Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-056K Council OrdinancesORDINAN� E NO. 56K CITY OF [ INO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA (2-110(761 000\ BY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE I >. 6 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO GENERAL BUSINESS (GB) AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, does ordain: I. Ordinance No. 6, of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the then Village Council on July 18, 1955, is hereby amended by rezoning from Agriculture (A) to General Business (GB), pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 56, of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: The North 468.6 feet of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Town- ship 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota; and by further rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (LI),pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 56, of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: The West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the North 468.6 feet thereof. II. Save as above amended, said Ordinance No. 6 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. III. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Passed by the City Council this loth day of December, 1979. ATTEST„: - Edna L. Sarney, Cierk-Treasurer / _, Harvey . Karth, Mayor (CITY SEAL) BABCOCK, LOCHER, NEILSON & MANNELLA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 EDMUND P. BABCOCK LANDOL J. LOCHER JAMES M. NEILSON FELIX A. MANNELLA JOHN R. SPEAKMAN ROBERT F. MANNELLA STEPHEN M.HALSEY WILLIAM D. SCHUTTER RICHARD W. JOHNSON September 11, 1979 Forest Lake Times 120 North Lake Forest Lake, MN 55025 Attention: Ken Jarvis Re: Ordinance No. 56K - City of Lino Lakes TEL: (612) 421-5151 NORTHTOWN OFFICE NORTHTOWN CENTER 117 NORTHTOWN DRIVE BLAINE, MN. 55434 TEL: (612) 786-0250 I enclose, herewith, a conformed copy of Ordinance No. 56K of the City of Lino Lakes. Please publish the same once in the Forest Lake Times in your next publication on September 13, 1979. Please send three affidavits of publication to me and send two affidavits of publication and the statement to Edna L. Sarner, City Clerk -Treasurer, City of Lino Lakes, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014. Thank you. Yours very truly, Landol J. Locher LJL:kmv Enclosure cc: Edna L. Sarner, Clerk -Treasurer T. Rehbine -*3784 Lake Drive ,ino Lakes, Mn. 55014 Rezone 1 2 3 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Initials Cate Preparea by Approved by 2 3 4 Date .,1.3 Chargos- ----Payments Bal-anee- 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 2 3 4 5 6 q c 7 i !I 8 j 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ft- 23 24 25 26 27 28 f 29 30 31 r 32 33 34 35 36 37 BABCOCK, LOCHER, NEILSON & MANNELLA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55808 TEL: (618) 481-5151 EDMUND P. BABCOCK LANDOL J. LOCHER JAMBES M. NEILSON DELIX A. MANNELLA JOHN R. SPEAKMAN ROBERT F. MANNELLA WILLIAM D. SCHUTTER RICHARD W. JOHNSON GARY T. LAFLEUR CHARLES H.STANDFUSS September 2, 1980 City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 NORTHTOWN OFFICE NORTHTOWN CENTER 117 NORTHTOWN DRIVE BLAINE, MN. 55484 TEL.,(612)786-0880 Attention: Marilyn Anderson Deputy Clerk Re: Ordinance No. 56K I enclose, herewith, a copy of my letter of December 11, 1979. Also enclosed, herewith, is a copy of my letter to the Forest Lake Times and Affidavit of Publication from them of Ordinance No. 56K. Yours very truly, Landol J. Locher LJL : ev Enclosures STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 SS COUNTY OF Washington Duane A. Rasmussen, being duly sworn, on oath says he is and during all the times herein stated has been the publisher and printer of the newspaper known as the Forest Lake Times and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows Said newspaper is printed in the English language in newspaper format and in column and sheet form equivalent in printed space to at least 900 squre inches. Said newspaper is a weekly and is distributed at least once each week. Said newspaper has 50% of its news columns devoted to news of local interest to the community which it purports to serve and does not wholly duplicate any other publication and is not made up entirely of patents, plate matter and advertisements. Said news. paper is circulated in and near the municipality which it purports to serve, has at least 500 copies regularly delivered to paying subscribers, has an average of at least 75% of its total circulation currently paid or no more than three months in arrears and has entry as second-class matter in its local post -office. Said newspaper purports to serve the City of Forest Lake in the County of Washington and it has its known office of issue in the City of Forest Lake in said county, established and open during its regular business hours for the gathering of news, sale of advertisements and sale of subscriptions and maintained by the managing officer of said newspaper or persons in its employ and subject to his direction and control dur- ing all such regular business hours and at which said newspaper is printed. Said newspaper files a copy of each issue im mediately with the State Historical Society. Said newspaper is made available at single or subscription prices to any per- son, corporation, partnership or other unincorporated association requesting the newspaper and making the applicable payment. Said newspaper has complied with all the foregoing conditions for at least one year preceding the day or dates of publication mentioned below. Said newspaper has filed with the Secretary of State of Minnesota prior to January 1, 1966 and each January 1 thereafter an affidavit in the form prescribed by the Secretary of State and signed by the managing of- ficer of said newspaper and sworn to before a notary public stating that the newspaper is a legal newspaper. He further states on oath that the printed Public Notice as a part hereof was cut from the columns of said newspaper, hereto attached and was printed and published therein in the English lanuage, once each week, for One successive weeks, that it was first so published on Thursday. / the 20th day of December 19 f 9 and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday to and including the 20th day of December 19 79 and that the following is a printed copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of said notice, to wit INOTORIAL SEAL) 6-point News Type--abcdefghiiklmnopgrstuvwxyz 8-point News type-- abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz orn to hefor me this 20th day of 1949. Notary public My Commissi yld et=lr,-;thisot. December 11, 1979 Forest Lake Times 120 North Lake Forest Lake, MN 55025 Attention: Len Jarvis Re: Ordinance -,do. 56K - City of Lino Lakes i enclose, herewith, a conformed copy of Ordinance No. 56i: of the City of Lino Lakes. Please publish the same once in the Forest Lake Times in your next publication on December 13, 1979. Please send three affidavits of publication to Lie and scil.. two affidavits of publication and the stater.tent to Edna L. Sarner, City Clerk -Treasurer, City of Lino Lakes, 1139 Main Street, Lino .Lakes, Minnesota 55014. " h:a.nk you. Yours very truly, Landol J. Locher LJL : kinv Lncleaure cc: Edna L. Sarner BABCOCK, LOCHER, NEILSON & MANNELLA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 EDMUND P. BABCOCK LANDOL J. LOCHER JAMES M. NEILSON FELIX A. MANNELLA JOHN R. SPEAKMAN ROBERT F. MANNELLA STEPHEN M. HALSEY WILLIAM D. SCHUTTER RICHARD W. JOHNSON September 11, 1979 Edna L. Sarner City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Ordinance No. 56K - City of Lino Lakes TEL: (612) 421-5151 NORTHTOWN OFFICE NORTHTOWN CENTER 117 NORTHTOWN DRIVE BLAINE, MN. 55434 TEL: (612) 786-0250 I enclose, herewith, the original of Ordinance No. 56K and a copy of the letter to the Forest Lake Times. Please type the original in the Ordinance Book and sign and seal and have the Mayor sign same. Yours very truly, Land 1 Locher LJL:kmv Enclosures City Council Meeting December 10, 1979 Page Two Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to authorize Mr. Schumacher to contact members of th Personnel Commission informing them of the disbanding of that Commission thanking them for their contributions to the City. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion declared passed. Mr. Schneider reported briefly on the financial report. Mr. Schneider, Mr. Schumacer and Mrs. Anderson will go over the financial status and report back at the next Council meeting. Also, the Council should appove a formal budget at the same meeting. Mayor Karth announced, that due to the Holidays, the next regular scheduled Council meeting will be held on December 26, 1979. The Public Hearing of Peltier Veiw Plat was called to order at 8:45 P.M. Mr. Locher noted this was a continued hearing first published on May 14, 1979. Mr. Locher read the notice of legal publication. Mayor Karth read the permit approval from Rice Creek Watershed Board. Mr. McLean asked about soils limitation and Mr. Gotwald's comments stated the soils was moderate to sever. Mr. Donald Marier, who owns lands to the North of this plat presented his objections to the platting of this land - high water table, possibility of pollution of Peltier Lake, no on -site inspection by RCWB, excessive ground water run-off. Mayor Karth noted that these problems were the reason why this plat was seTh to Rice Creek Watershed Board before this hearing. Mr. McLean felt the pei_"lt addressed the matter of soils and septic systems and not ground water run-off. Mayor Karth felt this was handled in the statement 'this plat conformed with the guidelines of the district'. There was general discussion on the drainage and ponding - the size of the lots - the planned density for: the area (Mr. Short's letter indicates this conforms to the existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan) - the ponding area is designed for the 100 year storm - The need for each individual lot to have a perc test and soil borings before a permit is issued - a complete road design and drainage plan must be submitted before final approval. Mr. McLean moved this hearing be continued with consideration of this plat tabled with Mr. Gotwald to look at the ground water of the area and advise the C ouncil on what a complete study would entail to be available for Council consideration in 30 days. Seconded by Mr. Schneider. Motion declared passed. he tezoning hearing or an. _ . .. was ca e. to order at 9:35P.M. Mr. Locher read the notice of legal publication and noted there is notarized mailing list. There was discussion of the status of Elmcrest (24th Avenue) and the fact this street will not carry industrial traffic. Mr. McLean aske. Mr. Tschida if he would participate in the upgrading of that street and Mr. Tschida dai•d they would be interested but it would have to have more owner's of the land involved to include the City of Hugo. The was discussion on the requirement of a plat design being presented befc rezoning and the inclusion of General Business lots along County Road #14. . Gourley said the Planning and Zoning had felt that rezoning could be City Council Meeting December 10, 1979 Page Three without the plat design. The developer must return for a special use permit before a building permit may be obtained in a commercial area without sewer All Building plans and site plans must be approved before any developing cG be done. Mr. Tschida was asked the plans for the area and he said they are looing for owners - they sell lots - they sometime consturct building and lease. He also has the land across 24th Avenue in Hugo for sale and they are not asking for any to participate in the upgrading of 24th. The matter of a portion being rezoned to general business and a portion to light Industrial was questioned and Mr. Tschida said it was done in order to attract different types of businesses. There was discussion of moving the area designated as general business from the East side of the area to the West but Mr. Locher said the area designated as general business could not be considered for light industrial at this hearing - it is permissable to zone down but not up. Mr. McLean moved to deny this rezoning. Mr. Tschida objected in that he felt that he must wait a year before reapplying - Mr. McLean said, not if he returned with a different layout. Mr. Zelinka suggested the entire North portion be rezoned to General Business with a rezoning application for the East half at a later date. Mr. McLean's motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Zelinka moved to rezone the North 468.6 feet of the W# of the SE' of the NE3 of Section 24 to General Business and the Wof the SEA of the NE -I except the North 468.E feet thereof to Light Industrial. Seconded by MR. McLean. Motion declared passed. Mr. Zelinka moved to deny the zoning on Block 3 of the plat. Seconded by Mr. Schneider. Motion declared passed. Mr. McLean moved to close the hearing at 10:15 P.M. Seconded by MR. Zelinka. ijMotion declared passed. Mr. Locher reported that the matter of Mr. Donald Holzmer's home had been completed. A11 that is necessary is the variance to the ceiling height in the basement area. This can be done by variance. Mr. McLean moved to grant a variance for the difference in height requirement for the basement area, this variance to be filed with the County Recorder to become a part of the abstract. Seconded by MR. Zelinka. Motion declared passed. The Forest Tagg matter is scheduled for trial Wednesday, December 12, 1979 at 10:30 A.M. Mr. Locher reproted that he had delived the transcripts of the minutes to the bond Attorney. There are a few minor details to be completed, but these must wait for a delvier date. Mr. Locher had checked the Letter of Agreement from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and had found only one area that he questioned. This wa. the area of repairs being done by the City on the MWCC equipment. The City would be reimbursed on a 50/50 basis. There was some discussion on this. Mr. Zelinka moved to approve this contract and to authorize the Mayor and Page 3 ram` Planning and Zoning October 17, 1979 Rehbein indicated he had not contacted them yet. Mr. Gourley noted that Mr. Rehbein had had this problem once before this year, and Mr. Rehbein indicated there had been no argument on his part with that, and the problem had been resolved; however, in this case, as far as safety factors, the adjoining house was 33 feet from the lot line and the house in question was 8'6" in from the line, so there should