HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/03/1992 Park Board Packet CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1992
6:30 PM
AGENDA
✓1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2� Approval of Minutes from January 8, 1992
1 Open Mike _
Old Business
�a. Follow-up on Woodridge Estates Trails
L-lb. Black Duck Estates Follow-up
Weaver Property Update
I� Marshan Lake Development Update
e. LCMR Funding Update f. Brauer & Associates -
Approval of Funds
g. Parks and Recreation Update
h. Other Old Business
5. New Business
6. Adjourn
PARK BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 8, 1992
The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Park Board was called to
order on Wednesday, January 8, 1992 by Chairman George Lindy at
6: 30 pm at Lino Lakes City Hall. Roll call was taken, members in
attendance were Bill Nissen, Ken Johnson, George Lindy and John
Baumann. Absent was board member Candi Toffoli. Also in attendance
were Marty Asleson, Parks, Recreation and Forestry Superintendent,
Barry Bernstein, Parks and Recreation Program Supervisor, and
Carole Kohler, Parks Secretary.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the December 2, 1991 meeting
were approved as mailed.
OPEN MIKE•
Bob Appleby and John Kuny/Woodridge Estates Trail - At this time
Mr. Bob Appleby of 214 Woodridge Ct. and Mr. John Kuny of 214
Woodridge Ct. addressed the Park Board with concerns they have
regarding the trail that has been graded in between their houses.
Both homeowners said that they were not aware at the time they
built their houses and signed final mortgage papers that there
would be a dedicated park trail running alongside their homes. They
further noted that not until several months after they moved in
did they learn that the easement between the two houses was not an
underground utility easement, but indeed a "nature trail" . This,
Mr. Appleby says he discovered when workers moved equipment in last
Spring and started grading. When they started to check on the
"trail" , they found out that the plat they were shown by their
builders did not show any trails running alongside the houses, just
an easement, and if they had known about the trail they wouldn't
have bought the lots. They purchased these lots in particular
because of the location on the cul-de-sac offering privacy and
seclusion, and paid a premium price for these amenities. In
checking with their builders, ( the Appleby's builder was John
Feges, Mr. Kuny's builder was Tony Palaia) both builders say they
were not informed by the developer (Rick Carlson of Carlson,
Dropps) of the dedicated trails either. Both Mr. Kuny and Mr.
Appleby commented that they made structural changes in the original
house plans to optimize their privacy.
George Lindy commented that he drove by the houses to get an idea
of where the trail would be, and expressed that he would not like
it either if a trail were to come by his patio or deck so passersby
could see in. He thinks we should find another alternative to get
back to the park. John Baumann questioned if there would be a way
to fence the trail off and landscape with shrubbery. This was not
acceptable because there is a sliding glass door at ground level on
the Kuny house.
Marty Asleson explained to the board that he recalls expressing his
concern about the trail situation to Mr. Carlson some time ago, and
" PARK BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 8, 1992
that Mr. Carlson assured him that things would be taken care of. It
seems the final plat that was approved showing the trail system is
different than the plat the builders were showing to potential
buyers. When asked for his opinion, Mr. Asleson noted that he hates
to see the trail go, but he most certainly can understand the
frustration of the homeowners. From a comprehensive trail
management standpoint, this trail link is definitely needed.
A discussion followed where everyone agreed that the placement of
a trail next to these houses in not desirable under the present
circumstances, and it would be nice to find an alternative. There
is a lot left near the end of the cul-de-sac that is not sold yet.
There was a suggestion that this may be a good place to put the
trail (down the middle of the lot) and buyers would know from the
start that there would be a trail running next to their house.
George Lindy feels that the burden should be on the builder to find
an alternative. Ken Johnson thinks the developer has slighted both
the builder and the home buyer and should come up with some type of
resolve in providing a trail link. He also feels that Rick Carlson
should be involved in settling this issue with both us and the
homeowners.
Bill Nissen would like to see both the builder and the developer
present their sides to the board. He says he would like to help
out, but also wants the trail. He asked if the City could get more
involved in this.
Mr. Appleby says he spoke with Mr. Carlson about the problem and
Mr. Carlson seemed quite belligerent, and Mr. Kuny says that Mr.
