Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/04/1991 Park Board PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES PARR BOARD MEETING MONDAY MARCH 4, 1991 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration and Approval of Minutes of February 4, 1991 meeting 3. Open Mike 4. ,Old Business A- Lakecrest Development Update B, irch Park Land Purchase (Whitcomb Property Update) �C. ,�nlenzel Farms Property P ert Update School District Park Land Update .'Park Dedication Formula Discussion �✓F'-Comprehensive Park Plan Update - Oral Report, Marty G. Other Old Business 5. New Business L"A. Preliminary Concept Discussion - Lake Amelia Estates -Ron Birch 1-�/B+. Recreation Program Position - Marty Asleson Shade Tree Ordinance final revision D. Property South of Lino Park - Oral Report, Marty Asleson E. Rice Lake Estates Update 6. Adjourn PARR BOARD MEETING February 4, 1991 Previous to the regularly scheduled meeting, the Park Board met with City Administrator, Randy Schumacher, at his request, to discuss the possibility of reducing the size of the Park Board from seven members to five. Park Board Members in attendance were: Candi Toffoli, Bob Williams, John Baumann, Ray Johnson, Ken Johnson and George Lindy. Absent was Bill Nissen. Staff in attendance were Don Volk, Director of Public Works and Carole Kohler, Parks Secretary. Mr. Schumacher explained that last year the City Council reduced the size of the Planning and Zoning Board (now called the Design and Review Board) to five members, allowing for more staff input, and the results have been very favorable. The Council has suggested that the Park Board be reduced for .� this reason, and also to be consistent with the DRB. Ray Johnson questioned why this was not discussed during regular Council meetings. Mr. Schumacher suggested that the members attend the next Council Meeting where this will be discussed. The issue of a liaison was also brought up. Ray Johnson feels a lack of communication between the Council and Park Board has occurred since there was no replacement after Andy Neal resigned as the Park Board liaison. Don Volk explained that the possibility of the reverse (a liaison from the Park Board to the Council) has been discussed. This solution seemed to be agreeable to Ray, if the report from the Park Board was at the first part of the Council Meeting The general consensus of the Board was that they all feel this seven member board is doing a good job as it is, the size does not encumber them, as a matter of fact, they feel that the current seven members give the board a good representation of the City as well as more diverse ideas concerning neighborhoods, ages, background, etc. Mr. Schumacher stated that no firm decision has been made at this point, and that he will bring the Board's comments back to the Council. He suggested that if someone has any comments or suggestions before next Monday's meeting, call him, or come to the meeting and express your feelings at that time. 1 PARK BOARD MEETING February 4, 1991 The regular February meeting of the Lino Lakes Park Board was called to order at 7:06 PM on Monday February 4, 1991 at Lino Lakes City Hall by Chairman Ray Johnson. Board Members in attendance were: Candi Toffoli, Bob Williams, John Baumann, Ray Johnson, Ken Johnson, and George Lindy. Absent was Bill Nissen. Staff in attendance were: Randy Schumacher, City Administrator, Don Volk, Director of Public Works, Marty Asleson, Superintendent of Parks, Recreation and Forestry, and Carole Kohler, Parks Secretary. Consideration of Minutes - There were no corrections or additions to the minutes of the January 7, 1991 meeting. The minutes were approved as mailed. Open Mike _ No one appeared under open mike. old Business - A_. Birch StreetSchool RarX Plan L Use - Mr. Andrew Matzke, the landscape architect for the school district, from the firm of Armstrong, Torseth, Skold and Rydeen, Inc. presented a drawing and basic overview of the proposed park/recreation land for the new Birch School that will open in the Fall of 1992. This school is designed for up to 800 students. At this time the plans include: three softball fields of different sizes, two regular size soccer fields, two play apparatus fields, future tennis courts, (the School District can't afford to put them in, but will maintain them should the City decide to install them.), a bituminous trail system, and possible picnic areas. Also, a detention pond that would be used for a skating rink. Mr. Matzke explained that the plan would be to try to preserve as many trees as possible. Don Volk and Marty Asleson have both met with John McClellan, Superintendent of Centennial Schools and feel that the City's recreation program could work together with the school to achieve the maximum benefit for all. Ray Johnson thanked Mr. Matzke for the presentation, and speaking for all the members, expressed the desire to work very close with the architects and school district in this plan, whether it be in maintaining fields, irrigation, etc. B. Lakecest/Comprehensive Planj School District prioritization - Don Volk addressed the board explaining that in view of recent staff discussions, he was advised to ask the board to prioritize the spending of dedicated park money. The fund is at around $165,000.00 now with $40,000.00 of that 10-1 dedicated to Rice Lake Estates. The choices, and the approximate dollar amounts needed to fund them are: A. Lakecrest Development park land purchase - $60,000.00 for the purchase of the two lots, the total size of them is 10.35 acres. B. Comprehensive Park Plan -A maximum of $35,000.00, but only a need for $20,000.00 to start to get into the planning stages and need awareness for that amount. C. Birch Park Elementary School Park -approximately $35,000.00 for a double tennis court - unlighted, and some bituminous trails, possible irrigation and maintenance. A Rolling of the board was as follows: Ray Johnson feels that the comp park plan ties in with the school park plan, so the comp park plan would be the first, school park second and Lakecrest park third. George Lindy is "not completely sold" on the comp park plan as he feels that Brauer & Assoc. doesn't realize that the City doesn't have unlimited funds to spend on the comprehensive plan. But to prioritize, it would be the "no frills" comp park plan first, then Lakecrest park purchase, because he sees a real need for open field play and tot lots, and lastly would be the school park. Ken Johnson thinks number one would be the comprehensive park plan, but he r1 agrees with George, that the basic comprehensive park plan is all that is needed. Second would be the school park and third is the Lakecrest park purchase. John Baumann feels the need for the comprehensive park plan first, Lakecrest park second, but keep the option open for re -sale if the property isn't being used, and last is the school park. Bob Williams sees the need for the comprehensive park plan first and agrees with Ray that the comp plan ties in with the school park, and Lakecrest park last. He feels a need for more discussion in this area and would suggest the board proceed with caution regarding all three choices. Cand' Toffoli chooses comp plan first with "no frills," Lakecrest second and the school park last. Randy Schumacher, City Administrator expressed that all three issues are matter of concern as it looks like there will be no support from the State, and the board will have to be prudent with what they spend. He suggested that the Council would be more supportive of any programs that would show that the board is using funds wisely. Lakecrest Development - Mr. Ron Mikolai representing the sellers for this project was in attendance. He advised that the bank, who is the owner, is motivated to sell and that the City should not wait too long as the two lots being considered were appraised at a total of $178,000.00 3 ,.IN 4 y and he feels that the property would be sold in a short time. The purchase option signed by us is valid until March 5. The seller will wait until then. Ray Johnson recommended that staff take the concept to the council for approval, (that would be the purchase of parcels B and C (10.35) acres for the price of $60,000.00) and report back at the next meeting on March 4, 1991. Mr. Paul Brandt, who was in attendance with other members of the neighborhood in the Lakecrest park area reminded the board that the neighborhood has been waiting for 17 years for a park, and that they would like to see the Lakecrest park area purchase be a priority over the comprehensive park plan. He feels $35,000.00 is too much money to spend for —a plan. C. Focus Meeting Update - This item was tabled until next meeting. D. Wenzel Farm Properties Unda e = The updated plan is to move the park dedication to 3.4 acres. The board feels that they would like the plan updated to remove the holding pond and advised staff to work with the developer to come up with a better plan and present it at the next park board meeting. New Business - There was no new business - The meeting adjourned at 8:20 PM. 4 ram,, special Work Session Park Board and Design Review Board February 4, 1991 A Special meeting of the Lino Lakes Design and Review Board and the Lino Lakes Park Board was held immediately following the regular Park Board meeting on February 4, 1991. Those in attendance from the DRB were: Monika Slatten, John Bergeson and Fred Chase. Present from the Park Board were: Candi Toffoli, Bob Williams, John Baumann, Ray Johnson, Ken Johnson and George Lindy. Staff in attendance were: John Miller, City Planner, Don Volk, Director of Public Works, Marty Asleson, Superintendent of Parks, Recreation and Forestry and Carole Kohler, Parks Secretary. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the possibility of changing the current park dedication format, and how the formula relates to minor subdivisions such as the Earl Olson property. It was agreed that the park dedication formula should remain the same , ($400.00 per dwelling unit to be constructed within the proposed development, or 10% of the fair market land value, whichever is greater.) but that the price per dwelling should be increased to a minimum of $600.00. The exact amount will be determined at the next park board meeting. It was decided that the issue of multiple dwelling units will also be addressed in the new park dedication formula. Also discussed was the idea that the park dedication formulation figures should be reviewed and/or revised every four years because the assessor re-evaluates property every four years. All in attendance agreed that the City has a definite need for a Comprehensive Park Plan, and once in place, would answer a lot of questions as developers try to work with the City to satisfy their dedicated park requirements. The issue of commercial and industrial park dedication should also be addressed within the Comprehensive Park Plan. The Earl Olson plan will go back to the original Council approved plan. n DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND PARK BOARD MEETING February 20, 1991 A special meeting was held to discuss the proposed preliminary plat of Wenzel Farms. The DRB reviewed this plat on February 13th and tabled it due to the fact that they felt they did not have enough detail and there were too many unresolved issues. The board did not feel comfortable issuing the rezone. In the month of January the preliminary plat was approved by the DRB for the single-family portion of the plat. Present at the meeting was: Council Members Sally Kuether, Andy Neal and Vern Reinert; DRB Members Bob King, John Bergeson, and Monika Slatten; Park Board Members Ray Johnson, John Bauman, Candy Toffoli, and Ken Johnson. Staff members present were John Miller, City Planner; Marty Asleson, Parks Superintendent; and Laura Elken, Planning Secretary. Kirk Corson, Developer of the plat and Roger Hokanson, owner of Hokanson Plumbing were also present. A public hearing is scheduled for Monday, February 11th, and staff felt that a special meeting should be held to resolve these issues before it went to council. Kirk Corson displayed a new site plan and landscaping plan. A memorandum outlining previously discussed issues was also handed out. First of all the park issue was discussed. Originally the developer proposed a park in the southern section. The park board denied this option because the majority of the land was low. Then the developer moved the park to the north east section of the plat. During the meeting with staff and the developer on the 15th of February it was decided that the park would not be adequate in that part of the development either. The plan now stands with a park located in the center of the plat on the east side. It is 7/10ths of an acre and will be a tot lot. Trails loop around the entire area and connect to Sunrise Park in the south western section. The remaining park dedication will be cash and be given at different times as each phase is started. This way if the cash dedication amount increases the parks department will receive the current rate. Marty Asleson stated that he feels this is an adequate amount of space considering that Sunrise Park is nearby, but added that smaller "tot lots" are difficult to maintain. He said that he felt it was a good central location for the townhomes and single-family homes. 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND PARK BOARD MEETING February 20, 1991 Wenzel Farms Subdivision will be constructed in three phases. The first phase will consist of 60 single-family homes. The second phase will consist of the remaining single-family homes with the possibility of one or two townhome units. The third phase then will be the townhomes. Kirk Corson added that all the grading will be completed at once. John Bergeson stated that the reason the park board could not approve the rezone is because the board wants to know what the project will look like first. If it were to be rezoned in 1991 and then in 1993 the developer wanted to construct townhomes, the city wants to be assured that it will be quality construction. This has been the policy of the board for some time. Bob King stated that he was on the board when Dennis Erickson brought in his site plan for townhomes. The board knew what the colors of the townhomes would be, what the roof would be like, and how they stored their trash. It was very detailed. He said that this plan would not require that much detail, but there were just too many unanswered questions. Kirk Corson reviewed his memorandum to the board. He stated in his memorandum: This is a report addressing all of the concerns brought to our attention by the planning staff. Hopefully, it will set the City of Lino Lakes at ease in regard to our development proposal and its quality. The Wenzel Farms townhouse development shall be done in such a fashion that will make it not only an attractive amenity to the City of Lino Lakes, but also allow it to be marketable to the empty nester population given its location and design. It is not possible to state every detail of the townhomes to be developed at this time as townhouse concepts change as the market changes and this market will not be tapped for another three years. This memorandum will be attached to the back of these minutes. Kirk Corson said that 82% of the area is green space. Corson stated that the townhomes would be two story. He said that split level townhomes do not sell well, and it is difficult for the elderly to live in because of all the steps. Each unit will have a separate back yard, the residents can personalize their yards by having gardens, etc. 4 TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Park and Rec Staff RE: Lakecrest Development The Lakecrest Development park issue was presented to the City Council in a staff report for consideration. The recommendation was made to attempt to extend the First Right of Purchase until the comprehensive plan has had a chance to make a determination of need. TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Marty Asleson, Supt. Parks, Rec and Forestry RE: Birch Park Land Purchase City Attorney, Bill Hawkins has prepared a Title Opinion after reviewing the Whitcomb property Abstract. He has requested a copy of the Trust Agreement of Vivian Whitcomb to review. After receiving this agreement, Mr Hawkins will set up a time to close the transaction by preparing a warranty Deed from the trust to the city. L DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND PARK BOARD MEETING February 20, 1991 A� hitdfid pr4di try: tit of WenzatIsar . The DRB reviewed this plat on February 13th and tabled it due to the fact that they felt they did not have enough detail and there were too many unresolved issues. The board did not feel comfortable issuing the rezone. In the month of January the preliminary plat was approved by the DRB for the single-family portion of the plat. Present at the meeting was: Council Members Sally Kuether, Andy Neal and Vern Reinert; DRB Members Bob King, John Bergeson, and Monika Slatten; Park Board Members Ray Johnson, John Bauman, Candy Toffoli, and Ken Johnson. Staff members present were John Miller, City Planner; Marty Asleson, Parks Superintendent; and Laura Elken, Planning Secretary. Kirk Corson, Developer of the plat and Roger Hokanson, owner of Hokanson Plumbing were also present. 11-N A public hearing is scheduled for Monday, February 11th, and staff felt that a special meeting should be held to resolve these issues before it went to council. Kirk Corson displayed a new site plan and landscaping plan. A memorandum outlining previously discussed issues was also handed out. First of all the park issue was discussed. Originally the developer proposed a park in the southern section. The park board denied this option because the majority of the land was low. Then the developer moved the park to the north east section of the plat. During the meeting with staff and the developer on the 15th of February it was decided that the park would not be adequate in that part of the development either. The plan now stands with a park located in the center of the plat on the east side. It is 7/10ths of an acre and will be a tot lot. Trails loop around the entire area and connect to Sunrise Park in the south western section. The remaining park dedication will be cash and be given at different times as each phase is started. This way if the cash dedication amount increases the parks department will receive the current rate. Marty Asleson stated that he feels this is an adequate amount of space considering that Sunrise Park is nearby, but added that smaller "tot lots" are difficult to maintain. He said that he felt it was a good central location for the townhomes and single-family homes. 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND PARK BOARD MEETING February 20, 1991 Wenzel Farms Subdivision will be constructed in three phases. The first phase will consist of 60 single-family homes. The second phase will consist of the remaining single-family homes with the possibility of one or two townhome units. The third phase then will be the townhomes. Kirk Corson added that all the grading will be completed at once. John Bergeson stated that the reason the park board could not approve the rezone is because the board wants to know what the project will look like first. If it were to be rezoned in 1991 and then in 1993 the developer wanted to construct townhomes, the city wants to be assured that it will be quality construction. This has been the policy of the board for some time. Bob King stated that he was on the board when Dennis Erickson brought in his site plan for townhomes. The board knew what the colors of the townhomes would be, what the roof would be like, and how they stored their trash. It was very detailed. He said that this plan would not require that much detail, but there were just too many unanswered questions. Kirk Corson reviewed his memorandum to the board. He stated in his memorandum: This is a report addressing all of the concerns brought to our attention by the planning staff. Hopefully, it will set the City of Lino Lakes at ease in regard to our development proposal and its quality. The Wenzel Farms townhouse development shall be done in such a fashion that will make it not only an attractive amenity to the City of Lino Lakes, but also allow it to be marketable to the empty nester population given its location and design. It is not possible to state every detail of the townhomes to be developed at this time as townhouse concepts change as the market changes and this market will not be tapped for another three years. This memorandum will be attached to the back of these minutes. Kirk Corson said that 82% of the area is green space. Corson stated that the townhomes would be two story. He said that split level townhomes do not sell well, and it is difficult for the elderly to live in because of all the steps. Each unit will have a separate back yard, the residents can personalize their yards by having gardens, etc. 2 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND PARK BOARD MEETING February 20, 1991 Corson proposed that most of the residents would be first home buyers with possibly closer to the wetland