HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-25-2019 Council PacketEXPANDED AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, March 25, 2019
***********
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Reinert, Councilmembers Maher, Manthey, Rafferty and Stoesz
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M.
Community Room (not televised)
1. Review Regular Agenda
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Roll Call - Rafferty, Stoesz, Maher, Manthey and Reinert were present
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment - none
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
The agenda was amended to table Item 3A
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) March 25, 2019 (Check No. 109883 through 109972) in the
amount of $636,527.35.
B) Consider approval of March 4, 2019 Work Session Minutes
Councilmember Maher absent
C) Consider approval of March 11, 2019 Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Manthey absent
D) Consider approval of March 11, 2019 Minutes – Interviews
Councilmember Manthey absent
E) Consider approval of March 11, 2019 Minutes – Interviews
Councilmember Manthey absent
F) Consider approval of March 5, 2019 Minutes – Jt. Meeting with
Planning and Zoning Board – Comprehensive Plan
G) Resolution No. 19-40, Approving a Peddler License for Edward Jones Financial –
Daniel Chrzanowski
H) Consider Resolution No. 19-41 Approving Declaration of Restrictive Covenant for
Main Street Shoppes 2nd Addition
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Stoesz, to approve
Consent Agenda Items 1A through 1H as presented, was adopted
(Abstain – Maher 1B; Manthey 1C, 1D & 1E; Rafferty 1F)
Council Agenda -2- March 25, 2019 EXPANDED AGENDA
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 2-19, Amending Chapter 208 of the Lino Lakes City Code Providing for a Public Safety Department, Jeff Karlson
Item was tabled
B) Chapter 205 of the Lino Lakes City Code, Jeff Karlson
i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 3-19, Amending Chapter 205
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Stoesz, to approve the 2nd Reading and Passage of Ordinance No. 03-19 as presented, was adopted; Yeas, 5; Nays none
ii. Consider Resolution No. 19-38, Approving Summary Publication of Ordn
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Stoesz, to approve
Resolution No. 19-39 as presented, was adopted
C) Chapter 207 of the Lino Lakes City Code, Jeff Karlson
i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 4-19, Amending Chapter 207
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Maher, to approve
the 2nd Reading and Passage of Ordinance No. 04-19 as presented, was
adopted; Yeas, 5; Nays none
ii. Consider Resolution No. 19-39, Approving Summary Publication of Ordn
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Maher, to approve Resolution No. 19-38 as presented, was adopted
D) Consider Appointment of a Police Officer, Karissa Bartholomew
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Maher, to approve
the appointment of Kenny Sinna as recommended, was adopted
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution No. 19-35, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction Contract for Civic Complex Roof Replacement Project, Justin Williams
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Rafferty, to approve
Resolution No. 19-35 as presented, was adopted
B) Consider Resolution No. 19-36, Awarding Contracts for Arena Acres Park
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Maher, to approve Resolution No. 19-36 as presented, was adopted
Council Agenda -3- March 25, 2019 EXPANDED AGENDA
C) Consider Resolution No. 19-37, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and
Specifications, Well No. 1 Rehabilitation Project, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Manthey, to approve Resolution No. 19-37 as presented, was adopted
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution No. 19-26, Approving Amendments to the Designated
Municipal State Aid Street System, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Rafferty, to approve Resolution No. 19-26 as presented, was adopted
B) Consider Resolution 19-28, Approving Amended Development Agreement, Northpointe 7th Addition, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to approve
Resolution No. 19-28 as presented, was adopted
C) Consider Resolution 19-32, Adopting Local Water Plan, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to approve Resolution No. 19-32 as presented, was adopted
D) Consider Resolution 19-27, Approving Change Order No. 1, West Shadow Lake Area Improvement Project, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to approve
Resolution No. 19-27 as presented, was adopted
E) Consider Resolution 19-33, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications,
East Cedar Street & Elmcrest Avenue Improvement Project, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Stoesz, to approve
Resolution No. 19-33 as presented, was adopted
F) Consider Resolution 19-34, Approving Pay Request No. 1 and Final, 2019
Surface Water Improvement Project, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to approve Resolution No. 19-34 as presented, was adopted
G) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19, Amending City Code Section 1007 Related to Multiple Principal Buildings on One Parcel, in Commercial, Industrial
or Public/Semi-Public Zoning Districts, Michael Grochala
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Stoesz, to approve
the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19 as presented, was adopted
H) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19, Amending City Code Section 1007 Providing for Retaining Walls in Excess of 42” in Height, Michael Grochala
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Maher, to approve
the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19 as presented, was adopted
Council Agenda -4- March 25, 2019 EXPANDED AGENDA
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Following adjournment of the regular meeting, the Council will reconvene in a closed session
to discuss land acquisition related to the following projects:
1. NE Drainage Area (Peltier Outlet) Improvements
2. Lake Drive/Marketplace Dwelling Acquisition
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead March 27, 2019 through April 8, 2019 Wednesday, March 27 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Environmental Board Monday, April 1 6:00 p.m., Community Room Council Work Session Monday, April 1 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Park Board
Thursday, April 4 8:00 a.m., Community Room EDAC
Monday, April 8 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers City Council Meeting
Updated 3/22/2019
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, March 25, 2019
***********
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Reinert, Councilmembers Maher, Manthey, Rafferty and Stoesz
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M.
Community Room (not televised)
1. Review Regular Agenda
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) March 25, 2019 (Check No. 109883 through 109972) in the
amount of $636,527.35.
B) Consider approval of March 4, 2019 Work Session Minutes
Councilmember Maher absent
C) Consider approval of March 11, 2019 Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Manthey absent
D) Consider approval of March 11, 2019 Minutes – Interviews
Councilmember Manthey absent
E) Consider approval of March 11, 2019 Minutes – Interviews
Councilmember Manthey absent
F) Consider approval of March 5, 2019 Minutes – Jt. Meeting with
Planning and Zoning Board – Comprehensive Plan
G) Resolution No. 19-40, Approving a Peddler License for Edward Jones Financial –
Daniel Chrzanowski
H) Consider Resolution No. 19-41 Approving Declaration of Restrictive Covenant for
Main Street Shoppes 2nd Addition
Council Agenda -2- March 25, 2019
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 2-19, Amending Chapter 208 of the Lino
Lakes City Code Providing for a Public Safety Department, Jeff Karlson
*Council may vote to dispense with full reading of the ordinance
*Roll vote is required for adoption of the ordinance
B) Chapter 205 of the Lino Lakes City Code, Jeff Karlson
i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 3-19, Amending Chapter 205
*Council may vote to dispense with full reading of the ordinance
*Roll call vote is required for adoption of the ordinance
ii. Consider Resolution No. 19-38, Approving a Summary of Ordinance No. 3-19
for Publication
C) Chapter 207 of the Lino Lakes City Code, Jeff Karlson
i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 4-19, Amending Chapter 207
*Council may vote to dispense with full reading of the ordinance
*Roll call vote is required for adoption of the ordinance
ii. Consider Resolution No. 19-39, Approving a Summary of Ordinance No. 4-19
for Publication
D) Consider Appointment of a Police Officer, Karissa Bartholomew
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution No. 19-35, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction
Contract for Civic Complex Roof Replacement Project, Justin Williams
B) Consider Resolution No. 19-36, Awarding Contracts for Arena Acres Park
Project, Justin Williams
C) Consider Resolution No. 19-37, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and
Specifications, Well No. 1 Rehabilitation Project, Diane Hankee
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution No. 19-26, Approving Amendments to the Designated
Municipal State Aid Street System, Diane Hankee
B) Consider Resolution 19-28, Approving Amended Development Agreement,
Northpointe 7th Addition, Diane Hankee
C) Consider Resolution 19-32, Adopting Local Water Plan, Diane Hankee
Council Agenda -3- March 25, 2019
D) Consider Resolution 19-27, Approving Change Order No. 1, West Shadow Lake
Area Improvement Project, Diane Hankee
E) Consider Resolution 19-33, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications,
East Cedar Street & Elmcrest Avenue Improvement Project, Diane Hankee
F) Consider Resolution 19-34, Approving Pay Request No. 1 and Final, 2019
Surface Water Improvement Project, Diane Hankee
G) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19, Amending City Code Section 1007
Related to Multiple Principal Buildings on One Parcel, in Commercial, Industrial
or Public/Semi-Public Zoning Districts, Michael Grochala
H) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19, Amending City Code Section 1007
Providing for Retaining Walls in Excess of 42” in Height, Michael Grochala
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Following adjournment of the regular meeting, the Council will reconvene in a closed session
to discuss land acquisition related to the following projects:
1. NE Drainage Area (Peltier Outlet) Improvements
2. Lake Drive/Marketplace Dwelling Acquisition
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
March 27, 2019 through April 8, 2019
Wednesday, March 27 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Environmental Board
Monday, April 1 6:00 p.m., Community Room Council Work Session
Monday, April 1 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Park Board
Thursday, April 4 8:00 a.m., Community Room EDAC
Monday, April 8 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers City Council Meeting
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 5, 2019
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : March 5, 2019 4
TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5 TIME ENDED : 9:10 p.m. 6 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, 7 Manthey, Stoesz and Mayor Reinert 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member Maher 9
10
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director John 11
Swenson; Community Development Director Michael Grochala; City Planner Katie 12 Larsen; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; City Engineer Diane Hankee. 13
1. 12th Avenue Trail – City Engineer Hankee noted that the council is considering a 14
trail connection in this area as requested by area residents. Based on preliminary design 15
work and meeting with property owners in the area, options have been identified: east 16
side with existing ditch system; east side with adding curb and gutter along 12th Avenue; 17 and west side at 12th Avenue. Staff did engage residents in establishing these options and 18 on drainage issues. Ms. Hankee noted cost estimates and said that staff would like to 19
discuss financing options with the council; staff is recommending that the council 20
consider funding as part of 2020 budget discussions. 21
22 Council Member Manthey remarked that he appreciates the willingness of the property 23 owners to get this project done. The cost has come in higher than expected. 24 25
Mayor Reinert asked if there is any other work in that area in the foreseeable future and 26
Community Development Director Grochala said nothing with the street there; something 27
further down. The council will have to discuss this project as part of next year’s budget. 28
29 Council Member Rafferty remarked that the situation is unique; there’s traffic and speed 30 and a safety situation that has been brought to the council’s attention. 31
32
A resident noted that getting to the park is a big part of the situation but there are also a 33
lot of people walking dogs; she noted also that there is quite a drop off. 34
35 Council Member Stoesz asked if it would be feasible to make the shoulder of the road 36 wider as a temporary project. Ms. Hankee said that was considered but wasn’t identified 37 as a good fix for the long term and for the cost. 38
39
Mayor Reinert asked that the matter come back to the council at the May work session to 40
keep it on the radar. He explained for the residents who were present how the city 41
collects a park dedication fee. The residents asked where their park dedication funds 42 went and Mr. Grochala said probably Birch Park and Holly trail. 43
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 5, 2019
DRAFT
2
The council will continue consideration of the trail project at the May work session. 44
2. Lyngblomsten Senior Living Community – City Planner Larsen noted that this 45
project has been reviewed at the Planning and Zoning board and also at a 46
neighborhood meeting. She reviewed a PowerPoint presentation outlining: 47
- Background on the land use application for the redevelopment; 48
- Site location map; 49
- A general overview of the project elements proposed (218 housing units, club 50
house, parking lots, future restaurant, future commercial development); 51
- Senior living community is proposed (elements reviewed); 52 - Senior living campus is included (elements reviewed); 53 - 3D rendering of the proposed project; 54
- History of Lyngblomsten; a longstanding local organization serving older 55
adults; noted that some services would be available to non-development 56
residents; 57
- The project includes three phases and elements; 58
- Zoning and land use review; 59 - Density (9.36 units per acre net density); 60
- Master Plan that was approved for the area previously; comparison with 61
master plan overview and Lyngblomsten plan overview; 62
- Transportation and access; 63
Regarding the transportation element, Mayor Reinert recommended that staff 64
include discussion of a roadway alignment as they look at roadway work. 65 Director Grochala explained how the County is looking at building on some 66 improvements. Council Member Stoesz mentioned people coming out of the 67
gas station and the sharp ending of the trail on the Shoreview side. Ms. 68
Larsen noted that the trail is part of Anoka County’s regional system. 69
- Traffic study submitted in January; study findings were reviewed; overall level 70
of services; 71 - Trails and open space planning; 72 - Greenspace buffers (existing trees and more plantings planned); 73
- Utility Improvements planned; 74
- Stormwater utilities planned; 75
- Site design and urban form; 76
- Architecture review (building views, tree preservation, landscaping); 77 - Impervious surface meets requirements; 78 - Preliminary plat (common areas to be maintained by Lyngblomsten); There 79
was discussion about commercial development on the corner of Hodgson and 80
County Road J; 81
- Park dedication fees (trail construction costs will be deducted); 82
- Design guidelines (would come forward with final design/plat); 83
- Architectural design standards (will continue being developed); 84 - Summary (benefits gained, setbacks); 85
- Results of Planning and Zoning Board review; 86
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 5, 2019
DRAFT
3
- Tax increment financing (TIF) application anticipated. 87 88
Mayor Reinert asked for the Public Safety Department’s opinion on the project. Director 89
Swenson said the department has been involved since early conception; there is 90
willingness on the developer’s part to work with the City on service needs but it’s clear 91
that there will be additional emergency services needed with the development; he added 92 that this facility will have nursing staff and that should be helpful. 93 94
Mr. Witham, 211 Woodridge Lane, representing the neighborhood. He stated that they 95
appreciate that the developer has listened to their concerns. There was much concern 96
about the height. They are happy for the buffering. Some people have concern about 97
water and runoff and they are going to trust the planners. They don’t want to see this 98 project lead the way to additional four story buildings because that would overwhelm 99 capacity. They are happy with the way the developer has used the flexibility of the PUD 100
so as to benefit all parties. Mayor Reinert said he feels that the design presented would 101
be friendly to the existing residents; there seems to be attention to fitting into the existing 102
neighborhood. A resident noted his concern (he’s on the south end) that he will not get 103
the same buffer as his neighbors. Staff will continue working on that element and will try 104
to address that concern much as possible. 105 106
Mayor Reinert indicated that the project will continue moving forward so the council will 107
be seeing requests for approval. 108
109
Council Member Stoesz asked how the northern road will connect and how that impacts 110
the future. Ms. Larsen explained how the roadway system is being planned to serve 111 future development on the eastside of Hodgson. Council Member Stoesz asked about the 112 appropriate time to discuss construction traffic and imposition on the neighborhood; Ms. 113
Larsen said it will certainly be discussed and managed as construction begins. 114
3. Elmcrest Avenue and Cedar Street Roadway Paving – City Engineer Hankee 115
explained that staff is following up on the council’s January direction to meet with the 116 City of Hugo regarding cost sharing for this project. Staff was also asked to explore the 117
elimination of certain hunting restrictions in the area. The City of Hugo has outlined 118
their hunting restrictions and are not receptive to any change. The roadway improvement 119
costs were discussed and Hugo eventually agreed to cover the cost of Elmcrest Avenue. 120
They will continue their plowing services also. Staff is proposing a plan to finance this 121
work through existing special assessment funding in the street reconstruction fund and 122 MSA funds. A joint powers agreement would establish terms of the project with the City 123 of Hugo. 124
125
The council concurred with the plans as presented, recognizing the additional work of 126
staff that brings forward a better situation. This could be a 2019 project. 127
128 Mayor Reinert asked Director DeGardner to thank the plowing staff for their good work; 129 awesome job this year. 130
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 5, 2019
DRAFT
4
4. Blue Heron Days Parade Traffic Plan – Public Safety Deputy Director Kyle 131
Leibel reviewed the written staff report outlining options for changes including changing 132
where parade would end and/or establishing a trail for property access during the parade. 133
Mayor Reinert said he likes option three but also sees the benefit of having the parade 134
follow a circuit to get things back to start. 135 136 Council Member Manthey said he supports option three and wouldn’t have a problem 137
with adding another option to get parade vehicles back. 138
139
Mayor Reinert said he’d hate to see the parade shortened by a third so would appreciate 140
some way to keep it its current length. 141 142 Public Safety staff will begin discussions with Target regarding the establishment of a 143
path. 144
5. West Shadow Lake Drive Project Request for Additional Curb – City 145
Engineer Hankee reviewed her written staff report. As part of a resident information 146 meeting, staff was asked by certain property owners to amend the street construction 147
plans to keep the golf course access open a little longer (until the golf course opens in the 148
spring) and to extend the addition of curb at the south end of the roadway. The extension 149
of curb and would add an additional $28,000 to the project cost (which would come from 150
the closed bond fund). 151
152 The possibility of other non-curbed areas being added was discussed. Staff will 153 approach all those without curbs plan. 154
155
The council concurred with the amendments but directed staff will do the outreach and 156
come forward with a full recommendation for a change order. 157
6. Recreation Complex Discussion – Public Services Director DeGardner read his 158
written staff report. He is providing additional information on cost of the recreation 159
development that was discussed (pickle ball courts, tennis courts, parking lot, trails and 160
landscaping). Staff is identifying two sources that could fill the gap in funding past the 161
budget for this year. 162
163 Council Member Rafferty discussed that the project makes sense in conjunction with 164 other work that will be done in the area (i.e. water tower) but not in the context it being 165
the beginning of an overall buildout of the park. 166
167
Mayor Reinert said he supports a project with the property. He asked about a schedule 168
and Mr. DeGardner said it would make sense in conjunction with the water project, with 169 completion most likely in 2020. Mayor Reinert indicated that there may be additional 170 opportunity and investment coming for a project in this area and so he’d like to continue 171
the discussion at next month’s work session. 172
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 5, 2019
DRAFT
5
7. Zoning Ordinance Updates - Community Development Director Grochala 173
reviewed his written report, utilizing a PowerPoint presentation about the areas that staff 174
proposes to change. Amendments are proposed to the zoning ordinance in the following 175
areas: 176
- Multiple Building on Single Lot in Commercial/Industrial; 177 - Exterior Storage; 178 - Retaining Walls; 179
- Driveway Width; 180
- Metal Roofs. 181
182 Staff will proceed to review the changes as necessary with the Planning and Zoning 183 Board and will bring amendments forward to the council as appropriate. 184
8. Police K9 Rotation – Public Safety Director Swenson reviewed his written report 185
updating the council on the City’s K-9 program and members. He is suggesting that it is 186
probably time to look at a replacement plan and that may involve some overlap and the 187
outfitting of an additional vehicle. 188 189
Mayor Reinert said he sees the benefit in moving forward now and in a way that doesn’t 190
include an interruption in service and that provides for good training of a new K-9 and 191
handler. He sees the associated cost as nominal. 192
193
Council Member Rafferty asked about experience with the type of dog used and Director 194 Swenson said that will be part of discussions moving forward; that topic is linked to 195 training options. 196
9. 2019 Squad Purchase – Public Safety Director Swenson reviewed his written 197
report that informs the council of progress in making the 2019 authorized squad purchase. 198
The Ford Motor Company has stated a delay in fulfilling orders resulting in the City 199 having to wait for a 2020 model at an additional cost. Staff has worked with the City 200
Attorney and the State of Minnesota on rectifying or at least making the most of this 201
situation. 202
10. Advisory Board Interview Schedule – Administrator Karlson asked the council 203 to schedule the next set of interviews. 204 205
The Council will interview six candidates on March 11, beginning at 5:30 p.m. 206
11. Council Updates on Boards/Commissions, City Council 207
208 Council Member Stoesz will be elected Chair of the North Metro Telecommunications 209
Board. 210 211
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 5, 2019
DRAFT
6
Director Swenson updated the council on efforts to gain support on the resolution on 212 emergency services. 213
12. Monthly Progress Report – Administrator Karlson noted that there are no 214
applicants for the recycling intern position. The position will continue to be advertised. 215
Review Regular Council Agenda of March 11, 2019 – The agenda was reviewed and 216
there were no changes. 217
218
The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. 219
220 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 221 March 25, 2019. 222
223
224
225
226
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 227 228
COUNCIL MINUTES March 11, 2019
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : March 11, 2019 4
TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 5 TIME ENDED : 7:00 p.m. 6 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Maher, 7 Stoesz and Mayor Reinert 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member Manthey 9
10
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Director of 11
Public Safety John Swenson; and City Clerk Julie Bartell 12 13 PUBLIC COMMENT 14
15
No one was present to address the council regarding a matter not on the agenda. 16
17
SETTING THE AGENDA 18 19 The agenda was approved as presented. 20
21
SPECIAL CEREMONY 22
23
Oath of Police Service – Officer Alex Hallin 24
25 CONSENT AGENDA 26
27
Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1C, as presented. 28
Council Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 29
30
ITEM ACTION 31 32 Consideration of Expenditures: 33
34
March 11, 2019 (Check No. 109820 – 35
109882, $195,171.46) Approved 36
37 February 25, 2019 Council Work Session Minutes Approved 38 39
February 25, 2019 City Council Meeting Minutes Approved 40
41
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 42 43 There was no report from the Finance Department. 44 45
COUNCIL MINUTES March 11, 2019
DRAFT
2
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 46
3A) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 02-19, Amending Chapter 208 of the City Code – 47
Administrator Karlson explained that the amendment would align with what the City’s current 48
organizational structure as it relates to the Public Safety Department and is revised to include fire 49
personnel. 50
Council Member Maher moved to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 02-19 as presented. 51 Council Member Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 52
3B) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 03-19, Amending Chapter 205 of the City Code – 53
Administrator Karlson reported that the amendment revises language to confirm that the Public Safety 54
Director reports to the City Administrator. Language is also amended to allow for appointment of 55
certain temporary positions to be accomplished administratively rather than having to go the City 56
Council for approval. 57 58 Mayor Reinert added that the temporary positions impacted will always be funded within the budget. 59
Any regular full or part-time position will still come forward for City Council approval. 60
Council Member Maher moved to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 03-19 as presented. 61
Council Member Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 62
3C) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 04-19, Amending Chapter 207 of the City Code – 63 Administrator Karlson explained that this amendment changes language to reflect the City’s current 64 organizational structure. 65
Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 04-19 as presented. 66
Council Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 67
3D) Consider Resolution No. 19-29, Approving Update to the Personnel Policy – 68 Administrator Karlson reported that the resolution updates one section of the City’s Personnel Policy 69 relative to severe weather. The change removes the ability for employees to utilize sick time for 70
severe weather days. It also eliminates severe weather language from the policy to represent that City 71
Hall will remain open. 72
Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-29 as presented. Council Member 73
Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 74
75 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 76
77
4A) Consider converting seized property to City property for City use – Public Safety Director 78
Swenson reviewed his request to convert certain unclaimed property in the property/evidence room 79 for City use. The items are listed in the staff report. 80
Council Member Maher moved to approve the conversion of listed items for City use as 81
recommended by staff. Council Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice 82
vote. 83
COUNCIL MINUTES March 11, 2019
DRAFT
3
84
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 85
86
There was no report from the Public Services Department. 87
88 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT 89 90 6A) Consider Resolution No. 19-30, Approving Joint Powers Agreement with Hugo, East 91
Cedar Street & Elmcrest Avenue Improvement Project - City Engineer Hankee reviewed the 92
request to approve a joint powers agreement that governs the Cedar Street and Elmcrest Avenue 93
Improvement Project. She reviewed the estimated project costs and the City’s portion. The City 94 Attorney has reviewed the agreement. If the agreement is approved, it will be forwarded to the City 95 of Hugo for their concurrence. 96
97
Mayor Reinert commented that this cooperative effort with another city will address some road issues. 98
He is comfortable that this is a fair situation for the City and he expects the residents will be pleased 99
with the result. 100 101 Council Member Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 19-30 as presented. Council Member 102
Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 103
104
UNFINISHED BUSINESS 105 106 There was no Unfinished Business. 107 108
NEW BUSINESS 109
110
There was no New Business. 111
112
COMMUNITY EVENTS 113 114
MONTHLY RECYCLE DAY will be held at Lino Park (7850 Lake Drive) on Saturday, March 16 115
from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Please see the city website for updated pricing. 116
117 COMMUNITY CALENDAR 118 119
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead 120 March 11, 2019 through March 25, 2019 121 122 Wednesday, March 13 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Board 123
Monday, March 25 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session 124
Monday, March 25 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting 125
126
127
128 129
COUNCIL MINUTES March 11, 2019
DRAFT
4
ADJOURN 130
131
There being no further business, Council Member Rafferty moved to adjourn at 7:00 p.m. Council 132
Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried. 133
134
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, March 25, 2019. 135 136 137
138
139
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 140
141
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION March 11, 2019
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : March 11, 2019 4
TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5 TIME ENDED : 6:30 p.m. 6 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Maher, 7 Stoesz and Mayor Reinert 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member Manthey 9
10
Staff members present: City Clerk Julie Bartell (part) 11
12 Interview Advisory Board Applicants – The council interviewed the following 13
applicants: 14
15
Eric Flower (Environmental Board); 16
Megan Madsen (Environmental Board); 17 Peter Postma (EDAC). 18 19
The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. 20
21
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 22
March 25, 2019. 23 24 25
26
27
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 28
29
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION March 11, 2019
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : March 11, 2019 4
TIME STARTED : 7:00 p.m. 5 TIME ENDED : 7:30 p.m. 6 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Maher, 7 Stoesz and Mayor Reinert 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member Manthey 9
10
Staff members present: City Clerk Julie Bartell (part) 11
12 Interview Advisory Board Applicants – The council interviewed the following 13
applicants: 14
15
Thomas Colgan (EDAC); 16
Jim Schueller (EDAC); 17 Donald Johnson (EDAC). 18
19
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. 20
21
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 22
March 25, 2019. 23
24
25
26
27
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 28
29
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
JOINT MEETING - 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN March 5, 2019
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : March 5, 2019 4
TIME STARTED : 6:05 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 7:40 p.m. 6
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT : Mayor Reinert, Council Member Maher, 7
Council Member Manthey, Council Member 8
Rafferty, and Council Member Stoesz 9
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD 10
MEMBERS PRESENT : Chair Tralle, Michael Ruhland, Jeremy 11
Stimpson, Neil Evenson, Perry Laden, 12
Michael Root, Sue Peacock 13
14
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development 15
Director Michael Grochala; City Planner Katie Larsen; Principal (Landform) Kendra 16
Lindahl; Community Development Administrative Assistant Mara Strand; Community 17
Development Intern Monika Mann 18
19
1. Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan Presentation – Kendra Lindahl, Principal 20
(Landform) – 21
22
Kendra Lindahl, Planner with Landform, presented the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan 23
presentation. 24
25
Mayor Reinert inquired about holding zones for certain zoning districts and if they would 26
be given their own map. Mr. Grochala noted the rural districts are holding districts which 27
are shown on the Full Build Land Use Map. 28
29
Mr. Stoesz asked about the cost to redevelop a property. Mr. Grochala explained the 30
process for property redevelopment and the fees associated. 31
32
Mr. Root asked about a mechanism for regulating PUDs. Mr. Grochala explained that the 33
City Ordinance sets parameters for PUDs and that minimum lot sizes and garage will be 34
specified for future PUDs. 35
36
Mr. Root added that it would be helpful to have a chart explaining the standards for each 37
land use classification. Mr. Grochala noted that it would be important to guide the 38
developer with a general idea or a site goal. 39
40
Mayor Reinert noted he believed it would be helpful to developers to have specific 41
parameters of what can and cannot be done of the piece of land. Mr. Grochala noted that 42
zoning classifications provide that guidance to developers. 43
44
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
JOINT MEETING - 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN March 5, 2019
DRAFT
2
Mr. Stoesz asked if we can require developers to be required to use visuals. Mrs. Lindahl 45
noted visuals were common for large developers but could be a barrier for homeowners 46
or small businesses. 47
48
Chair Tralle noted that he found the PUD to be an effective tool for the Planning and 49
Zoning Board because it allows the board to get the best proposals possible for the City. 50
51
Mr. Laden noted that master planning and planning studies have benefited the City. He 52
inquired if there would be master plans for other areas of the City. Mr. Grochala noted 53
that the City is broken into different areas in the Comprehensive Plan and the 54
implementation section is meant to be a work plan for each area. 55
56
Mr. Stoesz asked if any of the surrounding cities were measuring park usage. Mr. 57
Grochala noted that consumer surveys are the best way to understand park usage. Staff 58
discussed observed park usage trends in Lino Lakes. 59
60
Mrs. Peacock asked if there were guidelines for which areas can have bike lanes. Mr. 61
Grochala explained the link and connection of trails through the city trails. 62
63
Mr. Ruhland asked if there is a vetting process for developers. Mr. Grochala stated that 64
there is not a vetting process unless the City has dollars in the project. 65
66
Mr. Grochala explained the escrow dollars are required by developers. 67
68
Chair Tralle expressed concern around a specific development and its residents not 69
receiving their mail. 70
71
Mayor Reinert expressed his appreciation for the staff’s work on the Comprehensive 72
Plan. 73
74
Staff unanimously voted to have a public hearing regarding the Comprehensive Plan in 75
April. Next steps for the Comprehensive Plan will include: 76
April 10th – Planning and Zoning board meeting, Public Hearing 77
May 6th and May 13th – City Council to approve for comment 78
November and December – Submit to Met Council 79
Final adoption 2020 80
81
The meeting was adjourned at 7:29 p.m. 82
83
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting 84
held on March 25, 2019. 85
86
87
88
Monika Mann, Comm. Dev. Intern Jeff Reinert, Mayor 89
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1G
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues, Deputy Clerk
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Resolution No. 19-40, Approving a Peddler License for
Edward Jones Financial – Daniel Chrzanowski
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
Daniel Chrzanowski, Representative from Edward Jones Financial has submitted a
peddler’s license application to the City Clerk's office. He plans to travel through Lino
Lakes’ neighborhoods going door to door offering financial services to interested
potential clients.