Carlson didn't return his phone calls.
George Lindy thinks we need some legal advice. Ken Johnson
suggested that Marty Asleson have the City Attorney contact Mr.
Carlson about the situation. All were in agreement that it is the
developer's obligation to provide access and alternatives, and they
would prefer not to see a trail where it is now and would like to
see an alternate route. The board agrees that it would be best if
the City Attorney contact Mr. Carlson.
Marty Asleson will contact the City Attorney with the board's
request that he contact Mr. Carlson, and report back at the next
meeting.
Tom Jensen - Boy Scout Troop 136/Eagle Scout Project - Tom Jensen
� who lives in the city appeared before the board to explain he is
working to earn his Eagle Scout badge. His project for this badge
2
PARR BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 8, 1992
will be to add a basketball court to the park at the tennis courts
on Andall and Wood Duck Trail. Plans are to put up at least 1/2
court. He will need to clear brush and check on the soil type, etc.
The court would be on the north side of the playground, but behind
the tennis courts. To fund this project he will first start by
asking for donations and then organize a fund raiser. He is
appearing before the board tonight to get permission to use the
land for this purpose. Everyone thought this was a good idea.
George Lindy thinks the concept sounds good and wants to see the
project in its planning stages , John Baumann says there is a need
for something like this in that area. Marty Asleson says the Parks
and Recreation Department will be glad to work with Tom. At this
time Tom Jensen is asking for a letter to the District Scout office
from the board stating that they have accepted Mr. Jensen's idea.
Marty Asleson will draft a letter. Mr. Jensen hopes to start on the
project approximately May 15, 1992 .
OLD BUSINESS•
Black Duck Estates - Marty Asleson updated the board on the
progress of this development. In attendance regarding this matter
were the developer, Mr. Marcel Eibensteiner, and Mr. and Mrs.
Michael Swanson, owners of the house at 985 Birch Street. Evidently
Mr. Eibensteiner asked the Swansons to attend this meeting.
The original plan that was recommended for trail dedication was to
run the trail up the side and around behind the Swanson property,
rather than go in front of the property along the right-of way. The
Swansons are not in favor of the trail running behind or in front
of their property. City staff and the Parks and Recreation planner
met with the county and it appears that the county highway
department would allow for trails on their right-of-way, and that
some variance in trail location is allowable. The suggestion was
made to move the trail towards the road further in front of the
house. If the trail should be in front of the house it would
interfere with parking extra cars here and would ruin the Swanson's
two car drive-way, also the Swansons feel that it would be un-safe
for children.
Mr. Eibensteiner suggested he buy the property from the Swansons.
This plan seemed agreeable with the Swansons. With this in mind,
Mr. Eibensteiner will have to contact the property owner to the
east on the corner of Birch and Black Duck to get permission to run
the trail in front of that property on Birch St. The house on this
lot faces Black Duck. Mr. Eibensteiner will also have to get
permission again from the County.
Bill Nissen asked Mr. Eibensteiner if he would then re-plat the
3
PARK BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 8, 1992
development. Mr. Eibensteiner says he has no plans for that at this
time, he has plans for using the house. Marty Asleson says that
this seems agreeable, and conceptually fits in with the
comprehensive park plan.
The board all agreed that this is a good plan, "conceptually. "
George Lindy told Mr. Eibensteiner that we would be supportive of
his new plan, and accept it upon County approval of the right-of-
way, and that the trail does not front the "Swanson" property. If
this does not work out, the plan will then go back to what the park
board originally asked. Mr. Eibensteiner will now go ahead and
contact the property owners on the corner of Birch and Black Duck
and request to get on the agenda for the January 27th council
meeting to bring his new proposal to them.
Weaver Property - Mr. Kirk Corson appeared in front of the board
with an update on the progress of his development. Marty Asleson
explained to Mr. Corson the direction the comprehensive park plan
is taking, and suggested to him that he put trails over the
wetlands coming off Captain's Place.
