HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/02/1993 Park Board Packet CITY OF LINO LAKES SC
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, AUGUST 2, 1993
6:30 PM
AGENDA
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of July 12, 1993
3. Open Mike
4. Old Business
A. Country Lakes Park Master Plan Update
^ B. Woods of Baldwin Lake - Mini park master plan update
C. Sunset Oaks Park - Update
D. Council approval of expenditures
E. Athletic complex property update
F. City Hall Park - Update
G. Other Old Business
5. New Business
6. Adjourn
^
,.� CITY OF LINO LAKES
SCANNED
PARR BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Board
was called to order by Vice Chairperson Ken Johnson at 6:30 PM on
Monday, July 12, 1993 . Roll Call was taken, members in attendance
were Bob Williams, Brian Bourassa, Ken Johnson, Joe Schmidt and
Jacquelyn Farm. Members absent were George Lindy and John Baumann.
Also in attendance were Marty Asleson, Parks, Recreation and
Forestry Director and Carole Kohler, Parks, Recreation and Forestry
Secretary. In attendance at 7:30 PM was Don Volk, Director of
Public Works and at 8: 00 PM was Councilperson Linda Elliott,
liaison to the Park Board.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the May 3, 1993 meeting were
approved with no corrections or additions.
OPEN MIKE: No one appeared under Open Mike.
OLD BUSINESS•
a. Tom Jensen - Eagle Scout Project Update
Tom Jensen appeared before the board at the last meeting
requesting financial help to complete his Eagle Scout project, that
being a basketball court in Arena Acres Park. At that time he was
"guesstimating" that the project, which was a full basketball
^ court, would cost about $6000. The board had some concern that
figure was low and asked Tom to do more research on costs and
return with that information at the next meeting.
Since the last meeting, Brian Bourassa and Marty Asleson met with
Tom and all decided that a half court was a more affordable
project. The final price on that would be $3850. As of this time
Tom has raised $2169. He is asking for the Park Board to fund the
balance of $1681. He would like to start as soon as possible.
A discussion followed where all agreed that Tom has worked hard and
this is a "super" project that the Park Board should be involved
with.
MOTION: A motion was made and seconded to recommend to the council
to expend the sum of $1681 from the dedicated park fund to help Tom
Jensen complete his Eagle Scout project at Arena Acres Park.
All were in favor - motion carried. Ken Johnson explained to Tom
that this recommendation from the Park Board will now go on to the
city council for consideration and the council will make the final
determination as to whether to expend the $1681 or not.
b. Rice Lake Estates Park
This is an update on the progress of the proposed cooperative
park in the Rice Lake Estates/Circle Pines Baldwin Park area. This
particular item goes back about three years when the Cities of
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
Circle Pines and Lino Lakes proposed a joint use park in the area
of Rice Lake Estates to be developed by the City of Lino Lakes. It
would be managed and maintained as a Lino Lakes park and the trails
would be maintained jointly. Since then we have been waiting for
the City of Circle Pines to purchase the old right-of-way near Lake
Drive, on the eastern border of Circle Pines. Nothing has
transpired here for quite some time.
Recently the City of Lino Lakes acquired a parcel of land off of
Blue Heron Drive through tax forfeiture. This parcel is the first
lot to the north of Blue Heron adjacent to Hodgson Road and is
zoned commercial. Seeing that this is another opportunity that may
be an alternative to the joint use park, although not exactly what
we had in mind, Marty Asleson felt it might be a good incentive for
the City of Circle Pines to take some action. He contacted Circle
Pines City Administrator Jim Keinath and informed him that we may
be looking at alternatives. Since then Mr. Keinath has instructed
his attorney to expedite this issue.
Both Marty Asleson and Don Volk feel that it is worth waiting a
little longer for action from Circle Pines. This is an update that
requires no action at this time. Marty will keep the board informed
^ as this matter proceeds.
c. Joint use of park - Birch Street south of Sherman Lake
This is another informational item. The comprehensive plan has
identified a 10 acre piece of property on Birch Street south of
Sherman Lake that is currently owned by the Centennial School
District as a neighborhood park site.
Marty Asleson has pursued the joint use of this property through
letters to Superintendent of Schools John McClellan and has also
appeared at a recent school board meeting where he presented the
comprehensive plan and explained the city's desire to enter into a
joint use agreement regarding the 10 acre site. At that time he
requested that the City and School District enter into a
cooperative use agreement for those specified ten acres, and that
if the School District ever decided to sell the property, Lino
Lakes be given the first consideration to purchase.
The Centennial School District agreed to the cooperative use
agreement, but were unwilling to grant a formal first consideration
to purchase if they decide to sell. They did say that we would in
all probability be considered first should the occasion arise.
Marty related that Mr. McClellan is very pleased with the
relationship we have now regarding Rice Lake Elementary School and
looks forward to that type of relationship continuing. Marty will
continue to pursue the agreement and report back to the board.
