Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-021 Council ResolutionCITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO.19-21 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PROJECT, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2019 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 2019 Mill and Overlay Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council is ordering the project finding that it would be in the best interest of the City to proceed with the project; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota orders the 2019 Mill and Overlay Project and approves the plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at City Hall. The Engineer is directed to advertise for bids, and provide bidding administration. The City clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in Finance and Commerce an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk, at which time they will be publicly opened at the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be �. considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on April 8, 2019, in the Council chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of February, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member Manthey and was duly seconded by Council Member Stoesz and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Manthey, Stoesz, Rafferty, Maher, Reinert The following voted against same: none ATTEST: `.. u i �nneartell, ity �