Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/01/1994 Park Board Packet City of Lino Lakes PARK BOARD MEETING Monday, August 1, 1994 6 :30PM ***AGENDA*** 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 6:30pm 2. Approval of Minutes from June 6, 1994 6:35pm 3 . Open Mike 6:40pm 4. Concept Review A. Pine Ridge III 6:45pm 5. Updates A. Recreation Complex/Referendum 7:15pm B. Other Park and Recreation Updates 7:30pm C. Review Goals Set for 1994 7:45pm D. Schedule Meeting to Set Goals for 1995 8:00pm 6. Old Business 8:15pm 7. New Business 8:30pm 8. Schedule Next Park Board Meeting 8:45pm 9. Adjourn 8:5 0pm All times are approximate. Please call Sandie at 464-5562, Extension 176, if you cannot attend this meeting. C I T Y O F JINO LAW MMORAMUM TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Marty Asleson DATE: July 25, 1994 SUBJECT: Pre-Park Board Field Meeting I would like to give the Park Board Members a tour of the new Park, Recreation, and Forestry Departments building prior to the meeting. If you can make it please meet at 7204 Lake Drive at 5:45pm. Thank you. PARK, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DEPARTMENTS 7204 LAKE DRIVE,LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA 55014 (612)464-5562 CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MONDAY, DUNE 6, 1994 Please note that the following minutes may be more abbreviated than usual because of the audio problems that occurred during taping of the Park Board meeting. The City of Lino Lakes Park Board meeting was called to order at 6:35 pm at Lino Lakes City Hall by Chairperson George Lindy. Roll Call was taken, members present were: Sharon Lane, Brian Bourassa, Pam Taschuk, George Lindy, Ken Johnson, and Amy Donlin. Joe Schmidt arrived at 6:58 pm. Also in attendance were Marty Asleson, Park, Recreation, and Forestry Coordinator, Barry Bernstein, Recreation Program Supervisor and Sandie Wood, Park, Recreation and Forestry Secretary. Not in attendance were Linda Elliott, City Council Liaison, and Becky Dvorak, Therapeutic Recreation Specialist. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Sharon Lane moved approval of the May 2, 1994 minutes. Seconded by George Lindy. Motion approved unanimously with no corrections. OPEN MIKE: No one was present for open mike. n TRAPPERS CROSSING: Marty gave an information update of Trappers Crossing. Marty walked the trail crossing area from Trappers Crossing to Birch Park with Kate Drewery, Administrator for the Rice Creek Watershed, and it appears that this is probably as short as anywhere. He stated he had met with Jean Cummings and discussed the three concerns she had. Her concerns are land-locked parcels, trail liability and development of her land to the west. Marty showed on an overhead the location of the peninsula and stated that we have the potential to add to our park acreage totals to come closer to standard needs for this area, particularly if dedication is taken on the southwest side of the park when Jean Cummings develops the area to the west. George Lindy asked where the location of the swingset was on the overhead. Marty pointed out the grove and swingset. There was discussion on tax forfeited land. Sometimes developers leave tax forfeited land and the owner does not have to pay taxes on this land. Marty gave a slide show presentation and pointed out where Jean wants to build around the pond and other sections of the area. George asked how much further to the north the development would be going. Marty indicated the area on the slide. CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 6, 1994 George stated that he had been bike riding in the area and asked about the raised area he had noticed. George asked if there were any limitations to this area. Marty stated maybe a boardwalk could go on it. George then asked if it was possible to put chips on it. Marty though it would be considered fill on top of a wetland. Pam asked George when he had been on the raised area and wondered what it would be like in April. George feels because we are committed to a boardwalk maybe we should reconsider this raised area. Brian asked what can be done and how does it fit into the development plans. Mr. Lindy suggested that we should discuss this with Kirk Corson. Member Lane asked if we have to span the creek. Marty thought there was a culvert there. George and Marty will meet and look this area over. Marty said a peninsula will be a good addition to the park but he is proceeding carefully. Brian thinks we should use the narrowest area as possible but feels it should be further south so the park gets used. Amy said it was a passive wild life area and it will be a great addition to the park area. There was discussion on an open space in the center of the .� development that playground equipment could be placed and maintained by the residents in the area. George stated that in the past we have not asked developers to do this and he feels that we would be setting a precedence. There was discussion on mini parks. Brian had comments pertaining to national standards. Marty stated that national standards are not set in stone and the park board would know about any changes that would be made. Joe voiced concerns about the construction in the Brandywood area and kids playing in the streets. He also stated there were problems in the Baldwin area. Pam asked what happens to the mini park when all the parks are completed. Amy then explained her thoughts behind having a mini park. George said that people already have their own play structures in their yards. Joe said the kids in the Baldwin area will play in the streets regardless of what they have in their yards. Marty' s said he hears concerns from the engineers. They want to know who is going to pay for the utilities and other costs incurred in creating mini parks. Joe voiced that he does not want to see happen in Lino Lakes that has happened in Minneapolis. Brian asked if we could just proceed with a partial purchase. Marty responded no, she wants to sell the whole area at one time. RECREATION COMPLEX UPDATE: Marty stated that he has not done too much on the recreation complex because the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council were going to be meeting to discuss the growth and development of Lino Lakes. He wanted to wait and see what was going to be decided before proceeding. n CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 6, 1994 Marty then showed the board members the plan and discussed where the wetlands were and where the high ground is. George stated that our greatest needs are ballfields and we should look at the possibility of mitigation. Ken asked how much wetlands move. There was further discussion on wetlands. Three options we have are avoidance, minimization and mitigation. Replacement factor is 2/1. Amy, Brian and Joe asked if anyone had a copy of the plan. Marty stated no. Other comments made were that we should first look at the wetlands, secondly we should fit the element into the plan, and the last item would be financing. It was stated that the money has been approved by the City Council. Joe then asked about having an appraisal done. George asked if we should spend the $2000 before we decide if a referendum is going to be done. Marty said we should do it concurrently. However, we need to hold back a little before doing anything. Resident, Al Demotts was present and stated his views about parks and developers. He also responded to questions that the Park Board members had. There was continued discussion on mini parks. Amy stated she thought the residents would be happy if we thoroughly looked into the possibility of mini parks. George stated that it would take a minimum of two lots for a mini park which would equal approximately $71000 . Brian asked if the developer could leave a couple of lots vacant until close to completion of the project. Mr. Lindy stated we would really have to look at the cost of doing this. It was then asked how long it would take for the developer to complete this project. Marty said we would have to take this to the Project Management Committee and ask developers how they feel about this. George said this is only a bandaid fix until the recreation complex is completed. Joe thinks it is necessary to have something there. George stated the comprehensive park plan was done to avoid this. Marty said we should stick to the plan because we have put alot of money into the plan and we should avoid mini parks. Amy said it was a positive things for the developer to have a mini park and it would be to his financial benefit. George stated the