Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-08-2019 Council PacketEXPANDED AGENDA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, April 8, 2019 *********** 6:30 p.m. (Broadcast live: http://northmetrotv.com/local- meetings/lino-lakes/) City Council: Mayor Reinert, Councilmembers Maher, Manthey, Rafferty and Stoesz City Administrator: Jeff Karlson SPECIAL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M. 1. Lyngblomsten Financial Assistance Request, Mikaela Huot (Springsted), Michael Grochala CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.  Roll Call - Council Members Rafferty, Stoesz, Manthey, Maher, and Mayor Reinert were present  Pledge of Allegiance  Open Mike / Public Comment - none  Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items The agenda was amended to remove Item 3B (postpone) SPECIAL PRESENTATION Public Safety Department Volunteer Recognition 1. CONSENT AGENDA A) Consideration of Expenditures: April 8, 2019 (Check No. 109973 through 110053) in the amount of $262,923.33. B) Consider approval of March 25, 2019 Work Session Minutes C) Consider approval of March 25, 2019 Council Meeting Minutes D) Consider approval of March 25, 2019 Minutes – Closed Session E) Consider Resolution 19-46 – Approving a Peddler License for Big Bell Ice Cream Inc. Action Taken: Motion by Manthey, seconded by Rafferty, to approve Consent Agenda Items 1A through 1E as presented was adopted Council Agenda -2- April 8, 2019 EXPANDED AGENDA 2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT None 3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT A) Consider Resolution No. 19-31, Approving a Personnel Policy Update, Karissa Bartholomew Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Rafferty, to approve Resolution No. 19-31 as presented, was adopted B) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 02-19, Amending Chapter 208 of the Lino Lakes City Code Providing for a Public Safety Department, John Swenson Item removed from agenda 4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT A) Consider donation of Wellness Equipment to North Memorial, John Swenson Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to accept the donation as recommended, was adopted 5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT A) Consider Resolution No. 19-45, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction Contract for Woods Edge Park, Rick DeGardner Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Maher, to approve Resolution No. 19-45 as presented, was adopted 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT A) Lyngblomsten Senior Living Community, Katie Larsen i. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 07-19 Rezoning Property from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development Action Taken: Motion by Manthey, seconded by Stoesz, to approve Consent Agenda Items 1A through 1G as presented was adopted ii. Consider Resolution No. 19-42 Approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to approve Consent Agenda Items 1A through 1G as presented was adopted B) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19, Amending City Code Section 1007 Related to Multiple Principal Buildings on One Parcel, in Commercial, Industrial or Public/Semi-Public Zoning Districts, Michael Grochala Council Agenda -3- April 8, 2019 EXPANDED AGENDA Action Taken: Motion by Stoesz, seconded by Maher, to approve the 2nd Reading and Passage of adoption of Ordinance No. 05-19, was adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none C) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19, Amending City Code Section 1007 Providing for Retaining Walls in Excess of 42” in Height, Michael Grochala Action Taken: Motion by Manthey, seconded by Stoesz, to approve the 2nd Reading and Passage of adoption of Ordinance No. 06-19, was adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none D) Consider Resolution No. 19-43 Accepting Bids, Awarding a Construction Contract, and Approving Construction Services Contract, Diane Hankee Action Taken: Motion by Manthey, seconded by Stoesz, to approve Resolution No. 19-43 as presented, was adopted; Council Member Rafferty abstained from voting 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. NEW BUSINESS None Adjournment Following adjournment of the regular meeting, the Council will reconvene in a closed session to discuss land acquisition related to the following projects: 1. NE Drainage Area (Peltier Outlet) Improvements 2. Lake Drive/Marketplace Dwelling Acquisition Community Calendar – A Look Ahead April 8, 2019 through April 22, 2019 Wednesday, April 10 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Monday, April 22 5:30 pm, Council Work Session Community Room Monday, April 22 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting Updated 4/5/2019 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, April 8, 2019 *********** 6:30 p.m. (Broadcast live: http://northmetrotv.com/local- meetings/lino-lakes/) City Council: Mayor Reinert, Councilmembers Maher, Manthey, Rafferty and Stoesz City Administrator: Jeff Karlson SPECIAL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M. 1. Lyngblomsten Financial Assistance Request, Mikaela Huot (Springsted), Michael Grochala CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.  Call to Order and Roll Call  Pledge of Allegiance  Open Mike / Public Comment  Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items SPECIAL PRESENTATION Public Safety Department Volunteer Recognition 1. CONSENT AGENDA A) Consideration of Expenditures: April 8, 2019 (Check No. 109973 through 110053) in the amount of $262,923.33. B) Consider approval of March 25, 2019 Work Session Minutes C) Consider approval of March 25, 2019 Council Meeting Minutes D) Consider approval of March 25, 2019 Minutes – Closed Session E) Consider Resolution 19-46 – Approving a Peddler License for Big Bell Ice Cream Inc. 2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT None 3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT A) Consider Resolution No. 19-31, Approving a Personnel Policy Update, Karissa Bartholomew B) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 02-19, Amending Chapter 208 of the Lino Lakes City Code Providing for a Public Safety Department, John Swenson Council Agenda -2- April 8, 2019 *Council may vote to dispense with full reading of the ordinance *Roll vote is required for adoption of the ordinance 4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT A) Consider donation of Wellness Equipment to North Memorial, John Swenson 5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT A) Consider Resolution No. 19-45, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction Contract for Woods Edge Park, Rick DeGardner 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT A) Lyngblomsten Senior Living Community, Katie Larsen i. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 07-19 Rezoning Property from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development ii. Consider Resolution No. 19-42 Approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat B) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19, Amending City Code Section 1007 Related to Multiple Principal Buildings on One Parcel, in Commercial, Industrial or Public/Semi-Public Zoning Districts, Michael Grochala Council may vote to dispense with full reading of the ordinance *Roll vote is required for adoption of the ordinance C) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19, Amending City Code Section 1007 Providing for Retaining Walls in Excess of 42” in Height, Michael Grochala Council may vote to dispense with full reading of the ordinance Roll vote is required for adoption of the ordinance D) Consider Resolution No. 19-43 Accepting Bids, Awarding a Construction Contract, and Approving Construction Services Contract, Diane Hankee 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. NEW BUSINESS None Adjournment Following adjournment of the regular meeting, the Council will reconvene in a closed session to discuss land acquisition related to the following projects: 1. NE Drainage Area (Peltier Outlet) Improvements 2. Lake Drive/Marketplace Dwelling Acquisition Council Agenda -3- April 8, 2019 Community Calendar – A Look Ahead April 8, 2019 through April 22, 2019 Wednesday, April 10 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Thursday, April 11 6:30 pm, Community Room Charter Commission Monday, April 22 5:30 pm, Council Work Session Community Room Monday, April 22 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting WS – Item 1 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 1 Date: April 8, 2019 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Re: 49 & J Redevelopment - Lyngblomsten Background The City Council discussed the potential establishment of a Tax Increment Financing district for the Lyngblomsten project at the April 1, 2019 work session. The City Council requested additional explanation on TIF and discussion on the potential duration of the district. Mikaela Huot of Baker Tilly (formerly Springsted), will provide updated information on the mechanics of the TIF district. An updated memo, which includes projected tax increment review based on the duration of the district, is enclosed for your review. The next steps in the process will include completion of the financial analysis, preparation of the TIF plan, and public hearing. Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting Council direction regarding the use of tax increment financing for the proposed Lyngblomsten project. Attachments 1. BakerTilly Memo, dated April 5, 2019 The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP trading as Baker Tilly is a member of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. © 2018 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Memo To: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director, City of Lino Lakes Sarah Cotton, Finance Director, City of Lino Lakes From: Mikaela Huot, Director Date: April 8, 2019 Subject: Application Review for Financial Assistance through Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for Proposed Lyngblomsten Senior Care Campus Housing Project Background The City of Lino Lakes has received an application for financial assistance through Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to assist with financing a portion of the extraordinary development costs related to the construction of an approximate 198-unit senior care campus and 19 adjacent rental town homes. The project also includes the acquisition of several properties on the corner of County Road J and CSAH 49 where t he senior housing development will not occur but will present future development opportunities. The total investment budget including acquisition of all properties is about $77M and includes approximately $9.6M of TIF eligible expenditures including site improvements, acquisition, and demolition. City Council will be discussing the application with City staff at the April 1 work session. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a summary of review status of the application and next steps Springsted will incorporate regarding the submitted materials. Included will be review of the development project costs, sources of revenue, and operating pro forma as provided by the developer to assist the City with making a determination if the project as proposed would be unlikely to proceed without the requested Tax Increment Financing (TIF) assistance, and to determine the appropriate amount, if any, of financial assistance based on TIF-eligible costs. Developer Request for Assistance Assistance has been requested for financing a portion of the costs associated with completion of the project. The developer has proposed the $77.2 million project will be funded by an estimated $9.8 million of equity and $66 million through a bank loan with a TIF request of $5.3 million. The developer’s submitted information provides that the request for assistance would be pay-as-you-financing as reimbursement for extraordinary development costs and has requested a term of 15 years. Additional analysis regarding the financing components, estimated amount of available tax increment revenues and the amount necessary for the project to proceed will need to occur as the project proceeds. The total estimated sources and uses of funds is shown below: The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP trading as Baker Tilly is a member of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. © 2018 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Sources Amount Uses Amount Equity $9,800,000 Property Acquisition $3,620,000 Debt $66,000,000 Building Costs $44,855,442 TIF * $5,300,000 Site Development $6,000,000 Soft Costs $19,570,162 Financing Costs $850,000 Contingencies $2,325,267 Total $77,220,871 Total $77,220,871 * TIF assistance would be provided as pay-as-you-go (reimbursement) and not upfront Tax Increment Financing Assumptions Springsted made certain assumptions to calculate the estimated amount of tax increment revenues generated by the project. Those assumptions include the following:  Range of collection term o 5, 7.5, 10 and 13.5 years  Minimum term up to developer request o Maximum term for housing districts is 26 years  25 years after receipt of first increment o First year taxes payable 2022  construction commences in 2019 and completed in 2020  Full year collected in 2022  Total base value for land and building o Housing District: $634,300  Parcel ID: 31-31-22-43-0018  Total completed value following development o Housing TIF District  100 independent living units valued at $21,990,000  50 assisted living units valued at $6,840,000  Total estimated taxable value of $28,830,000  Preliminary – based on construction cost estimates  Construction schedule o Commences in 2019 and complete in 2020 o Partial value as of assess Jan. 1, 2020 for taxes payable 2021 o Full value as of assess Jan. 1, 2021 for taxes payable 2022 o Election to delay receipt of first increment until full value realized  Payable 2019 tax rates constant o Combined rate of 117.574% o ISD 12 and watershed district included o Will change each year with actual rates  Tax rates, class rates and future market values o Rental (Housing TIF District)  1.25%  No annual market value inflator  Net present value o Discount rate of 5.0% o Subject to financing assumptions Tax Increment Revenue Estimates Based on the assumptions outlined above and the City’s past practice for terms of TIF Districts, the projected tax increment revenues that may be generated from the project are shown in the chart below. The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP trading as Baker Tilly is a member of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. © 2018 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Total Number of Years 5 7.5 10 13.5 Estimated Gross Annual Increment $412,893 $412,893 $412,893 $412,893 Estimated Annual City Retained (5%) $20,645 $20,645 $20,645 $20,645 Estimated Net Annual Increment (95%) $392,248 $392,248 $392,248 $392,248 Total Gross Tax Increment $2,064,465 $3,092,054 $4,128,930 $5,569,412 City Retainage (5%) $103,223 $154,603 $206,447 $278,471 Net Amount to Development (95%) $1,961,242 $2,937,451 $3,922,484 $5,290,941 The values for the townhomes would not be included within the boundaries of the TIF District and would be included within the taxing entities existing tax base once constructed and on the tax rolls. The construction schedule is assumed to be in conjunction with the senior care campus. In addition, redevelopment of the corner to include new commercial buildings would also enhance the tax bases and not be included in the district. Developer Pro forma But-For Analysis In approving a TIF district and project, the City must make several findings, including the “but for” test: that the proposed development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. The developer has stated the assistance is necessary due to the high costs of developing/redeveloping the site, including acquisition of the 17 -acre site, in addition to the properties on the corner to create a larger redevelopment opportunity. There are also significant public improvement and s ite development costs to allow access into the site. The project is unable to entirely support those extraordinary costs upon completion. Based on the developer’s stated position relative to the need for tax increment financing assistance, the City could make its “but for” finding and provide tax increment assistance. We recommend, however, that the City also consider an appropriate level and type of TIF assistance for the project based on the information submitted by the developer. The application includes a requested 15-year term of assistance to equal approximately $5.3 million. The City’s position relative to the use of tax increment has typically been to finance extraordinary costs and the level of assistance is in part dictated by the ‘extraordinary’ costs of the project. Historically, on past projects the maximum term of assistance has been about 5-6 years. Following thorough evaluation of the project as provided allows the City to be prepared to make an informed “but-for” decision based on the likelihood of the project needing assistance, as well as the appropriate level of assistance. The “but-for” test is used to determine whether a project is likely to proceed as proposed without the use of public dollars. To complete this analysis, we review the developer’s provided operating proforma and will also construct similar ten-year project proformas, showing a result if the developer receives the assistance as pay-as-you-go (reimbursement for TIF eligible costs) and showing a result if the devel oper does not receive assistance. Our analysis of the proformas include a review of the development budget, projected operating revenues and expenditures, and the project’s capacity to support annual debt service on the bank loan. The purpose of evaluating the operating proformas is to understand the potential returns to the developer through the initial development of the project and the operation of the enterprise over a period. A 10 -year period may not be indicative of the developer’s intended investment period. The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP trading as Baker Tilly is a member of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. © 2018 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Generally, should the rates of return lie below a reasonable range without assistance; we could assume the project as proposed would not move forward without assistance. Should the returns lie within a reasonable range with the assistance, we could assume the amount of assistance tested is appropriate for the project. All such estimates should be viewed as general indicators of performance and not exact forecasts. The number of current and future variables affecting these estimates and actual results are great. There is no set rate of return benchmarks that dictates whether a project needs TIF assistance or not; however, there are market/industry standards for certain types of projects, as well as more specific investor/developer thresholds tha t need to be achieved. An additional measure of project feasibility is the Debt Coverage Ratio (DCR), which is a calculation detailing the ratio by which operating income exceeds the debt-service payments for the project. If the DCR is greater than 1.0 it indicates the project has operating income that is greater than the debt -service payment by some margin; conversely if the DCR is less than 1.0 it indicates the project is incapable of meeting its debt -service payment and would need to seek additional revenue sources in order to pay its debt. Typical lending standards will require a DCR of significantly greater than 1.0 as a measure of cushion in the event actual revenues and expenses are different than projected. Project Financing There are generally two ways in which assistance can be provided for most projects, either upfront or on a pay- as-you-go basis. With upfront financing, the City would finance a portion of the developer’s initial project costs through the issuance of bonds or as an internal loan. Future tax increment would be collected by the City and used to pay debt service on the bonds or repayment of the internal loan. With pay-as-you-go financing, the developer would finance all project costs upfront and would be reimbursed over time for a portion of those costs as revenues are available. Pay-as-you-go-financing is generally more acceptable than upfront financing for the City because it shifts the risk for repayment to the developer. If tax increment revenues are less than originally projected, the developer receives less and therefore bears the risk of not being reimbursed the full amount of their financing. However, in some cases pay as you go financing may not be financially feasible. With bonds, the City would still need to make debt service payments and would have to use other sources to fill any shortfall of tax increment revenues. With internal financing, the City reimburses the loan with future revenue collections and may risk not repaying itself in full if tax increment revenues are not sufficient. The developer’s financial information includes pay-as- you-go financing. Conclusion Per the submitted application for assistance, the developer has requested approximately $5.3 million over 15 years as related to development of the project site and construction of a senior care campus. Through the submission of the tax increment financing application and supporting financial information, the developer has indicated that the project as proposed would not occur on the current site without financial assistance from the City due to extraordinary costs associated with acquisition of the additional properties and site development/infrastructure improvements. We recommend additional review as the project proceeds rel ating to the following:  Identification of extraordinary project costs for reimbursement o Acquisition of redevelopment properties o Installation of public improvements  Estimated amount of assistance necessary for the project to proceed o Number of years required  City preference of reduced term (as short as possible)  Developer request of 15 years Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to the City of Lino Lakes. Please contact me at 651.223.3036 or 651.368.2533 or mhuot@springsted.com with any questions or comments. City Council Worksession Proposed Lyngblomsten Senior Care Campus Presenter: Mikaela Huot, Director Baker Tilly City of Lino Lakes April 8, 2019 1 Proposed Senior Care Campus 2 City received application for financial assistance Tax increment financing (housing) Term of 15 years totaling approximately $5.3 million Approximate $77 million total developer investment Includes acquisition, site development and infrastructure improvements, contingency, hard construction and soft costs $28.8 million within district boundaries (senior building) Tax Increment Financing 3 A method of capturing tax base growth resulting from new development Increment captured to pay for public costs and improvements related to development Fixed term for capture, then new development capacity is added to existing tax base Property owners within district pay taxes like all property owners Base Value –value before development or redevelopment How TIF Revenue is Derived 4New developmentTaxes continue to flow to city, county, school, etc. Taxes “captured” for the term of the TIF district Tax Increment Financing (TIF) 5 Incremental Taxes (portion used to finance TIF-eligible expenditures) New Tax Base (post -project; flows to General Fund and all taxing jurisdictions ) Existing Tax Base (frozen at start of project; continues to flow to all taxing jurisdictions)Annual Taxes Generated (Dollars)Duration of TIF District (Years) $ $$$$ $$$$$ $$$ $$First YearLast Year Project Area (Development District) TIF District (Specific Project or Projects) -TIF Plan Budget Geographic boundaries Purpose -Public Hearing -Certification How a TIF District is Created 6 TIF District 2 TIF District 1 Project Area/ Development District Proposed Senior Care Campus 7 Entire proposed project would include Senior care campus building 150 independent and assisted living units 48 skilled care nursing units Underground parking Approximately 19 townhomes North of senior building Restaurant pad and adjacent retail South of senior building Proposed Senior Care Campus 8 Boundaries of proposed district Senior care campus (198 units) Independent and assisted living units taxable and generate future increment Skilled care units tax exempt $392,248 projected net increment (95% of total) Townhomes and all retail/commercial value excluded Taxes not captured and could commence as phased Estimated City share only of taxes approximately $36,000 Proposed Development 9 Area A: Townhomes Est. Value: $6.0M Est. Total Tax: $105k City Share: $31k Area B: Commercial/Retail Est. Value: $3.3M Est. Total Tax: $119k (est.) City Share: $17k (est.) Area C: Independent/Assisted Living Est. Value: $28.8M Est. Total Tax: $505k Available Increment*: $392k City Share Post TIF: $150k *increment 95% of total tax Area D: Skilled Care Est. Value: Exempt Est. Total Tax: NA City Share: NA City receives taxes –taxes year 1 City receives increment for project development Tax exempt portion of building Proposed Senior Care Campus 10 Pay -as-you-go (PayGO ) financing Entire project financed upfront by developer Developer pays annual property taxes Reimbursed over time, to the extent increment is available Based on terms of agreement Proposed Senior Care Campus 11 Pay -as-you-go (PayGO ) financing Entire project financed upfront by developer Developer pays annual property taxes Reimbursed over time, to the extent increment is available Based on terms of agreement Tax Increment Revenue Estimate Scenarios 12 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Number of Years 5.5 7.5 10.5 13.5 Estimated Gross Increment 2,266,268 3,092,054 4,330,733 5,569,412 Est. City Retained (5%)113,313 154,603 216,537 278,471 Est. Net Increment (95%)2,152,955 2,937,451 4,114,196 5,290,941 What Drives the “Gap” or Need for Public Assistance? 13 Extraordinary redevelopment costs Extraordinary public improvement development costs “Oversizing” of utility and infrastructure for future growth Development needs more than it can pay for Extraordinary affordable housing costs Due Diligence Financial Review 14 Developer has submitted application for financial assistance Evaluation process including legal and financial to determine Qualification as Housing TIF District Financial gap exists to warrant need for public assistance CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 25, 2019 DRAFT 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 MINUTES 2 3 DATE : March 25, 2019 4 TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5 TIME ENDED : 6:28 p.m. 6 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Maher, 7 Manthey, Stoesz and Mayor Reinert 8 MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9 10 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development 11 Director Michael Grochala; Utilities Supervisor Justin Williams; City Engineer Diane 12 Hankee; City Clerk Julie Bartell 13 14 Review Regular Council Agenda of March 25, 2019 – 15 16 There were no questions on the Consent Agenda. 17 18 Item 3A – Ordinance Amending Chapter 208 (Public Safety Department) – Action will be 19 postponed to the next meeting. Mayor Reinert will be proposing some changes. He 20 would like those sent to all council members. 21 22 Item 3B – Ordinance Amending Chapter 205 (City Administrator Position) - 23 Administrator Karlson explained that the changes will: a) clarify that the Public Safety 24 Director reports to the City Administrator; and b) authorize administrative hire of certain 25 temporary positions, when they are budgeted. 26 27 Item 3C – Ordinance Amending Chapter 207 (Personnel Policy) - Administrator Karlson 28 explained that the ordinance removes some obsolete language relative to human resource 29 functions. 30 31 Item 5A – Civic Center Roof Replacement Project - Justin Williams, Utilities Supervisor, 32 explained that the resolution requests that the bid and construction contract be awarded 33 for the Civic Center Roof Replacement Project. He reviewed the bid results. One goal is 34 to get a better seal between the flat and the sloped roofs. The council asked if staff is 35 familiar with the company that is proposed; staff will do more research on that matter. 36 37 Item 5B – Arena Acres Park Project - Justin Williams, Utilities Supervisor, explained that 38 the resolution would award a contract for the Arena Acres Park Project (tennis and trail 39 improvements). 40 41 Item 5C – Well No. 1, Rehabilitation Project – City Engineer Hankee reviewed the 42 written staff report, requesting authorization to contract with WSB & Associates to 43 prepare plans and specifications for the project. 44 45 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 25, 2019 DRAFT 2 Item 6A – Amendments to Designated MSA Street System – City Engineer Hankee 46 reviewed the amendments proposed by the City and accepted by the State. The changes 47 will add revenue to the City’s MSA allotment. She noted that the changes do bring the 48 City to the 20% of city roadways maximum. 49 50 Item 6B – NorthPointe 7th Addition, Development Agreement – City Engineer Hankee 51 reported that this represents a trail that would be constructed as part of the 7th Addition of 52 the development. The trail project represents an amendment to the development 53 agreement. She noted the map included in the staff report. 54 55 Item 6C – Local Water Plan – City Engineer Hankee reported that staff is requesting that 56 the council adopt the water plan that has previously been reviewed and has now been 57 accepted by the Watershed District. The land use map will be updated based on the plan. 58 59 Item 6D – West Shadow Lake Road Improvement Project Change Order No. 1 – City 60 Engineer Hankee noted that the council heard about the change order at the last meeting; 61 she explained the proposed funding (Closed Bond Fund). It is hoped that weather will 62 allow blacktop removal to begin mid-April. 63 64 Mayor Reinert remarked that he has heard from a few residents, some not happy because 65 of the conditions. What is the immediate plan to deal with current conditions? Utilities 66 Supervisor Williams noted that Public Works personnel has been out addressing 67 problems as they can; they have gotten a few thumbs up for the work. 68 69 Item 6E – East Cedar St and Elmcrest Avenue Improvement Project – City Engineer 70 Hankee quickly reviewed the written staff report. 71 72 The remainder of the agenda was reviewed briefly. 73 74 The meeting was adjourned at 6:29 p.m. 75 76 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 77 April 8, 2019. 78 79 80 81 82 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 83 84 COUNCIL MINUTES March 25, 2019 DRAFT 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 MINUTES 2 3 4 DATE : March 25, 2019 5 TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 6 TIME ENDED : 7:30 p.m. 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Maher, 8 Manthey, Stoesz and Mayor Reinert 9 MEMBERS ABSENT : 10 11 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development Director Michael 12 Grochala; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Utilities Supervisor Justin Williams; and City Clerk Julie 13 Bartell 14 15 PUBLIC COMMENT 16 17 No one was present to address the council regarding a matter not on the agenda. 18 19 SETTING THE AGENDA 20 21 The agenda was amended to table Item 3A. 22 23 CONSENT AGENDA 24 25 Council Member Maher moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1H, as presented. 26 Council Member Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. (Abstain – Maher 27 Item 1B; Manthey Items 1C, 1D and 1E; Rafferty Item 1F) 28 29 ITEM ACTION 30 31 Consideration of Expenditures: 32 33 March 25, 2019 (Check No. 109883 – 34 109972, $636,527.35) Approved 35 36 March 4, 2019 Council Work Session Minutes Approved 37 38 March 11, 2019 City Council Meeting Minutes Approved 39 40 March 11, 2019 Minutes – Interviews Approved 41 42 March 11, 20189 Minutes – Interviews Approved 43 44 March 5, 2019 Minutes – Jt Mtg with P&Z Board Approved 45 COUNCIL MINUTES March 25, 2019 DRAFT 2 46 Consider Resolution 19-41, Approving a Peddler/Solicitor 47 License for Edward Jones – Daniel Chrzanowski Approved 48 49 Consider Resolution 19-41, Approving Declaration of 50 Restrictive Covenant for Main Street Shoppes 2nd Addn Approved 51 52 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 53 54 There was no report from the Finance Department. 55 56 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 57 3A) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 2-19, Amending Chapter 208 of the Lino Lakes 58 City Code Providing for a Public Safety Department – 59 Item 3A was tabled by the council. 60 3B) i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 3-19, Amending Chapter 205 of the City 61 Code; ii. Consider Resolution No. 19-38, Approving a Summary of Ordinance No. 3-19 for 62 Publication Administrator Karlson reviewed the proposed changes: 63 - Strike language that exempts the Public Safety Director as a direct report to the City 64 Administrator; 65 - Exclude “temporary” employees from needing council approval for hire. 66 Council Member Maher moved to waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 03-19. Council Member 67 Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 68 Council Member Maher moved to approve the 2nd Reading and passage of Ordinance No. 03-19 as 69 presented. Council Member Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none. 70 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-38 as presented. Council Member Stoesz 71 seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 72 3C) i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 4-19, Amending Chapter 207; ii. Consider 73 Resolution No. 19-39, Approving a Summary of Ordinance No. 4-19 for Publication – 74 Administrator Karlson explained that this is a minor change, amending language certain language 75 relating to the Human Resources Department. 76 Council Member Maher moved to waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 04-19. Council Member 77 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 78 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the 2nd Reading and passage of Ordinance No. 04-19 as 79 presented. Council Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none. 80 COUNCIL MINUTES March 25, 2019 DRAFT 3 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-39 as presented. Council Member Stoesa 81 seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 82 3D) Consider Appointment of Police Officer – Administrator Karlson reviewed the written 83 recommendation to hire Mr. Kenny Sinna for the vacant police officer position. 84 Council Member Manthey moved to approve the appointment of Kenny Sinna as recommended. 85 Council Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 86 87 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 88 89 There was no report from the Public Safety Department. 90 91 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 92 5A) Consider Resolution No. 19-35, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction Contract for 93 Civic Complex Roof Replacement Project – Utilities Supervisor Williams requested that the 94 council approve the resolution. He reviewed the written report outlining staff’s recommendation to 95 proceed with the low bidder. 96 Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 19-35 as presented. Council Member 97 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 98 5B) Consider Resolution No. 19-36, Awarding Contracts for Arena Acres Park Project – 99 Utilities Supervisor Williams requested that the Council approve the resolution. He reviewed the 100 written report outlining staff’s recommendation to award a contract for the project (tennis courts and 101 trail). Funding was reviewed (Parks and Trails Improvement Fund). 102 Mayor Reinert spoke in favor of the project. A tennis court was removed and residents were not 103 happy. This will provide a new tennis court as well as a trail. 104 Council Member Stoesz asked if it would ever make sense for staff to build the trails. Mr. Williams 105 suggested that trail development would decidedly take away from the other important work of the 106 parks department. 107 Mayor Reinert offered thanks to Council Member Rafferty for his work in knocking doors in the 108 neighborhood to see how residents wanted to proceed. 109 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 19-36 as presented. Council Member 110 Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 111 5C) Consider Resolution No. 19-37, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications, 112 Well No. 1 Rehabilitation Project – City Engineer Hankee requested that the council approve this 113 resolution that would allow staff to proceed with preparation of plans and specifications for the well 114 rehabilitation project. The plans would be prepared by WSB & Associates. When asked, Ms. 115 Hankee said staff expects the project to remain within the budget of $225,000. 116 COUNCIL MINUTES March 25, 2019 DRAFT 4 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 19-39 as presented. Council Member 117 Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 118 119 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT 120 6A) Consider Resolution No. 19-26, Approving Amendments to the Designated Municipal 121 State Aid (MSA) Street System – City Engineer Hankee explained that staff is recommending that 122 the council approve certain amendments to those streets in the city that are designated as MSA. With 123 this action, the City would be maximizing the amount of roadway that can be designated as well as 124 enhancing MSA revenue to the City. 125 Council Member Stoesz clarified that although the City sees this as enhanced revenue, it originates 126 from gas tax paid by gas consumers. 127 Council Member Rafferty asked if this an annual review? Ms. Hankee said it has been done 128 regularly. 129 Mayor Reinert remarked that these funds have grown markedly during his tenure on the council. Also 130 the amount of City funds that are designated for street work has grown. He noted the City’s 131 Pavement Management Plan as the document that guides the replacement/rehabilitation of roads. 132 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-26 as presented. Council Member 133 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 134 6B) Consider Resolution No. 19-28, Approving Amended Development Agreement, 135 Northpointe 7th Addition– City Engineer Hankee reported that the amendment requested would 136 provide for construction of a trail. This change requires amendment of the development agreement 137 for the NorthPointe 7th Addition. 138 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-28 as presented. Council Member 139 Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 140 6C) Consider Resolution No. 19-32, Adopting Local Water Plan– City Engineer Hankee 141 explained that the resolution would provide for the council’s adoption of the Local Water Plan (City). 142 The plan was approved by the council for distribution and has since been approved by the watershed 143 district with minor adjustments. Staff is recommending adoption of the plan. She noted that the plan 144 will have to be updated in the area of land use maps. 145 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-32 as presented. Council Member 146 Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 147 6D) Consider Resolution No. 19-27, Approving Change Order No. 1, West Shadow Lake 148 Area Improvement Project– City Engineer Hankee first updated the council on the project schedule. 149 She then reported that the resolution would approve a change order, requested by the residents, that 150 would extend curbing. The change will be funded through the closed bond fund for the project. 151 Mayor Reinert said he’s been in the area and knows the current road conditions are challenging. He 152 announced that the project (beginning with the removal of bituminous) will start next month and that 153 will be an improvement. 154 COUNCIL MINUTES March 25, 2019 DRAFT 5 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-27 as presented. Council Member 155 Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 156 6E) Consider Resolution No. 19-33, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications, 157 East Cedar Street & Elmcrest Avenue Improvement Project– City Engineer Hankee said that staff 158 is requesting authorization to proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications for this project. 159 The City has already entered into a collaboration agreement (JPA) to share certain project costs. She 160 noted the estimated project costs and funding sources. Also WSB & Associates has submitted a 161 proposal to prepare the necessary background work. She reviewed the proposed project schedule. 162 Council Member Manthey said he knows from speaking with residents in that area that they are very 163 much looking forward to the improvements. 164 Council Member Stoesz asked, with the completion of this project, how many gravel roads remain? 165 Staff noted Pine Street and one other area. Council Member Stoesz wondered if there will be Public 166 Works equipment that will no longer be needed. Staff will investigate. 167 Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 19-33 as presented. Council Member 168 Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 169 6F) Consider Resolution No. 19-34, Approving Pay Request No. 1 and Final, 2019 Surface 170 Water Improvement Project– City Engineer Hankee reviewed the written report. There will be 171 additional projects brought forward based on available funding. 172 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-34 as presented. Council Member 173 Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 174 6G) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19, Amending City Code Section 1007 Related 175 to Multiple Principal Buildings on One Parcel, in Commercial, Industrial or Public/Semi-Public 176 Zoning Districts– Community Development Director Grochala reviewed the zoning ordinance 177 amendment. This would change current language to allow multiple buildings in certain cases 178 through the conditional use permit process. Previously a Planned Unit Development process was 179 required. 180 Council Member Maher moved to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19 as presented. 181 Council Member Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 182 6H) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19, Amending City Code Section 1007, 183 Providing for Retaining Walls in Excess of 42” in Height – Community Development Director 184 Grochala reviewed the zoning ordinance amendment. The current restriction on retaining walls 185 height would be changed. 186 Mayor Reinert suggested that this is a common sense change. 187 Council Member Manthey remarked that this should help individual homeowners who work on their 188 property; it makes the requirements easier to understand. 189 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19 as presented. 190 Council Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 191 192 COUNCIL MINUTES March 25, 2019 DRAFT 6 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 193 194 There was no Unfinished Business. 195 196 NEW BUSINESS 197 198 There was no New Business. 199 200 COMMUNITY EVENTS 201 202 SPRING FLING will be held Friday, April 12 at 6:15 pm. For more information, please contact the 203 Parks & Recreation Department. 204 205 COMMUNITY CALENDAR 206 207 Community Calendar – A Look Ahead 208 March 27, 2019 through April 8, 2019 209 210 Wednesday, March 27 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Environmental Board 211 Monday, April 1 6:00 p.m., Community Room Council Work Session 212 Monday, April 1 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Park Board 213 Thursday, April 4 8:00 a.m., Community Room EDAC 214 Monday, April 8 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers City Council Meeting 215 216 ADJOURN 217 218 There being no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. 219 220 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, April 8, 2019 221 222 223 224 225 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 226 227 CLOSED COUNCIL SESSION March 25, 2019 DRAFT 1 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 2 MINUTES 3 CLOSED COUNCIL SESSION 4 5 DATE : March 25, 2019 6 TIME STARTED : 7:35 p.m. 7 TIME ENDED : 8:05 p.m. 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Members Rafferty, Manthey, 9 Maher, Stoesz and Mayor Reinert 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : none 11 12 Staff present: Community Development Director Michael Grochala; City Clerk Julie 13 Bartell (part) 14 15 Mayor Reinert called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. in the Council Work Room at Lino 16 Lakes City Hall. Before the meeting was closed, Mayor Reinert read a statement on the 17 purpose of the meeting. The meeting was closed as a session of the city council pursuant 18 to the Open Meeting Law for the purpose of discussing land acquisition related to the 19 following projects: 20 - NE Drainage Area (Peliter Outlet) Improvements; 21 - Lake Drive/Marketplace dwelling acquisition 22 23 The meeting was recorded and the recording will be maintained as required in the Office 24 of the City Clerk. 25 26 The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m. 27 28 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 29 April 8, 2019. 30 31 32 33 34 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 35 36 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 1E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues, Deputy Clerk MEETING DATE: April 29, 2019 TOPIC: Consider Resolution 19-46, Approving a Peddler License for Big Bell Ice Cream Inc. VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND Big Bell Ice Cream, Inc., 5951 University Avenue NE, #425, Fridley has submitted a peddler’s license application to the city clerk's office. The company representative who would be working in Lino Lakes is Mr. Jon Samuelson. He plans to travel through the Lino Lakes’ neighborhoods selling pre-packaged ice cream novelties. The City has received all the necessary forms required to issue this company a license. The Lino Lakes Public Safety Department has performed a background check and indicated no reason to deny the application. The application and all other required information is on file in the city clerk's office for review. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. 19-46, Approving the issuance of a Peddler License for a six month period commencing April 9, 2019 through October 9, 2019. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-46 RESOLUTION APPROVING PEDDLERS LICENSE WHEREAS, Big Bell Ice Cream, Inc., has submitted a peddlers license application to the city clerk's office; and WHEREAS, Big Bell Ice Cream, Inc. has complied with all of the provisions of Chapter 613 of the Lino Lakes City Code for obtaining the necessary license for a for-profit business; and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Public Safety Department has conducted a background check on the company representative in the past 12 months on Mr. Jon Randall Samuelson; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota: Mr. Jon Samuelson, an employee of Big Bell Ice Cream, Inc., is hereby authorized to vend for a period of six-months beginning April 9, 2019 and ending October 9, 2019. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of April, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _____________and was duly seconded by Council Member _____________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: _____________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator MEETING DATE: April 8, 2019 TOPIC: Update to Personnel Policy VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION The Council is being asked to consider Resolution No. 19-31, which updates one section of the Lino Lakes Personnel Policy. BACKGROUND Staff periodically reviews the City’s Personnel Policy and recommends updates as needed. Staff is proposing a revision to Section 6.5, which inserts a time parameter for paying out the difference between workers’ compensation and employee wages to a limit of 90 days. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 19-31 ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 19-31 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-31 APPROVING UPDATE TO PERSONNEL POLICY WHEREAS, periodically staff reviews the City’s Personnel Policy to make sure it is up-to-date and provides staff with appropriate controls for internal Personnel Administration; and, WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the Personnel Policy and recommends a modification to Section 6.5 Workers’ Compensation; and, WHEREAS, Section 6.5 Workers’ Compensation shall now include a time parameter for paying out the difference between workers’ compensation and employee wages at a limit of 90 days. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA, that the aforementioned update to the City of Lino Lakes Personnel Policy is hereby approved. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 8th day of April 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _____________and was duly seconded by Council Member _____________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: ___________________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 3B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator MEETING DATE: April 8, 2019 TOPIC: Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 02-19, Amending Chapter 208 VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION The City Council is being asked to consider the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 02-19, amending Chapter 208 of the Lino Lakes City Code Providing for a Public Safety Department. The first reading was approved March 11, 2019. BACKGROUND Staff has been in the process of revising ordinances that need updating to align with the City’s current organizational structure. The proposed amendment of Chapter 208 incorporates the City’s fire services into the Public Safety Department by including cross-trained police officers/firefighters and firefighters in the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of Ordinance No. 02-19 with the following actions: 1. Dispense with the full reading of the ordinance; 2. Roll call vote for adoption of the ordinance. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance No. 02-19 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4A STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Swenson, Public Safety Director MEETING DATE: April 8, 2019 TOPIC: Donate Wellness Equipment to North Memorial Ambulance VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION The City of Lino Lakes Ordinance 213.07 authorizes the Public Safety Department to dispose of City owned property in a manner authorized by a majority vote of the City Council. Staff is seeking Council approval to donate two pieces of wellness equipment to North Memorial Ambulance. BACKGROUND In August of 2016, Snap Fitness donated used wellness/exercise equipment to the Public Safety Department for use by staff. As part of this donation a Cybex Treadmill (Model 515T Sport; Serial # Z12-01515T9214NN013) and a Cybex Arc Trainer (Model 600A; Serial # Z12- 01600A9214N15759) were placed at the Fire Station #1. Due to the remodel of the Fire Station #1 there is no room to place this equipment. The Staff of North Memorial Ambulance has requested this wellness equipment be donated to their Forest Lake station for use by their staff. This donation will save the City the cost of disposal of this equipment. RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Public Safety Department to donate a Cybex Treadmill and Cybex Arc Trainer to North Memorial Ambulance. ATTACHMENTS None CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director MEETING DATE: April 8, 2019 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No.19-45, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction Contract for Woods Edge Park, Rick DeGardner VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The City Council approved Resolution 19-15 (Ordering the Project, Approving Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing Advertisement of Bids for the Woods Edge Park Project) on January 28, 2019. Bids were received and opened on Thursday, February 28, 2019. A total of seven bids were received as follows: Engineers Estimate $180,656.75 Dunaway Construction $119,315.06 Pember Companies, Inc. $142,316.10 Odesa II $146,380.00 GL Contracting $148,851.90 Blackstone Contractors $167,768.00 Northland Excavating $184,905.75 Urban Companies $213,260.00 The bid tabulation indicates the low bidder as Dunaway Construction, Columbus, MN, in the amount of $119,315.06 for the base bid plus all alternates. The recommended funding is from the Dedicated Parks Fund. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 19-45. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 19-45 2. WSB Memorandum, dated March 8 3. Depiction of Project Limits CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-45 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR WOODS EDGE PARK WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 19-15 (Ordering the Project, Approving Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing Advertisement of Bids for the Woods Edge Park Project) on January 28, 2019; and WHEREAS, bids were received and opened on February 28, 2019. A total of seven bids were received as follows; and Dunaway Construction $119,315.06 Pember Companies, Inc. $142,316.10 Odesa II $146,380.00 GL Contracting $148,851.90 Blackstone Contractors $167,768.00 Northland Excavating $184,905.75 Urban Companies $213,260.00 WHEREAS, the bid tabulation indicates the low bidder as Dunaway Construction, Columbus, MN, in the amount of $119,315.06 for the base bid plus all alternates; and WHEREAS, funding is from the Dedicated Parks Fund. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council hereby authorizes staff to enter into a contract with Dunaway Construction for the Woods Edge Park Project. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 8th day of April, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: ______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk K:\012206-000\Admin\Construction Admin\Bidding\R-012206-000 LOR-030419.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM March 8, 2019 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Woods Edge Playground City of Lino Lakes WSB Project No. R-012206-000 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Bids were received for the above-referenced project on Thursday, February 28, 2019, and were opened and read aloud. A total of seven bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and tabulated and any errors made on the Proposal Form have been corrected and highlighted with orange. The Engineer’s Estimate was $180,656.75 for the base bid plus all alternates. The bid tabulation indicates the low bidder as Dunaway Construction, Columbus, MN, in the amount of $119,315.06 for base bid plus all alternates. We recommend that the City consider these bids and award a contract to Dunaway Construction, based on the results of the bids received. Sincerely, WSB Candace Amberg, PLA Senior Associate Attachments: Bid Tabulatin cc: Kevin Dunaway, Dunaway Construction Rick DeGardner, City of Lino Lakes Candace Amberg, WSB ar 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: April 8, 2019 TOPIC: Lyngblomsten Senior Living Community i. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 07-19 Rezoning Property from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development ii. Consider Resolution No. 19-42 Approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION The applicant, Lyngblomsten, has submitted a land use application for Rezoning, PUD Development Stage Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review for the development of a senior living community, future restaurant and future commercial building. The 20 acre site is located in the northwest quadrant of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street). Development of the site is guided by the Council adopted Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J (“Master Plan”). A PUD Concept Plan was reviewed by City’s Advisory Boards and the Council from May to August 2018. This staff report contains review of the 20 acre preliminary plat and site plan review of the Phase I senior living community. Separate site plan reviews will be required for development of the Phase 2 restaurant and Phase 3 commercial development. The February 13, 2019 Planning & Zoning Staff report was based on plans submitted in January 2019. The plans have been revised based on Board, staff and resident comments. This Council staff report is based on the following revised submittal documents: • Preliminary Plat Sheet 1 prepared by Loucks dated March 11, 2019 • Boundary and Topographic Survey Sheets 1-3 prepared by Loucks dated September 5, 2018 • Tree Survey Sheets 1-2 prepared by Loucks dated October 4, 2018 • Civil Plan Set Sheets C0.0-C2.13 prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates, Inc. dated March 11, 2019 • Landscape Plans Sheets L1.0-L3.0 prepared by Colberg Tews dated March 11, 2019 • Photometric Plans Sheets 1-2 prepared by Visual dated January 11, 2019 2 • Architectural Plans Sheets A1-A17 prepared by Wold Architects and Engineers dated March 11, 2019 • Storm Water Management Report, prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates dated March 11, 2019 BACKGROUND Lyngblomsten History Incorporated in 1906, Lyngblomsten is a Christian nonprofit social ministry organization serving older adults and their families through healthcare, housing, and community-based services. The award-winning organization has been recognized for its innovation in person- centered care, technology, engagement of volunteers, and community services for those with memory loss. Lyngblomsten’s first building opened in 1912 on the same property from where they serve today at Midway Parkway and Pascal Street in Saint Paul (referred to as our Como Park campus), 12 miles from the proposed Lino Lakes campus. Today, their Como Park campus includes a 225-bed skilled nursing facility, two senior housing buildings with 165 units, and the offices of their Community Services department, which provides resources, opportunities, and services to hundreds of older adults living in their own homes in the east metro area. Many community partners, including about 50 churches, are engaged to help deliver on their mission of providing a ministry of compassionate care and innovative services for older adults in order to preserve and enhance their quality of life. As they look to the future, Lyngblomsten’s goal is to develop a second continuum-of-care campus that will become a vital part of the Lino Lakes community. The proposed Lino Lakes development will be owned and managed by Lyngblomsten for generations to come. The pursuit of a second campus is part of the five-year Strategic Priorities approved by the Lyngblomsten Board of Directors in late 2014. In 2018, the Lyngblomsten Board voted to enter into a Purchase Agreement to purchase property and develop a campus for older adults in Lino Lakes. General Site Plan Overview Lyngblomsten is proposing a 3 phased approach to redevelopment of 6 parcels totaling 20 acres located in the northwest quadrant of CSAH49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street). • Phase 1 is the senior living community consisting of the following housing options: • Cottage Homes = 20 units • Senior Living Campus o Independent Living = 100 units o Assisted-living = 50 units o Skilled Nursing Facility = 48 units o TOTAL UNITS = 218 total units 3 The market rate cottage homes are 1,400 sf single level cottages with 2 bedrooms and an attached 21’ x 21’ garage. The senior living community independent and assisted-living units are market-rate and mid- range in price with a variety of 1- and 2-bedroom units and heated underground parking. The community also includes complementary campus amenities such as a Life Enrichment Center (2nd Half Lyngblomsten), main floor town center with bistro style or fine dining, a pub, cinema, chapel, fitness center and gift shop. The development also includes a 4,600 sf club house with game room, kitchen and lounge. • Phase 2 is a stand-alone 6,000 sf restaurant with outdoor patio • Phase 3 is future commercial development The senior living community and restaurant are located on one existing 17 acre parcel. The future commercial development will be a redevelopment of the remaining 5 parcels (3 acres) which is currently occupied by an insurance business, vacant liquor store and recently demolished 49 Club. The development is accessed from CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) via an internal public road and two private roads. Existing Site Conditions The main 17 acre site (Phase 1 and 2) has a single family house and several accessory buildings on it. These will be removed during construction. A rural residential development abuts the parcel to the north (Rohavic Oaks) and a single family residential development abuts on the west (Woodridge Estates). A variety of commercial uses exists to the east and south. CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) is the east boundary and CR J is the south boundary. The MLCCS shows that land cover is a mix of forest, cultivated, and herbaceous groundcover. A 0.88 acres wetland is in the northwest corner of the site. Aerial photos show that a large portion of the site is covered by trees. A three-phase overhead power line runs along the eastern boundary of the property line within the right-of-way. The remaining 5 parcels (Phase 3) are approximately 3 acres and abut the CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) intersection. Two commercial buildings exist (liquor store and insurance building). The old 49 Club restaurant was demolished in October 2016 and is currently vacant land. Zoning, Land Use and Density Current Zoning GB, General Business Current Land Use Rural Residential and Commercial 2030 Future Land Use Mixed Use (Master Planning Study- Hodgson Road and CR J) Density = 8-15 units per acre 4 Proposed 2040 Future Land Use Signature Gateway District Density = 8-10 units per acre Utility Staging Area Stage 1A (2008-2015) Per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the site is guided mixed use and per the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan, it is guided Signature Gateway. The parcels will be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement the Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J. The Master Plan covers approximately 60 acres of land on both the west and east sides of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). The Comprehensive Plan states that all development in the area must be consistent with the Master Plan. It assumed that approximately half of the 60 acre area would develop with residential uses at approximately 10 units per acre overall. The Comprehensive Plan identifies a density range from 8 to 15 units per acre for the Mixed Use District portion. The proposed development would have a net density of 9.36 units per acre on site, which is consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan and Master Plan. Gross Area (acres) 20.47 Wetlands & Water Bodies (0.28) Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW (1.79) Other (Utility Transmission Easement) 0.00 Other (Wetland Buffer Area) (0.24) Net Area (acres) 18.16 # of Units1 170 Gross Density (units/acre) 8.30 Net Density (units/acre) 9.36 1Per Met Council, skilled nursing facilities/units are not counted toward a community’s net residential density. 218 total units - 48 SNF =170 units. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve South Commercial (City of Shoreview) Commercial (City of Shoreview) Commercial (City of Shoreview) East GB General Business Commercial Mixed Use West R-1X, Single Family Executive Single Family Residential Low Density Residential 5 Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J The development of this property is guided by the Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J (“Master Plan”), which was approved by the City Council in 2007 via Resolution No. 07-21. The Master Plan anticipated a mix of residential and commercial uses on the site, specifically noting that the mixed use district “would allow for, though not mandate, the inclusion of residential units, possibly in multi-story buildings. This would provide customers for the commercial development, and the commercial services would be convenient to the residents.” The Master Plan had four objectives: 1. Identify appropriate land uses (present and future) in the study area. 2. Plan for road improvements to provide good access and circulation. 3. Identify routing & phasing solutions for utilities to facilitate future development. 4. Plan for redevelopment while recognizing existing businesses. The Master Plan identifies planning and redevelopment requirements related to site configuration, transportation and access, trails and open space, municipal utilities, site design and urban form and stormwater management that should be incorporated into proposed developments. These requirements are detailed below. Planning and Development Requirements (The following bullets and italicized text are requirements of the Master Plan. Staff comments follow in regular text.) General • This Master Plan is to be incorporated into the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan with an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. This includes amendments to the Proposed Land Use Map: the area east of Hodgson Road should be designated Mixed Use instead of Commercial. Minor inconsistencies in the Proposed Land Use Map should be corrected as well, and zoning amendments should follow if and when appropriate. The Master Plan was adopted as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and will also be incorporated into the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. • Rezoning as part of new development applications will be examined for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and this 49/J Master Plan. The site is currently guided mixed use and zoned GB, General Business and will be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement the Master Plan. • The Master Plan is the guiding plan for development in the area. The Master Plan is intended to show a general land use arrangement with some specific design elements. The individual site layouts and uses are to be determined as part of the development review process, but should be based on the Master Plan, including specific elements noted below. 6 The Master Plan generally envisions townhome housing on the north and west portions of the site with a mix of residential and commercial uses on southern portions of the site. The Master Plan notes that “individual site layouts and uses are to be determined as part of the development review process.” The proposed Lyngblomsten senior living community proposes 20 cottage homes on the north end and a senior living campus on the eastern edge along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). Commercial development on the southern portion of the site includes a restaurant and future commercial pad that is intended to be built by this developer in the future. Additionally, this type of senior living campus does serve as an employment center for the staff. The City has previously treated assisted living facilities as commercial uses in both the Legacy development (Lino Lakes Assisted Living) and with Gracewood Assisted Living. • Tax increment financing and tax abatement on qualifying properties should be considered potential tools for implementing the Master Plan. The applicant is requesting tax incremental financing to assist with the development of this project. Overall, the proposed development is consistent with the general goals of the Master Plan. Transportation and Access • Accesses to Hodgson Road and Co. Rd. J are to be located at the points indicated on the Master Plan. o There is to be one full access on Hodgson Road, located 990± feet north of the CR J intersection (approx. 330 feet south of the northern edge of the study area). This access is to be centered on the property line east of Hodgson at this location. No other new permanent accesses are to be allowed. As development occurs, the City will work toward eliminating all other accesses along Hodgson. The City of Lino Lakes, the City of Shoreview, Anoka County and Ramsey County have spent several months working with the applicant on right-of-way needs and access points to the development. Access to Hodgson Road is proposed at two locations: a full movement access approximately 1000 feet north of CR J, consistent with the Master Plan and a right-in/right-out access approximately 440 feet north of CR J. This second access is being considered to improve circulation and accessibility to the site and is recommended by staff. o West of Hodgson Rd., there is to be one access onto CR J, located as far west as possible from the Hodgson/CR J intersection. This new access is to be constructed as right in/right out only. This will be a driveway into the development site, and there will be access easements on that site to provide access to, from, and through property to the north, leading to the full access on Hodgson. No other new accesses are to be allowed. The City will work toward eliminating all other accesses along CR J. A right-in/right-out access on CR J approximately 300 feet west of Hodgson Road is proposed which is consistent with the Master Plan. The City of Lino Lakes and the applicant are 7 analyzing other options that could push that access point even further to the west. Anoka County and Ramsey County are also analyzing turn lane options along CR J and CSAH 49 that are outside the scope of the Lyngblomsten project. • The access points, right of way, and internal circulation routes noted above are to create a circulation network serving all properties in the study area rather than individual driveways onto arterial and collector roads that serve only individual properties. A public road will extend north-south through the development providing public access to the senior housing complex, restaurant and future commercial development. The road right-of- way is 60 feet wide and the paved road surface is 32 feet back to back. Sidewalk is proposed on both sides of the public road on the north end and on the east side toward the south end closest to the development. On-street parking will be allowed. A 26 foot wide private road will serve the cottage home neighborhood. Sidewalk is proposed on the south side and will connect to the public road sidewalks. Two parking areas with a total of 11 parking stalls are provided on the west and east ends of the private road for visitors. No parking will be allowed on the private road. The southerly right in/right out access off of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) will also be a private road. The paved road surface has been reduced from 32 to 26 feet wide back to back. Both private roads will be owned and maintained by the developer. • The Hodgson/CR J intersection is to be signalized prior to or as part of any significant development in the study area. This is to be a cooperative effort of Anoka and Ramsey Counties, the Cities of Lino Lakes and Shoreview, and developers. Specific design requirements are to be determined. Signals were installed at the intersection in 2008 and modified in 2017. • Other road improvement needs such as additional lanes, median, and the like will be designed in cooperation with Anoka and Ramsey Counties, the Cities of Lino Lakes and Shoreview, and developers, as appropriate. Specific design requirements are to be determined. Both northbound and southbound turn lanes are proposed at the northern full access. Southbound right turn lanes are proposed at the Hodgson right-in/right-out and at the Hodgson and CR J intersection. A westbound right turn lane is proposed at the CR J right-in/right-out. The final configuration of improvements will be developed through a design process including Anoka and Ramsey County. Improvements along CR J will also include input from the City of Shoreview. Additionally, Anoka County and Ramsey County are analyzing other turn lane improvements to the overall area transportation system that are outside the scope of the developer’s project. • The quantity of development of the area will be limited to ensure that traffic generation does not exceed the capacities of Hodgson Road, the intersection with Co Rd J, or the new 8 access. Development shall not create the need for a traffic signal at the new full access on Hodgson Road. o Planning for the area must look forward to full development of the study area so as not to allow one project to “use up capacity” so that other sites cannot develop without creating the need for a signal at the new access. As noted, a traffic analysis was completed for the development. Peak trip generation from the proposed development is approximately 1/3 of the trip generation provided for in the Master Plan. No signal is proposed at the new full access. • Right of way will be dedicated with development to ensure adequate right of way for Hodgson and CR J as well as for the internal circulation system, as necessary. The preliminary plat dedicates additional right-of-way ranging from 27 feet to 45 feet along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) creating 60 feet to 75 feet of dedicated right-of-way from section line and/or roadway centerline. The preliminary plat also dedicates an additional 10-17 feet of right-of-way along CR J (Ash Street) to provide a full 60 feet from section line. The internal public road is dedicated with 60 feet of right-of-way. Overall, the proposed development is consistent with the Transportation and Access goals of the Master Plan. Trails, Open Space • A trail connection, included as an ‘enhancement corridor’ in the Parks, Natural Open Space/Greenways and Trail System Plan, will be established across the study area. This will link to the existing trail connection to Woodridge Lane on the west, cross through the study area, and link to a future trail in Ware Road. The specific alignment of this trail corridor across the Master Plan area will be determined as development occurs. The Lyngblomsten site plan includes a 9 foot wide concrete walk that extends from the existing Woodridge Lane trail to the private road then tapering to a 5 foot wide walk to the club house to the internal public road and sidewalk. This trail connection has been revised to a full 9 foot wide trail within a 20 foot wide corridor easement. The section of sidewalk along the internal public road has also been revised to 9 feet and connects to Hodgson Road. The 20 foot wide trail corridor shall be outside of Lot 13 and Lot 14, not just the house pad. • An, open, focal point green space is to be created where the Woodridge Lane trail connection enters the study area. The specific design of this focal point will be reviewed with any development application for the site. The original site plan included a community garden and lilac trees adjacent to the wetland that created an open, focal point green space in this location. Due to the need for additional storm 9 water management, the community garden has been replaced by a stormwater pond. The pond and landscaping still creates an open, focal green space as required. The clubhouse is located adjacent to a south storm water pond. The cottage home neighborhood also includes 4.54 acres (71%) of landscaped common open space that will be maintained by Lyngblomsten or an association. • A trail should be constructed along Hodgson Road in accordance with the City’s parks and trails plan. This could be accomplished with sidewalks in the study area. A 9 foot wide trail is proposed along the full length of Hodgson Road. Sidewalks are also proposed along the public and private roads. • Greenspace buffering is an important design element for new development along the border with existing neighborhoods such as Woodridge Estates and Rohavic Oaks. A 50 foot wide buffer of existing trees along the west lot line abutting Woodridge Estates will be preserved. The property owner at 253 Woodridge Lane noted the buffer behind his parcel tapers from 40 feet to 6 feet. A triangulated row of coniferous trees will be planted on the west side of the public road right-of-way where the commercial private road comes into the development. More landscape screening or privacy fence shall be planted in this area adjacent to 253 and 255 Woodridge Lane to provide more screening from the road and parking lots. A screen of lilac bushes will be planted at the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the stormwater pond. An existing row of 12’+ tall pine trees will be preserved at the west end of the cottage home private cul de sac. The public road right-of-way has shifted to the east near CR J approximately 10-40 feet. This will create additional buffer and allow the existing tree line adjacent to 275 Ash Street to be preserved. Along the north property line adjacent to the Rohavic Oaks neighborhood, the cottage homes will be setback a minimum of 30 feet. The landscape plans have been revised to include a 6 foot high wood privacy fence along the lot line. Trees and landscaping are also proposed in the 30 foot buffer. A 40 foot wide berm and landscape buffer is also provided in the cottage home neighborhood adjacent to CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). The plan has been revised to include a year round continuous screen on top of the berm. Municipal Utilities • All new development must have sanitary sewer and water service. Possible exceptions prior to the availability of utilities include renovation of existing structures if the building code allows it without utilities. However, the preference is for all uses in the study area to have municipal utilities. 10 The entire Lyngblomsten senior living community, cottage homes, restaurant and commercial development will be served by municipal utilities. • Several options exist for utility service, as described in this study document. West of Hodgson, the preference is for connection to the Woodridge Lane sanitary sewer. City watermain and sanitary sewer force main will be extended from Woodridge Lane through a 20 foot wide utility easement obtained by the City over 255 Ash Street, 275 Ash Street and a portion of the old 49 Club. A lift station is also required. A 12” watermain extends down the public road and 8” watermain serves the cottage homes, senior living community and commercial areas. The 4” sanitary sewer has been revised to an 8” sanitary sewer main to service the area. Utilities will be stubbed under CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) to serve future development to the east. • Water trunk lines must be looped, and development must provide the looping. Watermain will be extended north along Hodgson Road to connect and loop at Ravens Court as part of a City trunk watermain project. The watermain is also looped around the senior living campus. Site Design, Urban Form • The intent is to create an urban form for the area. The main senior living campus, restaurant and commercial building have been intentionally pulled towards Hodgson Road and CR J for multiple reasons. One is to create an edge and urban form along the corridor as required by the Master Plan. Two, the building locations were also in response to the Woodridge and Rohavic Oaks neighborhood’s concern regarding proximately of the buildings, noise, buffers etc. to their homes. The site design transitions from single story cottage homes on the north and west to the 2-story skilled nursing wing with the 3- and 4-story buildings closest to Hodgson Road. Three, the building shift also maximizes site design and efficiency. The senior living campus setback tapers from 30 feet to 26 feet from the Hodgson Road property line. The restaurant setback tapers from 35 feet to 15 feet from the Hodgson Road property line. The commercial building setback is 11 feet from the Hodgson Road property line and 30 feet from the Ash Street property line. These building locations and setbacks are consistent with the Master Plan. • Development layouts are to include buildings at intersection corners to establish the “cornerstones” of the area’s urban form. 11 The main senior living campus at the southwest corner of Hodgson Road and the future public road creates a corner stone at that intersection. A Lyngblomsten monument sign at the north side of the public road also creates a strong corner. The future commercial building at the Hodgson Road and CR J intersection is also consistent with the Master Plan’s gateway and cornerstone vision by providing the space for a community entrance sign and promenade. • As another means of pursuing an urban form, development is to avoid lining Hodgson with large parking lots. This could include the following elements. o Buildings fronting along Hodgson in addition to the cornerstone buildings o Extensive landscaping and screening of parking lots will be required along Hodgson and CR J, including boulevard trees and decorative fencing or walls. Landscaping must be included on the street side of fences or walls along parking lots. The parking lots for the senior living campus, restaurant and commercial building are internal to the development and not located along Hodgson Road and CR J. They are setback a minimum of 15 feet from the internal public road property line. One larger parking lot with joint parking facilities and cross easements is encouraged between Phase 2 (restaurant) and Phase 3 (commercial building). • Larger parking areas should be planned with internal landscaping, pedestrian sidewalks or walkways and be divided into smaller areas where possible: o Pedestrian walkways provided in larger parking lots should be landscaped, include path lighting, and provide direct access for pedestrians to an entrance of a commercial building; o Walkways should be raised, paved areas or defined paths distinguished by striping or a change in paving provided that pedestrians are kept safe from vehicular travel on the route to an entrance of a commercial building. The senior living parking lot includes landscaped islands and the perimeter along the public road is landscaped and screened with shrubs and trees. The sidewalk along the public road connects to a sidewalk leading to the main building for pedestrian connectivity. Future development of the restaurant and commercial building will require similar connections. • Sidewalks are to be constructed on both sides of Hodgson Road and on the north side of Co. Rd. J to form connections to the trails to the development areas and contribute to the urban form of the area. A 9 foot wide path is being constructed along the west side of Hodgson Road. A trail and/or sidewalk will be required when the east side of Hodgson Road develops. A trail and/or decorative sidewalk will also be constructed along CR J in conjunction with development of the commercial building. 12 • Pedestrian circulation should be an important design factor within the development areas to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle circulation among businesses and residential sites. Such circulation routes must be safe and aesthetically pleasing. Safe pedestrian corridors are provided throughout the development between the residential and commercial uses via trails and sidewalks. • Design guidelines must be prepared for any new development project in the area. Developers should submit draft guidelines with development applications. Design guidelines for each project must include attention to previous projects in order to coordinate design throughout the study area. After being refined in collaboration with City staff, design requirements shall be incorporated into the approval of the development. Design Guidelines will be prepared and finalized at the time of PUD Final Plan/Final Plat. Overall development shall be consistent with the Master Plan. As a starting point, the Lyngblomsten site plan shall be used to establish the building and parking lot setbacks (i.e. the building envelope.) Resolution No. 19-42 details the building and parking setbacks. Other parameters that shall be included in the Design Guidelines include: • Gateway Elements o The Hodgson/Co Rd J intersection is a gateway and appropriate elements are to be included in the development of the corners of this intersection. Such elements may include:  Community Entrance Sign with City Logo  Promenade with seating, public space, decorative pavers or stamped concrete and extensive landscaping  Public art • Architectural Standards • Building Heights o To the greatest extent possible, building heights shall be tiered from lowest to highest, west to east towards Hodgson Road. • Master Landscape Plan • Master Signage Plan • Buildings must be designed with “four-sided architecture”, using the same quality materials on all sides. o All facades shall be articulated with a variety of materials, glazing, awnings, or other details to add visual interest. o Building design elements should include an expression of a building base (of brick or stone), a middle, and a top with cornice elements at the top of the first floor and the top of the building. o Roof lines and cornice details shall be completed in a three-dimensional manner so that the features on the back of the roof or similar unfinished areas are not visible 13 o The front façade may have a unique design or more significant glazing. The senior living campus incorporates “four-sided architecture”. All sides of the building include the same quality stone/masonry, metal and composite siding and glass. The building layout was designed to limit blank walls facing the street. The separate wings of the building help to break up the massing as well as transition intensity from west to east on the site. The cottage home front façade includes a front porch, recessed garage, stone base and composite siding. More architectural detail is provided further in the staff report. Detailed site and building plan review will be required upon development of the restaurant and commercial building. • Commercial buildings must incorporate trash and service areas within the buildings rather than utilizing outdoor enclosures. This will conserve land and maximize the potential for outdoor seating and pedestrian friendly amenities. The original architectural site plan indicated a detached 15’ x 20’ x 8’ trash enclosure structure on the south end of the senior building. The plans have been revised and all trash and service areas are now contained in the building. • It is not the intent of this plan to specify housing unit styles. However, garage units must not access directly onto the main access drive or the main public streets through the development. The cottage homes garages access onto a 26 foot wide private drive not the main public street. • The Hodgson/Co Rd J intersection is a gateway and appropriate elements are to be included in the development of the corners of this intersection. Future development of the commercial corner will require these gateway elements. • The interface between new residential and commercial uses should be flexible. For example, new development in central areas can be multi-family, commercial, or mixed use. This would be consistent with the flexible land use lines noted above. Maintaining safety and quality of life are important considerations. The site design transitions from single story cottage homes on the west and north to the 2-story skilled nursing wing with the 3- and 4-story assisted-living and independent living wings closest to Hodgson Road. Intensity of development transitions from low near the existing single family neighborhood to high near the intersection. The senior living complex is also an employment center. • Lighting is to be appropriately scaled to a pedestrian friendly development. Lighting should be directed downward and screened to reduce light pollution, glare, and impacts on adjacent residential areas. 14 Wall mounted down lit lighting is proposed on the exterior of the senior housing complex. Street lights ranging from 12 to 28 foot in height with down lit shields will be utilized in the parking lot and near the main entrance and loading area. Foot candles do not exceed 1.0 fc onto right-of-way as required by City performance standards. Two 15 foot street lights with down lit shields are proposed in the parking areas in the cottage home neighborhood. The photometric plan indicates zero (0) foot candle levels protruding onto adjacent residential properties. The applicant shall work with the local electric company to design a street lighting plan for the public road. • Security or service lighting should be limited in coverage area and designed to reduce glare. Wall mounted down lit lighting is proposed on the exterior of the senior housing complex and clubhouse. Stormwater Management • Stormwater management design must incorporate filtration and infiltration elements. This could include such features as rain gardens, swales, dry creeks, infiltration chambers, and other ecologically based methods along with more traditional ponds and pipes. • Stormwater management ponds, if used, should be designed to be a site amenity, including appropriate landscape elements. Per the revised Storm Water Management Report prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates dated March 11, 2019, rate control is being accomplished using a combination of a dry pond and a storm water treatment pond. The dry pond is now located where the original community gardens were proposed. The proposed rate is less than 80% of the existing rate of runoff. Water quality treatment is accomplished at the single stormwater treatment pond. True infiltration was considered during the design phase, but several factors contributed to not pursuing infiltration practices. First, shallow groundwater exists on site. According to the soil borings, groundwater is in the 895 to 897 elevation range. A majority of the low points are around elevation 905 with one parking lot having a low point of about 902.5. This would mean the surface of an infiltration area would need to be at elevation 900 - 901 for effective drainage to occur. Additionally, the site has been maximized and there is not adequate space for effective infiltration practices. Instead, a stormwater pond has been constructed. The stormwater pond, in addition to providing rate control, has been sized to provide adequate dead storage below the normal water level to meet water quality requirements. Finally, an irrigation pumping station will be constructed at the stormwater pond to draw water from the pond to irrigate the surrounding areas. 15 The City’s stormwater management ordinance requires 4 feet of separation between low floor freeboard and groundwater. In order to minimize the site being built up to meet this requirement, this separation distance may be reduced upon submittal of a geotechnical report and design by a licensed engineer. This report shall define ground water level elevations for the senior living complex and include plans demonstrating that potential ground water inflow will be adequately mitigated. Said mitigation shall be approved by the City Engineer The clubhouse has been strategically located adjacent to the landscaped stormwater pond as a site amenity. Additional Site Plan Review Building Footprints and Floor Areas A summary of the building footprints and square footages is as follows: Building Footprint Total Floor Area Cottage Homes 1,400 sf 1,400 sf Clubhouse 3,400 sf 4,609 sf Senior Living Campus 128,113 sf 292,462 sf Future Restaurant1 6,000 sf 6,000 sf Future Commercial1 16,000 sf 16,000 sf 1These building footprints and total square footages may change upon final design. Setbacks Cottage Home Neighborhood The cottage home neighborhood consists of 20 single family homes accessed via a 26 foot wide private road. A 5 foot wide sidewalk is shown on the south side of the road. The houses on the north side of the road are setback 23 feet from the curb, 30 feet from the north Rohavic Oaks property line and 40 feet from the Hodgson Road property line. Houses on the south side of the road that have sidewalks are setback 23 feet from the sidewalk. The 23 foot setback allows for the parking of 2 vehicles side by side in the driveway without encroaching into the road or sidewalk. The rear setback of these houses is 25 feet to the public road right-of-way line. There shall be a minimum of 10 feet of separation between each house. Each lot is platted to include the building footprint (including front porch and rear patio) plus a 5 foot envelope around the footprint perimeter. The preliminary plat includes a Cottage Detail. Clubhouse The clubhouse is setback 30 feet from the public road right-of-way line and is 40 feet from the nearest adjacent cottage home. The parking lot is setback 16 feet from the public road right-of- way line and is 15 feet from the nearest adjacent cottage home. A coniferous landscape screen 16 is provided between the clubhouse, parking lot and adjacent cottage homes. Additional screening or fence has been added near Lot 16 as requested. Senior Living Campus As previously discussed, the setbacks along Hodgson Road and CR J are driven by the Master Plan’s intent to create an urban form for the area. The senior living campus setback tapers from 30 feet to 26 feet from the Hodgson Road property line. Along the northern boundary of the lot, the building corner is 12 feet from the property line and increases to 45 feet. Along the western boundary, the building corner is also 12 feet from the property line and increases to 45 feet. Along the south boundary, the building setback is 20 feet from the paved private road and 6 feet from the sidewalk. The parking lot is setback 15 feet from the property line. Restaurant and Commercial Development As discussed, full site and building plan review will be required for development of the restaurant and commercial buildings. Per the proposed site plan for Phase 2 and 3, the restaurant setback tapers from 35 feet to 15 feet from the Hodgson Road property line. An outdoor patio is shown adjacent to the property line and 5-10 feet from the paved trail. The commercial building setback is 11 feet from the Hodgson Road property line and 30 feet from the Ash Street property line. Architecture Detailed architectural comments were provided by Landform. The following is a summary. Overall, the proposed development upholds architectural standards envisioned by the Master Plan and is consistent with zoning ordinance performance standards. Cottage Homes The 2 bedroom, single level cottage homes are 18 feet in height. The floor area is 1,400 sf. Exterior materials include a stone/masonry base, glass and composite siding. The 21’x 21’ garage is recessed behind the front façade. The front porch has been revised to 6 feet deep and the rear patio has been revised to 10’ x 10’as required. Detailed building plans shall be provided with PUD Final Plan. Clubhouse The 2 level clubhouse is 31 feet at the highest peak of the unique roofline. Exterior materials include stone/masonry, metal siding, glass and composite siding. Glass makes up the highest percentage of materials. Senior Building Complex The multi-storied complex has varying heights that tier from the 2-story (23 feet) skilled nursing wing to the 3-story (33 feet) assisted-living wing to the 4-story (43 feet) independent living wing. Decorative parapets accent the rooflines with heights varying from 2-4 feet. The 17 signature parapet at the main entrance of the complex is 5 feet. Exterior materials include stone/masonry, metal siding, glass and composite siding. The zoning ordinance requires a minimum 33% of the exterior walls have an exterior finish of brick, stucco or stone. The elevations include stone/masonry ranging from 38-43%, exceeding ordinance requirements. The building has multiple façades, varying exteriors materials, textures and strong vertical and horizontal lines that provide articulation and depth and break up what could be long monotonous walls. The composite siding is Hardie board. A color palette and material board has been submitted. Parking The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum number of parking stalls per use, as follows: • Townhome, Quadraminium, Manor Home, Multiple Family Dwellings, and Mobile Homes within Mobile Home Parks. At least two and one-fourth (2-1/4) rent-free spaces per unit. In projects involving eight (8) or more units, the City may require additional clustered guest parking spaces based upon calculation of required demand. The cottage home neighborhood is served by a 26 foot wide private road with no on-street parking; therefore, off-street parking shall be provided. The 20 cottage homes require 45 parking stalls. Each cottage home has parking for 4 vehicles (2 in the garage and 2 in the driveway) for a total of 80 parking stalls. Two off-street guest parking areas also provide an additional 11 parking stalls for a total of 91 parking stalls. The clubhouse requires 14 parking stalls and 14 are provided with 2 of them accessible. Parking requirements for the cottage home and clubhouse neighborhoods are met. • Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required of only one-half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City Council considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated. There are 100 independent living units that would require 100 parking stalls. There are 102 underground heated parking stalls provided with 4 of them accessible. Parking requirements are met. • Rest Home, Nursing Home, Convalescent Center, or Institution. One (1) space for each six (6) beds based upon maximum design capacity, plus one (1) space for each two (2) employees. There are 50 assisted-living beds and 48 skilled nursing beds that would require 16 parking stalls. The Town Center portion of the facility has 7,521 sf of public use space that would require 25 stalls. There are 35 employees per maximum shift that would require 18 stalls. The total required number of parking stalls is 59. There are 78 total surface parking stalls provided with 7 of them accessible. Parking requirements are met. Sheet A2, Site Plan has been revised to correctly reflect the number of parking stalls. 18 • Restaurants, Cafes, Private Clubs Serving Food and/or Drinks, Bars, On-Sale Nightclubs. Ten (10) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of dining room, plus one (1) space for each employee of the maximum work shift. Detailed building plans will be required to verify the dining room square footage; however, assuming a 6,000 sf restaurant has 3,000 sf of dining room + 10 employees, 40 parking stalls would be required. The proposed 1,200 sf outdoor dining patio would require an additional 7 stalls for a total of 47 parking stalls. The original site plan accommodated 47 parking stalls; however, the revised plans now show only 42 stalls with 3 of them accessible. Joint parking facilities with shared curb cuts and access drives between the restaurant and commercial building have been incorporated into the plans which accounts for the reduction in the number of stalls. Upon development, further detailed review of the restaurant and commercial area will analyze joint parking facilities and peak parking demand. One shared parking lot without internal parking lot setbacks is encouraged. The single driveway connecting the two parking lots as shown on the current plans would not necessarily be needed. • Retail Store and Service Establishment. At least one (1) off-street parking space for each two hundred (200) square feet of floor area. Detailed building plans will be required to verify the floor area of the proposed commercial building; however, the commercial pad as shown is approximately 16,000 sf and 72 parking stalls would be required. The original site plan showed 76 stalls proposed with 4 of them accessible. The revised plans now show 70 stalls. Joint parking facilities with shared curb cuts and access drives will be encouraged between the restaurant and commercial building. As noted above, upon development, further detailed review of the restaurant and commercial area will analyze joint parking facilities and peak parking demand. One shared parking lot without internal parking lot setbacks is encouraged. The single driveway connecting the two parking lots as shown on the current plans would not necessarily be needed. Tree Preservation Plan Per the Tree Survey (Sheets 1-2), there are 1,685 significant trees located on the 20 acre site. Sheet L0.1, Tree Preservation Plan identifies the basic use area. Of the 1,685 significant trees, 201 will be preserved and 1,484 will be removed. The majority of the trees being preserved are along the west boundary providing a tree buffer between the Woodridge neighborhood and the development. The Tree Preservation Plan has been revised to exclude the stormwater pond and wetland buffer from the basic use area. There are 137 trees being removed in non-environmentally sensitive areas that require 180 trees for mitigation. There are 338 trees being proposed for mitigation. Trees being removed within the wetland buffer shall be mitigated at the Natural Resource Conservation Area ratio. The Tree Mitigation table shall be revised. Landscaping Canopy Cover 19 Canopy Cover standards require the minimum canopy cover to be 40% for all uses. Canopy cover is required for the senior living campus, clubhouse, restaurant and commercial development. The restaurant and commercial development will be reviewed upon submission of detailed plans. The senior living campus has 42,956 sf of hardcover which requires 17,182 sf of canopy coverage. The original Plan Sheet L2.1 indicated 17,450 sf of coverage provided; however, the medium trees were incorrectly valued at 500 and not 250. The values have been corrected. Plan Sheet L2.1 indicates 17,450 sf of coverage provided which meets the requirement. The club house has 5,866 sf of hardcover which requires 2,346 sf of canopy coverage. Plan Sheet L2.5 has been revised and now provides 4,100 sf. Coverage is met for the clubhouse. Foundation Landscaping Foundation Landscaping standards require 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs per 100 linear feet of the building. The senior living campus has 1,981 linear feet of building façade requiring 40 large trees and 119 large shrubs. The landscape plan proposes 63 large tree equivalents and 304 large shrub equivalents which exceed requirements. The landscape plan also provides for several outdoor landscaped courtyards. The trees along Hodgson Road have been relocated out of the road right-of-way and within 30 feet of the building. Open Areas Landscape Standards Open areas include disturbed site areas, such as cul de sac islands, boulevard medians, storm water management areas, common areas in multifamily sites that are not for recreation facilities, and disturbed areas that are not located within the foundation landscape zone, vehicular hardscape area or the building footprint. Open Space landscaping standards require 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2,000 square feet. Open space plantings are required for the main building, stormwater ponds, and north and south green spaces. Per Sheet L2.1 and L2.3, Main Building, there is 45,374 square feet of open space. This would require 23 large trees and 69 large shrubs. The plan proposes 25 large tree equivalents and 87 large shrub equivalents. Open space requirements are met and exceeded. The Clubhouse, per sheet L2.5, has 11,525 square feet of open space. This would require 6 large trees and 17 large shrubs. The plan proposes 16 large tree equivalents and 34 large shrub equivalents. Open space requirements are met and exceeded. The North East and North West Green Spaces, found on sheet L2.6, hosts 19,895 square feet and 54,073 square feet, respectively . The North East Greenspace requires 10 large trees and 30 large shrubs to meet the open space landscaping standards. The North West Greenspace requires 27 large trees and 80 large shrubs. The landscaping plan provides 18 large tree equivalents and 87 large shrubs equivalents for the North East Green space and 27 large tree equivalents and 80 large shrubs equivalents for the North West Green Space, which meets the open space requirements. 20 Per Sheet L2.7, there is 51,926 square feet of open space in the South West Greenspace. This would require 26 large trees and 78 large shrubs. The plan proposes 205 large tree equivalents and 101 large shrub equivalents. Open space requirements are met; however the plan sheet notes 28 trees and 84 shrubs are required. This shall be corrected. In addition to meeting the open space requirements, the developer is including three extensively landscaped courtyard areas around the senior housing building for the enjoyment of the residents. Buffer and Screen Standards Buffer and Screen Standards require a 6 foot high screen between a development and any adjacent, less intense, residential land use. Materials to meet this ordinance can include year round continuous planting screen, a wall or fence and plantings which cover 50% of a wall or fence on the exterior side, or a combination of berm and year round continuous screening. A 50 foot wide buffer of existing trees along the west lot line abutting Woodridge Estates will be preserved. A screen of lilac bushes will be planted at the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the stormwater pond. Additional landscape screening shall be planted in the area adjacent to 253 and 255 Woodridge Lane to provide more screening from the road and parking lots. The public road right-of-way near CR J has shifted to the east approximately 10-40 feet. This will allow for additional landscape buffer and allow the existing spruce tree line adjacent to 275 Ash Street to be preserved. Along the north property line adjacent to the Rohavic Oaks neighborhood, the cottage homes will be setback a minimum of 30 feet and a 6 foot high wood privacy fence will be located along the north lot line. A 40 foot wide buffer with a 3 foot berm and landscape plantings is also provided in the cottage home neighborhood adjacent to CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). The plan has been revised to include a year round continuous screen on top of the berm. A 30 inch shrub hedge is proposed between the senior living campus parking lot and public road right-of-way as is required by ordinance. A 3 foot berm is located on the north side of the northeast private cottage home parking area. Coniferous trees and shrubs are planted along the top of the berm. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per 70 linear feet of road frontage where property fronts on any public roads for townhome or multiple family homes. There are 20 cottage homes abutting 700 linear feet. This would require 10 boulevard trees. The cottage home private road has 33 boulevard trees which exceed ordinance requirements. There is 2,080 linear feet of public road (Street A) that abuts the senior living campus and future restaurant and commercial. This would require 30 boulevard trees. There are 33 boulevard trees proposed which exceeds ordinance requirements. There is 789 linear feet of private road (Street B) that would require 11 boulevard trees. There are 13 boulevard trees proposed which exceeds 21 ordinance requirements. Sheet L2.0 shall include the entire 20 acre parcels and revised calculations. The landscape plan has been revised so trees are not located within the Hodgson Road right-of- way; however, Sheet L2.1 shall be revised so coniferous trees are at least 15 feet from the trail and deciduous trees are at least 10 feet from the trail. Signage Sheet L2.6, NE Greenspace Plan indicates an entrance monument sign on the north side of the public road. The sign area is landscaped and it outside of the 100 foot vision triangle. Sheet A17, Signage Exterior provides detail of a monument sign. The sign is 6’4” high and 25 feet long. Materials include sandblasted concrete and stone. A separate Sign Permit Application is required for all wall signs and monument signs. A master sign plan for the 20 acre site is required and shall be incorporated into the Design Standards. This master sign plan should include a City of Lino Lakes gateway sign/monument at the intersection of Hodgson Road and CR J. Impervious Surface Coverage The allowed impervious surface coverage in a mixed use area is 75%. The proposed 56% post- development impervious surface coverage is compliant. Per the March 11, 2019 Storm Water Management Plan: Pre-Development Post-Development Impervious 1.93 acres (0.09%) 11.51 acres (56%) Pervious 18.80 acres (99.91%) 9.22 acres (44%) TOTAL AREA 20.73 acres (100%) 20.73 acres (100%) Traffic Study The proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 1,473 daily trips. 69 trips are estimated to be generated in the AM peak period (7:00 to 8:00) and 123 trips in the PM peak (4:30 to 5:30). A detailed traffic analysis was completed to describe the operating conditions of intersections surrounding the site in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). Facilities are given letter designations from “A” (best operating conditions) to “F” (worst conditions). A Level of Service “D” represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection conditions during a peak hour. City Code establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The Code states that if the LOS is A or B, the proposed subdivision will not the degrade the LOS more than one grade. If the LOS is C or D it will not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better. 22 The traffic analysis evaluated four surrounding intersections adjacent to the project area. • Co Rd J at Woodbridge Ln • Co Rd J at St. Albans St • Co Rd J at Hodgson Rd • Hodgson Rd at Rohavic Ln As discussed in the WSB Transportation Memorandum, dated February 6, 2019, all intersections, meet the City Code requirements. However, it was noted that the worst movement at the CR J and Hodgson intersection, during the PM peak period, changed from a LOS D to LOS E. The proposed southbound Hodgson Road right turn lane, at CR J adequately mitigates for this degradation. Additionally, City is working with Anoka and Ramsey County Highway Departments to evaluate other improvements that would improve overall intersection operations. Specific improvements will be worked out in a collaborative fashion with the two counties and the City of Shoreview. Staff is hopeful that additional improvements could be completed in conjunction with the Lyngblomsten project. Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan and Master Plan. Blocks and Lots The preliminary plat consists of 6 existing parcels. These parcels are individually owned by 4 different entities. Lyngblomsten currently has purchase agreements in place with all 4 owners. The senior living community and restaurant are located on one existing 17 acre parcel. The future commercial development will be a redevelopment of the remaining 5 parcels (3 acres) which is currently occupied by an insurance business, vacant liquor store and recently demolished 49 Club. If the terms of purchase agreement for the 3 acre commercial parcel are not finalized between the private parties, the preliminary plat could be revised and the final plat presented with just the one 17 acre parcel that contains the senior living campus and restaurant. The 3 acre parcel would need to possibly preliminary plat and final plat at a future date. The revised March 11, 2019 preliminary plat is summarized below. Lot or Outlot Size Purpose Ownership Square Feet Acres Lots 1-16 and Lots 18-21, Block 1 3,933-4,209 sf 0.09-0.10 acres 20 cottage homes Lyngblomsten Lot 17, Block 1 25,495 sf 0.59 acres Clubhouse Lyngblomsten Lot 22, Block 1 197,628 sf 4.54 acres Common open Lyngblomsten 23 space Lot 1, Block 2 212,109 sf 4.87 acres Senior living campus Lyngblomsten Lot 2, Block 2 53,441 sf 1.23 acres Future restaurant TBD Outlot A 76,384 sf 1.75 acres Stormwater pond Lyngblomsten Outlot B 14,177 sf 0.33 acres Remnant open space/lift station Lyngblomsten Outlot C 73,066 sf 1.68 acres Future commercial TBD TOTAL 891,567 sf 20.47 acres Lyngblomsten will be responsible for the ownership and maintenance of the majority of the development. The cottage home common area and senior living grounds will be professionally landscaped and maintained. Streets and Alleys CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) are A Minor Expander arterial roads. The development is served by an internal public road and 2 private roads. The streets and transportation plans are detailed previously in this report. As noted above, the 3 acre commercial site is under a separate purchase agreement with a different owner. If the purchase agreements are not executed at this time, the public road will temporarily terminate as a cul de sac near CR J (Ash Street) until future development of the properties. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide are provided on Lot 17, Block 1 and Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2. Drainage and utility easements are provided over Lot 22, Outlot A and Outlot B. A 20 foot wide public trail easement is provided over the east-west section of the trail. The trail along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) is located within the right-of-way. A 25 foot wide conservation easement is provided over the wetland buffer. Powerline A three-phase overhead power line runs along the eastern boundary of the property line within the right-of-way. Lyngblomsten is working with the electric company to discuss burying the power line. 24 Public Land Dedication The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication. Per the City’s Park, Greenway & Trail System Plan, a neighborhood park is not programmed for this area. Trail construction throughout the development and along Hodgson Road and CR J will be credited. The clubhouse will not be credited since it is a private amenity serving mainly the facility’s residents. The City’s current Park Dedication fees are $3,000 per residential unit and $2,400 per acre for commercial/industrial development. The senior building is a mix of both independent living units (residential) and assisted-living and skilled nursing facility units (commercial). The cottage home and independent living units will be charged as residential units. The assisted-living units and skilled nursing facilities will be charged as commercial users. This practice is consistent with previous assisted-living facilities constructed in the City. The assisted-living units and skilled nursing facilities occupy approximately half of the 4.87 acre lot (Lot 1, Block 2) and will be charged at 2.44 acres. Building # units or acres Fee per unit Total Cottage Homes 20 units $3,000 $60,000 IL (Independent Living) 100 units $3,000 $300,000 AL (Assisted-Living) + SNF (Skilled Nursing) 2.44 acres $2,400 $5,856 Trail Credit (TBD) TOTAL $365,856 Comprehensive Plan Per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the 20 acre site is located in Planning District 1. As discussed, a Master Plan was prepared for the mixed use area at CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) and approved by Council in 2007. The Comprehensive Plan states that all development in the area must be consistent the Master Plan. The proposed Lyngblomsten development is consistent with the Master Plan as detailed in this staff report and is therefore, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Environmental Assessment Worksheet An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is not warranted. The threshold computation of unattached units (20 cottage homes) and attached units (100 IL + 50 AL) is less than one. Wetlands A small 0.28 acre wetland exists in the northwest corner of the site. A wetland delineation was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental in June 2018. A WCA Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on October 3, 2018. The wetland is not part of the Wetland Management Corridor but the City will require a minimum 25 foot wide buffer. There are no wetland impacts. 25 Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Adjacent Jurisdiction Review As discussed, the City of Lino Lakes, the City of Shoreview, Anoka County and Ramsey County have spent several months working with the applicant on right-of-way needs and access points to the development. Adequate right-of-way is being dedicated along both CSAH 49 and CR J. Anoka County and Ramsey County are analyzing turn lane options along these corridors that are outside the scope of the Lyngblomsten project. During the PUD Concept Plan Review, the City of Shoreview commented the development should be served by City of Lino Lakes utilities. This has been accommodated. Shoreview expressed traffic and access concerns along CR J and recommended a traffic study be required. A traffic study has since been completed and distributed to all agencies. The City also noted the need for trail connections along which has been addressed. Overall land uses are compatible. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the land use application on February 6, 2019. Overall comments were positive. The Board recommended attention be given to the stormwater pond infiltration, wetland buffer signs, landscape buffers and screening. Public Safety Comments The Police Division reviewed the proposed development. With the proposed turn lanes on Hodgson Road and CR J into the site, there does not appear to be any public safety concerns at this time. Further analysis of additional turn lanes along CR J is encouraged. The Fire Division reviewed the proposed development and had the following comments: 1. Add a hydrant to the east side of the of the driveway for the underground garage 2. Add hydrant by club house and club house parking lot (one can serve both, possibly) 3. Hydrants in close proximity to all FDC’s (main building and club house) 4. Elevators are large enough to accommodate stretchers and gurneys The revised plans address these issues. Findings of Fact The Findings of Fact for the Rezoning and PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat are detailed in Ordinance No. 07-19 and Resolution No. 19-42 respectively. 26 Summary The proposed Lyngblomsten development meets the goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan. The intersection is a major gateway into the city and has been a high priority redevelopment area over the past 20 years. The site has been the focus of several proposed commercial/residential development proposals. However it has proven to be a challenge for development/redevelopment due to lack of public utilities and transportation infrastructure, high neighborhood expectations and timing. The senior living community will support and catalyze future commercial development in the area, including the restaurant planned by this developer. RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on February 13, 2019. Public comments were overall positive with some concerns regarding buffers and landscaping screening and traffic. The plans have been revised to address these concerns. The Planning & Zoning Board voted 5-0 in favor of the rezoning and PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat for Lyngblomsten. Staff is requesting Council consideration of the following: 1. Ordinance No. 07-19 2. Resolution No. 19-42 ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. 07-19 2. Resolution No. 19-42 3. 3D Rendering 4. WSB City Engineer letter dated March 29, 2019 5. Environmental Coordinator letter dated March 29, 2019 6. Preliminary Plat 7. Site Plan Overall 8. Tree Preservation and Site Layout Landscape Plan 9. Architectural Elevations 1 1st Reading: Publication: 2nd Reading: Effective: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 07-19 ORDINANCE TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM GB, GENERAL BUSINESS TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR LYNGBLOMSTEN The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains: Section 1: Findings of Fact 1. The City received a Land Use Application to rezone certain property from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development. 2. The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on February 13, 2019. 3. Per Section 1007.015 (5), the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed rezoning and its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: (a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Lyngblomsten development is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J. (b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed Lyngblomsten development is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. Existing and future land uses adjacent to the site include single family residential homes and commercial development. The proposed development transitions from existing low density single family homes to cottage homes to a senior living campus consisting of independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing facilities to restaurant and commercial use. (c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The proposed Lyngblomsten development conforms with all PUD performance standards as outlined in Section 1007.024(2) General Requirements and Standards: 2 1. Ownership. Lyngblomsten will be the owner of the property. 2. Comprehensive Plan Consistency. The proposed PUD shall be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Lyngblomsten development is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J. 3. Public or Common Open Space. The cottage home neighborhood includes 4.54 acres (71%) of landscaped common open space that will be maintained by Lyngblomsten or an association. The overall development’s pervious open space is 44%. 4. Operating and Maintenance Requirements for PUD Common Open Space/Facilities. A restrictive covenant or declaration shall be recorded against the property at the time of final plat detailing ownership and maintenance of the common open space/facilities. 5. Utilities. Public municipal utilities (water and sanitary) will service the entire development. 6. Roadways, Private. The cottage home neighborhood and commercial private road shall be owned and maintained by Lyngblomsten or similar entity. 7. Development Agreement. A Development Agreement detailing developer responsibilities and securities will be executed with the final plat. (d) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. The proposed Lyngblomsten development can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. The site is ultimately served by MCES Lift Station L69 and has substantial reserve capacity to accommodate the development in the district. The existing water supply and water distribution system can provide adequate water volume and fire protection upon looping of the system. Section 2: PUD, Planned Unit Development Zoning Requirements (1) Purpose. The Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J (“Master Plan”) as 3 approved by the City Council on February 12, 2007 by Resolution No. 07-21 is the guiding plan for development in this area. The district is being zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement the goals of the Master Plan. (2) PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat. Resolution No. 19-42 approving the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat establishes the Development’s framework in regards to the following: (a) Lot and Yard Requirements (b) Height Regulations (c) Impervious Surface Coverage (d) Design Guidelines (3) Permitted Uses. No building or land shall be used, and no building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered on Lots 1-22 Block 1, Lot 1 Block 2, Outlot A, or Outlot B that is not consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat as approved by Resolution No. 19-42. No building or land shall be used, and no building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered on Lot 2 Block 2 and Outlot C except for one or more of the following uses: (a) Governmental or public regulated utilities, buildings, or structures necessary for the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. (b) Liquor sales – on and off sale. (c) Office business – clinic. (d) Office business – general. (e) Personal services (subject to any licensing requirements of City Code, County or State). (f) Restaurants and Brew Pubs. (g) Retail business. (h) Service business – on-site. 4 (4) Accessory Uses. Subject to the applicable provisions of Chapter 1007: Zoning Code, the following are accessory uses: (a) Accessory structures as regulated by §1007.043 (4)(a) of the Zoning Ordinance. (b) One (1) accessory building is permitted on either Lot 17 Block 1 or Lot 22 Block 1 as regulated by §1007.043 (4)(a) of the Zoning Ordinance and as follows: 1. The accessory building shall not exceed two hundred (200) square feet. 2. The accessory building shall not be located within the front yard. 3. The building height shall be limited to twelve (12) feet. 4. Metal buildings and pole barns are prohibited. 5. Roof and exterior color and material shall be compatible with the principal structure. 6. A zoning or building permit is required. (c) Fences, as regulated by §1007.043 (18) of the Zoning Ordinance. (d) Off-street loading as regulated by §1007.045 of the Zoning Ordinance. (e) Off-street parking as regulated by §1007.044 of the Zoning Ordinance. (f) Radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs three (3) meters or less in diameter, short-wave dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers, ham radio transmitters and television receivers as regulated by §1007.053 of the Zoning Ordinance. (g) Signs as regulated by the City sign ordinance of the City Code. (h) Home Occupation Level A as regulated by §1007.047 of the Zoning Code are permitted on Lots 1-21 Block 1 (excluding Lot 17) and Lot 1 Block 2. (5) Conditional Uses. No building or land shall be used, and no building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered on Lots 1-22 Block 1, Lot 1 Block 2, Outlot A, or Outlot B that is not consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat as approved by Resolution No. 19-42. No building or land shall be used, and no building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered on Lot 2 Block 2 or Outlot C except for one or more of the following conditional uses: These uses require a conditional use permit based on the criteria and procedures outlined in §1007.016 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5 (a) Accessory drive-through facilities provided that: 1. Not less than one hundred twenty (120) feet of segregated automobile stacking must be provided for the single service lane. Where multiple service lanes are provided, the minimum automobile stacking may be reduced to sixty (60) feet per lane. 2. The stacking lane and its access must be designed to control traffic in a manner to protect the buildings and will not interfere with on-site traffic circulation or access to the required parking space. 3. No part of the public street or boulevard may be used for stacking of automobiles. 4. The stacking lane, order board intercom, and window placement shall be designed and located in such a manner as to minimize glare to adjacent premises, particularly residential premises, and to maximize maneuverability of vehicles on the site. 5. The drive-through window and its stacking lanes shall be screened from view of adjoining residential zoning districts and public street rights-of- way. 6. A lighting and photometric plan will be required that illustrates the drive- through service lane lighting and shall comply with §1007.043 (6) of the Zoning Ordinance. (b) Commercial day care facilities provided that: 1. All requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services, as may be amended, are satisfactorily met and the structure and operation is licensed accordingly. 2. Screening is provided along all shared property lines. Such required fencing and screening shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of §1007.043 (17) of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Adequate off-street parking is provided in a location separated from any outdoor play area(s). 4. Adequate off-street loading spaces in compliance with §1007.045 of the Zoning Ordinance. (c) Planned unit development – commercial including shopping centers as regulated by §1007.024 of the Zoning Ordinance. 6 (d) Private lodges and clubs provided that: 1. Screening from residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with requirements for business or industrial uses in §1007.043 (17) of the Zoning Ordinance 2. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with §1007.044 of the Zoning Ordinance 3. Parking is screened and landscaped in compliance with requirements for business or industrial uses in §1007.043 (17) of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where applicable by §1007.045 of the Zoning Ordinance. (e) Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings. Public or semi-public recreational buildings and neighborhood or community centers; limited to nursery, elementary, junior high and senior high schools; and religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, mosque, and synagogues provided that: 1. Screening from residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with requirements for business or industrial uses in §1007.043 (17) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with §1007.044 of the Zoning Ordinance 3. Parking is screened and landscaped in compliance with requirements for business or industrial uses in §1007.043 (17) of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where applicable by §1007.045 of the Zoning Ordinance. (f) Specialty schools such as music, dance or business schools provided that: 1. Provisions are made to buffer and screen any adjoining residential uses. 2. The site is served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic which will be generated. (g) Residential apartments accessory to permitted or conditional uses in the PUD District provided that: 7 1. The apartment is located in the same building as the principal use. 2. Residential and non-residential uses are not contained on the same floor. 3. The residential and non-residential uses do not conflict in any manner. (6) Uses by Administrative Permit. Subject to applicable provisions of Chapter 1007: Zoning Code, the following uses are allowed by administrative permit, as may be approved by the Zoning Administrator: (a) Personal wireless service antennas as secondary uses as regulated by §1007.053 of the City Ordinance. (b) Home Occupation Level B as regulated by §1007.047 of the Zoning Code are permitted on Lots 1-21 Block 1 (excluding Lot 17) and Lot 1 Block 2. (c) Accessory outdoor dining or seating facilities intended for consumption of food or beverages purchased on site, provided that requirements of §1007.054 are met. This administrative permit may be incorporated into another approval such as but not limited to a site plan, planned unit development, or building permit. 1. Accessory outdoor dining or seating facilities are only allowed on Lot1 Block 2, Lot 2 Block 2 and Outlot C. (d) Transient Merchants. (7) Interim Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, the following are interim uses and are governed by §1007.017 of the City Ordinance. (a) None. Section 3: Other Zoning Requirements Unless otherwise provided herein, the regulations of Chapter 1007: Zoning Code shall be in effect. Section 4: Amendment The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes is hereby amended to rezone the following described property from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development: PARCEL 1: 8 All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property PARCEL 2: All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Northerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5, Anoka County, Minnesota. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property PARCEL 3: That part of Lots 5 and 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying West of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6, 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at a right angle to said South line 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. Excepting therefrom Parcel 21, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 48. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property PARCEL 4: All that part of Lot 6, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6 which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with the South line of said Lot 6 to the North line thereof and there terminating. Excepting therefrom Parcel 22, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 48. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property 9 PARCEL 5: That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 5, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 107. Excepting therefrom Parcel 20, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 48. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property PARCEL 6: Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota; and That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No.107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the Westerly 50 feet thereof and lying between the Westerly extensions of the North and South lines of Lot 4, said Auditor's Subdivision No.107. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property Section 5: Development Regulations The development shall conform to the plans, requirements, and conditions of approval as listed in Council Resolution No. 19-42 approving the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat. Section 6: Effect This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter and upon the filing of the final plat. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 8th day of April, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council Member_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: ____________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-42 APPROVING PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LYNGBLOMSTEN WHEREAS, the City received an application for PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat for Lyngblomsten hereafter referred to as “Development”; and WHEREAS, the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary plat consists of the following plan sets and documents: • Preliminary Plat, Sheet 1 prepared by Loucks dated March 11, 2019 • Boundary and Topographic Survey, Sheets 1-3 prepared by Loucks dated September 5, 2018 • Tree Survey, Sheets 1-2 prepared by Loucks dated October 4, 2018 • Civil Plan Set, Sheets C0.0-C2.13 prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates, Inc. dated March 11, 2019 • Landscape Plans, Sheets L1.0-L3.0 prepared by Colberg Tews dated March 11, 2019 • Photometric Plans, Sheets 1-2 prepared by Visual dated January 11, 2019 • Architectural Plans, Sheets A1-A17 prepared by Wold Architects and Engineers dated March 11, 2019 • Storm Water Management Report, prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates dated March 11, 2019; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J (“Master Plan”) in 2007 via Resolution No. 07-21 and is the guiding plan for development in the area; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on February 13, 2019 and the Board recommended approval of the Development; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby makes the following: I. FINDINGS OF FACT A. PUD, Planned Unit Development Per Section 1007.024(1) Purpose and Intent, the PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage: 1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2 The proposed Lyngblomsten development is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan. 2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. The PUD allows implementation of the Master Plan’s vision to create an urban form for the area. Buildings are pulled towards the main collector roads and away from existing residential homes. 3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. The existing wetland on site will not be impacted. A wetland buffer and conservation easement will provide additional protection of the natural resource. 4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. The proposed Lyngblomsten development transitions from existing low density single family homes to cottage home to a senior living campus consisting of independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing facilities to restaurant and commercial use. Building heights are tiered from single level cottage homes to two, three and then four story senior living campus as the development progresses towards CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street). 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. The public road right-of-way width is the standard 60 foot wide with a 32 foot wide paved road surface. The cottage home private road is 26 feet wide and the commercial private road is 26 feet wide. Both private roads will be owned and maintained by a private entity. 6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations. The PUD allows implementation of the Master Plan’s vision to create an urban form for the area. Buildings are pulled towards the main collector roads and away from existing residential homes. B. Preliminary Plat Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: 1. General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. 2. Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. 3 a. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: i) Land use plan; ii) Transportation plan; iii) Utility (sewer and water) plans; iv) Local water management plan; v) Capital improvement plan; and vi) Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. The proposed Lyngblomsten development is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J. b. Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies. Lyngblomsten is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A (2008-2015). The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. c. Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual. Existing level of service ranges from A to D for applicable intersections. The proposed level of service does not fall below the acceptable levels. d. Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply. Lyngblomsten will have an adequate water supply. City watermain will be extended from Woodridge Lane through a 20 foot wide utility easement obtained by the City over 255 Ash Street, 275 Ash Street and a portion of the old 49 Club. A 12” watermain extends down the public road and 8” watermain serves the cottage homes, senior living community and commercial areas. Utilities will be stubbed under CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and looped to Ravens Court. e. Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems. Lyngblomsten will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. City sanitary sewer force main will be extended from Woodridge Lane through a 20 foot wide utility easement obtained by the City over 255 Ash Street, 275 Ash Street and a portion of the old 49 Club. A lift station is also required. An 8” sanitary sewer services the area as well. Utilities will be stubbed under CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) to serve future development to the east; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes that the Development shall be developed in accordance with the following: 4 I. PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT The PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat consists of the plans and documents previously noted. The final revised PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat establishes the general development plan in regards to building location, traffic circulation, common areas, public open space, architectural plans, landscape plans, grading and drainage plans, utility plans and erosion control. Separate site plan review will be required for development of the Restaurant (Lot 2, Block 2) and Commercial Development (Outlot C). These developments shall be consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Design Guidelines. II. LOT AND YARD REQUIREMENTS The final revised preliminary plat shall establish the lot sizes and lot widths for the development. The following preliminary plat legal descriptions shall be used to associate the development area with the appropriate building setbacks: A. Legal Descriptions Development Area Legal Description Cottage Home Neighborhood Lots 1-22, Block 1 Clubhouse Lot 17, Block 1 Senior Living Campus Lot 1, Block 2 Restaurant Lot 2, Block 2 Commercial Development Outlot C B. Building Setbacks Road or Boundary Building Setback (feet) CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) Cottage Homes 40 Senior Living Campus 25 Restaurant 10 Commercial Development 10 CR J (Ash Street) Commercial Development 10 Public Road 5 Cottage Homes 25 Clubhouse 25 Senior Living Campus 10 Restaurant 15 Commercial Development 15 Parking 15 Private Road Cottage Homes 23 from curb or sidewalk Senior Living Campus & Restaurant 15 from curb or sidewalk North Lot Line 30 West Lot Line 50 C. Parking Setbacks Road Comment Setback CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) Parking lots adjacent to these roads should be discouraged NA If approved by the City, extensive landscaping and screening of parking lots will be required along Hodgson and CR J, including boulevard trees and decorative fencing or walls. Landscaping must be included on the street side of fences or walls along parking lots. 15 Public Road 15 Private Road 15 from curb or sidewalk Between Lot 2, Block 2 (Restaurant) and Outlot C (Commercial) One parking lot is encouraged to serve both developments. No setback is required between the lots. 0 6 D. Between Cottage Homes: There shall be a minimum of 10 feet of separation between each house. III. HEIGHT REGULATIONS Building heights in the Development shall be tiered from lowest to highest and from west to east towards Hodgson Road except as otherwise approved by the City. A. Cottage Home Neighborhood and Clubhouse No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height. B. Senior Living Campus No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed forty-five (45) feet in height—or, for a multiple dwelling building, the greater of four (4) stories or forty-five (45) feet—except as allowed by §1007.043 (3). C. Restaurant and Commercial Development No building shall exceed a height of three (3) stories or thirty-six (36) feet, whichever is higher. IV. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE The allowed overall impervious surface coverage in the Development is 75%. V. DESIGN GUIDELINES The Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J (“Master Plan”) states that “Design Guidelines must be prepared for any new development project in the area. Developers shall submit draft guidelines with development applications. Design guidelines for each project must include attention to previous projects in order to coordinate design throughout the study area. After being refined in collaboration with City staff, design requirements shall be incorporated into the approval of the development.” The Design Guidelines shall be submitted with the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat and shall include at a minimum the following elements: A. Site Plan B. Land Use Legal Descriptions C. Building Setbacks D. Parking Setbacks E. Gateway Elements F. Architectural Standards G. Building Heights H. Landscaping I. Signage 7 VI. LAND USES Permitted, accessory, conditional, administrative and interim land uses are detailed in Ordinance No. 07-19. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes that in the event additional land is acquired that allows for the westerly relocation of the internal public road and CR J intersection to improve access spacing, a final plat submittal that shows such relocation shall not be deemed inconsistent with the preliminary plat provided that such location is approved by local road authority; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes that the final plat may exclude Outlot C and the internal public road would temporarily cul du sac until future development; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes that the surface water management low floor free board requirement of 4 feet separation from groundwater may be reduced upon submittal of a geotechnical report and design by a licensed engineer. This report shall define ground water level elevations for the senior living complex and include plans demonstrating that potential ground water inflow will be adequately mitigated. Said report and mitigation shall be approved by the City Engineer; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat for Lyngblomsten subject to the following conditions: 1. Comments from WSB City Engineer letter dated March 29, 2019 shall be addressed. 2. Comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated March 29, 2019 shall be addressed. 3. Comments from Anoka County and Ramsey County dated March 27, 2019 shall be addressed). 4. Design Guidelines shall be submitted with the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat. 5. A separate recordable document for 25 foot wide conservation easement over the wetland buffer is required at the time of final plat. 6. A separate recordable document for the 20 foot wide trail easement through the cottage home neighborhood is required at the time of final plat. 7. The separate Trail Easement Exhibits showing a 20 foot wide easement along Ash Street are not needed unless this land is acquired in conjunction with the project. 8. All plan sheets shall clearly differentiate between the property line and the 50 foot buffer line. The civil plan sheets use the same line which is confusing. 9. Sheet 1, Preliminary Plat: a. Detail shall include correct final cottage home building footprint. 8 i. Lot shall be minimum 5 feet from building and front porch structure. The front porch minimum is not met. ii. The Cottage Home detail shows 8 foot deep front porch but architectural cottage home plan shows 6foot. Please revise. b. Staff suggests Outlot C be preliminary platted as a lot and block and final platted as an outlot. This would avoid the need to preliminary plat and final Outlot C for future development. 10. Sheets C1.20-C1.22, Site Plan and Sheets C1.23-C1.25, Geometric Plan: a. A 20 foot wide public trail easement is required over the public trail extending from Woodridge Lane to the internal public road. i. The 20 foot wide trail corridor shall be outside of the lines (e.g. Lot 13 and Lot 14), not just the house pad. ii. A separate recordable trail easement shall be drafted by the applicant. iii. The trail from Woodridge Lane past the clubhouse to the internal public road shall be bituminous pavement. b. The number of restaurant parking stalls shown on Sheet C1.20 and A2 are not consistent. Please revise accordingly. c. Joint parking facilities with driveways and cross easements shall be encouraged between the future restaurant and future commercial development. i. Staff recommends one larger parking lot serve the two developments. Parking lot setbacks are not required between the two lots. d. Proper turn lanes and medians on CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) shall be finalized with Anoka County, Ramsey County, City of Shoreview and City of Lino Lakes and reflected on the plan sheets. e. The house pad of Lot 20 shall be a minimum of 25 feet from the public road right of way line. f. Sheet C1.23: i. The trail along the north side of the internal public road is noted as both 9 feet and 5 feet. All notes shall be 9 feet. g. Sheet C1.24: The 20 foot trail easement line shall be shown. 11. Sheet C1.30 and C1.31, Grading and Drainage Plan: a. The trail corridor north of the east end of the townhome cul du sac shall be graded for future paving. 12. Sheet C1.41, Utility Plan: 9 a. The Utility Easement Plan calls out utility easement lines which are confusing since a drainage and utility easement covers all of Lot 22. b. If additional easements are required over individual lots, these shall be shown on the preliminary plat. c. The arrows shall clearly point to what is being described. 13. Sheet C2.12, Site Details: a. The detail for the Wetland Buffer Signs shall be revised to the current City’s engineering standard detail plate. 14. Landscape Plans a. All sheets (Tree Preservation, Site Plan, Irrigated, Landscape etc.) shall include the complete 20 acre site. i. All landscape plans shall include required boulevard trees, irrigation, landscaping, buffer and/or screening along entire length of public road right-of-way including near CR J. b. All sheets shall clearly differentiate between existing trees and proposed trees. i. For example, Sheet L1.0 clearly shows the difference but Sheet L2.9 does not, especially in the 50 foot buffer area. c. The trail shall be better defined on all plan sheets. d. A year round triangulated coniferous screen or 6 foot high privacy fence is required between 253-255 Woodridge Lane and the public road right-of-way. 15. Sheet L0.1, Tree Preservation Plan: a. Trees being removed within the wetland buffer shall be mitigated at the Natural Resource Conservation Area ratio. The Tree Mitigation table shall be revised 16. Sheet L1.1, Irrigated Areas a. The irrigated areas are not clearly visible on the printed plan sheet. 17. Sheet L2.0, Boulevard Trees: a. Calculations are required for the Cottage Home private road. 18. Sheet L2.1 and L2.2, Main Building North & South: a. The trail along Hodgson Road shall be better defined. b. Coniferous trees shall be setback a minimum of 15 feet from paved trail. c. Deciduous trees shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from paved trail. 19. Sheet L2.7, SW Greenspace Planting Plan: 10 a. Under Open Space Plantings, the number of Trees Required shall be revised to 26 and the number of Shrubs required shall be revised to 78. 20. Sheet A2, Site Plan: a. The Parking Summary data shall be corrected to be consistent with the civil site plan data e.g. the Restaurant data. 21. Sheets A11-A14, Elevations: a. Include a building height measurement to the top of roofline and another height measurement from the roofline to the top of the highest parapet (not the 1’4” parapet). 22. Sheet A16, Cottage Homes: a. Building floor plan and footprint shall be consistent with that shown on civil plans Cottage Home Detail. i. Sheet 1 of 1, Preliminary Plat shows the front porch depth at 8 feet. Sheet A16 shows the front porch depth at 6 feet. These shall be consistent, please revise. b. A color palette shall be submitted showing varying elevation colors of the cottage homes and shall be approved by the City. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 8th day of April, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: _______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Dane Ekdom, EIT, WSB & Associates Date: March 29, 2019 Re: Lyn gblomsten Senior Communities Plan Review, 01/14/19 Preliminary Plat Submittal 012369-000 As requested by City Staff, WSB and Associates, Inc. has reviewed the Preliminary Plat for the Lyngblomsten Senior Communities site in Lino Lakes, MN received on March 11, 2019. The following documents were reviewed: • Preliminary Civil Construction plans dated March 11, 2019. • Preliminary Plat prepared by Loucks, received on March 11, 2019. • Stormwater Management Report prepaired by AJA Inc., dated March 11, 2019. Applicant responses to previous comments are shown in red. Additional comments below are shown in blue. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering • General The Lyngblomsten project is proposed on a 20.74 acre site at the northwest corner of the Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) and Ash Street (CR J) intersection. The City completed a master plan of this area and the area to the east of Hodgson in 2006. This development meets the goals of the master plan. Comments: 1. Xcel Energy has overhead power along the east side of the site. The applicant shall work with Xcel on a design to relocate. Response: This is acknowledged and the team will work with Xcel energy. 2. The Civil plans have multiple layers turned on, specifically the utility sheets. The applicant should turn off background layers. Layers have been modified. Please advise if additional clarification is needed The applicant should turn off the spot elevation call-outs. Contours and Contour labels can be left on. • Grading Plan The Lyngblomsten development is proposing grading of the entire site in one phase. This includes protection of an existing wetland, grading a new storm water pond, and grading roadway and site pads. 1. The applicant shall call out the emergency overland flow (EOF) elevation (with a flow arrow) on the grading plan for the proposed pond and the existing wetland. The EOF should be 1 foot above the HWL and 3.0 feet below the lowest adjacent building opening elevation. EOF and flow arrows have been added to the grading plan. EOT- and high water level elevations hare been verified per the city comment. Ms. Katie Larsen 03/29/2019 Page 2 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review The low floor/opening elevations need to be labeled on the grading plan. The EOF will need to be further reviewed once other comments are addressed. It appears the trail may be blocking the EOF from the pond and culvert should be considered under the trail. 2. The applicant shall call out the EOF elevations (with a flow arrows) on the grading plan for all catch basin low points. The EOF should be 1.0-foot below the lowest adjacent building opening elevation. EOF elevations have been added to each special low point area EOF elevations will be reviewed when low floor/opening information is added to the plan. 3. Building low floor elevations should be shown on the grading plan sheets. Building low floor elevations have been added to the grading plans. 4. The applicant should label the 10:1 safety bench on the proposed pond. 5. The applicant should provide proposed centerline street grades (either grading sheets, or in profile on street plan sheet). Profile sheets will be accomplished in the final plat phase. In the meantime, percent of slope along the gutter or centerline have been shown on the drawings 6. The SWPPP is being reviewed by the City’s Environmental Coordinator; below are our preliminary comments: a. The applicant should provide silt fence around the existing wetland. Silt fence has been provided. b. The applicant should provide silt fence along the project perimeter adjacent to Hodgson Road. Silt fence has been provided 7. The applicant should provide and label a maintenance access route to the outlet control structure. The access should be a minimum of 10-feet wide, 8.0% longitudinal slope, and 2.0% cross slope. A maintenance access route mas been provided to the pond. The maintenance route has been labeled accordingly. 8. The applicant should include riprap at storm sewer outfalls. The City’s standard detail for Rip Rap at outlets should be included in the plans. The city standard detail has been added to the set 9. The applicant should review the rear yard drainage of Lots 6-8. The current plan shows drainage onto private property. Proposed surface drainage needs to be directed westerly towards Wetland 1. Surface drainage has been diverted to the wetland 10. The applicant shall review the grades between Hodgson Road and the berms at the end of the private cul de sac. It appears that drainage is trapped in that area. The grading in this area has been reviewed and modified accordingly Two contours are shown on the grading plan between the berm and Hodgson Road. One contour is labeled with a drainage arrow flowing towards the berm. If there is a ditch being graded or connected too, it should be clear on the grading plan. In the future, the trail will be extended to the north, the grading should be representative of this. 11. The minimum allowable grade across turf areas and drainage swales is 2%. Considering the users of the homes, the driveways have been designed to each be at about 3° slope. Because the grades outside the building are 6 inches Upon further review the turf areas should be a minimum of 2% or greater to minimize the potential for standing water. 12. The grading plan needs to be adjusted at the southwest existing retaining wall. The grading plan has been adjusted 13. The applicant shall clearly label the top and bottom of the retaining wall along the pond. Retaining walls over 4 feet require a licensed engineering design and an approved fence. 14. The applicant has included the impervious surface area of the Hodgson turn lanes in the storm water calculations. However, they have not addressed how stormwater will be managed. There is no storm sewer system or ditch system shown, the applicant will need to coordinate the drainage plan with Anoka County also. Turn lane construction plans will be required with the final plat. Ms. Katie Larsen 03/29/2019 Page 3 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review • Stormwater Management The Lyngblomsten development is 20.74 acres in size, with an existing impervious area of approximately 2 acres. Majority of the site runoff is towards the west where there is an 24 inch diameter pipe outlet and to the existing wetland on site. The proposed impervious area is approximately 9.5 acres. There is a proposed pond located in the middle and east side of the site. The City adopts Rice Creek Watershed District’s (RCWD) rules for water quality and quantity requirements. The applicant is proposing a stormwater reuse system that will be further reviewed with the final design. It is strongly recommended that the applicant obtain an approved CAPROC prior to final plat approval. The current submittal now includes rate control via a combination of a dry pond (located in the northwest) and a stormwater treatment pond. The submittal normal water level of the pond is 896, and the 100 year elevation of the pond is at 900.5. 1. The applicant is not showing the existing impervious on Outlot C in the drainage calculations and if it is the intent to redevelop with this area being impervious the applicant would need to revise the proposed drainage map, HydroCAD model and water quality calculations to include this area. Otherwise in the future this area will be required to meet RCWD rule C and City stormwater requirements. Drainage calculations and spreadsheets now account for Outlot C. Genetically, the area has been set to mostly impervious to allow for flexibility in future planning 2. In the Stormwater report, the applicant should include a summary table of the HWLs (2, 10, and 100-year) for the wetland (both existing and proposed) and in the proposed pond. Indicate on the summery the lowest adjacent building opening elevation. a. The applicant shall also verify free board requirements are met. The summary table has been modified. 3. It is not clear on the plans where the Porous Baffle Basin and Floating Head Skimmer are proposed. The applicant shall submit additional information for review. The plans have been modified to show the location of erosion control devices. See sheets C1.50-CI .52. These erosion control devices will be reviewed with the final design submittal. 4. In the plan and modeling, the applicant shall update the NWL of the pond to be at, or above, the elevation of 897.0. This is the conservative estimated seasonal ground water elevation provided by Braun in the Geotechnical Report. a. The applicant shall also verify all HWL and freeboard requirements are still met. The normal water level lies been adjusted The City is comfortable allowing the NWL of the pond to be constructed below the ground water elevation if the pond is lined with a 1.0-foot clay liner. Please provide an updated plan, HydroCAD model/discharge rate calculations, water quality calculations, and irrigation calculations. 5. The City’s standard outlet control structure shall be used without a Fluidic-AMP Hydrobrake. The HydroCAD model shall reflect this. The fluidic amp Hydrobrake has been included in the model to allow for Rice Creek Watershed District’s required 80% reduction inflow rate. If a standard orifice where to be used, it would be small enough where we are concerned about clogging of the actual orifice. The Hydrobrake provides a reduced flow yet allows for the passing of a larger sphere. The model has not been updated. The applicant has communicated to us that this outlet has been changed and modified to be a v notch weir with a 10 inch orifice at outlet. 6. In the HydroCAD models, a. The applicant shall use a MSE3 rainfall distribution instead of the Type II. The MSE3 distribution has been used. Ms. Katie Larsen 03/29/2019 Page 4 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review b. In the HydroCAD model the applicant shall not include infiltration. The HydroCAD model is for flood modeling verses water quality. Water quality is calculated separately. The model has been updated. c. The applicant shall update all HydroCAD results and HWL elevations on the plan. The plans have been updated. We anticipate that the modifications required to meet City standards for to the HydroCAD model and site design will increase the flood storage required for the site. 7. The applicant shall update the water quality section based on our attached redlines. At the time of this review, no water quality design changes need to be made. The redlines are intended to clarify the design and the requirements. The dead storage calculations have been updated a. The water quality design may need to be adjusted based on other comments in this review. b. The dead storage volume should account for the entire site. The pond needs to over-treat the areas being directed to the pond to compensate for the areas leaving the site without treatment. The dead storage calculations have been updated 8. The Water Reuse system will be supplemented by municipal water in low conditions: a. The applicant shall provide calculations demonstrating the amount of infiltration provided. Standard Rice Creek watershed district water reuse calculations nave been provided. The location of the re-use system pump and connection to city water shall be shown on the utility plan with backflow prevention. b. Provide an elevation (below the NWL) that the irrigation system will need to switch to City water during dry periods. The elevation has been labeled on the plan The applicant shall submit their allowable pump down elevation. Please identify where on the plan this is included. If a pond liner is being proposed please include information on the grading plan or other. c. With the final design additional detail will be required and reviewed. This is noted 9. All storm sewer pipes that will be maintained by the City shall be concrete pipes per City standard specifications. Concrete pipes have been labeled 10. All storm sewer pipes that will be maintained by the City shall have a minimum diameter of 15”. Pipe size has been modified to the minimum 15 inch requirement within the City 11. The plan set shall show the storm sewer plan view and easement lines on the same page. This will allow the City to verify all storm and utility easements are correct. The plan sheets hare been modified Easements will be reviewed with the final design submittal. 12. In the Storm Sewer Pipe Sizing spreadsheet, the applicant shall include the Hydrology input values (area, C values, time of concentrations, intensities). The calculation spreadsheet has been included. 13. The applicant shall verify the manhole sizes/storm sewer layout for: a. CB 037, tight angle, consider storm sewer realignment. b. CB 004, tight angle, larger structure needed. c. CB 001, tight angle, larger structure needed. d. CB 101, tight angle, larger structure needed. e. CB 011, tight angle, larger structure needed. f. CB 013, tight angle, consider storm sewer realignment. g. CB 008, tight angle, larger structure needed. h. Additional CB’s required between CB 1 & 2 at the road bend. Ms. Katie Larsen 03/29/2019 Page 5 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Catch basin structures have been re-verified Storm sewer systems and catch basins will be reviewed with the final design submittal. Additional CB’s will be required to maintain the storm sewer pipe within 2 feet from the road. 14. On Sheet C1.51, in section D of the “General Construction Sequence”, the applicant shall add the following note prior to note 3 “Locally Strip topsoil…” a. “Prior to site disturbance, construct a construction detention pond (in the location of the proposed pond) to help treat soil runoff during construction.” The SWPPP excerpt has been modified 15. On Sheet C1.51, in section D of the “General Construction Sequence”, the applicant shall add the following note prior to note 11 “Complete stabilization of the…” a. “Prior to final stabilization, verify the proposed pond is constructed to final grade. Clean out any accumulated deposited sediments during construction.” The SWPPP excerpt has been modified. 16. On Sheet C1.51, in section G of the “General Construction Sequence”, the applicant shall add the following note. a. “Street Sweeping (with a pickup broom only) will be provided as needed or at the direction of the owner/engineer.” The SWPPP excerpt lines been modified 17. On Sheet C1.51, the applicant shall include erosion control blanket on the pond slopes above the NWL. The plan has been modified 18. On Sheet C1.51, the applicant shall include erosion control blanket on all back-yard swales and 50’ around all back-yard catch basins. The plan has been modified. 19. At the 24 inch diameter westerly pipe outlet we recommend connected the pond outlet to the existing pipe via a manhole with and open grate. If this were to be accomplished, there should not be an opportunity to drain the existing swale. The manhole has not been provided 20. Storm sewer shall have 15 feet of separation from a structure and include a 20’ easement. The applicant should consider a utility and trail corridor between the private road and main road. (between Lots 10-11, Lots 11-12) 21. Our review is based on the assumption that the senior living complex has a finished floor elevation of 910.5 and a 12 foot parking garage below. The ground water in this area is an 897 to 899. They are not meeting the 4 foot of separation from groundwater. It is being proposing to mitigate this with a drain tile and pump system, backup power, and cut off wall. The City could consider reducing the low floor free board requirement of 4 feet separation from groundwater upon submittal of a geotechnical report and design by a licensed engineer. This report shall define ground water level elevations for the senior living complex and include plans demonstrating that potential ground water inflow will adequately be mitigated. The proposed trench grate and draintile will need to be pumped or discharged downstream of the pond. It is recommended to construct an improved outlet for the site, downstream of the pond. It is our understanding that this option would have construction impacts in an existing developed area. • Water Supply The proposed site is currently not served by municipal water and on site wells shall be abandon per MDH. This area of the City, Woodridge Estates, is currently a low pressure area. The City’s Comprehensive Plan and water system model identifies the need for a 12-inch diameter trunk Ms. Katie Larsen 03/29/2019 Page 6 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review watermain to be looped through the Lyngblomsten development site to serve the fire flow needs for the site, and to improve flow within this area of Lino Lakes. The Lyngblomsten site will also have an 8- inch diameter watermain and service lines throughout the site. Comments: 1. The applicant shall loop an 8 inch diameter watermain between the north and south access along the east side of the site, adjacent to Hodgson. The watermain loop has been provided. 2. The applicant shall loop the 12-inch diameter trunk watermain from the north access to the Raven’s Hollow development. This section of trunk watermain can be installed by the developer and reimbursed by the City, or the developer can petition the City to complete the improvement. Offsite easements maybe required for this work. The 12 inch watermain has been provided The 12-inch watermain does not appear to be on the plans. The DEVELOPER shall identify if they want to install the watermain and be reimbursed by the City, or the developer can petition the City to complete the improvement. 3. Public watermain shall be Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP). Watermain is DIP. 4. Watermain fittings shall be compact AWWA C153 fittings. Noted and will be included in the project specifications. 5. Hydrant spacing shall be 200-feet (linear) max. The applicant shall provide detail or a figure of current hydrant spacing & coverage. Hydrant spacing meets the noted requirements. Hydrant spacing will be reviewed with the final design. 6. The applicant shall note that services Type K copper pipe from the main to the curb stop. Copper services are noted on the plan. 7. The applicant shall provide a profile views of the proposed watermain in the construction plans. Noted, profile plans will be provided in the final plat documents. 8. The applicant shall note the water connection location on the southwest end of the site will be adjusted as the City finalizes the construction plans for this project. Noted. 9. The watermains shall be extended to the east side of Hodgson Road at both the north and south access roads. Watermain has been extended as noted. 10. The City’s water model has accounted for the proposed land use. However, to verify the water supply the applicant should submit their required fire flow for each structure they’re proposing for model verification. Noted. The applicant shall submit their fire flow requirements. 11. Watermain shall have 15 feet of separation from a structure and include a 20’ easement. The applicant should consider a utility and trail corridor between the private road and main road. 12. The applicate should include service lines to the proposed commercial in Outlot C. 13. The utility crossings at Hodgson will require casing pipes. • Sanitary Sewer The project site is currently not served by municipal sanitary sewer. The City of Lino Lakes is working on a trunk sanitary sewer project including a Lift Station and forcemain to serve approximately 60 acres. This service area includes the Lyngblomsten site and an unserviced area east of Hodgson Road. The Lyngblomsten project proposes serving the development with municipal sanitary sewer and services extended to each lot. Comments: Ms. Katie Larsen 03/29/2019 Page 7 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review 1. Public sanitary sewer shall be PVC pipe, and SDR 35 or SDR 26 depending on depth of pipe. Refer to notes on the plan 2. Sanitary sewer services shall be PVC sch. 40 pipe. Refer to notes on the plan 3. The applicant shall update the minimum sanitary sewer sizes to 8-inch diameter PVC pipe. Service minimum size is 4-inch diameter. Refer to notes on the plan 4. The applicant shall note that sanitary sewer lines and invert elevations will need to be at max depth for future utility extension to the east of Hodgson Road. Noted. 5. The applicant shall note the sewer connection location at the lift station will need to be adjust as the City finalizes the construction plans for this project. Noted. The invert at the lift station will need to be modified, it should be at 889.XX. 6. The sewer shall be extended to the east side of Hodgson Road at both the north and south access points. The sewer has been extended. 7. The applicant shall provide profile views of the proposed sanitary sewer in the construction plans. Profiles will be accomplished with the final construction plans. 8. The applicant shall note that service pipe slopes shall be 2.0% minimum. Referred to the slopes noted on the plans. 9. The applicant should include service lines to the proposed commercial in Outlot C. 10. The utility crossings at Hodgson will require casing pipes and Manholes on each side of the roadway. • Transportation The existing site includes a single family home on the center large parcel and two commercial buildings on the south end of the project. There was also a restaurant on the corner of Hodgson Road and CR J that has been removed. The applicant is proposing to remove existing site accesses from county roads, and off Hodgson Road construct a full access on the north end of the site and a right in/out access at the midpoint of the site. They are also proposing a right in/out access off of CR J. 1. The traffic analysis review memo dated February 6, 2019 is attached. 2. The applicant shall adjust the southern entrance and road alignment at County Road J. The entrance shall be adjusted to the east to meet a 15 foot setback between the property line and curb line. The applicant shall protect the existing trees and retaining wall along the west side of the proposed entrance. This access alignment shall intersect CR J at a 90 degree angle for 100 feet, versus the skewed angle it is currently at. The southern entrance road alignment has been modified. 3. The applicant shall revise the road width dimension to be 32 feet from face of curb to face of curb to match the City’s standard roadway. The roadway detail GEN – 2 on sheet C2.12 shall be replaced with GEN – 1 with a note on the detail and on the site plan that the curb on the public roadway shall be B618. The dimension has been updated and the correct detail has been provided. The plans show GEN-1 they should include GEN-2 for a total road width of 32 feet. The geometric plan should be revised to call out 32 feet verses 33 feet. The curb can remain as in the detail as the surmountable please remove the B618 not from C1.20- 1.22 4. The private road between the senior living and the restaurant can be reduced in width to 26 feet, similar to the private road serving the townhomes, provided there is adequate parking for the restaurant and senior living facilities, and there will be no parking allowed on this roadway. Ms. Katie Larsen 03/29/2019 Page 8 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review The new road width has been reduced to 26 feet. 5. We do not recommend striped pedestrian crossing for this development. This item can be re-evaluated in the future if needed. The pedestrian crossing has been omitted. After further evaluation it is anticipated that there will be a higher pedestrian volume between the Club House and the senior living thus a cross walk may be constructed at the south driveway as currently shown on the site plans. 6. Depending on the use of the commercial building on Outlot C, the City may consider a connection between the restaurant and commercial building parking lots. Noted. 7. The location of the trail along Hodgson Road will be reviewed once Anoka County has provided their review and the Hodgson Road turn lanes are laid out correctly. Noted. 8. The trail intersections with roadways shall be at 90 degrees/ perpendicular to the roadway. Specifically at the private roadway cul du sac. Trails nave been adjusted to be 90° to the intersection 9. The applicant shall include detail GEN – 25 and note the private utility trench is located beyond the right of way line to provide and 8-10 foot wide boulevard for tree plantings. The detail and note hare been added to the plans 10. The applicant shall include detail GEN – 23 and note the sign is to include the City’s Logo. The detail and note frame been added to the plans 11. Remove detail GEN – 7. The City does not install valley gutters on new roadways. This detail is for reconstruction. The detail has been revised City staff has been working with the adjacent impacted agencies (Anoka County, Ramsey County and the City of Shoreview) to review impacts the development has on their respective roadways. The revised plans dated 3/11/2019 have been reviewed. The general concept of the roadway mitigation and layout is considered acceptable however, the details of the roadway geometrics still require final review and approval. Some of the issues that have been identified include: • The development north access on Hodgson Road right turn lane into site needs the taper revised so it does not impact the property to the north. • The proposed right turn lane on CR J to the development will require widening of the existing pavement to accommodate the future lane configuration on CR J. • The southbound to westbound Hodgson to J right turn lane construction will impact the existing signal cabinet and require re –location of signal equipment. • The applicant shall demonstrate how the proposed development access on CR J will be limited to a right-in/right-out • If “pork-chop” islands are used at the right-in/right-out access locations, they need to be designed correctly to insure that the left turn movements are not allowed. • The lane configuration south of CR J and needs to be included on the plans to insure lane continuity with any widening of Hodgson Road. • The ultimate design of Hodgson Road, including the raised median limiting access to the east side of the road, may require phasing. • Wetlands and Mitigation Plan There is one wetland located on the site. It was delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental on 06/11/18. The Technical Evaluation Panel approved the wetland delineation on 10/3/18. Comments: 1. In the preliminary plat, expand the drainage and utility easement to include the 25-foot buffer. The plans have been adjust accordingly. 2. The applicant shall replace detail GEN – 22 with the current version. The detail has been updated. This comment still needs to be addressed. Ms. Katie Larsen 03/29/2019 Page 9 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review • Landscaping The comments below address engineering related items associated with the landscaping plan. The City’s Environmental Coordinator will be submitting a landscape plan review. Comments: 1. The City’s ordinance requires a 30 foot clear zone at intersections. In addition the applicant shall provide a clear (no vegetation or other) triangular sight line of 100 feet at intersections with County roadways. 30’ sight lines will be provided for City road intersections. light triangles at County roads will be coordinated and verified with Anoka County. 2. The applicant shall adjust proposed tree locations to accommodate a maintenance access route to the pond overflow structure. Maintenance route access to the overflow access is being defined by Civil Engineers and a clear route has been provided. 3. The applicant shall include detail GEN – 25 and note the private utility trench is located beyond the right of way line to provide and 8-10 foot boulevard for tree plantings. See Civil or utility alignments and roadway alignments and sections. • Geotechnical A geotechnical report was completed by Braun Intertec for the proposed Lyngblomsten development. Below are the comments based on the geotechnical report: 1. The applicant shall note that additional geotechnical data as recommended in the Braun report dated May 12, 2006. New data will also provide an updated groundwater elevation need for surfacewater management designs. Additional geotechnical data will be obtained in the fixture 2. The applicant shall note that dewatering is likely for installation of the sanitary sewer. This note has been added 3. The geotech report from 2006 recommends a pond liner, this will be reviewed as part of the surfacewater management. A pond liner has been included please provide information on the grading plan. • Floodplain Floodplain is not present on this site. • Drainage and Utility Easements Comments: 1. The applicant shall note, the City requires a 10-foot drainage & utility easement beyond the High Water Level of the pond. Plans have been updated accordingly 2. Outlot B is where the City’s sanitary lift station is planned. If Outlot B is privately owned, it shall have a drainage & utility easement over it. Outlot B has a drainage and utility easement 3. The plat shall show the 10 foot drainage & utility easements along the parcels lines. Specifically the public road where the private utility trench will be located to accommodate adequate boulevard space for trees GEN - 25. Plans have been updated accordingly 4. The plat lines so not match the City’s. The City uses the County coordinates. The applicant shall review and revise. Plans have been updated accordingly Ms. Katie Larsen 03/29/2019 Page 10 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review 5. The private road/south access shall have a drainage & utility easement over the roadway for the public utilities. This width shall be a minimum of 30 feet and centered on the road/utilities. Plans have been updated accordingly 6. The plan set shall show the storm sewer plan view and easement lines on the same page. This will allow the City to verify all storm and utility easements are correct. See sheet C1.41, Utility Easement Plan. • Development Agreement A development agreement is required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement Not applicable at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance declaration will be required with the final plat. • Permits Required 1. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for grading 2. NPDES General Construction Permit 3. MDH Watermain Extension Permit 4. MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 5. RCWD Permit 6. Anoka County and Ramsey County Access and Right of Way Permits If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You may also contact Dane Ekdom at (763) 762-2815 or dekdom@wsbeng.com.  Page 1 Memo To: Katie Larsen From: Marty Asleson Date: March 29, 2019 Re: Environmental Board Comments/March 11, 2019/ Lyngblomsten / Preliminary Plat Review Environmental has the following comments about the Lyngblomsten Preliminary plat dated March 11, 2019: • The pond should be evaluated by our City Engineers to determine if the pond configuration as NURP is valid. Will this be a clay liner or something else such as rubber mat ? If Clay, pond volumes may be changed, so should talk to City Engineer about calcs. • Pond outlet pipe needs to be evaluated by our City Engineers so that back yard runoff is captured into the drainage through a closed pipe system Engineering issue • A liner for the pond should be evaluated for retaining water for irrigation purposes and preventing lateral water movement after storm events. Developer has indicated that they will use a liner. What kind of a liner ? • Irrigation design should consider a valve to shut off native prairie areas if water gets low in the pond. • A maintenance agreement should be submitted for the pond • A 25 foot wetland buffer should be established. Provided in the latest submittal • Wetland buffer signs should be placed around the wetland buffer. Provided in the latest submittal • Prairie area plantings should be a lower profile seed mix with enhanced forbs added. This comment was intended more for the residents visual perspective. • Flower gardens should be designed into the” Commons Area”. Addressed in comments Environmental  Page 2 • A screening plan must be submitted for the north property line. Addressed in the latest submittal • Trees designed into the County road ROW must be moved off of the ROW. Done • Trees designed under or near the power wires must conform to mature height distance from the wires standards established by the power company. Indicated they were talking to the power company • Applicant must have an NPDES permit. Not listed yet • Applicant must have a designated inspector for erosion control who is certified in erosion control from the State of Minnesota. • All erosion control inspections and corrections for non-compliance issues must be sent to the City of Lino Lakes no later than the next business day • A concrete washout area and plan must be shown on the plan sheets. Shown on the plan • No soil should be imported to the site without approval from the City Engineer. Acknowledged • The developer must escrow enough money to plant one tree on each frontage boulevard. Acknowledged • All sod and shrub plantings must be irrigated. Are you proposing to irrigate everything? Calculations should be submitted for including freshwater irrigation if pond dries out, and a shutoff for native areas included to shut off an area that really wouldn’t need water after establishment; but can be used during excessive pond volume times. LOUCKS W:\2018\18268\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S18268-PrePlatPlotted: 03 /11 / 2019 9:46 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION LYNGBLOMSTEN 6075 HODGSON ROAD LINO LAKES, MN LYNGBLOMSTEN 1415 ALMOND AVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108 SURVEY LEGEND SPOT ELEVATION GATE VALVE SIGN LIGHT POLE SANITARY MANHOLE POWER POLE HYDRANT STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC BARBED WIRE FENCE WATERMAIN CHAIN LINK FENCE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE A/C UNIT TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC MANHOLE TELEPHONE MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER HAND HOLE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS GUY WIRE CULVERT TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAILBOX GUARD POST OVERHEAD UTILITY WOOD FENCE WELL ELEV @ THRESHOLDTHSD ROOF DRAINRD N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 10/03/18 SURVEY ISSUED 10/04/18 REVISED SURVEY 10/17/18 REVISED PER COMMENTS 10/19/18 ADDED ADJ. EASEMENT 01/09/19 UPDATED SURVEY 01/10/19 UPDATED SURVEY 01/12/19 REVISED PER COMMENTS 01/29/19 REVISED PER COMMENTS 03/08/19 UPDATED SURVEY 03/08/19 REVISED PER COMMENTS 03/11/19 REVISED PER COMMENTS License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Henry D. Nelson - PLS 17255 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. 18268A HDN SFH HDN SFH, MJA 10/03/18EDGE OF JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS SPLIT RAIL FENCE SAN CLEANOUTCO BUILDING COLUMNCOL PROPOSED AREAS Block 1 Lot 1= 4,000 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 13= 4,014 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 2= 4,140 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 14= 3,980 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 3= 4,105 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 15= 3,933 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 4= 4,002 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 16= 3,933 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 5= 4,209 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 17= 25,495 Sq. Ft. or 0.59 Acres Lot 6= 4,002 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 18= 3,933 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 7= 4,047 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 19 = 4,140 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 8= 4,047 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 20 = 4,140 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 9= 3,933 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 21 = 4,140 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 10= 3,933 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 22 = 197,628 Sq. Ft. or 4.54 Acres Lot 11= 3,949 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 12= 3,995 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Block 2 Lot 1= 212,109 Sq. Ft. or 4.87 Acres Lot 2= 53,441 Sq. Ft. or 1.23 Acres Outlot A 76,384 Sq. Ft. or 1.75 Acres Outlot B 14,177 Sq. Ft. or 0.33 Acres Outlot C 73,066 Sq. Ft. or 1.68 Acres Gross Plat Area= 891,567 Sq. Ft. or 20.47 Acres Proposed ROW= 78,028 Sq. Ft. or 1.79 Acres Wetland and Wetland Buffer= 22,750 Sq. Ft. or 0.52 Acres Net Plat Area= 790,7789 Sq. Ft. or 18.16 Acres BUILDING SETBACK LINE All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Northerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5, Anoka County, Minnesota. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property That part of Lots 5 and 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying West of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6, 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at a right angle to said South line 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property All that part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6 which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with the South line of said Lot 6 to the North line thereof and there terminating. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 5, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 107. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota; and That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No.107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the Westerly 50 feet thereof and lying between the Westerly extensions of the North and South lines of Lot 4, said Auditor's Subdivision No.107. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property LEGAL DESCRIPTION GENERAL NOTES SURVEYOR: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55330 763-424-5505 1.Prepared March 8, 2019. 2.The address, if disclosed in documents provided to or obtained by the surveyor, or observed while conducting the fieldwork is 6075 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN. 3.The bearings for this survey are based on the Anoka County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1996 Adjust). 4.Benchmark: MNDOT monument "0280G" located at the southeast quadrant of Sunset Avenue over 35W. Elevation = 929.28 (NGVD29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located at the southeast quadrant of Ash Street and Albans Street. Elevation = 903.48 (NGVD29) 5.This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27003C0344E, Community Panel No. 2700150344E effective date of December 16, 2015. 6.The field work was completed on August 8, 2018. 7.Buildings on adjacent property are taken from aerial photographs and maps provided by others. Current Zoning: Zone (GB) General Business District Proposed Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development ZONING INFORMATION SITE DATA OWNER/DEVELOPER: Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave. St. Paul, MN 55108 651-632-5387 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: (NOT TO SCALE) PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 OF 1 DENSITY (Acres) Gross Area 20.47 Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.28 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW (CSAH)1.79 Other (Utility Transmission Easement)0.00 Other (Wetland Buffer)0.24 Net Area 18.16 # of Units 170 Gross Density 8.30 Net Density 9.36 0$7&+/,1(0$7&+/,1($&&(66,%/(6<0%2/ 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6,*1 7<3 '''%%%%%%%%%%%% ; 67$//6 7<3 3$,17675,3(# 2&:,7+:25'6123$5.,1* 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6<0%2/ 7<3 123$5.,1* 123$5.,1* 123$5.,1* 123$5.,1*3$,17675,3(# 2&:,7+:25'6123$5.,1* 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6,*1 7<3  ; 67$//6 7<3  ; 67$//6 7<3 12.0 0':+,7(3$,17675,3( ; 67$//6 7<3 123$5.,1*123$5.,1*3$,17675,3(# 2&:,7+:25'6123$5.,1* 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6<0%2/ 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6,*1 7<3 ƒ3$5.,1* 7<3,&$/ 19.01' (TYP) 16.00' (TYP) ; 67$//6 7<3 &21&5(7((175$1&(&21&5(7((175$1&( ; 67$//6 7<3 %&/8%+286(5(67$85$175()(572$5&+,7(&785$/)25/$<287$1'',0(16,2165()(572$5&+,7(&785$/)25/$<287$1'',0(16,216727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 3$,17('',5(&7,21$/$552: 7<3,&$/ 0$,13$5.,1*&/8%+286(3$5.,1*727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 1257+:(673$5.,1*5(67$85$173$5.,1*727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 3$,17('',5(&7,21$/$552: 7<3,&$/ 3$,17('',5(&7,21$/$552: 7<3,&$/ &21&5(7((175$1&(67236,*167236,*1123$5.,1*%0$,1%8,/',1*/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/271257+($673$5.,1*727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' &21&5(7((175$1&(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(1738.01' ; 67$//6 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6,*1 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6<0%2/ 7<3 3$,17675,3(# 2&:,7+:25'6123$5.,1* 7<3 123$5.,1* 123$5.,1*6287+3$5.,1*727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 5(7$,1,1*:$//5()(572$5&+,7(&785$/)25/$<287$1'',0(16,2165(7$,1,1*:$//:(7/$1'(;,67,1*<5+:/ (;,67,1*<5+:/ 352326('<5+:/ (;,67,1*<5+:/ 352326('<5+:/ 352326('<5+:/ 352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(5(7$,1,1*:$//5(7$,1,1*:$//5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:North6,7(3/$129(5$//'$9,'$5(<;;;;;;;;;;;%-''$5  &&,7<68%0,77$/5(9,6,21'$7(0,11(627$352)(66,21$/(1*,1((5/<1*%/2067(11415 ALMOND AVE WST. PAUL, MN 55108HODGSON ROADLINO LAKES, MN 55014/<1*%/2067(16(1,25&20081,7,(66,*1$*(.(<127(60Q087&'5 [ $0Q087&'5 [ %6,0,/$5720Q087&'5 [ 3$5.,1*&127(6 5()(5726+((7&6,7(3/$11257+)25127(6 5()(5726+((7&*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$11257+)25*(1(5$/127(6/(*(1'5()(5(1&(.(<726,7('(7$,/6'(7$,/,'180%(5 723 '(7$,/6+((7180%(5 %27720 352326('&21&5(7(:$/.352326('&21&5(7(6/$%352326('/,*+7'87<%,780,12863$9(0(17352326('0(',80'87<%,780,12863$9(0(17352326('+($9<'87<%,780,12863$9(0(17352326('123$5.,1*675,3,1*352326('75$)),&&21752/6,*16,*1$*(.(<127(352326('%2//$5'3$,17('$&&(66,%/(6<0%2/352326('0$1+2/( 0+ 352326('&$7&+%$6,1 &% 352326(')/$5('(1'6(&7,21 )(6 352326('+<'5$17 +<' 352326('*$7(9$/9( *9 352326('3267,1',&$7259$/9( 3,9 352326(')/$*32/(5()(572$5&+,7(&785$/3/$16352326('%8,/',1*672235()(572$5&+,7(&785$/3/$16352326('/,*+732/(5()(572(/(&75,&$/3/$163523(57</,1($1C2.111257+($673$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 1257+:(673$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' &/8%+286(3$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 5(67$85$173$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 6287+3$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 0$,13$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 6,7(67$7,67,&6030 60 886895895 896 8 9 6 896899899900900900 900901901 901902902 902902902902902902902902902903903903 90390390390390 39039 0 3 904 904904 904904 9 0 4 90 4904904904904904 905905 905905 9059 0 5 90590590 5905 905 905905905 906906 906906 9 0 6906 906906906906906 90690690 6 90 6 906 90 6 906906 906906 906 9069 0 6 9069069 0 6906 90690 6 907 907907907 907907907907907 907907907907907907907907 9079079079 0 7 907 907907907907907907 907907 907 908908908 908 908908 908 908908 908908 908908908908908909 909 909 909909909909909909 909909 909 910 9 1 0 9 1 0 9109109109109109109101919710105 BASIC USE AREA DISTURBED ARE ABASIC USE AREADISTURBED AREABASIC USE AREADISTURBED AREABASIC USE AREA DISTURBED AREA BASIC USE AREADISTURBED AREABASIC USE AREABASIC USE / DISTURBED AREAALL TREES WITHIN BASIC USE /DISTURBED AREA TO BE REMOVEDBASIC USE AREADISTURBED AREADISTURBED AREABASIC USE AREAPOND HWLBASIC USE AREAWETLAND BUFFERBASIC USE AREASTORMWATER DRY BASIN HWLFEDCBA12345678AMNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:10/2/2018 9:49:30 AMC:\Users\jsmith\Documents\Central_Lyngblomsten - Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18_jds3k.rvtCentral: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\Central_Lyngblomsten -Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18.rvt LyngblomstenLyngblomstenSenior Communities1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN55108Hodgson Road,Lino Lakes, MN 5501403/11/2019186024RevisionsDescriptionDateNumCOLBERG|TEWSlandscape architecture3101 East Franklin Avenue | Minneapolis MN 55406colbergtews.comPUD Submittal10/08/2018PUD Resubmittal01/14/2019PUD Resubmittal03/11/2019TreePreservationPlanL0.1Scale:1" - 50'1.REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES.2.SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION.3.SEE SHEET L200 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS4.SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION.5.SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION.6.THIS TREE PRESERVATION PLAN IS BASED ON A SITE AND TREE SURVEY PROVIDED TO THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT BY OTHERS. SEE SURVEY AND TREE SURVEY FOR ORIGINAL INFORMATION, TREE INVENTORY, ANDBENCHMARKS.7.ALL ROOT PROTECTION ZONES (5' OUTSIDE DRIPLINE) OF PRESERVED TREES MUST BE PROTECTED WITH MIN. 4'HT. ORANGE SNOW FENCE WITH POSTS MAX. 6' O.C. PRIOR TO AND THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.8.STAGING, STORAGE OF MATERIALS, PARKING OF VEHICLES, FOOT TRAFFIC, CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER ACCESSROUTES, AND ANY FORM OF DISTURBANCE OR ACTIVITIES THAT MAY CAUSE COMPACTION ARE PROHIBITEDWITHIN ROOT PROTECTION ZONES AT ALL TIMES. SEE CIVIL FOR LOCATIONS.9.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARYDIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THEINFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK.10.AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TOTHE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING.11.FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITECONDITIONS.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.L0.1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN NOTESPRESERVED TREESTREE MITIGATIONTREE MITIGATION TYPEMITIGATION TREES REQUIREDNON-ESA TREES REQUIRING MITIGATIONDECIDUOUS 6" TO 12" DBH OR CONIFEROUS 12'-20' HT94NON-ESA TREES REQUIRING MITIGATIONDECIDUOUS OVER 12" DBH OR CONIFEROUS 12'-20' HT(2:1 REPLACEMENT RATIO)86 (43 x 2)NRCA / NRCEA TREES REQIURING MITIGATION0NRPA TREES REQUIRING MITIGATION0TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRING MITIGATION180MITIGATION TREES PROVIDED338Tree #SpeciesDBHConditionStems1Oak, red18.0Good145Aspen10.5Fair146Aspen10.0Fair1157Aspen7.0Good1170APP13.0Fair1201Spruce, blue11.0Good1203Spruce, blue7.0Good1204Spruce, white6.5Fair1205Elm, Siberian8.5Good1206Spruce, white10.0Fair2207Spruce, white9.0Good1208Elm, Siberian14.5Good1209Spruce, white7.5Good1210Fir, balsam9.0Good1211Pine, red10.5Good1212Willow12.5Good1213Pine, red16.0Good1214Pine, red13.5Good1215Pine, red13.5Good1216Pine, red14.5Good1217Pine, red14.0Good1218Pine, jack10.5Good1410Pine, jack12.0Fair1411Pine, jack15.0Fair1412Pine, jack9.0Good1413Pine, jack6.5Good1414Pine, jack6.5Good1415Pine, jack7.5Good1416Pine, jack3.0Fair1417Pine, jack9.5Good1418Pine, white4.5Good1419Cherry, black8.5Good1420Pine, red8.5Good1421Boxelder10.5Good1422Pine, red7.0Good1423Pine, red6.5Good1424Pine, red6.0Good1425Pine, red6.0Good1426Aspen7.0Good1427Pine, red4.0Fair1428Pine, red4.0Fair1429Pine, red3.5Fair1430Pine, red3.0Good1431Pine, red5.0Good1432Pine, red5.0Good1433Pine, red4.0Good1434Pine, red4.5Good1435Aspen7.5Good1436Aspen6.0Good1437Aspen6.0Good1438Aspen8.0Good1439Aspen8.0Good1440Aspen8.5Good1441Aspen14.0Fair2442Aspen8.0Good1443Birch, paper6.5Good1444Aspen10.5Good1448Aspen7.0Good1449Aspen17.0Good2450Aspen9.5Good1451Pine, jack7.0Good1454Pine, jack5.5Fair1455Aspen6.0Good1456Aspen7.0Good1457Pine, jack8.5Good1459Pine, jack10.0Good1521Aspen7.0Good1522Aspen6.5Good1523Aspen8.0Good1524Aspen8.5Good1525Aspen8.0Good1526Aspen8.0Good1527Aspen8.0Good1528Aspen6.0Good1529Aspen6.5Good1530Aspen9.5Good1531Oak, red11.0Good1532Aspen7.0Good1533Pine, jack12.0Good1534Pine, jack12.5Good1535Cherry, black6.0Good1536Pine, jack14.0Good1537Aspen8.5Good1538Aspen9.0Good1539Aspen6.0Good1540Aspen9.0Good1541Aspen6.5Good1542Aspen7.0Good1543Aspen9.5Fair1544Aspen6.5Good1545Aspen11.0Good1546Aspen8.0Good1547Aspen8.6Good1548Aspen8.0Good1549Aspen7.5Good1550Pine, jack14.5Good1551Pine, jack9.0Good1552Pine, jack11.0Good1553Pine, jack8.5Good1554Pine, jack10.0Good1555Pine, jack12.0Good1556Pine, jack10.5Good1562Pine, jack11.5Good1563Pine, jack8.0Good1564Pine, jack7.5Good1565Pine, jack13.0Good1566Pine, jack11.5Fair1567Pine, jack11.0Good1568Pine, jack8.0Good1569Pine, red6.0Good1570Pine, red12.5Good1618Spruce, blue11.0Good1619Spruce, blue9.0Fair1620Spruce, blue7.0Fair1621Spruce, blue7.5Fair1622Spruce, blue7.5Fair1623Spruce, blue10.0Fair1624Spruce, blue7.5Fair1625Spruce, blue9.5Fair1626Spruce, blue10.0Fair1627Spruce, blue7.0Fair1628Spruce, blue7.0Fair1629Spruce, blue7.5Fair1630Spruce, blue7.5Fair1631Spruce, blue7.5Fair1632Spruce, blue7.5Fair1633Spruce, blue8.0Fair1634Spruce, blue8.0Fair1635Elm, Siberian8.0Good1636Spruce, blue3.5Fair1637Spruce, blue6.5Fair1638Spruce, white4.5Fair1639Elm, Siberian9.0Good1640Elm, Siberian11.5Good1642Elm, Siberian9.0Good1646Pine, jack11.0Fair1647Pine, jack13.5Good1648Pine, jack10.0Good1649Elm, Siberian10.0Fair1650Pine, jack13.0Good1651Pine, jack6.0Fair1652Pine, jack12.0Fair1653Boxelder11.0Fair1654Aspen6.5Good1655Aspen6.5Good1657Aspen10.0Good1658Aspen10.0Good1659Aspen12.0Good1660Aspen8.0Good1661Aspen6.0Good1662Aspen6.0Good1663Aspen9.5Good1664Aspen7.0Good1665Aspen6.5Good1686Pine, jack10.0Good1687Aspen9.5Fair1688Boxelder8.0Good1689Aspen6.5Good1690Aspen6.0Fair1691Aspen8.0Good1692Aspen9.5Good1693Aspen8.5Good1694Aspen8.0Good1695Aspen6.5Fair1696Aspen8.0Good1697Aspen8.5Good1698Aspen10.0Good1699Aspen10.0Good1700Aspen9.5Good1701Pine, jack11.0Good1702Pine, jack12.5Good1703Pine, jack10.0Good1704Pine, jack8.5Good1705Pine, jack10.0Good1706Pine, jack8.5Good1707Aspen17.0Fair1708Pine, jack10.0Good1709Pine, jack10.0Good1710Pine, jack12.0Fair1711Pine, jack9.5Good1712Pine, jack9.0Fair1713Pine, jack5.0Fair1714Pine, jack10.5Fair1715Pine, jack9.0Good1716Pine, jack7.5Fair1717Pine, jack11.0Good1718Pine, jack6.5Fair1719Pine, jack6.5Good1720Pine, jack14.0Good1857Aspen6.0Good1858Aspen6.5Good1901Boxelder8.0Fair1902Boxelder10.0Fair1903PIne, white11.0Good1904Pine, jack9.5Good1905Pine, jack13.5Good1906Boxelder17.0Fair1907Pine, jack13.0Good1908Pine, jack7.5Good1913Pine, jack13.5Good1914Pine, jack11.0Good1KEYTREE TO BE PROTECTED - DASHED LINE DENOTES ROOT ZONETREE TO BE MITIGATED 895895 900900900 900905905 905905 9059 0 5 90590590 5905 905 905905905 910 9 1 0 9 1 0 910910910910910910910NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING1919710105NOPARKINGNOPARKINGMAIN BUILDING STORMWATERDRY BASINMONUMENT SIGN100' SIGHT TRIANGLE100' SIGHT TRIANGLE30' SIGHT TRIANGLE30' SIGHT TRIANGLE30' SIGHT TRIANGLE30' SIGHT TRIANGLETOWN CENTERCOURTYARDSEE L2.3CLUBHOUSESEE L2.5MAIN BUILDING SOUTHSEE L2.1WESTTOWNHOMESSEE L2.9SKILLED NURSINGCOURTYARDSEE L2.4MEMORY CARECOURTYARDSEE L2.3EAST TOWNHOMES SEE L2.8MAIN BUILDING NORTHSEE L2.1NE GREENSPACESEE L2.6SW GREENSPACESEE L2.76' WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN FENCE PER DISCUSSIONW/ CITY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEEFEDCBA12345678AMNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:10/2/2018 9:49:30 AMC:\Users\jsmith\Documents\Central_Lyngblomsten - Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18_jds3k.rvtCentral: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\Central_Lyngblomsten -Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18.rvt LyngblomstenLyngblomstenSenior Communities1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN55108Hodgson Road,Lino Lakes, MN 5501403/11/2019186024RevisionsDescriptionDateNumCOLBERG|TEWSlandscape architecture3101 East Franklin Avenue | Minneapolis MN 55406colbergtews.comPUD Submittal10/08/2018PUD Resubmittal01/14/2019PUD Resubmittal03/11/2019Site LayoutPlanL1.01.REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES.2.SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS ANDELECTRICAL INFORMATION.3.SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION.4.SEE SHEET L200 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS5.SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS.6.SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION.7.SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION.8.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUTWORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK.9.AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES ORCOORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING.10.FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANYDISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUTDISCREPANCIES.L1.0 LAYOUT PLAN NOTES1SITE PLAN1" = 50'1" = 50'02550100 19 19 7 10 5 10 NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCOMMUNITY GARDEN GARDEN SHED CONNECTION TO EXISTING TRAIL 5 STALLS 6 STALLS 17 STALLS inc. 2 ADA CLUB HOUSE POND SKILLED NURSING FACILITY TOWN CENTER INDEPENDENT LIVING APARTMENTS ABOVE ASSISTED LIVING INDEPENDENT LIVING APARTMENTS GARDEN SHED SNF PATIO BUTTERFLY GARDEN MOBILITY COURTYARD ART/ CONCERT AREA AL PATIO MEMORY GARDENSETBACK30'-0"10 9 11 12 13 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SETBACK 41'-9" FROM SECTION LINE 60'-0" PHASE 1 78 STALLS inc. 7 ADA NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGGRILL/ PICNIC AREA LOADING DOCK UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE 5 3 '78'3 2 ' PHASE 2 47 STALLS inc. 3 ADA FUTURE PARKING PHASE 3 COMMERCIAL USE RESTAURANT PATIO CLUBHOUSE PARKING WEST PARKING EAST PARKING MAIN PARKING RESTAURANT PARKING ACTIVE USE AREA F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale:3/8/2019 2:37:58 PMC:\Users\cschmid\Documents\Central_Lyngblomsten - Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18_cschmid@woldae.com.rvt1" = 50'-0"Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\Central_Lyngblomsten -Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18.rvtLyngblomsten LYNGBLOMSTEN SENIOR COMMUNITIES A2 SITE PLAN 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Checker Author 10-08-18 186024 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Revision 1 3/11/2019 1 0 1" = 50'-0" SITE PLAN Copy 1 Copy 1F1 37'-6"75' UNIT COUNT IL: 4- STORY 100 UNITS AL: 3- STORY 50 UNITS SNF: 2- STORY 48 UNITS DETACHED TOWNHOMES: 20 UNITS PARKING SUMMARY TOWNHOMES: 40 NORTHEAST: 6 NORTHWEST: 5 CLUBHOUSE: 17 MAIN LOT: 78 UNDERGROUND: 102 RESTAURANT: 47 TOTAL: 295 EXCLUDES FUTURE PARKING 46'43'43'46'46'F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale:3/8/2019 1:58:15 PMC:\Users\cschmid\Documents\Central_Lyngblomsten - Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18_cschmid@woldae.com.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\Central_Lyngblomsten -Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18.rvtLyngblomsten LYNGBLOMSTEN SENIOR COMMUNITIES A11 MAIN BUILDING ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 P. Schmelzer G. Berens 10-08-18 186024 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING - ELEVATION - 33 6' 12' INCLUDING GLASS INDEPENDENT LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 25% METAL SIDING: 18% GLASS: 34% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 23% SKILLED NURSING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 30% METAL SIDING: 0% GLASS: 30% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 40% ASSISTED LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 27% METAL SIDING: 0% GLASS: 27% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 46% TOTAL BUILDING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 26% METAL SIDING: 11% GLASS: 32% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 31% 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING - ELEVAITON - 22 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING - ELEVATION - 11 6' 12' STONE 19% (32% W/O GLASS) GLASS 40% COMPOSITE SIDING 20% METAL SIDING 21%STONE 10% (31% W/O GLASS) GLASS 35% COMPOSITE SIDING 37% METAL SIDING 18% STONE 31% (44% W/O GLASS) GLASS 30% COMPOSITE SIDING 20% METAL SIDING 19% STONE 18% (28% W/O GLASS) GLASS 36% COMPOSITE SIDING 28% METAL SIDING 18% GLASS 19% COMPOSITE SIDING 37% METAL SIDING 27% STONE 17% (21% W/O GLASS) 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING - ELEVATION - 54 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING - ELEVATION - 45 6' 12' Revisions Description Date Num PUD Revision 1 3/11/2019 1 EXCLUDING GLASS INDEPENDENT LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 38% METAL SIDING: 27% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 35% SKILLED NURSING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 43% METAL SIDING: 0% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 57% ASSISTED LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 37% METAL SIDING: 0% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 63% TOTAL BUILDING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 38% METAL SIDING: 16% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 46% 46'46'48'43'F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale:3/8/2019 2:01:04 PMC:\Users\cschmid\Documents\Central_Lyngblomsten - Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18_cschmid@woldae.com.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\Central_Lyngblomsten -Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18.rvtLyngblomsten LYNGBLOMSTEN SENIOR COMMUNITIES A12 MAIN BUILDING ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 P. Schmelzer G. Berens 10-08-18 186024 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING - ELEVATION - 77 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING - ELEVATION 6B1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING - ELEVATION - 99 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING - ELEVATION - 88 6' 12' GLASS 31% COMPOSITE SIDING 18% METAL SIDING 20% STONE 31% (45% W/O GLASS) GLASS 33% COMPOSITE SIDING 28% METAL SIDING 18% STONE 21% (31% W/O GLASS) GLASS 46% COMPOSITE SIDING 25% METAL SIDING 5% STONE 24% (44% W/O GLASS)GLASS 28% COMPOSITE SIDING 9% METAL SIDING 12% STONE 51% (71% W/O GLASS)INCLUDING GLASS INDEPENDENT LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 25% METAL SIDING: 18% GLASS: 34% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 23% SKILLED NURSING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 30% METAL SIDING: 0% GLASS: 30% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 40% ASSISTED LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 27% METAL SIDING: 0% GLASS: 27% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 46% TOTAL BUILDING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 26% METAL SIDING: 11% GLASS: 32% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 31% Revisions Description Date Num PUD Revision 1 3/11/2019 1 EXCLUDING GLASS INDEPENDENT LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 38% METAL SIDING: 27% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 35% SKILLED NURSING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 43% METAL SIDING: 0% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 57% ASSISTED LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 37% METAL SIDING: 0% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 63% TOTAL BUILDING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 38% METAL SIDING: 16% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 46% 25'25'25'25'25'25'25'F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale:3/8/2019 2:05:23 PMC:\Users\cschmid\Documents\Central_Lyngblomsten - Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18_cschmid@woldae.com.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\Central_Lyngblomsten -Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18.rvtLyngblomsten LYNGBLOMSTEN SENIOR COMMUNITIES A13 SKILLED NURSING ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 P. Schmelzer J. Smith 10-08-18 186024 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING - ELEVATION 11 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING - ELEVATION 22 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING - ELEVATION 33 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING - ELEVATION 44 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING - ELEVATION 55 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING - ELEVATION 66 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING - ELEVATION 77 6' 12' STONE 38% (52% W/O GLASS) GLASS 27% COMPOSITE SIDING 35% COMPOSITE SIDING 22% GLASS 78% STONE 37% (50% W/O GLASS) GLASS 27% COMPOSITE SIDING 37% STONE 21% (30% W/O GLASS) GLASS 31% COMPOSITE SIDING 48% STONE 21% (30% W/O GLASS) GLASS 31% COMPOSITE SIDING 48% STONE 29% (39% W/O GLASS) GLASS 26% COMPOSITE SIDING 46% STONE 29% (39% W/O GLASS) GLASS 26% COMPOSITE SIDING 46% Revisions Description Date Num PUD Revision 1 3/11/2019 1 INCLUDING GLASS INDEPENDENT LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 25% METAL SIDING: 18% GLASS: 34% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 23% SKILLED NURSING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 30% METAL SIDING: 0% GLASS: 30% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 40% ASSISTED LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 27% METAL SIDING: 0% GLASS: 27% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 46% TOTAL BUILDING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 26% METAL SIDING: 11% GLASS: 32% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 31% EXCLUDING GLASS INDEPENDENT LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 38% METAL SIDING: 27% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 35% SKILLED NURSING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 43% METAL SIDING: 0% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 57% ASSISTED LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 37% METAL SIDING: 0% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 63% TOTAL BUILDING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 38% METAL SIDING: 16% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 46% 37'37'37'37'35'37'54'33'F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale:3/8/2019 2:10:26 PMC:\Users\cschmid\Documents\Central_Lyngblomsten - Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18_cschmid@woldae.com.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\Central_Lyngblomsten -Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18.rvtLyngblomsten LYNGBLOMSTEN SENIOR COMMUNITIES A14 ASSISTED LIVING ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 P. Schmelzer J. Smith 10-08-18 186024 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING - ELEVATION - 22 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING - ELEVATION - 44 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING - ELEVATION - 55 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING - ELEVATION - 77 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING - ELEVATION - 33 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING - ELEVATION - 66 6' 12' STONE 28% (38% W/O GLASS) GLASS 26% COMPOSITE SIDING 46% GLASS 71% STONE 29% (100% W/O GLASS) STONE 33% (44% W/O GLASS) GLASS 25% COMPOSITE SIDING 42% STONE 26% (36% W/O GLASS) GLASS 26% COMPOSITE SIDING 48% STONE 21% (29% W/O GLASS) GLASS 27% COMPOSITE SIDING 52% STONE 27% (36% W/O GLASS) GLASS 25% COMPOSITE SIDING 48% STONE 21% (29% W/O GLASS) GLASS 27% COMPOSITE SIDING 52% INCLUDING GLASS INDEPENDENT LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 25% METAL SIDING: 18% GLASS: 34% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 23% SKILLED NURSING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 30% METAL SIDING: 0% GLASS: 30% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 40% ASSISTED LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 27% METAL SIDING: 0% GLASS: 27% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 46% TOTAL BUILDING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 26% METAL SIDING: 11% GLASS: 32% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 31% STONE 37% (56% W/O GLASS) GLASS 34% METAL SIDING 29% 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING - ELEVATION - 11 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING - ELEVATION - 88 6' 12' Revisions Description Date Num PUD Revision 1 3/11/2019 1 EXCLUDING GLASS INDEPENDENT LIVING MATERIALS STONE/MASONRY: 38% METAL SIDING: 27% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 35% SKILLED NURSING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 43% METAL SIDING: 0% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 57% ASSISTED LIVING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 37% METAL SIDING: 0% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 63% TOTAL BUILDING MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 38% METAL SIDING: 16% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 46% 638 SF DINING 132 SF ST Not Enclosed RENTAL 83 SF REC 1,210 SF LOUNGE 64 SF T 66 SF T 340 SF GAME ROOM B4 A15 F4A15E4 A15C4A15 347 SF SERVING KITCHEN 71 SF ELEV 653 SF BALCONY 347 SF CONFERENCE ROOM 71 SF ELEV OPEN TO BELOW 132 SF MECH 31'31'31'31'F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale:3/8/2019 2:13:11 PMC:\Users\cschmid\Documents\Central_Lyngblomsten - Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18_cschmid@woldae.com.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\Central_Lyngblomsten -Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18.rvtLyngblomsten LYNGBLOMSTEN SENIOR COMMUNITIES A15 CLUB HOUSE PLANS & ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 P. Schmelzer G. Berens 10-08-18 186024 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLUB HOUSE - MAIN LEVELC1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLUB HOUSE- 2ND FLOORF1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLUBHOUSE - ELEVATION 1B4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLUBHOUSE - ELEVATION 4F4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLUBHOUSE - ELEVATION 3E4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLUBHOUSE - ELEVATION 2C4 6' 12' STONE 35.5% (66% W/O GLASS) COMPOSITE SIDING 18% GLASS 46.5% STONE 15.5% (18% W/O GLASS) COMPOSITE SIDING 70.6% GLASS 13.9% STONE 26.7% (44% W/O GLASS) COMPOSITE SIDING 34% GLASS 39.3% STONE 30.9% (63% W/O GLASS) COMPOSITE SIDING 17.9% GLASS 51.3% INCLUDING GLASS CLUB HOUSE MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 28% METAL SIDING: 27% GLASS: 36% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 9% Revisions Description Date Num PUD Revision 1 3/11/2019 1 EXCLUDING GLASS CLUB HOUSE MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 44% METAL SIDING: 42% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 14% REF30"30"24"B5A16C5 A16D5A16F5 A16 GARAGE 21'-0" X 21'-0" KITCHEN 21'-0" X 12'-0" DINING 10'-0" X 7'-0" LIVING 18'-0" X 9'-0" MASTER BEDROOM 16'-0" X 14'-0" WALK-IN CLOSET 6'-0" X 11'-0" TOILET 11'-0" X 9'-0" TOILET 8'-0" X 7'-0" LAUNDRY 6'-0" X 3'-0" BEDROOM/ DEN 11'-0" X 14'-0" ENTRY 6'-0" X 20'-0" FRONT PORCH 24'-0" X 6'-0" PATIO 10'-0" X 10'-0" PANTRY 6'-0" X 3'-0" SUPPORT 3'-0" X 7'-0" 46'-8 3/4"45'-5 1/2"24'2'24'1'-6" 2'24'18'2'24'2' 1'-4" F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale:3/8/2019 2:15:40 PMC:\Users\cschmid\Documents\Central_Lyngblomsten - Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18_cschmid@woldae.com.rvtAs indicatedCentral: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\Central_Lyngblomsten -Lino Lakes Site J Hodgson-8.27.18.rvtLyngblomsten LYNGBLOMSTEN SENIOR COMMUNITIES A16 COTTAGE PLAN & ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 P. Schmelzer G. Berens 10-08-18 186024 0 1/4" = 1'-0" COTTAGE - MAIN LEVEL PLANF1 3' 6' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" COTTAGE BEDROOM ELEVATIONB5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" COTTAGE - BACK ELEVATIONC5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" COTTAGE - GARAGE ELEVATIOND5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" COTTAGE FRONT ELEVATIONF5 6' 12' TOWNHOME INSPIRATION GLASS 14% SIDING 51% STONE 17% (21% W/O GLASS) GLASS 18% COMPOSITE SIDING 65% STONE 33% COMPOSITE SIDING 67% STONE 15% (17% W/O GLASS) GLASS 10% COMPOSITE SIDING 75% INCLUDING GLASS COTTAGE MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 23% GLASS: 12% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 65% Revisions Description Date Num PUD Revision 1 3/11/2019 1 STONE 35% (41% W/O GLASS) EXCLUDING GLASS COTTAGE MATERIALS: STONE/MASONRY: 26% COMPOSITE SIDING (FIBER CEMENT BOARD-HARDIE): 74% Lyngblomsten City Council April 8, 2019 Background•Land Use Application •Rezoning •PUD Development Stage Plan •Preliminary Plat •Site Plan Review •Cottage homes & senior living complex only •Lyngblomsten Senior Living Community •Redevelopment of 20 acre 49/J Site 2 3 General Project Overview PHASE 1 •Senior Living Community Club House •Cottage Homes = 20 Game Room •Senior Campus =Kitchen •IL = 100 units Lounge •AL = 50 units •SNF = 48 units •Total = 218 units PHASE 2= Restaurant PHASE 3 = Commercial 4 •2007: Council approved Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J •Master Plan guides development of the area •Proposed rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement Master Plan 5 Transportation & Access •2 County Roads •A Minor Expander Arterial Roads •Anoka County •Ramsey County •City of Shoreview •1 Full Access •1,000 ft north of CR J •1 RI/RO at Hodgson Road •440 ft north of CR J •1 RI/RO at CR J •300 ft west of Hodgson •Geometrics and turn lanes coordinated Counties 6 Transportation & Access Public Road •60 ft ROW •32 ft paved back to back •On-street parking allowed Private Road (Cottage Homes) •26 ft wide paved •2 guest parking areas •11 stalls •No on-street parking Private Road (Commercial) •26 ft wide paved •Both private roads owned and maintained by developer Sidewalks and Trails 7 Greenspace Buffers •Woodridge Estates •Maintain 50 ft wide buffer along west edge •223 Woodridge •253 Woodridge •275 Ash Street 253 275 Ash 223 8 Green = Property Line Orange = 50’ buffer Preliminary Plat •Depicts lots and blocks 9 10 Original Revised Cottage Home on Lot 9 was shifted 10 ft to the west •70 ft to 60 ft setback •Still outside 50 ft buffer 11 Original Revised Landscape Screen required at end of commercial private road •Row of coniferous trees provided •More screening required 251- 255 Woodridge251 253 255 253 12 Original Revised Public Road ROW shifted 10-40 feet east •90 degree angle •Creates more buffer and preserves existing tree line adjacent to 275 Ash Street 275 Ash 275 Ash 13 Original Revised Community Garden replaced with SW Dry Pond •More stormwater mitigation was required 14 Greenspace Buffers •Rohavic Oaks •30 ft setback for cottage homes •6 ft fence 15 Site Design, Urban Form •Varying Building Heights •1 story cottage home •2 story SNF •3 story AL •4 story IL 1 2 3 4 16 Building Envelope-Setbacks Hodgson Road •Cottage Home = 40 ft •Senior Campus = 25 ft •Restaurant = 10 ft •Commercial = 10 ft CR J •Commercial = 10 ft Public Road •Cottage Homes = 25 ft •Clubhouse = 25 ft •Senior Campus = 12 ft •Corner only •Restaurant = 15 ft •Commercial = 15 ft Private Road •Cottages = 23 ft curb or sidewalk •Commercial = 15 ft curb or sidewalk North Lot Line = 30 ft West Lot Line = 50 ft 15’ 40’ 25’ 10’ 10’ 15’ 12’ 50’ 30’ 25’ 17 Parking Lots-Setbacks Hodgson Road & CR J •Discourage parking lots adjacent to roads •If necessary, extensive landscaping, screening etc. Public Road •15 ft setback Private Road •15 ft from curb or sidewalk •Encourage Joint Parking Facilities and Cross Driveway Easements btn Restaurant and Commercial 15’ 15’ 15’ 15’ Architecture•Master Plan emphasizes buildings designed with “four-sided architecture” •Exterior material same quality stone/masonry, metal and composite siding and glass. •Building layout was designed to limit blank walls facing the street. •Separate building wings break up the massing as well as transition intensity from west to east on the site. 18 19Main Building & Independent Living •4 story (43 ft height roofline +2-4 ft decorative parapets) •Strong vertical design with building articulation, depth and textures View from Hodgson 20Main Building & Independent Living •4 story •43 ft height roofline + 2-4 ft decorative parapets •Main entrance signature parapet = 5 ft View from Public Road/Parking Lot 21Skilled Nursing Facility •2 story •23 ft height roofline + 2-4 ft decorative parapets View from Public Road/Parking Lot 22 Assisted Living •3 story (33 ft height +2-4 ft decorative parapet) View from Commercial Private Road and Hodgson 23 Cottage Homes •2 bedroom, single level •18 ft height •Floor area = 1,400 sf •21’x21’ recessed garage •6’ deep front porch •10’ x 10’ rear patio •brick/stone base 24 Clubhouse •2 level •31 ft height •Unique roofline •Stone/masonry •Metal siding •Composite siding •Glass (>%) 25 Revised Preliminary Plat Block 1 •Lots 1-21 = Cottage Homes •Lot 17 = Clubhouse •Lot 22 = Common Area Block 2 •Lot 1 = Senior Campus •Lot 2 = Restaurant Outlots •OL A = SW Pond •OL B = Open Space/Lift Station •OL C = Future Commercial 26 Revised Preliminary Plat As discussed, “lot of moving parts to full redevelopment of 49/J site” •20 acre site •6 parcels •4 different property owners •4 separate Purchase Agreements •If PA for 3 acre commercial development (OL C) is not executed, •Preliminary plat revised and temp cul de sac installed until future development •Preliminary Plat may change again after conditions addressed 27•20 ft trail corridor shall be outside of lot lines (Lot 13 and Lot 14) 28 •Setback shall be min 25 feet Park Dedication Fees Building # units or acres Fee per unit Total Cottage Homes 20 units $3,000 $60,000 IL (Independent Living)100 units $3,000 $300,000 AL (Assisted-Living) + SNF (Skilled Nursing)2.43 acres $2,400 $5,820 Trail Construction (Minus Costs) TOTAL $365,820 29 •Credit will be given for trail construction Planning & Zoning Board•Public Hearing held on February 13, 2019 •Approximately 20 residents attended •Overall comments were positive •Concerns •Buffers and screening •Traffic •P&Z voted 5-0 in favor of rezoning, PUD Dev Stage/PP 30 Council Consideration•Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 07-19 Rezoning Property from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development •Findings of Fact for Rezoning •Permitted, Accessory and Conditional Uses 31 Council Consideration•Consider Resolution No. 19-42 Approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat •Findings of Fact for PUD and Preliminary Plat •Details Specific Zoning Requirements •Lot & Yard Setbacks •Height Regulations •Design Guidelines •Additional land acquisition along CR J may allow intersection to shift west without deeming final plat inconsistent •Final Plat may not include Outlot C (commercial) and public road may cul de sac 32 End 33 34 35 3 Phased Development PHASE 1 •17 acre parcel •Senior Living Community •Cottage Homes •Senior Living Campus •Club House PHASE 2 •17 acre parcel •Restaurant PHASE 3 •3 acre balance •Commercial Development Density Gross Area (acres)20.47 Wetlands & Water Bodies (0.28) Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW (1.79) Other (Utility Transmission Easement)0.00 Other (Wetland Buffer Area)(0.24) Net Area (acres)18.16 # of Units1 170 Gross Density (units/acre)8.30 Net Density (units/acre)9.36 36 •1Per Met Council, skilled nursing facilities/units are not counted toward a community’s net residential density. (218 total units -48 SNF =170 units) •CP allows for 8-15 upa and Master Plan allows for 10 upa over 60 acre site •Proposed 9.36 upa Density is consistent with both Comprehensive Plan and Master Plan Traffic Study•Traffic Study completed by Swing Traffic Solutions January 2019 •Proposed project generate 1,473 daily trips •69 trips = AM peak period (7:00 to 8:00) •123 trips = PM peak (4:30 to 5:30) •Peak trip generation is 1/3 less than projected in Master Plan •Existing daily trips: •8,400 on Hodgson Road •10,700 on CR J (west of Hodgson) •6,700 of CR J (east of Hodgson) 37 Level of Service (LOS)•Traffic can be subjective •LOS provides objective, measurable standards •LOS is a measurement of intersection traffic operations and traffic delays •LOS of A = best operating conditions •LOS of F = worst operating conditions 38 Level of Service•City Ordinance establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. •If the existing LOS is A or B, the proposed development can not the degrade the LOS more than one grade. •If the existing LOS is C or D, proposed development can not degrade the LOS. •Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better. 39 Overall Level of Service 40 Intersection Existing LOS (AM/PM) Project Build (With Out SB RT onto CR J) Project Build (With SB RT onto CR J Co Rd J at Woodridge Ln A/A A/A na Co Rd J at St. Albans St A/A A/A na Co Rd J at Hodgson Rd C/D C/D C/D Hodgson Rd at Rohavic Ln A/A A/A na •All intersections meet the City Code LOS requirements. Summary•PUD flexibility for building setbacks •PUD Benefits Gained •Increased buffer from Woodridge Neighborhood •Implementation of Master Plan’s Urban Form Vision •Redevelopment of City gateway •Provide economic value and stimulus •Provides social value with senior programs and amenities •Higher SF home standards •Increased landscaping •Clubhouse and amenities •Wetland buffer 41 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: April 8, 2019 TOPIC: Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19, Amending City Code § 1007 Related to Multiple Principal Buildings on One Parcel, in Commercial, Industrial or Public/Semi-Public Zoning Districts VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration to amend City Code § 1007 to allow for multiple buildings on a single parcel in Commercial, Industrial, and Public/Semi Public Zoning Districts. BACKGROUND Current City ordinance only allows for one principal building per lot. In commercial and industrial zoning districts the size of accessory buildings is limited to 400 square feet. Accordingly any expansion project which requires an additional building in excess of 400 square feet would require approval of a planned unit development. PUD’s may be done by rezoning in Industrial Districts and by either rezoning or Conditional Use Permit in Commercial Districts. For a single use site, approval for multiple buildings may be more appropriately handled through a Conditional Use Permit process. City staff is proposing an ordinance change for the City Council’s consideration to simplify the process for single use expansion projects. ANALYSIS The proposed amendment provides for multiple buildings on a single lot as a conditional use. The provisions include the following: 1. Amends Section 1007.042 (4)(b) to allow multiple principal buildings by Conditional Use Permit. 2. Amends Section 1007.043 (4) to allow for multiple accessory buildings over 400 square feet in area by Conditional Use Permit in Commercial and Industrial Districts. 3. Amends the permitted Conditional Uses in the GB, General Business District, LI, Light Industry and GI, General Industry Districts, and the PSP, Public Semi-public District to include two or more buildings on same lot. 2 The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on March 13, 2019. The Board voted 4-0 to recommend adoption of the proposed amendment. RECOMMENDATION The City Council approved the 1st Reading of the ordinance on March 25, 2019. Staff is recommending approval of the 2ndt Reading of Ordinance No. 05-19. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. 05-19 1st Reading: Publication: 2nd Reading: Effective: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 05-19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 1007 RELATED TO MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON A SINGLE LOT IN COMMERICAL, INDUSTRIAL AND PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC ZONING DISTRICTS The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains: Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds that the allowance of two or more principle or accessory buildings on a single lot may be appropriately regulated through the Conditional Use Permit process when such buildings relate to a single business or enterprise. Section 2. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.042 (4) is hereby amended as set forth below: (b) Principal Buildings. Except in Commercial, Industrial and Public/Semi- Public zoning districts, where allowed by Conditional Use Permit, and in an approved planned unit development that specifically allows it, provided for in §1007.024 of this Ordinance, not more than one (1) principal building shall be located on a lot”. Section 3. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.043(4) (J) is hereby amended as set forth below: 1. Except in Commercial, and Industrial zoning districts, where allowed by Conditional Use Permit, and in an approved planned unit development that specifically allows it, provided for in §1007.024 of this Ordinance not more than Only one (1) accessory building shall be allowed not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet except when intended for storage of buses Section 4. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.112, GB, General Business District, (8) Conditional Uses is hereby amended as set forth below: (o) Two (2) or more buildings on same lot provided such buildings relate to a permitted or conditional use that is operated as a single business or enterprise. Section 5. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.120 LI, Light Industrial District, (9) Conditional Uses, is hereby amended as set forth below: (g) Two (2) or more buildings on same lot provided such buildings relate to a permitted or conditional use that is operated as a single business or enterprise. Section 6. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.121, GI, General Industrial District, (9) Conditional Uses, is hereby amended as set forth below: (j) Two (2) or more buildings on same lot provided such buildings relate to a permitted or conditional use that is operated as a single business or enterprise. Section 7. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007.130 PSP, Public and Semi-Public District, (8) Conditional Uses, is hereby amended as set forth below: (c) Two (2) or more buildings on same lot provided such buildings relate to a permitted or conditional use that is operated as a single business or enterprise. i. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 8th day of April, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council Member_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: ____________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: April 8, 2019 TOPIC: Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19, Amending City Code § 1007 Allowing for Construction of Retaining Walls Greater than 42”in Height. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration to amend City Code § 1007 to allow for retaining walls greater than 42” in height. BACKGROUND City Code §1007.043 (18) regulates the construction of Fences and Walls. This includes the construction of retaining walls. A Zoning Permit is required for construction within all platted areas of the city. §1007.043 (18) (d)(5) currently prohibits retaining walls over 42 inches in height. The state building code has provision for walls greater than 48 inches. This measurement includes any buried section of the wall (footing). Staff is proposing to allow the higher wall height subject to State Building Code provisions. ANALYSIS The proposed amendment includes four changes to current ordinance: 1. Provides a definition for “Retaining Wall” to differentiate from the definition of “Fence” which also includes a wall. 2. Requires a zoning permit throughout the City consistent with current practice regardless of whether the property is platted. The purpose of the zoning permit is to ensure that locational requirements are being met. 3. Provides for review of easement encroachments by the City Engineer rather than Zoning Administrator. The ordinance does allow encroachments in certain instances. These items are generally reviewed by the City Engineer. 4. Requires a Building Permit for walls over 48” in height. The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on March 13, 2019 and recommended approval of the proposed amendment. 2 RECOMMENDATION The City Council approved the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19 on March 25, 2018. Staff is recommending approval of the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 06-19. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. 06-19. 1st Reading: Publication: 2nd Reading: Effective: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 06-19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 1007 ALLOWING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RETAINING WALLS GREATER THAN 42” IN HEIGHT The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains: Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds that the construction of retaining walls greater than 42” in height are regulated by the State Building Code and therefore it is not necessary to prohibit construction thereof. Section 2. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code § 1007.001 (2) Definitions is amended as follows: RETAINING WALL. A wall not laterally supported at the top that resists lateral soil load and other imposed loads. Section 3. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code § 1007.043 (18) is proposed to be amended as follows: (a) Permit Required. It is unlawful for any person hereafter to construct or cause to be constructed or erected within the platted areas of the City, any fence or wall without first making an application for and securing a permit. Section 4. Amendment. Lino Lakes City Code § 1007.043 (18)(c) 4. is proposed to read as follows: h. No fence or wall shall be located within a drainage or utility easement without written permission of the Zoning Administrator City Engineer and the filing of an encroachment agreement. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 8th day of April, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council Member_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: ____________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer MEETING DATE: April 8, 2019 TOPIC : Consider Resolution No. 19-43, Accepting bids, Awarding a Construction Contract, and Approving Construction Services Contract, 2019 Mill and Overlay Project VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting council’s consideration to accept bids, award construction contract, and approving construction services contract for the 2019 Mill and Overlay Street Improvements Project. BACKGROUND In accordance with the City’s Pavement Management Plan, the following streets were identified for the 2019 Mill and Overlay Project: Sherman Lake Road, Merganser Court, Sherman Lake Court, Sherman lake Circle, Fire Station #1 Parking Lot, Deerwood Lane (Fox Road to the south cul-du-sac), Pheasant Hills Drive (cul-de-sac) Bids were received for the above-referenced project on Thursday, March 28, 2019. A total of seven bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and tabulated. Below is a table of Grand Total Bids received, which includes the Base Bid plus Alternate #1 (Deerwood Lane): CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID (INCL. ALT. #1) North Valley, Inc. $546,809.69 Northwest $551,350.33 GMH Asphalt Corporation $573,759.20 Midwest Asphalt Services $598,790.75 Park Construction Company $614,990.22 T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. $642,753.37 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $679,559.30 The low bid was submitted by North Valley, Inc. in the amount of $546,809.69. WSB and Associates has submitted a proposal to complete the construction services for the 2019 Mill and Overlay Project in the amount of $39,028. The total budget for the project is $655,000 to be paid out of the Pavement Management Fund. The completion date for this project is October 25, 2019. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 19-43, Accepting the Bid and Awarding a Construction Contract in the amount of $546,809.69 to North Valley, Inc., and Approving the Construction Services Contract with WSB for the 2019 Mill and Overlay Project, in the amount of $39,028. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 19-43 2. Bid Tabulation 3. WSB Proposal CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19-43 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BASE BID, AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, AND APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACT, 2019 MILL AND OVERLAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the 2019 Mill and Overlay Street Improvements Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID North Valley, Inc. $546,809.69 Northwest $551,350.33 GMH Asphalt Corporation $573,759.20 Midwest Asphalt Services $598,790.75 Park Construction Company $614,990.22 T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. $642,753.37 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $679,559.30 WHEREAS, it appears that North Valley, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder, including Alternate #1 of Deerwood Lane from Fox Road to the south end; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it would be in the best interests of the city to proceed with the construction oversight and administration, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with North Valley, Inc. in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the 2019 Mill and Overlay Street Improvements Project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with WSB, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction services of the 2019 Mill and Overlay Street Improvements Project in the amount of $39,028. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidder the Bid Bonds made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 8th day of April, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: _______________________________ Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk 2019 Mill and Overlay Street Improvements (#6135597) Owner: City of Lino Lakes Solicitor: WSB & Associates, Inc. 03/28/2019 11:00 AM CDT Engineer Estimate Northwest North Valley, Inc. GMH Asphalt Corporation Midwest Asphalt Services Park Construction Company T. A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc Bituminous Roadways Inc. Section Title Line Item Item Code Item Descr UofM Quantity Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension SCHEDULE A ‐ STREET SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $376,844.00 $366,374.17 $361,478.71 $379,012.44 $398,429.10 $398,045.35 $422,493.10 $444,381.15 SCHEDULE B ‐ FIRE STATION #1 SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $73,690.00 $75,349.27 $83,872.99 $82,982.76 $84,271.45 $91,004.02 $94,357.87 $100,248.15 ALTERNATE 1 ‐ DEERWOOD LANE SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $109,400.00 $109,626.89 $101,457.99 $111,763.90 $116,090.20 $125,940.85 $125,902.40 $134,970.00 Base Bid Total:$450,534.00 $441,723.44 $445,351.70 $461,995.20 $482,700.55 $489,049.37 $516,850.97 $544,629.30 GRAND TOTAL BID ‐ Base Bid + Alternate 1 $559,934.00 $551,350.33 $546,809.69 $573,759.10 $598,790.75 $614,990.22 $642,753.37 $679,599.30 K:\012972-000\Admin\Contract\2. Construction\20190408 Design Fee Proposal.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM April 8, 2019 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Proposal for Construction Services for 2019 Mill & Overlay Street Improvements Project WSB Project No.R-012972-000 Dear Mr. Grochala: WSB & Associates, Inc. is pleased to present to you this proposal for construction services associated with the City’s 2019 Mill and Overlay Street Improvements Project. This would be subsequent to the City Council awarding the construction contract for the project to North valley, Inc. in the amount of $546,809.69. The City of Lino Lakes is requesting assistance with design of its 2019 Mill and Overlay Project. The streets designated for rehabilitation are local streets as determined by their OCI ratings established in the City’s Pavement Management Study. A summary of the project site is described as follows: Project Understanding A summary of the project scope is described as follows: Street & Parking Lot Improvements, Full Depth Reclamation • Sherman Lake Road • Fire Station No. 1 Parking Lot Improvements • Deerwood Lane (Alternate) Street Improvements, Mill and Overlay • Pheasant Hills Drive Project scope to include minor curb and gutter replacement and storm sewer repair Scope of Engineering Services WSB is pleased to provide professional construction engineering services for the 2019 Mill and Overlay Street Improvements Project including contract administration, construction observation, construction staking, and public involvement with project stakeholders. Below is a detailed description of the engineering services and WSB’s proposed approach. I. Construction Services a. Project Management/Contract Administration Contract Administration includes holding meetings with the contractor & City of Lino Lakes (preconstruction & weekly construction), processing monthly quantities for pay vouchers, and communicating with residents on a regular basis. Mr. Michael Grochala April 8, 2019 Page 2 K:\012972-000\Admin\Contract\2. Construction\20190408 Design Fee Proposal.docx b. Construction Observation WSB will provide an experienced engineering specialist whose responsibilities will include communicating with the Contactor as an agent of the City, calculating and keeping track of daily construction quantities and costs, contact and meet with residents as necessary, and work with the Contractor to assist with a quality constructed product. c. Construction Staking (Survey) WSB will provide Surveying staff as necessary to provide field staking for necessary roadway centerlines, elevations, and any necessary curbing or structure related information. WSB will provide a separate proposal for materials testing services for the 2019 Mill and Overlay Street Improvements Project. Proposed Fee A copy of the project task hour budget is attached for your reference. Based on the proposed task hour budget, WSB will complete the scope of work the project discussed herein on hourly basis for a not-to-exceed amount of $39,028. Tasks not shown are considered outside of the scope of services. If additional work is necessary, we will prepare a detailed scope of work and include it as an addendum to this agreement. We will not proceed with any additional work until the addendum is authorized by both parties. This letter represents our complete understanding of the 2019 Mill and Overlay Street Improvements Project and the proposed scope of services. If you are in agreement with the scope of services and proposed fee, please sign in the appropriate space below and return one copy to us. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 763-287-7179 Sincerely, Edward C. Youngquist Associate Attachments