The City has received all the necessary forms required to issue this company
representatives a license. The Public Safety Department has conducted a background
check and have indicate no reason to deny the application.
The application and all other required information is on file in the Deputy City Clerk's
office for review.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Resolution No. 19-40, Approving the issuance of a Peddler License for a six
month period starting March 26, 2019 through September 26, 2019.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
RESOLUTION NO. 19-40
APPROVING A PEDDLER LICENSE FOR EDWARD JONES FINANCIAL
WHEREAS, Daniel Chrzanowski, Financial Advisors for Edward Jones Financial has
submitted a peddlers license application to the city clerk's office; and
WHEREAS, Daniel Chrzanowski has complied with all of the provisions of Chapter 613 of the
Lino Lakes City Code for obtaining the necessary license; and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Public Safety Department has conducted background checks on the
company representative that will be working in Lino Lakes, Daniel Chrzanowski; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves
the request of Edward Jones Financial to sell services door to door for a period of six-months
beginning March 26, 2019 and ending September 26, 2019.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th of March, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_____________ and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and upon vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_____________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 1H
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 19-41 Approving Declaration of
Restrictive Covenant for Main Street Shoppes 2nd Addition
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting Council consideration of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenant as it
relates the existing private driveway and Declaration of Driveway Easement for Main
Street Shoppes.
BACKGROUND
On February 11, 2019, the City Council passed Resolution No. 19-09 approving the final
plat of Main Street Shoppes 2nd Addition. This plat located in the northeast quadrant of
Main Street and Otter Lake Road. One condition of approval is that the existing
Declaration of Driveway Easement be amended to include Lot 1, Block 1, Main Street
Shoppes 2nd Addition.
The proposed Declaration of Restrictive Covenant places a restrictive covenant on Main
Street Shoppes 2nd Addition prohibiting the conveyance of the property to a third party
until either an amendment to the Driveway Easement or a separate suitable reciprocal
easement is recorded against the Property, providing reciprocal access and utility rights
for the respective owner(s) of the property.
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed Declaration.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 19-41. ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 19-41 2. Declaration of Restrictive Covenant
CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-41 RESOLUTION APPROVING DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR MAIN STREET SHOPPES 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, City Resolution No. 19-09 approving the Final Plat for Main Street Shoppes 2nd Addition required an amendment to the existing Declaration of Driveway Easement; and WHEREAS, the proposed Declaration of Restrictive Covenant places a restrictive covenant on
Main Street Shoppes 2nd Addition prohibiting the conveyance of the property to a third party
until either an amendment to the Driveway Easement or a separate suitable reciprocal easement is recorded against the property, providing reciprocal access and utility rights for the respective owner(s) of the property.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
hereby approves the Declaration of Restrictive Covenant as executed by CM Properties 14, LLC. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this ______________ day of _____, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
This Declaration of Restrictive Covenant (the “Agreement”) is made as of this _____
day of _____________, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), by CM PROPERTIES 14, LLC, a
Minnesota limited liability company (“Grantor”).
Statement of Facts
A. Grantor is the owner of certain property located in Anoka County, Minnesota, which is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Property”).
B. Grantor previously executed that certain Declaration of Driveway Easement dated July 31, 2013 which was recorded in the Office of the Anoka County Recorder as Document No. 2626404 (the “Driveway Easement”).
C. Grantor desires to place a restrictive covenant on the Property prohibiting the conveyance of the Property to a third party until either an amendment to the Driveway Easement or a separate suitable reciprocal easement is recorded against the Property, providing reciprocal access and utility rights for the respective owner(s) of the Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of one dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable
consideration, Grantor declares that the Property is and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, restrictions and agreements hereinafter set forth:
1. Covenants and Restrictions. The Property shall be subject to the following restrictive covenant:
(a) The Property shall not be conveyed to any third party, and Outlots A and B of Main
Street Shoppes 2nd Addition shall not be developed, until an amendment to the Driveway Easement or a separate suitable reciprocal easement providing reciprocal access and utility rights for the respective owners of the Property is recorded against the Property.
2. Runs with the Land. The above covenant binds and restricts the Property as a covenant and restriction running with the land and shall bind Grantor, and its respective heirs,
successors and assigns, including all subsequent owners of the Property and all persons claiming under them. Grantor may release this Declaration, in whole or in part, with the written consent of the City of Lino Lakes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Agreement as of the above date.
GRANTOR
CM PROPERTIES 14, LLC
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______________)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of _______
2019, by _________________________, the ____________ of CM RPROPERTIES 14, LLC, a
Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN LTD.
8300 NORMAN CENTER DRIVE SUITE 1000 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55437
EXHIBIT A
TO DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Legal Description of the Property:
Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlots A and B, Main Street Shoppes 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota
4.
CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE
Minnwest Bank Metro, a Minnesota banking corporation, (“Mortgagee”), is the holder of a mortgage granted by CM Properties 14 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Declarant”) against the Property described above. Mortgagee hereby consents to and subordinates its interest in the Property to the foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant
dated ________________, 2019, made by Declarant.
MINNWEST BANK METRO
By: Its: ___________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss.
COUNTY OF _________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of __________________________, 2019, by ___________________________________________, the ____________________________ of Minnwest Bank Metro, a Minnesota banking
corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN LTD. 8300 NORMAN CENTER DRIVE SUITE 1000 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55437
4828-0269-6587, v. 3
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 2-19, Amending Chapter
208
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is being asked to consider the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 2-19, amending
Chapter 208 of the Lino Lakes City Code Providing for a Public Safety Department. The first
reading was approved March 11, 2019.
BACKGROUND
Staff has been in the process of revising ordinances that need updating to align with the City’s
current organizational structure. The proposed amendment of Chapter 208 incorporates the
City’s fire services into the Public Safety Department by including cross-trained police
officers/firefighters and firefighters in the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the adoption of Ordinance No. 2-19 with the following actions:
1. Dispense with the full reading of the ordinance;
2. Roll call vote for adoption of the ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance No. 2-19
1st Reading: Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 2-19
AMENDING CHAPTER 208 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE
PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains:
CHAPTER 208: POLICE PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
§ 208.01 DEPARTMENT CREATED.
There is created a department of this city, which shall hereafter be known as the Lino
Lakes Police Public Safety Department.
(Prior Code, § 208.01)
§ 208.02 DUTIES.
It shall be the responsibility the Lino Lakes Police Public Safety Department to provide
a healthy and safe community, preserve peace and public order, prevent and detect crime,
prevent and suppress fires, and enforce laws and ordinances of the state, county and City,
within the city, and as authorized by the City Council.
(Prior Code, § 208.02)
§ 208.03 OFFICERS. POLICE AND FIRE PERSONNEL.
The Lino Lakes Police Public Safety Department shall be directed and supervised by a
Chief of Police the Public Safety Director. The members of the Lino Lakes Police Public
Safety Department shall consist of the Chief of Police Public Safety Director and other
police and fire personnel officers as the City Council shall hire. The members of the Lino
Lakes Police Public Safety Department shall be peace police officers, cross-trained police
officers/firefighters, and firefighters. and shall be the only persons who shall receive
compensation from services as peace officers.
(Prior Code, § 208.03)
§ 208.04 CHIEF OF POLICE. PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR.
The Chief of Police Public Safety Director shall be responsible to the City
Administrator and shall make complete reports on the operation of the Lino Lakes Police
Public Safety Department as requested by the Administrator or City Council. Other
members of the Lino Lakes Police Public Safety Department shall be responsible and
accountable to the Chief of Police Public Safety Director, who shall be responsible for
the proper training and discipline of other members. The Police Chief Public Safety
Director may recommend to the City Administrator a suspension suspend, without pay of
any member of the Lino Lakes Police Public Safety Department for just cause only.
refusal or neglect to obey orders, pending final action on discharge or discipline of the
member by the City Council. Suspensions without pay in excess of 30 days and
recommendations for termination will require final action by the City Council.
(Prior Code, § 208.04)
§ 208.05 RANKS.
Members of the Lino Lakes Police Public Safety Department, other than the Police
Chief Public Safety Director, may be given a rank or designation as determined by the
Chief of Police Public Safety Director. The order of command shall flow from the Police
Chief Public Safety Director downward in order as listed, each member being responsible
to his or her superior officer. The ranks and the rules of qualification for any of the
positions shall be as established by the City Council.
(Prior Code, § 208.05)
§ 208.06 RECORDS.
The Lino Lakes Police Public Safety Department shall keep a daily record of all Police
Public Safety Department activityies within the City, as prescribed by the City Council.
Access to Police Public Safety Department records shall be in accordance with the
Minnesota Data Practices Act.
(Prior Code, § 208.06)
§ 208.07 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT.
Equipment shall be provided to officers pursuant to the union contract. All city property
issued to any member shall be returned, in good condition, to the City, forthwith, upon
termination of employment. and Each member shall be responsible for and liable for each
item and the proper care thereof while same is in his or her possession. Uniforms and
equipment to perform duties will be provided to public safety personnel.
(Prior Code, § 208.07)
§ 208.08 IMPERSONATING OFFICER.
No person not a valid member of the Lino Lakes Police Department shall:
(1) Wear, carry or display an identification card, badge, cap or insignia or uniform of
the Lino Lakes Police Department or hold any item out to be such; and
(2) In any manner represent himself or herself to be connected with the Lino Lakes
Police Department.
(Prior Code, § 208.08)
§ 208.098 UNIFORM - WHEN WORN.
The badge and cap assigned may be worn only while a member of the Lino Lakes
Police Public Safety Department is on actual duty as assigned. Uniforms are only to be
worn while on duty, while in transit to or from work, for court, or at other official
department functions or events.
(Prior Code, § 208.09)
§ 208.109 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER.
A person holding the position of community service officer in the Lino Lakes Police
Public Safety Department may, under the direction of the Chief of Police Public Safety
Director, issue citations in lieu of arrest for violations of the following Chapters: 503
Animal Control Regulations, 802 Parking, 901 General Nuisances and 1006 Building
Numbers.
(Ord. 13-94, passed 9-12-1994)
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this ____ day of __________________ 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council
Member_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
____________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEMS 3B(i) & 3B(ii)
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance Amending Chapter 205
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is being asked to consider the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 3-19, Amending
Chapter 205 of the Lino Lakes City Code regarding the City Administrator position.
BACKGROUND
Chapter 205 was revised to strike language that exempts the Public Safety Director as a direct
report to the City Administrator, which is at variance with the current organizational structure.
To be consistent with Chapter 207, staff also proposed that Section 205.04 exclude
“temporary” employees from needing Council authorization for hiring purposes. Section
207.01 of Chapter 207 states the “City Council shall make every appointment of a ‘regular’
position of city employment.” “Regular” generally means regular full-time and part-time
employees.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the adoption of Ordinance No. 3-19 with the following actions:
1. Dispense with the full reading of the ordinance;
2. Roll call vote for adoption of the ordinance;
3. Approval of Resolution No. 19-38 for summary publication.
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance No. 3-19
1st Reading: Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 3-19
AMENDING CHAPTER 205 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains:
CHAPTER 205: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
§ 205.01 POSITION ESTABLISHED; PURPOSE.
The office and position of City Administrator is created for the purpose of assisting the
Council in carrying out the administrative functions of the city and to advise the Council
in matters of general policy.
(Prior Code, § 205.01)
§ 205.02 APPOINTMENT; TENURE.
The Administrator shall be appointed by the City Council for an indefinite term.
Removal from this position will be by an affirmative vote of a majority of all members of
the City Council.
(Prior Code, § 205.02)
§ 205.03 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
(1) Executive Officer. The Administrator shall be the chief executive officer for the
Council. The Administrator shall coordinate the administration of all City departments
and divisions.
(2) Laws and Policies. The Administrator shall be responsible directly to the Council
for the enforcement of all ordinances, regulations and law enforcement policies of the
Council and all laws of the state which may apply within the boundaries of the City. The
Administrator shall advise the Council on matters of governmental and public policy
which is pertinent to municipal operations.
(3) Budget and Finance. The Administrator shall be directly responsible to the
Council for the preparation, recommendation and management of the annual city budget
and shall be chief fiscal, financial and purchasing officer of the city.
(4) Programs and Projects. The Administrator shall be directly responsible to the
Council for planning and carrying out all capital improvement projects and service
programs and shall be chief project and program director for the City.
(5) Administrator and Personnel. The Administrator shall be the chief administrative
and personnel officer of the City. The Administrator shall be directly responsible to the
Council for administration of all departments and divisions of the City and shall be
directly responsible to the Council for the supervision of all temporary, permanent, full-
time, part-time and consulting personnel of the city, except those appointed by the
Council to serve on advisory boards and commissions.
(6) General. The Administrator shall attend all meetings as may be required by the
Council; perform all reasonable tasks set before the Administrator by the Council; furnish
all verbal and written reports concerning the assigned responsibilities of the
Administrator as the Council may desire; and maintain good and proper relations with the
public at large.
(Prior Code, § 205.03)
§ 205.04 AUTHORITY.
(1) Administrative Policy. The Administrator may establish administrative policies
and procedures as may be necessary to ensure the proper and efficient operation of all
departments and divisions of the city and may issue administrative orders to carry out
administrative policies and procedures. The administrative policies and procedures shall
be consistent with Minnesota Statues, city ordinances and Council policy. The Council
shall be apprised of administrative policies and procedures.
(2) Fiscal Control. The Administrator shall exercise control over the fiscal
expenditures of all the departments and divisions of the City and appropriations which
appear in the annual budget. The Administrator may allow purchases of up to $2,500 for
budgeted item purchases. Purchases over the allowed maximum shall require the
approval of the Council. No officer or employee of the City shall place any order or make
any purchase except for a purpose and to the amount authorized in the budget resolution.
The Council shall audit all claims and shall retain its power to disaffirm any order or
contract entered into by the administrator on behalf of the Council.
(3) Personnel. With the exception of § 208.04, all dDepartment heads, and
supervisors, directors and administrative personnel shall report directly to the
Administrator. The Administrator shall recommend to the Council the hiring, promotion,
demotion or dismissal of any regular or probationary, temporary, permanent, full-time or
part-time employee of the City. The Council shall make all final determinations with
regard to the employment, promotion or dismissal of City employees.
(Prior Code, § 205.04)
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this ____ day of ________________ 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by
Councilmember _____________and was duly seconded by Councilmember
___________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
____________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 19-38
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 3-19
FOR PUBLICATION
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the first and second reading of Ordinance No. 3-19,
WHEREAS, MN Statute 412.191 provides for a city to publish a summary of an ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the summary clearly informs the public of the
intent and effect of the ordinance, and
WHEREAS, publication in the City’s official newspaper will include a notice that a full printed
copy of the ordinance is available at City Hall.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
approves the summary in Attachment A for publication according to state law and the City
Charter.
Adopted by the Council of the Lino Lakes this 25th day of March 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
________________ and was duly seconded by Council Member_____________ and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
__________________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF LINO LAKES
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 3-19
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 205 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota ordains:
STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE
Chapter 205 was revised to strike language that exempts the Public Safety Director as a direct
report to the City Administrator, which is at variance with the current organizational structure.
Chapter 205 as amended will also exclude “temporary” employees from needing Council
authorization for hiring purposes, provided a temporary position is included in the annual budget.
Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its publication.
A full printed copy of the ordinance is available for review at the Lino Lakes City Hall, 600
Town Center Parkway.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEMS 3C(i) & 3C(ii)
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance Amending Chapter 207 of
Lino Lakes City Code
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is being asked to consider the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 4-19, Amending
Chapter 207 of the Lino Lakes City Code regarding the Personnel Policy.
BACKGROUND
Section 207.05 of Chapter 207 states who in the City is allowed access to data following a
criminal history background investigation of employment applicants. This section is being
revised by striking “Director of Administration” and replacing it with “Human Resources.”
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the adoption of Ordinance No. 4-19 with the following actions:
1. Dispense with the full reading of the ordinance;
2. Roll call vote for adoption of the ordinance;
3. Approval of Resolution No. 19-39 for summary publication.
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance No. 4-19
1st Reading: Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 4-19
AMENDING CHAPTER 207 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains:
CHAPTER 207: PERSONNEL POLICY
§ 207.01 APPOINTMENTS.
The City Council shall make every appointment to a regular position of city
employment. Each appointment shall be based on merit and qualifications for the position
as determined by the City Administrator.
(Ord. 35-97, passed 2-9-1998)
§ 207.02 PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS.
The Council may, by resolution, establish personnel rules setting forth the rights, duties
and responsibilities of employees. The rules shall be known as the City of Lino Lakes
Personnel Policy and may from time to time be amended.
§ 207.03 ADMINISTRATION.
The City Administrator may establish administrative policies and procedures as may be
appropriate to administer the employment practices of the city. All city employees shall
comply with these policies and rules.
(Ord. 35-97, passed 2-9-1998)
§ 207.04 COMPENSATION PLAN.
The City Administrator will establish and maintain a compensation plan for all regular
positions which will be reviewed and approved by the City Council.
(Ord. 35-97, passed 2-9-1998)
§ 207.05 BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR JOB APPLICANTS FOR CITY
EMPLOYMENT.
(1) Purpose. The purpose and intent of this section is to establish regulations that
will allow law enforcement access to Minnesota's Computerized Criminal History
information for specified non-criminal purposes of employment background checks for
the positions described in division 2(b) below.
(2) Criminal History License Background Investigations.
(a) Generally. The Lino Lakes Police Department is hereby required, as the
exclusive entity within the City, to do a perform criminal history background
investigations on the all regular full-time or part-time job applicants and other positions
that work with children or vulnerable adults, for the following positions within the City
employment unless the City’s hiring authority concludes that a background investigation
is not needed necessary.
(b) Employment positions. All regular part-time or full-time employees of the City
of Lino Lakes and other positions that work with children or vulnerable adults.
(3) Access to Data. In conducting the criminal history background investigation in
order to screen employment applicants, the Police Department is authorized to access
data maintained in the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehensions Computerized
Criminal History information system in accordance with BCA policy. Any data that is
accessed and acquired shall be maintained at the Police Department under the care and
custody of the chief law enforcement official or his or her designee. A summary of the
results of the computerized criminal history data may be released by the Police
Department to the hiring authority, to include the City Council, the City Administrator,
Human Resources, or other city staff as appropriate.
(4) Consent Required. Before the investigation is undertaken, the applicant must
authorize the Police Department by written consent to undertake the investigation. The
written consent must fully comply with the provisions of M.S. Ch. 13, as it may be
amended from time to time, regarding the collection, maintenance and use of the
information.
(5) Criteria for Rejection. Except for the positions set forth in M.S. § 364.09, as it
may be amended from time to time, the City will not reject an applicant for employment
on the basis of the applicant's prior conviction unless the crime is directly related to the
position of employment sought and the conviction is for a felony, gross misdemeanor, or
misdemeanor with a jail sentence. If the City rejects the applicant's request on this basis,
the City shall notify the applicant in writing of the following:
(a) The grounds and reasons for the denial;
(b) The applicant complaint and grievance procedure set forth in M.S. § 364.06, as it
may be amended from time to time;
(c) The earliest date the applicant may reapply for employment; and
(d) That all competent evidence of rehabilitation will be considered upon
reapplication.
(Ord. 35-97, passed 2-9-1998; Am. Ord. 05-00, passed 4-10-2000; Am. Ord. 19-01,
passed 10-8-2001; Am Ord. 15-08, passed 12-9-2008)
§ 207.06 INDEMNIFICATION.
The City or its insurance carrier will defend and indemnify all of its officers and
employees, whether elective or appointive, against any claim or demand arising out of an
alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of their official duties or
employment. If judgment is rendered in favor of the officer or employment, any
judgment for costs and disbursements shall be assigned to the City, and all monies
collected shall be paid to the City. The provisions of this section requiring
indemnification do not apply in cases of intentional tort, malfeasance in office or willful
or wanton negligence. In those cases, the City Council may indemnify the officer or
employee if it finds the action to be in the public interest. Indemnification under this
section is subject to the liability limits imposed by M.S. § 466.05, as it may be amended
from time to time, and any other relevant statutes.
(Ord. 35-97, passed 2-9-1998)
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this ____ day of ________________ 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by
Councilmember _____________and was duly seconded by Councilmember
___________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
____________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 19-39
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4-19
FOR PUBLICATION
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the first and second reading of Ordinance No. 4-19,
WHEREAS, MN Statute 412.191 provides for a city to publish a summary of an ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the summary clearly informs the public of the
intent and effect of the ordinance, and
WHEREAS, publication in the City’s official newspaper will include a notice that a full printed
copy of the ordinance is available at City Hall.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
approves the summary in Attachment A for publication according to state law and the City
Charter.
Adopted by the Council of the Lino Lakes this 25th day of March 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
________________ and was duly seconded by Council Member_____________ and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
__________________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF LINO LAKES
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4-19
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 207 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota ordains:
STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE
Section 207.05 of Chapter 207 states who in the City of Lino Lakes is allowed access to data
following a criminal history background investigation of employment applicants. This section is
being revised by striking “Director of Administration” and replacing it with “Human Resources.”
Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its publication.
A full printed copy of the ordinance is available for review at the Lino Lakes City Hall, 600
Town Center Parkway.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 3D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Karissa Bartholomew, Human Resources Manager
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Appointment of Police Officer
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to approve the appointment of Mr. Kenny Sinna for the vacant Police Officer position. BACKGROUND
There is one vacant Police Officer position within the Public Safety Department. At this time, staff has completed the recruitment process, provided a conditional offer, and is recommending the approval of Kenny Sinna for the position.
Mr. Sinna holds a Bachelor’s degree in Criminology and meets all POST mandated requirements to be a Police Officer in the State. Sinna has been a Police Reserve with the Lino Lakes Police Department for the past four years.
The hourly rate of pay would be $26.98, which is step one of the union wage schedule. The
Police Officer wage schedule has four steps. With the Council’s approval, Sinna would start in the position of Police Officer on April 1, 2019. RECOMMENDATION
Approve the appointment of Kenny Sinna for the Police Officer position.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 5B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Justin Williams, Utilities Supervisor
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 19-36, Award Contracts for Arena Acres Park Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required
INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting authorization to award contracts for the construction of a tennis court and a
bituminous trail at Arena Acres Park.
BACKGROUND The City Council authorized staff to proceed with the construction of a tennis court at Arena Acres Park during the October 1, 2018 City Council work session. The paved trail has been
included to provide accessibility from Andall Street to the tennis court, playground area, and
basketball court.
This project is divided into two parts – Site Improvements (earthwork, aggregate, court and trail paving, court painting/striping), and Fencing. Quotes were received for the above-referenced parts on March 12, 2019. The quotes were checked for mathematical accuracy and tabulated.
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
Midwest Asphalt $70,487.10
Bituminous Roadways $71,276.90
Barber Construction $85,569.00
New Look Contracting $91,850.01
The low quote was submitted by Midwest Asphalt in the amount of $70,487.10.
FENCING
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
Century Fence $16,174.80
Peterson Companies $16,920.00
Midwest Fence $17,586.00
The low quote was submitted by Century Fence in the amount of $16,174.80. Funding for this project is from the Park and Trail Improvement Fund.
RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 19-36.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 19-36
2. WSB Memo - Arena Acres Park Site Improvements, March 13, 2019 3. WSB Memo - Arena Acres Park Fencing, March 13, 2019 4. Depiction of Construction Area
CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-36 AWARD CONTRACTS FOR ARENA ACRES PARK PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council authorized staff to proceed with the construction of a
tennis court at Arena Acres Park during the October 1, 2018 City Council work session; and WHEREAS, this project is divided into two parts – Site Improvements (earthwork,
aggregate, court and trail paving, court painting/striping), and Fencing; and
WHEREAS, quotes were received on March 12, 2019 as follows: SITE IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
Midwest Asphalt $70,487.10
Bituminous Roadways $71,276.90
Barber Construction $85,569.00
New Look Contracting $91,850.01
FENCING
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
Century Fence $16,174.80
Peterson Companies $16,920.00
Midwest Fence $17,586.00
WHEREAS, the low site improvements bid was submitted by Midwest Asphalt in the amount of $70,487.10, and the low fencing bid was submitted by Century Fence in the amount of $16,174.80; and
WHEREAS, funding is from the Park and Trail Improvement Fund. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council hereby authorizes staff to enter into contracts with Midwest Asphalt and Century Fence for the Arena Acres Park Project.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of March, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same: ______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
K:\012396-000\Admin\Spec\Quote Package 1 - Grading, Aggregate, Paving, Nets, Footings, Color Coating\SITE WORK LTR RECMMDTN-012396-000.docx 701 XENIA AVE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM March 13, 2019
Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Arena Acres Park Site Improvements City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 012396-000
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Quotes were received for the above-referenced project on Tuesday, March 12th, 2019. A total of four bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and confirmed that Midwest Asphalt, Eden Prairie, MN submitted the lowest quote in the amount of $70,487.10. Below is a table of the quote results for reference.