second home buyers. A site plan for each phase of development will be brought before the city council for final approval before construction begins on each phase. The park issue was discussed further and a motion was made. MOTION. • Candy Toffoli moved to accept the park dedication as proposed for the Wenzel Farms subdivision consisting of the area approximately 7/10ths of an acre as proposed park land. The remainder will be given as a cash dedication given to the city as each phase receives final plat approval. John Bauman seconded the motion and the motion was approved unanimously. Street names were discussed. On the proposed plat the streets names consisted of "Ivy Ridge Lane, Ivy Ridge Court, Ivy Ridge Drive" and Andy Neal brought up the fact that the post office, fire and police department have a hard time when the street names are so similar. They decided that Ivy Ridge Lane would be used, but the rest of the streets would be named differently. John Miller will decide on the street names. Entrance monuments will be similar to the subdivision in Blaine called "Autumn Woods" a picture was handed out showing that monument. It will be wooded with large rocks and plantings below. A considerable amount of landscaping is proposed. Landscaping has doubled from the originally presented plat. Trees purchased will be 5 1 /2 feet tall. The entrance also shows two berms with ornamental bushes. Mr. Corson stated that instead of using berms between the townhouse units and the single-family units they proposed to install a double row of conifers such as Green or Black Hills Spruce which do well in this area. Roof material was questioned. Roger Hokanson stated they would be organic asphalt shingles. The colors of the townhomes will be earth tones. Corson stated that the minimum price of the townhomes would be $80,000. The square footage is an average of 1500 square feet. The main floor would be 1,018 and at the most upstairs would consist of two bedrooms and a bathroom. Vern Reinert stated that this will be the first townhome project going in to the city and 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND PARK BOARD MEETING February 20, 1991 the council wants to be sure that it is a good plan. Roger Kolstad said that he wants to build nice townhomes so they will sell. Kirk Corson explained how utilities will be run through the site. He is working with the city engineer on this issue. The city engineer and the design review board asked that the street widths be increased to 32 feet allowing parking on both sides. Vern Reinert asked about the bi-laws within the home owners association. He asked that the association be responsible for the monumentation. Mailboxes design are now dictated in part by the Post Office serving the development. Corson handed out pictures of what the mail boxes would look like. Consolidated boxes will be required for the townhomes. The Post Office installs the mail boxes. MOT/ON. Robert King moved to rezone the Wenzel Farms subdivision from single- family to R-3 multiple family. Monika Slatten seconded the motion and the motion was approved unanimously. MOT/ON. Robert King moved to rezone the Wenzel Farms subdivision from R-3 to R-5 Planned Unit Development. Monika Slatten seconded the motion and the motion was approved unanimously. MOTION.- Robert King moved to recommend to the city council approval of the preliminary plat for Townhouses of the Wenzel Farms subdivision. Approval is contingent upon the developer meeting the following conditions: 1. Side yard set back for unit #50 will be looked at and approved by the city engineer. 2. A water retention plan for positive drainage to be approved by the city engineer and presented to the city council at the time of the final plat hearing. 3. Utility easements shown in overall plat. 4. Planting of conifers will be of at least 5 1 /2 feet in height. 5. A two car garage will be constructed for each townhome. M DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND PARK BOARD MEETING February 20, 1991 6. The streets within the townhouse project will be 32 feet from back of curb to back of curb. The streets will be private streets. 7. Street names will conform with city regulations. 8. The city attorney review and approve the home owners association It is up to the developer to establish the home owners association. Monika Slatten seconded the motion and the motion was approved unanimously. 0 son onstruction, Inc. To: Lino Lakes City Council, Design Review Board, Park Board From: Hokanson Development Inc. Re: Wenzel Farms Date: February 19, 1991 This is a report addressing all of the concerns brought to otir attention by the planning staff. Hopefully, it will set the City of Lino Lakes at ease in regard to our development proposal and its quality. The Wenzel Farms townhouse development shall he done in such a fashion that will make it not only an attractive ammenity to the City of Lino Lakes, but also allow it to be marketable to the empty nester population given its location and design. It is not possible to state every detail of the townhomes to be developed at this time as townhouse concepts change as the market changes and this market will not be tapped for another three years. Whatever the market might be in three years, it is my understandinq that the site plan review will permit the City of Lino Lakes to review our project again and make recommendations prior to construction of the townhomes. Accordingly, whatever is revi=we-d now will again be scrutinized later by committees that will different perspectives and detailed concerns derived from townhouse projects already underway.Such an elaborate process anticipated in the future makes any metieulocis review done at this point in time a duplication of.efforts. The items that we are hoping to address to the satisfaction of the City Council, Park Board and Design Review Board will be directed towards densities, park location, building concepts, desiqn concepts, square footage, general colors, general construction materials, utility locations and design, general landscaping materials etc. Roads: We anticipate the installation of a private road that conforms to the City of Lino Lakes public standard of 32 feet hack of curb to back of curb. The curbs will be concrete D-4/12 surmountable curbs conforming to City engineering requirements. A public utility easement will lie adjacent to the street for the installation of public infrastructure. The road will not have a sixty foot right of way as is found on a public road given that such a layout would not allow development of the townhome site. All cul de sacs, roads, materials, and installation methods will be in conformance to City engineering standards. All cul de sac radii will be at least 46'. 9174 Isanti St. N.E. - Blaine, MN 55434 - (612) 786-3130 Highway access: We have discussed the access onto Lake Drive with both the County Highway Department and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. As originally discussed MNDOT prefers to see a maximum of two access points in accordance with the two original field access driveways. How the t+irn lanes and bypass Ianes are to be designed is covered under their permit process. The most northerly portion of the private drive will terminate in a c*tl de sac conforming to the city engineering standards. Townhouse locations: We do not anticipate moving the locations of the townhomes from the positions shown on the preliminary plat given that we need to have the pads graded at the same time as the rough grading. This is due to the requirement to have a soil engineer inspect the soil below each pad prior to fill placement in order to receive F.H.A. approval„ Townhouse design and design integration: The specific floor plans may change slightly to meet the market at the time of development but the materials, colors, quality, and size will not. For details on what we are proposing for a floor plan, please refer to the copies previously submitted. These plans indicate the layout of the proposed units and have alternate plans that can be installed intermittently for a greater variety and to allow greater flexibility in meeting the buyers needs. As drawn, the plans do not require great changes in the floor dimensions to allow a varied number of internal configurations_ The plans submitted show a streetsr_ape that is not excessively crowded and does not create a walled effect. This is due to the variety of impositions into the line of, sight caused by the jutting vestibules of several of the models in each set of units.With the landscaping shown on the landscape plan for each unit as well as that shown on the overall plan, we anticipate the curbside appeal for this project to surpass the typical single family development. Because we are required to construct upward rather than down due to the high water table, we must build the townhomes as stab on grade units. We do not foresee split level units given their awkwardness for the elderly. We expect to market the product shown or something very similar to it. The concept plan indicates two story units with alternative units available. Such a plan avoids a repitition that would become boring. All units shall have aluminum siding anti soffits for maintenance purposes. If brick is used on a particular unit, the design will carry through to other units in the project to maintain an integrated effect. Colors will be limited primarily to earth tones and pastels where they are not deemed to be obtrusive. Whatever color is used in the first phase of the townhouse development will he applied throughout the second phase as well. Setbacks: There is technically not a setback requirement from the private street given that it is owned by the townhouse association yet we are proposing thirty feet to allow adequate driveway parking area. The Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) concept allows such a setback flexibility as long as the density is established. The density is established at seventy five units. Setbacks from the highway are forty feet to allow as much distance as possible for bufferinq noise Ievels and to avoid a crowded appearance from the right-of-way. Rear setbacks are thirty feet to allow as much room as possible between the townhomes and the single family units. With such a setback it is not anticipated that there will be less than one hundred feet between the nearest single family residence and the adjacent townhome. a h =�M'" v Double frontage: there are no double frontage lots in the townhouse development given the private status of the street and the association lot that surrounds each townhouse lot. Parking: While it is possible to park on the street just as one would park on a city street, there will also be parking areas abutting the streets for visitors. These spaces are in addition to the two garage spaces and two driveway spaces provided for each unit. In addition, the townhouse bylaws will forbid the permanent parking of vehicles on the street and be able to have sur_h vehicles towed at the owner's expense. Permanent parking will be considered as the parking of vehicles on the street for more than thirty six hours. Park area: While the developer originally attempted to provide as much park space as possible on the north or south side of the project, the park board prefers a central location. Accordingly, a smaller, more centrally located park is now being shown. Lot maintenance: Each townhouse unit will have ownership of a lot on which they can plant a garden and maintain if they desire. It is the association however, which is ultimately responsible for the lot maintenance and the bylaws will ensure the neighbors that .