Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-056U Council OrdinancesMAActi_ 23, d g ORDINANCE NO. 56U CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI). The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Ordinance No. 6, of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the then Village Council on July 18, .955, is hereby amended by rezoning from Commercial and Residential to Light Industrial (LI), pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 56, of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of Interstate Highway No. 35W. AND That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly of State ^Trunk Highway No. 49 and Southeasterly of Interstate Highway No. 35W, EXCEPT that part of the South 437 feet thereof lying East of the West 538.56 feet thereof. AND That part of Lots 1 and 2, Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota lying North of the following described line, to -wit: Commencing at a point on the Northwesterly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 49 distant 300 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1, Auditors Subdivision Number 54, thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of State Trunk Highway No. 49, 127.34 feet, to the point ofbeginning of the line to be described; thence Northwesterly at right angles 272.63 feet to the South line of the North 300 feet of said Lot 2; thence West, parrallel with the North line of said Lot 2 to the West line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. AND All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: /'-\ Commencing at the point of intersection of the South line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter with the Westerly right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 8, as now established; thence on an assumed bearing of North 24 degrees 56 minutes East, along said Westerly road line, a distance of 1155.6 feet to the point of beginning;thence South 24 degrees 56 minutes West, back along said Westerly road line, 113.93 feet; thence North 65 degrees 04 minutes West, 208.7 feet; thence South 24 degrees 56 minutes West, 250.7 feet; thence North 84 degrees 24 minutes West, 358.4 feet to the West line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence Northerly, along said West line, 290 feet, more or less, to the Southerly right-of-way line of the Southeast ramp of Trunk Highway No. 35W; thence Northeasterly, along said Southerly right-of-way line 77 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection thereof with a line that bears North 78 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence South 78 degress 35 minutes 30 seconds East, 652.6 feet to the point of beginning. II. Save as above amneded, said Ordinance No. 6 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. '.413assed by the City Council this 23rd day of March, 1981. F. Kenneth Gourley, Mayor ATTEST: Edna L. Sarner, Clerk -Treasurer (CITY SEAL) ORDINANCE 56U CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO LIGHT INDUST- RIAL (LI). the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minn- esota, does ordain: I. Ordinance No. 6, of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minn- esota, passed by the then Village Council on July 18, 1955, is hereby amended by rezoning from Com- mercial and Residential to Light Industrial (LI), pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 56, of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of Interstate Highway No. 35W. AND That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 49 and South- easterly of Interstate Highway No. 35W, EXCEPT that part of the South 437 feet thereof lying East of the West 538.56 feet thereof. AND That part of Lots 1 and 2, Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, Lying North of the following de- scribed line, to -wit: Commencing at a point on the Northwesterly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 49 distant 300 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1, Auditors Subdivision Number 54; thence Southwesterly along said North- westerly line of State Trunk Iighway No. 49, 127.34 feet, to —the point of beginning of the line to be Nscribed; thence Northwester - Vigo right angles 272.63 feet to the South line of the North 300 feet of said Lot 2; thence West, parallel with the North line of said Lot 2 to the West line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. AND All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the South line of said Southeast Quarter of North- west Quarter with the Westerly right-of-way line of Trunk High- way No. 8, as now established; thence on an assumed bearing of North 24 degrees 56 minutes East, along said Westerly road line, a distance of 1155.6 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 24 degrees 56 minutes West, back along said Westerly road line, 113.93 feet; thence North 65 degrees 04 minutes West, 208.7 feet; thence South 24 degrees 56 minutes West, 250.7 feet; thence North 84 degrees 24 minutes West, 358.4 feet to the West line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence North- erly, along said West line, 290 feet, more or less, to the Southerly right-of-way line of the Southeast ramp of Trunk Highway No. 35W; thence Northeasterly, along said Southerly right-of-way line, 77 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection thereof with a line that bears North 78 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence South 78 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds East, 652.6 feet to the point of beginning. II. Save as above amended, said Ordinance No. 6 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. III. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Passed by the City Council this 23rd day of March, 1981. F. Kenneth Gourley, Mayor ATTEST: Edna L. Sarner, Clerk -Treasurer (CITY SEAL) Circulating Pines April 16, 1981 march 23, 1981 Page Two - Jaworski. Mr. McLean noted that in the previous study order, a condition was made that v"`.v persons petitioning would be asked to share the costs. He requested at this be added to this motion. Mr. Bohjanen asked the location of this - will this be on both sides of County IY14? The petition stops at the South line of County Road #14. Mayor Gourley said he will prepare the same Resolution as was prepared for the previous petition. Mr. Kulaszewicz seconded the amendment. The vote was on both the Motion and the amendment. Both carried unanimously. DESIGNATION OF A FINANCIAL CONSULTANT OSM is requesting a financial consultant be designation for the trunk sewer now being considered. Mayor Gourley said Juran $ Moody had been used for the last bond issue and Mr. Schumacher said the service had been excellent.= - Mayor Gourley moved that Juran F, Moody be designated as financial consultants on this project. Seconded by Mr. McLean_ Motion carried unanimously. SETTING OF A SPECIAL MEETING FOR CIP AND FIRE SERVICE REPORT Mr. McLean suggested this meeting be held on April 6, 1981 at 8:00 P.M. Council members agreed. RESIGNATION OF MR. GARY FOSTER Mr. McLean moved to accept this resingnation and the usual letter of thanks be forwarded to Mr. Foster. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. INTERNSHIP This is just for Council consideration for perhaps employing an intern again this year as was done last year. He asked the Council to think about this. RECESS 'P IC HEARING - REZONE REQUEST - GLENN REHBEIN Mayor Gourley noted that the format will be the same as previously - consultants will give testimony first, the developer may make comments, comments from the audience - either pro or con and the developer may answer - it will then be turned to the Council for a decision. A letter from Mr. Arden Lind, of Palico Instruments, was read. This indicates there is no objections to LI but did object to he HI designation. Clerk read the notice of publication and noted that certified letters had been mailed to all persons within 350' of the property and all but one - Mrs. Edith Morse - had been returned as received. March' 23, 1981 Pa.ge Three - Mr. Schumacher presented the petition as it had been presented to the Planning and Zoning Board. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended a Public Hearing be set for the consideration of the property designated as LI but had e"le no recommendations in reference to the proposed area for HI. Mr. Schumacher reported on the letter received from Mr. Short bascially noting that this is a proper use for this parcel of land. Mr. Short also suggested that the entire parcel be zoned LI until such time as Mr. Rehbein has a specific proposal for HI. This use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Schumacher presented some of the LI uses that are allowed per Ordinance #56. The Engineer's letter was read noting there would be limitations on the street construction and the septic system installation due to high water table. However, it was noted this area is scheduled for sewers sometime between 1981/1990. The street specifications were noted in this letter also. There is an additional letter from Mr. Short but this deals with the re- quirements for the platting and Mr. Schumacher that is not appropriate at this hearing since this hearing deals with the rezoning of the lands. Mrs. Paul Reinhold had written a letter setting forth some points she felt should be considered before this rezoning is approved. She indicated she felt that this matter had received preliminary approval. Mayor Gourley -said there has not been any action with the exception of recommending that a"public hearing be set. There has not been any preliminary approval of any sort. The purpose of this hearing is to approve or disapprove the rezoning of the lands - then the plat will need to go through the Planning and Zoning Board aommk the Council. Mrs. Reinhold's concerns with screeing, etc. will be con- s ered at that time. Mr. Harvey Karth, representing Mr. Glenn Rehbein, stated that they are not concerned with the HI area - this can either be rezoned to LI or left as- is. Mr. Karth pointed out that at the present time, they do not plan to develop the lands North of the ditch, nor do they plan to install a street on the South of the Skelly Station. There are several other items that will be discussed in more detail when the plat is presented. Mr. Bill Bohjanen asked how big an area is being considered? Mayor Gourley noted the area and that it contains 55 acres. Tyr:. Bouvier , 7841 Lake Drive, School property to the West? Yes. Wondered what kind of problems would this plat present if a school is developed- at that location. Mayor Gourley said those kinds of concerns would be addressed at the time of platting. Mr. Karth said he had a list of concerns that had been presented by some of the property owners along Lake Drive and these concerns will be taken into consideration at the time of platting. A resident asked if there had been any consideration of what this would do to property values - wouldn't this devalue thepropertyexisting? N �r Gourley said no such study had been done but he felt with the coming of the sewer the property values would increase. This person said that from what he had heard at this meeting, he would object to this rezoning. Mayor Gourley asked if he had any specifics and March 23, 1981 Page Four - he said he didnot - the things he wanted to discuss were the items that would be concerned with the platting of the property. Y"'N. Tom Ennis, 7395 Lake Drive, lives next door to Palico and he said there 1 only 25 to 30 feet from his house to the property being considered and he -asked the Council not to rezone this land. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Ennis if he knew he was in a commercial zone at the present time and Mr. Ennis said, Yes. Mr. Wally 0stlie, 7420 Lake Drive, concerned with the private homes being affected by the change and he wanted to know if there was something they could say to sway the Council or has this already been decided? Mayor Gourley said the purpose of the hearing is to take testimony and find facts. Mr. Ostlie felt that there is other areas of the City that could be use for Industrial purposes - the Acton property on the East side of the City. The Council noted that sewer is not available for that area and Mr. Acton's property is not for sale - he wants to develop this. Mrs. Elsenpeter said this has not been an immediate step - this matter is tied into the Comprehensive Plan. There has been over a year's work of planning into that plan in order to have a orderly development within the City to insure that this is not justa 'bedroom' community. She also point- ed out that the accessability to the freeway makes this an ideal site for i-4\ - nobody would want an Industrial Park in the middle of a residential ea. Mr. Ostlie asked if anyone had determined what the tax advantage to the City would be from this industrial property? Mr. Karth said he had called the County Assessor and asked how the Industrial tax is computed and was told they use the figure of $46.35 per thousand of assessed value - on a single family homesteaded property, they use the figure of $15.70 per thousand - these are 1980 figures. Multi -family residences are about midway between. Mrs. Reinhold, Lake Drive said her property had been devalued because of the Industrial property on the North of her by 25%. Mayor Gourley asked her to submit her documents to this effect to the City. Mr. Glenn Rehbein, the Developer, pointed out that this property is ideally located for industrial property - that his new home is across the street and did not feel that this development would devalue property. Mr. Jeff Johnson, 7421 Lake Drive, he is opposed to sewer because he has a lot of frontage and it follows that he would also be opposed to the rezoning. Mr. Ostlie felt it would be good to know what impact the reported tax increase would have on the residents of the City before a decision is made on this rezoning. . Karth said the dollar value would be approximately 3 times as much from an industrial zone as from a residential area. Mayor Gourley asked if there was any questions from the Council. Mr. Jaworski asked Mr. Karth if the area was zoned industrial, is there a time schedule _ Marcn Ls, i• I ,.Page Five for the development of the property - Mr. Karth said there is approximately a three months process of platting - the next phase would be to start of the construction - this would probably be in the early fall. This would depend pumNhow soon the preparation of the plat could be accomplished and presented the Planning and Zoning Board for their review. The area being considered is the entire area with the exception of 12,13, & 14. These are the Southern most lots that had been proposed for HI. Mrs. Elsenpeter pointed out that this Council must consider what is best for the entire City and regreted that in that process, some individuals may be hurt. Mr. Jaworski moved to approve the rezoning Zone A to Light Industrial. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion on roll call vote: Mr. Kulaszewicz, Aye; Mr Jaworski - Aye; Mr. McLean - Aye; Mrs. Elsenpeter - Aye; Mayor Gourley - Aye.' Motion carried unanimously. --------------------- A recess was called at this point in the meeting. The meeting reconvened and Mayor Gourley asked if there was a representative of Northwestern Bell Telephone present. Mr. Dokken was in the audience. Mr. Dokken presented the Council with contour maps of the area and informed the Council that there is no problem with the setbacks as required by the City. The building will be put at the 40' setback line. The site has been reduced in size to accomadate just the building with the minimum setbacks. Aiis would create a substandard lot that cannot be used for any other purpose. is lot will be fenced and will also be landscaped. This will be presented in detail at the time the application for construction is submitted. Mr. McLean moved to approve this variance as amended, the area to be land- scaped and fenced. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Mayor Gourley pointed out this is a variance to Ord. #56 $ Ord. #78. Mr. Schumacher questioned the Park Land dedication. MT. McLean amended his motion, that since this is a public utility, the park land dedication be waived. The amendment was second- ed by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. The Planning and Zoning Board actions were next on the agenda. SCHILLING - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING Mr. Schumacher pointed out the portion of this area that will be considered in this rezoning. A portion of the land abutting Lilac has LI zoning at the present time. This would include the remainder of the lands. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended approval and a public hearing be set. M d topublichearingf LinoIndustrial P k f April r. McLean move set a or Park or 13, 1981 at 8:00 P.M. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimousl! REHBEIN - LOT SPLIT o. '-"Nis is concerned with Lots 28 $ 29 in Equity Estates and each contain S acres Phone: (612) 464-5562 N U_ a w rz N 0) 0 co x a H a44 z d • O 5 U ww 5� 7a 0 a a 0 0 June 25, 1981 Mr. Raymond Rehbein Mr. Glenn Rehbein 7309 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Subject: Rezone from Commercial to Light Industrial (Zone A) Dear Mr. Rehbeins; Enclosed you will find a copy of Ordinance 56U which rezones certain parts of your property to Light Industrial. You will also find sev- eral statements from the City Engineer and City Planner and my ledger sheet indicating fees that were charged to the City in connection with the zoning change. The City has already paid these fees to the consultants and would app- reciate reimbursement for them. The total amount of the fees less the $100.00 deposit is $613.50. If you have any further questions about this matter please contact me. Respectfully, Edna L. Sarner, Clerk - Treasurer b BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Ten Cedar Square West/Cedar-Riverside,1610 South Sixth Street. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 (612)332-0421 February 17, 1981 Mr. Gary Bathke, Chairman Planning and Zoning Board City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Glenn Rehbein; Request for Rezoning Dear Mr. Bathke: I have reviewed the "Sketch Plan" (dated February 3, 1981) for the proposed industrial park and have discussed it briefly with the developer's representative Harvey Karth. The following comments are intended to address only the more general aspects of the Sketch Plan as plan refinement (required in Section 5.03) should provide us with the level of detail necessary to more thoroughly review the industrial park plan. 1. Zoning Classification: The developer is proposing to rezone the entire 55 acres from Commercial and Residential to Light Industrial (21 lots) and Heavy Industrial (3 lots). As mentioned in previous reviews (December 11, 1980 and November 25, 1980), this area appears to be generally suited for Light Industrial or Commercial use. Therefore, I would recommend a rezoning to Light Industrial when the industrial park site plan meets the city's approval and other assurances are met. And further, I would recommend that the city not rezone to Heavy Industrial at this time unless the developer has specific proposals for lots 12, 13 and 14. Rezoning the property to Light Industrial will provide the city with more control over proposed uses. 2. Layout: The conceptual lot and street layout illustrated on the Sketch Plan appears to be generally workable; as it allows opportunities for small business (on 1 to Di acre lots) and/or large business (on larger lots or assemblages of smaller lots). The minimum lot size for a sewered area is 22,500 square feet and has been met. The minimum lot size for an industrial use in an unsewered area must be established in a Special Use Permit. With the exception of the following four comments, I would recommend that the developer be encouraged to refine his industrial park layout plan in pursuit of the Light Industrial rezoning. a. How will lot 5 (north of County Ditch 10) be provided access and how might it be developed. b. The industrial park access road (between Fourth Avenue and Lake Drive) has an unnecessary jog in it which could be eliminated by realigning the intersection with Fourth Avenue. c. The intersection of Fourth Avenue and the industrial Bark roadway could be redesigned as a continuous curve rather than a 90 intersection (thereby allowing an opportunity to straighten out the jog mentioned above). This would require minor changes in the Fourth Avenue right- of-way. d. Since the primary purpose of Fourth Avenue will be to serve this property and the property to the west of Fourth Avenue, it appears feasible that its alignment could be revised to better suit the shape and character of the property. The attached sketch illustrates one potential realignment of Fourth which might more efficiently serve the industrial park. The developer should be encouraged to consider alternative layouts plans to assure that the one selected best suits the project area. 3. Utilities: Is sanitary sewer service an important factor in developing this industrial park? If it is, then the developer should be prepared to discuss the issue with the Planning Commission and City Council while continuing the planning process. A central water system may also be desirable in this area. Central water could better handle wet industries and would provide better fire protection. Feasibility for sewer and water should be discussed with the City Engineer. 4. Soils: The Anoka County Soil Survey indicates that approximately 20% of the site consists of soils with very severe wetness limitations (Iw-Isanty fine sandy loam) and that approximately 30% of the site consists of soils with marginal limitations due to wetness (Ln-Lino loamy fine sand). These soils limitations will most likely influence the lot and roadway layout of the industrial park. I would suggest that the developer perform a soils inventory of the site and record the extent, location and character of the problem soils and address what measures he will utilize to overcome them. 5. Access and Traffic: The developer should review the access and roadway plans with the Anoka County Highway Engineer and MnDOT. Their comments, in writing, should be submitted with any refined plans. Also, cul-de-sacs should be avoided in industrial areas where possible due to the more difficult turning movements of heavy trucks. If cul-de-sacs must be built (such as in area just south of ditch) then the diameter should be at least 130 feet. 6. Screening: The Sketch Plan illustrates areas for berm and landscape screening and screen planting along their east property line just south of the ditch. This positive design feature should also be utilized in the following areas: a. east property line north of County Ditch 10 b. property adjacent to I-35W (required 20 foot buffer strip per Section 6. (7) (bb) of Ordinance 21) c. property adjacent Reinholt residence Also, the developer should provide "typical" details of the proposed berm and landscape buffers for city approval. 7. Retention Pond: The Sketch Plan illustrates a Proposed Retention Pond along I-35W. This important feature may be more accurately located when site topographical and soils data are provided during plan refinement. A better location may be proposed in a less buildable (wet) area. 8. County Ditch 10: The proposed 50 foot wide natural green area located along County Ditch 10 is another positive design feature which may be more accurately dimensioned when the existing natural vegetation is located on the refined plan. There may be some locations where the natural green protection area should be wider than 50 feet. 9. Site and Building Plans: As previously mentioned, Section 5.03 requires, that prior to rezoning in any other category than Agriculture (A), Single -Family (R-1) and Duplex Residences (R-2), certified site plans (and building plans, as appropriate) be furnished to the city. The existing and proposed site data required in this section will be very important to the Planning Commission in completing your review of this proposal. In summary, the proposed Light Industrial rezoning appears to be generally suited to the area. The proposed industrial park layout is also generally acceptable but needs considerable site inventory input and refinement. The efforts already made by the developer are significant and helpful in reviewing the proposal. I would recommend that he be encouraged to continue his efforts towards acquiring the rezoning by refining his plan and submitting it to the city for more thorough development review. The above comments summarize my second review of this proposal and I will be available for more thorough review when the city receives the refined industrial park plan. If you have any comments or questions regarding this review, please contact me. Sincerely, illiam Short Senior Associate cc: Ken Meister Landol Locher Harvey Karth, Glenn Rehbein Excavating Inc. WFS:ajo ..•••.-• 'INNIIIMOIN • • .s J • • 1 i fkeiktelt4 Akfillakt4/ glke C‘;oS cOM►, 0n(14 c 4LY) 1 "'- ' OR*W4 SEPT. REVSED NOV 1974 1978 Dp 0 IM SCALE I"= 1500' I/2 MILE 3/4 LAM CITI CENTERVILLE 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 484-3301 Planning & Zoning Board City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main St. Lino Lakes, MN 55014 400 E. St. Germain St. St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 251-7751 RE: Review Sketch Plan of Rehbein Industrial Area Dear Commissioners: 314 Oak Street Sauk Centre, Minnesota 56378 352-3664 Feb. 17, 1981 I have reviewed the sketch plan for the Rehbein Industrial Area and offer the following comments. This is a brief review, a more thorough review will be required at the preliminary plat stage. 1. The Anoka County Soils Survey classifies the soils in this area as Lino (LnA), Isanti (Iw), and Zimmerman (ZmB). The majority of the soil is Lino and Isanti with severe limitations for on -site sewer systems and moderate to severe limitations for road construction due to the high water table. Due to the severe limitations of the soil, on -site sewer systems will limit the type of industry that can utilize this area. 2 This area is included in Urban Service District No. 2 and scheduled for sanitary sewer between the years 198i and 1990. This would eliminate the need for on -site sewer systems. At this time, sanitary sewer is not available. 