HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-27-2003 EDA PacketAGENDA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MONDAY
OCTOBER 27, 2003
6:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Consideration of Minutes of September 22, 2003
3. Consideration of Resolution No. 03-08 Decertifying Tax Increment
No. 1-6
4. Consideration of Resolution No. 03-09 Decertifying Tax Increment
No. 1-7
5. Consideration of Resolution No. 03-10 Decertifying Tax Increment
No. 3-1
6. Adjourn
Financing District
Financing District
Financing District
6 DATE
7 MEMBERS PRESENT
8 MEMBERS ABSENT
9 OTHERS PRESENT
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31.
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
DRAFT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES
September 22, 2003
: J. Bergeson, D. Carlson, C. Dahl, J. O'Donnell, J. Reinert
None
Mary Divine, Dan Tesch, Michael Grochala and Bill
Hawkins
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 11, 2003
EDA Member Bergeson moved to approve the August 11, 2003 minutes, as presented. EDA Member
O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED BUSINESS SUBSIDY TO PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
EDA President Carlson opened the public hearing at 6:09 p.m.
Ms. Divine summarized the Staff report, indicating the Economic Development Advisory Committee
has reviewed this project The committee recommended the EDA support the project, since it met the
necessary subsidy criteria, building standards, zoning codes and the Comprehensive Plan land use
designation.
EDA Member Bergeson indicated there was discussion at the work session about fiscal disparities.
He asked Ms. Divine to review that topic. Ms. Divine indicated the question was whether the city had
to take fiscal disparities from within this TIF District, which reduces the amount available for TIF.
She stated she has since learned that last year Legislation was passed that requires it be taken from
within the District, if it is an Economic Development District.
EDA Member O'Donnell stated they talked about costs associated with TIF. He questioned what the
project cost will be. Ms. Divine indicated about $12 million.
Rob Davidson, representing DAI, indicated one thing that was undetermined at the work session was
the number of years that might be appropriate. He indicated they are in a 10-year district, and will
create eight years of increment within that district. He noted the City's TIF consultant said there
really is not a right answer, and he has to agree. He indicated the only person who can answer the
question is the person who will pay the taxes each year, which is the President of the company, and he
believes eight years is the length of time that would allow him to make this project work on this site.
EDA Member Bergeson asked if eight years represented the $1.1 million figure. Mr. Davidson
indicated that was correct.
EDA MINUTES
DRAFT
46 Ms. Divine indicated at the request of the Council they ran numbers showing from five years up to
47 eight years, with eight years being $1.1 million. She noted at five years the company's rental rates are
48 10 cents a square foot away from what the business had requested. If they went seven years it brings
49 them to $5.89 per square foot, which is .01 cent from the original request. She added their revised
50 request is $5.84.
51
52 EDA Member Dahl moved to close the public hearing at 6:20 p.m. EDA Member Bergeson seconded
53
54
55 A. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO.03-06, APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR
56 PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LINO LAKES EDA AND
57 PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT, LLC
58
59 Ms. Divine summarized the Staff report, indicating there have been minor language changes in the
60 last few days, but none of them affect the overall agreement. She stated Staff recommends approval.
61 She clarified that if the Board approves the agreement, they may, under separate motion, want to
62 authorize a Subordination Agreement.
63
64 Ms. Divine explained that section 5.2 discussed the Subordination Agreement, and she reviewed that
65 section for the Board. She noted the language is in all of the City's agreements, but if the lender
66 requests a separate Subordination Agreement it must be done under a separate motion.
67
68 EDA Member Bergeson asked if $127,000 a year is the total tax subsidy; City, School District and
69 County. Ms. Divine indicated it is. EDA Member Bergeson stated in terms of a decision on the
70 number of years, the City's portion would be about $40,000 a year. Ms. Divine indicated that was
71 correct.
72
73 EDA Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 03-06 approving a contract for private
74 development and awarding the sale of, and providing the form, terms, covenants and directions for the
75 issuance of its $638,400 tax increment revenue note, Series 2001, contingent on City Council
76 approval of the EAW and Preliminary Plat. EDA Member Bergeson seconded the motion.