2
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
d. Woods of Baldwin Lake
This controversial issue has surfaced again on the agenda. Several
residents from the area were in attendance. Marty Asleson gave a
history of the Woods of Baldwin Lake development and brought
everyone up to date. Those residents in attendance explained that
they were here mostly because they are confused by conflicting
stories they have heard regarding the placement and development of
the mini park and were hoping to gain more information and a better
understanding. Marty assured them that contrary to what they may
have heard recently, there are no plans to place a trail along the
old St. Paul water works pipeline property from the park south, nor
to add a lighted field, or a parking lot, etc. The intent is to
cause minimum impact to the residents and develop a mini park as
requested in the last of two petitions received at City Hall. That
petition requested specifically " walking path around pond, park
bench and picnic table, and children play equipment, with a high
priority placed on maintaining the natural surroundings and safety
for children". He also added that we should keep in mind that this
mini park is, hopefully, just a temporary measure to satisfy
neighborhood park needs until there is property available to meet
the comprehensive plan goal of the six acres needed for this area.
Gary Kaufman of 141 Woodridge Lane addressed the board. He stated
that he is not opposed to the park, but has some concerns because
of the close proximity of his property to the proposed park. He
would like to see the trees left and is opposed to the walking path
as he is concerned about people cutting through his yard. He would
like to preserve the naturalness of the area.
Dan and Bonnie Lind of 120 Woodridge Lane also addressed the board.
They came to express support for the park. They have an eight year
old child and would be glad to see a play area in the neighborhood.
Mr. Lind asked the board if they would draft a letter to better
inform residents as there has been a lot of uncertainty surrounding
this issue. They would like the park board to provide leadership
and want to see the neighborhood friction come to an end. They
think it would help a great deal if the residents could see a site
plan showing the park location and where play equipment, etc. would
be placed.
Maryanne Leonard (Mrs. Kaufman) of 141 Woodridge Lane expressed
that she was confused about trees and the developer coming in and
taking them out when the city is supposed to have a tree
preservation policy. Marty Asleson explained that it's nearly
impossible to have development without removing some trees. He
always tries to minimize the impact to the neighborhood, although
he says some fringe trees will die. He went on to explain that the
City of Lino Lakes is a leader in tree preservation and has an
3
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
outstanding oak wilt control program recognized throughout the
state.
Betty Hulse of 258 Rohavic Lane noted that she has taken special
care to save/keep her oak trees by leaving space open around them
and has had them for the eight years that she has been a resident
of Lino Lakes.
Mrs. Hulse also took this opportunity to express her feelings
regarding the proposed park and placement of easements near her
property. She commented on the excellent educational system and
quality of life in the Lino area and explained that is why her
family chose to move here eight years ago. She stated that she is
not opposing the park but would like the park board to be more
sensitive to the neighborhoods feelings.
Mrs. Hulse went on to relate a personal experience regarding her
property and an incident which occurred in May of 1990. She
explained that while her husband was in their backyard he was
struck by a drunk driver who was being pursued by the police. As a
result Mr. Hulse is permanently disabled and is in constant pain.
She pointed out that the quiet setting of their yard relaxes her
husband and helps soothe his pain. So naturally, she says that when
she read the minutes of the February 6, 1993 Special Park Board
meeting where it stated that "there is a possibility of obtaining
an easement along the old St. Paul Water Works property from the
new owners. " (a copy of those minutes will be attached to the back
of these minutes) , and she and neighbors heard that the city is
planning an uncontrolled public easement along the former St. Paul
Water Department property which is now owned by them and other
residents whose property abuts it, this immediately sent a "red
flag" up.
Marty Asleson assured Mrs. Hulse that there is no plan for an
easement along the old waterworks property south of the park. The
board thanked Mrs. Hulse, and the others who attended for their
concern and interest.
Linda Elliott stated that the council is also very aware that there
are a lot of mis-conceptions regarding park development in the
Baldwin Lake area. She noted that two weeks ago the council
approved the final plat for the Baldwin Lakes Estates development
with the approximate one acre park located east of Oakwood Road and
south of White Pine Road. She asked that residents who have
concerns be patient with this plan for at least one year - let the
park go in and let the neighborhood live with it and then come back
and let the city know how they are getting along with it. Linda
suggested a site plan be drawn up and more information be sent to
4
�-. CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
residents involved.
There was discussion about a site plan. Marty Asleson suggested
Brauer & Associates do this, he thinks the cost would be about
$2000. He reminded the board that they had previously decided on
the sum of $18, 000 for developing the mini park. Residents in
attendance suggested that neighbors would most likely volunteer to
help with setting up park equipment, etc. Marty thought that with
residents help in cutting costs, the cost of a site plan would fall
easily within the $18, 000 figure. There was some concern about
spending an additional sum for a plan drawing, but the general
consensus was that it would be best to go ahead with it and try to
keep the residents better informed. Marty suggested that work could
probably start this year yet. He will contact Brauer & Associates
to start on a site drawing. The procedure will also involve
meeting with resident to get their input.
Joe Schmidt questioned why this item was on the agenda again. He
thinks enough time has been spent on this by now. Marty explained
that because we had received another petition, it required further
discussion.