3 The water supply will come from individual wells and will limit the type of industry unless a water system is installed to meet the demands required for consumption and fire flows. At this time, City water is not available in this area. Planning & Zoning Board Page 2 Feb. 17, 1981 4. The streets in the industrial area should have a 9 ton design and have a minimum width of 36 feet. Fourth Ave. will also have to be upgraded to a 9 ton design. Anoka County should be contacted concerning the possible need to upgrade County State Aid No. 12 (Elm St.) due to the possibility of increased truck traffic. The cul-de-sacs shown in the industrial area are not recommended because they cause problems with parking, driveways, and snow removal. However, if cul-de-sacs are used, they should be increased in size to allow for a proper truck turning radius. Access to Lot 5 is not indicated on the plan. 5. The drainage in the area will be directed to a retention pond and then to County Ditch No. 10. Permits will be required from the Rice Creek Watershed District and easements will be required for County Ditch No. 10. An overall drainage plan shall be submitted and shall address ponding, erosion control and environmental protection of County Ditch No. T0. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Yours very truly, MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. enneth R. Meister, P.E. KRM:bjw cc: Wm. Short Landol Locher Z G 7 / / , -, /-- /o al / /-- it// t- -4 ti.r4)•):,L,07 s- _ (1-e 44-1;:ee .0"1-Aftg /43& PALICO PALICO INSTRUMENT laboratories March 13, 1981 Edna L. Sarner Clerk- Treasurer City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main St. Lino Lakes, MN 55014 7413 HIGHWAY 49 CIRCLE PINES, MINN. 55014 TEL. 612 - 786-2740 Re: Re -Zone by Glen Rehbein, Your Letter of March 9, 1981 Dear Mrs. Sarner: We will be unable to attend your March 23, 1981 zoning meeting because of prior committments. Our activities would not be effected by light industrial activity in the area shown but heavy industrial could be a problem. A high degree of concen- tration is required for the assembly and test work which we do. High noise levels or vibration from large motors, compressors, punch presses and the like would cause problems due to the soil composition in this area which transmits vibrations. Local construction has caused difficulty in the past but that is transient in nature. A plant location and activity which caused lights and walls to rattle and vibrate would cause problems for us since it would effect work efficiency. We, therefore, do object to the issuance of a zoning change to heavy industrial. Very truly yours, PALICO INSTRUMENT LABORATORIES ALL:pm Arden L. Lind President Instrumentation, Test and Control Systems CITY OF LINO LAKES° COUNTY OF ANOKA L..../fATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING TAKE NOTICE, that a public hearing shall be held before the Lino Lakes City Council, in the City Hall, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, MN, on March 23, 1981 at 8:00 p.m. on the application of Mr. Glenn Rehbein to rezone from Commetcial/Agricultural to Light Industrial/Heavy Industrial the following described real estate, situated in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, to -wit: At said hearing both pro- ponents for and opponents of said rezoning shall be heard. Edna L. Sarner Clerk -Treasurer City of Lino Lakes LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of Interstate Highway No. 35W. AND That part of the North- w Zuarter of the Southwest Quirt* of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 49 and Southeasterly of Interstate High- way No. 35W, EXCEPT that part of the South 437 feet thereof lying East of the West 538.56 feet thereof. AND That part of Lots 1 and 2, Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, lying North of the following de- scribed line, to -wit: Commencing at a point on the Northwesterly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 49 distant 300 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1, Auditors Subdivision Number 54; thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of State Trunk Highway No. 49, 127.34 feet, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northwesterly at right angles 272.63 feet to the South line of the Nor" 300 feet of said Lot 2; thk West, parallel with the No line of said Lot 2 to the West line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. AND All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the North- west Quarter of Section 17, Town- ship 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, de- scribed as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the South line of said Southeast Quar- ter of Northwest Quarter with the Westerly right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 8, as now established; thence on an assumed bearing of North 24 degrees 56 minutes East, along said Westerly road line, a distance of 1155.6 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 24 degres 56 minutes West, back along said Westerly road line, 113.93 feet; thence North 65 degrees 04 minutes West, 208.7 feet; thence South 24 degrees 56 minutes West, 250.7 feet; thence North 84 degrees 24 minutes West, 358.4 feet to the West line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence Northerly, along said West line, 290 feet, more or less, to the Southerly right-of-way line of the Southeast ramp of Trunk Highway No. $5W; Thence Northeasterly, along said Southerly right-of-way line, 77 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection thereof with a line that bears North 78 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence South 78 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds East, 652.6 feet to the point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL That part of Lots 1 and 2, Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota( lying South of the following de- scribed line, to -wit: Commencing at a point on the Northwesterly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 49 distant 300 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1, Auditors Subdivision Number 54; thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of State Trunk Highway No. 49, 127.34 feet, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northwesterly at right angles 272.63 feet to the South line of the North 300 feet of said Lot 2; thence West, parallel with the North line of said Lot 2 to the West line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. AND Lots 3 and 5 of Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota. Circulating Pines March 12, 1981 IDAVIT OF PUBLICATION negota, ,NOKA SS. Albert J. H i gg in , being duly sworn, on oath times herein stated has been the newspaper known as CIRCULATING PINES and has full ?in stated as follows: (1) Said newspaper is printed in the ,aper format and in column and sheet form equivalent in 00 square inches. (2) Said newspaper is a weekly and is .ch week. (3) Said newspaper has 50% of its news columns erest to the community which it purports to serve and does her publication and is not made up entirely of patents, plate ,ts. (4) Said newspaper is circulated in and near the orts to serve, has at least 500 copies regularly delivered to average of at least 75% of its total circulation currently paid the in arrears and has entry as second-class matter in its local wspaper purports to serve the City of the County of Anoka , and it has its known office of 'ines in said county, established and open during its regular ;athering of news, sale of advertisements and sale of ed by the managing officer of said newspaper or persons in s direction and control during all such regular business hours ler is printed. (6) Said newspaper files a copy of each issue Historical Society. (7) Said newspaper has complied with all at least two years preceding the day or dates of publication ewspaper has filed with the Secretary of State of Minnesota and each January 1 thereafter an affidavit in the form .3,of State and signed by its publisher .y public stating that the newspaper is a legal newspaper. ath that the printed notice of public hearing lenn Rehbein to rezone from commercial/ gx_i0u1tural__tcz___light & heavy industries reof was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was erem in the English language, once each week, for ve-weeks; that it was first so published on t hur Sday day of March. 19 $hand blished-on-every , day —of , 19 and that the of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is being the size and kind of type used in the composition ce, to wit: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz C. L «fors- one this -_,�_1 Notar My Co NELS PETERSEN _ -NOTARY P_URL1C.