be no problem. Mr. Shearen felt the Board was more concerned with precedents --if they granted this one, where would they stop? Mr. Heath added that the neighbor was entitled to build up to 10 ft. from the lot line, and it wasn't feasible to tell him he couldn't do so. Mr. Rehbein asked about the situation where the neighbor is not willing to sell a foot and a half of property, the Borad indicated that was the case with Mr. Nelson's house, and hte 00 currently in suit, and was workinv with his title company and his lender and oper. Tim Rehbein had another matter for discussion concerning one of the two lots recently d R-2, on which he proposed to build a duplex (side -by -side), one side to be privately and the other to be used by himself, the upper level for model home es ail the lower as an office. He intended to park vehicles outside, and the would be used as shop space. Partof the lot, about 70 feet, was within the 300-ft. r'cial"4one along Lake Drive. This was. just north of 77th street and just east of Lino Auto Body; the duplex right across the street was used in a similar manner some years ago and didn't create a problem. There was some concern as to the property reverting to.a simple duplex after Mr. Rehbein moved out, and he indicated this was his intention. %t,.*s felt this could be made a condition, so that somebody buying it for the same purposes would have to go through the same process of applying for a permit. Mr. McLean fe there. should be some screening provision for the neighborhood; however, it was felt that'probably would not be necessary in view of the fact that the body shop was op one side and Swan Frozen Food across the street. 'M McLean asked what specifically Mr. Rehbein meant by the "shop" in°the garage. He indicated this was an attached garage in which they would be storing various lumber, light, items like nails, and would be doing light mechanic work for vehicles, no different than an individual would. There would be four trucks parked outside, the heaviest a one -ton truck. It would not technically be a shop, as they would have the model home upstairs. Mr. Gourley noted he might check with the building inspector as to parking requirements, as he thought it would require a larger driveway than normal, to accomodate people stopping by,so they wouldn't park in the street. Mr. Rehbein was told he would need the signatures of the adjoining property owners as well as the application. The next item on the agenda was Golden's Rice Lake lot; however, Mr. Berget was not present. T next item on the agenda was a rezone for Land and Oaks, Inc., which had been on the` genda at the last meeting, but nothing had been done. The representative present indi ated he hadn't realized they were'on that agenda,. They were requesting a rezoning on the property to light industrial, although they would also consider a general business category. He asked if industrial zoning included commercial zones as well, and was told they were different classifications. The developer indicated they were basically sellers of land, and although they did build some buildings, and also bought from other contract- ers to sell along with the land. He indicated they basically wanted to use the frontage of the County Road and Main Street, and split the land up into a 16-acre piece and two 10-acre pieces so everything would have over 330-ft. frontages. Also, they had thought about coming through the center with a road and putting lots off that. They had hired. Midnight Drilling to perk the property and had gone over the results with Mr. Mobley. He indicated that they were flexible at this point, and had more than one type of ten- ant or owner in mind; they basically wanted to know what the Board's position was. Mr. Mclean asked if they planned on splitting the property up into an industrial park, or did they want blanket zoning in the hopes that something might happen? He indicated Page 4 `Planning and Zoning October 17, 1979 that the Acton property, an industrial park, was just south of this area, and Mr. Heath noted a lot of the area had been zoned industrial and commercial, but not this particu- lar piece. Mr. Gourley pointed out a number of items; first, the property fit the Compre- hensive Plan, guidelines for the area; secondly, that the P & Z would want to see a com- plete layout as to how the developer intended to divide it before it was rezoned; and thirdly, there was a provision in the ordinance that stipulated that construction would have to begin within one year or the zoning would revert back to its prior use. The developer asked if all the parcels would have to be built by then, and was told not if if was zoned as a complete parcel, and so long as there was some substantial progress within one year. The developer indicated a Baptist Curch was considering the property, although this didn't qualify as a commercial or industrial use. Mr. McLean said this would be a public use, but it was indicated they would like to see an industrial or commercial use there, and there would be no major problem with the rezoning. The deve- loper asked if he went to 5 and 10 acre parcels, would he have to go through a subdivi- sion process; Mr. McLean explained the procedures used by Acton in their industrial park. The developer indicated they had considered 4 lots with two double driveways, and he had spoken to the County Highway Department about this; they had also considered 6 lots, but felt this was too small. He discussed some prospective tenants, and also the sewer situation at Bald Eagle Industrial Park. He did not feel the lack of sewer would cause a problem, and realized there was no possibility of its coming in. Mr. Gourley indicated the Board was in favor of the rezoning, but would like to see a pack - a .type plan: He indicated they should requst a specific zoning, and that the attorney coud give them some guidance on whether they wanted to go with a general business or '.light industrial use. Mr. McLean personally felt commercial would be more appropriate, and Mr. Heath asked if it would be possible to zone partly industrial and partly corn- mercial within one zoning; it was indicated this would be possible. The developer' felt they could convert the request to general business and plat 4 lots of varying s#res. Mr. Reinert expressed the opinion that at this time the Board really didn't know what the developer wanted, and wouldn't be able to act on it until they brought in a proposal. The developer indicated that if they stayed with the industrial zoning, the plan would. be 3 lots (two 10-acre and one 16-acre) on the County Road, and it was his understanding they would not need a plat along with that, and asked for a recommendation to the Council on that proposal. Mr. Reinert felt there was nothing to work with at this point, until the Board saw a complete plan. He indicated that industrial parks generally set a standard lot size throughout, and set the roads up, and then if an indus- try or business came in and needed more space,`they.combined lots, whatever was necessar He foresaw a problem with the 10- and 16-acre lots,-4ecause they would probably be comin in to divide that later on. For the benefit of the developer, Mr. McLean reviewed in detail the procedure they should follow in making his submission to the Board. The developer indicated he