Mr. Corson says he's puzzled at the change seeing that the board
had already accepted his trail proposal for an easement to the park
and a trail system coming out to Captain's Place. He says that the
Quail Ridge Development project is at a stand still now because of
recent developments from the DNR regarding the Shoreline Management
Act. This new suggestion from Mr. Asleson would limit the number of
lots and with the restrictions from the DNR they can only get a few
lots in the plat now. This development will be returning to the
Design Review Board because of the Shoreline Management Act, and
Mr. Corson states he will be looking to the council for direction
on this.
A discussion evolved regarding whether people want a wetland trail
running through their back yard or not. Mr. Corson commented that
this is not a good plan for the developer. Mr. Lindy expressed his
opinion that he would not want a running trail 30 feet from his
house or deck, and feels that a trail of this type could be looked
upon as an imposition if not done properly.
Mr. Asleson explained the philosophy of the recently completed
comprehensive park plan study is to use our wetlands to our
advantage, to make use of them and enhance them and look at them as
an amenity.
Mr. Corson says at this point he cannot make any decisions, but
�.-. will look into the feasibility of Mr. Asleson's proposal. Mr.
Asleson explained that Mayor Reinert's thoughts are to take time
4
` PARR BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 8, 1992
and look at all new developments more carefully.
George Lindy recommended looking into the feasibility of the trail
proposal as presented by Marty Asleson. In his opinion, he doesn't
know if this is the time to make these changes.
Shores of Marshan Lake /building discussion - This item concerns
the purchase of a functional, 28' x 64' stick built building that
sits on the park dedication property involved in the Shores of
Marshan Lake Development. (the old Forjay Floral building) Marty
Asleson explained that staff was not aware of this building until
after Mr. Menkveld had sold it. He (Marty) then contacted the new
owner of the building and was told that the building could be
purchased for approximately $10 to $12, 000. 00. The only stipulation
is that the owner wants assurance that should the City decide not
to purchase the building, he would have until April 1st or so to
move it.
Marty Asleson went on to explain that staff feels that given the
AIM% location and condition of this building it could be used to great
advantage by the Parks and Recreation Department, and would be a
good buy.
George Lindy told the board he flew over the structure recently and
was impressed at how big it was, and thought it would be a good buy
at the price. A discussion regarding the purchase followed as board
members noted the building is not very old and is close to and
easily accessible to the road. The general feeling of the board is
that it would be a good investment.
RECOMMENDATION: Bill Nissen made a motion to recommend to council
that the building be purchased if the development goes through.
Motion was seconded by John Baumann. All were in favor. Motion
carried.
Pheasant Hills - Marty Asleson gave an update of this development.
It seems that Mr. Ed Vaughan has decided not to pursue his land
"swap" plan whereby he would retain the island for development. Mr.
Vaughan sent Mr. Asleson a copy of a letter he wrote to Mr. Dave
Torkildson of Anoka County where he informed Mr. Torkildson of his
decision to leave the original agreement in place with the City.
LCMR Funds - Marty Asleson informed the board that the Legislative
Commission on Minnesota Resources has sent out requests for
proposals for projects designed to help maintain and enhance
•� Minnesota's natural resources. There are some $29 million dollars
available for funding in this program. He wants to keep the board
5
r
PARR BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 8, 1992
informed and he thinks there are several possibilities available
for monies here. Applications are due in on February 7, 1992. He
will get together with engineers and staff and talk about the
application. John Baumann asked if there would be funds available
to run a trail out to the island in the Pheasant Hills development.
Mr. Asleson noted that a wetland study of the entire area regarding
swimming, fishing, etc. would be advantageous.
OTHER OLD BUSINESS
There was no other old business.
NEW BUSINESS:
Comprehensive Park Plan - The public meeting for the presentation
of the new Comprehensive Park Plan will be held on January 29th,
1992 at City Hall. There will be a notice in the Quad Press about
the plan and there will be copies available at City Hall for
interested parties to pick up.
Appointment of Park Board Liaison - Marty Asleson informed the
s� board that the new Mayor has named each council member as a liaison
to the particular boards and departments in the city. The liaison
to the Park Board is Council Member Linda Elliott. She will attend
Park Board meetings when possible and meet with staff on a regular
basis.
OTHER NEW BUSINESS:
George Lindy informed the board that he will not be able to attend
the next two meetings.