MOTION: After more discussion Joe Schmidt made a motion to
recommend to proceed with development of a mini park as previously
presented. In addition, to spend $2000 for Brauer & Associates to
prepare a site drawing. Motion was seconded by Bob Williams. All
were in favor - motion carried.
e. Country Lakes Master Plan Update
Re-designing Country Lakes Park - At this time all the
information has not been received from the DNR, The Army Corps of
Engineers, the State Historical Society, the Rice Creek Watershed
District and LAWCON and all other agencies involved in the
permitting process. This item will be on the next agenda. When the
board is ready to make final decisions they will invite citizen
input.
f. Sunset Oaks Park Renovation Update
This park at Leonard and Bradley Streets is targeted for
upgrading. There have been three meetings with residents in this
area and they have decided on their priorities and expenditures
that include new playground equipment, engineering costs, grading,
seed, two benches, a picnic table, timber edger, miscellaneous
hardware and the costs for the equipment company to send someone
out to supervise while the neighbors construct the equipment. The
total budget is estimated at between $14,760 and $17,760 depending
upon final grading costs.
5
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 121 1993
One matter of concern to the residents is that of those living
along Jeanne Drive and their access to the park. As indicated in
our comprehensive plan, the trail extension east along the Bradley
Street right-of-way seems to be an important link to establish in
the future. Marty Asleson suggested that for now maybe simply
clearing a path would suffice so that residents could walk to and
from the park. Brian Bourassa reminded the board of it's decision
several months ago that all trails should have bituminous overlay
when they go in.
There was also some discussion regarding drainage. Brian Bourassa
explained two separate grade plans that he prepared for the park.
Both would improve the situation. He will come back with an update
at a later time to inform the board as to what plan he chose.
Marty Asleson commented that the project seems to be following the
correct process. Staff will follow through and set a time for the
neighbors to help with the project sometime after the summer is
over, as per the neighbors request.
g. Acquisition of property for Athletic Complex
The comprehensive plan has identified a need for a 50 acre parcel
to develop an athletic complex off of Holly Drive and 12th Avenue.
The Park Board has made it a priority item to locate a site and
pursue the purchase with a down payment at today's prices, assuming
the cost of property in that area will escalate.
The owners of the property that has been sited for purchase are the
Whitcomb family. Marty has been in contact with them. Although the
Whitcombs showed interest in our needs, they also have an agent
investigating the prospects of a development at this location. Also
to be noted is that since Marty's initial discussion with the
Whitcombs, several developers are looking at the same piece of
property. This area is in the MUSA and in the last two years since
selecting the site, sewer and water is moved up to the property. We
may have to look elsewhere.
Marty Asleson has spoken with the City Finance Director about
setting up a budget for this project. It was also suggested that an
attorney be contacted to work with the finance director to analyze
different financing scenarios such as a bond, or lease purchase,
etc. There was some concern expressed that the City Attorney may
not look at this as a project requiring immediate attention.
Perhaps another attorney with a lesser work load would be of more
assistance at this time.
There was discussion regarding the possibility of seeking another
--. site should the Whitcomb property be unattainable, and also
6
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
discussion as to how much money the board should request be
initially budgeted to start the ball rolling. $2000 was suggested,
but some board members thought that was not enough of a sum to let
the council know how serious the board is in pursuing this matter.
The figure of $5000 was suggested to "let the council know that we
want to make a commitment. "
MOTION: After further discussion, Brian Bourassa made a motion to
recommend to council that they budget $5000 to start the process of
locating and purchasing a 50 acre site for the athletic complex as
identified in the comprehensive plan. Also to look at other sites
as other options should the Whitcomb property not be attainable.
The motion was seconded by Ken Johnson. A vote was unanimous.
Motion passed.
H. City Hall Park Project Update
Several months ago the Park Board approved the idea of a Marine
Corps Reserve project to survey and grade the back acreage of City
Hall Park. Prior to any work being started, approval had to be
gotten from the union. Union Local 49 rejected the proposal saying
it had to be considered by the St. Paul Building and Construction
Trades Council. Marty Asleson had pursued approval through the
Trades Council and is currently awaiting their reply. He expects to
have an update at the next meeting.
i. Woodridge Estates Trail Issue - Resolved
This trail issue has finally been resolved through a joint meeting
with Mayor Reinert, the developer (Rick Carlson) , John Kuny of 212
Woodridge Lane and City Staff. The developer has agreed to not
install the trail on the south side of the Kuny house until there
is a trail link to the west of the ditch on the Kuny property. In
addition he will post an escrow account with the City to cover the
future installation of the trial. The City will install a trail
sign at the street side of the Kuny property consistent with all
other trail signs in the City, but there will be a small sign under
it stating "Trail Closed" . Mr. Kuny has agreed to remove the trees
he has planted on the City trail location after he receives the
$1000 that the developer has agreed to pay him. The trails are
posted closed for now. Marty Asleson noted that the Mayor was very
helpful in resolving this matter.
j . LaMotte Park Neighborhood Meeting Update
Brought up at the last Park Board meeting was the growing concern
of residents whose property adjoins LaMotte Park. They have
complained that children are using the park for a ballfield when it
is too small for that use. The balls are hit out of the park into
their yards and can cause damage.
