Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10/05/1992 Park Board Packet
CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1992 6: 30 PM 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2 . Approval of Minutes from September 7, 1992 3 . Open Mike 4. Old Business a. ) Minor Subdivisions 1. Northern Instruments - Commercial Addition 2 . J. MacNeil, Sunset and North Rd. Subdivision b. ) Park, Recreation and Forestry Updates AIIN 1. ) Shelter Donation from Shoreview - Project Track Sheet #1 2 . ) Park Grove 3 . ) Birch Park 4 . ) Electrical Projects - Lino, Country Lakes Parks, Forjay Building 5. ) Trails 6. ) Recreation Focus Committee, Programs, Youth Leagues 7 . ) Comprehensive Plan - Adopted by 8 . Other Old Business 5. New Business a. ) Birch Park Neighborhood Meeting b. ) Pets in Parks/Animal Control c. ) Woods of Baldwin Lake Development/Dedication Proposal - N-14 - Mr. Clyde Rehbein d. ) Parks and Recreation Foundation/Alternatives - Jacquelyn Farm e. ) Financing Comp Plan Priorities - Discussion f. ) Other New Business 6. Adjourn The balance in the Dedicated Park Fund is $221,254. 06 as of August 31, 1992 PARK BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 The September 8, 1992 meeting of the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Board was called to order at 6: 30 pm at Lino Lakes City Hall by Vice Chairperson Ken Johnson. Roll Call was taken, members in attendance were Jacquelyn Farm, Ray Johnson, Ken Johnson and Candy Toffoli. Members absent were Brian Bourassa, John Bauman and George Lindy. Also in attendance were Marty Asleson, Parks, Recreation and Forestry Coordinator, Linda Elliott, Councilperson- Liaison to the Park Board, Jeff Schoenbauer, Representative from Brauer & Associates, and Carole Kohler, Parks and Recreation Secretary. The minutes from the August 3 , 1992 meeting were approved as mailed. OPEN MIKE - No one appeared under Open Mike OLD BUSINESS : Completed Comprehensive Plan - Jeff Schoenbauer from Brauer & Associates appeared before the board with his comments on the finished comprehensive plan. He explained that the plan has been sent to the Metropolitan Council for their consideration and approval. The Lino Lakes City Council has approved the document contingent upon approval and acceptance by the Met Council. Mr. Schoenbauer feels that this document will impact the decision making process regarding parks and recreation development in the community and hopes that the council is aware and will use it in their planning process. Linda Elliott commented that the council is pleased with the plan and is very much aware of what a good tool it is. She thinks that all Planning and Zoning board members and Council members should have one. Ken Johnson mentioned that he was skeptical (at first) of spending the money for the plan, but now he is very pleased with the results and wants to work with the other boards to see that the plan is carried out. He would like to see new priorities set each year in respect to the comprehensive plan. Jeff Schoenbauer commented that chances for the City receiving grants and funding have been greatly increased with this document. Acquisition and Move of Shelter Donated by City of Shoreview - Jeff Schoenbauer referred the board to the copy of the project tracking sheet in their packets that he had prepared as an example for the board to use in following various projects/developments the board would act upon. The framework of this tracking sheet includes an overview statement explaining the particular project, then staff comments for consideration with a listing space for positive and negative attributes. Also included is a section called Recreational 1 PARK BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 Programming Issues that would identify potential impacts to current and future recreational programming and a section where it refers to the comprehensive plan. Following that is a section where each board member would write down comments for later discussion. Then a section describing the consensus reached by the board. Then a final vote count listing the board members and whether they voted yes or no , and the date . Also is a section for the action taken by the council and the date. In explaining this project tracking sheet, Mr. Schoenbauer used it to assess the acquisition and placement of the building recently donated from the City of Shoreview. (A copy of the tracking sheet assessment can be found at the end of these minutes. ) After his presentation Mr. Schoenbauer asked for comments from the board. Ray Johnson mentioned that at first glance he did not like the sheet, but after further consideration he thinks it's a tremendous tool to be used to track all projects. He thinks it should be used for any park development project in the city. He suggested adding the date the project is finished and have a sign off for the department managers. Ray Johnson also referred to the negative attributes of placing this building at Country Lakes Park. When the acquisition of the building was first presented to the board last month, staff suggested placing it at Country Lakes Park. After looking at the tracking sheet where the alternative of placing it at Birch Park was suggested, it appeared that there were other considerations. Ray thinks that if this building were placed at Country Lakes Park, because of the parks secluded location, it would be prone to heavy vandalism. He feels it would be far less subject to vandalism at Birch Park. Ken Johnson suggested perhaps putting the building at Birch Park and pulling the trailer from there to Country Lakes. Marty Asleson commented that he thought Birch Park was a better choice for placement of the building, and that Country Lakes may need to be re-designed in the future. MOTION: Ray Johnson made a motion to put into effect the project tracking sheet criteria for every park development from here on in the City of Lino Lakes. The motion was seconded by Candy Toffoli. After a brief discussion a vote was taken. All were in favor. The motion passed. MOTION: Ray Johnson made a motion to accept the building from Shoreview and locate it properly at Birch Park, and move the trailer currently at Birch Park to Country Lakes Park or wherever it can be moved to. Motion was seconded by Ken Johnson. All were in favor. The motion passed. Marty Asleson noted that crews will start to prepare the site and get the concrete slab down before it freezes. We should have the building sometime in October. 2 PARK BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 Underpass on Birch Street - Marty Asleson explained to the board that the original cost estimate by the engineers was way under the cost that came in from all the bids. The original cost was estimated at $60, 000, the low bid came in at $89, 255. The amount to come from park dedication funds was originally set at $24, 000 however, with the higher cost this amount was adjusted up to $31, 989 . Linda Elliott reported that because of the shortened time frame, the City Council has already acted on this matter and approved the expenditure of the $31, 989 . Construction of the underpass started today and should be completed in approximately three weeks. Candy Toffoli commented that she sees the trails in the Birchwood Acres development are being used a lot with all the activity surrounding the new Rice Lake School. Ken Johnson asked if all of the additional $7989. was going to be coming solely from dedicated park funds. Linda Elliott says she will get a break-down of the cost share. Ken Johnson commented that he thinks the County should be more involved in sharing the costs here, after all this is a County road. He feels that although safety and transportation issues should be a concern of the County and the City, the prime responsibility should be borne by the school. Ray Johnson stated that he wants to go on record that he disagrees with dedicated park funds in excess of $24, 000 being spent for the underpass construction. " $24, 000 is all the park board agreed to. " MOTION: Ray Johnson made a motion that any amount exceeding $24, 000 spent on construction of the Birch Street underpass should be replaced to the dedicated park fund. The motion was seconded by Jacquelyn Farm. All were in favor. Motion carried. Marty Asleson suggested that those who feel the County should bear more financial responsibility for this underpass should contact their County Commissioner and express their feelings. Summerfest - Marty Asleson gave a follow up report on the Summerfest. He reported it was a success. All comments were positive and he has heard from a lot of residents who want to be involved in the festival next year. Linda Elliott explained that the council will be considering how extensively they will be involved in next years celebration. Funding of the event is the biggest consideration. Other Old Business - Ray Johnson commented that he has a number of concerns and questions regarding items he read about in Council and Planning and Zoning board minutes and also some questions regarding things he has noticed in the city that could be addressed under Old Business. They are: 3 PARK BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 1. Park Dedication for the following: subdivision (lot split) request at 985 Birch St. - Royal Oaks Realty, the addition to Northern Instruments building at 6680 Hwy 49, site remodeling and paving of parking area for Buys Chiropractic at 7661 Lake Drive, and for a lot split on Sunset Drive and North Road requested by J. MacNeil. Marty Asleson will research this and bring his findings to the next park board meeting. 2 . Youth Committee - Mr. Johnson inquired as to the status of the formation of a youth committee as discussed at previous meetings. Marty Asleson says he has had some inquiries from a few interested teens and hasn't had enough time recently to follow up on it. He explained that there has not been a lot of interest shown for a committee such as this. There was a notice in the last recreation brochure asking interested youth to contact the parks and recreation department. 3 . Marshan Shores Park - Mr. Johnson wanted to know where the park boundary is supposed to be in the Shores of Marshan Lake development. He has noticed that traffic is coming and going across what is supposed to be park land. Marty Asleson will see that an orange fence and signage is put up to keep traffic away from the proposed park area. 4 . Forestry - Ray Johnson reports that he saw a man marking trees for oak wilt yesterday and when he inquired as to what the man was doing, was told that he was hired by the City. Marty Asleson explained that two people from the Kunde Company (a professional forestry service) were hired using cost share dollars to mark trees for the City. Ray wanted to know what will be accomplished by doing this. Marty explained that the vibratory plow will be sent to the areas marked by the end of September. Department staff is currently in the process of putting together a letter to residents involved. NEW BUSINESS• Brochures - Fall and Winter Programs - Marty Asleson referred the board members to the Parks and Recreation Department Fall and Winter brochure they received in their packets. This brochure was sent out to all Lino Lakes city residents two weeks ago. Marty explained the offerings and that some programs were being dropped for lack of registration such as kids soccer, and others such as kidsercise, karate and aerobics are a big hit again this year. Marty Asleson asked the board to contact him if they have any suggestions for future brochures. Ray Johnson commented that the VFW will be offering gun safety classes at City Hall for three Saturday mornings in October. This 4 PARR BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 will possibly be coordinated and run through our parks and recreation programs next year. Report on discussion of wetlands, trails, park land acquisition and development with Army Corps of Engineers - Marty Asleson reported on a recent visit he had with Joe Feller and Tom Yanta of the Army Corps of Engineers. Marty felt that with the on going changes with regards to wetlands and land use , it might help to clear up some confusion if he were to visit personally with the Corps. He reports that trail issues and connecting trail systems are being scrutinized by the Corps. An example of how much and how often the laws change is evidenced by the Park Grove development. It seems that when a developer starts out the laws are one way and then changed before he finishes the project. Marty feels that in order to get the end result hoped for, the city must take a more pro active role and possibly get involved in the physical lay out of the trails. He also suggests that the City rather than the developer go through the permit process in respect to particular areas where fill is allowed with permitted use. The surface water management plan currently being worked on will also be very helpful in dealing with the Corps for future projects. Marty will try to set up a similar meeting with people from the Rice Creek Watershed District. There was no other new business. ADJOURN• A motion to adjourn was made and seconded. All were in favor. Meeting was adjourned at 8 : 15 pm. 5 A — � AIP4T' PAUL PUJrL!C; SCHOOL DISTRICT #675 c �F \ el f/1- 360 Ct-LBORNE STREET SAINT PAUL, XN 55102-3299 AU --�Y� (612) 293-5100 ZDD --- C PUBLIC SCHOOLS FAX NLrgM: (bit) 293-5374 }ate Tine ,17 � ,�� .�-�' -''ems� —� -�- �- -, -*��'_° "�"'' •`'�'' �;�=v�- - — der ot M— (inclu im +coyar shad): - i ✓" r�°c �� �` t 3 jJ G IL I f Ilk PAJIL. M3 lvl��,SG rA 551^? i'J�ly • TOTHL P.Ell t SAINT FAUL FUBLLU SCHOOL DISTRICT A625 360 COLBORNE STREET t 1 SAINT PAUL, MN 55102-3299 (612) 293-5100 knu PUBLIC SCHOOLS FAX NUMBER. (612) 293-5374 FAMMILE 18hMITALc Date !� Tise: f 7b. r Fax Pb=e Departxaatl0f f iL--- Tel hme number: Number of pages (f=iudUV cover ishect): -y 6_ NAP LJ _ sty *t�s""T�,�r.; • a i f': = lr E >ST``' - ST PAUL. M4111,41NESOTA 55102=3 TATHL P.01 SAINT PAUL PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT #625 -r 360 COLBORNE STREET a SAINT PAUL, MN 55102-3299 (612) 293-5100 C— FAX NV : (6121 293-5374 mcsimilz =s m Date:Tis t: .......,�.�._.._ Fax Pie: ....�.�. .._ rrox: Tmlephme r.- der ct des (including cow"r sheet): "66 AL r i4 Lei'--L ffi} .; �-� '>-s�",y t�= _.�r�'f ..,,��--� //'�'�y' ', .i ter' '° -+� ��' �� _.i;-L-'C1•-����` ' :r F ] n x, aT. Ys�L Nh�S�.Ta 551C!.-32� +qr.� � 6-'�G. t.Y_�e,r"�✓,�.�� TOTHL -F-.0j , "ZI) � .