--Ml �,A ANOKA COt$iTittesota MpiCOMNM1SS10N FXPIRES MA9 30_1184 CITY OF LINO LAKES ;coUNtrit OF ANOKA STATE OF MiNNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC 11ARING ON REZONING TAKE NOTICE, that a public hearing shall be held before the Lino Lakes City Council, in the City Hall, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, MN, on March 23, 1981 at 8:00 p.m. on the application of Mr. Glenn Rehbein to rezone from Commeicial/Agricultural to Light Industrial/Heavy Industrial the following described real estate, situated in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, to -wit: At said hearing both pro- ponents for and opponents of said rezoning shall be heard. Edna L. Sarner Clerk -Treasurer City of Lino Lakes LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of Interstate Highway No. 35W. AND That part of the North- west Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 330" ange 22, Anoka County, 1VM sota, lying Northwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 49 and Southeasterly of Interstate High- way No. 35W, EXCEPT that part of the South 437 feet thereof lying East of the West 538.56 feet thereof. AND That part of Lots 1 and 2, Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, lying North of the following de- scribed line, to -wit: Commencing at a point on the Northwesterly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 49 distant 300 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1, Auditors Subdivision Number 54; thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of State Trunk Highway No. 49, 127.34 feet, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northwesterly at right angles 272.63 feet to the South line of the North 300 feet of said Lot 2; thence West, parallel with the North line of said Lot 2 to the W/"yine of said Lot 2 and there te. sting. AND All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the North- west Quarter of Section 17, Town- ship 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, de- scribed as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the South line of said Southeast Quar- ter of Northwest Quarter with the Westerly right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 8, as now established; thence on an assumed bearing of North 24 degrees 56 minutes East, along said Westerly road line, a distance of 1155.6 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 24 degres 56 minutes West, back along said Westerly road line, 113.93 feet; thence North 65 degrees 04 minutes West, 208.7 feet; thence South 24 degrees 56 minutes West, 250.7 feet; thence North 84 degrees 24 minutes West, 358.4 feet to the West line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence Northerly, along .said West line, 290 feet, more or less, to the Southerly right-of-way line of the Southeast ramp of Trunk Highway No. g5W; thence Northeasterly, along said Southerly right-of-way line, 77 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection thereof with a line that bears North 78 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence South 78 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds East, 652.6 feet to the point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL That part of Lots 1 and 2, Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota; lying South of the following de- scribed line, to -wit: Commencing at a point on the Northwesterly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 49 distant 300 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1, Auditors Subdivision Number 54; thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of State Trunk Highway No. 49, 127.34 feet, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northwesterly at right angles 272.63 feet to the South line of the North 300 feet of said Lot 2; thence West, parallel with the North line of said Lot 2 to the West line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. AND Lots 3 and 5 of Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota. Circulating Pines March 12,1981 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION '$ate of Rinnegota, County of ANOKA SS. P i v _' J . is i ir , being duly sworn, on oath says he is and during all the times herein stated has been the publisher and printer of the newspaper known as CIRCULATING PINES and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (1) Said newspaper is printed in the English language in newspaper format and in cblumn and sheet form equivalent in printed space to at least 900 square inches. (2) Said newspaper is a weekly and is distributed at least once each week. (3) Said newspaper has 50% of its news columns devoted to news of local interest to the community which it purports to serve and does not wholly duplicate any other publication and is not made up entirely of patents, plate matter and advertisements. (4) Said newspaper is circulated in and near the municipality which it purports to serve, has at least 500 copies regularly delivered to paying subscribers, has an average of at least 75% of its total circulation currently paid or no more than three months in arrears and has entry as second-class matter in its local post -office. (5) Said newspaper purports to serve the O i t V of Lino La kes , in the County of Anoka , and it has its known office of issue in the City of Circle Pines in said county, established and open during its regular business hours for the gathering of news, sale of advertisements and sale of subscriptions and maintained by the managing officer of said newspaper or persons in its employ and subject to his direction and control during all such regular business hours and at which said newspaper is printed. (6) Said newspaper files a copy of each issue immediately with the State Historical Society. (7) Said newspaper has complied with all the foregoing conditions for at least two years preceding the day or dates of publication mentioned below. (8) Said newspaper has filed with the Secretary of State of Minnesota prior to January 1, 1966 and each January 1 thereafter an affidavit in the form prescribed by the Secretary of State and signed by i t `= tutlisher and sworn to before a notary public stating that the newspaper is a legal newspaper. He further states on oath that the printed notice of ; ub j ^ '1E3 r in l� on rezonin' Glenn Re"ibri:i to rezone fro commercial aft-rIcul.tux_al---t-Q--1-fight-- _he: uy_ 1u u.st r ia. hereto attached as part hereof was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published therein in the English language, once each week, for one (1) weeks; that it was first so published on t hur sd ay the twelfth Oa) day of Marck., 19 C1,_ d y +o-a d ai^ 'h. da , 19 and that the following is a printed copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of said notice, to wit: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn to before me this (Notarial Seal) Q 1 Y 19 i- a of---- ------ NELS PETERSEN County NCT R''F Pl7BUC ATN�t ANOKA COUNTY 19 1L115St0NXPIRESMAR. 30, 1984 -)Lino Lakes City Counsil Members Lino Lakes, Minnesota Dear Council Members: March 12, 1981 In regard to the rezoning of Lake Drive scheduled for public hear- ing, I would like to present some points to ponder before final action is taken. At the December, 1980 meeting of the Zoning Board, Mr. Karth was instructed to contact each of the five homeowners residing within the area planned for rezoning, and work out a suitable agreement for their protection. He was asked to return with a report at the February, 1981 meeting. The Board stated that they would act on the rezoning at that time. Just before the February meeting I called Mr. Schumacher because none of the residents had been contacted. He assured me that there would be no action at the February meeting. There was action on a part of the area, but the Zoning Board did not feel comfortable about the part be- ing considered for heavy industrial. When Mr. Schumacher was questioned abobt the instructions the Zoning Board had issued in December, he stated it was not in the minutes. Mr. Bathke was not at the December meeting so I have contacted him and discussed the matter with him, requesting an investigation. Subsequently, Counsil gave preliminary approval of the entire area, even though the Zoning Board had expressed a desire to study the plan more thoroughly. We are sincerely hoping the City Counsil will be very cautious in passing the rezoning without holding a tight reign on what is proposed at a later date for the protection of the homeowners, and that new busi- nesses being developed will be compatable with adjoining' property use. On listening to discussion by Counsil at the preliminary approval, it is felt that if sewer were brought in, such controlls might not be exercised. Also the 75 ft. proposed buffer zone for residences might be inadequate for some types of activity. The ordinance allows 200 ft. for light in- dustrial and 300 ft. for heavy. Since there is now letigation pending against the already exsisting heavy industry, approval without careful consideration could very well lead to further legal action. Please study the plan carefully and make some provisions to protect homeowners. Counsil can prevent later head- aches by looking to this need before passing a rezone. Sincerely, Mrs. Paul E. Reinhold 7256 Lake Drive Circle Pines, MN 55014 r ...