7
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
It was decided that perhaps a neighborhood meeting would be helpful
in explaining to residents the concerns of using the field for a
ballf ield with the hopes to resolve this issue in a non-threatening
manner without sending the message that youth are not welcome in
the parks. A letter was sent to residents inviting them to an
informal meeting at the park. Joe Schmidt and Marty Asleson met
with residents there June 3rd. There were several adult residents
and a few youth at the meeting. A variety of comments and opinions
were given. One matter in which nearly everyone agreed was that
there should be an alternative activity provided for the youth such
as a volleyball net. One resident was very vocal at times, he
stated that he has been a resident for 26 years and that the park
was promised to be left an open and undeveloped area. Marty tried
to explain that neighborhoods and ideas change over time,
especially in parks and recreation.
In order to get a better idea of what the residents want, Jacquelyn
Farm made up a survey and brought it through the neighborhood the
next week-end. The survey showed that most favored the park but
would like to see it more passive. Almost everyone would like to
see plantings and foliage at the park. Several people commented
that they would like to see the grass mowed more often. Marty
^ commented that because of the wet summer it has been very difficult
to get in to mow any of the parks.
An alternative play option to baseball was discussed. Volleyball
was suggested and where the net should be placed, and the cost.
Marty Asleson thinks it will cost no more than $300 to install
volleyball nets. Would it be a good idea to put them up where the
kids play ball now? Jacquelyn Farm noted that the Friends of the
Parks Foundation would be willing to incur the cost of installing
a bench here. The tree spade could be used to bring in some trees
from another location.
MOTION: After further discussion, a motion was made by Joe Schmidt
to recommend to council to spend $300 to purchase and install
volleyball equipment and some additional plantings at LaMotte Park.
Motion was seconded by Jacquelyn Farm. All were in favor, motion
carried. It should be noted that Brian Bourassa voted in favor of
installation of volleyball nets, however he wants these minutes to
ref lect that he does not want to discourage children from using the
park.
k. Friends of the Parks
Friends of the Parks Foundation has a new brochure made up now and
will be distributed to all residents with the City Newsletter in
September. There have been several private donations and Ace Solid
,.� Waste Incorporated has become the first corporate sponsor. They
8
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
have requested a "wish list" to help them decide which particular
project they would like to become involved in.
Marty Asleson explained a donation to the foundation from residents
Kathy and Mark Urich in memory of their daughter. They have donated
$3000 they would like to see used for a piece of play equipment in
Sunrise Park. They have selected a train type piece of equipment
that meets all standards and regulations required by the city. The
total cost of this train is $3850. The Urichs have requested the
additional monies be donated either from the Friends of the Parks
Foundation or the Dedicated Park Fund, although they say they will
try to finance the entire amount themselves if need be.
MOTION: Joe Schmidt made a motion to recommend to council to spend
$850 from the park fund to complete the Mark and Kathy Urich
project at Sunrise Park. Motion was seconded by Jacquelyn Farm and
carried by unanimous vote.
OTHER OLD BUSINESS:
Ballfields used for Tournaments - Ken Johnson questioned what had
happened to Mr. Ron Ingram's request to use city ballfields for
tournaments. Marty Asleson explained that he had researched other
cities and found that very few have let their fields be used this
way. He felt that for the little the city would have gained, it was
not worth the problems that may have come from this. He thinks it
would work better if the city ran it's own tournaments, that's
something that will be looked at for next year.
NEW BUSINESS°
a. Recreation Updates
Performances in the Parks - So far there have been two
performances. The turn out has been good about 100 to 150 persons
each time. The next program will be Stomp n' Dixie, a dixieland
band at Birch Park and there are reports that the neighborhood is
excited and looking forward to it. The last of the six programs
will be at Country Lakes Park on August 8th.
Therapeutic Recreation Person - The department has received
applications for the position of therapeutic recreation specialist
and has received a good response of very well qualified people.
Interviews should start in the next two weeks. There is not room
for additional staff at City Hall, the new person may have to take
over the office the Recreation Department has at Centennial School.
Summer Programs - All of the playground programs will be ending
,..� next week. Even though the weather has been very un-cooperative
9
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
this summer, the programs were very well received. The tornado
threat last week during playground time showed how well prepared
playground supervisors were and the incident occurred without any
problems. Marty Asleson complimented Barry Bernstein and his staff.
OTHER NEW BUSINESS:
Joe Schmidt inquired about the new Joseph Wargo Nature Center. He
noticed that is it open now. He thinks it would be a good idea to
have the board tour the facility, and wondered if there was a
possibility of programming any activities here. Marty Asleson will
look into this and report back.
ADJOURN There was no other new business. A motion was made,
seconded and unanimously carried to adjourn at 10: 10 PM.
10
AGENDA ITEM 4 - A
STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson
DATE July 28, 1993
TOPIC Country Lakes Park Master Plan
BACKGROUND
The project status has changed little since the last meeting. At
that time we were waiting to hear from the Historical Society and
the Rice Creek Watershed to set limits for design reasons. I have
not heard from the Historical Society yet, but did meet with the
RCWD. Jeff Schoenbauer needed about a week to prepare after we
gained input from these and the other controlling agencies. My
guess is that we will have had accomplished more by the September
meeting.
.-1 OP� ONS
To be submitted in September.
AECQ �IENDAT1.0
Not to rush our planning process. Please find attached a synopsis
of the planning process developed by Brauer & Associates. We are
at the site analysis stage.