would like to submit his plan to the consultants before the next meeting, and was told this should be done two weeks in advance; also, he should submit the plan to Hugo as the property was on the county line. The city would notify all prop erty owners within 350 feet. Mr. Shearen moved to table the matter. Mr. Heath seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion declared passed. It was noted the Board was in) favor of a development of this kind. Next on the agenda was a request by Mr. and Mrs. Blain for a variance to transfer less than 22 acres to provide frontage for tract B. Mr. Ellison, the buyer, and owner of tract B, was present. The land in question was 80 feet on the culdesac. Mr. Blain owned the house on tract A. Mr. Gotwald had put together this plan, which would still main- tain frontage for the Blains, and give Mr. Ellison enough frontage for his lot as well. Mr. McLean indicated the.culdesac ha•d been reinstated at the last Council meeting in order to maintain the frontage. Mr. Gourley indicated a long driveway variance would be needed as well; however, P1r. Ellison said Mr. Gotwald had measured it, and found it was not necessary. Mr. Heath moved to recommend that this variance application be passed, con- tingent upon the sale. Mr. Shearen seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion de- clared passed. tuber 19, 1979 anning and Zoning Page 2 zoning and was only to clear up transfer of title on the land. There was some dis- cussion, and it was noted the house should have been indicated on the drawing. Mr. Doocey moved to approve the variance for 7720 Lake Drive. Vi Schwankl seconded the motion.. All were in favor. Motion declared passed. The next item on the agenda was a preliminary discussion of Twilight III, El Rehbein aed,Son, with Mr. Blackbird present. He indicated they would like to plat the area into four one -acre pieces fronting on Lake Drive, the exception being the area deeded to Tim Rehbein. The lots'would be 560 feet weep, and Mr. Blackbird's question was whether the entire area could.be platted commercial with a variance on the back 160 feet, which would be landlocked. It was noted that t[ie lots had 100-ft frontages, and in an unsewered area, the requirement was 150 feet. Mr. Doocey consulted the ordinances on this. Mr. Blackbird asked if it was feasible with the right kind of sketch, whether a variance would be granted on the back 160 feet. This would be a rezone, and it was also adjacent to a residential area, which could be a problem with homeowners. An alternative suggested by Mr. McLean was to plat two lots with 150-ft frontages as commercial or duplex, put a road in, and have the back lots as residential. Mr. Blackbird also had a matter involving the extension of 79th Street for a projected lot split. The problem lay with lining up the road extension with the existing 79th Street, which angled in from the south. Mr. Gourley read Marilyn Anderson's letter to the engineer stating the problem and asking for his comments, and also read the engineer's letter reviewing it. Lot B did not have a full 22 acres considering road easements; also the total net acreage did not add up to 5 acres. Mr. Blackbird explained that 79th Street angled.about 15 degrees north, then turned right at the line and went into Moorhouses' property, stopping there. He indicated North -Northeast Realty would absorb the cost of the road, but had a question as to how the 33-ft easement would be obtained from Mr. Moorhouse, and how to handle the road at the end of the property line. Mr. McLean felt this could be handled with some type of cul-de- sac, and Mr. Blackbird felt Mr. Moorhouse would probably give up the easement if they paid for the road. Mr. Gourley asked how the City handled getting the easements, and Mr. McLean indicated Mr. Blackbird would do that. Vi Schwankl brought up a similar situation of about a year and a half ago. Mr. Gourley asked about the other road easements, and Mr. Blackbird said they were vacated. The straightening of 79th Street was further discussed, and it was felt the details should be handled by the City engineer and the developer. Mr. Gourley noted that the existing road was entirely on the south easements and this would not match up at all if 33-ft easements were taken on both sides of the section line. Mr. Shearen moved to authorize the City Engineer to work with North -Northeast Realty on the extension of 79th Street for the projected lot split. Vi Schwankl seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion declared passed. It was noted that the developer would be absorbing the cost of the The next item on the agenda was a request for a rezone from Land and Oaks, Inc. There`d es no representative present. Next on the agenda was a plat for Forest Glen, with Mr. Menkveld present. The plat was first proposed in October of 1977, and the minutes of the April 10, 1978 public hearing' were available. The plat had been approved at that time; however, it was never signed, and the one-year period was up in April of 1979. Mr. Menkveld was told that a apvlication and platting fee would be required. Mr. Menkveld had not realized this would be necessary, and had hoped to be able to go ahead with the plat at this meeting. Mr. Reinert moved to authorize the Clerk to forward all necessary materials regarding Forest Glen to the planner"and engineer upon receipt of the fee Planninq and Zoning Board November 21, 1979 Page -4- Rehbine to provide a duplex one half to be used as a business and model home facility and to provide "off street" parking for employees and be "non -transferable". Mrs. 'Schwankl seconded the motion. Motion carried. Mr. Rehbine was told this would be on the November 26, 1979 Council agenda.' Mr. Gourley asked about the problem Mr. Rehbine was having on Knoll Drive regarding the side setback of a house. Mr. Rehbine said he is going to get the surveyor and Mr. Mobley out to the lot to see what can be done. ezone - Land and Oaks, Inc. - Ken Tschida Mr. Gourley read the letter from Barton - Aschman regarding this property. Elmcrest Avenue was discussed. The point being the road would not support any industrial traffic. Mr. Heath questioned Bloct #2 zoning. Mr. Tschida said whatever the Board prefers, either heavy or Tight industrial. One proposed use is a green house. Mr. Tschida said now they have a time problem and did not realize there would be a problem with Elmcrest. Mr. Gourley read the letter from the Anoka County Highway Department. In regard to the paragraph regarding the additional 27' for street right-of-way the City policy is not to require the additional dedication but to require additional set backs. Mr. McLean said this gets away from the idea that the County will get this land free. Also the County does not have any ordinances or legislation to back up this requirement. Mr. McLean asked for topogs. There were none. Mr. Gourley referred to the planners letter regarding frontage road. Mr. Tschida said the County has no plans for one. Mr. McLean said there remains the problem of Elmcrest Avenue, need for topogs and soil Iborings. Mr. Tschida said the soil borings are needed for the platting but not required for rezoning. Mr. Gourley said there is a request for rezoning not platting in the file. Mr. McLean read the requirement for Tight industrial and what operations