Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/30/2021 EB PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING Wednesday, June 30, 2021 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 26, 2021 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. Concept Plan for Huntson Addition 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Environmental Board Annual Work Plan — 2nd Review & UPDATES A. Recycling Update B. General Updates 9. ADJOURN CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING zOOM DATE : May 26, 2021 TIME STARTED : 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED : 7:50 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : John Sullivan, Cassie Cavegn, Shawn Holmes, Ella McNulty, Wendy Nelson, MEMBERS ABSENT : Eric Flower, Alex Schwartz STAFF PRESENT : Andy Nelson, Janele Waterman, Phillip Davis I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Mr. Sullivan called the Lino Lakes Environmental Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on May 26, 2021. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mr. Sullivan stated to approve the Agenda as it stands. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 31, 2021 Mr. Sullivan asked for a motion of the March 31, 2021 minutes. Ms. Holmes MOTIONED to approve the minutes. Ms. Cavegn seconded the motion. 5-0 passed. V. OPEN MIKE Mr. Sullivan declared Open Mike at 6:34 p.m. Open Mike declared closed at 6:34 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES Enivornmental Board May 26, 2021 Page 2 VI. INTRODUCTION OF NEW RECYCLING INTERN Phillip Davis introduced himself and was welcomed by the Environmental Board. VII. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Environmental Board Annual Work Plan Mr. Nelson presented the duties of the Environmental Board and a draft of the work plan that is presented to the City Council each year. This annual plan may contain initiatives concerning current environmental issues in the major areas of focus of the Environmental Board, including forestry, natural resources, waste, and solid waste management. Mr. Nelson had put together an annual work plan that he thought covered the areas of forestry, natural resources, water and recycling/solid waste. Mr. Sullivan questioned why this was called a work plan. He stated that in the past the work plan was labeled as a set of Environmental Goals. Mr. Nelson responded that the change in name was in response to feedback that calling it an annual work plan may better fit the purpose of the Board, and that the City Council is looking to the Environmental Board to provide a recommendation on this work plan. Mr. Sullivan would like to see Annual Tree Sale as a second, separate goal under Forestry. Ms. Holmes agreed because the tree sale was happening before Emerald Ash Borer response was a major focus in the city. Mr. Sullivan inquired if the City has found any new areas that would provide the opportunity for wetland credits. Mr. Nelson responded that there are potential areas that would be suitable for wetland bank establishment that are being considered and that any sites would be presented to the Board at a later date. Mr. Sullivan made a comment that the Environmental Board should make an effort to improve educational outreach. Potential topics might include composting and recycling. Mr. Sullivan recommended the Environmental Board promote more opportunities for funding projects in the interest of clean water. Some examples include neighborhood rain gardens, Adopt -a -Drain projects, and dog waste stations. Ms. Cavegn supported the ideas of promoting Adopt -a -Drain projects and additional dog waste stations. DRAFT MINUTES Enivornmental Board May 26, 2021 Page 3 Mrs. Holmes recommended either painted informational signs or placards near catch basins as a part of the Adopt -a -Drain program as a good educational outreach opportunity to reach residents. Scout groups have done this work in the past. Mr. Sullivan commented that improper lawn irrigation is a problem within the City. Mrs. Nelson responded that there are door hanger notices, noting addresses, and potential fines in place to reinforce watering restrictions. Mr. Sullivan asked for opinions regarding asking if more enforcement on watering restrictions should be pursued. Mr. Nelson and Ms. Cavegn agreed. Mr. Nelson suggested that the Environmental Board take another month to clarify and revise the list of goals. A new draft will be brought to the Board in the future to be voted on. Ms. Cavegn inquired about management strategies for fertilizer use and expanding upon enforcement related to proper application of fertilizers in areas that have higher potential to impact lakes and other surface waters, such as the County -owned golf course. Mr. Nelson responded that there is overlap and collaboration in management efforts related to lakes. Though the city is not in a position to make management decisions on their behalf as relates to the golf course, encouraging rain gardens and vegetated buffers on areas of residential shoreland could be an area that the Board could put more focus to have a positive impact on water quality. Currently, we do support these efforts through outreach to residents on webinars and workshops on raingardens and other native plant -based stormwater management efforts. Mr. Nelson provided information regarding a potential stormwater pond aerator permit that citizens may apply for. Mrs. Nelson asked if the permit would have any connection to pesticide and herbicide treatments on stormwater ponds. Mr. Nelson replied that treatments like the ones Mrs. Nelson mentioned would not currently be approved if they were connected to the city stormwater system. Mr. Nelson mentioned that the organics program has great opportunity for growth. Mr. Sullivan wanted to know if it would be possible to ask the City Council to require local businesses to recycle and compost. Mr. Nelson had a second document with ongoing tasks that he shared with the Board. The list contained established activities and standard operating procedures that have been ongoing and would not have to appear on the annual work plan that will be presented to City Council. VIII. UPDATES A. Recyclint! Update DRAFT MINUTES Enivornmental Board May 26, 2021 Page 4 Mr. Davis provided an update on the growth of the organics drop off program. Residents are continuing to sign up to use the drop off bins. He explained that the bins are reaching capacity by the end of the week, and there is opportunity to expand the program. Mr. Davis detailed that the City will be receiving new signage from the County free of charge that will help reduce the amount of non -organic material/contamination being placed into the bins. The City may be interested in creating a new organic drop off site in town that would correspond with future developments. Mr. Davis explained that he's begun to track participant data at Recycling Saturday events. The Board thanks him for the update and thinks these are good ideas. B. General Updates Mr. Nelson discussed the prescribed burn at Wollan Park on May loth. He shared aerial photographs of the burn as well as photographs of the newly regenerated vegetation. IX. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Nelson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Motion was supported by Ms. Cavegn. Motion carried 5 - 0. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator MEETING DATE: June 3W', 2021 REQUEST: Huntson Addition Concept Plan Review APPLICANT: Mike and Jennifer Ruhland 6149 Ware Road Lino Lakes, MN 55014 BACKGROUND The applicants, Mike and Jennifer Ruhland, have submitted a land use application for Concept Plan review. The proposed development is a subdivision of their 4 acre property located at 6149 Ware Road. They are proposing to subdivide the back portion of their lot into approximately 1.5 acres for the purpose of constructing one 6 unit townhome building and one two-family dwelling. This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Aerial Map prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated June 14, 2021 • Concept Plan prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated June 14, 2021 General Site Characteristics The site is currently composed of one 4 acre parcel zoned Rural. There is a single family home on the site, wooded area, wetlands, a small pond, and mowed areas near the home. The site is bounded by the Ravens Hollow subdivision to the north, and rural properties to the west, south, and east. Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the west 1.5 acres is guided for Medium Density Residential and the east 2.5 acres is guided Low Density Residential. Medium density requires 4.0-6.0 units per acre and low density requires 1.6-3.0 units per acre. Density calculations for the purpose of meeting Met Council requirements are based on net acres. The proposed development and the existing house will be consistent with the density range. Soils SSURGO (Soil Survey Geographic Database from Natural Resource Conservation Service) soils data indicates the presence of the following soil types: The northeast portion of the site is Soderville fine sand which is hydrologic group A, moderately well drained, with rapid permeability and negligible runoff potential. The southwest portion of the site is Zimmerman fine sand which is hydrologic group A, excessively drained, with rapid permeability and negligible to low runoff potential. T.and CnvPr Pre -settlement land cover (Marschner) was oak openings and barrens. Current land cover (Minnesota Land Cover Classification System) is: aspen forest, aspen forest/woodland with 26-50% impervious cover, and planted mixed coniferous/deciduous trees with 26-50% impervious cover. Rare, Unique or Significant Resources No rare, unique, or significant resources have been identified at this time, but the proposed wetland impacts would indicate that a survey for these resources should be performed. Storm Water Management, Erosion and Sediment Control Storm water management plan and Stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) will have to be submitted. The project will also require an NPDES permit. Drinking Water Protection The site is not within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). Flood Plain and Shoreland District Site does not fall within flood plain or shoreland district. Wetlands There are two wetland areas on the site as indicated by the wetland delineation performed by Jacobsen Environmental, Pllc. in 2017. A smaller wetland (3,141 sq. ft.) in the center of the site would be impacted by the extension of Oak Hollow Lane. Wetland impacts and mitigation plans are addressed by 2 Rice Creek Watershed District, which is the local government unit responsible for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act. The larger wetland (27,234 sq. ft.) that extends across the proposed townhome site and the existing single family home property to the east is part of a larger wetland complex that is in the wetland management corridor and the city greenway system. There do not appear to be any proposed impacts to this wetland associated with the project. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Considerations The project area does not fall within the AUAR boundary. Tree Preservation Plan A detailed tree inventory and preservation plan will have to be submitted. Landscape Plan A detailed landscape plan will need to be submitted. A buffer and/or screen will be required between the Huntson Addition and the property to the east, which is a less intense residential land use. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the Huntson Addition Concept Plan review be forwarded on to the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council with the following comments: 1. A buffer and/or screen will be required between the Huntson Addition and the single family lot to the east. 2. A survey for rare, unique, and significant resources should be performed due to the proposed wetland impacts. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Concept Plan 3 0 0 ................. i r ■ i r ■ 0. T A UPTIF Hill �rotessiona 5776 Lake C Lino Lakes. ................................ :T: ...... ...... .. .... ............. J 3 ........... ....................... .............. ............ WETLAND #5 ........ 900 12 (1,425 S.F.) F N D'Ilp'l 2 13- ............................ 00 DIP18213- ... FND 1.9 ......... PROPOSED I .................. ........ . . . ...... ......... ...... ............. ... . ................. 0, TOWNHOMES-, ........ . 906.16 4.36 ...... 3 IP314 D . , l­]­ ... * i I ...... .......... ...... ... 2.0 �01 S89 ........ CD 33 905 go 0 693.56 A e CD 1 899.23 0 nOM - — — — — — — --- — — — — — -- — — — — — — 126.83 ........... 30 LU FNDTP1,921 — -- — — — — — — — — ---- 0 3 4 FNDIP 140.00 3 -.0 tn F gal 48.0 WETLANE5 #4- (2,247 S.F.) WE? ..... .... h z q. I F 410.00 — - q 101 ...... ......................... 1�0`.00 10 *0 OF 13!9, 77 2 14 .. m c q .,I %_�_ b ILA m 01489 LU - — () ... a!' 4,420 S.F! S89o. * -AR'03"E 4,826 S. F. 10 9.�03 �WB 30.Q 2 . ............. k.. 0 .......... 4 � I ....... 0 Il 4 420 S F., ....... q 3,353 S.F.= Y4 - ...... 89040'03"Ej 144— N f _4 m .48.0 z _AO 0 WET ........... ....... 114,720 S.F. wr. A o 8.0 Ln LA 1 �j 13�.61 ----------- S89-49'0,V*T. 136W0 T . ........ . ..... ..... 08904 03' 3,349 S.F. E .......................... 06 231 39. 5 CD .. . ...... L%n LU Ul f EXCEPTION P A. c; Ln U) ............ 3,345 S.F. 0 '03"E C� - 0 eq V4 14 .. C) I �8904% "oll 1 0 -o- 0 0 4 go 16� 2 ET__ 2�-O o CC Z.] ol 1.39�28 0 z U OT A z WET WETLAND #2 WETLAND #1 ...... Uj C� It Im X L 0� 3,341 S.F. 0,9 .12, 28 S.F. A I IF, I —1— 11 FIJI, A N8904�'03"E 0- V CNI 24- (27,234 S.F.) 13 .12 C! M-4 of 11 ..-** (9,131 S.F.) .d 3 —WET ... .. . WET — — — — — — — — — — ... ....... 0 33 30 C o U! 6 3: P cin I . I rl I - 10 4 07 S F. 0 �4 - — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — 89798 /3YO� 30.0\0; 1 k7l :xt 139,..89 -FND9808 900.08 L. 903.90'- TN89-50'08 "E 1056.60 ..... ............... FNDIP1/2 DRAINAGE ..... ......... FND9808 PROPOSED AND UTILITY EASEMENT ....................... ............ C� (3'141 S.F.) OVERALL OF OUTLOT A WETLAND #3 \L 0 0 PROPOSED TEMPORARY . ......... ............... . ..... ................ CUL-DE-SAC EASEME NT—'--' 6.. .......... I,:- I IN K 1. dA ................ I r-.F -< I I I \ / I. I I I I\ *4 1... Ll I V 1 11 1/1 .......... A- r7 JL .................... ........... ......... _j .. . .... .... ......... . ............... . 3- L __wm 231 310 v 21�O 10 2 1975 .12 P44W 33, ............. a EL ................ ............ 40 ■ ............ ............ arlu ourveyors e NE, Suite 11 C 1 55014 Ll I I 11 I` K/ // I I I F< L I♦i I\, K\ I I I n nr� n/ nr n l n� nr nn n/ / / ' < /' ' i I I \ / I / I '� / I \ / I / t I < I / I I I I♦ , ` `IJ r / - - .. --for-- I \� for HUNTSON ADDITION .......................... ... ................. ....... I .I CONCEPT PLAN L......................................................................... ... 908 33 33 --of-- 6149 WARE ROAD . ........ . LINO LAKES, MN . ..... .... ... ..... 906..... 906 . .. rr, frI IFy/\ \/11` /7 1 ' � T I 1 j I L1J L I _ ISO 906 .. wo .... ...........................T ..... I L _ J / \I\ 908. � g9 60 S.... . ..... . .... •. ... . .................. ... ` Iw - IA K\�I'I lya V L_ I L r . , r n t. 906 - r. I , . I .............. 1 " 904 ................... I ■: 898 . ...... I . O o : 0 PROPOSED �........... ................... L. '� .. .. �� .� • $� 2� rna TOWNHOMES- 9p x§oi:36......, �. WETLAND #5 33 33 906.16 9p6 �Q35 v . 2 .............. .. p / /� /� ss]� �... 900.15 FNDIP3/4 ` FNi oo . -� 32.0 f-. 904.36 i/..... 89� 9�Qsl�,W FNDI1.........•' (1,425 S.F.) FNDIPI/2 °� rn FNDIP18213..' S ......... .Q. 9os.90 140.00 �. O (D 99.23 213 - 126.83 ... ..... �..... 693 56 33.00 FNDIPI/2 p - seas - O 30 30 O - -�1 O ----� -- -- ----------------- --------♦i- - - --- - In c 48.0 Ln - 30.0 - 48.0 0b.o - �•.- - - 33 w J: - SoA .... �- 1p m : ' M3lo.po 4 826 S.F.�'N N "' Oi 7 M I N 4,420 S.F.I I............ ` ti WETLAND 10 89° '03' E W - J 30. 10 - S89 49, 03.. �� J 1310.00 10 �o we wa (2,247 S.F.) - .... \ -I- n - • J . l j 9p ... „ 0 3,353 S.F.= ,., N 4,420 S.F.I o ,� we-� Z 6 0 L ♦/ I L _ Cp N 89°4g'03 E,� 48.0 z O .•a M .0 M .. I ��� 9~ 00 139.61 48.0 �5.0 p �� ----- --� ®T • So _ o �1 3 0 I *� I �/\ 114,720 S.F. � I uC � `i- ■ ■ - -------------- 231.30-------------------- �[ S89°49'0 130.00 7-y(v ' .. N 89°4 J03"E 3,349 S.F. ~ r e-1 I can ■ ■ 9Oo EXCEPTION OHO. _ \ `• °� ;y o 139.�45 � I o I o. sr6 N w o �i � :% o � � � � ?a • ��. � y ® � � W � .� . . O 4 uJ NNN 3,345 S.F... 89 4 03 E N ,� d m \ i �i po o Cam. • 0 1.39 8 - 2• c T �� N n �� ?r �o o 898 e o o 0 5 Z\ r O OT A Z i WET <,I 90 r�� L- ° 3;341 S.F. �o o, \� rya 12, 28 S.F. a^, �� WETLAND #2 we WETLAND #1 �. n I I r . -I- , , r . , , • of N k89 4�'03" a , N o � � Q i (27, 234 S.F.) Imo/ '� (9,131 ) __!j 10 139.12 0 6 JIlow S.F. `'. o 33 � 4, 807 S.F.N j i 10 - y�T WET. .. N ML_- 48.0 y ��a �; ��1 t L---- ----.------------ -= -- ----- - - -J i m130.00 0: s9�.9s - ------------- 0 . 33.00 -°� 1• o 0 30 30 _JL -.I 138,89 r 694.71� onn n❑ The South half (51/2) of the North half (N1/2) of the South half (S1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter (NE1/4 of SE1/4) of Section thirty-one (31), Township thirty-one (31), Range twenty-two (22), County of Anoka, State of Minnesota; excepting only the West 231.3 feet thereof, said exception commencing at the East line of Highway 49. Also commonly described as: That part of Lot 13, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107 described as follows: the South half (S1/2) of the North half (N1/2) of the South half (51/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter (NE1/4 of SE1/4) of Section thirty-one (31), Township thirty-one (31), Range twenty-two (22), County of Anoka, State of Minnesota; excepting only the West 231.3 feet thereof, said exception commencing at the East line of Highway 49. EST.1911 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 MUTES - Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 08/02/17. - Bearings shown are on an Anoka County Coordinate System. - Fee ownership is vested in Michael S and Jennifer L Ruhland. - Address of the surveyed premises 6149 Ware Road. - Parcel ID Number: 31-31-22-41-0011. - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 27003CO344E Community No. 270015 Panel No. 0344 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015 and Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 27003CO365E Community No. 270015 Panel No. 0365 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. - Contours shown are from MNGeo Lidar Topogrpahy. - Wetlands were delineated by Jacobson Environmental, Pllc, August 2017 - Soils information taken from Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey. - This plan is prepared based on Title Commitment prepared by Stewart Title Guaranty Company dated September 8, 2015 at 8:00 A.M. "Amended Commitment 2" sIII 1S DRAWN BY: JEN JOB NO: 17248PP DATE: 06/08/21 CHECK BY: JER FIELD CREW: JH-CB 1 06/14/21 Add project name JEN 2 3 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY DEVELOPMENT DATA TOTAL AREA = 174,573f S.F. (4.00 ACRES) WETLAND AREA = 43,178f S.F. (0.99 ACRES) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS = 9 LOTS PROPOSED NUMBER OF OUTLOTS = 1 OUTLOT RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION = 15,365 S.F EXISTING ZONING_ R - RURAL PROPOSED ZONING INFORMATION PUD - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM LOT AREA = 3,345 S.F. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK = 24 FEET MINIMUM LOT DEPTH = 126.83 FEET Iw = Isanti fine sandy loam GUIDING Mc = Marsh SoA = Soderville fine sand , 0 to 3 percent slopes LDR - LOW DENSITY SEWERED RESIDENTIAL ZmB Zimmerman fine sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes MDR - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL M11SA PROPERTY IS IN THE MUSA DISTRICT PROPOSEDSETRACKS FRONT ROAD = 30 FEET = 25 FEET FROM TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS OF CUL-DE-SAC. SIDE YARD = 10 FEET REAR YARD = 30 FEET WETLAND = 25 FEET DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT NOTE PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 10 FEET IN WIDTH ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY, REAR LOT LINES AND PLAT BOUNDARY LINE. 5 FEET MINIMUM FOR SIDE LOT LINE ADJACENT TO OUTLOT. BENCHMARK ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. 3002 ELEVATION = 901.895 FEET (NAVD88) V- E .10 *% ■ 1 A, NORTH CEAEHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 1 INCH = 50 FEET LEGEND. • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED DENOTES LIDAR CONTOURS SoA DENOTES SOIL S:\RUD\CAD\17PROJ\17248PP\17248PP.DWG 17248PP - SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: REQUEST: TOPIC: BACKGROUND: ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7A Andy Nelson June 3&, 2021 Discussion and approval of work plan Environmental Board Annual Work Plan The Environmental Board serves to provide aid and advice to the Council in its efforts to encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between people and their environment; to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and stimulate the health and welfare of people; to enrich the understanding of the ecological systems and natural resources important to the city; to advise the city in the use and management of its natural resources in order to preserve and enhance the environmental amenities for present and future residents, and to improve and ensure a lasting quality of life within the city. (City Code Chapter 217.01) Each year, the Environmental Board prepares an annual work program. This annual plan may include a list of initiatives concerning current environmental issues in the major areas of focus of the Environmental Board, including forestry, natural resources, water, and solid waste management. The work plan will be presented to City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL DIRECTION: Discussion and approval of annual work plan to be presented to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Environmental Board Annual Work Plan 2021 Environmental Board Annual Work Plan 2021 Forestry 1. Continue implementation of the City's Emerald Ash Borer response. This includes removal of boulevard trees and replacement with a diverse mix of species, a partnership with Rainbow Tree Care to offer a discount rate on private tree injections, and continued removals of ash trees in natural areas and parks. 2. Continue to promote the city tree sale. In addition to the many benefits that increased canopy cover brings to the city, the sale also helps residents to affordably replace private trees that have succumbed to EAB. Natural Resources 1. Review proposed changes to landscaping ordinance as part of the zoning ordinance update. 2. Support the pursuit of additional wetland bank establishment opportunities. 3. Evaluate updating MLCCS land cover data with the DNR to incorporate the development that has occurred in the city since the last update. Water 1. Continue to distribute educational outreach materials on water conservation, both on the city website and in newsletters. 2. Promote the Adopt -a -Drain program, which encourages residents to participate in improving water quality by cleaning storm drains and preventing trash and organic pollutants from reaching our lakes, rivers, and wetlands. 3. Update ordinance to enable residents to apply for permits to install stormwater pond aerators on ponds that are part of the city stormwater system. 4. Evaluate methods of promoting and supporting rain gardens. Recycling/Solid Waste 1. Assess organics recycling program to determine appropriate areas for the addition of new drop- off sites. Identify existing sites that may benefit from expansion. 2. Evaluate recycling in businesses and restaurants as a potential area of recycling program growth.