Midwest Asphalt Services (Low Bid) Bituminous Roadways New Look Contracting Barber Construction
$70,487.10 $71,276.90 $91,850.01 $85,569.00
The Engineer’s Estimate was $52,978.00. The earthwork, aggregate, and paving item quotes were higher than anticipated, which is likely due to the smaller quantities / scale of the work with
respect to costs of mobilizing equipment and crews. We recommend the City Council award a contract in the amount of $70,487.10 to Midwest Asphalt based on their low bid and past performance constructing parks. Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Jason L. Amberg, PLA Group Manager, Principal
cc: Rick DeGardner, City of Lino Lakes Paul Hoffer, Midwest Asphalt
K:\012396-000\Admin\Spec\Quote Package 2 - Fencing\FENCING LTR RECMMDTN-012396-000.docx 701 XENIA AVE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM March 13, 2019
Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Arena Acres Park Fencing City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 012396-000
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Quotes were received for the above-referenced project on Tuesday, March 12th, 2019. A total of three bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and confirmed that Century Fence, Forest Lake, MN submitted the lowest quote in the amount of $16,174.80. Below is a table of the quote results for reference.
Century Fence (Low Bid) Midwest Fence Peterson Companies
$16,174.80 $17,586.00 $16,920.00
The Engineer’s Estimate was $21,600.00. We recommend the City Council award a contract in the amount of $16,174.80 to Century Fence based on their low bid and past performance on fencing projects. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jason L. Amberg, PLA Group Manager, Principal cc: Rick DeGardner, City of Lino Lakes Scott Roush, Century Fence
INSERT CLIENT LOGO ARENA ACRES PARK 10’
SCALE IN FEET
5’0’20’
Project Number: 012396-000
March 18, 2019
K:\012396-000\Cad\Exhibits\012396-000 Arena Acres Master PlanEXISTING
BASKETBALL
COURT
EXISTING
PLAYGROUND
EXISTING
WOODED AREA
OPEN LAWN
FUTURE 5’ CONCRETE WALK
FUTURE PICNIC SHELTER
FUTURE PROPOSED
SHADE TREE (TYP)
TENNIS COURT & TRAIL LIMITS ANDALL STREETWOOD
DUCK
TRAIL
EXISTING
TREE (TYP)
COURT AND TRAIL
IMPROVEMENT AREA
8’ BITUMINOUS TRAIL
TENNIS COURT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 5C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer
C. C. MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Consider Resolution 19-37, Authorize the Preparation of Plans and Specifications, Well No. 1 Rehabilitation Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting Council authorization to prepare plans and specifications for the Well No. 1
Rehabilitation Project. BACKGROUND
Well No. 1 has been identified by Public Works staff to be operating inefficiently, and in need of
equipment upgrades and repair. Funding for the project is proposed through the Water Improvement Fund. WSB, the City Engineer for the City of Lino Lakes, has submitted a proposal to complete the plans and specifications, and provide bid documents, for the not to exceed total cost of $59,366.00, based on actual time spent on the project.
The proposed schedule for the City of Lino Lakes for this project is as follows: City Council Authorizes Plans and Specifications Mar. 25, 2019 Approve Plans and Specifications, Authorize Ad for Bids May 28, 2019
Open Bids June 18, 2019
City Council Awards Contract June 24, 2019 Construction Begins July 15, 2019 Final Completion January 31, 2020 RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 19-37, Authorizing the Well No. 1 Rehabilitation Project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 19-37 2. WSB Proposal
CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-37 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WELL NO. 1 REHABILITATION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes Public Works has identified Well No. 1 is in need of repair
and rehabilitation; and WHEREAS, the City Council is ordering the project finding that it would be in the best interest of the City to proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, WSB, the City Engineer, has submitted a proposal to prepare plans and specifications. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes:
1. Authorizes the Preparation of the Plans and Specifications for the Well No. 1 Rehabilitation Project. 2. WSB and Associates are designated as the engineer for this improvement and directed to prepare plans and specifications for the Well No. 1 Rehabilitation Project for an
amount not to exceed $59,366.00.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of March, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST:
________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
March 20, 2019
Mr. Rick DeGardner
Public Works Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Proposal for Design and Bidding Services
Well No. 1 Rehabilitation Project
City of Lino Lakes, MN
Dear Mr. DeGardner:
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this letter proposal to the City of Lino Lakes to provide
professional engineering services for the design and bidding of the proposed Well No. 1
Rehabilitation Project. The design team includes ten (10) team members consisting of a civil
engineer, a structural engineer, an architect, process engineers, a mechanical engineer, an
electrical engineer, and technicians that will provide civil, structural, architectural, process,
mechanical, and electrical engineering services.
Project Understanding
Well No. 1 has been identified by Public Works staff as operating inefficiently, and in need of
repair and equipment upgrades. A summary of the scope of improvements for Well No. 1 is
described as follows:
· Expand existing Pumphouse No. 1 with new chlorine, fluoride, and polyphosphate rooms.
· Prepare CAD based drawings of the existing pumphouse building in addition to civil,
structural, process, mechanical, and electrical drawings.
· The mechanical system design for the pump room will consist of one-for-one replacement of
existing HVAC systems. Air conditioning will be limited to the Pump Room. This air
conditioning system will be determined after the electrical loads are finalized.
· The new building addition will be provided with mechanical systems as required to meet the
space heating load and ventilation air change rate as determined after the space is fully
developed.
· Plumbing systems will generally will be limited to meet the needs of the new addition.
· Fire protection system design for the chlorine room.
· Development of standalone building HVAC controls systems including sequence of
operations. Design HVAC temperature controls shall be “stand-alone” controls as opposed to
a DDC BAS or a monitoring system.
· The existing main switchgear and motor control center will be replaced. The new equipment
will include a new motor control center with a 480vac, three phase, 200 amp main breaker, a
standby circuit breaker mechanically interlocked with the main breaker and connected to an
existing receptacle for a portable generator, a branch circuit breaker for well pump power, a
motor starter and circuit breaker for the chlorine booster pump, and a stepdown transformer
and lighting panel for general electrical circuits (lights, outlets, HVAC, etc.) A new 60hp VFD
for the well pump will be installed adjacent to the motor control center. The existing Xcel
Mr. Rick DeGardner
March 20, 2019
Page 2
Energy utility meter will be relocated to the building exterior to meet current Xcel
requirements.
· The existing control panel will be replaced with a new control panel. The City uses Sy/Com
as their systems integrator. The new control panel will use a PLC and radio that are
compatible with the existing SCADA system. Sy/Com and the City are in the process of
making upgrades to the SCADA system, including replacement of obsolete radios and
software updates.
· All other electrical equipment inside the building will be replaced, including lights, receptacles,
switches, cable and conduit, etc. The new light fixtures inside and outside will be LED.
· New rooms will be constructed to contain the fluoride and chlorine feed equipment. Both
rooms will have new lights, receptacles, heating and ventilation equipment. The exhaust fans
will be interlocked with the light switches as well as magnetic switches on the door frames, to
make sure the fans operate whenever anyone enters the rooms.
· A scale will be installed for monitoring the weight of the chlorine tanks. It will be connected to
the new control panel. A chlorine leak detector will also be installed in the chlorine room.
· New fluoride transfer and feed pumps will be installed in the fluoride room, and will be
controlled based on well flow rates. The fluoride feed tank will not require a scale.
· A new polyphosphate feed pump will also be installed, it is assumed it will be located in the
pump room. The polyphosphate feed tank will not require a scale.
· New HVAC equipment for the pump room may be installed, including a gas unit heater and
possibly an air conditioner. However, the exact requirements have not yet been determined.
· New instrumentation will be installed, including pressure transducers, a prelube solenoid
valve, a magnetic flowmeter, door entry switches, low temperature switches and a floor
flooding switch.
· Installation of a key card access system to the building was discussed with the City, but at
this time it is felt the cost to do so outweigh the benefits, so it is not included in the scope of
this proposal.
· All rooms and process piping will be painted and/or repainted.
· Surveying services are not anticipated to be needed for this project but can be provided for
additional fees if requested.
· Geotechnical services are not anticipated to be needed for this project but can be provided
for additional fees if requested.
Scope of Engineering Services
WSB is pleased to provide a professional engineering services proposal for the Well No. 1
Rehabilitation Project. Below is a detailed description of the engineering services and WSB’s
proposed approach.
I. Preliminary Design Services
a) Meet with City staff to review and obtain information needed in the Design Phase.
b) Prepare preliminary drawings and construction cost estimate for City’s review.
II. Final Design Services
a) Prepare detailed design drawings and specifications for the final design and bidding
of the proposed pumphouse improvements. The drawings and specifications will be
submitted to the Minnesota Department of Health for review and approval.
Mr. Rick DeGardner
March 20, 2019
Page 3
b) Organize and conduct progress meetings with design team and City staff at 90
percent completion of the design.
c) Prepare final construction cost estimate prior to bidding.
III. Bidding Services
a) Distribute bidding documents to prospective bidders.
b) Advertise project for bids.
c) Answer questions from contractors during bidding and issue addenda as necessary.
d) Attend the bid opening and evaluate the bids.
e) Provide a recommendation to the City regarding award of the construction contract.
Project Schedule and Fees
A. Project Schedule
We have estimated the time for the project to begin immediately after City authorization.
The proposed schedule includes the following milestone dates:
Task Dates
City Council Authorization to Proceed March 25, 2019
Preliminary Design March 26 - April 12, 2019
Final Design April 15 - May 24, 2019
City Council Authorizes Advertisement for
Bids
May 27, 2019
Bid Opening June 18, 2019
Award Construction Contract June 24, 2019
Begin Construction July 15, 2019
Substantial Completion (Water Tower in
Service)
December 31, 2019
Final Completion January 31, 2020
B. Fees
Compensation for tasks shall be on an hourly basis, based on the actual hours worked
for personnel assigned to the project. We propose to perform these services for the
following estimated fees.
Task Estimated Fee
A. Preliminary Design Services $18,852
B. Final Design Services $35,880
C. Bidding Services $4,634
Total Design and Bidding Services $59,366
We will invoice the City on the basis of actual hours spent at current billing rates. Additional
services requested by the City will be invoiced on the basis of actual hours spent at current billing
rates plus the actual cost of reimbursable expenses. All services will be invoiced monthly. Tasks
not shown are considered outside of the scope of services.
Mr. Rick DeGardner
March 20, 2019
Page 4
This letter represents our understanding of the Well No. 1 Rehabilitation Project and the proposed
scope of services. If you are in agreement with the scope of services and proposed fee, please
sign in the appropriate space below and return one copy to us.
If you have any questions about this proposal, please feel free to call me at (612) 209-0140.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Greg F. Johnson, PE
Water/Wastewater Group Manager
ACCEPTED BY:
City of Lino Lakes
Name
Title
Date
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 19-26, Approving Amendments to the
Designated Municipal State Aid Street System VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting council approval for Amendments to the Designated Municipal State Aid Street System.
BACKGROUND The Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) system allows cities with a population over 5,000 to be eligible to receive funding for road improvements and maintenance from the State Highway
Users Fund. Each year, the City receives an allocation based 50% upon its population and 50%
upon the construction “Needs” of its roadways. To receive funding, the City can designate up to 20% of its local streets to receive MSAS funding. The City has a total of 22.73 miles eligible to designate.
In an effort to maximize the construction Needs of Lino Lakes’ MSAS system we are
recommending amendments to the City existing system designations. To amend the system in 2019, MnDOT requires a council resolution be passed by June 1, 2019. MnDOT State Aid staff have approved the proposed revisions.
• Addition of Town Center Parkway from Lake Drive (CR 23) to Village Drive
o Segment Length: 0.33 miles
• Addition of Village Drive from Town Center Parkway to Town Center Parkway o Segment Length: 0.35 miles
West Bound One Way Area = 0.11 miles
East Bound One Way Area = 0.10 miles
Two Way Area = 0.14 miles RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 19-26 for Amendments to the Designated Municipal State Aid Street System. ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 2. State Aid Approval letter and Map
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 19-26 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMMENDMENTS TO THE DESIGNATED MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET SYSTEM
WHEREAS, as a requirement to qualify for state aid funding for streets, it is necessary that the
City Council designate certain streets within the City of Lino Lakes to comprise a Municipal
State Aid Street system (MSAS); and
AND WHEREAS, Council has reviewed the recommendations of the City Engineer and has
approved the modifications to the City of Lino Lakes MSAS;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes:
1. The following are Municipal State Aid System designations:
• Addition of Town Center Parkway from Lake Drive (CR 23) to Village Drive
o Segment Length: 0.33 miles
• Addition of Village Drive from Town Center Parkway to Town Center Parkway
o Segment Length: 0.35 miles
West Bound One Way Area = 0.11 miles
East Bound One Way Area = 0.10 miles
Two Way Area = 0.14 miles
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of March, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST: ________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Minnesota Department of Transportation
395 John Ireland Boulevard
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Memo
An Equal Opportunity Employer
TO: Ms. Diane Hankee
Lino Lakes City Engineer
FROM: William Lanoux
Manager, Municipal State Aid Needs Unit
DATE: February 27, 2019
SUBJECT: Municipal State Aid Designations
The following Municipal State Aid Street designations will be approved when the City
Council resolution is received.
MSAS 143: Town Center Parkway- from Lake Drive (CSAH 23) to Village Drive (0.33 miles)
MSAS 144: Village Drive- from Town Center Drive to junction of Village Drive & one-way
eastbound Village Drive (0.14 existing miles); and One-way eastbound Village Drive- from
Village Drive to Town Center Parkway (0.10 one-way miles); and One-way westbound Village
Drive- from Village Drive to Town Center Parkway (0.11 one-way miles)
A Commissioner's Order will follow.
Needs Update Comments:
If the city council resolution is received by May 1, 2019, routes designated can receive Needs and be
used in the calculation of your 2020 allotment. (Include this revision with your spring Needs update.)
Certification of Mileage Update Comments:
Plan to include this revision on the 2019 Annual Certification of Mileage that is due in January 2020.
If you have any questions, contact your DSAE or Bill Lanoux at (651) 366‐3817 for instructions.
cc. District State Aid Engineer
Available Mileage 0.72 2018 Certified Mileage
+ Revoked Mileage 0.00
- Designated Mileage 0.68
Remaining Available Mileage 0.04
SHEET 1 OF 1
SurfsideSeaplaneBase
CedarLake
AmeliaLake
GoldenLake
BaldwinLake
RiceLake ReshanauLake WardsLake
Sherman Lake
CentervilleLake
Loch Ness Lake
Loch Ness Lake
George
Watch
Lake
Peltier
Lake
RondeauLake
33 34 35 36 31
28 26 25 30
21 22 23 24 19
16 15 14 13 18
9 10 11 12 7
Indian HillsPark
CanterburyPark
PheasantRun Park Woods ofBaldwinLake Park
GoldenLake Park
GrovePark
BirchwoodAcres Park
SouthReshanau LakeEstates Park
City HallPark
ShenandoahPark
Carl ErckPark BaldwinPark
BarkPark
CountryLakesPark
CenterPark
North StarPark
Centennial Green Park GreenPark
SunrisePark
EastsidePark
MarshanPark
LochnessPark
Rice Creek-Chainof Lakes CountyRegional Park
Behn'sPark
AnokaCountyPark
LinoPark
T120
T33
T123A
T123B
T36
256246$+32 $+1
258126127105$+1
$+4 109$+1 $+21
$+59 81
$+54
$+60
84
249 154
81
$+17
109 126$+49 $+32
$+32108109127
102 102 107106
107108
140 109112
128 128140
139 109122 101110112113
$+34
107$+34
139§¨¦35E 84 114130130129
1
0
611 11
0
2
103
104
1 0 3
105 122131132$+34 $+34
114
1
2
9 114111104 $+23 13113 2 $+21
$+54
49 12053 49
13310
5
105
$+49 114124 124
101108
120
1
0
1 111$+21 84 $+14 $+8115118 116116117117140116
133§¨¦35W
101116
118 119
1 1 9
$+12
$+23 §¨¦35E
111115120 12053
103
$+14
$+54
1
1
1121142 138
$+12
138
121
$+17
142135 §¨¦35W
145 145 141 142136
53
123
123
135103142
137
136137142$+14 118$+14 140 4A140
$+23118 §¨¦35E
$+17
141
142117
103117
$+54
Restwood Rd
88th Ln NE
Woodland Rd Lake DrLovell Rd Village DrM-39
142nd St N
M-467
MSAS 112
Frenchman Rd N
99thAveNE
Oxford StAustin St NE
Short StOpal Cir NEHighland Cir
Marshan CtFirebarn Rd
O pal C t N EFox Cir
Fox Holw
Robinson Dr
Hickory Pl
Hokah DrKilldeer Ct
Villag
e
P
k
wyLake DrParkwood DrOtter Vie
w Cir
SaintAndrewsCt
Royal Oaks DrStella Cir
Langer CirArthur CtChurchill StEllen CtPheasantRidgeDrNEBallRdNE
Otter View TrIronwood Cir JaneAve
Crystal CtVictor Path
Sioux Ct Nordin StWare Cir
Highland Ct
Sherman Lake Ct
White Pine Cir125th St N
August Cir
136thAveNE
Timothy CtTwilight Ter NE
Caine CtClearwater Creek CirWayne CirTanner Ct JardinAveNPony Ct
Hartford Cir
Hardwood St
Goldenrod Cir
Heritage Pkwy N
Lacasse Ci
rFree domDr
Meadowlark CtKeithson DrElmcrestAveNMeadowvi
ewCt
Fenway Blvd Ct
114th Ln NE
Tom a h a w k Ct
Arrowhead Ct Leopold Ln N133rd Ln NE
Lind aCir Fair
oaks
Cir
N
Shadow Ct
134th St N
Velvetleaf Ln
Glen CirLorraine CtLever St NEShermanLakeC irBirchwood StD elin aCirArabian Cir
Quart
er Horse CtGrouseHolw
Golden Lake CirKieth
Dr
BirchStW id geonCir Tourville CirDianeSt
GrangeViewTeckla Ct
87th Ave CitySt
CosetteWayN
Sunfish Cir VictorHugoSqN
Gladstone Cir Mou
nd CtClydesdale CirCoyoteCtBlack Duck CtKeithRd
StonetbrookDrM-198WestARd 141st
CirNSchool Rd
106th Ln NE
City St
Cob
ble
r Ct
SedgeCtTerra CtPheasantHillsC ir
SaintAndrewsDrNE
RuffedGrouseCt Sumac CtCinnamon Teal CtTrapp ers CtDeer
Ct
Fox Cove CassiopeiaCtOak CirMuskrat Run
HighLand CtRockney St NETart CtSout h R d
128thSt N
F lo ra C tBrianCtCaribou CirClearwaterRdLeaCt
EmpressWay N
Dahlia WayIvy CtAppaloosa Ct
Meadow Ct
E urop aBayPoetsGrnN101st Ln NEHobeCtMeadowCtCenterville RdWest B RdPeregrineCir
Alameda StM all ard LnEva StDeerwood RunHawkRidge
Cir
M-86
Pine Dr Goiffon RdCarlson StCrippleCreekCtSnowOwlCir
72nd 1/2 St
MarshanCt FarnhamAveNEminenceAveCitySt
Mustang Ct
Linda Ave
RiceCt
EthanAve
WoodridgeCt
Clearwater Creek CtBlackDuckCir VictorHugoBlvdHeat
her CtOakviewCt64th StShadowLakeCtPheasantHillsDr
Marian CtMineralP tGateway Cir
F
airba
nksAveNPartridgeCtSavannaCtSunsetAveNESnowGooseTrPioneerLn
CameoL nQuitoStN E
FlowerfieldRdNE Kingfisher CtDurangoPtSheila AveWhitetail RdgRed Maple Ln
124thS tre etC irN
Itage Ln
National Ct NE
Broke nOakCt124th Ln
Twinkle Ter JardinAve124th Street Ct NO a k Ln
Re vo irSt
BloomCt
Hamline AvePheasant Run SEuropaAve
NLinda Ct
1 49thSt N
LacasseC tSchlavinCt PaintedTurtleR d
Robi
nOakCtDanubeSt122ndStN
FableHillRdN
BeaverCir Mall
ar
dWa
y
WestC
Dr
Timbe rwoleCirBuckthorn Ln
Glenview Ave
City
St
PheasantDrSherwood Ln
Robin Ln
RondeauLakeRdW
Grotto StElm St
Canterbury Rd
Barbara Ln
126th St N
WolfC irFensonCt
N
Parkview Dr Vo y a g e rC t129thStN
Kissel St NE HouleCir
Prairie View Ln
Westview St
174th St N
149th St N
Cardinal Dr
Steven LnJoseph CtOspreyCtM-289
Beaver Tr
M-132Meadow CtRed Hawk TrRoyalPlOjibway Dr FalconAv
e
NGhiaStNE
Oak DrOakwood DrDupreRdBaldwin Lake RdRed Birch Ct
Granta ireLnIversonCtLavalleDr F al k DrFarn
hamAveCanfield Rd
Garden Ln
Carl St
TamarackLnHumber St NERic
eLakeCtRed Clover Ln
126th
Stre
etCtDeerPassDrGreenwood Ln
Unity Ave173rd St N
L am otteDrCitySt
Indian
Hill
sLnWhiteBirc h C tLexingtonAveNE82nd St E
Woodchuck Ct
Bradley St
Smoketree Ln
Central St
F airpoint
DrCherry Ln
W
o
o
dsEdgeDrMead owCirDeerPass Tr
Tele DrLanternCir
132nd StHodgsonRdCedar StOpal St NE
Connie Ln
FableHill CtTele LnJon AveGordon Ave1
4
1
s
t
S
tN
158th St N
Rosemary WayTwinLakesRd
Duen WayLake Dr
Holly DrMerganse rCtFalconAve92nd Cir NE
P ondv iewCirWildTurk eyTrOak CtBlackbi
rdLnIsetta St NEKent StWoodcrest DrSouixLookMonarchWayWhiteO
wlDrMeadow Ave
GallivanCt N102nd LnNE
65thSt Arbre LnMyrtleLn
81stStW
130th St N
Doris Ave
HayfieldRd
Prai
ri
eFlowerRd
Point Cross Dr BrianWayMarcia Ln
Gol
den
LakeRd NationalStFoxtailCtTealCt EmeraldDrN
Elm DrNFable Hill Cir N
RusticLnMolitor Dr
G
olden O
ak Dr
HudsonTr103rd Ct NE
Gaage LnCherok
e
eTrShady WayHighland Tr
Sh epardCtFlora WayEnfieldAve
SargentCtNEdgeDrJewell St NECottonwood CtM-318
Fairview St
Ro b in H o o d L n
TartLakeRd
102ndAve NE
As penLn
Sher
w
o
o
dCt
SandpiperDr
Lamotte CirRi
dgeCreekRd ProvenceWay NLever Ct NEEnfieldA veN
Marshan Ln
ChokecherryRdElbe StApple Ln
San
d
hillDr Centerville Rd132ndW ay
C rossway D rTownCenterP kw y
Doris Ave
Rei lin g Rd
USTH 61Apollo St NEHugo RdFenway Bl v d C irN
Meadow Ave
Rohavic Ln WhitetailTrKilldeer Dr85thAve NE Jordell St NE123rd L n NE
101st Ln
FarnhamAveNPlumLn
72ndSt
106th Ln NE
Lilac St Zodiac St NEGreen Briar Dr
101stLnNE
Northern Ligh tsBlvdBluebill LnPleasant View Ln
Maple St
BaldEagleBlvdWParkDrEParkCt
4th AveGrey Squirrel Rd
Arrowhead Dr
Wildflower Dr
DupreRd
64th St
117thAveNE
Hunters RdgOn
e
k
a
Pk
wy
Sorel StRondeauLakeDrN
Hillcrest Ln
Village Pk wySunflower Ln
1
1
8thAveNE
Oak RidgeTrMoonlightDrErskin St NEFreedomDrNKnoll DrRevoir St
Sherwood RdNottinghamDr
Emmit Dr
Hobe LnTurtle Lake RdHodgson RdSaintAlbansStDellwoodAveFraizer St NEGhia St NELanternLn
FalconCtNMackubin StOjib
wayPathGoldenLakeRdFur
manS
t
N
E
L
e
v
e
r
S
t
NEQuebec St
140thStN
Cripple Creek PassAurora LnScenicPlCosetteLn
N
Hollow LnOakHollowLn Progress RdLinda Ave AenonPlHupp St NEFernwoodStEvertonCirNHeritageTrWillowPondTrBlueHeronDrPheasant Ln FosterDr
H un te r s Tr
Hardwood Ave
Stella LnMourningDoveRd
Glenview LnForestDrBehmLnHupp St NETotemTrAntelope DrTalle LnTimberwolf TrPackard St NEBaldwinDrTrappersCroEvergreen
DrN
TomahawkTr
Prairie Dr
79th St
EuropaTrailWayStutz St NECircleHeightsC IRCLE 81st St W
W i llo w CirPinto LnOt
t
erLakeDrRuffedGrouseRd
Fox Run
FenwayAveNExhallAveNFairmount Dr
EuropaCtNChippewa T rDeerwoo dLnHunters RidgeLn21stAveN112thAveNE
87thAveNE
133rd Ave
Post Rd
LeafWing DrFenwayAveNClearRdgFalconCirNThomas St
Shad AveNottingham LnFlowerfield Rd WhippoorwillLn106thAve NE
Meadow LnErskinCirNE
Linden Ln
Ravens Ct
Main St EvertonAveNHighview
Pl
Phelps Rd FairoaksAveN
LakotaTrFab
leHillWay NVicki Ln
4th AveStallion Ln
R iverBirchPlHeritage St
Pelican
P
l
1 0 8 th L n N E
CommerceDr
124th St N
Everton
AveN
Fanni
ngStNGardenWayNW oodduckTrCaroleDrWare RdEgret Ln
SiouxLnLittleJohnDr157thS t N
Kieth Rd
Glen Tr PartridgePl
121st St N
104th AveNE
Baldwin Cir
104th Ln NE MeadowViewTrFoxtailDrShermanL
akeRdNancyDrRidgeRd
P
eltier
Ci
rStoneybrookDrNorthStarLn
PartridgePl
FrenchDr
Twili
ghtTer
Andall St
115thAveNE
FarnhamDrGladstone Dr EmpressAveNKarth Rd
Otte
r
Lake
RdAppaloosaLn108thAveNE
Bald Eagle PtCres
centLnSnow Owl LnIvyRidgeLnEastRdOakwoodLnC o u n tr y L a kes Dr
TownCenterPkwy
PineHollo
w
DrInner Dr Rice Lake LnRice Lake DrGoldenLakeLn
Henery Ln
Orange St
114th AveNE FarnhamAve
N
81st St E
OldMillRdAsh StTrappersCroSGrayHeronDrHolly Ct FarnhamAveNSouth Dr
Ulmer Dr
GalaxyDr
Center St
Civic Heights Dr
Elizabeth Ln
Joyer LnPalomino Ln
W o o d la nd D rMill RdClearwater
CreekDr
WhiteOak Rd FarnhamAveNWilkinsonLakeBlvd
1 29 th S tN
Carl St
Rehbeins St
Dupree
R
dDianeStValJ ea n BlvdN
158th St N
105thAveNE
R edFoxRdLexingtonAveNELaurene AveAsh St
FawnL
n
EuropaAveNCenterS tMustang LnLexingtonAveNEGlenview Dr
Saint Andrew sCirNEWoodchuckCirPeterson TrPar
k
Dr
Oak Leaf LnGardenwoodPkwyNE
Coyote Tr
Cedar St EvertonAveNOld Birch StVictorHugoBlvdNLonesomePineT rP alomino Ln
National St NECountry LnLinda Ln
Highland
D
r
120th St NStagecoa
c
h
TrRobinson Dr
E
ducationDr
AquaCirBeaverPondWayPeltierLake Dr
Emil Ave Mill RdEvergreenTr
121st AveNE
Cent
er
RdMarvy St
107thAveNE
Maple LnJames St
Jeanne DrLever St NE12thAveSIndian
Hills
D
r
103rd Ln NE Pattie Dr1 5 9 th S tN
ShadowLakeDr77th St E
Stardust
Blvd
73rd StOpal StDeerwoodLn
L a k elandCirCircleDr
74th St
Hawthorn Rd
FalconAveNWhite Pine Rd111thAveNE 22ndAveSNational St NEMo u nd Tr
W
estRd
HokahDrEuropaTrLeonard AveHeritagePkwyN
RollingHillsDr
Apollo Dr
ClearwaterCreekDrLacasseDrEthanAveNVicto rPathNPeltierLakeDrEagleTr
LangerLn
Lois Ln Freeway DrKelly St
Otter Lake RdWood Duck TrMarilyn DrC e n tury Tr
RoyalOaks D rW
oodridge
Ln Rondeau Rd WHolly DrMain St NEFSt
ParkwayRdFox R dShadow Lake DrH St62nd St
77th St W
2nd AveAsh St
Lois Ln
Sunrise AveOak Ln
FableHillPkwyNBrian DrG S tLakeview Dr180th St N
170th St N
165th St N
80th St EMain St NE
Fenway BlvdForest Blvd109th AveNE
Aqua LnElmSt
NorthRd
ElmcrestAveNBlackDuck
Dr RondeauLakeRdEA p o llo D rPine St
20thAveN20thAveSLake DrLexingtonAveNELake DrBirch StLexingtonAveNE Main StJewellCtNE10.