ADJOURN•
John Baumann made a motion to adjourn, it was seconded by Bill
Nissen. All were in favor. Meeting was adjourned at 9: 00 pm.
THE NEXT MEETING WILL BE ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1992 AT 6:30 PM
6
AGENDA ITEM u A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park Board Members
FROM: Marty Asleson
DATE: January 24, 1992
SUBJECT: Woodridge Estates Trails Follow-up
Enclosed is a copy of the letter I sent to City Attorney, Bill
Hawkins as per the Park Board's request, along with copies of city
records pertaining to the Woodridge Estates development and the
trail system. I am awaiting a letter from Mr. Hawkins with his
comments. I will make a report at the meeting.
C I T Y O F
INO LAW
January 16, 1992
Mr. Bill Hawkins
Burke and Hawkins
Suite 101
299 Coon Rapids Boulevard
Coon Rapids, Minnesota` 55433
Re: Woodridge Estates Park Trails, Rick Carlson
Dear Bill,
Please find enclosed all of the information I could find in
researching the City files regarding the Woodridge Court trail
issue. If you refer to the memo I sent to the January 8, 1992 Park
Board Meeting, most of the history of my involvement is explained
there.Mr. Robert Appleby and Mr. John Kuny both appeared under
"Open Mike" .
Also please notice the two surveys I have included. The highlighted
trail corridors with park designations was the copy that I found in
our files. The other survey is the one that was given to the
property owners. Notice that the lot and block numbers are
different, and that the Quit Claim Deed to the park trail that the
city has in possession refers to lot 19, block 3, or the plat that
the property owner has been given.
At any rate, after having received the background information and
listening to the property owners complaint of being uninformed, the
Park Board directed me to contact you to inform Richard Carlson
that his trail is an important link in our trail system and that he
must find alternative means to get the trail through. The Park
Board determined, based on the information that I had given them,
that the property owners were innocent bystanders. There is an
open lot left in the development to the west of Woodridge Court and
the Park Board referred to this as a possible alternate site.
In our research after the park board meeting, we have been unable
to find any reference to city council acceptance of these trails
when the final plat was approve. My conversations with Rick Carlson
and the file correspondence at City Hall all indicate that the
trails were agreed upon and that the city actually paid for these
trails as part of their park dedication.
1189 MAIN 6TKEE1 LINO LAKES,MINNE6OTA 55014 612-464-5562
Please call me Bill, if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Marty Asleson
Parks, Recreation and Forestry Superintendent
MN/cmk
P.S.
I have also enclosed addresses and phone numbers for Mr. Appleby
and Mr. Kuny.
-2-
Bob Appleby
214 Woodridge Ct.
Lino Lakes, Mn 55014
737-5874 (w)
John Kuny
212 Woodridge Ct.
Lino Lakes, Mn 55014
i'� 482-9528
F
WOODRIDGE ETA TES
C'/T,' Of t/n'O LAKZS
ry_
l,/ �_ -� .. - h• \ 6 1 g 9 � �� ,^ry. \\ 1 � \,,. 9,r � ""p_� ha'�j� 6.F� 1� 0\�`/ �'�r` ..-.
J. _ {f100 /OGE r �1
P _WO9ORID6E s [ANE _ = •gyp' �.
t \ LANE
�� .-� sue' yews\ `
c /.
Now
�O J�\,r.\�,��\\1'yJ//C \� � ,.�,�1yp c,r •-- \\� \� ,4Q� �:, _ 0 j\. ,4"e �ppVi
�. n:.un„.guru, ...:.....................-:.....,.:.....:..,.:._, "—
\
V/C/IllnY
niunun acrrx. .. mr. !..'�P
pTY O. LK✓O LAKES COUNTY F ANJK/tm - t TV i !a halos
v
Alli
s -o
^r L.r `t�`-'•z.: >+t 1'•'�ri olvl-:':.Y,$`':;ea:"?.4-_' 'C•' '�
`rs• '" - t,, .Jo�'s''}�•'J,.:- si i' II ri �i III B ys 9 2 .3'F,G'4.