‘•_. . LAKE .11'E' MENIMMIllit• A - .tiVI 4 _ bao a000�iciiii amo- �11 PAR AMA '000II II e111 saakoar m� r•J*l anor � �II lN0 AIR PARK NORiM � • � � �� �, �1 . 1 I P AKE IEW LAKES REHA8ILITATIOIf CENTER - '.7LL-cul RESHANAU _7 , I 0 GEORGE LAKE _.L . >, CITY OF LINO LAKES APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Variance or REZONING NAMES (S) OF OWNER Raymond & Glenn R.ehbein ADDRESS 7309 Lake Dr., Lino Lakes, Mn., 55014 Rezoning XXXX FEE$ PHONE 78t-0657 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS (S) FOR WHICH APPLICATION IS MADE SEE ATTACHED SIZE OF PARCELS (S) SEE ATTACHED ACRES: FRONT FOOTAGE BY DEPTH REASON FOR APPLICATION Rezone from commercial andresidential agriculture to Light Industrial in Zone "A" and Heavy Industrial in Zone "B" as shown on attached drawing. DATED // 19 c.). S I GN E This application must be signed by the current owner (s) of the land. DO NOT NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE PLANNING & ZONING ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION STIPULATIONS FOR APPROVAL IF ANY P&Z Agenda Council Agenda REASONS FOR REJECTION, IF APPLICABLE CAJ id 0 eL,I. Os'tLt 2`-/r)0 G-AK('-> eeA be //t) L. A rajt e e .tP U.13 P 1.S7 7,5-045 /2 etif-kti se 67/6 oil ,L L Aj F. eeesy- 7 564,- 3,0:2,;ur Pk" 5 .5 47€3...1.. ie./und et �� 1-4R-7.ID 7991 L, K.- ►,1 2c2i0 E'om,SoAJ tt2 it©tt/01)S 7 L i L-4 e i)owtJ/e� 'J4L/PAP. 1,2LENa 7'ii 2-Alec oe Pv1-2 t)Pci/E ;.• ,tte_ 4,0 ria.51 73, Ke )LJ Pik( L Ai() s9 Teo t<6.. IC4iti1L3 2ELoori-,q 12.4„ e 7L:4- oesz, '73471 i-J=1k%. OP e/eJs. • / Ait.)47-re/o % I/441 sr-, 12$Z-L me..c h. ell A A) MAILING LIST Getty Refining Co. P.O. Box 1650 Tulsa, OK. 741'02 Mrs. Edith Morse 7364 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 /Mr. Kenneth Skoglund / 7481 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 ,'Mr. Charles Debee ^ / 2210 Bronson Drive Moundsview, MN. 5112 / Mr. Ronald Ramsden 7 7431 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 Mr. Jeffrey Johnson 7421 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 Mr. David Douvier 7417 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 Mr. Arden Lind 7411 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 iMr. Tom Ennis 7395 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 Rite Way Waterproofing 7337 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 Mr. Paul Reinhold 1 7256 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 Mr. Richard Zelinka / 7033 Lakeview Avenue Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 entennial School Dist. 12 North Road Circle Pines, MN'. 55014 Tilsen Homes ./ 627 S. Snelling Ave. St. Paul, MN. 55116 Mrs. Elsie Wenzel / 7150 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 Mr. Ellsworth Wenzel V 7158 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 / Mrs. John Kafka y/ 7191 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 /Mr. James Schilling 21921 Harrow Forest Lake, MN. 55025 MAILING LIST (cont.) Minn. Correctional 7525 - 4th Ave. Lino Lakes / United Methodist Church 7500 Lake Drive Lino,Lakes, MN. 55014 CITY HALL 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minn 55014 w x W w X !''1w 0 kg oz (0 a $A •z E' �z a 0 00 4 N U w w a N 0 m • 4 0 a Z oZ ° o a awe 5x 5txi 0 0 G i 0 0 Phone: (612) 464-5562 November 10, 1981 Glenn Rehbein Excavating 7309 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Subject: Rezone from Commercial to Light Industrial (Zone A) Dear Mr. Rehbein; On June 25, 1981 I sent you a letter regarding the expenses involved in the rezoning of your property. The total expenses were $613.50. To date I have not received this amount. Would you please check your records and remit to this office the $613.50. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Respectfully, L-717L f. (7/ i Marilyn Anderson, Deputy Clerk Council Meeting • February 23, 1981 The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called to order at 7;30 P.M., February 23, 1981 by Mayor Gourleywith all Council members present. Mr. Locher and Mr. Schumacher were also present. Mr. McLean moved to approve the minutes of February 9, 1981 as presented. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jaworski moved to approve the disbursements as presented. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. There was no one present who wanted to speak under the open mike portion of the agenda. The animal control contract was the next agenda item. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved tb tab;le this until Chief Myhre arrived. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. The representative of the County to give a report on the revised wet lands map hadnot arrived. This will be considered later in the meeting. Mr. Sc umacher presented the actions of the Planning and Zoning Board at the* meeting held on February 18, 1981. Glenn Rehbein - Lot Split in Shenandoah I. T:hisis for the splitting of the parcel of land that had been orginally dedicated for park purposes, but had been vacated by the City. Mr. Karth presented a certificate of survey for the two lots. The Planning and 'Zoning Board had recommended approval. Mr. McLean moved to approve this lot split. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. /Glenn Rehbein - Rezonirig zlu-3 Rcet. /This request is for the rezoning of a part of the lands bounded on the North, by I35W, on the East by Highway 8, on the West by 4th Avenue, and on the South by Elm Street. Mr. Schumacher pointed out this is just a sketch plan for Lots 1 through 10 and Lots 1 thorugh 11 proposed as LI and Lots 12,13, & 14 as HI. The Planning and Zoning had a lot of quesitons on this dealing with cul-de-sacs, screening, berms, etc., this plan will be coming back and this is just a request for the rezoning. The Planning and Zoning had \recommended a Public Hearing be set for the rezoning of Lots 1 through 10 and Lots 1 through 11 to LI and did not take any action on the HI lots. The Council questioned this action and Mr. Schumacher said he was not sure what they wanted in conjunction with the lots proposed for HI. Mrs. lElsenpeter pointed out that one of the lots is currently being used as HI. It was pointed out that even thought this land could be rezoned to LI, it would still be necessary for the builder to come before the Council for a ISpecial Use Permit in that this area is not served by sewer. 1 There was discussion as to the usages that could be applied in a HI zoning 'with the Council being concerned with this aspect of the zoning request. The Council felt that this should be dealt with at a public hearing rather than leaving this for future consideration. .-Council Meeting February 23, 1981 Page Two Mr. Schumacher recommended that the publication be as requested. This can /"41gen be decided at the Public Hearing. Mr. McLean moved to set a public hearing for the rezoning of Lots 1 thru 10,�I Lots 1 thru 11 as LI, and Lots 12,13, & 14 to HI for March 23, 1981 at 8:00 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. Nort wes ern Bell Variance Request Mr. Schumacher presented the proposal of this company for a building of 17x18, on a 50' parcel and having only a 20' setback from Birch Street. This parcel of land is located approximately 300' West of Centerville Road on Birch Street. Mr. McLean asked if the property would be sodded and Mr. Dokken felt that because of the configuration of the property, it would be left as is. Mr. McLean asked if this would be fenced and Mr. Dokken said the adjoining land owner would be using a portion of the property for a turn around and would probably use it for grazing cattle. Mr. Dokken said this will be a radio facility for the storage of anumber of cables that will increase the telephone capacity for this area. There was discussion of the landscaping of the area - the driveway - the possibility of conforming with the set back regulations. Mr. Dokken said that when they have a survey done, they will also have contour maps done. /'\ McLean moved to table this request until these maps are done and the Council has more information. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Dokken will call the office when he has the information and will be put on the agenda. Ostrom Variance Request. This request is for permission to allow a garage to remain nearer the street than the principle building. The garage had been constructed without a permit. Mr. Ostrom said he did not know he needed a permit - he thought this was included in the permit for construction of the home. Mr. Short had reviewed this matter and had recommended that this provision in the Ordinance be revoked and that garage be allowed nearer the street than the home. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended on a 4 to 1 vote that the Council amend the Ordinance to allow this. Mr. McLean felt that amending the Ordinance is not the answer to this - this is piecemealing the Ordinance. Mr. Jaworski questioned the owners as to why the building is where it is and Mrs. Ostrom said that when they bought the lot they were told that a street would be put in on the North line of the lot - so they built their home to face North and used Sunset - which is the West line - for an " dress. They built the garage on the West side of the house also facing firth. At the time they built, Leonard was not in. Mr. Jaworski suggested they move their driveway from Sunset to Leonard and this would eliminate the problem. p?cng and Zoning .----'-F,; bruary 18( 1981 The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 7:30 P.M., February 18, 1981, by Chairman Bathke. Members present; Klaus, Johnsen, Doocy, Prokop. Absent; Johnson. Mr. Bathke noted that there is a quorum present but not a 2/3's majority. The minutes of Jan. 7, 1981 special meeting were considered. Mr. Doocy moved to approve. Seconded by Mr. Prokop. Motion carried. Mr. Prokop moved to approve the minutes of January 21, 1981 as presented. Seconded by Mrs. Klaus. Motion carried. Mr. Schumacher reported on the actions of the Council actions on Jan. 26, 198I noting that a Resolution had been forwarded to the Metropolitan Council in conjunction with the submission of the Comprehensive Plan for review. Mr. Prokop asked the status of the court action in conjunction with the proposed quads and Mr. Schumacher said at the present time he has not heard of any further action at this point in time. The first item on the agenda was a request for a rezone as submitted by Mr. Glenn Rehbein. Mr. Harvey Karth represented Mr. Rehbein. Mr. Rehbein had also submitted a variance request and since there is not a 2/3's majority to vote on a rezone, Mr. Bathke suggested considering the variance first. This variance is for the splitting of the land that had been vacated as park lands in Shenandoah I. This would split that parcel of land into two lots each with more than the required square footage. Mr. Prokop moved to recommend approval of this variance for the lots splits per the survey of December 30, 1980.Seconded by Mr. Doocy. Motion carried. Mr. Johnson arrived. li considering the rezone request, the Board took some time to read the comments from Mr. Meister and Mr. Short they had just received this evening. - Mr. Bathke asked Mr. Karth what the company's reaction was to Mr. Short's letter, particularly in the area of crossing the creek. Mr, Karth said they had pulled the cul-de-sac back to the South of the Creek. Mr. Johnson questioned the use of the land of as HI at the present time - has there been a special use permit issued? Mr. Schumacher said that this use had been approve administratively- there had not been a special use permit issued. Mr. Johnson asked if this property is currently under litagation and Mr. Karth said, yes, a civil action. The points set forth in both Mr. Short's and Mr. Meister's letters of reviewed were discussed. Mr. Doocy moved to recommend approval of the rezone of the Glenn Rehbein proposal for LI, to include Lots 1 through 11, according to the sketch 1 and Zoning Board February 18, 2981 Page Two /"'N plan dated Feb, 3, 1981 and that consider Lots 12,13,E 14 at a later 1 date. Seconded by Mr. Prokop. Correction on the lot numbers would b 1 through 10, Block 1, and 1 through 11, Block 2 for the LI. Seconde by Mr. Prokop. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was a variance request for Nor rn-� Bell Telephone for the purchase of a small parcel of land for the construction of a building for the housing of cables. Mr. Dokken repre- sented Northwestern Bell and explained this will be a building 17'x18' and will used for equipment storage only. The land is located on Birch Street, approximately 300' West of Centerville Road. There were questions on the use of the building, will there be fencing, etc. with Mr, Dokken supplying the answers. Mr. Johnson moved to recommend approval of this variance request. Seconded by Mr. Prokop. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was a variance request by Mr Edward Ostrom. Thiss request is for the placement of a garage nearer the street than the home and is an after the fact request in that the garage has already been constructed. Mrs. Ostrom explained why the building is where it is. A letter from Mr. Short had been received this evening and the members took time to read Mr. Short's comments. Mr. Johnson moved to table this request to give the City Council time to change the language in Ord. #i56, Section 4.05 (I). Seconded by Mr. Prokop. Mr. Schumacher said the first question the Council will ask is does the Planning Commission agree with this amendment. Mr. Johnson said this is part of his motion. After some discussion of this matter, Mr. Bathke said he would prefer to leave the Ordinance as is and deal with this problem on an individual basis. The motion carried with Mr.Bathke voting, No. The next item on the agenda was a variance presented by the VFW for the transfer of a triangular parcel of land from the parcel to the North of the building. The existing fence is located on the North line of the proposed parcel the variance is being considered. There was discussion on the location of the fence, the septic system and the side lot line in conjunction with the existing home on the North parcel. Mr. Prokop moved to recommend approval of this variance with the provision that the proposed new lot line with be at least 10' from the existing home. Seconded by Mr. Doocy. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was a rezone request by Mr. Augustine. This • for a parcel of land located on the service road East of 135E and is for the purpose of constructing a dome building to house the manufacturing of dome home precut kits. /4j,t4- 0" the 4* of SW4Cof Sec. 17,)Range _22,,Township 31, lying southeasterly of I35W, and the NWT of SW4 of Sec. 17, Range 22, Township 31, lying Westerly of State Highway #49 except parcels #5750 and 5760, owned by Rite Way Waterprodfing, and Parcel 4205 in and the NE4 Zf SW3d of Sec. 17, Range 22, Township 31, /NVU4 the north 458 feet of p rrP7 .5--9- of Lot 1 and all of Parcel 2, Aud. Sub. No. 54 to Light Industrial and, all of parcel 630ofLot 2, Lots 3 & 5 and the South 260 feet of Parcel 520, Lot 1 of Aud. Sub. No. 54 to Heavy Industrial. 600, Lot O 4 H tn a G or 64 V a March 9, 1981 Dear Resident, You are hereby notified that a public hearing on the application of Mr. Glenn Rehbein to rezone from Commercial/ Agricultural to Light Industrial/Heavy Industrial will be held before the Lino Lakes City Council in the Council Chambers at 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota on March 23, 1981 at 8:00 P.M. the lands so noted on the map below. At said hearing both proponents for and opponent of said rezoning shall be heard. N >4 U .i w g N co x 4 W Mry A i 1 oC dna L. Sarner o :V Clerk -Treasurer M w U p a City of Lino Lake Z U U BABCOCK, LOCHER, NEILSON & MANNELLA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 TEL:(612)421.5151 EDMUND P. BABCOCK LANDOL J. LOCHER JAMES M. NEILSON FELIX A. MANNELLA JOHN R. SPEAKMAN ROBERT F. MANNELLA WILLIAM D. SCHUTTER RICHARD W. JOHNSON GARY T. LAFLEUR BARBARA J. GISLASON March 5, 1981 Edna L. Sarner, Clerk City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 NORTHTOWN OFFICE NORTHTOWN CENTER 117 NORTHTOWN DRIVE BLAINE, MN. 55484 TEL., (612) 786-0250 Re: Proposed rezoning by Glenn Rehbein Excavating, Inc. I enclose, herewith, legal descriptions which I have drafted per your instructions of today. Yours very truly, Landol Locher LJL:dc Enclosures CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING TAKE NOTICE, that a public hearing shil be held before the Lino Lakes City Council, in the City Hall, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, MN, on March 23, 1981 at 8:00 P.M. on the Application of Mr. Glenn Rehbein to rezonne from Commercial/Agricultural to Light Industrial/Heavy Industrial the following described real estate, situated in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, to -wit: (see attached) At said hearing both proponents for and opponents of said rezoning shall be heard. Edna L. Sarner Clerk -Treasurer City of Lino Lakes LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of Interstate Highway No. 35W. AND That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 49 and Southeasterly of Interstate Highway No. 35W, EXCEPT that part of the South 437 feet thereof lying East of the West 538.56 feet thereof. AND That part of Lots 1 and 2, Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, lying North of the following described line, to -wit: Commencing at a point on the Northwesterly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 49 distant 300 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1, Auditors Subdivision Number 54; thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of State Trunk Highway No. 49, 127.34 