were allowed in a light industrial area. It was noted that Acton is light industrial. Mr. Gourley said this could be sent on to the Planner and Engineer for more detail study or a recommendation. for rezoning as presented on the map tonight with the understanding ,that a Special Use Permit Is needed just•for the land use. There was furtVtr discussion.. Mr. Heath moved to recommend that Block #1 be rezoned General Business and Block #2 and #3 be rezoned light industrial. .Mr. Gourley asked for withdrawal of the motion until after.further discussion. Mr. Heath agreed. Mr. Gourley said the Palnner had addressed himself to setback requirements. Lot #1 was only 100' wide. , Mr. McLean said that the industrial park was rezoned only after they had shown complete plans and prepared a package. Mr. Gourley said they had to put in some streets. Mr. ,Gourley said as stated before they can go two ways. Planning and Zoning Board November 21, 1979 Nage -5- Mr. Heath moved to recommend to Council that Block #1 be•rezoned to General Business and Block #2 and #3 be rezoned to light industrial with the stipulation that in Block #I the lines be moved so that they 132' frontage lot be Lot #1 and the 100' frontage lots be #2 and #3 with the access to County Road #14 be limited to two access and the County requirement of an additional 27'vwi,llinot be necessary but an additional set back re- quirement will be necessary and the Council set a public hearing. Mr. Shearen seconded the notion, Motion carried. Mr. Gourley told Mr. Tschida that this will be on the Council agenda November 26, 1979 about 8:30 p.m. Mr. Gourley noted that Mr. Tschida will have to come back to the Planning and Zoning Board for a.Saecial Use Permit before any construction can be started. 0ld Business 'Mr. Richard Berget did not appear tonight or last regular Planning and Zoning meeting and the Clerk was asked to contact Mr. Berget and ask him what his intentions are in respect to Lot #II of Goldens Rice Lake Terrace. Plat - Royal Oaks Estates - Shoreview Mr. Gourley read the letter submitted with this plat. The plat is located in Shoreview adjoining Lino Lakes sourthern boundary just south of Baldwin Lake Road. The City of •Shoreview has asked if this City has any comments or questions on the proposed development. Mr. Gourley'said his only concern is that the County has input on the capacity of County Road "J". The entire access is County. Road "J". It was noted that the area contains 193 acreas and 498 housing units plus two 150 unit apartments. /"1 Mr. Gourley suggested the only action this Board could take was to forward it to the• Council listing the Boards concern for County Road "J". Mr. Shearen moved to pass this plat on to the Council with the recommendation that the Council express its concern for additional traffice on County Road "J". Mrs. Schwankl seconded the motion. Motion carried. Mr. Gourley noted in Ordinance #56 on page 13 the section dealing with unsewered areas in non-residential areas need a Special Use Permit. The City has not been enforcing this part of the ordinance. Mr. Shearen said he understood that a Special Use Permit could not be made non -transferable and wondered if this would cause a -problem. Mr. Gourley noted the Ordinance stated the Council could put any conditions they want on Special Use Permits. Mr. Heath moved to ajourn."- Mr. Shearen seconded the motion. Aye. Tapes transcribed by Marilyn.Anderson November 26, 1979 Council Meeting Pag. Two the above listed uses - to be non-transferrable - to have a July 1 issuance date and to be reviewed annually. Seconded by Mr. Zelinka. Motion declared passed. iThe Industrial plat of Land and Oaks was considered. This is located alon County Road 14 East of 135E and a portion borders 24th Avenue. There was discussion on the condition of 24th and the ability to handle commercial usage. The County's recommendation for only two driveway exits had been received - Mr. Short, the Planner,had felt this rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Mr. Gotwald was questioned on this and he will submit his remarks in writing. Planning and Zoning had recommneded approval of this rezone. MR. McLean moved to set a public hearing on thi ,plat for December 10, 1979, at 9:00 P.M. Seconded by MR. Kulaszewicz. otion laced passed. Shoreview had submitted a preliminary plat -of Royal Oaks which borders County Road J and and asked for this City's comments' Mr. McLean moved that this development'be delayed until Anoka County and Ra►sey County has made a com- .plete study on the ability of the adjoining street to handle the increase in traffice that would be generated by this planned development. It was also suggested that the Metropolitan Council be involved in this study. Seconded by Mr. Zelinka. Motion declared passed. Mr. Schneider presented the prepared list of investments and the due date on the CD's. There is to be some reinvesting of these monies. Mr. Schneider and Mr. Schumacher will do this. Mr. Kulaszewicz presented the bids for the new Police car. The low bid was from Main Motiors in Anoka in the amount of $8969.47. After some discussion, Mr. Schneider moved to approve this bid. Seconded by MR. Zelinka. Motion declared passed. There was no report on the Park Board.. Mr. Locher noted that MR. Babcock had done the title search on the Bloom's addition. There was to be some change in the legal description. He will check with MR. Anderason, the County Surveyor, on this matter. Mr. Zelinka reminded the Council that his term on the Circle Pines Utility Commission expires at the end of this year and this Council should make their wishes known, to the Circle Pines Council as soon as possible as to who they would recommend to serve on that Commission. r ' Mr. Zelinka asked Mr. Locher if there is any way this City can assist in collecting cverdue bills or unpaid bills on the gas system in Lino Lakes. In Circle Pines this is handled by the lein process but since Circle Pines has no jurisdiction in Lino Lakes, it cannot be handled in that manner. Mr. Locher said he did not know, but would research and get back to Mr. Zelinka with an answer.. Mr. Gotwald reported that he had be revieweing all projects in relationship to Letters of Credit with Mr. Schumacher. Some of the Letters of Credit should be renewed in an amount sufficient to complete the project. Mr. Gotwald said he had contacted NSP several times on the street lights in the Shenandoah area. He felt the construction on Birch Street and the sewers COUNTY OF ANOKA Department of Highways Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer COURT HOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 November 20, 1979 City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Subject: Proposed Plat - Sec. 24 CSAH #14 Gentlemen: We have reviewed a copy of the attached plat presented to us by Land & Oak, Inc. We would recommend approval of the plat provided access to CSAH #14 is limited to two points; one centered on the line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and the other centered on the line between Lot 3, Block 1 and Block 2, and that an additional 27 feet of right-of-way be dedicated for the portion fronting on CSAH #14. Should you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact our office. Very jily yours, ae_4_,€./ Paul K. Ruud, P.E. County Engineer PKR:dmh cc: Land & Oak, Inc Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer ..arton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Ten Cedar Square West/Cedar-Riverside, 1610 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minn. 55404 612-332-0421 November 20, 1979 Mr. Ken Gourley, Chairman Planning and Zoning Board City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Sketch Plan. Commercial/Industrial Subdivision (Land and Oaks Inc.) Dear Mr. Gourley: I have reviewed the proposed subdivison and discussed it with Ken Tschida, the developer. The following comments summarize may brief initial review. 