ss(oht`lir Is/ 9,i1 ,US, .¢-' ia_ - rl
.A, _+_s<=s_,�r� s 117, ,�i�;1a3 sl ,,£ ,, a� _
MGM, ,� :?� _O-JIL_,:v J� ±mJ L_-s.r_, `:,Sl"il 1 es>i 1-i (�,�_ y/
-
"•n__ —_ ` __ LA!✓E� :Et �,P'hFq :�� _ rr - - - sY:. .-v
1 N r�H m'r l�/D6 it a �r�' �, ^�<-..>'�+•?•:'j/� -- .�1_. :::L j�'
s�r.13sYd
8 ,y,-9 r: /O. "sue B./y �•p�- ��,lp-moo 'S ___ t
.� , /OOi��ga,gib s'(MIO' 1,�i E4''lli 41
`ii it i�' 'pt Lr
•�n }'iL'"_^°JL"__JL,a rr� a. r- `�_ �'�� ;, E''i>' o�� ',ia_��- chi ter'.' •+/«.....,...,
-
•- -- -- -. .___-• _---------- 21-
' EXCEPT/ay a � "9_�ex_-• C°J1LtT" '//• f\- / � -
P - 'L'j`s<� �iulk3 y-{:�. `y��r: �f,�v L,,. ��'f2• �.• �� � k �
t,:.:y:..w :I :�; .H:>-�ax� :I a_z. - r:• �._ ,�,. z _
`•'Six_ a' - ,i' - _ =ti? -
1 oA OAK.
15
��t � :+v`<yt :-�?'r'u3ase=.:s-:�� - __.. ._ - - ;` :''>at. f '� :•' :o �'` .e a es 4�
r 'as•?i +z/ . .ttR
�s• `. :$ -
:x':.,fi.
',s �•• ri }?.: '-15 aq`. �L ,:_w:a�i:'`�' x i�� L<;e'w to � r-:ti a1"o-" �•' '�'
r SLos ;`5 `• `E
'• a< Li's.ir^'d�a } ��` ) e' pa�t��.i1�4_ -3.y\ ;f
`"3a.?fba"s '�f,_-__.«�.2..w`�''.��..«�`s'n ��.�ic^H•>'r;�.�•s'<Mti�'�' �' .'�'.s�'�`x ...t � �'•,;'�"�.'Lpt�f ° �^L�%B° i'�� ��u.�c<%�'�`` ?'.' /`"`.
k a
g ',Y �r "�4�.� J , -.-,:,oy,,,'W fat•,a�•j'.15�,.•� 4�q�� � .::i.
y -mot
=T-E {- r' 1 - ii'r:7i�-`•P23 : �i m`' t - t r.,..i ,n
` � `" � 20 z•��- is a: ,,+T` 9 � �a: ,r�� rr.t•.- _
3.d:.cv ..
i 1 } <a RO 1: '/ I„•n'`�2 : f� `ice` .E�t+Prrl -`-- 7i 2 -
`L�' �
..r'`A NOW
"..._..�y _
._iC• y.?fir
- •!.' .r. - -�.�. - -
..„,..<ja
/
' ,h� eb �F _..... . �� L_�vn*___I?a f�veT•naiY=�'.�':�,_.sSY..,.a.,o.�__.: .
1 „r s rst '` - ^ � SL>� _ 'a_a- L'ih-26 ta-•e�ueetozsYw'
"{.._.,o. _.-,s:�. ,<t�:: �... :.. 1- ,, sz :;- - '-• � .. n'— - 1F-f -�
v.•rF.J. Y _
.. .;.... ...... .:.. .. ..:, rir•_� Leg -
:.....,.v.F..r.., v-.t.,_,:.... _ ... ..: .. - .��
ter, Y
I.
✓.;.!Vc{.1s�•;�.. ..- - _ I EX6EXLEPJJp
_ Nh f.a
L •L S' i _ _ l ys y 1
NO 209OVA
�— -
: Mae
IF
:. ,
AGENDA ITENII 4 �=
MEMORANDUM
TO: All Park Board Members
FROM: Marty Asleson
DATE: January 24, 1992
SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
.r
Please find enclosed a copy of correspondence from Brauer &
Associates concerning our comprehensive plan, including an invoice
for the project costs to date. As you can see, we are within the
budgetary parameters of the project as the contract was written.
This contract did not include two areas that were within the
initial project scope considerations. These two elements were left
out in order to accomplish the bare necessary parts of this plan.
These two areas were Administrative Framework and Financing Sources
for Park Land Dedication and Development.
I feel that these are two important elements of the plan, and that
the fees to incorporate them are very reasonable. The question of
finance in particular, I am sure is on everyone's mind.
I will be looking for approval or disapproval to finance this final
phase through dedicated park monies.
LAND USE PLANNING AND DESIGN
B RAV E R
ASSQCIATEs, LTD,
January 13, 1992
Attn: Mr. Donald Volk
Public Works Director
Mr. Marty Asleson
Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Coordinator
Agency-City of Lino Lakes
1189 Main Street
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Scope of Additional Services for the Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide.
Dear Don and Marty,
As per your request, I am submitting an outline for the two additional work tasks that, as you may recall at the
outset of the project,the City decided to hold off on for later consideration once the project was underway.We
have now reached the point in the project where a decision needs to be made as to whether or not the City wants
to include these two tasks in the scope of the project. Both tasks, in my opinion, are important from a
comprehensive planning standpoint and should be given strong consideration. Each of the tasks are outlined
below along with an estimated fee to complete them.
Task I - Administrative/Management Framework
This task deals with important administrative/management issues that affect the development of the park and
recreation system. The scope of this task would include:
• highlighting and defining important administrative and management issues.
• establish a framework and course of action to guide the continued development of administrative
procedures/policies and management techniques.
Specific issues that would be included as part of this task include:
• Parks & Recreation Board's Role: defines the role and responsibility that board members play in
overseeing the development of the park system.
• Parks and Recreation Department Structure: defines the staff structure of the Parks and Recreation
Department based on current practice. Also includes a brief description of individual staff positions
and related responsibilities.
• Recreation Programming Guidelines:defines how recreational programs impact the development of the
park system.Also identifies important issues related to their development and how programming is likely
to be affected by changes in recreational trends in the future.
• Communication Guidelines: defines the basic components of a comprehensive communications and
community interaction strategy.
0 Joint-Use Agreement(s)Guidelines:defines the essential elements of joint-use agreements and identifies
their basic parameters.
7901 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie MN 55344 Tel(612)941-1660 Fax(612)941-1663
•
• Volunteer Program Guidelines:identifies a number of volunteer opportunities associated with parks and
recreation and defines the framework necessary for their successful implementation.
• Park Maintenance Procedures/Guidelines:defines the importance of the maintenance operation and
identifies ways in which it can be done as effectively and efficiently as possible.
• Park Design And Development Guidelines:defines the standard procedures for undertaking the planning
and design of any given park development project.
• Tree Preservation Policy Guidelines:in this case,the City's recently developed policies will be referenced.
• Water Quality Program Guidelines: provides an overview of the water quality problem as it relates to
parks and recreation and establishes a set of general parameters which provide impetus for further
action.
Task II - Financing Sources for Park Land Dedication and Development
This task deals with defining the financing sources that are available to the City for park land acquisition and
development. The scope of this task would include:
identifying and defining financing sources under several funding categories.
The categories include:
• Local Initiatives
• Debt Financing
• Intergovernmental Sources
Completion of this task will involve a meeting(s)with the City's financial director to identify funding sources or
limitations that may be unique to the City.
This task is of particular importance because it impacts the manner in which the implementation plan is prepared
and presented.
Fee Schedule for Expanded Services
The following defines the anticipated fees associated with the additional work tasks as defined above.As with
the current contract, fees would be on a not-to-exceed basis using the charge-out rates defined in the contract.
Fee Schedule:
Task 1: Administrative/Management Framework $1,900
Task Il:Financing Sources for Park Land
Acquisition and Development $ 700
Total Fee Estimate For Additional Tasks: $2,600
January 13, 1992 2 City of Lino Lakes
As I stated,both tasks,in my opinion, are important from a comprehensive planning standpoint and worthy of
consideration. Please give these tasks consideration and let me know your decision as soon as possible.
Please give me a call if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
B E & AS ' IATES LTD.
ey c o nbauer, R.LA.
i President
January 13, 1992 3 City of Lino Lakes