-1 any private gardens and plantings will not be a nuisance (ie. contain noxious weeds, long grass etc.). Al"N A Landscaping: The landscape plan originally submitted indicated one tree per unit and a number of shrubs for each unit. This was iri addition to the decorative plantings done to make the entrance to the development more enticing. Staff has requested additional tree plantings. Accordingly, we have proposed more treeSalong Lake Drive as a buffer and will install an additional ornamental tree (ie. one which does not overwhelm the setting such as Locust, Crab, Amur Maple, River Hirch)in front of each unit. Privacy Buffer: Rather than using berms between the townhouse units and the single family units we propose to install a double row of conifers such as Green or Black Hills Spruce which do well in this area. This will help avoid the problems of trees dying due to the lack of sufficient moisture (as too often occurs on bermed areas where the rain does not penetrate). It would also help to avoid some drainage problems given that swales are proposed to be located where the privacy buffer is required. Wetland Retention: I have had numerous discussions with Tim Fell �j at the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers regarding this parcel and the means in which they prefer to see the wetlands retained intact. Our ponding areas (if feasible) will not be done in a trench type fashion as originally shown and will have the grades completed in accordance with the desires of the "Corp_" In regard to the directive that the townhouse association not mow the wetland area, we will grade the ponding areas in such a manner as to prevent mowing up to the open water. This will encourage wildlife by creating habitat and act to filter some of the non point pollution. An additional amendment to the townhome association bylaws will assist in the maintenance of the water quality within the wetland. With this amendment the townhome development should have less impact upon the wetland than a typical single family development. It will restrict the applications of any fertilizers, Pesticides, and herbicides near the wetlands and require that all applications be kept back at least twenty feet from the wetland area. Mailboxes: Mail boa designs are now dictated in part by the Post Office serving the development. If the U.S.P.S_ is attempting to consolidate routes or reduce route delivery time (as they frequently are) they will require consolidated boxes. In many townhouse developments this means that one stand of mailboxes will serve each cluster of townhouse units. The Post Office will in those cases dictate the appearance of the mailboxes. Street lighting: For the townhouse portion of the development, we anticipate using a black teardrop design standard with high pressure sodium bulbs. Spacing will be at each intersection within the townhouse development and at the end of the cut de sacs. Monument design: The monument design in intended to be installed at the entrance of the townhouse area where it is most visible to the highway traffic. It will be well landscaped and have a stone base much like the one located in our project in Blaine (Autumn Woods). Timbers will support the name of the project on a rough hewn cedar sign_ The monument will not he placed in a location that will cause it to be a hindrance to traffic visibility. ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC. ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Project Number 90028 MEMORANDUM NO. 4 DATE February 4, 1991 PROJECT New Elementary School for Centennial ISD #12 SUBJECT City of Lino Lakes Park Board Meeting (Agenda Attached) BY Andy Matzke The elementary school site plan was presented to the Park Board by Andy Matzke and the Board responded with the following comments: 1. The Park Board is very open to working jointly with the School District on this facility, but their support will be limited by the City's budget. 2. The Park Board requested that the School District and Architects work with City staff to set up the construction and maintenance parameters for the District and City at the Birch Street site. For example, because the City has aerating and fertilizing equipment, maintenance of the soccer and softball fields could potentially be taken care of by the City. 3. The elementary school and related site amenities are the type of facility the City needs on the south side of Lino Lakes and is very complimentary to Country Lakes Park. After the presentation of the school site plan, Don Volk, Public Works Director, requested the Park Board to prioritize their plans to assist the City Council in deciding how much money and effort should be spent on the school site development, preparation of a comprehensive plan for City parks, and purchase of the Lakecrest property. During discussion of this subject, Board Members expressed different opinions on what project(s) should have higher priority. Before adjourning, a motion was made to direct City staff to proceed with negotiations on purchasing the Lakecrest property so that price and terms could be discussed at the next Park Board meeting. A follow-up phone call was made to Marty Asleson, Parks Superintendent, on Tuesday morning (February 5, 1991) to review Council meeting and project submittal dates. To get on the February 25, 1991, City Council agenda, project materials should be submitted on February 19, 1991. A meeting with City staff will be set up before this to review School District and City construction/maintenance responsibilities at the Birch Street site. AM:bg cc: John McClellan Bill Lawrence Marty Asleson Don Volk City of Lino Lakes Park Board Attachment .r\ Special Work session Park Board and Design Review Board February 4, 1991 A Special meeting of the Lino Lakes Design and Review Board and the Lino Lakes Park Board was held immediately following the regular Park Board meeting on February 4, 1991. Those in attendance from the DRB were: Monika Slatten, John Bergeson and Fred Chase. Present from the Park Board were: Candi Toffoli, Bob Williams, John Baumann, Ray Johnson, Ken Johnson and George Lindy. Staff in attendance were: John Miller, City Planner, Don Volk, Director of Public Works, Marty Asleson, Superintendent of Parks, Recreation and Forestry and Carole Kohler, Parks Secretary. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the possibility of changing the current park dedication format, and how the formula relates to minor subdivisions such as the Earl Olson property. It was agreed that the park dedication formula should remain the same , ($400.00 per dwelling unit to be constructed within the proposed development, or 10% of the fair market land value, whichever is greater.) but that the price per dwelling should be increased to a minimum of $600.00. The exact amount will be determined at the next park board meeting. It was decided that the issue of multiple dwelling units will also be addressed in the new park dedication formula. Also discussed was the idea that the park dedication formulation figures should be reviewed and/or revised every four years because the assessor re-evaluates property every four years. All in attendance agreed that the City has a definite need for a Comprehensive Park Plan, and once in place, would answer a lot of questions as developers try to work with the City to satisfy their dedicated park requirements. The issue of commercial and industrial park dedication should also be addressed within the Comprehensive Park Plan. The Earl Olson plan will go back to the original Council approved plan. --. special Work session Park Board and Design Review Board February 4, 1991 A Special meeting of the Lino Lakes Design and Review Board and the Lino Lakes Park Board was held immediately following the regular Park Board meeting on February 4, 1991. Those in attendance from the DRB were: Monika Slatten, John Bergeson and Fred Chase. Present from the Park Board were: Candi Toffoli, Bob Williams, John Baumann, Ray Johnson, Ken Johnson and George Lindy. Staff in attendance were: John Miller, City Planner, Don Volk, Director of Public Works, Marty Asleson, Superintendent of Parks, Recreation and Forestry and Carole Kohler, Parks Secretary. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the possibility of changing the current park dedication format, and how the formula relates to minor subdivisions such as the Earl Olson property. It was agreed that the park dedication formula should remain the same , ($400.00 per dwelling unit to be constructed within the proposed development, or 10% of the fair market land value, whichever is greater.) but that the price per dwelling should be increased to a minimum of $600.00. The exact amount will be determined at the next park board meeting. It was decided that the issue of multiple dwelling units will also be addressed in the new park dedication formula. Also discussed was the idea that the park dedication formulation figures should be reviewed and/or revised every four years because the assessor re-evaluates property every four years. All in attendance agreed that the City has a definite need for a Comprehensive Park Plan, and once in place, would answer a lot of questions as developers try to work with the City to satisfy their dedicated park requirements. The issue of commercial and industrial park dedication should also be addressed within the Comprehensive Park Plan. The Earl Olson plan will go back to the original Council approved plan. special Work session Park Board and Design Review Board February 4, 1991 A Special meeting of the Lino Lakes Design and Review Board and the Lino Lakes Park Board was held immediately following the regular Park Board meeting on February 4, 1991. Those in attendance from the DRB were: Monika Slatten, John Bergeson and Fred Chase. Present from the Park Board were: Candi Toffoli, Bob Williams, John Baumann, Ray Johnson, Ken Johnson and George Lindy. Staff in attendance were: John Miller, City Planner, Don Volk, Director of Public Works, Marty Asleson, Superintendent of Parks, Recreation and Forestry and Carole Kohler, Parks Secretary. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the possibility of changing the current park dedication format, and how the formula relates to minor subdivisions such as the Earl Olson property. It was agreed that the park dedication formula should remain the same , ($400.00 per dwelling unit to be constructed within the proposed development, or 10% of the fair market land value, whichever is greater.) but that the price per dwelling should be increased to a minimum of $600.00. The exact amount will be determined at the next park board meeting. It was decided that the issue of multiple dwelling units will also be addressed in the new park dedication formula. Also discussed was the idea that the park dedication formulation figures should be reviewed and/or revised every four years because the assessor re-evaluates property every four years. All in attendance agreed that the City has a definite need for a Comprehensive Park Plan, and once in place, would answer a lot of questions as developers try to work with the City to satisfy their dedicated park requirements. The issue of commercial and industrial park dedication should also be addressed within the Comprehensive Park Plan. The Earl Olson plan will go back to the original Council approved plan. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR RE -ZONING OF WENZEL FARMS All that part of Lots 26 and 27, Auditor's Subdivision No. 151 and that part of Government Lot 2, Section 20, Township 31, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 26; thence South 0 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line of said Lot 26 a distance of 209.23 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 29 degrees 39 minutes 20 seconds West 43.79 feet; thence South 0 degrees 15 minutes West 104.93 feet; thence South 40 degrees 55 minutes West 206.95 feet; thence North 86 degrees 10 minutes West 174.08 feet; thence North 51 degrees 18 minutes 06 seconds West 139.56 feet; thence South 09 degrees 45 minutes West 243.34 feet; thence South 0 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West 80.37 feet; thence South 0 degrees 15 minutes West 452.13 feet; thence South 21 degrees West 108.28 feet; thence South 60 degrees West 127.37 feet; thence South 22 degrees West 105.13 feet; thence South 01 degree 30 minutes East 497.15 feet; thence South 29 degrees 57 minutes 02 seconds West 295.71 feet; thence South 69 degrees 34 minutes 41 seconds West 409.32 feet; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes West 153.75 feet to the west line of said Lot 27; thence South 0 degrees 15 minutes West along the west line of said Lot 27 a distance of 308.11 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 27; thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 02 seconds East along the south line of said Lot 27 a distance of 611.11 feet to the westerly right of way line of State Highway No. 49; thence north- westerly 736.17 feet along a non -tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 2824.97 feet and a central angle of 14 degrees 55 minutes 51 seconds, the chord of said curve bears North 25 degrees 25 minutes 56 seconds East; thence North 17 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East tangent with said curve 1619.80 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 2904.22 feet to the intersection with a line which bears South 89 degrees 29 minutes 07 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 07 seconds West 165.14 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. March 5, 1991 00W% Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 07 - 91 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE, SECTION 703, CABARET LICENSE The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I. Section 703 License Required as originally written in the Lino Lakes City Code is hereby deleted. II. Section 703 License Required is hereby amended to read as follows: 703.01 License Required. No person to whom an on -sale beer or on -sale intoxicating liquor license has been issued shall permit on the licensed premises any dancing, singing, stage show or other entertainment unless a cabaret license has also been issued for conducting such activities within the building on the premises. This section shall not prohibit the use of radios, televisions, or juke boxes on premises licensed for the on -sale or beer or intoxicating liquor, provided a nuisance is not created or any other ordinance violated thereby. 703.02 Issuance of License. A cabaret license shall be issued by the Clerk -Treasurer on application therefor by any on -sale liquor or beer licenses upon payment of the cabaret license fee. 703.03 Term and Fee. Subdivision 1. Annual. The fee for an annual cabaret license shall be $200.00. All annual cabaret licenses shall expire on June 30th of each year. 111S4 Subdivision 2. Short -Term. A cabaret license may be issued for a shorter term for a fee of $20.00 per day. ORDINANCE NO. 97 - 91 PAGE -2- II. Save as above amended, Section 703 of the Lino Lakes City Code shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the City Charter. Passed by the City Council this day of , 1991. Harold L. Bisel, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 ►l ORDINANCE NO. 15-90 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1007. SHADE TREE ORDINANCE 1007.1 PURPOSE AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE PLANTING, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF TREES AND SHRUBS IN THE PUBLIC STREETS, AND OTHER MUNICIPAL OWNED PROPERTY: 1.) ESTABLISHING A SHADE TREE BOARD AND ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF FORESTRY AS THE AGENCIES PRESCRIBING REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE PLANTING, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF TREES AND SHRUBS IN PUBLIC PLACES: 2.) PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUING OF PERMITS FOR THE PLANTING, MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF TREES AND SHRUBS IN PUBLIC PLACES: 3.) PROVIDING FOR THE PRUNING AND REMOVAL OF TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHICH ENDANGER PUBLIC SAFETY: PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF ALL POLICY CONCERNING SHADE TREES ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF CARE PROTECTION POLICY CONCERNING SHADE TREES IN SUBDIVISION PROPERTIES PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CARE PROTECTION POLICY CONCERNING SHADE TREES IN LAND DISTURBANCE AREAS. 1007.2 SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the Shade Tree Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. 1007.3 DEFINITIONS For the purpose of the Ordinance the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein. When not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future, words in the plural include singular, and words in the singular include the plural. I. City is the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota II. Forestry Department is the Department of Parks, Recreation and Forestry. III. City Forester is the Municipal Arborist, Forester, Tree Warden, or other qualified designated official of the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, The City Forester will be assigned to carry out the enforcement of this Ordinance. IV. Person is any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company, or organization 1 r"\ 4 of any kind. V. Street or Highway means the entire width of every public way or right-of-way when any part thereof is open to the use of public, as a matter of right, for purposes of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. VI. Principal Thoroughfare shall mean any -street upon which trucks are not prohibited. VII. Park shall include all City parks having individual names. VIII. Public Place shall include all other grounds owned by the Municipality of Lino Lakes. IX. Property line shall mean the outer edge of a street or highway right-of-way.This area includes the area between the curb and the platted lot line. X. Treelawn is that part of a street or highway, not covered by a sidewalk or other paving, lying between the property line right-of-way, and that portion of the street or highway usually used for vehicular traffic. XI. Public trees shall include all shade and ornamental trees now or hereafter growing on any street or any public areas where otherwise indicated. XII. Large trees are designated as those attaining a height of forty-five (45) feet or more. XIII. Medium trees are designated as those attaining a height of thirty (30) to forty-five (45) feet. XIV. Small trees are designated as those attaining a height of twenty (20) to thirty (30) feet. XV. Property owner shall mean the person owning such property as shown by the County Auditor's Plat of Anoka County, State of Minnesota. 1007.4 CREATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A CITY TREE BOARD There is hereby created and established a City Tree Board for the City of Lino Lakes, State of Minnesota, which shall consist of the Park Board. 1007.5 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The duties of said "City Tree Board" shall be as follows: To Study the problems and determine the needs of the Municipality of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, in connection with it's tree planting program. To recommend to the City Council, the type and kind of trees to be planted upon such municipal streets or parts of municipal streets or in parks as is designated. To assist the City Council of the City and the citizens of the City in the dissemination of news and information regarding the selection, planting, preservation and maintenance of trees, whether the same be on private or 2 public property, and to make such recommendations from time to time to the City Council as to desirable legislation concerning the tree program and activities for the municipality. To provide regular and special meetings at which the subject of trees insofar as it relates to the municipality may discussed by the members of the City Tree Board officers and personnel of the municipality and its several divisions, and all others interested in the City Tree Program. 