The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/13/2019 P&Z PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, November 13, 2019 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. ACF.NDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 9, 2019 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. Houle Estates Second Addition Final Plat 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update B. Project Update 8. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4-minute limit. • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice -Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : October 9, 2019 TIME STARTED : 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED : 8:08 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Paul Tralle, Michael Ruhland, Michael Root, Sue Peacock, Neil Evenson, Perry Laden, Jeremy Stimpson STAFF PRESENT : Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Diane Hankee, Katharine Dowlding, Mara Strand PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 P.M. on October 9, 2019. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The Agenda was approved as presented. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Laden made a MOTION to approve the September 11, 2019 meeting minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Stimpson. Motion carried 6-0. Chair Tralle abstained. V. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:32 P.M. There was no one present for Open Mike Mr. Ruhland made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:32 P.M. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 6-0. VI. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: Poehling Addition Variance and Preliminary Plat Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 9, 2019 Page 2 Mr. Everson questioned if the buffer is recommended or required. Staff recommends a buffer, but it is not required. It is recommended that the buffer decision be recorded against the property. Mr. Ruhland asked for confirmation that the buffer minimum is 10 feet. Ms. Larsen restated a 20 foot average for the buffer. Mr. Ruhland questioned if there is a wetland setback requirement if there is a deck. Ms. Larsen stated that a deck could be built up to the 10 foot drainage and utility easement around the wetland. Mr. Ruhland questioned previous variances similar to this case. This is the first shore land variance under 20,000 square feet that current staff has seen. This is a unique situation and recognized when considering extending sanitary sewer and water to the area. The greater benefit is getting sewer and water utilities extended and getting rid of onsite septic systems in the neighborhood. Mr. Ruhland inquired about the floodplain and fill area that will raise the house. Staff explained that the house will be raised 5 feet from the wetland area. Ms. Hankee stated that the submittal to FEMA does not accommodate a deck or accessory structure. The FEMA process will have to be re -done and include this to be approved. Mr. Stimpson asked if conversations with the DNR included the wetland buffer consideration. Ms. Larsen stated the DNR's recommendation was based off criteria that should be met and that there is an existing viable lot with nothing stating that it has to be subdivided. Mr. Stimpson suggested a percentage of the water front be used instead of a specific number for the shore line access area. Ms. Peacock questioned the average size of the other lots that could be subdivided. Ms. Larsen stated that some are in the 40,000 square foot range. Submittals will be taken on a lot by lot basis. Ms. Hankee discussed the other lot's status. Mr. Laden questioned why the property is not planned to subdivide into two small lots rather than one conforming lot and one smaller non -conforming lot. Staff considered this; a smaller lot would be more of a deviation and impacts to the lake would not be greatly different. Mr. Laden questioned if the houses are required to hook up with the utility improvements. Ms. Larsen stated that all the property owners along West Shadow can hook up when they are ready. A platting process itself requires utility hook up. Mr. Laden questioned if neighbors are notified by mail for the variance. Ms. Larsen stated that a notice was sent regarding the preliminary plat and variance. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 9, 2019 Page 3 Mr. Laden questioned who determines lot sizes. Ms. Larsen stated that the DNR decides these parcels lot size due to being in the shore land management district. Board members discussed shore line access area width options. Chair Tralle opened the public hearing at 7:20 P.M. Jerome Poehling, 6790 West Shadow Lake Drive, stated the history of the property and the purpose of the project. He thinks everything has been covered well and he appreciates the consideration. Mona Poehling, 6790 West Shadow Lake Drive, stated that City water and sewer hookup for their property has taken a long time and she is happy it is finally happening. Mr. Stimpson made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing. Motion was supported by Mr. Ruhland. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Root stated that the variance is substantial but the lots will be consistent with other properties in the neighborhood. Mr. Root stated that the situation was not created by the homeowner, but instead by outside agencies. Not granting the variance would be denying the homeowners appropriate use of their property. Mr. Root made a MOTION to approve the Poehling Addition Variance and Preliminary Plat with recommendations to change the shore line access to 20 feet. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 6-0. B. PUBLIC HEARING: Stern Addition Preliminary Plat Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Stimpson stated that changes should be made to the submittal to FEMA if a deck or accessory structure is considered. Ms. Hankee stated that the property owners could have a detached deck which could avoid FEMA requirements. Chair Tralle opened the public hearing at 7:37 P.M. Jamie Stern, 6820 West Shadow Lake Drive, is excited to see this project move forward and appreciates the work the board and the City have done. Mr. Stern questioned if a detached deck requires a building permit. Mr. Laden stated that a detached deck requires a building permit if it is over 42 inches off the ground. Mr. Evenson made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing. Motion was supported by Ms. Peacock. Motion carried 6-0. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 9, 2019 Page 4 Mr. Evenson made a MOTION to approve the Stern Addition Preliminary Plat with recommendations and additional change the shore line access to 20 feet. Motion was supported by Mr. Ruhland. Motion carried 6-0. C. Watermark 2nd Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Root expressed confusion regarding resolution 17-133. Ms. Larsen clarified that it is only the 3-stall garage house plan that the amendment would apply to. Staff and the board discussed the resubmittal process. The 2-stall garage house plan, that meets the 64 foot wide lot requirements, can be built. Mr. Stimpson made a MOTION to approve the Watermark 2nd Addition Final Plan/Final Plat. Motion was supported by Mr. Ruhland. Motion carried 6-0. VII. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Mini Self -Storage Facilities Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. Ms. Peacock questioned traffic flow and suggested they primarily be kept in industrial areas. Staff explained traffic is a factor that would be evaluated. Mr. Grochala stated that the City is trying to create property tax value. The fully enclosed structure would be appropriate for light industrial districts. They have an opportunity for higher value products and are adjacent to where people have put a greater investment into their buildings. Mini multi -storage buildings may be best in general industrial districts. The goal is to find the best places for storage facilities knowing they are not going to create a lot of tax value. Board members suggested placing multi -unit storage in general industrial areas due to fiscal and aesthetics reasons. An indoor storage building looks like any other business and could be located in light industrial or commercial districts. Mr. Evenson questioned regulations regarding the number of buildings allowed on site due to location in an industrial zone. Ms. Larsen responded that regulation is based on hard cover; this wouldn't limit the number of buildings but would be self- regulating. Chair Tralle stated that he observed little car traffic at a storage facility in Columbus. He is in favor of self-contained bigger box storage. Mr. Laden asked about the valuation of the self-contained storage buildings. Mr. Grochala stated that he predicts that the bigger box interior storage units have a higher per square feet value to them. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 9, 2019 Page 5 Mr. Laden stated that he is not concerned about the length of the buildings but wants to suggest that the buildings be broken up for aesthetics. Mr. Grochala suggested implementing fencing requirements for areas along public roads. The board and staff discussed condo-ized, garage storage products. The board suggested looking at condo garages, mini multi -storage and bigger box interior storage buildings. B. Project Updates Chair Tralle inquired about the CUP for Bald Eagle Erectors. Mr. Grochala stated that when Bald Eagle Erectors bought the site, there was CUP to bring it into conformance and upgraded the site to meet regulations. Chair Tralle inquired about API and why the CUP wasn't re -reviewed. Mr. Grochala stated that this site had an existing CUP that allowed for outside storage. It was legally grandfathered in as long as it is maintained. Chair Tralle asked how long the bag dumpsters can be placed on the boulevard for a residential house. There are general rules that include inspection to confirm the dumpster is connected with construction activity. They are expected to be gone with construction is completed. VIII. ADJOURNMENT r Mr. Laden made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:08 P.M. Motion was supported by Mr. Stimpson. Motion carried 6-0. Respectfully submitted, Mara Strand and Katharine Dowlding DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE REQUEST: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: OWNER: REVIEW DEADLINE: Katie Larsen, City Planner November 13, 2019 Houle Estates Second Addition Final Plat FP2019-005 Guy and Jennifer Houle 6701 Ruffed Grouse Road Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Same Complete Application Date: October 25, 2019 60-Day Review Deadline: December 24, 2019 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: November 13, 2019 City Council Meeting: November 25, 2019 BACKGROUND The applicants, Guy and Jennifer Houle, submitted a land use application for Houle Estates Second Addition final plat. The proposed development is a 1 lot and 1 outlot single family residential subdivision located at the north end of Ruffed Grouse Road. The subject site is 30.72 acres. This staff report is based on the following information: • Final Plat prepared by EVS , Inc. received September 27, 2019 • Buffer Easement Exhibit prepared by EVS, Inc. dated September 25, 2019 • Easement Exhibit prepared by EVS, Inc. dated March 12, 2019 • Title Commitment issued by Old Republic Title Insurance Company dated September 25, 2019 Previous Council Actions: • July 10, 2017: Resolution No. 17-63 approving Preliminary Plat 1 ANALYSIS History The preliminary plat, Houle Addition, was approved in July 2017 as 1 lot and 1 outlot. In August 2017, Mr. Houle has decided to final plat the entire parcel as Lot 1, Block 1, Houle Estates (the name was changed from Houle Addition) and no outlot to avoid Wetland Conservation Act requirements of wetland buffers, monument staking and conservation easements. In 2018, he built his single family house on the north end of Ruffed Grouse Road. Mr. Houle is now final platting the outlot with wetland easements etc. consistent with the approved with the preliminary plat. No development is proposed for Outlot A. Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The parcel is guided low density residential and zoned R-1X, Single Family Executive. The final plat is compliant with the comprehensive plan, zoning and subdivision ordinance. The final plat substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat. Blocks and Lots The final plat contains Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, Houle Estates Second Addition. Lot 1 contains the single family home. Outlot A is non -buildable, open space with wetlands. No principal or accessory structures are allowed on Outlot A. F1 Required per Lot 1 Outlot A R-1X Emor— Min. Lot Size 12,825 sf 201,870 sf 1,136,591 sf (contiguous buildable land) (4.63 acres) (26.09 acres) Min. Lot Width 90 ft (interior lot) 915 ft 431.72 ft Min. Lot Depth 135 ft 220 ft 1500 ft Streets and Alleys Lot 1 (single family home) has frontage along Ruffed Grouse Road that has 60 feet of platted right-of-way. Outlot A has frontage along CSAH 34/Birch Street. No street improvements are required. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided along all lot lines. The wetland has been protected by a drainage and utility easement that includes a 10 foot buffer extending outward from the delineated wetland boundary. Wetland Conservation Act regulations as administered by Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) requires a conservation easement and wetland buffer over the wetlands. These documents have been provided and shall be recorded separately. Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control Storm water management and erosion and sediment control were handled with the construction of the single family. No further stormwater mitigation is required for the platting of Outlot A. Utilities Sanitary Sewer An 8" PVC sanitary sewer main along Ruffed Grouse Road serves Lot 1. There is an 8" sanitary plug at the end of the main. Watermain A 6" DIP watermain along Ruffed Grouse Road serves Lot 1. There is a 6" watermain plug at the end of the main. Public Land Dedication The Park, Natural Open Space, Greenways and Trail System Plan do not indicate a future neighborhood park within the area. The City is requiring cash in lieu of land dedication for the new Lot 1. No fees are required for Outlot A. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 1 x 2019 Park Dedication Fee $3,000 = Total Due $3,000 Tree Preservation A tree inventory is not required for Outlot A since no development is proposed. Landscaping Landscaping is not required for the platting of Outlot A. Comprehensive Plan Houle Estates Second Addition is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities as detailed with approval of the preliminary plat. Density and Land Area Calculations The following chart implements Met Council's formula for calculating net density. GrosTrea (acres) 30.72 _[: Wetlandsffers on Lot 1 (4.18) Public Parks & Open Space NA Arterial ROW NA Other (Non -Buildable Outlot A) (26.09) Net Area (acres) 0.45 # of Units 1 Gross Density (units/acre) .03 Net Density (units/acre) 2.22 The subject site is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.9 units per net acre. Outlot A contains non -buildable upland (island), wetlands and wetland buffers. The net density of 2.22 units per acres is consistent with low density residential development. Wetlands A Wetland Delineation Report was completed by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC on May 23, 2017 for the area in Lot 1. A WCA Notice of Decision was received from RCWD on August 10, 2017. Since no development is proposed on Outlot A, the edge of wetland as delineated by Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. in November 2000 was used. The site contains 21.71 acres of wetland and is located within in the RCWD Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). A WMC Buffer Declaration, Conservation Easement, and wetland monument signs are required and are shown on the Buffer Easement Exhibit and Easement Exhibit. These documents shall be recorded. There are 4.29 acres of wetland buffer required and 4.99 acres provided. al No wetland impacts are proposed. Floodplain The 2015 DFIRM indicates Zone A floodplain on both Lot 1 and Outlot A. The plan sheets have been revised to indicate a RCWD floodplain base flood elevation (BFE) of 886.87. No impacts to the floodplain are proposed. Shoreland Management Overlay The site is located in a Shoreland Management Overlay district of Wards Lake. This lake is a classified as a Natural Environment Lake and has an 883.7 OHWL elevation. A setback of 150 feet from the OHWL is required for all primary and accessory structures on Lot 1. Section I IO2.07(2)(a) does however, allow for the following exception: "Placement of structures on lots. When more than one setback applies to a site, structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building site, structure setbacks may be altered without a variance to conform to the adjoining setbacks from the ordinary high water level, provided the proposed building site is not located in a shore impact zone. " The plans show the 883.7 OHWL and this elevation has been field surveyed. The OHWL setback of 6697 Ruffed Grouse Road is 56.3' and the OHWL setback of 6690 Ruffed Grouse Road is 92.1'. The average setback is 74.2'. The 75' shore impact zone is the more restrictive and shall be the applicable setback. The Grading Plan indicates 2.31 % impervious surface coverage which meets the allowed 30% impervious surface coverage of the shoreland ordinance. Development Agreement A Development Agreement shall be drafted by the City, executed by the City and the developer and recorded by the developer. Title Commitment The City Attorney reviewed the title commitment and notes that mortgage lender consent to plat is required. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement Since there are no stormwater management facilities being constructed with this development, a stormwater maintenance agreement is not required. 5 City Engineer The City Engineer reviewed the final plat and has no comments requiring changes to the final plat. FINDINGS OF FACT -FINAL PLAT The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: 1. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. The final plat substantially conforms with the preliminary plat. 2. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and This is a one (1) lot single family residential subdivision and will be platted in one (1) phase. 3. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. The conditions of the preliminary plat have been substantially fulfilled. Securities will be required with a Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Houle Estates Second Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. General Conditions: a. Any future subdivision and/or development of Outlot A will require full preliminary and final plat approval. b. No principal or accessory buildings or structures shall be constructed on Outlot A. c. No off-street parking of motor vehicles (i.e. passenger motor vehicles, recreational vehicles or trailers or motor vehicles exceeding a gross weight of 11,075 pounds) or equipment is allowed on Outlot A. i. The exiting motor vehicles and equipment located in the southwest corner of Outlot A shall be removed. C� ii. The area shall be restored to natural vegetation in compliance with the WMC Buffer Declaration Buffer Vegetation Management Plan. d. No exterior storage is allowed on Outlot A. i. Any exterior storage on Outlot A shall be removed. 2. The following documents as required by RCWD and the City shall be recorded: a. WMC Buffer Declaration with Exhibits b. Conservation Easement with Exhibits c. Easement for Public Ditch System with Exhibits d. Development Agreement e. Final Plat 3. The City's "Protected Open Space Area" wetland sign detail (Gen-22) shall be used for the installation of the required wetland monument signs. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Preliminary Plat -Houle Addition 3. Final Plat -Houle Addition Second Addition 4. Conservation Easement Exhibit 5. Buffer Easement Exhibit 6. Wetland Sign Detail 7 Houle Estates 2nd Addition 1 14, r i 4V f AI _44( Z ME pot, ) T az� -W V, Z4 C, Ir4 41 j J11 FA4.1 AAW am t34] j*- A X J" /Ar '4) ., M-1 4 Y77 7U C I T Y�L"ALi- _OF V 0 A t XX 1 in = 400 ft N A November 4, 2019 Map Powered By DataLink wsb 3 I 00 I 0 U a� 0 0 J 0 c J T C7 U) rn c 0 L 0 0 Q U 0 Q UI 0 U 0 L a_ 0 c J I U) a� 0 I N 0 I i _J J_ LL rno w� 0 0 �M:3 a0 Z o � C o a) oN� L Lj 3�:Zo rn t U N N T I E 1 0 Ld Ln L0 O �o � N O N Oy U) / I DD N / r v C r p T 1 n AI ! L /♦ L V IV / �` Zoned : PSP (Public Semi -Public) / of Outlot South Line of the North 1100 feet OutlotD WL 1 S 89042'27" W 1314.92 WL �r / S 89019'39 W 719.23' 332.61 25125 �' �i �i --Ordinary High Water �� vation: 883.7 LOT 1 Judicial �\ ` 1 -RCWD Floodp1.in 10 Ditch \ \ _ - _ _ _� � ` �\ Elev=886.87 Q \ City Setback 50 judicial 0�0 I M Edge O& Wetland As.,I,� O- Line �Delineated BJacobson wtditch easement �� 201,870 sq. ft. o Environmentdin April, I �o o ,% N� J 4.63 acres I in 1\ 2017 \� i N o uo l 0 \ BLOCK 1 0 \ opose I� ; -�-- 219.9 ---- z M N °4s 10 25125 0 N42.56'35"E<-- \ � - / / � � " >% � � f ,-Anoka County Reference Monument on If 84.32 50 wetland buffer easement /� WETLAND -�� N\ 325.24 915.53 - ` 400.00 N 89041'31" E 1315.53 W, `--The Southwest corner of / 6 3• House o House the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, PI & R-1X (Planned Development I o [ Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 and Single Family Executive) I I / \ "� The Southeast corner of the NE 1/4 of--' the NE 1/4, Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 1000 I _ WONI TY MAP \r / /' �. S, R, Not to Scale I I / o \ / \ ��9/ (o e 4<V 1G' 5 1 1 Sect/on 27, do 28 Township 31, Range 22 Anoka County, MN O / 0 Li � N L-- , - - - - - c0 <\� N Q Owner / Developer M L Guy and Joseph Houle IL r, rA / � ° 1221 Birch St. L� L_\J .. r 3 O Lino Lakes, MN 55038 \ / ~ O (612)210-3854 0 N (n Engineer & Surveyor Kaskaskia Engineering Group \ / 2550 University Avenue West �' 7 Suite 161 S / St. Paul, MN 55114 / PARK 4 z 1 (651)337-5652 / I\ 100 0 100 200 Municipality: City of Lino Lakes Proposed Utilities: 9 HORIZONTAL: 1 "=100' Sewer: City Utilities (available) e �o rA/o Water: City Utilities (available) �' /Opp ■ LEGEND 0 EXISTING LIGHT POLE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE EXISTING SIGN - - - - - EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING WETLANDS EDGE - EXISTING GUY WIRE ® c6 EXISTING CATCH BASIN 502 502 EXISTING EXISTING CONTOUR CONTOUR EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE Q EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE E EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC o GD�4 G EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING GATE VALVE ed • FOUND IRON MONUMENT D D EXISTING DD SANITARY SEWER 0 BENCHMARK �• Cr / 0 SET MONUMENT DD EXISTING STORM SEWER Top Nut of Hydrant (NAVD 88) aCrs \ e AS EXISTING TREELINE Located at the end of Ruffed Grouse Road 4 // R EXISTING AUTO SPRINKLER as shown on the survey. y w EXISTING WATERLINE Elev.= 897.26 feet DO EXISTING MANHOLE SF SF EXISTING SILT FENCE EXISTING WATER METER ■ BASIS OF BEARINGS cM EXISTING GAS METER CONTIGUOUS BUILDABLE AREA For the purposes of this survey the West line of Outlot D, of PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, Z EXISTING HAND HOLE according to the plat thereof, Anoka County, ® EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX Minnesota is assumed to bear N 00'44'55" W ® EXISTING GUAR POST ■LOT SUMMARY EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT Lot 1 201,870 sq. ft. or 4.63 acres SB-1 Outlot A 1,136,590 sq. ft. or 26.09 acres EXISTING SOIL BORING Contiguous Buildable Area (Lot 1) 26,526 sq. ft. or 0.61 acres Total 1,338,460 sq. ft. or 30.72 acres ■ ❑ONING SUMMARY Current Zoning: R-1X Ord. 02-08 Proposed Zoning: R-1X Current use: Not being used Proposed use: Residential ■ EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, Minnesota EXCEPT that part of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve being in the West One-half of the Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the West One-half of said Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West along the East line of said West One-half, Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27, a distance of 57.73 feet to the Southeast corner of said Outlot D for a point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the East line of said Outlot D, a distance of 910.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 580.47 feet; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D, a distance of 548.90 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East, parallel with the South line of said Northwest One -Quarter, Section 27, a distance of 416.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D a distance of 370.14 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10 (Anoka County Right -of -Way Plat No. 11); thence North 85 degrees 24 minutes 36 seconds East along said right-of-way line a distance of 28.66 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way line along a curve concave tc the North (which has a radius of 3879.72 feet, a delta angle of 02 degrees 00 minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 136.02 feet) a chord bearing and distance of North 86 degrees 24 minutes 53 seconds East, 136.01 feet to the point of beginning. And EXCEPT the North 1100 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserver, Anoka County Minnesota And EXCEPT the South 400 feet of the North 1500 feet of the East 600 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, Minnesota ■ PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, and Outlot A of HOULES ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota / 5 / 7\ / 130 - ■ NOTES 1) The property lies in flood zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and zone A (areas where no base flood elevations are determined) as designated on Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel Number 27003C 0365 E, Anoka County, Minnesota, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency effective date December 16th, 2015. 2) The Contiguous Buildable Area is 10' outside the wetland boundary and consist of 26,526 sq. ft. 3) The flood plain elevation of 886.87 was provided by the Rice Creek Watershed District. 4 Per the Shoreland Ordinance the setback from the OHWL is 75 minimum or the average of adjacent houses. The adjacent houses are at 56.3 and 92.1 with the average being 74.2. So the 75' minimum must be held. 5) The Property ID Number is 27-31-22-23-0010 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. C_C��- D E 8-15-17 L N 17765 Ronald P. Alwin the E. Line of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 28, \\�- - Twp. 31, Rge. 22 0 - WETLAND LOT 1 - 600' O \� `\ r \N68.29'04� 3Of, BLOCK 1 00 �� --N38°27'51 "W \ ��\ 6 -� _ -7•r9 47"w 1'41' \V�/\\\ Zoned PSP (Public Semi -Public) 67.86 �9°248"W-� 348 51iW �'u6,j10 LO �- _4 ° N1nZ�2211"V�1 O / The South Line of the North 1500 �7�j Z feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills N11 °42'37" 36 N z Preserve, Anoka County, MN S 89 19 39 W 600.01 wetland buffe{ -� �6 \� �� ' / S25°33'43"W �9 _�N36'09E�� i 6.98 S43.36'36"W 59.88 Basemen \ 37 ----wetland buffer _-- _ N88.43 1 - WETLAND = / - - easement ,, 85.09 S86'55'19"E WETLAND \ro/ co/ �-------------- L _ _ - _ - - - �j-5 1\�5° S 89022'49" W 580.47 1 !-! r_- A A N I T !-! 1 1 I rr �� [> - ^ - E:) I I L_ /-\ .� /-\ 1 V 1 I I 1 L_ L _' I I\ L_ L_ I\ V L_ 1 � Zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential) I I T I /"N T r1 / \J U I L_L/ I V Edge Of Wetland As Delineated_--' By Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. On Nov. 15, 2000 w 0 I- - �� I- - OUTLOTA I I IL_/- /-\IV I I I I I I\L_�,L_I\VL_ I o 1,136,590 sq. ft. j_ o 26.09 acres 3 (D c I I 0) 1 a ; 1 0_ \ 4 � 00 ., � O �� Lo Lo O / O N 89°2\9\� \� 9 80 Zoned R Si�j\ie\ ly R, I ential) \\\\ \\ \\\ I\ a 11� o O:f LO to � L 0 +moo oa z 0 U) / H o C: 1 \ o � 0' l \` ` N \� O U)Z3 U I C0 oar a U cn I ,= F I N62°20'02"E ��52.37 _ Parallel with the South line lof the Northwest Quarter \0.84 i WETLAND --' \ 1 \ N 89°22'49" E � - N17.48'O�W 416.00' �17 wetland buffer- --� ` easement 1� N Z J �--75-ft Shore Impact Zone I \ -- S�0'26'25"E / 58.E� �/556°58'26"E l-\ \ \ \ � N�• 30'1 @ W _�__ N25°524 ` l / \\ N75°45'02" / 36.19 House J / F ure Build ble Are 10 sq, �_--Ez7- o `- The South line of the of Sec. 27, Twp. 1 Rge. 22 C S. A u, r I 6� �4/ / / w LO so O 0 o O �(D o C N in o � 0 O a_ L,1 G� 0 0 Ui 00 E 0 0 N rn �o a� ry M v o� xx a� o o cf 1~ r_4 N n Q O z >�� W4 0 en toItN W It a 00 00 N W �O \O • ,� E=4 J t.o z 2 � o 4� w N Q W U W Ln a Wp� O a- 0 a C z a N /-The Northerly / right-of-way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10. I I The Southeast 1 corner of said \ Outlot D. 1l \ 1 \ -- N852�9,666 -- o ^^moo rV o ^ b O�o - cl v r. c, REV. DATE DESCRIP Q:Ed a E- I--I E- E- W w h E- E- U W O W a DRAWN ❑❑ ESHEET BY: 03 CHECKED E �E BY: SHEET NO. = OF SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER I I � LAST PLOTTED: 8/23/2017 1:50 PM 1-10 U-L-.,E E S TA TES ,SE C Oi A-D-DIT101V D ir7A A NIT I F I L_/-\`:/-\I V I i ill I F] I L_L_`: I I \ L_`: L_I \ V L_ �� V I /1 I I T SL/1 T rl ��. v _V V S 89°42'27" W 1314,92 ,' ---- S 89°19'39" W 719.23 ----- -------------- ` 630.48 �� ' 134.27 �� - 62.52 - ; P5 on W --- � 332.61 -'� � ----- 914.90 ----- .� --' � ---- / i ' \ d s r \100 foot drains el Ede Of Wetland As-----''N80 3015 W'' / ,�1 \o eke X>LN I cb I I /1 i i I r- N42°56'35'E�-� 400.02 ° < / LF)LOT �`� i Delineated By i 84.28 \ / 27.98 "� I \ °33 0{ d gy\ Got\2�00 _drainage and ------ e asement O �- 13 I Jacobson r- ^ T A T r- ^ ��, WETLAND 5°�2� �'I i _ �N3� �2 /��de reo��er�� 15�, utility easement - \ AIM Environmental in / ^ L_.� I/-\ I L_.� i 5 p o o r I com / ,S78°47'59'W R�° 3 "�1 -- / .i�< N O ` "PILO April, 2017 O• �` °�`' ° N 5 �2 c �� I NII e a 3 3 I /� 50.08 323 2 \ / Er p\ O d- cu BLOCK > CuIo vti��wi �°� p �2 v N7 31 52 W-� I , \ 39° A \ r \� J') O °O (LI n ---- I� li \i_ ° , -� S R� 3° 0 57.58 _ �-- N35°59'51'W N i- V. 1 O --� drain ge and-- \ \ �o� in cu i ° " i �\ 0 \ O r_ Ng5 00 Ol E S7 °3 S ° N N80 45 47 W F. YI c� �i 44,03 �___- CL of Count ' utilit easement \ 8' ___ _ I n\ /A -�i \\\ 112,92 9361�2 \ 12 z - utility geasement�� '� ��2 Sj1 60,72 ,�/I 4 __.,N67°19'47'W,��1\ Ditch No. 2 >N11°34'16"E \ zH 21•W _ ° , I \ 6 \� �/ _- ,N51 41 54 W 67.86 _ o� \ J \ �---- k r \ (, �� / 100i00 --I N3°53'50'W�' 43,33 \ ,' wi 102.39 N68°29'04'W`' / , \ i \ �jg°— /---- / �- Drainage and ° " / �5' \ / / 28, / (< -� i 60.31 / i S27 12 35 E� \ i 35,00 , \ ��-E 10;7 t✓ ` 3 _ \ j WETLAND,' i ----J915.53 ----- JLIUtility Easement 26 92 �21 \1? 400.00 --_ ��o;,2o N/\.-F 325.43 -� ' 459.56 N89 28 48 W S3�° 9 �f w 325.24 - c Q o i " -n Ln -7- --- 157.09 $ 2� �3. 93,82 333448 $1. ✓s f\ °N N 89 41 31 E 1315.53 0 :� `r l 3 w s m ILLI CD o I / N69°42'13'W-�!-- --� CD 4)J \ 22.94 0) _j ro l60 o N12°22'31'W' T _ - A 00 i z_ \c< \\ OuTLO N11°42'37'E�\' -4Ln- Z 36,52 Y KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Guy R Houle and Jennifer L Houle, husband and wife, owners of the following described OD property. / \\ \�I - 9I ��' a; Lot 1, Block 1, HOULE ESTATES, Anoka County, Minnesota, I ' / / \ \ \ �%Y p /�� ml\ S 8 9 ° 19' 3 9" W 600.01 O >S43°36'36'W Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as HOULE ESTATES SECOND ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the / / \\ `0 \N6464g N36°09'S4"E<___- / S25°33'6463 8r��'� 59.88 drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. Also dedicating to the County of Anoka the right of access onto County State Aid�9��. 124,40 37,26 Highway No. 34 as shown on this lat. 9 Y P / \ t✓ N88°43'21'W N� s `� WETLAND / 85.15 — Q I / S86 55 19" In witness whereof said Guy R Houle and Jennifer L. Houle, husband and wife, have hereunto set their hands this ________ day of _ -------20---• 'i — u �- I W ,'� \N✓� / \� \��___- drainage and-- -- _____drainage and --- / y �\\---------------------------- °59 (U -- \ utilit easement" � N 09 U7 utility easement � N17 38 54 E 9 Y---- ,D ' � ° � " \ Edge Of Wetland As Delineated B ' ------------------------------------------------ I ) ,� <� 82.38 �� Peterson Environmental Consulting, r; Guy R Houle Jennifer L. Houle I- "E STATE OF MINNESOTA �\ S ,.�3' Al 1° ,�� Inc. On Nov. 15, 2000 COUNTY OF / NI A U °' �� S 8 9° 2 2' 4 9" W 580.47 i U"I L,u_v.�r� t O i This instrument was acknowledged before me this __________ day of _____________, 20---- by Guy R Houle, O ------------------------- (Signature) -------- (Print) \ \ \ // vj r J \J U L _ L_ L_ `: I /-\ I L_ Notary Public, ________ County, Minnesota My Commission Expires STATE OF MINNESOTA I< / / I nl � f\ t COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this __________ day of _____________, 20____ by Jennifer L. Houle. / n J\ WETLAND ------------------------- (Signature) ------------------------ (Print) Notary Public, ________ County, Minnesota My Commission Expires STATE OF MINNESOTA \ COUNTY OF r / I Scott C. Alwin do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor // in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly ^ A designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this _____ day of ---------- 20___. N 8 9 ° 2 2' 4 9 " E Scott C. Alwin, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 53528 \ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA This instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ---------- 20___ by Scott C. Alwin. / \-------------------------------------- (Signature) Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota (Print) CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA This plat of HOULE ESTATES SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this ____ day of -------------, 20__, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota BY---------------------------- Mayor By---------------------------- Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of ------------------- 20__. Charles F. Gitzen Anoka County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20___ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this _____ day of ----------------,20---• By--------------------------- Deputy Property Tax Administrator COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES County of Anoka, State of Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of HOULE ESTATES SECOND ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this _____ day of ----------------- 20___, at _____ o'clock __.M. and was duly recorded as Document Number By. County Recorder/Registrar of Titles Deputy -7 DI ir_ -n^n NIT i ill 1 ^ r-^r_-�)\ /r_- I rI L_/-\`:/ \I V I r1 I L_L_`: I I \ L_.� L_I \ V L_ /"� I I T I rN T r\ 01J v v i L_v i L) O 0 0 3 11 LJ J Edge Of Wetland As Delineated By---- LO Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. On Nov. 15, 2000 `\ � \ o \\ O 309,80 \ W` 10�44°E Z �'�--N62°20'02'E N3°02'36'W1 49.24 `A � 52.37 ____ -�-N39°50'15'W \ 60.84 \`-'N17°48'03'W ' 32.17 -___ drainage and------- utility easement I M 00 I^m I CDCO W -- � S40°26'25'E WETLAND ,D \�\ / 58.72 \ �� I \ _S56*58'26'E \� 'i' 24.46\QO N4°30'10"W O S\ 45.38 O 1\125°59'08'E�1 32.24 ��\ - O� A cv , 59 ,7 14 S82°54'35"E 31.48 .9 S o i 0 0 0 o eo� o _—_--- N 89°41'18" E L=129.32 302,40 R=5669.58 n i i t\Ir1 tin` A=1°18'25" N�T 1 I. I A A InI.(/ A /1I I N IT\I I I/\I 1\A/ A '�)It\ I IT f -\I I A I A ��I nT +/-\� v�r\/-\ .��v v I I r] I\.�n v v/-\ I I \IvFl I vv/-\ I L_f-\ T r,e-- rX Tn N I /1 O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 53528, THAT WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT. • DENOTES FOUND 1/2 IRON PIPE MONUMENT WL DENOTES WETLAND BOUNDARY o DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED TO ANOKA COUNTY City of Lino Lakes County of -Anoka Sections 27 8r28, Tvwp. 31, Rng. 22 VICINITY MAP Not to Scale Xk Xk C.S.A.H. NO.34 w G. Q G. Section 27, & 28 Township 31, Range 22 Anoka County, MN ■BASIS OF BEARINGS For the purposes of this survey the West line of Lot 1, Block 1, of HOULE ESTATES, according to the plat thereof, Anoka County, 3 Minnesota is assumed to bear S 00'44'55" E LQ U-) r I _ ,- O O 100 0 100 200 (SCALE IN FEET) 1 INCH = 100 FEET ENGINEERING SURVEYING RENEWABLE ENERGY w U zQ) �N O N L � °w� D Ir-A A NIT I III I �� )r-^r-�)\ /r- z c �- \ i FI L_/-\.�/-\I N I \ F, I L_L_.E �- \ I I\ L_.� L_I \ V L_ = O M w L/ VTL_\JT v Anoka County Reference Monument--, � °� S 89°42'27" W 1314,92 on the E. Line of the NE 1/4 of � ,----- Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22-- \ - � \� �' - 'I_ 1233.59 H � N 332.61 - I WETLAND ,� N17°45'16'E�\ 100 foot drainage-�� L__- I I /-\ I I I r- easement \ 1 59.90 \ _-_-_ -- Conservation Easement l \J lJ L _ L_ / \ \ 1w "-- ------ l,' \ L0 CD` 00IM ' N86°49'54'E \` r- \ T A T r- \ N45 16 56 �_ , \\ � \ J \ `• of oN i 73.85 �\ L_ .� I /-\ I L_ .� ° J \� \�� NIo 55.16 I O (�f J\ iZ i 1 "� 7°10'22'E wt /-_S56°04'02'E `�\ '�� \\ CLJ \ •i / 86,72 89.10 N7E3�59'34' 1 v �-52.48 \� O / CL of Count - I i �\�' KL O Ditch No. 2 \-�i i m o. ----- -- _SO°18'29'E 100JI00 i' ^ CO! -�. \ 37.04 Z ' The West Line -- of Lot 1, Block 1, of HOULE ESTATES 554.77 I _ -- 325.24 __ I -,� � _y-- 514.14 `------------ _ ��, N 89°41'31" E \\\ 1315,53 0 r `--The Southwest corner of Lot 1, --Point of beginning Q Block 1, Houle Estates and the point of Public Drainage r) I O I of beginning of buffer easement Easement p \ .� M Public Drainage Easement Description A 100 foot public drainage easement over that part of Lot 1, Block 1, HOULE ESTATES, centerline of said easement described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, HOULE ESTATES; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East, assumed bearing along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 325.24 feet to the beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 1 degree 09 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 220.68 feet to the northerly property line of Said Lot 1 and said centerline there terminating. The side lines of said easements shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate at the property lines of said Lot 1. Conservation Easement Description A Conservation Easement over that part of Lot 1, Block 1, HOULE ESTATES, described as follows Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East, assumed bearing along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 554.77 feet; thence North 7 degrees 49 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 89.13 feet; thence North 86 degrees 49 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 73.85 feet; thence South 87 degrees 10 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 86.72 feet; thence South 56 degrees 04 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 89.10 feet; thence South 0 degrees 18 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 37.04 feet to the property line of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1 a distance of 514.14 feet; thence South 00 degrees 54 minutes 46 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 760.35 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 309.80 feet; thence South 0 degrees 54 minutes 46 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 341.49 feet; thence South 51 degrees 48 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 118.59 feet; thence South 40 degrees 00 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 59.16 feet; thence South 74 degrees 30 minutes 47 seconds East a distance of 67.98 feet; thence North 69 degrees 34 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 87.30 feet; thence North 87 degrees 56 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 88.79 feet; North 39 degrees 30 minutes 57 seconds East a distance of 58.40 feet; thence North 14 degrees 44 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 373.15 feet; thence North 76 degrees 57 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 119.14 feet to the property line of said Lot 1; thence North 1 degree 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 424.19 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 580.47 feet; thence North 1 degree 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 174.17 feet; thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 39 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 600.01 feet; thence North 1 degree 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 400.01 feet; thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 39 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 662.56 feet; thence South 0 degrees 40 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 53.26 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 81.96 feet; thence South 60 degrees 28 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 279.20 feet; thence North 87 degrees 28 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 152.29 feet; thence South 30 degrees 32 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 55.61 feet; thence South 45 degrees 50 minutes 01 seconds West a distance of 173.19 feet; thence North 87 degrees 26 minutes 51 seconds West at distance of 162.38 feet; thence North 47 degrees 09 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 249.06 feet; thence North 76 degrees 59 minutes 34 seconds West a distance of 52.48 feet; thence North 45 degrees 16 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 55.16 feet; thence North 17 degrees 45 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 59.90 feet to the north property line of said Lot 1; thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds West, along the north property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 1233.59 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence South 0 degrees 44 minutes 55 seconds East, along the westerly property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 220.70 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT A 100 foot public drainage easement over that part of Lot 1, Block 1, HOULE ESTATES, centerline of said easement described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, HOULE ESTATES; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East, assumed bearing along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 325.24 feet to the beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 1 degree 09 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 220.68 feet to the northerly property line of Said Lot 1 and said centerline there terminating. The side lines of said easements shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate at the property lines of said Lot 1. Conservation Notes 1) Conservation area needed to have an average 50' setback is 186,745 sq. ft. 2) Conservation area shown has an area of 217,559 sq. ft. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SCOTT ALWIN The Southeast corner of the NE 1/4 of--" i the NE 1/4, Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 �( ' / > \ i \ / L0 M N N O ° EP / a' N C F- O N _ C ° — N / L�L_V�f�\CD a� z O -� )A E� It n / X1 t / Cr / o \� / / \ rn 0) ILO Anoka County Monument Cast Iron Monument Southwest corner of the N) Sec. 27, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 (West Y4 Corner) 3 I� Iz D I r_- A ^ n I\ I T I III I ^ D[> r- ^ r_- i Fl L_/—\.�/ \1 N 1 F, I L_L_`: I I \ L_.� L_I \ V L_ -The South Line of the North 1100 feet of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE i\ I ITI r\T r-\ a� v v I L_\J I L) F- _ S 89°19'39" W 719,23------_ °Cn , 662.56 -� w° = > - 6LLI \\, --Edge Of Wetland As ° w Delineated By Peterson c o 0- 4P " ; Environmental Consulting, - � ` SO 26 21 E Inc. On Nov. 15, 2000 WETLAND 0 CD o O I N LSD �. O c' 0.9- N87-28102-E \ O g9p� 152.29 ) �- 0)° -- \ `" rn CD O --The South Line of the North 1500 00 feet of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS \ ,\ 7,-\ PRESERVE NP N87°26'51"w \\ 1\ S 89°19'39" W 600,01 ��. 162.38 \ ------- / -- - WETLAND ------------- - -,/ _- -__- --- o WETLAND \ ' Edge Of Wetland As Delineated By----' Peterson Environmental Consulting, 40 Inc. On Nov. 15, 2000 N 89*22/49" E 580,47 trerL' i Eose r-^T A Tr-^ or F I \J lJ L _ L_ L_ `: I /-\ I L_ F II 0j WETLAND ,\.j CD ' 3 \ L0 \1 T) Edge Of Wetland As Delineated By--- O Peterson Environmental Consulting, �\ i CD Inc. On Nov. 15, 2000 `\ \ O ` I I �1 89°22'49" E 309,80 r, 4 \`• �% m WETLAND --' %\ \ M I M r a M' LLJ � ,D I LrT o I g8- /r_- F I \ V L � I L_L_`: i I \ L_`: L_ _ r1 I I T I r\ T r\ v v I L_\-/ I LJ 18 S 1 The Norther) CD�; S9 8. y I CDF S40°00'30'E ,_right-of-way r 59.16 +� / line of C.S.A.H. fV) �Z h^ ' i No. 10. o Ln N ``\ 57 6 30 47,e N69 g'I Found iron 5.28 - 98 - ----_--_�-�-- 1 feet north of \ 88.79 corner ` e o 0 0 0' o o --The South line of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 27, (U Twp. 31, Rge. 22 �n NIr\It n 1 v\-Jr\/-\ N 89°41'18" E L=129.32 _ — — — — — — — — — — 302,40 R=5669.58 C.S.A.H. NO. 34 °=1°1825 1 BIRCH ST. r\r\I InIT\i �I/\� �IA/n\� [)1/\I �T r\rl \A/n\i �)1 n-r 1 v 1 1 I-11\�IF1 VV/-\ I I \I\7F1 I —`Ji — vvr-\ I I L-r\ 1 Tr- .I--&Tn O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 53528, THAT WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT. • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT 0 100 200 DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT WETLAND SIGN SCALE IN FEET wL DENOTES WETLAND BOUNDARY o DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED TO ANOKA COUNTY 25' OFFSET FROM WETLAND BOUNDARY 50' OFFSET FROM WETLAND BOUNDARY N ° w� ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10025 Valley View Road, Suite 140 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Phone: 952-646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www.evs-eng.com EASEMENT EXHIBIT PROJECT HOULE ESTATES LOCATION LINO LAKES, MN SHEET # DATE REVISION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SCOTT ALWIN DATE 03/12/ 2019 REGISTRATION NUMBER 53528 1---*00 ftftwmwmw� DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCA MRW DATE PROJECT # 3.12.19 2019-035.2 SHEET NUMBER REGISTRATION NUMBER: 53528 DATE: 2019 / 02 / 26 1 OF 1 W U Z N U) N O N r� 0�� N z c U) a 0 3 H \N Ln O Ln F, o O 0 0 \ The West Line-- I of Lot 1, Block 1, of HOULE ESTATES DI Ir-n ^ /\ N IT I III I ^ ��[)r-^r_-I-)\ /r_- i FI L_/-\.�/ \I N I F, I L_ E I I\ L_.� L_ I\ V L_ r\ I 'TI r1T rn Anoka County Reference Monument--, o �� UU I L_L/ I LJ on the E. Line of the NE 1/4 of S 8 9 4 2 2 7 W 1314.92 Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 1233.59 ----_a 332.61 I WETLAND 100 foot drainage ,�__- I \\ easement \ --- Iw -, Buffer Easement \� IN N86°49'54'E i ��/ \ r \ \ cu10` 73.85 � Nlo I IZ ° \ I 8 CL of Count Ditch No. 2 I 100J00 ° -- 554.77 325.24 - 1 �\ N 89*41/31' E- 1315,53 0 The Southwest corner of Lot 1, --Point of beginning of Public Drainage Q Block 1, Houle Estates and the point of beginning of buffer easement Easement O r CD � Buffer Easement Description A Buffer Easement over that part of Lot 1, Block 1, HOULE ESTATES, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East, assumed bearing along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 554.77 feet; thence North 7 degrees 49 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 89.13 feet; thence North 86 degrees 49 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 73.85 feet; thence South 87 degrees 10 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 86.72 feet; thence South 56 degrees 04 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 89.10 feet; thence South 0 degrees 18 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 37.04 feet to the property line of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1 a distance of 514.14 feet; thence South 00 degrees 54 minutes 46 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 760.35 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 309.80 feet; thence South 0 degrees 54 minutes 46 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 341.49 feet; thence South 51 degrees 48 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 118.59 feet; thence South 40 degrees 00 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 59.16 feet; thence South 74 degrees 30 minutes 47 seconds East a distance of 67.98 feet; thence North 69 degrees 34 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 87.30 feet; thence North 87 degrees 56 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 88.79 feet; North 39 degrees 30 minutes 57 seconds East a distance of 58.40 feet; thence North 14 degrees 44 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 373.15 feet; thence North 76 degrees 57 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 119.14 feet to the property line of said Lot 1; thence North 1 degree 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 424.19 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 580.47 feet; thence North 1 degree 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 174.17 feet; thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 39 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 600.01 feet; thence North 1 degree 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 400.01 feet; thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 39 seconds West, along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 662.56 feet; thence South 0 degrees 40 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 53.26 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 81.96 feet; thence South 60 degrees 28 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 279.20 feet; thence North 87 degrees 28 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 152.29 feet; thence South 30 degrees 32 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 55.61 feet; thence South 45 degrees 50 minutes 01 seconds West a distance of 173.19 feet; thence North 87 degrees 26 minutes 51 seconds West at distance of 162.38 feet; thence North 47 degrees 09 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 249.06 feet; thence North 76 degrees 59 minutes 34 seconds West a distance of 52.48 feet; thence North 45 degrees 16 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 55.16 feet; thence North 17 degrees 45 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 59.90 feet to the north property line of said Lot 1; thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds West, along the north property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 1233.59 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence South 0 degrees 44 minutes 55 seconds East, along the westerly property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 220.70 feet to the point of beginning. Excepting A 100 foot public drainage easement over that part of Lot 1, Block 1, HOULE ESTATES, centerline of said easement described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, HOULE ESTATES; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East, assumed bearing along the property line of said Lot 1, a distance of 325.24 feet to the beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 1 degree 09 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 220.68 feet to the northerly property line of Said Lot 1 and said centerline there terminating. The side lines of said easements shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate at the property lines of said Lot 1. Also Excepting therefrom any wetland area. The official wetland buffer line is held at RCWD office as a shapefile. File name: Surveying - Shortcut.shp D I r_- n ^ n N I T I III I ^ � � [> r- ^ r_- �) \ / r_- i Fl L_/-\.�/ \1 N I F, I L_L_`: I I \ L_.� L_I \ V L_ -The South Line of the North 1100 feet of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE I ITI r"\T rn U U I L_�/ I v S 8 9° 19' 3 9" W 719.23 ------_ 662.56 N17°45'16'E 59.90 \\ F l \J lU L _ L_ \\ Edge Of Wetland As Delineated By Peterson r- ^ T n T r- ^ \ \ ° ,' Environmental Consulting, L_ `: I M I L_ `: . 6. `\ ��s° _ 0 Inc. On Nov. 15, 2000 WETLAND S56°04'02'E l9 89.10 - F SO°18'29'E 37.04 514.14 / r� / / \ The Southeast corner of the NE 1/4 of--/ i the NE 1/4, Sec. 28, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 / I L C ' �i / %\ \ / <. U-) M / I r\ / \ y N t N O 1,D / /J \ .- O / , \ N a' C� O N U U) Ln / L�L<\ t N 3\ CD \ I- CD >< z -� E� n E)1t n / t Cr / \� o / r / / — Anoka County Monument Cast Iron Monument — Southwest corner of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 27, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 --- •/ — — — — I — — (West Y4 Corner) \--The South line of then NW 1/4 of Sec. 27, cLl Twp. 31, Rge. 22 �n n1�lt n 1 v \_J r I 98��/ •c'p F c'g09, \\N87°28'02'E 9psr. \\ `\ 152,29 i Buffer Easement- LEGEND O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 53528, THAT WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT. • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT 0 100 200 QQ DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT WETLAND SIGN SCALE IN FEET DENOTES WETLAND BOUNDARY o DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED TO ANOKA COUNTY DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER a a� w� OQ (oCn w w°a_� Uj 0 Cn O Uj a)-X ow r2 O J CD CD 37 O 2 CD I \ � I i N O� `° 3 i Ln 1 Ln O CD o� o CD ---The South Line of the North 1500 r�� feet of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS Z PRESERVE i I .. 302.40 R=5669.5 8- C.S.A.H. N0. 34 °=1°18'25" BIRCH ST. /\/11 In1T\/ I II/\I IIA/n\/ Dir\I IT fN1 1A/n\/ ��I nT 1\4 I ' �\JlJ1 \1 1 1 rl1\7r� VV/-\ I I \I\7�l I —\_JI — VV/-\ I I L_r\ 1 I i N O N 0,4- -� ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10025 Valley View Road, Suite 140 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Phone: 952-646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www.evs-eng.com BUFFER EASEMENT EXHIBIT PROJECT HOULE ESTATES LOCATION LINO LAKES, MN SHEET # DATE REVISION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SCOTT ALWIN DATE 09/25/ 2019 REGISTRATION NUMBER 53528 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCA PROJECT # 2019-035.2 SHEET NUMBER 1 OF 1 PROTECTED OPEN SPACE AREA Beyond this marker is a protected area of resource management features and natural ground cover abutting a watercourse, wetland or open space. Federal, State and local laws prohibit activities that could disturb this natural area and adjoining water bodies. Any alterations such as dumping, tilling, plowing, mowing and yard waste disposal are prohibited. C I T O F INOLAKES If you have questions on the protection of this area and the adjacent water resource areas, please contact City Hall at (651) 982-2400. 4 X 4 TREATED POST SPECIFICATIONS: MONUMENT CONSISTS OF A POST AND A PROTECTED OPEN SPACE SIGN WETLAND BUFFER SIGNS MOUNTED FLUSH WITH THE TOP OF THE POST FASTENED WITH NON -REMOVABLE SCREWS OR RIVETS SIZE: 5.5" H x 3.75" W ALUMINUM SHALL BE 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY. GAUGE SHALL BE 0.080 SIGN COLOR COLOR SHALL BE GREEN AND BLUE LETTERS ON A WHITE BACKGROUND. POST MATERIALS 4" X 4" SQUARE TREATED WOOD OR OTHER CITY APPROVED MATERIAL POST INSTALLATION MOUNTED TO A HEIGHT OF FOUR FEET ABOVE GRADE SET AT LEAST 42 INCHES IN THE GROUND INSTALLED AT EACH LOT LINE WHERE IT CROSSES A WETLAND BUFFER WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 300 FEET BETWEEN SIGNS ( IF NO BUFFER IS REQUIRED THE MONUMENT SHALL BE AT THE EDGE OF THE WETLAND). PLACE ADDITIONAL POSTS AS NECESSARY TO FOLLOW BUFFER CONTOUR LINE DIGITAL COPY OF SIGN AVAILABLE FROM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT JANUARY, 2019 WETLAND BUFFER SIGNS C I T Y O F SIN KES GEN-22 STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: REQUEST: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANTS: REVIEW SCHEDULE: BACKGROUND PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7A Michael Grochala, Community Development Director November 13, 2019 2040 Comprehensive Plan Summary N/A City of Lino Lakes. N/A On May 13, 2019 the City Council authorized distribution of the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan to adjacent jurisdictions for review and comment. Under state law reviewing agencies have six (6) months to provide comments on the plan. The plan was distributed on May 22nd to twenty- one (21) jurisdictions and the deadline for comment ends on November 19tn To date the City has received nine (9) responses. Staff will be working with the consultant team to address substantive comments. At this time we are proposing to bring forward the draft 2040 Plan for preliminary approval and authorization to submit to Metropolitan Council at the November 25, 2019 City Council meeting. The draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update can be found here: https://www.ci.lino- lakes.mn.us/compplan. RECOMMENDATION Discussion item only. ATTACHMENTS 1. Adjacent Jurisdiction Review Comments Anoka County MINNESOTA 'b�& Respectful, Innovative, Fiscally Responsible June 24, 2019 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182 Re: Anoka County comments on the City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan (2019) Dear Mike: Thank you for providing the County of Anoka an opportunity to comment on the City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The following includes comment from a variety of departments within the County. Community Development: The Anoka County Community Development Department has reviewed the City's revised Comprehensive Plan and has no further comments. Parks Department: The County Parks Department has reviewed the revised Comprehensive Plan and offers the following comments: Figure 2.17 2017 Existing Land Use a. Revise RCCOL park boundary at City Hall to show the correct boundary. The larger of the two blue Public/Semi-Public should be shown as County Park and Recreation. �oil[ -•;:jai io Parcel should be labeled County Parks and Recreation Government Center A 2100 3rd Avenue, Suite 700 A Anoka, MN 55304-5025 A www.anokacounty.us Office:763-324-4700 A Fax:763-324-5490 Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer Page 2 b. Consider changing land use for Parcel number: 023122130001 (On the north side of the park reserve) to be shown as Public/Semi-Public. While it is under Anoka County ownership, it is excluded from the park boundary. Parcel should be shown as Public/Semi-Public; it is not part of the park boundary. 2. Figure 3.10 - Consider acknowledging that the existing asphalt trail on Elm Street is part of the existing Bunker — Chain of Lakes Regional Trail. 3. Figure 3.12 - Please confirm that Central Anoka County Regional Trail that follows CSAH 14 to Washington County is accurately depicted as existing in the 35E area and that it is not an on -street route. 4. Figure 6.15 - Please confirm that Central Anoka County Regional Trail that follows CSAH 14 to Washington County is accurately depicted as existing in the 35E area to the City of Hugo and that it is not an on -street route. Public Health and Environmental Services: The County Public Health and Environmental Services Department has reviewed the revised City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan and has no additional comments. Transportation Division: The County Highway Department has reviewed the revised City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan and has no additional comments. The Transit Department has reviewed the revised City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan and offers the following comments: 1. Page 6-32 a. Under Existing Transit Service- Metro Transit and Anoka County Traveler are listed. Change Anoka County Traveler to Anoka County Transit. The County has other services that are not Traveler related. b. Table 6-10 - Metro Transit lists the Route 250 frequency at approx. 5-15 minutes and service runs until 7:47pm. c. After the Fixed Route Transit Service paragraph add: L Anoka County Transit Services Anoka County Transit offers transit service to all residents of Anoka County who can travel independently or with a personal care attendant. ii. Anoka County Traveler Transit Link- Dial -A -Ride Service (note service hours and fares has changed quite a bit) Traveler Transit Link is a demand -response transit service in Lino Lakes which serves all of Anoka County as well as NW Ramsey County. Hours of service are 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday. There is no weekend service for Transit Link. Transfers are Page 3 coordinated with all fixed routes in Anoka County and NW Ramsey County to give passengers the most efficient and affordable way to travel. The regular fare for Traveler Transit Link service is $ 3.50 per person; the peak hour fare is $4.50 per person with a $ .75 surcharge for all trips over 15 miles. All Traveler vehicles are accessible. It should be noted Transit Link is a metro -wide service utilizing multiple providers. iii. Anoka County Traveler fixed -routes 801, 805 and 831. These routes operate in the southern part of the county. Although they do not serve Lino Lakes residents can access these routes by transferring from Transit Link service. iv. Anoka County Medlink (formerly Anoka County Volunteer Transportation) The Anoka County Volunteer Transportation Program provides rides to and from medical, dental, and appointments with social services. To be eligible for a ride you can be a veteran, a senior 60 years of age or older, or a client of Anoka County. This service relies on volunteer drivers. While the service is free, donations are encouraged. Medical and dental trips may be made throughout the metro area while appointments with social services must remain within Anoka County. 2. Pg.6-33 a. Travel Demand Management paragraph should be moved under Anoka County Transit. b. Travel Demand Management Program- Coordinated through Anoka County Transit's Commute Solutions Travel Demand Management (TDM) services include programs that promote and support any alternative to commuting via single -occupant vehicle. It may include ride -matching, car-pool and van -pool services as previously described, both covers many other options as well. Transit promotions, employer -subsidized bus passes, flexible work hours, and telecommuting are just some of the possible strategies to reduce single occupant vehicle (SOV) use. Metro Transit provides regional services through its Metro Commuter Services group and Anoka County Transit's Commute Solutions continues to receive grants to coordinate programs within the County. These local transportation management organizations provide further support and services. The city and employers may use these services and programs free of charge to benefit employee travel arrangements and budgets. (revised) c. Anoka County Transit no longer provides Metro Mobility service for the Met Council. d. May want to update the 2006 ridership number. 3. Page 6-33 a. Second column first paragraph. Anoka County Volunteer Transportation is now known as Anoka County Medlink. The program also assisted Veterans of any age. We haven't received a private grant for quite some time. b. 95t" Ave park and ride was expanded to 1,482 spaces. c. St. Joseph's Church is still listed as a Lino Lakes park and ride. d. Routes 262 and 275 are no longer privately contracted. e. Southbound Bus -only shoulder lanes have been expanded beyond 95t" Ave. and Hwy 36. Thank you again for providing the County an opportunity to comment on your City's Comprehensive Plan. Please review the County's comments and contact me directly with CITY.,t4 OF IN"IAKEs Name of adjacent or affected governmental unit C ►-r ( 01= &AltiE Contact Information Name of Reviewer bee 11n.,crJ Signature of Reviewer Title: Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Review and Comment Form Date 9 1 4111 Address: larrdl TbwN $q �K.�vc.- , i3�«arc. r'�N SSyN9 Phone: �7c-3- 78'S- (.IN'1 Email: G44\0rV' Ci C' 6IGi nIf MA@q o✓ Per Minnesota Statute §473.858 Subd. 2 and the Metropolitan Council, we are distributing the proposed Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for your review and comment. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update can be found here: https://www.ci.lino-lakes.mn.us/compplan We ask that you provide feedback as timely as possible within the requested 6-month comment period. On behalf of the City of Lino Lakes, we would like to thank you in advance for your assistance and prompt response. We have reviewed the proposed Plan Update, do not have any comments, and are therefore waiving further review. ❑ We have reviewed the proposed Plan Update and offer the following comments (attach additional sheets if necessary) Please Return to: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 300 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182 Email: mgrochala@linolakes.us May 22, 2019 CITY' OF IN From: Mara Strand To: Mara Strand Subject: FW: Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Date: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 1:29:44 PM Attachments: imaae002.ong imaae003.pnna imaae004.ona DWSMA Vulnerability Map.pdf From: Mark Statz <MStatz(@centervillemn.com> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 3:08 PM To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP <KLindahl(@landform.net> Cc:'Janovec, Mark' <Mark.Janovec(@stantec.com>; Paul Palzer<PPalzer(@centervillemn.com>; Teresa Bender <TBender(@centervillemn.com>; 'Carlson, Phil' <Phil.Carlson(@stantec.com> Subject: RE: Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Kendra, Here are the City of Centerville's comments. Let me know if you need them in any other format: Given the city's Charter -style government and the difficulties this can present when completing road projects that may involve assessments, we would encourage the city to add 21 st Avenue and Cedar Street to its State Aid system? Centerville wants to be sure there is adequate and reliable funding sources to complete improvements to these shared roads. They both appear to be good candidates for State Aid routes. Even though 21 st is a dead end, currently, it has the right-of-way to go through to Cedar Street as development there occurs. For Cedar Street, it appears that the eastern portion (where it is completely within the city of Lino Lakes) is a part of your system, but the shared portion is not. It is our understanding that a shared road can be added to your system (with funding used only for your half of the improvements). 2. Centerville's DWSMA (attached map) extends into Lino Lakes. We would like to note the existence of ISTS and private wells in Centerville's DWSMA and encourage programs to eliminate both as soon as practical. 3. Planned Land Uses in Centerville's DWSMA include Industrial uses. Restrictions on these uses should be considered to ensure the prevention of contamination of the City's water supply. Centerville requests an opportunity to review and comment on Conditional Use Permits or other zoning applications for industrial uses within our DWSMA. 4. We have received several inquiries from prospective developers wishing to develop property adjacent to Centerville, but whose properties are in the later utility staging areas as shown on your plan. If requested by the City of Lino Lakes, Centerville could likely provide interim water and sewer service to these areas to facilitate earlier development. 5. Table 6-3 lists future roadway connections — collectors. We have the following comments on that table: a. 21st Ave. — Says it will connect 80th with Main Street. It seems that, with the Lennar Development layout, this is no longer true. b. 21St Ave. — We would like to see a future connection between Main Street and Cedar Street listed, since the right-of-way is in place to do so. c. 73rd St. — It is unclear as to what is meant by this connection. d. New East/West Street between Peltier Lake Drive and 21St Ave. — We would be interested in the location of this connection. 6. When Centerville Road was reconstructed a few years ago, we inquired with the city of Lino Lakes as to whether or not there were plans to have a trail along this road, down to Birch. We were told there were no plans to add a trail there, so we did not continue ours south of Dupre Road. Figure 10-1 shows a future trail that extends into Centerville and connects with the south end of the trail along Centerville Road (at Dupre). The city has no current plan to extend the trail to our southern border. While we support the idea of having a trail connection here, its construction is not on our capital improvement plan. 7. On the Parks, Greenways and Trail System map (Fig 10-1), there is no name given to the small park in the LaMotte Drive neighborhood, along Centerville Lake. On the County's GIS system, it is labeled "LaMotte Park". With Centerville's large park, very near, named Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park and often referred to as, simply, "LaMotte Park", there can sometimes be confusion. We understand that your park predates ours, however, we are not in a position to be able to rename our most prominent park. If there were an opportunity to rename yours, it may help avoid confusion. 8. Figure 9-18 does not show the Interconnection with Centerville's water system at 73rd St. and 20th Ave. 9. Page 8-22 — Intercommunity Connections does not mention potential future service to areas in Centerville along the west side of 21 st Ave., north of Main Street. We understand that the sanitary sewer in 21St Ave. (north of Main St.) was designed with the potential to serve some of the vacant land to the west. Centerville has sewer service along the west and south sides of the 22 acre parcel there, but depending on how it is developed, utilizing the Lino Lakes sewer in 21 st may be most practical. We wish to have Lino Lakes prepared to serve a portion of this area if needed. 10. Page 8-22 — Intercommunity Connections does not mention the city of Centerville's service of the Anoka County regional park facility, located in Lino Lakes. There is an intercommunity service agreement associated with that service. Mark Statz, PE City Administrator/Engineer City of Centerville 1880 Main St. Centerville, MN 55038 O: 651-429-3232 D: 651-792-7931 i r . 169252-2 , 163271 -3 I e1 1173946 - 4 R'112541 163269 - 3 .1----; 3 i CITY OF CENTERVILLE 9097 2 I CITY OF LINO LAKES 487542 - 4 8990 - 0 173991 - 5 405777 - 8 ..., .4 01564 - 4 0 173982 - 3 429699 - 142965.5 -1 3 511091 -0 I ------- 142042 - 4 � --- - 5 i 439 5 -3 439231 - 5407876� 4 3453511 01 I 82913 - 218 - PM05231-- 45351 142 130 - 4 1575 - 5176078 - 5 16351 - 4 199281 - 3 36759 - 3 1 112637 - 3 20322 - 3 w WELL 2 52�745 - 4 Gad §A 431482 - 169296 - 513470 - 2 I r•148 439185 - 4 142016 - 5 14' � = 14 01 -4 69290 435302 - 4 1 107003 -615° 460 - D '. I " t126867: -, 6059 - 0 435342 - 4 4426466 - 0 442093 - 4 ' 12-4 45700 1 I; ® Stantec Stantec Consulting Services 2335 Highway 36 West Saint Paul, MN 55113 651.636.4600 U bb 0 1,500 a95-- 1. CIT�Y;OF HUGO� 2 - 0 p�45 _ 6 _ 161830 - 0 470187 . 1 716393 - 8 404155 - 3 58596 4 163718 - 8 404192 - 4 139268 - 4 441753 - 0 645394 - 4 507726 - 0 654497 - 0 455757 - 3 208521 -0 504189 - 0 483201 -1 427681 -3 124392 - 2 412853 - 1 -3 i r i a o•Q LEGEND WELL WITH UNIQUE ID AND LSCORE W CITY WELL LOW GEOLOGIC SENSITIVITY C3 EMERGENCY RESPONSE AREA MODERATE GEOLOGIC SENSITIVITY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA • VERY HIGH GEOLOGIC SENSITIVITY MODERATE VULNERABILITY DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA �7A7!. J•.. :, t`''r'IBrl: a .r., - FS :l:;s�.,l�"•+O :v ?'.5 :�. :el�:A. .= ZA 3,000e ,000 N Feet r- BASE MAPPING [ CITY LIMITS i PARCEL FIGURE 4 - DWSMA VULNERABILITYThe bySta tecstan°ntha mapyofsourcesanhas been ' is by Stantec staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Stantec makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, CENTERVILLE WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN as to accuracy, com to the use of nights to the use of such information. DECEMBER 2018 V:119381active11938033581GIS1Projects\Figure 4 DWSMAVUL.mxd COLUMBUS Rural Nature, an Access. June 28, 2019 City of Lino Lakes Attn: Michael Grochala 600 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Review Dear City of Lino Lalces, Thank you for the opportunity to review the City of Lino Lalces 2040 Comprehensive Plan. On June 26, 2019 the planning staff presented their recommendations to the City of Columbus City Council. The City Council has reviewed these recommendations and would like to offer the following comments regarding further intergovernmental collaboration. 1. The City would appreciate further discussion regarding fitture utility (sewer and water) to serve the commercial district along Lake Drive/CSAH 23 in Columbus. 2. The City believes any coordination regarding future trail connectivity near the border would help to gamer a beneficial symbiotic relationship in the adjacent residential neighborhoods. 3. Further discussion regarding upgrades to roadways that cross city limits (i.e. Jodrell St NE, 4th Ave N. and Lyons St/Ehmcrest Ave/ 24th Ave N.) 4. The City would like to discuss the future I-35W/I-35E connector plans, such as the proposed full access interchange on 80' street. They would like to recommend exploring alternative solutions to reduce the potential adverse impacts on existing residential neighborhoods on Furman St. NE (pictured on the back) caused by an increase in traffic volume. We appreciate this opportunity to offer comment and thank you for your time. Please inform us should you have any questions. Sincerely, l Eliz th Mursko City Administrator 16319 Kettle River Boulevard, Columbus, MN 55025 651.464.3120 Twin Cities 651.464.5922 Fax www.ColumbasMN.com r e ��. Expanded/FutureRoad (Wghliohled in Anoka Coady 2030 Comlxebmi.e Pion) (2�l ;rc - - 145th Ave NF - ee NE 2 n - n_Lake Rd W 0 0 C) Y Cty Hal FBIk hi a(n-51—{Id i IL Z _ su 9 N Z m li �aRoMaautak�U r ttI k Residential Area / of Concern LJ � 4 C R•3 ruleau Lake 1 �lp,� I % CIT)UOF LINOLAKES Name of adjacent or affected governmental unit Contact Information Name of Reviewer Dawnette Shimek Signature of Reviewer Dawnette Shimek Title: Deputy City Clerk Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Review and Comment Form Address: 15544 Central Avenue NE, Ham Lake, MN 55304 Phone: 763-235-1673 Email: dshimek@ci.ham-lake.mn.us Date 5/28/2019 Per Minnesota Statute §473.858 Subd. 2 and the Metropolitan Council, we are distributing the proposed Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for your review and comment. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update can be found here: https://www.ci.lino-lakes.mn.us/compplan We ask that you provide feedback as timely as possible within the requested 6-month comment period. On behalf of the City of Lino Lakes, we would like to thank you in advance for your assistance and prompt response. C We have reviewed the proposed Plan Update, do not have any comments, and are therefore waiving further review. ❑ We have reviewed the proposed Plan Update and offer the following comments (attach additional sheets if necessary) Please Return to: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182 Email: mgrochala@linolakes.us May 22,2019 c1Tv�'�` Qf LN6 KES j CITY OF 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN55038 • (651) 762-6300 • www.ci.hugo.nnn.us � FRT 14(]fi July 26, 2019 Michael Grochala, Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182 Re: City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Dear Mr. Grochala: Thank you for the opportunity to review the City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan, a few items were identified for comment. 1. 801h Street. As you may know, there was effort with the 1-35W/E coalition to collaborate on improvements along 1-35 in several communities and Counties. The discussions included this connection and interchanges at 1-35E and I-35W. Lino Lakes participated in the coalition meetings. The City is interested in cooperating with adjacent jurisdictions on creating a corridor management plan that would include representatives of the 1-35 W/E coalition to further this planning effort. In addition, the City supports an interchange location for 1-35E at CR-140 (80th Street). 2. CR-84. The Lino Lakes Transpiration Plan recommends proposed new roadway connections. Specifically a new County north -south route (extension of CR-84/Otter Lake Road). It would seem that this road is intended to be a County Road shared by Washington and Anoka Counties. Similar to CR-140, we recommend a corridor study be initiated by Anoka and Washington Counties including representatives from all cities along the corridor. If you have any questions or need more information, please feel free to contact me at rjuba@ci.hugo.mn.us or (651) 762-6304. ncerely, Rac el Juba Community Development Director CC: Honorable Mayor and Council Bryan Bear, City Administrator Mark Erichson, City Engineer Kendra Lindahl, City Planner Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION June 13, 2019 Michael Groe hala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182 SUBJECT: City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan MnDOT Review # CPA19421 City Limits of Lino Lakes Lino Lakes, Anoka County Dear Mr. Grochala: Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan development. Please address the following issues contained in your comprehensive plan: Transit: On page 6.33, the discussion of bus only shoulders states "Bus -Only Shoulders (BOS) allow buses to use the roadway shoulder to bypass automobiles that are in the general flow of traffic. They may only be used when the speed in the regular lanes drops to 30 mph or lower." 30 MPH is incorrect, it should be 35 MPH. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent inee oncaly can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. An electronic .pdf version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us provided that each separate a -mail is less than 20 megabytes. 2. A compact disc with the plans in .pdf format. The disc can be sent to: MnDOT—Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. A .pdf version of the plans sent to MnDOT's external shared workspace site located at: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us Please contact MnDOT development review staff gain access to the shared workspace site. Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us indicating the file name and stating that the plans have been submitted on the shared workspace site. An equal opportunity employer MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road 62 West, Roseville, MN 55113 0"`\,I RI�EE�TER�ISTRDICT September 16, 2019 Michael Grochala City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: 2040 Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Comments Dear Mr. Grochala, The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) has reviewed the City of Lino Lakes' draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan, received on August 22, 2019. The RCWD offers the following comments below: General comment: The RMP is referred to as the City's RMP, the RCWD's RMP, and the City/RCWD's RMP throughout the plan. Please revise for consistency and include RCWD in the reference. Chapter 2 Community Background, Lino Lakes RMP/Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan, page 2-4: "Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan" should be revised to "Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management Plan" to be consistent with the WCA authority and title under which it has been developed. 3. Chapter 2 Community Background Natural Resources Revolving Fund Plan, page 2-4: RCWD is unaware of the City's 2017 wetland bank study and some of the identified locations on Figure 2-5. Please provide more information or reference to how the potential sites were identified. 4. Chapter 2 Community Background, Table 2.9, page 2-16: Net Acres/Net Land Area includes "as identified by the Rice Creek Watershed District", however the inclusion of RCWD is unclear. Please clarify and indicate if the City means as identified by the National Wetland Inventory, RMP, or otherwise. 5. Chapters 3 & 10: Minnesota Statute (M.S.) 103E may be incompatible at times with the City's planned greenways and trails and will require early coordination with the RCWD, which should be included in the discussion. The RCWD would be happy to meet with the City to discuss further. 6. Chapter 5 Economic Development, Interstate 35E and Co. Rd. 14 Corridor, second paragraph, page 5-11: Please clarify if the referenced Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) is the completed Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Area CSMP that was conditionally approved by the RCWD Board and revise the language as needed. If by "currently completing a CSMP" the City means it is currently building the CSMP infrastructure, another sentence should be added. It is also RCWD's understanding that the CSMP area is for residential development, not commercial or industrial. RCWD suggests adding language to this section to clarify that the City is planning business and industrial development east of 1-35E and residential development west of I-35E, consistent with the City's Future Land Use Figure 3-2. 7. General Comments on Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan: In general, a detailed summary and duplicated sections of the LWMP are not required. If the City intends to utilize the summary to move in a new direction with the LWMP, the LWMP will need to be amended and follow the review timelines of M.S. 1036.235 and M.R. 8410. If the City intends to solely summarize the information contained in the LWMP, RCWD recommends only including an executive summary with reference to Appendix A and removing the duplicated information to maintain consistency with the RCWD-approved LWMP in Appendix A. There are currently a few inconsistencies in this chapter, discussed in the comments below. 8. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Goal 2.2, page 7-2: A policy is missing that is contained in the LWMP in Appendix A and should be revised to be consistent. 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE #611 1 Blaine, MN 55449 I T: 763-398-3070 1 F: 763-398-3o88 I www.ricecreek.org BOARD OF Barbara A. Haake Michael J. Bradley Patricia L. Preiner Steven P. Wagamon John J. Waller MANAGERS Ramsey County Ramsey County Anoka County Anoka County Washington County 9. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Goal 9.1, Policy b, page 7-4: This policy is inconsistent with the LWMP in Appendix A and should be revised to be consistent. 10. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan Figures: Figures 7-1, 7-3, and 7-7 are not the same versions that are contained in the RCWD-approved LWMP in Appendix A and should be removed or revised to be consistent. Figure 7-10 and a few of the issues listed on the figure are not contained or described in the approved LWMP in Appendix A. If Figure 7-10 is utilized, RCWD recommends amending the LWMP and the City's CIP table to include and address the issues on Figure 7-10. 11. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan Existing and Potential Future Water Resource Related Problems, page 7-9: The water resource -related issues in this section are not presented consistently with the RCWD- approved LWMP in Appendix A and should be removed or added to the LWMP. For example, the references to the public drainage systems are not consistent with RCWD's knowledge and management of the systems. RCWD has recently completed repairs on the public drainage systems in the City, noted on page 7-9, including ACD 10-22-32 and portions of ACD 55 and ACD 72 per the RCWD-approved repair reports. Any alteration to the ditch system or abandonment of a system will need to be completed through the petition process in M.S. 103E and RCWD will need to be engaged early in the process, as multiple steps and public noticing will be required statutorily. Please revise this section to be consistent with the language contained in the LWMP in Appendix A or remove this section. 12. Chapter 12 Implementation, Local Water Management Plan, #2, page 12-6: Recommend removing or revising "alternatives." It is unclear what "alternatives" is referencing. The provided comments below offer minor suggestions: 1. Chapter 1 Introduction, Regional Planning Context, first paragraph, last sentence page 1-3: Recommend removing or revising the comprehensive plan deadline since it has passed. 2. Chapter 3 Land Use, Medium Density Residential, last sentence, page 3-9: RMP should be defined as "Resource Management Plan" for consistency. 3. Chapter 3 Land Use, Growth Management and Utility Staging, second paragraph, last sentence, page 3-13: Recommend revising this sentence for clarity. 4. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Goal 2.2, Policy a, page 7-2: The "V" in VLAWMO is missing and should be added. 5. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Goal 7.1, page 7-3: Recommend removing the blank policy line under policy d. 6. Chapter 7 Local Water Management Plan, Summary of Implementation Section, second paragraph, page 7-10: Recommend removing this paragraph to remove duplicative information. 7. Chapter 12 Implementation Tools, Capital Improvement Plan, last paragraph, page 12-2: Recommend removing or updating "by the end of 2018." 8. Appendix A Local Water Management Plan: This plan version is consistent with the version RCWD approved except the order of Figures 2-13 and 2-14 should be switched to be in numerical order. The RCWD appreciates the opportunity to comment on the City's Comprehensive Plan and looks forward to collaboration in the future. Please contact me with any questions at 763-398-3078 or Iampedro@ricecreek.org. Sincerely, Lauren Sampedro District Technician Rice Creek Watershed District 21 Attachment 1 Washington County Comments Draft City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4: Housing • Page 4-4, Goals and Policies: The County is encouraged by the goals listed in Chapter 4 (pg. 4) around the efforts to address housing needs in Lino Lakes. It is great to see the efforts being placed into the planning for life -cycle housing and senior housing. The recognition of making these homes accessible to the community ensures opportunities for social connection and access to healthier food options for residents. It is also encouraging to see the efforts around protecting the environment as housing expansion increases. An area of consideration when looking at the overall protection of the environment as housing options continue to change would be to encourage edible and pollinator -friendly landscapes for residential properties and housing developments. Chaster 5: Economic Development Page 5-11, Economic Development Priorities: The County is encouraged by the efforts made in Chapter 5 to ensure streets and roads are as safe as possible for residents and promote alternative transportation options such as bicycling and walking. Both of these efforts encourages and considers the health of the residents of Lino Lakes. The trail policy to link trails to schools and neighborhoods speaks to accessibility for the community. Chapter 8: Sanitary Sewer • Page 8-20, Sanitary Sewer: In Chapter 8's individual subsurface sewage treatment system (ISTS), the plan states that there are no community treatment systems and that large portions are served by ISTS. MN Rules Chapter 7080-7083 now use the term Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) as a more generic name as many SSTS serve more than one specific wastewater generator. • Page 8-20, Sanitary Sewer: Regarding inspection of SSTSs every three years, does this refer to the maintenance activity that is required under MN Rules or does the city require the systems to be inspected. Typically the term inspection refers to a Compliance Inspection that is defined in MN Rules Chapter 7080. Chapter 10: Parks, Greenways and Trails • Areas of consideration for chapter 10 would include a policy for tobacco -free parks and encourage edible and pollinator -friendly landscapes on park property. 2