Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-056Q Council OrdinancesORDINANCE 56Q CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA Dec. 22, is W AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO DUPLEX FAMILY (R-2). The City Council of the City of City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, does ordain: I. Ordinance No. 6, of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the then Village Council on July 18, 1955, is hereby amended by re- zoning from Residential Single Family (R-1) to Duplex Family (R-2), pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 56, of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: Lot 2, Block 1; and Lots 1 through 5, Block 4, Wollans' Estates, as now platted and recorded. II. Save as above amended, said Ordinance No. 6 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. III. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Passed by the City Council this 22nd day of December, 1980. F. Kenneth Gourley, Mayor ATTEST: 2 Edna L. Sarner, Clerk -Treasurer (CITY SEAL) ii C[5uncil. Meet g, May 27, 1980 \ Page Four Mayor Gourley called a recess at this point. Meeting to reconvene at 8:55 P.M. The meeting was reconvened. Mayor Gourley noted that there are three requests under the Planning and Zoning report - Mr. Smeed and Mr. Turene for keeping of horses and Mr. Suchy for keeping animals - he suggested these requests be tabled until the suggested ordinance is completed. He put this suggestion to the persons affected and they agreed to the postponment. Mr. McLean moved to approve the tabling of these three items Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. The Public Hearing on Wollan's Estates was called to order. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Schumacher to present the information on this request. Mr. Schumacher read the notice of publication. The application was for the rezoning from Commercial/Residential to Light Ind- ustrail. This is for the four lots facing Lake Drive. This should have been for a zoning of General Business. This is for the rezoning of the entire lots 24,25,26, and 27 of Wollan's Estates from Comm/Res to General Business. The park requirements for this land has been taken care of for this property, Mayor Gourley asked for comments from the audience, there was none. Mr. McLean moved to approve this rezoning. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Mr. Locher said the meets and bounds description will have to be used for the legal since this is not a filed plat. Legal descriptions that are not filed cannot be used, so in order to rezone this , the meets and bounds description of these lots must be used. Mayor Gourley amended the motion to have the developer provide this description for the Attorney. This was accepted. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. 9:20 P.M. On considering the Restrictive Ordinance, Mr. Locher reported t at e a had problems in locating the exact State Statute. The Ordinance is not ready for consideration at this meeting but is to be on the June 9, 1980 agenda. The next item was the ponding areas in Sunset Oaks and there are some dis- crepancies. There are some ponding areas thg7 are not included. This matter was discussed with Mr. Stanley. Mr. Locher disagreed with the term "Ponding area". He felt that the situation may change and there would be another use of this land that would serve a different purpose. Mr. McLean moved to table consideration of these ponding areas until the June 9, 1980 meeting. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. The Public Hearing. for the rezoning for Rite -Way Waterproofing was called to order at 9: 30 P.M. There was no representative present. Mr. Schumacher felt this rezoning is necessary for the financing of their project. There was no testimony from the audience. Mr. Schumacher read the legal notice of publicatio Mr. Jaworski moved to continue this hearing to June 9, 1980 at 9:00 P.M. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. May 21, 1980 Planning and Zoning -Page Three_ Mr. Stanley was asked if he had contacted the property owner whose lands had been suggested for an exchange in this matter. Mr. Stanley said he had contacted Mr. Hendricksen and he seemed to have no objections. Mr. Heath felt the lands designated as Light Inustrial should remain or be replaced with the like amount. Mr. Johnson moved to deny this request and leave at LI, Seconded by Mr. Doocy. Motion carried with Mrs. Schwankl voting, No. Mr. Prokop moved to recommend to the Council that the lands to the North and West of Lilac & 4th Avenue be considered as LI. Seconded by Mr. Doocy. Motion carried. The special use permit for Teresa Krysinski of 7830 Lake Drive for the operation of a used vehicle lot. Teresa Krysinski appeared before the Planning and Zoning Board and briefly explained the operation. The Planning and Zoning requested some drawings and information concerned with the adjoining property owners, streets, Comprehensive Plan conformance. The Planning and Zoning had tabled this matter until the information is available. Mr. Robert Turenne of 1282 W. 81st Street had applied for a variance to keep a horse on 2.53 acres. A letter signed by seven of the adjacent property owners that says they have no objections. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended to the Council approval of this request. A special use permit request from Robert Sulander of 7384 Lake Drive for temporary storage - exterior. Five adjacent property owners had signed his petition - needs four more. The parcel of approximately 3 acres is zoned commercial/ residential. The Comprehensive Land Plan calls for Multi -family. The zoning ordinance calls for this type of operation be in a LI area. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended approval of this special use permit, This exterior storage included used construction materials. This permit to be reviewed on an annual basis. The special use permit of Mr. Henry Suchy of 6620 -20th Ave. for the keeping of 2 hogs, 150 fryer, 30 geese, 20 ducks, 75 laying hens, 6 head of cattle, 50/100 rabbits. There is three signatures of surrounding property owners. Mr. Locher had said that what ever had existed at the time of transfer could continue. There is only 265 front footage and a farm requires 300. Mr. Nadeau said he only had dogs, cats and horses at the time of the sale. If this is under a residential zone, Ord. #56 said that you cannot keep animals in a residential zone or if it is considered under an agricultural zone, then the Ord. states there must be a 300' frontage. After a lenghly discussion, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended denial of this special use permit. Mr. Nadeau had presented a new petition and there are conflicting signatures - some of the signatures appeared on both petitions. ,-The application of James R. Schilling to rezone of Lot 24,25, 26, & 27 in Wollans' Estates from Crom Res to LI, this is in error - should read from Comm. to General Business. The first 300' of these lots are currently zoned i Commercial - this application is to rezone any portion of these lots beyond the 300'. The Comprehensive Plan shows this as commercial and the lots sizesi are in conformance. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended approval of this rezoning request. Variance Rezoning NAMES (S) OF OWNER (. ADDRESS c,// n 7 / PHONE �� In nk NI I I I gi FEE$ CITY OF LINO LAKES APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE or REZONING LEGAL DESCR I PT I.OJN OF PARCELS (S) FOR WHICH APPLICATION IS MADE crp ol'i 9 gl SIZE OF PARCELS (S) ACRES: FRONT FOOTAGE BY DEPTH REASON FOR APPLICATION This application must be signed by the current owner (s) of the land. PLANNING & ZONING ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE STIPULATIONS FOR APPROVAL IF ANY P&Z Agenda Council Agenda REASONS FOR REJECTION, IF APPLICABLE re/// The meeting was reconvened and the Public Hearing on Wollan's Estates was called to order at 9:15 P.M. 11r- April 2H, 1980 Page Five Mr. Schumacher summarized the action that had occured at the previous Council meeting. This layout has been redesigned to give 18+ acres to the City ror Park purposes and also providing access to this park land. This had been ` the major contention at the last meeting. Another concern was the access to Highway 8 in a second location - this had been provided so that; if and when, the land is developed there is an additional access to the Highway'to assist in the traffic flow. It was noted this park land dedication is to include the lands being platted as the Lino Industrial Park. Mayor Gourley asked about the rezoning of the back portion of the lots that face Highway #8 - he suggested this hearing be set at this meeting in order to facilitate this hearing. Mr. McLean moved to approve this plat, Woolan Estates, as presented and amended, including the approval of the 18+ acres to be deeded to the City f01`/ gifX/00x413010# to include the park requirements from the Lino Industrial park, require a letter of Credit to be issued before building permits are issued, lot elevations to be set by the City Engineer, and Rice Creek Water- shed requirements he met. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimoulsly. Mr. Jaworski moved to set the Public Hearing for the rezoning of the Lots along Highway #8 for May 27, 1980 at 8:30 P.M. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gourley indicated to the Engineer what this Council is requiring in reference to the lot elevations. Mr. Jaworcki moved to close the hearing at 9:25 P.M. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. The next agneda item was the Attorney's report and the first matter to be discussed was tho matter of 77th street. Mr, Locher presented the deeds for the Soutl: 28'-f feet - this is measured from the Section line. Mr. Locher pointed out that the State Law, the Cartway easement, it is the provisions of this lay that, if a cartway has been maintained for a period of six years continuously or longer, then the cartway easement exists from then on., 33 feet on either side of the traveled portion of the roadway. Mr. Locher noted .hat the traveled portion of this roadway is basically north of the censor line. The Engineer had prepared a map showing the existing roadway. The traveled surface is approximately 22 to 23 feet wide. 3 to 4 feet lies South of the section line - 19 to 20 feet of the surface is to the :forth o-- the center line. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Marier to present his arguments on this matter. Mr. Marier said when the road was upgraded in 1971, Mr. Gotwald was to have centered the traveled surface and he pointed out that the major portion of the street was on his property to the North. He suggested this would cause L: setback problem with the development now being done on the- South - side of the street. Mr. Marier disputed the Certificate of Survey that was to have been done in 1966 - he said this was not a survey, just a sketch.