Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-103 Council Resolution �e L.U. {CtCpl'�lr �IIJ �2.4(g CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 18-103 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MINI SELF- STORAGE FACILITIES (LINO LAKES STORAGE-440 PARK COURT) WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for a mini self-storage facility for Lino Lakes Storage located at 440 Park Court and hereafter referred to as "Development" ; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned LI, Light Industrial and allows for such uses with a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the legal description of the subject property is Lot 4, Block 1, Marshan Lake Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the proposed mini self-storage facility based on the following plans: • 7/3/2018: Plan Set, prepared by AMI • 7/3/2018: Tree Preservation&Mitigation Plan, prepared by AMI • 7/27/2018: Architectural Plans and Color Elevations, prepared by Robert D. Johnson Architect • 1/11/2018: Environmental Site Assessment Phase II, prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc. • 1/8/2018: Environmental Site Assessment Phase I, prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc. • 10/4/2017: Report of Geotechnical Exploration,prepared by ITCO Allied Engineering Company • 7/3/2017: Storm Water Management Plan, prepared by AMI • Narrative, prepared by Amaris Development, LLC • 8/25/2017: Certificate of Survey, prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning& Zoning Board on August 8, 2018, and the Board recommended approval of the conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: a) Land Use Plan. 1 ,-� b) Transportation Plan. c) Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans. d) Local Water Management Plan. e) Capital Improvement Plan. f) Policy Plan. g) Natural Environment Plan. The mini self-storage facility is consistent with the Land Use, Utility, Local Water Management, Capital Improvement, Policy and Natural Environmental Plans and recommendations of the comprehensive plan as detailed in the August 8, 2018 Planning&Zoning Board staff report. 2. The proposed mini self-storage facility application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed mini self-storage facility is compatible with present and future land uses with conditions being met in staff report. The property to the west is zoned PSP, Public and Semi-Public, and are guided for civic/institutional. Other properties to the north and south are also zoned LI, Light Industrial and are guided for industrial use. Properties to the east are zoned, R-2, Two Family and are guided for low density residential. The current land use to the north and south is industrial. The property to the west is owned and used by Centennial School District. The properties to the east are single family homes. 3. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. A Site Plan Review has been completed and the proposed mini self-storage facilities will meet zoning performance standards if conditions listed in staff report are met. 4. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: a. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. b. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. c. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. d. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. 2 e. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. f. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. g. The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange. h. The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Lino Lakes Storage does not change the level of service along CSAH 23/Lake Drive or Park Court. CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) is an "A" minor reliever road and has capacity to handle minimal traffic volumes created by the development. 5. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. The site is currently served by municipal water. 6. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer system. The site is currently served by municipal sanitary sewer; however, the mini self- storage facility does not require sanitary sewer service. 7. The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. No City funds are being expended on this project. 8. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 3 .-� The proposed mini self-storage facility is an allowed use within the LI, Light Industrial Districts with an approved conditional use permit. The project will not generate excessive traffic, noise, smoke,fumes, glare or odors. 9. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. There are no natural, scenic or historic features on the existing site. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of Lino Lakes in addition to the administrative requirements of a conditional use permit, the following specific performance standards of Section 1007.120 (9) must also be met: (d) Mini self-storage facilities provided that: 1. No single building shall be greater than one hundred fifty (150) feet in length. No single building on the property exceeds 150 feet in length. The longest building is I10 feet. 2. If an "on-premises" caretaker dwelling unit is provided on site, ^ construction of said dwelling unit shall conform to all design standard regulations for multiple family dwelling units of the Minnesota State Building Code. There is no "on premises" caretaker dwelling unit provided on site. 3. No retailing, wholesaling, manufacturing, repair, or other such activity other than storage is to occur within the mini self-storage facility. There will be no retailing, wholesaling, manufacturing, repairing or other such activity other than storage that is intended to occur within the mini self-storage facility. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the conditional use permit for mini self-storage facilities for Lino Lakes Storage located at 440 Park Court subject to the following conditions: • The Conditional Use Permit approval is for development of Phase 1 (north portion) only as depicted on Sheet C2.0, Site Plan. • A separate and complete Land Use Application to amend the conditional use permit to development Phase 2 (south portion) shall be required. • The City makes no representation that Phase 2 will be approved with the approval ,--� of Phase 1. • No open and/or outdoor storage is allowed on site. 4 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the conditional use permit subject to the following requirements: l. All comments from the City Engineer letter dated August 2, 2018 shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated August 2, 2018 shall be addressed. 3. All comments from the Anoka County Highway Department letter to be provided at a later date shall be addressed. 4. The applicant shall provide a narrative and access/clean-up plan to Phase 2 area indicating how vehicle and equipment access needed for potential contamination clean-up will be obtained. a. Direct access to/from CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) will not be allowed. b. A gate along the 8 foot privacy fence may be required. 5. A RCWD permit is required. 6. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement shall be approved by City Council. 7. All Plan Sheets (civil, landscaping, architectural etc.): a. CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) and Park Court shall be labeled on all plan sheets. b. Show consistent Phase 1 and future Phase 2 development. i. For example, Sheet Al shows "Future Outdoor Parking" on the south end which is not allowed. Other plan sheets show buildings. c. Use Certificate of Survey as the base and include entire parcel i. For example, C2.0 shall include the west lot line. �..� d. Revision dates shall be included. 8. AutoCAD file 9. Site Plan Worksheet: a. Items highlighted in"red" shall be addressed. 10. Sheet C2.0, Site Plan a. An 8 foot wood privacy fence shall be required along the Phase 1 south boundary. b. Details for the 8 foot wood privacy fence shall be provided. c. The required principal building street setback along CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) is 50 feet. d. The required parking lot setback along Park Court is 15 feet. e. A minimum 24 foot wide drive aisle is required between buildings and lot lines. i. Please note all widths on site plan. f. Each building should be numbered and consistent with Sheet Al, Site Plan. 11. Sheet C2.0, Site Plan Phase I + II a. Plan sheet shall be renumbers to avoid confusion between C2.0 Site Plan and C2.0 Site Plan 1+11. 12. Sheet C2.1, Site Plan: a. Sheet shall be titled Site Plan Details. b. Please provide fence/gate details for key card access gate. 13. Sheet C3.0, Grading Plan: a. The grading plan shall show how the south end of the berm tapers off into Phase 2. 14. Sheet C4.Utility Plan: 5 r-� a. Existing water main and sanitary sewer main along Park Court shall be shown. 15. Sheet EX3, Shoreland District: a. The plan shall be revised to reflect only Phase 1 development data under Site Data. b. The "Building Area" line item shall also be omitted. 16. Sheet L0.0, Tree Preservation & Mitigation Plan: a. Mitigation calculations and replacement tree location shall be shown. b. The scale bar is not correct and shall be revised. 17. Sheet L1.0, Landscape Plan a. An irrigation plan shall be submitted. b. Coniferous trees do not provide canopy cover and cannot be counted as such. c. The most northeast green spire tree is not within 7 feet of the vehicle hardscape and can only receive 300 sf of canopy coverage credit. d. An 8 foot privacy fence is required along the south boundary of Phase 1. i. Canopy trees can be planted on either the north or south side of the fence provided they meet the 7 foot distance requirements. ii. Fence details shall be provided. e. Open area landscaping is short by one (1) shrub. f. More coniferous trees shall be planted along the berm to provide better screening. g. The berm cross section shall show a 6 foot berm. h. The scale bar is not correct and shall be revised. 18. Sheet CLR1, Colored Elevations: a. The architectural scale shall be corrected. 19. Sheet Al, Site Plan: a. Plan sheet shall be consistent with Sheet C2.0, Site Plan(civil plan sheet) and no "Future Outdoor Parking" shown. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 101h day of September, 2018. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member Maher and was duly seconded by Council Member Stoesz and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof. Maher, Stoesz, Rafferty, Manthey, Reinert The following voted against same: none Jeff Reine , or ATTEST: n is 'e Bartell, Ci Clerk 6 Record ID 4146929 C I T Y °' Cf F 11N(:)LA!qS 220897 1 . 001 CITY OF LINO LAKES CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. 18-103 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF ANOKA) SS CITY OF LINO LAKES) 1, Julianne Bartell, City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, in the County of Anoka and State of Minnesota, certify that I have examined the attached copy of Resolution No. 18-103, Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Mini Self-Storage Facilities, approved by the Lino Lakes City Council on September 10, 2018, and have carefully compared the same with the original on file in this office, and that the attached copy is a true, correct and complete copy of the original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed and affixed the city seal on September 11, 2018. 