1007.6 OPERATION The Board shall operate within the rules set forth by the Park Board Ordinance. 1007.7 APPOINTMENT'AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE CITY FORESTER The City Forester shall be appointed by the City Council. This person shall be skilled and trained in the arts and sciences of municipal arboriculture, and shall hold a college degree or its equivalent in arboriculture, ornamental or landscape horticulture, urban forestry, or other closely related field as described in the job description in the city personnel files. 1007.8 AUTHORITY OF THE CITY FORESTER The authority of the City Forester shall be in accordance with the City Forester job description. 1007.9 PERMITS REQUIRED I. PLANTING MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL A. No person shall plant, spray, fertilize, preserve, prune, remove, cut above ground, or otherwise disturb any tree on any street or municipal -owned property without first obtaining a permit from the City Forester or otherwise specified municipal authority. The person receiving the permit shall abide by the Arboricultural Specifications and Standards of Practice adopted by the City Forester. II. PLANTING A. Application Data. The application required herein shall state the number of trees to be set out; the location, grade, species, cultivar or variety of each tree; the method of planting; and such other information as the City Forester shall find reasonably necessary to a fair determination of whether a permit should be issued. B. Improper Planting. Whenever any tree shall be planted or set out in conflict with the provisions of this section, it shall be lawful for the City Forester to remove or cause removal of the same, and 3 the exact cost thereof shall be assessed to the owner as provided by law in the case of assessments. III. MAINTENANCE A. Application Data. The application required herein shall state the number and kinds of trees to be sprayed, fertilized, pruned, protected, or otherwise preserved; the kind of treatment to be administered; the composition of the material to be applied; and such other information as the City Forester shall find reasonably necessary to a fair determination of whether a permit should be issued. IV. REMOVAL, REPLANTING AND REPLACEMENT A. No person or property owner shall remove a tree from the treelawn for the purpose of construction, or for any other reason without first filing an application and obtaining a permit from the City Forester, and without replacing the removed tree or trees in accordance with the adopted Aboricultural Specifications. Such replacement as provided for in a permit issued by the City Forester. The person or property owner shall bear the cost of removal and replacement of all trees removed. 1007.10 PUBLIC TREE CARE The City shall have the right to plant, prune, maintain, remove, or perform any other Arboricultural practices as decided necessary within the lines of all streets, alleys, avenues, lanes, squares and public grounds, as may be necessary to insure public safety or to preserve or enhance the symmetry and beauty of such public grounds. No other planting may be done without consent of the City Forester. The City Tree Board may remove or cause or order to be removed, any tree or part thereof which is in an unsafe condition or which by reason of its nature is incurious to sewers, electric power lines, gas lines, water lines, or other public improvements, or is affected with any injurious fungus, insect or other pest. The Tree Board shall notify affected property owners of removal or trimming to be done and give the property owner the option to complete the work by contract with a City approved tree contractor. Under certain conditions, e.g.; emergency situations. The City may complete the work without prior notification to the property owner. Every tree overhanging any street or right-of-way within the City shall be pruned so that the branches shall not obstruct the light from any street lamp or obstruct the view of any street intersection and so that there shall be a clear space 4 of eight feet (81) above the surface of the street or sidewalk. Dead, diseased or dangerous trees, broken or decayed limbs which constitute a menace to the safety of the public shall be removed. The City shall have the right to prune any tree or shrub on private property when it interferes with the proper spread of light along the street from a street light or interferes with visibility of any traffic control device or sign. The minimum clearance of any overhanging portion and twelve (12) feet over all streets except truck thoroughfares which shall have a clearance of sixteen (16) feet. 1007.11 ABUSE OR MUTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TREES Unless specifically authorized by the City Forester, no person shall intentionally damage, cut, carve, transplant, or remove any tree; attach any rope, wire nails, advertising posters, or other contrivance to any tree, allow any gaseous liquid, or solid substance which is harmful to such trees to come in contact with them; or set fire or permit any fire to burn when such fire or the heat thereof will injure any portion of any tree. It shall be an unlawful practice for any person, firm, or City department to top any street tree, park tree, or other tree on public property without authorization from the City Forester. Topping can be defined as severe cutting back of a branch to a stub. 1007.12 PROTECTION OF TREES A tree preservation plan is to be submitted by all developers, builders and soil disturbance project area facilitaters in accordance with the City of Lino Lakes Tree Preservation Administrative Guidelines Policy. 1007.13 VIOLATION AND PENALTY Any person violating any provisians of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 1007.14 LEGALITY OF ORDINANCE AND PARTS THEREOF Should any section, clause, or provisions of this Ordinance be declared by the courts to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or parts thereof, other than the part to be declared to be valid. 5 Passed this day of , 19 Signed this day of , 19 Harold L. Bise , Mayor Attest: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Council Member Bohjanen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 18 — 91 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT OF SUNRISE DRIVE FROM FAIRMONT DRIVE TO ELM STREET WHEREAS: it is proposed to improve Sunrise Drive from Fairmont Drive to Elm Street and to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 429 and the Lino Lakes City Charter, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to Darrell Schneider, TKDA for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary was as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this llth day of March, 1991. Harold L. Bisel, May r ,--A" d Lj-"(A� ar'lyn .Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Reinert and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Neal, Kuether, Bisel, Reinert, Bohjanen. The following voted against same: None. Where upon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. n .AIOON Council Member Reinert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 19 91 RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT OF WENZEL FARMS WHEREAS: pursuant to resolution of the council adopted January 14, 1991, a report has been prepared by Darrell Schneider of TKDA with reference to the improvement of Wenzel Farms, and this report was received by the council on March 11, 1991. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such Wenzel Farms in accordance with the report and the assessment of benefitting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes Charter at an estimated $1,404,160.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on April 8, 1991 at 7:15 P.M. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the Lino Lakes Council on March 11, 1991. Harold L. Bisel, Mayor MarilyA G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bohianen and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Neal, Bisel, Reinert and Bohjanen. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether abstained. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Reinert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 22 - 91 RESOLUTION URGING THE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT OF EARTHKEEPERS' CLEANUP EFFORTS BY ALL ANOKA COUNTY CITIES AND TOWNSHIPS WHEREAS: Anoka county prides itself on its quality of life for residents and businesses and is interested in working to improve and maintain the beauty of the area; and WHEREAS: residents should be encouraged to recognize the environmental impact on our community of their daily lives by becoming environmentally responsible consumers, conserving energy, increasing recycling efforts and promoting environmental responsibility in our communities; and WHEREAS: this goal was aided by a volunteer organization called Earthkeepers who during Earth Day/Arbor Day 1990 organized more than 500 volunteers to pick up more than nine (9) tons of debris in Centerville, Circle Pines, Lexington, Lino Lakes and Blaine; and, WHEREAS: the 1990 efforts marked the beginning of a long-term commitment by individuals and groups in Anoka County to build a safe, just and sustainable planet; and, WHEREAS: Earthkeepers, made up of a group of community leaders with Anoka County Commissioner Margaret Langfeld as honorary chair, has again organized a cleanup and beautification project along roads in Eastern Anoka County; and, WHEREAS: Earthkeepers will conduct cleanup activities in conjunction with Arbor Day activities on April 27, 1991; and, WHEREAS: Earthkeepers needs support and volunteers to successfully complete its projects: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anoka County Board of Commissions does hereby recognize and support Earthkeepers in its efforts to clean up and beautify areas in Anoka County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anoka county Board of Commissioners does strongly urge all Anoka County cities and townships to recognize and support Earthkeepers' activities through similar RESOLUTION NO. 22 - 91 PAGE -2- resolutions and/or volunteer efforts. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this llth day of March, 1991. Harold L. Bisel, Mayor Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Neal, Kuether, Bisel, Reinert, Bohjanen. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. r Council Member Reinert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24 - 91 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATIONS OF PLANS FOR WENZEL FARMS IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS: a certain petition requesting the improvement of Wenzel Farms was duly presented to the Council on the 14th day of January, 1991; and WHEREAS: pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted January 14, 1991, a report has been prepared by Darrell Schneider, TKDA with reference to the improvement, and this report was received by the Council on March 11,1991; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: .-� 1. The council f inds and determines that said petition was signed by all owners of real property in Wenzel Farms named as the location of the improvement. 2. Darrell Schneider, TKDA is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council the 11th day of March, 1991. C Harold L. Bisel, Mayor r t4hr t ly JG. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bohjanen and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Neal, Bisel, Reinert, Bohjanen. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether abstained. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. C I l' Y O F CN LINO LAK\F-8 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MARCH 10 - 16, 1991 AS GIRL SCOUT WEEK WHEREAS: Girl Scouts of the United States of America recognizes that today's girls will be tomorrow's leaders; and ~ WHEREAS: Girl Scouts of the United States of America is the largest voluntary organization for girls in the world and draws upon a large resource of positive adult role models; and WHEREAS: The Girl Scout Mpy)jment continues to emphasize leadership and personal an(A--); reer development for girls; and WHEREAS: Our Community and world will be the direct beneficiaries of the skilled younc1;Pwomen who are Girl Scouts; NOW, THEREFORE, I, HAROLD L-. BISEL, THE MAYOR OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM THE WEEK OF MARCH 10 - 16, 1991 TO BE GIRL SCOUT WEEK IN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA. 1169 MA1N ,�TKEET. HNO LAKES, MINNESOTA 55014 612-464-5562 TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Parks and Rec Staff RE: Lake Amelia Estates Enclosed is a preliminary concept that Mr. Ron Birch presented to Parks and Rec Staff for comments. Mr. Birch would like to take the time to discuss the concept with the Park Board prior to a formal concept consideration. i FW TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Parks and Recreation Staff RE: Recreation Program Position Enclosed is a draft job description for our Recreation Programer position. Since we have to advertise for this position, we should start the process. In light of limited funds this year, we have some different ideas on how to proceed with programming, both long term and short term, that we will be bringing to the park board meeting. n 5 13 JOB DESCRIPTION POSITION TITLE - Recreation Program Supervisor DEPARTMENT - Park and Recreation Position Objective: To provide recreational opportunities for youth, teens and adults. This is a new position in a newly created Parks and Recreation Program. Duties and Responsibilities: Supervise the work of various activities that are assigned by the Parks and Recreation Coordinator Determine the recreational needs of youth, teens and adults Develop and promote the needs of youth, teens and adults Work closely with Community Education Departments to ensure coordinated efforts Initiate all programs planned and approved Assist in recruiting, selection, training and evaluating seasonal staff needed for activities planned Supervise all programs initiated. Ensure proper training has occurred and help to ensure safe facility use Plan and supervise social and league activities for various youth and adults Coordinate programs with surrounding communities Write professional reports, perform other duties as assigned Position Requirements: Knowledge of the philosophy and objectives of organized recreation Knowledge of recreation programming relating to youth, teens and adults PAGE 1 RECREATION SUPERVISOR (cont'd.) Ability to maintain cooperative and harmonious relationships with employees, organizations and the public Ability to speak effectively in public Strong ability and desire to market recreation in the community Ability to conduct meetings Knowledge of planning, scheduling and executing recreational programs Desirable Training and Experience: Internship completed and some experience in the above responsibilities Minimum Requirements and Education: � Bachelor's Degree in Recreation and Parks, or Leisure Studies n PAGE 2 0 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES 200 Civic Heights Circle Circle Pines, Minnesota 55014-1795 Telephone 784-5898 FAX 785-2859 Marshall N. Dahl, Mayor Hazel Schneider, Councilmember Mike Wagner, Jr., Councilmember Jeffrey Nelson, Councilmember Michael A. Felling, Councilmember James W. Keinath, City Administrator February 25, 1991 Marty Asleson Parks Director City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main St. Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Marty: Eric Olsen, of Fred Burstein and Associates, has reviewed the park property lease. He has sent me a letter indicating that, because the property pro- posed to be leased is not currently owned by the City, it would be premature for the City to enter into the lease. The City Council has directed full acquisition of this parcel. The City Attorney has made a number of contacts with the Department of Transportation, however, to this point, we have been unsuccessful in proceeding forward on the variety of State ownerships on the four different parcels that are in- volved. It would be my best guess that it would be into the summer, at the earliest, before all of the legal work necessary for us to acquire the property were to occur. I realize that you had hoped to place park equipment on this parcel during 1991. I do not see that as a likely possibility. I will update you when I have more information as to a closing or acquisition date for the parcel. Sincerely, res W. Keinath City Administrator JWK/mh cc/Dave Phipps /"t TO: All Parks, Recreation and Forestry Board Members FROM: Park, Rec and Forestry Staff RE: Shade Tree Ordinance Please find enclosed a copy of the revised City of Lino Lakes Shade Tree Ordinance. Mayor Bisel headed up this committee and feels satisfied with it's contents. Please read it over for any final comments. TO: All Park Board Members FROM: Park and Rec Staff RE: School District Park Land Consideration Please find attached a copy of the agreement that we have written between the City of Lino Lakes and School District 12 for the use of the new Birch Park Elementary Park area. It is hoped that we would use this area as a 1st priority to program after school district educational periods. There are a few changes that were made to include the extension of the western ballfield size to 2801, and turning the southern ballfield to prevent sun in the batters' eyes. City of Lino Lakes / School District 12 Birch Street School Park Agreement Whereas, This an agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and School District 12 for Birch Street Elementary School park facility development and use. Whereas, City of Lino Lakes is given 1st preference of scheduling use of park facilities. With the exception of normally scheduled school hours. Whereas, City of Lino Lakes agrees to maintain all athletic facilities and open areas directly adjacent to athletic facilities, all trails located on or directly connected to District 12 Birch Street Elementary School, all trees located within athletic areas, trails and adjoining open space. It is cities responsibility to purchase and provide all supplies necessary to perform maintenance fore mentioned facilities. Whereas, City of Lino Lakes will provide insurance only as it relates to activities programmed by the city. City of Lino Lakes to name School District 12 as an additional insured. School District 12 to name City of Lino Lakes as additional insured. Whereas, School District 12 rules will be enforced in addition to any City of Lino Lakes rules for all programming of facilities by the city. Whereas, City of Lino Lakes will do the following improvements; apply the bituminous surfacing to all walking/biking trails located and directly connected to Birch Street Elementary School property. Whereas, School District 12 will construct the following; 3 softball/baseball fields, 2 soccer fields, irrigation for these fields, and grading and graveling of all trails located on School District 12 property and new trails as necessary directly connected to District property. E CITY OF CIRCLE PINES 200 Civic Heights Circle Circle Pines, Minnesota 55014-1795 Marshall N. Dahl, Mayor Hazel Schneider, Councilmember Mike Wagner, Jr., Councilmember Jeffrey Nelson, Councilmember Michael A. Felling, Councilmember James W. Keinath, City Administrator February 25, 1991 Marty Asleson Parks Director City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main St. Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Marty: Telephone 784-5898 FAX 785-2859 1 Eric Olsen, of Fred Burstein and Associates, has reviewed the park property lease. He has sent me a letter indicating that, because the property pro- posed to be leased is not currently owned by the City, it would be premature for the City to enter into the lease. The City Council has directed full acquisition of this parcel. The City Attorney has made a number of contacts with the Department of Transportation, however, to this point, we have been unsuccessful in proceeding forward on the variety of State ownerships on the four different parcels that are in- volved. It would be my best guess that it would be into the summer, at the earliest, before all of the legal work necessary for us to acquire the property were to occur. I realize that you had hoped to place park equipment on this parcel during 1991. I do not see that as a likely possibility. I will update you when I have more information as to a closing or acquisition date for the parcel. Sincerely, es W. Keinath City Administrator JWK/mh cc/Dave Phipps ORDINANCE NO. 15-90 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1007. SHADE TREE ORDINANCE 1007.1 PURPOSE AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE PLANTING, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF TREES AND SHRUBS IN THE PUBLIC STREETS, AND OTHER MUNICIPAL OWNED PROPERTY: 1.) ESTABLISHING A SHADE TREE BOARD AND ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF FORESTRY AS THE AGENCIES PRESCRIBING REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE PLANTING, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF TREES AND SHRUBS IN PUBLIC PLACES: 2.) PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUING OF PERMITS FOR THE PLANTING, MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF TREES AND SHRUBS IN PUBLIC PLACES: 3.) PROVIDING FOR THE PRUNING AND REMOVAL OF TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHICH ENDANGER PUBLIC SAFETY: PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF ALL POLICY CONCERNING SHADE TREES ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF CARE PROTECTION POLICY CONCERNING SHADE TREES IN SUBDIVISION PROPERTIES PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CARE PROTECTION POLICY CONCERNING SHADE TREES IN LAND DISTURBANCE AREAS. 1007.2 SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the Shade Tree Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. 1007.3 DEFINITIONS For the purpose of the Ordinance the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein. When not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future, words in the plural include singular, and words in the singular include the plural. I. City is the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota II. Forestry Department is the Department of Parks, Recreation and Forestry. III. City Forester is the Municipal Arborist, Forester, Tree Warden, or other qualified designated official of the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, The City Forester will be assigned to carry out the enforcement of this Ordinance. IV. Person is any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company, or organization 1 of any kind. V. Street or Highway means the entire width of every public way or right-of-way when any part thereof is open to the use of public, as a matter of right, for purposes of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. VI. Principal Thoroughfare shall mean any street upon which trucks are not prohibited. VII. Park shall include all City parks having individual names. VIII. Public Place shall include all other grounds owned by the Municipality of Lino Lakes. IX. Property line shall mean the outer edge of a street or highway right -of -way. This area includes the area between the curb and the platted lot line. X. Treelawn is that part of a street or highway, not covered by a sidewalk or other paving, lying between the property line right-of-way, and that portion of the street or highway usually used for vehicular traffic. XI. Public trees shall include all shade and ornamental trees now or hereafter growing on any street or any public areas where otherwise indicated. XII. Large trees are designated as those attaining a height of forty-five (45) feet or more. XIII. Medium trees are designated as those attaining a height of thirty (30) to forty-five (45) feet. XIV. Small trees are designated as those attaining a height of twenty (20) to thirty (30) feet. XV. Property owner shall mean the person owning such property as shown by the County Auditor's Plat of Anoka County, State of Minnesota. 1007.4 CREATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A CITY TREE BOARD There is hereby created and established a City Tree Board for the City of Lino Lakes, State of Minnesota, which shall consist of the Park Board. 1007.5 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The duties of said "City Tree Board" shall be as follows: To Study the problems and determine the needs of the Municipality of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, in connection with it's tree planting program. To recommend to the City Council, the type and kind of trees to be planted upon such municipal streets or parts of municipal streets or in parks as is designated. To assist the City Council of the City and the citizens of the City in the dissemination of news and information regarding the selection, planting, preservation and maintenance of trees, whether the same be on private or 2 public property, and to make such recommendations from time to time to the City Council as to desirable legislation concerning the tree program and activities for the municipality. To provide regular and special meetings at which the subject of trees insofar as it relates to the municipality may be discussed by the members of the City Tree Board officers and personnel of the municipality and its several divisions, and all others interested in the City Tree Program. 1007.6 OPERATION The Board shall operate within the rules set forth by the Park Board Ordinance. 1007.7 APPOINTMENT AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE CITY FORESTER The City Forester shall be appointed by the City Council. This person shall be skilled and trained in the arts and sciences of municipal arboriculture, and shall hold a college degree or its equivalent in arboriculture, ornamental or landscape horticulture, urban forestry, or other closely related field as described in the job description in the city personnel files. 1007.8 AUTHORITY OF THE CITY FORESTER The authority of the City Forester shall be in accordance with the City Forester job description. 1007.9 PERMITS REQUIRED I. PLANTING MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL A. No person shall plant, spray, fertilize, preserve, prune, remove, cut above ground, or otherwise disturb any tree on any street or municipal -owned property without first obtaining a permit from the City Forester or otherwise specified municipal authority. The person receiving the permit shall abide by the Arboricultural Specifications and Standards of Practice adopted by the City Forester. II. PLANTING A. Application Data. The application required herein shall state the number of trees to be set out; the location, grade, species, cultivar or variety of each tree; the method of planting; and such other information as the City Forester shall find reasonably necessary to a fair determination of whether a permit should be issued. B. Improper Planting. Whenever any tree shall be planted or set out in conflict with the provisions of this section, it shall be lawful for the City Forester to remove or cause removal of the same, and 3 W the exact cost thereof shall be assessed to the owner as provided by law in the case of assessments. III. MAINTENANCE A. Application Data. The application required herein shall state the number and kinds of trees to be sprayed, fertilized, pruned, protected, or otherwise preserved; the kind of treatment to be administered; the composition of the material to be applied; and such other information as the City Forester shall find reasonably necessary to a fair determination of whether a permit should be issued. IV. REMOVAL, REPLANTING AND REPLACEMENT A. No person or property owner shall remove a tree from the treelawn for the purpose of construction, or for any other reason without first filing an application and obtaining a permit from the City Forester, and without replacing the removed tree or trees in accordance with the adopted Aboricultural Specifications. Such replacement as provided for in a permit issued by the City Forester. The person or property owner shall bear the cost of removal and replacement of all trees removed. 1007.10 PUBLIC TREE CARE The City shall have the right to plant, prune, maintain, remove, or perform any other Arboricultural practices as decided necessary within the lines of all streets, alleys, avenues, lanes, squares and public grounds, as may be necessary to insure public safety or to preserve or enhance the symmetry and beauty of such public grounds. No other planting may be done without consent of the City Forester. The City Tree Board may remove or cause or order to be removed, any tree or part thereof which is in an unsafe condition or which by reason of its nature is injurious to sewers, electric power lines, gas lines, water lines, or other public improvements, or is affected with any injurious fungus, insect or other pest. The Tree Board shall notify affected property owners of removal or trimming to be done and give the property owner the option to complete the work by contract with a City approved tree contractor. Under certain conditions, e.g.; emergency situations. The City may complete the work without prior notification to the property owner. Every tree overhanging any street or right-of-way within the City shall be pruned so that the branches shall not obstruct the light from any street lamp or obstruct the view of any ,r. street intersection and so that there shall be a clear space H of eight feet (81) above the surface of the street or sidewalk. Dead, diseased or dangerous trees, broken or decayed limbs which constitute a menace to the safety of the public shall be removed. The City shall have the right to prune any tree or shrub on private property when it interferes with the proper spread of light along the street from a street light or interferes with visibility of any traffic control device or sign. The minimum clearance of any overhanging portion and twelve (12) feet over all streets except truck thoroughfares which shall have a clearance of sixteen (16) feet. 1007.11 ABUSE OR MUTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TREES Unless specifically authorized by the City Forester, no person shall intentionally damage, cut, carve, transplant, or remove any tree; attach any rope, wire nails, advertising posters, or other contrivance to any tree, allow any gaseous liquid, or solid substance which is harmful to such trees to come in contact with them; or set fire or permit any fire to burn when such fire or the heat thereof will injure any portion of any tree. It shall be an unlawful practice for any person, firm, or City department to top any street tree, park tree, or other r'�, tree on public property without authorization from the City Forester. Topping can be defined as severe cutting back of a branch to a stub. 1007.12 PROTECTION OF TREES A tree preservation plan is to be submitted by all developers, builders and soil disturbance project area facilitaters in accordance with the City of Lino Lakes Tree Preservation Administrative Guidelines Policy. 1007.13 VIOLATION AND PENALTY Any person violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 1007.14 LEGALITY OF ORDINANCE AND PARTS THEREOF Should any section, clause, or provisions of this Ordinance be declared by the courts to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or parts thereof, other than the part to be declared to be valid. 5 Passed this day of , 19 Signed this day of , 19 Harold L. Bise , Mayor Attest: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer L