HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-04-2019 Council PacketCITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday, November 4, 2019
Community Room
6:00 P.M.
1. Susan Vento, Metropolitan Council Board Member, District 11
2. Twin Cities Gateway 2020 Budget, Executive Director Steve Markuson
3. NE Drainage Improvement Project update, Michael Grochala, Pete Willenbring (WSB)
4. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update, Michael Grochala
5. I-35E AUAR 5 Year Update, Michael Grochala
6. PSD Quarterly Update, John Swenson
7. 2020 Budget, Sarah Cotton
8. Council Updates on Boards/Commissions, City Council
9. Monthly Progress Report, Jeff Karlson
10. Review Regular Agenda
11. Adjourn
WS – 1
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 1
Date: November 4, 2019
To: City Council
From: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator
Re: District 11 Metropolitan Council Member Susan Vento
Background
Metropolitan Council Member Sue Vento, who represents District 11, asked if she could
be placed on the agenda to introduce herself to the City Council. Ms. Vento was
appointed to the Metropolitan Council by Governor Tim Walz in March 2019.
Vento is a former school teacher who served as a field representative and program
organizer with the Minnesota Education Association and Education Minnesota for nearly
30 years.
As the District 11 representative, Vento represents the cities of Columbus, Centerville,
Linwood, and Lino Lakes in Anoka County, and 10 other jurisdictions in the counties of
Ramsey and Washington.
Attachments
Map of Met Council District 11
Requested Council Direction
No action is required.
WS – 2
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 2
Date: November 4, 2019
To: City Council
From: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator
Re: Twin Cities Gateway 2020 Budget
Background
Executive Director Steve Markuson will be at the work session to give an overview of
TCG’s 2020 budget.
Attachments
TCG 2020 Budget
2020 Budget Overview
TWIN CITIES GATEWAY
2020 BUDGET
Approved by TCG Board of Directors
September 17, 2019
2020
2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 Proposed
Actual Actual Actual Budget Projected Budget
FUND RESERVE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 606,608$ 678,622$ 621,970$ 532,974$ 532,974$ 357,199$
REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES
Lodging Taxes
938,457$ 949,400$ 1,006,224$ 975,000$ 975,000$ 975,000$
Grants 8,000 6,401 6,727 7,000 7,000 7,000
Investment income 557 957 985 1,000 925 1,000
Other - - - - 1,100
947,014 956,758 1,013,936 983,000 984,025 983,000
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Management contracts 123,784 171,504 197,920 200,000 200,000 215,000
Other administrative costs 22,224 28,275 12,876 25,000 25,000 20,000
Blaine (Fiscal Agent)15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
Organizational insurance 1,384 - 2,777 1,500 1,450 1,500
Organizational memberships 1,407 2,347 4,141 3,000 3,000 3,000
Miscellaneous 333 333 333 1,500 350 1,500
MARKETING EXPENDITURES
Website enhancement/Social media 37,968 28,132 33,600 50,000 50,000 35,000
Destination Marketing 327,918 435,284 493,875 450,000 450,000 420,000
Promotions/collateral materials 19,240 17,754 31,587 35,000 35,000 35,000
Public/media relations - - - - -
New Venue/Public Facilities promotion 20,000 - - 10,000 20,000 -
Member City Grants 101,564 99,708 101,093 100,000 100,000 95,000
Meeting & conference marketing & promotion 57,765 77,327 61,193 80,000 80,000 50,000
Sports Marketing 126,638 122,533 134,504 150,000 150,000 145,000
Regional Grant program 19,775 15,213 14,033 30,000 30,000 15,000
875,000 1,013,410 1,102,932 1,151,000 1,159,800 1,051,000
Revenue over (under) Expenditures 72,014 (56,652) (88,996) (168,000) (175,775) (68,000)
FUND RESERVE 678,622$ 621,970$ 532,974$ 364,974$ 357,199$ 289,199$
1
Twin Cities Gateway FY20 Approved Budget Overview
Overview: This overview is in accordance with the organization’s
Member City Agreements to provide its FY20 budget annually by
October 1. The budget was approved by the Twin Cities Gateway
Board of Directors at its September 17, 2019 Board meeting.
REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES – represents the projected 3%
lodging tax receipts, collected by 22 hotels and one B & B in TCG’s
nine member cities; grants received; and investment income.
OPERATING EXPENDITURES:
• Management Contracts – instead of employees or staff, Twin
Cities Gateway contracts with two firms to provide day to day
management and program execution. This greatly reduces
operating and administrative costs to enable more marketing.
• Other Administrative Costs - includes out of the metro area
travel costs to attend tradeshows to promote TCG and
conferences, and Board and committee meeting expenses,
• Blaine (fiscal agent) – TCG contracts with the City of Blaine
Finance Department to handle all lodging tax receivables,
accounts payable and monthly financial reporting.
• Organizational Insurance – TCG costs for Board of Directors
liability and errors and omissions insurance policy coverage.
NOTE: Both independent contractors are required to carry their
own similar coverage that includes TCG as additional insured.
2
• Organizational Memberships – covers local area Chamber of
Commerce memberships; national tourism association
memberships; Minnesota Association of Convention & Visitors
Bureau annual memberships and so on.
• Miscellaneous – funding for Board and committee meeting
copies, software programs, office supplies, electronic file
sharing, backup and data storage,
MARKETING EXPENDITURES:
• Website Enhancement / Social Media – expenses incurred for
on-going website maintenance; website updates; content
development; calendar of events, etc. and social media posts
promoting attractions and events occurring in the TCG area.
• Destination Marketing – online, print and broadcast marketing
efforts and activities to promote the entire TCG destination
area to generate incremental visitation into and throughout
TCG’s nine member cities for day trips and overnight travel.
• Promotions / Collateral Materials – production and distribution
of the TCG regional maps; promotional banners for sports
events hosted in the TCG area; tradeshow booth and exhibits.
• Member City Grants - grants provided to each of TCG’s nine
member cities for use to promote their community festivals,
events and other assets to encourage visitation to the area.
Grant amounts are based on the percentage of the 3% lodging
tax receipts collected by each respective member city.
• Meeting & Conference Marketing & Promotion – online and
print ads to promote TCG’s meetings / conference venues.
3
• Sports Marketing – funds are used to travel to sports marketing
tradeshows to generate hosted-sports events and activities at
the National Sports Center and TCG’s nine member cities and
to sponsor sporting events to offset the cost of field, court, or
ice rental fees if the event is held in the Twin Cities Gateway.
• Regional Grant Program – grant funding is available to assist
local entities in developing and hosting events and activities
within the TCG area. Grants awarded require a 1:1 match.
REVENUE OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES – the TCG FY20 budget has
been projected conservatively with same-level revenue as that of
FY19. The organization remains in a strong financial position with a
sound fund reserve. In order to maximize marketing and promotion
to generate incremental visitation to the area, the TCG FY20
approved budget includes expending some of this fund reserve. This
will result in deficit spending of approximately $68,000 for the year.
The projected fund reserve as of 12/31/20 will be $289,199 or 29% of
budget. The TCG Board’s goal is to retain a fund reserve of 25%.
WS – Item 3
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 3
Date: November 4, 2019
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
Re: NE Lino Lakes Drainage Area Improvements
Background
On October 22, 2018, the City Council authorized preparation of plans and specifications
for phase 1 and 2 of the NE Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project. The
improvements will provide an improved drainage outlet for approximately 1,350 acres of
future residential, commercial and industrial land within the City.
Current Project Status
WSB has been working to finalizing plans based on agency review comments. This
process has taken longer than originally anticipated due to state/federal permitting
requirements. Based on comments received WSB is evaluating possible modifications to
the proposed project. WSB staff will be present at the meeting to discuss.
Land acquisition is still in progress. Negotiations with property owners are still in
progress. A court hearing has been scheduled for November 22, 2019, if necessary.
Requested Council Direction
None Required. Update only.
Attachments
1. NE Drainage Area Improvement Project area
LINDNER GERALD G& CYNTHIA MNELSON RICHARD D & JANET MWITTNER STACIFARMERIE HENRYLEIBEL HAL LSALO TRUSTEE BERNICE & SALO TRUSTEE JAMESLEIBEL HAL LLEIBEL HAL LLEIBEL HALLLEIBEL HAL LLAKE DRIVEPELTIER
20TH AVE
156.6 Cut/Fill SummaryNameComposite 12-4-18TotalsCut Factor1.000Fill Factor1.0002d Area456558.68 Sq. Ft.456558.68 Sq. Ft.Cut116843.34 Cu. Yd.116843.34 Cu. Yd.Fill0.88 Cu. Yd.0.88 Cu. Yd.Net116842.46 Cu. Yd.<Cut>116842.46 Cu. Yd.<Cut>STORM PIPE SEGMENTGREENWAY SEGMENTWSB PROJECT NO.:REVISIONS
NO.DATE DESCRIPTION
013084-000SCALE:PLAN BY:DESIGN BY:CHECK BY:AS SHOWNI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LIC. NO:DATE:
PETER R. WILLENBRING, PE
07/20/2018 15998SHEETOF EY/KHPWMRNortheast Lino Lakes
Comprehensive StormWater
Management Plan
City of Lino Lakes, MN25
WS – Item 4
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 4
Date: November 4, 2019
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
Re: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Summary and Authorization for Distribution
Background
On May 13, 2019 the City Council authorized distribution of the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan
to adjacent jurisdictions for review and comment. Under state law reviewing agencies have six
months to provide comments on the plan. The plan, was distributed on May 22nd and the
deadline for comment ends on November 19th.
To date the City has received nine responses. Staff will be working with the consultant team to
address substantive comments. At this time we are proposing to bring forward the draft 2040
Plan for preliminary approval and authorization to submit to Metropolitan Council at the
November 25, 2019 City Council meeting.
The draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update can be found here: https://www.ci.lino-
lakes.mn.us/compplan.
Requested Council Direction
None.
Attachments
1. Adjacent Jurisdiction Review comments
Government Center 2100 3rd Avenue, Suite 700 Anoka, MN 55304-5025 www.anokacounty.us
Office: 763-324-4700 Fax: 763-324-5490
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
June 24, 2019
Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182
Re: Anoka County comments on the City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan (2019)
Dear Mike:
Thank you for providing the County of Anoka an opportunity to comment on the City of Lino
Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The following includes comment from a variety of
departments within the County.
Community Development:
The Anoka County Community Development Department has reviewed the City’s revised
Comprehensive Plan and has no further comments.
Parks Department:
The County Parks Department has reviewed the revised Comprehensive Plan and offers
the following comments:
1. Figure 2.17 2017 Existing Land Use
a. Revise RCCOL park boundary at City Hall to show the correct boundary. The
larger of the two blue Public/Semi-Public should be shown as County Park
and Recreation.
Parcel should be labeled County Parks and Recreation
Page 2
b. Consider changing land use for Parcel number: 023122130001 (On the north
side of the park reserve) to be shown as Public/Semi-Public. While it is under
Anoka County ownership, it is excluded from the park boundary.
2. Figure 3.10 - Consider acknowledging that the existing asphalt trail on Elm Street is
part of the existing Bunker – Chain of Lakes Regional Trail.
3. Figure 3.12 - Please confirm that Central Anoka County Regional Trail that follows
CSAH 14 to Washington County is accurately depicted as existing in the 35E area
and that it is not an on-street route.
4. Figure 6.15 - Please confirm that Central Anoka County Regional Trail that follows
CSAH 14 to Washington County is accurately depicted as existing in the 35E area to
the City of Hugo and that it is not an on-street route.
Public Health and Environmental Services:
The County Public Health and Environmental Services Department has reviewed the
revised City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan and has no additional comments.
Transportation Division:
The County Highway Department has reviewed the revised City of Lino Lakes 2040
Comprehensive Plan and has no additional comments.
The Transit Department has reviewed the revised City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive
Plan and offers the following comments:
1. Page 6-32
a. Under Existing Transit Service- Metro Transit and Anoka County Traveler are
listed. Change Anoka County Traveler to Anoka County Transit. The County
has other services that are not Traveler related.
b. Table 6-10 - Metro Transit lists the Route 250 frequency at approx. 5-15
minutes and service runs until 7:47pm.
c. After the Fixed Route Transit Service paragraph add:
i. Anoka County Transit Services
Anoka County Transit offers transit service to all residents of Anoka
County who can travel independently or with a personal care
attendant.
ii. Anoka County Traveler Transit Link- Dial-A-Ride Service (note
service hours and fares has changed quite a bit)
Traveler Transit Link is a demand-response transit service in Lino
Lakes which serves all of Anoka County as well as NW Ramsey
County. Hours of service are 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday-Friday.
There is no weekend service for Transit Link. Transfers are
Parcel should be shown as Public/Semi-Public; it
is not part of the park boundary.
Page 3
coordinated with all fixed routes in Anoka County and NW Ramsey
County to give passengers the most efficient and affordable way to
travel. The regular fare for Traveler Transit Link service is $ 3.50 per
person; the peak hour fare is $4.50 per person with a $ .75 surcharge
for all trips over 15 miles. All Traveler vehicles are accessible. It
should be noted Transit Link is a metro-wide service utilizing multiple
providers.
iii. Anoka County Traveler fixed-routes 801, 805 and 831.
These routes operate in the southern part of the county. Although
they do not serve Lino Lakes residents can access these routes by
transferring from Transit Link service.
iv. Anoka County Medlink (formerly Anoka County Volunteer
Transportation)
The Anoka County Volunteer Transportation Program provides rides to
and from medical, dental, and appointments with social services. To
be eligible for a ride you can be a veteran, a senior 60 years of age or
older, or a client of Anoka County. This service relies on volunteer
drivers. While the service is free, donations are encouraged. Medical
and dental trips may be made throughout the metro area while
appointments with social services must remain within Anoka County.
2. Pg. 6-33
a. Travel Demand Management paragraph should be moved under Anoka
County Transit.
b. Travel Demand Management Program- Coordinated through Anoka
County Transit’s Commute Solutions
Travel Demand Management (TDM) services include programs that promote
and support any alternative to commuting via single-occupant vehicle. It may
include ride-matching, car-pool and van-pool services as previously
described, both covers many other options as well. Transit promotions,
employer-subsidized bus passes, flexible work hours, and telecommuting are
just some of the possible strategies to reduce single occupant vehicle (SOV)
use. Metro Transit provides regional services through its Metro Commuter
Services group and Anoka County Transit’s Commute Solutions continues to
receive grants to coordinate programs within the County. These local
transportation management organizations provide further support and
services. The city and employers may use these services and programs free
of charge to benefit employee travel arrangements and budgets. (revised)
c. Anoka County Transit no longer provides Metro Mobility service for the Met
Council.
d. May want to update the 2006 ridership number.
3. Page 6-33
a. Second column first paragraph. Anoka County Volunteer Transportation is
now known as Anoka County Medlink. The program also assisted Veterans
of any age. We haven’t received a private grant for quite some time.
b. 95th Ave park and ride was expanded to 1,482 spaces.
c. St. Joseph’s Church is still listed as a Lino Lakes park and ride.
d. Routes 262 and 275 are no longer privately contracted.
e. Southbound Bus-only shoulder lanes have been expanded beyond 95th Ave.
and Hwy 36.
Thank you again for providing the County an opportunity to comment on your City’s
Comprehensive Plan. Please review the County’s comments and contact me directly with
From:Mara Strand
To:Mara Strand
Subject:FW: Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Date:Tuesday, October 29, 2019 1:29:44 PM
Attachments:image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
DWSMA Vulnerability Map.pdf
From: Mark Statz <MStatz@centervillemn.com>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 3:08 PM
To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP <KLindahl@landform.net>
Cc: 'Janovec, Mark' <Mark.Janovec@stantec.com>; Paul Palzer <PPalzer@centervillemn.com>;
Teresa Bender <TBender@centervillemn.com>; 'Carlson, Phil' <Phil.Carlson@stantec.com>
Subject: RE: Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Kendra,
Here are the City of Centerville’s comments. Let me know if you need them in any other format:
1. Given the city’s Charter-style government and the difficulties this can present when
completing road projects that may involve assessments, we would encourage the city to
add 21st Avenue and Cedar Street to its State Aid system? Centerville wants to be sure
there is adequate and reliable funding sources to complete improvements to these shared
roads. They both appear to be good candidates for State Aid routes. Even though 21st
is a dead end, currently, it has the right-of-way to go through to Cedar Street as
development there occurs. For Cedar Street, it appears that the eastern portion (where it
is completely within the city of Lino Lakes) is a part of your system, but the shared
portion is not. It is our understanding that a shared road can be added to your system
(with funding used only for your half of the improvements).
2. Centerville’s DWSMA (attached map) extends into Lino Lakes. We would like to note
the existence of ISTS and private wells in Centerville’s DWSMA and encourage
programs to eliminate both as soon as practical.
3. Planned Land Uses in Centerville’s DWSMA include Industrial uses. Restrictions on
these uses should be considered to ensure the prevention of contamination of the City’s
water supply. Centerville requests an opportunity to review and comment on
Conditional Use Permits or other zoning applications for industrial uses within our
DWSMA.
4. We have received several inquiries from prospective developers wishing to develop
property adjacent to Centerville, but whose properties are in the later utility staging
areas as shown on your plan. If requested by the City of Lino Lakes, Centerville could
likely provide interim water and sewer service to these areas to facilitate earlier
development.
5. Table 6-3 lists future roadway connections – collectors. We have the following
comments on that table:
a. 21st Ave. – Says it will connect 80th with Main Street. It seems that, with the
Lennar Development layout, this is no longer true.
b. 21st Ave. – We would like to see a future connection between Main Street and
Cedar Street listed, since the right-of-way is in place to do so.
c. 73rd St. – It is unclear as to what is meant by this connection.
d. New East/West Street between Peltier Lake Drive and 21st Ave. – We would be
interested in the location of this connection.
6. When Centerville Road was reconstructed a few years ago, we inquired with the city of
Lino Lakes as to whether or not there were plans to have a trail along this road, down to
Birch. We were told there were no plans to add a trail there, so we did not continue ours
south of Dupre Road. Figure 10-1 shows a future trail that extends into Centerville and
connects with the south end of the trail along Centerville Road (at Dupre). The city has
no current plan to extend the trail to our southern border. While we support the idea of
having a trail connection here, its construction is not on our capital improvement plan.
7. On the Parks, Greenways and Trail System map (Fig 10-1), there is no name given to
the small park in the LaMotte Drive neighborhood, along Centerville Lake. On the
County’s GIS system, it is labeled “LaMotte Park”. With Centerville’s large park, very
near, named Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park and often referred to as, simply, “LaMotte
Park”, there can sometimes be confusion. We understand that your park predates ours,
however, we are not in a position to be able to rename our most prominent park. If there
were an opportunity to rename yours, it may help avoid confusion.
8. Figure 9-18 does not show the Interconnection with Centerville’s water system at 73rd
St. and 20th Ave.
9. Page 8-22 – Intercommunity Connections does not mention potential future service to
areas in Centerville along the west side of 21st Ave., north of Main Street. We
understand that the sanitary sewer in 21st Ave. (north of Main St.) was designed with
the potential to serve some of the vacant land to the west. Centerville has sewer service
along the west and south sides of the 22 acre parcel there, but depending on how it is
developed, utilizing the Lino Lakes sewer in 21st may be most practical. We wish to
have Lino Lakes prepared to serve a portion of this area if needed.
10. Page 8-22 – Intercommunity Connections does not mention the city of Centerville’s
service of the Anoka County regional park facility, located in Lino Lakes. There is an
intercommunity service agreement associated with that service.
Mark Statz, PE
City Administrator/Engineer
City of Centerville
1880 Main St.
Centerville, MN 55038
O: 651-429-3232
D: 651-792-7931
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!W WELL 2
CITY OF C ENTERVILLE CITY OF LINO LA KES CITY OF H UGO
511091 - 0
208521 - 0
453511 - 0
654497 - 0
457003 - 0
516353 - 0
507726 - 0
176059 - 0
686272 - 0
441753 - 0
426466 - 0
161830 - 0
504189 - 0
182103 - 0
208990 - 0
453514 - 0
153460 - 0
453501 - 0
164674 - 0
138353 - 0
420322 - 3
513470 - 2
487542 - 4
596895 - 1
585962 - 4
431482 - 5
163290 - 4155881 - 4
455757 - 3
437671 - 4
427681 - 3
126867 - 5
173991 - 5173982 - 3
163271 - 3
429655 - 3
435302 - 4169290 - 4
136759 - 3
448867 - 3
418777 - 3142042 - 4
169252 - 2
405231 - 4
163718 - 8
142030 - 4
169296 - 4
435342 - 4
407876 - 4
551576 - 3
512330 - 3
554336 - 5
406537 - 4429699 - 1
439231 - 5
442093 - 4
176064 - 5
170618 - 3
112541 - 3
435338 - 4
163273 - 5
401575 - 5
439185 - 4
435312 - 4
524745 - 4
716390 - 5
470187 - 1
448260 - 2
435283 - 4
180808 - 4
142012 - 5
176078 - 5
495045 - 4
428500 - 6 112614 - 3
127645 - 6
112637 - 3
412853 - 1
151715 - 3
529097 - 2
645394 - 4
590981 - 7
671642 - 2
404155 - 3
483201 - 1
401564 - 4405777 - 3
162118 - 4
758615 - 4 716393 - 8
486556 - 5
142016 - 5
544452 - 6
731137 - 4
182806 - 3
139268 - 4
439175 - 3
574242 - 4
163284 - 4
139267 - 3
142031 - 4
142001 - 4
163295 - 4
405754 - 4
426484 - 5
163269 - 3
169281 - 3
439174 - 3
138116 - 4
173946 - 4
404192 - 4
182913 - 2
124392 - 2
107003 - 6
Geo graphic In formation Systems
³
DECEMBER 2018
FIGURE 4 - DWSMA VULNERABILITY
CENTERVILLE WELLHEAD PROTEC TION PLAN
V:\1938\active\193803358\GIS\Projects\Figure 4 DWSMA VUL.mxd
LEGEND
WELL WITH UNIQUE ID AND LSCO RE
!LOW G EOLO GIC SENSITIVITY
!MO DERATE GEOL OG IC SENSITIVITY
!VERY HIG H G EOLO GIC SENSITIVITY
!W CITY W ELL
EMERG EN CY R ESPO NSE AREA
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA
MO DERATE VU LNERABILITY DR INKINGWATER SUPPLY MAN AG EMENT AR EA
BASE MAPPING
CITY L IMITS
PARCEL
0 1,500 3,000
Feet
The information on this map has been compiled by Stantec staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Stantec makes no representations or warranties, express or im plied, as to accuracy, com pleteness,tim eliness, or rights to the use of such information.Stantec Consulting Services2335 Highway 36 WestSaint Paul, MN 55113 651.636.4600
Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive
Plan Review and Comment Form
May 22, 2019
Name of adjacent or affected governmental unit
Contact Information
Name of Reviewer Date
Signature of Reviewer
Title:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
Per Minnesota Statute §473.858 Subd. 2 and the Metropolitan Council, we are distributing the
proposed Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for your review and comment. The 2040
Comprehensive Plan Update can be found here:
https://www.ci.lino-lakes.mn.us/compplan
We ask that you provide feedback as timely as possible within the requested 6-month comment
period. On behalf of the City of Lino Lakes, we would like to thank you in advance for your
assistance and prompt response.
We have reviewed the proposed Plan Update, do not have any comments, and are therefore
waiving further review.
We have reviewed the proposed Plan Update and offer the following comments (attach
additional sheets if necessary)
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Please Return to:
Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Pkwy
Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182
Email: mgrochala@linolakes.us
Dawnette Shimek 5/28/2019
Dawnette Shimek
Deputy City Clerk
15544 Central Avenue NE, Ham Lake, MN 55304
763-235-1673
dshimek@ci.ham-lake.mn.us
ξ
,CITY OF HUGO EST. 1906
July 26, 2019
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN55038 • (651) 762-6300 • www.ci.hugo.mn.us
Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Pkwy
Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182
Re: City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Dear Mr. Grochala:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan, a few items were
identified for comment.
1.80th Street. As you may know, there was effort with the l-35W /E coalition to collaborate on
improvements along 1-35 in several communities and Counties. The discussions included this
connection and interchanges at l-35E and l-35W. Lino Lakes participated in the coalition meetings. The
City is interested in cooperating with adjacent jurisdictions on creating a corridor management plan
that would include representatives of the 1-35 W/E coalition to further this planning effort. In addition,
the City supports an interchange location for l-35E at CR-140 (80th Street).
2.CR-84. The Lino Lakes Transpiration Plan recommends proposed new roadway connections.
Specifically a new County north-south route (extension of CR-84/Otter Lake Road). It would seem that
this road is intended to be a County Road shared by Washington and Anoka Counties. Similar to
CR-140, we recommend a corridor study be initiated by Anoka and Washington Counties including
representatives from all cities along the corridor.
If you have any questions or need more information, please feel free to contact me at rjuba@ci.hugo.mn.us
or (651) 762-6304.
��� Community Development Director
CC: Honorable Mayor and Council
Bryan Bear, City Administrator
Mark Erichson, City Engineer
Kendra Lindahl, City Planner
Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner
4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE #611 | Blaine, MN 55449 | T: 763-398-3070 | F: 763-398-3088 | www.ricecreek.org
BOARD OF
MANAGERS
Barbara A. Haake Michael J. Bradley Patricia L. Preiner Steven P. Wagamon John J. Waller
Ramsey County Ramsey County Anoka County Anoka County Washington County
September 16, 2019
Michael Grochala
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Pkwy
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: 2040 Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Comments
Dear Mr. Grochala,
The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) has reviewed the City of Lino Lakes’ draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan,
received on August 22, 2019. The RCWD offers the following comments below:
1. General comment: The RMP is referred to as the City’s RMP, the RCWD’s RMP, and the City/RCWD’s RMP
throughout the plan. Please revise for consistency and include RCWD in the reference.
2. Chapter 2 Community Background, Lino Lakes RMP/Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan, page 2-4:
“Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan” should be revised to “Comprehensive Wetland Protection
and Management Plan” to be consistent with the WCA authority and title under which it has been
developed.
3. Chapter 2 Community Background Natural Resources Revolving Fund Plan, page 2-4: RCWD is unaware of
the City’s 2017 wetland bank study and some of the identified locations on Figure 2-5. Please provide
more information or reference to how the potential sites were identified.
4. Chapter 2 Community Background, Table 2.9, page 2-16: Net Acres/Net Land Area includes “as identified
by the Rice Creek Watershed District”, however the inclusion of RCWD is unclear. Please clarify and
indicate if the City means as identified by the National Wetland Inventory, RMP, or otherwise.
5. Chapters 3 & 10: Minnesota Statute (M.S.) 103E may be incompatible at times with the City’s planned
greenways and trails and will require early coordination with the RCWD, which should be included in the
discussion. The RCWD would be happy to meet with the City to discuss further.
6. Chapter 5 Economic Development, Interstate 35E and Co. Rd. 14 Corridor, second paragraph, page 5-11:
Please clarify if the referenced Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) is the completed
Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Area CSMP that was conditionally approved by the RCWD Board and revise
the language as needed. If by “currently completing a CSMP” the City means it is currently building the
CSMP infrastructure, another sentence should be added. It is also RCWD’s understanding that the CSMP
area is for residential development, not commercial or industrial. RCWD suggests adding language to this
section to clarify that the City is planning business and industrial development east of I-35E and
residential development west of I-35E, consistent with the City’s Future Land Use Figure 3-2.
7. General Comments on Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan: In general, a detailed summary and
duplicated sections of the LWMP are not required. If the City intends to utilize the summary to move in a
new direction with the LWMP, the LWMP will need to be amended and follow the review timelines of
M.S. 103B.235 and M.R. 8410. If the City intends to solely summarize the information contained in the
LWMP, RCWD recommends only including an executive summary with reference to Appendix A and
removing the duplicated information to maintain consistency with the RCWD-approved LWMP in
Appendix A. There are currently a few inconsistencies in this chapter, discussed in the comments below.
8. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Goal 2.2, page 7-2: A policy is missing that is contained in the
LWMP in Appendix A and should be revised to be consistent.
2
9. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Goal 9.1, Policy b, page 7-4: This policy is inconsistent with the
LWMP in Appendix A and should be revised to be consistent.
10. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan Figures: Figures 7-1, 7-3, and 7-7 are not the same versions that
are contained in the RCWD-approved LWMP in Appendix A and should be removed or revised to be
consistent. Figure 7-10 and a few of the issues listed on the figure are not contained or described in the
approved LWMP in Appendix A. If Figure 7-10 is utilized, RCWD recommends amending the LWMP and
the City’s CIP table to include and address the issues on Figure 7-10.
11. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan Existing and Potential Future Water Resource Related Problems,
page 7-9: The water resource-related issues in this section are not presented consistently with the RCWD-
approved LWMP in Appendix A and should be removed or added to the LWMP. For example, the
references to the public drainage systems are not consistent with RCWD’s knowledge and management of
the systems. RCWD has recently completed repairs on the public drainage systems in the City, noted on
page 7-9, including ACD 10-22-32 and portions of ACD 55 and ACD 72 per the RCWD-approved repair
reports. Any alteration to the ditch system or abandonment of a system will need to be completed
through the petition process in M.S. 103E and RCWD will need to be engaged early in the process, as
multiple steps and public noticing will be required statutorily. Please revise this section to be consistent
with the language contained in the LWMP in Appendix A or remove this section.
12. Chapter 12 Implementation, Local Water Management Plan, #2, page 12-6: Recommend removing or
revising “alternatives.” It is unclear what “alternatives” is referencing.
The provided comments below offer minor suggestions:
1. Chapter 1 Introduction, Regional Planning Context, first paragraph, last sentence page 1-3: Recommend
removing or revising the comprehensive plan deadline since it has passed.
2. Chapter 3 Land Use, Medium Density Residential, last sentence, page 3-9: RMP should be defined as
“Resource Management Plan” for consistency.
3. Chapter 3 Land Use, Growth Management and Utility Staging, second paragraph, last sentence, page 3-13:
Recommend revising this sentence for clarity.
4. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Goal 2.2, Policy a, page 7-2: The “V” in VLAWMO is missing and
should be added.
5. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Goal 7.1, page 7-3: Recommend removing the blank policy line
under policy d.
6. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Summary of Implementation Section, second paragraph, page
7-10: Recommend removing this paragraph to remove duplicative information.
7. Chapter 12 Implementation Tools, Capital Improvement Plan, last paragraph, page 12-2: Recommend
removing or updating “by the end of 2018.”
8. Appendix A Local Water Management Plan: This plan version is consistent with the version RCWD
approved except the order of Figures 2-13 and 2-14 should be switched to be in numerical order.
The RCWD appreciates the opportunity to comment on the City’s Comprehensive Plan and looks forward to
collaboration in the future. Please contact me with any questions at 763-398-3078 or lsampedro@ricecreek.org.
Sincerely,
Lauren Sampedro
District Technician
Rice Creek Watershed District
Attachment 1
2
Washington County Comments
Draft City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 4: Housing
Page 4-4, Goals and Policies: The County is encouraged by the goals listed in Chapter 4 (pg. 4) around
the efforts to address housing needs in Lino Lakes. It is great to see the efforts being placed into the
planning for life-cycle housing and senior housing. The recognition of making these homes accessible to
the community ensures opportunities for social connection and access to healthier food options for
residents. It is also encouraging to see the efforts around protecting the environment as housing
expansion increases. An area of consideration when looking at the overall protection of the environment
as housing options continue to change would be to encourage edible and pollinator-friendly landscapes
for residential properties and housing developments.
Chapter 5: Economic Development
Page 5-11, Economic Development Priorities: The County is encouraged by the efforts made in Chapter 5
to ensure streets and roads are as safe as possible for residents and promote alternative transportation
options such as bicycling and walking. Both of these efforts encourages and considers the health of the
residents of Lino Lakes. The trail policy to link trails to schools and neighborhoods speaks to accessibility
for the community.
Chapter 8: Sanitary Sewer
Page 8-20, Sanitary Sewer: In Chapter 8’s individual subsurface sewage treatment system (ISTS), the plan
states that there are no community treatment systems and that large portions are served by ISTS. MN
Rules Chapter 7080-7083 now use the term Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) as a more
generic name as many SSTS serve more than one specific wastewater generator.
Page 8-20, Sanitary Sewer: Regarding inspection of SSTSs every three years, does this refer to the
maintenance activity that is required under MN Rules or does the city require the systems to be
inspected. Typically the term inspection refers to a Compliance Inspection that is defined in MN Rules
Chapter 7080.
Chapter 10: Parks, Greenways and Trails
Areas of consideration for chapter 10 would include a policy for tobacco-free parks and encourage
edible and pollinator-friendly landscapes on park property.
WS – Item 5
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 5
Date: November 4, 2019
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
Re: NE Lino Lakes Drainage Area Improvements
Background
The I-35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) is an environmental
review document that analyzed potential impacts of development within a study area of
4,660 acres. The final document was originally adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council
on October 24, 2005. The AUAR serves as a substitute environmental review. As long
as a development project is consistent with the assumptions of the analyses in the AUAR,
no additional environmental review is required. In order to remain valid as a substitute
form of environmental review, the AUAR must be revised under certain criteria. One of
the criteria is the passing of five years.
The AUAR serves as both an important economic development tool as well as a
comprehensive framework for mitigating possible environmental impacts of
development. The AUAR was last updated in October of 2015. Since that time the City
has amended the Comprehensive Plan for the corridor as well as prepared the 2040
Comprehensive Plan update. New development has also begun to take place within the
corridor including Main Street Shoppes, Northpointe and Watermark. Additionally, the
update will allow for the City to accommodate any considerations to further facilitate the
Minnesota Technology Corridor along 35E.
WSB and Associates have prepared a proposal to complete the update in the amount of
$33,272. Funding for this project is included in the Professional Services line item of the
Economic Development, Planning and Zoning and Engineering budgets as well as the
Water, Sanitary, and Surface Water Management funds. The City does collect an AUAR
fee of $269 per acre for all new development within the corridor to offset the
administrative costs associated with the document.
Requested Council Direction
Staff is requesting direction to place Authorization for Profession Services on the
November 12, 2019 council agenda for consideration.
Attachments
1. 1-35E AUAR Boundary
2. WSB Proposal
K:\02029-950\GIS\Maps\AUAR\Fig51_ProjectLocationMap.mxd Date: Thursday, April 30, 20150 5,000 10,000Feet
PROJECT LOCATION
CITY OF LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA
I-35E CORRIDOR AUAR UPDATE
FIGURE 5-1
Legend
Project Location
G:\Group Data\Natural Resources\Proposals\Lino Lakes\Hatch and AUAR\MEMO - 090319 - AUAR Update Scope of Work.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum
To: Mike Grochala, City of Lino Lakes
From: Andi Moffatt, WSB
Date: September 20, 2019
Re: Scope of Work for Project I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
The City of Lino Lakes is seeking to update its I-35E Corridor AUAR. To remain valid as the
environmental review document for the area, the AUAR needs to be updated every five years
until development has received approval. The AUAR was originally completed in 2005. Updates
have been completed in 2010 and 2015.
Approach
In 2015, the update included a simple review and update of any changes and mitigation
measures for the study area. Since it has been nearly 15 years since the original AUAR was
completed and based on comments we received from review agencies on recent, similar AUAR
Updates, we will use the EAW/AUAR questionnaire form to update the AUAR rather than having
a standalone report. This will allow information to be more formally brought forward in the
document as part of the AUAR Update process.
Scope of Work for AUAR Update
Task 1 – Project Management and Meetings
This task includes the project management and meetings to be completed throughout the
development of the AUAR Update. This includes three meetings with city staff; one meeting with
the planning commission, and one meeting with the City Council.
Task 2 – Review Development Scenarios
The development scenarios will be reviewed based on the current, adopted Comprehensive Plan
and any anticipated development in the study area. It is anticipated that Scenario 1 will be
removed from the Update; Scenario 2 will be reviewed and adjusted to reflect actual conditions as
well as a review of the residential land use plans; and the new Comp Plan will become a new
scenario. These scenarios will be reviewed with City Staff before proceeding with further tasks.
Task 3 – Prepare List of Permits/Approvals
This item will be developed per the AUAR requirements and list the local, state, and federal
permits and approvals that may be needed for development.
Task 4 – Evaluate Geology, Soils, and Topography
This task includes describing the geology, soils, and topography of the study area. Available
public information sources and GIS will be used to develop this section. If additional information is
available based on past studies of the project area, that will be included. If these features would
create unique environmental impacts, that will be discussed in this section.
September 20, 2019
Page 2
G:\Group Data\Natural Resources\Proposals\Lino Lakes\Hatch and AUAR\MEMO - 090319 -
AUAR Update Scope of Work.docx
Task 5 – Evaluate Project Impact on Water Resources
This task covers an analysis for surface water, groundwater, wastewater, stormwater, and water
appropriation for the three development scenarios. Recent past studies that WSB has completed
will be used to inform this section.
Information about wetlands will be obtained through the existing wetland delineation
information and readily available desktop data, such as the National Wetland Inventory.
For the stormwater analysis, WSB will prepare a planning level stormwater analysis for the
scenarios. This will include general analysis of before and after conditions as well
as requirements for stormwater management based on MPCA, City, and Watershed
District requirements.
For groundwater, existing soils mapping and groundwater information from the USGS will be
used to analyze impacts to susceptible groundwater features in relation to proposed land use.
WSB will analyze the proposed water use and wastewater generation based on the three
development scenarios and the recent studies that WSB has completed. This will be reviewed in
relation to the municipal system’s ability to serve the area.
Task 6 – Review of Contamination / Hazardous Wastes
Available studies and information will be used to complete this section of the Update. If the
scenarios include the potential for hazardous wastes to be stored or generated within the project
area, that will be included in this section as well.
Task 7 – Review of Fish and Wildlife
Information from past site visits and the DNR Natural Heritage Database will be used to describe
and evaluate wildlife impacts to the area. From the existing information and the field review, the
impact of the development scenarios on these resources will be summarized in the Update.
Task 8 – Review of Historic Properties, Visual Impacts, and Parks
Information from the City, State Historical Preservation Office, and the readily available public
data will be used to determine if there are impacts to historic properties or parks or if there will be
visual impacts. Based on our understanding of the site and proposed development, we do not
expect there will be visual impacts per the AUAR guidelines. This information will be used to
complete the AUAR Update.
Task 9 – Traffic Analysis
The traffic mitigation measures will be reviewed and updated if needed, based on changes in land
use from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, other studies completed in the area, and the
implementation of roadway improvements. The updated traffic study will include:
Data Collection: Updated traffic data will be collected from MnDOT, Washington County
and the City of Lino Lakes. It is assumed that no additional traffic counts will be collected.
Traffic Generation: Area traffic generation will be updated and compared to the traffic
generation from the previous AUAR updates.
Traffic Forecasts: The traffic forecasts will be updated to 2040 based on the current
land use plans and anticipated development scenarios
September 20, 2019
Page 3
G:\Group Data\Natural Resources\Proposals\Lino Lakes\Hatch and AUAR\MEMO - 090319 -
AUAR Update Scope of Work.docx
Mitigation Review: Based on the updated scenario traffic generation and traffic
forecasts, the approved mitigation measures will be reviewed and updated as required. It
is assumed that no detailed traffic analysis modeling will be completed.
Task 10 – Air Quality and Noise Analysis
Updates to the noise and air anal ysis are not anticipated and reference to the original AUAR will
be made in the Update.
Task 11 – Prepare and Submit AUAR Update
This task includes compiling the information prepared in the previous tasks into the AUAR Update
using the EAW form. This task assumes one round of review and revision with City. Once
distribution of the AUAR Update has been authorized by the City, the Update will be submitted to
the required agencies for a 10-day review.
Task 12 – Respond to Comments and Adopt AUAR Update
If no objections are filed, the City can adopt the AUAR Update. This task includes responding to
comments and preparing the Council Packet items for AUAR Update adoption. This task
assumes a typical level of agency comments. If comments are received that require additional
analysis, this will be discussed with the city. The final Update with responses to comments will be
submitted to the agencies after Council adoption.
Cost Estimate
The costs to complete the above work plan for the AUAR Update is $33,272. Once authorized,
we can develop a schedule to complete the work based on the city’s timelines.
If you have questions, please feel free to call me at (763) 287-7196.
Task Approximate Billing
Rate Estimated Hours Subtotal
Project Management and
Meetings
Principal $185 20 $3,700
GIS Specialist $87 4 $348
Subtotal 24 $4,048
Development Scenarios
Principal $185 6 $1,110
GIS Specialist 87 8 $696
Subtotal 14 $1,806
Permits/Approvals
Principal $185 1 $185
Environmental Scientist $94 1 $94
Subtotal 2 $279
Geology, Soils, and Topography
Principal $185 1 $185
GIS Specialist $87 4 $348
Environmental Scientist $94 2 $188
Subtotal 7 $721
Water Resource Analysis
Principal $185 8 $1,480
Environmental Scientist $94 16 $1,504
Engineer $109 16 $1,744
Subtotal 40 $4,728
Contamination/Hazardous
Wastes
Principal $185 1 $185
Environmental Scientist $94 4 $376
Subtotal 5 $561
Fish and Wildlife
Principal $185 1 $185
Environmental Scientist $94 3 $282
Subtotal 4 $467
Historic, Visual, Parks
Environmental Scientist $94 4 $376
Subtotal 4 $376
Traffic Analysis
Sr. Engineer $185 24 $4,440
Engineer $105 44 $4,620
Subtotal 68 $9,060
Air and Noise
Sr. Engineer $185 1 $185
Engineer $105 1 $105
Subtotal 2 $290
Prepare and Submit AUAR
Update
Principal $185 16 $2,960
Office Technician $80 6 $480
GIS Specialist $77 20 $1,540
Environmental Scientist $94 20 $1,880
Subtotal 62 $6,860
Respond to Comments and
Final Documents
Principal $185 20 $3,700
Environmental Scientist $94 4 $376
Subtotal 24 $4,076
TOTAL 256 $33,272
I-35 AUAR Update 9/20/19
WS – Item 7
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 7
Date: November 4, 2019
To: City Council
From: Sarah Cotton, Finance Director
Re: 2020 Budget
Background
At the September 23, 2019 City Council meeting, a preliminary budget and tax levy was
adopted by the Council. The preliminary tax levy adopted by the Council was
$10,491,518, an increase of $436,102, or 4.34% over the 2018/2019 tax levy. The levy is
estimated to result in a city tax rate of 39.680% for 2020, a reduction from the 2019 tax
rate of 41.817%
Prior to the City Council meeting on September 23, 2019, Council and Staff met during a
Special Budget Work Session to discuss the proposed budget and tax levy. Staff
provided information regarding a reduction in health care costs to the City that would
result in monetary savings of $39,000. The Council expressed the desire to limit the
increase in expenditures year over year to 2%; and therefore, reduce the proposed levy by
an additional $60,000. Staff has identified the following cuts to expenditures to meet the
$60,000 reduction in the operating levy adopted by the Council:
• $10,000 reduction in Surface Water Maintenance
• $3,000 reduction in Fleet – Contracted Services – Maintenance & Repair of Fire
Apparatus
• $24,443 reduction in Paid-On-Call Firefighter wages
• $22,576 reallocation of Finance Director wages & benefits to Water/Sewer
Enterprise Funds
The proposed reductions and reallocation reduce general fund expenditures to
$11,195,170, an increase of $141,342, or 2.0% over 2019.
At the September 9, 2019 Special Budget Work Session staff reviewed the 2020 Water
and Sewer Enterprise Funds with the Council. Council requested that staff prepare a
summary of the Enterprise Fund activity over the last few years to aid in the discussion.
Staff has prepared a 5-year summary for Council review.
Attachments
General Fund Forecast Gap Analysis
Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund Activity
7/29/2019 8/12/2019 8/26/2019 9/3/2019 9/9/2019
Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Preliminary %
2019 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 Change Change
Tax Levies
Operating Levy 8,193,124 9,248,018 9,247,299 8,736,256 8,767,756 8,467,756 8,368,756 175,632 2.14%
Debt Levy 1,862,292 2,122,762 2,122,762 2,122,762 2,122,762 2,122,762 2,122,762 260,470 13.99%
Total Tax Levy 10,055,416 11,370,780 11,370,061 10,859,018 10,890,518 10,590,518 10,491,518 436,102 4.34%
Year-over-Year Change Levy $1,315,364 1,314,645 803,602 835,102 535,102 436,102 4.34%
Drill-Down on Year-Over-Year Levy Changes 7/29/2019 8/12/2019 8/26/2019 9/3/2019 9/9/2019
Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Preliminary %
2019 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 Change Change
Revenues
Property Taxes (Delinquent, Penalties/Interest)39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 - 0.00%
Intergovt Revenue 577,105 616,722 616,722 616,722 616,722 616,722 616,459 39,354 6.82%
Business Licenses/Permits 137,600 144,233 144,233 144,233 144,233 144,233 144,233 6,633 4.82%
Non-Business Licenses/Permits 764,860 788,113 788,113 788,113 788,113 788,113 788,113 23,253 3.04%
Charges for Services 25,477 27,538 27,538 27,538 27,538 27,538 27,538 2,061 8.09%
Public Safety Service Charges 200,800 190,800 190,800 190,800 190,800 190,800 190,800 (10,000) -4.98%
Municipal Fines 119,132 116,100 116,100 116,100 116,100 116,100 116,100 (3,032) -2.55%
Miscellaneous 322,445 324,171 324,171 324,171 324,171 324,171 324,171 1,726 0.54%
Trf from Closed Bond Fund - - - 100,000 100,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 ***
Use of Reserves 594,773 - - 180,000 180,000 200,000 200,000 (394,773) -66.37%
Total Revenues/Funding Sources 2,781,192 2,246,677 2,246,677 2,526,677 2,526,677 2,826,677 2,826,414 45,222 1.63%
Expenditures
Personal Services 7,398,006 7,783,412 7,782,693 7,692,000 7,692,000 7,692,000 7,605,738 207,732 2.81%
Supplies 472,775 477,825 477,825 477,825 477,825 477,825 477,825 5,050 1.07%
Other Services and Charnges 1,295,289 1,377,557 1,377,557 1,344,407 1,344,407 1,344,407 1,344,407 49,118 3.79%
Contracted Services 743,794 742,084 742,084 725,084 725,084 725,084 722,084 (21,710) -2.92%
Capital Outlay 94,452 60,317 60,317 42,117 42,117 42,117 42,117 (52,335) -55.41%
Others 970,000 1,053,500 1,053,500 981,500 1,013,000 1,013,000 1,003,000 33,000 3.40%
Total Expenditures 10,974,316 11,494,695 11,493,976 11,262,933 11,294,433 11,294,433 11,195,171 220,855 2.01%
Debt Service
Bonds 1,255,008 1,549,975 1,549,975 1,549,975 1,549,975 1,549,975 1,549,975 294,967 23.50%
Certificates of Indebtedness 607,284 572,788 572,788 572,788 572,788 572,788 572,788 (34,497) -5.68%
Total Debt Service 1,862,292 2,122,762 2,122,762 2,122,762 2,122,762 2,122,762 2,122,762 260,470 13.99%
(1)
Year-over-Year Change Levy $1,315,364 1,314,645 803,602 835,102 535,102 436,102
Total Levy Supported by Valuation Increase ($10,978,734)738,640 923,318 923,318 923,318 923,318 923,318
Gap to Maintain Flat Tax Capacity Rate 576,724 391,327 (119,716) (88,216) (388,216) (487,216)
Tax Capacity Rate 41.817%44.389%43.535%41.293%41.431%40.115%39.680%
GENERAL FUND FORECAST GAP ANALYSIS
2019-2020
Actual
Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Proposed
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020
Operating Revenues 1,015,306 1,094,947 1,150,834 1,217,590 1,080,500 820,170 1,166,000
Operating Expenses 557,323 880,363 651,954 737,312 724,070 801,313 824,786
Revenues Over/(Under) Operating Expenses ***457,983 214,584 498,880 480,278 356,430 18,857 341,214
*** Available for Capital Projects, Depreciation Expense, Debt Service
Actual
Account Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Proposed
Number 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020
Operating Revenue
Current Assessments 3110-000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Delinquent Assessments 3120-000 174 973 382 579 0 0 0
Penalties & Interest 3150-000 297 260 119 205 0 0 0
Water Hook-Up Charge 3248-000 13,260 26,010 33,010 40,030 28,000 18,510 36,500
Other State Revenue 3348-000 0 0 0 3,298 0 0 0
Water Meter Sales 3406-000 15,128 30,687 37,606 50,518 30,000 23,217 50,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 3714-000 1,769 12,981 12,579 1,607 7,500 814 7,500
Refunds and Reimbursements 3730-000 12,583 0 2,260 0 0 0 0
Water Sales 3855-000 955,353 1,000,652 1,041,301 1,099,016 995,000 761,998 1,050,000
Water Penalties 3858-000 16,743 23,384 23,577 22,336 20,000 15,630 22,000
1,015,306 1,094,947 1,150,834 1,217,590 1,080,500 820,170 1,166,000
Increase over Prior Year 7.84%5.10%5.80%
Non-Operating Revenues/Transfers/Contributions
Interest on Investments 3620-000 33,166 37,560 30,827 108,262 35,000 0 40,000
Change in Fair Value of Investments 3621-000 (12,245)2,754 8,785 (25,479)0 0 0
Sale of Capital Assets 3910-000 0 (689)0 0 0 0 0
Operating Transfers 3920-000 0 0 104,969 0 0 0 0
Capital Improv (Developer)3720-000 263,024 1,985,356 421,608 487,444 0 0 0
Capital Improv (City)3721-000 1,708,933 (48,364)166,246 405,283 0 0 0
1,992,878 1,976,616 732,434 975,510 35,000 0 40,000
CITY OF LINO LAKES
WATER OPERATING FUND (601)
CITY OF LINO LAKES
WATER OPERATING FUND (601)
OPERATING REVENUES
Actual
Object Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Proposed
Code 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020
Personal Services
Salaries 4101-000 149,521 154,944 175,070 188,479 207,295 139,615 222,110
Overtime 4102-000 1,900 3,963 3,553 7,447 4,000 6,481 7,000
On Call 4105-000 1,594 2,060 2,825 2,986 2,600 448 4,801
Temporaries 4106-000 6,044 9,002 7,653 11,295 6,000 8,005 9,240
Wellness Program 4108-000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERA 4121-000 11,059 11,996 13,603 14,505 16,042 11,336 17,543
FICA/MEDICARE 4122-000 11,512 12,273 13,572 14,197 16,822 11,063 18,601
ICMA Employer 4123-000 658 719 885 755 850 0 250
Health Insurance 4131-000 15,734 20,003 30,078 26,055 30,629 25,424 34,740
Life & Disability Insurance 4133-000 492 597 687 603 712 518 851
Dental Insurance 4134-000 1,128 1,250 1,482 1,557 1,760 1,312 1,799
Reemployment Insurance 4141-000 0 3,228 0 0 0 0 0
Worker's Compensation 4151-000 3,847 3,505 3,263 4,858 5,860 5,624 5,338
203,489 223,539 252,671 272,737 292,570 209,826 322,273
Supplies
Office Supplies 4200-000 1,605 1,576 1,818 2,430 2,000 583 2,000
Maintenance Supplies 4211-000 40,419 47,613 32,523 32,998 40,000 36,174 45,000
Fuels 4212-000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 10,000
Meters 4215-000 26,757 340,350 68,640 77,372 60,000 16,138 80,000
Shop Parts 4221-000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chemical 4222-000 56,588 50,625 57,976 78,886 75,000 64,718 80,000
Small Tools 4240-000 901 1,936 1,907 3,339 2,500 1,610 2,500
136,269 452,100 172,864 205,025 189,500 119,223 219,500
Other Services and Charges
Professional Services 4300-000 77,501 61,363 69,057 99,173 80,000 87,658 100,000
Municipal Engineer 4304-000 34,972 21,911 16,254 20,382 25,000 87,605 25,000
Other Consultant 4310-000 0 0 5,319 2,466 2,600 2,589 11,052
Telephone 4321-000 2,706 3,968 4,331 4,655 4,000 2,630 5,000
Postage 4322-000 4,514 5,327 4,934 5,163 5,000 4,044 5,500
Travel & Tuition 4330-000 1,112 929 436 1,349 3,000 414 3,000
Printing & Publishing 4340-000 0 2,179 0 2,020 3,500 2,871 3,500
Insurance 4360-000 6,246 6,177 9,506 1,694 8,000 7,569 8,000
Auto Insurance 4363-000 612 606 1,601 581 700 644 700
Uniforms 4370-000 526 585 569 469 600 355 760
Electricity 4381-000 65,663 68,484 82,112 86,824 80,000 59,113 90,000
Utilities (Water/Sewer)4382-000 16,462 15,822 16,959 14,591 15,000 2,916 15,000
Heat 4383-000 2,520 2,583 3,806 4,038 5,000 2,681 5,000
212,834 189,935 214,885 243,405 232,400 261,088 272,512
Contractual Services
Contracted Services 4410-000 2,733 13,889 7,097 9,712 9,100 207,504 10,000
Subscriptions & Dues 4452-000 1,998 900 4,438 6,434 500 3,671 500
4,731 14,789 11,535 16,145 9,600 211,175 10,500
557,323 880,363 651,954 737,312 724,070 801,313 824,786
Increase over Prior Year 57.96%-25.94%13.09%
Non-Operating Expenses
Pension Expense 4125-000 1,494 12,869 12,002 (2,128)12,500 0 0
Asset Depreciation 4510-000 836,772 436,384 580,804 597,571 580,000 0 600,000
Operating Transfers 4910-000 33,417 34,627 35,727 0 0 0 0
Capital Outlay 5000-000 0 970 491 0 225,000 0 675,288
871,683 484,850 629,024 595,443 817,500 0 1,275,288
WATER OPERATING FUND (601)
OPERATING EXPENSES
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Actual
Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Proposed
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020
Operating Revenues 1,622,104 1,659,273 1,698,963 1,753,712 1,697,000 1,316,467 1,720,000
Operating Expenses 1,184,020 1,248,300 1,412,237 1,470,744 1,519,582 1,198,498 1,650,588
Revenues Over/(Under) Operating Expenses ***438,083 410,973 286,726 282,968 177,418 117,970 69,412
*** Available for Capital Projects, Depreciation Expense, Debt Service
Actual
Account Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Proposed
Number 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020
Operating Revenue
Current Assessments 3110-000 0 0 772 708 0 354 0
Delinquent Assessments 3120-000 174 973 382 579 0 0 0
Penalties & Interest 3150-000 297 260 119 205 0 0 0
Sewer Hook-Up Charge 3249-000 10,580 21,050 26,497 31,754 23,000 14,544 29,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 3714-000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Refunds and Reimbursements 3730-000 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
Sewer Sales 3856-000 1,593,097 1,612,724 1,641,396 1,693,995 1,650,000 1,280,682 1,665,000
Sewer Penalties 3858-000 17,956 24,266 29,787 26,471 24,000 20,887 26,000
1,622,104 1,659,273 1,698,963 1,753,712 1,697,000 1,316,467 1,720,000
Increase over Prior Year 2.29%2.39%3.22%
Non-Operating Revenues/Transfers/Contributions
Interest on Investments 3620-000 47,918 62,404 52,085 170,759 60,000 0 70,000
Change in Fair Value of Investments 3621-000 (17,672)4,401 14,791 (40,108)0 0 0
Sale of Capital Assets 3910-000 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
Operating Transfers 3920-000 0 0 104,969 0 0 0 0
Capital Improv (Developer)3720-000 142,017 599,645 414,421 754,588 0 0 0
Capital Improv (City)3721-000 1,183,137 32,084 3,964 309,232 0 0 0
1,355,400 698,585 590,230 1,194,471 60,000 0 70,000
CITY OF LINO LAKES
SEWER OPERATING FUND (602)
CITY OF LINO LAKES
SEWER OPERATING FUND (602)
OPERATING REVENUES
Actual
Object Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Proposed
Code 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020
Personal Services
Salaries 4101-000 149,521 154,944 175,070 188,478 207,295 139,614 222,110
Overtime 4102-000 1,900 3,963 3,553 7,448 4,000 6,482 7,000
On Call 4105-000 1,594 2,060 2,825 2,986 2,600 448 4,801
Temporaries 4106-000 6,044 9,002 7,653 11,295 6,000 8,005 9,240
Wellness Program 4108-000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERA 4121-000 11,048 11,996 13,603 14,503 16,042 11,336 17,543
FICA/MEDICARE 4122-000 11,502 12,273 13,572 14,196 16,822 11,064 18,601
ICMA Employer 4123-000 658 719 885 755 850 0 250
Health Insurance 4131-000 15,733 20,003 30,078 26,012 30,629 25,423 34,740
Life & Disability Insurance 4133-000 491 597 687 603 712 518 851
Dental Insurance 4134-000 1,128 1,250 1,482 1,557 1,760 1,312 1,799
Reemployment Insurance 4141-000 0 3,228 0 0 0 0 0
Worker's Compensation 4151-000 8,234 6,793 6,724 10,203 10,560 12,039 11,949
207,853 226,827 256,131 278,035 297,270 216,240 328,884
Supplies
Office Supplies 4200-000 1,605 1,576 1,764 2,208 2,000 41 2,000
Maintenance Supplies 4211-000 16,286 13,336 37,768 20,278 30,000 13,383 45,000
Fuels 4212-000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 10,000
Shop Parts 4221-000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Small Tools 4240-000 1,254 1,214 1,512 3,336 2,500 1,080 2,500
29,145 26,127 51,044 35,822 44,500 14,504 59,500
Other Services and Charges
Professional Services 4300-000 73,660 26,932 63,631 103,738 90,000 79,256 105,000
Municipal Engineer 4304-000 33,516 19,243 18,045 17,174 25,000 11,118 25,000
Other Consultant 4310-000 0 0 5,319 2,466 2,600 2,589 11,052
Telephone 4321-000 1,711 1,252 865 800 1,500 1,100 1,500
Postage 4322-000 4,483 5,306 4,837 5,108 5,000 4,044 5,000
Travel & Tuition 4330-000 278 831 156 160 3,000 1,304 3,000
Printing & Publishing 4340-000 0 0 0 0 500 0 500
Insurance 4360-000 18,706 17,387 16,175 15,868 18,000 14,736 18,000
Auto Insurance 4363-000 610 604 601 580 700 644 700
Uniforms 4370-000 526 585 569 469 600 355 760
Electricity 4381-000 28,155 27,381 28,192 31,869 30,000 20,647 30,000
Utilities (Water/Sewer)4382-000 11,777 11,686 11,933 12,536 15,000 6,784 15,000
Heat 4383-000 1,331 1,162 1,172 1,370 1,800 885 1,800
174,753 112,369 151,493 192,139 193,700 143,461 217,312
Contractual Services
MCES Sewer Treatment Charges 4405-000 751,648 877,565 942,972 949,776 977,612 814,677 1,035,391
Contracted Services 4410-000 19,207 5,389 6,997 8,872 6,000 6,526 9,000
Subscriptions & Dues 4452-000 1,415 23 3,600 6,101 500 3,090 500
772,270 882,977 953,569 964,749 984,112 824,292 1,044,891
1,184,020 1,248,300 1,412,237 1,470,744 1,519,582 1,198,498 1,650,588
Increase over Prior Year 5.43%13.13%4.14%
Non-Operating Expenses
Pension Expense 4125-000 1,493 12,869 12,002 (2,128)12,500 0 0
Asset Depreciation 4510-000 892,427 456,421 477,094 495,856 475,000 0 500,000
Operating Transfers 4910-000 33,417 244,594 35,727 242,145 0 0 0
Capital Outlay 5000-000 0 970 491 0 0 0 178,838
927,337 714,854 525,314 735,873 487,500 0 678,838
CITY OF LINO LAKES
SEWER OPERATING FUND (602)
OPERATING EXPENSES
YTD September
Fund 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
General 5,459,582 5,337,583 5,054,673 5,300,509 5,078,336 5,887,986 6,113,436 6,731,738 6,793,380 4,272,785
Special Revenue Funds
Recreation Program 124,494 113,836 123,343 119,605 116,876 86,312 47,569 9,186 22,948 10,267
Economic Development Authority - - - - - - - 88,456 89,541 7,088
Cable TV and Communications - - - 10,618 39,331 80,237 134,072 186,113 77,044 137,100
Blue Heron Days - - - - 11,321 14,662 11,619 8,244 9,695 14,104
Federal Forfeiture - Justice - - - - 39,647 51,389 29,911 262,269 132,310 18,538
State Narcotics Forfeiture 12,203 12,944 16,150 22,132 6,506 10,645 13,317 23,636 23,837 22,395
DUI Forfeiture 36,711 30,061 17,058 7,806 1,668 17,430 30,127 44,961 53,667 63,132
Forfeitures-Other - - - - - - - - 874 1,519
Federal Forfeiture - Treasury - - - - - - - - - 83,604
K-9 Unit - - - - - - - - 37,189 18,537
Debt Service Funds
Closed Bond Fund 1,134,263 1,420,571 1,429,946 1,398,702 1,704,483 1,246,696 884,989 616,983 223,139 1,004,728
Certificates of Indebt 121,716 129,811 143,490 151,341 113,072 125,653 149,501 184,203 210,223 536,672
Lease Rev 1998A 486,798 - - - - - - - - -
Public Proj Refunding 1999C 270,684 - - - - - - - - -
GO Imp 2002A 243,523 228,292 212,835 187,564 - - - - - -
GO Imp 2002B 647,720 497,562 342,581 69,932 - - - - - -
GO Imp 2003A 122,469 147,244 595,880 129,030 - - - - - -
GO Imp 2003B 63,541 67,350 56,717 53,358 - - - - - -
GO Imp & Utility Rev 2004A 215,188 - - - - - - - - -
GO Imp 2005A - 2 158,742 157,905 959 536,670 3,102,978 - - -
GO Imp 2005B 262,158 324,213 405,931 462,017 429,829 18,447 31,083 - - -
GO Tax Abatement 2006C 83,127 138,965 187,264 206,347 231,984 255,754 1,853,505 - - -
GO Utility Rev 2006D 50,974 67,711 83,405 95,579 153,560 179,935 188,082 - - -
GO CIP 2006E 244,784 759,335 814,525 828,858 848,690 884,319 929,085 970,261 - 756
GO TIF 2007A 155,088 154,320 153,628 149,897 149,896 149,896 149,896 149,951 149,696 (105,130)
GO Imp Note 2009A 425 491 491 996,291 33,780 204 22 - - 33,117
GO Imp & Utility Rev 2010A 4,945 109,770 23,817 8,249 223,948 120,638 66,502 849 0 (110,401)
GO 2012A - - - 63,763 295,270 255,992 356,691 317,957 263,837 118,153
GO Imp 2013A - - - 2,416 - - 298,558 287,008 426,587 404,490
GO Imp 2014A - - - - 21,310 127,747 985,966 1,035,504 1,162,052 775,018
GO Bonds 2015A - - - - - 50,605 236,794 450,068 593,906 479,579
EDA Lease Rev Bonds 2015B - - - - - 107,367 243,205 257,616 280,071 147,176
GO Capital Note 2016A - - - - - - 113 253 38,410 38,618
GO Utility Rev 2016A - - - - - - - 254,460 261,726 101,826
GO Improv Refund 2016B - - - - - - - 944,886 726,988 219,758
GO Tax Abate Refund 2016C - - - - - - - 312,104 342,966 236,387
GO Bonds 2018A - - - - - - - - - (25,524)
Capital Projects Funds
Bldgs & Facilities Revolving 1,416,151 946,336 592,753 601,128 509,321 239,657 223,387 190,359 197,518 336,516
Cap Equip Revolving 286,637 184,259 94,997 105,370 162,820 463,297 1,091,703 434,623 502,823 609,288
Office Equip Revolving 250,142 272,023 264,621 269,578 243,131 194,792 34,248 45,356 40,998 56,168
Dedicated Parks 66,963 404 408 16,602 122,773 215,515 446,561 420,647 254,652 829,413
Area & Unit 2,778,231 3,217,984 3,466,242 3,661,631 3,991,116 2,545,343 4,484,589 6,244,215 7,095,776 7,032,158
TIF 1-5 55,668 78,255 99,456 135,688 173,754 209,982 249,412 290,444 338,560 361,743
TIF 1-10 135,900 188,669 189,274 187,194 189,037 188,941 189,697 190,157 192,815 273,864
TIF 1-11 - - - - - - - - - (703,289)
TIF 1-12 - - - - - - - - 82,857 52,382
MSA 1,251,484 1,439,143 5,037,136 4,595,797 3,922,220 3,119,825 2,012,170 843,374 3,921,001 3,791,412
Seal Coating/Overlay 445,003 465,169 477,527 529,065 591,400 614,123 211,648 362,495 336,403 453,170
Surface Water Management 276,610 374,653 407,977 518,189 494,339 476,343 747,048 995,093 1,004,245 1,462,289
Street Reconstruction 538,252 587,203 608,173 620,865 650,450 667,152 686,670 706,274 740,543 746,772
Surface Water Maintenance - - - - - - 85,034 105,798 168,189 180,181
Park & Trail Impr - - - - - - - - 438,280 323,125
Birch St/Hodgson Rd Imp 15,383 15,583 15,738 15,677 - - - - - -
Legacy at Woods Edge 522,104 548,979 554,416 527,265 533,848 - - - - -
I35E Interchange 4,271,142 - 274,525 226,347 72,153 - - - - -
Main/Lake - Birch/Ware Traffic Signal - - 530,087 166,105 107,038 113,737 - - - -
Otter Lake Rd Ext - - - 293,961 293,515 207,609 - - - -
21st Ave Ext - - - - - - - - - -
Fire House #2 - - - - 624,253 96,188 92,081 - -
Well #6 and Well House - - - - 1,100,305 854,423 63,796 - - -
North Pointe Street and Util Improvement - - - - 1,136,772 413,273 386,274 - - -
Birch ST San Sw Ext & Turn Lanes - - - - - 193,124 134,721 133,592 - -
2015 Street Reconstruction ( Shenandoah)- - - - - 242,580 195,703 - - -
Blackduck/Aqua Lane Watermain Ext - - - - - - 770,078 - - -
2040 Comp Plan Update - - - - - - - 36,758 - (14,033)
2018 Street Reconstruction (LaMotte/WShad - - - - - - - - 6,400,371 1,968,634
Cedar St Recon - - - - - - - - - (82,704)
Enterprise Funds
Water 3,555,128 3,649,473 4,110,341 4,791,243 5,322,125 5,738,284 4,947,883 5,477,346 6,022,044 5,974,513
Sewer 6,237,600 6,575,417 7,028,014 7,286,546 7,733,759 8,141,597 8,522,604 8,800,191 8,977,443 9,081,922
Agency/Fiduciary Funds
Contractors Deposits 705,343 657,975 476,973 639,540 726,972 689,685 825,372 1,719,511 1,421,716 2,182,364
Interim SA - - - - 56,466 37,946 - - 28,586 28,586
Foxborough Trust 112,676 119,881 110,536 121,475 128,734 121,111 133,542 115,705 123,161 128,861
Preserve Stewardship - - - - - 2,681 4,763 7,611 10,692 10,692
Totals 32,660,810 28,861,467 34,159,670 35,731,185 37,762,514 36,523,852 42,400,109 40,348,338 50,218,760 43,588,319
** All Color Coding = Related Funds
CITY OF LINO LAKES
YEAR-END CASH & INVESTMENT BALANCE BY FUND
2010 - 2019
Item #9
Monthly Progress Report
November 4, 2019
Item Last Action Taken Staff Status
White Bear Lake Restoration
Assn. v. Dept. of Natural
Resources (DNR)
4/22/19 – The Minnesota Court of
Appeals released its ruling in favor of the
DNR
Jeff The case was appealed and
will be heard by the Supreme
Court in a couple of months
Employment Update CSO – Applications are being reviewed
Police Officer
Marty Asleson
Jeff Interviews will be conducted
soon
Backgrounds are being done
Last day is November 30