1. The proposed commercial and industrial land use is generally consistent with the City's draft Land Use Plan. According to the developer, the precise location of the three commercial lots is felxible as long as the frontage along CSAH 14 remains about the same. Before finally tying down the commercial lots the City may wish to review any proposed uses to the east and west of the property in an effort to align the commercial lots with a consistent adjacent land use. 2. The mixed commercial and industrial land uses and the odd shape of the property dictate that special care be taken in reviewing this proposal. The two large industrially zoned pieces (15.5 acres and 20.3 acres) will have limited frontage relative to their size. An ultimate development plan should be prepared for this property to illustrate how these large parcels will be used and how access will be provided. 3. Control of driveway cuts along CSAH 14 is important in minimizing traffic disruptions. The City's draft Thoroughfare Plan policies reinforce the need for such control. Mr. Tschida mentioned that he has already met with the Anoka County Highway Department to discuss the access issue. The City should require a sign -off from Anoka County documenting their recommended access arrangements. The City should also consider the possibility of a future frontage road for the proposed commercial areas on both sides of Main Street. Although it may not be practical to develop a frontage road now, the City should consider some provision for one in the future. This could be done by simply requiring a deeper front yard setback, deep enough for a proper setback if a frontage road is ever built. Mr. Ken Gourley November 20, 1979 Page two 4. Ordinance No. 56 (Zoning Code) Section 6:23 requires a minimum 100 foot lot width for General Business (GB) and Limited Business (LB). This requirement has been met in the sketch plan. 5. Section 4.15 requires that where a commercial district is adjacent to a residential district, that the minimum building setback from the lot line be 35 feet. The setback for an industrial district adjacent to a residential district is 75 feet. 6. Section 4.23 states that non-residential land uses may be permitted in areas without sanitary sewer only if a special use permit is issued. See Section 5.04 Special (Conditional) uses. 7. The City may want to ask the engineer for an opinion as to whether or not Elmcrest Avenue would have to be upgraded in order to support industrial traffic. The above comments represent only a "quick" review of the proposal. Should the developer continue to refine the plat a more thorough review during the Preliminary Plat phase will be undertaken. Sincerely, illiam F. Short Senior Associate WFS:deb MEMO BOB DOOCY REPRESENTATIVE 707 W. COUNTY ROAD E P. O. BOX 43109 ST. PAUL, MN 55164 Phone: 483-6651 Better Forms To Communicate On More Useful Envelopes To Carry Your Communications 500 West Highway 96 400 E. St. Germain St. 314 Oak Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 Sauk Centre, Minnesota 56378 484-3301 251-7751 352-3664 Dec. 3, 1979 Mr. Ken Gourley Planning & Zoning Board 1.189 Main St. Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Sketch Plan - Land & Oaks, Inc. Dear Mr. Gourley: I have reviewed the sketch plan of the proposed subdivision together with an on -site inspection and offer the following comments: 1. The present use is Agriculture (corn field). 2. Soils are as follows: HdB - Fine Sandy Loam, water below 6 feet Ge - Glencoe Loam & Silt Loam - water 0 to 3 feet NEA - Hessel - Fine Sandy Loam - water 3 to 5 feet NO - Fine Sandy Loam - water 2 to 4 feet Wb - Loam - water 1 to 3 feet L.W. - Loamy Wetlands - water 0 to 2 feet General soils information from the Soil Survey of Anoka Co. 3 The existing Elmcrest Avenue is nothing more than a dirt and gravel road and, therefore, could not withstand commerical or industrial traffic. Any non-residential land use plan that would outlet traffic onto Elmcrest Avenue must i-nclude a plan to upgrade Elmcrest to a 36 foot wide, 9 ton road. This may not be feasible because the east side belongs to Hugo and the north_1/4 mile on the west side is not a part of this proposal. The City could limit the access to County Road 14 by the way of a 60 foot right-of-way and not permit any access to Elmcrest until such time that it is upgraded. The proposed G. B. lots could front onto the above mentioned street. Mr. Ken Gourley Dec. 3, 1979 Page 2 The only soil limitations for on -site sewer systems and roads appear to be the water table. The water table limitations can be corrected by excavation and filling. Detailed engineering plans shall be a part of the actual preliminary and final plat phase. The above review is limited to items that could present future problems for the owners. Sincerely, MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. eor'= otwa GG:bj BABCOCK, LOCHER, NEILSON & MANNELLA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 EDMUND P. BABCOCK LANDOL J. LOCHER JAMES M. NEILSON FELIX A. MANNELLA JOHN R. SPEAKMAN ROBERT F. MANNELLA STEPHEN M. HALSEY WILLIAM D. SCHUTTER RICHARD W. JOHNSON November 27, 1979 Edna L. Sarner City Clerk -Treasurer 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Land and Oaks, Inc. Rezoning TEL: (612) 421-5151 NORTHTOWN OFFICE NORTHTOWN CENTER 117 NORTHTOWN DRIVE BLAINE, MN. 55434 TEL: (612) 786-0250 I enclose, herewith, the original Notice of Hearing on Rezoning, with the affidavit of service by mailing attached thereto. Also enclosed is a copy of my letter to the Forest Lake Times requesting said Notice by published in this week's publication. Yours very truly, i Land p J. Locher LJL:kmv Enclosures NOTICE OF HEARING ON REZONING CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA TAKE NOTICE, that pursuant to the requirements of City and Minnesota Law, a public hearing shall be held before the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, on Monday, December 10, 1979, at 9:00 P.M., at the City Hall, for the purpose of considering the application of Land and Oaks, Inc., a corporation, for Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Busi- ness (GB), certain land situate in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, and which is described as follows, to -wit: The North 468.6 feet of the East 332 feet of the West One -Half of the Southeast One -Quarter of the Northeast One -Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota; and for Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (LI), certain lands situate in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, and which are described as follows, to -wit: The West Half of the Southeast One -Quarter of the Northeast One -Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the North 468.6 feet of the East 332 feet thereof; and That part of the Northeast One -Quarter of the Southeast One -Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying North of Clearwater Creek, and excepting that part thereof contained in Parcel 9500 and owned by Northern States Power Company. At such hearing, both proponents for and opponents against such application shall be heard. /a/ Edna L. Sarner Edna L. Sarner City Clerk -Treasurer City of Lino Lakes Anoka County, Minnesota AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA) Barbara Campbell of the City of Anoka, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, being duly sworn says that on the 27th day of November, 1979, she mailed by Registered Mail, the Lino Lakes Notice of Hearing on Rezoning for Rezoning for the purpose of considering the application of Land and Oaks, Inc., a corporation, for Rezoning frcm Agricultural (A) to General Business (GB) and Light Industrial (LI) to the following: Cyril H. LaCosse, Jr., and Catherine LaCosse East Cedar Street Hugo, MN 55038 Elizabeth Belland 7071 - 24th Avenue South Hugo, MN 55038 Frances E. Bernier, Robert C. Bernier, Sylvia Marier, Joann Furey, James G. Bernier, Mildred Perrault and Donna Erickson c/o Ivan Bernier 7233 - 24th Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Ivan Bernier 7233 - 24th Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 James G. Bernier 2325 Main Street Hugo, MN 55038 Robert C. Bernier and Regina M. Bernier 15135 Forest Boulevard Hugo, MN 55038 Robert A. Backer and Janice R. Backer c/o Robert C. Bernier 15135 Forest Boulevard Hugo, MN 55038 Richard G. Belland 2373 Main Street Hugo, MN 55038 Secure Properties, Inc. 2154 Hasting Avenue Newport, MN 55055 Paul K. Miller Box 394 Hugo, MN 55938 Telesphore J. LaCosse and Rosemary M. LaCosse c/o Acton Construction Co. Box 394 Hugo, MN 55038 Acton Construction Co. Box 394 Hugo, MN 55038 Eugene F. Arnt and Beatrice E. Arnt 5275 Geneva Avenue \.- North St. Paul, MN 55109 Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 Land and Oaks, Inc. P. O. Box 8626 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Barbara Campbell Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27th day of November, 1979. ? Public KATHRYN M. VIALL NOTARY PUBLIC — MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY Commission Expires Mar. 28,1985 BABCOCK, LOCHER, NEILSON & MANNELLA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 EDMUND P. BABCOCK LANDOL J. LOCHER JAMES M. NEILSON FELIX A. MANNELLA JOHN R. SPEAKMAN ROBERT F. MANNELLA STEPHEN M. HALSEY WILLIAM D. SCHUTTER RICHARD W. JOHNSON November 27, 1979 Forest Lake Times 120 North Lake Forest Lake, MN 55025 Attention: Ken Jarvis Re: Land and Oaks, Inc. Rezoning TEL: (612) 421-5151 NORTHTOWN OFFICE NORTHTOWN CENTER 117 NORTHTOWN DRIVE BLAINE, MN. 55434 TEL: (612) 786-0250 I enclose, herewith, a Notice of Hearing on Rezoning, for property located in the City of Lino Lakes. Please publish said Notice once in your Thursday, November 29, 1979, publication, and forward three Affidavits of Publication to me. Also, please send two Affidavits of Publication and your statement for the publication to Edna L. Sarner, City Clerk - Treasurer, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014. Thank you for your assistance. Yours very truly, Landol J. Locher LJL:kmv Enclosure STATE OF MINNESOTA SS COUNTY OF Washington Duane A. Rasmussen, being duly sworn, on oath says he is and during all the times herein stated has been the publisher and printer of the newspaper known as the Forest Lake Times and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows • Said newspaper is printed in the English language in newspaper format and in column and sheet form equivalent in printed space to at least 900 squre inches. Said newspaper is a weekly and is distributed at least once each week. Said newspaper has 50% of its news columns devoted to news of local interest to the community which it purports to serve and does not wholly duplicate any other publication and is not made up entirely of patents, plate matter and advertisements. Said news- paper is circulated in and near the municipality which it purports to serve, has at (east 500 copies regularly delivered to paying subscribers, has an average of at least 75% of its total circulation currently paid or no more than three months in and has entry as second-class matter in its local post -office. Said newspaper purports to serve the City of Forest Lake in the County of Washington and it has its known office of issue in the City of Forest Lake in said county, established and open during its regular business hours for the gathering of news, sale of advertisements and sale of subscriptions and maintained by the managing officer of said newspaper or persons in its employ and subject to his direction and control dur- ing all such regular business hours and at which said newspaper is printed. Said newspaper files a copy of each issue im mediately with the State Historical Society. Said newspaper is made available at single or subscription prices to any per- son, corporation, partnership or other unincorporated association requesting the newspaper and making the applicable payment. Said newspaper has complied with all the foregoing conditions for at least one year preceding the day or dates of publication mentioned below. Said newspaper has filed with the Secretary of State of Minnesota prior to January 1, 1966 and each January 1 thereafter an affidavit in the form prescribed by the Secretary of State and signed by the managing of- ficer of said newspaper and sworn to before a notary public stating that the newspaper is a legal newspaper- Public Notice He further states on oath that the printed as a part hereof was cut from the columns of said newspaper, tannage, once each week, for One successive weeks; that it was first so published on Thursday, the 29th day of November 1979 and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday to and including the 29th day of November 19 79 and that the following is a printed copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of said notice, to wit hereto attached (NOTORIAL SEAL) and was printed and published therein in the English 6-point News Type—abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz 8-point News type-- abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn tobefore me this 29tflay of__.3C+titL_79 KENNETH JARVIS Notary publiCHISP(Ft.,htCQ .IthUota NOTAte} rwr,J i•SOTs My Commiss(� n Ez iit atichi.rte-tsa .. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Washington Duane A. Rasmussen, being duly sworn, on oath says he is and during all the times herein stated has been the publisher and printer of the newspaper known as the Forest Lake Times and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows • Said newspaper is printed in the English language in newspaper format and in column and sheet form equivalent in printed space to at (east 900 squre inches. Said newspaper is a weekly and is distributed at (east once each week. Said newspaper has 50% of its news columns devoted to news of local interest to the community which it purports to serve and does not wholly duplicate any other publication and is not made up entirely of patents, plate matter and advertisements. Said news- paper is circulated in and near the municipality which it purports to serve, has at least 500 copies regularly delivered to paying subscribers, has an average of at least 75% of its total circulation currently paid or no more than three months in and has entry as second-class matter in its local post -office. Said newspaper purports to serve the City of Forest Lake in the County of Washington and it has its known office of issue in the City of Forest Lake in said county, established and open during its regular business hours for the gathering of news, sale of advertisements and sale of subscriptions and maintained by the managing officer of said newspaper or persons in its employ and subject to his direction and control dur- ing all such regular business hours and at which said newspaper is printed. Said newspaper files a copy of each issue im mediately with the State Historical Society. Said newspaper is made available at single or subscription prices to any per- son, corporation, partnership or other unincorporated association requesting the newspaper and making the applicable payment. Said newspaper has complied with all the foregoing conditions for at least one year preceding the day or dates of publication mentioned below. Said newspaper has filed with the Secretary of State of Minnesota prior to January 1, 1966 and each January 1 thereafter an affidavit in the form prescribed by the Secretary of State and signed by the managing of- ficer of said newspaper and sworn to before a notary public stating that the newspaper is a legal newspaper. He further states on oath that the printed Public "otice as a part hereof was cut from the columns of said newspaper, lanuage, once each week, for One successive weeks; that it was first so published on Thursday. the 29th day of November 1979 and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday to and including the 29th day of November 19 79 and that the following is a printed copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of said notice, to wit hereto attached ( NOTORIAL SEAL I and was printed and published therein in the English 6-point News Type--abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz 8-point News type-- abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz T_.. w e C1 Subscribed and sworn to fore me this 29thday of No m1)Q,r,--79 Notary public, My Commissi G . KE!!NETH JARVIS CHISPvSiiG1sCQ8 4 heTMa NOTR * c-. r-u r� N ESOTn Expires P7-Yg t t1e 2 Variance Rezoning /< NAMES (S) OF OWNER ADDRESS CITY OF LINO LAKES APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE or REZOG gg, FEES /�• PHONEv?' .� ' ' LEGAL DESCR1P-10N OF PARCELS (S) FOR WHh H APPLICATION IS MADE SIZE OF PARCELS (S) 66. ACRES: FRONT FOOTAGE REASON FOR APPLICATION /%6-'Z--e-- • t e g,"(4)s.70--404- This appli::ation must be signed by the current owner (s) of the land. SIGNED DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE PLANNING & ZONING ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION STIPULATIONS FOR APPROVAL IF ANY BY DEPTH PAZ Agenda Council Agenda REASONS FOR REJECTION, IF APPLICABLE PE.L.71E.P1 PG1.7161,-0 CENT'ESIVJLLE, AKE.. \\--- — --\ 8 \\ \ it 4 Countrj Ditch -re T-I TH • -s T ...,, if- -,.. ii s...\ . , Ns, \,..• 03844 Ditch ho.47 OTTER LAKE 471"Fg "OSS raNLI 1 COUNTY OF ANOKA Department u/ Highu arA Paul A'. Ruud, Highway Engineer COURT HOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 ember 20, 1979 City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Subject: Proposed Plat - Sec. 24 CSAH #14 Gentlemen: We have reviewed a copy of the attached plat presented to us by Land & Oak, Inc. We would recommend approval of the plat provided access to CSAH #14 is limited to two points; one centered on the line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and the '"\ other centered on the line between Lot 3, Block 1 and Block 2, and that an additional 27 feet of right-of-way be dedicated for the portion fronting on CSAH #14. Should you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact our office. Very ly yours, Paul K. Ruud, P.E. County Engineer PKR:dmh cc: Land & Oak, Inc Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer BABCOCK, LOCHER, NEILSON & MANNELLA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 EDMUND P. BABCOCK LANDOL J. LOCHER JAMES M. NEILSON FELIX A. MANNELLA JOHN R. SPEAKMAN ROBERT F. MANNELLA WILLIAM D. SCHUTTER RICHARD W. JOHNSON GARY T. LAFLEUR CHARLES H. STANDFUSS December 11, 1979 Edna L. Sarner City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Ordinance No. 56K - City of Lino Lakes TEL: (612)421-5151 NORTHTOWN OFFICE NORTHTOWN CENTER 117 NORTHTOWN DRIVE BLAINE, MN. 55434 TEL: (612) 786-0250 I enclose, herewith, the original of Ordinance No. 56K, and a copy of the letter to the Forest Lake Times. Please type the original in the Ordinance Book and sign and seal and have the Mayor sign same. Thank you. Yours very truly, Land•,,-3. Locher LJL:kmv Enclosures ORDINANCE NO. 56K CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA BY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 6 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO GENERAL BUSINESS (GB) AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, does ordain: I. Ordinance No. 6, of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the then Village Council on July 18, 1955, is hereby amended by rezoning from Agriculture (A) to General Business (GB), pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 56, of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: The North 468.6 feet of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Town- ship 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota; and by further rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (LI),pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 56, of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: The West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the North 468.6 feet thereof. II. Save as above amended, said Ordinance No. 6 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. III. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Passed by the City Council this loth day of December, 1979. ATTEST: Edna L. Sarner, Clerk -Treasurer Harvey F. Karth, Mayor (CITY SEAL) BABCOCK, LOCHER, NEILSON &MANNELLA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAP,: SI REET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 EDMUND P. BABCOCK LANDOL J. LOCHER JAMES M. NEILSON FELIX A. MANNELLA JOHN R. SPEAKMAN ROBERT F. MANNELLA WILLIAM D. SCHUTTER RICHARD W. JOHNSON GARY T. LAFLEUR CHARLES H. STANDFUSS December 11, 1979 Forest Lake Times 120 North Lake Forest Lake, MN 55025 TEL:(612)421-515I NORTHTOWN OFFICE NORTHTOWN CENTER 117 NORTHTOWN DRIVE BLAINE, MN. 55434 TEL: (612) 786-0250 Attention: Ken Jarvis Re: Ordinance No. 56K - City of Lino Lakes I enclose, herewith, a conformed copy of Ordinance No. 56K of the City of Lino Lakes. Please publish the same once in the Forest Lake Times in your next publication on December 13, 1979. Please send three affidavits of publication to me and send two affidavits of publication and the statement to Edna L. Sarner, City Clerk -Treasurer, City of Lino Lakes, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014. Thank you. Yours very truly, LJL:kmv Enclosure cc: Edna L. Sarner