-P$rks-and Recreation Facilities ;t � � Minnesota Recte800n Obd Park Association
TY PJannif g!n Design Process
Phase Specific Work Task .
Design Ph;se Needs Assessment
Focus Meeting
Site Analysis
Program Development
,Alternative Concepts
Master Plin'
Construction Phase Design Developttt nt
Construction Dpou gents
Construction blodif g and
Observalvoll ,
WAM
"A well thought-out pros : , �,' 'J l (c the success of t a pio}ect"
y ,
MAY 0, 1�D3 Breuer d Assoclet6s, Ltd. 4 .'
1 i r
Park Planning and Design Procoss Institute fo Professional Development
For Parks and Recreation factilties Minnasola Rec �tlora end Perk Association
Need* Assossment
• The intent is to find out what the user-groups) need and want- Be .very
specific.
• For the city to understand what It Will take to keep citizens satisfied (and
Supportive), it is essential to ffnd out the answer to four key questions.
1) who are they:
2) What are their eyp tatlons?
3) What must we do' g to tn their expectations?
4) What must we do to reed their expectations?
To' go one step farther and gain their long-terra commitment, the city must
ask:
9) How'can we anticlpat64heir changing needs?
2) How can we`nneet those greeds?
The key is for you to maintain close contact with the user groups to
monitor their ever changing needs,
Then the city must take action on those changing needs. Be proactive, not
reactive. Treat your citixens.as a business would treat their customers.
The biggest challenge for all businesses is to stay in touch with the
customer. Their existence depends on it And so does.yours.
• Key concerns:
s) Do not assume that you af:ea.dy knew what they need, and want. Ask
them directly by going out Into,(he community.
2) Use the most appropriate survey instalment to get the job done.
Understand the Inherent limitations of each survey technique.
3) Remember �- meeting the needs of the user groups is your primary
concern. The success of y ur park system depends on it.
Brauer Associates, Ltd. MOO 4, 1993
Park Planning and Design Process institute for llroteiv#;ansl Development
For Parks and Recreation Facilities Minnesota Reare4t(On ond Park Association
--` FOOD ee In
This Is the.,point at which the d on 0lystiltant`tisually gets Involv0d In the projet:t
(unless they were Involved In th6 -niq a;�sessrnent). r:
• 'he purpt '# ,X'so of the focus i�teetln
. _
�A 1) : Allow the, consultant the ft4inity o� 'd'ec�elop cle a �rt• ttt�oe�(ar�ding
of the scope 0f the ph .irtefcled outcomes.
f . f ,
Clearly define the city',, ct tlons of the consultant's services.
3) ^onfirtn Ivey individual , a007MIttees, city staff nlerrrbers, etc. who will
be either directly invoI40 M theproject or have Information that ,will
affect the project.
4) Junderfake a general ,vie ;snd.'discussion about the issues an'd
I concerns related to the pif a spOP'IaIIV the results of ti a n,eeds
g2sessment
f _
1
8ratrer A Associates, Ltd. 3 May$, 1993
Park Planning and Design Process lnstitufe for Professions!Development
For Parks and Recreation Factildes Minnesota Recreation and Perk Association
Site Analysis
• Through field research, the consultant should 15ecolne famillar,with the site's
physical charac teristics end determine Its;developmental opporfunitles and
constraints This will allow both. the city and consultant to develop a clear
understanding of the site's unique coaracte sties.
• Invite the'Advisoty Committee (most =often the. marls Board) to the site so, that they
gain an understanding of its potential.
• The following issues, among perhaps many others, should be addressed as part
of this task:
1) What type of facilities.can. the site accommodate?
2) What design, engineering, environmental, and lead use opportunities or
constraints are presented by the site? e t Eorough<
3) How does the site relate id, other parks and suffoun'ding
developments?
4) What is its Character, appeal, aesthetid qualities?
The-site analysis should also help you articulate a "sense of place".-- meaning the
basic emotional response you gat Upon visiting the site. Remember;-- don't try to
change the innate character of a site. And don't try to force a use on a s to that it
simply is'not well suited for:
• Product(s):
1) Site Graphics
2) Aerial Photography
3) Ground-level photography
4) Written supportive text
Brauer Assoclate*, Ltd, 4 May 6, 1993
Park Plannlny.aned Design Process Institute,for Profa*JOnal Development
For Parka and Recreation Facilltlos; ArtiriPl9sota Recreation rind Perk Association
l ° rogr e op .
r
i
Developing a complete and corn"preh fialyo pig,am Is essential to the success of
the protect. It Is the point at which the Oida end wants of the user groups are
first Introduced and considered
• Since the written program is the basin for tho design, it should very Oeady:
J) Define the park's purpose.' l#n tyre singular context of the park Itself
and within tho context of fhb'shf 'pa c system).. .
2) identify and,address he many boas affect ng its future development
Identify and define the recrat7ol uses, site'am enities, and facilities
needed and appropriate for.:thettl�;.
4) Identify end set priorities far faculty needs.
• if you`.ve corgi �faPed tl crcu lr need 'ass ssm ; public neeftn : snot „
necessary at this stage (although the ubllc .should be invited to attend the
programming meetings).