77
78 EDA Member Dahl asked if this is the actual subsidy approval. Ms. Divine indicated it is; they are
79 approving $638,000, with the requirement of four new jobs over two years:
80
81 EDA Member Bergeson noted that at the work session EDA Member O'Donnell brought up the
82 subject of the 'but for' test. He is not sure how to assess that. He stated the issue was raised, but he is
83 not sure they received an answer. He indicated this is an important project for the City and within
84 reason they need to do what it takes to make it work, but he does not know how to determine it meets
85 the 'but for' rationale.
86
87 Ms. Divine stated that can be subjective, that this request was based on the target base rent needed to
88 make the project comparable to other rents. She indicated the City's TIF Consultant evaluation was
89 that five years stayed within the policy and scope of what has been approved over the last several
90 years, and was within the acceptable range.
the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
EDA MINUTES
DRAFT
SEPTEMBER 22, 2003
Mr. Davidson indicated Ms. Divine described the basis for their request. He stated they are hoping to
93 get within the economic market range for going ahead with this project, noting without this subsidy
94 the cost of the project would make it economically out of reach.
95
96 EDA Member O'Donnell noted the job growth is at the required minimum, and asked if there was any
incentive to go beyond the minimum. Mr. Davidson stated he spoke with the President of the
98 company this afternoon on wage goals, noting they are committed to four jobs at a minimum of $10
99 per hour. He indicated the penalty for failing to achieve the job goals is severe. He believes they
10o have some range on salaries, and will not gravitate to the lowest wage. He stated they are feeling
101 good about the growth they can have, but also have to be conservative. He added in addition to their
102 regular employees they have a great number of temporary employees they employ year round.
103
104 EDA Member O'Donnell stated he understands the uncertainty, and there is some of that on the part
105 of the City as well, not knowing what the future holds for cities. He stated there is a 2 to 2.5%
106 difference between what the company wants and what this subsidy is proposing. He indicated given
107 what he knows, and without having all the answers on the 'but for', he would be in support of the five
1o8 year recommendation on the table now.
109
110 Patrick Pelstring offered two suggestions that might move them toward a resolution to meet the
111 customer's needs. He indicated the average wage is $13.37. He believes a couple of the jobs will be
112 above the $10.00 minimum. He stated the other aspect is that they originally looked at $5.88 per
113 square foot. Seven years gets them to $5.89. He indicated given their discussion if they could move
114 into that range it would be helpful.
115
116 EDA Member Dahl suggested they poll the Authority. She stated she is hearing some of the members
117 may be in favor of a longer term. She also stated she has a history of voting no on TIF subsidies. She
118 does not believe they should be necessary and no one has ever convinced her otherwise. She believes
119 you should be able to make it on your own, especially with the low interest rates. She stated the City
120 relies heavily on their TIF Consultant; however everyone who cannot afford what they want has to cut
121 back. She indicated the developer has the option of making it a smaller project and adding on when
122 they can afford it.
123
124 EDA President Carlson stated if the motion on the floor fails they can introduce a second motion.
125
126 Motion carried. EDA Member Dahl opposed.
127
128 B. CONSIDERATION OF A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
129
130 Ms. Divine reviewed the Subordination section of the contract.
131
132 EDA President Carlson asked if they would need to vote on this at the City Council meeting also.
133 Ms. Divine indicated they would not.
134
EDA MINUTES
DRAFT
135 EDA President Carlson verified the City Attorney had reviewed the information and recommended
136 this action. Ms. Divine stated the City's TIF Attorney made the recommendation.
137
138 EDA Member Bergeson moved to adopt a resolution authorizing a Subordination Agreement between
139 the City of Lino Lakes and the lender for the developer. EDA Member O'Donnell seconded the
140 motion.
141
142 Motion carried. EDA Member Dahl opposed.
143
144
145
146
147
148 Ms. Divine summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
149
150 EDA Member O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 03-07 authorizing preparation of a modified
151 - program for Development District No. 1 and the establishment of Redevelopment Tax Increment
152 Financing District No. 1-11.
153
154 Motion carried unanimously.
155
156 ADJOURNMENT
157
158
159
160
161 Meeting adjourned at 6:43 p.m.
162
163
164
165
166
167
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 03-07 AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF
A PLAN TO MODIFY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND TO ESTABLISH
REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-11
There being no further business, EDA Member O'Donnell moved to adjourn. EDA Member
Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Karen Whaley
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
AGENDA ITEM 3
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 10/27/03
TOPIC: Resolution No. 03-08 Decertifying Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1-6, Apollo Business Park
BACKGROUND:
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-6 was established in 1994 as a one -
project district to provide assistance to UDOR U.S.A. The obligations in that
district have been satisfied. This resolution terminates the district as of November
15, 2003. This project, totaling approximately $375,000 in market value, will add
an additional $3,000 of city taxes on the tax rolls as of the second half of 2003.
OPTION
1. Adopt Resolution No. 03-08 Decertifying Tax Increment Financing District
No. 1-6
2. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
RESOLUTION 03-08
TERMINATING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 1-6 AND
DIRECTING DECERTIFICATION THEREOF BY THE COUNTY,
AUDITOR
WHEREAS, by adoption of a resolution on August 11, 1994, the Economic
Development Authority of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "Authority") has
heretofore created Tax increment Financing District 1-6 (the "District"), located within
Development District No. 1, and has approved a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF
Plan"), for the District to provide assistance to the UDOR; and
WHEREAS, the County Auditor of Anoka County has certified the original net tax
capacity and the original local tax rate of the District pursuant to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177; and
WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, all of the projects have been completed, all
obligations to which tax increment from the District has been pledged have been paid in
full or defeased, and the Authority has determined that it is in the best interests of the
City to terminate and decertify the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development
Authority of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that:
(1) Tax Increment Financing District 1-6 is hereby terminated as of November 15,
2003.
(2) The Clerk -Administrator shall provide a certified copy of this resolution to the
County Auditor of Anoka County so that the District may be decertified on the
books and records of the County Auditor with no further tax increment from
the District being remitted to the City.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority on the 27th day of
October 2003.
Executive Director
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 10/27/03
TOPIC: Resolution No. 03-09 Decertifying Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1-7, Apollo Business Park
BACKGROUND:
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 was established in 1995 to provide
assistance to businesses to develop the Apollo Business Park. The businesses
within the district are Mag Con, Emergency Apparatus Maintenance, Lino Lakes
Business Center Phases 1, 2, 3, and 4, Progressive Engineering, Nol-Tech and
Rice Industries. These businesses have added approximately $10 million in
market value to the city's tax base, hundreds of jobs and approximately $92,000
in city taxes.
The obligations in that district have been satisfied. This resolution decertifies the
District as of November 15, 2003.
OPTION
1. Adopt Resolution No. 03-09 Decertifying Tax Increment Financing District
No. 17
2. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
RESOLUTION 03-09.
TERMINATING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 1-7 AND
DIRECTING DECERTIFICATION THEREOF BY THE COUNTY
AUDITOR
WHEREAS, by adoption of a resolution on May 22, 1995, the Economic
Development Authority of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "Authority") has
heretofore created Tax Increment Financing District 1-7 (the "District"), located within
Development District No. 1, and has approved a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF
Plan"), for the District to provide assistance to several projects within the District; and
WHEREAS, the County Auditor of Anoka County has certified the original net tax
capacity and the original local tax rate of the District pursuant to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177; and
WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, all of the projects have been completed, all
obligations to which tax increment from the District has been pledged have been paid in
full or defeased, and the Authority has determined that it is in the best interests of the
City to terminate and decertify the District; and
WHEREAS, there remains an excess balance of tax increments collected from
within the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development
Authority of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that:
(1) Tax Increment Financing District 1-7 is hereby terminated as of November 15,
2003.
(2) The Clerk -Administrator shall provide a certified copy of this resolution to the
County Auditor of Anoka County so that the District may be decertified on the
books and records of the County Auditor with no further tax increment from
the District being remitted to the City.
(3) The balance of excess tax increments shall be returned to the County Auditor
of Anoka County for redistribution to the appropriate taxing jurisdictions.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority the 27th day of
October 2003.
President
Executive Director