-� Jacquelyn, These are some names I have come up with that may be worth a try for the foundation: Harold Bisel (former Mayor) 6381 - 20th Ave. Lino Lakes, Mn 55038 426-1337 John Kenney (resident and owner of Captain Ken's Beans) 6299 Red Maple Lane Lino Lakes, Mn 55014 484-7232 Mick Corbett, President Firstar Hugo Bank 14431 Forest Blvd. No. Hugo, Mn 55038 The bank in Lino is a branch of this one. Gary Uhde (developer/builder- currently doing Apollo Meadows is a member of the City Economic Development Advisory Committee) 3825 - 85th Ave. No. Brooklyn Park, Mn 55443 424-8559 Roger Hokanson (Developer-Wenzel Farms/Also owns Hokanson Plbg. ) Hokanson Development 9174 Isanti St. - NE Blaine, Mn 55434 784-4792 Tom Molin (resident) Molin Concrete 415 Lilac St. Lino Lakes, Mn 55014 Art Hawkins (resident) 6102 Centerville Rd. Lino Lakes, Mn 55110 n� MEMORANDUM TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Marty Asleson DATE: October 1, 1992 SUBJECT: Minor Subdivisions/Park Considerations I have placed the minor subdivisions that were in question last meeting back on the agenda. I have asked Mary Kay Wyland to address this issue in a letter to the park board. Since she was a new employee, she was unaware that the park board reviewed minor subdivisions. She is now aware of this policy. Also, as Mary alludes to in her letter, there has been some confusion with minor additions to major commercial buildings. Our dedication ordinance spells out , for instance, that $133 . 00 shall be appropriated for each 1000 square feet of proposed building for uses as: 1 . ) warehousing 2 . ) Low labor intensive light manufacturing/assembly/one or less employee per 1000 square feet of structure 3 . ) Other low labor intensive uses (please see enclosed copy of ordinance) The confusion starts when a company such as Northern Instruments submits a request to build a "garage" onto their building. Let' s talk about this. CY5 Td-u- O.Ro I � � e ir �' / / / ' //// /• / / / /i �k<k CEHCuT GUOCak io loorG —� 17ooq Sr. —At TeR.sr. � I j sr,a� �r2nerz ,zeeF / yam i"y , /,/• ' -/.,/ � / /�i 1F,M10 o� •� Ge GR�.TC A Roa �00 O - / Exrsr... � DRIVE • r I :Jle Dhtut . Opp _. i1.o� 4.v �R�.►*� ..3 Cs+ G.Qf�-,�-b — O W"J�P Wv.AJ � N QAGCESS _ >.0 32.zP ° P. �.. ' L LINO ,'AIR PARK NORTH E O• _ I R 9 t" , — — � � _J 15 3 14 3 15 M 13 U I '. SUB. 2 13 14 4 s' 5 7 8 9 q 11 I 5 6 7 8 9 IG I 12 I ! ^'\C L NO. 134 ^^11 I+ /�i r4v 5 ' �. T• 5 5 5 6 ` LINO LAKES �I i • F REHABILITATION CENTER wwwi: �-i 2 6 7 92 31 2 fo 1 4 3 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 + l 2 3 4 5 G ' 1 av HO. AUD- � SU& �. •-. a e�. I I ! > , ;n�cS,{5 �„_, ,' MARSHAN LAKE le .a .• .1 � 1 I II ! I ; a1,T .�� �aY`C ,. 1. I • AA >j �> QQ�y\ -LAKE. > ; - $ .Ir> • ♦ • "1'<•':J bl % JR¢u x c , Vi� '3 ' .� � •i+°' � s /.wo.ac i i �, ass �,��� ,� v1Ew Will .. /O; RICE AKE RESHAN > s PAnK �__..__.__...n.,. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS SOo W. HWY. 96 314 OM'OT. 1e 4TH Aft S.L ST. PAUL 12, MINN. SAUK c6mE, MINN. ST. CLOUD. MINN. 494.3301 352.366W• 2S1.79¢1 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report s prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duty Registered land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1 16 1969 —�`�.�®�� =�1�-t•-�.. Reg. No 9051 Date��y_..... ' — ' a � sue- I �=� I • o •z .66 -�•- ems, f,'�y f.�;» � t i �.05� � AXE D�ivE" V Lot 10, Block 7, LEXINGT©N PARK UAKE VIEW, Anoka County, Minnesota subject to easement of record. i i G�-?d7 a-a l MEMORANDUM TO: Marty Asleson - Park & Recreation FROM: Mary Ray Wyland - Planning Coordinator DATE: September 30, 1992 SUBJECT: Park Dedication and Planning Items This memo is in response to concerns expressed by the Park Board at their September 8th, 1992 meeting. ,.� Two simple subdivisions were reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board in the recent past. One involved the split of one lot into two at 985 Birch Street and the other involved the split of one lot into three on North Road. It was the understanding of the Planning Department that approval for these two subdivisions included payment of the required Park Dedication Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. The request involving Northern Instrument did not address Park Dedication nor did the paving of a parking area for Buys Chiropractic. City Staff will be addressing the issue of Park Dedication and a procedure to follow in relation to simple subdivisions and commercial additions at their next Project Management Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, October 7th. At this time we do not have a clear cut procedure for these matters and it has lead to some confusion for staff. I will be happy to submit something in writing for review by the Park Board after this Project Management Meeting. If you, or the Park Board have any additional questions regarding this matter, please let me know. REF:mk42 1285 W. Minnehaho Ave, Registered land Svrveyor Phone 646-2179 • �+1 St. Pavl, Minn. 55104 . Scala 1 inch./-I / PLAT OF SURVEY O Indicatca ,Iron � � OF PROPERTY OF '�`; ducribcdasfollows, That part of 1Toyernment Lot 2 ud (joyernment _Lot 4. 9ection 30 . Township 31 garee 22 `Anoka County-, Minnesota described as fnilowe Commencirw, at the Northwest corner of said oyernment i,ot 2, thence Nort `'� ' ' - ''he North line of Lot 2 a distance of 817.09 feet a distance of 677.23 feet to the point of r n to be described; thence worth 44. 17, West RICE t_Athence !North S'ior. F 1 feet to rr L � �. oac. 1,o t 2, C G shore terly 6H \\ i c t s�lorc id tq o 2 ` 76� �z6 so• . �Va�VY�I ray' I � �� 5 3 •� 96 76� ;d o� N 50 /-I 6.64 �89.S5 59 /Y .4.4 7 "V� _ 0 67923' CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF BUILDING C>RTIFICATE OF SURVEY �y I herrby certify that on ABC'• a26 19 69 I her"y certify that on Vie• e7 , I9.62 1 made a survey of the proposed location of the buildin4 1 sun•eyed the property described above and that the above on the above described property and that the location of plat is a correct representation of said survey, and there tsid building is trees! ow on he abov plm are no encroach tcept as shown h<, n. t CERTIFICATE OF SURVE , MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS ISM W. Nw. 96 314 J11T. 1.0H Aft S.L ST. PAUL 12, MINN. SAUK C"E, MINN. IT. CLOUD, MINN. 494.3301 352.3664• lS1.17i EL I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report s prepared by me or under my diraet supervision and Mat I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Reg. No 1 9051 Date_July 1969 16, I yw loe..rE'c: /.f i �� LAXE D.eivE' • V Lot 10, Block 7, LEXINGTON PARK BAKE VIEW, Anoka County, Minnesota subject to easement of record. i F loll s H cl Mel si 6 ` r w i ._ f �r 124 J + 7 at if M Mattke Engineering, Inc. 7671 Central Ave. N.E. • Fridley, MN 55432 . (612) 783-0300 Sentember 15, 1992 City of Lino Lakes C/o Mr. Marty Asleson, Parks 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes , MN 55014 Re: Revised Park Proposal, Park Grove Dear Mr. Asleson: Mr. Richard Carlson asked me to write this letter detailing our park proposal, revised to meet the Park Board wishes. We are proposing to dedicate 6.61 acres of land, including 3.68 acres outside of the drainage easements which contain wetlands. In addition, we are providing a trail along the north property line as far as King Fisher Place, and out to Hawthorn Road. A trail is also provided along the south property line as far as the west line of, Lot 8, Block 5. The park access has been increased to 20 feet in width as per the Park Board request. The park land outside of the drainage easement will be leveled for use as a play field, and seeded. In addition, $28,783.20 will be provided in cash, calculated as follows: Total Land (Park Grove and Pine Ridge) 77 Acres Total Lots 138 ------------------------------------------------- Lots Per Acre (138/77) 1.79 Park Land Contribution 3 .68 Acres X 10 36.8 Acres Land for Cash Contribution Required: 77 Acres - 36.8 Acres = 40.2 Acres Cash Contribution Required: 40. 2 X 1. 79 X $400 = $28,783.20 If you have any questions, please give me a call. r Sincerely, Tedd Mattke, P.E. cc. Richard S. Carlson • Residential & Commercial Development Hydrology • Water Resources • Municipal AGENDA ITEM # 4-B MEMORANDUM TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Marty Asleson DATE: September 4, 1992 SUBJECT: Project Tracking Please find enclosed a copy of a project tracking sheet that Jeff Schoenbauer has developed. I believe that this process will help us as staff, park and recreation board and city council get a better overview of proposals as needs arise. Since there were some planning variables that presented themselves as we as staff discussed the acquisition and move of the Shoreview building, Jeff suggested using this form. Jeff will be at the meeting to demonstrate how this may be meshed with comprehensive planning in Lino Lakes parks. r1 4 ►T1 [ FtT:[ 1E^ L ; 1+ P PROJECT#: 92-1 PROJECT.- Park Building from City of Shoreview. DATE OF ORIGIN:August 31, 1992 TO: Parks & Recreation Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: • The City of Shoreview has given the City of Lino Lakes the opportunity to purchase one of their older park buildings for $1.00 to make way for a new facility. • The building is a hexagon shape about 30' across (approximately 400 s.f.) • The inside of the building is open, with no interior walls. The ceiling has exposed trusses with lights. The entire structure has been insulated and is usable for winter activities. • One side of the building has a roll-up garage door. • The building requires a concrete slab for a base. No footings should be required, except perhaps for the center support. • Although older, the building has been well taken care of and is in reasonably good shape. STAFF COMMENTS/ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: • The building provides an opportunity for the City to acquire an older but structurally sound building for virtually no cost. • The total estimated cost associated with relocating the building is between $4,900 and $7,800, including the following: 1) Transport from Shoreview to selected site in Lino Lakes: $2,500 to $5,000 (rough estimate- not confirmed). 2) Site preparation: $800.00. 3) Concrete footing and slab: $1,600 to $2,000 4) Utilities (electric, water, etc.): either already available or at a latter date. • At this time, staff sees two district options for locating the building: Country Lakes Park(C-1) and Birch Park(N-1 1). Other possibilities may exist. • At Country Lakes Park,the building could be used for a changing room,concessions,and warming house, meeting room, and/or storage. Positive Attributes: 1) Serves an immediate need by better serving those using the park, particularly the beach area. 2) It could provide the impetus for additional improvements, such as upgrading the beach area. 3) May allow for more joint-use of the facility between the School District and the City. Negative Attributes: 1) May not be the best long-term solution for the park since the building is somewhat limited in regard to function, size, and all-around usability. 2) Architectural style may not be what is desired for this park. • At Birch Park, the building would replace the temporary warming house. It would also allow for some additional year-round use (e.g., recreation programs and storage). Positive Attributes: 11 Permanently replaces a temporary facility with a sound structure. 2) Provides additional use opportunities and storage space. Parks & Recreation Board 1 City of Lino Lakes 3) Completes an important site development program element in a very cost effective way. Negative Attributes: 1) None. RECREATIONAL PROGRAMMING ISSUES:The following identifies potential impacts to current and future recreational programming: • Locating the building at Country Lakes would allow for more extensive use of the beach area for programmed swimming, skating, and other recreational activities. It could also be used for community picnics and events, although only to a limited degree given the nature and size of the building. • Since locating the building at Birch Park would serve the same general purpose as the temporary building, it would not affect programming to a large degree, although it would provide more space and perhaps additional opportunities for summer programs. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REFERENCES.Refer to the following references for information that may affect discussions related to this issue. Description Comment Section 2- Assessment of Lino Lakes Needs • Figures 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, Review popularity of swimming. & 2.6) Section 3 - Governing Polices • Page 3-4, Col. 1, Item 6 Review desire for quality development. :ection Page 3-5, Col. 2 and 3) Review goals and policies for interacting with the School District. 5- Administration • Page 5-10, Recreation Review goals of recreational programming. Programming Section 6 - Park and Trail System Plan • Page 6-15, Quality Review the need for quality development. Initiative • Pages 6-58/59, Birch Review park development programs for both parks. Park; Pages 6-68/69, Country Lakes Park Section 8 - Implementation • Figures 8.1 through 8.5 Review priorities for development. PARK&RECREATION BOARD COMMENTS:The following is a summary of the comments made by the Board: • Board member Ray Johnson felt that another negative attribute related to locating the building at Country Lakes Park is that a wood structure such as this would be subject to more vandalism than other types of buildings. PARK&RECREATION BOARD ACTION/POSITION STATEMENT.•The following consensus was reached by the Board: • Given the conditions stated above, a consensus was reached that the building should replace the temporary trailer currently located at Birch Park.The building is to be located in consideration of its long-term uses,including the potential for future expansion. • Concurrently, a consensus was reached to move the temporary trailer over to Country Lakes Park to serve the skating area.It is expected that it will be replaced at some point in the future when the park is further developed. FINAL VOTE COUNT.• Board Member Yes No George Lindy, Chair John Bauman Ken Johnson xxx _ Candy Toffoli xxx _ Brian Bourassa Jacquelyn Farm xxx _ Ray Johnson xxx _ FINAL VOTE DATE:Tuesday, September 8, 1992. Parks & Recreation Board 2 City of Lino Lakes DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION(IF NECESSARY): :ESIGN Non required. REVIEW BOARD ACTION DATE: N/A COUNCIL ACTION(IF NECESSARY): • .... pending .... :OUNCIL ACTION DATE.• .... pending .... PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS:The following defines staff observations related to actual implementation. This includes issues raised (and resolved)during implementation, general observations, and project outcome. • .... pending .... PROJECT FINAL COMPLETION DATE. .... pending .... Park, Recreation& Forestry Coordinator Date Parks & Recreation Board 3 City of Lino Lakes MEMORANDUM TO: All Park and Recreation Board Members FROM: Marty Asleson DATE: October 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Birch Park Building Please find attached an updated project tracking sheet no. 92-1. We are at this point in time under direction by the city council to meet the budget figures set forth in the proposal. We will try to do as much of the work in-house as possible to reduce costs. r ....... ............ .. .. ... ......... ..... .......... .......... .. ..... ... .. ................ ...... ::::.:.:.4 ........ ...... ... K IN ................................::::::::::::.::.,::.::::::.::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:..:...........................:::...:::::: ., : .... ..:::.:.....::.::::::: :........ PROJECT#: 92-1 PROJECT: Park Building from City of Shoreview. DATE OF ORIGIN: August 31, 1992 TO: Parks & Recreation Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: • The City of Shoreview has given the City of Lino Lakes the opportunity to purchase one of their older park buildings for $1.00 to make way for a new facility. • The building is a hexagon shape about 30' across(approximately 400 s.f.) • The inside of the building is open, with no interior walls. The ceiling has exposed trusses with lights. The entire structure has been insulated and is usable for winter activities. • One side of the building has a roll-up garage door. • The building requires a concrete slab for a base. No footings should be required, except perhaps for the center support. • Although older,the building has been well taken care of and is in reasonably good shape. STAFF COMMENTS/ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: • The building provides an opportunity for the City to acquire an older but structurally sound building for virtually no cost. • The total estimated cost associated with relocating the building is between $4,900 and $7,800, including the following: 1) Transport from Shoreview to selected site in Lino Lakes: $2500 to $5000 (rough estimate-not confirmed) 2) Site preparation: $800.00. 3) Concrete footing and slab: $1,600 to $2,000 4) Utilities (electric, water, etc.): either already available or at a latter date. • At this time,staff sees two district options for locating the building: Country Lakes Park(C-1) and Birch Park(N-1 1). Other possibilities may exist. • At Country Lakes Park,the building could be used for a changing room,concessions,and warming house,meeting room, and/or storage. Positive Attributes: 1) Serves an immediate need by better serving those using the park, particularly the beach area. 2) It could provide the impetus for additional improvements, such as upgrading the beach area. 3) May allow for more joint-use of the facility between the School District and the City. Negative Attributes: 1) May not be the best long-term solution for the park since the building is somewhat limited in regard to function, size, and all-around usability. 2) Architectural style may not be what is desired for this park. '�• At Birch Park, the building would replace the temporary warming house. It would also allow for some additional year-round use (e.g., recreation programs and storage). Positive Attributes: 1) Permanently replaces a temporary facility with a sound structure. 2) Provides additional use opportunities and storage space. Parks & Recreation Board 1 City of Lino Lakes 3) Completes an important site development program element in a very cost effective way. Negative Attributes: 1) None. XCREATIONAL PROGRAMMING ISSUES:The following identifies potential impacts to current and future recreational programming: • Locating the building at Country Lakes would allow for more extensive use of the beach area for programmed swimming, skating, and other recreational activities. It could also be used for community picnics and events, although only to a limited degree given the nature and size of the building. • Since locating the building at Birch Park would serve the same general purpose as the temporary building,it would not affect programming to a large degree, although it would provide more space and perhaps additional opportunities for summer programs. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REFERENCES.Refer to the following references for information that may affect discussions related to this issue. Description Comment Section 2- Assessment of Lino Lakes Needs • Figures 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, Review popularity of swimming. & 2.6) Section 3 -Governing Polices • Page 3-4, Col. 1, Item 6 Review desire for quality development. • Page 3-5, Col. 2 and 3) Review goals and policies for interacting with the School District. Section 5- Administration • Page 5-10, Recreation Review goals of recreational programming. Programming Section 6- Park and Trail System Plan Page 6-15, Quality Review the need for quality development. Initiative • Pages 6-58/59, Birch Review park development programs for both parks. Park; Pages 6-68/69, Country Lakes Park Section 8 - Implementation • Figures 8.1 through 8.5 Review priorities for development. PARK&RECREATION BOARD COMMENTS:The following is a summary of the comments made by the Board: • Board member Ray Johnson felt that another negative attribute related to locating the building at Country Lakes Park is that a wood structure such as this would be subject to more vandalism than other types of buildings. PARK&RECREATION BOARD ACTION/POSITION STATEMENT.-The following consensus was reached by the Board: • Given the conditions stated above, a consensus was reached that the building should replace the temporary trailer currently located at Birch Park.The building is to be located in consideration of its long-term uses, including the potential for future expansion. • Concurrently, a consensus was reached to move the temporary trailer over to Country Lakes Park to serve the skating area.It is expected that it will be replaced at some point in the future when the park is further developed. FINAL VOTE COUNT.• Board Member Yes No George Lindy, Chair John Bauman Ken Johnson xxx _ Candy Toffoli xxx Brian Bourassa _ Jacquelyn Farm xxx _ ''Ray Johnson xxx FINAL VOTE DATE.•Tuesday, September 8, 1992. Parks & Recreation Board 2 City of Lino Lakes DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION(IF NECESSARYI: • Non required. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION DATE. N/A COUNCIL ACTION(IF NECESSARY): 7 • Approved COUNCIL ACTIONDATE.• .... endi all PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS:The following defines staff observations related to actual implementation. This includes issues raised (and resolved) during implementation, general observations, and project outcome. Low quote for moving the building came in at $2600. Engineering strongly recommends the use of frost footings. Staff contacted an engineering firm to cost estimate and draw specifications and plans for this work. the following list breaks this down: 1) Preliminary project review:$286.88 2) Preliminary project survey:$304.70 3) Prepare plans and specifications for concrete floor:$1700 4) Provide construction staking and observation for concrete floor:$445.30 Coordinate with Geotechnical Engineering firm for site review:$963.12 - I i 5) Provide preliminary design information for future driveway access and sidewalk to shelter:$100 tX4✓ Estimated Total :$3800.00 PROJECT FINAL COMPLETION DATE.• ....pending .... /8N Park, Recreation&Forestry Coordinator Date Parks & Recreation Board 3 City of Lino Lakes Lj MEMORANDUM TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Marty Asleson DATE: October 1, 1992 SUBJECT: Trails I have installed our existing trials into a Data Base. I have not as of yet developed a map section system. This guide will help us to cost track and assign maintenance to these trails. One segment that us not on this inventory is the Rice Lake Lane/Ulmer Drive to Wenzel Farms trail. This trail should be roughed in this week and paved this week. 0 , Comprehensive Trails System Guide Lino Lakes Parks and Recreatiuon 1990-1994 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Map I I Facility Data I Treatments I 1990 I 1991 I 1992 I 1993 I 1994 I ISectionlTrail Segment I------------------------I----------------------I----------------I----------------I----------------I----------------I----------------I I I I Year Length Sq. Yds. I Work Year Cost I Work Cost I Work Cost I Work Cost I Work Cost I Work Cost I II--------------------I------------------------I----------------------I----------------I----------------I----------------I----------------I----------------I I IGlenv-Srpk I 92 149 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 150 Egret-woods I 91 188 I I I I I I I I 190 Egret-woods I 91 173 I I I I I I I I 110 Wdrge-BOL. Igravel 160 I I I I I I I I 221 Wdrge-woods Igravel 190 I I I I I I I IHaw-Lonpin-Coyote Igravel 1722 I I I I I I I IW Shad Lk-culvert I 92 1038 I ( I I I I I I IHok-Tom I 92 1412 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ITom-Hoka I 92 1427 I I I I I I I IMorndov-Antelop I 91 260 I I I I I I IPrarift-tunnel Igravel 167 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Fawn Ln-culvert I 91 442 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (Fawn Ln-nwdev I 91 1227 I I I I I I I IChkcher-whttaiL-brchlgraveL 1210 I I I I I I I I IPheasthLs ent Igravel 650 I IKingfis-tunnel Igravel 1125 1 ITomahk-tunneL 1 92 1030 I I I I I I I Comprehensive Trails System Guide Lino Lakes Parks and Recreatiuon 1990-1994 IRceLk EL-1 92 1256 IRceLk EL-2 92 1181 jRceLk EL-3 I 92 823 IRceLk EL-4 92 1731 IRceLk EL-5 1 92 1730 1 � \ f s CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE Wednesday, September 1, -19192 TIME STARTED : 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT.. Gelbmann, Landers, Mesich, Nordine, Robinson, Sehaps, Slatten MEMBERS: ABSENT None ALSO. PRESENT Planna.ng Consultant:.Erix<ius,, -City Engineer Schneider, Staff Person :Ayland I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 12, 1992 Al Robinson moved and was supported by Tom Mesich to approve the minutes of the August 12, 1992 meeting as submitted. All voted aye. Motion carried. Mr. Mesich indicated that they had not received all pages of Ordinance No. 92-85 concerning Location of New Development in the Council Minutes and he would like to have the whole copy. He also asked if it would be possible to get their copies of the Council minutes a little sooner. Mary Kay stated she would check on this and mail out the minutes rather than holding them for the Agenda Packets. III. OPEN MIKE: No one was present for Open Mike. IV. ACTION ITEMS: A. 92-42-S, Northern Natural Gas, 8198 20th Ave. , Site Plan Mary Kay Wyland reviewed this request which is to construct a 6 x 9 EFM Building and a 12 x 16 Meter Building on an easement located on the northern boundary of the City just east of 20th Avenue. The Staff recommended approval of the request provided proper building permits are obtain and a landscape plan be provided and approved screening the site from the roadway. 1 r PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES September 9, 1992 Kathy Nordine asked if any noticeable noise would be generated from this use and was advised that there should be none. Al Robinson asked if the Gas Company did any "burning off" . The applicant stated that they were not aware of any such procedure. Tom Mesich asked if any residential development was proposed for this area and advised that it would be some time before development reached this area. MOTION: Rick Gelbman moved and was supported by Tom Mesich to approve the request with the conditions listed in the staff report. All voted aye. Motion carried. B. 92-39-PDO, Quail Ridge, Subdivision/PDO Planning Consultant Brixius reviewed this request which had been tabled at the August 12th Planning & Zoning Board Meeting and discussed at a P & Z Work Session on August 20th. At the Work Session the P& Z Board members suggested some revisions to the plan. Those revisions have been made and the item returned for P & Z action. The request is to plat 40 acres off Birch Street between Lakes Addition & the future 12th Avenue into approximately 41 lots. The staff recommended approval with the conditions outlined in the original report and the additional conditions outlined following the August 20th meeting. Those conditions are contained in the staff report of September 10, 1992 . MOTION: After some discussion Al Robinson recommended approval of the request with the conditions outlined in the staff report. Monika Slatten seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. C. 92-31-PDO, Park Grove, Subdivision/PDO Planning Consultant Brixius reviewed this request which is to allow platting of 80 lots on a 45 acre parcel. This parcel has had extensive review by the City and the current proposal has received approval from the RCWD and the Corp. of Engineers. Staff would recommend approval with the conditions outlined in the Staff Report of 9-4-92 . Ted Mattke, Engineer for the project, explained that the wetland has been expanded from the previously presented plats in response to concerns from the Corp. of Engineers. Rick Gelbman asked why the staff was concerned about triangular lots and was advised by Mr. Brixius that lots perpendicular to the roadway are easier to maintain proper setback require- ments. Monika Slatten expressed concern about lots which do not meet the minimum requirements for the R-1X Zoning District. Rick Gelbman stated that there is a bind here in regard to what was approved for Pine Ridge (adjoining this 2 f • r. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 Plat) and what is now being required of Park Grove. Some of the rules and regulations have changed in the recent past. City Engineer Schneider stated that from an Engineering standpoint, we would favor more lots to bear the costs of utilities. He added that the developer has cooperated with the drainage concerns for the site. MOTION: Tom Mesich recommended approval of the preliminary plat with the requirements outlined in the staff report of September 4, 1992 with the exception of #2 and the additional condition that Provision of an erosion control plan that includes the following items: 1. Provision of silt fences around disturbed areas susceptible to erosion until such time as the area is sodded. 2 . Sodding be provided for the entire yard or disturbed land prior to issuance of occupancy permits or within six months of construction occurring during winter months. 3 . Developer shall escrow a financial security for an amount 1. 5 times the cost of sodding all disturbed areas of land in the plat. 4. The Park Grove development contract will include these provisions for erosion control and security. Al Robinson seconded the motion. On Roll Call: Ayes - Gelbman, Landers, Mesich, Robinson Nays - Nordine, Slatten Motion carried. V. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Wenzel Farms - Townhomes This item was tabled until the next meeting of the P & Z Board. B. Clyde Rehbein - Mr. Rehbein advised the P & Z that he was interested in developing some property south of Baldwin Lake owned by the. Ayres Family. He presented two possible street layouts and discussed dedication of a portion of the area to the City for park purposes. The P & Z indicated that the cul de sac arrangement seemed better suited to the property and encouraged Mr. Rehbein to present a preliminary plat for their review. Sewer and water services are available to serve this property. 3 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 C. Kathy Nordine questioned the City Code regarding fences around swimming pools. At this time if the pool has under a certain number of gallons, no fence is required. She suggested that we may want to consider a revision of this rule in the future. D. Mr. Landers suggested that the City may want to consider regulating/licensing realtors or agents who work within the City to try to prevent the misrepresentation that occurred in the Reshanau Lake area. Kathy Nordine stated that this could be a duplication of efforts as the state currently licenses realtors. Mr. Brixius also questioned how we would police such an ordinance. E. NOVEMBER MEETING: The November regular meeting of the P & Z Board is scheduled on a holiday, therefore, the meeting will be changed to Thursday, November 12th at 6:30 P.M. VI. ADJOURNMENT Upon the unanimous consent of the Board the meeting was adjourned at 8: 10 P.M. 4 - V SAINT PA` L PUBLIC SCHOOL vio*mTCT 9625 r• �; 360 COLBORNE STREET SAINT PALrL, C,UI 557 -32`9 �l (612) i93--5I00 LEARM -pusuc Elk (612) 293-5374 W I 4 • Date, Tize: rMhe_ - Telerphaml f pear.aq j '-1 i- cover sheet) - € pi1 f t 1n i'"R C- TOTHL P.01 CLYDE RENBEIN r'1 C.R. INVESTMENTS 7309 LAKE DRIP€ LINO LAM, MINNESOTA $5014 October 1, 1992 City of Lino Lakes 1169 !Bain Strcut Lino Lakes, MN o014 Dear Part BoArd Members: This letter is to explain ti-e park portlot of proposed plat of The Woods of H advin Late. Under city practice, the 10 acres to be developed into !4 lots would require part atior. of 10 of the land or 9SOO.00 per lot. Following discussions wilh The City Staffs we have come, forward w:xh a proposal that au'd provide 2-29 acres of park land Instead of rOt of the 'arid the vall3k of this park land �ao�s d 6e far in extess of SSOO.00 per lots I stress, however, that this proposal is contingent upon approval by the City Council of the ba=$r-lee of the ;eras o aTussed btttean the City Staff and ayself. 'he baiance of these teres inn lade deferral of assessment charge charqts in c Fha ge fof coc�et oc*son of rublic iepr v►eaea�#5 and dedication of addt iooa park land= l believe this should -clarify fot° yo.0 thy the proposed plat contaiws parkland beyond what would be normally required. 'if have any further questions, , - _a c l F „a St at 764-4063. Sincerely, Clyde Rehbein /plg MEMORANDUM TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Marty Asleson DATE: October 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Comp Plan Implementation As per discussion item no. 5E, I have enclosed copies of the comprehensive park plan , implementation section. Please review the priorities set forth in the acquisition and development sections in particular. The comp plan has just gone to print, and we should have copies in the near future. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 612 291-6359 FAX 612 291-6550 77Y 612 291-0904 September 11, 1992 Marty Asleson City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Amendment Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide Metropolitan Council District 7 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14120-8 Dear Mr. Asleson: The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the city's plan amendment received by the Council on August 31, 1992. We have determined that the proposed amendment has no potential impact upon any of the metropolitan system plans. Therefore, the city may place the amendment into effect immediately. Because the proposed amendment appears unlikely to affect policies and plans in other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide, the Council will waive further review and comment on this amendment. The amendment, explanatory materials supplied and the information submission form will be appended to the city's plan in the Council's files. This concludes the Council's review. Sin erely, Mary E. Berson Chair MEA:ro cc: Esther Newcome, Metropolitan Council District 7 Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council Staff Robert Overby, Metropolitan Council Staff on 8-implementation Plan City of Leto Lakes Section 8 Implementation Plan The forthcoming implementation plan establishes a changes is priorities are tracked over time. systematic approach(Le,Implementation Planning Process) for prioritizing the acquisition and This is particularly important in a municipal setting OVeMew development of the various park system since the individuals involved in the reevaluation components. process are often appointees whose terms are finite. Having an established process will allow new mplementation of the Park System Plan will be Since the pace of community development and appointees to readily participate in reevaluating ►ngoing, long-term process, which, to be groom the, availability of funding. and changes in priorities. require: recreational trends and needs cannot be predicted ssK will with certainty,it is important to understand that the strong belief among city residents that a Priorities established herein should be reevaluated at least once each year by the Parks& Recreation Implementation Planning �mprehensive park system enhances the quality Board, city staff j and other appropriate P life within the community and makes it a bodies. PProP governing Process gyre desirable place in which to lim willingness by city residents to invest in the Given its importance, it is vital that those involved . y's future. in reevaluating priorities follow the same process The process of preparing an implementation plan each time to ensure that: involves a number of important steps that are defined as follows: *mmitted and persistent effort by the various long-term continuity in the decision making verning bodies,city staff,and most importantly process is achieved. city residents to see the Park System Plan ough the various implementation phases. rivet City of Lino Lakes • typical development costs (in 1992 dollars) as determined by industry cost-to-construct Step L`Ddermine the I Wmated/Propcted Costa averages CLe.,what it would cost on average for Step 3: Determine the Priority Ranking for Associated with the Acquisition and Development a contractor to come in and do the work). Acquisition and Development of Park Land of the Various Park System Canpooeats Additionally,the cost estimate for each park is based on that paws optimal level of development - as By using the previously established evaluation Although not an exact science,estimating the costs defined in the park plates in Sew 7-and therefor criteria as a basis for discussion, the priority associated with developing the park system is do not mflect the affect that funding limitations may rankings can be determined.The evaluation criteria important in that it provides the city with a basic have on their development. are intended to help define what the compelling understanding as to the economic commitment that reasons were for ranking one park above or below will be required over a period of time to implement It is also important to note that the cost estimates another. the park system plan. are based on each parles current condition and does not consider the costs associated with replacing If, for example, the community wants to see the Additionally, the estimated cost of developing one existing facilities and amenities that are currently in existing parks upgraded,it then becomes reasonable park or recreational facility versus another will reasonable shape but may 'wear-out" in the to expect that upgrading existing parks will rank undoubtedly affect how they are prioritized and fit forthcoming years.These its should be factored very high on the priority list. into the citfs overall development scheme, in as appropriate when the cost estimates for each - park are updated in the future. fure &2 defines the General Fmd'mgs and It should be recognized that the cost figures are for Park Land Acquisition and = intended to be used only as benchmarks for Figure 83 and 8A-Priority Ranking Matrices and Development The text represents a summary of the budgeting purposes.Actual costs will depend upon: Figure 85-Phasing Program/Implemcatation Plan Advisory Committees recommendations for park illustrate the estimated acquisition and development land acquisition and development • the actual land values at the.time of acquisition. costs for each component of,the park system. Figures 83 and 8A illustrate the Priority Ranking • the actual program for development at the time Matrices for Park Land Acquisition and of development based on community and Step 2 Determine Enlnatlon Criteria for Devdopmcnt as well as the derived priority neighborhood input ft;wkWngParkLu dAogni�andDevekl ment rankings. • site specific physical characteristics (such as The priority rankings are based on actual and grades, sons, availability of utilities, etc.) The priority ranking of individual park sites,relative perceived community needs and demands that are m affecting the development of each park. to other park sites within the Lino Ickes Park present within Lino Lakes at this time.Naturally,the System, is based on and evaluated against criteria conditions or circumstances that impact the priority • the actual construction costs at the time of derived from factors which affect park land rankings may (or may not) change within an development acquisition and development undefinable timebrame. • what portion of the costs for acquisition and The criteria must be broad based enough to In this light,and as previously stated,it is important development can be offset through alternative consider the important and predominant factors,yet that the priorities established herein be reevaluated .. funding programs: volunteerism, grants, limited enough to allow for a manageable and at least once each=by the Parks&Recreation donations,eta practical evaluation by which priority rankings for Board, city stag:, and other appropriate governing can be determined bodies to ensure that they are reflective of the The cost estimates are based on: conditions present within the community at that Figure 81 illustrates the C ditaia for Fiiaritizmg the point in time. • estimated land values (in 1992 dollars) as Acquisition and Development of Park Land. determined by the city. 8-2 nn 8-Implementation Plan City of Lino Lakes sure continuity in the priority ranking process, stablished evaluation criteria and matrices I be used as the basis for reevaluating the Step 4: Develop A Phasuogjlnmplementation Plan step I Capital)<mproMment Plan ty rankings. By doing so, Previous priority for Acquisition and Development of Park Land W can be used for comparison,justification iy revisions,and tracking changes over time. Through a process involving participation by the Based on the priority rankings and bmeframe Parks & Recreation Board, city staff, and City categories, a Phasmg/Implenatatatioa Plan can be Council, the mplementation Plan should k Develop Phasing Thnef ame Categories for developed which defines the optimal phasing of be further deduced to fit into the city's short and isition and Development of Park Land acquisition and development of specific parks and long-tam Capital Impmvement Plan(C3. facilities. The difference between the Phasing/Implementation ally,the acquisition and development of park The plan illustrates the priority rank and timeframe Plan as defined in this document and the C1P is that nust be phased so that the community's park in which specific projects should ideally be the latter puts the various park system improvement e creation needs are met in a timely fashion implemented based on the actual and perceived initiatives in the same contest as other community remaining within the cis ability to fiord the needs of the community. development initiatives. is projects. Naturally, it would be ideal to pursue the The transition fiom the Phasing f Implementation xomplish this objective, timeframes must be implementation of the park system plan in strict Plan to the C P is perhaps best defined as going fished that define the most appropriate time accordance with the established schedule.However, from the optimal-within the singular contest of the ich the various park development initiatives this desire must be balanced against the realities of park system's development-to the realistic-within I be undertaken. finding availability and other non-park related the more complex, multifaceted context of the j community needs. community`s overall development. imefranmes must be defined enough to be able yet flexible enough to allow adequate Ultimately, it will be the responsibility of the As would be expected,the availability and timing of p tunity for funding sources to evolve. implementing agencies CLe, Parks and Recreation finding from the various sources will have a direct Board and City Council) and city residents to and significant impact on how the Phasing/ illowing defines the Timeframe Categories for determine the pace in which implementation is Implementation Plan is incorporated into the CIP quisition and development of park land undertaken. Given the Phasing/Implementation Plan,along with xy#L•1992-IM Figure 85-Acquisition and Development Phasing/ the overall amount of finding that will be needed to ny#7:1996-2WO Implementation Plan illustrates each component of finance the park land acquisition and development ny#12WI-Beyond the park system in the order of their priority rank initiatives, the challenge to the community, and defines: governing bodies,and city staff will be to. Ad be expected,the timeframes become less " 1 as they are projected further into the future their estimated acquisition and development determine and evaluate the most appropriate because it becomes more difficult to costs and available financing sources or debt financing ine with certainty when the demand for a structure. park or facility will manifest itself optimal phasing/implementation,schedule Y: • determine the most appropriate use of the i the priority rankings,the timeframes must potential financing sources. available finding. iewed on a periodic basis and either led or modified as appropriate to ensure that • determine the most appropriate time to initiate evelopment is in line with the needs of the implementation of the park system plan. pity. 8-3 { EI YWHO 81, ttiteria for Prioritidng the Acquisition and Dcvelopmoat of Pads Land cRnDUMA FOR PRIORITIZING ACOUISTrION CRUERIA FOR PRIORITIZING DEVEIAPMF.NT The priority ranking of individual park sites,nehmw to the other park The priority ranking of individual park situ relative to the other park sites within the Lino Lakes Park System, is based on and evahiated sites within the Lino Lakes Park System,is based on and evakiated against 900g tea' against the following criteria. DEVELOPDIENT PATTERNS AND DEVELOPMENT PA118RNS AND POPUTATION GROW M/DENSiTY POPULATTON GROWIH/DENSITY Based on cwwa and amiapated development patterns and Based on ainent and anticipated residential developmentpattems and population growth/density, is acquisition warranted to provide popukWon gtowth/densi% is development warranted to service the adequate park land to service the future needs of the area? recreational needs of the area? LAND AVAHABH=/QOM C�OMQbIUNITY DEMAND Based on cuffmt needs assessment studies (i.e.