• Remember the design for tire' park Will,only be as good as, the prngratr� it Is
based upon.
• Produc((s):
9) tie ail written programs � _
Brauer A Associates_Ltd. g may 6, 1093
Park Planning and Design Process Institute for Professional Development
For Parks and Recreation Facilities Minnesota Recreation and Park Association
lt6rhdt1ve Concept
• The alterative concepts turn the development program. Into a number of physical
relationships.
• The concepts should explore various creative and unique design solutions and
themes. The essence of design is to bring together the unique characteristics of
the site with that of the written program. The combination of these two
components establishes or relnfor es,the spark's sense of place.
• specific criteria that will affect the concepts Include:
1) What are the ideal physicet, relationships between the recreational
facilities proposed forthis. site?
2) How can these Physical relationships limit the duplication of support
structures?
3) What unique opportunities.. does the site present and how can these be
taken advantage of in the design? Be creative. Take a few chances.
E Remember -- take the opportunity to Oxplore :unique outcomes during this step.
Don't limit yourself to "boilerplate" parr design.`
• This is a good time for a public neetsng, It gives interested partles an opportunity
to be Involved In the design. Koy port have the meeting in a location that Is
easily accessible to the user groups,,Meks It convenient for therm to attend.
}
• Product(s):
1) Alternative Concept Ora
ph�cs
�?) Written Supportive T*Xt
Brauer Associate se Ud. : map, 101V3
Park Planning and Design Process Institute for Protesstona!Development
For Parks and Recreation Facilities Minnesota Recreatfon an d Park Assoclalion
-. 3tl P
• The master plan is an outgrotAdh of the concept plans anti represents the :design
solution that best addresses the deeds and d6sires�of the community.
• The final master plan is usually a,co bination'of the alternative congepts,' rather
than just ohe:
r
• This task..typically involves JWo steps;
=�) 'A preliminary master plan, ,end Est,estimate -- for review and
refinement Ourposes. .,
2 A final roaster plan and 66st estimate — for final presentation purposes,
.-� • This is a 9ood time for a follow«u l
Pq I C ► inq to present the'pr�ell. mnary
roaster plan. Make sure you let th,* G1tize'nt ksow it Is , so That they feel
they can Mill have an, active role In ttie design' process (usually,: very', dew
concerns, are expressed -� if, of course, you've, done a g� d job of listening prior
to this point.}
• if the process has been carried out tot Its fullest extent (by not Utting corners),
the final roaster plan will laps*nt a design that meets the needs of the
community while croating its own ld htlty,ond sense of place.
• Product(s):
91 Master Plan Graphic
2) :Written Supportive Text
3) , Cost Estimates -
Brauer& Associates, Ud. May 6, 1093
Park Planning and-Design Procass irestitufo for Protessionsl bevelopneent
For Parks and Rocraation Facilities Minnesota Recreation and Park Association
Des!"gn' . D evolopm on t
• Design dovOlopment ratlne$ and"further d fires the fecilltles and site othenities as
Illustrated.on the blaster flan.
• It is the last ,step in the formal design{pr�CeSs and allows forgone last opportunity
to review the parks design and protect elements prior to actual contract
documents. This task is important in ,the sense that it allows for final issues and
concerns to be addressed prior to "hard lining" the contract documents. This
avoids costly and timely revisions:
• Technica issues should be rVW0w* ,*hd dWussed to ensure :fret all relevant
concerns have been properly ed ie d. -,This inoludes,
f) Site layout
2) Facilities
3) Site amenities
4) :Grading schemes anc ogifftrk balance calculations
5) Construction deteillno-and.0sterials selection
6) Utilities layout
7) Landscaping '
8) Other concerns
• Other coricems that should be 04rood include:
9) :Site maintenance ,
2) 'Risk controltiability1 llc safety issues)
3) HandicaO,accessibild .:
4) ;. Clearance or safety toho fhpO.4ed,for the various fa,"0liltiv�
5) Materials selection b*#, h 1110=cycle considerations.
6) Regulatcry requirement
Brauer A Assoa&te4, Ltd.
IaY a, 1903
Hark Planning and Design process Inslttule for rafesslahal Dovelopment
For larks and F?tcrsatlan sreiffti rs Minnesota Recre Ilan and Aar-Association
Documents
Construction
Construction documents should cle ply d0frne the extent of the work, construction
standards and techniques, and g nerP l p1 e/inesladministrative provisions
necessary, for bidding and constructions purposes.
• Specific Issues.
t 9) Determine and include appropriefs municipal standards.
' 1) Determine the bidding format most appropriate for the pro ect.
3) Refinement of safety requirem4pts, _
4) Refinement of maintenance considerations.
,..� 5) Coordination of the plans and spoclfications for inclusion of the;normal
surveying and construction goordinstlon practices of the. city.
6) Construction cost monitoring during the final construction document phase to
ensure compliance with the city.t budget.
7) .Obtaining the required permits from regulatory agencies.
8) Determining special bidding reaulremOnts, such as contractor tionding and
Insurance. -
Braust&Associates, Ltd May 6, 1993
1
Park Planning and Design Process institute to I rawil hat Development
For Parks and Recreation Faclildes Minnesota Roor*AtlOn OtW Perk A850018(10n
t:
Construction VON 09,,arid. e at �� x
• Con tr rcti t bidding' and abs r l aportant tasks that n10 �t executed
prpperly to ensure the success tctfploWn
f the prtfecf 'r
• Key aspects of the consulte,,it's ! *h `Ob 6ry tion
1) Continuing refinement. of 40ign up to the point of actust
-implementation.
2) Liaison between the OwOr nd the contractors.
'3} Facilitator..
R} Interpret design lntont,
b, Anticipate pr hle s before `t11 Y Occur,
C} fair ir`iterpretation of ontrsot Documents.
:dJ ,Provide a consistent 'p%c management style that lea yes,no
ambiguity with respeet is' )(peo6tions and desired result.
Brauer A Associates, Ltd. 10 May'4, lQg3
t
AGENDA ITEM y '
STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson
DATE July 28, 1993
TOPIC Woods of Baldwin Lake Master Plan Progress
.......:............. .
..BACRGR UND.
A motion was made at the last Park Board meeting to recommend to
proceed with the development of the mini park in the Woods of
Baldwin Lake, and to plan the development of the park using Brauer
and Associates before proceeding. Since we have only had a couple
of weeks between meetings the only step that we have taken so far
is setting up a meeting with Brauers' Environmentalist to do a site
analysis. I will be meeting with her on Thursday, July 29 and will
update you on any conclusions that might be drawn by Monday.
n
Jeff Schoenbauer thought that it might take up to a month to go
through the process. After we have some visual materials drafted,
perhaps we should invite public review of the plan before they go
to the Park Board for approval. This could be some evening at
City Hall for a couple of hours.
�CUl�ME�TDN
Proceed according to the planning process, including public review
however you feel would be most appropriate in this instance.
AGENDA ITEM 4 '
STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson
DATE July 28, 1993
TOPIC Sunset Oaks Park Update
BADR.....:It ...:.........:.....................
Grade plans were reviewed at the last Park Board meeting for the
renovation of Sunset Oaks Park. We met with adjoining property
owner Gerald Hanson of 7462 Sunset (adjacent property owner on the
southeast side of the park) to discuss drainage and options. Mr.
Hanson was agreeable to allowing fill to be placed on his property
to allow for drainage. This is a mutually beneficial option since
we need to get rid of some fill. A letter of encroachment
authorization has been prepared. Once this is done we will proceed
to have the surveyors set grade stakes and the grading done.
I have received two proposals from the three playground companies
that I contacted. I will bring them to the meeting for your
review.
C <»«<` '`�P .
If I have a third option for playground equipment by the meeting I
would like to make a decision so that we can order. It takes about
six weeks to receive these orders. The rest of project would
involve coordinating a playground raising time for the
neighborhood, and site renovation this fall.
RECOMM NDATI:GN..:::::
This is basically an update, except for your review of the
playground equipment.
AGENDA ITEM',-
STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson
DATE July 29, 1993
TOPIC Council Approval of Expenditures
Please refer to the following council agenda item concerning the
consideration of recommended expenditures from the dedicated park
fund:
AGENDA ITEM
STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson
DATE July 19, 1993
TOPIC Park Board Recommended Park Dedication
Expenditures
The Park Board at the July 12th meeting made the following
recommendations to expend dedicated park dollars:
1. Tom Jensen has been working on an Eagle Scout project to
install a half-court basketball court in Arena Acres Park. The
estimated project cost is $3850.00. Tom indicated that he has
raised $2169. 00, and has exhausted his funding options. He has
worked over a year on this project so far. The Park Board
recommended to fund the balance of $1681. 00.
2 . $5000. 00 for the purpose of acquiring legal council for the
development of finance alternatives and the securing of land in the
south of Birch Street area for athletic complex A-3 .
3 . Lamotte Park. Because of concern in the Lamotte Road
neighborhood, concerning the use of the mini-park known as M-6 in
our comprehensive plan, the Park Board recommends the expenditure
of $300. 00 to purchase a volleyball net and standard. Ball playing
has become an issue and the thought was to provide an alternative
play option for the children who wish to use the park. The Friends
of the Parks has found a donor for a bench dedication to also be
installed in this park.
4. The Friends of the Parks accepted a donation for a memorial
play train by a couple who wished to see the apparatus go into
Sunrise Park. The residents were able to donate $3000. 00 out of
the $3850. 00 cost for this equipment and asked the Park Board to
finance the rest. The Park Board recommended the expenditure of
the additional $850. 00 for this project. The donating couple would
be responsible for a plaque.
TOTAL----$7831.00
1. Fund Park Board Requests as per Council Wishes.
2 . Deny Requests
.
RE OMME.N.AAT.I::::I . :
Approve Requests
These requests were approved for funding by the City Council.
Previous approvals included $34, 000 for the trail underpass at Rice
Lake Elementary School, $18,000 ea for development of Leonard and
Bradley and Woods of Baldwin Lake Mini Parks, $15, 000 for 1993
trail overlays, $4, 000 for the Country Lakes master plan.
As of June 30th, 1993 the Park Dedication Fund ballance was
$237,900.95. In this we recently received the dedication dollars
for Birchwood 3rd, Woods of Baldwin Lake, and Park Grove. The
$34, 000 for the underpass has not been taken out yet. The total
comes to $96,831.
I suggest we set up another goal setting session in the future to
re-look at priorities again for 1994. I do have a concern for
future land needs where we might want to leave reserve funds.
RLCO2 �I�T1�A�'�QN
This is open for discussion.
AGENDA ITEM -* 4"- C
STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson
DATE July 29, 1993
TOPIC Athletic Complex Property Update
BACRGRON
The A-3 Athletic Complex in our Comprehensive Plan was selected for
different criteria, including at that time, an area out of the
growth area. Since the Park Board has placed a priority on
acquiring this area, the process has taken about 2 years to get to
the point of approving dollars to develop finance options and legal
help with the process. It appears now that we have waited too long
as was discussed at the last Park Board meeting. Staff was to look
at several alternative sites that might be used for the same
purpose. We have done this. It is felt that the best way to sort
this out is to pull together a committee, perhaps our original ad-
hoc committee to look at the criteria for selection and the
alternative sites, and make a decision on acquisition.
We did take some slides of some of the areas. I will bring them to
the Park Board meeting.
.
OPT:IQNB:>::>::: ....: ........>:::<::::>
It appears that we need to look for an alternative site, select it
and then move fast enough to make acquisition possible. I have
discussed this with the City Administrator and Bill Hawkins so that
when we have a site selected, Bill can develop the financing
options and secure the parcel.
RECDMMENDAT:I:ON::::;:
Pull together the above mentioned committee, select a site out of
the MUSA and proceed with acquisition.
r, AGENDA ITEM * �{ F
STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson
DATE July 29, 1993
TOPIC City Hall Project Update.
Please find attached copies of the previous correspondence with the
St Paul Buildings and Trades Council and their decision rendered.
As you can see the project request was denied. I am meeting with
the local union representative on the 30 th of July. They
contacted me and wanted to discuss this further, so the issue is
not totally dead at this time. I will bring more information to
the Park Board.
..
To be discussed at the Park Board Meeting
> 2EC.OMMENDAT I O� >> >
Have none at this time.
AGENDA ITEM
STAFF ORIGINATOR Marty Asleson
DATE July 7, 1993
TOPIC A-1, City Hall Park Project Update
.<BACKG1tOUND
Earlier this year a member of the Marine Corps Support Group
approached the Park Board with a project idea, that of helping us
with surveying and grading the back acreage of our park at City
Hall. The project was looked at favorably and there was an
understanding that the work would first have to be approved by the
union organization.
I gave this information to the local 49 representative and some
time later I received a rejection because this was something that
needed to be considered by the St. Paul Buildings and Construction
Trades Council. A letter was then sent to the St. Paul office and
I received a call from their executive secretary inquiring about
the specifics of the project. We are still waiting for an answer.
OPT
Wait
(�RECOMMNDATION
This is simply an update at this time
Mr. Dick Amfang June 26, 1993
Executive Secretary
Saint Paul Building and Construction
Trades Council
Labor Center
411 Main Street
St. Paul, Mn. 55102
Dear Mr. Amfang
Please find enclosed a rough sketch of a project that the City of
Lino Lakes would like the U.S. Marine Corps Wing Support Squadron-
471 Det A, out of Fort Snelling to help us with. They cannot do
this without your approval. This work would not be done by any
,.� other means, and does not eliminate any work for our own local 49
group.
The work would include the surveying and setting of a grade plan to
facilitate their help with grading the area and building a ball
field, hockey rink, and soccer field. We would also like them to
move a building, a small existing shelter to the rink area.
Please get back to me with any questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Marty Asleson
Parks and Recreation Coordinator
City of Lino Lakes
6121224-9445
��EgEiUTl0,y0
�Q C" F
Building and Construction Trades p - ti Council
�F�MQus 0.��bp
LABOR CENTRE, 411 MAIN STREET, ROOM 206
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
5 5
July 16, 1993
Mr. Marty Asleson
Parks & Recreation Coordinator
City of Lino Lakes
1189 Main Street
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Dear Mr. Asleson:
I am responding to your correspondence concerning the park project
in the City of Lino Lakes and your request for permission to use
the U.S. Marine Corps Wing Support Squadron-471 Det A, out of Fort
Snelling, to do a portion of the work.
Please be advised that after review of your request by the
affiliated local unions of the St. Paul Building Trades, we regret
to inform you that we cannot give our permission to use the Marine
Corps Support Squadron.
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Dick Anfang
Executive Secretary
DA/df
afl-cio
opeiu##12
.r
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park Board Members
FROM: Marty Asleson
DATE: July 28, 1993
SUBJECT: Tour of New Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center
At your request, I contacted the nature center inquiring about a
tour. They will not be "officially" open and complete until Labor
Day when they have their Grand Opening.
Lisa Gillend-Herringer, an interpreter at the center has offered to
be our tour guide when we're ready. We can schedule the tour for
Monday, October 4th before the next Park Board meeting.
Let me know if this is agreeable with you and I'll proceed with
arrangements.
Thank you.
r