HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-06-1983 Park Board Minutes PARK BOARD
June, 1983
Minutes but no agenda or packet
June 6 , 1983
Park Board
The regular meeting of the Lino Park Board was called to order by
Chairman Johnson with the following members present : Lindy , Flannery ,
Arntzson , Scherer, LeBlond. R . Johnson will be late .
MINUTES - May 2 , 1983
Mr . Scherer moved to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by
Mrs . LeBlond. Motion carried unanimously .
PLAT - RICE LAKE ESTATES
This plat was to be reviewed by the Park Board for a recommendation on
whether the Board should accept land or money in leiu of land for this
plat .
Mr . Arntzson questioned the several areas designated as parks - why the
smaller park areas ? why not all ` in one?
Mr. Schumacher noted that the Baldwin Park is adjacent to this plat and
felt that the need for larger parks was not there .
This plat is for single family manufactured homes and each lot contains
9 ,000 square . If the Park Board recommended money in leiu of land, the
current figure being used is $1500 . 00 per acre . This would compute to
$6840 . 00 for this plat .
The general consensus of the Park Board was that a park is not needed in
that area . Mr. Arntzen moved to require money in leiu of land. Seconded
by Mr . Scherer. Motion carried unanimously .
PARK SURVEYS
The returned surveys had been analyized and a report had been prepared
for discussion at this meeting. Mr . Schumacher noted this is also on the
Council agenda for June 13 , 1983 .
Chairman Johnson asked if there were any additional comments from the
Park Board members . Mr. Flannery felt the results were interesting and
was suprised that Horse back riding wasn ' t higher . There was discussion
on the multi use of some of the facilities .
It was noted that there is some support in the community to increase the
Park budget .
There was a question on the comments and Mr. Schumacher said the comments
need to be typed.
Mr. Schumacher reported that Mr. Volk will be meeting with the reporter
to design a method of publishing a map denoting the location of the City
Parks . Mr. Schumacher felt it would helpful if an article in conjunction
with the survey could be published at the same time .
Mayor Benson had some questions as to how these figures were arrived at
and if it is possible to determine the number of persons who would use
the parks rather than the number of times the facilities would be used.
Mrs . LeBlond said if this is computed by families , then only the catagory
i
Pa,xk Board
June 6 , 1983
Page Two
would be ranked, not the usage and Mr. LeBlond felt there would be very
little , if any , changes in the ranking of the usage . She said the re-
sponses could be rechecked, if it is thought necessary .
Mr. Flannery suggested that the use of the Parks be calculated as a
separate statistic. He will alAo put together an article for the news-
paper.
The comments from the surveys are to be typed and included in the next
Park Board packet. Mr. Flannery and Mrs . LeBlond will put together an
arthicle for publication on the results of this survey .
(Clerk 's note : There are many persons , such as I, that do not use the
Parks and distort the figures on that questions #10) .
COUNTRY LAKES PARK
Chairman Johnson asked what is the next step for this Board in conjunction
to the development of that Park?
Chairman Johnson felt that the 51% response on the survey indicated that
the Board should proceed with the development of this Park. He asked for
comments from other members of the Board.
Mr. Lindy noted that the Lake is completed weeded at this point and they
are so bad that even a sail boat cannot be used. The cost of $1 . 00 per
front foot was an estimated cost for treating the lake for the weeds .
Mr. Lindy noted that many lakes are having this problem.
Mr. Lindy noted that sailing, boating and canoeing was a part of the
consideration for the LAWCON Grant , what happens if these things cannot
be provided due to the status of the Lake?
This was discussed by Chairman Johnson . He felt that if it becomes im-
possible to install a beach , that portion of the grant would probably be
deducted from the total funds .
Mr. Scherer felt that for what is gained from this park in relationship
to what is put into it , wouldn ' t it be better to develope it as a
passive park and put no more than nescessary ? He said if it wasn ' t for
the Grant , he would be in favor of dumping this park and expending the
money on some other park .
Mr. Schumacher said the next phase would to recommend to the Council to
authorize plans and specifications for Phase 1 of the development . Mrs .
LaBlond so moved. Seconded by Mr . Lindy , The vote on the motion ended
in a tie .
Mr. Arntzen was asked for his reasons for abstaining which he stated. He
felt this park was not developing in the way planned and it could be a
very expensive park.
Mr. Lindy was concerned with the maintenance cost of the park also the
crowding of the lake was a concern .
Park Board
June 6 ( 1983
Page Three
Mr . Flannery was concerned with the quality of the park - felt that the
quality of the park was not there.
Mr . Scherer restated his feeling in that the park should be scrapped.
He felt the money spent to develope this park could be better spent on
other parks in the City .
There was a question of whether these problems had been checked into')
before the application for the grant was filed. Mr. Schumacher pointed
out that only a small portion of the shore line was to be used and there
was dredging proposed for just that area .
Mr. Scherer suggested calling Mayor Benson and Mrs . Elsenpeter to get
their opinion on this matter.
Mr. Schumacher suggested asking Mr. Jambois to attend a Park Board meet-
ing and discuss this matter.
The general consensus of the Park Board was they felt this should be
done and someway salvage some part of the Grant and alter the plans for
the development of this park area .
Mr. Lindy offered to take Mr . Jambois on the lake and any one else who
cared to go . Mr. Johnson requested Mr . Schumacher to notify the members
of the Board when this is scheduled.
Any decision was tabled at this time and an update to be on the July
agenda .
OLD BUSINESS
An update on the BMX track was discussed. Mr. Johnson asked for Council
direction on this matter. Mayor Benson discussed the Country Lakes Park
noting the areas where he thought development could take place and the
things that could be done with that park .
Mr. Schumacher reported that the BMX Track proposal had been before the
Council on two separate occasions and approval had been given for the
installation of the track, however, the Council had some questions on
the laibility insurance and had rqquested the City Attorney to check this
out . The matter should be on the agenda for June 13 , 1983 meeting.
The basic concern is three wheelers getting onto the track and ruining
it . There is one section that should be fenced.
Mr. Johnson asked if Mr. Klienhans had been able to come up with financial
backing and Mr . Schumacher said he had .
The Park Board asked Mr. Volk to put together a cost estimate for the
installation of the needed fencing. Mr. R . Johnson reported that the
Lions Club had requested Mr. Volk to get the cost figures for platic
type fencing. These figures should be ready for the July meeting.
Mr . R . Johnson asked if the location had been discussed? He suggested
that this track be kept as close to the NE corner of the park as possible .
The Board members agreed. This would leave as much of the area open as
possible .
Park Board
June 6 , 1983
Page Four
�\ OAK LANE ACCESS TO LINO PARK
Mr. Schumacher said the City has a verbal agreement with Anoka County
to allow the City to use this area for access . This would be just a
path - left as a grassy area .
CODE AMENDMENTS
Mr. Schumacher explained this had to do with changing the City Code to
mandate that all investment interest from Park Funds be put back into
the Park Fund. This had been presented to the Council..' The policy of
the City is that investment .interest has always been put back into that
fund, but the Council would prefer the leave .the policy as is in order
to give the Council the flexiability on the use of these funds .
Mrs . LaBlond reported that she had received a call from a lady across
the street from Lino Park and asked what the City 's policy is on the
use of the parking lot - she also said a gentleman is also parking a
semi in that parking lot .
Mr. R. Johnson felt this had been presented to the Police and to the
Council and nothing has been done about this problem.
Mr . K. Johnson suggested requesting the Council to direct the Police
to enforce the parking in this lot.
Mrs . LaBlond moved to request that the City Council take the necessary
action to enforce the 'no parking' in the Lino Park parking lot by
semis . Seconded by Mr. R. Johnson . Motion carried unaimously .
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Schumacher reported that the City crews are cutting the grass in the
Centerville City Park on an experimental basis .
Mr. Arntzen suggested that Shenandoah Park be mowed . Mr. K. Johnson
asked if the equipment purchased has been installed? It was felt this
equipment should be installed as soon as possible . Mr. Schumacher felt
it should be up very soon .
Mr. Scherer moved to adjourn . Seconded by Mr . Lindy . Aye.