- surveys, public Based on aitrent ownership,usage,availability(inckidingthepo(ential hearing, neighborhood meetings,etG�is then community(or service j for losing the pnVeny to other types of development),and land value, area)demand for deNelopmeentT is land acquisition watranted? COMMUNITY DEMAND RECREATIONAL PROGRAM NEEDS Based on aanmt needs assessment studies n e.- public Based on aunent and anticipated Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation o �o P� � Dgwtment and local associations p gfj`e»ngs and elated hearings,neighbontiood mneedrigs,etas is there community(or service facility use schedules, is there an adequate demand for additional area)demand for acquisition? facilities to warrant development of the park? PRESERVATION OF SIGNIRCANT NATURAL.RESOURCES REDEVELOPMBN'T/UPGRADING OF FACILITY s. Based on the environmental characteristics of the park site, is acqufsFtim warranted to protect significant natural resautces from Based on the current age, owrall quality,functioiy and safety of the a developm:antal encroachment? 4 ing facitides along with the as mw regional needs of the park's service areg is redevelopment andjor upgrading warranted? 8-4 n 8-Implementation Ptah My of Lino Lakes e 82(Fait 1 of 2). General Frmd ings and for Park Land AcguisiOion and Devdopma t )rthcoming text summaries the Advisory Committee's general findings and Acquisition of linear trail eomdors/easements rights should be undertaken unendations for park land acquisition and development.They are based on prior to (optimal) or coincide with the development of the surrounding perceptions and understanding as to the City of Lino Lakees current parks area The location of the corridors should be based on the parameters as creational needs and desires. set forth in this document and in accordance with city ordinance. qgs and Reconunendations for Park Land Aogagc Findings and Recamme for Park Land Devrl .n general, acquiring land for individual neighhborhood parka should be Since the overriding objective is to provide quality recreational opportunities undertaken prior to(if feasible) or coincide with the development of the for curma residents, the development of the parks that are in close airrounding area.The parcel should be selected on the basis of its quality proximity to established or developing neighborhoods were cited to be the 'or park purposes and location within the service area.Actual site selection top priorities.To this end,each existing park should be developed to a level should be based on the parameters as set forth in the individual park plates. that is consistent with their development program (as defined in the ro the extent possible,acquisition of land for neighborhood parks should individual park plates). Given current finding limitations, it should be )e accomplished through park dedication. expected that each park's development will likely occur over a number of phases-unless,of course,alternative funding sources can be secured(such ►fore specifically,acquiring land for neighborhood parks NA N I% M 2, as a park bond referendum and state grants).The priority rankings as listed 414 is considered a high priority since the land surrounding them has reflect the Advisory Committee's perception as to the relative order in zither already been developed or is near the development stage.At this which individual park improvement initiatives should be undertakm i! ime,it is anticipated that N-8 would be acquired through a long-term lease Ath the State.N 12&M 2 will likely be acquired through park dedication. An important note with respect to development priority rankings as set ►nd N-14 will likely have to be acquired through direct purchase. forth in this document is that they are not intended to dictate the use of the Park Department's parks maintenance budget.Dealing effectively with squiring land for A 1(the athletic complex near city hall)should ideally the general day-today maintenance concerns that arise through normal use ;cur in Phase I (1992-1995) to avoid inflated land values.The land will of the facilities should naturally take precedence over the development cely have to be acquired through direct purchase, priorities listed here.Additionally,small or individual development projects that improve the usability of any given park should,at the discretion of the Ithough land for A 3(athletic complex)will not be needed in the short Park Board and staff; take precedence over the development priorities rm,its long-term importance to the park system warrants its acquisition listed here.As an example, improving the warming house and adding a fore the opportunity is missed meaning being lost to other development skating rink at N 5 Lino Park are justifiable short-term projects since they the escalation of land values. To this end, the city should undertake would significantly improve the useability of the park - even though the gotiations with the current land owner during Phase I (1992-1995) to park is actually fairly low on the development priority list(#21). :ermine if some type of purchase arrangement-such as a time purchase h life estate-can be arranged. The first community-wide park development concern is C-1(Country Lakes Park). based on funding limitati Again dmg ors, amulti-phase approach will hough acquiring land for parks in a timely fashion is vital to the success likely be necessary: with the first phase concentrating on improving the he park system,it is also considered important to strive for a balance existing facilities,such as the beach,picnic areas,trails,parking,restrooms, / Neen acquisition and development initiatives.In other words,acquiring etc.Providing for the needs of disabled and handicapped users was cited as I for future parks should not be accomplished entirely at the expense of an important concern which should be addressed in the first phase of riding facilities for those that already reside in the city. development. rr 8-S ( 1 t Section 8-Implementation Plan Oily of Lino Lakes Figuro&2(Part 2 of 2). General Fm&W and for Park Land Acquisition and Development Fmc (contianrdk point, high priorities proving dTq accessibility and far Park Land Development At this the highest es for improving fa accessi are Gl(Country Lakes Park),A-2(Sunrise Park)and A 1 (City Hall Park). • The development of the athletic complexes-for adults and youths-should In each of these parks,a reasonable attempt show be made to make all ; be initiated when the anticipated demand for specific facilities outpaces buildings,play areas,and site features(such as parking lots,fishing docks, c rrent-supply.Projections of demand should be based on empirical data swimming areas,etc.)accessible to all levels of abilities. (past history), future program offerings, and the anticipated growth of specific user-group populations. Fmd'ings and for • More specifically, developing the athletic facilities at A-1,A% N 2 are The Advisory Committee also identified improving the trail system as a _ considered the highest priorities since their development programs include major developmental objective,with incremental improvements being made facilities that are already in high demand. Based on expected fimding on a yearly basis. Trail development should be consistent with the Trail limitations and the fact that the need for new facilities will manifest itself System Plan as defined in this document. Linking together public parks over an extended period of time, a multi-phase approach will again be (local and regional), public schools, and development areas through a necessary- cohesive trail system was considered to be of particular importance. • As established in Section G,municipalities have a growing responsibility to To the extent possible, trams should be developed concurrently with the provide a reasonable level of accessibility (to parks and programs) for infrastructure(Le,roads,utilities,etc.)of the subdivision or development -' individuals with varying levels of ability.To this end,the federal government area it traverses. has established new standards - through the American Disabilities Act (ADA)of IM-that provide for equal access to all users of public(and The inter-linking transportation trams(Le,separate trails that run along the private) facilities and programs.Although still largely untested, the basic major roadways)should be developed to keep pace with general community intent of the act is clear. equal access opportunities must be provided to development to ensure safe travel in and around the city.Top priorities in those with disabilities.In this light, the city will have to take appropriate this regard are the trails that run along Lake Drive, Birch Street, Main action to meet the needs of special populations and be in-line with. Street,and Hodgson Road. mandated requirements. Naturally, these mandates may affect developmental priorities as they become better defined and understood The Parks& Recreation Board,Design Review Board, City Council, and From a long term perspective,the city will simply have to stay abreast of city staff should work closely together to ensure that the tram system is ADA requirements and react accordingly. developed in a logical,cohesive,and comprehensive manner. In the short term,however, the city should also assume the responsibility The development of the bike routes(Le,paved shoulders)should coincide for providing a reasonable level of accessibility to parks and programs for with the upgrading of local,county and state roads and be.consistent with all individuals that reside in the community. the Trail System Plan as defined in this document.The Parks&Recreation Board and staff should work closely with county and state agencies to To accomplish this objective,the city should make a masonabie alternpt at achieve this end in a logical,cohesive,and comprehensive manner. designing new facilities and upgrading existing ones to meet or exceed accepted accessible standards.In this instance,reasonable attempt means to achieve these ends within the realities of limited funding and the necessity to balance the needs of the disabled with those of other user groups. Given this, a phased approach is likely to be necessary - with incremental improvements being made over time. ) / 8-6 s n 8-Implementation Plan City of Lino Lakes e 83(Part 1 of 2). Priority Ranking Matra-Park Land Aogoistiou itiung gc1: t 1ligh Priority/cOacm Moderate Priority/Concern C Low Priority/Concern I Ranking Scale:1 thsogh— (1 Being Most Important) Site Park Type Park Aaeage HsL Acq.Cost 1 ASL Future Total sunset Oaks Park) Mini Park 2.1 Ar- None 2.1 Ac. None Mini Park None SA SA Ac. $501000 • • 3 Mini Park LO AG None LO Am None Mini Park 3.0 Ac. Now 3.0 Ac. None Mind Park 10 Ace None 3.0 Ac. None amotte Park) Mini Park LO Ac. None LO Ac. None Neighborhood Park None 80 Ac. &0 Ace 531,000 O 13 'dtws Park) Neighborhood Park 1&0 Ac. None 1&0 Ace Non xna Acres) Neighborhood Park LO Ac. 7.0 Am &0 Ac� $M,00o O 14 Neighborhood Park Non &0 Ace &0 Ac. $181000 O 15 w Park) Neighborhood Park 7.5 Ac. None 7.5 Ac. Non Neighborhood Park None 10.0 Ac. 10A Ac. $40,000-$60,000 • 6 Neighborhood Park 7.0 Ac. None 7.0 Ac. Pion . operative) Neighborhood Park LO Ac. 1.5 Ace 2.5 Ac. $91000 • • 1 mandoah Park) Neighborhood Park &0 At None &0 Ace None Neighborhood Park SA Ac. SA Ac. 10.0 Ac. $32,000 O O 9 4 r+ch Paris) Neighborhood Park 5.5 Ac- 45 Ac. 10.0 Ac. 536,000 O O 8 b.'. Neighborhood Park None 6.0 Ace 6.0 Ac. $38,000 • • O 2 . i 8-7 L . 5 Section 8-Implementation Plan Ch'of Lino Lakes Figure U(Part 2 of 2� Pri ely Ranking Matra-Park Land Acgnisibian High Priority/Concern " [Q] Moderate Priority/Concern LOw'P"""`I/COtiOCTl1 Priority Ranking Sedr-1 through— (1 Being Moat hVortrmt) Park Site Pads Type Park Aacagt: Est.Ao4 Cast • _ , Exist. future Tote! N-D(Brandywood Park) Neighborhood Park 5.0 Ac 3.0 Ac &0 Ac. 32SAM O 10 N-14 neighborhood Part none 6.0 Ac. 6.0 Ac. $3i= a e,- N-15 Neighborhood Park none 10.0 Ac 10.0 Ac. WAW-S6g000 O 16 41(Country Lakes Park) Community Park 22A Ac 9.0 Am 31.0 Ac $45,000 O O O 11 C.2 Community Part None 36A Ac. 3"Ac 5200AW-$250 W O Of 12 - :r A-1 Athletic Complex 27.0 Ac 33.0 Ac CaO Ac. $57,000-$64AW O 5 A4 Youth Athletic Fields(W/Neighborhood Park) 20A Ac. None 20.0 Ac None A-3 Athletic Complex None su 50.0 Ac $200 OW 5250,000 7 JLT-1(UW Lakes Ekm.) Youth Athletic Fields and Neighborhood Pule 20A None 20.0 A- None NEW AT-2(Birch Street Ekm.) Youth Athletic Fields 15A None 15.0 Ac None AJ-3(Cent.School Dist.) Neighborhood Park 10.0 None 1a0 Ac. None JU 4(Rica Creek Park) Neighborhood Part 10.0 None 10.0 Ac None Rice Creek Park Regional Park Reserve 2500+Ac None 2500+Ac. None i t : •- Actual acquisition and development poets will depend upon:a)the actual land values at the time of acquisition;b)the actual program for development at the time of development based on community and neighborhood input;c)site specific physical characteristics(such as grades,soils,availability of utilities,etc.)affecting the development of each park;c)the actual construction costs at the time of development;and d)what portion of the costs can be offset through alternative funding programs:volunteerism,grants,donations,etc The cost estimates as shown are based on:a)estimated land values F (in 199E dollars)as determined by the city;and b)typical development costs('m 1992 dollars)as determined by industry cost-to-construct averages for parks of similar size and scope.The cost estimate for each park is based an that parks optimal level of development and therefore do not reflect the affect that funding limitations may have on their developwat.Also,the cost estimates are based on each paws current condition and does not consider the costs associated with replacing existing facilities and amenities that are currently in reasonable shape but may"wear-out'in the forthcoming years.These poets should be factored in as appropriate when the cost estimates for each park are updated in the future. ` Implementation Plan C dy of Lino Lakes (Part 1 of 2). Priar4 Ranling NW&-Parr Land Dembpment gKeY i Priority/Concern tcmte Priori Concern Priority/Concern tint Seta 1 &IMO— (1 Bdn&Moct t) Park Type Park Acreage F.sL Dev.Cost• a ri Exist. Future lbtd Oats Park) Mini Park 11 Ac. Now 11 Ac. S150,000 O S Mini Park None SA SA Ac. $200,000 8 Mini Part lA Ac. None LO Ac. S12S,000 1 Mini Park 3A Ac. Nate 3A Ae. $110,000 16 Mini Park 3.0 Ae. Nate 3.0 Ac $110,000 0 1S e Park) Mini Park LO Ae. Nan LO Ae. S12S,000 19 Neighborhood Part None &0 Ac. &0 Ac. $230,000 24 r Park) Neighborhood Park 18.0 Ac. None 1&0 Ac. $230,000 22 axes) Neighborhood Park LO Ac. 7.0 Ac. &0 Ac. $215,000 23 Neighborhood Park Now &0 Ac. &0 Ac. $230,000 26 t) Neighborhood Park 7.5 Ac. None 7S Ac. $90,000 O 21 Neighbodiood Park Now 10.0 Ac. l0A Ac. 5310,000 18 Neighborhood Park 7.0 Ac. Nate 7.0 Ac. W%000 2S ive) Neighborhood Park LO Ac. LS Ac. IS Ac. S15S,O00 � 2 rah Park) Neighborhood Park &0 Ac. None &0 Ac. $140,000 O 6 Neighborhood Park SA Ac. SA Ac. 10.0 Ac. $290,000 O .9 A) Neighborhood Part SS Ac. 4.S Ae. 10.0 Ac. $145,000 0 17 Neighbafiood Park None 6.0 Ac. 6.0 Ac. $140,000 3 Section 8-Implementation Plan arty of Lino Lakes FWwt M(Part 2 of 2). Pr;m*RanUng Matra-Park Land Dambpmeatftiwwzing KW. — 'r W — High Priority/Concern z c Moderate Priority/Concern -r LOW Priority/cOnom 8 Mosily Racing Snk:1 through— (1 Being Most Important) g' n � 44 Park Site Park Type Park AotW Est.Dev st Co • a cg a�a — Exist Future Total N-13(Braadywood Park) Neighborhood Park 50 AG 3.0 Ac. &0 Ac. S1901000 4 N-14 Neighborhood Park None 6.0 Ac. 6.0 Ac. 3180AW O it N-15 Neighborhood Park None 10.0 Ac. 10.0 Ac. $295,000 28 C-1(Country Ickes Park) Community Park 22.0 Ac. 9A Ac. 310 Ac. $625,000-$MAW 7 { G2 Community Park Now 36.0 Ac. 36.0 Ac. $1.5-32.0 Mil 27 A-1 Athletic Complex 270 Ac. 330 A¢. 