10
9.
9
17.
17
29.
29
14.
14
7.
7
3.
3
4.
4
26.
26
19.
19
1.
1
18.
18
5.
5
12.
12
16.
16
15.
15
2.
2
20.
20
23.
23
25.
25
24.
24
11.
11
22.
22
27.27
6.
6
31.
31
21.
21 28.
28
30.
30
8.
8
13.
13143
109
104
110141
123
102 114143
104
110141
123
102 114143
109
104
110141
123
102 114Edgewood Rd
97th Ln NE
140th St NElmcrest Ave NPortage WayTo request information from this document in an alternative format, call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota); 711 or 1-800-627-3529 (Minnesota Relay). You may also send an e-mail to ADArequest.dot@state.mn.us. (Please request at least one week in advance.)
MUNICIPALITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY
Population (U.S Census 2010): 20216
IN COOPERATION WITHU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPALITY OFLINO LAKES
0 0.45 0.9 1.35 1.80.225 Kilometers
0.3 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.20.15 Miles
SC ALE
1 in = 1,600 ft
PREPARED BY THEMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONOFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
2 0 18µProjection:Transverse MercatorNAD 1986UTM Zone 15
North American Datumof 1986
ADD TOWN CENTER
PKWY FROM LAKE
DR (CR 23) TO
VILLAGE DR
(0.33 MILES)
ADD VILLAGE DR FROM TOWN
CENTER PKWY TO TOWN CENTER
PKWY
WEST ONE WAY PIECE = 0.10 MILES
EAST ONE WAY PIECE = 0.10 MILES
TWO WAY PIECE = 0.15 MILES
(0.35 MILES)
LINO LAKES ROUTE
REVISIONS
EXISTING UNDESIGNATED MILEAGE = 0.72 MILES
ADDED MILEAGE = 0.68 MILES
REVOKED MILEAGE = 0.00 MILES
PROPOSED UNDESIGNATED MILEAGE = 0.04 MILES
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer MEETING DATE: March 25, 2011 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 19-28, Approving Amended Development Agreement, Northpointe 7th Addition
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND
The Final Plat for the 7th Addition of the Northpointe Development was approved at the June 12, 2018 City Council Meeting. The original development agreement included park dedication fees in the amount of $84,000, part of which would go towards constructing a trail connecting to the development.
As part of the original agreement, the developer needs to complete additional site work. City Staff has worked with the developer in order to construct the trail as part of the additional site work through an amendment to the original development agreement by reducing the park dedication fees. The original park dedication fees would be reduced in the amount of $25,843 and be reimbursed to the developer who will coordinate construction of the trail. Construction
of the trail would follow the City’s General Specification and Details for construction. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 19-28, Approving the Amended Development
Agreement, Northpointe 7th Addition.
ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 19-28
2. Amendment to Development Agreement
3. Exhibit A – Original Development Agreement (Executed) 4. Exhibit B – Trail Construction Exhibit
CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-28 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR NORTHPOINTE 7TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the City Council approved the development agreement for NorthPointe 7th Addition with Resolution No. 18-50 on May 14, 2018; and WHEREAS, the original park dedication fees shall be reimbursed in the amount of $25,845; and WHEREAS, the developer shall complete the work in coordinate with their other site work; and WHEREAS, the construction of the trail shall meet the City’s General Specifications and
Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction dated February 2018. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the Amendment to Development Agreement & Planned Unit Development Agreement between Tony Emmerich Construction, Inc. and the City of Lino Lakes for
NorthPointe 7th Addition and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the City. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of March, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NorthPointe 7th Addition
THIS AMENDMENT is entered into on ________ day of ____________, 2019, by the City of Lino Lakes (“City”), and Tony Emmerich Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Developer”), Parties to the Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement NorthPointe 7th Addition dated June 12, 2018 which is attached as Exhibit A.
RECITALS WHEREAS, the NorthPointe 7th Addition Development includes a portion of trail to be installed
by the City and it is cost effective to have the Developer complete the work in coordination with
their other site work. The trail location is detailed in Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the developer shall install the trail to meet the City’s General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction dated February 2018: and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement NorthPointe 7th Addition dated June 12, 2018 section 16a is amended to provide for reimbursement of park dedication for trail improvements constructed by the Developer in the estimated amount of $25,845.00 based on the bid proposal from C. W. Houle,
Inc. dated January 24, 2019. Reimbursement to the Developer shall be the actual construction
costs. Reimbursement shall be made within 30 days upon receipt of a lien waiver from the Developer as proof of payment to the Contractor. Any future costs to the Developer for warranty work or additional work requested by the City
will also be reimbursed by the City to the Developer.
CITY: City of Lino Lakes
By:________________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST: By:________________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
2
DEVELOPER: Tony Emmerich Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
By:__________________________________ Baleen K. Roberts Its: President
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF _________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of ____________, 2019, by Jeff
Reinert as Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of said City. _______________________________ Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of ____________, 2019, by Julianne Bartell as City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of said City.
_______________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss. COUNTY OF _________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _________, 2019, by Baleen K. Roberts, the President of Tony Emmerich Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on
behalf of the corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public
3
EXHIBIT A Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement NorthPointe 7th Addition
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x x x x x x x x
x
x
x xAJE COMPANIES4920 173rd Ave. NEHam Lake, MN 55304NORTHPOINTELino Lakes, MinnesotaTRAIL EXHIBITNotes:ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGf:\jobs\4581 - 4600\4586 - lino lakes parcel\cad\engineering\4586_trail exhibit bid 2019.dwgSave Date:01/18/19
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 19-32, Adopt Local Surface Water
Management Plan VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration to Adopt the November, 2018 Local Surface Water Management Plan. BACKGROUND The City Council authorized preparation of the Local Surface Water Management Plan as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update in April of 2017. The Local Surface Water Management Plan was
updated to meet the requirements for local plans in the Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B.235, Minnesota Rules 8410 and in conformance with Watershed District, Management Organization, and Metropolitan Council plans.
The Council approved the draft Local Surface Water Management Plan for distribution on January 8,
2018. The Rice Creek Watershed District approved the plan on December 12, 2018. The City of Lino
Lakes is required to adopt and implement the City’s local water plan within 120 days of watershed district approval, in accordance with the M.R. 8410 and M.S. 103B.235 a 120 days is April 11, 2019.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 19-32, Adopt Local Surface Water Management Plan. ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 2. Local Surface Water Management Plan
CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-32 RESOLUTION TO ADOPT LOCAL SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN DATED NOVEMBER, 2018 WHEREAS, the City’s Local Surface Water Management Plan dated November, 2018 has been updated in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes Adopts the November, 2018 Local Surface Water Management Plan. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of March, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
November 2018Prepared ForCity of Lino Lakes600 Town Center ParkwayLino Lakes, Minnesota 55014Local WaterManagement PlanWSB Project No. 02988-500
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 1 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Contents Local Water Management Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Local Water Management Plan Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Local Water Management Responsibilities and Related Agreements ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Background ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Summary of Implementation Section ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Local Water Management Responsibilities and Related Agreements ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Amendments to the Local Water Management Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Climate and Precipitation ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Topography, Soils and Geology ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Resource Management Units ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.4 Surface Water Resources ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 2.5 Stormwater Management System .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.6 Water Quality Data and Impairments ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 2.7 Groundwater Resources .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 2.8 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 2.9 Fish and Wildlife Habitat .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 2.10 Regulated Pollutant Sources ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 2.11 Proposed Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 3. ASSESSMENT OF WATER RESOURCE-RELATED PROBLEMS AND ISSUES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46 3.1 Issues .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 3.2 Goals and Policies .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 48 4. GOALS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 52 5. LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 53 5.1 Implementation Activities ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53 5.2 Implementation Costs ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 2 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 6. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 56 7. REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 List of Appendices Appendix A – MS4 SWPPP Application for Reauthorization Appendix B - City-wide and RMU-specific water resources issues Appendix C – Shoreland Management Overlay District Appendix D - Proposed city-wide and RMU-specific actions
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 3 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 List of Tables Table 2-1. 1981-2010 Climatic Data for Lino Lakes, MN Table 2-2. NOAA Atlas 14 Design Storm Events Table 2-3. Amelia Lake Summary Table 2-4. Bald Eagle Lake Summary Table 2-5. Baldwin Lake Summary Table 2-6. Cedar Lake Summary Table 2-7. Centerville Lake Summary Table 2-8. George Watch Lake Summary Table 2-9. Marshan Lake Summary Table 2-10. Otter Lake Summary Table 2-11. Peltier Lake Summary Table 2-12. Reshanau Lake Summary Table 2-13. Rice Lake Summary Table 2-14. Rondeau Lake Summary Table 2-15. Sherman Lake Summary Table 2-16. Wards Lake Summary Table 2-17. Wilkinson Lake Summary Table 2-18. 2018 Impaired Waters Table 2-19. Benchmark Intercommunity Flow Rates Table 2-20. Lino Lakes Public Supply Wells Table 2-21. Summary of Flooding Concerns by Resource Management Unit Table 2-22. Documented Rare Species in Lino Lakes Table 5-23. City-Wide Implementation Plan Table 5-24. Stormwater Management Implementation Plan List of Figures Figure 1-1 Location Map Figure 2-1 Hydrologic Soil Group Figure 2-2 Surficial Geology Figure 2-3 Bedrock Geology Figure 2-4 Resource Management Units (RMUs) Figure 2-5 Surface Water Resources Figure 2-6 High Priority Wetlands Figure 2-7 Existing Storm Sewer System Figure 2-8 Impaired Waters Figure 2-9 Groundwater Resources Figure 2-10 Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction Figure 2-11 Existing Land Use Figure 2-12 Minnesota Land Cover Classification System Figure 2-13 Shoreland Management Figure 2-14 Floodplain Districts Figure 2-15 Potential Environmental Hazards Figure 2-16 Full Build Out Land Use Figure 2-17 2040 Land Use
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 4 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Local Water Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Local Water Management Plan Purpose The City of Lino Lakes’ Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) is a local management plan that meets the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 103B.235, Minnesota Rules 8410, the Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Plan (dated January 2010, as amended November 9, 2016), and the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization Watershed Management Plan (dated October 26, 2016). Minnesota Statute 103B.201 states that the purposes of the water management programs are to: § Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; § Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems; § Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; § Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; § Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; § Promote groundwater recharge; § Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and § Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater. The Lino Lakes’ Local Water Management Plan addresses these purposes. The LWMP was adopted by City Council in 2018 and is incorporated as Chapter 7 and Appendix A of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Local Water Management Responsibilities and Related Agreements The City of Lino Lakes has not entered into any water management related agreements with its neighboring cities, Anoka County, Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), or the State of Minnesota other than on a project-specific agreement for BMPs constructed to meet water quality requirements. The City of Lino Lakes has a Joint Powers Agreement with the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO), in which the City is designated as a signer and member of VLAWMO. The City of Lino Lakes is responsible for construction, maintenance, and operation of the City's stormwater management system. Background The City of Lino Lakes (population 20,216) is located in Anoka County in the seven county Twin Cities metropolitan area, approximately 20 miles north of downtown Saint Paul. The City covers approximately 33 square miles. Lino Lakes is nestled between the cities of Blaine and Circle Pines to the west, Columbus to the north, Hugo to the east, and Shoreview and North Oaks to the south. The city of Centerville is located near the center of Lino Lakes. Lino Lakes is within two watershed agencies: RCWD and VLAWMO. RCWD is a watershed district and has the authority to regulate development impacts on water resources; VLAWMO is not a permitting agency, but does provide guidance on the implementation of best management practices within its jurisdiction. This plan addresses the rules and regulations put forth by the RCWD and VLAWMO. Surface water in Lino Lakes general drains to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes which includes Baldwin Lake, Rice Lake, Reshanau Lake, Marshan Lake, George Watch Lake, Centerville Lake, Peltier Lake, and Rondeau Lake as well as Rice Creek, Hardwood Creek (Judicial Ditch 2), and Clearwater Creek (Judicial Ditch 3). A large portion of the city remains undeveloped. Although the community has been identified as Suburban Leading Edge, it still retains its rural and agricultural roots. Section 2.6 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan discusses land use in Lino Lakes.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 5 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Summary of Implementation Section The need to address water quality within the city is partially illustrated in the map showing the various impaired lakes (Figure 2-8) which has regulatory implications that are still being developed, the City’s stormwater infrastructure (Figure 2-7), the underlying soils and geology (Figures 2-2 and 2-3), the groundwater resources (Figure 2-9) and the existing floodplain (Figure 2-14). The following is a generalized list of the key implementation strategies, policies, and/or actions proposed in this LWMP to address the City of Lino Lakes’ water resources issues: § Implement the Resource Management Plan through development of Subwatershed Management Plans for each resource management unit (RMU). These plans will establish: - A clear vision of the multi-functional Greenway System for City staff and developers that will be used as a tool early in the land development process. - Create a wetland bank to provide replacement opportunities for development or roadway projects. - Work with RCWD on the ditch abandonment process for public drain tile systems and explore partial abandonment for surface ditch systems, in cases where the public drainage system requires redesign to implement the multi-functional Greenway System. - Implement water quality improvements via the Subwatershed Plans for each RMU specific to the waterbodies of the area and upcoming regulations (ex., impairments, TMDLs). § Implement the design guidelines of Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) with future development in the Peltier Lake and Clearwater Creek subwatersheds § Continue to manage the City’s wetlands and natural resources by: - Implementing City-wide Natural Resource Revolving Fund Plan, in cooperation with RCWD and VLAWMO - Continuing to participate in pre-permit application meetings with the RCWD and US Army Corps of Engineers to support the collaborative permitting process implemented through RCWD Rule and the Corps’ Programmatic General Permit that implements the Special Area Management Plan. - Continuing to manage and protect the heron rookery, tamarack swamps, and other important plant and animal communities. § Review existing City policies, regulations, ordinances and plans including: - Continue to implement and enforce the City's Stormwater Pollution Protection Program (SWPPP) as part of the NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. - Implement the Wellhead Protection Plan to protect the groundwater source from contamination. - Continue to implement the City’s Water Conservation Management Plan - Evaluate the need to modify existing ordinances to ensure implementation of all components of the multi-functional Greenway System - Revise maximum allowable impervious surface requirements for low and medium-density residential districts § Establish and adopt Better Site Design (BSD) standards for new and re-development that: - Provide guidance for staff, City Boards, and City Council - Protect high priority wetlands, their biological condition, and their function as high quality habitat; - Enhance groundwater hydrology and protect groundwater-dependent natural resources; - Provide natural flood reduction; - Integrate water quality improvement components in the landscape; and - Implement the Resource Management System Plan. § Evaluate revisions to Road Design Standards including: - Reducing minimum pavement widths; - Ribbon curbs and curb cuts with roadside swales, infiltration, and biofiltration; and - Use of pervious pavements. § Review existing watershed models and work with the RCWD and VLAWMO to address flow constraints in the system. § Continue public outreach, education and dissemination of information, including: - Work with private landowners to retrofit/implement the multi-functional Greenway System, for those parcels that are not part of a Master Plan or are already developed. - Partner with RCWD, VLAWMO, and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) to establish program to educate residents on the means to identify and eradicate invasive species. - Participate with other public agencies and organizations on education and outreach efforts. - Develop, distribute, and present public with information regarding the importance of shoreland buffers. § Evaluate financing options to implement activities and policies in LWMP, such as: - Pursue funding through federal and state grant opportunities - Pursue grants through RCWD Grant Programs to assist in the funding of projects that will reduce the impact of existing development on local water resources. - Pursue funding support from VLAWMO for projects in the Amelia Lake and Wilkinson Lake watersheds. - Review and evaluate funding sources for surface water management including ad valorem taxes, development charges, grants and user fees. - Update and continue to implement Trunk Surface Water Management Fee System.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 6 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 1. INTRODUCTION The City of Lino Lakes (population 20,216) is located in Anoka County in the seven county Twin Cities metropolitan area, approximately 20 miles north of downtown Saint Paul (Figure 1-1). The City covers approximately 33 square miles. Lino Lakes is nestled between the cities of Blaine and Circle Pines to the west, Columbus to the north, Hugo to the east, and Shoreview and North Oaks to the south. The City of Centerville is located near the center of Lino Lakes. Lino Lakes is within two watershed agencies: Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO). RCWD is a watershed district and has the authority to regulate development impacts on water resources; VLAWMO is not a permitting agency, but does provide guidance on the implementation of best management practices within its jurisdiction. This plan addresses the rules and regulations put forth by the RCWD and VLAWMO. Surface water in Lino Lakes general drains to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes which includes Baldwin Lake, Rice Lake, Reshanau Lake, Marshan Lake, George Watch Lake, Centerville Lake, Peltier Lake, and Rondeau Lake as well as Rice Creek, Hardwood Creek (Judicial Ditch 2), and Clearwater Creek (Judicial Ditch 3). This Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) builds off three previous plans, completed in 1994, 2005, and 2015. 1.1 Purpose The City of Lino Lake’s Local Water Management Plan (LWMP, the Plan) is a local management plan that meets the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 103B.235, Minnesota Rules 8410, the RCWD Watershed Management Plan (adopted January 4, 2010 and amended November 9, 2016), and the VLAWMO 2017-2026 Comprehensive Water Plan (adopted October 26, 2016). Minnesota Statute 103B.201 states that the purposes of the local water management programs are to: § Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; § Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems; § Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; § Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; § Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; § Promote groundwater recharge; § Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and § Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater. The Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan addresses these purposes. Figure 1-1. Location Map
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 7 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 1.2 Local Water Management Responsibilities and Related Agreements The City of Lino Lakes has not entered into any water resource management related agreements with its neighboring cities, Anoka County, RCWD, or the State of Minnesota. The City of Lino Lakes has a Joint Powers Agreement with VLAWMO, in which the City is designated as a signer and member of VLAWMO. The City of Lino Lakes is responsible for construction, maintenance, and other projects in or along the City's stormwater management system that are not considered part of a county or watershed district’s public drainage system. 1.3 Amendments to the Local Water Management Plan The City may need to revise this Plan prior to the next update for it to remain a useful long-term planning tool. Plan amendments will be needed if significant changes are required involving goals, policies, administrative procedures, funding or the capital improvement program, or if problems arise that are not addressed in the Plan. This Plan will remain in full effect through 2028 unless an updated plan is approved prior to that date. Technical information (i.e., from City-led studies and monitoring and new data from City partners) will require frequent updating. The City intends to post this updated information on the City website. Technical information that results in new action items will be incorporated into City operations through implementation of the City’s programs, projects, and watershed management strategies as appropriate. Generally, these technical updates and studies are considered part of the normal City operations consistent with the intent of this Plan and will not trigger a Plan amendment. However, when the new technical information or study findings result in a significant policy change, or the watershed district intends to initiate a program or construct a capital improvement not sufficiently identified in the Plan, a plan amendment will be required. All major amendments to the Plan that deviate from the existing Plan scope and direction will be submitted to RCWD and VLAWMO for review and approval. The review process is 60 days unless the City agrees to an extension of the review period. The Plan amendment will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for a 45-day review to be incorporated into the review of the RCWD and VLAWMO. 1.4 Roles and Responsibilities Federal Coordination with federal agencies on water issues for the City of Lino Lakes often is with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and sometimes also with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The USACE regulate activities in navigable waters and wetlands. Therefore, coordination is required for activities that have the potential to affect wetland and lake systems in the City of Lino Lakes. The USACE issues permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and allow for approval of permitting and replacement plans that meet the requirements of Section 404 on a regional basis. Lino Lakes has submitted a Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) with the USACE. The SAMP is implemented through a Programmatic General Permit (PGP) that includes special wetland regulatory conditions for the City of Lino Lakes. In summary, the PGP provides mitigation flexibility for impacts that are consistent with the SAMP. The EPA has delegated many of its responsibilities within Minnesota to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) including the administration and enforcement of National Pollutant Discharge and Elimination (NPDES) permits and the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program. FEMA’s mission is to support communities and first responders to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from and mitigate all hazards. Most often in Lino Lakes, this translates to implementation of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The MnDNR has assumed responsibility for most of the floodplain management roles through adopting state-wide higher standards and works directly with the City of Lino Lakes to update flood insurance rate maps and floodplain ordinances. The USGS collects data on stream flow, groundwater levels, and other information which is useful to the City in evaluating its resources. The USDA oversees the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) and the Farm Service Agency who provide technical services, conservation programs and funding to agricultural producers. In addition, the soils and technical data collected by the NRCS used by the City. The USFWS works to conserve and improve fish and wildlife and their habitat. NOAA, among other activities, collects weather and climate data used by the City for design and informational purposes. State On a state level, regulatory coordination related to water and natural resources includes addressing impaired waters, managing storm sewer systems and construction sites, managing shorelines, and a number of other areas. Agencies the City may coordinate with include the MPCA, MnDNR, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). The MPCA oversees the programs addressing municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s), construction site stormwater, industrial stormwater, impaired lakes and streams, feedlots, soil and groundwater contamination, and wastewater treatment. A number of these programs affect the City of Lino Lakes. The two main areas requiring coordination are the MS4 program and addressing impaired waters. The City’s stormwater system is designated as an MS4 by the MPCA. The City’s SWPPP was developed to address the requirements for MS4s. A permit re-issuance was approved in May 2013 and went into effect August 1, 2013. A number of TMDLs are in process and others have been completed to address impaired waters in Lino Lakes. These studies establish daily load limits for certain compounds that were found to contribute to the impairment. The City of Lino Lakes will likely have a wasteload allocation in the future that establishes the maximum allowed discharge of the regulated pollutant for each TMDL. The City of Lino Lakes will document information on a routine basis regarding new projects and programs that lead to load reductions needed to meet a TMDL. The MnDNR leads programs that regulate shoreline and floodplain development, groundwater use, and conducts various efforts to support water-based recreation and quality fisheries. The City has a shoreline and floodplain ordinance that is in compliance with the MnDNR’s standards. MnDOT manages the state’s transportation system including a number of highways in the City of Lino Lakes. Coordination with MnDOT is needed when an activity may impact a state highway or its right-of-way. The MDH works to address a number of health issues, but the primary area of coordination for the City is with the protection of drinking water resources including wellhead protection and drinking water treatment.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 8 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Regional Regulatory coordination on a regional level involves coordination with the Metropolitan Council and with watershed management organizations, particularly RCWD and VLAWMO. The City addresses the water-related concerns of the Metropolitan Council primarily through the City’s Comprehensive Plan and this Plan. The Comprehensive Plan frames how the City will address issues such as housing and transportation along with water concerns noted by the Metropolitan Council. RCWD implements and enforces a set of rules related to stormwater and natural resource management. In addition, the RCWD is the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Local Government Unit (LGU) for a number of jurisdictions including Lino Lakes. The City works with the RCWD to protect and manage the wetland and water resources of the City. VLAWMO also works to protect and improve water resources. VLAWMO is also the WCA LGU for a number of jurisdictions including those portions of Lino Lakes within their jurisdictional boundary. City Administration of Surface Water Management Plan The implementation of this Plan will be coordinated by staff with input from the Environmental Board. The staff will coordinate within the various departments as needed to ensure implementation of this plan over the next ten years. After this Plan is approved by the watershed organizations, the City of Lino Lakes will adopt and implement the Plan within 120 days and will update and approve its ordinances and official controls to be consistent with this Plan within 180 days.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 9 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 2. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 2.1 Climate and Precipitation The climate within the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan area is described as a humid continental climate with moderate precipitation, wide daily temperature variations, warm humid summers, and cold winters. The total average annual precipitation in this area from 1981 to 2010 (the most recent year the data was available) is approximately 30.81 inches, of which approximately 40% occurs in the months of June, July and August (MnDNR 2017). The annual snowfall is about 37.3 inches (MRCC 2017) and is roughly equivalent to 2.9 inches of water. Additional climatological information for the area may be obtained from the Minnesota State Climatology Office. Table 2-1. 1981-2010 Climatic Data for Lino Lakes, MN 1981-2010 Monthly Normal Precipitation - Lino Lakes, MN Annual Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 30.81 0.86 0.76 1.74 2.68 3.57 4.32 4.02 4 3.33 2.69 1.7 1.14 1891-2017 Monthly Precipitation – Lino Lakes, MN Annual Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 28.96 0.83 0.83 1.53 2.36 3.63 4.45 3.71 3.70 3.16 2.31 1.48 0.99 1972-2014 Monthly Pan Evaporation – University of Minnesota, St. Paul Annual Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 36.83 - - - 1.85 6.72 7.50 8.06 6.67 4.75 1.26 - - 1981-2010 Monthly Normal Snowfall - Vadnais Lake NCDC Station Annual Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 37.9 9.5 5.7 7.6 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 5.4 8.5 1981-2010 Monthly Normal Temperature – Vadnais Lake NCDC Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Max 25.8 31 42.8 58.4 71 80 84.6 82 72.9 59.3 42.3 28.7 Min 7.1 11.6 23.7 37.6 50 59.4 64.1 61.8 52.8 40.8 27 12.8 Mean 16.5 21.3 33.3 48 60.5 69.7 74.4 71.9 62.9 50.1 34.7 20.7 Precipitation is often defined in terms of recurrence intervals, or the probability of a certain rainfall occurring during a given year. For example, a rainfall event of 6.13 inches has a 2% probability of occurring in any given year, which is also expressed as once in every 50 years, the 9.81 rainfall event has a probability of 0.2% and is expressed as once every 500 years. The following table presents the probability of typical design rainfall events within the City of Lino Lakes, including the 100-year 10-day snowmelt event. Table 2-2. NOAA Atlas 14 Design Storm Events (Sanja et al 2013). Recurrence Interval [years] 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 100 200 500 1,000 Probability 100% 50% 20% 10% 4% 2% 1% 1% 0.5% 0.2% 0.1% Duration 24-hour 24-hour 24-hour 24-hour 24-hour 24-hour 24-hour 10-day 24-hour 24-hour 24-hour Rainfall Amount [in] 2.43 2.80 3.50 4.17 5.22 6.13 7.12 9.86 8.22 9.81 11.10
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 10 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 2.2 Topography, Soils and Geology Topography The topography of Lino Lakes is generally rolling, with the highest ground in the southeast corner of the city and the lowest around Baldwin Lake. The majority of Lino Lakes is dominated by the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes, interspersed with lakes, wetlands, streams, and various judicial and county ditches. Soils Soils in Lino Lakes consist of Zimmerman fine sands, Rifle muck, and Isanti soil complexes (Soil Survey Staff 2017). In the northwest, the soils are predominately well-draining, on top of the Anoka Sand Plan, while on the southeast, the soils are poorly draining and result in a higher runoff potential compared to the northwest. The hydrologic soils group, a measure of the infiltration and runoff potential of the surface soils, is provided in Figure 2-1. Geology The surficial geology of eastern Lino Lakes is primarily glacial ice deposits of loamy tills with peat and muck around the Chain of Lakes and in isolated pockets (Figure 2-2). The loamy till is from the New Ulm formation and is chiefly loam texture with unsorted sediment. Peat and muck was deposited in the quaternary era and is composed of partially decomposed organic matter deposited in marshes. Peat and muck also includes fine grained organic matter laid down in ponded water and marl (Setterholm 2013). The western area of Lino Lakes is primarily lake deposits from the Late Wisconsin Pleistocene (Meyer 1993). Bedrock geology consists of sandstones (Figure 2-3). St. Peter Sandstone and the Prairie du Chien Group from the Ordovician and Lower Ordovician periods comprise the southeast corner of Lino Lakes. The northwest corner is made up of the Jordan Sandstone, the Tunnel City Group, and St. Lawrence Formation. Buried stream channels that are incised into several rock formations are a primary influence on the distribution of bedrock geologic units, including under the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes (Berg, 2016).
BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinson LakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th AveJD 2JD 3AC D 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25RCD 8ACD 10-22-32RCD 8§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewAmeilaBaldwinCentervilleClearwaterCreekDeepGeorge WatchHardwoodCreekMarshanMiddleRiceCreekPeltierReshanauRice LakeShermanUpperRice CreekWilkinsonRondeau´Figure 2-1Hydrologic Soil GroupLegendCity of CentervilleHydrologic Soil GroupAA/DBB/DCC/DDPublic DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseResource Management UnitsOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 1/22/2018
BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBald EagleLakeWilkinson LakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedarLakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420th AveJD 2JD 3AC D 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25RCD 8AC D 10-
2
2 -32
RCD 8§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLakeRd WHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewAmeilaBaldwinCentervilleClearwaterCreekDeepGeorge WatchHardwoodCreekMarshanMiddleRiceCreekPeltierReshanauRice LakeShermanUpperRiceCreekWilkinsonRondeauQpQpQpQpQbtQbtQpQpQbsQpQbtQpQpQpQbtQbtQbsQlQlQbtQbtQbtQpQpQpQpQlQlQlQlQlQlQlQbsQbtQbtQbtQllQbtQllQbtQbsQlQbsQlQbsQbtQbtQpQbtQndQpQpQlQlQlQbsQlQnaQnaQbtQndQbsQpQllQbtQllQpQbtQlQbtQpQmQpQpQpQbtQpQntQndQbtQbsQbsQbtQbtQbtQmQntQpQpQpQpQpQpQbtQntQllQlQpQbtQpQpQbtQlQntQpQntQlQllQpQpQpQlQlQllQpQbtQbtQbcQbtQciQllQmQndQpQntQbtQpQpQndQpQntQnaQmQlQndQbtQpQnaQbtQpQeQeQntQbtQbtQlQbtQntQbsQllQaQntQntQlQbsQbsQbtQlQbtQlQlQbtQbtQpQpQpQlQlQpQllQllQllQpQllQbtQlQlQlQbs´Figure 2-2Surficial GeologyLegendCity of CentervilleQuaternary UnitsAlluvium (Qa)Lake Sand (Ql)Lake Silt and Clay (Qll)Peat and Muck (Qp)Marl (Qm)Eolian Sand (Qe)Sand Facies (Qbs)Silt and Clay (Qbc)Sand over gray loamy tosandytill (Qbt)Loamy Till (Qnt)Sandy Till (Qna)Mixed Till (Qnd)Ice-contact Deposit(Qci)Public DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseResource ManagementUnitsOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 1/22/2018
250 150100250
15010 0 100100100100150200150 10010020010 0
150150100300150150150100100100100100100300
200150100100100100300150
250150100100100100100150100
100100100
350350
200100100
100100100350150250100
100100300250200300100100
350100
250100350100150150350250100100150100150150100
200350150350200100100 150100
150
350200200200100250150100300300250200100150100BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinsonLakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th AveJD 2JD 3AC D 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25RCD 8ACD 10-22-32RCD 8§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4thAveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewAmeilaBaldwinCentervilleClearwaterCreekDeepGeorge WatchHardwoodCreekMarshanMiddleRice CreekPeltierReshanauRice LakeShermanUpperRice CreekWilkinsonRondeau´Figure 2-3Bedrock GeologyLegendCity of CentervillePALEOZOIC ROCKSPlatteville Limestone, Up. Ord.St. Peter Sandstone, Mid. toUp. Ord.Prairie du Chien group, LowerOrd.Jordan Sandstone, Up. Camb.St. Lawrence Formation, Up.Camb.Tunnel City group,Up. Camb.Wonewoc Sandstone, Up.Camb.Eau Claire Formation, Mid. toUp. Camb.Mt. Simon Sandstone, Mid.Camb.Depth to Bedrock ContourLines (ft.)Public DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseResource Management UnitsOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 1/22/2018
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 14 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 2.3 Resource Management Units The 2008 Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan identifies fifteen Resource Management Units (RMUs) within the City (Figure 2-4). RMUs are subwatershed based drainage areas that break the City of Lino Lakes into distinct hydrologic units. The purpose is to provide drainage-area specific management recommendations that address the unique conditions of each subwatershed area. When developing the RMUs, a full analysis was completed using existing and future land use conditions to gain a full understanding of the resources and the stressors that cause impairments within each RMU. Each RMU has its own stressors based on the existing and future land use conditions. For example, for some RMUs stormwater volume is a stressor, and for others it is excess nutrients. RMUs are used in the development of goals and policies for the city’s surface water resources in Sections 3 and 4 and existing inventories for each RMU are provided in Appendix B. The intent of implementing RMU specific goals, policies, and implementation recommendations is to achieve the aquatic resource management goals of the 2008 Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan and achieve a watershed-based approach to flood control and protecting high quality wetlands. In Section 5, the RMU classification is used within the stormwater management implementation plan (Table 5-24) to demonstrate funding prioritization for RMUs. Additionally, the development of Subwatershed Management Plans for RMUs is listed in Table 5-23 as an action item for the top priority RMUs over the next ten years. RMU priority for subwatershed plan development is intended to occur in the following order: 1. Clearwater Creek RMU 2. Marshan RMU 3. Reshanau RMU 4. Wilkinson RMU 5. Amelia RMU 6. Hardwood Creek RMU 7. Rice Lake RMU If the need arises and resources allow, subwatershed plans for the remaining RMUs will be developed. The RMU specific subwatershed plans will expand on the Resource Management Plan identified stressors, and will develop specific projects and actions to manage impairments and existing and future land use using a watershed-based planning approach.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 15 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 2.4 Surface Water Resources Lakes, wetlands, and judicial and county ditches dominate the landscape of the City of Lino Lakes. Open water makes up 14% of the City’s land, prominently represented by the Chain of Lakes. The surface water resources are shown in Figure 2-5. These natural features play an extensive role in the way the community has developed and will develop in the future. Two watershed districts cover the City of Lino Lakes: Rice Creek Watershed District, which covers most of Lino Lakes, and Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization in the southeast corner. Public Waters The City contains all or part of fifteen lakes. Of the City’s lakes, nine of them (Baldwin, Centerville, George Watch, Marshan, Peltier, Reshanau, Rice, Sherman, and Ward) are located within or abutting the Chain of Lakes Regional Park. The City’s lakes generally fall into three shoreland management categories: Natural Environment, Recreational, and General Development. The Natural Environment lakes are primarily located in the Chain of Lakes area and include Peltier, George Watch, Marshan, Rice, Ward, Sherman, Cedar, Amelia, Rondeau, and Wilkinson. Most of the lakes in the Chain of Lakes are shallow lakes with maximum depths of 20 feet or less. Recreational lakes include Otter, Centerville, Reshanau, and Baldwin. Bald Eagle Lake is a General Development Lake. They are used for a variety of aquatic recreational uses such as swimming, boating, fishing, and water skiing. Centerville, Bald Eagle, Peltier, and Reshanau Lakes are considered game fishing lakes. The details of each lake are presented in Section 2.4 and Appendix B. Creeks The City’s river and stream resources are characterized by three major stream systems: Rice Creek and two of its tributaries, Hardwood Creek and Clearwater Creek. A network of ditches and storm sewer drain to these streams; the ditch and storm sewer system is discussed in Section 2.6. Rice Creek, Hardwood Creek, and Clearwater Creek join at Peltier Lake with a combined drainage area of 70 square miles (44,800 acres). Hardwood Creek, with a total drainage area of 28 square miles, originates in Washington County’s Rice Lake at a normal lake elevation of 920 feet and flows to Peltier Lake at an approximate elevation of 884 feet. Clearwater Creek originates in Bald Eagle Lake, which has a normal elevation of about 911 feet. From there, it proceeds to Centerville Lake and then to Peltier Lake. Two creek reaches are listed in the 2014 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 303(d) list of impaired waters. The reach of Clearwater Creek between Bald Eagle Lake and Peltier Lake was listed in 2002 for fish bioassessments, and in 2006 for aquatic macroinvertebrate assessments. The reach of Hardwood Creek between Highway 61 and Peltier Lake was listed in 2002 for fish bioassessments. Based on a TMDL started in 2003, this listing was updated as a dissolved oxygen stressor on aquatic life in 2004. Wetlands Wetland inventories have been completed by the USFWS as published on the National Wetland Inventory Maps and by the MnDNR, as published in their Protected Waters Inventory. These wetland inventories will be utilized to assist in determining if a wetland is present on a given parcel of property within Lino Lakes. A number of comprehensive wetland studies have been conducted to guide the management of wetlands and their benefits within Lino Lakes. The three key studies are the Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan (RMP 2008), the draft Lino Lakes SAMP (SAMP 2010), and the Anoka/Washington Judicial Ditch 4 Resource Management Plan. These three studies provide the foundation for the management of wetlands, surface water, floodplains, and greenway resources within the City of Lino Lakes and establish RMUs and standards to support the wetland resources of the City under future development in a manner that integrates with floodplain management, stormwater management, and greenway management.
"
"""""""
"""
"
"
"""""""
"""
"
"
"
"
"
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
""""""""""
"
"
"""""
""""""""""""""""""
"""""""""""""""""
"""
"
""""""""
"""
"""""""""""""""""""""""
"
""""
""""
"
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
"
"
"""""""
"
"""""""""""""
"
"
"
""""""""""""""""""""""""
"""
""""""
"""""""""""""""
"
"
""BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinson LakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th AveJD 2JD 3AC D 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25RCD 8ACD 10-22-32RCD 8§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewAmeilaBaldwinCentervilleClearwaterCreekDeepGeorge WatchHardwoodCreekMarshanMiddleRiceCreekPeltierReshanauRice LakeShermanUpperRice CreekWilkinsonRondeau´Figure 2-5Surface WaterLegendCity of Centerville"Major Drainage Routes"Minor Drainage RoutesPublic DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseResource Management UnitsNational Wetlands InventoryOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryWatershed District BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 10/9/2018Rice Creek Watershed DistrictVadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management OrganizationRice Creek Watershed District
BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinsonLakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th Ave§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of Shoreview´Figure 2-6High Priority WetlandsLegendCity of CentervilleWetland Management CorridorHigh Priority WetlandsWetlandsOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreamsAnoka/Washington Judicial Ditch 4 RMPLino Lakes RMP3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 11/21/2018
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 18 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Amelia Lake Amelia Lake is located within the boundaries of the VLWMO and outflows to the south. Amelia Lake has a surface area of 195 acres and a maximum depth of 4 feet. Table 2-3. Amelia Lake Summary DNR ID1 02001400 Watershed District3 Vadnais Lake WMO Watershed Area3 754 ac Surface Area3 195 ac Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth3 4 ft Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 908.26 Lowest Recorded1 900.98 Highest Known1 911.9 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 - FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 910.2 Impaired Water No Impairment - Approved TMDL - Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015 Bald Eagle Lake Bald Eagle Lake has a surface area of 1,071 acres, a watershed area of 10,835 acres, and a maximum depth of 36 feet. Only a small portion of Bald Eagle Lake is located within the City of Lino Lakes municipal boundary. Bald Eagle Lake is a deep lake and is managed to support aquatic life and recreational uses such as boating and swimming. Bald Eagle Lake was listed as impaired for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators in 2002. Table 2-4. Bald Eagle Lake Summary DNR ID1 62000200 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 10,835 acres Surface Area1 1,071 acres Category4 Lake Maximum Depth1 36 ft Uses:4 1C, 2Bd, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 X Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 X [Walleye] Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 X [Mercury] Drinking Water Supply4 X [reserve] Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 911.18 Lowest Recorded1 906.2 Highest Known1 912.89 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 912.5 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 912.5 Impaired Water Y - 1998 Impairment Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Mercury in fish tissue Approved TMDL Y - 2008 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 19 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Baldwin Lake Baldwin Lake has a surface area of 220 acres, a watershed area of 612 acres, and a maximum depth of 4.5 feet. Baldwin Lake is a shallow lake and is managed to support aquatic life and enhance passive recreational uses. It was listed as impaired for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators in 2010. Table 2-5. Baldwin Lake Summary DNR ID1 02001300 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 612 acres Surface Area1 220 acres Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth1 4.5 ft Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 883.25 Lowest Recorded1 877.73 Highest Known1 885.2 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 887 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 887 Impaired Water Y - 2010 Impairment Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Approved TMDL Y - 2013 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015 Cedar Lake Cedar Lake is a small lake located east of Reshanau Lake. Lake surface area, watershed area, and maximum depth are unknown. It is not listed as an impaired water body. Table 2-6. Cedar Lake Summary DNR ID1 02001200 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 662 acres Surface Area1 208 acres Category4 - Maximum Depth1 - Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 893.06 Lowest Recorded1 892.87 Highest Known1 892.87 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 894.4 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 - Impaired Water No Impairment - Approved TMDL - Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 20 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Centerville Lake Centerville Lake has a surface area of 495 acres, a watershed area of 424 acres, and a maximum depth of 19 feet. It is a deep lake and is managed to support aquatic life and recreational uses such as boating and swimming. Centerville Lake was listed as impaired for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators in 2002. Table 2-7. Centerville Lake Summary DNR ID1 02000600 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 866 acres Surface Area1 424 acres Category4 Lake Maximum Depth1 19 ft Uses:4 1C, 2Bd, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 X Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 X [Walleye] Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 X [Mercury] Drinking Water Supply4 X [reserve] Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 885.15 Lowest Recorded1 883.27 Highest Known1 886.5 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 887.9 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 887.9 Impaired Water Y - 2002 Impairment Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Approved TMDL Y - 2013 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015 George Watch Lake George Watch Lake has a surface area of 979 acres, a watershed area of 2,824 acres, and a maximum depth of 5 feet. It is a shallow lake and is managed to support aquatic life and enhance passive recreational uses. George Watch Lake was listed as impaired for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators in 2002. Table 2-8. George Watch Lake Summary DNR ID1 02000500 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 2,824 acres Surface Area1 979 acres Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth1 5 ft Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 - Lowest Recorded1 - Highest Known1 - RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 887.0 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 Zone A Impaired Water Y - 2002 Impairment Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Approved TMDL Y – 2013 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 21 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Marshan Lake Marshan Lake has a surface area of 299 acres and a maximum depth of 3.5 feet. It is a shallow lake and is managed to support aquatic life and enhance passive recreational uses. Marshan Lake was listed as impaired for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators in 2002. Table 2-9. Marshan Lake Summary DNR ID1 02000700 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 4,956 acres Surface Area1 299 acres Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth1 3.5 ft Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 883.45 Lowest Recorded1 878.68 Highest Known1 882.56 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 887 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 887 Impaired Water Y - 2002 Impairment Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Approved TMDL Y - 2013 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015 Otter Lake Otter Lake has a surface area of 229 acres, a watershed area of 1,512 acres, and a maximum depth of 21 feet. It is a deep lake and is managed to support aquatic life and recreational uses such as boating and swimming. Otter Lake is not listed as an impaired water body Table 2-10. Otter Lake Summary DNR ID1 02000300 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 1,512 acres Surface Area1 229 acres Category4 Lake Maximum Depth1 21 ft Uses:4 1C, 2Bd, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 X Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 X Drinking Water Supply4 X [reserve] Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 911.7 Lowest Recorded1 906.2 Highest Known1 912.92 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 912.7 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 912.7 Impaired Water Y - 2010 Impairment Mercury in fish tissue Approved TMDL Y - 2008 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 22 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Peltier Lake Peltier Lake has a surface area of 552 acres, a watershed area of 33,595 acres, and a maximum depth of 16 feet. It is classified as a deep lake and is managed to support aquatic life and enhance passive recreational uses. Peltier Lake was listed as impaired for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators in 2002. Table 2-11. Peltier Lake Summary DNR ID1 02000400 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 33,595 acres Surface Area1 552 acres Category4 Lake Maximum Depth1 16 ft Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 X Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 X [walleye] Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 X Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 884.85 Lowest Recorded1 876.98 Highest Known1 886.63 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 887.7 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 887.7 Impaired Water Y - 1998 Y - 2002 Impairment Mercury in fish tissue Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Approved TMDL Y - 2008 Y - 2013 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015 Reshanau Lake Reshanau Lake has a surface area of 375 acres, a watershed area of 913 acres, and a maximum depth of 10 feet. It is a shallow lake and is managed to support aquatic life and enhance passive recreational uses. Reshanau Lake was listed as impaired for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators in 2006. Table 2-12. Reshanau Lake Summary DNR ID1 02000900 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 913 acres Surface Area1 375 acres Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth1 10 ft Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 X Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 883.65 Lowest Recorded1 879.36 Highest Known1 885.5 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 887 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 887 Impaired Water Y - 2006 Impairment Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Approved TMDL Y - 2013 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 23 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Rice Lake Rice Lake has a surface area of 560 acres, a watershed area of 2,229 acres, and a maximum depth of 4.75 feet. It is a shallow lake and is managed to support aquatic life and enhance passive recreational uses. Rice Lake was listed as impaired for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators in 2010. Table 2-13. Rice Lake Summary DNR ID1 02000800 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 2,229 acres Surface Area1 560 acres Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth1 4.75 ft Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 X Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 883.25 Lowest Recorded1 878.35 Highest Known1 885.2 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 887 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 887 Impaired Water Y - 2010 Impairment Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Approved TMDL Y - 2013 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015 Rondeau Lake Rondeau Lake has a surface area of 546 acres, a watershed area of 1,533 acres, and a maximum depth of 12 feet. It is classified as a shallow lake and is managed to support aquatic life and enhance passive recreational uses. Rondeau Lake is not listed as an impaired water body. Table 2-14. Rondeau Lake Summary DNR ID1 02001500 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 1,533 acres Surface Area1 546 acres Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth1 12 ft Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 - Lowest Recorded1 884.63 Highest Known1 887.35 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 887.6 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 887.6 Impaired Water No Impairment - Approved TMDL - Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 24 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Sherman Lake Sherman Lake has a surface area of 44 acres, a watershed area of 680 acres. Maximum depth is unknown, however Sherman Lake is a known shallow lake. It is not listed as an impaired water body. Table 2-15. Sherman Lake Summary DNR ID1 02001100 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 680 acres Surface Area1 44 acres Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth1 - Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 - Lowest Recorded1 - Highest Known1 - RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 886.9 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 Zone A Impaired Water No Impairment - Approved TMDL - Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015 Wards Lake Wards Lake has a surface area of 163 acres and a watershed area of 1,663 acres. Maximum depth is unknown, however Wards Lake is a known shallow lake. It is not listed as an impaired water body. Table 2-16. Wards Lake Summary DNR ID1 02001000 Watershed District2 Rice Creek WD Watershed Area2 1,663 acres Surface Area1 163 acres Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth1 - Uses:4 2B, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 883.86 Lowest Recorded1 881.14 Highest Known1 885.3 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 886.9 FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 Zone A Impaired Water No Impairment - Approved TMDL - Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 25 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Wilkinson Lake Wilkinson Lakes is a 94 acre water body with a maximum depth of 4.5 foot. The lake is located at the south end of the City and was listed as impaired for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators in 2010. At its ordinary high water level, it extends into the City of Lino Lakes. Table 2-17. Wilkinson Lake Summary DNR ID1 62004300 Watershed District3 Vadnais Lake WMO Watershed Area3 1,108 acres Surface Area3 94 acres Category4 Shallow Lake Maximum Depth3 4.5 ft Uses:4 1C, 2Bd, 3C Aquatic Recreation4 X Water Access1 Aquatic Life4 X Fish Stocking1 Aquatic Consumption Advisory1 Drinking Water Supply4 X Industrial Supply4 X Agriculture Irrigation4 X Lifestock and Wildlife4 X Aesthetic Enjoyment4 X Ordinary High Water Level1 895.36 Lowest Recorded1 893.53 Highest Known1 893.53 RCWD Regulatory Floodplain2 - FEMA Base Flood Elevation5 - Impaired Water Y - 2010 Impairment Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Approved TMDL Y - 2013 Lake Summary Sources: 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Lake Finder 2 Rice Creek Watershed District 3 Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization 4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5 FEMA Anoka County Flood Insurance Study, 2015 Clearwater Creek Only a small portion of the Clearwater Creek watershed is located in Lino Lakes. Its beneficial uses include supporting the propagation and maintenance of a healthy indigenous fish communities, associated aquatic life, and their habitats. Clearwater Creek is also suitable for non-motorized boating and other forms of aquatic recreation. Clearwater Creek was listed as an impaired water body in 2006 for low levels of dissolved oxygen affecting aquatic life. Hardwood Creek Only a small portion of the Hardwood Creek watershed is located in Lino Lakes. Its beneficial uses include supporting the propagation and maintenance of a healthy fish communities, associated aquatic life, and their habitats. Hardwood Creek is also suitable for non-motorized boating and other forms of aquatic recreation. Hardwood Creek is listed as an impaired waterbody for low levels of dissolved oxygen and fishes bioassessment and has an approved TMDL. Rice Creek Only a small portion of Rice Creek (Upper Rice Creek) is located in Lino Lakes. Its beneficial uses include drinking water supply, supporting the propagation and maintenance of a healthy indigenous fish communities, associated aquatic life, and their habitats. Rice Creek is also suitable for boating and other forms of aquatic recreation. Middle and Lower Rice Creek are both on the impaired waters list. Middle Rice Creek is impaired for fish bioassessments (2004) and macroinvertebrate bioassessments (2006). There is no approved TMDL for Middle Rice Creek. Lower Rice Creek is impaired for fish bioassessments (2014), macroinvertebrate bioassessments (2014), and E. Coli (2014). Lower Rice Creek is included in approved TMDL for E.coli (Upper Mississippi River Bacteria TMDL, 2014), in which the City is a regulated entity.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 26 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 2.5 Stormwater Management System Hydrologic boundaries do not stop at the municipal borders and orderly coordination between related municipalities is addressed in the Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan (RMP). Hydrologic boundary based, RMUs identified in the RMP are the basis for neighbor community coordination of shared water resources. The modeling encompasses true watershed catchments even where the boundaries are outside the municipal boundaries. The RCWD District-Wide Regional Model covers small portions of land area within North Oaks, Hugo, and Blaine, as well as all of Centerville. RCWD has similar, larger, boundaries and modeling called Resources of Concern (ROC) that are delineated based on lakes, while the City of Lino Lakes’ RMUs are subsets within the RCWD ROCs. Public Ditch System The State of Minnesota has established a set of rules (Minn. Statute 103E) to provide an opportunity for individual landowners to obtain drainage and to minimize the effects to downstream landowners. There are a number of County Ditches (Nos. 8, 10, 22, 25, 32, 47, and 55) and two Judicial Ditches (Nos. 2 and 3) that run through the city. The majority of the drainage system was constructed during the late 1800s and early 1900s. Over the decades, much of the system was minimally maintained by different ditch authorities. Today, many ditches function as straightened creeks within a partially or marginally drained wetland slough or riparian corridor. The major public ditch systems in Lino Lakes are: § Anoka County Ditch (ACD) 10-22-32 § ACD 25 § ACD 47 (abandoned) § ACD 55 § ACD 72 § Judicial Ditch (JD) 2 (Hardwood Creek) § JD 3 (Clearwater Creek) In Lino Lakes, Anoka and Ramsey Counties have delegated the jurisdiction over all public ditches to the RCWD, who has the authority for managing the drainage systems, including improvements and repairs. Thus, the RCWD is the ditch authority for the purposes of implementing Minnesota Statute §103E (Drainage Law). There are a number of private ditches within the city that are not managed under Minn. Statute 103E, instead are managed individually by private landowners. Municipal Storm Sewer and Stormwater Treatment Features The City’s storm sewer network and catalogued best management practices (BMPs) treatment devices and structures, as available in GIS, are shown in Figure 2-7. The City is also actively updating their infrastructure database and will be adding information, such as BMP normal water levels (NWL) and high water levels (HWL) in the future, but was not comprehensively available at this time. The RCWD also has hydrologic and hydraulic information available for the system and should be contacted if that information is needed. The numbering system and level of resolution of the RCWD data and modeling was not consistent with City information, so the RCWD information should be obtained directly from the RCWD. 2.6 Water Quality Data and Impairments Water quality data for the city has been obtained from the MPCA Environmental Data Access site. This database is utilized by the participating agencies to compile water quality testing data and is almost entirely used for the storage of water quality parameters. Many waterbodies in Lino Lakes are currently identified on the state List of Impaired Waters (Figure 2-8), also known as the 303(d) List from the applicable section of the Federal Clean Water Act. These waters are ones that do not currently meet their designated use due to the impact of a particular pollutant or stressor. If monitoring and assessment indicate that a waterbody is impaired by one or more pollutants, it is placed on this list. For each water body on the list, the MPCA is required to conduct a study to determine the allowable Total Maximum Daily Load. Impaired waters in Lino Lakes are summarized in Table 2-18.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 27 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Table 2-18. 2018 Impaired Waters Impaired Water Affected Use Pollutant Year Added TMDL Status Hardwood Creek (07010206-596) Hwy 61 to Peltier Lake Aquatic Life Dissolved Oxygen, Fishes Bioassessment 2004, 2002 Hardwood Creek Impaired Biota (Fish) and Dissolved Oxygen TMDL, 2009 Clearwater Creek (07010206-519) Bald Eagle Lake to Peltier Lake Aquatic Life Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment, Fishes Bioassessment 2006, 2002 Not Complete Rice Creek (07010206-584) Long Lake to Locke Lake Aquatic Life, Aquatic Recreation Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment, Fishes Bioassessment, E. Coli 2006, 2014, 2014 Upper Mississippi River Bacteria TMDL Study and Protection Plan, 2014 Rice Creek (07010206-583) Unnamed Lake (02-0041-000) to Long Lake Aquatic Life Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment, Fishes Bioassessment 2006, 2014 Not Complete Baldwin Lake (02-0013-00) Aquatic Recreation Nutrients 2010 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient TMDL, 2012 Bald Eagle Lake (62-0002-00) Aquatic Consumption, Aquatic Recreation Mercury in fish tissue, Nutrients 1998, 2002 Bald Eagle Lake Nutrient TMDL, 2012 Centerville Lake (02-0006-00) Aquatic Recreation Nutrients 2002 Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake TMDL, 2016 George Watch Lake (02-0005-00) Aquatic Recreation Nutrients 2002 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient TMDL, 2012 Golden Lake (02-0045-00) Aquatic Consumption, Aquatic Recreation Mercury in fish tissue, Nutrients 2010, 2002 Golden Lake TMDL, 2009 Marshan Lake (02-0007-00) Aquatic Recreation Nutrients 2002 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient TMDL, 2012 Peltier Lake (02-0004-00) Aquatic Consumption, Aquatic Recreation Mercury in fish tissue, Nutrients 2008, 2002 Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake TMDL, 2016 Reshanau Lake (02-0009-00) Aquatic Recreation Nutrients 2006 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient TMDL, 2012 Rice Lake (02-0008-00) Aquatic Recreation Nutrients 2010 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient TMDL, 2012 Wilkinson Lake (62-0043-00) Aquatic Recreation Nutrients 2010 Vadnais Lake Area WMO Total Maximum Daily Load and Protection Study, 2014
BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinson LakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th AveJD 2JD 3A CD 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25RCD 8ACD 10-22-32RCD 8§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewAmeilaBaldwinCentervilleClearwaterCreekDeepGeorge WatchHardwoodCreekMarshanMiddleRiceCreekPeltierReshanauRice LakeShermanUpperRice CreekWilkinsonRondeau´Figure 2-7Existing Storm Sewer SystemLegendCity of Centerville"Storm SewerPublic DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseStormwater BMPsResource ManagementUnitsNational WetlandsInventoryOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 6/28/2018
BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinson LakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th AveJD 2JD 3AC D 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25RCD 8ACD 10-22-32RCD 8§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewAmeilaBaldwinCentervilleClearwaterCreekDeepGeorge WatchHardwoodCreekMarshanMiddleRiceCreekPeltierReshanauRice LakeShermanUpperRice CreekWilkinsonRondeau´Figure 2-8Impaired WatersLegendCity of CentervillePublic DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseImpaired StreamsImpaired LakesResource Management UnitsNational Wetlands InventoryOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 1/22/2018
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 30 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Intercommunity Flows The City of Lino Lakes is surrounded by several neighboring communities and receives watershed runoff from Blaine, Centerville, Columbus, Hugo, Shoreview, and White Bear Township. RCWD has completed watershed-wide hydrologic and hydraulic models that includes the City of Lino Lakes as part of their District-wide Modeling Program. These models include SWMM models for public drainage systems into Rice Creek, direct drainage into Rice Creek, water quality models, Future Conditions Modeling, and a HEC-RAS model of Rice Creek. RCWD has estimated the flows to its jurisdictional reaches and, as such, downstream communities like Lino Lakes are required to include their allocated flows in their future planning studies to limit adverse impacts to their downstream neighbors of Centerville, Hugo and Circle Pines. The City is pursuing an alternate outlet for build-out conditions using RCWD’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) provisions under RCWD Rule C.5(f). Existing intercommunity flows and modeled peak flow rates as provided by RCWD district wide modeling are shown below (Table 2-19). The City intends to either maintain or reduce intercommunity flow rates relative to the established benchmarks through its goals and policies as well as deference to RCWD rules. The City incorporates by reference the RCWD hydraulic and hydrologic model and Watershed Management Plan for stormwater runoff volumes and rates for the City’s subwatersheds. The City will regularly coordinate with the RCWD to data-share any updated component of the models, and will continue working with RCWD on future management of model input data to ensure Lino Lakes and RCWD have consistent information for future projects. Table 2-19. Benchmark Intercommunity Flow Rates Receiving City Watercourse Peak Flows [cfs] 2-Year 24-Hour Rainfall 10-Year 24-Hour Rainfall 100-Year 24-Hour Rainfall 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Centerville JD 3 Main Trunk 157 291 544 388 Circle Pines RCD 8 Main Trunk 9 21 39 36 Circle Pines Rice Creek 119 292 698 1214 Hugo JD 3 Branch 4 34 67 163 64 Hugo JD 3 Branch 1 15 17 53 8 Centerville ACD 55 Main Trunk 7 15 108 31 2.7 Groundwater Resources Various agencies are responsible for groundwater management and protection. The MnDNR regulates groundwater usage rate and volume as part of its charge to conserve and use the waters of the State. The MDH is the official state agency responsible for addressing all environmental health matters, including groundwater protection, the well abandonment program, and regulation of the installation of new wells. The MPCA administers and enforces laws relating to the pollution of groundwater. The Minnesota Geological Survey provides a complete account of the state’s groundwater resources. The RCWD serves in an advisory and educational role in cooperating and assisting the DNR, MDH, and the MPCA in their groundwater protection efforts. The City promotes infiltration and groundwater recharge, but follows guidance from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual and RCWD for limiting infiltration in potential stormwater hotspots and Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMA). The City is located over the Prairie du Chien-Jordan and the Mt. Simon-Hinckley aquifers, as well as glacial sand and gravel. Groundwater is at or near the surface in most of Lino Lakes (Figure 2-9). Groundwater flow generally follows the surface topography and flows towards the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes (Berg 2016) and ultimately towards the Mississippi River (Palen 1993). Groundwater has been known to seep out of natural artesian wells in the Chain of Lakes, especially near the capped St. Paul Water Authority wells in Centerville Lake. The Metropolitan Council has reviewed the surface water and groundwater interactions for Lino Lakes (Figure 2-10), which supports these observations and documents the aquifer recharge areas within Lino Lakes. Groundwater studies which include the City of Lino Lakes were completed, or were in the process of being completed during the time this plan was written. Those studies include the following: § Lino Lakes Wellhead Protection Plan § North & East Metro Groundwater Management Area Plan § Anoka County Geologic Atlas, Part B § Anoka Sand Plain Regional Hydrogeologic Assessment § Minnesota DNR Draft Groundwater Management Plan The City of Lino Lakes currently operates six active water supply wells, which draw from groundwater from the Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers. The total annual volume appropriated to the City’s water supply system by the DNR is 900 million gallons. Locations of the wells are identified in Figure 2-9, all six wells are located in a highly sensitive aquifer area, and the vulnerability of the City’s wells and groundwater source varies. Areas closer to Wells No. 1, 3, 4, and 5 contain a lack of low permeability material above the Prairie du Chien and Jordan buried sand, while areas closer to Well No. 2 are considered less vulnerable due to the low permeability of the surficial soils. There
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 31 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 are 750 private, non-municipal wells, averaging 103 feet in depth, within the City’s DWSMA, which are a source of concern for potential contamination. Unmaintained, damaged, poorly constructed, or unused/abandoned wells could provide a direct route for contaminants to enter the aquifers utilized by the City of Lino Lakes as the principal drinking water supply. Table 2-20. Lino Lakes Public Water Supply Wells Local Well Name Unique Number Aquifer Well Depth [ft] Date Constructed Authorized Pumping Rate [gpm] Well No. 1 240171 Prairie du Chien - Jordan 306 1971 900 Well No. 2 110471 Jordan 258 1986 850 Well No. 3 559379 Prairie du Chien - Jordan 283 1995 1,100 Well No. 4 554207 Prairie du Chien - Jordan 338 1995 675 Well No. 5 722629 Prairie du Chien - Jordan 273 2005 1,100 Well No. 6 767887 Prairie du Chien - Jordan 295 2016 1,200 There are ten other active water appropriations permitted by the DNR within the City of Lino Lakes. The St. Paul Water Utility maintains a surface water appropriation from the Chain of Lakes for 8,000 million gallons annually. Other active water appropriations include crop irrigation, sod farms, athletic fields, nursery, and institutional uses of groundwater and surface water.
BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinson LakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th AveJD 2JD 3AC D 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25RCD 8ACD 10-22-32RCD 8§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewAmeilaBaldwinCentervilleClearwaterCreekDeepGeorge WatchHardwoodCreekMarshanMiddleRiceCreekPeltierReshanauRice LakeShermanUpperRice CreekWilkinsonRondeau´Figure 2-10Surface Water Groundwater InteractionLegendCity of CentervilleSurface Water TypeDisconnected from the regional groundwater systemRecharges aquifersReceives and discharges groundwaterSupported by upwelling groundwaterPublic DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseResource Management UnitsOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 1/22/2018
!>!>!>!>!>!>!>!>!>BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinson LakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th AveJD 2JD 3A CD 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25RCD 8ACD 10-22-32RCD 8§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewAmeilaBaldwinCentervilleClearwaterCreekDeepGeorge WatchHardwoodCreekMarshanMiddleRiceCreekPeltierReshanauRice LakeShermanUpperRice CreekWilkinsonRondeauLINO LAKES 5LINO LAKES 4LINO LAKES 3LINO LAKES 2LINO LAKES 1CENTERVILLE 1CENTERVILLE 2LINO LAKES 6´Figure 2-9Groundwater ResourcesLegendCity of Centerville!>Municipal WellsDrinking Water SupplyManagement AreaModeled Depth to WaterTable (ft)0 to 10>10 to 20>20 to 30>30 to 40>40Public DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseResource Management UnitsOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 6/28/2018
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 34 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 2.8 Existing Conditions Land Uses and Utilities Most of the land in Lino Lakes is classified as rural residential (24.9%), agricultural (23.3%), or single family residential (13.5%) and shown on the existing land use map (Figure 2-11). The land uses are defined below: § Private Airfield: Aviation related uses § Parks and Open Space: Passive or active recreational areas and facilities as well as lands under public control that area designated as permanently undeveloped for the purpose or resource management or protection § Commercial: Retail, office, and service uses § Industrial: Manufacturing, processing, warehousing, and research and development uses § Mixed Use: Mix of residential, retail, and office uses either within one building, structure or development. Residential development may include higher density housing options. § Low Density Residential: Residential development at 1.6 to 3.9 dwelling units per acre § Medium Density Residential: Residential development at 4.0 to 5.9 dwelling units per acre § High Density Residential: Residential development at 6.0 to 10.0 dwelling units per acre § Permanent Rural: Areas that are not intended to receive sewer service due to topography and soil issues. Development limited to residential single family at low densities or agriculture related uses § Civic and Institutional: Public buildings or facilities, private, or public utilities and infrastructure, public and private schools, and cemeteries A more detailed definition of land uses within the City of Lino Lakes is available in Chapter 3 – Land Use of the Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The City of Lino Lakes has also been categorized according to the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS). MLCCS categorizes areas based on land cover rather than land use to inform land use planners on open space planning and comprehensive planning. Figure 2-12 shows a map of the City’s classified MLCCS areas. Public utility services within the City of Lino Lakes include city sewer and water. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) is the area in which public utilities are available, agreed upon with the Metropolitan Council and the City of Lino Lakes (Figure 2-11).
Baldwin LakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinsonLakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445671445672345672145672145671445671420thAve20th Ave§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")153")140")84")84LakeDr NMainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLake DrSunset AveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCentervilleRdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of Shoreview´Figure 2-112017 Existing Land UseLegendCity of CentervilleAgriculturalRural ResidentialSingle-Family ResidentialMulti-Family ResidentialCommercialIndustrialUtilityCounty Park and RecreationCity Park and RecreationOpen Space and ConservationPublic/Semi-PublicPrivate AirfieldVacant-CommercialVacant-IndustrialVacant-ResidentialVacant-Rural ResidentialOpen WaterRight-of-WayParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 12/12/2017DRAFT
BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinsonLakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th Ave§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of Shoreview´Figure 2-12Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS)LegendCity of CentervilleArtificial Surfaces and Associated AreasPlanted or Cultivated VegetationForestsWoodlandShrublandHerbaceousOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 1/22/2018
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 37 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Shoreland The City of Lino Lakes had adopted a Shoreland Management Overlay District, a copy of which is located in Appendix C. This ordinance requires setbacks from Shoreland areas and limits the type of development, amount of impervious area, and use of the City’s Shoreland areas (Figure 2-13). Floodplain The City of Lino Lakes is the administrator of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) for the community and has adopted a Floodplain Overlay District in the floodplain management ordinance in accordance with the requirements of the NFIP. This ordinance generally regulates developments, land uses and alterations within each of the floodway, flood fringe, and general floodplain districts shown on Figure 2-14 to minimize potential losses due to periodic flooding in these areas. The City’s Resource Management Plan and I-35E Alternative Urban Areawide Review, as well as the RCWD, identify specific areas of flooding concern under a full buildout scenario, summarized in Table 2-21 below. Table 2-21. Summary of Flooding Concerns by Resource Management Unit RMU Conveyance Type Receiving Waters Receiving Waters Flooding Concern Existing Flooding Concerns Partially Drained Wetlands Future Flooding Concerns Pollutant Loading Concerns Upper Rice Creek None n/a n/a No Yes Yes Yes Hardwood Creek Natural Channel Peltier Lake Yes No No Yes Yes Clearwater Creek Ditch and pipe Clearwater Creek/Peltier Lake Yes Yes Yes – Ditch 55 and Abandoned Ditch 47 Yes Yes Rondeau None or private ditch n/a n/a No No No Yes Peltier Pipe and pond; ditch and pipe; private ditch Peltier wetlands Yes Yes Yes - Ditch 72 Yes No Centerville Pipe and pond Centerville wetlands and lake Yes Yes - minor No No No George Watch Pipe and pond; private ditch George Watch groundwater-supported wetlands and lake Yes No No No Yes Marshan Ditch and pipe Marshan wetlands and lake Yes Yes Yes – Ditch 10-22-32 Yes Yes Reshanau Pipe and pond, ditch Reshanau wetlands or lake Yes Yes - minor No No Yes Rice Pipe Groundwater-supported wetlands and Rice wetlands and lake No No No No Yes Baldwin Pipe Baldwin wetlands Yes No No No No Sherman Pipe Sherman Lake and high priority wetlands Yes n/a No No No Amelia Pipe Amelia Lake and high priority wetlands No Yes No No No Wilkinson None n/a n/a n/a No No No Middle Rice Creek Pipe High priority wetlands Yes n/a No No Yes
BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinson LakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th AveJD 2JD 3AC D 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25RCD 8ACD 10-22-32RCD 8§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewAmeilaBaldwinCentervilleClearwaterCreekDeepGeorge WatchHardwoodCreekMarshanMiddleRiceCreekPeltierReshanauRice LakeShermanUpperRice CreekWilkinsonRondeauHar dw ood CreekCl earwater CreekRi ce C reek´Figure 2-14Floodplain DistrictsLegendCity of CentervilleGeneral Floodplain (Zone A)Flood Fringe (Zone AE)Floodway (Zone AE)500-year Floodplain (Zone X)Public DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseResource Management UnitsOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 1/22/2018
BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinsonLakeOtterLakeAmeliaLakeReshanauLakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshanLakeGeorgeWatch LakePeltierLakeCedar LakeLilac St20thAve S45672145674945675445672145674945671445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th AveJD 4ACD 53-62ACD 72 ACD 55JD 3ACD 25ACD 10-22-32RCD
11
RCD 1 RWJD 1JD 4RCD 8JD 2
§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")140")84")84LakeDr NMainStMainStMain StCedar StHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLake DrSunset AveRondeauLake Dr EAshStOak LnApolloDr62ndSt NAsh StRondeauLakeRd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of Shoreview´Figure 2-13Shoreland ManagementLegendCity of CentervillePublic DitchTile, Public DitchPrivate DitchDNR Public WatercourseNational WetlandsInventoryOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreamsShoreland ManagementAreaShoreland ClassificationGeneral DevelopmentNatural DevelopmentRecreational Development3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 7/11/2018
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 40 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 2.9 Fish and Wildlife Habitat The 2008 Resource Management Plan established RCWD’s Wetland Management Corridor (WMC), which is the basis of the City’s Greenway System. Lino Lakes continues to evaluate and update the resources that go into this plan and continues to implement this plan through development reviews. In cooperation with the RCWD, the WMC is updated regularly to incorporate changes resulting from development and land acquisition. Chapter 10 of the Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan outlines the current data used to identify the Greenway System. The area’s mix of plant community types provides diverse habitat for amphibians, reptiles, and mammals as well as numerous species of birds found in multiple habitat niches. The most recent known bird surveys conducted in the mid-1970s for Lino Lakes and Anoka County documented well over 200 species occurring in the immediate vicinity. The shoreline and shallows north of the island serve as a spawning area for Northern pike and walleye, and as a resting area for terns, black crown night herons, and other waterfowl. The north arm of the lake is one of the few remaining places in the metro area with healthy native vegetation, including water willow, which is considered a species of special concern. Rare and Endangered Species The City has a notable number of rare biological resources, see Table 2-22. As the RMP was developed, these rare features and habitats that support rare species were prioritized for protection and incorporation into the Wetland Preservation Corridor. These important natural resource areas were carried forward into the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and identified as part of the multi-functional Greenway System. In general, the rare plant species are found along the upland- wetland transitional zones. Extensive botanical survey work has occurred within the City to document locations of these rare plant species. The City has also invested resources in identifying and protecting Blanding’s turtle habitat. The critical habitat areas were identified and incorporated into the Wetland Preservation Corridor and Greenway System. Table 2-22. Documented Rare and Endangered Species in Lino Lakes Common Name Scientific Name Status Autumn Fimbry Fimbristylis autumnalis Special Concern Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Watchlist Bell's Vireo Vireo bellii Special Concern Black Huckleberry Gaylussacia baccata Threatened Blanding's Turtle Emydoida blandingii Threatened Clinton's Bulrush Trichophorum clintonii Threatened Cross-leaved Milkwort Polygala cruciata Endangered Forster's Tern Sterna forsteri Special Concern Lance-leaf Violet Viola lanceolata var. lanceolata Threatened Least Moonwort Botrychium simplex Special Concern Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis Watchlist Snailseed Pondweed Potamogeton bicupulatus Endangered St. Lawrence Grapefern Botrychium rugulosum Special Concern Toothcup Rotala ramosior Threatened Trumpeter Swan Cygnus buccinator Special Concern Tubercled Rein Orchid Platanthera flava var. herbiola Threatened Twisted Yellow-eyed Grass Xyris torta Endangered Upland Sandpiper Bartramia longicauda Watchlist Water-willow Decodon verticillatus var. laevigatus Special Concern
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 41 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 2.10 Regulated Pollutant Sources Point Sources The MPCA is charged with regulating businesses that have applied for and received different types of environmental permits and registrations from the MPCA. The MPCA has also been tracking potentially contaminated sites since the early 1980s when major federal and state cleanup programs were created. Figure 2-15 depicts the locations of properties that have active environmental permits or have a record related to a potential environmental hazard. Additional information of specific sites can be found through the “What’s in My Neighborhood” feature on the MPCA website. Potential environmental hazards vary from properties where a spill or problem has already been cleaned up, to those currently being investigated or cleaned up. In addition, some sites depicted in Figure 2-15 have no record of known spills or problems; but rather mark locations where hazardous materials or wastes are used or generated. The most common types of sites in Lino Lakes are small to minimal quantity hazardous waste generators, multiple activity sites, and tank sites. The following descriptions are intended to elucidate sites illustrated in Figure 2-15 and provide the description given by the MPCA for each site type listed in the figure’s legend. The total number of each sites is given in the brackets below. § Unpermitted Dump Site [2]: Unpermitted dump sites are landfills that never held a valid permit from the MPCA. Generally, these dumps existed prior to the permitting program established with the creation of the MPCA in 1967. These dumps are not restricted to any type of waste but were often old farm or municipal disposal sites that accepted household waste. State assessment staff have investigated many of these dump sites. § Voluntary Investigation & Cleanup Site [2]: The Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program is a non-petroleum brownfield program. The VIC program provides technical assistance to buyers, sellers, developers, or local governments seeking to voluntarily investigate or clean up contaminated land. Properties often enter the VIC program in preparation for sale, financing, or redevelopment. Voluntary parties that complete investigation and/or cleanup activities under MPCA oversight can receive liability assurances that protect them from future Superfund liability. In some cases, the MPCA may use institutional controls as part of the overall site remedy and notify interested parties of any property use conditions or restrictions. § Landfill, Permitted by Rule [1]: A landfill that is permitted by rule is not required to obtain an individual solid waste permit if it meets certain eligibility criteria. However, it must comply with waste management rules and regulations. Landfills may be permitted by rule if they have a small capacity and/or operate for a short period of time. Some yard waste composting facilities, recycling facilities, and energy recovery facilities are also permitted by rule. § Leak Site [3]: Leak sites are locations where a release of petroleum products has occurred from a tank system. Leak sites can occur from aboveground or underground tank systems as well as from spills at tank facilities. A leak can result from an accident or from activities that occur over a long time. The MPCA’s Petroleum Remediation Program staff investigates potential leaks and work to minimize or clean up contamination at those sites. § Tank Site [14]: A tank site is a place with an underground or aboveground storage tank of a certain size on the premises. One tank site may have multiple tanks, and these tanks may contain food products, petroleum products, or other substances. Tank sites include gas stations, bus companies, and trucking companies as well as factories that process sugar beets, ethanol, pulp and paper, or chemicals. The MPCA requires monitoring and maintenance at these sites, which helps to ensure that tanks do not cause environmental contamination. § Industrial Stormwater Permit [2]: Stormwater may come into contact with harmful pollutants, including toxic metals, oil, grease, de- icing salts, and other chemicals at industrial sites such as factories, salvage yards, and airports. Industrial stormwater permits are designed to limit the amount of these contaminants that reaches surface water and groundwater by requiring good practices for storing and handling materials. Facilities with these permits must prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, detailing the practices they will use to limit stormwater pollution. § Hazardous Waste, Small to Minimal Quantity Generator [62]: A small to minimal quantity generator is a facility that generates less than 1,000 kilograms (kg) (2,200 pounds) of hazardous waste or 1 kg (2.2 pounds) of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month. These facilities have less stringent rules than large quantity generators. This group includes Small Quantity Generators (SQGs), which produce 100 – 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month; Very Small Quantity Generators (VSQGs), which produce less than 100 kg of hazardous waste per month; and Conditionally Exempt Generators, which produce less than 100 kg or 10 gallons of hazardous waste per year. Like large quantity generators, SQGs and VSQGs must have current hazardous waste licenses. § Multiple Activities [31]: Multiple Activity sites are locations where there are multiple MPCA activities occurring. These sites vary from facilities with a wastewater permit and an air quality permit to cleanup sites with more than one permit. Nonpoint Sources Nonpoint source pollution is caused by rainfall or snowmelt moving over and through the ground. Runoff picks up and carries away natural and human-made pollutants, finally depositing them into lakes, rivers, wetlands, and groundwater. Because of the nutrient (phosphorus) impairments of the Chain of Lakes, phosphorus is the most important nonpoint source pollutant in Lino Lakes. The current total phosphorus budgets for the Chain of Lakes are identified in the 2013 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient TMDL. Chloride pollution is an emerging contaminant of concern in much of the metro area. Snowmelt and spring runoff pick up road salts used for deicing purposes and deposits them into stormwater ponds, wetlands, lakes, and groundwater. Other sources include residential water softeners and municipal waste water treatment plant effluents. Once salts enter surface or groundwater, there are no existing methods available to remove it and at high concentrations it can be harmful to plants and wildlife as well as foul drinking water supply sources.