600 Town Center Parkway,Lino Lakes,MN 55014 Phone:651-982-2400•Fax:651-982-2499 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 18-103 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MINI SELF- STORAGE FACILITIES (LINO LAKES STORAGE-440 PARK COURT) WHEREAS,the City received a land use application for a mini self-storage facility for Lino Lakes Storage located at 440 Park Court and hereafter referred to as "Development" ; and WHEREAS,the property is zoned LI, Light Industrial and allows for such uses with a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS,the legal description of the subject property is Lot 4, Block 1, Marshan Lake Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the proposed mini self-storage facility based on the following plans: • 7/3/2018: Plan Set, prepared by AMI • 7/3/2018: Tree Preservation &Mitigation Plan,prepared by AMI • 7/27/2018: Architectural Plans and Color Elevations,prepared by Robert D. Johnson Architect • 1/11/2018: Environmental Site Assessment Phase II,prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc. • 1/8/2018: Environmental Site Assessment Phase I, prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc. • 10/4/2017: Report of Geotechnical Exploration,prepared by ITCO Allied Engineering Company • 7/3/2017: Storm Water Management Plan,prepared by AMI • Narrative,prepared by Amaris Development, LLC • 8/25/2017: Certificate of Survey, prepared by E.G. Rud& Sons, Inc. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on August 8, 2018, and the Board recommended approval of the conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: a) Land Use Plan. 1 b) Transportation Plan. c) Utility(Sewer and Water) Plans. d) Local Water Management Plan. e) Capital Improvement Plan. f) Policy Plan. g) Natural Environment Plan. The mini self-storage facility is consistent with the Land Use, Utility, Local Water Management, Capital Improvement, Policy and Natural Environmental Plans and recommendations of the comprehensive plan as detailed in the August 8, 2018 Planning&Zoning Board staff report. 2. The proposed mini self-storage facility application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed mini self-storage facility is compatible with present and future land uses with conditions being met in staff report. The property to the west is zoned PSP, Public and Semi-Public, and are guided for civic/institutional. Other properties to the north and south are also zoned LI, Light Industrial and are guided for industrial use. Properties to the east are zoned, R-2, Two Family and are guided for low density residential. The current land use to the north and south is industrial. The property to the west is owned and used by Centennial School District. The properties to the east are single family homes. 3. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. A Site Plan Review has been completed and the proposed mini self-storage facilities will meet zoning performance standards if conditions listed in staff report are met. 4. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: a. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. b. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. c. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. d. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. 2 e. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. f. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. g. The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project,how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange. h. The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Lino Lakes Storage does not change the level of service along CSAH 23/Lake Drive or Park Court. CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) is an "A" minor reliever road and has capacity to handle minimal traffic volumes created by the development. 5. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. The site is currently served by municipal water. 6. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer system. The site is currently served by municipal sanitary sewer; however, the mini self- storage facility does not require sanitary sewer service. 7. The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. No City funds are being expended on this project. 8. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities,processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 3 The proposed mini self-storage facility is an allowed use within the LI, Light Industrial Districts with an approved conditional use permit. The project will not generate excessive traffic, noise, smoke,fumes, glare or odors. 9. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. There are no natural, scenic or historic features on the existing site. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of Lino Lakes in addition to the administrative requirements of a conditional use permit,the following specific performance standards of Section 1007.120 (9) must also be met: (d) Mini self-storage facilities provided that: 1. No single building shall be greater than one hundred fifty (150) feet in length. No single building on the property exceeds 150 feet in length. The longest building is 110 feet. 2. If an "on-premises" caretaker dwelling unit is provided on site, construction of said dwelling unit shall conform to all design standard regulations for multiple family dwelling units of the Minnesota State Building Code. There is no "on premises" caretaker dwelling unit provided on site. 3. No retailing, wholesaling, manufacturing, repair, or other such activity other than storage is to occur within the mini self-storage facility. There will be no retailing, wholesaling, manufacturing, repairing or other such activity other than storage that is intended to occur within the mini self-storage facility. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the conditional use permit for mini self-storage facilities for Lino Lakes Storage located at 440 Park Court subject to the following conditions: • The Conditional Use Permit approval is for development of Phase 1 (north portion) only as depicted on Sheet C2.0, Site Plan. • A separate and complete Land Use Application to amend the conditional use permit to development Phase 2 (south portion) shall be required. • The City makes no representation that Phase 2 will be approved with the approval of Phase 1 • No open and/or outdoor storage is allowed on site. 4 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the conditional use permit subject to the following requirements: l. All comments from the City Engineer letter dated August 2, 2018 shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated August 2, 2018 shall be addressed. 3. All comments from the Anoka County Highway Department letter to be provided at a later date shall be addressed. 4. The applicant shall provide a narrative and access/clean-up plan to Phase 2 area indicating how vehicle and equipment access needed for potential contamination clean-up will be obtained. a. Direct access to/from CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) will not be allowed. b. A gate along the 8 foot privacy fence may be required. 5. A RCWD permit is required. 6. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement shall be approved by City Council. 7. All Plan Sheets (civil, landscaping, architectural etc.): a. CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) and Park Court shall be labeled on all plan sheets. b. Show consistent Phase 1 and future Phase 2 development. i. For example, Sheet Al shows "Future Outdoor Parking" on the south end which is not allowed. Other plan sheets show buildings. c. Use Certificate of Survey as the base and include entire parcel i. For example, C2.0 shall include the west lot line. d. Revision dates shall be included. 8. AutoCAD file 9. Site Plan Worksheet: a. Items highlighted in"red" shall be addressed. 10. Sheet C2.0, Site Plan a. An 8 foot wood privacy fence shall be required along the Phase 1 south boundary. b. Details for the 8 foot wood privacy fence shall be provided. c. The required principal building street setback along CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) is 50 feet. d. The required parking lot setback along Park Court is 15 feet. e. A minimum 24 foot wide drive aisle is required between buildings and lot lines. i. Please note all widths on site plan. f. Each building should be numbered and consistent with Sheet Al, Site Plan. 11. Sheet C2.0, Site Plan Phase I+II a. Plan sheet shall be renumbers to avoid confusion between C2.0 Site Plan and C2.0 Site Plan I+II. 12. Sheet C2.1, Site Plan: a. Sheet shall be titled Site Plan Details. b. Please provide fence/gate details for key card access gate. 13. Sheet C3.0, Grading Plan: a. The grading plan shall show how the south end of the berm tapers off into Phase 2. 14. Sheet C4.Utility Plan: 5 a. Existing water main and sanitary sewer main along Park Court shall be shown. 15. Sheet EX3, Shoreland District: a. The plan shall be revised to reflect only Phase 1 development data under Site Data. b. The`Building Area" line item shall also be omitted. 16. Sheet L0.0, Tree Preservation&Mitigation Plan: a. Mitigation calculations and replacement tree location shall be shown. b. The scale bar is not correct and shall be revised. 17. Sheet L1.0, Landscape Plan a. An irrigation plan shall be submitted. b. Coniferous trees do not provide canopy cover and cannot be counted as such. c. The most northeast green spire tree is not within 7 feet of the vehicle hardscape and can only receive 300 sf of canopy coverage credit. d. An 8 foot privacy fence is required along the south boundary of Phase 1. i. Canopy trees can be planted on either the north or south side of the fence provided they meet the 7 foot distance requirements. ii. Fence details shall be provided. e. Open area landscaping is short by one (1) shrub. f. More coniferous trees shall be planted along the berm to provide better screening. g. The berm cross section shall show a 6 foot berm. h. The scale bar is not correct and shall be revised. 18. Sheet CLR1, Colored Elevations: a. The architectural scale shall be corrected. 19. Sheet Al, Site Plan: a. Plan sheet shall be consistent with Sheet C2.0, Site Plan (civil plan sheet) and no "Future Outdoor Parking" shown. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 1 O h day of September, 2018. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member Maher and was duly seconded by Council Member Stoesz and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof. Maher, Stoesz, Rafferty, Manthey, Reinert The following voted against same: none —� Jeff ReinervWor ATTEST: 'e Bartell, Ci Clerk 6 ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA Document No.: 2208971.001 ABSTRACT I hereby certify that the within instrument was filed in this office for record on: 09/14/2018 11:48:00 AM Fees/Taxes In the Amount of S46.00 JONELL M. SAWYER Anoka County Property Tax Administrator/Recorder/Registrar, of Titles KAK, Deputy Record ID: 4146929