60.0 Ac. $2.3-$3.0 Mil O O O 12 A 2 Youth Athletic Fields(W fi fthbothood Park) 20.0 Ae. None 20A Ac. $400.000-$600,000 O O A 3 Athletic Complex None 50.0 50.0 Ac. $25-$3.2 Mkt. 30 JU-1(Lino Lakes Hem.) Youth Athletic Fields and Neighborhood Park 20.0 None 20.0 Ac. $150,000-3210AW O 20 1 3U-2(Birch Street Elem.) Youth Athletic Fields 15.0 None 15.0 Ac. $235,000-$MSAW 00 10 ` JU-3(Cent.School Dist.) Neighborhood Park 100 None 10.0 Ar- $180,000 O 14 , r JU-4(Rice Creek Park) Neighborhood Park 10.0 None 10.0 Ac. N/A 29 Rice Creek Park Regional Park Reserve 2500+Ac. Noce 2500+Ar- N/A N/ '- Actual acquisition and development costs will depend upon:a)the actual land values at the time of b)the actual program for development at the time of development based on community and neViborbood input;c)site specific physical characteristics(such as grades,soils,availability of utili�atlecting the development of each park;e)the actual construction Costs at the time Of development;and d)what portion of the costs an be offset through alternative funding program: volunteerism,grants,donations,etc, The Cost estimates as shown are traced on:a)estimated land values (in 1992 dollars)as determined by the city;and b)typical development costs(in 1992 dollars}as determined by industry cost-to-construct averages for parks of similar size and scope.The poet estimate for each park is based on that parts optimal level of development and therefore do not reflect the affect that funding limitations may have on their development Also,the cost estimates are based on each 9' park's current condition and does not consider the costs associated with replacing existing Udliities and amenities that ate currently in reasonable shape but may'wearour m the fordwoming years.These Costs should be factored in as appropriate when the cost estimates for each park are updated in the future. � 0 l 1 R R 000ar�0000000a000 �y .. _ :.y. , � 1..'.'.11.' 1 I Y11 M '. 1.1;1 Yl �lll • ♦ �1 1 �II I M11.' / 11 •� r y • , .� 111 .Y ill ® ►'a.e��'�■■■"■■S■■. 111 111 S'13■13 n 013 M M M''■■■■■■ .1111 .l 111 IMME MMllMN 1213■13 n"11■■■R0MMM.■ UV 01-1 1-3 w7l�j Lis 111 •:r 111 r,Y I 111 rw I 111 'Cr.Y 111 R'■■13 n„I1.■■'I M M M I I ■ r i 1 111 r.11 111 ® „�■��"�..■"■■■■ON ' 1 r..1 111 11 i 111 "�■��"�.�■"■.■■■■ 1 rl . w J. n 111 111 •1 I11 • I i 1 _®".■e�„�■■■"■�..■■ 1 111 :•1 111 ___-,a.a n"I■0 M ORM■.■■■ r < i YI 111 1 I11 i 111 „■a�Q"DOME ".■■■■■ •11 111 111 111 r.11 111 ril I I1I r.11 I11 '�■��®�'�■�■''■■■■.■ M. . .. :1 111 „13■0n-'D■■■„■■■■■■ + 1 ill s I 111 ►,����-'O■S■-'■OM.■. A 111 � Ill ���bOMDA�ROMEM��MENNEN R 1 111 C w 111 „13■13n=/13■■■'R,000EMIN ■ mcm VNCM ►.�►�►.�►-�►-t►�►-�;�XX :/ Ir 1111 r� �: r 1 oftqwm , 00000aao�a as . XXXX XXX ,.. ,.. . 000000�o aooc�0000�o ouna 00000aoo■■ , 11 ►,X►,X►.�►•�X►•�►X 01 >. ME 196a _ - rk f 1 f f f ► f 1 4 _ _ l t - I I / 1 /.II,.'I ' I .4�11�' I t 111 r 1 1.1 ' 1 .�If.` 11 t MII ♦ 1.1',1 �til ' / ir'I 1 -11 I.Y11 ' / 11 Y': _ y j • ' I .I i '. � � to i T -. � _ _ TI ri • . ►�DMea��a00ME iM0MM00 111 111 ►,o■o_n►'a■■■►'■.■■■■ 1111 1 ill -O0 0MUn UMMO-,MEMO■■ 1 I11 .1 111 UMUnMOME■►'MEM■OO UV � ►_�oEoo►-�oEEE►_�EMEEE■ .w Ill •:. III r l Ili rw t l l l R1w l l l ='OE�a►'�EEE►'EEMaa■ 1 1 Y'1 111 I t l 111 -=OM13O��OMMM 0MM0 0 ME : r . J I, ►_4oMoc2:�0MME►:�0M0MM■ ♦ < I [11 111 1 111 i 1 I 1 "E��a„Q�MM,�MM.MOO -+ 11 111 .11 111 r.11 111 r.11 111 r.11 111 13MM■"ME■NON a < i l 11 OiE l l l l Cal.oMao►.:4oMMM►:MMEMME 11I r . l I 1 ►6 0Moo►leMEM►BMEMMM■ .1 r. -. J n 1 111 r 1 111 r 1 111® 3M000�3o0MEP REOENEE i it >_ Is a t 1 .111 1 _ _ t AIBeyondi ■e0000vvoo . . ., ' ,. Guts, ®eeeeeeee■ vea000®ovo t veovvvvvva Grants,Voluntem Donations, _ oe00000000 , .. . :.,.Pm Rawnue Bonds ■eeeeeeee■Mum Lew--Pu=hm ■eeeeeeee■Install. 5<—Xz x xm■eeeeeeee■ �m Parits Act eeeeeeeeee Local School Dist = ■eeeeeeee■AnokaCounty ■eeeeeeeo■ 1 ■eeeeeeee■ - , . . ■e■■eeee■Ma Dar AMR, I m. J .etWj zL11 IN UM LZI, PROPOSED PROJECT TO THE ROSEVILLE CENTRAL PARK FOUNDATION DATE SUBMITTED TO FOUNDATION Organization) Street City State Zip PROJECT CHAIR,LAN Street City %ip Telephone Number GENERAL DESCRIPTION 0-7 PROJECT AND AREA Amos ANTICIPATED STARTING DATE INTERI1t PHASES ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE WOULD NEED THE FOLLOWING HELP CENTRAL PARK FOUNDATION CO1\24ENTS: CENTRAI. PARK FOUNDATION BOARD ACTION DATE: FOUNIDATION PRESIDENT' S SIGNATURE DATE: COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN DATE: MAYOR'S, SIGNATURE DATE: looms_l five of these forms to the Roseville Central Park Foundation President trio weeks prior to the Foundation Board meeting, for placing on agenda for " action. You may be required to send a representative to the Foundation Board meeting when this proposal is discussed. I WIe!. x $=�+• m ,•. .r.-,. .y-, .a' "' 4t ar ty v _ 'fix; k h .:�. �� c :"t'3y,��" �-. �,: / ..7 f�'.s s r ,ait o'�'"- ri Er"t.� �#6��da •i:4 � .�'zr� ��� e:tr s r ero a p3 c`_ '+� �I�:[:r Y..•K' '9^w-•"8aa� i- �-.- s.. `p yt�- 7.X`a'.t � •� 4 F� ,�a+p<- -4`•y-• t •d``•K_ Y '�,.,?f� 3.^i �""��� 'c"�jy'#-�• .�'�°. '2' .. +r< •" '.W �' �, �. .i. iF ter•` �5..'lj ...e S 'C 'ate• '�E.Yii� i-S RM&MR.Nm F f rti =iQ -��.. ....1^�g,� ��*t .._.�d�'-�i'��"n �rec� � `�� �;• z �.��'?"' �„� ^s��` �` "+ .►. tea""- ����,�«�,y �. .a �- � o za` ��e • s 3� �r e �*-e� z -� ��� - .r ..��` t Y � } � F xa Y ,�. ��,. � • s t F�`�=.�.'�� ems" ,�`ft�- ��.�. tA.. � �� � ram,,. � "` ... :�-sit��yy.S r +��c+,N���may'`:_ ram,.� F, -��s� t< e � '•3* � � ,r� s -=- �xr.���(#''°"a3i<•o opus �r4aa�aga��V. - ii =S: 3����� �'"�'i � �-'- 4'" � °'rs�� a ;�• -�� •c•P-ac"...fFd" f ..':a Vie-: _ :,T.. ,.� "�*e "� k.- e t'. -,rr - i^•=z�'�r„'^^.r'�'—t;., �' i � S .:,S.a st ..;. - • - s: e • - e e • e s -s - � r �� J..fl y 4 E .w a �t a �-��.,,.�» a y � "'' s---«* -s., -•..+� f-- e � p��.i.� as,.�, ,� -. * : .,.G'�t•a-x�,r, s, fir "'•'.,'. ' rt �, e :-r + "' ^- -'st91 sfi i,r°'„�� ���� sRt'� .��p �, 3�r*� : � X ._i°{ ,�da" -�'v.r�. : ,�""� i ; 'G• �' -r ��.;�`s.i x'. ,'. i i ->`._�'h} •` "� �•`�,�i t °.:+ . s ° •s� s r a e 2 ei ;�'��r �'�t>r � r- C��"�%'.'g .fi-arc � .fie �ue �.°z � 4 '� �'Lr...K_3.ay r :=#_ Yc r .aw. s � ae �`- 1 �,.:�• g"'.`* ,�..+«_ s � "�',i �a'r'g �.#her;,' �'c .��_ �`�'' -�:e _ +c w°s i� ., rc �e • •! tt �� o� •� e e s � -t • • �c :� o s ° a e r `Q • �. a+sv��r���- .� w �, >�. a�"� X_.-. r i �, ,•..+.,-� '°fire •:.. [- '' � •� 5 '!-�^Sl"' SeR�' ���,,..��J 'e..� � -. if'����5� F- 'f'i` S i ��i 'T�� x�r.'>�}Fe,U.4 �(' �j' t,..G�.'Si 3e�G �` s f*.# " di z`_: SF= s 8__..r -„u T �c� •' °� e yrAsa /C �g rs r: �rrvt`k', - .•„> : �`�d•,w''f� -"ra'�t'E-ck'' # 3,«�•�s' � t -S-E 'a r`.•t+ _.�I`"�5'- .3 � s w'$�r�'si-. m�r � a''.r•.��+�� �, ti-. a`u .a � x�Y�� '•e#` s�as�h'_- � ram,.;' �''" �.'�- «�.R r�`'r'� '� - ,t' F^`.�';x`' 3 � � � � H� _µ�j�i2� • •�'-:'. 7e�." : e�i'4�'.a'Gy. �, 7 '�� _ '.� �°$�• .. ., Y�Y4 �s� ` '� 4¢�." ar--`X�' �t� a ,g 3 - .. ,r s . �,y.,,'.z�� rE"' �e y .. �.• -unya ::z �. ._ag" �._: ; '�.'y..,�x'�s� ..�'�-'�-. . .` s�F�-�i`? + �` `S�'s �+3• � I. g:# t _ yi , �eT� F 3-. d +4'kY {T'y' E 9} �.�, y. .� *,s ,r t 'ss=r'�,• k .nt €� r � ...�..8 *ti; � _� z�`. '�,';s�:. s� � �38�*;a z.`t�«_.> 3�:`�.r� �-.—z '5,�,*z�•�,.."�`'°�y.�'�"''tS`sx.�-� r --3+a ��: •3. q ",��:;Y'.». �..y, .. • f„"`� 3; 4�-+rrZ:`;�f—n '�4s. '4 -•4�..Wit-�`,ems {k.�i a.aYX :ea�r*".rI u�',.t� s.� �it� ,',.'�" '�3 �`"�i'a-}.r� � � ��� �"` r r � t •�' � a"'�.�,. ter.<<. ,� .. x-. � .,.�.....i.,�c-Y� ��'-#`�'_ ,: s �t9n�''ai3. �Y -r-u-��•; �.y:'Y'`rs., ;�r �e..c. ....:. .r". 4�'- ��3` � tc � � � as• 5 - � 3£v �� � ��`�.}, ''w. `.� .x`�Y; ^ .,�t S ALL. - �r'�.,pe��' �va.� ^' _ �n .��t sb,e�" � `�.� ;� . �A• 5RN "sue '-�'-.-'+'t..�"'t'.�x: s.. ���. iv���s s'�'�a�i^•,` ''�1: �^'.€� `�=�'i rr.i. � ,a�. � �o_n:•. x �.�.,s'' _ '�3' �"'.�c-r; ,�_! a•'=�✓ rk„ ;,,�t� �*'"'.: .Ln sa_: .`_'� sx. ",w°--�. zb a1'h- x E t k A:. � �...;,� yTy-,.`�•^�°r �'r�:�'��"� `3'�x� l�y`�F '�g ��� - � -��� Y�a �� v- � _.�,eJ s�.oc�'-. f� ;< �`"�ruV• �`' ,.7E � ---,��'"''��r`4 �-e i a ;zr� `.t �, :c;��,� a1t,��` i'?Xh �, ^tf� S�4 AFL. ty'���3 t .e.+ss. "� The h ,•, ..., +�}�i`-r�.: ..;7�3 .� -°�- F' P S,t v a�..'e><'u ,3'sr.:x s��e ^"r' a't` � a a nn.�-G'kt�+�£�.,'*P r � ga �.��. r Interview with Bob Bierscheid, Director of Parks and Recreation, Roseville, 09/17/92 Roseville Central Park Foundation How was the Foundation established? -It started when the Roseville JC ' s created the first exercise trail around the lake. Some of them got so enthused over doing more that they brought in other service clubs and formed the Central Park Foundation. Attorney Jack Chestnut did the legal work. Marie Slavik' s involvement was very important. She contributed about $500 per year, but leveraged many thousands of dollars of services ,etc. How should a Board of Directors be chosen? -Central Park Foundation has 21 directors , including a representative of Deluxe Check, a generous developer, an attorney, a banker, an attorney, a C.P.A. , representatives of the service clubs, and Bob. How do projects get funded? -Foundation bylaws restrict the use of its money to capital improvements . Auxiliary funds can be used for concert series , etc. The city council must, by state statute, accept all gifts. The foundation has a park project review committee--depends a lot on Bob. Large projects : city builds,then the foundation pays . Small projects (playground equipment ) , foundation just goes ahead and builds. City doesn ' t formally accept projects less than $1000 (no form) . Service clubs may also suggest projects . Does having the Foundation help get grants? -Grants from Department of Trade and Economic Development : grant information comes to city administrator rather than parks department. The application procedure has been simplified. City applies to state for part of necessary funding, says foundation will match-state likes that the foundation exists . Better response than just matching with city money. How is foundation funded? -Gifts , Central Park Ball : Ball is really an annual campaign drive reaching all area businesses for pledges. Sometimes get unexpected funds--attorney called one day, said Harriet Anderson estate settled, parks got check for 450,000. Any other fund sources? -LIttle Canada relies heavily on money from Bingo Hall . �.., So much goes to city under Charitable Gambling Act (up to 10% of hundreds of thousands of dollars ) . Act says money can be used for "youth activities" or "to lessen the burden of government" . Also funds from park dedicatigralaxg aftdsmvUtainOhg p BY-LAWS THE ROSEVILLE CENTRAL PARK FOUNDATION ARTICLE I -- MEMBERS A. Eligibility for Membership. Individuals , partnerships , trusts, associations, funds, institutions, governmental bodies and other foundations or corporations may be members of the .r �S corporation. MU=ERS SHALL NOT HAVE VOTIN RIGHTS_ There shall be no limit on the number of non-voting members. (Voting members shall be limited to twenty-one (21) . ) B. Classes of Non-voting Members. There shall be the following classes of non-voting members: (1) Annual members. Anyone contributing up to and including $5 to the corporation shall be an annual member of the corporation for a period of one year from the date of the contribution. (2) Contributing members. Anyone contributing more than $5 and up to and including $100 to the corporation in any calendar year, shall be a contributing member of the corporation for a period of one year from the date of the contribution. (3) Sustaining members. Anyone contributing more than $100 and up to and including $1000, to the corporation in any calendar year, shall be a sustaining member of the corporation for a period of one year from the date of the contribution. (4) Life Members. Any individual contributing more than $ 1 , 000 and up to and including $ 10 , 000 , 'to the corporation shall be a life member of the corporation. (5) Benefactors. Any individual contributing more than $10, 000 to the corporation shall be a benefactor of the corporation. Benefactors shall be life members. (6) Firm members. Any partnership, association, business trust, or corporation contributing $1, 000 or more to the corporation shall be a firm member of the corporation. (7) Honorary members . Any member who, in the judgment of the Board of Directors has, by his or her own efforts, contributed substantially to the promotion and development, of the Roseville Central Park, or has done outstanding work or accomplished outstanding results in any field of activity identical with or similar to any work in which the corporation is engaged, may be elected an honorary member of the corporation whether or not he or she has made any monetary contribution to the corporation. (8) Charter members. There shall be a class of non-voting members known as charter members. These members shall �„\ be elected by the Board of Directors pursuant to such I I terms and conditions as set forth by resolution to be contained in the minutes of a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. C . Voting members . There shall be 21 voting members of the corporation. (1) Terms of Membership. At each annual meeting of the Board, nine voting members shall be elected for a term of three years. Each member shall hold membership until his successor has been elected and has qualified or until he dies , resigns , or is removed, or his term otherwise expires , as provided by law or in these By- Laws . Any original member and any member subsequently elected, shall be eligible for election for an additional term or terms. (2) Nomination and Election of Voting Members. Nominations for voting membership of any person may be made by any director. Election to voting membership of any such person shall be made by the Board of Directors at such times and subject to such rules and regulations as the Board may from time to time make or prescribe. (3) Termination of Membership. The membership of any voting member of the corporation may be terminated by the Board of Directors, but only after giving the member a right to be heard at a hearing held on written notice delivered or mailed to him at least five days before the hearing, only by a two-thirds vote of all members of the Board of Directors , and only upon a determination , entered in the minutes of a meeting of the Board with the written approval of two-thirds of the members of the Board, that continuation of the membership in questions would be detrimental to the best interests of the corporation. Such termination shall be effective upon the mailing of a written notice thereof to the member whose membership is so terminated. (4) Resignation. Any member may resign from membership in the corporation at any time , by written resignation delivered or mailed to the secretary of the corporation. Such termination shall be effective upon the mailing of a written notice thereof to the member whose membership is so terminated. (5) Vacancies. Any vacancies in the voting membership may be filled by the Board of Directors for the unexpired term. (6) Voting. Each voting member of the corporation shall have one vote on, or in respect to, any matter on which members .of the corporation have the right to vote under the terms of the Articles of Incorporation, these By- Laws or any applicable statute or rule or law. There shall be no cumulative voting for directors or an any other matter. ( 7 ) Dues . No voting member shall be liable to the corporation for any contribution, dues, subscriptions, or assessments of any kind except such as he may specifically agree to in writing. ARTICLE 2 -- MEETINGS OF MEMBERS A. Annual Meetings . An annual meeting of the members of the corporation shall be held at the registered office of the corporation, or at such other place as shall be designated by the Board of Directors, at 8: 00 p.m. on the in in each year, for the election of directors (except that there need not be any election of directors at the 196_ annual meeting) and for the transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting. B. Special Meetings . Special meetings of the members of the corporation to be held at the registered office of the corporation or such other place as shall have been, or shall be, designated by the Board of Directors, shall be called by the secretary of the corporation for any lawful purpose at any time upon the request of the president of the corporation, any vice-president, a majority of the members of the Board of Directors, or voting members of the corporation comprising not less than ten percent (10`s) of the total voting membership of the corporation. C. Voting by Members . At each annual or special meeting of members, each voting member of the corporation may vote in person by voice or by ballot. No member shall be allowed to vote by proxy. Except where otherwise required or provided by statute, by the Articles of Incorporation, or by other provisions of these By- Laws, at any meeting where a quorum is present, each matter shall be decided by a majority vote of the members voting on such matters. D. Notice of Meetings. Written notice of each annual or special meeting of the members of the corporation shall be delivered or mailed by the secretary of the corporation, or the other person or persons entitled to call such meeting, not less than ten (10) nor more than thirty (3) days before the meeting, including the day of '^ the meeting, to each voting member of the corporation at his or her address as the same appears on the books of the corporation. Each such notice of a meeting shall state the time and place of the meeting and the purpose or purposes thereof ( or in the case of an annual meeting, any matters concerning which special notice is required) . E. Quorum. A quorum for any annual or special meeting of the members of the corporation shall be twenty-five percent (25%) of the members of the corporation entitled to vote. If, however, such majority shall not be present, the members present shall have power to adjourn the meeting from time to time without notice other that announcement at the meeting until the requisite quorum shall be �,,� obtained. ARTICLE 2(3) -- DIRECTORS 1(A) . General Powers. The business, property, and affairs of the corporation shall be managed by a Board of Directors. 2 (B) . Number, (Qualifications, and) Terms of Office. THERE SHALL BE 21 DIRECTORS OF THE CORPORATION. At each annual meeting of the DIRECTORS (members) , the DIRECTORS (members) of the corporation shall elect seven (7) directors for terms of three years each, to succeed the seven (7) directors whose terms of office expire at the time of that annual meeting. Each director so elected by the members of the corporation shall hold office for the term for which he has been elected and until his successor has been elected and qualified, or until he dies, resigns, or is removed, or his term otherwise expires , as provided by law or in these By-Laws. Any member of the first Board of Directors and any SUBSEQUENTLY ELECTED director (elected by the members) shall be eligible for re-election for an additional term or terms. 3 (C) . Nominating Committee. The Board of Directors shall consti- tute a nominating committee to nominate candidates for the position of Director. Nominations shall be submitted to (the membership) the President of the Board of Directors. More than one name may be presented for each Directorship to be filled. Additional nomina- tions may be made from the floor by ANY DIRECTOR AT A MEETING CALLED FOR THE ELECTION OF ANY DIRECTOR (voting members) . 4 (D) . Annual Meetings . An annual meeting of the Board shall be held for the purpose of electing officers of the corporation to h serve until the next annual meeting of the Board and until their successors have been elected and have qualified, and to transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting, and at the same place, or at such other time and place as may be speci- fied either in a notice given as provided in these By-Laws for special meetings of the Board or in a written consent and waiver of notice signed by all the directors. 5(E) . Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the Board of Direc- tors may be held from time to time at such intervals and at such places as may from time to time be fixed by resolution adopted by a majority of the entire Board of Directors, or agreed upon in writ- ing by all the directors. No notice of any such regular meeting need be given. 6(F) . Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board of Direc- tors may be held at such times and places as may from time to time be designated in notice or waivers of notice of such meetings. A special meeting may be called by the president of the corporation and shall be called on the written request of any two directors, delivered to the secretary of the corporation. Unless notice is waived by all directors entitled thereto, notice of any special meeting shall be given by the secretary of the corporation, who shall give at least FIVE (5) DAYS NOTICE(twenty-four hours notice) thereof to each director by mail , telegraph, telephone, or in person; except that a special meeting may be held without waiver of notice from or giving notice to any director who is in the armed forces of the United States. 7(G) . Quorum. Except as may be otherwise specifically provided in other provisions of these By-Laws, THIRTY PER-CENT (30%) OF THE MEMBERS (a majority of the members) of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. 8 (H) . Compensation. No director shall receive any compensation for his services as a director; but directors shall be allowed or reimbursed for any expenses incurred or expenditures made by them for or in behalf of the corporation; . and nothing herein contained shall. be construed to preclude any director from serving the corpo- ration in any other capacity and receiving proper compensation therefore. 9 (I) . Resignation and Removal . Any director may at any time resign as such, effective either immediately or at a specified later date, by written resignation delivered to the secretary of the corporation. A (And) director may be removed as a director, with or without cause, by the (unanimous) affirmative vote OF A MAJORITY of the other directors of the corporation. SUCH REMOVAL SHALL BE EFFECTIVE UPON THE MAILING OF A WRITTEN NOTICE THEREOF TO THE MEMBER WHOSE MEMBERSHIP IS SO TERMINATED. (or by the affirma- tive vote of the majority of all of the voting members of the corporation. ) 10 (J) . Filling Vacancies. If the DIRECTORS (members) of the corporation remove a director, they may simultaneously, and by a like vote, elect a new director in his place and stead; or if they fail to do so, or if there is ever a vacancy in the Board of Direc- tors due to any other cause (including an increase in the number of directors) , the vacancy may be filled by the remaining director or directors, though less thaN(t) a quorum. Each director so elected to fill a vacancy shall serve and hold office until his successor is elected by the members of the corporation and qualifies , or until he dies, resigns or is removed. 11 (K) . Executive Committee and other Committees. The Board of Directors, by resolution adopted by a majority of the directors then present may designate and appoint an Executive Committee which shall consist of the president and two or more directors, subject in all respects to the authority and discretion of the Board of Directors and between its meetings the Executive Committee shall have and exercise the power and authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the corporation. Members of the Executive Committee shall serve for the same terms and be subject to removal in the same manner as officers of the corporation, except that anyone who ceases to be a director shall automatically cease to be a member of the executive committee. The Board of Directors may also, from time to time, appoint such other standing or temporary committees as it may consider proper and prescribe the functions and duties of such committees and the terms of membership of com- mittee members. ARTICLE 3 (4) -- OFFICERS 1 (A) . Number and Offices. The officers of the corpora- tion shall be a president, a secretary, a treasurer, and such other officers (including one or more vice-presidents, one or more as- sistant secretaries, and one or more assistant treasurers) as may from time to time be DFTERXINED NECESSARY (chosen) by the Board of Directors. 2 (B) . Election, Terms of Office, and Qualifications. The Board of Directors shall elect one of their number as president of the corporation, and from within ?or without? their number, they shall elect a vice-president, secretary and a treasurer of the corporation. The Board of Directors may elect one or more addi- tional vice-presidents, one or more assistant secretaries, one or more assistant treasurers from time to time in its discretion, and such other officers or agents as the Board may consider advisable. Officers of the corporation shall be elected at each annual meeting of the Board of Directors. The president of the corporation must be a member of the Board of Directors . Each such officer shall hold office until the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors and until his successor is elected and qualifies , or until his earlier resignation or death, except that any officer may be re- moved from office at any time, with or without cause, by the af- firmative vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors, and that if the president ceases to be a director of the corporation, his term of office shall thereupon terminate. 3 (C) . Powers and Duties. The respective officers of the corporation shall have such powers and duties as generally pertain to their several offices or as the Board of Directors shall from time to time prescribe . Specifically (but without in any way limiting the power of the Board) , unless the Board changes their respective powers or duties or prescribes different or additional powers or duties, the president of the corporation shall preside at all meetings of the members of the corporation, the Board of Direc- tors , and the executive committee, shall be the chief executive officer of the corporation, and shall be ex-officio a member of all standing committees of the Board, and he or she may, in the name of the corporation (either alone or together with another officer or officers) execute and deliver any deeds, mortgages, bonds, con- tracts, or other written instruments pertaining to the business of affairs of the corporation; keep corporate records and minutes, and seal , AND appoint committees. ( , ) T(t)he respective vice-presi- dents, in the order designated at the times of their election to office (or in the absence of such designation, in the order in which they were originally elected) shall succeed to the powers and duties of the president in the event of his or her absence or disability and (if they are directors of the corporation, but not otherwise) to the office of president in the event of the presi- dent's resignation or death; the secretary (or in the event of his or her absence, disability, resignation, or death, the assistant secretaries, if any, in the order in which they were elected) shall give all required notices of, attend, act as secretary of, and keep proper minutes of all meetings of the members, the Board of Direc- tors, and shall have power to affix the corporate seal to any instrument requiring it and, when necessary, attest the seal by his or her signature; and the treasurer (or in the event of his or her absence, disability, resignation, or death, the individual assist- ant treasurers, if any, in the order in which they were originally elected) shall have general charge of the receipt of funds of the corporation, with power to endorse for deposit or collection and credit to the account of the corporation, in such depository or depositories as may be selected by the Board, all instruments for the payment of money received by the corporation, shall have power and authority to disburse funds of the corporation, alone or joint- ly with another officer or officers, as may be authorized or di- rected by the Board of Directors, and shall have the duty to keep and render accurate accounts of all such receipts and disburse- ments. 4 (D) . Corporate Assistant Treasurer. The Board of Direc- tors may, in its discretion, but only by affirmative vote of two- thirds of the Board of Directors, elect or appoint a bank or trust company as an assistant treasurer of the corporation, to be the depository of the seal , funds, and securities of the corporation, or any of them, and of any documents relating to property of the corporation; prescribe and from time to time alter or change its power and duties; and at any time abolish the office entirely or remove any such assistant treasurer from office, with or without cause. 5(E) . Officers Not to Lend Corporate Credit. No officer of the corporation shall sign or endorse in the name or on behalf of the corporation, or in his official capacity, any obligation for r1 the accommodation of any other party or parties, except upon the express direction of the Board of Directors, nor shall any check, note, bond, stock certificate, or other security or thing of value belonging to the corporation be used by any officer or director as collateral for any obligation of his own or for any purpose other than for the use of the corporation. ARTICLE 4(5) -- WAIVER OF NOTICE; ( : ) ACTION WITHOUT MEETING; ( : ) IRREGULAR MEETING. 1(A) . Waiver of Notice. (A member of the corporation or)A (a) director may execute a written waiver of any notice of any meeting required to be given by statute, by the Articles of Incor- poration, or by any provisions of these By-Laws, either before, at, or after that meeting, and any such waiver, when filed as hereinaf- ter provided, shall be equivalent to such notice. Any such waiver shall be filed with the person designated to act as secretary of that meeting who shall enter it upon the minutes or other records of that meeting. Appearance at a meeting by any (member or) direc- tor shall also be deemed a waiver of notice thereof unless the appearance is solely for the purpose of asserting the illegality of the meeting. 2(B) . Action Without Meeting. Any action by the directors (or by the members) without a meeting, which is taken or authorized in writing signed by all of the directors, (or by all of the mem- bers of the corporation, as the case may be, ) shall be valid and ,� effective, as provided in Sections 317A.237 (317 .20, Subd. 12 , and 317 . 22 , Subd. 9 , respectively) , of Minnesota Statutes as now or hereafter amended. r'1 3 (C) . Validation of Irregular Meetings . An irregular meeting of members of the corporation, and any action taken at such meeting, may be validated by the written consent of all members who were entitled to notice of that meeting, filed with the person designated to act as secretary of that meeting and entered upon the minutes or other records of that meeting. ARTICLE 5(6) -- INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS: DEALINGS WITH OTHER CORPORATIONS A. Indemnification. Each director and officer, whether or not then in office, shall be indemnified by the corporation against all costs , DAMAGES and expenses INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS reasonably incurred by or imposed upon him in connec- tion with or arising out of any action, suit, or proceeding in which he may be involved by reason of his being or having been a director or officer of the corporation. Such expenses shall in- clude the cost of reasonable settlement (other than amounts paid to the corporation itself) made with a view to curtailment of the cost of litigation. The corporation shall not, however, indemnify any director or officer in respect of any matter as to which he shall be or shall have been finally adjudged in any such action, suit, or proceeding to be or to have been derelict in the performance of his duty as such director or officer, or in respect of any matter on which any settlement or compromise is or has been effected, if the total expense, including the cost of settlement, shall substan- tially exceed the expense which might reasonably have been incurred by that director or officer in conducting that litigation to a final conclusion. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of other rights to which any director or officer may be entitled as a matter of law. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY HEREIN, THE CORPORATION SHALL NOT INDEMNIFY ANY PERSON IN RESPECT OF ANY MATTER FOR WHICH SUCH PERSON IS ELIGIBLE FOR INDEMNIFICATION, - EITHER IN WHOLE OR -IN PART, BY THE TERMS OF ANY INSURANCE POLICY OR BY ANOTHER ORGANIZA- TION. B. Dealings with Other Corporations and organizations. In the absence of fraud, no contract or other transaction between this corporation and any other corporation, and no other act of this corporation, shall in any way be invalidated or otherwise affected by the fact that any one or more of the directors or officers of this corporation are pecuniarily or otherwise interested in, or are directors or officers of, that other corporation. Any director or individual, or any partnership, association, or business trust of which any director or officer is a member or beneficiary, may be a party to, or may be pecuniarily or otherwise interested in, any contract or transaction of this corporation, provided the fact that he individually, or such partnership, association, or business trust, is so interested shall be disclosed or shall have been known to the Board of Directors (or a majority thereof) ; and any director of this corporation who is also a director or officer of any such other corporation or who is so interested, or is a member or bene- ficiary of a partnership, association, or business trust that is so interested, may NOT be counted in determining the existence of a quorum, AND MAY NOT VOTE at any meeting of the Board of Directors or of any committee of this corporation which shall authorize any such contract or transaction, PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT IF THE CON- TRACT IS A MERGER OR CONSOLIDATION, THE PROVISIONS OF MINNESOTA STATUTES 317A.255 SUBD 1 (4) AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, SHALL APPLY. ( with like force and effect as if he were not a director or officer of such other corporation, were not so interested, or were not a member or beneficiary of the partnership, association, or business trust so interested) . ARTICLE 6 (7) -- DISPOSITION OF CORPORATE ASSETS (Upon adoption by the voting members of the corporation constituting at least twenty percent (20%) of the total voting membership and also constituting at least a majority of the members who vote upon the resolution, of a resolution previously approved, recommended, and submitted to the voting members by) UPON A two- thirds vote of ALL the Board of Directors, all, or substantially all, of the property and assets of the corporation, may be sold, leased, exchanged, mortgaged, encumbered, or otherwise disposed of upon such terms and conditions and for such consideration, which may be money, shares, bonds, or other instruments for payment of money, as the Board of Directors, by two-thirds vote shall deter- mine to be expedient, ( . ) PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT SUCH DISPOSITION OF ASSETS COMPLIES IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS WITH THE PROVISIONS OF MINNE- SOTA STATUTES 317A.661 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS THEREOF. ARTICLE 7 -- DISSOLUTION THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY DISSOLVE THE CORPORATION PROVIDED THAT SAID DISSOLUTION IS ACCOMPLISHED PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF MINNESOTA STATUTES 317A.701 THROUGH AND INCLUDING STATUTES 317A.811 THEREOF, AND ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS TO SUCH STATUTES. SUCH STATUTES AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. ARTICLE 8 -- CORPORATE SEAL The Corporation shall have a seal which shall be circular in form and shall have inscribed thereon the following words: THE ROSEVILLE CENTRAL PARK FOUNDATION CORPORATE SEAL MINNESOTA ARTICLE 9 -- FISCAL YEAR The fiscal year of the corporation shall by the calendar year. (ARTICLE 10 -- AMENDMENT OF BY-LAWS The voting members of the corporation may, by a majority vote of the members voting at an annual meeting or at a special meeting duly called for the purpose, authorize the Board of Directors of the corporation, but only by the affirmative votes of at least two- thirds (2/3) of the entire Board of Directors at a meeting of the Board ; subject , however to the right of the members to prospectively revoke such authority so given to th Board of Directors , in the manner now or hereafter provided by law, and subject also to the right of the members to adopt any amendment or amendments to the By-Laws which may be proposed by the Board of Directors and submitted to the members for adoption as provided by law, but only by the affirmative votes at a meeting held upon notice as provided by law, of voting members constituting at least thirty percent (30%) of the total voting membership and also con- stituting at least a majority of the members who vote thereon. ) ARTICLE 10 -- AMENDMENT OF BY-LAWS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY AMEND THE BY-LAWS OF THE CORPORATION BY AIMN A TWO-THIRDS (2/3) VOTE OF ALL OF THE DIRECTORS, AT ANY REGULAR, ANNUAL OR SPECIAL MEETING, PROVIDING THAT NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT BE MAILED TO EACH DIRECTOR 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE AMENDMENT WILL BE VOTED UPON. THE REQUIRED 10 DAY WRITTEN NOTICE TO A DIRECTOR MAY BE WAIVED IN WRITING BY ANY SUCH DIRECi'OR AND SUCH DIRECTOR'S VOTE ON ANY AMENDMENT TO THE BY-LAWS WILL BE COUNTED AS THOUGH THE REQUIRED 10 DAY NOTICE HAD BEEN GIVEN. SUCH WAIVERS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE MINUTES OF THE MEET- ING, AT WHICH THE AMENDMENT WAS VOTED UPON. ,0aN MEMORANDUM TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Marty Asleson DATE: October 1, 1992 SUBJECT: Animal Control on Public Grounds Please find attached a copy of a letter from Superintendent of schools, John McClellan concerning the prohibition of pets on school property. This has also become somewhat of an issue in some of our other public parks, especially in relation to dog "droppings" . d-. 7-� .-. CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS Independent School District No. 12 N 4707 North Road G^ Circle Pines, Minnesota 55014 L . ois (612) 780-7600 FAX(612)780-7691 SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS August 10, 1992 CHAIRPERSON Joanne Anderson Mr. Randall Schumacher VICE CHAIRPERSON City of Lino Lakes Charles Cheesebrough 1189 Main Street CLERK Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Catherine Streit TREASURER RE: Rice Lake Elementary School Dennis Halverson Walkways Along Birch Street (North & South) DIRECTOR Thomas Carlin Last week the School District received quotes for the north DIRECTOR and south Birch Street walkways . Rick Olson /10\ The quote for doing the site prep work was from Glenn Rehbein Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $20,540 . ADMINISTRATION SUPERINTENDENT The low quote for bituminous was from Lino Lakes Blacktop, John R.McClellan Inc. in the amount of $23,200. 780-7610 DIRECTOR OF There are some additional Architect' s fees that will be INSTRUCTION Clifford W.Holman paid by the School District. 780-7607 DIRECTOR OF The city portion of this $43 ,740 would be $21,670 . In BUSINESS AFFAIRS talking to . Don Volk about this, we agreed, or at least Warren780-76 W.Tester thought it may be a good idea if the city contribute its Igo-76o1 g Y 9 Y share via "park facilities" i.e. , bleachers, fences, etc. , DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL during the next 3-5 years. If this sounds reasonable to Larry E.Jablinski you please let me know and I will draw up a short 780-7608 agreement. If not, lets review this so there is a clear understanding. It' s my understanding that Lino will maintain these walkways as part of its trail or walkway system. Am I on track? Sincerely, John R. McClellan Superintendent "An Equal Opportunity Employer- Printed On Recycled Paper .-� CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS Independent School District No. 12 11-11 N 4707 North Road Circle Pines,Minnesota 55014 ���jq L , p�gS4ti (612) 780-7600 FAX(612)780-7691 SCHOOL BOARD MEMO MEMBERS CHAIRPERSON TO: City Of Lino Lakes Joanne Anderson 1189 Main Street VICE CHAIRPERSON Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Charles Cheesebrough CLERK ATTENTION: Randy Schumacher Catherine Streit TREASURER FROM: John R. McClellan Dennis Halverson Superintendent DIRECTOR Thomas Carlin DATE: August 14, 1992 DIRECTOR Rick Olson RE: Walking of Pets at Rice Lake Elementary School loml\ ADMINISTRATION Please be informed that the Centennial School District has a SUPERINTENDENT policy prohibiting the walking of pets on school district John R.McClellan property. We will be posting Rice Lake Elementary School site 780-7610 notifying people of this policy and would appreciate the Lino DIRECTOR OF Lakes police cooperating in enforcing this policy. INSTRUCTION Clifford W.Holman 780-7607 I further ask that the Lino Lakes City Council adopt this policy DIRECTOR OF and enforce it as one of their local laws. BUSINESS AFFAIRS Warren Tester 780-7601 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call . Enclosed you will find a copy of School District Policy #2062, DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL Animal Control on School Grounds. Larry E.Jablinski 780-7608 JRM:ep cc: Dean Campbell Lino Lakes Police Chief �� "An Equal Opportunity Employer" Printed On Recycled Paper 2062 ANIMAL CONTROL ON SCHOOL GROUNDS Need, Question, Issue Animal excrements can be a health hazard and a nuisance on school grounds . The function of school grounds is to provide an area for recreational activities of students. POLICY STATEMENT The School Board must assure that facilities and grounds are maintained in such a manner as to be available for the use they were intended. School grounds are available for the recreational use of students. Dogs and other domestic animals are not to be allowed on school district property having a school building located on the site. Local police authorities shall be notified that domestic animals are not to be allowed on school district grounds and such is a violation of School Board policy. Violators shall be reported to the local police. Adopted 10-15-84 Revised