developer has to make that decision. Pam said it would have to be done right away and not 3-5 years later. There was further discussion on the recreation complex and concerns were voiced. It was stated that we need to know where the recreation complex is going. It would be easier to decide what to do if it was known. FOCUS COMMITTEE UPDATE: Brian Bourassa gave an update on the Focus Committee. He stated a purpose statement has been completed and a Teen Subcommittee has been formed. Brian said Lino Lakes Police Officer Brandon Young 100-1.1 CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 6, 1994 and Pam Taschuk are on the Teen Subcommittee. Brian asked if a Mission Statement was available. Marty responded no but a copy would be put in the next Park Board meeting packet. Marty said it was important to get teens involved in the community. He also stated that Ray Weber was working on a survey. OTHER PARK AMID RECREATION UPDATES: Marty said Circle Pines and Rice Lakes joint park agreement is still with the attorneys and is not aware of any options we have. George said we do not want to let this get away from us and was wondering if we should have someone go to the council meeting and explain to them what we need to do. Marty said he would make contact and see what would be the appropriate committee to go before to voice our feelings. Maybe we should just have an informal meeting. Amy asked the density of the neighborhood. The response was that it is higher development than most areas in the city. Marty said it was a planned urban development and was divided by lake and road. Marty gave some history in regards to this. He explained that many years ago the developer put aside money to build a park, plant trees, etc. Then the developer went bankrupt. He stated that the current company .� owner is willing to put trees on the boulevards that are not owner built. Mr. Asleson continued to discuss problems in the area. George said we should meet with someone. Maybe this will make them realize our urgency. TIME SCHEDULE: Marty recapped his time schedule. He stated about 80% of his time is used in the field. It is hard to get back to people that have contacted him on the phone. He said for one week his time was used to get ready for open house. He has also been working on irrigation problems, planting trees, and monitoring the new building. He has been in the field for 2-3 days working on ADA compliance which we are 2 years behind on. He also reported on the backstop and playground repair at Sunset Oaks Park and the Lino Park parking lot and flower beds. Ken said he had concerns about the bait store using the parking lot at Lino Park and Brian said the flower beds need to be marked better. GOALS AND PROJECTS: Ken said we need to look at trails and engineering design at Country Lakes Park. Marty responded that the brush has not been moved yet. CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MONDAY, DUNE 6, 1994 PRIORITIES: Baldwin Lake: We need to look at mowing and drainage on Fawn Lane. Quail Ridge: The boardwalk created an attractive nuisance which needs to be looked at and taken care of. Sunset Oaks Park: We need to stretch ball fence and replace the pine tree. Woods of Baldwin Lake: Screening, plant trees and clear remaining brush. During June/July raze the playground equipment. Brian asked if we were going to have trouble meeting the goals set for this year. marty said yes and we should review this at the August meeting. He said we were not at a standstill but it is taking longer than planned. One alternative would be to subcontract. Joe Schmidt stated the Friends of the Park were looking for a list of things to do to spend their money on. WOODRIDGE ESTATES II: Marty explained that Rick Carlson had contacted him and hoped to be present to discuss developing the parcel of land south of Oakwood Lane. Because he did not attend the meeting Marty gave the presentation. On an overhead he showed Outlot B which contains approximately 1.59 acres of upland. He explained that Rick was interested in developing the northern portion of the church property but, before he would pursue this idea he wanted to discuss the issue with the board and get their feelings for an idea on park land and trail dedication. Rick would dedicate the trail corridor extending from Woodridge Court through the church parcel. The strip on the northeast would allow for possible expansion to the landlocked piece of property in the northeast corner of the property to the west. Details on access to the park in Outlot B would need to be incorporated in the development design. Marty explained there were a couple of possibilities. The Comprehensive Plan places a need for about 6 acres of park in this area. The Woods of Baldwin Lake provide 2 .18 acres of mini- park of which 1 acre is wetland. Rick' s proposal would add to the park acreage needs by adding about another 2 acres of upland bringing our total park land acreage in this area to about 3 .25 acres. The possibility would then be open to purchasing or taking through dedication additional land in the adjoining property to the '"`� west to bring up our park land needs to standards in this area. CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 6, 1994 Brian Bourassa asked what could be done with this size parcel. Marty' s response was small informal ballfields, a picnic area, some playground equipment, and tennis courts could be on the parcel. George said we felt we had all the park land needed in the area and he wanted the developer to develop the trail system. Joe asked what other land was available in the area to meet our six acre requirement. Marty responded he had been all over the area and there was not anything available. The type development was discussed and it was said that the board needed the residents to come before the board and voice their unified input at open mike. There was lengthy discussion on this topic and a poll was taken on how the board members felt about this project. George said there was mixed reaction from the members and felt a decision could not be made on this issue. Marty said he would contact Rick and relay the boards feelings. OLD BUSINESS: There was no old business to discuss. NEW BUSINESS: There was no new business. There was discussion about when the board would meet again because of the 4th of July holiday. A consensus could not be reached so Marty said the board members would be contacted later and we would meet when a date could be decided upon. ADJOURN: Joe Schmidt made a motion to adjourn, Sharon Lane seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 8:35pm. 't1�1 AGRIM IT STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: July 2 , 1994 TOPIC: Pine Ridge III Park Dedication Proposal BACKGROUND Please find attached the preliminary;plat submitted by Mr. Rick Carlson for Pine Ridge III. The planning and zoniM reports are also attached for your information and will be reviewed at the Park Board Meeting. Since we +dial not have a Park Boars .Meeting in July ,be. a ; holiday, the plat was reviewed by, the Planning and Zoning'` Board with a Park Board. Review c ntin9en . summarizing this development Pine Ridge :III is a 19 lot single family subdivision consisting of 10 acres of land, zoned R=1X, with a density of 19 units per acre. A trail is indicated for the entire length of the north side of the proposed Flat. This length would connect with the trail link into Pine Ridge II addition to the East and Ware Road to the West. Since the original Pine Ridge I plat was before thecomplation of our Comprehensive Plan, trail length segment # 27 in the Comprehensive Flan can adequately be accomplished through this new proposed link to Ware Road. This trail length to Ware road than ages with future trail length # 26 and Ware Read 3aAsp ~tatf On Trail # 29 to the south. This trail is depicted on the West side of Ware Road where it intersects the 'b2nd street trail connection to hwy.49. Please recall the Foss Trace addition north of 62 nd street has a portion of trail segment` 129 on the West side of Ware Road. In the fall of 1995, a Metropolitan Waste Control Commission sewer intercept will be placed on the East side of Ware Road fronting the Pine Ridge III development.` Tutus it makes sense to locate the trail in this disturbance area at that time. This would give a connecting point for trail segment #29' and a safe means for residents to travel to R-10 pax*. n Please find enclosed a vicinity , Pine Ridge III Plat sketch, a copy of the Park Dedication Ordinance-' and Mr. Carlson's letter of dedication Proposal. I have called Rick to ask his for a copy of the land sale document in order to establish a fair market value for the cash portion of-the prOpostl- OPTIONS 1. Approve preliminary, plat; wig the condition$ as outlined in the Planning ate . 2. Return to staff for fur '.consideration. RECKNUUMMTION Option 1 Mattke Engineering, Inc. 7671 Central Ave. N.E. • Fridley, MN 55432 • (612) 783-0300 June 20, 1994 City of Lino Lakes C/o Mr. Marty Asleson, Parks Director 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 re: Park dedication, Pine Ridge 3rd Addition Dear Mr. Asleson: Enclosed is our proposed layout for the above project, which includes a trail along the north side of the site. In addition, we are proposing a park dedication in cash. Please place this item on the Park Board adjenda for discussion at the July meeting. Thanks for your help. Sincerely, Tedd W. Mattke, Ph.D. , P.E. • Residential & Commercial Development TA'di nlnfyv Wnfor Roenairnoo Minii+irnl .UL-25-1994 15:^1 FROM CITY OF L i NU LHY.t--, l u FrNorthwest Associated Consultants , Inc . U R 8 A N PLANNI N G • DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNT G REPORT TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: Bob Kirmis/A?an Brixius DATE: 6 July 1994 RE: Lino Lakes - Pine Ridge 3rd Addition - Preliminary Plat FILE NO: 194. 01 - 94 . 05 EXECT)TrVF, SUN MARY Background Mr. Richard Carlson is requesting preliminary plat approval of a 19 lot single family subdivision entitled Pine Ridge 3rd Addition. The subject 10 acre site lies east of Ware Road and south of the Pine Ridge 1st Addition. The property is zoned R-_ X, Single Family Executive. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Detailed Site Location Exhibit C - Preliminary Plat Exhibit D - Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Exhibit E - Wetland Locations Exhibit F - Buildable Area Summary o„U KANI C r i Jr, . tv)1 595-9837 AGMWA ITEM 4 B ST"P ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland BATE July 22, 1994 TOPIC Pine Ridge III fir•: Mr. Rick Carlson is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for Pine Ridge 111. The Planning and Engineering Reports are attached for your information and will be reviewed at the Council Meeting. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this plat and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. No building permits will be issued on Outlots 1 and 2 until utilities become available. No assessments will be levied until utilities become available. 2. Right of dray dedication and financial security for upgrading of Ware Road shall be as determined by the City Engineer. 3. The side lot line separating Lots 6 and 7, Block 1 shall be reconfigured to lie radial to the adjacent cul-de-sac. 4. Street names shall be subject to City approval. _5. The proposed wetland mitigation plan is subject to approval by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Rice Creek Watershed District. 6. The lot Layout shown on the submitted grading and drainage plan is changed to match that shown on the preliminary plat. Grading and drainage subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. A utility plan is approved by the City Engineer. S. Ten foot wide utility easements are provided along rear and other lot lines subject to review and comment by City Engineer. 9. Drainage easements established and subject to review and comment by City Engineer. 10. Park Dedication and trails subject to approval of the Park Board. 11. A development agreement and financial guarantees submitted Post-it"Fax Note 7671 �oac6 pagges� ("� JU!_-25-1994 15:12 FROM CITY OF L I NU LHKE�� I u (V"1 I_G I �Recon=endafion Based on the following review, our office recommends approval of the Pine Ridge 3rd Addition Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The subdivision is reconfigured such that Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 are provided internal access from the subdivision. This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. 2. The City Engineer provide comment/recommendation in regard to right-of-way dedication associated with Ware Road and the need for a financial security for the eventual upgrading of Ware Road. .1. The side lot line separating Lots 8 and 9, Block 1 is reconfigured to lie radial to the adjacent cul-de-sac_ 4. The subdivision' s cul-de-sac is specifically named. Such street naive shall be subject to City approval . S. The proposed wetland mitigation plan is subject to approval by the A_-rmy Corps of Engineers and Rice Creek Watershed District . n 6 . The lot layout shown on the submitted grading and drainage plan is changed to match the lot configuration shown on the preliminary plat. The grading and drainage plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer_ 7. A utility plat is submitted subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 8 . Ten foot wide utility easements are provided along rear and other lot lines . This issue should be subject to comment/ recommendation by the City Engineer. 9 . The City Engineer provide comment/recommendation in regard to drainage easement establishment . 10 . The City Park Board provide coTimient/recommendation in regard to park and trail dedication. 11 . Comments from other City staff . 2 ISSUES ANALYSIS Den.si.ty. within R-IX Zoning Districts, the maximum number of dwelling units per acre must not Exceed three. The proposed plat contains 19 lots at a density of 1. 9 units per acre. As such, the proposed density conforms to Ordinance standards. Blocks_ According to the City subdivision Ordinance, blocks shall have a maximum length of 1, 500 feet and a minimum length of 400 . Both proposed blocks within the subdivision comply with required block length standards. Lot Depth. According to the Zoning Ordinance, lots within R-IX Districts must provide 135 feet of depth. All proposed lots have been found to meet this requirement . Lot Area.. According to City policy, lot area calculations must exclude all waterbodies. In this regard, all lots must provide at least 12 , 825 square feet of lot area (R-1X standard) exclusive of waterbodies. All proposed lots have been found to meet or exceed minimum R-1X lot area requirements (see Exhibit F for reference) . Lot Width.. Within R-1X Zoning District, a minimum lot width of 90 Meet is required for interior lots and a minimum of 115 feet is required for corner lots. All proposed lots have been found to meet minimum lot width requirements . Setbacks. All lots successfully demonstrate an ability to accommodate the following R-IX Zoning District. setbacks. Front Yard 30 Feet Side Yard - Interior 10 Feet - Corner 30 Feet Rear Yard 30 Feet Lot Configuration. Generally speaking, the proposed lot configuration is considered positive and responds to the site' s design parameters (i.e. , wetlands) . One concern which does exist relates to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 in the northwest corner of the plat , As shown on Exhibit C, these lots will be required to obtain access from Ware Road and lie isolated from the balance of the subdivision' s lots . While Ware Road itself is classified as a local street (per 1987 Transportation Plan) , the street is listed on the City' s Municipal State Aid (MSA) System and is expected to accommodate significant traffic volumes in the future. Although the existence of direct single family lot access is acknowledged along Ware Road both north and south of the subject site, such access condition should not justify the proliferation of a genuine 'safety problem. 3 1!:?:J-, FRUN LITY OF LINO LAKES TO 784722- P.06 ^ The City in past plat reviews required lots to be accessed through an internal streets to protect more heavily travelled street corridors . Most recently, Fox Trace was required to modify its plat to avoid direct lot access onto Ware Road. Emphasizing the isolation of Lots 1 and 2 is the need to extend utilities from the proposed cul-de-sac along side lot lanes to serve Lots 1 and 2. This long utility extension would become a City owned utility with the final plat approval . We would express concerns with regard to the maintenance and upkeep of this sewer line which would require the disruption of private yards. The City Engineer should comment on the acceptability of the utility arrangement . Based on the aforementioned issues, we would suggest that the preliminary plat should be reconfigured so as not to isolate said Lots I and 2 from the balance of the subdivision. This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. One additional concern in regard to lot configuration relates to the side lot line separating Lots 8 and 9 of Block 1 . According to Section 1001 . 08 , Subd. 6 (3) of the Subdivision Ordinance, side lot lines must be substantially at right angles to straight street lines or radial to curved street lines . So as to comply with the provisions of the ordinance, the side lot line separating Lots 8 Viand 9 , Block 1 should be reconfigured to lie radial to the adjacent cul-de-sac. Streets. The proposed street layout has to a large extent been dictated by existing development which surrounds the subject property. In this regard, the street configuration is considered generally acceptable. While it is acknowledged that the subdivision' s street configuration is influenced by the site' s wetland locations, - interior street access should be provided to Lots 1 and 2 , Block 1 if at all possible. All proposed streets are shown to provide appropriate right-of-way widths and cul-de-sac lengths. The City Engineer should provide comment in regard to specific right-of-way dedication requirements associated with ware Road and the need for any financial security for the eventual upgrading of ware Road. While the subdivision' s east/west street shall exist as simply an extension of Coyote Trail, the subdivision' s cul-de-sac has not been specifically named. Such cul-de-sac should be named as part of the forthcoming final plat submission. Such street name shall be subject to City approval . Wetlands- As shown on Exhibit E, the subject site contains two wetlands/drainageways . Some mitigation of the wetland/drainageway will likely be necessary to accommodate the proposed extension of '_"':oyote Trail . As a condition of preliminary plat approval, the submitted wetland mitigation plan (incorporated in grading and 4 JOL-25-1994 15:33 FROM CITY OF LINO LAh:ES TO ., . drainage plan) must be approved by both the Army Corps of Engineers and the Rice Creek Watershed District . Grading and Drainage. In accordance with City subdivision regulations, a grading, drainage and erosion control plan has been submitted for review. To be noted, however, is that the lot layout depicted on the grading plan does not match the layout depicted. Whereas, the preliminary plat depicts 115 foot wide corner lots, the grading plan illustrates 110 foot wide corner lots. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, the lot layout illustrated on the grading plan should match that shown on the preliminary plat . The grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Utilities. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, a utility plan must be submitted. Such plan must demonstrate how all proposed lots are to be serviced and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Easements. According to the City Subdivision Ordinance, easements at least i0 feet wide (centered on rear and other lot lines) must be provided for utilities where necessary. In addition, easements for drainage purposes must be provided when determined necessary. While the submitted preliminary plat has appropriately provided easements over the property' s two drainageway/wetland areas, additional easements for utilities and drainage must be provided. This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. Park/Trail Dedication. As shown on Exhibit C, a 12 foot wide trail corridor has been proposed along the subject plat' s northern border. Such trail would constitute a westerly extension of an existing trail corridor. The acceptability of the proposed trail location, as any other park/trail dedication requirements should be subject to the recommendation by the City Park Board_ CONCLUSION Based on the preceding review, our office recommends approval of the Pine Ridge 3rd Addition Preliminary plat subject to the conditions, listed in the Executive Summary of this report. pc: Darrell Schneider Randy Schumacher Richard Carlson 5 prior to final plat. 12. sod be installed over any disturbed areas within the plat following grading. 13 . An 8" grater main be extended from Coyote Trail north along Ware Road and connected to the existing 8" line between Lots 7 and 8, Block 5, Pine Ridge 1st Addition. Consideration be given to extending an 811 water main north to Hawthorne Road and reviewed by the city Engineer. 1. Approve preliminary plat with conditions listed above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. b +113A !T Option 1 r r. CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 05 - 91 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE BY CHANGING THE PARK DEDICATION FEE The City Council of the�City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I_ Property Dedication_ Section 1001. 14 of the Lino Lakes City code is amended to read as follows: AMENDMENT: ELIMINATE: Entire section 1001. 14 after (4) in paragraph 2 . ADD: For residential development the following formula shall apply: I. Density in Units/Acre Percentage of Land Dedication O to 3 10% 3 to 5 12% 5 to 7 14% 7 to 9 16% 9 or more 18% Land site selection is to be approved by the park board_ The city may choose to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant based on the following formula: d Cost/Acre 0,000/minimum) x (Density Factor % x Subd Acreage) = Park Dedication Per Unit Number of Lots in Subdivision OR rk Dedication/Unit ) x (No . of Units) = Park Dedication/Acre Number of Acres r-� ORDINANCE NO. OS - 91 II. The park board may accept any combination of land and monies, not to exceed the dedication requirements. III. Minor subdivisions, as defined by ordinance, will be required to follow the Land Dedication Density Table listed in the ordinance, or $500.00 per building site, at the decision of the park board. IV. For commercial or industrial development: A. The developer shall pay to the City $200. 00 for each 1, 000 square feet of proposed building for any commercial or industrial use except those uses set forth as follows: B. The developer shall pay to the City $133 . for each 1,000 square feet of proposed building for uses as follows: 1. ) Warehousing 2. ) Low Labor Intensive Light Manufacturing/Assembly (one or less employee per 1,000 square feet of structure) 3. ) Other Low Labor Intensive Uses C. All such money must be paid prior to the issuance of the building permit_ D. The above shall apply to new buildings and additions to existing buildings. II. This Ordinance shall be effective February 1, 1992 . Passed by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of November 1991. Harold L. Bisel, Mayor Marilyn-G. Anderson, Clerk-Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly I; / t� � Ql l i 2 3 4 I 5 roil t3,500 SF 7 9 23.742 SF 19.aO-) SF 2 3.500 Sf 3 059 --T 1-3.7&1 SF 10 9 19.8m SF 5 J 15,100 SF 4 28.087 17,480 if 17.5-19 SF 13,550 SF t3,517 SF a 7 5 17.57EI SF 7 z KAr - Coyote Trail i-- ---F 4x, L, i BLOCK 2 -5 3 2 4 1-5. 113. SF 3.5 SF I J. 9:1? 501 SF SF ol SF 1'. 01 SM w F MAMF- ENO w-ERW,, INC. �-4 7WI 00"A. Of Addition loft P".w W4 WA.Ta PoWkmlq Flat (612) 783-0" 7 45 58 3 v G 53 65Zy 533 0 z 1 o 7 6 J to 65`r0 o.. O vJ q� v p v n T In bSUB 41 In GAI97 ' �9 3 v CD SSS GHBI r0 9yHip T- G`l79 to 0 9 90 y� H 89 v A.16 AiO 4Y71 i Se S1 1 h � y�1 Tb d aiRCH CT. GHSi 66 7� t S ' by v 65�7, > 8 hV n )s 6 WV bir GHy7 8 y1 pgbq 6K 6 �. r«sr N!y G'/YS 0 �►9 �0 of y �' i yl i w CD 7401 M53 Y 3.3 z 6M41 'LS r 3a � 9, � Bo 9!o Zb W qri 9 r r10 p 3 yy K (sH17 �mo- h u Y)) GH09 G 375 ';� `'l�y a V,a! rc J .•c,`y�1ti rtb yt6 z 77� 1 �* r�N v' n v � v 3bT. 463163 3 63 (o351 L3b(. 71 pw 7 t j 36 r— l/1 357 635(e Io37Z G 3 by 6353 5 L393 L35L �� � � •�,+�? r o r.3 63Y7 W N c v N N M 3� 63/G. &293 PAQk ! 6309 v bZE9 r/I�te g r 6^ �6� Rb2 0 238 G297'0 BUS v 30 GARAGE Q ,� 6�ss �L3 2j3 g3 eL��Z99 t, •d c v 6 Z'i l G2 9 S I b 630� v v �'9 v v 6250 ` b Z 2 317 V S� � yyl 2`I2� b3/0 zs (.3vE A V v v k 6433 Sy B 63y0 pi 0 o1 Z S E 3 cv pitv 6 Z 1 i \ 6202 o n ro L �z/` hhX b3 3 31 v 6/99 v v v o o v 67.0(o �p 4179 6i8o " T N 0 3 2 o 6 1 �� 6j5 6/, (,13N b/`I& N % V 7loo �s / `/ 6 (e!fog n Z s3 5Z 153 fo r 5 L v ryy 1y5 N 133 v �! r �XJ7'i l 278 6v,/ &110 v C v v Bros —__ Id - - 1 C I T Y O F INO LAW TO: Lino Lakes Park Board From: Marty Asleson Date: July 26,1994 Regarding: Recreation/Recreation Complex Issues Since the last Park Board meeting I have visited the Recreation Complex site with both the Rice Creek Watershed and Jeff Schoenbauer. I have scheduled another meeting with Kate Drewery from the Rice Creek Watershed this Friday. Barry and I recently met with Jeff to discuss Recreation Complex elements and layout. The meeting with Rice Creek Watershed on Friday will take Jeff's concept drawing and allow for a more realistic discussion of the wetland issues on this property. Jeff will be at the Park Board meeting to present the concept and field questions and suggestions. How does the Referendum tie into this? We still do not have an answer on the Cities's direction on capital facility needs. We have talked to Decision Resources to get a quotation for running another User Survey. Decision Resources has worked with many municipal Parks Referendum issues, and has worked with Brauer and Associates. We should have this quote this week. PARK,RECREATION AND FORESTRY DEPARTMENTS 7204 LAKE DRIVE,LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA 55014 (612)464-5562 A-rk-6-n6 GoAoynEx PAS"' _ -o w67ZA P.s__ - __-_ �... ._Gll�i(��n�b . �L.�►1�1{ib�T1I1b�S _ — UJ+�a.� �4G'7iJ,�Oe.L�.__GtJT_ _7n'�/�, ._ .__ 0 CAP. . wS 'FZo _ JN�ricE N 2 �I •i•`. ® , -�% 225' 36 225JR 60' r .�•� ��• SOCF RI SOC���•�, uw ti O �,, ��•• • I Y T , tt i --- _ - s ;NEIGHBORH00[��� YOUTH i � i YOUTH i 275' O') 225' 360' 225' 360' p ( i . ------ SOgC RI OCiC RI --- Fi I I I q "_YJ91 H 25' 60'Yok e I ~ IBASES A i i 250'�ELD a CI]ALL A C L OC�E(275') COMBINATION i ee i OMB NATION max"° PICNIC SH CNIC SHELTER/WARMING HO I; BALL FIELD i ee i LL)ELD 30 PLAY PO e (W G e O .O e•eee ® ��' p . � p COMBINA MBINATION / O �•EO BALLFIELD •e BALL FIELD TRAIL LINK (300') •e i (300' e e _ MULTIPUU_ E BUILDING ?�Id�Q ATTOH CONCEPT PLAN LINO LAKES ATHLETIC COMPLEX BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. PURPOSE STATEMENT LINO LAKES RECREATION FOCUS COMMITTEE The Lino Lakes Recreation Steering Committee at the last meeting generated a number of reasons for being. Some of the key terms include: opportunity, involvement, priorities, flexibility, dynamics of need, community empowerment, evolution of programs, growth evaluation, staff direction, needs assessment, quality initiative. Given the defined parameters, perhaps the following statement is a starting point: The purpose of the Lino Lakes Commmmity Recreation Advisory Committee is to provide input to city staff in the formation, progress, and the evaluation of the existing, and planning of future recreation programs in order to ensure quality recreational opportunities for all residents. � . � . § � � �� \ - � © , 2: � � �� � ■ � � �» a \>: a . , . � � . § ` » y z�. : « a §\ � � & � - � . . z «:�y�3 . 2/ d \2 p��: . . »� . ». /f� . , �> > ° f ` fJ ° \��, . / �; �: : ., /�«. ®yam�cy , * w� �. :� � ^ �.�.�� �� . � �, �. �.x . >�. � ! \ � \yy . . � a . ¥ � . ! ! : `\ ) \ � � : % ,��� ! ! ! } \ �/| / < z y � . w�� � � � ■ ! ■ ■ � � C I T Y 0---F-- 'PON INO LAW Summary Enclosed are summaries for time spent in different activities in the Departments of Park, Recreation and Forestry. These summaries are for work performed between the dates of January, 1994 through April, 1994 . We should have a more up to date summary in the near future. Also, please find enclosed a section on recreation program summaries. The Parks, Recreation and Forestry Departments have been very busy this year meeting the challenges of rapid growth. The following summarizes the progress to date of the major issues for each department. Parks: The projects for 1994 are Park Board goal driven. Primarily, these projects are based on the priority of order as established by the board. Development projects have been scheduled after the normal maintenance and routine work schedules have been accomplished. Recreation Complex: A concept is presently being worked on. A rendering of this complex should be presented at the August Park Board meeting for discussion and then to the Council for review. Shores of Marshan Park, Park Headquarters: Staff is moved in. Turf establishment for this park area will occur later in August for best seeding time reasons. A substantial amount of the boardwalk trail is in as of July 19. Park Grove Park: Rough graded, top soil spread and tilled. Fine grading and seeding will occur in August. Country Lakes Park: Engineering for trails and parking lot move presently being worked on. Brush clearing for this park and Wood of Baldwin Lake will occur in two weeks. Concepts for Undeveloped Parks: Meeting is set with Birchwood neighborhood. Contact has been made with the Brandywood neighborhood. Simple concept sketches will be developed from neighborhood input as a first step to future development projects. Lamotte Park: - Minor improvements have been made including the installation of a volleyball net, picnic table, and park bench. PARK, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DEPARTMENTS 7204 LAKE DRIVE,LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA 55014 (612)464-5562 ^° Qual Ridge: Screening and fence have been placed in park and trail areas where impacts were significant. Forestry: This year 385 trees were planted on the boulevard in a new development. A screening project was also planted along 4th Avenue, fronting Moline Concrete. We expect that this year we should have a limited number of Oak Wilt vibratory plow line to install, as compared to previous years. Excess funds from last years grant were carried forward to this year. We know of only three new Oak Wilt sites this year that had not been identified last year. Recreation: Please find the updated plans for Fall/Winter/Spring program summaries. In addition our summer programs are well on their way to a successful summer. This year we added the traveling playground program to include Sunset Oaks and Shenandoah Parks. The averages by park has been as follows: PARK AVERAGE CHILDREN PER PARK* Country Lakes 13 Sunrise Park 26 Birch Park 11 City Hall Park 19 Traveling Park 13 *The average is figured on a 13 day period. Performances in the Park: Attendance for the first three performances has been 150, 250 and 150 people. This has attracted all ages of residents and many families have shown interest. Attendance is up from last year. As a subcommittee to our Recreation Focus Committee, we have a teen group that will meet periodically to be involved in the program plan process. It is our hope that we can better address our teen populations recreation needs through this empowerment process. Friends of the Parks: We are continuing to work with our non- profit support group. The Friends have recently obtained their State Tax Exempt status. Respectfully submitted, Marty Asleson Park, Recreation and Forestry Supervisor Att. Zali ` u it SUBPRO FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS Landscape and Turf Maintenance Total: 354.25 2 . 00 002 Ferti 1 i zati on Ir Total: 6.50 003 Flower Beds Install/Maint. Total: 2 .50 004 Garbage Pickup/Control Total: 2 . 00 005 Irrigation Installation Total : 4 . 00 006 Irrigation Total: 78 .50 n 007 Misc. Lndscp/Turf Maintenance Total: 35 .00 010 Seeding Total: 9 . 00 016 Tree/Shrub Maint. (Park) Total: 5.00 018 Tree/Shrub Remove (Parks) Total: 176.00 1 .00 020 Weeding Total: 27 .50 022 Other Total: 7 .00 Page 1 Athletic Fields, Rinks, Courts SUBPRO FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 025 Bleacher/Bench Repiar/Maint. Total: 17 .00 026 Fence Installation Total: 11 .50 028 Goals-Maint./Repair Total: 17 .50 030 Infield Maintenance Total : 16 .00 3 .50 031 Line Painting & Chalking Total: 8 . 00 033 New Construction Total: 8 . 00 035 Tennis Court Maint. Total: 6 . 00 036 Volleyball Court Maint. Total: 22 .50 037 Other Total: 13 . 00 038 Garbage/Rubbish Total: 5.00 039 Tree Hauling Total: 3. 00 Ice Rinks 041 Fencing & Board Repair Total: 6 . 00 n Page 2 SUBPRO FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS Ice Rinks 042 Flooding Total: 63.00 043 Grading Total: 5.00 045 Misc. Rink Maint. Total: 16.00 046 Plowing Total: 61.00 5.50 047 Shaving Total: 7 . 00 048 Shoveling Total: 64.50 049 Snow Blowing Total: 20.00 2 .00 050 Other Total: 168.50 5 .50 051 Other Total: 6 . 00 052 Special Events Total : 3.00 Playground 058 Repair and Maintenance Total: 1 .00 Park Bldg. 064 Carpentry Total: 7 .00 Page 3 SUBPRO FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 065 Cleaning Total: 36.00 4. 00 066 Electrical Repair Total: 2 .00 067 Misc. Bldg. Maint/Repair Total: 3.00 068 New Construction Total : 16 .00 Parking Lots 077 Grading/Survey Total : 16 .00 079 Plowing Total: 2 .00 �. 080 Other Total: 12 .00 082 Plowing Only Total: 3.00 083 Plowing and Sanding Total: 8 .00 3.00 Trails 086 Maintenance Total: 5 . 00 089 Signing Total : 4. 00 090 Snow & Ice Removal Total: 63. 00 4.50 Page 4 SUBPRO FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 092 Sodding and Seeding Total: 10. 00 Forestry 095 Blvd. Planting Total : 44.00 096 Blvd. Planting Prep. Total : 167 .00 1 .50 097 Blvd. Maint. Total: 20. 00 1 .00 098 Brush Chipping (Dead,diseased) Total: 26. 00 099 Brush Chipping (Xmas Trees) Total: 17 .00 102 O.W. Control Program Total: 2 .50 103 O.W. High Risk Tree Total : 15 .00 106 Tree Pres. Plan Inspect. Total: 5 . 00 107 Other Total: 3.00 City Maint113 Bulb Replacement Total: 3 .00 119 Compost Turning Total: 13 .00 Page 5 SUBPRO FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 120 Conference Total: 103.00 .50 128 Equipment Maintenance Total: 106 . 00 129 General Cleanup Total: 45.00 130 Grading Total : 3. 00 132 Hauling Material Total: 9 .00 141 Pickup and Delivery Total: 39 .50 142 Plowing and Sanding Total : 30.25 7 .00 143 Plowing Only Total: 39 .00 25.50 145 Public Works Bldg. Maint. Total: 8.00 148 Right-of-Way Maintenance Total: 5 .00 150 Sanding Only Total: 3.00 156 Spreading Rock Total: 8.00 Page 6 SUBPRO FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 157 Staff Meeting Total: 31 .50 159 Summer Storm Cleanup Total: .50 165 Wash Total: 4 . 00 167 Other Total: 3 .00 168 Total: 4.50 Recreation 201 Aerobics Instructor Total: 75.00 203 Dance Instructor Total: 182 . 00 204 Golf Instructor Total : 16 .00 205 Gym Supervisor Total: 12 . 00 208 Martial Arts Instructor Total : 40 .00 209 Music Instructor Total: 61 . 00 210 Open Basketball Supervisor Total: 24.00 n Page 7 SUBPRO FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 211 Open Volleyball Supervisor Total: 45.25 212 Playground Leader Total: 11 .25 213 Skating Instructor Total: 2 . 00 214 Sports Official Total: 68. 00 219 Warminghouse Activity Leader Total: 765 .50 220 Other Total: 4.00 252 Total: 3 .50 ------------------------------------------------------- Total: 3507 .00 69 .50 3576 .50 ------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 FUND EMP NO REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 0 Total: 1268.25 001 General Maintenance/Park Total: 748.50 1 .50 002 General Maintenance Total : 1297 .25 60 .00 003 Heavy Equipment Total: 91.00 8 . 00 005 Seasonal Total: 102 .00 ------------------------------------------------------- Total: 3507 .00 69 .50 3576.50 ------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 PROJ FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS Parks Total: 872 .00 42 .50 001 Arena Acres Total : 54 .75 4 .00 002 Birch Park Total : 363 .25 4.50 003 Brandywood Park Total: 9 .00 004 Centennial Campus Total: 107 . 00 005 City Hall Park Total: 444 .00 1 .00 006 Country Lakes Park Total : 187 . 00 007 Fire Station Total : 5 .00 008 LaMotte Park Total : 2 .00 010 Lino Park Total: 71.50 O11 Marshan Park Total : 33 .00 012 Park Grove Park Total : 4.50 Page 1 PROJ FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 014 Quail Ridge Total : 38 .00 016 Rice Lake Elem. Total: 147 .00 5.50 017 Rice Lake Estates Park Total: 29 .25 018 Shenandoah Park Total: 117 .50 019 Sunnygate Total: 19 .50 020 Sunrise Park Total: 544 .25 11 .00 �-� 021 Sunset Oaks Park Total: 19 . 50 022 Sunset Oaks Park Total: 5.50 025 Woods of Baldwin Lake Park Total : 177 .50 1 . 00 026 Other Total: 104 .50 031 Apol 1 o Drive Total: 10 .50 033 Birchwood Acres Total: 1 .00 Page 2 PROJ FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 034 Brandywood Total: 1 . 00 042 Pheasant Hills Preserve Total: 1 .00 047 Rohavic Oakds Total: 1 .00 048 Shores of Marshan Total: 10.50 052 Wenzel Farms Total: 8.00 201 Aerobics Instructor Total: 3.00 209 Musi6 Instructor Total: 1 .50 811 Court Hours Total: 26 .00 813 Emergency Total: 88 . 00 ------------------------------------------------------- Total: 3507 . 00 69 .50 3576.50 ------------------------------------------------------- Page 3 ACTIV FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 4 Total: 21.50 — 001 Public Works Total: 688.50 23 .00 002 Rec and Parks Total: 2784.50 46 .50 005 Total: 4.50 032 Total: 8.00 ------------------------------------------------------- Total: 3507 .00 69 .50 3576 .50 ------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 ACCT FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS Total: 21 .50 002 Total : 114.00 012 Total: 8.00 802 Court Hours Total : 296. 75 806 Holiday Hours Total: 72 .00 809 Other Time Total: 8. 00 810 Overtime Hours Total: 29 . 75 61.50 811 Regular Hours Total: 1802 .00 8 . 00 812 Sick Time Total: 101. 00 813 Temp. Hours Total: 922.00 814 Time Off With Pay Total: 11 .00 816 Vacation Hours Total: 113 .00 n Page 1 ACCT FUND REG HRS O/T HRS TOT HRS 818 Total: 8. 00 ------------------------------------------------------- Total: 3507.00 69 .50 3576.50 ------------------------------------------------------- Page 2 e LIM LAKES PARK AND RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: Open Adult Volleyball Year: 1993 LOCATION: Centennial Jr. High School Season: Fall/Winter TIMES: 7:30-9:45pm DESCRIPTION: This program was developed for the individuals who may not want to participate in an organized league or who enjoys participating with other individuals to socialize and have a fun experience. INSTRUCTOR: PAY SCALE: PROGRAM CONTENT: This program meets every Friday evening for 3 hours. PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program is to provide a program for adults who would like to participate in a volleyball program that does not have the competitiveness of league play. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: This program has limited needs. We use 6-10 volleyballs and an instructor. The volleyball standards and nets are supplied by the school. PROGRAM BUDGET: See attached. EXPENSES- INCOME- ADMINISTRATION- TOTAL EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program has grown tremendously in a short time. As far as the number of people who attended this program each week, the numbers were very strong. From the participants surveys we have received back from the participants they were pleased with this program. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANT REACTIONS: The general comments we received back from the participants were favorable, but the lack of space was an issue with a lot of people. Also, some people would have liked more power volleyball as to the recreation volleyball that was offered. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: She relayed the need for additional space and for a space for power volleyball. ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS: POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: We are seeking an additional spot for this program. At the present time it is anticipated for the 1994-95 program year Rice Lake Elementary will be used as the additional site. At Rice Lake a court will be setup for power volleyball. LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: Open Adult Volleyball FALL X WINTER X SPRING SUMMER REGISTRATION FEE $3 .00 per person per session NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS Approximately 390 participants PROGRAM INCOME $1, 169.00 PROGRAM EXPENSE $474 .45 TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS INCOME $694 .55 LINO LAKES PARK AND REC.REATION PROGRAM PLANING AMID EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: Pre-Kids-er-Cise Year: 1993/1994 LOCATION: Rice Lake Elementary Season: Fall/Winter TIMES: Saturdays 9:30-10:30am DESCRIPTION: This program is intended for elementary age children who have music in their souls. The instructor leads participants through a variety of dance line steps. INSTRUCTOR: Christy Casanova PAY SCALE: $10.00/hr PROGRAM CONTENT : Over the six one hour sessions the participants will put together a dance line routine for an informal and fun show. '� PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program is meant to give young people the opportunity to learn a new skill while having a terrific time doing it. It also serves as a tool for coordination, social skill development and increased self esteem. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: Needs are a quality instructor and a location for this program. PROGRAM BUDGET: See attached. EXPENSES: INCOME: ADMINISTRATION: TOTAL: rr. EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOADS AND OBJECTIVES: This new program is offered on Saturday mornings and the registration numbers were not as high as preferred, but there was enough for this program to operate. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANT REACTIONS: The participants seemed to enjoy the opportunity to work with their children in a situation where they were directly involved. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS: This type of family programming seems to be gaining popularity. The possibility of future programs of this type will be looked at in the future. POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: Pre Kids-er-cise FALL X WINTER X SPRING SUMMER REGISTRATION FEE _ $15 .00 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 9 Fall program/10 Winter program PROGRAM INCOME $138.00/Fall $151.00/Winter* PROGRAM EXPENSE $130.93/Fall Refunded/Winter TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS INCOME $ 7.07 both programs * During the winter session our instructor became ill. Rather than training another instructor the department felt it would best be served that we cancel this class. A full refund to the winter participants was issued. LINO LAKES PARK AND RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: Softball Year: 1993 LOCATION: City Parks Season: Fall TIMES: 6-10pm DESCRIPTION: This program is offered as a competitive league for the enjoyment of adults who enjoy softball. This league covers five weeks and ten games. INSTRUCTOR: PAY SCALE: PROGRAM CONTENT: ^ PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program is to provide a quality softball experience to all team/participants. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: This program is a high impact program. The needs are groomed and well maintained softball fields, game officials who are certified, ballfield maintenance person and field marking material. PROGRAM BUDGET: See attached. EXPENSES: INCOME ADMINISTRATION: TOTAL: EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program increased from past years with registration numbers, but, there is still room for more teams. This program was a successful offering to all who participated. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANT REACTIONS: The participants in this program seemed to enjoy our softball program. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS: This program is a terrific way to reach several adults. Several of the participants in this program go into some of our other program offerings. POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: n In the season to come, I will be anticipating that two separate game seasons will be offered. LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARZM= PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: 1993 Softball FALL X WINTER SPRING SUMMER REGISTRATION FEE 5270 per team + S35 tournament registration NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 24 TEAMS PROGRAM INCH $5, 300.00 PROGRAM EXPENSE $4,362.99 n TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS INCOME $647.01 n LINO LAKES PARK AND RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNIM AND EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: 5 Player Basketball League Year: 1993 LOCATION: Centennial Jr. High School Season: Winter TIMES: 6-10pm DESCRIPTION• This program is intended to give adults the opportunity to participate in an organized basketball program. This program features 10 league games and a playoff to decide who will travel to a state tournament. INSTRUCTOR: PAY SCALE: PROGRAM CONTENT: PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: n This program is intended to offer an alternative basketball program for adults. This program will feature game officials, scorekeeper and a highly competitive level of play. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: This program needs quality and dedicated officials who know and understand the game of basketball. Also, gym space is important. This program moved from the lower gym at Centennial Jr. High School to the cafe gym which is a bigger floor. PROGRAM BUDGET: See attached. EXPENSES: INCOME ADMINISTRATION: TOTAL: r� EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program ran very well, but two teams withdrew prior to the season starting which caused some reshuffling of the schedule. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANT REACTIONS: Good, no complaints except would like to see more teams. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS: This program was a benefit to the community which in turn provides the department with the possibility of an increased program in the future. POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: For next season it is expected that more teams will participate in this program. It is also anticipated that the larger gym will be used for this program. --� LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: Adult 5 Player Basketball League FALL WINTER X SPRING SUMMER REGISTRATION FEE $275 per team NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 4 TEAMS PROGRAM INCOME $1, 110.00 PROGRAM EXPENSE $1,452 .22 TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS Loss -$342 .22 *There were six teams that registered for this program, but two teams withdrew prior to the start of this program. The decision was made to run this program with four teams. LINO LAKES PARK AND RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: Adult Volleyball League Year: 1993 LOCATION: Rice Lake Elementary Season: Winter TIMES: 6-10pm DESCRIPTION: This program is to give adults the opportunity to participate in a well organized volleyball program. This program has an official and eight week season. INSTRUCTOR: PAY SCALE: PROGRAM CONTENT: PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: To provide an organized volleyball program for adults. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: This program needs adequate game space, volleyball nets/standards and game officials. PROGRAM BUDGET: See attached. EXPENSES: INCOME: ADMINISTRATION: '� TOTAL: EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOATS AND OBJECTIVES: This program ran very well, but, the need for more team involvement would enhance this program. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANT REACTIONS: Participants seemed pleased. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS:. This program led to additional participation in open volleyball. POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: The possibility of having a low cost unofficiated volleyball program. LINO LAKES PARKS AMID RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: 1993 Adult Volleyball League FALL WINTER X SPRING SUMMER REGISTRATION FEE $175.00 per team NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 4 TEAMS PROGRAM INCOME $875.00 PROGRAM EXPENSE $718.87 TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS INCOME $156.13+ LINO LAKES PARK AND RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: Breakfast w/Santa Year: 1993 LOCATION: City Hall Season: Winter TIMES: 10-Noon Saturday, December 11 DESCRIPTION: This program is intended for families to have a fun holiday party. The children participated in a variety of craft activities, breakfast and have pictures taken with Santa. INSTRUCTOR• PAY SCALE: PROGRAM CONTENT: PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES• A This program is to provide a fun program for children and parents alike. This program is also intended to provide an enlightening holiday experience for all people in attendance. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: This program used the Senior Center and Senior volunteers to help with the cooking and craft activities. This program would not have been as successful if it were not for the seniors helping out. PROGRAM BUDGET: See attached. EXPENSES: INCOME: ADMINISTRATION: TOTAL: EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program was filled to capacity. It appeared that all who attended had a terrific time and even thanked the staff for such a program. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANT REACTIONS: As stated above, all who attended had a terrific time and were very pleased with this program. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS: This program was very well organized and ran according to plan. Parents really liked that the Park and Recreation Department offered family programs. POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: In the future this program will be offered in a similar fashion, but breakfast will be single with pancakes and sausage. LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: Breakfast w/Santa FALL WINTER X SPRING SUMMER REGISTRATION FEE $6.50 per child. Parents were free. NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 54 participants PROGRAM INCOME $468.96 PROGRAM EXPENSE $452.31 n TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS INCOME $ 16.65 LINO LAKES PARK AND RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNING AMID EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: Open Adult Basketball Year: 1993-1994 LOCATION: Centennial High School Gym Season: Winter TIMES: 7-10pm DESCRIPTION: Anyone who is over the age of 17 or out of high school may participate in this program. This program features open registration for all basketball enthusiasts who do not want the commitment of a league or just enjoys playing the game. INSTRUCTOR: PAY SCALE: PROGRAM CONTENT: This program is organized on site. Gym supervisor will organize players into teams. PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program is intended for the basketball enthusiast who wants to participate without the commitment' of a league situation. Players may showup when they have the time. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: This program needs 6 basketballs and a dedicated supervisor. PROGRAM BUDGET: See attached. EXPENSES: INCOME: ADMINISTRATION: TOTAL: n EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program did indeed meet the goals set forth by the department. Players followed rules set forth and received a lot of basketball playing time. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANTS REACTIONS: INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS: This program served its purpose and the instructor did an outstanding job. POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: In the future to avoid problems of organized teams playing together as a practice game it is anticipated the first five who sign up are a team, then the next five and so on. LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: Open Adult Basketball FALL WINTER X SPRING SUMMER REGISTRATION FEE $3 .00 per person NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS Approximately 247 participants PROGRAM INCOME $741.00 PROGRAM EXPENSE $430.00 TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS INCOME $311.00 LINO LADS PARK AMID RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: Snack and Skate Year: 1993 LOCATION: Sunrise Park Season: Winter TIMES: Saturday morning DESCRIPTION: This program is for the young skater who would like to learn or get better at general skating. This program met at Sunrise Park. There is a light snack at the end of each session. INSTRUCTOR: PAY SCALE: PROGRAM CONTENT : PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program is to teach young people how to skate in basic class. The class is a general skating program and not either hockey or figure skating. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: Sunrise Park is a good site for this program. The shelter provides a nice area where parents can watch and help put skates on. The large hockey rink provides a perfect opportunity to practice skills without feeling cramped. PROGRAM BUDGET: See attached. EXPENSES: INCOME: ADMINISTRATION: TOTAL: EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: The registration for this program was fine, but the instructor failed in her responsibilities and decided after four weeks not to continue her employment with our department. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANT REACTIONS: O.K. , but the program did not meet their expectations because they could not complete the class. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS: This program fell apart when the instructor decided not to ,-., continue her employment. POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: In the future this program will continue to be offered, but better discipline by the instructor must be shown. The Park and Recreation Department could not get a substitute for the last couple of sessions. A program credit slip was sent to all participants. LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMEIV'I' PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: Snack and Skate FALL WINTER X SPRING SCR REGISTRATION FEE $24 .00 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 17 participants PROGRAM INCOME $436.00 PROGRAM EXPENSE $346.00 TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS INCOME $ 90.00 *This program was canceled after two classes. The instructor failed in her responsibilities of fulfilling her work agreement. The Park and Recreation Department could not find another instructor so the class was canceled. Each participant received their choice of a program credit or a refund of $14 .00 . LINO LAKES PARK AND RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: Adult Indoor Soccer Year: 1994 LOCATION: Centennial Sports Arena Season: Spring TIMES: Sunday 6-10pm DESCRIPTION: This program gives an opportunity for adults to participate in an organized soccer program. This program is eight weeks in length. The rules for this program are current indoor soccer rules. INSTRUCTOR: PAY SCALE: PROGRAM CONTENT: PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program is to provide a positive experience for adults who enjoy the game of soccer. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: This program needs a facility that can accommodate a group of adults, preferably in a large gym or the Centennial Sports Arena. This league also needs officials who are familiar with the rules of the game of soccer. PROGRAM BUDGET: See attached. EXPENSES: INCOME: ADMINISTRATION: TOTAL: EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program increased in registration for the co-rec program by three teams. The men' s program numbers did not allow for operations of their league. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANT REACTIONS: The biggest comment I received was a need for an older league. Our participants would like to possibly see an over 35 league. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS: POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: For the 1995 season, it is anticipated that in the co-rec division two separate leagues will be offered. An A-League for team/players with extensive experience in soccer and a B-League for team/players with limited playing experience. LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPAR'IMENrI' PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: Adult Indoor Soccer - 1994 FALL WINTER X SPRING SUMMER REGISTRATION FEE $450 00 per co-rec team NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 7 Teams PROGRAM INCOME $2, 955.08 PROGRAM EXPENSE $2, 890.85 TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS INCOME $ 64 .23 ram. LINO LADS PARK AMID RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM PROGRAM: Baseball Clinic Year: 1994 LOCATION: Centennial Sports Arena Season: Spring TIMES: Saturday 10-11:30am Wednesday 7-9pm DESCRIPTION: The high school baseball coach at Centennial High School taught the participants a variety of baseball skills in a two hour, two day session. Some of the skills were hitting, fielding, throwing, catching and running. INSTRUCTOR: PAY SCALE: PROGRAM CONTENT: PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program is designed to give young ballplayers the opportunity to develop new skills or further their current skills of baseball. PROGRAM NEEDS AND IMPACTS: This program needed an indoor setting due to the time of year it is offered. Also, to have a coach and assistant who likes working with young people and the game of baseball. PROGRAM BUDGET• See attached. EXPENSES• INCOME: ADMINISTRATION: ..-�; TOTAL: ^ LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAM FINAL REPORT PROGRAM NAME: Baseball clinic FALL WINTER X#2 SPRING SUMMER REGISTRATION FEE $27 .00 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 31 participants PROGRAM INCH $823 .00 PROGRAM EXPENSE $481.84 TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME/LOSS INCOME $341.06 EVALUATION - HOW DID THE PROGRAM MEET IT'S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This program met all expectations set forth. There was terrific coaching done by the instructor. The facility was terrific to host this program in. The attendance was solid, but lower than anticipated. WHAT WERE THE PARTICIPANT REACTIONS: The participants were pleased with this program but disappointed this program was held an the same weekend as Little League tryouts. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION RESULTS: Would like to see separated groups for age and softball/baseball. ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS: Primarily the only impact or concern is securing the facility and coaching staff. Both have already committed for 1994-95. POLICIES - PROCEDURES - PRACTICES - EVALUATION: It is anticipated that the weekend of the clinic will not change due to the availability of facility. It is also anticipated a separate baseball/softball program and separate age groups.