feet, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northwesterly at right angles 272.63 feet to the South line of the North 300 feet of said Lot 2; thence West, parallel with the North line of said Lot 2 to the West line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. AND All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the South line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter with the Westerly right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 8, as now established; thence on an assumed bearing of North 24 degrees 56 minutes East, along said Westerly road line, a distance of 1155.6 feet to the point of beginning thence South 24 degrees 56 minutes West, back along said Westerly road line, 113.93 feet; thence North 65 degrees 04 minutes West, 208.7 feet; thence South 24 degrees 56 minutes West, 250.7 feet; thence North 84 degrees 24 minutes West, 358.4 feet to the West line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence Northerly, along said West line, 290 feet, more or less, to the Southerly right-of-way line of the Southeast ramp of Trunk Highway No. 35W; thence Northeasterly, along said Southerly right-of-way line, 77 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection thereof with a line that bears North 78 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence South 78 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds East, 652.6 feet to the -point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL That part of Lots 1 and 2, Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, lying South of the following described line, to -wit: Commencing at a point on the Northwesterly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 49 distant 300 feet South of the North line of said Lot 1, Auditors Subdivision Number 54; thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of State Trunk Highway No. 49, 127.34 feet, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northwesterly at right angles 272.63 feet to the South line of the North 300 feet of said Lot 2; thence West, parallel with the North line of said Lot 2 to the West line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. AND Lots 3 and 5 of Auditors Subdivision Number 54, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota. SBID PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARSON DiTACT - PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REM. AND fOR SUBJECT Glenn MESSAGE Dear Ken; Iazose tisqu.st Is it posit -hie far you to rerisv ar. E T U R N T DATE 2 / 11 / i1 request for s yes rise at d send your is to es far the 2/18/81 Planniag and Zemial' Beard meeting? 7ue• REOTFORM . 4S 472 SIGNED SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT - �� PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. DATE POLY PAK (50 SETS) 4P4T2 fc- A /4/2 ? Et k / )7 b " 1. c. )50 Al Cd2. Q.1733 71 7) 1--S. )) I 11" *L) 11-1L7 <1. 1, ) I,_ ) — - E S- i) ci A ' 2`f 3)) (/ •I.- i.1))_1..) " c i P 1,- ..,---:- ,,,,I) (1,/.41,),Lf..-._ cjI 1-±- h ) F>' °"/ / 4 47S-1/) 1(12/24--te/2/Atz, IREEDTFORPAL 4S 472 F_ R O SEND PARTS 1; AND 3 WITH, CARBON INTACT - PART 3 WILL SE RETURNS WITH REKY. 4 ....7)777.477XASZ:TESPE770*,777447e STXTTAC(7,i2757777)§079277EWNSQ(No(4)(447M677NAA*E(WEEWMKA-414,7h)-:))210:7W 774557.5057(7)74777709775041077a(74,147747 Glean *Abele SUBJECT MESSAGE Attedhed is a plat of the proposed area to be rescued. I have of the Plamalas aad Boating Board 'dilutes. Is it possible to have your comments for the Fahroary 1841981 RETURN TO °I'm* Frit-biForn 45 472 SIGNED SIGNED 7m11,4,07, SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT - PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. DATE 11 81 DATE MV,MP .',72241:7.,TPZ.Ei4242‘77P77 POLY PAK (50 SETS) 4P472 December 17, 1980 planning & Zoning ,Page Three Mr. Reinert made the following statement; "As Chairman , I exercise certain prerogatives and one the them is in regard to the agenda in trying to make thj.N an efficient operating board fully informed with all the facts so we ca to a good job. That was my major concern about that particular item being set up special." The first item on the agenda was a special use permit application by Gary Taylor for the construction of a pole building on his property along Lake Drive North of Main STreet to be used for the purpose of old car restoration and aused car sales lot. The land is currently zoned commercial and the special use permit is for the construction of a building for commercial use in an unsewered area. Several of the residents had questions that were discussed. MRs. Schwankl asked about the absence of the signatures of the surrounding property pwners. There was discussion on the possibility of noise pollution. Mr. Reinert asked Mr. Doocy to read Mr. Short's letter on this request. Mrs. Schwankl moved to deny this request. Seconded by MR. Doocy. Mr. Johnson asked to amend the motion to 'deny because this is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan' - Mrs, Schwankl refused the amendment. Mr. Reinert asked for a second - Mr. Prokop seconded the amendment. The amend- ment passed with Mr. Reinert casting the tie breaking vote. The original motion carried. There was a five minutes recess called at this point in time. Th iext item on the agenda was a rezoning request by Mr. Glenn and Mr. Ray Rehbein to create an Industrial Park on lands located South of I35W, West of Lake Drive, North of Elm Street and East of 4th Avenue with the exception of 'the several residential parcels existing. There was a definite concern of some sort of scredjing or a buffer zone for the existing residential lands. Mrs. Reinhold pointed out there is current litagation with some of this land and she didn't feel this rezoning request should be rail roaded through. The Board asked that Mr. Karth present a more specific and detailed plan at a subseque#tp P&Z meejfting. Mr. Johnson moved to table this rezoning request; pending a more detailed layout being presented to the Board for consideration, surrounding property owners to be notified by staff, per Mr. Reinert. Second- ed by Mr. Prokop. Motion _carried. Mr. James Livingston requested a variance for the split of a lot on the corner of Sunrise and Fairmont. It was noted this is the only areas in the City where lots of less that 1 acre and:150' frontage is allowed. Mr. Doocy moved to recommend approve of this lot split. Seconded by Mr. Prokop. Mr. Johnson asked to amend the motion to include ' this is being allowed because of a precedent having been set' this amendment was accepted. Motion carried! Mr. James Schilling had applied for a rezoning of the remaining portion of Lino Industrial Park but no one was present. The matter was tabled. Mr Joel Peterson's request for a special use permit was considered. Mr. A DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date Subject To Dept. From Dept December 15, 1980 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Moser 540 Marshan Lane Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Moser; The letter I sent to you dated December 8, 1980 regarding property Mr. Glenn and Mr. Ray Rehbein have requested to be rezoned was sent to you in error. Your property is not located within 300 feet of the property to be rezoned and you should not have received that notice. Please accept my apology for this error. Respectfully, Edna L. Sarner, Clerk - Treasurer CITY HALL h O O a 1189 Main Street N U W N Id Q A `. Ez A 0 DC A'x 02 rr 0 0 Phone: (612) 464-5562 December 15, 1980 Mr. & Mrs. Arthur Rehbein 532 Marshan Lane Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Rehbein; The letter I sent to you dated December 8, 1980 regarding property Mr. Glenn and Mr. Ray Rehbein have requested to be rezoned was sent to you in error. Your property is not located within 300 feet of the property to be rezoned and you should not have received that notice. Please accept my apology for this error. Respectfully, Edna L. Sarner, Clerk - Treasurer -4e CITY HALL a w 14 co a a uZ 0a bOF. •z m z a dz a U 0 4 Phone: (612) 464-5562 December 8, 1980 TO Landowners within 300 feet of Subject listed below. SUBJECT: Glenn Rehbein and Raymond Rehbein Request to rezone portion of their property from Commercial to Light Industrial or Heavy Industrial The above named landowner will appear at the December 17, 1980 Planning and Zoning Board meeting to request that he be issued a rezoning on portion of his property. Since your property is within 300 feet of the above named property owner, we are notifying you by mail of this request. If you have any questions, comments or objections regarding this rezone request, please appear at this same December 17, 1980 meet- ing. Respectfully, Edna L. Sarner, Clerk - Treasurer REZONE - Glenn & Raymond Rehbein 21 22 23 24 25 Initials, Date Prepared by Approved by, Light & Heavy Industrial Payments Balance ■I■ HI ■1 • ■ ■ I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20