#"!.##"""""#"""""""""""!.######""#######!.#"##"######"#"#"""#########################"####################!.!.!####"!"###!.""#"#"##!.#####"""####!.#######"!.#######""#######################!.######!.!.!.!."""####""#!.!.!.#"########!.""##!.!.###""####"#!."""!.#""#"#####!!.!.#"!.###""#!.##!.######!.##"##"###"########"#######"#!.!.""######!.#####!.#"###!."#######!.##!.###BaldwinLakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinsonLakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445672345671445675445675445671445671420thAve20th Ave§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLakeDrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCenterville RdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StWhite Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of Shoreview´Figure 2-15Potential Environmental HazardsLegendCity of CentervilleMPCA Environmental Sites"Air!Investigation and Cleanup#Water"Hazardous Waste!Solid Waste#Tanks and Leaks!.Multiple ActivitiesOpen WaterMunicipal BoundaryParcels3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 6/28/2018
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 43 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 2.11 Proposed Conditions Lino Lakes is forecasted to add 3,300 households between 2020 and 2040. As part of the metropolitan region, the city is required to accommodate a portion of the region’s forecasted growth. As Lino Lakes grows, it is anticipated that development patterns will change in many areas of the city. In Chapter 2 of the Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan, a key component of developing the future land use plan was analysis of a wide variety of natural resource information. This included the location of high priority wetlands and other natural resource areas, drainage patterns, and soil suitability information, to identify environmentally sensitive areas and areas most suitable for development. This natural resource information was used to guide decisions regarding future land uses and intensities in Lino Lakes. Based on the development suitability information, a full build-out future land use plan was developed (Figure 2-16). The Metropolitan Council requires that communities plan for growth up to 2040 in their current comprehensive plans. Areas that will not be developed until after 2040 are designated on the 2040 future land use map as Urban Reserve. Although the 2040 Future Land Use Plan (Figure 2-17) will serve as the City’s official Future Land Use Plan to regulate future development, the full build-out plan is also provided for reference to guide future land use decisions regarding 2040 Urban Reserve areas. The City’s goals and strategies relating to natural resources were also considered throughout the development of the plan. Providing for higher density uses on some sites with scenic natural amenities such as wetland areas or along the shores of Peltier Lake also promotes accessibility to key community features and natural amenities for residents of higher density housing, which is another community goal. Identifying higher density options in these areas also addresses the community’s goal and related strategies to sustain Lino Lakes’ natural resources by promoting more flexible development in these areas. Accommodating higher density in these areas provides for more site plan flexibility, as development can be concentrated on areas of the site more suitable for development while environmental features are preserved as open space. As Lino Lakes develops, protection of its valuable natural resources will continue to play an important role in guiding growth and shaping future development. Growth and economic development objectives should be balanced with managing natural resource systems. Natural resource protection strategies are also an essential component of a growth management plan to ensure that the community’s resources are preserved. The City has several tools to protect natural areas while also managing future growth. These tools are further outlined in Chapter 2 of the Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan and additional information on future land uses is available in Chapter 3 of the City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
3-5Figure 3-1. Full Build Land UseBaldwin LakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinsonLakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilac St20th Ave S45672145674945675445672145674945671445675445671445672345672145672145671445671420th Ave20th Ave§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")153")140")84")84Main StMain StMain StCedar StHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLake DrSunset AveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCentervilleRdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StCity of BlaineCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North Oaks White Bear TownshipFigure 2-16Full Build Out Land UseLegendCity of CentervillePermanent RuralLow Density ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialHigh Density ResidentialMixed UseCommercialBusiness CampusIndustrialCivic and InstitutionalParks and Open SpacePrivate AirfieldOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 3/8/2018DRAFT Mar13-18for review only
Baldwin LakeRondeauLakeBaldEagleLakeWilkinsonLakeOtter LakeAmeliaLakeReshanau LakeRice LakeCentervilleLakeMarshan LakeGeorgeWatchLakePeltier LakeCedar LakeLilacSt20th Ave S45672145674945672145674945671445675445671445672345672145672145671445671420thAve20th Ave§¨¦35E§¨¦35W")53")153")140")84")84MainStMainStMain StCedarStHodgsonRdLake DrElm StBirch StBirch StLake DrSunsetAveRondeauLake Dr EAsh StOak LnApollo Dr62nd St NAsh StRondeauLake Rd WCentervilleRdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr EBirch St80th St E64th StCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of ColumbusCity of HugoCity of North OaksCity of ShoreviewWhite Bear Township´Figure 2-172040 Future Land UseLegendCity of CentervillePermanent RuralUrban ReserveLow Density ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialHigh Density ResidentialMixed UseCommercialBusiness CampusIndustrialCivic and InstitutionalParks and Open SpacePrivate AirfieldOpen WaterRight-of-WayMunicipal BoundaryParcelsStreams3,500 0 3,5001,750FeetDate: 12/12/2017DRAFT
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 46 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 3. ASSESSMENT OF WATER RESOURCE-RELATED PROBLEMS AND ISSUES Issues, goals, and policies were developed for this Plan through a process of compiling issues and goals identified in plans and studies previously completed by the City and other local agencies. Primary sources of information were the previous Surface Water Management Plan, the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Resource Management Plans, and Watershed Management Plans of the RCWD and VLAWMO. The compiled goals and policies were refined by city staff and consultants for review by the City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board (whose purpose is to advise the city council in the use and management of its natural resources). The primary issues facing the City of Lino Lakes are: 1. Challenges in meeting stormwater volume reduction goals due to poor soils in the south and east regions of the City 2. Flood control issues in the Chain of Lakes 3. Antiquated public ditch systems without capacity for future development and stormwater runoff 3.1 Issues A detailed list of the City-wide and RMU-specific water resources issues facing the City of Lino Lakes is provided in Appendix B and summarized below. Water Rate and Quantity Issues Within the City of Lino Lakes, streams, lakes, and wetlands have been subjected to increased surface water runoff rates and volumes. Increased discharge rates and volumes have caused serious down-cutting and stream bank erosion in some areas. Increased runoff rates and volumes also contribute to flooding concerns and water quality concerns. These issues are likely to intensify in the future. The Metropolitan Council prepared and adopted a regional growth strategy that anticipates further urbanization of the City. In addition, transportation improvements in or near the City will facilitate and precipitate urbanization. The City of Lino Lakes is planning for development of 1,400 acres east of Peltier Lake, north of Main Street. Furthermore, the City of Hugo is planning for development of a 215-acre area; both areas are currently being drained by Anoka County Ditch 55 (ACD 55). Currently, precipitation events larger than 0.25-inch results in surface water ponding and surface water runoff within the ACD 55 drainage area (Houston Engineering 2013b). Without an alternative outlet or increased capacity, the development may be limited within the ACD 55 drainage area. This may exacerbate current flooding up stream in the ACD 55 system since ACD 55 restricts downstream flows and can only accommodate a small amount of flow. Sediment loads, and with it, pollutants and contaminants would also increase. Flow from the 215-acre area within the City of Hugo may be up to 62 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the 100-year 24-hour storm. Additionally, 54 cfs will be generated from the 534-acre area within Lino Lakes that is currently served by ACD 55. The ACD 55 infrastructure currently reaches capacity at 1-2 cfs. As a result, the City of Lino Lakes is pursuing a new conveyance system and outlet structure to Peltier Lake from the 1,400-acre development area, using the RCWD Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) provisions. The CSMP was approved by the RCWD Board on June 27, 2018. Any development within the CSMP area will require RCWD review for compliance with the CSMP. Water Quality Issues Current data indicate that water bodies located within the City have water quality issues. Several City lakes, such as Bald Eagle, Peltier, George Watch, Marshan, Centerville, Reshanau, Baldwin and Rice are included in the MPCA’s impaired waters list. In addition, both Clearwater and Hardwood Creeks are also included on the 303(d) TMDL list due to biotic impairments. A TMDL was recently completed for the Upper Mississippi River to address the water quality standard for E. coli. Additionally, the City drains to Golden Lake, which has an approved TMDL for nutrients. Runoff carrying nutrient-rich sediment, road salts, and hydrocarbon-based contaminants is detrimental to the water quality of the City’s lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. Current water quality conditions present a potential stress to the diversity and population of fish and aquatic invertebrates and impact human uses of the resources. Improvement of these waters will require a watershed-wide solution because in many cases much of the drainage area originates upstream of the City. Additionally, it has been found that internal loading sources of phosphorus derived from the lake bed sediments in Peltier Lake are affecting the water quality of downstream water bodies. Wetland Management Issues Benefits attributed to wetlands include floodwater storage and retention, nutrient assimilation, sediment entrapment, ground water recharge, low flow augmentation, shoreland anchoring and erosion control, aesthetics, recreation, and education. Accordingly, the loss of high priority wetland acres, function and value (Figure 2-6) will have a direct negative effect on the City and its water resources.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 47 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Floodplain Management Issues Given the physical characteristics, high water table, and number of water bodies and flood prone areas, floodplain management is an important consideration to minimize future flooding events. In addition, a number of areas of current flooding concern have been identified by the City Public Works Department and RCWD. Future flooding could also be a concern if development is not conducted in a manner that reduces runoff rates and volumes and if changes in rainfall and snowmelt patterns overwhelm existing infrastructure. Public Ditch System Issues Several of the major drainageways in the City are public ditch systems managed by the RCWD. Some of the public drainage systems are located within completely urbanized areas, have been totally or partially replaced by storm sewer pipe, and no longer serve agricultural land or provide agricultural benefits. These systems function as the outlet for storm water runoff. Other public drainage systems are comprised nearly entirely of undeveloped/agricultural areas that are primarily forecasted for urban development. Public ditch systems need to be managed to provide the drainage services suited to the land contributing to the system. Groundwater Management Issues The City of Lino Lakes relies solely on groundwater as its water supply source. The Prairie du Chien- Jordan aquifer serves as the City’s municipal water source. In addition, there are numerous private wells throughout the City. There is a growing concern that water supplies may be depleting, and as additional municipal wells are added in the region, this may affect private residential wells, which are often shallower. Depleting groundwater will affect not only public and private drinking water supplies, but also resources that may depend on groundwater, such as wetlands, lakes and streams. The MnDNR established the Northeast Metro Groundwater Management District in 2012 to regionally manage the area’s aquifers. Natural Resources Issues Lino Lakes is rich in unique and rare natural resources. These resources are most often hydrologically dependent on natural water systems. Reduced quality and variances of water levels stemming from land use changes may have critical impacts to the sustainability of these resources. Preserving and enhancing quality natural resources within the City can have a positive effect on surface and ground water. Extensive development or misuse of the natural areas within the City can have deleterious effects on water resources. Erosion and Sediment Control Issues Erosion prevention and sediment control is an important aspect in the effort to improve water quality and protect and improve water and natural resources. Erosion is caused by runoff over disturbed soils such as on a construction site or along streambanks. This erosion can result in the transport of sediment into water and natural resources. Sediment deposits and sediment transport can decrease water quality and increase maintenance efforts. Regulations, Permitting and Reporting Issues The City is regulated under a number of local, state, and/or federal programs that require the implementation of ordinances, permitting, and/or reporting. In addition, the City implements ordinances and permitting to attain the goals outlined in this Plan. Monitoring, Maintenance and Inspection Issues To protect its capital investments and provide an effective water management system, the City of Lino Lakes needs to conduct monitoring, maintenance, and inspection of City infrastructure in a timely and cost-effective manner. Infrastructure needs to be monitored and maintained regularly to prevent unnecessary reconstruction projects. This can only be accomplished if an effective inspection and regular maintenance program is in place. A monitoring program verifies the effectiveness of the stormwater infrastructure. Public Participation, Information and Education Issues City residents, businesses, and property owners need to have a clear understanding of basic stormwater management, water quality, and natural resource protection concepts, policies, and regulations to support and implement stormwater management and natural resource protection efforts. Financing Issues The City needs to ensure that funding is available to implement the policies and actions identified in this plan and to respond to future needs of development, operation and maintenance, and repairs. To attain the goals identified in this plan, the City will need to provide funding and staffing resources adequate to address the goals of the plan. Current funding includes trunk stormwater improvement fees and the general fund; however, other funding options may need to be considered.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 48 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 3.2 Goals and Policies Water Rate and Quantity Goals & Policies Goal 1 Use the natural characteristics of the City’s watersheds in combination with development standards and projects, to reduce present and future runoff rates and volumes (see also Natural Resources and Wetlands goals and policies). Policy 1A Continue to enforce standards for storm water runoff quantity from new and re- developments consistent with RCWD, VLAWMO and NPDES Phase II requirements. Policy 1B Implement volume control practices to address areas of identified rate and volume concern. Policy 1C Support implementation of RCWD comprehensive stormwater management plans as an alternative means of meeting water quality treatment standards. Policy 1D Recognize the potential uncertainty associated with managing water resources and understand the implications of emerging issues including climate change and use Adaptive Management when appropriate. Policy 1E Promote “Better Site Design” development techniques in developing and redeveloping areas to minimize runoff volumes. Policy 1F Promote the use of regional Best Management Practices where appropriate to reduce the rate and volume of runoff. Policy 1G Encourage groundwater recharge, when and where appropriate Water Quality Goals & Policies Goal 2.1 Protect and improve water quality and the scenic and ecologic values of City lakes, wetlands and other aquatic assets (see also Natural Resources and Wetlands goals and policies). Policy 2.1A Develop specific management plans for each Resource Management Unit Policy 2.1B Preserve and improve the recreational resources associated with water by improving water quality. Policy 2.1C Continue to enforce City water standards for storm water runoff quality from new and re-developments Policy 2.1D Incorporate TMDL limits, when determined, into the City’s Surface Water Management requirements to reduce degradation and improve the quality of the City’s and region’s lakes, waterways and other aquatic resources. Policy 2.1E Manage city-owned facilities subject to Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) program requirements consistent with permit conditions. Policy 2.1F Continue to enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges in accordance with the City’s MS4 requirements. Policy 2.1G Manage septic systems in conformance with state standards to protect the quality of water and natural resources. Policy 2.1H Educate residents on the importance of cleaning up after their pets to reduce pollutants entering the stormwater system. Goal 2.2 Initiate and continue collaborations to address, restore, and preserve the water quality of the region’s lakes, wetlands and other aquatic assets. Policy 2.2A Work with and partner with the RCWD, VLAWMO, and adjacent local governments to protect high quality resources. Policy 2.2B Collaborate with adjacent jurisdictions and agencies to meet TMDL goals and remove impaired water bodies from the impaired waters list. See Table 5-24 for projects and practices that address TMDL goals. Policy 2.2C Facilitate data sharing among public entities that have jurisdiction or facilities within the City. Policy 2.2D Initiate Salt Application Reduction Program Policy 2.2E Continue to educate residents on the importance of cleaning up after their pets to reduce pollutants entering the stormwater system to address the Upper Mississippi River TMDL.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 49 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Wetland Management Goals & Policies Goal 3 Maintain and enhance, where possible, the functions and services of existing wetlands and associated habitats with the City. Policy 3A Continue to support the administration of the Wetland Conservation Act requirements within the City by the RCWD and VLAWMO. Policy 3B Avoid impacts to upland natural communities that are critical to wetland wildlife habitat function and incorporate these into the wetland preservation corridors/buffer zones. Policy 3C Integrate parcel- or project-based wetland replacement with watershed-based restoration and enhancement locations Policy 3D Manage wetland resources using the flexibility afforded by state and federal rules, through the implementation of the Resource Management Plan and Special Area Management Plan. Policy 3E Consider providing incentives to private landowners to avoid wetland impact, minimize wetland impact, and restore wetlands. Policy 3F Require wetland functional assessments, based on accepted methodology, on new development projects to ensure wetland function and services are preserved to the extent possible. Policy 3G Consider creation of wetland banks to provide local replacement options Floodplain Management Goals & Policies Goal 4.1 Provide adequate storage and conveyance of runoff to protect the public safety and minimize property damage. Policy 4.1A Preserve and manage the storage associated with the 100-year floodplain along and within water-bodies to minimize the frequency and severity of flooding caused by high water. Policy 4.1B Use the natural characteristics of the City’s watersheds (e.g., pond, swales, wetlands) in combination with development standards and projects, to reduce present and future flood damage and enhance the quality of surface and ground water. Policy 4.1C Require that adequate drainage facilities and easements are provided with land development activities. Policy 4.1D Continue to enforce floodplain regulations to ensure that new structures are adequately elevated above identified flood elevations. Policy 4.1E Update the Floodplain Overlay Ordinance as required by FEMA and the MnDNR, or as needed, to ensure adequate protection for structures and eligibility for flood insurance programs. Policy 4.1F Support efforts to restore and reestablish floodplain basins to improve their natural function. Policy 4.1G Consider joining FEMA’s Community Rating System to provide residents with a discount on flood insurance policies Policy 4.1H Review approximate floodplain boundaries and consider establishing a base flood elevation Public Ditch System Goals & Policies Goal 5.1 Ensure the management and operation of drainage systems and use of waterways in a manner which recognizes the origin of the system (e.g., constructed vs. natural), the interconnectedness of resources, and present and future conveyance needs, while considering legally established rights. Policy 5.1A Work with the RCWD to facilitate effective management of the public ditch system, as needed, to support the recognized functions of these systems. Policy 5.1B Work with the RCWD to address the system capacity limitations of ACD 55 and ACD 72 and ACD 10-22-32 Groundwater Management Goals & Policies Goal 6.1 Incorporate ground water considerations into the decision-making process through recognizing the interconnectedness of surface water and groundwater supply and groundwater-dependent natural resources. Policy 6.1A Preserve ground water recharge areas in cooperation with Anoka County. Policy 6.1B Promote infiltration of stormwater to result in groundwater recharge where it is feasible and does not pose a threat to groundwater quality. Policy 6.1C Continue to implement the City’s Wellhead Protection Plan. Policy 6.1D Participate in the Anoka County Wellhead Protection Group in implementing joint projects that benefit the City of Lino Lakes. Policy 6.1E Continue to initiate water conservation programs through promoting water reuse and reducing water consumption
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 50 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Natural Resources Goals & Policies Goal 7.1 Identify, protect and preserve the desirable natural areas and ecological and aquatic resources of the community. Policy 7.1A Pursue a well-defined natural resource restoration and management plan consistent with the RCWD/Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan (RMP). Policy 7.1B Maintain the partnership of Lino Lakes and RCWD and other groups such as Anoka County to maintain, restore, and manage the aquatic, aquatic dependent (such as the Blue Heron Rookery on Peltier Lake) and upland areas of the City. Policy 7.1C Require natural space buffers, where appropriate, around wetlands to preserve their function and value. Policy 7.1D Apply the Resource Management Unit recommendations from the RMP to meet RMP goals for aquatic resource protection and management. Goal 7.2 Ensure that well-planned, quality residential, commercial, industrial and institutional development accommodates the City’s projected growth needs and occurs in a manner that also conserves and enhances the City’s natural resources and amenities. Policy 7.2A Encourage developers, where appropriate, to use Open Space Design/Conservation Development Model to implement the Resource Management System Plan. Policy 7.2B Continue to use the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process to assess the impact of development on the City’s natural resources and infrastructure. Goal 7.3 Capitalize on opportunities to enhance water quality, reduce runoff volume and flood damage, and enhance ecological resources by using open space and greenways. Policy 7.3A Encourage the use of open space in the design of City projects when multiple benefits are realized. Policy 7.3B Collaborate with others responsible for managing open space to enhance their ongoing recreational programs, when these programs are related to the water and resource management effort and are consistent with the City’s open space priorities. Policy 7.3C Seek opportunities to enhance habitat function and integrity, to benefit water resources and eco-systems. Erosion and Sediment Control Goals & Policies Goal 8.1 Prevent erosion and minimize the conveyance of sediment into surface water systems through enforcement of the City’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Policy 8.1A Enforcement of City’s SWPPP: § Require erosion control plans for all land disturbance activities in accordance with the City’s stormwater management ordinance. § Continue to enforce the Illicit Discharge and Detection Elimination Ordinance § Coordinate construction site inspections and enforcement with watershed management organization inspection staff § Implement and perform good housekeeping measures to minimize sediment entering the drainage system Regulations, Permitting and Reporting Goals & Policies Goal 9.1 Address regulatory requirements of local, state and federal programs through updated ordinances, permitting, and ongoing reporting. Policy 9.1A Evaluate City’s existing ordinances and programs to facilitate implementation of the Resource Management System Plan. Policy 9.1B Coordinate with the RCWD, USACE, and VLAWMO to manage local wetland resources. Policy 9.1C Work with the RCWD to implement the Resource Management Plan. Policy 9.1D Implement programs, implement structural solutions, and complete reporting as needed to meet MPCA’s requirements for MS4s. Policy 9.1E Support the implementation of the SAMP by the USACE.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 51 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Monitoring, Maintenance and Inspection Goals & Policies Goal 10.1 Maintain the function and effectiveness of stormwater management structures through inspection, monitoring and maintenance. Policy 10.1A Implement the City’s plan for the regular inspection and maintenance of public water resource infrastructure consistent with the requirements of the NPDES MS4 permit. Policy 10.1B Require Operation and Maintenance agreements for the inspection and maintenance of privately constructed water resource infrastructure. Policy 10.1C Implement and refine a training program to prevent or reduce pollutant runoff resulting from City operations. Policy 10.1D Prepare an annual report in accordance with the NPDES MS4 permit and share results with the public, City Council, and Boards. Policy 10.1E Conduct monitoring to evaluate the effectiveness of the City’s stormwater management actions on the quality of water resources. Public Participation, Information and Education Goals & Policies Goal 11.1 Inform and educate the public concerning urban stormwater management and the problems pollutants cause if allowed to enter our water resources. Policy 11.1A Identify and alert residents of potential ecological challenges and threats. Policy 11.1B Plan and initiate cooperative educational efforts with the state and other local government entities for resident education. Goal 11.2 Offer programs, educational opportunities, and information that facilitate an understanding of water resource issues in the City of Lino lakes. Policy 11.2A Actively develop and implement a community education program relating to preserving and improving water quality consistent with the City’s MS4 permit requirements and/or coordinate with regional education efforts. Policy 11.2B Provide infrastructure management information for City-owned facilities to educate the public about how water resources are managed, the programs and policies and projects of the City, and to encourage public involvement Policy 11.2C Utilize and engage citizens to promote sustainable stewardship of lakes. Policy 11.2D Continue to support and participate in the RCWD’s Stream Health Evaluation Program (SHEP) Financing Goals & Policies Goal 12.1 Ensure that the costs of the surface water system are equitably distributed and sufficiently funded to cover the liabilities. Policy 12.1A Update and apply area-based charges so that the surface water related costs of development can be fairly borne by development. Policy 12.1B Consider funding options that will equitably distribute the costs of managing and implementing the City’s surface water management plan, such as a stormwater utility or district- based fees. Goal 12.2 Leverage partnerships to cost-effectively manage the City’s surface water and natural resource systems and attain the goals of this plan. Policy 12.2A Pursue grants, donations, and in-kind contributions to help fund stormwater projects. Policy 12.2B The City will coordinate local stormwater management issues with the member watersheds and neighboring cities in order to leverage the watershed’s work and thus reducing City expenditures.
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 52 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 4. GOALS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS Since the last Local Water Management Plan revision, the City has taken great steps to make headway on meeting their goals. The following is a summary of the progress being made so far: • Establishment of the Wollen Park Wetland Bank • Development of TMDLs for the Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes and the Upper Mississippi River • Development of the Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan • Updates and revisions to the City’s Stormwater, Erosion Control and Floodplain Ordinances • Compliance with the City’s MS4 permit program and required annual updates • Application for numerous grants to help fund water resources projects within the City • Adopted Greenway System Plan • Updated ordinances to include Better Site Design practices
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 53 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 5. LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM 5.1 Implementation Activities The implementation activities identified in this section of the Plan were taken from previously conducted planning and/or resource management documents or they are new activities developed as part of the planning process. The goals and policies listed in Section 3 represent the ideal list of implementation activities with full funding, which is currently beyond the City’s resources. As a means of prioritizing and aligning the efforts with a more attainable funding level, or until additional funding becomes available, the activities identified in Table 5-23 represent a synthesized and focused list of actions for city implementation. Appendix D provides a list of the proposed city-wide and RMU-specific actions in the plan that are a basis of the implementation cost table shown in Table 5-23. Implementation activities are categorized as follows: • City Wide Actions – Includes implementation activities that apply on a broader scale, such as annual maintenance and MS4 compliance • RMU Specific Actions – Includes implementation activities that have been identified for the three highest priority RMUs: Reshanau, Marshan, and Clearwater Creek • Miscellaneous RMU Actions – Includes implementation activities that have been identified for the remaining RMUs Table 5-23. City-Wide Implementation Plan Action No. Actions identified by Issue Category Additional Issue(s) Addressed Goals Addressed Policies Addressed WATER RATE & QUANTITY Establish and adopt Better Site Design (BSD) standards for new development, and provide guidance for staff, City Boards, and City Council, including: • Encourage use of stormwater treatment trains; • Protect high priority wetlands, their biological condition, and their function as high quality habitat; • Enhance groundwater hydrology and protect groundwater-dependent natural resources; • Provide natural flood reduction; • Integrate water quality improvement components in the landscape; and • Revise maximum allowable impervious surface requirements for low- and medium-density residential districts. • Incorporate surface water reuse options into new developments and public facilities. Water Quantity 3.1.1 3.1.1E 1 Water Quality 3.2.1 3.2.1A 3.2.1C Natural Resources 3.7.2 3.7.4 3.7.2B 3.7.4A Wetland Management 3.3.1 3.3.1C Floodplain Management 3.4.1 3.4.1B WATER QUALITY 2 Implement water quality improvements via the Subwatershed Plans for each RMU specific to the waterbodies of the area and upcoming regulations (ex. TMDLs). Regulations 3.2.1 3.2.1B 3.2.1D Initiate Salt Application Reduction Program Permitting and Reporting 2.2. 2.2.D WETLAND MANAGEMENT 3 Implement Wetland Banking Program NA 3.3.1 3.3.1A 4 Conduct annual meeting with the RCWD to review wetland mitigation permits to ensure wetland functions are being preserved. NA 3.3.1 3.3.1E 5 Coordinate with MnDOT and County transportation officials on projects that propose to disturb wetlands within their right-of-way by holding annual meeting to discuss future road plans and wetland mitigation banking. NA 3.3.1 3.3.1A 6 Work with RCWD and VLAWMO to establish watershed-based approaches to maintaining or restoring wetland functions. NA 3.3.1 3.3.1D FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT 7 Review existing watershed models and work with the RCWD and VLAWMO to address flow constraints in the system. NA 3.4.1 3.4.1D PUBLIC DITCH SYSTEM
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 54 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Action No. Actions identified by Issue Category Additional Issue(s) Addressed Goals Addressed Policies Addressed 8 Work with the RCWD on the ditch abandonment process for public subsurface (drain tile) systems and explore partial abandonment for surface (ditch) systems, in cases where the public drainage system requires redesign to implement the multi-functional Greenway System. Before the City pursues full or partial abandonment of any public drainage system, they will engage with RCWD early in the process. NA 3.5.1 3.5.1A 9 Support RCWD’s implementation of ditch activities and Resource Management Plans by providing input where it impacts the city’s drainage system and development plans by encouraging: • Integrating management of ditch systems and adjacent wetland and upland systems; • Maintaining ditch systems being used for agricultural benefit; • Using branch maintenance in rural areas, retrofits in urbanizing areas and master planned communities with greenways and open space to reduce downstream flooding and retain and reuse water in the local catchments; • Minimizing future ditch maintenance costs by developing a self-sustaining design; • Work with private landowners to retrofit/implement multi-functional Greenway System, for those parcels that are not part of a Master Plan or are already developed. NA 3.5.1 3.5.1A GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT 10 Implement the wellhead protection plan to protect the groundwater source from contamination. NA 3.6.1 3.6.1C 11 Continue to implement the City’s Water Conservation Management Plan NA 3.6.1 3.6.1A NATURAL RESOURCES 12 Partner with RCWD, VLAWMO, and MnDNR to establish program to educate residents on the means to identify and eradicate invasive species. NA 3.7.1 3.7.1A 13 Continue to manage and protect heron rookery and other important plant and animal communities. NA 3.7.1 3.7.1B 14 Develop, distribute, and present public with information regarding the importance of shoreland buffers. NA 3.7.3 3.7.3C REGULATIONS, PERMITTING AND REPORTING 15 Implement Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. Water Rate & Quantity 3.1.1 3.1.1A 16 Implement Greenway System Plan through development of subwatershed management plans. The Plan will establish a clear vision of the multi-functional Greenway System for City Staff and developers and will be used as a tool early in the land development process. Water Rate & Quantity 3.1.1 3.1.1A 17 Complete subwatershed management plans in order of priority: 1. Peltier RMU 2. Clearwater Creek RMU 3. Marshan RMU 4. Reshanau RMU Develop subwatershed management plans for the remaining RMUs in the following order: 1. Wilkinson RMU 2. Amelia RMU 3. Hardwood Creek RMU 4. Rice Lake RMU If need arises and resources allow, develop subwatershed plans for the following RMUs: § Rondeau RMU § Upper Rice Creek RMU § Centerville RMU § Sherman RMU § Baldwin RMU § Middle Rice Creek RMU Water Quality 3.2.1 3.2.1D Wetland Management 3.3.1 3.3.1D Floodplain Management 3.4.1 3.4.1B Natural Resources 3.7.1 3.7.1A Regulations, Permitting & Reporting 3.9.1 3.9.1A 18 Evaluate the need to modify existing ordinances to ensure implementation of all components of the multi-functional Greenway System Water Rate & Quantity 3.1.1 3.1.1A 3.9.2 3.9.2A
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 55 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Action No. Actions identified by Issue Category Additional Issue(s) Addressed Goals Addressed Policies Addressed 19 Incorporate neighborhood stormwater planning and education into street reconstruction program. Water Rate & Quantity 3.1.1 3.1.1E 20 Evaluate Revisions to Road Design Standards including: • Reducing minimum pavement widths • Ribbon curbs and curb cuts with roadside swales, infiltration, and biofiltration • Use of pervious pavements Water Rate & Quantity 3.9.2 3.1.1 3.9.2A 3.1.1.A 21 Continue to implement the RMP: • Create a wetland bank to provide replacement opportunities for development or roadway projects. Water Rate & Quantity Wetland Management 3.9.2 3.1.1 3.3.1 3.9.2C 3.1.1C 3.3.1C 3.3.1D 3.3.1E Continue to participate in pre-permit application meetings with the RCWD and USACE that support the collaborative permitting process implemented through RCWD Rule and the USACE’s Programmatic General Permit that implements the Special Area Management Plan. Water Quality 3.9.2 3.9.2B 22 3.2.2 3.2.2C MONITORING, MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION 23 Work with RCWD and VLAWMO to develop a long-term monitoring program to accompany RMP implementation and to evaluate quantitatively the strategy’s long-term environmental and cost benefits. NA 3.10.1 3.10.1E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, INFORMATION & EDUCATION 24 Participate with other public agencies and organizations on education and outreach efforts. NA 3.11 3.11.1A 3.11.1B 3.11.1C 3.11.2B 3.11.2C 3.11.2D FINANCING 25 Pursue grants through the RCWD Grant Programs to assist in the funding of projects that will reduce the impact of existing development on local water resources. NA 3.12.2 3.12.2A 26 Pursue funding support from VLAWMO for projects in the Amelia Lake and Wilkinson Lake subwatersheds. NA 3.12.1 3.12.2B 27 Review and evaluate funding sources for surface water management including ad valorem taxes, development charges, grants, and user fees. NA 3.12.1 3.12.1A 3.12.1B 28 Update and continue to implement Trunk Surface Water Management Fee System. NA 3.12.1 3.12.2A 29 Pursue funding through Federal and State grant opportunities NA 3.12.2 3.12.2A 5.2 Implementation Costs The City will use funds generated from its General Fund and Surface Water Management Charge as the primary funding mechanisms for its implementation program including maintenance, repairs, capital projects, and studies. Additionally, for applicable projects, the City will apply for grant funding through state, federal and watershed opportunities as they become available. Priority actions in the RMU-specific implementation plan as defined in Appendix D are listed in Table 5-24. The total estimated cost to implement this plan, including City-wide and all RMU Subwatershed Areas, is $5,597,000 over 10 years. These costs vary based on the year. It should be noted, that some of the costs should be recovered through surface water management impact fees collected in conjunction with development. Most of the City-wide costs are related to maintenance of the existing system and satisfying the programmatic requirements of the City’s NPDES permit. Phase 1, 2, and 3 of the Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Plan make up a majority of the infrastructure costs in relation to the high priority Peltier RMU. It is further assumed that once the more detailed RMU Subwatershed Plans are completed, more of the infrastructure costs will be defined so it can be included in developer fees for each area.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer MEETING DATE: March 11, 2019 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 19-27, Approving Change Order No. 1,
West Shadow Lake Area Improvement Project VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting council approval of Change Order No. 1 for the West Shadow Lake Area Improvement Project.
BACKGROUND On October 8, 2018, the City Council awarded the bid for the West Shadow Lake Area Improvement Project to Geislinger and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $4,940,636.57. Construction
of the project has been on-going since that time. On February 6, 2019, WSB and the City held a
neighborhood meeting to provide information regarding the 2019 construction season. At the meeting, residents along the south end of the project, near the woods, requested that the ribbon curb be extended further to the south. During final design, it was understood that residents in this area wanted the road to remain as rural as possible and without curbing through this area
and thus it was not included in the project.
For Council consideration, WSB along with City staff have drafted Change Order No. 1 in the amount $41,849.00 to extend the ribbon curb approximately 625 feet to the south. The construction of curb on this project is funded through the Closed Bond Fund. This would bring
the estimated total cost of the curb on the project to $182,000. The West Shadow Lake Area
Improvement Project contract with Geislinger and Sons, Inc. with Change Order No. 1 would be increased to $4,982,485.57. RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 19-27 for Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $41,849.00 for the West Shadow Lake Area Improvement Project. ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 19-27 2. Map 3. Change Order No.1
CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-27 RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WEST SHADOW LAKE AREA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution 18-27 of the Council adopted on October 10, 2018, awarding the contract for the West Shadow Lake Area Improvement Project to Geislinger &
Sons; and WHEREAS, a complete summary of costs are detailed in Change Order No. 1;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
that Change Order No. 1 is approved in the amount of $41,849.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of March, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
N
SCALE IN FEET
0 200100
WSB PROJECT NO.:K:\010326-000\Cad\Exhibits\CO #1 Exhibit.dwg 3/8/2019 1:46:49 PMR-010326-000
WEST SHADOW LAKE AREA
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
LINO LAKES, MN
C.O. #167106709672967306750674967596769677067906779682068196829PROPOSED CONCRETE
CURB EXTENSION START
PROPOSED CONCRETE
CURB EXTENSION END
CONCRETE
CURB PER PLAN
WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MN
WSB PROJECT NO. R-013170-000
OWNER:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
600 TOWN CENTER PARKWAY
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
YOU ARE DIRECTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION:
CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE:CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE:$4,940,636.57 ORIGINAL CONTRACT TIME:11/1/2019
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS: NA $0.00 NET CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS: NONE
CONTRACT PRICE PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER:$4,940,636.57 CONTRACT TIME PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER: 11/1/2019
NET INCREASE OF THIS CHANGE ORDER:$41,849.00 NET INCREASE OF CHANGE ORDER:NONE
CONTRACT PRICE WITH ALL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS: $4,982,485.57 CONTRACT TIME WITH APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS:11/1/2019
RECOMMENDED BY:APPROVED BY:
ED YOUNGQUIST, PE, PROJECT MANAGER
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEER
APPROVED BY:
CITY ENGINEER
DATE
GEISLINGER & SONS, INC.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
03/13/2019
DATE
CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE
CURB AND GUTTER EXTENSION ON WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE FROM STA 32+50 TO THE ORIDINALLY PROPOSED
CURB AT STA 43+40
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS CHANGE ORDER INCLUDES ALL ADDITIONAL COSTS AND TIME EXTENSIONS WHICH ARE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR
FORM ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK ELEMENTS DESCRIBED ABOVE.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR:
GEISLINGER & SONS, INC.
511 CENTRAL AVENUE SOUTH, PO BOX 437
WATKINS, MN 55389
Page 1 of 1K:\010326-000\Admin\Construction Admin\WSL Construction Admin\Change Orders\Change Order No. 1\
010326-000 CO1 031219CO 1
WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MN
WSB PROJECT NO. R-013170-000
Item No. Mat. No. Description Qty Unit Price Extended Amount
15 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) (P)563 CY 13.00$ $ 7,319.00
46 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 150 TON 13.00$ $ 1,950.00
38 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN SURMOUNTABLE 1145 LF 13.00$ $ 14,885.00
40 2531.501 CONCRETE RIBBON CURB 1145 LF 11.00$ $ 12,595.00
61 2574.525 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW 204 CY 25.00$ $ 5,100.00
$41,849.00
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $41,849.00
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DETAIL
ADDED ITEMS
TOTAL ADDED ITEMS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
03/13/2019
Page 1 of 1
K:\010326-000\Admin\Construction Admin\WSL Construction Admin\Change Orders\Change Order No. 1\
010326-000 CO1 031219CO 1 Detail
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, PE City Engineer
C. C. MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Consider Resolution 19-33, Authorize the Preparation of Plans and Specs, East Cedar Street & 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North Improvement Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting Council authorization to prepare plans and specifications for the 2019 East Cedar Street & 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North Improvement Project. BACKGROUND
The City of Lino Lakes has entered into a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the City of Hugo to complete roadway improvements on 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue from Tart Lake Road to the south a distance of 2,300 feet, and East Cedar Street from Otter Lake Road to the east a distance of 2,600 feet. The JPA outlines that the East Cedar Street improvements are the financial
responsibility of the City of Lino Lakes and the 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue improvements are
the financial responsibility of the City of Hugo. The final project costs to each community will be based on the percentage of construction and engineering costs as outlined in the JPA. The Cedar Street project total estimated project cost is $490,000. Funding for the project is
proposed through the street reconstruction fund for arterial street reconstruction in the amount of
$247,500 and state aid in the amount of $242,500. WSB, the City Engineer for the City of Lino Lakes and the City of Hugo, have submitted a proposal to complete the plans and specifications, and provide bid documents, for the not to exceed total cost
of $128,968 between both Cities, based on actual time spent on the project. The City of Lino Lakes
cost share is estimated to be $81,250, with the remaining amount to be paid by the City of Hugo. The proposed schedule for the City of Lino Lakes for this project is as follows:
City Council Authorizes Plans and Specifications Mar. 25, 2019
Approve Plans and Specifications, Authorize Ad for Bids May 13, 2019 Open Bids June 14, 2019 City Council Awards Contract June 24, 2019 Construction Begins July 2019
Final Completion October 2019
The proposed schedule for the City of Hugo for this project is as follows:
Hugo City Council Authorizes Plans and Specifications Apr. 1, 2019 Approve Plans and Specifications, Authorize Ad for Bids May 20, 2019 Open Bids June 14, 2019
Hugo City Council Awards Contract July 1, 2019
Construction Begins July 2019 Final Completion October 2019 RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 19-33, Authorizing the Preparation of Plans and Specifications, East Cedar Street & 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North Improvement Project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 19-33 2. Project Location 3. WSB Proposal
CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-33 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE EAST CEDAR STREET & 24TH AVENUE/ELMCREST AVENUE NORTH IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes and the City of Hugo entered into a Joint Powers Agreement to complete roadway improvements on 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue from Tart Lake Road to the south a distance of 2,300 feet, and East Cedar Street from Otter Lake Road to the east a distance of 2,600 feet; and WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement outlines that the East Cedar Street improvements are the financial responsibility of the City of Lino Lakes and the 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue improvements are the financial responsibility of the City of Hugo; and WHEREAS, the City Council is ordering the project finding that it would be in the best interest of
the City to proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, WSB and Associates, the City Engineer, has submitted a proposal to prepare plans and specifications. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes: 1. Authorizes the Preparation of the Plans and Specifications for the East Cedar Street & 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North Improvement Project.
2. WSB and Associates are designated as the engineer for this improvement and directed to prepare plans and specifications for the East Cedar Street & 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue Improvement Project for an amount not to exceed $128,968.00. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of March, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same:
_______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Lino LakesHugo%&c(
Clearwater Creek Park
Cedar St Gravel 590 vpd
Cedar St Paved 1,100 vpd
Elmcrest Ave 700 vpd
E LLEN
CT
DELINACIRLACASS E CTALBERT CTTART CTF L ORAC TTELELN STELLALNARTHU R C T
IVERSON CT
TELE DROTTERLAKESERVICE
R
D
65TH ST
LACASSEDR
TARTLAKE R D 24THAVECLEARWATERCREEKDRMAINSTTOSBI35ELANGERLNOTTER LAKE RDCEDAR ST
INTERSTATE35EF A BLEHILLPKWY
NVALJEANBLVDNGARDENW
AYN
ELMCRESTAVEN
ARBRELN
N
JARDINAVENF ABLE ROAD CT N
1 2 9 T H S T N
ArbrePark
ValjeanPark
Aspire Park
1 inch = 500 feet Document Path: K:\02029-870\GIS\Maps\RoadwayImprovement11x17Aerial.mxd Date Saved: 2/25/2019 1:47:24 PMRoadway Improvement ProjectsLino Lakes, MN
Lino Lakes ProjectHugo ProjectCity Boundary
Figure 1 - Project Location 0 600Feet¯
K:\02029-870\Admin\Contract\20190318 Design Fee Proposal.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM March 20, 2019
Mr. Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Proposal to Complete Final Engineering Design for East Cedar Street & 24th
Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North Improvement Project
WSB Project No. 02029-870
Dear Mr. Grochala:
The City of Lino Lakes is requesting assistance with the final design and bidding of the East
Cedar Street & 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North Improvement project. The project includes
proposed surface improvements of 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North, and East Cedar Street.
A Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) was approved earlier this month by the City of Hugo and the
City of Lino Lakes. The JPA outlines that the East Cedar Street improvements are the financial
responsibility of the City of Lino Lakes and the 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue improvements are
the financial responsibility of the City of Hugo.
Project Understanding
The final project costs to each community will be based on the percentage of construction and
engineering costs as outlined in the JPA.
A summary of the project scope is described as follows:
East Cedar Street (City of Lino Lakes financial share)
· Reclaim existing pavement section and paving from Otter Lake Road to the east
approximately 1300 feet.
· Grading and paving an existing gravel section of roadway from 1300 feet east of Otter
Lake Road to the east approximately 1300 feet.
24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North (City of Hugo financial share)
· Grading and paving existing gravel section from Tart Lake Road to the south
approximately 2300 feet.
Scope of Engineering Services
WSB is pleased to provide professional engineering services for the East Cedar Street & 24th
Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North Improvement Project including final design, topographic surveys,
soil borings and geotechnical evaluation, permitting, and public involvement with project
stakeholders. Below is a detailed description of the engineering services and WSB’s proposed
approach.
I. Data Collection & Field Documentation
Mr. Michael Grochala
March 20, 2019
Page 2
K:\02029-870\Admin\Contract\20190318 Design Fee Proposal.docx
The scope of services for this phase includes gathering the necessary data and
performing field documentation activities to complete the final design of the project. The
information gathered will be used to develop an accurate AutoCAD base map and
document current conditions in the field. The following is a detailed list of the work tasks
to be performed.
a. Project Management
WSB will lead the project design process including communication and coordination
efforts to facilitate the design and biding of the proposed project. WSB will hold
project meetings with the City of Lino Lakes or other governing entities during final
design. We will provide the necessary graphics, maps, and presentation materials for
these meetings. In addition, email correspondence, conference calls, and other
related day-to-day communications techniques will be used.
b. Topographic Survey
i. Collect, review and establish survey control points necessary to perform
topographic survey along the project length. Iron monuments (property corners)
will be used as control whenever possible. Survey control points will be located
such that will not be disturbed by construction. There will be enough control
points throughout the project to allow for staking during construction. Each
control point will be visible from minimum of two other control points. The control
points will be within an error tolerance of 0.03 feet or better for X,Y,Z.
ii. Perform topographic survey along the project corridor using total station
equipment.
iii. The extents of the survey will be 15 feet beyond the right of way, the locations of
the existing wells will be included in this Survey, the survey will continue around
radius of intersections at the project limits. Trees include additional information,
such as size and type. All possible property irons will be located. First floor or
garage floor elevations will be collected as a part of the topographic survey.
iv. Use topography survey data to develop an existing conditions base map.
v. The base map will include the survey points, line work (as survey figures where
applicable), and existing ground surface.
vi. Data pertaining to the city’s storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main shall be
collected in the field. This data includes rim elevations, invert elevations, pipe
sizes, and structure sizes.
vii. Private and other utilities (gas, telephone, electric, cable, etc.) data will be
collected with design level locates.
viii. It has been assumed that the City will provide record plan information or any
existing plat information for incorporation into the AutoCAD base-map and TIN.
Once the project is complete, WSB will provide the City with the electronic files
used on the project. Any additional survey requested by the City, or what may be
needed due to changes in scope, or schedule, will require a re-evaluation of this
service fee.
c. Private Utility Plan Review & Integration
A Gopher State One Call will be initiated to request field markings and mapping of
the existing private utilities within the project area. This information will be reviewed
and with what was obtained with the survey in the field.
d. Road Cores & Geotechnical Evaluation
We propose to complete necessary road coring along East Cedar Street to establish
existing pavement and base depths necessary for reclaiming.
Mr. Michael Grochala
March 20, 2019
Page 3
K:\02029-870\Admin\Contract\20190318 Design Fee Proposal.docx
II. Final Design & Permitting
The scope of services for this phase will further the design of the project including the
creation of a full set of plans of the proposed improvements and coordination with private
utility companies. WSB will assist the City in obtaining approvals from governmental
authorities having jurisdiction over the project if it is determined that they are needed
including the preparation of permit application(s) and/or approval requests and will assist
the City with submitting the applications/approval requests to the appropriate regulatory
agencies.
a. Private Utility Coordination
Private utility coordination will be conducted to ensure that all parties with facilities in
the project area are notified of proposed City project improvement, scheduling,
proposed private utility installations, and possible impacts. This task includes one
coordination meeting with affected utility companies, preparation of meeting minutes,
and continued coordination and communications throughout the design process.
b. Final Plan Preparation and Design Review
The final plans created in AutoCAD will detail the removals, location and grade of the
street improvements, street cross sections, culvert replacement as necessary,
pedestrian connections, restoration, erosion control, traffic control, and SWPPP
documentation.
III. Construction Documents & Bidding Process
Upon completion of permitting and agency review and approval WSB will develop the
final project plans and specifications in preparation for bidding and construction. This task
will include an internal QA/QC review of the final plans, final quantities, and
specifications.
WSB will print, assemble, and submit the final contract documents to the City and request
authorization to advertise the project for bidding each project. WSB will receive and
respond to bidder inquiries concerning the plans, specifications, and intent of the project.
Logs of all inquiries will be kept and maintained to document inquiries. WSB will attend
the project bid opening with the City.
WSB will review the low bidder’s bid proposal for each project, contractor’s and
subcontractor’s personnel proposed for the project and relative experience, quality and
availability of equipment, performance on similar projects, references, nature and extent
of other similar contracts, whether or not the contractor or subcontractors have ever been
denied contract award, and any other information that would affect the ability of the
contractor to perform the work.
IV. Construction Services
Construction Services have not been included with this proposal. A separate proposal will
be provided at the request of the City once final plans are completed approved.
Proposed Fee
A copy of the project task hour budget is attached for your reference. Based on the proposed
task hour budget, WSB will complete the scope of work for both projects discussed herein on
hourly basis for a not-to-exceed amount of $128,968. Per the Joint Powers Agreement with the
City of Hugo, Lino Lakes share would be responsible for approximately 63% of this amount,
which is $81,250. The proposed total construction cost with contingency was estimated to be
$785,000.
Mr. Michael Grochala
March 20, 2019
Page 4
K:\02029-870\Admin\Contract\20190318 Design Fee Proposal.docx
This letter represents our complete understanding of the East Cedar Street & 24th
Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue North Improvement Project and the proposed scope of services. If you
are in agreement with the scope of services and proposed fee, please sign in the appropriate
space below and return one copy to us. We are available to begin work immediately based on
your authorization.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 651-286-8479
Sincerely,
WSB
Diane Hankee
City Engineer
Attachments
cc: Mark Erichson, City Engineer, City of Hugo
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6F
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 19-34, Approving Payment No. 1 and Final, 2019 Surface Water Maintenance Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting council consideration, approve payment for the 2019 Surface Water
Maintenance Project.
BACKGROUND
The City’s annual Surface Water Management Program (SWMP) addresses areas in need of
maintenance, and conforms to the City’s Surface Water Pollution and Prevention Plan. In the last
two years the City’s SWMP has been addressing pond cleaning projects. This type of work is best completed in the winter season.
The 2019 SWMP was proposed within the Wollan Estates neighborhood. The project included
the removal of vegetation and sediment in the stormwater pond located west of Diane Street. The
construction contract was in the amount of $43,600.00 and the final payment earned by the
contractor for this project is $49,000.00. The project was successfully completed in the first two weeks of March with additional sediment removed to maximize pond volume. The final payment to Arnt Construction Company is for $49,000.00. The total budget for the 2019 Surface Water
Maintenance Project is $140,000.00. The City has a lengthy list of Surface Water Maintenance
Projects to complete. Because we received favorable bids for the Wollan Estates pond sediment
removal project, staff is working with Public Works to identify and complete a second surface
water maintenance project in 2019.
RECOMMENDATION
Consider Resolution No. 19-34, Approving Payment No. 1 and Final, 2019 Surface Water
Maintenance Project in the amount of $49,000.00 to Arnt Construction Company.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 19-34 2. Pay Request No. 1 & Final
CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-34 APPROVING PAYMENT NO. 1 AND FINAL FOR THE 2019 SURFACE WATER MAINTENANCE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution 19-22 on February 25, 2019, awarding the
construction contract to Arnt Construction Company for the 2019 Surface Water Maintenance Project; and WHEREAS, a complete summary of costs are detailed in Payment No. 1 (Final) for the 2019 Surface Water Maintenance Project and can be found on file at the offices of the City of Lino
Lakes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that Payment Request No. 1 (Final) is approved in the amount of $49,000.00 to Arnt Construction Company.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of March, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST: ________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6G
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019 TOPIC: Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19, Amending City
Code § 1007 Related to Multiple Principal Buildings on One Parcel, in Commercial, Industrial or Public/Semi-Public Zoning Districts
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration to amend City Code § 1007 to allow for multiple buildings on a single parcel in Commercial, Industrial, and Public/Semi Public Zoning
Districts. BACKGROUND Current City ordinance only allows for one principal building per lot. In commercial and
industrial zoning districts the size of accessory buildings is limited to 400 square feet.
Accordingly any expansion project which requires an additional building in excess of 400 square feet would require approval of a planned unit development. PUD’s may be done by rezoning in Industrial Districts and by either rezoning or Conditional Use Permit in
Commercial Districts. For a single use site, approval for multiple buildings may be more
appropriately handled through a Conditional Use Permit process.
City staff is proposing an ordinance change for the City Council’s consideration to simplify the process for single use expansion projects. ANALYSIS
City Code defines the follow terms:
ACCESSORY BUILDING. A portion of the principal building or a detached structure on
the same lot which is used for an accessory use.
BUILDING, PRINCIPAL. A building in which is conducted the principal use of the lot
on which it is located. City Code §1007.042 (4)(b) states “except in an approved planned unit development that specifically allows it, provided for in §1007.024 of this Ordinance, not more than (1) principal
building shall be located on a lot”.
2
Section 1007.043 (4) (j) 1. states “Only one (1) accessory building shall be allowed not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet except when intended for storage of buses”.
The accessory building limitations are only applicable to commercial and industrial zoning
districts. The PSP, Public and Semi-public, which is applicable to most City, School and
County park properties is regulated separately.
Prior to an ordinance amendment in 1997, only parcels in residential zoning districts where subject to the one building requirement.
The PUD process is appropriate when considering approval of complicated sites with multiple
buildings and potentially multiple owners, to ensure a harmonious development pattern.
However, staff is of the opinion that multiple buildings on single use sites have fewer inherent issues.
Provided that the base lot meets all applicable dimensional requirements, standard setbacks are met, and only one (1) use is proposed on the site, site plan approval through the Conditional
Use Permit process could more simply address development concerns.
Proposed Amendment Staff has worked with the City Attorney to provide for multiple buildings on a single lot as a conditional use. The provisions include the following:
1. Amends Section 1007.042 (4)(b) to allow multiple principal buildings by Conditional Use Permit. 2. Amends Section 1007.043 (4) to allow for multiple accessory buildings over 400 square
feet in area by Conditional Use Permit in Commercial and Industrial Districts. 3. Amends the permitted Conditional Uses in the GB, General Business District, LI, Light Industry and GI, General Industry Districts, and the PSP, Public Semi-public District to include two or more buildings on same lot.
RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on March 13, 2019. The Board voted 4-0 to recommend adoption of the proposed amendment.
Staff is recommending approval of the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19. ATTACHMENTS
1. Ordinance No. 05-19
1st Reading: Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 05-19
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 1007 RELATED TO MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON A SINGLE LOT IN COMMERICAL, INDUSTRIAL AND PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC ZONING DISTRICTS
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds that the allowance of two or more principle or
accessory buildings on a single lot may be appropriately regulated through the Conditional Use
Permit process when such buildings relate to a single business or enterprise.
Section 2. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.042 (4) is hereby amended as set
forth below:
(b) Principal Buildings. Except in Commercial, Industrial and Public/Semi- Public zoning districts, where allowed by Conditional Use Permit, and in an approved planned unit
development that specifically allows it, provided for in §1007.024 of this Ordinance, not more than one (1) principal building shall be located on a lot”. Section 3. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.043(4) (J) is hereby amended as
set forth below:
1. Except in Commercial, and Industrial zoning districts, where allowed by Conditional
Use Permit, and in an approved planned unit development that specifically allows it,
provided for in §1007.024 of this Ordinance not more than Only one (1) accessory building
shall be allowed not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet except when intended for
storage of buses
Section 4. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.112, GB, General Business
District, (8) Conditional Uses is hereby amended as set forth below:
(o) Two (2) or more buildings on same lot provided such buildings relate to a permitted or conditional use that is operated as a single business or enterprise.
Section 5. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.120 LI, Light Industrial District,
(9) Conditional Uses, is hereby amended as set forth below:
(g) Two (2) or more buildings on same lot provided such buildings relate to a permitted or
conditional use that is operated as a single business or enterprise.
Section 6. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.121, GI, General Industrial
District, (9) Conditional Uses, is hereby amended as set forth below:
(j) Two (2) or more buildings on same lot provided such buildings relate to a permitted or conditional use that is operated as a single business or enterprise.
Section 7. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.130 PSP, Public and Semi-Public
District, (8) Conditional Uses, is hereby amended as set forth below:
(c) Two (2) or more buildings on same lot provided such buildings relate to a permitted or conditional use that is operated as a single business or enterprise. i.
Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and
publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 8th day of April, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council
Member_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
____________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6H
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: March 25, 2019 TOPIC: Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19, Amending City
Code § 1007 Allowing for Construction of Retaining Walls Greater than 42”in Height. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration to amend City Code § 1007 to allow for retaining walls greater than 42” in height.
BACKGROUND City Code §1007.043 (18) regulates the construction of Fences and Walls. This includes the construction of retaining walls. A Zoning Permit is required for construction within all platted areas of the city.
§1007.043 (18) (d)(5) currently prohibits retaining walls over 42 inches in height.
The state building code has provision for walls greater than 48 inches. This measurement includes any buried section of the wall (footing). Staff is proposing to allow the higher wall height subject to State Building Code provisions. A Zoning Permit will continue to be required
for walls 48 inches in height or less.
ANALYSIS The City regulates the placement and construction of retaining walls within all zoning districts.
Walls are proposed for various purposes but are predominately related to landscaping
improvements. Wall height can vary based on the elevation changes within a given property.
The prohibition on wall heights over 42 inches can lead to additional costs to property owners in the form of additional wall construction. Staff does not see any public purpose for this provision. Wall construction over 42 inches can be reviewed and approved through the
established building permit process.
A zoning permit will continue to be required for walls 48 inches or less in height. This is intended to ensure retaining walls are located within property lines and do not obstruct drainage.
The proposed amendment includes four changes to current ordinance:
2
1. Provides a definition for “Retaining Wall” to differentiate from the definition of
“Fence” which also includes a wall.
2. Requires a zoning permit throughout the City consistent with current practice regardless
of whether the property is platted. The purpose of the zoning permit is to ensure that
locational requirements are being met.
3. Provides for review of easement encroachments by the City Engineer rather than
Zoning Administrator. The ordinance does allow encroachments in certain instances.
These items are generally reviewed by the City Engineer.
4. Requires a Building Permit for walls over 48” in height.
In addition to these changes staff is developing a resident informational flyer that provides guidelines and City Policy related to fence/wall installations, including encroachments in City
easements.
RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on March 13, 2019. The Board voted 4-0
in favor of adopting the proposed amendment.
Staff is recommending approval of the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. 06-19.
1st Reading: Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 06-19
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 1007 ALLOWING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RETAINING WALLS GREATER THAN 42” IN HEIGHT
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds that the construction of retaining walls greater
than 42” in height are regulated by the State Building Code and therefore it is not necessary to
prohibit construction thereof.
Section 2. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code § 1007.001 (2) Definitions is amended as
follows:
RETAINING WALL. A wall not laterally supported at the top that resists lateral soil
load and other imposed loads.
Section 3. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code § 1007.043 (18) is proposed to be amended as
follows:
(a) Permit Required. It is unlawful for any person hereafter to construct or cause to be
constructed or erected within the platted areas of the City, any fence or wall without first making an application for and securing a permit. Section 4. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code § 1007.043 (18)(c) 4. is proposed to read as
follows:
h. No fence or wall shall be located within a drainage or utility easement without written permission of the Zoning Administrator City Engineer and the filing of an encroachment agreement.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and
publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 8th day of April, 2019.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council
Member_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
____________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk