18,804.79
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
12th Avenu
3
309.75
33.
10,221.86
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
12th Avenu
4
1,197.55
24.
28,741.26
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Street Name
Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft)
Area (ft2)
PCI
Pavement Management Report
Page X39
Recommended Maintenance Activi
12th Avenu
5
33787
24.
8,108.80
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
413
360.8
28.
10, 10236
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
414
348.85
28.
9,767.93
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
415
245.77
28.
6,881.58
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
416
259.54
28.
7267.23
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
417
873.78
28.
24,465.86
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C
576
327.13
28.
9, 159.69
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Snow Goose
977
289.34
28.
8, 101.39
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Sherman La
1116
469.89
28.
13, 157.01
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Sedge Cour
1117
35232
28.
9,865.09
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Stoneybroo
1118
367.78
28.
10,297.81
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Stoneybroo
1119
1,616.37
28.
45,258.24
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Sherman La
1138
729.57
28.
20,42786
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Trappers X
1255
113.7
90.
10,233.04
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Broken Oak
9778
301.19
28.
8,433.34
92.99
Preventative Maintenance
Country La
163
1,528.81
30.
45,864.43
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Country La
165
811.46
30.
24,343.91
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Greenwood
256
575.02
30.
17,250.72
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Henry Lane
267
450.6
28.
12,616.93
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Highland D
276
386.47
28.
10,821.03
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Joseph Cou
315
3327
28.
9,315.72
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
375
1,37721
30.
41,316.31
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Praire Vie
432
578.85
30.
17,36548
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Sherwood L
508
492.78
38.
18,725.62
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck
964
333.44
28.
9,336.45
93.18
Preventative Maintenance
Andall Str
59
1,254.22
30.
37,626.46
93.19
Preventative Maintenance
Bradley St
125
605.19
30.
18,155.82
93.19
Preventative Maintenance
Jon Avenue
313
658.77
28.
18,445.58
93.19
Preventative Maintenance
Leonard Av
362
1,715.67
28.
48,038.85
93.19
Preventative Maintenance
Leonard Av
363
1,559.45
28.
43,664.69
93.19
Preventative Maintenance
Pony Court
427
262.3
28.
7344.36
93.19
Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr
1126
951.82
28.
26,650.99
93.19
Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr
1160
329.76
28.
9,233. 18
93.19
Preventative Maintenance
Clydesdale
1165
310.01
28.
8,680.34
93.19
Preventative Maintenance
Aenon Plac
53
1,112.89
30.
33,386.81
93.20
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
379
933.73
30.
28,01204
93.20
Preventative Maintenance
Flora Cour
222
349.98
24.
8,399.43
93.98
Preventative Maintenance
Langer Cir
1104
171.74
60.
10,304.56
93.98
Preventative Maintenance
Hartford C
1106
1652
43.
7,103.40
93.98
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
1122
982.79
28.
27,518.04
93.99
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
1136
451.26
28.
12,63529
93.99
Preventative Maintenance
Henry Lane
266
1,351.33
28.
37,83721
94.04
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
377
176.72
30.
5,301.53
94.04
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
1214
258.76
30.
7,762.77
94.04
Preventative Maintenance
Andall Str
58
699.31
30.
20,979.23
94.05
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 140
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft=)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Mustang Co
648
351.73
28.
9,848.31
94.05
Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck
966
3,1228
28.
87,438.38
94.05
Preventative Maintenance
Arabian Ci
1132
314.61
28.
8,808.97
94.05
Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr
1159
439.09
28.
12,294.45
94.05
Preventative Maintenance
Lilac Stre
1270
5, 163.54
28.
144,579.21
94.05
Preventative Maintenance
Park Court
1199
36761
32.
11,763.62
94.33
Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck
625
243.51
28.
6,818.26
94.89
Preventative Maintenance
Andall Str
56
791.84
30.
23,755.23
94.90
Preventative Maintenance
Andall Str
57
904.84
30.
27 145.32
94.90
Preventative Maintenance
Blackbird
120
751.55
28.
21,043.51
94.90
Preventative Maintenance
Mustang La
649
479.38
28.
13,422.77
94.90
Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck
967
678.93
28.
19,010.01
94.90
Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr
1128
121.45
92
11, 173.74
94.90
Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane
378
572.66
30.
17 179.80
94.91
Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake
544
22279
28.
6,23798
94.98
Preventative Maintenance
August Cir
1107
169.85
43.
7303.37
94.98
Preventative Maintenance
Stella Cir
1108
134.57
43.
5,786.42
94.98
Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan
1134
196.96
25
4,924.12
94.98
Preventative Maintenance
Butternut
1354
144.75
28.
4,05289
94.98
Preventative Maintenance
Peregrine
410
345.86
26.
8,992.36
94.99
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
1120
1, 133.62
28.
31,741.34
94.99
Preventative Maintenance
Goldenrod
1123
258.65
28.
7,242.27
94.99
Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H
1135
29793
28.
8,341.94
94.99
Preventative Maintenance
Apollo Dri
64
321.09
36.
11,559.12
95.77
Preventative Maintenance
Oakwood La
1250
622.3
28.
17424.44
95.85
Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road
1144
238.99
28.
6,691.66
95.90
Preventative Maintenance
Red Oak La
1346
560.17
28.
15,684.66
95.98
Preventative Maintenance
Cottonwood
1347
160.05
28.
4,481.33
95.98
Preventative Maintenance
Red Oak La
1348
24577
28.
6,881.47
95.98
Preventative Maintenance
Red Oak La
1349
190.47
28.
5,333.15
95.98
Preventative Maintenance
Old Birch
671
1,238.86
24.
29,73266
96.00
Preventative Maintenance
Cedar Stre
1252
888.22
22
19,540.80
96.98
Preventative Maintenance
Cedar Stre
1356
30.19
22
664.27
96.98
Preventative Maintenance
Rolling Hi
454
1,6572
24.
39,77276
96.99
Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road
1145
723.57
26.
18,81283
97.07
Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road
1146
450.2
26.
11,705.30
97.07
Preventative Maintenance
Red Fox Ro
1147
783.91
26.
20,381.65
97.07
Preventative Maintenance
Red Fox Ro
1148
77736
26.
20,211.42
97.07
Preventative Maintenance
Bubble
1151
100.
120.
12,000.00
97.07
Preventative Maintenance
Cedar Stre
1344
1, 12725
22
24,799.51
97.98
Preventative Maintenance
Cedar Stre
1345
1973
22
4,340.70
97.98
Preventative Maintenance
Palm Stree
1350
1, 175.03
28.
32,900.89
97.98
Preventative Maintenance
Deer Pass
179
523.35
28.
14,653.84
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Foxtail Co
232
804.12
30.
24,123.52
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Foxtail Dr
233
946.32
30.
28,389.56
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 141
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft=)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Foxtail Dr
234
591.78
30.
17,753.41
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Reiling Ro
444
871.78
28.
24,409.79
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Rolling Hi
453
551. 1
24.
13,226.47
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Sargent Co
474
910.92
28.
25,505.90
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Whitetail
617
412.
30.
12,359.96
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Woodchuck
627
821.24
30.
24,63734
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Woodchuck
628
588.06
30.
17,641.79
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Woodchuck
629
764.33
30.
22,929.89
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Woodchuck
630
572.54
30.
17176. 19
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Partridge
691
448.75
28.
12,565.05
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Rolling Hi
982
198.3
20.
3,966.08
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Deer Pass
983
119.75
28.
3,353.04
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle
1180
1,193. 72
24.
28,649.29
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle
1181
1,149.8
24.
27595. 11
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle
1182
37772
24.
9,065.33
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle
1183
1,394.5
24.
33,468.09
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle
1184
643.22
24.
15,43736
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Ash Street
1338
1, 173.25
28.
32,851.13
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Ash Street
1339
888.62
28.
24,881.29
97.99
Preventative Maintenance
Vaughan Co
1167
222.87
28.
6,240.42
98.19
Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv
976
3,463.97
24.
83,135.40
99.00
Preventative Maintenance
Red Fox Ro
1150
305.39
26.
7,940.26
99.44
Preventative Maintenance
Fox Cove
1152
338.
26.
8,788.00
99.44
Preventative Maintenance
Fox Hollow
1153
163.53
26.
4,251.84
99.44
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
9
338.22
40.
13,528.97
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
10
331.36
40.
13,254.37
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
11
333.44
40.
13,33758
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
12
1,457.36
40.
58,294.39
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
13
319.66
40.
12,786.35
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
14
343.35
40.
13,733.91
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
15
318.29
40.
12,731.72
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
16
483.67
40.
19,346.81
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
17
342.23
40.
13,689.35
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue
18
308.67
40.
12,346.71
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Glenview A
242
494.56
27
13,353. 15
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Glenview L
247
324.6
27
8,764.14
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Parkview D
690
501.41
27.
13,538. 14
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Glenview L
984
824. 14
27
22,251.78
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Aqua Lane
1006
650.
24.
15,600.00
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1030
455.49
28.
12,753.62
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street
1031
411.23
28.
11,514.37
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Red Fox Ro
1149
196.09
26.
5,098.27
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre
1204
832.37
32
26,635.68
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre
1205
952.53
32
30,480.99
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Shelia Ave
1206
483.84
32.
15,482.88
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page j42
Street Name
Section ID
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ft2)
PCI
Recommended Maintenance Activity
Timothy Co
1207
201.99
32.
6,463.69
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre
1208
380.12
32.
12,163.84
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Wayne Cour
1209
201.33
32.
6,442.55
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre
1210
620.81
32.
19,865.94
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre
1212
891.1
32.
28,515.28
99.57
Preventative Maintenance
Butternut St
TBD
513.45
28.
14,376.60
99.98
Preventative Maintenance
Redwood Ct
TBD
344.61
28.
9,649.08
99.98
Preventative Maintenance
Cypress St
TBD
2,488.42
28.
69,675.76
99.98
Preventative Maintenance
Rosewood St
TBD
1,459.37
28.
40,86236
99.98
Preventative Maintenance
Rosewood St
TBD
1,388.84
28.
38,887.52
99.98
Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu
TBD
471.8
28.
13,210.40
99.98
Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu
TBD
284.42
28.
7963.76
99.98
Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu
1352
488.71
28.
13,683.94
99.98
Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu
1355
238.36
28.
6,673.95
99.98
Preventative Maintenance
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 143
Table B.2. List of private roadways not inspected.
Name
Section ID
Length
82ndStE
1281
914.91
Apollo Ct
1288
1054.37
Apo/lo Dr
1272
1399.03
Apple Ln
1278
87236
Aqua Cir
1310
263.75
Baldwin Cr
1279
499.07
Baldwin Cr
1280
196.48
Baldwin Cr
1314
17264
Baldwin Cr
1315
49764
Baldwin Cr
1316
171.18
Cherry Ln
1313
6423
Ivy Ridge Ct
1311
33241
Ivy Ridge Ct
1312
513.85
Ivy Ridge Ct
1317
188.48
Ivy Ridge Ct
1318
1,53275
Market PI
399
241.22
Market PI
1286
1511.24
Market PI
1287
794.29
Market PI
1319
643.49
Morgan Ln
1283
55786
Morgan Ln
1285
47705
Nancy Ct
1305
579.09
Otter Lake
1273
1494.06
Plum Ln
1276
925.15
Shetland Ln
1284
461.08
Willow Pond TrI
1271
1,101.64
Willow Pond Trl
1300
304.84
Willow Pond Trl
1301
27295
Willow Pond Trl
1302
217.39
Willow Pond TrI
1303
315.45
Willow Pond Trl
1304
228.02
WSB
Pavement Management Report
Page 44
Table B.3. List of gravel roadways not inspected.
Name
Section ID
Length
74th Street
1188
62795
74th Street
1189
36698
74th Street
1257
25694
Cedar Street E
1251
1,30211
Cedar Street E
1252
888.22
Channel Dr
1277
393.48
E/mcrestAvenue
1185
243.42
E/mcrestAvenue
1186
621.95
ElmcrestAvenue
1330
5,574.6
Elmcrest Avenue
1331
2,602.23
E/mcrestAvenue
12336
3,553.62
Pine Street
1321
1,629.99
Pine Street
1322
2,9979
MI
.4111
kb Raw
11111MEM
issimi8.111111111
11111711.118111111111811111111111111111
Countyt.Kwy.i4
.A friari
..II wir• AM 11111111=111Wi
111411111111111111117 11111119111E
I. l'se wit 1W--
'
Mill & Overlay Year m.o. 2020
2018
2019
2021
2022
3
0
cu
NJ
c
P-
3
0
-a
CITY
LINOL
C.,. .4..
0 F
KES
Figure 2 - Mill and Overlay
Lino Lakes PMP
Lino Lakes, MN
A
0 4,250
=:=1Feet
1 inch = 4,250 feet
WSB
WSB
- Engineering • Planning ■ Environmental • Construction
& Associates, Inc.
February 8, 2018
City of Lino Lakes
Mr. Michael Grochala
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Engineering Proposal for the 2018 Mill and Overlay Project
Dear Mr. Grochala:
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
The City of Lino Lakes has a Pavement Management Plan which recommends preservation of
local roadways based on their OCI ratings. The proposed 2018 Mill and Overlay Project
(roadway preservation) includes:
Mill and Overlay
• Ware Road (6365 LF) Total Estimated Cost - $415,000
Project scope to include minor curb and gutter replacement and
storm sewer repair
• Brandywood Estates (4610 LF) Total Estimated Cost - $300,000
Whitetail Trail, White Oak Road, Buckthorn Lane,
Chokecherry Road, Velvetleaf lane
Project scope to include minor curb and gutter replacement and
storm sewer repair
Based on the City's existing street maintenance plan and discussions with staff, WSB would
perform the following tasks:
I. Prepare Final Project Plans/Maps
Final construction plans will be prepared for the milling and overlaying of the
above listed roadways. Topographic information will be collected by a
combination of field survey, city parcel map information and Lidar contours.
Construction plans necessary for the contractor to build the roadway to
specifications will be prepared.
RCWD, Ramsey County and Anoka County permits will be obtained for the
project.
Minneapolis • St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. Michael Grochala
February 8, 2018
Page 2
II. Final Quantities
An Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost will be completed on the final
construction plans and specifications.
III. Prepare Permits, Specifications and Bidding Documents
WSB will work with impacted property owners through the project design. WSB
will prepare permit applications and submit to the appropriate regulatory
agencies.
WSB will develop the final project plans/maps and specifications based on the
agency review comments. This task will include an internal QA/QC review of the
final plans, quantities, and specifications.
Upon completion of permitting, and agency review and approval, a final set of
construction documents will be prepared for bidding.
WSB will print, assemble, and submit the final contract documents to the City and
request authorization to advertise the project for bidding. WSB will receive and
respond to bidder inquiries concerning the plans, specifications, and intent of the
project. Logs of all inquiries will be kept and maintained to document inquiries.
WSB will attend the project bid opening with the City.
WSB will review the low bidder's bid proposal, contractor's and subcontractor's
personnel proposed for the project and relative experience, quality and availability
of equipment and performance on similar projects.
The engineering fee to complete the 2018 Mil and Overlay Project is $43,978.00 (not to
exceed).
This letter represents our complete understanding of the 2018 Mill and Overlay Project and the
proposed scope of services. If you are in agreement with the scope of services and proposed fee,
please sign in the appropriate space below and return one copy to us.
If you have any questions about this proposal, please feel free to call me at 763-287-7167.
Mr. Michael Grochala
February 8, 2018
Page 3
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Edward C. Youngquist
Project Manager
ACCEPTANCE:
The City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the WSB proposal of $43,978.00 for all services outlined
in this letter.
City of Lino Lakes
Name
Title
Date
tVB
ae.aaaw. are.
Budgeted Hours
2018 Road Improvement Project
Mill and Overlay -Ware Rd / Brandywood Estates
City of Lino Lakes
Anoka County
nIlirly Ca 0
Total Direct Lab,, Cars
160.00
152.00
143.00
94.00
126.00
95.00
17200
13700
32,288.00
58,460.00
122,176.00
53,230.00
13,440.00
S4}84.00
TOTAL BASE PROJECT COST
$ 43,978.0
Base Estimated Hours
Cost
Associate/
Principal RLS
Project
Manager
Project
Engineer
Engineering
Specialist
V
Graduate
Engineer
IV
2 -Person
Survey Crew
Office
Technician
Total
Hours
Tok Dornption
1 PreWdnary Design
A. Kickoff meeting
2
2
2
6
1 726.00
B. Assess existing conditions
4
8
8
20
S 2,332.00
C. Assess culverts/drainage
S__ _ _
D. Propose best value solution for payment & C&G
1 -
E. Propose best value solution for stoat sewer
S -
F. Detemnine potential areas and types of water quality imp.
1 -
G. Detenno if other rehab necessary
1
H. Review televising tapes
S
I. Review soil borings discuss pavement solutions
2
2
4
S 378.00
J. Collect background data and private utility w&
4
8
12
1 1.384.00
K. Prepare preliminary opinion of probable cost
8
8
16
1 1.512.00
L. Create funding;sssessment roll
1
M. Maps/graphics for meetings/report
1 -
N. Neigborhood meeting (61)
S -
0. Prelim may (feasibility) Report Preparation
1 -
Subtotal
6
24
18
10
58
S 6,33100
2 Preliminary Survey
A. Topographic Survey (estimate by others)
20
20
5 3.440.00
Subtotal
20
20
$ 3,440.00
3 Deign
A. Final Plans
1. Fisting Conditions Plan?opo Base Map
4
32
36
1 4,408.00
2. Removals/Demolition Plan
1 -
3. Traffic Control/Detour Plan
6
10
16
S 1.824.00
4. Street Min/Overlay Plans
10
76
86
S 10,516.00
5. Storm Sewer Repan
4
14
18
1 2,140.00
6. Sealcoat Plans
5 -
7. Woe, Quality Improvement Plan (Infiltration Area)
1 -
8. Stemmata Modeling (HydroCad)
S -
9. Utility Details Plan (Sanitary/Storm)
S -
10 Construction Specifications
8
16
12
36
1 3,916.00
11 Misc. Sheets (Tide/Details/etc)
10
10
$ 1260.00
B. SWPPP Plan
1
I. Prepare PW
1 -
2. Prepare report
$ -
C. Meetings
1 -
I. Plan and specification meeting with City (#2)
6
6
12
$ 1,422.00
2 Neighborhood meeting (42)
S
D. Bidding Administration
1 -
1. Website creation and meitenance
2
2
2
6
1 630.00
2. Advertise bids
2
4
4
10
1 1210.00
3. CreateT Onbute Bid Package
2
4
6
S 736.00
-3 Respond to RFIs from prospective bidders
4
4
8
1 880.00
5. Issue addenda. if rey'd
4
2
4
10
S 1,11400
6. Bid Openinarrabulate results
2
4
6
S 736.00
7. Letter of Award recommendation to City
2
2
4
S 46200
8 Prepare Notice of Awad and Contract
2
2
2
6
S 748.00
Subtotal
10
60
148
20
32
270
1 32,002.00
8 Special Services'
'411 Special Services
are categorized
as pass through
items
A. Permits
1. Anoka County
2
4
6
S 692.00
2. Ramsey County
2
4
6
S 692.00
B. Soil Borings & Coordination
2
2
4
8
S 820.00
C. Materials Testing & Coordination
S -
Subtotal
6
18
4
20
S 2,204.00
Total Hours
16
90
176
34
20
32
368
S 43,978.00
nIlirly Ca 0
Total Direct Lab,, Cars
160.00
152.00
143.00
94.00
126.00
95.00
17200
13700
32,288.00
58,460.00
122,176.00
53,230.00
13,440.00
S4}84.00
TOTAL BASE PROJECT COST
$ 43,978.0
aim
fNNW,
111-1
tNW[
!Id 6.
CITY`; OF
LNQL__KES
Figure 1 - Full Depth
Reclaim/Reconstruction
Lino Lakes PMP
Lino Lakes, MN
A
0 4,250
Feet
1 inch = 4,250 feet
Reclaim Year
2018
2021
A
WSB
)
)
Site Location Map
2018 Road Improvement Project
Lino Lakes, MN